The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2007 [03] Mar 01 {Book 40} www.cityofstjoseph.com CITY Of ST. JOSEPH St. Joseph City Council March 7, 2007 7:00 PM (St. Joseph Community Fire Hall) 1. Call to Order Administrdtor Judy Weyrens 2. 7:00 PM Mdyor Richdrd Cdrlbora. Councilors Steve Frdnk AI Rdssier Renee Symdnietz Ddle Wick Public ImprovementHearing 2007 East Side Mill and Overlay Project Consent Agenda a. Minutes - Requested Action: Approve the minutes of February 12 and 15,2007. b. Bills Payable - Requested Action: Approve check numbers 038410- 038521. c. Application for Payment - Requested Action: Authorize the Mayor to execute Pay Application #3 for the 2006 Trunk Water Main Improvements and authorize payment to Randy Kramer Excavating in the amount of $21,650.35. d. Application for Payment - Requested Action: Authorize the Mayor to execute Pay Application #12 for the Water Treatment Facility and authorize payment to John T. Jones Construction in the amount of $123,064.97. 4: Public Comments to the Agenda 5. 7:45 PM Parkway Business Center - Draft EA W 6. City Engineer Reports 7. Mayor Reports 8. Council Reports 9. Administrator Reports a. Funds Transfer 10. Adjourn NOTE: Please bring your packets from the March 1st meeting with you. 2.) College Avenue North, PO Box bbs . Sdint. loseph, Minnesotd )6174 Phone ,2.0.,6'.72.01 FdX 12.0.,6,.0'42. CITY OF ST. JOSEPH RESOLUTION 2007-007 ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AND PREPARATION OF PLANS 2007 East Side Mill and Overlay Improvement WHEREAS, a resolution of the city council adopted the 15th day of February 2007, fixed a date for a council hearing on the proposed Mill and Overlay Improvements of the following areas: Able Street between lOth A venue SE and 7th Avenue SE; 8th Avenue SE , Callaway Street between 7th Avenue SE and 12th Avenue SE; 9th Avenue SE south of East Baker Street; the intersection of Dale Street East and 9th Avenue SE; 1 oth Avenue SE; 11 th Avenue SE; Dale Street East from 7th Avenue SE to 1ih Avenue SE and the entrance and parking are of Klinefelter Park. AND WHEREAS, ten days' mailed notice and two weeks' published notice of the hearing was given, and the hearing was held thereon on the 7th day of March, 2007 at which all persons desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard thereon, NOW THEREFORE, BE. IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF ST. JOSEPH, MINNESOTA: 1. Such improvement is necessary, cost-effective, and feasible as detailed in the feasibility report. 2. Such improvement is hereby ordered as proposed in the council resolution adopted 7th day of March 2007. 3. SEH is here by designated as the engineer for this improvement. The engineer shall prepare plans and specifications for the making of such improvement. 4. The city council declares its official intent to reimburse itself for the costs of the improvement from the proceeds of the tax-exempt bond. Adopted by the council on this 7th day of March 2007. Richard Carlbom, Mayor Judy Weyrens, Administrator Notice of PUblic Improvement Hearing City of St. Joseph Notice his hereby given that the St. Joseph City Council will meet at the St. Joseph Community Fire Hall at 7:00 PM on March 7, 2007 to consider the milling and overlay of the following areas: Able Street between 10th Avenue SE and rth Avenue SE; 8th Avenue SE , Callaway Street between rth Avenue SE and 12th Avenue SE; 9th Avenue SE south of East Baker Street; the intersection of Dale Street East and 9th Avenue SE; 10th Avenue SE; 11th Avenue SE; Dale Street East from rth Avenue SE to 1ih Avenue SE and the entrance and parking area of Klinefelter Park as well as the Klinefelter Park Improvements pursuant to MN Statute 429.011 to 429.111. The estimated cost of the improvement is $ 600,000. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed improvement will be heard at this meeting. Judy Weyrens Administrator Publish: February 23, 2007 March 2, 2007 Brian Baxter 101 10th Avenue SE St Joseph, MN 56374 Notice of Public Improvement Hearing City ofSt. Joseph Notice his hereby given that theSt. Joseph City Council will meet at the St Joseph Community Fire Hal/.at 7:00PM on March 7, 2007to consider the. milling and overlay of the tol/owingareas: Able Street between 10th AvenueSEand ihAvenueSE; 8th Avenue SE , Callawqy Street between ihAvenue..SEand 12thAvenue.S.E;.9thAvenueSE south of East Baker Street the .intersection of Dale Street Eastand 9th Avenue SE;10th Avenue SE; 11th AVePlIeSE;OaleStreetEastfrom ih AvenueSEt012th AvenueSE ",nd tne.entrance and parkingqrea of Klinefelter Park as well as the Klinefelter Park Improvements pursuant to MN Statute 429.011 to. 429.111. The estimated cost at the improvement is $600,000. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed improvement will be heard at this meeting. Judy Weyrens Administrator Publish: February 23, 2007 March 2, 2007 Proposed Assessment Worksheet 84-53471-064 Lot 8; Cedar Village III 101 10th Avenue SE Rates: This section represents how the assessment for the above property is calculated. The left side oUhis section identifies the specific street footCige(s) for your property and the right side illustrates the proposed rates per lineal foot. . Street Footaoe(s) Long side 137.44 (For long side - divide by 2) Assessment Rates Overlay (60%) $21.74/LF Reclaim (60%) $45.05/LF Short side 0.00 Assessment: This amount represents the amount the property above will be assessed for the 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project. Reclaim Overlay $3,095.78 $0.00 Total Assessment $3,095.78 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project - 1 Virginia Meier 803 Able Street E S1. Joseph, MN 56374 Notice of Public . Improvement Hearing City of St. Joseph Notice. his hereby given that the S1. Joseph City Council will meet at the S1. Joseph Community Fire Hall at 7:00 PM on March 7, 2007 to consider the milling and overlay of the following areas: Abl.eStreetbetween 10th Avenue SE and ih Avenue .SE; 8th Avenue SE , CallawayStreetbetween.7thAvenue SF and 12th Avenue SE; 9th Avenue SE south of East Baker Street; the intersection otDale Street East and 9th Avenue SE; 10th Avenue SE; 11 th Avenue SE; Dale Street East from ih Avenue SE to 12'h Avenue SE and the entrance and parking area of Klinefelter Park as well as the Klinefelter Park Improvements pursuant to MN Statute 429.011 . to 429.111. The estimated cost of the improvement is $ 600,000. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed improvement will be heard at this meeting. Judy Weyrens Administrator Publish: February 23, 2007 March 2,2007 Proposed Assessment Worksheet 84-53474-002 Lot 1 Block 1; Cloverdale Estates 2nd Add 803 Able Street E Rates: This section represents how the assessment for the above property is calculated. The left side. of this section identifies the specific street footage(s) for your property and the right side illustrates the proposed rates per lineal foot. Street Footaae(s) Long side. 0.00 (For long side - divide by 2) Assessment Rates Overlay (60%) $21.7 4/LF Reclaim (60%) $45.05/LF Short side 80.00 Assessment: This amount represents the amount the property above will be assessed for the 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project. Reclaim Overlay $3,603.93 $0.00 Total Assessment $3,603.93 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project - 2 Thomas & Cardl Schindler 807 Able Street E S1. Joseph, MN 56374 Notice. of Public Improvement Hearing CiW of8t. Joseph Notioe his hereby . given. that the.S1. .Joseph. City Council will . meet at the S1. Joseph Community Fire /-lallat 7:00 PM on March 7, 2007 to consider the milling. and overlay of the foUowingareas:. Able Street between 10th Avenue SEand. 7thAvenueSi;; 8th Avenue SE , CallawaYStreetbet-Ateen7'h AvenueSEand...12'hAvenue SE; glhAvE3nue 5E south of East l3akerStreet; the intersecti.on of Dale Street East.andgth Avenue.SE;1Qth.Avenue SE; 11th A...v. e. n.. u.e... SE'..Da.le..S..tr..ee. tEast.Jr.om ih Avenue SE to 12th A.ve.nue SEa. nd.theentra. nee and ............. .............i.>..'...................................," .. '" ',', .'. ". ", . ..... . ',' ,,", '" . '" . ..... ,," ',. .... ,'. ........ " .' parkin~~re~ of Klinefelter. Park as well as the.Klinefelter Park Improvements pursuant to MN Statute 429..011 to 429.111. . The estimated cost of the improvement is $ 600,000, Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed improvement will be heard at this meeting. Judy Weyrens Administrator Publish: February 23, 2007 March.2,2007 Proposed Assessment Worksheet 84-53474-004 Lot 2 Block 1; Cloverdale Estates 2nd Add 807 Able Street E Rates: This section represents how the assessment for the above property is calcu.lated. The left side of this section identifies the specific street footage(s) for your property and the right side illustrates the proposed rates per lineal foot. Street Footaae(s) Long side 0.00 (For long side - divide by 2) Assessment Rates Overlay (60%) $21.74/LF Reclaim (60%) $45.05/LF Short side 108.20 Assessment: This amount represents the amount the property above will be assessed for the 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project. Reolaim Overlay $4,874.35 $0.00 Total Assessment $4,874.35 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project - 3 Dennis Nordmann 811 Able Street E St. Joseph, MN 56374 Notice of Public Improvement Hearing City of St. Joseph Notice his hereby given that the St. Joseph City Council will meet at the St. Joseph Community Fire Hall at 7:00 PM on March 7, 2007 to consider the milling and overlay of the following areas: Able Street between 10th Avenue SE and ihAvenue SE; 8th Avenue SE , Callaway Street between ih Avenue SE and 1ih Avenue SE; 9th Avenue SE south of East Baker Street; the. intersection of Dale Street East and 9th Avenue SE;1 oth Avenue SE; 11th Avenue SE; Dale Street East froin ih Avenue SE to 1 ih Avenue SEand the entrance and parking area of Klinefelter Park as well as the Klinefelter Park Improvements pursuant to MN Statute 429.011 to 429.111. The estimated cost of the improvement is $ 600,000. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed improvement will be heard at this meeting. Judy Weyrens Administrator Publish: February 23, 2007 March 2, 2007 Proposed Assessment Worksheet 84-53474-006 Lot 3 Block 1; Cloverdale Estates 2nd Add 811 Able Street E Rates: This section represents how the assessment for the above property is calculated. The left side of this section identifies the specific street footage(s) for your property and the right side illustrates the proposed rates per lineal foot. Street Footaae(s) Long side 0.00 (For long side - divide by 2) Assessment Rates Overlay (60%) $21.74/LF Reclaim (60%) $45.05/LF Short side 71.02 Assessment: This amount represents the amount the property above will be assessed for the 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project. Reclaim Overlay $3,199.18 $0.00 Total Assessment $3,199.18 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project - 4 r - Arthur Novak PO Box 26 St. Joseph, MN 56374 Notice of Publi~ Improvement Hearing .Ci'tyof.St. Joseph Notice his hereby given that .the St . Joseph City .Collncil\Aiill meetattheSt. Joseph Community Fire Hall at 7:00PM on March 7., 2007 to consider the milling and overlay of the fOllowing areas: Abl~streetbetween 10th AvenueSEand ih AvenueSE;8th Avenue SE , C~lIaway Str~etl:>etyleel1.. 7th )\venue.. SE apd 1 ih. AvenUE! ..S 1;; ~th Avenue..SE south of East aa.k(9rStreet;theintersectionof Da.le Street East and 9th Avenue SE;.toth Avenue SE; 11th Ayel1ueSE;.[)al~9trE!etEastfromihAvenueSE to 12thAvenueSE and the entrance and parKing area of Klinefelter Park aswelLas the Klinefelter Park Improvements pursuant to MN Statute 429.011 to 429.111. The estimated cost of the improvement is $ 600,000. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed improvement will be heard at this meeting. Judy Weyrens Administrator Publish: February 23, 2007 March 2, 2007 Proposed Assessment Worksheet 84-53474-008 Lot 4 Block 1; Cloverdale Estates 2nd Add 815 Able Street E Rates: This section represents how the assessment for the above property is calculated. The left side of this section identifies the specific street footage(s) for your property and the right side illustrates the proposed rates per lineal foot. Street Footaae(s) Long side 0.00 (For long side - divide by 2) Assessment Rates Overlay (60%) $21.74/LF Reclaim (60%) $45.05/LF Short side 70.98 Assessment: This amount represents the amount the property above will be assessed for the 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project. Reclaim Overlay $3,197.70 $0.00 Total Assessment $3,197.70 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project - 5 John Kalla 817 Able Street E St. Joseph, MN 56374 Notice of Public Improvement Hearing City of St. Joseph Notice his hereby given that the St. Joseph City Council will meet at the St. Joseph Community Fire Hall at 7:00 PM on March 7,2007 to consider the milling and overlay of the following areas: Able Street between 1 OthAvenue SE and ih Avenue SE;8th Avenue SE , Callaway Street between ih..Avenue SE .and1ih Avenue SE; 9th Avenue SE south of East Baker Street; the intersection .of Dale Street East and 9th Avenue SE; 10th Avenue SE; 11 th Avenue SE; Dale Street East from ih Avenue SE to 1ih AvenueSE and the entrance and parking area of Klinefelter Park as well as the Klinefelter Park Improvements pursuant to MN . Statute 429.011 to 429.111. The estimated cost of the improvement is $ 600,000. Such persons as desire to be heard With reference to the proposed improvement will be heard at this meeting. Judy Weyrens Administrator Publish: February 23, 2007 March 2, 2007 Proposed Assessment Worksheet 84-53474-010 Lot 5 Block 1; Cloverdale Estates 2nd Add 817 Able Street E Rates: This section represents how the assessment for the above property is calculated. The left side of this section identifies the specific street footage(s) for your property and the right side illUstrates the proposed rates per lineal foot. Street Footaaels) Long side 0.00 (For long side - divide by 2) Assessment Rates Overlay (60%) $21.7 4/LF Reclaim (60%) $45.05/LF Short side 81.89 Assessment: This amount represents the amount the property above will be assessed for the 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project. Reclaim Overlay $3,688.96 $0.00 Total Assessment $3,688.96 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project - 6 r - City of St. Joseph PO Box 6.68 St. Joseph, MN 56374 Notice of Publiclmpr()vement Hearing . CiWofSt. Joseph Notice his herebygiventhaLtheSt. Joseph .City Council will meet at the St. Joseph Community Fire Hall at 7:00PM on March7, 2007 to consider the millillgand overlay of the fo/lQ'Ningareas:Able Streetbeltween 10th Avenue SEand th Avenue S,E;8thAvenue SE , Calla~ay. StreettJetween .7'h ..Avenueie'=~nd .1~th.Avenue9,=;~thA\fenUeSE.. south of East Ba~er Street;theintersectignofDalei Streettastand9Ihj\venueSE;.toth Avenue SE; 11th AvenUe SE;DaleStreetEast from ihAvenue8?t012thAyenuEl..SEand.the entrance and parking area .of Klinefelter Parkas. well. as. the. Klinefelter ParK Improvernentspursuant to MN Statute 429.011 to 429.111. . The estimated cost of the. improvement. is$600,000. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed improvement will be heard at this meeting. Judy Weyrens Administrator Publish: February 23, 2007 MarCh 2, 2007 Proposed Assessment Worksheet 84-53474-013 Cloverdale Estates 2nd Add Rates: This section represents how the assessment for the above property is calculated. The left side of this section identifies the specific street footage(s) for your properw and the right side illustrates the proposed rates per lineal foot. Street FootaQe(s) Long side 0.00 (For long side - divide by 2) Assessment Rates Overlay (60%) $21.74/LF Reclaim (60%) $45.05/LF Short side 48.12 Assessment: This amount represents the amount the property above will be assessed for the 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project. Reclaim Overlay $2,167.48 $0.00 Total Assessment $2,167.48 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project - 7 Matt & Shannon Prom 901 Able Street E St. Joseph, MN 56374 Notice of Public Improvement Hearing City of St. Joseph Notice his hereby given that the St. Joseph City Council will meet at the St. Joseph Community Fire Hall at 7:00 PM on March 7, 2007 to consider the milling and overlay of the following areas: Able Street between 10th Avenue SE and ih Avenue SE; 8th Avenue SE , Callaway Street between ih Avenue SE and 1ih Avenue SE; 9th Avenue SE south of East Baker Street; the intersection of Dale Street East and 9th Avenue SE; 10th Avenue SE; 11th Avenue SE; Dale Street East from ih Avenue SE to 1ih Avenue SE and the entrance and parking area of Klinefelter Park as well as the Klinefelter Park Improvements pursuant to MN Statute 429.011 to 429.111. The estimated cost of the improvement is $ 600,000. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed improvement will be heard at this meeting. Judy Weyrens Administrator Publish: February 23, 2007 March 2, 2007 Proposed AsSessment Worksheet 84-53474-014 Lot 1 Block 2; Cloverdale Estates 2nd Add 901 Able Street E Rates: This section represents how the assessment for the above property is calculated. The left side of this section identifies the specific street footage(s) for your property and the right side illustrates the proposed rates per lineal foot. Street Footaae(s) Long side 0.00 (For long side - divide by 2) Assessment Rates Overlay (60%) $21.74/LF Reclaim (60%) $45.05/LF Short side 81.00 Assessment: This amount represents the amount the property above will be assessed for the 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project. Reclaim Overlay $3,648.89 $0.00 Total Assessment $3,648.89 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project - 8 Delores & John Reischl 907 Able Street E St. Joseph, MN 56374 , Notice of Public,llJlprov~ment Hearing CiwofSt. Joseph Noticehisherebygivepthat theSt.Joseph . City Council wilLmeetaLthe St. Joseph Communi~y Fire Hall at .7:00. PM on March 7, 2007 to consider the milling and overlay of the following areas: Able. Street between . 10th AvenueSEanditlAvenueSE;8thAvenue SE , CallalNayStreetpetween7'~h Avenu~ SE~9q.12tgAvenue. SE;~thAvenueSEsouth of East Baker Street;the.intersectionofDale Street;Eastandgth AvenueSE;i10th Avenue SE; 11th AvenueSE;DaleStreetEast. from7thAvenue9E;to12ttlAvenueSE~nd . thE!. entrance and parkinQarea of Klinefelter Parkas well.as the Klinefelter Parkhnprovementspursuant to MN Statute 429.011. to 429.111. The estimated. cost of the improvement is $600,000. Such persons as .desire to be heard with reference to the proposed improvement will be heard at this meeting. Judy Weyrens Administrator Publish: February 23, 2007 March 2, 2007 Proposed Assessment Worksheet 84-53474-016 Lot 2 Block 2; Cloverdale Estates 2nd Add 907 Able Street E Rates: This section represents how the assessment for the above property is calculated. The left side of this section identifies the specific street footage(5) for your property and the right side illustrates the proposed rates per Iinea.lfoot. Street Footaae(s) Long side 0.00 (For long side - divide by 2) Assessment Rates Overlay (60%)$21. 741LF Reclaim (60%) $45.051LF Short side 80.64 Assessment: This amount represents the amount the property above will be assessed for the 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project. Reclaim Overlay $3,632.66 $0.00 Total Assessment $3,632.66 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project - 9 John & Evelyn Schindler 911 Able Street E St. Joseph, MN 56374 Notice of Public Improvement Hearing City of St. Joseph Notice his hereby given that the St. Joseph City Council will meet at the St. Joseph Community Fire Hall at 7:00 PM on March 7, 2007 to consider the milling and overlay of the 'following areas:. Able Street between 10th Avenue SE and yth Avenue SE; 8th Avenue SE , Callaway Street between yth Avenue SE and 1ih Avenue SE; 9th Avenue SE south of East Baker Street; the intersection of Dale. Street East and. 9th Avenue SE;1 Oth Avenue SE; 11th Avenue SE; Dale Street East from yth Avenue SE to 1 ih Avenue SE and the entrance and parking area of Klinefelter Park as well as the Klinefelter Park Improvements pursuant to MN Statute 429.011 to 429.111. The estimated cost of the improvement is $ 600,000. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed improvement will be heard at this meeting. Judy Weyrens Administrator Publish: February 23, 2007 March 2, 2007 Proposed Assessment Worksheet 84-53474-018 Lot 3 Block 2; Cloverdale Estates 2nd Add 911 Able Street E Rates: This section. represents how the assessment for the above property is calculated. The left side of this section identifies the specific street footage(s) for your property and the right side illustrates the proposed rates per lineal foot. Street Footaae( s) Long side 0.00 (For long side - divide by 2) Assessment Rates Overlay (60%) $21.7 4/LF Reclaim (60%) $45.05/LF Short side 80.00 Assessment: This amount represents the amount the property above will be assessed for the 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project. Reclaim Overlay $3,604.01 $0.00 Total Assessment $3,604.01 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project - 10 Joseph Schindler PO Box 302 St. Joseph, MN 56374 Notice of. Public Improvement Hearing City .ofSt. Joseph Notice his herebygiventhattheSt.Joseph City. Council win. meet at the St. Joseph GommunityFire . Hall at 7:00PM on March ]. 2007 to consider the miUipgand overlay of the following..areas: . AbleStreetbe.tween 10th Avenue SEand. vth Ave~ueSE; 8th Avenue SE , Callaway..Streetpetvveen vthAvenue SEand12th.AVenU~SI;;.9th.f1.venue.RE3south of East Ba.kerStreet;.thejnt~rsection of Dale StreetI;astand9thAvenueSE;10thAvenue SE; 11th Avenue .SE;DaleStreetEast..from 7thA"enue. SEto .12thAvenlJeSEand th~entrance and parkingarea.Qf KlinefelterPark.as well as the Klinefelter Park lmprovements.pursuant to MN Statute 429.011 to 429.111. The estimated cost of the improvement is$600,000. Such p.ersons as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed improvement will be heard at this meeting. Judy Weyrens Administrator Publish: February 23, 2007 March 2, 2007 Proposed Assessment Worksheet 84-53474-020 Lot 4 Block 2; Cloverdale Estates 2nd Add 913 Able Street E Rates: This section represents how the assessment for the above property i.s calculated. The left side of. this section identifies the specific street footage(s) f.or your property and the right side illustrates the proposed rates per lineal foot. Street FootaQe(s) Long side 0.00 (For long side - divide by 2) Assessment Rates Overlay (60%)$21.7 4/LF Reclaim (60%) $45.05/LF Short side 80.01 Assessment: This amount represents the amount the property above will be assessed f.or the 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project. Reclaim Overlay $3,604.21 $0.00 Total Assessment $3,604.21 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project - 11 Gary & Mary Johnson 1001 Able Street E St. Joseph, MN 56374 Notice of Public Improvement Hearing City of St. Joseph Notice. his hereby given that the St. Joseph City Council will meet at the St. Joseph Community Fire Hall at 7:00 PM on March?, 2007 to consider the milling and overlay of the following areas: Able Street between 10th Avenue SE and ih. Avenue SE; 8th Avenue SE , Callaway Street between 7'h Avenue SE and 12th Avenue SE;gth ..Avenue SE south of East Baker Street; the intersection of Dale Street East and gth Avenue SE; 10th Avenue SE; 11th Avenue SE; Dale Street East from 7'h Avenue SE to 12th Avenue SE and the entrance and parking area of Klinefelter Parkas well as the Klinefelter Park Improvements pursuant to MN Statute 429.011 to 429.111. The estimated cost of the improvement is $ 600,000. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed improvement will be heard at this meeting. . Judy Weyrens Administrator Publish: February 23, 2007 March 2, 2007 Proposed Assessment Worksheet 84-53474-022 Lot 5 Block 2; Cloverdale Estates 2nd Add 1001 Able Street E Rates: This section represents how the assessment for the above property is calculated. The left side of this section identifies the specific street footage(s) for your property and the right side illustrates the proposed rates per lineal foot. Street FootaQe(s) Long side 0.00 (For long side - divide by 2) Assessment Rates Overlay (60%) $21.7 4/LF Reclaim (60%) $45.05/LF Short side 80.00 Assessment: This amount represents the amountthe property above will be assessed for the 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project. Reclaim Overlay $3,603.80 $0.00 Total Assessment $3,603.80 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project - 12 Richard & Lavonne Torrence 1007 Able Street SE ~St. Joseph, MN 56374 Notice. of PublicJmprov.ement Hearing Ci~yofSt. Joseph Notice. his hereby given . that the St.. Joseph City Council wiHmeet. at the S1. Joseph Community. Fire Hall at 7:00PM on March.?, 2007 to consider the miUingandoverlay of the foHowingareas:. Able. Streetbet'vveen toth Avenue SEand ihAverue SE;8th .Avenue SE , Call~,^,ayStreetbet'vveen 7'hAvenue SEanq1ihAvenueSE;9lhAvenue SEsouth of East BaKer Street the... intersection of Dale StreetEastand9IhAvenueSE;..1Qth Av~nue SE; 11th AvenueSE; Dale Street East from .7th.Avenue.SEto.12IhAvenue.SE. and the. entrance and parking area of KlinefelterPark .as well as. the Klinefelter Park Improvements .pursuant to MN Statute 429.011 to 429.111. The estimated cost of the improvement. is$ 600,000. Such p~rsons as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed improvement will be heard at this meeting. Judy Weyrens Administrator Publish: February 23, 2007 March 2, 2007 Proposed Assessment Worksheet 84-53474-024 Lot 6 Block 2; Clovercfale Estates 2nd Add 1007 Able Street SE Rates: This section represents how the assessment for the above property, is calculated. The left side of this section identifies the specific street footag~(s) for your property and the right side illustrates the proposed rates per lineal foot. Street Footaqe(s) Long side 0.00 (For long side - divide by 2) Assessment Rates Overlay (60%) $21.74/LF Reclaim (60%) $45.05/LF Short side 80.00 Assessment: This amount represents the amount the property above will be assessed for the 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project. Reclaim Overlay $3,603.89 $0.00 Total Assessment $3,603.89 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project - 13 Susan Karnik 1011 Able Street E St. Joseph, MN 56374 Notice of Public Improvement Hearing City of St. Joseph Notice hishereoy given that the St. Joseph City Council will meet at the St. Joseph Community Fire Hall at 7:00 PM on March 7, 2007 to consider the milling and overlay of the following areas: Able Street between 10th Avenue SE and ih Avenue SE; 8th Avenue SE , . Callaway Street between ihAvenue SE and 1ih Avenue SE; 9th .Avenue SE south of East Baker Street; the intersection of Dale Street East and 9th Avenue SE; 10th .Avenue SE; 11 th Avenue SE; Dale Street East from ih Avenue SE to 1ih Avenue SE and the entrance and parking area of Klinefelter Park as well as the Klinefelter Park Improvements pursuant to MN Statute 429.011. to. 429.111. The estimated cost of the improvement is $ 600,000. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed improvement will be heard at this meeting. Judy Weyrens Administrator Publish: February 23, 2007 March 2, 2007 Proposed Assessment Worksheet 84-53474-026 Lot 7 Block 2; Cloverdale Estates 2nd Add 1011 Able Street E Rates: This section represents how the assessment forthe above property is calculated. The left side of this section identifies the specific street footage(s) for your property and the right side illustrates the proposed rates per lineal foot. Street Footaoe(s) Long side 0.00 (For long side - divide by 2) Assessment Rates Overlay (60%) $21.74/LF Reclaim (60%) $45.05/LF Short side 79.59 Assessment: This amount represents the amount the property above will be assessed for the 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project. Reclaim Overlay $3,585.51 $0.00 Total Assessment $3,585.51 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project - 14 Thomas. Braegelmann PO Box 39 Big Lake, MN 55309 Notice of Public .Improvement Hearing CityOfSt. Joseph Notice hisherai:>y giventhattheSt.Jos~ph CityCounciJ will meet at theSt. Joseph Community Fire.Hallat7:00.PM on MarqhI, 4007 to consider the milling and overlay of the following areas: Able Street between 10th AvenueSE and ihAvenueSE;8th Avenue SE , CaUCl\NayStreet between thAvenueSEand 12th Avenue. SE;9thAyenueS'=.SQuth of East BaKer Street;.. the. intersection..of Dale. Street East and 9th Avenue.. SS;.i1glh .}\venue SE; 111h AvenlJe SE;Oale StreetEastfrorn .7th AvenueSE to t2thl\v~nueSE.and the entrance and parl<ingiareaofKlinefelter Parkas weUas the Klinefelter park Improvements. pursuant to MN Statute429.0tjJo 429.111. The estimated. cost of the improvement is $600,000. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed improvement will be heard at this meeting. Judy Weyrens Administrator Publish: February 23, 2007 March 2, 2007 Proposed Assessment Worksheet 84-53474-032 Lot 3 Block 3; Cloverdale Estates 2nd Add 116 10th Avenue SE Rates: This section represents how the assessment for the above property is calculated. The left side of this section identifies the specific street footage(s) for your property and the right side illustrates the proposed rates per lineal foot. Street Footaoe(s) Long side 224.11 (For long side - divide by 2) Assessment Rates Overlay (60%) $21.74/LF Reclaim (60%) $45.05/LF Short side 0.00 Assessment: This amount represents the amount the property above will be assessed for the 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project. Reclaim Overlay $5,047.93 $0.00 Total Assessment $5,047.93 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project - 15 Scott & Jennifer Ambrosier 132 8th Avenue SE S1. Joseph, MN 56374 Notice of Public Improvement Hearing City of St. Joseph Notice his hereby given that the S1. Joseph City Council will meet at the S1. Joseph Community Fire Hall at 7:00 PM on March 7,2007 to consider the milling and overlay of the following areas: AbleStreet between 10th Avenue SE and ih Avenue SE; 8th Avenue SE , Callaway Street between ih Avenue SE and 1ih Avenue SE; 9th Avenue SE south of East Baker Street; the intersection of Dale Street East and 9th Avenue SE; 10th Avenue SE; 11th Avenue SE; Dale Street Eastfrom ih Avenue SE to 1ih Avenue SE and the entrance and parking area of Klinefelter Parkas well as the Klinefelter Park Improvements pursuant to MN Statute 429.011 to 429.111. The estimated cost of the improvement is $ 600,000. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed improvement will be heard at this meeting. Judy Weyrens Administrator Publish: February 23, 2007 March 2, 2007 Proposed Assessment Worksheet 84-53474-048 Lot 1 Block 5; Cloverdale Estates 2nd Add 132 8th Avenue SE Rates: This section represents how the assessment for the above pro.perty is calculated. The left side of this section identifies the specific street footage(s) for your property and the right side illustrates the proposed rates per lineal foot. Street Footaqe(s) Long side 0.00 (For long side - divide by 2) Assessment Rates Overlay (60%) $21.74/LF Reclaim (60%) $45.05/LF Short side 80.00 Assessment: This amount represents the amount the p.roperty above will be assessed for the 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project. Reclaim Overlay $3,603.84 $0.00 Total Assessment $3,603.84 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project - 16 Ryan Hiltner 128 8th Avenue SE St. Joseph, MN 56374 Notice OfPubUcJrnprovernent Hearing City of St. Jo.seph Notice his hereby' given that the . St.. . Joseph . City .Council will meet at the St. Joseph Gornl11unity Fire Hal.lat 7:00PM on . March 7. 20.0.7 to . consider the milling and overlay of the following. areas: Able Street between 10th AvenueSE and 7th AvenueS~; 8thAvenue SE, C~lIaway Street ~etwE!E!n 7th}\venu~ .SEand12thAvenue. SE;91hAvenueSE south of East B(iker Street; . the intersection ..ofDale Street Eastand.gth. AvenueSE;.1 oth.. Avenue SE; 11 th ,l\'1enLJe. SE; Dale Street Eastfrom 7thAvenue SEto12th Avenue SEand th~ entrance and parKingar(3aptK:linefelter Park as weUasthe. Klinefelter Park Improvementspursuant to MN Statute 429.o.11tQ 429.111. The' estimated cost of the improvement is $60.0.,0.0.0., Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed improvement wil/be heard at this meeting. Judy Weyrens Administrator Publish: February 23, 20.0.7 March 2, 20.0.7 Proposed Assessment Worksheet 84-53474-0.50. Lot 2 Block 5; Cloverdale Estates 2nd Add 128 8th Avenue SE Rates: This section represents how the assessment for the above property is calculated. The left side of this section identifies the specific street footage(s) for your property and the right side illustrates the proposed rates per lineal foot. Street Footaoe(s) Long side 0..0.0. (For long side - divide by 2) Assessment Rates Overlay (60.%) '$21.74/LF Reclaim (60.%) $45.o.5/LF Short side 80..0.0. Assessment: This amount represents the amount the property abovewiU be assessed for the 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project. Reclaim Overlay $3,60.3.84 $0..0.0. Total Assessment $3,603.84 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project - 17 Kathleen Schmidt 124 8th Avenue SE St. Joseph, MN 56374 Notice of PublicJmprovement Hearing City of St. Joseph Notice his hereby given that the St.Joseph City Council will meet at the St. Joseph Community Fire Hall at 7:00 PM on March 7, 2007 to consider the milling and overlay of the following areas: Able Streetbetween 10thAvenue SEand 7'h Avenue SE; 8th AvenueSE , Callaway Street between ih Avenue SEand 12th Avenue SE; 9th Avenue SE south of East Baker Street; the intersection o.fDaleStreet East and9lh Avenue SE; 10th Avenue SE; 11th Avenue SE; Dale Street East from 7'h Avenue SE to 1 ih Avenue SE and the entrance and parking area of Klinefelter Park as well as the Klinefelter Park Improvements pursuant to MN Statute 429.011 to 429.111. . The estimated cost of the improvement is $ 600,000. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed improvement will be heard at this meeting. Judy Weyrens Administrator Publish: February 23, 2007 March 2, 2007 Proposed Assessment Worksheet 84-53474-052 Lot 3 Block 5; Cloverdale Estates 2nd Add 124 8th Avenue SE Rates: This section represents how the assessment for the above property is calculated. The left side of this section identifies the specific street footage(s) for your property and the right side illustrates the proposed rates per lineal foot. Street Footaae(s) Long side 0.00 (For long side - divide by 2) Assessment. Rates Overlay (60%) $21.74/LF Reclaim (60%) $45.05/LF Short side 80.00 Assessment: This amount represents the amount the property "above will be assessed for the 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project. Reclaim Overlay $3,603.84 $0.00 Total Assessment $3,603.84 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project - 18 1- Michael & Kathleen Bader 120 8th Avenue SE St. Joseph, MN 56374 NoticeofPul)liclRlprovement Hearing City of St. Joseph Notice his hereby given that theSt..Jos~ph ...GityCouncil will..meet at the .St. Joseph Community Fire HaHat 7:QO PM on March ],2007to consider~he.millir1g and overlay of the following areas: AbleStreetbetvle~n 10t~Avenue. SEand 7IhAvenueSE;..8th.Avenue SE , Call~way Street. between7t~,l\ver1U~~E.~9cj12t~;}.v~nu~ScI3;~lhAvenue$l3south of East Bak.er Street; the ir1tersectionof[)ale~tr~etl3~stand~th,l\~~n.ueSE;.10Ih. Avenue SE; 11th Avenue SEiDale StreetEasLfr()m?t~ .t>.venueS[;tQ12th,Av7nuEl E1Eandtheentrance and parking/area of Klinefelter ~atkas.wellastheKlinElfelter Park Improvements pursuant to MN Statute 429.011.to .429.111... The.estirnatedcost of th~ improvement is $600,000. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference tothe proposed improvement will be heard at this meeting. Judy Weyrens Administrator Publish: February 23, 2007 March 2, 2007 Proposed Assessment WorkSheet 84-53474-054 Lot 4 Block 5; Cloverdale Estates 2nd Add 120 8th Avenue SE Rates: This section represents how the assessment for the above property is calculated. The left side of this section identifies the specific street footage(s) for your property and the right side illustrates the prop.osed rates. per lineal foot. Street Footaae(s) Long side 0.00 (For long side - divide by 2) Assessment Rates Overlay (60%) $21.74/LF Reclaim (60%) $45.05/LF Short side 80.00 Assessment: This amount represents the amount the property above will be assessed for the 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project. Reclaim Overlay $3,603.84 $0.00 Total Assessment $3,603.84 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project - 19 Dennis & Laura Sullivan 116 8th Avenue SE S1. Joseph, MN 56374 Notice of Public Improvement Hearing City of St. Joseph Notice his hereby given that the S1. Joseph City Council will meet at the S1. Joseph Community Fire Hall at 7:00 PM on March 7, 2007 to consider the milling and overlay of the following areas: Able Street between 10th AvenueSE and 7th Avenue SE; 8th Avenue SE , Callaway Street between ih Avenue SE and 1ih Avenue SE;9th Avenue SE south of East Baker Street; the intersection of Dale Street East and 9th Avenue SE; 10th Avenue SE; 11th Avenue SE; Dale Street East from ih Avenue SE to 12th Avenue SE and the entrance and parking area of Klinefelter Park as well as the Klinefelter Park Improvements pursuant to MN Statute 429.011 to 429.111. The estimated cost of the improvement is $ <600,000. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed improvement will be heard at this meeting. Judy Weyrens Administrator Publish: February 23, 2007 March 2,2007 Proposed Assessment Worksheet 84-53474-056 Lot 5 Block 5; Cloverdale Estates 2nd Add 116 8th Avenue SE Rates: This section represents how the assessment for the above. property is calculated. The left. side of this section identifies the specific street footage(s} for your property and the right side illustrates the proposed rates per lineal foot. Street Footaqe(s) Long side 0.00 (For long side - divide by 2) Assessment Rates Overlay (60%) $21.74/LF Reclaim (60%) $45.05/LF Short side 80.00 Assessment: This amount represents the amount the property above will be assessed for the 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project. Reclaim Overlay $3,603.84 $0.00 Total Assessment $3,603.84 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project - 20 Paul & Kathryn Wirth POBox 8 St. Joseph, MN 56374 Notice of PUblic Improvement Hearing Cib'of St. Joseph Notice. his hereby giyen that .the. St.Joseph. . City Council wHlrneet at theSt. Joseph ComrnunityFire Hall at 7:00 PM on March}, 2007toconsiderthemHlingand overlay of the following <areas: .. AbIeSt~eetbetween1 Qlh ,L\venue SEancJ7'h AvenuEJSE; .8th Avenue SE , C~Haway Str~etbeP.y~e9 it~.Avenue.SS.ClncJ.1~th Avenu~.Ss;9.thAvenueS!:south of East BClker Street; theintersectionpf[)aleStreetEasta~d9th}\Y.EilllueSE;.10th AVEilnue SE; 11th AvenueSE;Oal.e Street<~astfrom7th.A:venueSEtc)12tl).A:v~nue~E.amj the. entrance and parking .areaof.KlinefelterParkasweU...asthe.Klinefelter Parklrnprovernentspursuant to MN Statute 429.01.1 to 429.111. The estimated cost of the improvement is $600,000. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference tethe proposed improvement will be heard at this meeting. Judy Weyrens Administrator Publish: February 23, 2007 March 2, 2007 Proposed Assessment Worksheet 84-53474-058 Lot 6 Block 5; Cloverdale Estates 2nd Add 110 8th Avenue SE Rates: This section represents how the assessment for the above. property is calculated. The left side of this section identifies the specific.street footage(.s) for your property and the right side i1/ustrates the proposed rates. per Iineal.foot. Street Footaae(s) Long side 0.00 (For long side - divide by 2) Assessment Rates Overlay (60%) $21.74/LF Reclaim (60%) $45.05/LF Short side 80.00 Assessment: This amount represents the amounttheproperty above wUI.be assessed for the 2007 East Side MiI/ & Overlay Project. Reclaim Overlay $3,603.84 $0.00 Total Assessment $3,603.84 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project - 21 Elmer & Viola Kirchner 108 8th Avenue SE St. Joseph, MN 56374 Notice of Public Improvement Hearing City of St. Joseph Notice his hereby given that the St. Joseph City Council will meet at the St. Joseph Community Fire Hall at 7:00 PM on March 7,2007 to consider the milling and overlay of the following areas: Able Street between 10th Avenue SE and ih Avenue SE; 8th Avenue SE , Callaway Street between ih Avenue SEand 1ih Avenue SE;9th Avenue SE .south of East Baker Street; the intersection of Dale Street East and 9th AvenueSE; 10th Avenue SE; 11th AvenueSE; Date Street East from ih Avenue SE to .12th Avenue SE and the entrance and parking area of Klinefelter Park as well as the Klinefelter Park Improvements pursuant to MN Statute 429.011 to 429.111. The estimated cost of the improvement is $ 600,000. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed improvement will be heard at this meeting. Judy Weyrens Administrator Publish: February 23, 2007 March 2, 2007 Proposed Assessment Worksheet 84-53474-060 Lot 7 Block 5; Cloverdale Estates 2nd Add 108 8th Avenue SE Rates: This section represents how the assessmentfor.the above property is calculated. The left side of this section .identifies the specific street footage(s) for your property and the right side illustrates the proposed rates per lineal foot. Street Footaoe( s ) Long side 0.00 (For long side - divide by 2) Assessment. Rates Overlay (60%) $21.74/LF Reclaim (60%) $45.05/LF Short side 80.00 Assessment: This arnount represents the amount the property above will be assessed for the 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project. Reclaim Overlay $3,603.84 $0.00 Total Assessment $3,603.84 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project - 22 Anthony Fernkes 102 8th Avenue SE St. Joseph, MN 56374 Notice of PUIJ/ic Improvement Hearing CityofiSt. Joseph Notice. his. hereby giv(3n that. theSt. JosephCityCoUl1cil wIll meet at the St. Joseph Community Fire Hall at 7:00PM .onMarch 7, 2007tQ considerth;. milling and overlay of the following areas: Able Street between 1 Olh AveQueSEal1d 7IhA.venueSE;alhAvenue SE , qall~\lVaY$treet~etvJe(3n ..7Ih. Avenue.. SE..and..12IhAve~U(3..$E:;...9Ih AvenueSE.south of East ElakerStreet;thejntersectioDofD~leStr;et~astand,.glhA.~epu7<SE:; ..1.qlh.A.Y~Que SE; 11th AvenuepE;....Dale.Stre.etEastfrom7'h.A.venue.s~.tOl?lhA:v{fnueeEand. the entrance and parking area of Klinefelter Parkas well as the Klinefelter. Park Improvements pUfsuant to MN Statute 429.011 to 429.111. The estimated cost of the improvement is $ 600,000. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed improvement will be heard at this lTIeeting. Judy Weyrens Administrator Publish: February 23, 2007 March 2, 2007 Propos~d Assessment Worksheet 84-53474-062 Lot 8 Block 5; Cloverdale Estates 2nd Add 102 8th Avenue SE Rates: This. section represents how the assessment for the above property is calculated. The left side of this section identifies the specificstreetfootage(s) for your property and the right side illustrates the proposed rates per lineal foot. Street FootaQe(s) Long side 116.18 (For long side - divide by 2) Assessment Rates Overlay (60%)$21. 74/LF Reclaim (60%) $45.05/LF Short side 97.88 Assessment: This amount represents the amount the property above will be assessed for the 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project. Reclaim Overlay $7,026.33 $0.00 Total Assessment $7,026.33 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project - 23 Joshua Nelson 806 Able Street E S1. Joseph, MN 56374 Notice of Public Improvement Hearing City of St. Joseph Notice his hereby given that the St. Joseph City Council will meet at the St. Joseph Community Fire HaU at 7:00 PM on March 7, 2007 to consider the milling and overlay of the following areas: . Able Street between 1 Oth Avenue SEand ih AvenueSE; 8th Avenue SE I Callaway Street betw.een jlh Avenue SE and tih Avenue SE; 9th Avenue SE south of East Baker Street; the intersection of Dale Street East and 9th Avenue SE; 10th Avenue SE; 11th Avenue SE; Dale Street East from ih Avenue SE t01ihAvenue SE and the entrance and parking area of Klinefelter Park as well as the Klinefelter Park Improvements pursuant to MN Statute 429.011 to 429.111. The estimated cost of the improvement is $600,000. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed improvement will be heard at this meeting. Judy Weyrens Administrator Publish: February 23, 2007 March 2, 2007 Proposed Assessment Worksheet 84-53474-064 Lot 9 Block 5; Cloverdale Estates 2nd Add 806 Able Street E Rates: This section represents how the assessment for the above property is calculated. The left side ofthissection identifies the specific streeUootage(s) for your property and the right side illustrates the proposed rates per lineal foot. Street Footaoe(s) Long side 0.00 (For long side - divide by 2) Assessment Rates Overlay (60%) $21.74/LF Reclaim (60%) $45.05/LF Short side 100.35 Assessment: This amount represents the amount the property above will be assessed for the 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project. Reclaim Overlay $4,520.65 $0.00 Total Assessment $4,520.65 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project - 24 John & Julie Taufen PO Box 531 St. Joseph, MN 56374 Judy Weyrens Administrator Publish: February 23, 2007 March 2, 2007 Proposed Assessment Worksheet 84-53474-066 Lot 10 Block 5; Cloverdale Estates 2nd Add 810 Able Street E Rates: This section represents how the assessment for the above property .is calculated. The left side of this section identifies the specific street footage(s) for your property and the right side illustrates the proposed rates per lineal foot. Street Footaae(s) Long side 0.00 (For long side - divide by 2) Assessment Rates Overlay (60%) $21.74fLF Reclaim (60%) $45:05fLF Short side 140.14 Assessment: This amount represents the amount the property above will be assessed for the 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project. Reclaim Overlay $6,312.95 $0.00 Total Assessment $6,312.95 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project - 25 Dena Florek 129 8th Avenue SE St. Joseph, MN 56374 Notice of Public Improvement Hearing City of St. Joseph Notice his hereby given that the St. Joseph City Council will meet at the St. Joseph Community Fire Hall at7:00 PM on March 7,2007 to consider the milling and overlay of the following. areas: Able Street between 10th Avenue SE and th Avenue SE;8th Avenue SE , Callaway Street between 7th Avenue SE and 12th Avenue SE; 9th Avenue SE south of East Baker Street; the intersection of Dale Street East and 9th Avenue SE; 10th Avenue SE; 11th Avenue SE; Dale Street East from 7th Avenue SE to 1ih Avenue SE. and the entrance and parking area of Klinefelter Park as well as the Klinefelter Park Improvements pursuant to MN Statute 429.011to 429.111. The estimated cost of the improvement is$ 600,000. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed improvement will be heard at this meeting. Judy Weyrens Administrator Publish: February 23,2007 March 2, 2007 Proposed Assessment Worksheet 84-53474-082 Lot 1 Block 6; Cloverdale Estates 2nd Add 129 8th Avenue SE Rates: This se-ctionrepresents how the assessment for the above property is calculated. The left side of this section identifies the specific street footage(s) for your property and the right side illustrates the proposed rates per lineal foot. Street Footaqe(s) Long side 0.00 (For long side - divide by 2) Assessment Rates Overlay (60%) $21.74/LF Reclaim (60%) $45.05/LF Short side 107.00 Assessment: This amount represents tMamount the property above will be assessed for the 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project. Reclaim Overlay $4,820.11 $0.00 Total Assessment $4,820.11 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project - 26 Peter & Leora Honer 127 8th Avenue SE St. Joseph, MN 56374 Notice of P.ubli~ Improvement Hearing CityofSt. Joseph Notice. his hereby given thatthEl St. <JosephCitYiCouncil willrneet at the St. Joseph' Community Fire .Hallat 7:00PM on March 7, 2007 to consider the. milIing and overlay of the following areas: . Able Street between '1.oth Avenue SEand 7th, AveniJe SE;8thAvenue SE , C~II~waYStreetbetwEleI'l7thAvenueSEand12th.A.venueSE;.~thA~enue .sgsouth of Eas~ Baker Street;the'intersectioniof[)ale9treet~astan99thAvElrue.sE;10thAvElnue SE; 11t Avenue i$E;Dale StreetEastfrom7thAvenueSEto J21hAvenueSEand the entrance and parking area of Klinefelter Parkas.well,as the Klinefelter Park Improvernents .pursuant to MN $t(itute 429..011 to 429.111. The estimated cost of the irnprovemenHs$ 600,000. Such per~ons as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed irnprovement will be heard at this meeting. Judy Weyrens Administrator Publish: February 23, 2007 March 2, 2007 Proposed Assessment Worksheet '84-53474-084 Lot 2 Block 6; Cloverdale Estates 2nd Add 127 8th Avenue SE Rates: This section represents how the assessment for the above property is calculated. The left side of this section identifies the specific street footage(s) for your property and the right side illustrates the proposed rates. per lineal foot. Street FootaQe(s) Long side 0.00 (For long side - divide by 2) Assessment Rates Overlay. (60%) $21.7 4/LF Reclaim (60%) $45.05/LF Short side 107.00 Assessment: This amount represents the amount the property above will be assessed for the 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project. Reclaim Overlay $4,820.14 $0.00 Total Assessment $4,820.14 , 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project - 27 Frank Danzl 123 8th Avenue SE St. Joseph, MN 56374 Notice of Public Improvement Hearing City of St. Joseph Notice his hereby given that the St. Joseph City Council will meet at the S1. Joseph Community Fire Hall at 7:00 PM on March 7, 2007 to consider the milling and overlay of the following areas: Able Street between 10thAvenue SEand ih Avenue SE; 8th Avenue SE , Callaway Street between ih Avenue SEand1ih Avenue SE; 9th Avenue SE south of East Baker Street; the intersection of Dale Street East and 9th Avenue SE; 10th Avenue SE; 11th Avenue SE; Dale Street Eastfrom ih Avenue SE to 12th Avenue SE and the entrance and parking area of Klinefelter Park as well as the Klinefelter Park Improvements pursuant to MN Statute 429.011 to 429.111. The. estimated cost of the improvement is $ 600,000. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed improvement will be heard at this meeting. Judy Weyrens Administrator Publish: February 23, 2007 March 2, 2007 Proposed Assessment Worksheet 84~534 7 4-086 Lot 3 Block 6; Cloverdale Estates 2nd Add 123 8th Avenue SE Rates: This section represents how the assessment for the above property is calcUlated. The left side of this section identifies the specific streetfootage(s) for your property and the right side illustrates the proposed rates per lineal foot. Street Footaae(s) Long side 0.00 (For long side - divide by 2) Assessment Rates Overlay (60%) $21.74/LF Reclaim (60%) $45.05/LF Short side 80.00 Assessment: This amount represents the amount the property above will be assessed for the 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project. Reclaim Overlay $3,603.84 $0.00 Total Assessment $3,603.84 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project ~ 28 David Strack 119 8th Avenue SE S1. Joseph, MN 56374 Notice.of.publicJl11prevement Hearing City.ofSt. Jeseph Notice his herel:>Y given thattheSt..JosephCityCouncil will>meet at the S1. Jeseph Community Fire HaH at7:00PM en March 7, 2007 toconsiderihe milling and overlay of the fellewingareas:Abl.e$treetbetvveen 10th AvenueSEand ihAverlU~ SE; i8th Avenue SE , Call.c1\lvaY.$treetbetween thAvenueSEand12thAvenue SE;9th Avenue SE .seuth ef East B~KerStreet; the.inter~ectien()fDale<Street...Eastand gth,A.yepueSE;10th .Av~nue SE; 11th ,4.venueSE; Dale Street East from 7th Avenue SE. to12thAv~nLl~SEa.nd the entrance and parkinQareaof Klinefelter. Parkas well as the KlinefelterParkllllProvementspursuant to. MN St~tute 429.011 to. 429.1.11. The estimated cest ef the .imprevementis $ 600,000. Such per~ens. a~ desire to. be heard with reference to. the prepesed improvement will be heard at this meeting. Judy Weyrens Administrater Publish: February 23, 2007 March 2, 2007 Prepesed Assessment Werksheet 84-53474-088 Let 4 Bleck 6; Cleverdale Estates 2nd Add 119 8th Avenue SE Rates: This sectienrepresents hew the assessment fer theabeve preperty is calculated. The left side ef this sectienidentifiesthe specific .street feetage(s) fer yeur preperty and the right side illustrates the prepesed rates per lineal ..feot. Street Feetaae(s) Lengside 0.00 (For long side - divide by 2) Assessment Rates Overlay (60%) $21.74/LF Reclaim (60%)$45.05/LF Short side 80.00 Assessment: This ameunt represents theal11eunt theprepertyabeve will be assessed fer the 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Preject. Reclaim Overlay $3,603.84 $0.00 Tetal Assessment $3,603.84 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project - 29 Keith Trettel 113 8th Avenue SE St. Joseph, MN 56374 . Notice of Public Improvement Hearing City of St. Joseph Notice his hereby given that the St. Joseph City Council will meet at the St. Joseph Community Fire Hall at 7:00 PM on March 7, 2007 to consider the milling and overlay of the following areas: Able Street between 10th Avenue SE and ih Avenue SE; 8th Avenue SE , Callaway Street between ih Avenue SE and 1ih Avenue SE; 9th Avenue SE south of East Baker Street; the intersection of Dale Street East and 9th Avenue BE; 10th Avenue SE; 11th Avenue SE; Dale Street East from ih Avenue SE to 1ih Avenue SE and the entrance and parking area of Klinefelter Parkas well as the Klinefelter Park Improvements pursuant to MN Statute 429.011 to 429.111. The estimated cost of the improvement is $ 600,000. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed improvement will be heard at this meeting. Judy Weyrens Administrator Publish: February 23, 2007 March 2, 2007 . Proposed Assessment Worksheet 84-53474-090 Lot 5 Block 6; Cloverdale Estates 2nd Add 113 8th Avenue SE Rates: This section represents how the assessment for the above property is calculated. The left side of this section identifies the specific street footage(s) for your property and the rightside illustrates the proposed rates per lineal foot. Street FootaQe(s) Long side 0.00 (For long side - divide by 2) Assessment Rates Overlay (60%) $21.7 4/LF Reclaim (60%) $45.05/LF Short side 80.00 Assessment: This amount represents the amount the. property above will be assessed for the 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project. Reclaim Overlay $3,603.84 $0.00 Total Assessment $3,603.84 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project - 30 I -- Christine WarJeski 109 8th Avenue SE St. Jeseph, MN 56374 Notic~ of.Publiclmprovernent Hearing CitYQf St. Joseph N9tice.hishereby givem.. thatthe.stJoSep8City .Ceuncil will meet at theSt. Joseph COrnlTlunityFire HaHat 7:aQ P'\11PD . March .7,2007 tecensiderthe mHli~gandoverlay of the fellowingareas: AbleStre.eibetween 1Qth,A."enu~ SEand th Ave~ueSE;8th Avenue SE . Call<;)Ylay .. Street. betwe~l1. !th<A.vem~.e<pE:i<;)nQ1gthj.\venueSE; ..9thAvenu~SEseuth of East Baker street;.th~jntersectienefJ:)~le.ptreet~~st.anQ..9thAvEmueSE;...1qth Ave.llue SE; 11th Avenue SE; Dalei~tr~et~astfr<:>m7th.J:\venueSEto>tihf.ven ue. SEanc;l the entrance and parkin!;liareaefKlinefelter ParK CiS welL as the. Klin~felter Park Improvements pursuant to MN Statute 429.011 . te 429.1.t1. ..... Th~estimatedcost .of the improvement is $60.0,0.00. Such persons as desire te be heard with reference to the proposed imprevement will be heard at this meeting. Judy Weyrens Adm inistrator Publish: February 23, 2007 March 2, 2007 Proposed Assessment Worksheet 84-53474-092 Let 6 Block 6; Cleverdale Estates 2nd Add 10.9 8th Avenue SE Rates: This section represents how the assessment for the above property. is calculated. The left side of this section identifiesthespecificstreetfootag~(s) for your property and the right side illustrates the proposed rates per Iinealfoot. Street FootaCle(s) Leng side 0.00. (For long side - divide by 2) Assessment Rates Overlay (60%) $21.74/LF Reclaim (60%) $45.05/LF Short side 80.00 Assessment: This amount represents the amount the property above will. be. assessed for the 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project. Reclaim Overlay $3,603.84 $0.00 Total Assessment $3,603.84 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project - 31 Jeffrey Smelter 105 8th Avenue SE St. Joseph, MN 56374 Notice of Public Improvement Hearing City of St. Joseph Notice his hereby given that the St. Joseph City Council will meet at the St. Joseph Community Fire Hall at TOO PM on March 7, 2007 to consider the milling and overlay of the following areas: Able Streetbetween 10thAvenue SE and ih Avenue SE; 8th Avenue SE , Callaway Street between ih Avenue. SEand .1ih Avenue SE;9th Avenue SE south of East Baker Street; the intersection. of Dale Street East and 9th Avenue SE;1 Oth Avenue SE; 11th Avenue SE; Dale Street East from ih Avenue SEto 12th Avenue SE and the entrance and parking area of Klinefelter Park as well.as the Klinefelter Park Improvements pursuant to MN Statute 429.011 to 429.111. The estimated cost of the improvement is $ 600,000. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed improvement will be heard at this meeting. Judy Weyrens Administrator Publish: February 23, 2007 March 2, 2007 Proposed Assessment Worksheet 84-53474-094 Lot 7 Block 6; Cloverdale Estates 2nd Add 105 8th Avenue SE Rates: This section represents how the assessmentforthe above property is calculated. The left.sideof thiss.ectionidentifies the specific street footage(s) for your property and the right side illustrates the proposed rates per lineal foot. Street Footaae(s) Long side 0,.00 (For long side - divide by 2) Assessment Rates Overlay (60%) $21.74/LF Reclaim (60%) $45.05/LF Short side 80.00 Assessment: This amount represents the amount the property above will be assessed for the 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project. Reclaim Overlay $3,603.84 $0.00 Total Assessment $3,603.84 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project - 32 Daryl & Cynthia Lindbloom 101 8th Avenue SE St. Joseph, MN 56374 Notice of Public Improvement Hearing City of St. Joseph Notice his hereby given that the St. Joseph City Council will meet at the St. Joseph Community Fire Hall at 7:00 PM on March 7,2007 to consider the milling and overlay of the following areas: Able Street between 10th Avenue SE and ih Avenue SE; 8th Avenue SE , Callaway Street between ih Avenue SEand 1ih Avenue SE; 9th AvenueSE south of East Baker Street; the intersection of Dale Street East and 9th Avenue SE; 10th Avenue SE; 11th Avenue SE; Dale Street East fron; 7th Avenue SE to 12th Avenue SE and the entrance and parking area of Klinefelter.Park as well as the Klinefelter Park Improvements pursuant to MN Statute 429..011 to 429.111. The estimated cost of the improvement is $ 600,000. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed improvement will be heard at this meeting. Judy Weyrens Administrator Publish: February 23, 2007 March 2, 2007 Proposed Assessment Worksheet 84-53474-096 Lot 8 Block 6; Cloverdale Estates 2nd Add 101 8th Avenue SE Rates: This section represents how the assessment for the above prQpertyis calculated. The left side oUhis section identifies thespecificstreeffootage(s) for your property and the tight side illustrates the proposed rates. per IinealJoot. Street Footaae(s) Long side 0.00 (For long side - divide by 2) Assessment Rates Overlay (60%)$21.74/LF Reclaim (60%) $45.05/LF Short side 82.00 Assessme[1t: This amount represents the amounUhepropertyabove will be assessed for the 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project. Reclaim Overlay $3,693.94 $0.00 Total Assessment $3,693.94 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project - 33 Paul & Lisa Wallin 810 Baker Street St. Joseph, MN 56374 Notice of Public Improvement Hearing City of St. Joseph Notice his hereby given that the St. Joseph City Council will meet at the St. Joseph Community Fire Hall at 7:00 PM on March 7, 2007 to consider the milling and overlay of the following areas: Able Street between .1 oth Avenue SEand ih Avenue SE; 8th Avenue SE , Callaway Street between 7thAvenue SEand 12'h Avenue SE; 9th Avenue SE south of East Baker Street;. the intersection of Dale Street East and 9th Avenue SE; 10th Avenue SE; 11th Avenue SE; Dale Street East from th Avenue SE to 12th Avenue SE and the entrance and parking area of Klinefelter Park as well as the Klinefelter Park Improvements pursuant to MN Statute 429.011 to 429.111. The estimated cost of the improvement is $ 600,000. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed improvement will be heard at this meeting. Judy Weyrens Administrator Publish: February 23, 2007 March 2, 2007 Proposed Assessment Worksheet 84-53475-002 Lot 2 Block 7; Cloverdale Estates 2nd Add 810 Baker Street Rates: This section represents how the assessment for the above property is calculated. The left side of thissection.identifies the specific street footage(s) for your property and the right side illustrates the proposed rates per lineal foot. Street Footaae(s) Long side 0.00 (For long side - divide by 2) Assessment Rates Overlay (60%) $21.7 4/LF Reclaim (60%) $45.05/LF Short side 92.84 Assessment: This amount represents the amount the property above will be assessed for the 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project. Reclaim Overlay $4,182.22 $0.00 Total Assessment $4,182.22 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project - 34 Nina Battisini 108 9th Avenue SE St. Joseph, MN 56374 Ntltice of PUbli<:I01provernent Hearing CinriofSt. Joseph Notice. his hereby given. ..that. ..theSt. . .Joseph Gity Council willi meet.. at. .theSt. Joseph Community Fire Hall at 7:00 PMonMarch7,2007toconsider the miUingand overlay of the following areas: . Able Street between 10th ~venueSE:and7th Avenue. SE;8th Avenue SE , C.allaw~iY Street between .7thp,.venH~>~Eand1.tll~venue~E;.Qth,A.venUe9E south of East l3aker Street; the intersectionof8~Je.StreetEl:Jstand ..9th~ve9ueSE; 10tllAve9ue SE; 11th Avenue. SE;Dale StreetEastfrom.7tll.\)\venueSEctc>.12thAvenue~Eand the. entrance and parking .areaQf Klinefelter Rark ias,wE!llastheKlinefelter. ParkJmprovementspursuant to M N Statute 429,011 to 429.111. Theestirt'latedcost of theimprovemenLis $600,000. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed improvement will be heard at this meeting. Judy Weyrens Administrator Publish: February 23, 2007 March 2,2007 Proposed Assessment Worksheet 84-53475-070 Lot 1 Block 1 and undivided 1/20 interest in Lot 1 Block 6; Cloverdale Townhouse Add 1 089th Avenue SE Rates: This section represents how the assessment for the above property is . calculated. The I.eftside of this section identifies the specific street footage(s) for your property and the right side illustrates the proposed rates per lineal foot. Street Footaae(s) Long side 6.85 (For long side - divide by 2) Assessment Rates Overlay (60%) $21.74/LF Reclaim (60%) $45.05/LF Short side 0.00 Assessment: This amount represents the amount the pro.pertyabove wiUbe assessed forthe 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project. Reclaim Overlay $154.29 $0.00 Total Assessment $154.29 2007 East Side Mill.& Overlay Project - 35 Pamela Rakotz 110 9th Avenue SE St. Joseph, MN 56374 Notice of Public Improvement Hearing City of St. Joseph Notice his hereby given that the St. Joseph City Counc::i1 will meet at the St. Joseph Community Fire HaUat 7:00 PM on March 7, 2007 to consider the milling and overlay of the following areas: .AbleStreet between .10th Avenue SEand. 7'h Avenue SE; 8th Avenue SE , Callaway Street bet\Neen 7'h Avenue SE and 12th Avenue SE;9th Avenue SEsouth of East Baker Street; the intersection of Dale SlreetEastand 9th Avenue SE; 10thAvenue SE; 11th Avenue SE; Dale Street Eastfrom 7'h Avenue SE to 12'h Avenue SE and the entrance and parking area of Klinefelter Park as well as the Klinefelter Park Improvements pursuant to MN Statute 429.011 to 429.111. The estimated cost of the improvement is $ 600,000. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed improvement will be heard at this meeting. Judy Weyrens Administrator Publish: February 23, 2007 March 2, 2007 Proposed Assessment Worksheet 84-53475-071 Lot 2 Block 1 and undivided 1/20 interest in Lot 1 Block 6; Cloverdale Townhouse Add 110 9th Avenue SE Rates: This section represents how the assessment for the above property is , calculated. The. left side ofthissection identifies the specific streetfootage(s) for your property.and the right side illustrates the proposed rates per lineal foot. Street Footaqe(s) Long side 6.85 (For long side - divide by 2) Assessment Rates Overlay (60%) $21.7 4/LF Reclaim (60%) $45.05/LF Short side 0.00 Assessment: This amount represents the amount the property above will be assessed for the 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project. Reclaim Overlay $154.29 $0.00 Total Assessment $154.29 .. 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project - 36 r - MiChael & Stacy Lawson 112 9th Avenue SE St. Joseph, MN 56374 Notice of. Public Improvement Hearing CiW()fSt.J()sep~ Notice.. his.... hereby. Qiven .that.thEl.St.Joseph City. Council wIll .rne.et at. the.St. Joseph Community Fire HaUat 7:00PM on March 7, 2007toconsi.d~rthemillil'lgandoverlay of the following areas: AbleStreetbEltween 10th AvenueSEandihAvenlJe/SE;athAvenue SE , CallawaYStreetbEltween. 7t~ A.venue9E~n~1~thAvenue9E;9Ih Avenue?Esouth of East Baker. Street; .theintersectionof [)~leStre~ttasta~d9thA.Venu~SE;.1oth-'t-YEl9ue SE; 11th AvenueSE;Dale Street East frpm .yth/AvenueSEto12thAyenueSE andt!1€:}~ntrance. and parking area of Klinefelter Park as well as the/Klinefelter Park Improvements pursuant to MN Statute 429.011 to .429.111. . The estimated cost of the improvement ;s$600,OOO. Such persons as desire . to be heard with reference to the proposed improvement will. be heard at this meeting. Judy Weyrens Administrator Publish: February 23, 2007 March 2, 2007 Proposed Assessment Worksheet 84-53475-072 Lot 3 Block 1 and undivided 1/20 interest in Lot 1 Block 6; Cloverdale Townhome Add 112 9th Avenue SE Rates: This section represents howthe assessment for the abovepropeJ1y .is c.alculated. The leftsideofthis section identifies the specific streetfootage(S) for your property and the right side illustrates the proposed rates per lineal foot. Street FootaQe(s) Long side 6.85 (For long side - divide by 2) Assessment Rates Overlay (60%) $21.. 74/LF Reclaim (60%) $45.05/LF Short side 0.00 Assessment: This Cilmount represents the amounUhe property above. will be assessed for the 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project. Reclaim Overlay $154.29 $0.00 Total Assessment $154.29 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project - 37 Allen & Carol Schleicher 114 9th Avenue SE St. Joseph, MN 56374 Notice of Public Improvement Hearing City of St. Joseph Notice his hereby given that the St. Joseph City Council will meet at the St. Joseph Community Fire HaUat 7:00 PM on March 7, 2007 to consider the milling and overlay of the following areas: Able, Street between 10th Avenue SE and th Avenue SE;8th Avenue SE , Callaway Street between ih Avenue SE and 12th Avenue SE; 9th Avenue SE south of East Baker Street; the intersection of Oale Street East and 9th Avenue SE; 10th Avenue SE; 11th Avenue BE; Dale Street East from th Avenue SE to 1ih AvenueSE and the entrance and parkirigareaof Klinefelter Park as well as the Klinefelter Park Improvements pursuant to MN Statute 429.011 to 429.111. The estimated cost of the improvement is$ 600,000. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed improvement will be heard at this meeting. Judy Weyrens Administrator Publish: February 23, 2007 March 2, 2007 Proposed Assessment Worksheet 84-53475-073 Lot 4 'Block 1 and undivided 1/20 interest in Lot 1 Block 6; Cloverdale Townhome Add 114 9th Avenue SE Rates: This section represents how the assessment for the above property is calculated. The left side of this section' identifies the specific street footage(s) for your property and the right side illustrates the 'proposed rates per lineal foot. Street Footaqe(s) Long side 6.85 (For long side - divide by 2) Assessment Rates Overlay (60%) $21.74/LF Reclaim (60%) $45:05/LF Short side 0.00 Assessment: This amoulltrepresents the amounttheproperty above will be assessed for the 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project. Reclaim Overlay I $154.29 $0.00 Total Assessment $154.29 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project - 38 Pamela Spanier Etal Trustee 116 9th Avenue SE St. Joseph, MN 56374 Notice of Public Improvement Hearing City of St. Joseph Notice his hereby giventhst.the St..Jos~phGityCouncil will meet .at theSt. Joseph Community Fire Hall at 7:00 PMonMarch.7., 2007 to consider thelTlilling and overlay of the follo'Ningareas:.. AbleStreet.between1dth Avenue SEand yth AvenueSE;..8IhAvenue SE , C~Haway~treetbetweeq . ythAvenue... SEand .t2thAvenue.. SE;9th .Aven ue .Spsouth of East E3aker Street;theintersectiqnof.[)aleE3tr~etEast<3n9~th AvenueiSE;.tothAY~nue SE; 11th Avenue SE;DaleStreetEastfrom7th~venue9Ei t()121h Jl.v~nue SEan~ the entrance and parking area of Klinefelter Parkas wella.s the Klinefelter Park Improvements pursuant to MN StatL/te 429.011 to 429. 111.. The estimated c()stof the improvement is $600,000. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed improvement willee heard at this meeting. Judy Weyrens Administrator Publish: February 23, 2007 March 2, 2007 prop()sedAsses,sm~nt Worksheet 84-53475-074 Lot 1 Block 2andundivided 1120 interest in Lot 1 Block 6; Cloverdale Townhome Add 116 9th Avenue SE Rates: This section represents. how the assessment for the above property is . calculated. The left side oUhissection identifies the specific street footage(s) for your property and the right side illustrates the proposed rates per lineal foot. Street Footaqe(s) Long side 6.85 (For long side - divide by 2) Assessment Rates Overlay (60%) $21.74/LF Reclaim (60%) $45.05/LF Short side 0.00 Assessment: This amount represents the amount the property above will be assessed for the 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project. Reclaim Overlay $154.29 $0.00 Total Assessment $154.29 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project - 39 Mark & Coral Heinen 118 9th Avenue SE St. Joseph, MN 56374 Notice of Public Improvement Hearing City of St. Joseph Notice his hereby given that the St. Joseph City Council will meet at the St. Joseph Community Fire Halla! 7:00PMon March 7, 2007 to consider the milling andoverlay of the following areas: Able Street between 10th Avenue.SE and yth Avenue SE;ath Avenue SE , Callaway Street between ythAvenue SEand 1ih Avenue SE; 9th Avenue SE south of East Baker Street; the intersection of Dale Street East and 9th Avenue SE; 10th Avenue SE; 11th Avenue SE; Dale Street East from yth Avenue SE to 1 ih Avenue SE and the entrance and parking area of Klinefelter Park as well as the Klinefelter Park Improvements pursuant to MN Statute 429.011 to 429.111. The. estimated cost of the improvement is $ 600,000. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed improvement will be heard at this meeting. Judy Weyrens Ad ministrator Publish: February 23, 2007 March 2, 2007 Proposed AssessmentVVorksheet 84-53475-075 Lot 2 Block 2 and undivided 1/20 interest in Lot 1 Block 6; Cloverdale Townhome Add 118 9th Avenue SE Rates: This section represents how the assessment for the above property is calculated. The left side of this section identifies the specific street footage(s) for your property and the right side illustrates the proposed rates per lineal foot. Street Footaqe( s) Long side 6.85 (For long side - divide by 2) Assessment Rates Overlay (60%) $21.7 4/LF Reclaim (60%) $45.05/LF Short side 0.00 Assessment: This amount represents the amount the property above will be assessed for the 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project. Reclaim Overlay $154.29 $0.00 Total Assessment $154.29 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project - 40 Mary Johannes 120 9th Avenue SE St. Joseph, MN 56374 Notice of P~blic Improvement Hearing City of St. Joseph Notice.. his herepygiven thatthe..St. .Jo~ephCiW<CQLJncH . will rneetat . the. St. Joseph Community Fire. HaIlat.7:00PMonMarch.7', 20p7.to considerthemifling .and overlay of the following areas: Able Street between 1 oth A"enue$Eand 7th Avenue SE;8th Avenue SE , C~II~vvay 9tr:etbet\\ieenzth Avenue SE~nd 12thA.venu~9E;9th .AvenueSEsouth of East BakerStreet;th~int:rsectionof..DaleStreetEastapd9thAvenu.eSE;10th i\"epue SE; 11th AvenueSE; Dale Street East from ]thAvenueSEto.12thj\venLle SE and the. entrance and parkingareaofKlinefelterParkasweU as the KlinefelterParklmprovementspursuant to MN Statute 429.011 to 429.111. The estimated cost of the improvement is$ 600,000. Such persons. as de.sire to. be heard with reference to the proposed improvement will be heard at this meeting. Judy Weyrens Administrator Publish: February 23, 2007 March 2, 2007 Pre>posed Assessment Worksheet 84-53475-076 Lot 3 Block 2 and undivided 1/20 interest in Lot 1 Block 6; Cloverdale Townhome Add 120 9th Avenue SE Rates: This section represents how the assessment for the above property is calculated. The left side of this section identifies the specific street footage(s) for your property and the right side illustrates the proposed rates per IineaLfoot. Street Footaae(s) Long side 6.85 (For long side - divide by 2) Assessment Rates Overlay (60%) $21.74/LF Reclaim (60%) $45.05/LF Short side 0.00 Assessment: This amount represents the amount thepr()pertyabove will be assessed for the 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project. Reclaim Overlay $154.29 $0.00 Total Assessment $154.29 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project - 41 Gerald Knapp 122 9th Avenue SE S1. Joseph, MN 56374 Notice of Public Improvement Hearing City of St. Joseph Notice his hereby given that the S1. Joseph City Council will meet at the S1. Joseph Community Fire Hall at 7:00 PM on March 7, 2007 to consider the milling and overlay of the following areas: Able Street between 10th AvenueSE and ih Avenue SE; 8th Avenue SE , Callaway Street between ihAvenueSEand 1zth Avenue SE; 9th Avenue SE south of East Baker Street; the intersection of Dale Street Eastandgth Avenue SE; .10th Avenue SE; 11th Avenue SE; Dale Street East from ih Avenue SE to 1zth Avenue SE and the entrance and parking area of Klinefelter Park as well as the Klinefelter Park Improvements pursuant to MN Statute 429.011. to 429.111. The estimated cost of the improvement is $ 600,000. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed improvement will be heard at this meeting. Judy Weyrens Administrator Publish: February 23, 2007 March 2, 2007 Proposed Assessment Worksheet 84-53475-078 Lot 4 Block 2 and undivided 1/20 interest in Lot 1 Block 6; Cloverdale Townhome Add 122 9th Avenue SE Rates: This section represents how the assessment for the above property is calculated.Theleftside~f this section identifies the specific streeUootage(s) for your property and the right side illustrates the proposed rates per lineal foot. Street Footaqe(s) Long side 6.85 (For long side - divide by 2) Assessment Rates Overlay (60%) $21.74/LF Reclaim (60%) $45.05/LF Short side 0.00 Assessment: This amount represents the amount the property above will be assessed for the 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project. Reclaim Overlay $154.29 $0.00 Total Assessment $154.29 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project - 42 -1- Elizabeth Doyle PO Box 365 St. Joseph, MN 56374 N()tice .ofPublic Iro.Pl'ovement Hearing City ofSt. Joseph Notice his . herebYi givell.. that. the ... St.Joseph . Gi1y.CoHncH wUL . meet. at the. St. Joseph Community 'fire Hall at 7:00PIVI()nMarch7, 2007 to consider the milling and. overlay of the followin~areas:AbleiStreetb~tll\leen 10th Ave~ueSEand 7th AvenueSE; athAvenue SE , Callall\lay.Str~e1. ~elll\f~en ..7th.f\venUe..SE..~nq .1fth .AvenueSE; ...~thAvenue..SE..south of East Baker Street;...theintersection()fP~le~t~eet.!:astan~@th..Av~nu~SE;..1oth ..f\~~nue SE; 11th A~enUEtSE;[)ale~treettastfrC)rn7tl1.A"enue SEto 12th .Av13nueS;Eand the entrance and parking area of .Klinefelter Parkas well as the. Klinefelter ParkJlTlprovelTlentspursuant to MN Statute 429.011 to 429.111. The estimated cost of the improvementis $ 600,000. Such persons as.desire to be heard with reference to the proposed ilTlprovementwillbe heard at this meeting. Judy Weyrens Administrator Publish: February 23, 2007 March 2, 2007 Proposed Assessment Worksheet 84-53475-079 Lot 1 Block 3 and undivided 1/20 interest in Lot 1 Block 6; Cloverdale Townhome Add 124 9th Avenue SE Rates: This section represents how the assessmenUor the above property is calculated. The left side of this section identifies the specific streetfootage(s) for your property and the right side illustrates the proposed rates perlinealfoot. Street FootaQe(s) Long side 6.a5 (For long side - divide by 2) Assessment. Rates Overlay (60%) $21.74/LF Reclaim (60%) $45.05/LF Short side 0.00 Assessment: This amount represents the amount the property above will be assessed for the 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project. . Reclaim Overlay $154.29 $0.00 Total Assessment $154.29 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project - 43 Sandra Bock 126 9th Avenue SE S1. Joseph, MN 56374 Notice of Public Improvement Hearing City of St. Joseph Notice his hereby given that the St. Joseph City Council will meet at the S1. Joseph Community Fire Hall at 7:00 PM on March 7, 2007 to consider the milling and overlay of the following areas: Able Street between 10th Avenue SEand7th Avenue SE; 8th Avenue SE , Callaway Street between 7th Avenue. SE and 1ih Avenue. SE;9th Avenue SE south of East Baker Street; the intersection of Dale Street East and 9th Avenue SE; 1 OthAvenue SE; 11th Avenue SE; Dale Street Eastfrom ih Avenue SE to 1ih AvenueSE and the entrance and parking area of Klinefelter Park as well as the Klinefelter Park Improvements pursuant to MN Statute 429.011 to 429.111. The estimated cost of the improvement is $ 600,000. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed improvement will be heard at this meeting. Judy Weyrens Administrator Publish: February 23, 2007 March 2, 2007 Proposed Assessment Worksheet 84-53475-080 Lot 2 Block 3 and undivided 1/20 interest in Lot 1 Block 6; Cloverdale Townhome Add 126 9th Avenue SE Rates: This section represents how the assessment for the above property is calculated. The leftside?fthis section identifies the specific street footage(s) for your property and the right side illustrates the proposed rates per lineal foot. Street Footaqe(s) Long side 6.85 (For long side - divide by 2) Assessment Rates Overlay (60%) $21.74/LF Reclaim (60%) $45.05/LF Short side 0.00 Assessment: This amount represents the amounttheproperty above will be assessed for the 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project. Reclaim Overlay $154.29 $0.00 Total Assessment $154.29 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project - 44 ,- Cdlleen Larson 1289th Avenue SE St. Joseph, MN 56374 NoticeofPubliClmero"ement Hearing Piwof .$f. Joseph Notice his here~y given that the St. Joseph City Council will meet at the St. Joseph Community Fire Hall at 7:00 PM on March 7, 2007 to consider the milling and overlay of the following areas: Able Street between 10th Avenue SE and ih Avenue SE; 8th Avenue SE I Callaway Street between ihAvenue SE and .12th Avenue SE; 9th Avenue SE. south of East Baker Street;. the intersection of. Dale Street East and 9th Avenue SE; '10th Avenue SE; 11 th Avenue SE; Dale Street East from ih Avenue SE to 12th Avenue SE and the entrance and parking area of Klinefelter Park as well as the Klinefelter Park Improvements pursuant to MN Statute 429.011 to 429.111. The estimated' cost of the improvement is $ 600,000. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed improvement will be heard at this meeting. Judy Weyrens Administrator Publish: February 23, 2007 March 2, 2007 Proposed Assessment Worksheet 84-53475-081 Lot 3 Block 3 and undivided 1/20 interest inlot 1 Block 6; Cloverdale Townhome Add 128 9th Avenue SE Rates: This section represents how the assessment for the above property is calculated. The left side oUhis section identifiesthespecificstreeUootage(s.)for your property and the. right s.ide illustrates the proposed rates per lineal foot. Street Footaae(s) Long side 6.85 (For long side - divide by 2) Assessment Rates Overlay (60%) $21.74/LF Reclaim (60%) $45.05/LF Short side 0.00 Assessment: This amount represents the amount the property above will be assessed forthe 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project. Reclaim Overlay $154.29 $0.00 Total Assessment $154.29 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project - 45 Deborah Ann Reber 130 9th Avenue SE St. Joseph, MN 56374 Notice of Public Improvement Hearing City of St. Joseph Notice his hereby given that the St. Joseph City Council will meet at the St. Joseph Community Fire Hall at 7:00 PM on March 7, 2007 to consider the milling and overlay of the following areas: AbleStreetbetween10thAvenueSEand thAvenue SE; 8th Avenue SE , Callaway Street between 7th Avenue SE and 1ih Avenue SE;9th Avenue SE south of East Baker Street; the intersection of Dale Street East and 9th AvenueSE; 10th Avenue SE; 11th Avenue SE; Dale Street East from th Avenue SE t01ih Avenue SE and the entrance and parking area of Klinefelter Park as welL as the Klinefelter Park Improvements pursuant to MN Statute 429.011 to 429.111. The estimated costof the improvement is $ 600,000. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed improvement will be heard at this meeting. Judy Weyrens Administrator Publish: February 23, 2007 March 2, 2007 Proposed Assessment Worksheet 84-53475-082 Lot 4 Block 3 and undivided 1/20 interest in Lot 1 Block 6; Cloverdale Townhome Add 130 9th Avenue SE Rates:Thissection.represents how the assessment for the above property is calculated. The left side of this section identifies the specific streetfootage(s) for your property and the rightside illustrates the proposed rates per lineal foot. Street Footaqe(s) Long side 6.85 (For long side - divide by 2) Assessment Rates Overlay (60%) $21.7 4/LF Reclaim (60%) $45.05/LF Short side 0.00 Assessment: This amount represents the amountthe property above will be assessed for the 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project. Reclaim Overlay $154.29 $0.00 Total Assessment $154.29 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project - 46 Tom & Amy Gerads 132 9th Avenue SE St. Joseph, MN 56374 Notice .01 Publ.iclmprc)V'ement Hearing City of St. Joseph Notice. . .his <hereby given that the St. <.Joseph . City Council win. m.eetat the. St. Joseph Community Fire. ... Hall~t 7:00 PM on . March.. 7, 2007 to. considertheruillingand overlay of the following areas: AbleStreetb7~7en10th A\lenu7S~and. ih Avenue SE;ath . Avenue SE , Callaway Streetbetvveel'lzth,A.venUe~E~nd12thJ.\venU~BE;9thAVElnue BE south of East Baker Street;t~eint~rsecti()~iof8~le~tr~~t'3~st~n9~th.,A.\l7QU7. 81;;.1 oth,A.venueSE; 11th Aven~e..<SE; <. D.aleStreet.EastJrOr1"7th,A."enu7~E t~ .12th..AV~llue...SEand.. thElentrance and parkil,garea of Klinefelter Park as well as the Klinefelter Park Improvernents pursuant to MN Statute 429.01tto 429.111... Thee~timated cost of the improvement is $600,000. Such per~ons >as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed il1'lprovement will be heard at this meeting. Judy Weyrens Administrator Publish: February 23, 2007 March 2, 2007 Proposed Ass~ssment Worksheet 84-53475-083 Lot 1 Block 4 and undivided 1/20 interest in Lot 1 Block 6; Cloverdale Townhome Add 1329th AvenueSE Rates: This section represents how the assessment for the above property is calculated. The left side of this section identifies the specific street footage(s) for your property and the right side illustrates the proposed rates per lineal foot. Street Footaae(s) Long side 6.85 (For long side - divide by 2) Assessment Rates Overlay (60%) $21.74/LF Reclaim (60%) $45.05/LF Short side 0.00 Assessment: This amount represents the amount the property above will be assessed for the 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project. Reclaim Overlay $154.29 $0.00 Total Assessment $154.29 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project - 47 Mark & Devona Emerson 134 9th Avenue SE St. Joseph, MN 56374 Notice of Public Improvement Hearing City of St. Joseph Notice his. hereby given that the St. Joseph City Council will meet at the St. Joseph Community Fire Hall. at 7:00 PM on March 7, 2007 to consider the milling and. overlay of the following .areas: Able Street between .10th Avenue SEand ih AvenueSE; 8th Avenue SE , CaUawayStreet between 7th. Avenue SEand 12th Avenue SE;9th Avenue SE south of East Baker Street; the intersection of Dale Street East and 9th Avenue.SE; 10th Avenue SE; 11th Avenue SE; Dale Street East from ih Avenue SE to 1ih AvenueSE and the entrance and parking area of Klinefelter Park as well as the Klinefelter Park Improvements pursuant to MN Statute 429.011 to 429.111. The estimated cost of the improvement is $ 600,000. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed improvement will be heard at this meeting. Judy Weyrens Administrator Publish: February 23, 2007 March 2, 2007 Proposed Assessment Worksheet 84-53475-084 Lot 2 Block 4 and undivided 1/20 interest in Lot 1 Block 6; Cloverdale Townhome Add 134 9th Avenue SE Rates: This section represents how the assessment for the above property is calculated. The left side of this section identifies the specific street footage(s) for your property and the right side illustrates the proposed rates per lineal foot. Street Footaqe(s) Long side 6.85 (For long side - divide by 2) Assessment Rates Overlay (60%) $21.74/LF Reclaim (60%) $45.05/LF Short side 0.00 Assessment: This amount represents the amount the property above will be assessed for the 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project. Reclaim Overlay $154.29 $0.00 Total Assessment $154.29 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project - 48 Micheal MUrphy 1369th Avenue SE St. Joseph, MN 56374 Notice ofPubli.cll11provement Hearing . City of St. Joseph Notice his hereby . given . that the. .StJos~ph..City....Council will.. meet at the . St. JosElph GommunityFire HaUat7:00 PMonMarch],200yto.c9nsider the milling and overlay of the foUov.tingareas: . Able Streetpetween1 01h A\fenue SEand .ihAvenueSE;81hAvenue SE , Gallaway Streetbetween]1h~venue~Sandt21hAVElnUe$E;.~thAver1UeSssouth of East Baker Street; .theintersectioli.otpaleStreetEast and. .91h.AvenueSE;;.101hA~~nue .SE; 111h Avenue SE;Dale StreetEastfromz1hAvenue8Etcr121h,A,vElnueSE<andfhE;lentrance and . parking area ofKlinefelterPar~aswellastheKJinefelter park Improvernerttspursuant to MN Statute 429.011 to 429.111. The estimated cost of the improvement is $.600,000. Such persons .as desire. to be fteard with reference to the proposed improvement will be heard at this meeting.. Judy Weyrens Administrator Publish: February 23, 2007 March 2, 2007 Proposed Assessment Worksheet 84-53475-085 Lot 3 Block 4 and undivided 1/20 interest in Lot 1 Block 6; Cloverdale Townhome Add 136 9th AvenueSE Rates: This section represents how the assessment for the above pr9pertY is calculated. The left side of this section identifies the specific street footCige{s) for your property and the right side illustrates the proposed . rates per lineal Joot. Street Footaae(s) Long side 6.85 (For long side - divide by 2) Assessment Rates Overlay (60%) $21..74/LF Reclaim (60%) $45.05/LF Short side 0.00 Assessment: This amount represents the amount the property above will be assessed for the 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project. . . Reclaim Overlay $154.29 $0.00 Total Assessment $154.29 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project - 49 Nick & Barbara Heltemes 138 9th Avenue SE St. Joseph, MN 56374 Notice of PUblic Improvement Hearing City of St. Joseph Notice his hereby given thattheSt. Joseph City Council will meet at the St. Joseph CommunityFire Hall at 7:00 PMon March 7,2007 to consider the milling and overlay of the following areas: Able Street between 10thAvenue SEand. 7'h Avenue SE;8th Avenue SE , Callaway Stre.et between 7'h Avenue SE and 12th Avenue SE; 9th Avenue SE south of East Baker Street; the intersectionoLDaleStreet East and 9th Avenue SE; 10th Avenue SE; 11th Avenue SE; Dale Street Eastfrom 7'hAvenue SE to 12th Avenue SE and the entrance and parking area of Klinefelter Parkas well as the Klinefelter Park Improvements pursuant to MN Statute 429.011 to 429.111. The estimated cost of the improvement is $ 600,000. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed improvement will be heard at this meeting. Judy Weyrens Administrator Publish: February 23, 2007 March 2, 2007 Proposed Assessment Worksheet 84-53475-086 Lot 4 Block 4 and undivided 1/20 interest in Lot 1 Block 6; CloverdaleTownhome Add 138 9th Avenue SE Rates: This section represents how the assessment for theabovepropeqy is calculated. The left side .of this section identifies the specific street footage(s) for your property and the right side illustrates the proposed rates per lineal foot. Street Footaqe(s) Long side 6.85 (For long side - divide by 2) Assessment Rates Overlay (60%) $21.74/LF Reclaim (60%) $45.05/LF Short side 0.00 Assessment: This amollntrepresents the amount the property above will be assessed for the 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project. Reclaim Overlay $154.29 $0.00 Total Assessment $154.29 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project - 50 Sarah Klinnert 140 9th Avenue SE St. Joseph, MN 56374 Notice of Publi~JmprO'l~ment Hearing City of St. Joseph Notice his hereby giventhattheSt. Jos~ph .City<.Council will .meetaLtheSt. Joseph Community Fire HaIIat..7:00 PMon March.7,.2007to.considerthe milliqgandoverlay of the foUowingareas:AbleStreetb~tween10th ,l\venueSEano th Avenue. SE;.8thAvenue SE , Callaway Str~etbet'Neen ...ih~venue.$Eand 12th.,l\venUeSE;..~thAvenueSI;s()uth of East BakerStreet;theint~r~ection.of D~leStf~et~~stand ..9thf\'1E:lnU~SE;<....19tr~'1E:lnue $E; 11th AvenueSE; Dale. Street~ast fr()mih ;AyenuEl SEto12th AVE;mu~SEa~cLth~entrance and parking area of Klinefelter Par'kEls well. as the.Klinefelter Park .lmprove.'1lentspursuant to MN Statute 429.011 to 42~.111.The estimat~d coslof the improvementis $60P,OOO. Such person~asdesire to be heard with reference tp the. proposed i'1lprove'TJentwillbe heard at this meeting. . Judy Weyrens Administrator Publish: February 23, 2007 March 2, 2007 PrOp()sed. .~ssess.ll1e.nt Worksheet 84-53475-087 Lot 1 Block 5and undivided 1/20 interest in Lot 1 Block 6; Cloverdale Townhome Add 140 9th Avenue SE Rates: This section represents how the assessment for theaboveproper1y is calculated. The leftsideof this section identifies the specificstreetfootC'lge(s) for your property and the . rightsideUlustratestheproposedrates per lineal foot. Street Footaae(s) Long side 6.85 (For long side - divide by 2) Assessment RateS Overlay (60%) $21.74/LF Reclaim (60%) $45.05/LF Short side 0.00 Assessment: This amount represents the amount the property above wilLbeassessed for the 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay.Project. Reclaim Overlay $154.29 $0.00 Total Assessment $154.29 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project - 51 Jason & Paula Bloch 142 9th Avenue SE S1. Joseph, MN 56374 Notice of Public Improvement Hearing City of St. Joseph Notice his hereby given that the 81. Joseph City Council will meet at the S1. Joseph Community Fire Hall at 7:00 PM on March 7, 2007 to consider the milling and overlay of the following areas: Able Street between 10th Avenue..SE and ih Avenue SE; 8th Avenue SE , Callaway Street between ih Avenue SE and 1ih Avenue SE;9th Avenue SEsouth of East Baker Street; the intersectionbf DaleStreetEast and 9th AvenueSE; 10th Avenue SE; 11th Avenue SE; Dale Street East fromih Avenue SE to 1ih Avenue SE and the entrance and parking area of Klinefelter Park as well as the Klinefelter Park Improvements pursuant to MN Statute 429.011 to 429.111. The estimated cost of the improvement is $ 600,000. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed improvement will be heard at this meeting. Judy Weyrens Administrator Publish: February 23, 2007 March 2, 2007 Proposed Assessment Worksheet 84-53475-088 Lot 2 Block 5 and undivided 1/20 interest in Lot 1 Block 6; Cloverdale Townhome Add 142 9th Avenue SE Rates: This section represents how the assessment for the above property is calculated~ The left side ofthissection identif.i.esthe specific street footage(s) for your property and the right side illustrates the proposed rates per lineal foot. . Street Footaqe(s) Long side 6.85 (For long side - divide by 2) Assessment Rates Overlay (60%) $21.74/LF Reclaim (60%) $45.05/LF Short side 0.00 Assessment: This amount represents the amount the property above.will be assessed for the 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project. Reclaim Overlay $154.29 $0.00 Total Assessment $154.29 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project - 52 David Schramel 144 9th Avenue SE St. Joseph, MN 56374 Notice Qf.Public.lmprovement Hearing City of St. Joseph Notice his..herepy givefl...thatthe. St.....Joseph City..Coyncil wiHmeet.at the.St. Joseph COrn.murlityFire Hallat}:OORM()n March..!,2007to.considerthemillingandoverlay of the following areas: Able Street between 10th AvenueSEand ihAver'lueSE;8thAvenue SE , 9allaway. Street between thAvef1ueSr: jand1 gth AvenueSE;9th Avenue. 5E:SQuth of East B~ke~ . Street;.j the.inters~ction..ofpale.9trt::etr:ast.and~1~...AyenLJe..SE;.JpthAyenue SE; 11 th AyenueSE; Da.leStreet Eastfr()rn7~h.A"enueSE to ..12thA,venue 5Eand thEtentrance and parking area of Klinefelter ParKas well as the . KI.inefelter ParK Improvements pursuant to MN Statute 429.011 to. 429.t11. Theestimateq cost of the improvement is $ 6.00,000. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed irTlprovement will be heard at this meeting. Judy Weyrens Administrator Publish: February 23, 2007 March 2, 2007 Proposed Assessm~nt Worksheet 84-53475-089 Lot 3 Block 5 and undivided 1/20 interest in Lot 1 BlOCK 6; Cloverdale Townhome Add 144 9th Avenue SE Rates: This section represents how the assessment for the above propertyis calculated. The left side ofthissection identifies the specific street footage(~) for your property and the right side illustrates the proposed rates per Iinealfoot. Street Footaae(s) Long side 6.85 (For long side - divide by 2) Assessment Rates Overlay (60%) $21.74/LF Reclaim (60%)$45.05/LF Short side 0.00 Assessment: Thisamountrepresents the amount the property above will be assessed for the 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project. Reclaim Overlay $154.29 $0.00 Total Assessment $154.29 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project - 53 Howard Pierskalla 146 9th Avenue SE St. Joseph, MN 56374 Notice of Public Improvement Hearing CityofSt. Joseph Notice his. hereby given that the St. Joseph City. Council will meet at the St. Joseph Community Fire Hall at 7:00. PM on March 7, 2007 to consider the milling and overlay of the following ~reas: Able Street between 10th Avenue SE and ih Avenue SE; ath Avenue SE , Call~way Street betweenihAvenue SE and 12th AvenueSE; 9thAvenueSE south of East Baker Street; the intersection of Dale Street East and 9th Avenue SE;1 oth Avenue SE; 11th Avenue SE; Dale Street East from ihAvenue SE to tih Avenue SE and the entrance and parking area of Klinefelter Park as well as the Klinefelter Park Improvements pursuant to MN Statute 429.011 to 429.111. The estimated cost of the im.provement is $ 600,000. Such persons as .desire to be. heard with reference to the proposed improvement will be heard at this meeting. Judy Weyrens Administrator Publish: February 23, 2007 March 2, 2007 Proposed Assessl11ent Worksheet a4-53475~090 LetA Bleck 5 and undivided 1/20 interest in Let1Block 6; Cloverdale Townhome Add 146 9th Avenue SE Rates: This section represents how the assessment for the above property is calculated. Theleftsideofthissection identifies the specific street footage(s) for your property and the right side illustrates the proposed rates per lineal foot. Street Footaae(s) Long side 6.85 (For long side - divide by 2) Assessment Rates Overlay (60%) $2174/LF Reclaim (60%) $45.05/LF Short side 0.00 Assessment: This amount represents the amounttheproperty above will be assessed for the 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project. Reclaim Overlay $154.29 $0.00 Total Assessment $154.29 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project - 54 Cloverdale Properties PO Box 404 SarteH, MN 56377 Nptice.ofPui)llclmprov.ement Hearing CityofSt. Joseph Notice his hereby given that the St. Joseph City Council will meet at the St. Joseph Community Fire Hall at 7:00 PM on March 7, 2007 to consider the milling and overlay of the following areas: Able Street between 1 dth Avenue SE and thAvenue SE; 8th Avenue SE , Callaway Street between ihAveriue SE and 1ihAvenue SE;9th Avenue SE south of East Baker Street; the intersection of Dale Street East and 9th Avenue SE; 10th Avenue SE; 11th Avenue SE; Dale Street East from ih Avenue SE to 1zth Avenue SE and the entrance and parking area of Klinefelter Park as well as the Klinefelter Park Improvements pursuant to MN Statute 429:011 to 429.111. The estimated cost of the improvement is $ 600,000. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed improvement will be heard at this meeting. . Judy Weyrens Adrninistrator Publish: February 23, 2007 March 2, 2007 Proposeci Assessl11entWorksheet 84-53475-004 Lot 1 Block 8; Cloverdale Estates 2nd Add 904 Baker Street E Rates:. This section represents how the assessmenUorthe above.properl:Y is calculated. The left side of this section identifies the specific streetfootage(s) for your property and the right side illustrates the proposedrates.per lineal foot. Street Footaae(s) Long side 0.00 (For long side - divide by 2) Assessment Rates Overlay (60%) $21.74/LF Reclaim (60%) $45.05/LF Short side 126.18 Assessment:. This amount represents the amount the property above will be assessed for the 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project. Reclaim Overlay $0.00 $2,743.32 Total Assessment $2,743.32 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project - 55 Christine Long 207 9th Avenue SE St. Joseph, MN 56374 Notice.of PUblic Improvement Hearing City of St. Joseph Notice his hereby. given that the .. St. Joseph City Council will meet at the St. Joseph Community Fire Hall at 7:00 PM on March 7, 2007 to consider the milling and overlay of the following areas: Abl.e. Street betWeen 1 Oth Avenue SE and ih Avenue SE; 8th Avenue SE , Callaway Street betweenthAvenue SE and tih Avenue SE; 9th Avenue SE south of East Baker Street; the intersection of Dale Street EasLand 9th Avenue SE; 10th Avenue SE; 11th Avenue SE; . Dale Street East from 7th Avenue SE to 1 ih Avenue SE and the entrance and parking area of Klinefelter Park as well as the Klinefelter Park Improvements pursuant to MN Statute 429.011 to 429.111. The estimated cost of the improvement is $ 600,000. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed improvement will be heard at this meeting. Judy Weyrens Administrator Publish: February 23, 2007 March 2,2007 Proposed Assessment Worksheet 84-53475-015 Lot 1 Block 1; Cloverdale Estates 3rd Add 207 9th Avenue SE Rates: This sectionrepresentshowtheassessmentfor the above property is calculated. Theleftsid~ofthissection identifies the specific street footage(s) for your property and the right side illustrates the proposed rates per lineal foot. Street Footaae(s) Long side 0.00 (For long side - divide by 2) Assessment Rates Overlay (60%) $21.7 4/LF Reclaim (60%) $45.05/LF Short side 162.77 Assessment: This amount represents theamounUhe property above will be assessed for the 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project. Reclaim Overlay $0.00 $3,539.00 Total Assessment $3,539.00 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project - 56 J.oyce Richter 805 Callaway Street E St. Joseph, MN 56374 Notice.of Public Improvement Hearing City of St. Joseph Notice his hereby given that the. St. Joseph City Council will meet at the St. Joseph Community Fire. Hall at 7:00 PM on March 7, 2007 to consider the milling and overlay of the following areas: Able Street between 10th Avenue SE and ih Avenue SE; 8th Avenue SE , Callaway Street between 7~h Avenue SE and 12th Avenue SE;9th Avenue SE south of East Saker Street; the intersection of Dale Street East and 9th Avenue SE; 10th Avenue SE; 11th Avenue SE; Dale Street East from ih Avenue SE to 12th Avenue SEand the entrance and parking area of Klinefelter Parkas well as the Klinefelter Park Improvements pursuant to MN Statute 429:011 to 429.111. The estimated cost of the improvement is $ 600,000. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed improvement will be heard at this meeting. Judy Weyrens Administrator Publish: February 23, 2007 March 2, 2007 .Proposed Assessment Worksheet 84-53475-016 Lot 2 Block 1; Cloverdale Estates 3rd Add 850 Callaway Street E Rates: This section represents how the assessment for the above property is calculated. The left side of this section identifies the specific street footage(s) for your prope.;y and the right side illustrates the proposed rates per lineal foot. Street Footaae(s) Long side 13.3.19 (For long side - divide by 2) Assessment Rates Overlay (60%) $21.74/LF Reclaim (60%) $45.05/LF Short side 99.99 Assessment: This amount represents the amount the propeliY above Will be assessed for the 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project. Reclaim Overlay $0.00 $3,621.77 Total Assessment $3,621.77 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project - 57 Jerome & Lucilia Guerrero 206 9th Avenue SE St. Joseph, MN 56374 Notice of Public. Improvement Hearing City of St. Joseph Notice. his ... hereby. given that.. the. St. Joseph. City Council wfll meet at the St. Joseph Community Fire Hall at 7.:00 PM on [V1arch 7,2007 tocol1sider the milling and overlay of the following areas: Able. Street between 10th AvenueSEand ih Avenue SE;8th Avenue SE , Callaway Street between 7th Avenue SE and1ih Avenue SE; 9th Avenue SE south of East Baker Street; the intersection of Dale Street East and 9th Avenue SE;1 oth Avenue SE; 11th Avenue SE; Dale Street East from ih Avenue. SE to 12th Avenue SE and the entrance and parking area of Klinefelter Park as well as the Klinefelter Park Improvements pursuant to MN Statute 429.011 to 429.111. The . estimated cost of the improvement is $ 600,000. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed improvement will be heard at this meeting. Judy Weyrens Administrator Publish: February 23, 2007 March 2, 2007 Proposed Assessment Worksheet 84-53475-017 Lot 1 Block 2; Cloverdale Estates 3rd Add 206 9th Avenue SE Rates: This section represents howtheassessmel1t for the above property is calculated. The left side of this section identifies the specific street footage(s} for your property and the right side illustrates the proposed rates per lineal foot. Street Footaae(s) Long side 0.00 (For long side - divide by 2) Assessment Rates Overlay (60%) $21.74/LF Reclaim (60%) $45.05/LF Short side 101.43 Assessment: This amount represents the amountthe property above will be assessed for the 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project. Reclaim Overlay $0.00 $2,205.36 Total Assessment $2,205.36 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project - 58 I - Adam & Crystal Boettcher 210 9th Avenue SE St. Joseph, MN 56374 Notic:e.ofPubliclrnprovernent Hearing CiwofSt. Joseph Notice his hereby given that the St. Joseph City Council will meet at the St. Joseph Community Fire Hall at 7:00 PM on March 7, 2007 to consider the milling and overlay of the following areas: Able Street between 10th Avenue SE anq ih Avenue SE; 8th Avenue SE , Callaway Street between. ihAvenueSE and 12'h Avenue SE; 9th Avenue SE south of East Baker Street;. the intersection of Dale Street East and 9th Avenue SE; 10th Avenue SE; 11 th Avenue SE; Dale Street East from ih Avenue SE to 12th Avenue SE and the entrance and parking area of Klinefelter Park as well as the Klinefelter Park Improvements pursuant to MN Statute 429.011 to 429.111. The estimated cost of the improvement is $ 600,000. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed improvement will be heard at this meeting. Judy Weyrens Administrator Publish: February 23, 2007 March 2, 2007 Proposed Assessment Worksheet 84-53475-018 Lot 2 Block 2; Cloverdale Estates 3rd Add 210 9th Avenue SE Rates: This section represents how the assessment for theaboveproperl;y is calculated. The left side of this section identifies the specific street footage(s) for your properl;yand the right side illustrates the proposed rates per lineal foot. Street Footaae(s) Long side 127.98 (For long side - divide by 2) Assessment Rates Overlay (60%) $21.74/LF Reclaim (60%) $45.05/LF Short side 125.81 Assessment: This amount represents the amount the properl;y abovewUlbeassessed for the 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project. Reclaim Overlay $0.00 $4,126.70 Total Assessment $4,126.70 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project - 59 Amber Jo Mrosla 907 Callaway Street E St. Joseph, MN 56374 Notice of Public Improvement Hearing City of St. Joseph Notice his hereby given that the St.Joseph City Council will meet at the St. Joseph Community Fire Hall at 7: 00 PM on March 7, 2007 to considerthe milling and overlay of the following areas: Able Street between 10th AvenueSEand ih AvenueSE;8th Avenue SE , Callaway Street between 7'h Avenue SE and12'h Avenue SE;9th Avenue SEsouth of East Baker Street;. the intersection of Dale Street East and 9th Avenue SE; 10th Avenue SE; 11th Avenue SE; Dale Street East from 7th Avenue SE t612th Avenue SEand the entrance and parking area of Klinefelter Park asweH as the Klinefelter Park Improvements pursuant to MN Statute 429.011 to 429.111. The estimated cost of the improvement is $ 600,000. Such persons. as desire to be. heard With reference to the proposed improvement will. be heard at this meeting. Judy Weyrens Administrator Publish: February 23, 2007 March 2, 2007 Proposed Assessment Worksheet 84-53475-019 Lot 3 Block 2; Cloverdale Estates 3rd Add 907 Callaway Street E Rates: This section represents howtheassessmentforthe above property is calculated. The left side of this section identifies the specific streetfootage(s) for your property and the right sideUlustrates the proposed rates per lineal foot. Street Footaqe(s) Long side 0.00 (For long side - divide by 2) Assessment Rates Overlay (60%) $21.74/LF Reclaim (60%) $45.05/LF Short side 109.99 Assessment: This amount represents the amount the property above will be assessed for the 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project. Reclaim Overlay $0.00 $2,391.42 Total Assessment $2,391.42 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project - 60 Jerry Hechtel 911 Callaway Street E St. Joseph, MN 56374 No.ticeofPubllc illt'lprOVement Hearing City of St. Joseph Notice his hereby given that theSt.Joseph City Council will meet at the St. Joseph Community Fire Heill at 7:.0.0 PM on March 7, 2.0.07 to consider the milling and. overlay of the following areas: Able Street between 1.oth Avenue SE and ih Avenue SE; 8th Avenue SE I Callaway Street between ih Avenue SE and 1 ih Avenue SE; 9th Avenue SE south of East Baker Street; the intersection of Dale Street East and 9th Avenue.BE; 1.oth Av~nue SE; 11th Avenue SE; Dale Street East from ih Avenue SE to 1th Avenue SE and the entrance and parking area of Klinefelter Parkas well as the Klinefelter Park Improvements pursuant to MN Statute 429..011 to 429.111. The estimated cost of the improvement is $ 6.0.0,.0.0.0. Such persons as desire lobe heard with reference to -the proposed improvement will be heard at this meeting. Judy Weyrens Administrator Publish: February 23,2.0.07 March 2, 2.0.07 Proposed Assessment Worksheet 84-53475-.02.0 Lot 4 Block 2; Cloverdale Estates 3rd Add 911 Callaway Street E Rates: This section represents how the assessment for theaboveprope/1yis calculated. The left side of this section identifies the speclfic street fo.otage(s) for your property and t~eright side illustrates the proposed rates per lineal foot. Street Footaae(s) Long side .0..0.0 (For long side - divide by 2) Assessment Rates Overlay (6.o0/0) $21.74/LF Reclaim (6.0%) .$45..o5/LF Short side 8.0..0.0 Assessment: This amount represents the amount the property above will be assessed for the 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project. Reclaim Overlay $.0..0.0 $1,739.34 Total Assessment $1,739.34 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project - 61 Kathy Stromberg 1001 Callaway Street E St. Joseph, MN 56374 Notice of Public Improvement Hearing City of St. Joseph Notice his hereby given that the St. Joseph City Council will meet at the St. Joseph Community Fire Hall at 7:00PM on March 7, 2007 to consider the milling and overlay of the following areas: Abl.e Street between 10th Avenue SE and ih Avenue SE; SthAvenue SE , Callaway Street between 7th Avenue SEand 12th Avenue SE;9th AvenueSE south of East Baker Street; the .. intersection of Dale Street East and 9th Avenue SE; 10th Avenue SE; 11 th Avenue SE; Dale Street East from ih Avenue SE to 12th Avenue SE and the entrance and parking area of Klinefelter Parkas well as the Klinefelter Park Improvements pursuant to MN Statute 429.011 to 429.111. The estimated cost of the improvement is $600,000. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed improvement will be heard at this meeting. Judy Weyrens Administrator Publish: February 23, 2007 March 2, 2007 Proposed Assessment Worksheet S4-53475-021 Lot 5 Block 2; Cloverdale Estates 3rd Add 1001 Callaway Street E Rates: This section represents how the assessment for the above property is calculated. The left side of this section identifies the specific street footage(s) for your property and the right side illustrates the. proposed rates per lineal foot. Street Footaqe(s) Long side 0.00 (For long side - divide by 2) Assessment Rates Overlay (60%) $21.74/LF Reclaim (60%) $45.05/LF Short side SO.OO Assessment: This amount represents the amount the property above will be assessed for the 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project. Reclaim Overlay $0.00 $1,739.41 Total Assessment $1,739.41 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project - 62 Bryan & Michelle Allen 1003 Callaway Street E S1. Joseph, MN 56374 Notice Of Public Inlprovenlent Hearing City of St. Joseph Notice.:. his hereby given . that.. .theSt, . Joseph.iCity ..Council wil.1 meet at. the S1. Joseph Community Fire Hall at . 7:00 PM on March 7 , . 2007 to. consider therniHiqg and.over1ay of the following. areas: Able Street:between 10th AV(3nueSEand 7th.. AvenueSE;8thAvenue SE., CaUavvayStreetbetweell7~hAvenueSE <and1.?th AvenueSE;~th AV(3nueS.~.south of East Baker Street; the intersection of [>ale Street~astand9thAyenU(3.SE;.10th AV6;nue SE; 11 th AyenueSE;Dale. Stre.etEastfr()mihAvenueSEto12th A\lenu~.SE:andtheentrance and parking area. of Klinefelter Park aSilNell as the Klinefelter ParKll"l'lprovernentspursuant to MN Statute 429.011 .to429.111. . The. estimated cost:. of the ill1provementis. $600,000. Such persons as desire to be. heard with reference to the proposed improvement wilLbe heard at this meeting. Judy Weyrens Administrator Publish: February 23, 2007 March 2, 2007 Proposed Assessment Worksheet 84-53475~022 Lot 6 Block 2; Cloverdale Estates 3rd Add 1003 Callaway Street E Rates: This section represents how the assessment for theabovepropertyjs calculated. The left side of this section identifies thespecificstreetfoo~ag~(s) for your property and the right side iUustratesthe proposed .rates perlineaUool. Street FootaQe(s) Long side 0.00 (For long side - divide by 2) Assessment Rates Overlay (60%) $21.7 4/LF Reclaim (60%) $45,05/LF Short side 80.01 Assessment: This amount represents the amount the property above willbe assessed for the 2007 East SideMiU & Overlay Project. Reclaim Overlay $0.00 $1,739.45 Total Assessment $1,739.45 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project - 63 Mary Binsfeld 1005 Callaway Street E St. Joseph, MN 56374 Notice of Public Improvement Hearing City of5t. Joseph Notice his hereby given that the St. Joseph City Council will meet at the St. Joseph Community Fire Hall at 7:00 PM on March 7, 2007 to consider the milling and overlay of the following areas: Able Street between 10th Avenue SEand ih Avenue SE; 8th Avenue SE , Callaway Street between th Avenue SE and 12'h Avenue SE;9th AvenueSE south of East Baker Street; the intersection of Dale Street East and 9th Avenue SE;10th Avenue SE; 11th AvenueSE; Dale Street Eastfrom ihAvenue SE to 12th Avenue SE and the entrance and parking area of Klinefelter Park as well as the Klinefelter Park Improvements pursuant to MN Statute 429.011 to 429.111. The estimated cost of the improvement is $ 600,000. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed improvement will be heard at this meeting. Judy Weyrens Administrator Publish: February 23, 2007 March 2, 2007 Proposed Assessment Worksheet 84-53475-023 Lot 7 Block 2; Cloverdale Estates 3rd Add 1005 Callaway Street E Rates: This section represents how the assessment for the above property is calculated. The left side of this section identifies the specificstreetfootage(s) for your property and the right side illustrates the proposed rates per lineal foot. Street Footaqe(s) Long side 0.00 (For long side - divide by 2) Assessment. Rates Overlay (60%) $21.74/LF Reclaim (60%) $45.05/LF Short side 79.99 Assessment: This amount represents the amount the property above will be assessed for the 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project. Reclaim Overlay $0.00 $1,739.15 Total Assessment $1,739.15 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project - 64 Paul & Karen Walgren 1007 Callaway Street E St. Joseph, MN 56374 ~oticeofPublic Impro.vement Hearing CiwofSt. Joseph Notice his hereby given that the St. Joseph City Council will meet at the St. Joseph Community Fire Hall at 7:00 PM on March 7, 2007 to consider the milling and overlay of the following areas: Able Street between 10th Avenue SE and ih Avenue S.E; 8th Avenue SE , Callaway Street between ih Avenue SE and .1ih Avenue SE; 9th Avenue SE south of East Baker Street; the intersection of Dale Street East and 9th Avenue SE; 10th Avenue SE; 11th Avenue SE; Dale Street East from ih AvenueSE to 12th Avenue SE and the entrance and parking area of Klinefelter Park as well as the Klinefelter Park Improvements pursuant to MN Statute 429.011 to 429.111. The estimated cost of the improvement is $ .600,000. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed improvement will be heard at this meeting. Judy Weyrens Administrator Publish: February 23, 2007 March 2, 2007 Proj)oli5.~d .Ali5ses.li5mellt Worksheet 84-53475-024 Lot 8 Block 2; Cloverdale Estates 3rd Add 1007 Callaway Street E Rates: This section represents how the assessmenUortheab()ve pr9pertY!li5 calculated. The left side oUhis section identifies the specificstreeUootCJge(s) for your property and the right side illustrates the proposed rates. per lineal foot: Street F ootaoe( s ) Long side 0.00 (For long side - divide by 2) Assessment Rates Overlay(60%)$21.74/LF Reclaim (60%) $45.05/LF Short side 81.20 Assessment: This amount represents the amount the .propertyabove will be assessed for the 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project. Reclaim Overlay $0.00 $1,765.35 Total Assessment $1,765.35 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project - 65 Katherine Meyer 1101 Callaway Street E S1. Joseph, MN 56374 Notice of Public Improvement Hearing City of St. Joseph Notice his hereby . given that the S1.Joseph City Council will meet at the S1. Joseph Community Fire Hall at 7:00 PM on March 7, 2007 to consider the milling and overlay of the following areas: Able Street between 10th Avenue.SEand ih AvenueSE; sth Avenue SE , Callaway Street betweerr ih AvenueSEand12'h Avenue SE;9th Avenue SE south of East Baker Street; the intersection of Dale Street East and 9th Avenue SE; 10th Avenue SE; 11th AvenueSE; Dale Street East from ih Avenue SE to 12'h Avenue SE and the entrance and parking area of Klinefelter Park as well as the Klinefelter Park Improvements pursuant to MN Statute 429,011 to 429.111. . The estimated cost of the improvement is $ 600,000. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed improvement will be heard at this meeting. Judy Weyrens Administrator Publish: February 23, 2007 March 2, 2007 Proposed Assessrnent Worksheet S4~5347 5~025 Lot 9 Block 2; CloverdaleEstates 3rd Add 1101 Callaway Street E Rates: This section represents how theassessmtmt for the above property is calculated. The left side of this secti.on identifies the specific street footage(s) for your property and the right side illustrates the proposed rates per lineal foot. Street Footaqe(s) Long side 0.00 (Forlong side - divide by 2) Assessment Rates Overlay (60%) $21.74/LF Reclaim (60%) $45.05/LF Short side SO.OO Assessment: This amount represents the amounfthe.property above will. be assessed for the 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project. Reclaim Overlay $0.00 $1,739.34 Total Assessment $1,739.34 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project - 66 -- I Steven & Cheryl Doose 1103 Callaway Street E St. Joseph, MN 5.6374 Notice of Public Improvement Hearing City of St. Joseph Notice his hereby given that the St. Joseph City Council will meet at the St. Joseph Community Fire Hall at 7:.0.0 PM on March 7, 2007 to consider the milling and overlay of the following areas: Able Street between -10th Avenue SE and ih Avenue SE; 8th Avenue SE , Callaway Street between 7th Avenue SE and 1ih Avenue SE; 9th Avenue SE south of East Saker Street; the intersection of Dale Street East and 9th Avenue SE; 10th Avenue SE; 11th Avenue SE; Dale Street East from 71h Avenue SE to 12th Avenue SE and the entrance and parkil')g area of Klinefelter Park as well as the Klinefelter Park Improvements pursuant to MN Statute 429.011 to 429.111. The estimated cost of the improvement is $ 600,000. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the - proposed improvement will be heard at this meeting. . Judy Weyrens Administrator Publish: February 23, 2007 March 2, 2007 ,proJ>osed Assessl'llEmt Worksheet 84-53475-026 Lot 1 0 Block 2; Cloverdale Estates 3rd Add 1103 Callaway StreetE Rates:. This sectionrf~presents.howthe assessment fortheabove property. is calculated. The left side of this section identifies the specific street footage(s) for your property and the right side illustrates the proposed rates.per Unealfoot. Street Footaae(s) Long side 0.00 (For long side - divide by 2) Assessment Rates Overlay (60%)$21.74/LF Reclaim (60%) $45.05/LF Short side 100.00 Assessment: This amount represents the amountthepropertyabove will be assessed for the 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project. Reclaim Overlay $0.00 $2,174.18 Total Assessment $2,174.18 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project - 67 Michael & Angela Grussing 1104 Callaway Stre.et E St. Joseph, MN 56374 Notice of Public Improvement Hearing City of St. Joseph Notice his hereby given that . the. St.Joseph City Council will meet at the. S1. Joseph Community Fire Hall at 7:00 PM on March 7, 2007 to consider the milling and overlay of the following areas: Able Street between 10th .Avenue SE and ih Avenue BE; 8th Avenue SE , Callaway Street between 7th Avenue SEand12th Avenue SE; 9thAvenue SE south of East Baker Street; the intersection . of Dale Street East and 9th AvenueSE; 10th Avenue SE; 11th Avenue SE; Dale Street East from ih Avenue SE t01ih AvenueSE and the entrance and parking area of Klinefelter Park as well <as the Klinefelter Park Improvements pursuant to MN Statute 429.0.11 to 429.111. Theestirnated cost of the improvement is $ 600,000. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed improvement will be heard at this meeting. Judy Weyrens Administrator Publish: February 23, 2007 March 2, 2007 Proposed Assessment Worksheet 84-53475-027 Lot 1 Block 3; Cloverdale Estates 3rd Add 1104 Callaway Street E Rates:Th is section represents how the assessment for the above property is calculated. Theleftside ofthissection identifies the specific street footage(s) for your property and the right side illustrates the proposed rates per lineal foot. Street Footaqe(s) Long side 124.96 (For long side - divide by 2) Assessment Rates Overlay (60%) $21.74/LF Reclaim (60%) $45.05/LF Short side 100,00 Assessment: This amount represents the amounfthe property above will be assessed for the 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project. Reclaim Overlay $0.00 $3,532.57 Total Assessment $3,532.57 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project - 68 Combined with Item 68 Notice of Public Improvement Hearing City of St. Joseph Notice his hereby given that the. St. Joseph City Council will meet at the St. Joseph Community Fire Hall at 7:00 PM on March 7, 2007 to consider the milling and overlay of the following areas: Able Street between 10th Avenue SE and ih Avenue SE; 8th Avenue SE , Callaway Street between ih Avenue SE and 1ih Avenue SE; 9th Avenue SE south of East Baker Street; the intersection of Dale Street East and 9th Avenue SE; 10th Avenue SE; 11th Avenue SE; Dale Street East from ih Avenue SE to 1ih Avenue SE and the entrance and parking area of Klinefelter Park as well as the Klinefe.lter Park Improvements pursuant to MN . Statute 429.011 to "429.111. The estimated cost of the improvement is $ 600,000. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed improvement will be heard at this meeting. Judy Weyrens Administrator Publish: February 23, 2007 March 2, 2007 Proposed Assessment Worksheet Rates: This section represents how the assessment for the above.propertyi~ calculated. The left side ofthis section identifies the specificstreetfootage(s) for your property and the right side illustrates the proposed rates per lineal foot. Street Footaqe( s ) Long side (For long side - divide py 2) Assessment Rates Overlay (60%) $21.74/LF Reclaim (60%) $45.05/LF Short side Assessment: This amount represents the amount the property above will be assessed for1he 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project. Reclaim $ Overlay $ Total Assessment $ 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project - 69 Myron & Yvette Traut 302 10th Avenue SE S1. Joseph, MN 56374 Notice of Public Improvement Hearing City of St.Joseph Notice his hereby given ..that the S1., Joseph. City' Council will meet at the 81. Joseph Community Fire Hall at 7:00 PM on March 7, 2007 to consider the milling and overlay of the following, areas: Able Street beM'een1Qth Avenue SE and 7'h .Avenue SE; 8th Avenue SE , Callaway. Street between ?th.Avenu~ 8E and 12th Avenue 8E; 9th Avenue SE south of East Baker Street; the,intersectionofDale8treet East ,and 9th Avenue SE; 10th Avenue SE; 11th Avenue 8E; Dale Street East from 7'h Avenue SE to 1ih Avenue SE and the entrance and parking area of Klinefelter Park as well as the Klinefelter Park Improvements pursuant to MN Statute 429.011 to 429.111. The estimated cost of the improvement is $600,000. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed improvement will be heard at this meeting. Judy Weyrens Administrator Publish: February 23, 2007 March 2, 2007 Proposed Assessment Worksheet 84-53475-029 Lot 1 Block 4;CloverdaleEstates3rd Add 302 10th Avenue SE Rates: This section represents how the assessment for the above property is calculated. The left side of this section identifies the specific street footage(s) for your property and the right side illustrates the proposed rates per lineal foot. Street Footaqe(s) Long side 125.00 (For long side - divide by 2) Assessment Rates Overlay (60%) $21.74/LF Reclai,m (60%) $45.05/LF Short side 100.03 Assessment: This amount represents the amount the property above will be assessed for the 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project. Reclaim Overlay $0.00 $3,533.58 Total Assessment $3,533.58 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project - 70 Combined with Item 70 Notice of Public Improvement Hearing City of St. Joseph Notice his hereby given that the St. Joseph City Council will meet at the St. Joseph Community Fire Hall at 7:00 PM on March 7, 2007 to consider the milling and overlay of the following areas: Able Street between 10th Avenue SE and 7th Avenue SE; 8th Avenue SE , Callaway Street between ih Avenue SE and 1ih Avenue SE; 9th Avenue SE south of East Baker Street; the intersection of Dale Street East and 9th Avenue SE; 10th Avenue SE; 11th Avenue SE; Dale Street East .from 7th Avenue SE to 12th Avenue SE and the entrance and parking area of Klinefelter. Park as well as the Klinefelter Park Improvements pursuant to MN Statute 429.011 to 429.111. . The estimated cost of the improvement is $ 600,000. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed improvement will be heard at this meeting. . Judy Weyrens Administrator Publish: February 23, 2007 March 2, 2007 Proposed Assessment Worksheet Rates: This section represents how the assessment for the above property is calculated. The left side of this section identifies the specificstreetfootage(s) for your property and the right side illustrates the proposed rates per lineal foot. Street Footaoe(s) Long side (For long side - divide by 2) Assessment Rates Overlay (60%) $21.74/LF Reclaim (60%) $45.05/LF Short side Assessment: This amount represents the amount the property above will be assessed for the 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project. Reclaim $ Overlay $ Total Assessment $ 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project - 71 Daniel & Julie Peterson 1006 Callaway Street E S1. Joseph, MN56374 Notice of Public Improvement Hearing City of St. Joseph '( Notice his hereby given that the S1. Joseph City .Council will meet at the S1. Joseph Community Fire Hall at 7:00 PM on March 7, 2007to consider the milling and overlay of the following areas: Able Street between 10th Avenue; SEand th AvenueSE;8th Avenue SE , Callaway Street between thAvenue SEand 12th Avenue SE; 9th Avenue SE south of East Baker Street;>the intersection of DaleStreeLEastand9th Avenue SE; 10th Avenue SE; 11th Avenue SE; Dale StreeLEastfrom ihAvenueSE to 12th Avenue SE and the entrance and parking area of Klinefelter Parkas well as the Klinefelter Park Improvements pursuant to MN Statute 429.011 to 429.111. The estimated cost of the improvement is$ 600,000. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed improvement will be heard at this meeting. Judy Weyrens Administrator Publish: February 23, 2007 March 2, 2007 Proposed Assessment Worksheet 84-53475-030 Lot 2. Block4;Cloverdale.. Estates3rd Add 1006 Callaway StreetE Rates: This section r~presents how the assessment for the above property is calculated. The left side of this section identifies the specific street footage(s) for your property and the right side illustrates the proposed rates per lineal foot. Street Footaqe( s) Long side 0.00 (For long side - divide by 2) Assessment Rates Overlay (60%) $21.74/LF Reclaim (60%) $45.05/LF Short side 80.00 Assessment: This amount represents the amount the property above will be assessed for the 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project. Reclaim Overlay $0.00 $1,739.34 Total Assessment. $1,739.34 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project - 72 Loretta Louwagie 301 11th Avenue SE St. Joseph, MN 56374 Notice of Public Improvement Hearing CiW of St. Joseph Notice his. hereby given . that the St. Joseph City. Council will meet at the St.Joseph Community Fire HaUat7:00.PMon March 7,2007 to consider the millingand.overlay of the following areas: Able Street between 10th Avenue SEand ih Avenue SE; .8th Avenue SE , CaHawayStreet between ih Avenue.SEand 14th Avenue SE; 9th AvenueSE south of East Baker Street; the intersection of ~ale Street East and 9th Avenue SE; 10th p..venue SE; 11 th Avenue SE; .Dale Street East from 7th Avenue SE to 12th Avenue SEand the entrance and parking area.of Klinefelter Parkas well as the Klinefelter Park Improvements pursuant to MN Statute 429.011 to 429:111. The estimated cost of the improvement is $ 600,000. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed improvement will be heard at this meeting. Judy Weyrens Administrator Publish: February 23, 2007 March 2, 2007 Proposed Assessment Worl<sheet 84-53475-031 Lot 3 Block 4; Cloverdale Estates 3rd Add 301 11th Avenue SE Rates: This section represents how the assessment for the above property is calculated. The left side of this section identifies the specific street footage(s) for your property and the right side illustrates the proposed rates per lineal foot. Street Footaoe(s) Long side 125.00 (For long side - divide by 2) Assessment Rates Overlay (60%) $21.7 4/LF Reclaim (60%) $45.05/LF Short side 100.00 Assessment: This amount represents the amount the property above will be assessed for the 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project. Reclaim Overlay $0.00 $3,533.05 Total Assessment $3,533.05 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project - 73 Combined with Item 73 Notice of Public Improvement Hearing City of St. Jos~ph Notice his hereby given that the St. Joseph City Council will meet at the St. Joseph Community Fire Hall at 7:00 PM on March 7, 2007 to consider the milling and overlay of the following areas: Able Street between 10th Avenue SE and th Avenue SE; 8th Avenue SE , Callaway Street between 7th Avenue SE and 1ih Avenue SE; 9th Avenue SE south of East Baker Street; the intersection of Dale Street East and 9th Avenue SE; 10th Avenue SE; 11th Avenue SE; Dale Street East from th Avenue SE to 1ih Avenue SE and the entrance and parking area of Klinefelter Park as well. as the Klinefelter Park . Improvements pursuant to MN Statute 429.011 to 429.111. The estimated cost of the improvement is $ 600,000. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed improvement will be heard at this meeting. Judy Weyrens Administrator Publish: February 23, 2007 March 2, 2007 Proposed Assessment Worksheet Rates: This section represents how the assessment for the above property is calculated. The left side of this section identifies the specific street footage(s) for your property and the right side illustrates the proposed rates per lineal foot. Street Footaqe(s) Long side (For long side - divide by 2) Assessment Rates Overlay (60%) $21.74/LF Reclaim (60%) $45.05/LF Short side Assessment: This amount represents the amount the property above will be assessed for the 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project. Reclaim $ Overlay $ Total Assessment $ 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project - 74 Joseph Ziegelmeier 302 9th Avenue SE St. Joseph, MN 56374 Not.ice of Public Irnprovernent Hearing Cit.ydfSt. Joseph Notice hishereby given that the St. Joseph CityCouncU will meet at the St. Joseph Community Fire Hal.1 at7:00 PM on March7, 2007 to consider the milling and overlay of the following areas: Able Street between 10th Av.enue SEand ih Avenue SE; 8thAvenue SE , C<:1l1away. Stre.et between th Avenue$e:and 12th.Avenu~ 9E:;.9th Avenue SE south of East Baker Street; the intersection of DClle~tr~etEastandath Avenue .SE; . 10th Avenue SE; 11th Avenue SE; Dale Street East from 7th Avenue SE te> 1.2th Avenue SE and the entrance and parking area of Klinefelter Park as well as the Klinefelter Park. Improvements pursuant to MN . Statute 429.011 to 429.111. The estimated cost of the improvement is $ 600,000. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed improvement will be heard at this meeting. Judy Weyrens Administrator Publish: February 23, 2007 March 2, 2007 Proposed Assessment Worksheet 84-53475-032 Lot 1 Block 5; Cloverdale Estates 3rd Add 302 9th Avenue SE Rates:. This section represents how the assessment. for the above property is calculat.ed. The left side of this section identifies the specific street foot.age(s) for your property and the right. side illustrates t.he proposed rates per lineal foot.. Street Footaae(s) Long side 125.00 (For long side - divide by 2) Assessment Rates Overlay (60%) $21.74/LF Reclaim (60%) $45.05/LF Short side 100.00 Assessment.: This amount represents the amount t.he property above will be assessed for the 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project. Reclaim Overlay $0.00 $3,533.04 Total Assessment. $3,533.04 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project - 75 Jennifer Woestehoff 906 Callaway Street E St. Joseph, MN 56374 NoticQ of Public Improvement Hearing City of St. Joseph Notice his hereby given that the St. Joseph City Council will meet at the St. Joseph Community Fire Hall at 7:00 PM on March 7, 2007 to consider the milling and overlay of the following areas: Able. Stre.et between10th Avenue SE and ih Avenue SE; 8th Avenue SE , Callaway Street between 7th Avenue SE and 1ih Avenue SE;9th Avenue SEsouth of East Baker Street; the intersection of Dale Street East and 9th Avenue SE; 10th Avenue SE; 11th Avenue SE; Dale Street East from th Avenue SE to 12th Avenue SEand the entrance and parking area of Klinefelter Park as well as the Klinefelter Park Improvements pursuant to MN Statute 429.011 to 429.111. The estimated cost of the improvement is $ 600,000. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed improvement will be heard at this meeting. Judy Weyrens Administrator Publish: February 23, 2007 March 2, 2007 Proposed Assessment Worksheet 84-53475-033 Lot 2 Block 5; Cloverdale Estates 3rd Add 906 Callaway Street E Rates: This section represents how the assessment for the above property is calculated. The left side of this section identifies the specific street footage(s) for your property and the right side illustrates the proposed rates per lineal foot. Street Footaae(s) Long side 0.00 (For long side - divide by 2) Assessment Rates Overlay (60%) $21.74/LF Reclaim (60%) $45.05/LF Short side 80.03 Assessment: This amount represents the amount the property above will be assessed for the 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project. Reclaim Overlay $0.00 $1,739.90 Total Assessment $1,739.90 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project - 76 r- Andrew Kalenda 301 10th Avenue SE St. Jaseph, MN 56374 Notice of Public Improvement Hearing Ci~of St.Joseph Natice his hereby giventhattheSlJasephCity Cauncil will meet at theSt. Jaseph GammunityFire Hal' at7:00PM on March?, 2007 to cansiderthe milling and.averlay .of the fallpwingareas: Able Street between 10th Avenue SEand 7th Avenue SE; 8th Avenue SE , CallClwaYSltreet betw~~n ih Avenue. Sl.E.<;Ind1.2th AveAue.SE;9th Avenue SEsauth .of East Baker Street;theint~rsectianafpaleStr~etEClstClnd9thA\yenu~S.E;toth A\venue SE; 11th Avenue. BE; . D;3le Street East fram 7th Avenues~ ta. ..121h AvenUE:~SE. andthe.entrance and parking area .of Klinefelter Park as well.as the KHnefelter Park.lmpr.ovements pursuant t.o MN Statllte 429.011. t.o 429.111.. The estimatedc.ost .of the impr.ovement is $ 600,000. Such persans as desire t.o be heard. with reference ta the prapased improvement will be heard at this meeting. . Judy Weyrens Administrator Publish: February 23, 2007 March 2, 2007 Proposed Assessment Worksheet 84-53475-034 Lot 3 Block 5; Gloverdale Estates 3rd Add 301 10th Avenue SE Rates: This section represents how the assessment for the above. property is calculated. The left side of this section identifies thespec.ificstreet footage(s) for your property and the right side illustrates the proposed rates per lineal foot. Street FootaaeCs) Long side 125.00 (For long side - divide by 2) Assessment Rates Overlay (60%) $21.74/LF. Reclaim (60%) $45.05/LF Short side 100.00 Assessment: This amount represents the amount the property above will be assessed for the 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project. Reclaim Overlay $0.00 $3,533.03 Total Assessment $3,533.03 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project - 77 Greg Huston 806 Callaway Street E St. Joseph, MN 56374 Notice of Public Improvement Hearing City of St. Joseph Notice his hereby given that the St. Joseph City Council will meet at the St. Joseph Community Fire Hall at 7:00 PM on March 7, 2007 to consider the milling and overlay of the following are~s: .Able Street between 10th Avenue SE and ih Avenue SE; 8th Avenue SE , Callaway Street between ih Avenue SEand 1ih Avenue SE; 9th Avenue SE south of East Baker Street; the intersection of Dale Street East and 9th Avenue SE; 10th Avenue SE; 11 th Avenue SE; Dale Street East from ih Avenue SE to 1 ih Avenue SE and the entrance and parking area of Klinefelter Park as well as the Klinefelter Park Improvements pursuant to MN Statute 429.011 to 429.111. The estimated cost of the improvement is $ 600,000. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed improvement will be heard at this meeting. Judy Weyrens Administrator Publish: February 23, 2007 March 2, 2007 Proposed Assessrnent Worksheet 84-53475-035 Lot 1 Block 6; Cloverdale Estates 3rd Add 806 Callaway Street E Rates: Th is section represents how the assessment for the above. property is calculated. The le.ftside of this section identifies the specific street footage(s) for your property and the right side illustrates the proposed rates per lineal foot. Street Footaqe(s) Long side. 133.43 (For long side - divide by 2) Assessment Rates Overlay (60%) $21.74/LF Reclaim (60%) $45.05/LF Short side 100.00 Assessment: This amount represents the amount the property above will be assessed for the 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project. Reclaim Overlay $0.00 $3,624.71 Total Assessment $3,624.71 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project - 78 Dona Johnson PO Box 106 St. Joseph, MN 56374 Notic.e of Public Improvement Hearing City of St. Joseph Notice hisherei:)y given that theSt. Joseph City Council wil.lrneet .at the St. Joseph Community Fire Hal' at .7:00 PM on March 7~2007toconsider. the l11iHing and overlay of the following areas: Able Street between 10th Avenue SEand ih AvenueSE;8thAvenue SE , QallaV>iay...StreeLbetween th}\venueSE and 12th AvenueSE;!3~hA\l~nue SEsouth of East . Baker Street;the.intersectio~. ofpale~treetEastand 9thAvenu~.SE3;19th AV~Due SE; 11th Avenue SE; Dale Street Eastfrom 7th AvenueSEtoj2th AvenueSE and the entrance and parking area of Klinefelter Park as well as the Klinefelter Parklmprovements.pursuant to MN Statute 429.0.11 to 429.111. . The estimated cost of the improvement is $ 600,000. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed improvement will be heard at this meeting. Judy Weyrens Administrator Publish: February 23, 2007 March 2, 2007 Proposed Assessment Worksheet 84-53475-037 Lot 1 Block 1; Cloverdale Estates 4th Add 307 9th Avenue SE Rates: This section represents how the assessment for the above property is calculated. The left side of this section identifies the specific street footage(s) for your property and the right side illustrates the proposed rates per lineal foot. Street FootaQe(s) Long side 0.00 (For long side - divide by 2) Assessment Rates Overlay (60%) $21.74/LF Reclaim (60%) $45.05/LF Short side 115.03 Assessment: This amount represents the amount the property above will be assessed for the 2007 East 'Side Mill & Overlay Project. Reclaim Overlay $0.00 $2,500.89 Total Assessment $2,500.89 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project - 79 Gae Neumann 805 Dale Street E St. Joseph, MN 56374 Notice of Public Improvement Hearing City of St. Joseph Notice his hereby given that the St. Joseph City Council will meet at the St. Joseph Community Fire Hall at 7:00 PM on March 7, 2007 to consider the milling and overlay of the following areas: Able Street between 10th Avenue SE and ih Avenue SE; 8th Avenue SE , Callaway Street between 7th Avenue SE and 1ih Avenue SE; 9th Avenue SE south of East Baker Street; the intersection of Dale Street East and 9th Avenue SE; 10th Avenue SE; 11th Avenue SE; Dale Street East from ih Avenue SE to 12th Avenue SE and the entrance and parking area of Klinefelter Park as well as the Klinefelter Park Improvements pursuant to MN Statute 429.011 to 429.111. The estimated cost of the improvement is $ 600,000. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed improvement will be heard at this meeting. Judy Weyrens Administrator Publish: February 23, 2007 March 2, 2007 Proposed Assessment Worksheet 84-53475-038 Lot 2 Block 1; Cloverdale Estates 4th Add 805 Dale Street E Rates: This section represents how the assessment for the above property is calculated. The left side of this section identifies the specific street footage(s) for your property and the right side illustrates the proposed rates per lineal foot. Street FootaQe(s) Long side 136.86 (For long side - divide by 2) Assessment Rates Overlay (60%) $21.74/LF Reclaim (60%) $45.05/LF Short side 131 .49 AsSessment: This amount represents the amount the property above will be assessed for the 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project. Reclaim Overlay $0.00 $4,346.56 Total Assessment $4,346.56 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project - 80 r - Brent & Kate Tschakert 308 9th Avenue SE St. Joseph, MN 56374 Notice of Publicll11provement Hearing City of St. Joseph Notice hisherepygiven thatthe St. JosepbCityCouncil will meet at the St. Joseph Community Fire Hall at 7:00PMonMarch7, 2007 to consider the milling and overlay of the fOllowing areas: AbleStreetbetwren 10th Avenue SE and 7'h Avenue SE; 8th Avenue SE , Calla,^,ay.~treet between..7thAvenu~$E~nd12th .AvenlJe SE;..ElthAvenueSEsouth of East l3a~Elr Street;theint~rsectionof D~leStreett=ast~nd9th Aye[luEl SE; 10th Avenue SE; 11th "Avel1ue~E; DaleStreet Eastfn:>m.7th Avenue SEta 12thAvenueSEand the.entrance and parkingcueaof Klinefelter Parkas we.ll as the. Klinefelter Park Improvements ..pursuant to MN Statute 429.011 to 429.111. The estimated cost of the improvement is $ 600,000. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed improvement will be heard at this meeting. Judy Weyrens Administrator Publish: February 23, 2007 March 2, 2007 Proposecl Assessment Worksheet 84-53475-039 Lot 1 Block 2; Cloverdale Estates 4th Add 308 9th Avenue SE Rates: This section represents how the assessment for the above property. is calculated. The left side of this section identifies the specific street footage(s) for your property and the right side illustrates the proposed rates per lineal foot. Street Footaae(s) Long side 0.00 (For long side - divide by 2) Assessment Rates Overlay (60%) $21.74/LF Reclaim (60%) $45.05/LF Short side 78.02 Assessment: This amount represents the amount the property above will be assessed for the 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project. Reclaim Overlay $0.00 $1,696.39 Total Assessment $1,696.39 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project - 81 Barbara Kettler 310 9th Avenue SE St. Joseph, MN 56374 Notice of Public Improvement Hearing City of St. Joseph Notice his hereby given that the St.Joseph City Council will meet at the St. Joseph Community Fire Hall at 7:00 PMdn March 7, 2007 to consider the milling and overlay of the following.areas: Able Street between 10th Avenue SE and 7'h AvenueSE; 8th Avenue SE , Callaway Street between .7th AvenueSE and 12th Avenue SE; 9th Avenue SE south of East Baker Street; the intersection of Dale Street East and 9th Avenue SE;10th Avenue SE; 11th Avenue SE; Dale Street East from 7th Avenue SE to 12'h Avenue SE and the entrance and parking area of Klinefelter Park as well as the Klinefelter Park Improvements pursuant to MN Statllte 429.011 to 429.111. The estimated cost of the improvement is $ 600,000. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed improvement will be heard at this meeting. Judy Weyrens Administrator Publish: February 23, 20-07 March 2, 2007 Proposed Assessment Worksheet 84-53475-040 Lot 2 Block 2; Cloverdale Estates 4th Add 310 9th Avenue SE Rates: This section represents how the assessment for the above property is calculated. The left side of this section identifies the specific street footage(s} for your property and the right side illustrates the proposed rates per Iinealfoot. Street Footaae(s) Long side 0.00 (For long side - divide by 2) Assessment Rates Overlay (60%) $21.74/LF Reclaim (60%) $45.05/LF Short side 78.00 Assessment: This amount represents the amount the property above will be assessed for the 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project. Reclaim Overlay $0.00 $1,695.86 Total Assessment $1,695.86 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project - 82 -- I Darren Guse 312 9th Avenue SE St. Joseph, MN 56374 Notice ofPui:)nclrnprovement Hearing CiW.of$t. Joseph Notice his hereby giyenthatthe St.Jos~phCity Council will meet at the St. Joseph Community Fire Hall at 7:00 .pMon March 7, 2007to considerthe milling and overlay of the following areas: Able Street between 10th AvenueSEand ih AvenueSE; 8th Avenue SE , pall<:lwaY.$treet between .th.Avenue. SE and 1ihAvenue Si::;..9th Avenue .SE 'south of East 13fkrr Street; theintersectiorof 9aleStreet~astand9thJ.\YrnurSE;19Ih Avenue SE; 11th Av~nue SE; Dale Street East from 7th AvenueSEto 12th Avenue SEand tOe entrance and p~rkingarea of Klinefelter. Park as well. as the Klinefelter Park Improvements pursuant to MN Statute. 429.011 to 429.111. The estimated cost of the improvement is $600,000. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed improvement will be heard at this meeting. Judy Weyrens Administrator Publish: February 23, 2007 March 2, 2007 Proposed Assessment Worksheet . 84-53475-041 Lot 3 Block 2; Cloverdale Estates 4th Add 312 9th Avenue SE Rates: This section represents how the assessment for the above property is calculated. The left side of this section identifies the specific street footage(s) for your property and the right side illustrates the proposed rates per nneal foot. Street Footaae(s) Long side 0.00 (For long side - divide by 2) Assessment Rates Overlay (60%) $21.74/LF Reclaim (60%) $45.05/LF Short side 78.00 Assessment: This amountrepresents the amount the property above will be assessed for the 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project. ' Reclaim Overlay $0.00 $1,695.86 Total Assessment $1,695.86 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project - 83 John & Jennifer Ness 314 9th Avenue SE St. Joseph, MN 56374 Notice of Public Improvement Hearing City of St. Joseph Notice his hereby given that the St.Joseph City Council will meet at the St. Joseph Community Fire Hall. at 7:00 PM on March 7, 2007 to consider the milling and overlay of the following areas: Able .Street between 10th Avenue SE and 7'h Avenue SE; 8th Avenue SE , Callaway Street between. 7th Avenue SE and 12'h. Avenue SE; 9th Avenue SE south of East Baker Street; the intersection of Dale Street East and 9th Avenue SE; 10th Avenue SE; 11th Avenue SE; Dale Street East from 7'h Avenue SE to 12'h Avenue SE and the entrance and parking area of Klinefelter Park as well as the Klinefelter Park Improvements pursuant to MN Statute 429.011 to 429.111. The estimated cost of the improvement is $ 600,000. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed improvement will be heard at this meeting. Judy Weyrens Administrator Publish: February 23, 2007 March 2, 2007 Proposed Assessment Worksheet 84-53475-042 Lot 4 Block 2; Cloverdale Estates 4th Add 314 9th Avenue SE Rates: This section represents how the assessment for the above property is calculated. The left side of this section identifies the specific street footage(s) for your property and the right side illustrates the proposed rates per lineal foot. Street Footaae(s) Long side 0.00 (For long side - divide by 2) Assessment Rates Overlay (60%) $21.74/LF Reclaim (60%) $45.05/LF Short side 78.00 Assessment: This amount represents the amount the property above will be assessed for the 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project. Reclaim Overlay $0.00 $1,695.86 Total Assessment $1,695.86 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project - 84 1- Clair Ragers 402 9th Avenue SE St. Jaseph, MN 56374 Notice of PUblic Improvement Hearing City "fSt. Joseph Notice his. hereby.. given that theSt. ..Jaseph City Cauncil will meet at the St. ,Jaseph Camrnunity.Fire Hall.at7:00PM.an March..7, 2007ta cansiderthe. millil'lg.and .overlay .of the follawing areas: Able 'Street between 10th Avenue SEand 7th Avenue. SE; 8th Avenue SE , CallC3\IVaY8,treetbetvi(een 7th Avenue SE c:lnd 1.2th AvenueSE; 9th AvenueSE sauth .of East 13~~<;r Street; the jntersectioryaf R~leStreet~astand9thAvenue SE; 10th Aven ue SE; 11 th j.\venueSE; Dale S~reetEastfrom7thAvenue SEta 12th Ayemue SEandthe entrance and parking area .of Klinefelter Park as well as the Klinefelter Park Improvements pursuant to MN Statute 429.011 ta 429.111. The estimated cast .of the improvement is $ 600,000. Such persans as desire ta be heard With reference ta the prapased impravement willbe heard at this meeting. Judy Weyrens Administratar Publish: February 23,2007 March 2, 2007 Proposed Assessment Worksheet 84-53475-043 Lat 5 Black 2; Claverdale Estates 4th Add 402 9th Avenue SE Rates: This section represents how the assessment for the above property is calculated. The left side of this section identifies the specific street footage(s) for your property and the right side illustrates the proposed rates.per lineal foot. Street Faataae(s) Lang side 0.00 (For long side - divide by 2) Assessment Rates Overlay (60%) $21.74/LF Reclaim (60%) $45.05/LF Shart side 78.00 Assessment: This amount represents the amount the pro.perty above will be assessed for the 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project. Reclaim Overlay $0.00 $1,695.86 Total Assessment $1,695.86 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project - 85 Brenda Peipus 406 9th Avenue SE St. Joseph, MN 56374 Notice ofPOblic Improvement Hearing City of St. Joseph Notice his hereby given that the St. Joseph City Council will meet at the St. Joseph Community Fire Hall at 7:00 PM on March 7, 2007 to consider the milling and overlay of the following areas: Able Streetbet\l\1een 10th Avenue SE and ih Avenue SE; 8th Avenue SE , Callaway Street bet\l\1een .ih.Avenue SEand1ih Avenue .SI;; 9th Avenue SE south of East Baker Street; the intersection of Dale Street East and 9th Avenue SE; 10th Avenue SE; 11th Avenue SE; Dale Street East from ih Avenue SE to 1ih Avenue SE and the entrance and parking area of Klinefelter Park as well as the Klinefelter Park Improvements pursuant to MN Statute 429.011 to 429.111. The estimated cost of the improvement is $ 600,000. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed improvement will be heard at this meeting. Judy Weyrens Administrator Publish: February 23, 2007 March 2, 2007 Proposed Assessment Worksheet 84-53475-044 Lot 6 Block 2; Cloverdale Estates 4th Add 406 9th Avenue SE Rates: This section represents how the assessment for the above.property is calculated. The left side of this section identifies the specific street footilge(s) for your property and the right side illustrates the proposed rates per lineal foot. Street Footaqe(s) Long side 133.26 (For long side - divide by 2) Assessment Rates Overlay (60%) $21.74/LF Reclaim (60%) $45.05/LF Short side 100.00 Assessment: This amount represents the amount the property above will be assessed for the 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project. Reclaim Overlay $0.00 $3,622.83 Total Assessment $3,622.83 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project - 86 Gregory & Jennifer Walker 905 Dale Street E S1. Joseph, MN 56374 Notice of Pul:tlicll11provement Hearing City of 5t.Joseph Noti.ce . his hereby .. given. that the. S1.JosephCity Council will. meet at the S1. Joseph CommunitY.Fire Hall at rOO PM on March 7, 2007 to consider the. milling. and overlay of the following areas: Able Street between 10th Avenue SEand ihAvenue SE;..8th Avenue SE , CallawayStrE!et bE!tween ihAvenue SEand1~th Avenue SE;;9thAvenue SEl)outh of East ~~ker Street;theigte;rsecnonOf[)~le .9treet9~st~nd91~Av~nueSE; .1.01h AVE!nue SE; 11th Avepue SE; Dale Street EaSitJrom ih AvenuepE to 12thAv~nueSE and the entrance and parking area of Klinefelter Parkas wen as the Klinefelter Park Improvements pursuant to MN Statute 429.01.1 to 429.111. The estimated cost. of the improvement is $600,000. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed improvement will be heard at . this meeting. Judy Weyrens Administrator Publish: February 23, 2007 March 2, 2007 Proposed Assessment Worksheet 84-53475-045 Lot 7 Block 2; Cloverdale Estates 4th Add 905 Dale Street E . Rates: This section represents how the assessment for the above property is calculated. The left side of this section identifies the specific street footi!ge(s) for your property and the right side illustrates the proposed rates per lineal foot. Street Footaae(s) Long side 0.00 (For long side - divide by 2) Assessment Rates Overlay (60%) $21.74/LF Reclaim (60%) $45.05/LF Short side 80.00 Assessment: This amount represents the amount the property above will be assessed for the 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project. Reclaim . Overlay $0.00 $1,739.25 Total Assessment $1,739.25 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project - 87 David & Debra Ismir 405 10th Avenue SE St. Joseph, MN 56374 Notice of Public .Improvement Hearing City of St. Joseph Notice his hereby given that the St. Joseph City Council will meet at the St. Joseph Community Fire Hall at 7:00 PM on March 7, 2007 to consider the milling and overlay of the following areas: Able Street between 10th Avenue SEand 7th Avenue SE; 8th Avenue SE I Callaway. Street between ih Avenue SE and1ih Avenue SE; 9th Avenue SE south of East Baker Street; the intersection of Dale Street East and 9th Avenue SE; 10th Avenue SE; 11th Avenue SE; Dale Street East from ih Avenue SE to 12th Avenue .$E and the entrance and parking area of Klinefelter Park as well as the Klinefelter Park Improvements pursuant to MN Statute 429.011 to 429.111. The estimated cost of the improvement is $ 600,000. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed improvement will be heard at this meeting. Judy Weyrens Administrator Publish: February 23, 2007 March 2, 2007 Proposed Assessment Worksheet 84-53475-046 Lot 8 Block 2; Cloverdale Estates 4th Add 405 10th Avenue SE Rates: This section represents how the assessment for the above property is calculated. The left side of this section identifies the specific street footage(s) for your property and the right side illustrates the proposed rates per lineal foot. Street Footaqe(s) Long side 129.28 (For long side - divide by 2) Assessment Rates Overlay (60%) $21.74/LF Reclaim (60%) $45.05/LF Short side 100.01 Assessment: This amount represents the amount the property above will be assessed for the 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project. Reclaim Overlay $0.00 $3,579.79 Total Assessment $3,579.79 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project - 88 Sandra Ressemann 401 10th Avenue SE St. Joseph, MN 56374 NoticeofPubJi~Jrnprovernent Hearing C.ity.ofSt. Joseph Ndticehis>hereby giventhaLthe$t..Jos~phCityCouncil will. meetaLtheSt. Joseph Community Fire. Hall~t7:00 pMpn March.7, 2007 to consider the milling and overlay of the following areas: Able Stre.et between 10th Avenue SEand 7th AvenueSE; ath Avenue SE , Call;away Streetbetw~en..th AvenueSE~l"Id12t~AvenueSr=;.9thAvenue$E50uth of E~st ~~ker Street;th~int~r~ectipfl/of9~le9tr~~t.iEast~nd..9t~f.yeflu~<.SE;.10th Ay~nue SE; 11th Avepue S~; Dale Street Ea$lfromihAvenue SEt()12IhA\lenu~ SE and the entrance and parking area of Klinefelter Parkas well as the Klinefelter. Park Improvements pursuant to MN Statute 429.011 to 429.111. The estimated cost of the improvement is $ 600,000. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed improvement will .be heard at this meeting. Judy Weyrens Administrator Publish: February 23,'2007 March 2, 2007 Proposed Assessment Worksheet 84~53475-047 Lot 9 Block 2; Cloverdale Estates 4th Add 401 10th Avenue SE Rates: This section represents how the assessment for the above property is calculated. The left side of this section identifies the specific street footag~(s) for your property and the right side illustrates the proposed rates per lineal foot. Street Footaqe(s) Long side 0.00 (For long side - divide by 2) Assessment Rates Overlay (60%) $21.7 4/LF Reclaim (60%) $45.05/LF Short side 78.00 Assessment: This amount represents the amount the property above will be assessed for the 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project. Reclaim Overlay $0.00 $1,695.87 Total Assessment $1,695.87 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project - 89 Jason & Rose Haugen 315 10th Avenue SE St. Joseph, MN 56374 Notice of Public Improvement Hearing City of St. Joseph Notice his . hereby given that the St. Joseph City Council will meet at the St. Joseph Community Fire Hall at 7:00 PM on March 7, 2007 to consider the milling and overlay of the following areas: Able. Street between 10th Avenue SE and ih Avenue SE; 8th Avenue SE , Callaway Street between th Avenue SE and 12th AvenueSE; 9th Avenue SE south of East Baker Street; the intersection of Dale Street East and 9th Avenue SE; 10th Avenue SE; 11th AvenueSE; Dale Street East from th Avenue SE to 12th Avenue SE and the entrance and parking area of Klinefelter Parkas well as the Klinefelter Park Improvements pursuant to MN Statute 429.011 to 429.111. The estimated cost of the improvement is $ 600,000. Such persons as. desire to be heard with reference to the proposed improvement will be heard at this meeting. Judy Weyrens Administrator Publish: February 23, 2007 March 2, 2007 Proposed Assessment Worksheet 84-53475-048 Lot 10 Block 2; Cloverdale Estates 4th Add 315 10th Avenue SE Rates: This section represents how the assessment for the above property is calculated. The left side of this section identifies the specific street footage(s) for your property and the right side illustrates the proposed rates per lineal foot. Street FootaQe(s) Long side 0.00 (For long side - divide by 2) Assessment Rates Overlay (60%) $21.74/LF Reclaim (60%) $45.05/LF Short side 78.00 Assessment: This amount represents the amount the property above will be assessed for the 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project. Reclaim Overlay $0.00 $1,695.87 Total Assessment $1,695.87 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project - 90 Mary Kay Moening 313 10th Avenue SE St. Joseph, MN 56374 Notice .01. Public:lr11provefllent Hearing Cityo1.St. Joseph Notice. his hereby given. thatthe. St. . Jos.eph City .Ceuncil wilL meet at the.. St. Joseph Community Fir~ Hall C1t7:OO PMon March.7.,20Q7toconsiderthemillingand overlay of the following areas: Able Street between 1.0th Avenue. SEand th AvenueS!;; 8th Avenue SE , Callaway Street between .thAvenueSE andt2thAvenue.SfE.;9th.Ave.nueSE.so~th of East Baker Street;.the il1t~r~ectionofI)aleStreetfE~stand~thAy~pueSE;10thAve.nue SE; 11th Avenue SE; Dale Street East from 7th Av~nue~St912th}\v~nu~~Eand the entrance and parking area of KlinefelterPark.as wellastheKline.felter Park Improvements pursuant to MN Statute 429.011 to 429.1.1.1. The estimated costef the improvement is $.600,000. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed improvementwill be heard at this meeting. Judy Weyrens Administrator Publish: February 23, 2007 March 2, 2007 Proposed Assessment Worksheet 84-53475-049 Lot 11 Block 2; Cloverdale Estates 4th Add 313 10th Avenue SE Rates: This section represents how the assessment for the aboveproperty.is calculated. The left side of this section identifies the specific street footage(s) for your property and the right side illustrates the proposed rates per lineal foot. Street Footaae(s) Long side 0.00 (For long side - divide by 2) Assessment Rates Overlay (60%) $21.7 4/LF Reclaim (60%) $45.05/LF Short side 78.00 Assessment: This amount represents the amount the property above will be assessed for the 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project. Reclaim Overlay $0.00 $1,695.88 Total Assessment $1,695.88 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project - 91 Patricia Konz 311 10th Avenu'e SE St. Joseph, MN 56374 Notice of Publiclmprovement Hearing City ofSt. Joseph Notice his hereby given that the St. Joseph. City Council will meet at the St. Joseph Community Fire Hall at7:00 PM on March 7,2007 to consider the milling and overlay of the following. areas: Able Street betvyeen 10th Avenue SEand ih Avenue SE; 8th Avenue SE , Callaway Street between 7th Avenue SE and 1ih Avenue SE; 9th Avenue SE south of East Baker Street; the. intersection of Dale Street East and 9th Avenue SE; 10th Avenue SE; 11 th Avenue SE; Dale Street East fromih Avenue SE t01ih Avenue SE and the entrance and parking area of Klinefelter Park as well as the Klinefelter Park Improvements pursuant to MN Statute 429.011 to 429.111. The estimated cost of the improvement is $ 600,000. Such persons. as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed improvement will be heard at this meeting. Judy Weyrens Administrator Publish: February 23, 2007 March 2, 2007 Proposed Assessment Worksheet 84-53475-050 Lot 12 Block 2; Cloverdale Estates 4th Add 311 10th Avenue SE Rates: This section represents how the assessment for the above property is calculated. The left side ofthis section identifies the specific street footage(s) for your property and the right side illustrates the proposed rates per lineal foot. Street Footaae(s) Long side 0.00 (For long side - divide by 2) Assessment Rates Overlay (60%) $21.74/LF Reclaim (60%) $45.05/LF Short side 78.00 Assessment: This amount represents the amountthe property above will be assessed for the 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project. Reclaim Overlay $0.00 $1,695.87 Total Assessment $1,695.87 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project - 92 -r D~le & Katie Schwegel 309 10th Avenue SE St. Joseph, MN 56374 Notice of Public I~provement Hearing City .of.St. Joseph Notice his .heregy given .thattheSt. . Joseph City COlJncil. Will meet .at .. the ... St. . Joseph Community Fire HaHat 7:00PMonMarch 7, 2007 to consider the. milling and overlay of the following~reas:Able Street between 16th AvenueSEandihAvenue SE;.8th Avenue SE , Callp.\NayStreetbetvveenzthAvenue.SEand 12th Avenue$E;/9th Aven ueSE,sQuth .of East B~k~r Street; th~.intersecti9nof.I:)~leStr~et5~f:itandi~th ..J\yegue..SE;.1pth Av~nu.e SE; 11 th Ave.nueSE; pale, Str~etEastfrpJ1l7th A"enueSE tp12thf.,,~nue.SE and the entrance and parking area of Klinefelter Parkas well as the. Klinefelter Park Improvements .pursu.ant to MN Statute 429.0.11 to. 429.111. The estimated cost of the improvement is $600,000. Such persons. as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed improvement will be heard at this meeting, . Judy Weyrens Administrator Publish: February 23,2007 March 2,2007 Proposed Assessment Worksheet 84-53475-051 Lot 13 Block 2; Cloverdale Estates 4th Add 309 10th Avenue SE Rates: This section represents how the assessment for the above property is calculated. The left side of this section identifies the specific street footage(s) for your property and the right side illustrates the proposed rates per Iinealfoot. Street Footaoe(s) Long side 0.00 (For long side - divide by 2) Assessment Rates Overlay (60%) $21.74/LF Reclaim (60%) $45.05/LF Short side 78.02 Assessment: This amount represents the amount the property above. will be assessed for the 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project. Reclaim Overlay $0.00 $1,696.35 Total Assessment $1,696.35 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project - 93 Thomas Ortmann 308 10th Avenue SE St. Joseph, MN 56374 Notice ofPliblic Improvement Hearing City of St. Joseph Notice his. hereby given that the St. Joseph City Council will meet at the St. Joseph Community Fire Hall at 7:00 PM on March 7, 2007to consider the milling and overlay of the following areas: Able Street between 10th Avenue SEand ih Avenue SE;8th Avenue SE , Callaway Streetbetweenih Avenue SEand 1ih Avenue SE; 9thAvenue SE south of East Baker Street; the intersection of Dale Street East and 9th Avenue SE; 10th Avenue SE; 11th AvenueSE; Dale Street East from ih Avenue SE to 12th Avenue SEand the entrance and parking area of Klinefelter Park as well as the Klinefelter Park Improvements pursuant to MN Statute 429.011 to 429.111. The estimated cost of the improvement is $ 600,000. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed improvement will be heard at this meeting. Judy Weyrens Administrator Publish: February 23, 2007 March 2, 2007 Proposed Assessment Worksheet 84-53475-052 Lot 1 Block 3; Cloverdale Estates 4th Add 308 10th Avenue SE Rates: This section represents how the assessment for the above. property. is calculated. The left side of this section identifies the specific street footage(s) for your property and the right side illustrates the proposed rates per lineal foot. Street Footaqe(s) Long side 0.00 (For long side - divide by 2) Assessment Rates Overlay (60%) $21.74/LF Reclaim (60%) $45.05/LF Short side 78.02 Assessment: Thisamolint representstheamounlthe property abovewillbe assessed for the 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project. Reclaim Overlay $0.00 $1,696.39 Total Assessment $1,696.39 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project - 94 -[ .Audrey Robinson 310 10th Avenue SE St. Joseph, MN 56374 Notice of Public Improvement Hearing Ci~yofSt. Joseph Notice his herebygiventhattheSt.Joseph City Council will meet .at the St. Joseph Community Fire HaJlat}:OO PM on March 7, 2007 to consider the milling and overlay of the fOllowing areas.: .Able Street between 10th Avenue. SEand ih .AvenueSE; 8th Avenue SE., g~Ha)\'aYStre~tl:>etween7thAvenueSEand 12th AvenueSE;9thAv~nue SEsouth of Ea~~ B~~.~r Street; th~.in~er~~ctionRf pale~treet!=astand9thAvenueSE.; 10th Avenue SE; 11 A"e.nue SE;Dale Street EasUrom th }\venue SE tot2thAvenue SEand the entrance and parking area ofKlinefeiterPark as weHas the.Klinefelter Park Improvements pursuant to MN statute 429.01.1 to 429.111. The. estimated cost of the improvement is $ 600,000. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the .proposed improvement will be heard at this meeting. . Judy Weyrens Administrator Publish: February 23, 2007 March 2, 2007 Proposed Assessment Worksheet 84-53475-053 Lot 2 Block 3; Cloverdale Estates 4th Add 310 10th Avenue SE Rates: This section represents how the assessment for the above property is calculated. The left side of this section identifies the specific street footage(s) for your property and the right side illustrates the proposed rates per lineal foot. Street Footaae(s) Long side 0.00 (For long side - divide by 2) Assessment Rates Overlay (60%) $21.74/LF Reclaim (60%) $45.05/LF Short side 78.00 Assessment: This amount represents the amount the property above will be assessed for the 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project. Reclaim Overlay $0.00 $1,695.86 Total Assessment $1,695.86 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project - 95 Joseph Pavkovich 312 10th Avenue SE St. Joseph, MN 56374 Notice of Public Improvement Hearing City of St. Joseph Notice his hereby given that the St. Joseph City Council will meet at the St. Joseph Community Fire Hall.at 7:00 PM on March 7, 2007 to consider the milling and overlay of the following areas: Able Street between 10th Avenue SE and ih Avenue SE; 8th Avenue SE , Callaway Street between 7th Avenue SE and 12th Avenue SE;gth Avenue SE south of East Baker Street; the . intersectiondf Dale Street East andgth Avenue SE; 10th Avenue SE; 11th Avenue SE; Dale Street East from ih Avenue SE to 12th Avenue SE and the entrance and parking area of Klinefelter Park as well as the Klinefelter Park Improvements pursuant to MN Statute 429.011 to 429.111. The estimated cost of the improvement is $ 600,000. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed improvement will be heard at this meeting. Judy Weyrens Administrator Publish: February 23, 2007 March 2, 2007 Proposed Assessment Worksheet 84-53475~054 Lot 3 Block 3; Cloverdale Estates 4th Add 312 10th Avenue SE Rates: This section represents how the assessment forthe above property is calculated. The left side ofthis section identifies the specific street footage(s) for your property and the right side illustrates the proposed rates per lineal foot. Street Footaae(s) Long side 0.00 (For long side - divide by 2) Assessment Rates Overlay (60%) $21.74/LF Reclaim (60%) $45.05/LF Short side 78.00 Assessment: This amount represents the amountthe property above win be assessed for the 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project. Reclaim Overlay $0.00 $1,695.86 Total Assessment $1,695.86 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project - 96 Frank Peitz 314 10th Avenue SE St. Jeseph, MN 56374 Notice of public .Improvement Hearing Oity .ofSt. Joseph Notice his. herel:w givel1. that the StJeseph . City Ceuncil will meet at theSt. Joseph Cemmunity.Fire Hallat7:qOPM.on March 7,2007 tecensider the milling and .overlay of the f.oll.owingareas: AbleStreetbebNeen 10th Avenue SEand ihAvenue S6; 8th Avenue SE , Call~waY9treetbetween 7th Averyue S.E .and 12th Avenue SE;9th Avenue S6 seuth of East B~.~er Street;th~jn~~rsecti.o9.efDaleStr~etF.:.ast,and~thA,,~nue S;;1pth Avenue SE; 11th AvenueSE; Dale Stfl:!et East from7thi\venue SE to 12th AvenueSE and the entrance and parking area of Klinefelter Park as well as the Klinefelter Park Imprevementspursuant to MN StCltute 429.01.1 te 429.111. The estimated cest .of the imprevement is $ .600,000. Such p~rsonsas desire. to be heard with reference te the proposed improvement will be heard at this meeting. Judy Weyrens Administrater Publish: February 23, 2007 March 2, 2007 Proposed. Assessment Worksheet 84-53475-055 Lot 4 Bleck 3; Cleverdale Estates 4th Add 314 10th Avenue SE Rates: This section represents how the assessment for the above property is calculated. The left side ofthis section identifies the specific street footage(s) for your property and the right side illustrates the proposed rates. per lineal. foot. Street Feotaae(s) Long side 0.00 (For long side -:- divide by 2) Assessment Rates Overlay (60%) $21.74/LF Reclaim (60%) $45.05/LF Short side 78.00 Assessment: This amount represents the amount the property above will be assessed for the 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project. Reclaim Overlay $0.00 $1,695.86 Total Assessment $1,695.86 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project - 97 Roger & Lynn Mischke 402 10th Avenue SE St. Joseph, MN 56374 Notice of Public Improvement Hearing City of St. Joseph Notice his hereby given that th~ St. Joseph City Council will meet at the St. Joseph Community Fire Hall at 7:00 PM on March 7, 2007 to consider the milling and overlay of the following areas: Able. Street between 10th AvenueSE and. ih Avenue SE; 8th Avenue SE , Callaway Street between 7th Avenue SEand 12'h AvenueSE; 9th Avenue SE south of East Baker Street; the. intersection of Dale Street East and 91h Avenue SE; 10th Avenue SE; 11 th Avenue SE; Dale Street East from ih Avenue SE to 12'h Avenue SE and the entrance and parking area of Klinefelter Park as well as the Klinefelter Park Improvements pursuant to MN Statute 429.011 to 429.111. The estimated cost of the improvement is $ 600,000. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed improvement will be heard at this meeting. Judy Weyrens Administrator Publish: February 23, 2007 March 2, 2007 . Proposed Assessment Worksheet 84-53475-056 Lot 5 Block 3; Cloverdale Estates 4th Add 402 10th Avenue SE Rates: This section rep.resents how the assessmentfor the above property is calculated. The left side of this section identifies the specific street footage(s l for your property and the right side illustrates the proposed rates per lineal foot. Street Footaae(s) Long side 0.00 (For long side - divide by 2) Assessment Rates Overlay (60%) $21.7 4/LF Reclaim (60%) $45.05/LF Short side 78.00 Assessment: This amount represents the amount the property above Will be assessed for the 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project. Reclaim Overlay $0.00 $1,695.86 Total Assessment $1,695.86 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project - 98 <'J Aleta Kvatum PO Box 661 St. Joseph, MN 56374 Notice of PubHclmpro.vement Hearing Ciwof St. Joseph Notice his hereby given thaLthe St. Joseph City Council will meet at the St. Joseph Community Fire Hall at 7:00PM on March. Z, 2007 to consider the milling and overlay of the following areas: Able Street between 10th AvenueSEand ihAvenueSE;sth Avenue SE , Callal,\/ClY Stre.et between7thAyenuecSE:a~d1,2thAvenueSE:;9thAv~nueSE: south of East Bi3~er .Street;theinterse~~i9~9fPale.9tr~etE:a~tapd9thf\yenueSE;. 10th AVenue SE; 11th Av~nueSE;. DaleS.tr~et Eastfrpm thAYEmue SE to1zth Avenue9Eand the entrance and parkingareaofKlinefelterParkaswellas the Klinefelter Park Improvements pursuant to MN Statute 429.011 to 429.111. The . estimated cost of the improvement is $600,000. Such perspns as. desire to. be heard with reference to the proposed improvement will be heard at this meeting. Judy Weyrens Administrator Publish: February 23, 2007 March 2, 2007 Proposed Assessment Worksheet 84-53475-057 Lot 6 Block 3; Cloverdale Estates 4th Add 406 10th Avenue SE Rates: Thi&section represents howtheassessmentfor the. above property is calculated. The left side of this section identifies the specific street footage(s) for your property and the right side illustrates the proposed rates per lineal foot. Street Footaae(s) Long side 128.34 (For long side - divide by 2) Assessment Rates Overlay (60%) $21.74/LF Reclaim (60%) $45.05/LF Short side 100.01 Assessment: This amount represents the amount the properl:yabo.ve will be a.ssessed for the 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project. Reclaim Overlay $0.00 $3,569.56 Total Assessment $3,569.56 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project - 99 Richard & Stephanie Hampton 1004 Dale Street E St. Joseph, MN 56374 Notice of PLiblic Improvement Hearing City of St. Joseph Notice his hereby given that the St. Joseph City Council \/Viii meet at the St. Joseph Community Fire Hall at 7:00 PM on March 7, 2007 to consider the milling and overlay of the following areas: Able. Street between 10lh Avenue SE and ih Avenue SE; 8lh Avenue SE , Callaway Street between. ih Avenue SE. and 12lh Avenue SE; 9th Avenue SE south of East Baker Street; the intersection of Dale Street East and 9th Avenue SE; 10th Avenue SE; 11th Avenue SE; Dale Street East from ih Avenue SE to 1ih Avenue SE and the entrance and parking area of Klinefelter Park as well as the Klinefelter Park Improvements. pursuant to MN Statute 429.011 to 429.111. The estimated cost of the improvement is $ 600,000. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed improvement will be heard at this meeting. Judy Weyrens Administrator Publish: February 23, 2007 March 2, 2007 Proposed Assessment Worksheet 84-53475-058 Lot 1 Block 4; Cloverdale Estates 4th Add 1004 Dale Street E Rates: This section represents how the assessment for the above property is calculated. The left side of this section identifies the specific street footage(s) for your property and the right side illustrates the proposed rates per lineal foot. Street Footaae( s) Long side 129.92 (Fot long side - divide by 2) Assessment Rates Overlay (60%) $21.7 4/LF Reclaim (60%) $45.05/LF Short side 99.91 Assessment: This amount represents the amount the property above will be assessed for the 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project. Reclaim Overlay $0.00 $3,584.61 Total Assessment $3,584.61 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project - 100 Debra Williams 806 Dale Street E St. Joseph, MN 56374 Notice of. PUblic:lmprovement Hearing City of St. Joseph Notice his . hereQY. givel"\> that the. St.Joseph City Council wiHmeetaLthe St. Joseph Community Fire. Hallat7:00 PM9n March 7,2007 .. to consider the millil'lgand overlay of the following areas: Able Streetbetween 1Qtll Av.enueSEcmd ih AvenueSE; athAvenue SE I CaUaw.ay .~treet <betWreq>7th,Avenue.9Eaqd.1gthJ.\venueSE;51tl1Av13pUe9E;south of East Ba~rr: . Street;. the.intrrse8ti9q()f.~~le~trrrt>l2c:1stand.. ~thJ.\V.rI1lJ13SE;.19thJ.\\(enue SE; 11th AvenueSE; paleStre13t.Eastfrom. 7th Avenue SEto..tzthAvenue,<G)E.and the . entrance and parking area. of Klinefelter ParkasweUas the Klinefelter Park Improvements .pursuant to MN Statute 429.011. to 429.111. The estimated cost. of the improvement is $ 600,000. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed improvement will .be heard at this meeting. Judy Weyrens Administrator Publish: February 23, 2007 March 2, 2007 Proposed Assessment Worksheet 84-53475-059 Lot 1 Block 5; Cloverdale Estates 4th Add 806 Dale Street E Rates: This section represents how the assessment for the above .property is calculated. The left side of this section identifies the specific street footage(s) for your property and the right side illustrates the proposed rates per lineal foot. Street Footaae(s) Long side 122.07 (For long side - divide by 2) Assessment Rates Overlay (60%) $21.7 4/LF Reclaim (60%) $45.05/LF Short side 100.00 Assessment: This Cimount represents the amount the property above will be assessed for the 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project. Reclaim Overlay $0.00 $3,501.20 Total Assessment $3,501.20 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project - 101 Sheila Dodge 807 Dale Street E St. Joseph, MN 56374 Notice of Public Improvement Hearing City of St. Joseph Notice his hereby given that theSt. Joseph City Council will meet at the St. Joseph Community Fire Hall at 7:00 PM on March 7, 2007 to consider the milling and overlay of the following areas: Able Street between 10th Avenue. SEand 7th AvenueSE; 8th Avenue SE , Callaway Street between 7th Avenue SE and 1ih Avenue. SE;9thAvenueSE south of East Baker Street; the intersection of Dale Street East and 9th Avenue SE; 10th Avenue SE; 11th AvenueSE; Dale Street East from ih Avenue SE to 1ih Avenue SE and the entrance and parking area of Klinefelter Parkas well as the Klinefelter Park Improvements pursuant to MN Statute 429.011 to 429.111. The estimated cost of the improvement is $ 600,000. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed improvement will be heard at this meeting. Judy Weyrens Administrator Publish: February 23, 2007 March 2, 2007 Proposed Assessment Worksheet 84-53475-060 Lot 2 Block 5; Cloverdale Estates 4th Add 807 Dale Street E Rates: This section represents how the assessmentfor the above property is calculated. The left side ofthissection identifies the specific street footage(s) for your property and the right side iIIustrates.the proposed rates per lineal foot. Street Footaae(S) Long side 171.87 (For long side - divide by 2) Assessment Rates Overlay (60%) $21.74/LF Reclaim (60%) $45.05/LF Short side 136.71 Assessment: This amount represents the amount the property above will be assessed for the 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project. Reclaim Overlay $0.00 $4,840.57 Total Assessment $4,840.57 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project - 102 r -- Troy & Vicki Koopme.iners 809 Dale Street E St. Joseph, MN 56374 Notice .QfPubliclmprovcrment Hearing . Cityof.St. Joseph Notice ..his hereQY given. that... the...StJosephGityCouncil will meet at the. St. Joseph Community Fire Hall at7:00. AMon: MarSh7,2007toconsiger the millil'lgand overlay of the following areas: Able Street..between 10th Avenue SE~nd ih Avenue. SI;; athAvenue SE , CaH~\NaY$treetbeWr~el'l.: ih)\venue .SRC:lng12t~.AvenuE:lS>9; .~~h Av~rlU~. SE~outh of East Ba..ker$treet;the .int~rsectiopofp~le~tr~etEC:lstC:lnd~t~1*~~n.l.lr$I;.;1oth AVE:lrue SE; 11th Ave?lle SE; Dale Street East frqm 7th ~vrnue St=;tP.}2.th AVE:lnueSE and theE:)ntrance and parking area of Klinefelter ParKas well as the Klinefelter park Jmprovements.pursuant to MN Statute 429.011 to 429.1.11. The estimated cost of the improvement is $600,000. Such persons .as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed improvement will be heard at this meeting. Judy Weyrens Administrator Publish: February 23, 2007 March 2, 2007 Proposed Assessment Worksheet 84-53475-061 Lot 3 Block 5; Cloverdale Estates 4th Add 809 Dale Street E Rates: This section represents how the assessment for the above.prO,perty is calculated. The left side of this section identifies the specific street footage(s) for your property and the right side illustrates the proposed rates per lineal foot. Street FootaQe(s) Long side 0.00 (For long side - divide by 2) Assessment Rates Overlay (60%) $21..74/LF Reclaim (60%) $45.05/LF Short side 119.63 Assessment: This amount represents the amount the property above will be assessed for the 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project. Reclaim Overlay $0.00 $2,601.01 Total Assessment $2,601.01 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project - 103 Sarah Klehr 810 Dale Street E St. Joseph, MN 56374 Notice of Public Improvement Hearing City of St. Joseph Notice his herepy given that theSt. Joseph Oity Council will meet at the St. Joseph Community Fire Hall at 7:00 PM on March 7, 2007 to consider the milling and overlay of the following areas: Able Street .between 10th AvenueSEand th Avenue SE;8th Avenue SE , Callaway . Street between7'h Avenue SE and 12th Avenue SE; 9th Avenue SE south of East Baker Street; theintersectiondf Dale Street East and 9th Avenue SE; 10th Avenue SE; 11th Avenue SE; Dale Street East from th Avenue SE to 12'h Avenue SE and the entrance and parking area of Klinefelter Park as well as the Klinefelter Park Improvements pursuant to MN Statute 429.011 to 429.111. The estimated cost of the improvement is $ 600,000. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed improvement will be heard at this meeting. Judy Weyrens Administrator Publish: February 23, 2007 March 2, 2007 Proposed Assessment Worksheet 84-53475-062 Lot 4 Block 5; Cloverdale Estates 4th Add 810 Dale Street E Rates: This sectionrepresertts how the assessment for the above property is calculated. The leftsideofthis section identifies the specific street footage(s) for your property and the right side illustrates the proposed rates per lineal foot. Street Footaqe(s) Long side 0.00 (For long side - divide by 2) Assessment Rates Overlay (60%) $21.7 4/LF Reclaim (60%) $45.05/LF Short side 91.34 Assessment: This arnoulitrepresentsthe amount the property above will be assessed for the 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project. Reclaim Overlay $0.00 $1,985.97 Total Assessment $1,985.97 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project - 104 - I Themas & Ann Klein 812 Dale Street E St. Jeseph, MN 56374 N()tiCEt ()fPublic. Improvement Hearing CifitofSt. .Joseph Notice his hereby giventhaLtheSl Jeseph CityCeuncif. will meet at theSt. Jeseph Cemmunity Fire Hall (it7:00 PM on. March)', 2007Jeconsider the milling and overlay .of the fellewingiareas:Able Streetbe~een 10th Avenue BE and ih AvenueSE; 8thAvenue SE , C~lla,^,ay ..8,treet ..b~t\Neen7'h }\venue'9E ~pd1fth}\venuesS;.i9~h. ,l\venues,Sseuth .of East Baker Street; the int~nsecti()nOfif:)ale<Stre~ts~stan99th}\Y~nU~$E;..1pth }\Y~flUe SE; 11th Avenue Sg;. 8a17.i Street ..EastJrC?w th"?'v'~nue SEte . t?th"?'v'enue,SE C1ndth~.entrClnce C1nd parking area. .of KlinefeltefParkas well as the KI.inefelter Park Impr.ovemelltspursuant t.o MN Statute 429.0t1 te 429.111. The estimated cestef the improvement is $ 600,000. Such persensas desiretebe heard with reference. to the prepesedimprovementwi.lt be heard at this meeting. Judy Weyrens Administrater Publish: February 23, 2007 March 2, 2007 Proposed Assessment Worksheet 84-53475-063 Let 5 Bleck 5; Cleverdale Estates 4th Add 812 Dale Street E Rates: This section represents how the assessmentfor.theabove.propedy.is calculated. The left side oUhis section identifies the specific street fo.otage(slfor your property and the right side illustrates the proposed rates per lineal foot. Street Feetaae(s) Leng side 0.00 (For long side - divide by 2) Assessment Rates Overlay (60%) $21.74/LF Reclaim (60%) $45.05/LF Shert side 90.98 Assessment: This amount represents the amount the property abov.e will be assessed for the 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project. Reclaim Overlay $0.00 $1,978.16 Total Assessment $1,978.16 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project - 105 Scott Kelm 814 Dale Street E S1. Joseph, MN 56374 Notice of Public Improvement Hearing City of St. Joseph Notice his hereby given that the S1. Joseph City Council will meet at the S1. Joseph Community Fire Hall at 7:00 PM on March?, 2007 to consider the milling and overlay of the following areas: Abl.e Stre.et between .10th Ave!:lue SEand th AvenueSE; 8th Avenue SE , Callaway Street between ih Avenue SE and 12th.Avenue SE; 9th Avenue SE south of East Baker Street; the intersection of Dale Street East and 9th Avenue SE; 10th Avenue SE; 11th AvenueSE; Dale Street East fr,om ih Avenue SE to 1ih Avenue SE and the entrance and parking area . of. Klinefelter Park as well as the Klinefelter Park Improvements. pursuant to MN Statute 429.011 to 429.111. . The estimated cost of the improvement is $600,000. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed improvement will be heard at this meeting. Judy Weyrens Administrator Publish: February 23, 2007 March 2, 2007 Proposed AS~essrr1ent Worksheet 84-53475-064 Lot 6 Block 5; Cloverdale Estates 4th Add 814 Dale Street E Rates: This section represents how the assessment for the above property is calculated. The.left side of this section identifies the specific streetfootage(s) for your property and the right side illustrates the proposed rates per lineal foot. Street Footaae(s) Long side 0.00 (For long side - divide by 2) Assessment Rates Overlay (60%) $21.7 4/LF Reclaim (60%) $45.05/LF Short side 85.00 Assessment: This amounfrepresentsthe amount the property above will be assessed for the 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project. Reclaim Overlay $0.00 $1 ;848.05 Total Assessment $1,848.05 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project - 106 Mark & Louann Simon 904 Dale Street E St. Joseph, MN 56374 Notice. pf PUblic 1r1lprpvernent Hearing City of St. Joseph Notice hishereby give!) .that the$t. . Joseph Ci~yCouncIl will. meet at the St. Joseph Community Fire Hallat.7:QOPMon March?, 200.7 to considerthemilling.and overlay of the following areas: Able.Streetbetween 10th Avenue.SE andihAvenueSE; athAvenue SE , qallaway. Street betweenth Avenue SEan.d 12th AvenueSE;9thAvenue SG<5.Quth of Ea~~ BakElr Street; the illtE!rsectionofD~leStreet (;c:istand 9th AvenueSE;10th AY13nue SE; 11 ,A.venue SE; Dale Street EasLfrom 7th Avenue SEto .1211'1 AvenueSE and the entrance and parking. area of Klinefelter Park as well as the Klinefelter Park . Improvements pursuant to MN Statute 429.011 to 42.9.111.. . The. estimated. cost of the improvement. is $600,000. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed improvement will be heard at this meeting. Judy Weyrens Administrator . Publish: February 23, 2007 March 2, 2007 Proposed Assessment Worksheet 84-53475-065 Lot 7 Block 5; Cloverdale Estates 4th Add 904 Dale Street E Rates: This section represents how the assessment for the above propert:Y is calculated. The left side ofthis section identifies the specific street footag~(s) for your property and the right side illustrates the proposed rates per lineal foot. Street Footaae(s) Long side 0.00 (For long side - divide by 2) Assessment Rates Overlay (60%) $21.74/LF Reclaim (60%) $45.05/LF Short side 85.00 Assessment: This amount represents the amount the property above will be assessed for the 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project. Reclaim Overlay $0.00 $1,848.05 Total Assessment $1,848.05 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project - 107 Barbara Aanstad 906 Dale Street E St. Joseph, MN 56374 Notice of Public.lmprovement Hearing City of St. Joseph Notice his hereby given that the St. Joseph City Council will meet at. the St. Joseph Community Fire Hall at 7:00 PM on March 7, 2007 to consider the milling and overlay of the following areas: Able Street between .1 Oth Avenue SE and yth Avenue SE;. 8th Avenue SE , Callaway Street betweenth Avenue SE and1ih Avenue SE; 9th Avenue. SE south of East Baker Street; the intersection of Dale Street East and 9th Avenue SE; 10th Avenue SE; 11th Avenue SE; Dale Street East from 7th Avenue SE to 12th Avenue SE and the entrance and parking area of Klinefelter Park as well as the Klinefelter Park Improvements pursuant to MN Statute 429.011 to 429.111, The estimated cost of the improvement is $ 600,000. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed improvement will be heard at this meeting. Judy Weyrens Administrator Publish: February 23, 2007 March 2, 2007 Proposed Assessrllent Worksheet 84-53475-066 Lot 8 Block 5; Cloverdale Estates 4th Add 906 Dale Street E Rates: This sectionrepresel1ts how the assessmenUor the above property is calculated. The left side of this section identifies the specific street footage(s) for your property and the right side illustrates the proposed rates per lineal foot. Street Footaqe(s) Long side 0.00 (For long side - divide by 2) Assessment Rates Overlay (60%) $21.74/LF Reclaim (60%) $45.05/LF Short side 85.00 Assessment: Thisamount.represel1tstheamount the property above will be assessed for the 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project. Reclaim Overlay $0.00 $1,848.03 Total Assessment $1,848.03 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project - 108 Gary & Ann Donabauer 910 Dale Street E St.Joseph, MN 56374 NoticeofPubli<: Improvement Hearing City of St. Joseph Notice his hereby given thatth~St. Joseph City Council will meet at theSt. Joseph Community Fire ~aUat7:00PMon. March 7\ 2007tocom~iderthemiUingandoverlay of the following .areas: Able Street between 10th AvenueSE and yth AvenueS~; 8th Avenue SE , CC:lIIC:lwayStreetbetween7thAvenu~iSEafld 12thAvenueSE;91hAvenue SE~outh of East B~k~r Street; the .intersecti()f1ofI:)~leStreet~C:lsti3nd~th AyenueSE;1 oth ~v~nue SE; 11 th Ave~ue. BE; Dale. $,trE;letE;:ast frolliih AvenueSi::to 12th AvenUeSE and the .entrance and parking area of Klinefelter Parkas welL as the. Klinefelter Park> ImprOVements pursuant to MN Statute 429.011 to 429.111. Theestirnatedcost of the improvementis $600,000. Such persol1s as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed. improvement will be heard at this meeting. Judy Weyrens Administrator Publish: February 23, 2007 March 2, 2007 PrOP9~ed. Assessment Worksheet 84-53475-067 Lot 9 Block 5; Cloverdale Estates 4th Add 910 Dale Street E Rates: This section represents how the .8ssessment for the above property is . calculated. The left side of this section identifies the. specific .street footClge(s) for your property and the right side illustrates the proposed rates per lineal foot. Street Footaqe(s) Long side 129.91 (For long side - divide by 2) Assessment Rates Overlay (60%) $21.74/LF Reclaim (60%) $45.05/LF Short side 100.00 Assessment: This amount represents the amount the property above will be assessed for the 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project. Reclaim Overlay $0.00 $3,586.44 Total Assessment $3,586.44 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project - 109 William & Julie Nelson 1005 Dale Street E St. Joseph, MN 56374 Notice of Public Improvement Hearing City of St. Joseph Notice hiS. hereby given that the St. Joseph City Council will meet at the St. Joseph CommunityFire Hallat7:00PM on March 7, 2007 to consider the milling and overlay of the follo""ing areas: Able Street between 10th Avenue SE andih AvenueSE; 8th Avenue SE , Callaway Street betweEln. ih Avenue SE and 12th Avenue SE; gth Avenue SE south of East Baker Street; the intersection of Dale Street East andgth Avenue SE;1 Oth Avenue SE; 11th Avenue SE;. Dale Street East from 7th Avenue SE to 12th Avenue SE and the entrance and parking area of Klinefelter.Park as well as the Klinefelter Park Improvements pursuant to MN Statute 429.011 to 429.111. The estimated cost of the improvement is $ 600,000. SUch persons as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed improvement will be heard at this meeting. Judy Weyrens Administrator Publish: February 23, 2007 March 2, 2007 Proposed Assessment Worksheet 84-53476-020 Lot 1 Block 1; Cloverdale Estates 5th Add 1005 Dale Street E Rates: This section represents how the assessment for the above property is calculated. The left side of this section identifies. the specific street footage(s) for your property and the right side illustrates the proposed rates per lineal foot. Street Footaae(s) Long side 0.00 (For long side - divide by 2) Assessment Rates Overlay (60%) $21.74/LF Reclaim (60%) $45.05/LF Short side 79.32 Assessment: This arnountrepresents the arnount the property above will be assessed for the 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project. Reclaim Overlay $0.00 $1,724.58 Total Assessment $1,724.58 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project - 110 Eugene & Roberta Sell 405 11th Avenue S6 St. Joseph, MN 56374 t-.lotice of public Improvement Hearing CitY ofSt. Joseph Notice his. hereby. ~iventhat theSt. . Jos.ephCity Council wiJl.meetat the St. Joseph Community Fire Hall~t 7:00 PM on March 7, 2007toconsiderJhe milling and overlay of the foUowingareas: . Able Streetbet\N~en ,10th Avenue SEand.ih Avenue<SE; 8th Avenue SE , C~lIawaY9tr~etbe~ee~ 7t,tAveny'eSf2.and ,12th Avenue.SE;9th.Avenu~$6 ,south of East ~~k~r Street; thtif1t~rse9tionof[)~lemr~~tpastcmq,9th,Avenue SI;;. 10th Avenue 5E; 11th AvenueSE;pale St.rf?et5ast fromihA~enueSE te>.1ZthAvenueSEandtheentrance and parkingareae>f'5linefelter parkas well as the Klinefelter Rarklmprovements.pursuant to MN Statute 429.011. to 429.111. The estimated cost of the improvement is $600,000. Such persons as, desire to be heard with reference to the proposed improvement will be heard at this meeting. Judy Weyrens Administrator Publish: February 23, 2007 March 2, 2007 Proposed Assessment Worksheet 84-53476-021 Lot 2 Block 1; Cloverdale Estates 5th Add 405 11th Avenue SE Rates: This section represents how the assessment for the above property is calculated. The left side of this section identifies the specific street footage(s) for your property and the right side illustrates the proposed rates per lineal foot. Street Footaoe(s) Long side 124.36 (For long side - divide by 2) Assessment Rates Overlay (60%) $21.74/LF Reclaim (60%) $45.05/LF Short side 100.01 Assessment: This amount represents the amount the property above will be assessed for the 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project. Reclaim Overlay $0.00 $3,526.31 Total Assessment $3,526.31 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project - 111 James & Julie Haag 401 11th Avenue SE S1. Joseph, MN 56374 Notice of Public Improvement Hearing City of St. Joseph Notice his hereby given that the S1. Joseph City Council will meet at the S1. Joseph Community Fire Hall at 7:00 PM on March 7,2007 to consider the milling and overlay of the following areas: Able Street between 10th AvenueSEand 7'h AvenueSE; 8th Avenue SE , CallawayStreE)t between 7th Avenue SE and12'h Avenue SE; 9thAvenue SEsouth of East Baker Street; the intersection of Dale Street .East and 9th Avenue SE; 10th Avenue SE; 11th Avenue SE; Dale Street East from 7'h Avenue SE to12'h Avenue SEand the entrance and parking area of Klinefelter Park as well as the Klinefelter Park Improvements pursuant to MN Statute 429.011 to 429.111. The estimated cost of the improvement is $ 600,000. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed improvement will be heard at this meeting. Judy Weyrens Administrator Publish: February 23, 2007 March 2, 2007 Proposed Assessment Worksheet 84-53476-022 Lot 3 Block 1; Cloverdale Estates 5th Add 401 11th Avenue SE Rates: This section represents how the assessment for the above property is calculated. Thel.eft side of this section identifies the specific street footage(s) for your property and the right side illustrates the proposed rates per lineal foot. Street Footaqe(s) Long side 0.00 (For long side - divide by 2) Assessment Rates Overlay (60%) $21.74/LF Reclaim (60%) $45.05/LF Short side 78.00 Assessment: This amount represents the amount the property above will be assessed for the 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project. Reclaim Overlay $0.00 $1,695.86 Total Assessment $1,695.86 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project - 112 Micheal & Laurie Renn 31511th Avenue SE Sf. Joseph, MN 56374 Notice of Public Improvement Hearing City ofSt. Joseph Notice his hereby given that the St. Joseph City Council will meet at the St. Joseph Community Fire HaJJ at 7:00 PM on March 7, 2007 to consider the milling and overlay of the following areas: Able Street between 10th Avenue SE and ih Avenue SE; 8th Avenue SE , Callaway Street between ih AvenueSE and 12th Avenue SE;9th,Avenue Sl=south of East Baker Street; the intersection of Dale Street East and 9th Avenue SE; 10th Avenue SE; 11th Avenue SE; Dale Street East from 7th Avenue SE to 12th Avenue BE and the entrance and parking area of Klinefelter Park as well as the Klinefelter Park Improvements pursuant to MN Statute 429.011 to 429.111. The estimated cost of the improvement is $ 600,000. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed improvement will be heard at this meeting. Judy Weyrens Administrator Publish: February 23, 2007 March 2, 2007 i=>>ropo!i;ed Assessment Worksheet 84-53476-023 Lot 4 Block 1; Cloverdale Estates 5th Add 315 11th Avenue SE Rates: This section represents how the, assessment for the above. property is calculated. The left side of this section identifies the specIfic street footage(!i;) for your property and the right side illustrates thepr.oposed' rates pe.r Jineal,foot. Street Footaae(s) Long side 0.00 (For long side - divide by 2) Assessment Rates Overlay (60%) $21. 74/LF Reclaim (60%) $45.05/LF Short side 78.00 Assessment: This amount represents the amount the property above will be assessed for the 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project. Reclaim Overlay $0.00 $1,695.86 Total Assessment $1,695.86 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project - 113 Mortgage Elec Reg Systems Inc 8120 Nations Way #100 Jacksonville, FL 32256 Notice Of PUblic Improvement Hearing City of St. Joseph Notice his. hereby given that the St. Joseph City Council will meet at the St. Joseph Community Fire Hall at7:00 PM on March 7,2007 to consider the milling and overlay of the following areas: Able Stree.t .between 10th Avenue SE and zlh Avenue SE; athAvenue SE , Callaway Street between th Avenue SE and 1ih Avenu~ SE; 9th Avenue SE south of East Baker Street; the intersection of Dale Street East and 9th Avenue SE; 10th Avenue SE; 11th Avenue SE; Dale Street East from th Avenue SE to 1ih Avenue SE and the entrance and parking area of Klinefelter Park as well as the Klinefelter Park Improvements pursuant to MN Statute 429.011 to 429.111. The estimated cost of the improvement is $ 600,000. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed improvement will be heard at this meeting. Judy Weyrens Administrator Publish: February 23, 2007 March 2, 2007 Proposed Assessment Worksheet 84-53476-024 Lot 5 Block 1; Cloverdale Estates 5th Add 313 11th Avenue SE Rates: This section represents how the assessmentfor the above property is calculated. The leftside of this section identifies thespecific<street footage(s) for your property and the right side illustrates the proposed rates per lineal foot. Street Footaqe(s) Long side 0.00 (For long side - divide by 2) Assessment Rates Overlay (60%) $21.74/LF Reclaim (60%) $45.05/LF Short side 78.00 Assessment: This amOUl1trepresents the amount the property above will be assessed for the 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project. Reclaim Overlay $0.00 $1,695.86 Total Assessment $1,695.86 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project - 114 - r Marc & Jacqueline Vadnais PO Box 231 S1. Joseph, MN 56374 Notice of Public lr11prQV~l11ent Hearing City of St. Joseph Notice his hereby given that the S1. Joseph City Council will meet at the S1. Joseph Community Fire Hall at 7:00 PM on March 7, 2007 to consider the milling and overlay of the following areas: Able Street between 10th Avenue SE and ih Avenue SE; 8th Avenue SE , Callaway Street between ih Avenue SE and 12'h Avenue SE; 9th Avenue SE south of East Baker Street; the Intersection of Dale Street East and 9th Avenue SE; 10th Avenue SE; 11th Avenue SE; Dale Street East from 7th Avenue SE to 12!h Avenue SE and th.e entrance and parking area bf Klinefelter Park as well as the Klinefelter Park Improvements pursuant to MN Statute 429.011 to 429.111. The estimated cost of the improvement is $600,000. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed improvement will be heard at this meeting. Judy Weyrens Administrator Publish: February 23, 2007 March 2, 2007 Proposed Assessment Worksheet 84-53476-025 Lot 6 Block 1; Cloverdale Estates 5th Add 31111th Avenue SE Rates: This section represents how the assessment for the above. prQpeJ1y is calculated. The left side of this section identifies the specific street footage(s) for your property and the right side illustrates the proposed rates per lineal foot. Street Footaae(s) Long side 0.00 (For long side - divide by 2) Assessment Rates Overlay (60%) $21.74/LF Reclaim (60%) $45.05/LF Short side 78.00 Assessl11ent: This amount represents the amount the prQperty above will be assessed for the 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project. Reclaim Overlay $0.00 $1,695.86 Total Assessment $1,695.86 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project - 115 Lance Johnson 309 11th Avenue SE St. Joseph, MN 56374 Notice of ublic Improvement Hearing City of St. Joseph Notice his hereby given that the t.Joseph City Council will meet at the St. Joseph Community Fire Hall at 7:00 PM on arch 7, 2007 to consider the milling and overlay of the following areas: Able Streetbetwee 10th Avenue SE and ih AvenueSE; 8th Avenue SE I Callaway Street between 7th Avenue SE and 12th AvenueSE; 9th Avenue SEsouth of East Baker Street; the intersection of Dal Street East and9thAvenueSE; 10th Avenue SE; 11th Avenue SE; Dale Street East from th Avenue SE to 12th Avenue SE and the entrance and parkirlg area of Klinefelter Park as w II. as the Klinefelter Park Improvements pursuant to MN Statute 429.011 to 429.111. Thee timated cost of the improvement is$ 600,000. Such persons as. desire to be heard with eference to the proposed improvement will be heard at this meeting. Judy Weyrens Administrator Publish: February 23, 2007 March 2, 2007 Proposd Assessment Worksheet 84-53476-026 Lot 7 Block 1; Cloverdale Estates 5th Add 309 11th Avenue SE Rates: This section represents ho . the assessment for the above property is calculated. Thel.eft side. of thisse tion identifies the specific streeUootage(s) for your property and the right side iIIustra es the proposed rates per lineal foot. Street FootaQe( 5) Long side 0.00 (For long side - divide by 2) Assessment Rates Overlay (60%) $21.74/LF Reclaim (60%) $45.05/LF Short side 78.03 Assessment: This arnountrepres nts the amount the property above will be assessed for the 2007 East Side Mill & Overl y Project. Reclaim Overlay $0.00 $1,696.50 Total Assessment $1,696.50 2007 East S de Mill & Overlay Project - 116 - r Kerry & Julie Johnson PO Box 42 St. Joseph, MN 56374 Notice ()f Rubliclmprove!nl3nt Hearing City of St. Joseph Notice his, hereby given that, the St. Joseph City Council will meet at the St. Joseph Community Fire Hall at 7:00 PM on March 7, 2007 t() consider .the milling and overlay of the following areas: Able Street between 10th Avenue SE and 7'h Avenue SE; 8th Avenue SE , Callaway Street between 7'h Avenue SE and 12th Avenue SE; 9th Avenue BE south of East Baker Street; the intersection of Dale Street East and '9th Avenue SE; 10th Avenue SE; 11 th Avenue SE; Dale Str~et Eastfrom 7th Avenue SE to 12th Avenue SE and the entrance and parking area of Klinefelter Park as well as the Klinefelter Park Improvements pursuant to MN Statute 429.011 to 429.111. The estimated cost of the improvement is $ 600,000. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed improvement will be heard at this meeting. Judy Weyrens Administrator PUblish: February 23, 2007 March 2, 2007 Proposed Assessment Worksheet 84~53476~027 Lot 1 Block 2; Cloverdale Estates 5th Add 308 11th Avenue SE Rates: This section represents how the assessment for the above property is calculated. The left side of this section identifies the specific.street footage(s) for your property and the right side illustrates the proposed rates per lineal foot. Street Footaaels) Long side 0.00 (For long side - divide by 2) Assessment Rates Overlay (60%) $21.74/LF Reclaim (60%) $45.05/LF Short side 87.36 Assessment: This amount represents the amounUheproperty above wiJ/beassessed for the 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project. Reclaim Overlay $0.00 $1,899.37 Total Assessment $1,899.37 '2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project - 117 Steven & Tonia Olson 310 11th Avenue SE St. Joseph, MN 56374 Notice of ublic Improvement Hearing City of St. Joseph Notice his hereby given that .the t. Joseph City Council will meet at the St. Joseph Community Fire Hall at 7:00PM on arch 7, 2007 to consider the milling and overlay of the follo""ingareas:Able Street betwe n 10th AvenueSE and ih Avel1ueSE; 8th,Avenue SE , Callaway Street between. 7th Avenu SEand 12th Avenue SE; 9th Avenue SE"south of East Baker Street; the intersection of . Dal Street East and. 9th Avenue SE; toth Avenue SE; 11th Avenue SE; Dale Street East from th Avenue SE to 12th Avenue SE and the entrance and parking area otKlinefelter Parkas II as the Klinefelter Park Improvements pursuant to MN Statute 429.011 to 429.111. The stimated cost of the improvement is $ 600,000. Such persons as desire to be heard with eference to the proposed improvement will be heard at this meeting. Judy Weyrens Administrator Publish: February 23, 2007 March 2, 2007 Propo ed Assessment Worksheet 84-53476-028 Lot 2 Block 2; Cloverdale Estates 5t 310 11th Avenue SE Rates: This section represents h the assessment for the above property is calculated~Theleft side.of this.se tion identifies the specific street footage(s) for your property and the right side iIIustr tes the proposed rates per lineal foot. Street F ootaQe(s) Long side 0.00 (For long side - divide by 2) Short side 87.33 Assessment Rates Overlay (60%) $21.74/LF Reclaim (60%) $45.05/LF Assessment: Thisal11ountl"epres ntS the amountthe property above will be assessed for the 2007 East Side Mill & Ove lay Project. Reclaim Overlay $0.00 $1,898.69 Total Assessment $1,898.69 2007 East rde Mill & Overlay Project: 118 Toni Weiler 312 11th Avenue SE St. Joseph, MN 56374 Notice of Publi~ Improvement Hearing CiW of St. Joseph Notice hisherepy. given that the St. . Joseph City Council will rneetat the St. Joseph ComrnunityFireHalla.t 7:00 PM on March .7, 2007 to. consider the milling and overlay of the foIlQwingareas:Abl~Streetbetween 10th Avenue SE/and 7th Avenuei SE; .8th Avenue SE , CClU~'I.'ClY~treetpetween 7th ~venue. SEand14th. Avel1ue.SS;~lh. Avenue. SEsouth. of East Ba~7r Street;th~int~rs.ectiQn.ofl?~leStf~ettastanq~lh.f\venueSE; .10th .Avenue SE; 11th A"epue?~;DaleStreetEastfrorn7t~ j\venue SE to. 12th Avenue SE and the entrance and parking area of Klinefelter Park as weHas the Klinefelter Park Improvements pursuant to MN Statute.429.011 to 429.111. The estimated cost. of the improvement. is$ 600,000. Such personsasdesire to be heard with reference to the proposed improvement Will be heard at this meeting. Judy Weyrens Administrator Publish: February 23, 2007 March 2, 2007 Proposed AssessmenlWorksheet 84-53476-029 Lot 3 Block 2; Cloverdale Estates 5th Add 312 11th Aveue SE Rates: This section represents how the assessment for the above prQpertyis calcUlated. The left side of this section identifies the specific street footage($) for your property and the right side illustrates the proposed rates per lineal foot. Street Footaae(s) Long side 0.00 (For long side - divide by 2) Assessment Rates Overlay (60%) $21 ,74/LF Reclaim (60%) $45.05/LF Short side 87.33 Assessment: This amount represents the amount the property above will be assessed for the 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project. Reclaim Overlay $0.00 $1,898.69 Total Assessment $1,898.69 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project - 119 Paul & Amy Erickson 314 11th Avenue SE St. Joseph, MN 56374 Notice of ublicJmprovement Hearing ity of St. Joseph Notice his hereby given that the t.Joseph City Council Will meet at the St. Joseph Community Fire Hall.at 7:00PM on. arch 7, 2007 to consider the milling and overlay of the following areas: Able Street betwee10th Avenue. SE and th AvenueSE; 8th Avenue SE , Callaway Street bet\IVeen ihAvenue SE and 1z1h AvenueSE;9th Avenue SE .south of East Baker Street; the intersection of Dal Street East and 9th Avenue SE;10th Avenue SE; 11th Avenue SE; Dale Street East from th Avenue SE to 1z1h Avenue SE and. the entrance and parking area of Klinefelter Park as w II as the Klinefelter Park Improvements pursuant to MN Statute 429.011 to 429.111, The e timated. cost of the improvement is $ 600,000. Such persons as desire to be heard with eference to the proposed improvement will be heard at this meeting. Judy Weyrens Administrator Publish: February 23, 2007 March 2, 2007 Proposd Assessment Worksheet 84-53476-030 Lot 4 Block 2; Cloverdale Estates 5th Add 314 11th Avenue SE Rates: This section represents ho the assessment for the above property is calculated. The leftside.ofthis se tion identifies the specific street footage(s) for your property and the right side iIIustra es the proposed rates per lineal foot. Street Footaae(s) Long side 0.00 (For long side - divide by 2) Assessment Rates Overlay (60%) $21.74/LF Reclaim (60%) $45.05/LF Short side 87.33 Assessment: This amount repres nts the amount the property above will be assessed for the 2007 East Side Mill & Overl y Project. Reclaim Overlay $0.00 $1,898.69 Total Assessment $1,898.69 2007 East S'de Mill & Overlay Project - 120 Kelly Behl 402 11th Avenue SE St. Joseph, MN 56374 Noti.ce ofi=J,ubliclrtlllrovement Hearing City or St. Joseph Notice his. hereby giventhaLthe.St. <Joseph CityCounciI will meet at the St. Joseph Communityfire Hall at 7:00PM on Maryh 7, 2007 to consider the milling and overlay of the followiflg"areas: . Able Streetbetween 10thAvenueSEand 7'h AvenueSE; 8th Avenue SE , CCiIICl\J\lCi~ $trretbetw~e~ 71hAvenueSE and 12IhAvenuEl.SE;9th Avenue SEsouth of East ~~Ker Street;mf:lintrrsecti~~<Of.9CileStreeti1:astand9Ih.A.xenUrSE;1pth Ave.nue SE; 11th ,l\venueSE; T)al~ $treetEast from 7th Avenue SE totzth Aven uEl SEano the entrance anO parking Clreaof Klinefelter Parkas well as the Klinefelter Parklmprovements.pursuant to MN Statute 429.011 to .429.111. The estimated. cost of the improvement is $600,000. Such perfpns as desire to be heard with referencEl to the proposed improvement will be heard at this meeting. Judy Weyrens Administrator Publish: February 23, 2007 March 2, 2007 Propo~ed Assessment Worksheet 84-53476-031 Lot 5 Block 2; Cloverdal~ Estates 5th Add 402 11th Avenue SE Rates: This section represents how the assessment for the above pro.perty is calculated. The left side of this section identifies the specific street footage(s) for your property and the right side illustrates the proposed rates per lineal foot. Street FootaQe(s) Long side 0.00 (For long side - divide by 2) Assessment Rates Overlay (60%) $21.74/LF Reclaim (60%) $45.05/LF Short side 87.34 Assessment: This amount represents the amount the property above will be assessed for the 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project. Reclaim Overlay $0.00 $1,899.03 Total Assessment $1,899.03 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project - 121 Lance & Keri Culliver 1103 Dale Street E . St. Joseph, MN 56374 Notice of ubliclmprovement Hearing ity of St. Joseph Notice his hereby given that the t.Joseph City Council will meet at the St. Joseph Community Fire Hall at 7:00 PM on arch?, 2007 to consider the milling and overlay of the folloV\lingareas: Able Street betwee. 10th Avenue. SEand thAvenue SE; 8th Avenue SE , daHawayStreet .between 7th AvenueSE and 12th Avenue SE;. 9th Avenue SE south of East Baker Street; the intersection of Dal . Street East and 9th Avenue SE; 10th Avenue SE; 11th Avenue SE; Dale Street East from 7h Avenue SE to 12th AvenueSE and the entrance and parking area of Klinefelter Parkas w II as the Klinefelter Park Improvements .pursuant to MN Statute 429.011 to 429.111. The e timated cost of the improvement is $ 600,000. Such persons as desire t9be heard with eference to the proposed improvement will be heard at this meeting. Judy Weyrens Administrator Publish: February 23, 2007 March 2, 2007 ProposdAssessment Worksheet 84-53476-032 Lot 6 Block 2; Cloverdale Estates 5th Add 1103 Dale Street E Rates: This section represents ho the assessmentforthe above property is calculated. Thel.eft side. of this. se tion identifies the specific street footage(s) for your property and the right side iIIustra es the proposed rates per lineal foot. Street FootaQe(s) Long side 124.96 (For long side - divide by 2) Assessment Rates Overlay (60%) $21.74/LF Reclaim (60%) $45.05/LF Short side 101.77 Assessment: This amountrepres nts the amount the property above will be assessed for the 2007 East Side Mill & Over ayproject. Reclaim Overlay $0.00 $3,571.03 Total Assessment $3,571.03 2007 East S de Mill & Overlay Project - 122 Mark & Karen Schneider 11.04 Dale Street E St. Joseph, MN 56.374 Notice of Public Improvement Hearing City afSt. Joseph Notice hishereby gi"ell that the St. Joseph City Council will meet at the St. Joseph CofllmunityFirfl HaUElt]:.oo PM on Marsh], 2D07toconsider the milling.Cind overlay of the foUowingareas: Ablfl.Streetbetween 1Dth Avenue.SE.and ihAvenueSE;8th Avenue SE , QCiI19!,9~i~Jrt:letbfltwElell. 7th Avenue SE .and 12th}\VenuEl~.E:;.~tl1p'venut:lSSsouth of Eas~ a~k.~r Street;th~int~rsecti~~of8~le~tr~etE:~st and.9th~"enUt:lSE:;19th ..!-\vElllue SE; 11 t .A.venueSE; Dale Stre~tEastfrom 7th .Avenue .s.Et01~lhl\ve:nueSE and the entrance ano parking area of Klinefelter Park as weIlas the Klinefelter Park Improvements pursuant to MN Statute 429..011 to 429.111. The estimated cost of the. improvement is $ 6.0.0,.0.0.0. Such per~onsc:ls . desire to . be heard with reference to the proposed improvement will be heard at this meeting. Judy Weyrens Administrator Publish: February 23, 2.0.07 March 2, 2.0.07 Proposed Assessment Worksheet 84-53476-.033 Lot 1 Block 3; Cloverdale Estates 5th Add 11.04 Dale Street E Rates: This section represents how the assessment for the above pro.pertyis calculated. The left side of this section identifies the specific street footage(s) for your property and the right side illustrates the proposed rates per lineal foot. Street Footaae(s) Long side .0..00 (For long side - divide by 2) Assessment Rates Overlay (6.0%) $21.74/LF Reclaim (6.0%) $45.D5/LF Short side 84.95 Assessment: This amount represents the amount the property above willbe.assessed for the 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project. Reclaim Overlay $.0..0.0 $1,846.9.0 Total Assessment $1,846.90 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project - 123 David & Donna Wood 1100 Dale Street E St. Joseph, MN 56374 Notice ofubliclmprovement Hearing City of 8t. Joseph Notice his hereby given that. the t. Joseph City Council will meet at the St. Joseph Community Fire Hall at 7:00 PM on arch 7, 2007 to consider the milling and overlay of the following areas: . Abl~ Streetpetwe n 10th AvenueSE and.. th. Avenue SE; 8th Avenue SE , Callaway Street between 7th Avenu . SE and 1ih Avenue SE; 9th Avenue SE south of East Baker Street; the intersection of Dal Street East and 9th Avenue SE; 10th Avenue SE; 11th Avenue SE; Dale Street East from th Avenue SE to 12th Avenue SE and the entrance and parking area of Klinefelter Park as ell as the Klinefelter Park Improvements pursuant to MN Statute 429.011 to 429.111. The stimated cost of the improvement is $ 600,000. Such persons as desire to be heard with eference to the proposed improvement will be heard at this meeting. Judy Weyrens Administrator Publish: February 23, 2007 March 2, 2007 Propb ed AssessmentWorksheet 84-53476-034 Lot 2 Block 3; Cloverdale Estates 5t Add 1100 Dale. Street E Rates: Thissectic)Orepresentsh w the assessmentfor the above .property is. calculated. The left side ofthis s . ction identifies the specific street footage(s) for your property and the right side iIIustr tes the proposed rates per lineal foot. Street Footaae(s) Long side 0.00 (For long side - divide by 2) Assessment Rates Overlay (60%) $21.74/LF Reclaim (60%) $45.05/LF Short side 85.01 Assessment: This amountrepreentsthe amount the property above will be assessed forthe 2007 East Side Mill & Ove lay Project. Reclaim Overlay $0.00 $1,848.26 Total Assessment $1,848.26 2007 East ide Mill & Overlay Project - 124 Matthew Koski 1008 Dale Street E S1. Joseph, MN 5.6374 Notice qf. Publiclmprovernent Hearing Cityof.St. Joseph Notice hisherSQY given that the Sf.> Joseph City Council wiH meetattheSf. Joseph 90mmunityFireHallat 7:0pPM()nMarsh7.r 2007to consid~rthemimngandoverlay of the f()lIowingareas: .. >AbleStreetbetw~~J'l1 Oth Avenue. SEand 7th AvenueSE;8thAvenue SE , 9~JI9~a.y.. Strretbetw~~97th)\v~nuec~9.;(md.;~~1~)\venU~SE;.91h. Ayenu~.SEsouth of East ~~krr Street;/th~.>il1te.rsecti()11()f[)ale~~rert9<3.~ti3l1d ..9th,A.Y~11 ue.S i::;;>1pth Ave.nue S E; 11th 7\venqeSE; Dale Str~etEastfron,th,i'\VenueSEtoi12thAvel1ueSEand the .entrance and parking area of Klinefelter Park as well <as the Klinefelter f>ark J mprovements .pursuant to MN Statute 429.011 to 429.111. The estimated costof the improvement is $600,000. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed improvement will be heard at this meeting. Judy Weyrens Administrator Publish: February 23, 2007 March 2, 2007 Proposed Assessment Worksheet 84-53476-035 Lot 3 Block 3; Cloverdale Estates 5th Add 1008 Dale Street E Rates: This section represents how the assessment for the above property is calculated. The left side ofthissection identifies the specific street footage(s) for your property and the right side illustrates the proposed rates per lineal foot. Street Footaae(s) Long side 0.00 (For long side - divide by 2) Assessment Rates Overlay (60%) $21.74/LF Reclaim (60%) $45.05/LF Short side 100.98 Assessment: This amount represents the amount the property above will be assessed . for the 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project. Reclaim Overlay $0.00 $2,195.52 Total Assessment $2,195.52 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project - 125 Timothy & Mary Knudsen 1006 Dale Street E St. Joseph, MN 56374 Notice ofubliclmprovement Hearing City olSt. Joseph Notice his hereby given . that the t.Joseph City Council will meet at the St. Joseph Community Fire Halfat 7:00 PM on arch 7, 2007 toconsiderthe milling and overlay of the following areas: Able.Streetbetwee 10th Avenue SEandih Avenue SE; 6th Avenue SE , Callaway Street between ih Avenue SE and 12th Avenue SE;9th Avenue SE south of East Baker Street; the intersection of Dal Street East and 9th Avenue SE;10th Avenue SE; 11th Avenue SE; Dale Street East from th Avenue SE t01ih Avenue SE and the entrance and parking area of Klinefelter Park as wll as the Klinefelter Park Improvements pursuant to MN Statute 429.011 to 429.111. The e timated cost of the improvement is $ 600,000. Such persons as desire to be heard with eference to the proposed improvement will be heard at this meeting. Judy Weyrens Administrator Publish: February 23, 2007 March 2, 2007 Proposd Assessment Worksheet 84-53476-036 Lot 4 Block 3; Cloverdale Estates 5th Add 1006 Dale Street E Rates: This section representsho the assessmentfor the above . property is calculated. The left side of thisse tion identi.fies the specific street footage(s) for your property and the right side iIIustra es the proposed rates per lineal foot. Street Footaoe(s) Long side 0.00 (For long side - divide by 2) Assessment Rates Overlay (60%) $21.7 4/LF Reclaim (60%) $45.05/LF Short side 99.42 Assessment: This amount represents the amount the property above will be assessed for the 2007 East Side Mill & OverlyProject. Reclaim Overlay $0.00 $2,161.67 Total Assessment $2,161.67 2007 East Si e Mill & Overlay Project - 126 Jodel Johnson 225 12th AvenueSE St. Joseph, MN 56374 Notic~()f PubliclR'lprovement Hearing City of St. Joseph Notice his ht3reQY ghfen that the St.. Joseph City Council will meet at the St. Joseph ComrnunityFire Hal/at 7:00.PMPI1 March7,2007.to (;cmsiderthe rnillir9. and overlay of the fOl/owingareas: .AbleStreetbetween10thAvenu~.sEand ihAverue.SE; 8th Avenue SE , q~lla,^,C!y Stnitet. betvle~9.. 7'thAvenu~,Spcmd12mAvenu~SE;i~thAVt3nUeSE .~outh of Ea~~ B~Ker Street;the.intersectien()f[)~tt3~tSt3E!tpClstClndgt~f\"E!nUE!.sE:.;i i1 Oth. AVEln ue SE; 11 ,t>.verlue se; Da.leStreetEastfromfh,?venueSE to 12thAvenueSEandJheentrance and parRing area of Klinefelter Parkaswel/as the .Klinefelter Park. Improvements pursuant to MN Statute 429.011 to 429.111. The estimated cost of the improvement is $600,000. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed improvement will. be heard at this meeting. Judy Weyrens Administrator Publish: February 23, 2007 March 2, 2007 Proposed Assessment Worksheet 84-53790-040 Lot 1 BlocR 1; Pond View Ridge 3 225 12th Avenue SE Rates: This section represents how the assessment for the above property is calculated. The left side of this section identifies the specific street footage(s) for your property and the right side illustrates the proposed rates per lineal foot. Street Footaae(s) Long side 140.06 (For long side - divide by 2) Assessment Rates Overlay (60%) $21.74/LF Reclaim (60%) $45.05/LF Short side 0.00 Assessment: This amount represents the amount the property above will be assessed for the 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project. Reclaim Overlay $0.00 $1,522.59 Total Assessment $1,522.59 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project - 127 Joyce Oldeen 305 12th Avenue SE St. Joseph, MN 56374 Notice of ubliclmprovement Hearing ity of St. Joseph Notice his hereby given that the 1. Joseph City Council will meet at the St. Joseph Community Fire Hall at 7:00 PM on. arch 7, 2007 to consider the milling and overlay of the following areas: ... Abl19Street betwee 10th Avenue SE and. ih Avenue SE;8th Avenue SE , Callaway Street between 7th Avenue SEand tzth Avenue SE; 9th .Avenue SE south of East Baker Street; the intersection ofDal Street East and 9th Avenue SE; 10th Avenue SE; 11th Avenue SE; Dale Street East from 7 Avenue SEto 1zth Avenue SE and the entrance and parking area of KlinefelterPark asw II as the KlinefelterPark Improvements. pursuant to MN Statute 429.011 to 429.111. The e timated cost of the improvement is $ 600,000. Such persons as desire. to be.. heard. with eference to the proposed improvement will be heard at this meeting. Judy Weyrens Administrator Publish: February 23, 2007 March 2, 2007 Propos d Assessment Worksheet 84-53790-043 Lot 1 Block 3; Pond View Ridge 3 305 12th Avenue SE Rates: This section represents ho the assessment for the above property is calculated. The left side of thisse tion identifies the specific street footilge(s) for your property and the right side iIIustra es the proposed rates per lineal foot. Street FootaQe(s) Long side 140.08 (For long side - divide by 2) Assessment Rates Overlay (60%) $21.7 4/LF Reclaim (60%) .$45.05/LF Short side 0.00 Assessment: This amount repres nts the amount the property above will be assessed for the 2007 East Side Mill & OverlyProject. Reclaim Overlay $0.00 $1,522.79 Total Assessment $1,522.79 2007 East S de Mill & Overlay Project - 128 Carol McNeal 339 12th Avenue SE St. Joseph, MN 56374 Notice ofPubli9Jmprovement Hearing Ciwof.St. Joseph Notice his hereby given that the St. Joseph City Council will meet at the St. Joseph Community Fire Hall at 7:00 PM on March 7" 2007 to consider the milling and overlay of the following areas: Able Street between 10th Avenue SE and 7'h Avenue SE;. 8th Avenue SE , Callaway Street between 7'h AvenueSE and 12th AvenueSE; 9th Avenue SE south of East Baker Street; the intersection of Dale Street East and 9thAvenue BE;, 10th AVenue SE; 11th Avenue SE; Dale Street East from 7th Avenue SE to 1ih Avenue SE and the entrance and parking area of Klinefelter Park as well as the Klinefelter Park Improvements pursuant to MN Statute 429.011 to 429.111. The estimated cost of the improvement is $ 600,000. Such persons as desire to be heard' with reference to the proposed improvement will be heard at this meeting. Judy Weyrens Administrator Publish: February 23, 2007 March 2, 2007 Proposed Asse~sment Worksheet 84-53790-080 Lot 1 Block 1; Pond View Ridge 4 339 12th Avenue SE Rates: This section represents how the assessment for the above property is calculated. The left side of this section identifies the specific street footClge(s) for your property and the right side illustrates the proposed rates per lineal foot. Street Footaaels) Long side 141.46 (For long side - divide by 2) Assessment Rates Overlay (60%) $21.74/LF Reclaim (60%)$45.0.5/LF Short side 0.00 Assessment: This amount represents the amount the property above wiU be assessed for the 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project. Reclaim Overlay $0.00 $1,537.76 Total Assessment $1,537.76 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project - 129 Mark & Joan Loch 111 0 Dale Street E St. Joseph, MN 56374 Notice of ubliclmprovement Hearing ityof St. Joseph Notice his hereby given that the t. Joseph City Council will meet at the St. Joseph Community Fire Hall at 7:00 PM on arch 7, 2007 to consider the milling and overlay of the follo,^,ing ar~as:AblE!.StreetbetweelQth Avenue SEand thAvenue 5E; 8th Avenue SE , Callaway Street betweenih Avenue SE and 12th Avenue SE; 9th Avenue SE south of East Baker Street; the intersection of Dal . Street East and 9th Avenue SE; 10th Avenue SE; 11th Avenue SE; Dale Street East from th Avenue SE to 12th Avenue SE and the entrance and parking area of Klinefelter Parkas w II as the Klinefelter ParK Improvements pursuant to MN Statute 429.011 to 429.111. The stimated cost af the improvement is $ 600,000. Such persons as desire to be heard with eference to the proposed improvement will be heard at this meeting. Judy Weyrens Administrator Publish: February 23, 2007 March 2, 2007 Proposed Assessment Worksheet 84-53790-138 Lot 1 Block 6; Pond View Ridge 4 1110 Dale Street E Rates: This section represents ho . the as.sessment for the above property is calculated. The left side of this se tionidentifies the specific street footage(s) for your property and the right side iIIustr tes the proposed rates per lineal foot. Street Footaae(s) Long side 141.29 (For long side - divide by 2) Assessment Rates Overlay (60%) $21.74/LF Reclaim (60%) $45.05/LF Short side 0.00 Assessment:Thisamountrepres nts the amountthe property above will be assessed for the 2007 East Side Mill & Ove lay Project. Reclaim Overlay $0.00 $1,535.95 Total Assessment $1,535.95 2007 East ide Mill & Overlay Project - 130 City of St. Joseph Notice of Public Improvement Hearing City of st. Joseph Notice his hereby given that the St. Joseph City Council will meet at the St. Joseph Community Fire Hall at 7:00 PM on March 7, 2007 to consider the milling and overlay of the following areas: Able Street between 10th Avenue SE and ih Avenue SE; 8th Avenue SE , Callaway Street between ih Avenue SE and 1ih Avenue SE; 9th Avenue SE south of East Baker Street; the intersection of Dale Street East and 9th Avenue SE; 10th Avenue SE; 11th Avenue SE; Dale Street East from ih Avenue SE to 1ih Avenue SE and the entrance and parking area of Klinefelter Park as well as the Klinefelter Park Improvements pursuant to MN Statute 429.011 to 429.111. The estimated cost of the improvement is $ 600,000. SUCh persons as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed improvement will be heard at this me.eting. Judy Weyrens Administrator Publish: February 23, 2007 March 2, 2007 Proposed Assessment Worksheet 84-53400-008 Rates: This section represents how the assessment for the above property is calculated. The left side of this section identifies the specific street footage(s) for your property and the right side illustrates the proposed rates per lineal foot. Street Footaae(s) Long side 0.00 (For long side - divide by 2) Assessment Rates Overlay (60%) $21.7 4/LF Reclaim (60%) $45.05/LF Short side 118.59 Assessment: This amount represents the amount the property above will be assessed for the 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project. Reclaim Overlay $0.00 $2,578.35 Total Assessment $2,578.35 2007 East Side Mill & Overlay Project - 131 February 12,2007 Page 1 of2 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the City Council for the City of St. Joseph met in Joint session with the St. Joseph Planning Commission on Monday, February 12,2007 at 7:00 PM in the St. Joseph City Hall. City Council Members Present: Mayor Richard Carlbom. Councilors Al Rassier, Dale Wick, Renee Symanietz, and Steve Frank. Administrator Judy Weyrens. Planning Commission Members Present: Chair Bob Loso. Commissioners S. Kathleen Kalinowski, Michael Deutz, Ross Rieke, Mark Anderson and Council Liaison Al Rassier. City Representatives Present: EDA consultant Cynthia Smith-Strack Others Present: Collegeville Development Communities representatives Jim Diagovanni Mayor Carlbom stated the purpose of the meeting is to review the concept plan for the development entitled Millstream Lofts and Shops: At this time Mayor Carlbom turned the floor over to City Administrator Judy Weyrens. Weyrens stated the City staff has been working with Collegeville Communities on a proposed redevelopment plan for the property known as the Krebsbach site. The property is currently vacant and the proposed development includes a two story development with residential dwelling units on the second level and commercial shops on the lower level. The proposed development also includes the demolition of the St. Joseph Laundromat. This area will serve as a courtyard for the development. It is anticipated that the commercial suite adjacent to the courtyard will consist of a restaurant that will be able to provide outdoor dining. The proposed development is consistent with the standards in the General Business District. Weyrens clarified that a concept plan is a broad brush approach to reviewing a plan to determine it it meets the general intent of the zoning district. The detailed plans have not been reviewed at this time as engineering and architectural plans are costly and the Ordinance does not require detail at this stage of development. Weyrens stated that the City Staff has reviewed the plans and have recommended the City Council and Planning Commission accept the plan, authorizing the developer to move to the next step in the planning process. At this time Mayor Carlbom turned the floor over to Collegeville Development. Jim Diagovanni spoke on behalf of Collegeville Communities. Diagovanni stated that as Weyrens has indicated the proposed plan includes a mixed density development with 18 residential units on the second level and 10 commercial suites on the lower level. Due to the cost of the project, the development will be constructed in two phases. The first phase will consist of eight residential units and four commercial suites. At this time Collegeville Communities have secured three letters of intent for the commercial suites and five letters of intent for the residential suites. Upon being questioned as to the timeframe for development, Diagovanni stated that CDC has completed both the preliminary and fmal TIF application. The application material submitted for the concept plan included a time line that identified ground breaking in May of2007 with completion in September of2007. CDC has hired W Gohman construction as the general contract and they are currently working on the documents for the required planning processes. To follow is a summary of discussion regarding the concept plan from both members of the City Council and Planning Commission. PARKING Does the plan meet the parking requirements of the Ordinance. The plan does not indicate how many parking spaces are required and how many are provided. Weyrens reiterated that the plan before the Council and Planning Commission at this time are concept only. If the concept is approved at this meeting the additional details will be provided and the plan will be reviewed for Ordinance compliance. Diagovanni stated that CDC is not looking for relief at this time and they anticipate being able to meet the requirements. Weyrens reminded those present that the subject property is located in the Central Business District and as such strict adherence to the Parking requirements ofthe Ordinance is not required. In the past the Planning Commission and have granted relief for development in the Central Business district if the development provides required parking for all residential developments. If February 12,2007 Page 2 of2 deviation from the Ordinance is required, the Plannin Commission will have an opportunity to discuss and determine the required parking. HOUSING TYPE (Rental versus Non Rental) Those present questioned if the proposed dwelling u its are intended as rental units. Diagovanni stated that it is the intent of CDC to sell the each of the residential units, it is not intended as a rental unit. However, if a property owner sub-leases the unit, CDC has no control. Ther was considerable discussion as to the difference in parking requirements between rental units and owner occupie units. Again it was stated that the parking requirements will be reviewed and the analysis will be presented to the lanning Commission for consideration. ALLEY V ACA nON Commissioners questioned the existing north/south a ley and the same has been vacated. Weyrens responded that the previous property owner had requested the vacati n of the north/south alley and the Council agreed to vacate the alley with the submission of a development plan. As the alley does not include easements for utilities or access to property is not needed from the alley, the request to acate the alley appeared to be in the best interest of the public. Therefore, during the planning process the City Co cil will consider a request to vacate the alley. SITE PLAN DETAILS Those present questioned if the proposed developme t plan includes a signage plan. Smith-Strack responded that site plan material must include a master site plan. Di gavonni stated that in reviewing the proposed Ordinance it appears that the signage will fall within the allowabl limits. There being no further questions, Loso made a moti n to accept the concept plan entitled Millstream Shops and Lofts as presented by Collegeville Development G oup with the understanding that staff will continue to work on the detailed plans including: parking, re tal status, balconies as they relate to BBQ devices, signage, landscape detail Common Interest Com unity requirements and alley vacation. The motion was seconded by Kalinowski and passed unanimously y both the Planning Commission and City Council. Future Development Plan: Weyrens presented the PI ing Commission and Council with draft concept plans for the following proposed developments FELD/PROM PROPERY Proposed development includes platting 35 acres of roperty with a mix ofIndustrial and Commercial. The area proposed to be platted falls outside the North Corrid r study area and can be platted without affect to the study. It is anticipated that the Planning Commission will be re iewing the proposed plan in April with the City Council reviewing the draft Environmental documents in M ch. COUNTY ROAD 75 AND 8TH A VENUE NE Proposed development includes the construction oft 0 multi office complexes which will be constructed in two phases with the fIrst phase beginning in 2007. It is a ticipated that the Planning Commission will be reviewing the plans in April. Adiourn: The meeting was adjourned by consensus t 7:25 PM. Judy Weyrens Administrator DRAFT February 15, 2007 Page 1 of 4 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the City Council for the City of St. Joseph met in regular session on Thursday, February 15, 2007 at 7:00 PM in the St. Joseph City Hall. Members Present: Mayor Richard Carlbom, Councilors AI Rassier, Dale Wick, Renee Symanietz, Steve Frank, City Administrator Judy Weyrens Citv Representatives Present: City Engineer Tracy Ekola, Public Works Director Dick Taufen Others Present: Quentin Donabauer, Catherine Brown, Gary Donabauer, Randy Broda, Phil Welter, Bob Wahlstrom Approve Aqenda: Symanietz made a motion to approve the agenda with the following deletion: 3b Bills Payable - Moved to March 1st The motion was seconded by Rassier and passed unanimously. Consent Aqenda: Symanietz made a motion to approve the consent agenda as follows: a. Minutes - Approve the minutes of February 1, 2007. b. Bills Payable - DELETED c. Waiver of Conflict - Authorize the Administrator to execute the waiver of conflict, acknowledging a conflict of interest with regard to the school development. d. Special Use Permit - Accept the contingent recommendation of the Planning Commission granting a Special Use Permit to allow the construction of a K-8 school in an R-1 Zoning District. e. Change Order - Approve Change Order #8 for the Water Treatment Plant resulting in an increase of $1,745.00. The motion was seconded by Frank. Discussion: Rassier requested that page 8 of the minutes be amended clarifying his position on the market study. Rassier stated that he voted in the negative not on the need for a market study, rather the removal of the Industrial component of the study. Public Comments to the Aqenda: No one present wished to speak. 2007 Jade Road Improvements - Continuation Hearinq: Carlbom advised the Council and the public, that due to a publishing error, the Public Hearing for the 2007 Jade Road Improvements will be continued. At this time he welcomed comments from those present. Cathy Brown, Attorney for Donabauer and Broda, approached the Council to provide written objections to the assessments from the property owners. She stated that she has had a chance to review the tape from the last meeting relating to the proposed improvement project. Brown questioned when the assessment hearing will be set. She was advised that the City has done it both when bids are accepted as well as when the project is complete. Ekola stated that the Council has not yet decided on a date for the assessment hearing. The written objection states that both property owners are objecting to the proposed assessments as they relate to the turn lanes at Iverson Street. The objection also questions the City authority to assess the residents and the authority to assess turn lanes. ct the project. Wick made a motion to close the Public Hearing for the 2007 Jade Road Improvements. The motion was seconded by Symanietz and passed unanimously. Wick made a motion to adopt Resolution 2007-003 Accepting the Feasibility Report and Ordering the Improvements. The motion was seconded by Symanietz and passed unanimously. DRAFT February 15, 2007 Page 2 of 4 Wick questioned the next step. Ekola advised hi that they plan to advertise for bids in April with the bids being due in Mayas well as construction to begi in May. 2007 East Side Mill and Overlav Improvements: Previously, the Council authorized SEH to prepare the Feasibility Report for the proposed 2007 East Si e Mill and Overlay Improvements. Ekola presented the Council with the Feasibility Report for the projec . According to Ekola, the schedule is as follows: February March Feasibility Report to be presented to the Council Open Houses to discus the project designs March 1 4-6 PM March 5 2-4 PM Public Improvement He ring Bid Opening Assessment Hearing Project work being don April May July/August Ekola stated that rather than holding individual eetings with the residents, there will be two open houses set up for residents to come and ask questions nd see the actual design of the project. The project is broken into two project areas: 1. Able Street E from 8tn Avenue SE t 10th Avenue SE as well as 8th Avenue SE between Able Street E and Baker Street E. (Porti ns of Cloverdale 2nd Addition) 2. Callaway Street E near 9th Avenue E to 12'h Avenue SE, Dale Street from the cul-de-sac to 12'h Avenue SE, 9th Avenue SE fro Baker Street E to Dale Street E, 10th Avenue SE from Callaway Street E to Klinefelter Par and 11th Avenue SE from Callaway Street E to Dale Street E. (Portions of Cloverdale 4,5, 6th Additions) Wick questioned the portions of both Callaway treet E and Dale Street E between ih Avenue SE and 8th Avenue SE as the City recently replaced those treets. Ekola stated that the Cloverdale Project ended where this project will begin in those areas. Sh added that these streets will now match up with the previous project. Ekola stated that the portion of 8th Avenue and ble Street E was constructed in 1968. An overlay was planned in 1998; however it was not completed Based on the high degree of cracking, Ekola stated that it is recommended that this area be reclaimed an new pavement be laid. The portions of 9th, 10th, 11th Avenues SE, Callaway Street E and Dale Stree E were constructed in 1987, 1988 and 1989. Ekola stated that although there is a lot of cracking 0 these streets as well, the structure appears to be sound, so it is recommended that an overlay project b completed for these areas. Carlbom questioned how long the reclaim and overlay projects will extend the life of the street. According to Ekola, a reclaim can extend the life an additional 15-20 years and an overla can extend the life about 10-12 years. She added that when the City did the seal coating project last y ar, they did look at these streets; however they were in need of more work than seal coating alone. There is also a small portion of the entrance to Klinefelter Park that was included in the project. Weyrens suggested that Wick discuss possible Park 1m rovements with the Park Board as well. Rassier stated that the portion of 10th Avenue SE which serves as he entrance to Klinefelter Park should not be assessed to those adjacent property owners as he believes that it is part of the park system. According to Ekola, this is not a park entrance rather it is designated as a Cit~ Street and to not charge assessments to those property owners on the corner of Dale Street a d 10t Avenue SE would require a policy change. Carlbom questioned whether those property owners be efit from their location and whether or not their property is worth more. Frank questioned whether the par or the houses were there first. Weyrens advised the Council that the park was there first and devel pment was planned around the park. Weyrens stated that there is a lot in Graceview that has a holding p nd on their property that they own, but they cannot use. DRAFT February 15, 2007 Page 3 of 4 That lot has a huge front footage due to the holding pond. She questioned how that would be any different than the two corner parcels being charged for that portion of 10th Avenue SE that serves as an entrance to Klinefelter Park. She stated that staff will look into this issue. Frank stated that, in his opinion, this should only pertain to park areas. Wick questioned why there, is a holding pond on private property. Ekola explained that they have an easement and the holding pond is on that easement. Since then, the City has a policy that all holding ponds be located on City property. Wick questioned the parking lot near Northland Park and if that would be a different situation. Ekola explained that the Northland Park parking lot is located on an easement; whereas, 10th Avenue SE is a platted street. Ekola advised the Council that the estimated cost is based on last years construction prices taking inflation into consideration. She added that they will have a better idea of the actual costs once the bids are received. Rassier stated that the estimated cost should be updated to include the cost of paving the parking lot. Based on the estimates, the assessment rates are as follows: Overlay $21.7 4/Linear Ft. Reclaim $45.05/Linear Ft. The proposed assessment is based on the City policy whereby the property owners will be assessed at 60% and the City will be responsible for the other 40%. According to Ekola, she anticipates that this will be a competitive construction season and hopefully the bid prices will be lower than the stated estimates. Carlbom then questioned the Cloverdale Townhouse area and why they are being assessed as they paid for the overlay along 9th Avenue SE that was done in 1998. Ekola stated that only the corner lots are being assessed as they were not fully assessed in 1998. The assessment for those lots is in accordance with the City policy whereby corner parcels are assessed at 100% of the short side and 50% of the long side. When questioned how cul-de-sacs are assessed, Ekola stated that the assessment is based on the front footage at the setback line. Frank made a motion to approve Resolution 2007-006 Receiving the Report and Ordering the Hearing on Improvement to be held on March 7 at 7:00 PM at the St. Joseph Community Fire Hall. The motion was seconded by Wick and passed unanimously. Weyrens advised the Council that the length of the bond has not yet been determined. Therefore, when questioned by residents as to the terms of payment, it will either be 10 or 15 years. More information will be available after the financing alternatives have been reviewed. Wick questioned whether or not the improvements to Klinefelter Park need to be brought back to the Council after the Park Board has made a decision. Weyrens stated that at this time the project can continue to move forward while the Park Board is considering additional improvements. The final decision must be brought back to the Council and the project scope must be determined before the Council orders the design and specifications. MAYOR REPORTS AFSCME - Sprinasted Implementation: Carlbom reported that the Personnel Committee met with AFSCME to discuss the implementation of the Springsted Study. Springsted was hired to review current and future staffing needs for the City. While the Council does not have the full implementation for this Council meeting, Carlbom requested the Council review the staffing needs of the Maintenance Department at this meeting. The study recommended the Council add the following two positions: · Maintenance Supervisor- This position will be posted and all union members will have the opportunity to apply. · Utility Plant Operator- Currently, this position did not exist; however Mike Sworski has been working out of class doing the duties of the new position. It is proposed that Sworski's title be reclassified from Maintenance Employee to Utility Plant Operator and that he be compensated $1500 in back-pay for working out of class. DRAFT February 15, 2007 Page 4 of 4 Rassier made a motion to approve the additi n of the two new positions entitled Maintenance Supervisor and Utility Plant Operator and to eclassify Mike Sworski from Maintenance Worker to Utility Plant Operating, compensating him $ ,500 for working out of class. The motion was seconded by Symanietz and passed unanim usly. Council Workshop: Carlbom stated that the Cou cil met with City Staff in an all day workshop to discuss the progress in 2006 and the plans for 2007. COU CIL REPORTS SYMANIETZ St. Cloud Area Leadership Meetinq: Symanietz eported that she attended the St. Cloud Area Leadership meeting at which she spoke as a future leader 0 the community. Joint Council/Planninq Commission Meetinq: S manietz stated that she attended a joint meeting with the Council and Planning Commission on February 12, 2007. WICK - No Report RASSIER Winter Warm-Up: Rassier mentioned that he att nded the Chamber's Winter Warm-Up on February 2 at which Ken Hiemenz was presented with the Kel y Award. Rassier congratulated Hiemenz on the receiving the Kelly award, as it was well deserved. FRANK - No Report ADMINIS RATOR REPORTS Field Street: Weyrens reported that she receive another proposed layout for the proposed Field Street. The new layout shows Field Street south of wh re it had been presented in the past. Wick questioned where the proposed layout came from. Weyre s stated that Doug Weiszhaar of WSB met with the FHA and the Cultural Resources Unit of MN Dot to d scuss the status of the project. During the discussion they suggesting other possible alternatives. At he same time they acknowledged that they have not laid any of the suggestions out to determine feasibil ty but recommended further consideration. The alternative illustrated is a result of this meeting. Carlbom stated that this should be researched further as it was presented by MN Dot and the FHA. We rens suggested that this be presented to the TAC Committee as they worked on the other alterna ives that were presented to the Council. She questioned whether the Council would like to see the costs associated with presenting this to the TAC. Frank stated that he would like to see some advantages of t is new route. Wick questioned why they chose to move the proposed road to that location to which We rens stated that there is less development and they can possibly use current roads. Weyrens reminded the Council that this is a proposed layout, but has not yet been laid out on paper. She raised the questio as to whether or not the Council would like this alternative evaluated. Weyrens agreed to gath r additional information as to the origin of the layout as well as the current status. Adiourn: Symanietz made a motion to adjou n at 8:15 PM; seconded by Wick. Ayes: Carlbom, Symanietz, Wick, Fr nk Nays: Rassier Judy Weyrens Administrator City 0 St. Joseph Page ~ Bill Payable Febru ry 23, 2007 Check Search Name Comments Amount FUND DEPART OBJ Nbr 038435 ELECTION SYSTEMS & SOFTWARE election suppli s $67.15 101 41410 210 038436 FASTENAL COMPANY bots $13.92 601 49430 210 038436 FASTENAL COMPANY bolts $46.55 601 49430 210 038437 GRAINGER chemical pum $34.96 601 49410 220 038438 GRANITE ELECTRONICS Channels for tr $400.00 601 49431 530 038439 HAWKINS WATER TREATMENT GROUP Phosphorus T st $40.20 602 49480 312 038439 HAWKINS WATER TREATMENT GROUP Influent Bod $91.20 602 49480 312 038439 HAWKINS WATER TREATMENT GROUP Lead Sample $32.00 602 49480 312 038440 HEARTLAND DOOR SALES INC. repair door #8 $144.60 105 42280 220 038441 HENRYS WATERWORKS INC water meter $67.41 601 49430 210 038442 HOLIDAY STORES fuel $86.49 602 49490 210 038442 HOLIDAY STORES fuel $86.49 101 43120 210 038442 HOLIDAY STORES fuel $86.48 601 49440 210 038442 HOLIDAY STORES fuel $86.49 101 43125 210 038443 JOHN T JONES Water Treatme t $220,135.3 601 49431 530 038444 KEEPRS, INC/CY'S UNIFORMS rewire gun loc & $39.00 101 42120 220 038444 KEEPRS, INC/CY'S UNIFORMS safety vest cia s $26.57 101 42120 210 038444 KEEPRS, INC/CY'S UNIFORMS D Magaard $159.95 101 42120 171 038444 KEEPRS, INC/CY'S UNIFORMS J Reverman -$40.95 101 42120 102 038444 KEEPRS, INC/CY'S UNIFORMS credit J Klein -$191.50 101 42120 171 038444 KEEPRS, INC/CY'S UNIFORMS J Reverman- $53.20 101 42120 102 038444 KEEPRS, INC/CY'S UNIFORMS P Janssen-clot ing $89.23 101 42120 171 038445 KERN, DEWENTER, VIERE, L TD J Rigndon $3,862.50 101 41540 300 038446 KLN DISTRIBUTING, INC new antivirus $108.22 601 49440 215 038446 KLN DISTRIBUTING, INC new antivirus $108.23 602 49490 215 038446 KLN DISTRIBUTING, INC new antivirus $108.22 101 43120 215 038446 KLN DISTRIBUTING, INC new antivirus $108.22 101 42120 215 038446 KLN DISTRIBUTING, INC new antivirus $108.22 101 41430 215 038446 KLN DISTRII3UTING, INC new antivirus $108.22 603 43230 215 038447 LEEF BROS Jan Allowance $71.58 101 43120 171 038447 LEEF BROS Jan Allowance $71.58 601 49440 171 038447 LEEF BROS Jan Allowance $71.57 602 49450 171 038447 LEEF BROS Jan Allowance $71.58 101 45202 171 038447 LEEF BROS Jan Allowance $71.58602 49490 171 038447 LEEF BROS floor mats & $124.54 '101 41430 220 038447 LEEF BROS floor mats - Ja $51.02 101 42120 220 038448 L1NGL, GREG & JULIE cleaning servic - $350.00 101 41942 300 038449 LOSO, NATHAN 3 meetings $90.00 101 41950 103 038450 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT Sweeper Clini $100.00 101 43220 331 038451 MENARDS sand paper, sp ay $16.30 601 49430 220 038451 MENARDS sand paper, sp ay $5.43 101 43120 220 038451 MENARDS light bulbs $64.70 101 43120 210 038451 MENARDS paint, tape, joi t $28.55 601 49430 220 038452 MILLS FLEET FARM wire wheel, ext cord $56.88 602 49480 240 038452 MILLS FLEET FARM drill bit sharpe er $116.18 101 45201 240 038453 MINNESOTA ELEVATOR, INC service-Feb $82.57 101 41942 220 038454 MN COUNTY ATTORNEY'S ASSOC DUI Vehicle $27.16 101 42120 200 038455 NAHAN, TOM VHS Cleaner, $16.98 101 41950 210 038456 NCPERS GROUP LIFE INSURANCE life insurance- eb $9.00 101 038457 OFFICE MAX adding tape $8.98 101 41530 200 038457 OFFICE MAX W2 Forms $6.99 101 42120 200 038457 OFFICE MAX clasp envelope $24.39 101 41430 200 038457 OFFICE MAX W2 Forms, $53.64 101 43120 200 038457 OFFICE MAX Digital Camera $213.99 108 41950 580 038457 OFFICE MAX paper, labels $47.34 101 42120 200 038457 OFFICE MAX dry easers $21.18 602 49490 200 038457 OFFICE MAX deskjet toner $56.69 101 41530 200 038457 OFFICE MAX paper, desk pa $21.68 101 42120 200 038457 OFFICE MAX W2 Forms $6.99 101 41430 200 038458 ONE CALL CONCEPTS, INC notification-Jan $65.95 601 49440 319 038458 ONE CALL CONCEPTS, INC notification-Jan $65.95 602 49490 319 038459 OXYGEN SERVICE CENTER oxygen $39.85 101 45201 210 City of St. Joseph Bills Payable February 23, 2007 Page 3 Check Search Name Comments Amount FUND DEPART OBJ Nbr 038460 PITNEY BOWES INC postal ribbon $105.37 101 41430 200 038461 PROMOTIONAL RESOURCES INC clothing allow 2006 $545.00 101 41430 171 038461 PROMOTIONAL RESOURCES INC clothing allow 2006 $123.00 101 41310 171 038461 PROMOTIONAL RESOURCES INC clothing allow 2006 $284.00 101 42120 171 038461 PROMOTIONAL RESOURCES INC clothing allow 2006 $181.00 101 43120 171 038461 PROMOTIONAL RESOURCES INC clothing allow 2006 $181.00 101 45202 171 038461 PROMOTIONAL RESOURCES INC Clothing allow 2006 $181.00 601 49440 171 038461 PROMOTIONAL RESOURCES INC clothing allow 2006 $290.00 101 41110 171 038461 PROMOTIONAL RESOURCES INC clothing allow 2006 $181.00 602 49450 171 038461 PROMOTIONAL RESOURCES INC clothing allow 2006 $181.00 602 49490 171 038462 QUALITY FLOW SYSTEMS ABS Lift station $517.07 602 49470 230 038463 R. L. LARSON EXCAVATING, INC Hill Street Improve $3,706.90 433 43120 530 038464 RAMSAY CORPORATION Basic skill tests $682.45 101 43120 300 038465 RED'S AUTO ELECTRIC battery onan $39.42 101 45202 210 038465 RED'S AUTO ELECTRIC battery onan $39.42 101 45201 210 038466 SAM'S CLUB 55 gallon drum oil $109.18 602 49450 210 038466 SAM'S CLUB 55 gallon drum oil $109.17 601 49430 210 .038466 SAM'S CLUB 55 gallon drum oil $109.17 101 45202 210 038466 SAM'S CLUB 55 gallon drum oil $109.17 101 43120 210 038467 SEH Wellhead Protection $556.50 601 49434 530 038468 ST. CLOUD AREA PLANNING ORG. 1 st half $3,135.00 101 41110 433 038469 ST. CLOUD TIMES Maintenance $156.98 601 49430 340 038469 ST. CLOUD TIMES Maintenance $156.98 101 45202 340 038469 ST. CLOUD TIMES Maintenance $156.98 603 43230 340 038469 ST. CLOUD TIMES Maintenance $156.99 101 43120 340 038470 ST. JOE TOUCHLESS CAR WASH car wash $5.35 101 42152 210 038471 ST. JOSEPH NEWSLEADER ISD spl use permit $22.75 101 41120 340 038471 ST. JOSEPH NEWSLEADER Summary Budget $90.75 101 41530 340 038472 STEARNS COUNTY AUDITOR-TREAS Auditor Verification $75.00 101 41430 210 038472 STEARNS COUNTY AUDITOR-TREAS Mobile workstation $4,000.00 101 42120 215 038472 STEARNS COUNTY AUDITOR-TREAS RMS Access $1,000.00 101 42120 215 038473 TENVOORDE MOTOR COMPMANY rotate tires & $9.43 601 49440 220 038473 TENVOORDE MOTOR COMPMANY rotate tires & $9.43 101 43120 220 038473 TENVOORDE MOTOR COMPMANY rotate tires & $9.43 602 49490 220 038474 TIREMAXX SERVICE CENTERS tires-unit #88 $83.90 101 43125 210 038474 TIREMAXX SERVICE CENTERS dispose of tires $20.00 101 43120 210 038475 TRAUT WELLS Water samples-7 $114.00 601 49420 312 038476 UNUM LIFE INSURANCE disability $567.36 101 038477 US CABLE internet service-Feb $39.95 105 42250 321 038477 US'CABLE internet service-Feb $49.95 101 41430 321 038478 VERIZON WIRELESS Feb usage $20.11 101 43120 321 038478 VERIZON WIRELESS Feb usage $141.94 101 41430 321 038478 VERIZON WIRELESS Feb usage $38.85 602 49490 321 038478 VERIZON WIRELESS Feb usage $236.24 101 42151 321 038478 VERIZON WIRELESS Feb usage $20.11 101 45202 321 038478 VERIZON WIRELESS Feb usage $15.99 101 45202 321 038478 VERIZON WIRELESS Feb usage $80.18 105 42250 321 038478 VERIZON WIRELESS Feb usage $15.98 101 43120 321 038479 VIKING INDUSTRIAL CENTER safety $181.49 601 49440 212 038479 VIKING INDUSTRIAL CENTER drivers gloves, $74.11 601 49440 210 038479 VIKING INDUSTRIAL CENTER drivers gloves, $74.11 602 49490 212 038479 VIKING INDUSTRIAL CENTER drivers gloves, $74.10 101 43120 210 038479 VIKING INDUSTRIAL CENTER safety $181.49 101 43120 212 038479 VIKING INDUSTRIAL CENTER safety $181.49 602 49490 212 038480 W. GOHMAN CONSTRUCTION Centennial Park $9,410.00 205 45203 531 038481 XCEL ENERGY Jan Usage $408.11 601 49420 381 038481 XCELENERGY Jan Usage $20.51 101 42610 386 038481 XCEL ENERGY Jan Usage $2,289.43 101 43160 386 038481 XCELENERGY Jan Usage $40.60 101 45202 381 038481 XCEL ENERGY Jan Usage $25.28 101 45123 381 038481 XCELENERGY Jan Usage $22.39 602 49471 383 038481 XCEL ENERGY Jan Usage $3.49 101 42500 326 St. Joseph Payable ry 23, 2007 Page 4 Check Search Name Comments Amount FUND DEPART OBJ Nbr 038481 XCEL ENERGY Jan Usage $534.61 105 42280 381 038481 XCEL ENERGY Jan Usage $55.02 101 45123 383 038481 XCEL ENERGY Jan Usage $131.36 602 49470 381 038481 XCEL ENERGY Jan Usage $288.61 602 49480 383 038481 XCEL ENERGY Jan Usage $476.55 602 49480 381 038481 XCEL ENERGY Jan Usage $158.33601 49410 383 038481 XCEL ENERGY Jan Usage $1,031.19 601 49410 381 038481 XCEL ENERGY Jan Usage $186.99 101 45202 381 038481 XCEL ENERGY Jan Usage $269.86 601 49435 381 038481 XCEL ENERGY Jan Usage $49.35 101 43120 381 038481 XCEL ENERGY Jan Usage $38.84 101 45201 381 038481 XCEL ENERGY Jan Usage $349.80 101 41941 381 038481 XCEL ENERGY Jan Usage $1,012.78 105 42280 383 038481 XCEL ENERGY Jan Usage $1,017.74 101 41941 383 038481 XCEL ENERGY Jan Usage $302.36 101 43120 383 038481 XCEL ENERGY Jan Usage $812.23 101 41942 383 038481 XCEL ENERGY Jan Usage $58.27 101 43120 381 038481 XCEL ENERGY Jan Usage $585.83 101 45201 383 038481 XCEL ENERGY Jan Usage $18.36 101 45201 381 038481 XCEL ENERGY Jan Usage $10.40 101 45201 381 038481 XCEL ENERGY Jan Usage $15.59 101 43120 381 038481 XCEL ENERGY Jan Usage $201.57 101 45201 383 038481 XCEL ENERGY Jan Usage $724.98 101 41942 381 038482 ZARNOTH BRUSH WORKS INC front brush mount $351.45 101 43125 220 038483 ZEP MANUFACTURING Brake wash $46.01 101 43120 210 038483 ZEP MANUFACTURING Towels $55.34 101 45201 210 038484 ACCLAIM BENEFITS-REIMB Medical $700.00 101 038484 ACCLAIM BENEFITS-REIMB Medical $400.00 101 038485 COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE Reg pp 4, 4.1, & $1,576.20 101 038486 EFTPS Reg pp 4, 4.1 $3,610.57 101 038486 EFTPS SS Reg pp 4, .1, $2,980.82 101 038486 EFTPS Medicare Reg pp $1,161.72 101 038487 ING LIFE INS & ANNUITY COMPANY deferred com $500.00 101 038488 JM GRAYSTONE OIL CO., INC Diesel Fuel - $346.03 101 45202 210 038488 JM GRAYSTONE OIL CO., INC fuel - January $110.14 601 49440 210 038488 JM GRAYSTONE OIL CO., INC fuel - January $110.14 101 43125 210 038488 JM GRAYSTONE OIL CO., INC fuel-January $110.13 101 43120 210 038488 JM GRAYSTONE OIL CO., INC fuel c January $59.36 105 42220 210 038488 JM GRAYSTONE OIL CO.,INC postage $31.74 602 49490 322 038488 JM GRA YSTONE OIL CO., INC fuel sender $15.97 101 45202 220 038488 JM GRAYSTONE OIL CO., INC Diesel Fuel - $346.03 101 43120 210 038488 JM GRAYSTONE OIL CO.,INC fuel - January $110.14602 49490 210 038488 JM GRAYSTONE OIL CO., INC fuel sender $15.98 101 43120 220 038489 LEE'S ACE HARDWARE supplies $18.46 602 49450 220 038489 LEE'S ACE HARDWARE Shop Vac $77.04 101 42120 240 038489 LEE'S ACE HARDWARE supplies $13.48 101 42120 220 038489 LEE'S ACE HARDWARE reparts parts $4.80 101 . 45202 220 038489 LEE'S ACE HARDWARE parts $6.74 101 45201 220 038489 LEE'S ACE HARDWARE repair parts $120.31 601 49440 220 038489 LEE'S ACE HARDWARE supplies $41.36 101 41942 210 038489 LEE'S ACE HARDWARE repair parts $9.13 101 43120 220 038490 PERA retirement pa - $6,059.74 101 038491 RAJKOWSKI HANSMEIER L TO Arcon Dev $23.00 101 41610 304 038491 RAJKOWSKI HANSMEIER L TO Manhole 12 is ue $12.50 434 49440 530 038491 RAJKOWSKI HANSMEIER L TD 1996 Chevy- $82.00 101 42120 304 038491 RAJKOWSKI HANSMEIER L TD 1990 Mercury $7.00 101 42120 304 038491 RAJKOWSKI HANSMEIER L TO 1993 GMC Tit e $7.00 101 42120 304 038491 RAJKOWSKI HANSMEIER L TO Ordinance iss es $2,241.00 101 41130 304 038491 RAJKOWSKI HANSMEIER L TO Lambert issue $335.76 101 41610 304 038491 RAJKOWSKI HANSMEIER L TO Erdahl rental $96.00 101 42120 304 038491 RAJKOWSKI HANSMEIER L TD Verizon/Qwes $479.00 101 41610 304 038491 RAJKOWSKI HANSMEIER L TO Meadowvale I sue $137.50 425 43122 530 -, City of St. Joseph Bills Payable February 23, 2007 Page 5 Check Search Name Comments Amount FUND DEPART OBJ Nbr 038491 RAJKOWSKI HANSMEIER L TO Personnel Issues $507.50 101 41610 304 038491 RAJKOWSKI HANSMEIER L TD US Cable $350.00 101 41610 304 038491 RAJKOWSKI HANSMEIER L TO Junk Cars, pursuit $373.50 101 42120 304 038491 RAJKOWSKI HANSMEIER L TO Easements $37.50 101 41610 304 038491 RAJKOWSKI HANSMEIER L TD Dept Head Mtgs $356.50 101 41610 304 038491 RAJKOWSKI HANSMEIER L TD Criminal Matters $3,500.00 101 42120 304 038492 SIMPLEX GRINNELL Alarm System $497.02 101 41942 300 038493 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH M SWorski License $32.00 601 49440 446 038493 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH M Johnson $3MO 601 49440 446 038494 MINNESOTA RURAL WATER ASSOC. MRWA $125.00 601 49440 331 038494 MINNESOTA RURAL WATER ASSOC. MRWA $125.00 6(H 49440 331 038495 MN CHAPTER IAAI T Lowell Conf $195,00 105 42240 331 038495 MN CHAPTER IMI S Brill Conf $220.00 105 42240 331 038496 ACCLAIM BENEFITS"REIMB 2007 $160.47 101 038496 ACCLAIM BENEFITS-REIMB 2006 $1,500.00 101 038497 AUTO VALUE PARTS STORES - WEST oil filter, spark $3.10 601 49440 210 038497 AUTO VALUE PARTS STORES - WEST wiper blades $6.41 101 45202 220 038497 AUTO VALUE PARTS STORES - WEST oil filter $6.48 602 49490 210 038497 AUTO VALUE PARTS STORES - WEST oil filter, spark $3.09 101 45202 210 038497 AUTO VALUE PARTS STORES - WEST oil filter, spark $3.09 101 43125 210 038497 AUTO VALUE PARTS STORES - WEST wiper blades $6.41 101 43120 220 038497 AUTO VALUE PARTS STORES -WEST wiper blades $6.42 602 49490 220 038498 CITY OF SARTELL 4th Quarter Gang $1,198.13 101 42120 300 038499 HARDRIVES 154 yds salt/sand $7,872.48 101 43125 210 038500 HAWKINS WATER TREATMENT GROUP Influent BOD $91.20 602 49480 312 038500 HAWKINS WATER TREATMENT GROUP Phosphorus Test $40.20 602 49480 312 038500 HAWKINS WATER TREATMENT GROUP Lead Sample $32.00 602 49480 312 038501 HENRYS WATERWORKS INC Meter sealing wire $23.43 601 49430 210 038502 KEEPRS, INC/CY'S UNIFORMS J Revermann- $40.95 101 42120 102 038503 KERN, DEWENTER, VIERE, L TO J Rigdon $3,688.00 101 41540 300 038504 KLN DISTRIBUTING, INC Postini Software $83.45 603 43230 215 038504 KLN DISTRIBUTING, INC computer sn $2,504.80 490 42120 581 038504 KLN DISTRIBUTING, INC NetGear-Switch $8,495.51 601 49431 530 038504 KLN DISTRIBUTING, INC Postinj Software $83.45 101 43120 215 038504 KLN DISTRIBUTING, INC Postjni Software $83.44 101 41430 215 038504 KLN DISTRIBUTING, INC Postini Software $83.45 101 41530 215 038504 KLN DISTRIBUTING, INC Postini Software $83.45 101 42120 215 038504 KLN DISTRIBUTING, INC Postini Software $83.45 602 49490 215 038504 KLN DISTRIBUTING, INC Postini Software $83.45 601 49440 215 038504 KLN DISTRIBUTING, INC Postinj Software $83.45 105 42210 215 038504 KLN DISTRIBUTING, INC Postinj Software $83.45 101 45201 215 0385.05 L1NGL, GREG & JULIE cleaning service- $210.00 101 41942 300 038506 MCCOMB GROUP, L TO Real Estate $16,000.00 101 41910 300 038507 MINNESOTA BENEFIT ASSOCIATION J Klein Life $38.84 101 038508 MN DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 1 st quarter $1,752.00 601 49440 444 038509 M-R SIGN CO., INC. Winter parking $883.63 101 43120 210 038510 MUNICIPAL DEVELOPMENT CORP eda contract $2,264.99 150 46500 300 038511 OFFICE DEPOT toner, dividers, $278.27 101 41430 200 038512 REED CONSTRUCTION DATA Ad 2007 $198.47 651 49900 530 038513 RENGEL PRINTING Stray dog forms $72.00 101 42700 210 038514 RISK'S SAFETY CONSULTING CO. 7 First Responder $1,922.00 101 42140 300 038515 S & T OFFICE PRODUCTS minute book paper $41.66 101 41110 200 038516 SEH GIS Service-Gen $195.50 101 43131 303 038516 SEH CDG-Callaway St- $217.82 101 43131 303 038516 SEH CR 121 Improve $1,207.29 425 43122 530 038516 SEH Municipal State Aid $1,188.00 101 43131 303 038516 SEH Northland Heights $1,083.50 435 49450 530 038516 SEH Misc Gen $883.31 101 43131 303 038516 SEH 2006 Street $1,494.42 438 43120 530 038516 SEH 2007 Street $9,270.34 441 43120 530 038516 SEH Safe Routes $2,257.76 101 43131 303 038516 SEH Centennial Park $83.52 205 45203 531 City 0 St. Joseph Bill Payable Febru ry 23,2007 Page 6 Check Search Name Comments Amount FUND DEPART OBJ Nbr 038516 SEH 8th Ave NE $905.50 440 43120 530 038516 SEH Water System- $1,020.00 601 49420 303 038516 SEH Sewer System $2,321.57 602 49480 530 038516 SEH Streets & Tra c- $892.50 101 43131 303 038516 SEH Land Survey & $170.00 101 43131 303 038516 SEH 2006 Trunk W ter $512.80 601 49432 530 038516 SEH 2007 Storm S wer $8,322.92 651 49900 530 038516 SEH Water Treatm nt $27,072.37 601 49431 530 038516 SEH North Corridor $953.60 435 49450 530 038517 SPRINT 4 mobil servic s- $455.32 101 42151 321 038518 SRF CONSULTING GROUP INC North Corridor & $2,362.40 435 49450 530 038519 TOS METROCOM telephone $89.18 602 49490 321 038519 TDS METROCOM telephone $268.00 101 42151 321 038519 TOS METROCOM telephone $189.27 101 45201 321 038519 TOS METROCOM telephone $100.64 105 42250 321 038519 TOS METROCOM telephone $39.06 150 46500 321 038519 TDS METROCOM telephone $55.64 601 49440 321 038519 TOS METROCOM telephone $100.22 602 49470 321 038519 TOS METROCOM . telephone $53.30 602 49471 321 038519 TOS METROCOM telephone $55.30 602 49473 321 038519 TOS METROCOM telephone $53.30 101 41941 321 038519 TOS METROCOM telephone $219.14 101 41430 321 038519 TOS METROCOM telephone $55.63 101 41946 321 038519 TOS METROCOM telephone $55.30 602 49472 321 038520 TRAUT WELLS Water sample - $57.00 601 49420 312 038521 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED 2-Training Tas r $389.49 101 42140 210 $485,041.15 I Attachment: Yes REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: March 1.2007 RECEIVED FEB 2 2 2007 CITY OF Sl JOSEPH Engineering Tracy L. Ekola, PE DEPARTMENT APPROVAL ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT AGENDA ITEM 2006 Trunk Water Main Improvements (SEH NO. STJOE 0602). PREVIOUS ACTION Application for Payment No.2 for $204,359.15. RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION Application for Payment No.3. FISCAL IMPACT $21,650.35 COMMENTSIRECOMMENDATIONS P:\PT\Slstjoe\common\D39 Req Council Action\0602 pm! 3 030107.doc ~ SEH February 22, 2007 City of St. Joseph Honorable Mayor and City Council c/o Judy Weyrens 25 College Ave N PO Box 668 Saint Joseph, MN 56374-0668 Dear Mayor and Members of the Council: RE: St. Joseph, Minnesota 2006 Trunk Water Main Improvements SERNo. A-STJOE 0602 14 Enclosed please find Application for Payment o. 3 for this project. We have reviewed this application and it appe s to be in order. When payment is made, sign all copies and distribute as follows: Randy Kramer Excavating, Inc. SEH City ofSt. Joseph If you have any questions, please feel free to c II us. Sin~Y. ~t?1 i- Tracy L. Ekola, PE City Engineer JIDW Enclosures G:\STDSIFORMSILTRSIFORML211. Short Elliott Hendrickson inc., 120 25th Avenue South, P.O. Box 1717, St, Cloud. MN 56302-1717 SEH ic an equai oDportunity employer ! wwwsehinc.com i 320.229.4300 800.572.0617 i 320.229.4301 fax o:::o::::c wow ZI-OO s:o o~ I- Z o o Z =< :E 0::: W I- ~~ ~Z ZW :.::>:E 0:::> 1-0 (00::: 00.. ~:E (O!'- S2S2 'Vo S2s::2 LO .... 00 a: o u. 0::: o I- o ~ I- Z o o :I: C) ::J o 0:: :I: l- e W :I: en :::i a. w== 1-0 ~8 1-<( z~ Wo::: :Eo ttl~ 0:::0::: C)O <(u. C") cj Z I- Z W :E' > <( Q. 0::: o u. Z o j::: <( o ::::i Q. Q. <( C) Z j::: Z~ :E<( .0 :I: X [hw 000::: OW N-':E o . <( (01-"" oool.L. wu.'~ 00> j:;>Cl OOI-Z .-<( <(00::: g g I- 0 (Jo:::~ ~WI- o~z 0:::>0 a.oo :!,,;n ~ 'z; i I- ,:ti o!~ ~fi o~ o~ ~ i ."~::2 -~,~~f{ o C! .... o N ..t LO f:I7 o C! .... o .... ci N 'V Il'i f:I7 o ..... ci o C! .... o N ..q: LO f:I7 o C! o C! .... o N ..t LO f:I7 :E :.::> 00 a. :E :.::> ...J ...J o 0::: I- Z o o o u: u. <( 0::: I- N 00 o a; <") ..... cD <") f:I7 o C! o o ci f:I7 00 o a; <") ..... cD <") f:I7 o C! 00 (0 o 'V a; -.i <") .... ..... f:I7 cD <") f:I7 :E :.::> CJ) 0.. :E :.::> ...J C) Z ii: w I- ~ W Cl <") 00 00, -.i o 'V f:I7 o o ci fit o o cO N o o ci o o ci f:I7 o o ci fit 00 00 -.i o 'V f:I7 o 00 ,..: en en f:I7 o o cO N o o ci <") (0 N (") <") f:I7 I- u. Z ::::i t Z ::::i a. :E o in ..... ...J ...J ~ 00 Z O/l W C) ~ ...J <( CJ) ~ Z I- ::::i Z Z w <( :E :c w o ~ W 0.. o CJ) :5 :.::> 0.. 0 W Z 0::: ~ Cl ::J Z I- <( CD w w >w> 000 :Ez:E wwW O:::u.o::: 'V LO (0 o o cO LO "'t ..... f:I7 o o ci !'- <") o o ci f:I7 o 00 ,..: !'- C!. ..... f:I7 o o ,..: ..... <") o 'V (") f:I7 Cl > o 00 LO LO cO N 00 f:I7 o o Iri ..... o M f:I7 o C! ..... !'- N o o ci en o N N ..... f:I7 o o -.i o 00 f:I7 o C! v o o ..t N o en -.i (0 (0 f:I7 o LO Iri 'V 'V N f:I7 o o cO ..... N o o (") !'- LO o (") f:I7 o LO (") <") f:I7 I- u. Z ::::i Cl > :.::> o I- Z w :E w > a: 00 :.::> o Z ~ :.::> !::: co C) Z ~ CJ) 00 ~ ~ o ...J W Cl 0::: w :.::> o I- :5 x a. ~ w w CJ) 00 <( 0::: co :.::> w 0 ~ ~ fa ~ 0:::5'0::: C) 0 <(w C)- <(LQS: !'- 00 en LO .... cO !'- 'V ..q: f:I7 o o Iri 'V o o ci f:I7 !'- LO (") 00 o M f:I7 o C! ..... <") !'- <") 'V 'V a; cO en en f:I7 ; f:I7 Z o I- N en N 'V N ..t fit o o cO !'- f:I7 o o -.i 'V o o ci LO o o ci fit o o cO !'- f:I7 o o ci LO 'V '0 <") N -.i Iri (0 .... (0 f:I7 ri f:I7 o 0 o 0 cO ci <") ..... N ~ .... f:I7 Z f2 ...J <( C) ~ ...J W 0::: :.::> l- x ~ W CJ) 0::: :.::> o o 0::: <( W s: I Z o Z ~ o <( I- 0::: ~ ~ <t :.::> ii: Cl w ~ ~ <( :E ~ 00 uj :.::> 0 o Z Z W ~I-u. :'::><(1- !:::o:::! COO 00 o ..... ..... N ..... .... N en ,..: 00 ~ .... f:I7 o o -.i o C!. N 00 ,..: .... f:I7 o C! en ~ Iri o o N f:I7 o o (") .... C!. 00 ~ ..... f:I7 I- u. Z ::::i o o ci f:I7 o C! N LO en. ..... f:I7 o o ci o o ci o (0. o o ci f:I7 o o ci f:I7 o <") ci LO !'- f:I7 ~ N !'- ~ ..... fit o o cO 'V N o o ,..: ..... ~ LO o (") f:I7 N C"! ..... f:I7 I- u. Z ::::i Cl > o 00 ~ o w :c o :c o !::: Cl ...J ...J o 0::: o CD ~ o t-=" w ~ Z :5 co ...J o 0::: I- Z o o Z o Ci5 o 0::: WM <") ..... 'V ..... 0::: 0::: I WOLU zl-en SO O~ I- Z o o Z <i: :2 0::: W I- ~~ ~Z ZLU ::>:2 0:::> 1-0 coO::: 00. 0:2 N- co I"'- QQ "<to Q~ lO ..... 00 Q: o LL [t: o I- o ~ I- Z o o :i:: C) ::> o [t: ::I: I- C W ::I: en :::i 0.. w:E 1-0 <co Co 1-<( Z~ W[t: :EO ltl~ [t:[t: c>0 <CLL M d z I- Z W :E ~ 0.. [t: o LL Z o i= <( o ~ a. a. <C C!) Z Z~ :2~ IO 0.>< WLU en 0::: NQ~ o . <( COl-o::: aen WLL~ 00>- ~>-o enl-Z ,-<( <(00::: 0::: g g I- 0 0[t:<C ww[t: .zl- O:::.Z [t::>0 0..00 jti! z .:;:,: W_, I- .:;" <C :iE: C:<. g), ~! ~~. ~ a ',~~H: "',":., 'ii' z ,;): I- (9" z::E Wet ~'.., en ~. :i:it! 1-% 0(: .::1 a .r....',;: '~ :!). o I- :iE' o <C. ~.. I- z~ 0.".. o p::' z ;.( ,:::); f~ l-;-i.~lO <;;..... :::. .,' ;:>'r' ; N co < C') (It o o r-..: C') co o o ci (It o I"'- o l"'- e>> r-..: o C') I"'- co_ er> N C') (It (It o 0 o 0 ci M lO co co co CC! ..... lO (It I- l- LL LL Z z :J :J N ...Jl-lO o ~ ...J 00 Z...,Z 00.0 0::: 02 0::: I-C!)- o ~' I- ::>enO 0<(::> , LL 0 Z 0 I <i:W~ :2Z<( 0::: <i: :2 wO::: 0::: I-I-W <(en I- :s:W<( _ _ o:::.:s: coacoa- .....lO.....lO CO co I"'- ..... ..... co <C! ..... co "<t N (It o o N I"'- 0) o cO I"'- C') (It o ~ ..... ..... 0) ..... ~ C') (It C') l"'- N "<t lO_ co (It o o M o o ci (It "<t co M N I"'- cri (It o o ~ ..... 0) ci co ..... co 0) lri "<t o er> ..... (It o o cO o o ci (It ..... N C') lO ci N N 0 N N ui er> ..... (It (It o 0 o 0 r..: ~ C') C') C') co ~ ci I"'- 0 ..... co N (It (It I o <( w x o a:l o Z <( W ~ ;g; ~ LI.. 0::: W 1= ::> OJ <0 ..... 0) ..... 0) CC! ..... o "<t N (It o o M o o ci (It I o <C W x o OJ o Z <C W ~ ;g; W ~ C!) <0 o N lO ~ C') I"'- q ..... ..... (It o lO N o ..... er> (It o ~ ..... o o N o o ci (It o o ci (It lO lO M I"'- a. ..... ..... (It o lO N o ..... er> (It o ~ ..... o o N lO lO M I"'- 0_ ..... ..... (It :2 ::> en a. :2 ::> ...J lO ~ ..... lO ~ ..... (It ::I: o <( W LU ~ ;g; oI:S I :2 LU en <( w ...J W 0::: 0::: <i: LU a. 0::: a. W C!) ~ ~ :s: <( C!) 0 Z ...J i= LU en ~ X (f) W b o C') I- LU I- 0::: o 0 W a:l Zz::2 Z-O 8~~ ..... N N C') N N ..... ..... M o o er> 0) ~ o ~ ..... N "<t o o ci (It ..... o ~ 0) 1"'-_ o 0) (It o ~ ..... ..... "<t ..... 0) ci N N (It l- Ll.. Z :J o C') N o C') ui N ~ o o ci 0) I"'- ui o ~ o (It N co ~ "<t lO cD ..... (It o o cO co I"'- er> I"'- C') ~ (It o Z ::> o a. en C) Z ~ u: Z <i: :2 0::: W ~ :s: "<t N co ..... lri 0) co ...j (It N ~ ..... r-- C') cD (It o N M ..... ..... ..... (It o o ~ 0) N o o ~ co ..... o o N 0) o o ci (It o o ci (It o o ci (It ..... o M o ~ C') ..... (It I"'- 0 lO "<t M r-..: ..... "<t co C') ...j N (It (It o o M C') co o 0 o 0 e>> ~ C') 0) ..... ..... N I"'- 0) lri ..... (It C') co ~ C') (It o ..... N ..... (It o >- o en o 0 >- >- ::> ::> o 0 Z o ~ ::> en ~ N W C!) a. Z a:: 0 g S:2 5J <(O:::a:l o:::OJw w<(o. I-~a:: ::! :s: 0::: ~ C!) ::s enZ::> o:::i5z <CO<( Ow 0::: OOJC!) lO N co r-- N N o::o:::e wow ZI-(/) ~() O~ I- Z o () Z 4: ::!E 0:: W I- ~~ ~Z ZW ~::!E 0::> 1-0 <00:: 00. ~::!E <01'"- QQ ...,.0 Q~ to ~ 00 a:: o u. 0:: o I- o ~ I- Z o o :i: o ;:) o 0:: :r: l- e W :r: (/) ::i 0. li.i::E 1-0 ~8 1-<( z~ Wa:: ::Eo lH~ 0::0:: 00 <(u. M d z I- Z w ::E >- <( 0. 0:: o u. Z o ;:: <( o ::i 0. 0. <( C) Z i= z~ ::!E<( -() :ex fuw (/)0:: NOW 0""::!E <0 . <( ot;o:: Wu.~ 00>- ~>-e (/)I-Z .-<( <(()o:: 0:: g ~ I- 0 00::< WwO:: -'zl- ~~~ 0..00 :1 ::J' a 1-2 o,~ ~~~: !z:~;t 0>'< 05 ~ ice ':): :0: :';~!_J~ 19 :ji;:t. ,;z: ;;:): co N N Ol <'1 ~ ER- (") I'"- ...; o o c:i ER- o <0 N <0 0_ ~ ER- ~ <0 M to to (") (") ...; ...; Ol Ol N N ER- tR- W 0:: () <( 1=' Z W Z <( ::!E 0:: W e:- C) Z is W W (/) Ol N o o c:i lA- o o c:i o o c:i lA- to (") ...; Ol N tR- o ~ ~ o o c:i <0 <0 lA- o o c:i to N o o c:i <0 <0 ER- o o c:i to N ...,. co r..: I'"- ...,. ER- o ~ ~ co ~ o to r..: o to tR- o o c:i to N o o c:i lA- o C"! ~ co lA- o o c:i ...,. N ~ ~ <0 ~ ..... ER- o o N (") ...,. o o c:i ER- (") 0 co 0 N r..: <0 to C"!. <'1 ..... ..... ER- lA- o N o N M oj Ol N co ..... lci Ol N. ..... tR- o co cO o o c:i lA- <0 Ol r..: <0 N lA- o ...,. ...; o o c:i ER- to I'"- c:i co N ER- ..... <0 ...; ...,. (") ..... co 0 0 <00(") ..... Ol (") N N ...; r..: c:i c:i lA- ER- ER- ...,. <0 lA- ..... lA- lA- w a::: () <( s:- a::: <( a::: o a.. ::!E w t:. C) Z is w w (J) o M Cl Z ~ o 0. 1=' Z W Z <( ::!E a::: W e:- o co N W a::: ~ l- X ~ e W W (/) ..... (") Cl Z ;:) o 0. s:- a::: <( a::: o 0. ::!E W t:. o to ..... W a::: ~ l- X ~ e W W (/) N (") Cl >- o (/) Z ~ W 0. ~ C) Z is Cl o (J) (") (") Z o I- ..... W 0. ~ I- o Cl Z ::!E J <( a:: W ~ ::!E :e () ....J ~ :iE ...,. (") W a::: () <( C) Z a:: o :e () Z <( () (J) is to (") o o c:i I'"- N lA- co Q an .... co o co ...,. ER- o o c:i o Ol o o c:i ...,. "N lA- .... N cO Q CD ",,- ER- o o c:i o co o N ...; co ...,. lA- Q) CD cO .... .... N- co ...,. lA- o o ...; ..... ~ (") Cl Z ~ o 0. a::: W N ::::i i= a::: W u. ....J <( (J a::: W :iE ::!E o () e iii rn ::E w != ...I ~ o I- <0 (") Cl:Cl::c wow zl-en SO O~ I- Z o o Z <( ::2: Cl: W I- ~~ ~Z ZW ::>::2: Cl:> 1-0 coCl: 00.. ~::2: co .... 00 -- ","0 o C") -- LO ..- 00 Ii:: o LL 0:: o I- U c( 0:: I- Z o U i: C) ::J o 0:: J: l- e w J: en :J 0.. w::2 1-0 c(u eu 1-<( z~ Wo:: :Eo tH3: 0::0:: C)O c(LL (') d z I- Z W ::2 >- c( Q. 0:: o LL Z o 1= c( U :J Q. 0.. c( C> Z i= Z~ ::2:<( :cO 0..>< WW enCl: NOW 0-'::2: co '<( ot:)o:: WLL~ 00>- ~>-o enl-Z .-<( <(u" 0:: g f2 I- U uo::c( Wwo:: -'zl- o>z 0:::::-0 o..OU ;~. z Zl ~O' c(~ g~: ~:',,:, ot, 3:F;. z" ~; a: );~.H ~ 1-0 z :E. wYc( ~"::i"'; c( 0.. ," en~ :ti=' 1-%" c( ::J a 1#i~>4t i ~, ~ ,z :J o I- ":E' u<t ~ I- Z "', o~ u~ Z' .~ Q, ::iE. W !::, co Q an .... CC) o co o:t .,. .... N ui Q CD ...: .,. en CD ui .... .... N co o:t .,. 0:: W o 0:: o W C)~ zc( c(1- J:O UI- co 0 o C") Iri cO ..- ..... CX) co ai .,. COC"l1l) t-:~C") ~~o .....LOIl) .....aiCD ...."'""1"'" o:t"t('.l .,..,.~ --- <fl. N ....., Q) Cl co c: '(ij Q) Cl: III III Q) -I $.l!!,S co c: cu o ~ C .9 ~ 0 Q)o..- ::J III CI) ~ ::J ~ 5 ,~ c o Q) - E .... C <( 0.. ~ III 0 ~ E -I<t .... ~ co -e E c: 0 .g o U _ 13 ~ lB Q) c: E c: Cl >- 5 'i:?! [ U Q) _ c: -c 0 :c 5 15. ~ Q) 'Qi .... .s::. U G I- ~ ,5 iii - .... 'E 0 o Q) III ti E ~ l!! >--c 'E [~ o o :z ,5 Q) ~ :5 :5 g>'3 ~ Ci ~ o -c .9 ~ '(ij ~ ,!;2) III .... :c >- 'E o .c 0 1ii ~ ,g l- Q) ~ Q) -: .2 ~ 1ii 6, ~ ,5 ~ >- in 3: Q) .... co ....oe>oc. Q) co 3:0 -cQ).s::.Q)- 5:5~:5~ Q) E '6 :5 ~ F= .g .9 '3 f6> -C ,!!:! C. c. co c: Q) Q) .c Q) > co .s::. ti l!! 'E o U III ;S .... Q) -c - c: ::J Q) c: o -c ~ ~ a.i - ::J 15 in Q) 15 ~ 1;) ti .l!! co 0 .... III 'E Q) o c: U c: .g ~ III Q) Q) -c :5 c: >- ::J .c -c -c ~ Q) 'C -c U 'S; III o Q) .... -c c. III ~ ~ U III '2: ~ Q) Q) U) :5 -c Q) >- - co ~ C. III .9 '6 III 5 Q) .... ~ .E f6> ~ 0 1ii ti c. co .0 ~ '2 c: ::J 0 E 0 Q) ~ :5 I- f\. o K b N li.i ~ o ~ ~ :>: CO "'" ~ ) \, '~ <:J ,(' li.i ~ e j ,,, ''--,- ""~,~ .><, -~'''' .~ ~ "''\.~ ,~~ .........J :>: CO (!) Z i= ~ ~ <( C5 u dl >< co W C"l Cl: :2 w ::2: Z <(co::2: Cl: 0) - ~ '<t en' >-><Z oOSZ ZIDI- <(O~ Cl:o..> ..... ..... ..... ..... N o C") co LO Z .....::2: ..... - .....0 .....::> ><0 0-1 J:ID~ WOI- en 0.. en o W o z W :E :E o U W 0:: o W l- I- :E a:I ::> U) li.i ~ o '<l :>: CO co co co o I '<t .... C"l co LO Z ::2: :c 0.. W en o -, , co :c I-coo.. encow LL><U) 000 ~CO-' _O~ o 0.. en o W ~ 0:: Q. 0.. c( I Attachment: Yes or No REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION . DATE: March L 2007 Engineering ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Steve Campbell, PE DEPARTMENT APPROVAL AGENDA ITEM Water Treatment Facility (STJOE 0506.06) PREVIOUS ACTION Application for Payment No. 11 for $220,135.30. RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION Approve Payment No. 12. FISCAL IMPACT $123,064.97 COMMENTSIRECOMMENDATIONS P:\PT\S\syoelcomrnon\D39 Req Council Action\OS06 06 pm! 12 030107.doc o .... l: o :;::; ~ 0:: ,Q 0:: lli 'i: w ~ U; Z (9 .- $: Z Q~,~ g U5 N '0 ~ c N 0 Ql > Qj ~ o z z o ~ '-' ::; a. a. <( ~ o u. g t; o <( o g: 0: z w 0 a. '-' C\I c r.... C) .... i (,) o Cl S 0:( o o C tG ~ nJ '0 It') C:~:B ~ E ~ .5 ~ :;; ., e-[<k~ ~ ~ 0 0 '- 0 Z Z ~ ~ :I: ""') s: iii :Jl t::; t=-: o w .., o 0:: a. ..... Z W ::;; >- c( a. 0:: o LI. W ..... <3 ii: ;:: 0:: w o c z c( z o ;:: c( o ::i a. a. c( ~ t o ... Z I'- .c Q) C"l Co ~ ff5 5: Q.) Z ~ .i: ::E Q) .c ii) 0) 0- '0 ~ ~ ~ U ...., C3 ~ u5 i? w z s: Q. o I- 0::: o I- o <( 0:: 0:: I- 0 W Z -' :r: o !!! ..... o LL 0 ODD '" g ~ o o <ri :il o w Q I- If) .;, W I- <( o I- '-' ~ I- Z o '-' en o Z I- U W o <:<: a. :; "5 ~ ~ f5i CO) ;;; Iii w w z (; z w c( :> i? o I- o c( 0:: ..... Z o ~ ::;; o 0:: LI. .s~.E~ ......::.cnc ~ g 2.~ ~ (,) ~.~ -g~t:w (I]+-,Q)J:: cJ:C,)C: o:t:::: (I) ~ ro~5~ g ~ .~ ~ ~~~~ ~ '- u >> (1) 0 .- m ]'~3~ _ ~c ~.5~. .~ c "'::J ~"'O ,00 -E~S~ 00. '- +-' oE.e'O ~ 8 B ffi~ 8 ~_~ ~ Q) Q) "E ~ .c..cOQ ::wOQ) ~~~:5 ~c:~g Q) Q) - .::: :5 ~E"O B if ~.~ - "Q) :5~~~ '" .0 '" ~;~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ :s 8:~ ~ '0<(::1-0 ~ en ~- ffi 6;;~~ U>.ro:J "'O.c.....~ (l) co .- .~~:5~~ f!? g; ~ :: IDoe..... "0 u Q) C C E Q) ::I..::.::: ::l E 1?gglU'~ .....>00--0 ti ~ c o o Q) f; Q) .... ro o o 0 0 (1) (J') 0 C) 0> N cO cO N ~ ; ~ v -.:i N r--: 0- <0 co -.::t ,..., I'- '" C"l u-i trim f:It f:I7 ffl- f:It N M z '''" :.l,,! ill :rj C/J 0-. :f c?-J'i :%.2~ w 0' D 0 0Z <11'L?, ci c (7.' '~ L o o 4~~ 1\ z -s ~ ~ ~ ~ J~J-~ ~ ~.. ~ .... ~~ U- c: 10)- .... - rl,= !: o 0 ------. c. .... ws:>- @ W w~ro (,) c3 ~ .~ .~ ~ "C~ :C.!!! (,) ';';Q)~::lE w 0:9~ D..E ~ ?ti:c....- ~o :2 ::;.2 .gJo (,) O::lQ) 0>- ~ owE z:2 c:( ~. g ~~~ :C~6 e:o~ <( .s <( ~~:5 c-o_ gm2 ~ ~ ~ ~K~ ~~.9 ~~ ~ :~~ ~ ~ ~.~ ~~~ ~~~ Ql"OC =ffi8 ~.~ ~ (1)10'1:1 ~.E ffi ~~ en c:.- c ~~~ ~.!E g ~~o , c- ~~~ ~~6 Q)._ U ~e~ "He - wQ)~ c=3= Ql- m EO" ,,- C ,,00 " 8JJ"E _ Ql 8 ~= ~ 'E .9 .s 8 ~.~ ~::~ ;:g?; j~~ Qlm- ~~~ci "E-~~ 000 roLL ~~6-~ _tQ)W E~=U ~\ 'd- <.LJ o ~! --, (,'7. ~ 1 H Ii " j " " ~ " i C' w~ ~i j ~. ~i ~ . (,)\!J ~~ w z~ !::: ::;)" :I: OLe.> :E~] ~ c:( H c:( L() <Xl ~ l"- N I"- ... ...: u) ;::: " c C"l ::; I"- " N ;;; OJ cO N CD N M 0 "- ..... (9 Z ui '0 w (9 ::;; c( C ~ z E < ::J D- o 0:: ..... " w .E w 0 0:: C> LI. C> m c( ~ $" z 0 z w co C ..... ~ ..... ~ M 5 m c( ::l () t: ui -' '" 0 '" w 0 ii: 0 is I'- M L() 0:: ..... ;:: ., ::l :?: (9 ~ 0 L() 0 c iD s: C "- + ~ 0:: is :i" ~ (9 '" ~ Q) ..... Q) -0 0 L() w C w .~ z ~ C .!l w .. C Q) ...J :::; () w Z :::; + ::;; 0 C '" ~ ::;; '" ., c E ii: is. 0 -0 LL d w '" ::l >- '" C '" C z .!'l 0 ,g c( 0 .!'l w E E is E Q) a:: ... :> a. ..... t'") C> 0 :J ::J 0) c( Q) lD Q) CJ iii '" w ..... w c( .... 0 0 " W C 0:: Ql Z () C Z 0 ~ .... ~ ~ -' d. D- " W z 2- 0 ~ < ~ ~ Q) c( ~ 0:: c( ..... ll:: ..... V) 0:: -' w It) It) ~ 0 W ::l c( 0:: cO .ci ..... ...J 0 II) 0 ,,; ..... "' ...: 00 ai r- a . '0 N C '" ~ 0- ~ '" ~ .s M o '~ ~ () C Cl Z .2 c o 1:5 0 i= ~ (!) o i5 E ~ .~-g -s ~ ffi ~ ~ ; 8 ",::;;Qi't\1 ..... ~ o~~.!!! N~ ~~~~~8 +0 Q~~~~~ ~i ~gg~c~::;;~wo 5 0 ~ ~ ~ a ~ 0 ~ :;; ...,o.:LLoiU'81-(l)C~ i2O-<{~g'l?c ~~~~~~~ "'" E t5 0 (l) I- ~ l?!!!c...JCl()O oi5.Q~;~~ ~ 'ffi ~ (; 1i !Z ;!: ... .S:2 c: ii2 a; 0 0 ~~~~zo..... o<{o, ,f 40 N .S 1:5 ~ l!! "'- .c " -g8 E .!!l ~:: ~ .Ql .g-g l!! " g~ Ul!! :s8 Q) 0 U ro :; ~ o g ~ Ql " :00 ~Ql ~= 00 0 o~ ~~ u. 'C ~~ ~.9 ~ .~ 5~ ~~ Qlo; .c 0 1-5 ~ .~ .o~ .~ ro 'Oc mQl ~~ 'O~ "- '" 0 :&B ~ ffi ~i5.. t '" Ql U .. u ~ >.. .~ '0 en ~ ~ i:1i ro o >. co ii w z ::: o (J) z 0 i= 0 ::l 0 W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c (J) -' ~ Q; 0 c ..... ~ 0 >- .0 '" ~ "E 0 rr: E w '" 0 ::J 0:: 0 >- ',> 0 0:: Q) W <{ 0. (9 ::E ,E ~ Z ::E -0 "E <( ::l Q) 0 :r: (J) > ::E 0 0 0:: 0. '" >- W 0- ~ II) 0 '" (J) 0:: '" -0 W 0 Q) Q) (9 > W 0> e Z c (9 '" 0- <{ Z .<:: 0- :r: <{ <..> '" 0 :r: m m >- 0 0 0 w ..... ..... Z "" ~ (,!) ... <: ~ :::. (,) o Cl :$ q; b8 .b<O (1)'0 lL", .,J..O -w o ~ en OW..O Z~~i= ZO.OU QZow ~Qffio ~~o.g: 0.S,2 en ~~ ffi <( ~ (3 Z w Ql l:; ~i:J Q) " ;:: '7 I-~ W (!J ~~ -~~ 1-", W !l: w U I ~ 20Ul(!J I<(I-Z <t u:: Q CD ~Q (I 5 (!J 00 --.l~~~LL ~~8~lt g~~i2e 02 U<( Ul>- ~gffi~ili u.a:::,WCCI-O:: ~Uli200 <(~(f.)~O ;:;:0. o o WofE Wo. lDU) c[I ;:;:1- o U '" !l:Ul 0::>2 s;Qo Gi~w o g:~a ;:;:0. '~~ LL o W -'w uB3 W<( I> U Ul O<OU'>O ot--t{)....., o -u)N ~, ocaoo 1.0 ..- ,....- Noath tR-N..... "'''' 010'0 I'- acaDO 0"';:' 0 oj fflN ffl....., t'- 0) o '" ;;; ~*'::R.'#. a.....aeo o o:t. 0 OJ o"":oct:i ~O)~O> 0100<0 o 00) o tri' ~ o T-.Ill IX) o~oo g~gf$ ffiv N ffi "'''' 0000 0000 0006 Efl{fl(fl* 0000 0000 ood6 (fl 0 (806'7 o o ;;; OL()O(") o om ciLri""':""": o.....r.oco 01'--00 o~".r~ 1.00)0..-, ffl ('I) N &'7 "'''' 0000 0 0000 Cl) 0"":;"':0 N O('l)lOO (f) ovoo en o...tN'tri' ~ 1.0.....0..... <0 Efl v N &'7 <0 "'''' '" t--' ,:, Z C. W Co ;:;: ro ~ ,.. ro E !l: E 0 ~ LL ~ 2 Ql 0 (5 ~ ;:: " I- <( ,; 1;; .E u Ql ~ Ql W u: .c ro '" '" W ~ " Ql ro OC 19 <= <= ~ :I: W ro Q) ~ m- en a '" ,s ~ LL 0 <= 2 Ql 0 Ql Z 2 .2 " :;; "'15 :; <( ro 2 ro " 0 .g ro .~ Q) 2 1;; > ;:: 00 .<: i= 0 t " ~ ~ 0- Z Z en ~ Ql ii: 0 <( " ro Ql 0 Ql "0 '" .<: a i= j:: Ql :J a Ql C 3: Ul 5 Ql ~ Z :J <= '" w " Qla ~.~ ~ "0 0 Z <= '" "::I '" i= ~ 0 l!! Ql lij~ ~ ~.~ ro C U :>= 3:1- Z '" 0 ~ 0 ...J .s'g~~~ iii 0 0 "0 a ~ Ql .... ~ (!J OJ <= ~LL~!20 .~ (,) C .c 0 W "'151= <= 0 rr. <= 0 '" - Ql a <= <= z -gE:g~~ E .5~ E w t\l~:2~iii "" " " Cl ::> " 0 0 <= :; 0 ~ .c a <(roo <( 19 ill ~ rooo ""'" ro ;;: 0 .E ::> !::2 " m ... ,~ IX> oti '" .,. ee ('tj IX> '" ~ ;;; '" '" IX> ,...: .... '" .... ei ... '" .; ;:;; .,. o o o .,. .... <0 o '" oj .,. "' '" M " " oj o '" .,. omooool,()OOl.{) oO)oooo.<ooor-... CD ocr) ci d lci ,ci_~ d ci a.rl OCO'fh-fflOJfflCOf-..;fflN .0> co (0 ..- to c6aS to ,f/7 u) v.t>'7 C'\I"- Ef7 (fl t>'7 tI'7 01"'-00000000 0\\100000000 dlriddoc:ir-.:60ci cx)u)&'T&'TO.tfilOOf:l7tfi COM C") lOCO ,,-Ef7 l!i ..;i.(fl ffl Y7 w. ?ft.'#. 00 IX> IX> crioi mm .'#, IX> m <ri m (fl.'#. 00 00 0:)10 0) co OMOOOO.OOOO d6jd6~:;~6:;~ N.,..... Efl'ffl 0'.(,17 0)0 &'7,,- N t--. N...... Ll) air-: ri ri('f)" d C"') "'"' ..- N b'7 0)..- U') N ,,- b'=}t.'7 ~ tF; EI7 0000000000 0000001.0000 6066660:)606 &'7&'7r:,<7&'7f:17f:t'7:I"'-ER-EI7-&9 '" '" .,. OOOOOOO'O;OU') 000000000 ocioooo060lri t/7&'76'7t/7t/7-&9-&90t/70 '" .,. - .,. 0'" 01'- c:i ai "'.... '" oS"': "'.... m~ .,..,. o o o o .... C'i ;;; .,. 00 "'0 ...to _0 0'" "":ri '" .,. '" .,. 000 0 000 0 olrid 0 OM f:I7 0 0<0 0 dr:: (1) ~~ u; .,..,. '" . 00 0 00 0 00 10 ~g U; ~;i ~ ~ ut OlOlO 10 1:'--' Q) criro<o ",m", I"'-Noo 6'T~ffl .,. 000 000 ooiri .,. "' IX> "'''' 0;... '" .,. .,. '#. o o o ;2 '#.~'* 0000 ONO olrid ~..I.()CO (0000\000 vCOIOOOOO (Y-) 'cO ~ ui 0 00 coorol'-;69:01.() O."-MN Nt--. ('f)"ffl.fRJ:/:fl fflER: .,. It)OOOOOO I'-; 0 0 0 o. o. 0 lri....tooocio v N &'7 &'T.O 69:&'T "'0 '" ri ,,-~ r-: y?(fl ffl .'#..'#*-*-~~~ 0000000 0000000 iriccioocic:id O>CO~~ ~~. 1.0000000 ~ .~ :; ~ :;...~ .:;. co 1'-;,1.0.0 ffl 00 (0 ""'1.0 00 - oj r-: Ui .~i.6 co {,F,l. $ {,F,l. (,F,l.,,- .,. .,. 0000000 0000000 0000000 o ffl -&9 El9- E>'7 f:I7 Y7 o C'i ;;; .1.() 0 0 0 0 0 0 1'-;000000 iriojocicio6 vl!)t/7fflfflOO N'N' 00 ait/7 ~l!i '" "'~ .,. .,. 0000000 lDOOOOOO cr;r--.:cic:iooo N......1.0 Offlf:l7(fi vO>t--lD d....:r-:Ifi C\.l &'T &9 &'7 .,. 0000000 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 iricicicicicio ..-01.00000 O>N 1"'-10 1.000 ..,fCfir-:a6r-:oiilfi co t/7 (fl &'7 f:I7 f:I7 ..- .,. .,. ..-0000 Ol 00,00 cricid.cid o f:I7&'7E09 0 .... '" .,. .,. 1.00000 1"'-0000 tcicicio;..;r I"'-('I)OLOr-- N~..I.OCOCO cri6"":N<O N ,,- W &9<0 .,..,. .,. *-..?ft~?ft.;f. -00000...... 00000 tcic:iOOM '" - It)OOOO iti.:;:;d~ 0> f:fl (fi.f:17 0 o ...; ci ~ ~ 00000 00000 cioc:ico f:I7 f:I7 &9 -&9 EI7 00000 00000 ccicooo o Eli) U7 69' 0 "' 0 uS It)- '" .,. LOOOOO Noeoo coooo 0) (fl &'7 E:I7 0 <0 0 ,...: lli .,. .,. 00000 00000 Jriooo-i I"'-t"">OlOl"'- vo:;tl.OCOtO ciO":':N<D o:;t ..- f:I7 f;h I'-; .,..,. .,. z o i= o W I- o ~ 0. g.!!! ~ ~~~ g ~ i=,~~ Woo ~.s ~ 00'1::= :i: Ql III ~ {! :c :3 5~~ g~~~ ~ 8 ~ ~>~~~ ~~8rn ~Ql E ~ c~g m C1)~~~ro :i:~"~~E :> <( :c= s j~c!gg_crn~gg~ ~ ~ ~~~~ > WE~5~~~cz~~~o~ ~ Q - ~ ~~0m~~~<eg.~<g~~~E <wg ~~~~ ~c~~~C~~I=~B~O~~~~gi~~ ~~:~ ~gl-ldg)WE~~OOjo~iE~N~~Ql8~5W :2~~wi.~~~t~gll~6i@8~t~~~fi "E Ql E Ql l:! .E " w "m I- !l: ~.!!.!! o ~ ~ a g 5 uuu 000 000 c:iJrioj en 1'-;('1) f"""0> t g ~~ El$EI$~ v 0 0 0 000 cioo b'?(flEfl COC\! 00 cON .,..,. ~ '" 0; .,. "' co ei o " 0; ~ .,. ooco ooco cilricci en 1"--' N ....mO) ..,fllir-: _IX>'" .,..,. C'?co.c ..,. co It) C\J.c CQ C'O I'-; ro.c 0 co ro..o 0 "'C Q) -I 0: en ctl.c 0 "'C Q) ~ 000 000 oJri-.:i OlC\lN ...."'" "';ui"": ~"'''' .,.~ .,. .,. "" ~ t!J I- ~ ~ :::l Co) o Q ~ <:( ",,0 Q.)QOO ~~.ocO 3:u.~g I-i~~ o ...., f- en o Uj ..0 Z~~;: zoot) Qzow ~Qffio ~~tl.g: tl.S,2 en ~~ 0: tl. W <( ~ C5 z w ,..: :>. z Ci. w c. :2 ro >> >- ro <( E tl. oc ~ 0 :& u. ~ Z Q) 0 (; E ~ -c I- -0 <;; .8 u Q) Q) Q) W u: .c ffi OJ u Q) ro W i= l'l co co J: oc 10 Q) ]i w '" ,s ~ t/) u 0 co S Q) Z z .'2 -c :0 <( ~ Q) .~ Q z ~ ro i= 0 'e > ~ Q) Q) Q) <( u ffi i; -c V> .c :J u Q) C 3 :::J co Z a. .2' ::l J!l tl. '" 0 u i= <( '" E e> .0 ro C Z <'i ~ 0 0 u u Q " (9 e> Qi c: U 'E.o 0 co 0 V> - Q) U c: co E .~ :g E ::l ::l U (; 0 c: "5 0 'iii .c U <( C l'l :Jl 0 <( u .E :::> w (9 -~; <(0 f-'" W OC W U I- I~~~{9 ;i. u:::f2.. '" ~Q o S o OJ C> 00 c::i ...J_~ ~ Wu: ~~ ~~~-~Lt~ OIl.U) + 1-~~(2e U<( ex) " ~~ ~ ::f~fd~w~ LLO::WO:::I"-a:::Efl ~(/)OOO <( ~ ~~O 20. o o Wof5 wa. tiJ~ ...II ~I- o o '" o:(/) O:::>Z :;::Qo G:i~w o 0::0+ Q..:::Je. :20. 00. 0:<( u. o W -'w 053 W<( I> o (/) '" 0: o :;:: LL o "'15 i= 0. Cl: o (/) W o <(fij~ t:: :2 ...; o " '" 0000000000100 oaOOOlDc)..-OONO LriO-.:iLriONtOMNOOro .....CO""'"COlOO>O,....vtDCO..- .,.;-I.()M......,.;-_6'7..-l'-o::t~CD,..... "'f ,;..: -.:i fF) fh Efl"'; f:fi en 61? El7t/7tA <or- f:I7 '" o 00 '" 0 0 r....: cid OJ "'0 N "" Efl ...; ~ .,. o o o '" '" '" .... ..- "< a; o o o '" OJ '" '" o o o '" '" <6 '" o o o '" o o o .,. o 00 0 o 00 0 d dci ci o lOO V LO 010 CD r.J5 "":N ..0- f:fl Efl 0) Efl N .,. OOU?OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOU?OlO OOU?lOOOOOOOOOOOOOQOOU?,.....ON NO~Nc:ic:i0~c:ic:ic:ic:ic:idc:i6c:i~~N~~~ COf:fl.....vf:flONNf:fl~OIOCOOVOOfDOlCOvC'OOO N CO"- MaN ..-..........NU?~lO mNO>l.()lON f:fi NEfl Eflw';": f:fif:fi"":EflNEfl"":N..-..-mEflN~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~EI7f:17W ~ .,. 00 00 cio "'.,. q .,. ~~ 00 00 cia o 00 00 dci .,. 0 o <'i '" N .,. 00 00 60 .,..,. 0"" o cicr) .,. ~ 0;- 0:> .,. 0"- 00:> ccri .,. 0:> 0:> <'i o N .,. o o o '" 000000 000000 olodcicici tOLOOOCON lO..--vONM fflf:l7cDNro"'; f:flffl N Efl .,. 00000000000000 00000000000000 oooociciciociciciLricilri ffiffi&'70fflOf8-fflOOfF>NOf'-. "t N r--. COt---CO ~ ~ g~ g~~ .,. ~~:::R~~.~~~~~~~~~ 00000000000000 00000000000000 ciooociciociciociLriuilri ~~ooo~o)~~o)f'-.~t---O)f'-. 00000000000000 oooooooooooooC! cic:icic:icicic:icicicidLric:ilO OOOOOOOOOOlOl'-ON COOOCOOCOOOMO)COCO('l)CO NNrilfici-ociNMl6crici~Lri fl7fflNfI7lO.....("')vMNm U')f:17 fF> fl7f17f17f17(hfl7.....f:I7{t7 .,. 00000000000000 00000000000000 cicicicic:idcicicidciodci t.'7fflfl7f17f:17 E17Ef7f17f17 Ef7Ef7f17f17f:17 00000000000000 00000000000000 ocicicio6cicicicicilriciLri f:l7WlOlOfI70fflOlOlOfflt---ON .....('1) N 1.01.0 co ~f17 $ ~gg ~~;;; .,. 00000000000000 00000000000000 cicicicicicicicici6ci6cid OOlOl.OOOOOlOLOLOOOO COOCONOCOOo)f'-.(I')IDl'-lOlO NN""':ufcicricicri"":dmcOd"; &7WNfI7l.Of:I7('1')("')NNO>f:I3-vf17 f:I3- Ef7 fl7fflfflf:l7...... tfl '" 0.0000000000000 00000000000000 ooociociciciciciocioo 00000000001.0000 COOOOOOOOOOIDLOOlO NNM,...:dNciN....:....:O>~..;;..;....: Ef)-fflNfI7l.O.....C"?v(l')C"?O).....I.Of:F7 EF.J. fl7f:17f:17Ef)-f:I7fh.....fI7tfl .,. 00 c ~ ml.~ ~ Q) I;; '" tl. ::l Ul ~ 1."'- E 1ll:l :g ;;!.". ~.$ <1l Q) -E;? ~ 00 LLO o ~ .':" >- 00 Q.) 0 ~~w ~ w w~ 5:g~ w ~~ ~gl~~~~ ~ ~I~ ~~~~0 ~~~~o ~E'~E' ~~ ~ 13 u.. Q.) $ Q) E 'g ~I.~ 0 U U5 ro ~ en 0 ~ '0...S: II) ~ ~ '-' ::l Q) ~ <1l .~ ~. E V> ~I.~ 3:::> ~ I!! w ~ lit l'l a: .!2- ~ f- <= C ~OO~~~.5~IDm ~w m~SS~oo S~~-~ cc ~2 w ~~~I~g&~I@~~ om ~~~~~~ ~~~~g gg uu ~~ Q) CWo ro cl~E~ ~-w z ~~m~:E~m~.-~ 00 ~~ cc ~f-:~glci~~t)ool!!Q)~~zI0~o~~CEI!!~x~2~Blf ~~~~~~gg .~z-ulz~ffiQ)~s ffiQ)-~ ~u~~z ul~~-w~nuoooo oooo~mg$ ,~~~~Ia~~-~'g~E~$~~~~o~~~~~~5oS~~~~~mm~~~~iffi~~ 1~~_~~E~E~E~~g~~~~~z~~u~I~:~I,,~~~~~~uigl~mm~I~~~~8EEm~ ~ ...... ~ .t: ~I E E:=' :> Q) E ~ s:.. ~ Q) E u.. I I '- ~ 0 0 - - ~ 2 u '-' o~mc~o~I~Q)~~>_~~~CW~gz~ogmo~ Q)wet~~~~I~I!!~~_.5~ ~g~~~~~&GG~~~~s~~~5~8~~~~~~~~rnm~~~~~~t~~~~~~~ ~ ...; 0:> ..- <'i '" 000000000000 000000000000 cicic:iociodociocido t;,9Q<7Q<70tF7f:17t;,9C"?fA-f:I7tfltF7 '" fI7: oi '" .... o o o ~ ~~~~*~ oooa())o oooocoo g~o~o;~ ro~roDO~Q)-O~.- ~_E~ro=roD~m=ro~o~Q)_=roDu~ID_lo~._I._~_Ec .... o o <6 ex) '#.rft.~'#.*-;R.~~~'#.-;R.~O 000000000000 000000000000 000ciooo"":0066 ~~~,Q)~~~Q)~~~~ 000000000000 000000000000 cioc:iciciciciNciciLrid oO,COOOI00COvOOCO C")(QCO r--. 0 co..... vco NCO('l) N ci cD 'N (f) ~ N ui oj r'oi ..;; COC")COffitF7tF7f:17Olfl7tF7l'--T- f:l7f:17f:fl C\l f:fltF7 .,. 000000000000 000000000000 c:icioocio600c:icic:i EA-f:I7f:flfflfl7ffl-tF7COfl7f17fflf:fl "" <!i .,. o o o '" OOOOOOOO-.o:;to,OO 00000000 000 cici..,jcic:i6oNNoocri f:F.ttfl~OOLOOQ)lONfflC") C")r--.o(X).....or---..... v coN"ri"":N"cOojf:J7 ~ v tfltF7ff7tflfl7ffl fA- '" N 00000000(0000 oooooooocoooo c:ic:icricicioc:i0"": olri-.i OO('l)f:flfflf:l7Efl~COCOOC\l (l')COLO f'-.f:I70COOl ~a~ ~ ~~~~ .,. <0 <6 '" o o " '" '" q; ;;; 0000000000000 0000000000000 ciooc:icicic:icicicilrici6 OOCOOOI000..;toocoo C")<DCOOOCO..-CDCOC\lCOC")O NOcDMcQ"':Noria:i~oi";"; COMlXltflffl-Eflf:/70tF7f:17t---..-C\l fflf:flfA- (l') f:l7tflffl .,. o o o ..- "" <6 .,. 000000 000000 ~c:icici6ci C')LOfflONCO (I') co OLO~ cON CIid"; 1Of:F.t fflNN .,. "'.,. .,. o o o .,. 000000 000000 ciocicicic:i &'7tfl fl7ffl ffl- 0 '" ,.: .,. o o o '" 000000 000000 -.ioc:icicv:ici ~c.of:fl&'7vro 0)(1') coO) oif:F.t McO _ N _ .,. V> .,. o o o ..- "" <6 '" 000000 000000 "":oci6"":0 .....O)fI7ot---tfl v"t oco cON cOc.oh C")tfl wa> .,. N .,. 000000 000000 6oc:icicici 000000 movocooo <oC"iCIiaiaSaS LOfI7WWVN .,. '" '" .,. a '" Ql .... <: ~ :::> (.) o Cl S q; ~~t?g ~~~~ r-~i~ o ~ f/) b w" b Zf-OZ zC!idt) QzOLlJ ~Qa::a ~~~g: o..~ f/) ~~ 11: ~ aJ z (j) Z LlJ I- W W J: tn Z o ~ <( =:l Z ~ Z o () ...: :>. z a. w 0. ::;: ~ ~ ~ c:: E f2 ~:m 5 {3~ i= "0 '- <(-ciiiiQ o Q) 2? Q) ~-5mg' ffi~~~ ().~:5E:! o c: .9 <D zgijJ~ <( 1l - ." 6~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 9 ~-~ ~ ~ .Ql g U ~~~ ~~ R ~ ~ 8 (!)~Qjc _c.cO c 0 U)- (l) ()c c: 5g>g5 u '2 ~"5 8 'm E () <( i: 19 Q) <(8.E~ w <.') ~~ -:;:c~ 1-'" W c:: w o I- Zo(/)<.') I:5I-~U <( IL_ "' ::RQ ,s 000000 OOL()OOO g ~~-g ~g C'-l {'\l 0 tfl-b'7ffl b'7b'7M'" ... 00 0 0 0 -0 o :0 0 0 -0 0 oc:icic:icici tfltfl ffl (;f)b'7 b'7 ~?ft*-';ft_,*~ 000000 000000 cicciodci ~ ~-~~ ~ ;: 000000 (!) 0 0 -~ ~ _~ ~--~ ~ -J ~ ~, ~__ u:, -~ -~ ~~,~ ~~ ~ ~:~~2ijJb'7~<O~--b'7~ o a.. U) _ + Efi 1-6~8e ()<( (/)>- ~~ffi~w lLC::WC::I-a:: i:!!(/)OOO <( lJ! l7i bo ::;:0.. o o Woffi Wa.. ttlu) c[I ::;:1- o o " a::(/) O:Oz 3;Qo GJ~w o fEge. ::;:0.. 1i!~ lL o w -'w 0153 w<( I> o (/) " a:: ~ lL o "'15 ;:: 0.. 0: o (/) w o <(11]0 t:z 000000 000000 cicioooo WEA-tR-.f:I7b'7f:F> 000000 CJ00090 06dooo EA- &9- tR tt7 N ;;~ 000000 000000 oc:icicido 001000>00 OU?<OOO>O ll'i"fo..- EflT'""- b9f:0'7COt.'7 ffl ... 000000 000000 dciciocici 001.0000 OlO<OO N ll'i~6"':T"""': 6'76'7 co b'7 b'7 ffl ... ::;...J .g.g> moo .~.~ ~~~...J ~~.9.9~...J --~~ (J) en Q) Q) N C\l "C"Occ:UU o 0 Q) Q) ::;::;(.?(.?<(<( oc.C"'-fI)_ lOll'>IOOOOOl.O <0 0 r..;.MO 0 ui Ntri ~..~ 0 0 r...: NtDt{)CO~ffi{fl.O N ,<-..6/7 LO &9 ..... ffl..- aj ffl (fl .CO' N 6/7- 0000000,.... ~ ~ ~~~I'6 @ ~- ~ ffiffltl7<<>E09.t>'7(l')0 co N N N u) r-...~ ~ ~ ~ ... ~?ft..?fl..'#..~ ooocoo OOONO 0000>0 ~ ~-~ ;: ~ :::R o " d ~ 00.00000(') 00000000> cQ .r--:. -:.;..: ~.cci oo.c\j @ ~ ;:'gj ~ &9.t17 ~ ~~~i~ .~ f:h tfi ("/ ",' '" ggggggg ~ dciodociocci ffifflfflffiE09Efltl7..... to ri " ... 00000000> 00000>00(') c:i6ci;,i""":oocD {flfflffl~~{fl(flO ~M r-: ... ... " '" ... oooooooco 0000 OON Mr..:""":d"..::fodcci o III 0 ffi ()) fflf:0'7 r-... LOC\I 0> N ~ M r:ii c:6 0) fflC\lf:0'7....... r-... ... '" '" " ... 00000000 00000000> c-ir--:....:cOcOoc-icci o III 0 r-........&9(l')v LON 0)(") (\J(') ~MMriN m r-: Eo9 C\I {fl..- N ....... V {fl ffl (fl (fl co ,,; ... en l;; " O.c: -E ~ ~ I:;: ~ C Q) -g Q) ~~ ~ ~:2e c.J1::Q)-' -~Q; ~ '~ i~ 2 ~ ..c: 2:' 0 ~ 0 == (I) f/)."u'Ous:l'l -$ '5 ~ e? ~I~ ~ -a>oQ)oc:z. ~ ~~ ~~~.t: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~I iU ~ b z.Ewa::WOf/) f- .....C\It""J'<:tLOCDr-... -- Ql ~ !: III III III _.I: III ::i 0 0 0 III III III an ....N .... .... .... IX) an IX) .... .... .... I- 0 " y, :,: f/) co co co I'- I'- co m 00 , i, 0 z ~.... It .'." 0 00 0 0 _0 0 0 0 0 g:= 0 000 00 0 00 00 IX) ({) N 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 ON 00 0 00 0 0 N Z 6 oi 6 6 00 6 6 6 6 6 6 600 66 6 66 6 6 00 0 0 ~ -.r 0 0 I'- 0 0 co (() IFJ-<i' IFJ- IFJ--.r Ef> IFJ-IFJ- IdS- Ef> Ef> Ef> -.r i= ..J W I'- N ~ 0 N 0 10 co m 00 IX) 0 ~ 0:: - Ef> IFJ- Ef> Ef> Ef> Ef> IFJ- Ef> -.r '<t :::l 0 0 Ef> <I'l- 0:: l- I- l- f/) (f) Z ~ 0 0 (f) 0 0 0 (<) -.r 0 0 0 0 ~~ 0 01'- 00 0 0 0 0 00 r-- LU 0 0 ~ (<) C') m 0 0 0 0 00 00 0 0 0 0 00 '=! Z ..J 0 6 6 ~ N o:i 6 6 6 6 ~i; '6 d~ 66 6 6 6 6 66 .... 0 <( W <t7 <t7 C') (<) N 0 0 <t7 <t7 <t7 IFJ-m <t7 <I'l- <t7 IFJ- Ef> <t7 <t7 <t7 en -, ..J m co. -.r co I'- co '" N c-: ii2 ..J M ~ N' M ""' r-: r-: w <( IFJ- ~ N N Ef> co '" ~ <t7 <t7 <t7 <t7 <I'l- Z ~ l- I f/) 0 :E ~ -, ~ 0 Ii: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 00 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 00 00 0 0 0 C> 00 0 Z 0 I- 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 66 6 66 66 6 6 6 0 66 0 en l- I- 0 IFJ- Ef> <t7 Ef> <t7 <t7 <t7 IFJ-IFJ- <t7 IFJ- Ef> Ef> <t7 <t7 IFJ- Ef> IFJ- Ef> <t7 <I'l- ....I U Z f/) W f/) 0 <( W ~ 0:: i: ii2 i:2 ::l I- 0:: I- W W 0 Z ::l a.. ~ w 0 0:: 0 g :iiE >- U C <( w a.. At 0:: 0 z I- 0 en i= Ul >2 Ql u. 0 .;:: 0 ::l 0 (' ,~ 0:: ~ Ul >- Q) Ul I- ~ Q) w 0:: 00 u u ...I 0 z .3~ w 0 I- 0 o1l:!:: Ul Cl Z Q) z ", 00 .!!l Q) W '0 E ii: w ;:: I- > Z Q) ro Ul Q) D.. >- Z Z 0 E o1l U: Iii ro E 00 :"':~ 0 ..., t e "0 ~ Q) /0 >- i= ~ 0 o1l "0 "0 ~ ".' g l- n ~ ro ro ro ':....:.5 ....I a.. z E ...I I (f) :o~ :, ~ " :I: ii2 2 0 ... 0 J: 0 0 o1l Q) 0 I- 0 0 e ~ Cl o1l Q) ::2: ~ C,.) Ul :;; ...I Z ..., ]i 0. Q) E Ul e ... Q) .. f/) > (ji 0 :~ 0 e: w '0 l!: ::> Q) ,:g, 0 '8- 2Ul "',,: :iiE 0 u:: 0 Ci5 u:: Cl rr:8 : 0:: I- ...I (f) 000 0(<) '<to 000 010 00 ({) 00 ({) 0 ({)N ~ C') <Xl mo 00 0(<) 0 o-.r 00 -.r IX) 0 ooi ~ N """ 60 66 60i 6 600 66 00 r-.: 0 r-- ~-.r C') C') 0 00 co 10 IFJ- (<) <t7 <t7 N IFJ- <t7 N '" I'- N -.r 00 I'- CON co m 10. m m '<t cD C> -<iN' ""' cO - <t7 ~ N C') ~ IFJ- <t7 .... ({) (() '" l!) LL W tFT tFT ~ IFJ- IFJ- .... 0 .... C,.) Z Ef> <I'l- UJ ::l 0 0 0 -, ~ > :E I- ~ (f) <( ~I'- OZ NZ -.r-.ro ,', 0 C) "'10 0- <Xl- CO<XlN 00> t:N ~cb ....~-.r Z Z ({)-.r 1'-0 l- e m", NlO C'\J~ ~o "'~ '" ~ u z UJ 0:: l!) l!) ~ <( w C,.) w 0 0 N N 0:: C 0 a:l I- :E Z 0 ~ > ::l 0 i:2 z z C,.) w a.. e -1 -1 -' U U e .2 <( <( <( 00 e e Q) tl l- I- l- ii E ...I Q) 0 0 0 Ul ~ <( <:= l- I- l- I- ::> ::> ~ 0. u (/)(f) Q) ~l!: l!: l;::: ell ell ell 0 "" 0:: e e u ro -al ~ U:'Oa5 ::> ::> ::> I- 00 (f) (/) (f) w .- .- E ~ Q) 0'- ::i UO E"E ::2:"E ,~ Q. (A a.. ~.s o ro ... ro -roo- a.. Ul Ul ...I Q)I >Q)(ji e e ~'1B ~= 0...1 ... ~ ::l 00 ... Ql C co ~ f/) 00 Z(/) ell(/) eLL-ell - - ---- -- I ~ '0 Q) Ol ro 0. [9'LI':I':'LSv H'90c'S 017' ~I':~ 'SLv L9'41':8'LSv OS'c8S'899 . . . 00' ~c9 9c'H $ 00'91': lP83 "l.NO:} "U 'J..I8MO OW86cO PO ElO 8l1alS" $!118:JOJaWaH/l\l!Ilieo OJO ao 811alS jJBMO . - 00' ~c9 9c'H $ 00'91': 4:J83 '.LNO:} "U 'jJBMO sUJn)a8 600'1':6Z0 Add8H" $!IIB:JOJaWJaH/IiI!IIiBO $UJnla8 Iidd8H }J8MO - - 00' ~c9 9c'H $ 00'91': 4:J83 '.LNO:} ,.c ~ '}JBMO BOO'86Z0 spJa=l a!).Ia8 " S!lIB:JOJaWaH/IiI!I1i80 SpJa=l a!).Ia8 }JBMO - - - 98' ~ ~O'Z 9S'LI': $ 00'1':9 4:J83 '.LNO:} "vc '8Ja:J!uOl LOO'I':6Z0 BII!AJa!O/appnsliauoH 4sn8 - - - 01'1' ~1':9' ~ 09'O~9 $ 00'8 4:J83 8'8S "IH 900'8660 ,1'1 'SP1SaA!IiS SnU!d/aU!d 4:J10:JS - - 9c' ~9B'6 917'1761': $ 00'9Z 4:J83 8'l1S ''lH ,9 '818suao 900'I':6Z0 8:JnelE) Ba:J!dla:JnJds SII!H )j:JBIS - - - OO'COO'V 00'L99 $ 00'9 4:J83 S'lIS VOO'86CO "IH ,O~ '8JD!N SnU!dlaU!d U8P1Sn'lf - - - 017'0&9'9 Oc'69v $ OO'C~ 4:J83 S'8S "WO 1':00'I':6Z0 ,,~'Z S!l8P!osd!ll3 sn:JJanOf)jBO U!d - - - OO'Ba'v 9L'v89 $ 00'1'1 4:J83 S'8S "W:} ZOO'I':6Z0 ..9'Z 8dJB:JOJ:J8V\1 $n:JJanOf)jeOJns - - - OZ'6S6'9 OS '[(;17 $ OO'V~ 4:JB3 S'8S "W:) "O(e, SIB!IUapJ:J::>Q ~00'1':6Z0 S!1IsO/!iJJsq)j:J8H (JowuJoO - - - 09'66Z' ~ 00'669'c $ 09'0 aJ:J1;f sqJo.:! 41!M 900'Z6Z0 X!V\llaM aA!18N - .LMSO~I': lOOIUV\I - - - 00'9~1':'6 OO'OLO'c $ 09'17 SJ:J'If sqJO:l 41!M X!V\I ).I04S 900'Z66O IiPUBS aA!leN -.SSN081': lOOIUlAJ - - - 0~'89L'Z 9y'ZL $ 00'1'18 '),::} 4:JlnV\l pOOMpJ8H pappaJ4S yOO'Z66O - - - 00'901'1 09'01'1 $ OO'O~ uO.L I;f L aOAl cBB8aaAl '4:JlnV\l 1':00'c66O - - - 09'c9L '0 ~ 6B'y $ OO'OOc'c XS aU^l UM81 'DU!PPOS cOO ~c6cO - - - 9L '81'16' ~ 9c'H $ 00'9~ ~ XO $pas mO'c6cO DU!IUBld JOJ MOJJOS 1!0$dOl palas - - - 00'9cc'Oc 00'9ZC'OC$ OO'~ 4:J83 J01BJado 41!M a18E) ap!lS cOO'cBcO - - - 00'090'9 OO'l':C $ OO'OCC '=1'1 IAU!A " a:Jua=l )jUll U!B4:} ~OO'ZIlZO cS'S~~'B <:6' ~ ~6'9 00' 1'10<: '<: c6'6~ ~ '1'1 ~L'y~ OO'OBc'll 00 'c99 $ 00'9~ '=1'1 OC01> UD!SSO 'U!$8S 4:J1BO cw<:L60 9<:'S<:8'8 9C'1>S<:'C 00'980' ~ 9<:'6cl':'l': 99'S 00'091>'8 00:9YI': $ OO'O~ '=1'1 H aOAl 'U!$8S 4:J1BO ~ wcao OS'L9B - 06'L9B OS'L9B OO'C OS'L9B 96'BcY $ OO'C 4:J83 pJ8nE) 4S8JlIM UOJd'lf dO~ 4:JUI"9~ 9~9'ZLZO 9L'v~6'~ - 9L'v~S'~ 9L'v~S'~ 00'9 9L'N6' ~ 96'cB8 $ 00'9 4:J83 pJBnE) 4$8Jl/M UOJd'lf dO~ 4:JU!-c ~ U9'ZLZO 00'99c'v - 00'99c'1> 00'99<:'1> OO'OO~ 00'99c'y 99'cy $ oo'om '=1'1 JSMas WJ01S 4:JU!-9 ~ 9 ~Y'CaO 00'091':'L - 00'091':' L 00'091':'L OO'OOC 00'098' L 01'1'91': $ OO'OOc '=1'1 JaMSS WJ01S 4:JU!-Z ~ CWCL60 09'BW6 . - 09'1'1 ~9'S 09'BW6 00'1> 09'B~9'6 99'1>01>'c $ OO'Y 4:J83 lUBJP^H 060'99CO 09'HB'c - - 09'HS'<: 09'HB'<: OO'~ 09'[>B'c 09'LWc $ OO'~ 4:J83 xoq pUB aAI8A AljJallns 4:JU!-9 ~ 01l0'99CO 00'L6~'8 - - 00'L6~ 'I': 00'L6~ 'I': 00'17 00'L6~'1': 9c'S6L $ 00'17 4:J83 XOS PU8 aAI8A a18E) 4:JU!-9 090'99l0 00'01>0' ~ ~ - 00'0170' ~ ~ 00'0170' ~ ~ 00'OOl'8 OO'OYO' ~ ~ 9Y'I': $ 00'OOl'8 'SSl $Bu!ll!.:! dlO 090' 99<:0 00' OLL 'cc - OO'OLL'lc 00' OLL '<:c OO'Oll OO'OLL'cl 09'1':0~ $ OO'O<:Z '::n c9 SSBIO 'U!BV\I JalBM dlO 4:JU!-9~ 9~O'99l0 00'll9'Y6 - - 00'll9'1>6 00'lc9'Y6 OO'OLB'~ 00'Zl9'Y6 09'09 $ OO'OLB'~ '.:d'l c9 $$810 'U!eV\l Jal8M dlO 4:JU!-B 900'99l0 00'09~'~ - - 00'09~' ~ 00'09~' ~ OO'O~ 00'09~'~ 00'9~ ~ $ OO'O~ '=1'1 ~d JaMas ^1!ABJE) dlO ,,11 900'Y9CO OO'OYO' ~ ~ - - OO'OyO' ~ ~ OO'OyO' ~ ~ OO'OYC OO'OyO' ~ ~ 00'9Y $ OO'OYC '=1'1 aa!d JaMas !\l!A8JE) OAd ,,9 YOO'y9cO 00'09Y'8 - - 00'09Y'1': 00'09Y'1': OO'OC~ 00'09Y'1': 9L'Bc $ OO'Oc ~ '=1'1 U!8V\1 a:JJo.:! JalSWBIO IIBWS 800'Y9l0 00'O<:C'8 .' - OO'OCC'l': 00'Ocl'8 OO'~ 00'OCC'8 OO'Oll'l': $ OO'~ 'S'l DU!IS80 '1? al04u8V\1 AJ81!UBS cOO'y9l0 00'9a' ~c - 00'9Lnl 00'9a'~c OO'~ 00'9a' ~c 00'9Lnc$ OO'~ . 'S'l ~uBl oU1PIOH Jal8MEll8M ~00'y9l0 00'090'1'1 . - 00'090'1'1 00'090'1'1 OO'~ 00'090'1'1 00'090'1'1 $ OO'~ 'S'l UOl181S dwnd JSpUpE) ~09'1':9<:0 aB8~:JBd pa1l81$UI alaldwoo - 09'll':9 09'l89 $ OO'~ 4:J83 ISOd UD!S OW~9l0 - - - 09'01'1 09'01'1 $ OO'~ 'S'l DUI1U!8d IIB1S a8:J!pUBH 600' ~9l0 - - - 09'cH 6C'O $ 00'009 '=1'1 oU!aplS luawaA8d al!4M "y BOO' ~9l0 - - 00'1'191':'8 1'19'1':8 $ OO'OO~ 'A'S )jl8M alaJ:Juo:} LOO' ~9l0 91'1' ~ 179' ~c - 91'1' ~ 179' ~c 91'1' ~ y9' ~c 00'9YIl' ~ OB'HB'~l 8L'~~ $ 00'091'1' ~ '=1'1 JElllnE) PU8 qJn:} 900' ~96O - - - 9l'I':6c 8n $ OO'OH 18E) 1800 )!:JBl snOU!Wnl!8 900' ~9l0 - - - OO'cWv~ OS'l9 $ 00' OBc uOl aJnlx!w aSJno:J Bup8aM vAl adlil YOO' ~9CO 171'1'609'0<: - YB'609'Oc YS'609'OC 09' 61'18 OO'CO ~ '0<: OS'l9 $ 00'01'11': UOl aJnIX!W 800' ~9<:0 aSJnoo DupeaM-uON 8Al adlil 09'~ZL'H - 09'~ZL'H 09'~cL'H 00'OL9 09'~ZL'H 9y'9c $ 00'OL9 XO \9 SS810) aSBS al80aJoB'If cOO' ~9l0 - - - 09'9170' ~ 9l'Ov $ 00'9c XO II SSBI:} 'a8Ja!~ WOpUB~ ~09'B8l0 - - - 09'yZL 9l'Oy $ OO'B~ XO I SSBIO 'dBJd!~WOPUB~ m9'L8l0 - - - 09'c~8'v IlB'c $ 00'009' ~ XS la~Uel8 IOJ1UOO UO!SOJ3 YOO'L8<:0 00'0917'8 - 00'09Y'I': 00'09Y'1': 00'009 00'09Y'1': , 9L'9 $ 00'009 '=1'1 a:Jua=lll!S 800'L86O 09'<:Y6'CC - 09'lv6'lc 09'cy6'lc 00'9Bc 00'09~'YC 09'011 $ 00'001': XS a:JuBJlu3 )j:J0~ cOO'L8l0 - - 9L'OU 917'1': $ 00'91': '=1'1 ~:Ja40 4:Jl!O (1I0~ O!S) 001 Jaq!=I ~00'L8l0 - - 00'06~ '1'19 9y'9c $ OO'OOc'l XO !BpaleV\l MOJJ08 I!oseo 1 B09' ~ ~lO 9S'YBL'99 ~ - 9S'YBL'99~ 9S'vBL'99~ 00'969' ~ ~ OO'OU'~H 9c'y~ $ OO'OOO'c ~ XO !8palBV\I MOJJ08 con ~lO 00'00 ~ '9 ~ - OO'OO~ '9~ oo'om '9~ 00'000'<: 00'OO~'9~ 90'1'1 $ 00'000'<: XO UO!IBAB:Jx3 ~09' ~ ~lO alBO 01 paJOIS paJ01S pOllad S!lj.L UOI1B:l!lddV' alBO 01 alBO a:l!Jd P!a a:l!Jd ^mUBnO llUn wall 'ON wall pUB palaldwoo IillUaSaJd sno!AaJd WOJ:! patardwo:> 01 pElllelSul Ilun P!S paleW!IS3 lelO.L SIBIJalell\l )jJOM limueno sa:l!Jd I!Un a alnpalj:lS ljdasor 'IS I Attachment:. Yes orNo REQUEST FORCOUNCfL NCnaN ;EA.W - Parkway BUsiness Center D^,TE: March 1, 20()7 ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT DEPARTMENT APPROVAL AGENDA ITEM Parkway Business Center..... Draft EA W PREVIOUS ACTION On September 7, 2006 the Council authorized the initiation of the EA W for the Feltl/Prom fann now entitled Parkway Business Center. The initiation requested authorized KLD to draft the EA W documents. RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION Accept the draft EA W and authorize the same to be distributed for comments and review. FISCAL IMP ACT COMMENTSfRECOMMENDA TIONS At the joint City Council/Planning Commission meeting the proposed Industrial Park was discussed. During discussion a question arose as to the impact of starting the platting process when the North east/west corridor study is in process and whether the City is jeopardizing federal funding. I have had a chance to discuss the proposed development with Mary Karlsson of SRF and Gameth Peterson (the consultant hired to complete the North corridor Study). They both concurred that loss of Federal Funding is not a risk. The study for this corridor does not include official mapping, rather it stops once the environmental documents are complete. As you may recall, the North corridor study has three different environmental documents depending on the section of street. The section east of CR 133 includes an EA, which is underway and due to be complete in October. This section only includes one alternative, so when the EA is completed the road could shift up or down. The developer is aware of this. If the road is shifted, a re-plat of a portionofthe area might be needed, but again that is the risk of he developer and they are willing to do so. The EA W that you are receiving is a draft only. e environmental process requires that various agencies have an opportunity to review and comment on th draft document. The City of 8t. Joseph is the regulating unit (ROD). We haveauthorizedtheE Wprocess andKDLis preparing the document on behalf of the City. . The cost of the EAW is the so responsibility of the developer. As the RGD all the comments come back to the City, which are then ed over to KDL to review and amend as needed. Once the comment period has closed, the Counci will review the comments received and any amendment. At that time the final document will e recommended for approval. If you have a chance to get your comments befor Thursday please forward them to me so they can be included. If you don't have a chance toread the e tire document before Thursday you can still make comments; however, I would ask that you return our comments within two weeks. The draft has already been reviewed by the City ngineer and the attached emails illustrate that her concerns have been addressed. We have not prin ed new pages for your copy, please use the emails as verification. When we have a new document we ill forward the same. Other staff members are reviewing the draft and will submit comments as ell. At this meeting the Council must accept the draft ocumentso that it can be forwarded to the required agencies for review and comment. S;E,H MEMQRAND.UM TO: Judy Weyrens, City Adminstfator FROM: Tracy L. Ekola, PE DATE: February 26,2007 RE: Draft EA W for Parkway Business Center, St. Joseph, MN Engineering Review Comments The following are engineering review comments. for the Draft Parkway Business Center. Item numbers listed,below refer to the correspondingEAW item. 4. Mandatory EA W should be checked. 6b. Please clarify the following: "Lot construction will occur on an individual lot basis at the future landowner?s discretion." Is this referring to individual site development of each lot? Rough grading of the lots should occur with the street and. utility improvements. 6d. Delete the last sentence of paragraph 6d and revise to include the following information: Corridor studies and environmental documentation for the North Corridor and the Southwest Arterial will be completed independently. There will be a two-part environmental review process for.the entire 320 acres (previous Feld farm). The first will bethe EA W for the 55.2 acre Parkway Business Center and the second is an EIS or AUAR for the entire site after the corridor studies have been completed and additional site concept plans are developed for the entire site. ThisEA W for the 55.2 acres does not confer development rights onto the remaining site. 7. While the ordinance may allow 60% of the total lot area to be covered by building or structures, it is not likely that this will occur on the majority of lots. Expected typical commercial and industrial building sizes should be used to calculate the maximum gross building area. 8. City of St. Joseph should be listed for Plat Approval, Re-Zoning and Final Plat Approval. 13. Add the following: With the City's new wells and water treatment plant to be completed in April 2007, the water treatment capacity will be 3,000,000 gallons per day. 17. Include the additional information: Based on the City's Storm Water Management Plan, the northern portion of the project is in the Watab River Watershed and the central and southern portions of the project are in the Sauk River Watershed District. Stormwater ponds will be designed according to the City's Storm Water Management Plan. 18. Revise expected wastewatertlow rates based on revised building area calculations (see item 7). Delete the last two sentences in paragraph 18c since the conveyance is not the limiting factor. The following additional information should be included: Existing WWTF allocation for the City of St. Joseph is 600,000 gpd (1,500,000 peak gallons/day). Current average wastewater tlow for the City is approximately 390,000 gpd. The DBL'lift station (which serves the industrial park) has an average Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc., 1200 25th Avenue South, P.O. Box 1717, SI. Cloud, MN 56302-1717 SEH is an equal opportunity employer I www.sehinc.comI320.229.4300 I 800.572.0617 I 320.229.4301 fax February 26,2007 Page 2 capacity 0000,000 gpd and peak capacity of 7 0,000 gpd. The. forcemainsystem which pumps DBL lift station and the city's main lift station to St loud (St Cloud's collection system) has an average capacity of 1,200,000 gpd and peak capacity 0 3,000,000 gpd. The City of S1. Joseph is currently working with the City of St Cloud to double St Joseph's WWTF allocation by 2010. The City has purchased 2,100,000 gpd capacity of St Cloud' collection system leading to the St Cloud WWTF. 21. Include the number of parking spaces base on expected square feet of building area and requirements per the City's zoning ordinance u rrequired parking stalls. Use traffic generation numbers from ITE Trip . eneration Manual, 7th Edition or most current edition or cite the source for the estimated 20 trips per lot (does this adequately represent the commercial lots also?). Include information on the existing traffic con itions on CSAH 133 (i.e. 2003 AADT for CSAH 133 is 4750). Minnesota State Aid Standards allo a two-lane roadway for traffic volumes up to 15,000 vehicles per day. Therefore, even with the ad ition of _ trips/day at full build-out, the two-lane roadway is adequate to handle the Parkway B siness Center Traffic. Future traffic issues are discussed in the draft. However, implications should be discussed regarding the north access onto CSAH 133. IfCSAH 1.3 is rerouted as a result of the North Corridor construction (as illustrated in the North Corri or documentation) or if the access from the Parkway Business Center is too close to the CSAH133 orth Corridor intersection, the north access may not be feasible for the future roadway configurati n (the site would still have two other access locations). 29. Delete the last paragraph ofitem no. 29 d replace with the following information: Corridor studies and environmental documentation for the North Corridor and the Southwest Arterial will be completed independently. There will be a tw -part environmental review process for the entire site (previous Feld farm). The first will be theE W for the 55.2 acre Parkway Business Center and the second is an EIS or AUAR for the entire site frer the corridor studies have been completed and additional site concept plans are developed u r the entire site. This EA W for the 55.2 acres does not confer development rights onto the remainin site. Provide the EA W distribution list for City re iew and include the list as part the EA W document. The purpose of the Environmental Assessme t Worksheet (EA W) is to assess the environmental impacts of the proposed project and to dete ine if an Environmental Impact Statement (ElS) is required. Acceptance of the EAW does not onstitute approval of the project or waive any ordinance requirements. When an EA W is to be prepared, the propos r shall submit the completed draft EAW to the Responsible Government Unit (RGU). The GU shall determine whether the proposer's submittal is complete within 30 days. If the RGU dete ines that the submittal is incomplete, the RGU shall return the submittal to the proposer for com letion of the missing data. If the RGU determines that the submittal is complete, the RGU shall no ify the proposer of the acceptance of the submittal within five days. The RGU shall have 30 days fro notification to add supplementary material to the EA W, if necessary, and to approve the EA W for d'stribution. The RGU shall be responsible for the completeness and accuracy of the informati n. . February 26, 2007. Page 3 EWVIRORMENTAL ASSESS.ENT WORKSHEET PROCESS iO CALB1lDAR DAYS .. .. EAW PREPARATION ~-~------------------------------------~ \/ARiES 1 TO 5 WORKING DAYS ~ RGIl ~:fIliU OlmpleleS ~ RGU distributes EliIh' .""diES . ..fA .W. . .ilnd ,10 dist,1butirnli;, prqx>m' ill'P"""'" n fur dl>1riblliion -- 1 m I> WUIlKlNlJ DAY;;; ~ft'3U iool!S pm'" . .,,,leaS'> .., jRGU ."_""ines. . E'AWis """l!5!NIlY ~propll$B' titblllitsEAW. completod data ptttio.,to RGU ~ ~.RGU..pIllIlIP..."., ..1Iy. ''''''......_ '. j.D. atai5Ub",itt.1 sLtlmillal fiy ""mplm completenell$; letum.ll> prop......if,;,Clllllpletll PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD as NEED DECISION ....-~~--- ----"....... ......-~--- ~--_...._- ~-~~----- ~Notke pablilhlld i" E08~ .11n2.'da.'I'allll'''''''iJlloffAW.,: 1Ib4l~Y;Clllll1'l1flltjJl.irlO<ll ~&15 fX1;1fIi1mstl 1. .3D.-d ..~.' . ClllII_t period EIIds 3WORKlUG DAY$T03!lDA;n< RG.U '.de..cides . '. p."".:.ecl...1.3.0.CiI...len..d.. sr d. ..1 needs ~1$.pn!p<l'E$ judil:llilil~.1 Dndilgsoflact; .nll period bOilgs <elplJrld'tD lIll'IlmfMl!i 1RG U..disiJibutl!S nllrtked de:isim "} TO 21 CAI.!!!UIAI! DAYS tlotke pub. lish.lld. in roa...' ~.. Manita1to21 ~ after '''''''i>t of de:isi::l1 30 CALEMJiAfl DA'i5 1 TO 5 WORKlWJ DA'1'5 .. Calf Wlty depeniiiug ()ff RG'IJ. NOTES 11me fnlme5 are dillQlilmedai prescrIbed In the rules and should be coll5ldered I1Ilnlrntlfll estlm8les. Day CiIIl mean either calendar or wo1'klng lIay depending on the timeframe listed mr a specific mnt. 11 the tellt lists 15 or fllWeT days. th~ are working days; calendar d~ 1If!! 16 Of more dt)'i (4410:.0200, mbpart 12}. Wotklng d~ m:lum SatU:nIIlYS, Sundays aM' legal state holidlfl'S. DOlfi' to count It period of time., TIle first day of any time ~riC)'j 1;$ not mUllted, but the finlll dlJ1 is counted (part 441 00.0200, slJbput 12). Tlle last day of the time pe~ emls with nollMlllu5lnl!Ss houlS, !leMIaNy lit 400 p.m. No tIme period can end on II Saturday, Sunday or legal state hoNdllY. The 30-day period for EAW ClJl1Im@nts bli'{jins on the biWQl!lI:ly JlIIbllcatlon date of the EQIHifonitaf, which is IIl\vllJS on Monday. lhlrty days from II Monday always fall,s on a Wednesday, so the m_t periods end on Wednesday tlnless it Is II legal holiday. p:lpt\slstjoelcommonld77\m-jweyrens090106.doc Sarah BJalke From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Attachments: Mitch Brinks [m.brinks@kldland.com] Monday, February 26,200711:54 AM tekola@sehinc.com Judy Weyrens; Sarah Bialke; Dick Taufen; Sam DeLeo St. 'Joe EAW - use this email instead EAW-EIS%20Distribution%20List.pdf; Parkway Business Center EAW-final.doc EAW-EIS%20Distrib Parkway Business ution%20List.... Center EAW-fi... Please disregard the previous email and use this one (I had to correct the Mandatory EAW category). Thanks. Tracy, Attached is the revised EAW based on your comments. Regarding Item 7, we used a 30% gross b~ilding area based on the building footprints of the neighboring industrial park, which was between 20 and 30% (depend on the method of calculation). For Item 18, I had an extra multiplier of 43560 that didn't need to be there, so we should be good to go now. I also took a stab at the traffic and parking space calculations...please tell me if you agree with them. I will be in the office today and tomorrow in case we need to revise this further. Let me know if you want me to make updated CDs / hard copies for the council meeting tomorrow when we get this figured out. Otherwise, feel free to use the old CDs for the Appendices and just print out the updated text. Just let us know what you need (and how many) and we will get it to you. Once the City is OK with the document, KLD will make the final CDs for distribution to the attached distribution list ~plus any other local addresses you need). Please advice us how many CD's and hard copies of the final copy you want us to make for the City, SEH, etc. If the City appoves the EAW this week, we can still make the March 6th EQB submittal deadline, which would mean that the 3D-day public comment period for this EAW would start on March 12th and end on April 11th. The only requirements for the city/SEH is to notify the EQB of the EAW and let them know that you want it published in the EAW monitor on March 12th. To do this, you (or the city) simply need to .email the EBQat eqb.monitor@state.mn.us and atta~h the abstract (Item 6a in the EAW) and give them contact info for you/city. Please let me know if you have any questions, Mitch Mitch Brinks Director of Environmental Services Kramer, Leas, DeLeo PC 1120 Industrial Park Road SW Brainerd, MN 56401 office: 218-829-5333 office toll-free: 1-866-816-5333 cell: 320-630-0232 fax: 218-829-5377 www.kldland.com 1 MINNESOTA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY BOARD ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW PROGRAM EA W DISTRIBUTION LIST DeCimlber 20(l6 Note: Approximately 25 copies are needed for distribution. For further information about this list, contact the EQB at (651) 201-2477. STATE AGENCIES Department of Agriculture (1 copy) Becky Balk 625 N. Robert S1. St. Paul,:MN 55155 DepartJn~t~fCommerce (I COpy) Susan M"edh:a~g 85 SeVenth Place East, . Suite 500 St. Paul, MN55 101 Environmental Quality Board (1 copy) Environmental Review Program 658 Cedar St., Room 300 St. Paul, MN 55155 Department of Health (1 copy) Environmental Health PivisioQ Policy, Planning & Analysis Unit 625 N. Robert- 81. St. Paul,:MN 55155 Department of Natural Resources (3 copies) Steve Colvin Environmental Review Unit 500 Lafayette Road St. Paul,:MN 55155-4025 Pollution Control Agency (3 copies) Rick Newquist, Supervisor EnvReview Unit/Majors/Rem Division 520 Lafayette Road St. Paul, MN 55155 Department of Transportation (3 copies) Gerald Larson MnlDOT Environmental Services 395 John Ireland Blvd., MS 620 S1. Paul, MN 55155 Board of Water and Soil Resources (1 copy) Jim Haertel 520 Lafayette Rd. St. Paul, MN 55155 State Archaeologist (1 copy) Fort Snelling History Center S1. Paul, MN 55111-4061. LIBRARIES 'teC~1I1oJggy and .science (2 cqpies) Minn~ap()lis public Libl'ary Attn; 'fIeleIlBui'ke Government Documents, 2nd Floor 300 Nicollet Mall M"inn~.!l:polis, ,NlN. 5540 l-IQ92 FEDERAL U.S. Army Corp of Engineers (1 copy) Tamara Cameron Re~lllatory Functions Branch 190 Fifth 8t. E St,Pa.\Jl;,NlN 55101-1638 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1 copy) Kennethi Westlake EnvironmerttalPlanning & Evaluation Unit 77 W Jackson Blvd., Mailstop B-19J Chicago, IL 60604-3590 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (1 copy) Twin Cities Field Office E.S. 4101 E 80th 81. Bloomington, MN 55425-1665 REGIONAL Metropolitan Council (NOTE: 5 copies IF the project is in the seven-county metro area) Review Coordinator Planning and Technical Assistance Unit 230 E. Fifth St. St. Paul, MN 55101-1626 OTHER. National Park Service (1 copy) Stewardship Team Manager III EKellogg Blvd., Suite 105 St. Paul, MN 55101-1288 (If project is located within, or could have a direct impact upon, the Mississippi River Critical Area! Mississippi National River and Recreation Area. This is a 72-mile stretch of river from the mouth ofthe Crow River at Dayton/Ramsey to the Goodhue County border. ) . Indian Affairs Council (1 copy) . 161 St. Anthony, Suite 924 . St. Paul, MN 55103 Also distribute copies to: . Project proposer . Local unit of government corresponding to proje jurisdiction, such as the county planning and zoning office, township, watershed district, soil and waterc<)fise...ation districts, water management organizations . Regional Development Commission, where appli a.ble (see attached lists and map) . Regional Development Library for there,gion in.. hichthe project site fa.lls (see attached lists and maps) . Representatives of petitioners if the review was' itiated by a citizen petition . Any other person who has su.bmitted a written re. uest for notification Press Release A press release must be provided to at least one neWs. aper of general circulation in the project area within five working days ofEA W distribution. The release mus.hlclude the name, location, and a brief description of the project; location(s) where the EA W can be reviewed; he comment period deadline (call the EQB if unknown); and to whom comments should be submitted. DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMP CT STATEMENT DISTRIBUTION LIST NOTE: Draft EIS section is in the process of be in edited. Refer to Minnesota Rules 4410.2600, sllbp. 3 for rules on distribution. REGIONAL DEVELOPMEN COMMISSION DISTRIBUTION LIsT Northwest RDC 115 So. Main Ave. VVarren,MN 56762 Headwaters RDC PO Box 906 Bemidji, MN 56609-0906 Arrowhead RDC John Chell,. Executive Director 221 W First St. Duluth, MN 55802 Region Five RDC 611 Iowa Ave. NE Staples, MN 56479 West Central.lnitiative 100 VV estern Ave. Fergus Falls, MN 56537 Upper Minnesota Valley RDC 323 VV. Schlieman Ave. Appleton, MN 56208 East Central RDC 100 Park S1. So. Mora, MN 55051 Southwest RDC 2401 Broadway Ave., Suite 1 Slayton, MN 56172 Region Nine RDC 410 E. Jackson St. Mankato, MN 56002-3367 Mid-Minnesota RDC 333 VV Sixth St., SW Willmar, MN 56201-5615 REGIONAL DEVELOPME T LIBRARIES DISTRIBUTION LIST Region 1 Crookston Public Library 110 No. Ash St. Crookston, MN 56716 Region 7E East Central Regional Library 244 So. Birch St. Cambridge, MN 55008 Region 2 Bemidjj;l?ti1}li<:i~jp~ 509 American Ave. NW Bemidji,MN 56601 R~gion 7W ';~t)!Riv~r)~~ipnal,;:4it>~ 405 S1; Germain St. Cloud, MN 56301-3667 Region 3 Duluth Public Library 520 W Superior St. Duluth, MN 55802 Region 8 Marshall-Lyon County Library 301 W Lyon St. Marshall, 'MN 56258 R~gion 4 Fergus Falls Public Library 205 E Hampden Fergus Falls, 'MN 56537 'R~gion 9 Minnesota Valley Regional Library, Reference Dept. 100 E. Main, POBox 3446 Mankato, 'MN 56.0.02 . R~gioll~ Kitchigami~~~iona] Library 212 Park Ave.,p@,Box 14 Pine River, MN 56414 Region 6 Willmar Public Library 410 FiiJh St. SW Willmar, MN 562.01-3298 R~gion 10 . 'RochesterPublic;iL.ibrary, Reference Dept. 1.01 Second St. SE Roc@s,te:r, MN 55904 R~giog.t~i~~tf~~tJlitan Council Minne~polis Public r..ibrary Attn:I:l~len Burke GClvem1l1ent Documents (2tl~Floor) 3.0.0 NicdUetMall Minm;~polis; 'MN 544.o149:9~ Region 6W Montevideo/Chippewa County Library 224 So. First St. Montevideo,'MN 56265 MiiRlle:sotaRegi,...IA"'''Sil.,ment '...i.i.IIS, Kittson f!0aeau Mill$han1 1 tJ!ottllwest 2 Headwaters' 3 Arr()Wh~ad 4 WestCelltral 5 Region Five 6E Six East 6IN Six West 7E East C~ntral 7W Central MinneSOta 8 Southwest 9 Re,gion Nine 10 Southeastem 11 Metropolitan Council t: "5 Q ,0; ..;J Pip.&- #one Rock Nobles Jackson Martin ill Not served by e Regional Development Commission ENVIRON:MIENTAL ASiSE~MENT WORi'SHEET Parkwc:ty lJu'8ine'Ss Genter Works:beet~Items 1... 31) Pages 2-19 CertiticactiDuby tbe.R:QUf Page 20 Appendices: General Location Map 1 :24,009 USG8TopograIlmcal Map of Project Area Site Map! Conceptual Layout . Project Narrative . Aerial Photo of Project Area Proposed Z()niri~ Areas DNRNatural Herita.ge Program Report Wetland Delineation Report Stearns County Soil Survey - Soils Map Minnesota 'State Historic Preservation Review Executive Summary - "S1. Joseph North Corridor and CSAH 2 Realignment Corridor Study Report" A B C D E F G H I J K Typical Road Section L Environmental Assessment Worksheet Parkway Business Center . ENVIRJ.ONMENT ALASSESSMENT WORKSHEET Note to pr~parers: This form is available at www.mnplan.state.mn.us. EA WGuidelines will be available in Spring 1999atthe web site. The Environmental Assessment Worksheet provides information about a project that may have the potential for significant environmental effects. The EA W is prepared by the Responsible Governmental Unit or its agents to determine whether an Environmental Impact Statement should be prepared. The project proposer must supply any reasonably accessible data for - but should not complete - the final worksheet. If a complete answer does not fit in the space allotted, attach additional sheets as necessary. The comp1etequestion as well as the answer must be included if the EA W is prepared electm:nically. Note to reviewers: Comments must be submitted to the RGD during the 30~day comment period following notice of the EA W in the EQB Monitor. Comments should addl'ess the accuracy and completeness of information, potential impacts that warrant further investigation and the need for an EIS. 1. Project title: Parkway BUSiness Center Phone: 952-925-5124 Fax: 952-892-7670 E-mail: N/A 3. ROU; City of St. Josepb Contact ;p~rson: Judy Weyrens Title: N/A Address: 25 College Avenue N. City, state, ZIP; PQ:Box 668 St. Josepb,.lVfN 56374 Phone: 320-363-7201 Fax: N/A E-mail: iwevrens@citvofstioseph.com 2. Proposer: Central Minnesota Land Developmellt Contact person: Todd Rodenwald Title: N/A Address: 7038 East Fish Lake Road City, state, ZIP: Maple Grove,MN 55311 4. Reason for EA W preparation (check one) _ EIS scooping _X_ Mandatory EAW _ Citizen petition _ RGD discretion _ Proposer volunteered If EA W or EIS is mandatory give EQB rule category subpart number and subpart name Minnesota Rules 4410.4300, subpart 11b 5. Project location County: Stearns CityfTownship: City of St. Joseph Section: Part of Section 2 & Section 11 Township: 124 North Range: 29 West Attach each of the following to the EA W: . County map showing the general location of the project. See Appendix A. . U.S. Geological Survey 7.5 minute, 1:24,000 scale map indicating project boundaries (photocopy acceptable). See Appendix B. Kramer, Leas, Deleo Pc. 2 Environmental Assessment Worksheet Parkway Business Center " . ..SiteplaJlsho~gaJ,1.signifi.cantp:t7Qj.ectaJldnatuxatfeatur.es.S.e.e.4npendB:C. 6. Descllip~on, a. Pr(i)Mi~a.prC)jectsl11.J:1rn.~ oI50wora$/or less'tooepl.iblisheddfi .the .Ef411 M(.)nitor. The PJlr~ayBusiness Center is~ prqpo.se~:light~indnstri~J! comme.rcia{planned unit development located oD.55.2acres in St. -Jose,ph" M)l. ,T:h~pr~je~tin:cl~des,;the,creation of 25 lats ranging from 1.10 acres to. 3.32 acres. The project will beseA"icedby , municipal sewer and water. b. Give a complete description df~,epr~posedp:rQ3ectMd~ela.ted new construction. Atta,ch additional sheets as neceSsary. Emphasize construction, operation methods and features that willcay.~e(P4ysi.9aJ,manipy'1a.ti%1Q~'~e~virQnmeJ+tor.wiijiP~~U~~~~"~~clu4e' modifications to existing equipment or industrial pro9,es~e~,~~.;si~;t19~,~mQlitio~$" removal or remod~ling of existing structures. Indicate the timing.and duration of construction activities.. The Parkway Business Center is a proposed light-industrial! commercia.l planned unit dev~lqpJllentlocatelli'~1l.5$.~Jll)J"esJn.St. Jo.;sepll,MN".The ..PJ"Qj.ectsica.l~fo~the co.nstructio.n of 5 light..industrial (LI) lo.ts, 10 commercial. (B..3 - Gen~r,a,I.llllsines$ District) lot~, and 10 LI I ~-3 Co.mbinatio.ll1ots. Lot sizes range from 1.10 to. 3.32 acres. COI1Co.X(;} .~:freet, COlDiIllerc,e(]g;,cle"anl:l,(JolDmerCe'Cfl;qrt,aJ"epJOo;PllSeU,new .rOiJc:l~within the'IJrQj~t.lnadtlitill~,L.~.t.l'lllo.Qka.. ofthe,a41jaf.leP.t,a.enl):ie..t\'4it.j(Jnwas.puJO~hased to. pro.videaccessfro.m theneighborin,g. industrial develqpment. and. 1.9th A\l'enue NW. The pro.po.sedin.dustrialpatk wiUconnect,to.thee~istingCjtyof St.. Joseph sewer and water system 'tothewestoftheproj,ect. Tbe,project proposes .to'co.JlD.ect to. ane1A:1isting sanitary se.."eJO at. 19!h A"~I111eNW"alld to connect with an existillgwaternudn at 19th Aveplle NW ~n4.Co.ull'ty Ro.ad .1J3. Rongh .gradingof the lots willlikeJyo.ccur witbthe street and . utility ill!pro.\lements. Alo.ngwitbthe road,. utility, andJo.tconstruction w:ill be two,stoJOmwate,r reten:tio.n.po.nds lo.catedwitbin tbe pro.ject site. The overflowJortbese po.nds w411 he dineiCtedto. an area east oltbe develo.pment. that is.planned .to. beJhelo.cation Qfregio.mll stormwater po.nding facilities fo.rpo.ssiblefuture development. The ro.adway constructio.n will o.ccu!" soan after receiving appro.valand will co.ntinue until completed. A 40' wide paved ro.adway (70' wide rigbt...,of-way) with curb and gutter wilIbe,constructedacco.rdu.g toCityandCo.unty'ro.ad standards,and specificatio.ns (see Appendix L far a pro.po.sed typical sectio.n). The duratio.n o.f the pro.po.sed ro.ad co.nstructio.n is appro.ximately 120 days o.r until completed. Road co.nstructio.n, sewer and water installatio.n, and site grading will require a Minneso.ta Po.llutio.n Co.ntro.l Agency (MPCA) Natio.nal Pollutant Discharge Eliminatio.n System (NPDES) permit. All co.nstructio.n activity will utilize Best Management . Kramer, Leas, Deleo Pc. 3 Environmental Assessment Worksheet Parkway Business Center Practices(BMP~s) t(}mininiiz~'erusionandsediment 'transpurt o'ffsite.BMP's may include but are not limited to sedimentation basins, silt fence, bale checks, and erosion control blankets. In addition, individual lot owners will be required to abide 'by 'the MPCAN'PBESperniit requirements. The pruJed proposes no impacts to wetlands. Pl"eliminarygtadingand utilityplansas;wellas:apreliminaryerusioD'cDllfr61 plan will be'subDlittea'by;KUD'priortopreliminarY'P.UD'approv~d. SEHlnc.'willbecmnpleting the SWPl~P'and'nnal 'engineering plans. c. Explain the project purpose; if the project will be carried out by a governmental unit, exPlain the need for the project and identify its beneficiaries. The purpose <of the 'project is the conversion of agricdlturallaudfo a ligbt-,industrial1 commercial 'planned '! unit,development. d. Are future stages of this development including development on any outlots.plannedor likely to happen? _X_Yes _No If yes, brie'flydescribe future stages, rela.tionship to presentproject,timeIil1e and plans for, enviroIl1Il'entalreview. Althou;ghthereare no plans at this time, future development will undoubtedly occur in the/area around ,theP'arkWayIJusineSsCen1:er with thecreati.on ofJlew"intrastmcture (seeEAWitems # 21,2'7;28). Theproposer~ownsseveralhundredacresto tbe nortb and east of the project site that will likely be developed (formerly known as tbe Prom I Feld Farm). Plans for this . area arecontingentonihe creation of the necessary infrastructllre, espe~ially" ~~latedtotbeNorth(:orrid()rroadproject (discussed later in tbisdocument)~Itiaddition, tbe City of St.. Josepb hasindica,ted that ~ffutur~ Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) and/or Alternativ~Urban Areawide Review (AUAR.) will be necessary to discuss the environmental impacts of future develop.ment in the area.Ool"ridor studies and < envirtJnmenta:1 documen'tatio:n for the"North Corridor and the Southwest Arterial will be completed independently. Tbere will be a two-part environmental review process for the entire 3Z0 acres (previous Prom 1 FeldFarni). Tbe first willbetbisEAW for the55.2acl"~ParkWayBusiness Center and the second IS an EIS or AiUAR'fortheentire siteafterthecorridoristudies bave been completed and additional site concept plans are developedfotthe entire sit.tt. '''f''his EA Wfor the55~2 acres does not confer development rights onto the remaining site. e. Is this project a subsequent stage ofan earlier project? ~ Yes _X_No If yes, briefly describe the past development"timeline and 'any past environmental-review. 7. Project magnitude data Total project acreage: 55.2 Number of residential units: 0 Kramer, Leas, Deleo Pc. 4 Environmental Assessment Worksheet CQllll11ercial,..industrialor.institutional..hujldrng area (gross' floor "'$pace): Parkway Business Center The maximum gross buildin,g area. aUowed, by ordinance, is 24.7 acres (60% of the total. lot'arelt.~~.. .,R.,_ve..,iit,j$'Dvt'likely!~hat6i$')W'ill'!:Qcctm1();I1"'.e.majo.R'ty.nfjlo:ts.,Bas.ed';o\n builQi:n.g;:f~9..:~in!ts.'iO:f,the1llqja~.ntinau$tr:iaI"fla:vk?tto!,fhe~e8\t,it'canib:e,'expected,;tba.t,rthe total,gf;os$,':builalQg.;area.p~'I"21ot,.in!!;ea)!!i!w~yBusiness!fJeJ1te;r;p~P\OS'~Q..'dei\{el()pmeJ1t!wiU range;;;from"209k..,tp,25fkof,,tl1e,tDtallot;area. ",UsiD,g..2:5,%..of.the;itotal(\.ktt:~Fea;asa:ba'Sis for -calculaftD,gthe to;talgro~:building..~u~ea,;,aDwestimate .(Jfl{).29.;a.eres .(1t4B,232is.q.!feet . +1.,}'Canb:ereasoml'filye~pected. l1he,::aniicip'ated,.'.(25%),gros5.l1ooTisp.a,ce;(separated';byzoning:classmcatioD'\!i).iare'fisted below: Indicate areas l)'fspecific'u~~s: Offic.efs.ee,B-:@ below) Retail (see.B",3 below) Warehouse (see LI below) Light industrial (LI)2.14/acre$ Other commercial (B-3) 4.29 acres Manufac:turlng. 's:ee?LI Other industriaI.(c!ombined .LIf.B~3) 3.86 acres Institutional 0 Agmc:ultural 0 BuildingheightN/A If over 2 stories, compare to heights of nearby buildings 8. Permits and approvals re:q.llired. List all known local, state and federal 'pennits.,' approvals and financial assistance for the project. Include modifications of any existing pennits, govermnental re-view of plans and all direct and indire.ct formsofpl1hlicfinancial assistance iuc;lu.ding bond guarantees, Tax IllcrementFinancing and infrastructure; Unit of ;g!ov.ermnent Stearns County Stearns County City of St.Jos~ph City of St. Jos~ph City of St. Joseph City of St. Jos~ph City of St. Joseph DNR MPCA MPCA Type of application A:pproval-DfW~tla:ndBoundaries Entrance Permit . Bl'eliDliJu\ry.;JJlat Approval Finalflat Approval Re-Zoning Bnildin,g Permit& Industrial Discharge Permit (if needed) Dewatering Permit (if needed) NPDESI SDS Stonnwatet Permit Design Certification for Sanitary Sewer E~tension Plans, Permit APPlication, and Transmittal for Sanitary Sewer Extension WatermainEl'tension Plan Review MN Dept. of Health Status Approved To be ap?plied for . Bendin,g 'l'oJle~lu)liedJor Pending To, be ~p.plied for To be.pplied for T(fbe applied for To be applied for To be applied for To be applied for 9. Land use. Describe current and recent past land use and development on the site and on adJacent lands. Discuss project compatibility with adjacent and nearby land uses. Indicate whether any potential conflicts involve environmental matters. Identify any potential . . Kramer, Leas, Deleo Pc. 5 Environmental Assessment Worksheet Parkway Business Center environmental hazards due to past 'site uses, such as soil eontarnination or abandoned storage tanks, . or proximity to nearby hazardous liquid or. gas pipelines. 'Fhe..cunrentzoui'Qg..ofthe'prqje.ctls Agricliltttral,...which.1s...consistent,with....theprevious land'.usc,ofrow...crqpfarming. Arez'Ori:ing"reqllestwill:Xbe8nbmitted.t()ohangelth~ zonin"gito'se'Vceraldiff.eFent.zoningareas.'Fhe'soutb.,,'side.ufthepndect'is;planned.for Light.IndwstrialD'istFict(Ll)'zoIiing,whichwimbe,coDsistentiwiththe,currentlight- industrialtu8esin.the.industrialpattk.immediately>westo'f;the?proj.ect.'site.'f:he northeastern portion of the site, along the proposed' new Foad.co,rridors,.is planned for a commercial district, using the General Business District (8-3) .zoning classification. The rezO'ning re.quest,als'O:prop:oses .torezonethc!remainder.oftheprtjjectsiteto'a.m'()dified LI I B-3 zoning class. Future land uses within the proposed development must abide by the permitted uses of each zoning type as outlined in therCity of St. Joseph Zoning Ordinallce and, are expected to be consistent with surroundinglight'tinoostrialand commercial uses. Please refer to the Project Narrative in Appendix D for further discussion on these. zoning ,areas, especially regarding the requirements,oftheLI 1 B-3 area. An Anticipa.ted Zoning map is'also included in Appendix Dand Appendix F. There is no known past land useS on this property that wouldUkely leave soil contamination or other negativ.eimpacts. The adjacent land uses vary. There are agricultural activities and oak woodlands with scattered wetlands to the north and east, light industrial and commercial to the west, and heavy industrial uses associated with Borgert Products Inc. and Amcon Block & Precast Inc. that are immediately south of the project site. Thisdevelo'pment will increase traffic. flow {and emissions) to ,and from the project and adjacent roads (see discussion 011 traffic blitelll W8 21,27,28). Because the proposed land use is consistent witbthe lightindustrial uses in the area and the project will connect toexi,sting infrastructure (includingsewer1aDd water), there are no other known environmental issues for theneigllboringtpropertyowners. Most of the project is contained within watershed #16012 (Sauk River). The far northern portion of the project falls within watershed #15011 (Watab River). 10. Cover types. Estimate the acreage of the site with each of the following cover types before and after development: After o o o o TOTAL 55.2 acreS If Before and After totals are not equal, explain why: Typ.es 1.;.8 wetlands Waoded/forest Brush/Grassland . Cropland Before o () o 53.8 Before After Lawn/landscaping 0 10.7 .Impervious surfaces 1.4 39.9 Other (stormwater ponds) 0 4.6 The decrease in agricultural area would be caused by clearing for the new construction of the access roads and individual unitsllots. This would also result in an increase.in the Kramer, Leas, Deleo Pc. 6 Environmental Assessment Worksheet Parkway Business Center area'Of',law,nll3Dds~!\P~,'ilnd.tiIq,~nriOllS,Sltrfaee..Qn"the,(jl~qj~~t,~ite.. J]he,Jn.7,~c~escOf ~~~~dsC1lP,i~g,was,ib.as~tl'()~i~n,asslID.lPtiqIl(iof,ZO?~i'9f.laW.n.l:lantls~p.in,g areayp~r,lot and another 2.~,~~~~~~or~ra.~~lJa.w~iIl'~9uJevard ~~s. ,11lt~i~e~i()~sSll~ce . area inellldesthetotal 'acreage for roads, buildillgs, driveways, ,and parking ,lots. Density',~.D.dilJ!Cpe1Wionssurfacecalcltlations.DleetlllliJoca1 re,q'llireme,nts.forthis~p.eof development. 11. Fish" wildlife and e,colo,gically sensitive ,rcesour..ces a. .Identify fish and wildlife, resourCes ,and habjtats on or, near , thesitf! and,describehow ,they would be affected by the project. D.escribe,,fllJy measures to be takeu to minimize ,or avoid impacts. ' Since the:prevj~q~ laJl~'use, of;trgJect ~!t~w~nrw."c,rjUl.1J;gd~:qJtllre,. the ~~~t3tio~ and soils have been,constantly.d rbedsever,al timesay.ear fO;J"iDlaJIY years., thus, not providing any significant ecol()gical function or wildlifebabitat. To the'llu;rtba.1l4~~~t.~;r,th~PJ0qj~~t ,sit~" .theJ/~ .e,~iS$~.~4i$t:qt"JJed'Il~~'!!~Qlltfg.q~Q.,s/Q~k fores~~~th,sc~~~~~\Q~enill~,s,.~sW'~Il~~;.allll;II1l>,,,~,Ij~w~tl8in4~~ . .~~'~~lI~w.ltllif~ turk~ys, whit~,.tailed jackrabbits,an,:~.,s~:v~r,31~~je~if.}f:(J,1J((}~ iU:.QiW~~et,thj8i,ail1~a.ha8 been, significantly disturbed by cattle grazillg, resulting in compacted soil, vegetation re~()~'al,.. al1diIlCfe~8ed.i,erosioll~. .Altho'qghno,i1Q;pa~)ts t~thi8area~,e,~n~;.~~tedt~ result from this project, develo,ment.and c(lnS~ructiO:llfQ;rfllhJr~ ilifra,stru~re.will likely have some impact. It is difficult to determine the nature and degree of future iDJ,ll8cts',atthis.time,;~'S,e.e item..(id.). b. Are ~y sta,t~-Ji~1~d (eJf'c:l~g~r~<i~~f!at~~ed or s;p~qialq911celJl) $Pf!,qi~s,I;f!f~.plat1~,; cOl1'11).}~ti~s,Qr 9thytsYI1sitJV~ eCoplpgiqai resQurcys Sllqh .as. t1ative pl'airiy ha1:>it€tt,q~dQ1'lial waterbird nesting colonies or regionally rare plant communities on Dr near the site,'? Yes X No - -- If yes, describy thyr~source and how it would 1:>,~aff~ctedl?y,.thy;proj,ect. II1diqateifi~site survey of the resources has been conducted and descr,i.bethyres111t~..lfthe PNR Natural Heritage and Nongame Research program has been contacted give the correspondence reference number: .ERDB20060743 A request has been made to the Minnesota Department. of Natundltesources Natllral Herit3,ge and Nongame. Research Program. Norare,spe.cies wer.e found in lihe vicinity of the project area. The results of the Natural Heritage request are included in this docuDlent.as -4pp.endix G. Describe measures to minimize or avoid adverse impacts. None planned. Kramer, Leas, Deleo Pc. 7 Environmental Assessment Worksheet Parkway Business Center 12. Physicarimpacfsonwaterresources....Will the project. involve'tID.e'pnysicalorhydr61ogic . alteration -""'-'me~gi1lg,T[lling,'stteamdiverSion,<o1itfaH.structme,dilcirrg, .a:ntlilIlpoundment _ of anysmacewaterssUch asala.ke., 'Pond, wetland, 's'tre~ordrainage ditch? _Yes _X_No. . If yes, identify water resaurce affected and give the DNR Protected Waters Inventary number(s).ifthe water resources . affected 'are 'onfhePWI: . Describe. itltematives cansidered and propased mitigatian measures to. minimize impacts. A wetland delineati6n has been dune on'tbis site.ltisindudetlinthisducument as A:ppenil~.\f[. 'l1h~'Stearns't;ounty.'iEnvir6nm~~tal.'Servicesl}epartment'bas.a;ppro.ved tbewetland ;buundaries.Jfbere is no. pruposedfilling, dredging, ur alteratiuns o.f any kind to. the existing wetlands ur p.ublic water budies. 13. Water'llse, Wirl the" project involve institllation or "abandonnten'td Fariywatef wens, cOn11ectionto otchflliges' in an)' public watetsupply or appropriation of anygtOU1'ld or surface water (including dewatering)? _X_Yes ~Na If yes, as applicable, give IDcatian atldpurpDse Df any new wells; public supply affected, chan~:~tobe~~de~.a.nd' water qUantifies to.' be'used;thesotlfce,dura~Dn,ql1antityand' pllTJ:lo~eofa.nyappr()priations;and utiique~ell nUIllbers andilf.H{appropriaiion 'pemiit nUIllb~rs,. if'Kno\V11'. Identifyany.eJcisfingand~ew\VeI1son thesiternap. Ifthereare no wells known on site., explain methodolagy usedfo determine. Tbe'prQjee1will;eulluect to. the City of St. J6seph'spublic water stlptlly at the existing watennarn'at 19th .Avenue NW and County Road 133. The City's current water system cunsists o.f3 municipal wells, wbicbcandeliver 1,000 galluns per~~ute with anavera~e demand of2~0,OOO gallons rer day. The City's curr~ntst6ra~e capacity is500,000gaUuns.Witb ~he City'sne", wells and water treatment plant to. be completed in April 2007,. tbewater treatment capacity will be 3,000,OOOgallo.n's per day. In addition, temporarygro.undwater appropriatio.n may be necessary during cunstructio.n (if so, a DNR permit must be obtained). 14. Water-related land use management district. Daes any part Dftheproject invalve a shDreland zDning district, a delineated 100-year fload plain, ar a state ar federally designated wild or scenic riverlandu.sedistr1ct? _YeS _X ...:.No If yes, ideIltifythe district and discuss project c0111patlbilityvvithdistncttand use restrictions. This pro.ject does no.t fall within a FEMA 100-year tluudplain, a sho.'relandzoning district, ur a wild and scenic river district. 15. Water surface use. Will the proj ect change the number Dr type of watercraft an any water bady? _Yes _X_No. If yes, indicate the current and prajected watercraft usage and discuss any pDtential avercrowding or cDnflicts with Dther uses. Kramer, Leas, Deleo Pc. 8 EnvironmentalAssessment Worksheet Parkwas Business Center TI:1eI7.e ar~..nQsllr.f~ce waters .on.the,.site. 16. Erosion and sedimentation. Give the acreage to be graded or excavated and the cubic yards of soil to. be moved: 38.1 acres; 140,000 cubic yards Des:ctihe allY ste.~p s19pe.s or 4i$11.1yerodibl~soil$~dideIltify th.~month~sit~map. There are no steep slopes on tlle.site. .El7osiQn ;a;n4sed.jnJ;eJJ.tcontr,o,l;ssnes al'e ,discussed below. Describ~<myerosionand sediJnel1tatioIl cQp.trQI measures tgl:>e used durmgartd a1;terprQjeot . construtitiop.. Proposed construction activities will disturb more than 1 acre of land., thus requiring an NmCA~t()rmwater;Permit..Am()qg :otl1er.thiqgs.,.thispe~~trequ,ilS~~,that.1l Stormwater Pollution Preventio11J;>l~:g:.~~WP~~:,"~!}.d.~y~.~pe~~,~t~~e:l,l.est management practices for erosion control and sedimentation control. Below are se. di. 'm. e....n. ta..n..... .d......,er. ..o.....s....iQ'I111o..n... tr.,o. 1...,11I. ea..s... u...res...th. Ilt..m. .'. ~Y.' ........fJ;.. ..e. ,p. ro.,p.os.e. d.......,1"0. )~"'t. hi.....~..s......... .p. }1..\1.:\O...(J."cc.t. '. A..' l>cf.elj~.i~'J:f .er()s~QJJ..COJJ.tfQ]....p]~n...a;.s.~eu~s~:pr~liIllUt~.};;;~'d~JJ,g'\!lU;~,,~~ili".:p~n/wi1l be. prep~red by KLn pri.or to appr6val of the prelimi~~iplan.S.E::m.~Jl'C.W',Qlbe. preparing the Stormwater Polluti6n Preventi6n Plan (SWPPP) f.or this pr.oject after pl'elimill3rYJ)lan~pproval. 1'1Iey Dill.alsQl:l.e pr.epllriJlgtlIefin~.gxlldmgiutiftty,a'nd road plans, AU,gfQund,di8tur:b.ed by construction cis t6.. be stabilized as soon.aspossible.using the ~PP'rQPl"iate]J~. '.' . .. '. . . ...............-'..-...:.......-...................'.....'-' -......"'..-... ..-';....... ................'_..'.'...'.. ,- S.i.lt...... ..f<... e....J...l.....C. m.-. gw.... ........iI.....J.. be. u$ed at..... dle. .'. d...Qw~.... g.r. a...d....J..e. ..Ill .p....e.. r.im...... ..eter..o.....f.d. .st. 4...~e. d......... .a..r........e..lls....... a.... 11(1.. st~~~.l>.l.~i~~.. . I;a~ditiall, tl1~.. pia~em~Jliof thesiitfe;~~Wj][be in~,. ectedpri.or tQ. cODstr1!lction, .. . . Existing trees, grass, and .other vegetative cover will be preserved where possible, MPCAnativeseed.mix~s and weed..free mulCh willlu~use(lfor teIJ!pol7lll"Y J;JP'(I permanent.erosiollcontrol T.r~ck Equipment (Dozer)mustbeQperatedlJpandd.own .e~Po~~tilso~l.sltu)esoJl final pass, leaviQgtrack grooVes..peg>.endicular totlIe slope.m.~d.tlitio;Jl,thesurface must be left rough to minimizeefQsion. . .Bale'chec~, st.ot'mDaterretentj.on po.n~and otherBMP~s wil1be.use4. olJ,~hesite durin,g constructi6n. BMP's will.bein~pected..weeWy or.afte.r.~..~' inch..rainevent..by permittee/c6ntractor and may be adjusted or increased as c6nditions dictate. Erosi.on and sediment cOl1trol plans may be required for land disturbances .on each Iotas pa.~ .of any future bui1dll!g permit for theconstrnction .of stl1'ucturesand dril'eJV~Ys. Temporary.erosion and sediment control measures will be .prop.er'lydispos.ed of within 30 days after tmal sitestabilizati6nis achieved.or after the temporary measures are n6 16nger needed. Kramer, Leas, Deleo Pc. 9 Environmental Assessment Worksheet Parkway Business Center The stor~water retention ponds will be Cleaned, i'f'required, after grading operations and turf establishment have been completed. Stearns County Environmental Services is in charge of enforcing stormwater compliance for this project. Based on tbe City's Storm Water Management Plan, the northern portion of the project is in theWafabltiver'Watersbedandtbe'central, and 'southern portions of the project are in the Sauk River Watershed District. Stormwater ponds will be designed accoritingto'the'City's'Storm'Water'Management'Plan. 17. Water ,uality: surface w~ter runoff a. Compare the quantity and quality or siterrinoffbeforeandafter thepro]ect. bescribe permanent controls to manage or treat rulioff. Describe any stormwater pollution prevention plans. The projectisdesignedtomeetaUlocaland.state stormwater requirements and willbe monitored during construction to insure compliance. b. Ide~tify~~~t~s lltrdreceiying waterbo~ies forrunofffrolU the site; include major downstteantwatet'hodies as well as the'immediate receiving waters. Estimate impact runoff on the quality of receivingwaters. Tbemajoritytiftberundff from ,the proposed development will foUow tbe natural drainage way. Runoff will be collected by a storm sewer system and delivered to two individual stormwater retention ponds (see Appendix C for the locations of these ponds',.' Tbese ponds are ,designed to "hold a lOO-year stormevent,~n~w'u,l~D.eludethe follo""iD.~ ~~a~ur~s: .,~,sliipllIl~~",s~~uct~~e"ell1erg~D.5Y ~l)illway, wetstorage"an.~'a~cess benching along 'witlimaintenanceaccess. The oV,ertlow for these ponds wiUbedlrected to an area 'east <<fthe developmenttbatis plannedtobetbe location of regional stormwater ponding facilities for possible future development. No adjacent f downstream water bodies will be adversely impacted by runoff from the proposed development. Stormwater runoff will be collected, treated, and released at a controlled rate &fdischargebackto theellvironment. A preliminary erosion control plan as weU1tsaprelimin~lrygratlingand u.tilityplan will be prepared by KLDprior to approval of the.preliminary~U])plan for tbe~arkwaY'BusinessCenter. SEH Inc.. will be'preparingtheStormwaterPollution~PreventionPlan' (SWPPP) for 1liisproject after preliminaryPUD approval.l'hey will also be preparing the final grading, utility, and road plans. The runoff after the develop.ment will likely consist not only of sediment but also small amounts of road salts, oils, and .other trace chemicals commonly associated with 'runoff from roads and constructions sites~Bydirecting the' runoff to stormwater retention ponds, the runoff can be adequately collected and treated. Kramer, Leas, Deleo Pc. 10 EnvironmentalAssessment Worksheet Parkway Business Center 18, WateJ: Jlual~ty:wastew4lters ,'. . D 'b . 'd' . . f al'I' , 'I d 'd '1 a, . eSCJ;1 e;;s@urce~~,coIllPo.sltlOn .an,;quantI,tles:o . . samtar,y,.lUlmiC;!paJU1lll ustna wastewater produced or treated. at the she., Waste:waterfor~Dmmer:cial a:ndlljght~industl'~al. 'us.es;was,estimated .fin .~;per .acre basis. Wastewa1er\gcn~ration.rates;froll1 ilulu,stfY B9ur,ces,canllag !wjdely,dep~del1t.up.on the ity,peandsize oftheJ'acility,t:hed~~ee uhvater;r.eus~, ~d ~h:e.DllSite\wast~wJlter :trceatlllen:t,method~ cDJ1plQy.e.d, if~y.Jlecaus.e of this. vatJ.atio.Q., which can .,be independent of the number'9feDJploy;ees atthecia:cilities;a wastewater ,Bow ,rate of1500 gallons per acre per day (gpad) was estimated for,the site with a possible maximum of 2000gpad formediwn~industl'iaJ use~,.lfallowed. These estimates w:er..e.generatedfrom sources such as Metcalf and Eddy, et. al. ,~nance,a JJ;la~Dlumfif\~poJO o~,~~he total19t~rea~:n bebll~ldjngsflac~. ''f:hJ;ls, the . .' uD1,~stewater generated l?yt~~entire proj.ectc~n:be,~ppl'O~D;l~t'Cd...at by mllltiplfi~gthe ,anticipated. totalgroBs;buildiqg a~reage n[the pri)po~ed Parkwi~Y Business Center by the gpad rates of 1500 and 2000 listed above. Using these cal~u~~tioD:~. ~esl,Jt~ . in ,a,maxilll'ltm,igaIl~.nsper"acl'e ;p~r dajrJV,a&te~~tel:~DoYf:: rate ,Of app,fQximate.y $6.,99D...to49,,320::gallonsiPer,;day~ ;How~yer,.actualJ:a,te~JQl~N ;b~ Ie~s;1;han ,'_'.:-: ,~:, :"::"<" '," ": -,.' ,.-.,' " .' ,".-' , " .' :--:'-' ~":.' ~ ,'-,', -'. co'. >,,"_'.: . .. _"'''_:.':- --",' . -, _ , :'.:: ' _:_'-0:, ,: /",_'_:"_ :_",;.---,<: _, "" ,', _.,,' _ _,_' -' ',' '" ':_. ,,"_' ,":': these estill1at.es dependingnnthetY:peof:~om:p).ercUlt/ jnd~t:rjal \u~e,sin ,tbe,~ipJ;'o~,Q~~ deY~lo.l>ptent.. iUsjn,~~m().rerealistic'C;alcUlat~o~iof 25%,,Qf,the tot~l4()'~;.eafol~!,ml9ing ~p.ace( see EAW item #7,above), thea,b.ove .flowrate. estimatesiwould.bermorethall;eut.. in half. ACCDrdi.p,;g,to. the. City~s Sewer Use Ordinance, industrial users mschal'giD,g.into ,th.e City~s. Sanita~ Sewer~ycstem "shaUohtain ,an. Industrial. Discharge Permit" ifnntified by the' City. "The critel'iausedby tbe.Cityto.detevmineMan IndustFialnischarge Permit will be required shall include: ,.-;.' " - a. f\n aV'er.age.,go:w g~eater tJJ.all.~S,f)O() gaU<Jnsper iQ.per.a;tiD,gA~y,.or b. 4:iPo~luta~t~(!)nceJltr~tjoD. 'fif~~er .than$O%foriOJle.o:r,more'.replated;pollutants (s.ee$ec;ti()n4~..11, .SulJd..(iJ at.the, point of disch3rge,.~r . c. . Has"pf>Qpertiesi.:n the ~cba~geforit to beJt..p~o~ibitel!J,distfiut.l)'ge, .01'.. d. Has\been"pre.tveated ,or .passed.thro.ugh.an ;equalizatio:n',taBkllef()l'ei4is~~rge, or e. Al!ydraulic or o.l)'.ganicJoadin.ggreaterttban 5% of theaver~geJ:iJY weatb.eri~~p.3ccity oUhe$SS,or f. An,in.mstrialprocessregulatedJ~y the EP1\.categoricalstandar4~,or g. Othercrite.ria.asdesignated,))ythe;City asdefine.d in 4:0CFiR 403.12'(~),," .Users nftheCity.'s.sSS :willbere.guired,to.abidebytbe>remainderioftbeSewel'Use Ordinance as well as the Sewer Rate Ordinance andWaterandSewer.SysteDl Ordinance Availability Charges. Among other things, these ordinances restrict the size, co:m,posjiicm.,aeiditY, andc:CJ;JJlbustibUity ,01 wastewater ,entering the Ci:(y'sSSS. All permittees are .r:cquired to '~maintain a flow measurement device for instan.taneous. rate and/or cumulative flow volume determinations." In addition,self..;monito~.jqg.repoJts must be submitted to the City. The City may also inspect users of the SSS (including Kramer, Leas, Deleo Pc. 11 Environmental Assessment Worksheet Parkway Business Center sample taking). If pretreatment .is necessary it must be :conductedln ;a:ccoxtlan:ceWith Federal'Pr-etreatment"Regutations .and 'aU othet'applicati'lemles anc1l'egrila'tions. P~osphorus discharg.e to the .~it)"s SanitarySewerSy:steDl.'~S~S) is re~ulatedby the Git)'. A:~cord~gt~'t~e"Ph~sphoT'll~'ManageDlerttsection'offl1e.'~elVer '[}se..Ordinance, "aJlysig~ificallt'll~n""aomestic.'nutt'ientcontii~;tor;~DN(]}Ofp~o~phorus,as determineD'Dy.'tbe"Uity.will';btl're,qu.iredto,d~velop.'aPho&phoru~'Reduction' Strattlgy (PRS). The~NVw'illeV'a1:uateaniJ.torIQldate'the'PR8to.inc1u(le'.methods.'andJor"steps tdkento elirrima:te or reduce phospnorus 10admg to 'the SSB;" Allwastewa:terwiUbetreateabytheSt~Glouaarea sewer system (see item c. -below). h. Descrihe waste treatment methods or pollution prevention efforts and give estimates of c()mp~siti~tr\~ftet:re~tmel'it.....ld~I1tiIYteceivillg.,vaters,..incluffingiilajor'downstreafil.'\Vatet bodies,anCl estimatetne dischargeimpactoll,theqtt.a1ityofreceivingwaters. If the project involveS!(')h'"sitese\\iagesystems,discussthesuitabilify of sitecoIlditions forsuchsysterns. After being treated 'by the St. Cloud area 'Sewer system (see item 'c. - below), wastewater is dis'cbarged<iil:tolbe Mis.sissippi River. Prior to discliarge,wa~ewater unaergoes many'stages' oftreatnient,inCluding preliniinary treatment, primary 'treatment, seconihiry;treafment,and'tlnaJclarifica1ion;. In addition, the liquids flow 'to the 'chlorine contact cbambersfor disinfection, before 'final discharge to the receiving waters ofihe Mississippi River. c. Ifwasteswill be discharged iIltoapublicly owned treatment facility, identify the facility, describeanyptetrea.tmeIlt provisi'OIlsand discuss the facilitY's ability to handle the volume and compositioIlofwastes, identifying any improvements necessary. The wastewater generated in18a.(above)wiUbeco!lectedand treated by the St.~loud area sewersy~t~Dl,w~~chserve~Bt.CI~udandSurr()llnllillgcities,mcluain~ St. Joseph. TheeDtire'system.hasa;capa~ity(jf13,OOn~U~O~dllonsldaywithan'averagetlenullld of 9,500,000. gallons per day. E~st~ll'gi\V!ste"\Vater'treatmeD.tfacilit)' allocation'for'tne City is 600,000 gpd(1,500~OOOpeakganonslday). Gurrentaverage wasfewaterflow tor the City is<a,proiimately390,OOOcgpd; '.The UBVlift. station (which serves the 1itljacellt industiiatpark.) bas an .caverag,ecapaCity;of3UO;OOUgpd'and"peak . capaCity, of'7'50,OOO gpd. The forcemain system which PUDlpsDBL lift station and the City',smain'Uft station. to .St... Cloudhas'.aD'.ave~ag~;3apa~ityof .1,200~1)OO~pdilnd peakcap-acityof 3,000,000 gpd.TbeCityofSt. .Joseph;iscurrentlyworldngwithHthe City of'St.Cloud to double St. Joseph's wastewater treatment facility allocation by 2010. The City has purchaS~i'!;tOO;DOOrgpdc;'Ca;,a'Ci~GfSt,'Glou<<,scollectioD 'system leamng'to ,the. St. Cloud wa;gfewatertreatmen:t'f-acility. d. If the project requires disposalofIiCiwd animal marnlie,descrlbedisposal technique and location anti Cliscuss capacity to handle the volume andco:rnposition of manure. IdeIltifyany improvements necessary. Describe any requiredsethackS fof land disposal systems. Kramer, Leas, Deleo Pc. 12 Environmental Assessment Worksheet Parkwtl)' Business Center N ot'a"pplicahle. 1,9. GeolQgic hazards and soil conditions a; Approximate depth (in 'feet) to ground water: minimum: ~within 6 ft. average: See below T,he,de,pth to ,groundwater v,ariesbased on soiL!y;pe;aBdgeQgr~pbiclocatiQn wit~in the site. B,ased'on soil surv,~y data and:top()gr~phicjmormation,\ the, d~pthtogroundwater ranges from :within 6 feet Df the surface togreater"than 10 feet,fro~thesurface. to bedrock: minimum: See below aver~ge:, See ,below The d~pth to, betl!ock,is\lOO'"7~~O;f.~*acc.q,~diqg"to,the tte()l(}gicM:~p\~~.M:iJlneSf)Ul: De,pth to D'edrock (1982; D.M. Olsen and d.H. MossIer -1:1,000,000 Scale) Despi;tbeaI1}'pfthe fol1p#11~ge,(Z)lQgi~.sit~haz~ds .tPgrQ'1ll1d watetanclctlsQ ,idr;ntifyth~111 on the,sit~ lTI~p.: ,~h~oles, shallowli111estonefonnationsor karst.eonditiol1S,. ;Pescribe measures to avoid or minimize env1ronmentalproblems due to any of these hazards., None Known. b. O~sptip~ ,tp,~, sQlls on. thesitr;".giving NRCS(SCS) cl~sificatiQm)~ if~QW1J"Pi$~l~SI)SQi1 iranli1~t~ and po:tential for groun4watercontaminationfrom wastes or chemi<:;als$pread or spilled onto the soils. Discuss any mitigation measures to prevent such contamination, The Stearns County Soil Survey lists the soils in the area as: Estherville sandy 10am,O to 2 percent slopes (41A) JD~~IJ,~J;'Ville Sa,~lcJY lo'-lf,n, Z',to 6"p(tr~ent ~IOI>.~~ .(4~Jl) Dic~~1Il~t':pcJlI9am,() t() .ZP(trcent.~JQP(t~(3Z7~) Os~kis .lOJJlll(413) Esthervin~awick co~ple'X',,zto,6p.ercentsIQpes.(875B) A.s9il~Jl1JJP as weUas a 'complete description, of each soil .type listed above are inclmt~d in Appendix I. Becaus~()f,thegranularnatqrc.e ofthe.soils,onthe site., there exists th,e potential for groundw~ter,.colitamination from chemical s.pread oras.pill.Howey;el',tbere..ap.e no foreseeable permanent sourcesofcontan'1inationfro~ thisPrQ:posed,tlel\elQPJllent~ Duriqgconstruction, machinery containingfneJwiUlJepr~sent 'ontnesite. .Tb~ cOJltr.actoj" .willbe(re~ponsilJle for.maintajningthe~uipment'jprovidil!ga. $uitable,.a,.Fea for fueling, and cleaning...p any&pillsthatoccurduring ,construction. 20. Solid wastes, hazardousw.astes, stor.etanks a. Describe types, amounts and compositions of solid or hazardous wastes, including solid animal manure, sludge and ash, produced during construction and o.peration. Identify. method and location of di~posal. For projects generating municipal solid waste, indicate if there is a Kramer, Leas, Deleo Pc. 13 Environmenta.l Assessment Worksheet Parkway Business Center source separation plan; describe how the project will be modified for recycling. Ifhazardous waste is generated, indicate if there is a hazardous waste minimization plan and routine hazardous waste reduction assessments. According to. the City of St. Joseph Zo.ning Ordinance fo.r the LI-Light Industrial Bist,fiet"int1:nstl'iabactiVfifiesishlJuld'llav~a"'~lIlinimum.degree'ofref'use'byproduetsand air"ffr\lloise.pullutioll'~'~nd,"a'~relativelr;lo.wlevel''Cffon+pre~ise.P1"o.cessin~:''. .lln additio.nto.';wa'Stes specitic'to.'th'e industrial use 'of"tbe lo.t'(which', aredifticultto. determine at this time), it is anticipated that typical solid (garbage) and hazardo.us (paint, cleaners" etc.) waste wiUbe'generate.dim-site when 'construmonofthepro.posed unit t~ke~Jllace. ,The lo.t o.wner is req~ired to. dispose ~fall wastes prqperly, in acco.rdanc'e'Wlth".the' Cit;yol'St. Jo.seph"Garbage and Refuse Ordinance. b. Identify any toxic or hazardous materials to be used or present at the site and identify measures{d'be tisedto preven.t them from'col1.taminating grourtawater. If the use of toxic or hazardous materials will lead to a l'egulated'waste,dischargeor emission, discuss any altemativescoIlsidered tominitnize or eliminate the waste; discharge or emission. No.ne kno.wn. c. Indicate the nUrtiber, location, siZe and use orany above oibelow ground tanks to store petroleum products or otherm.aterials, except water. Describe any emergency response contairtl11.erit plans. No.t applicable. 21. Traffic. Parking spaces added: AU units mustabi~ebyt~~~ityofSt. Jo.seph'sOff~streetParking Ordinance (Sectio.n 52.10 o.f the Zo.ningOtdiiiarice).' BaS'ea on thiso.\rdinance, th~ number o.f parking spaces varies by anticipated use. For catego.ry 'I"(manufacturing, fabricating o.rprocessing o.f aproouctco'r'lI1ateritH, 'wareho.us'e,sto.rage,handling 61' bulk go.ods, Po.st offices), eight (8) spaces are required plus o.ne (1) space fo.reach two. (2}employeeSo.1l each shift based o.n maximum plannedemplnyment or atamIDimum o.ne (1) space fnr each five hundred (500) square feet o.f flo.o.r area. BasedonEAWltem 7 aho.ve,this wo.uld result in theadditio.n o.f 723 +/- parki~g spaces fo.r areaS zo.ned LI and UIm-3. <POl' category'n'(retaUsales,andservices business'withTIfty(50) percent o.f grossl1o.o.rarea devoted to. 'storage,wareho.lIsesandlorindustry),o.ne (1) space fo.r'each three h:fttfClred'(300)'sijuarefeetllcvotedto puhlicsalesanll/o. r seniiceplus' one (1) space fo.r each one thousand (HJOO) 'Square 1'eet!ofstorage area or6ne (1) 'space 'fo.reach employee'o.n thema:iimumcsh:ift,W;hichis'appropJ:iiate.Categary'm" i(Retailstoreand service establishment). requiresafleasto.ne J(1 )off..street paf.lUng space 'for each three hundred (3flO) square feet o.f flo.o.r area. Based o.n EA W Item 7 abo.ve, this wo.uld result in the additio.n o.f 623 +/- parking spaces f6r tbeareaszonedB-3. Existing spaces (if project involves expansion) N/A Estimated total average daily traffic generated: Hwy 133 = 4750 ADT (data fro.m Kramer, Leas, Deleo Pc. 14 Environmental Assessment Worksheet , Parkway Business Center MinnesntaD~padmmtof rxa~lln.atio'n -.2003). Estimatedmaximum,peakhour traffic ,generated,(if kn()wn) .~d .time ofocc,urrence: NJA Provide an estimate Qffhe i~pact ,on i;rafficcongesti(:Jn (Ul affectedroads~ddescrilJe,any traffic improvements necessary. Iftllf~J'l'oje,ctis with:i.nthe TwinCitiesolneitropolitan area, discuss its impact qn the regional transportation sYstem., It is assumed that each unit will have ~pp,roximately l6,trips .per HmO ,;sq. feet (based nn ITE Trip Generatinn Manual, 7th Erlitinll fnr an industriallbusinesspark with snme commercial). ,Based .on the .gross huilding,area b:ei~:~p,pnoximately 25~,lonfthelnt,area (see EAW,ltem 7 ,ab6v;~)and ,the,ab.oVe,x,ate:of 16,trjps per 1,00.0 sq.feet,the;Parkw~y Business ,Center :wiU like!yhave 71'Z2.total ,tn!ps per day. The peakhnur ,rate is 12% with an8:2inlout ratio,. 120k,of7172,is 861 trips. As prnpnsed, the prnject will 6utlet traffic to, Cnunty R6ad 133, 19th Avenue NE (via Concor4Street)~,and<,a ~~~:col~ector road,(uJlnamed :at,thispoi~~l()n,th~. :easts.i;de \of thefpr~j,~t. ,rhe City plans to"connectthisllollectorroadto<(il,onnty .R;()ad. 75 in th:e~ future (no' locatinn determined yet). CnuntyR~ad 133 an,d the newJzolledorroaa will bnth likely have access to, the Nnrth C6rridnr parkway to, the north (see description . beJnw '~" .l'Ji,e,. increas:ei'l1,' t~affi~ generated.l>y thedevelf:~:p,meJlt~iUlikelY incr~se '.'th:euse 6 " ,~,Ro~l:l133"bIiUt~s nverallimpact will be dntleult tn.deterndne because, traffic patterli~<il!t~earea wjll'''~,sigJlificant.y affectedbytbe iCom,pletinn, oft be North ' . Cnrti~1)r::prqJect. Minnesota State Aid Standards..aUows,a tw-o..lane roadw.l,lY f6r tra(fi~ volume~ of 'up to 15.;000 vehicl:esper.day. Therefnre; even with the addition of 7172 tt,ps per da,y at full project ,build-out (assuming County Road 13.3 being the.only entrance/exit), the two-lane rnadway is adequate to ,handle theP,atkwayBusiness Center Traffic. There is a prnp6sed alternative l'f~~tert1,{~liglilDcet,lt6fCouJl'ty.RQ~d~?~-witlt.re$pe.~t to, access ,Of the Nnrth C6rrid6r pr6ject. If this alternative was accepted, it may remove the.Coun~RDad.133.accesspointfrom .theP~kw~yBusiness .Center f:lr()j~t. Hnwever, the ather prDp6sed access pnints w6uld solI be suffi:cienttn p,rovideaccess !to the,prQject. . Traffic cD.Q,gestion -is ,nnt e~pected to, be a pr6blem because 0,1 the afOrementioned ac;cess points. Notraffic signal.lights ,are planned at this time,but.IW!Y .beneede4 iJlthe. future with additinnal develnpment in the area. Aright-turn lane will likely be necessary f6r C6untyRnad 133 {assuming it is nntreali,gned). Ther,e issufticientline...af-sightforsafe entran.ce on to, all roadways. Ae:cnrdio.g to' .a "St. J6scJlhNodh norridnrand.CSAH2RealigumentCorridorStn,tly" (seet\ppendix J() ,~onducted onbchalf nf the Ci~, "theSt. Josl}pharea.transponfati6n system lacks.botb .continunus east-w'CSt and aodh..snuth l'oa4w~ys,whicl1,all.eneeded. to, serve the urbanizing metrop6litan area and anticipated City.gl'nw:th.,$t.Jo.s~pIl,Stearns Cnunty and St. J6seph T6wnship understand the need to, plan and def'me these imp6rtanttranspnrtatinncnrrid6rs nnw sO, that future. impacts can be avoided or minimized and development can nccur in an nrganized and'th6ughtful waY. The Nnrth Kramer, Leas, Deleo PC 15 Environmental AsseSSIIient Worksheet Parkway Business Center Corridor and. CS:W 2 RealignDlentstuijyisan;initiaIfsic,Il toward iievelq.pingtbes~ futul"'etran~po~(Jn'c(JrriilOl's.Thecortil~rs'lVilhrerveas :(k~y~o~pODeDi1linthe future:I()'Cat'r()aawaysy(st~m'and\VIJlcom,plem~nt other rcorridor'stmlles 'that are alreatJ.y undenva,y 'orsoontQ be:initiated,>ill:cluding the,ea~t...west Field. 'Street 'Corridor planned for south of St. Joseph and the nortliextension dftlie Southwest Arterial Corridor.", Tbere is, more information ion how this proposed Corridor relates to tbe Parlkway:Bnsiness"Cenfer:i.n'EAWi1ems'Z7'anil28lbelow). 22. Vehicle...rela'ted air enlissions.Estimate the effect offue project's traffic generation on air quality,".incltidingc~bonIl1onoxidelevels.~iscuss't11eeffectoftraffictmprovementsor othermitigation'measures on air quality impacts. 'Note: If the project involves 500 or more parking ,spaces, consult EA W Guidelines about whether a detailed air quality analysis is needed. _ Addit,ional"airemissions'willoccurfrottl increasedautolllobile traffic in the area. H()wev~r,llie;pr()jecf'will1l'otcaIlse 'allY sigfiificantdecreases in airquafitysincethe reSulnD;gdaIlyitrafncwillnof'be significant. ' 23. Statl()naryr"snui~air'emis~iu~s:;.pescribethetype" sources, quantities and compositions of anY'emissiolls~~1l1stati~nfllY'so!ceso~air emissi~~s such as boilers',.exha~s~ stacks or fugitivedu:stsDrirees.lnclutleanyhazardousa.ir pollutants (consult EA W Guidelines for a listing) andanygreenh.ousegases{sucnascat'boI1 dioxide, methane; nitrous oxide) ana ozo11e"t1ePletin~.ttheI11icals, (chloro-fluorocarbol1s,' hydrofluorocarbons, perfluorocarbons or sulfur hexafluoride). Also describe anyprQPosed pollution prevention techniques and proposed air pollution controldevices. Describe the ,'impacts on air quality. B~sed on the. zo?ingcl~ssificati?ns" t~ere a~e ?O ,permitted uses that would significantly contribute to negative stationary source air emissions. 24. Odors, noise and,nust. Will the project generate odors, noise ordust duririgconstruction or dming'Operatroti? _X ~Y;es _No If yes, describe sources, characteristics, duration, quantities or intensity and any proposed measures to mitigate adverse impacts. Also identify locations of nearby sensitive receptors antiestimateitripacts on them. Discuss potential impacts on human health or quality oflife. (Note: fugitive dust generated by operations may be discussed at item 23 instead of here.) DuSfcOlildo'cctird1l.l'ingsite' grading. Thisbfipact is normally intermittent' and a . temporary nuisance, subject to varying weather conditions. ,If the dust becomes excessive, it should be mitigated by construction methods. Noise commonly associated with'heavyequipllleBt,opeTationwillalso'o:ccurdu:l'inge~cavation and dirt removal for each site, as well'as dur'ingroadconstruction. The construction activities will occur dlltingnonnalworking'hollrs 'ofeontractors~ ConstmctionpoSeSDQ potenualimpacts onbuman'health or quality of life. 25. Nearby resources. Are any of the following resources on or in proxiniity to the site? Archaeological, historical or arChitectural resources? _Yes ' _X_No Kramer, Leas, Deleo Pc. 16 Environmental Assessment Worksheet Parkway Business Center Prime or unique farmlands or land within an1:lgficultural,preserve? -,Yes X ,No 'Designatedparks, recreation areas or~iails? _Yes ~X..JJQ Scenic views and vistas? Yes ~X_No Other unique resour,ces?_ Yes. _X_No . If.ye$, d~scribe the resource andoidentifyan,y project-related impacts on the resource. l)e~cribe.an:Y measures to mimmizeor .avoid adverse impa,cts. Th{lMinnesQta State Shor~lineStandards ~pecify,thaUocal:governmental units (LGUs) evaluate the, presence of historic sites when considering ,develQpments (MN,Rules 6120.3500 subpart 1). Accordingly, a request was made to the Minnesota Historical Society's Historic Preservation Office. No archaeological sites or historic structures were. id,entified withillthe boundaries jof the,prQj ect site in a,se~rch.of.the 'Minnesota Ar~ha~()IQ,gical In'fientory.aDlJ;HistoricStnIc.tu:t:~~,Iuvento;ry . (see. .4:j)pendi~,J).., The only historic.~~ructure or ,archaeol()gical.site. identified .w,ithin l;ll1,pe.of thepfoject site is ,the a~~~t Northe~nilailrDad~~gmentthat runs through St. Joseph. . It is unlikely that any sites of archaeological significance would be unearthed by further investig~ttion!.However,. 'sbnuld ~l!Y buria~ or,humanremains bellneaJ(thed ,during constr,UCHOIl~,~ILea.rth-' 'activities sho.uldcease~nd lo.eal~w';enfc;>rcemeJIt , _' '_ _ ":~":"',';'<_'_"':'O"_'::_;'_ -"', ,:,__,:","-",:__,:"_ '_' J_ _:' ",':'\"'''' " ,- , " _"'_'_'>'<,': ':' _ '_' _, " , ': ' _,:""",_"" _' "'__ . _ ._...,. ;_,,,..:,_,,., ,',", _",.', _"_ ,_,',' " of:fi;~UlI~Il,O,prieda~ '. . "u . St~te Statute307.0S,(or,its su~cessor~tatut~)~ A repJ;'esell*ativ~Jrom, ,.st~teyarchaeologist's u(fice will.authenticate;wh~:Ate~Jt.isa burial~ite.andtI1e state shallpay for the .authentication,marking, and,rescue.of any Native American artifacts.. 26. Visual impacts. Will the project create adverse visual impacts during construction or operation? Such as glare fromintens.e l~ghts,lights visible in wilderness.areasandJarge visible plumes from cooling towers or exhaust stacks;? _Yes -,X_No If yes~ explain, !. t,~:_: _ : ',. , .' " _, '. _, . . ,_ ;- 27. Compatibility with plans and land use regulations. Is the projectsubjecitoanadQpted local comprehensive plan, land use plan or regulation, or other applicable land use, water, or resource. manCl.gement plan of a local, regional, state or federal agency? _X_\l:es _No. Ify...es, describei@plan,discussitscompatibilitywiththeprojectand explain how any conflicts will he resolved. Iino, explain. Thispj"9jectconforms to aU local, state, and federal regulations, ordinances, and zoning (if ap,pro'Ved) .f9r.this type of devel9pment. 'fhe,proposed develQpment meets or eX~eeds the, future land use recommendations of the City of St. JosephCoJD..prehensiveBlan (2002). The Comprehensive Plan states that "the northeast portion oftbe CiW has vacant land suitable for industrial growth." The City is also divided into planning districts. The proposed Parkway ,Business Center is lQcatedwithindistrict 15. Recommendations forthis.distJictare,.at indu~trial~p.aBsion,$hou.ld ,be in ".thearea east of existing :industrial development" and that "Iu:tur.edrivewa;y oo.ce$spoints directJY onto CSAH 134,133, and 75 should be curtailed." The"proposedParkway Business Center does notconf1ict with these recommendations. Kramer, Leas, Deleo Pc. 17 Environmenta.l Assessment Worksheet Parkway Business Center This project,hasbeen designefiinaccordancewitbthefiudin~softhe"St.:rosephNorlh Corridor and CSAII2 RealigIlmentCorridor $tut'ly/' 'Fheexecutivesummaryjsee Appendix K) of this report identities a new roan'W2iytb.a'twille:dend west from Westwood, Parkway in ~orthlV~st~rll St,. SlolldtoSteal3lsCount.YRoad3anda realigned County Roan 2. 'Tbelayou~ oftbe ~oI1h;Corridorhas undergone ,extensive study and review by many groupsandindiviuuals, inCluuingtheCorridor Advisory Colllmittee, foclls~roul's,federal,state, ,and loca.l, offices and ~~encies, a~d. tbegeneral public. .'The:Nol'th'Corrid{Jr'prQ~ect'isnowinfhe"environmentalassessment 'ph3:se(to be comp'letedin 200'7 or '2(08),withrigb1-of-way acquisition and construction to occur at 'alater<da'te. 28. ,II1lI'~ct'olli~f,~~~!rijctrfrell~'~p~~~i~,s~rvl~~~. .."Will~~\V ,()rexPand~d'lltilities,roacls,?ther in~astI'uct!e'dr,~tip1ie8ervi~eshe,te~liil'e~'to'servetheJJroject? ,__~__Yes" " ~No.', If yes, describe tne'newor;a:ddrtiorral ififiastfitcttrreorservicesneeded.(N ote:' any infrastnictureihat is a connected action with respect to the project must be assessed in the EA W; see EA W Guidelines for details.) Thepr~~o~e~'~~~~~,~~~i!l~ss.~el1teri~~ludes.,th~~onstruction,ofa new rO~,d netw~~~'{~?ltc~ra~!~eef"~~Dl~e"cl".Circle"a!ldColllmerceCoutf)'tbatwill ihave entra!ce~'~!~~~o~~'\f~{)~~)~~:3,'19f~,,}\v~ll~e l~~,a. fllftIr~north-s{)llth' coUectorroad, and,f~ep!o~:~S~dNortb!'rJo!l"idor.TlIese,roads wilFbecomepulllic roads within ,the CityofiStJoseph. Th'eprolectwiUbeserViced by municipal sewer and water. This project will also require the expansion of electrical, gas, commun.ication, and television lines. The amoulltofadditionalfire and police protectionfromtbe City of8t. Joseph is difficult to determine at this time. Due to the relative proximity ufthe project to the downtown of St. Joseph, the use,ofthese resources will be more efficient and less costly than if the project was located elsewhere. Increased tax revenue from the project will . help pay for these services. 29. Cumulative impacts. Mil11lesota Ru.lepart 4410.1700, subpart 7, item B' requires that the RGU considetthe l'cUIllulative potential effects of related or anticipated future projects" when determining the need for an environmental impact statement. Identify any past, present or reasonably foreseeable future projects that may interact with the project described in this EAW itlsueha way as tocatisectlrI1ulatlve impacts. Describe the nature of the cumulative impacts aridsl.:t111.'riiafize 'arty other ava.ilable information relevant to determining whether there ispoti:mtia:lforsignifi6antenviroIlitrelltaleffectsdue toctinnilative impacts (or discuss each, cumulative 'impact under appropriate item(s) elsewhere o'nihis form). This project will 'connect to a future east-west parkway {North 'Corridor) that forms the northeastern boundary"offheproposedJlarkway''BusinessCenter. The North Corridor has been designed toprovi'dean'efficient, safe, and reliable transportation 'corridor between'St Joseph antI St. Clo1l6,priorto development in the area. This will allow for better planning, more efficient use of resources, and better use of land in the area. Limited access to the North Corridor is being planned (currently proposed access Kramer, Leas, Deleo Pc. 18 Environmental Assessment W otksheet Parkway B,usiness Center PDint~~r,eli~te9,to.....~.mil~'~llft~,aWl,s'i~alsaf~"l)1ile~J)la~,..BesidesaIDlitjoift~1 traffic., the '.Non... h. C........o....cr....:ri.a....D. 'r..../m.. ,:U. ..'.....,.gene.rat.e..l)1fll1tlsto.l.r ,.,mwJI. '~...:r'IlD. D.. ,'.ff.c;~. n.. 4~. Ail. . litt1!. ,p.. '.00., .....','t several wetlands on its proposed route. 'Environmental assessments..r~~~~~J.ttIY,l>e~g cftDtiuc.tetl'f;()'rth:e,NnrihCnr);'ido;r. The cumulative, effects 'Of the Parkwa,.yBusi~ess Center prQject itself aree~pected tD be min,imal.Th:ere wilLbeaddedilemandon the ,City's sewer and water~ystems, an additional ro~d network, and the ,ex:pansiDnofother,City services. Tbe ,creating 'Of the NorthCDrridDr will undoubtedly have a,greater cumulative effect 'On th,earea. Corridorstudiesllndellv,ironmeD'bililocumentlltlon'tor theNol'tbCol"ridoralld the SOllthw'est Arterial will be cOIl!~~eted independently. There willbe a two'-part environmental review process for the entire 3.20 acres (previousP'rDm I Feld, Farm). The first willbethjs EAWfor the 55.2. acre, Parkw~y Business Center and the second i~ an EIS Dr AUAR. fDr the entire site after tlIe cDrridDr studies. have been completed aDd a~~.ti?"~l~~t~co~~~J}tPlalJsaredevel~lled. fortheel1~i~~~it~~ r~i~ ..,~~ ~' f'Or tlt~ ~5.2 acres'd,!~~nO,fcoJtfer develo''IlDlcnt rig~t.$. onl'O the retnailli~g sit~. 30. Other potentia]. envirDnmcnfallDlpacts. If the proJect may 'cause an)'a~'Yerse, environmental impacts not addressed by items 1 to 28, identify and discuss themhere, along with any proposed mitigation. NDne Known. 31. Summary 'Of issues. Do not complete this section if the EA W is being done for EIS scaping; instead, address relevant issues in the draft Scaping Decision document, which must accompany the EA W List any impacts and issues identified above that may require further investigation before the project is begun. Discuss any alternatives or mitigative measures that have been or may be considered for these impacts and issues, including those that have been or may be ordered as permit conditions. The City 'Of St. Jaseph CDmprehensive Plan (2002) lists the priDrities fDr evaluating a new develDpment in the nDrtheastern pDrtion 'Of the City (district 15 - see Item 27). It recDmmends that the City and Township JDint AnnexatiDn BDard review prapased developments within the district tD determine: a. Impact an existing and future transportatiDn facilities, b. Existing and future surface water management systems, c. Adequacy 'Of park facilities within the prDpDsed develDpment, d. Ap.prapriateness 'Of the propDsed use(s), e. Adequacy and quality of proposed sanitary sewer and water facilities; ,and, f. Sufficient capacity is available within the praposed sanitary sewer and ,water facilities to service the prDposed development. The envirDnmental impacts 'Of the Parkway Business Center related tD the abDve issues . and 'Others have been previDusly discussed thrDughDut the document. Reference material is included in the appendices that follow. Kramer, Leas, Deleo Pc. 19 Environmental Assessment.W orksheet Parkway Business Center ROD cFJR.!''lFrCllTf(\)~.. TlIe Envito111l1entaIi<;luaIity BOaf4will orlly.accepfSIGNED Environmenml t\:ssessmentWorksheetsforpublicnoticein 'the BQB . Momtor. I b~bycernIythat: . The information contained in this document is accurate and complete to the 'best of my knowledge. TheJ3:1\'\1l,descfibes thecompletepro~ect;, there are no other projects, s~ges or components otherthanth()se desc:ihedinthis docU111ent~ whi~h are related to the projectasco11llectedactionsorphasedactions,as defined atMinnesota Rules, parts 4410:0200, subparts 9b and 60, respectively. Copies of this Ef\W are bein,g sent to the entire E<;lBdistribution list. . . Signature Date Title Environmental Assessmen~ W~rl\.Sb.~et was p)."epm-ed 'by thesillffof the EnviroIlIllental Quality Board at Minnesota Planning. Foraaditional information, worksheets or for EAWGuidelines, contact: EnviroIll1lental Quality Board, 658 Cedar St., St. Palll, 11N551~5?651-2.96-8253, or www.mnplan.state.mn.us\ Kramer, Leas, Deleo Pc. 20 I Attachment: Yes or No REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Gambling License-.St. Cloud Boxers DATE: March 1, 2007 ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT DEPARTMENT APPROVAL AGENDA ITEM Premise Permit - Boxers Club PREVIOUS ACTION None RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION Determine if the applicant has met the requirements of Ordinance 62 FISCAL IMPACT COMMENTS/RECOMMENDATIONS Ordinance 62 identifies criteria for granting a premise permit. I called the gambling manager, Randy Beehler to see how their current gambling funds (Shooters and Benton Station) are distributed. He stated that their main mission is boxing and wrestling so they try and fund activities that relate, such as the St. Cloud Apollo Wresting Club, Sauk Rapids Hockey, Cold Spring Wrestling.... . In addition they have donated to the Sauk Rapids Fire Department and made a donation for the canine purchase in Sauk Rapids. The Ordinance requires that a premise permit must show a broad base benefit to the trade area (within 15 miles). It is unclear as to whether or not they provide broad base benefit. The Ordinance does provide a provision for denial if the applicant does not meet the criteria. CHAPTER VI - GENERAL REGULATIONS ORDINANCE 62 GAMBLING ............. ..................................... ............ ................... ............62-1 Section 62.01: PURPOSE .......... ....... ....... ....... ................ ............. ......................................62-1 Section 62.02: DEFINlTIoNS. ......... ....... ................ .............. ...... ........ ...... ........... ............62-1 Section 62.03: PROVISIONS OF STATE LAW ADOPTED.......................................... 62-1 Section 62.04: INVESTIGATION FEE .................. ................. .............. ...... ....................62-1 Section 62.05: PERMIT CRITERIA ..... ........... ................ ............ ..... ........... ....................62-1 Section 62.06: FILING OF RECORDS; INSPECTION; ACCESS TO RECORDS .......62-2 Section 62.07: EXPENDITURE OF PRoCEEDS/LoCAL BENEFITS .........................62-2 Section 62.08: PENALTIES...................................... .......................................................62-3 62-0 CHAPTER VI - GENERAL REGULATIONS ORDINANCE 62 GAMBLING Section 62.01: PURPOSE. The purpose of this section is to regulate and control the conduct oflawful gambling in the City ofSt. Joseph and to ensure the integrity of operations, and provid~ for the use of net profits for lawful purposes by setting criteria and standards related to the approval or disapproval of premise permits. Section 62.02: DEFINITIONS: Except as otherwise provided in this section, the terms defined in Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 349, are incorporated herein by reference and shall be applicable to the provisions contained herein. Subd. 1: Gross Profit: "Gross Profit" means the gross receipts collected from lawful gambling, less reasonable sums necessary and actually expended for prizes. Subd.2: Net Profit: "Net Profit" means gross profit less reasonable sums actually expended for allowable expenses. Section 62.03: PROVISIONS OF STATE LAW ADOPTED: The provisions of Minnesota Statutes Chapter 349, relating to the definition of terms, licensing, regulation, investigation and enforcement of bingo, ga:mbling devices arid video games, and all other matters pertaining thereto, are adopted and made a part of this ordinance as if set out in full. Section 62.04: INVESTIGATION FEE: Any organization applying for a charitable gambling license, or renewing a license, shall pay art investigation fee in the amount as set by the City Council. ~,/' ,~ \ , I Section 62.05: PERMIT CRITERIA: Each pending application for issuance or renewal of a premise permit shall be approved or disapproved by resolution of the City Council within sixty (60) days after receipt of the application. In approving the application, the City must determine whether or not the benefit that the lawful use of the charitable gambling funds brings to the local community is broad based or for the benefit of needy non-members of the organization, as opposed to aiding a very small number of individuals who are also members of the organization. The City may disapprove an application for issuance or renewal of a premise permit for any of the following reasons: Subd. 1: Violation by the gambling organization of any statute, ordinance or rule relating to gambling; 62-1 CHAPTER VI -GENERAL REGULATIONS Subd. 2: Violation by the on-sale establishment, or other organization leasing its premise fof gambling, of any statute, ordinance or rule relating to the operation of the establishment, including but not limited to, laws relating to alcoholic beverages, gambling, controlled substances, suppression of vice and protection of public safety; Subd. 3: Failure by the gambling organization to make adequate corrections in its organizational structure and procedures in response to an audit report. Subd. 4: Where the operations of gambling at the site would be detrimental to health, safety or welfare; or Subd. 5: The benefit that the lawful use of charitable gambling funds brings to the local community is not broad based. Subd. 6: The application has not been submitted in a timely fashion and not all the required information has been submitted. Subd. 7: The organization has not been cooperative with respect to past investigations. . Section 62.06: FILING OF RECORDS: INSPECTION: ACCESS TO RECORDS. Subd. 1: Every organization licensed to conduct gambling in the City of St. Joseph shall file with the City Clerk, on a quarterly basis, copies of all records and reports required to be filed with the Minnesota Gambling Control Board and Department of Revenue pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 349 and the rules and regulations promulgated there under. Subd. 2: Each organization licensed to conduct lawful gambling in the City of St. Joseph shall submit any additional information requested by the City. Subd. 3: Any organization leasing premises for the conducting of lawful gambling shall file with the City a copy of the lease within one (1) week after execution of the lease. Subd.4: Every gambling event in the City ofSt. Joseph conducted by an organization under State license shall be open to inspection by officers ofthe City. Subd. 5: The City may inspect, at any reasonable time without notice or search warrant, all records of a licensed organization that are required to be maintained by the State Gambling Control Board. Section 62.07: EXPENDITURE OF PROCEEDS/LOCAL BENEFITS. Each organization conducting lawful gambling within the City ofSt. Joseph shall annually expend at least ten percent (10%) of its net proceeds from gambling within the trade area of the City of St. Joseph in a manner which provides a broad based benefit or benefits non-members of the organization. The "trade area" is defined as an area within fifteen (15) miles of the City limits. The expenditure shall be managed as follows: 62-2 CHAPTER VI - GENERAL REGULATIONS Subd. 1: No later than January 31 of each calendar year each organization shall be responsible for providing a summary illustrating thatten percent (10%) of the net proceeds have been expended within the CityofSt. Joseph meeting the criteria stated in 62.05, reaching a broad base. If the expenditures for the ca.lendar year do not meet the 10% or criteria, the organization shall contribute the difference to the City ofSt. Joseph no later than February 15 of each calendar year. Subd. 2: Any money remitted to the City shall be held in a special fund conforming to the requirements of Minnesota Statutes Section 349.213. Section 62.08: PENALTIES. In addition to the penalties set forth in the Statutes, any violation of Minnesota Statute Chapter 349, as herein adopted shall constitute a violation of this Ordinance and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. Ordinance 62 amended 5/19/05 62-3 St. Cloud Boxers Workout, Inc. 220 7th Avenue south St. Cloud, MN 56301 To: City of St. Joe From: The membership of the Boxers Workout Date: 212112007 Re: Premise Permit for Trobecs Enclosed you will find various articles of what The Boxers Workout Gym is. As a tax- exempt organization we are sponsors of The St. Cloud Youth Boxing & Wrestling Club. We are organized to help promote youth sports in Central Minnesota. We also have charitable gambling at Shooters and Benton Station and keep the majority of our funds right here in Central Minnesota. We are applying for a premise permit at Trobec's Event Center. If you would like more information please contact our Gambling Manager Randy Beehler at 761-9667 or our President Mike Heidemann at 763-238-5546. We are looking forward to being on this next council agenda. Thank You . Page 1 I Ky- .! '--"-'~-~'17 . .....~_~D~~,~~:~~~~T\.....""""".-....i ~M.--_:Plr ~'r'\~J St. Cloud 1.i.Ines 11A :... .k~ jh\[- tJY MINNESOTA SECRETARY OF STATE 1111~~II~ill~lliij~I~~llliIIW~ili~~~ 21757120002 C.ERT'F'CATE OF ASSUMED NAME Minnesota Statutes Chapter 333 Read the directions on reverse side before completing. Filing fee: $25.00 The filing of an assumed name does not provide a user with excJuslve rights to that name. The filing Is required for consumer protection In order to enable consumers to be able to Identify the true owner ota business. 1. Slate the exact assumed name under whioh the business is or will be conducted: (one business name per applicationV "'Sf; ~LOl4 ~ .IV6 -f-- WI?~7LI/ljG c. t.. ~ PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT LEGIBLY IN BLACK INK FOR MICROFILMING PURPOSES. 2. State the address of the principal place of business. A complete street address or rural route and rural route box 'number is required; the address cannot baa P.O. Box. . ;?:20-II!fAv~Sori:fH- 'Sr.Cli:JUtJ M("'~ .563:::>1 f Street City State Zip 3. List the name and complete street address of all persons conducting business under lhe above Assumed Name or if the business is a corporation, provide the legal corporate name and registered office address of the corporation. Attach additional sheet(s) jf necessary. 8 Name (please print) Street City State Zip fSO)(LORS' l{)OJ?Kau;r(, Yvvr . II1!<2 - 27-0-7J!lk. &. - sr:~ .,""I! 4. I certify that I am authorized to sign this certificate and I further certify that I understand that by signing this certificate, I am subject to the penalties of perjury as set forth in Minnesota Statutes section 609.48 as if I had signed this certificate under oath. 1-IOr-07 Date STATE OF MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF STATE FILED JAN 1 0 2007/ ~ ?1l~~ Secretary Of State ScoT 13. ~~. - OIR~R Print Name and Title . rnlK~ flS/X:-/lf/WN 763-Z38-55'~G SC1>Tr KE?-rr'l. 320-65'-/-0::202- . Contact Person Daytime Phone Number bus~9 CertifICate of Assumed I Jame Rev 1-06 1-- Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury Washington, DC 20224 p The Boxers I Workout Gym d/~1 a Minnesota Athletic Training c/o Scott B. Kelm 22O'-7th Avenue South st. Cloud/ Minnesota 56302 Cont\:}ct Person: Centra..L Ronald Fo.w1.erj50-02405 cen"lffilephone Number . ~2O'2) 622-7236 In Reference to: OP:E:EO:T:3 . 'Da~EB 2 5 1999 Employer Identification Number: Accounting Period Ending: Foundation Status.Classification: Advance Ruling J;>eriod Begins: Advance Ruling Period Ends: Form 990 Required: 41-1820'191 Decem.ber 31 50'9 (a) (2) May 28, 1997 December 31, ~W01 YES Dear Applicant: Based on the inform~tion supplied/ and assuming your operations will be as stated in your application for recognition of exemption, we; have determiped you are exem.pt from federal income tax under. section ,.501 (a) of the .Internal Revenue Code as an organization desc:t::ibe!=l in :~ect~on 5~~ (c) (3) . ;' , . '.' 1.... ". '. .' Because you are .at.newly. 'created .organizat1.on,' we are not now making a final determination of your foundation"status under section 5O'9(a) of.. the Code. However, we have determined that you can reasonably be expected to be a publicly supported organization described in the section(s) indicated above. Accordingly/ you will be treated as a publicly supported organization/ and not as a private foundation/ during an advance ruling period. This advance ruling period begins and ends on the dates indicated above. You have agreed to this effective date. within 90' days after the end of your advance ruling period/ you must submit to the Ohio EP/EO key district office information w, needed to determine whether you have met the requirements of the applicable support test during the advance rUling period. If you establish that you have been a publicly suppor~ed organization/ you will be 'classified as a section 50'9 (a) (1) q~;t" 50'9 (a) (2) organization.a~ long as you continue to meet tA~ requirements of the applicable support test. If you do not meet the public support requirements during the advance ruling.period/ you will be classified as a private foundation for futur'e periods.. ~ Also/ if. you' are classified as a private foundation,~ou will, be treated as a private foundation.from the date .qt your inception for purposes:of'secti6ns 5O'7(d) and 4940'. ~T ~ ft!fti3(T It r- ~ :'!~~. More Local ',. PO, } 'T'l:..~sr.~,LO. un .l;II.11e8 ThllrsdaY, Oct 8, 1998 9A~; Cerebral. ptdsy group .,s funds _cally" 90 percent of money !crlsed stays in Central Minnesota Cerebral palsy is the most prevalent lifelong disability in the United States IOd<Iy, An esti- mated 500,000 I'hildren and adults are affected, and 5,000 ". infants are diagnosed with the 'condition eath year. .' Local!y, United Cerebral Palsy of Central Minnesota i~ helping those children and their . ;families, as well as people with <.~ .' as prelllature birth, low birth . weight; prenatal infection and RHincompatibilityputinfants at risk. How does United Cerebral PaJw of Qenlral MInneso1a help? Some. of the services this non" profit Qrganizationoffers are; . Ii infwmation and referrals ll1I issullsi:elated to disabilities; . .a'l~dinglibraiy; . flpancial as~istance for equipment that Will help dis- abled'PelSODS be more indepen. dent 8!ld . ~equipment thateen be borrowed, in.~oUaboraljon With Goodwill !laster Seals <Uid Cen. traI Minnesota Cale Cent~ One of the most PopUlarser. vices is the Respi\ality.~ said Marilyn l'o~adilijnistra- rive asSistant.", ::"::,:! ' i How doe. .t"~tpJ1!gram work?>;'..<C"",;, : Through thisip~ntso/a<:hild with disabilitieseen reak from tion . ..... ...,Othan overnight stay at a hote!iidinner at a restaurant.and possible entertaimnent.''That's al1IQgram NEWSQ&A . other disabilities. #. What Is CI8n!bnd palW1 . Cerebral palsyis a chronic con. dition that affects body move- mentandmuS~ecoordination beginnmg anypme from fet;;! develoPIQentthrougb infancy. It also can ilnpact vision, hearing, learning and speech. What C8useslt? A prominent cause is insuffi. cient oxygen reachWg the brain during birth. Other facto" ~ch ... New moniker ret1ects wider scope of activity at bigger location By Adrian Wagner "'IMES SPORTS WAITER Bigger and better things lie ahead for the St. Cloud Boxing and Wresding Club. The club first came to St. Cloud in 1989 and moved to its present site on West SL Germain Street in 1993. In the next two weeks, however, the nonprof- it/profit organization will be tripling in size with another move. Directors Scott Kelm and Richard Davidson expect to be in their new location at 220. 224112 Seventh Ave. S by Oct. 19. 'IWe1ve really outgrown our present locatioD,u Kelm said. "The move is going to allow us to go from 4,000 square feet to something like 12,000 square feet. We're reelly excited about the move and au it's going to allow us to provide to our cus. torners." The St. Cloud Boxing and Wrestling Club - offers much . :llore than just boxing and wresding. The club also offers a ,omplete workout gym, kick hoxing and judo. The .c1ub features a boxing :Hlg, fow' punching bags and a ',,,mber of speed bags; a full \\Tcstling mat with some mldi- I lllllal workout space; and- cmn- -ioll" that gets used a lot," rossin said. cent M fll1Ids going toward pro- How Is U!1iled Cefebral PaIllY . _andservices. of Cenltal Minnesota funded? . 'What Is the organlz:at1on's Connibutions come from iIIdi- ~ e-,>ent? viduals, special events, a . The annual Halloween party for children with disabilities and phoneathon, the St.Cloud Area theirfamilies is from 6:30 to ai ~~, WaY and other funding p.m:1\{ond<ly,Oct, 26, alWhillley $eniorCeriter. About90 percent of the money Where, can you get more is used iocaUy forptogI!UllSilI!~"..,InforIMIion..... ......... ? services,wbiletherestis1Jse<lwr . natiollll1 reSearch~d ProgratllS.'Callthe SL ,cloud Unite<l Cere-, ThenaqonalUnit~dC~reprll!",p~~9;fficeat2?3-l)?65or e., Palsy Association i:onSiStentlY.'>IlI~jH' the,. orgaDlzaqol\ , ,at! has ranked among the top five. ~oLcom health care orgmlizaqonsforper. ;; ~"':. Lll;llI McCllntlc.k 'lii ,. TODAY'S RECREATION: ST. CLOUD BoXING Arih WRESnJNG CLUB TIMES PHOTQ 8Y.JASON WACHTER ': '.:._:.-.._,:}~~!&J~':"~,,:,;:: Boxer, David Blalke lIparred In the ring photo from Apr1l1S97. Bialk8l/V11s'~,.Pm-- with Loren Laudenbach at the St. Cloud Ing to compete In the Natlonlili(l~lden Boxing and Wrestling Club In this file Gloves tournament. . ";j,",' ;"-.,:()ti't" plete weight lifting and exercise members, 50-60 boxers, 40-50 and girls. lbe programif';~uses equipment center. wrestlers and 10-15 judo mem- on freestyle and GrecO]toman "We do have quite a bit of bers. wresding. ',"l'! equipment already, but once we The boxing season rullS from The buxing and 'wre~t)jng get situated in the new place, October through March with pans of tlungs are'.actiiiWy"non' we're going to add to it," KeIrn regular sessinns on Tuesday, profit lor the 51.'0]0 . g said. "1 think within the no-so- Wednesday llnd Thursday Association, k .. distant future we'll be'vel)' com. nights. At vaJious rimes. inSU'lll"- IlIinimum; BnxiIlg petitive with a lot of the clubs in lion and sparring time will be for those 18 and over,,1l'ti .0 the area." availllbleon other nights as well ior those 17 and.'l'~llder. The Sl. Cloud Boxing and The wrestling seasun fUll" Wrestling iees afl"$35.~r9r);lll- Wrestling Club Iws ahoUl200 Februmy tll1'OlIgh July with ~I>p' UCfll':> in killdt!J'gur.tch::~lg~lh gym memhe.r.'\. S7 kick-boxing i1f8LC programs for hOlh hoys !~r,lde and S6S for i,lJgh~j.sch(l,ol. Devon MUler of Sal1ell worked on boxing skills one day in February, . jlged wrestlers and above. Insur- 8!lce is provided at no CQ$(;to all wresden; and boxers. .:.'. . . . .. .' Otherchalgesbytheclub~ $15 for a simple gymm~be!r; Ship and $30 foragynl' Ship and kicJ<.boJQng . Whauhe St. Clou and Wrestlli1g Club is all about can be found in theorg8!liZil. tion's mission statement: "To offer health and fimess services to the entire con:unUJlf- ty, providing prograins sul'h as boxing and wrestling to aUow the youth ill our C01llIllunity or the wider privileged to benefit by having a place to go, relax, play, become more educated and encourage friendships and learn skills from practicing in these \.'arious activities~ and not have lhese people feel offended is doing just '.CoJnmu- IIsQayfrom e last opens wi !lolling Club to anyo;le. "The purpose of this is to reach out to the people wbo dop'! have the accessibility io these'types of faci\ities," Kelm said. !'It's a rea[jy good opportu- nity for. someone \vho just wants to tty sornethit)g, and this way they don't bave to pay for it Ot sign a contract or anything. It', 1I really good program." For more infom7aticn abOUi ('IB Sf. Clouei Bo..' '-")Q :!,...-;./ ~Vrq" ':::iG Club . ~al!! 65.:1<'202 2006-07 Boxing Membership & Registration Boxers Workout Gym/St. Cloud Boxing Club 220 7th Avenue South St. Cloud, MN 56301 (320)654...0202 1-888-754-0202 email: kelm56301@aol.com Registration & Practice: Boxing for The Boxers' Workout GymlSt. Cloud Boxing Club season will start with registration & practice beginning September 18, 19, & 21 6:30pm to 8:30pm (Mon, Tues, & Thurs). Season will run from October i006 to April 30, 2007. Costs: Compete or Skills New boxers: ages 17-35 cost $150 / $125 Returning boxers: ages 17-35 cost $125 I $100 New boxers: ages 10-16 cost $90 / $60 Returning boxers: ages 10~16 cost $75 / $60 (Costs will include practice 3x per week, gym membership(7i/ayslweek), Saturday sparring, travel, aiul your USA boxing insurance, WOW!) Paperwork Boxers Need: . waiver & membership form . . . . USA membership form (NEW) need 2 pictures of yourself (NEW) a copy of birth certificate Equipment Needs: Boxers can purchase mouthguards $2, handwraps for $7, and jump ropes range from $6 to $15. Mandatory Boxing Insurance: USA Boxing provides insurance at a cost of $37 per year of January thru December. This cost is included in the price. If you are new and start in September, you will have to pay $150 (ages 17-35) and $90 (ages 10':16) which will include your 2006 insurance and your 2007 insurance, otherwise if you are a returning boxer you will pay just your renewal fee, since you already have your 2006 insurance & passbook. Extra Sparring: There is always open sparring every Saturday from noon-4pm for those that need extra sparring time. This day is also reserved for extra practice Gym membership: Your membership allows you to come down to the gym any day of the week (seven days a week) to work out to the end of April 2007. Matches: There are two state tournaments and a complete schedule for all boxers if they wish to compete. Fundraising: Mandatory somewhat, to help offset the cost of gas, hotels, and meals. Everybody helps. Boxing Registration Form: (cut across sheet and turn in 'bottom) Name: Date of Birth: Age: Address: City: Zip: Phone: Amount Paid: . Membership# Emergency Contact: (name & phone #) Today's date: I Attachment: Yes or No REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Administration Report (A) DATE: February 26, 2007 Administration ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT DEPARTMENT APPROVAL AGENDA ITEM Request to transfer funds. PREVIOUS ACTION RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION Authorize Administration to transfer funds as approved by 2006 budget to prepare for the 2006 audit. FISCAL IMPACT COMMENTS/RECOMMENDA TIONS City of St. Joseph Transfers For the Year Ended 2006 IN OUT Approved Transfers A-1 Sewer Fund (602) B 47,200.00 Trunk Sewer Fund (501) 47,200.00 Previously the Council establsihed the Trunk. Sewer Funds and agreed to transfer bond requirements annually for trunk charges A-2 CR 121 (321) B 16,900.00 Trunk Sewer Fund (501) 16,900.00 Previously the Council establsihed the Trunk Sewer Funds and agreed to transfer bond requirements annually for trunk charges A-3 02 Equipment Fund (327) B 19,557.94 Fire Fund 19,557.94 Annual Equipment Certificate payment A-4 General Fund (101) 14,000.00 Storm Water Utility (651) 14,000.00 Transfer for street sweeping A-5 Storm Water Utility (651) 39,200.00 Trunk Sewer Fund (501) 72,800.00 112,000.00 Water main improvements and storm water program was financed with WAC and storm water fees. This transfer is equal to the 2006 requirement A-6 General Fund (101) 3,240.00 Fire Fund (105) 3,240.00 Transfer Fire Maintenance A-7 General Fund (101) 11,733.00 Fire Fund (105) 11,733.00 Transfer Administration for Fire Dept A-8 CIP-Water Treatment Plant (434) 1,182,798.06 CIP-Water Treatment Plant (601) 1,182,798.06 Reclassify CIP expenses A-9 Water Fund (601) B 140,000.00 Trunk Sewer Fund (501) 140,000.00 Previously the Council establsihed the WAC Funds and agreed to transfer bond requirements annually 4. 595M GO Water Revenue Bond of 2005 series D A-10 Water Fund (601) B 127,050.00 Trunk Sewer Fund (501) 127,050.00 Previously the Council establsihed the WAC Funds and agreed to transfer bond requirements annL{ally 3. 575M GO Water Revenue Bond of 2005 series A A-11 Federal Grants-Other(101) 177,051.97 2002 Street Improvements(325) 177,051.97 Reclassify MSA funds A-12 Water Revenue Bonds(336) 47,045.13 Water Revenue Bonds(436) 3,504,980.05 Water Fund(601) 3,552,025.18 Reclassify bond revenue to fund 601 A-13 Federal Grants-Other(101) 152,398.95 North Corridor/Northland Heights(335) 152,398.95 Reclassify federal funds i? o 'to %: cc ~ '6 "' Q: 5 -E' " " r-- € 0<<:; ON N~ "'Q,j en:; <"I::: , 0 00'" NO . .c_ u= m~ ~U$ \ijs League of Minnesota Cities 145 University Ave. West 51. Paul, MN 55103-2044 (651) 281-1200 March 28-29, 2007 . St. Paul Learn more about city, county, and school board issues that affect your community. Before you get to the conference: . Get acquainted with county and school board officials . Check with your county and school board officials to encourage their participation . Coordinate with county and school board officials to make sure your community is well represented Register tOday at www.lmnc.org ci. ..c:: en ~ cv co cv :5 oS.5 '- (,) '- ..2 C co en~~ co cv co '(3 1: (,) .- 0 0 :t::(,), o ~ o~.s o ~ en ..c::.!!1cv iil .!{1 -S "0 'aD 'l- c..s!2 0 co......- >;a:;~ "E:ECV ::l C C o Q:; ~ Q > co >;0,- :~ 'aD 0 (,)-""" o co CJ) ogen o-~ .-f"E:Q. '- CV €.Q, ~ ~ Q5 CD ciD-s .~ in ~ o .:: 0 --, 'l- ...... CJ) CV ~ 'c o co .C C) Q. .2 ~ ~ co U5 .~ ..s!2 I"- o o '- N CV en -s .cv CV ::l ~= 'aD ......._ co -d.o~~ C CJ) <D E ~ -s 0(.)..... Q 1E ::l (,) 0 0 .~ ~ {j t) '0 Co :c ~ CV en CV ::J: :c..c:: I- ~ . CV (,) c CV '- ~ c o (,) .?;> C o CV ..c:: ...... .!{1 co 'aD -: .~ e tl"E: ~ 8 co- en co cv Q ::l.2 ~ en .- cv c Q ~~ 5 Etj:~ o I~ Q.lB5 Q) c Q. ..c:: cv en ...... E c ~ E ~ o cv ...... 0.>"0 >< 0 C UJ 'aD co . C "~, {.'. ,.8, .5~ =:i....(,) 0 .;,:.; 19 '5 cPo -g E co E _ 0 o Q ::: +-' Q.::l co 0 u.o Q) co ..c:: ~ ~.8 co co .?;>U5 co .~ o:::..s!2 . " . ,t'il; iJ) Q> C Ll..o s:: ~ o cv :;:;Q. !!! cv .. Q. .~ LD 'oliN Q>~ o::~ <]) 'oJ) ~ ro 'oJ) a:; "0 .t::>, Q) ro -5: C Q) .- 0.. <])0 :i5LO ro . -0i .- -rl g;. <A ro,>- (f) 0 .- <]) 'oJ)"", .~ ~ tro ro"", 0.. ro 'On ... o ~ c E - ;~ := == ro ...... o en OJro - Cc"O g (f).t:: .- <]) 0 ::?:C(I) b.S m OJ::?: 0 ~b~ ~cc OJ 0 .- ...J~2:c Q) '- <]) 0 ~g:S~ >.. (/) "0 () D<tcO "0 <]) '" (f) ~ :5 (/)"'!!t gu)~-2 C <l) C lo- e.- ~ co o..:t::' 0 0 (1)0000 .... ftS CD C - C o ... CD .... f/) "Q CD a:: r I'" 0~~H Qlli! ".... J r ii ,/ ~-;U~ FIRST CLASS U.s. POSTAGE PAID St. Paul, MN PERMIT NO. 3223 1,1,1"II"ull,I",I,lnl,h.I,I,1 ,ltI.t,Uu"I.t.I.I" JI, ,I JUDY WE~RENS Adntin-Q'-lk St ..:Td$ePh 25 COLLEGE AVE N PO Box 668 SAINT JOSEPH MN 56374-4576 "tl Ill. ~ "-~- III 0 :r - o'lIO. 3 C- 5" n :1'::.' :T III Ill. ti" (l)' (l) ..:::s ::0 CD ao. (ii" .... CD '""I Q := - -" := CD Q) ..... !';.....'.. III (l) l/) c--g ~Q" (l)'~ ,Ill' n i'~ ~_ CD :::s. 3.C'l = CD S'@ o <t qO. '~ \~' ... (l) III (l) <! (l) 0. - o ... 3 - o :T 'CD '~ :5" 0 -h :r o _ 3r- !1l.&g, 0' ~ ,::I III . - ::::;, <" l/) (l) ;::;:(") -0 ~~ r-(l) SCD (")~ (l). ...... ~ ...... Vl I ...... VJ o '? P ~~;r8.....tTJ~r-< ~;:::::s:::sp-~:;'Q (;:) = (1) ~ --""2... ~ ~ E:- n :::n S :::. 0 1=:' e:.. ~ t:r'M 0 o...~:.::; ;:t, ~ !f' :::s ~ rc C:;' n ~" <. ~ !"""t ...... 0 _ ::..' ::; "-, ::::: if~ 1:1 '-- ::r is... :::s "< "'... ~... n M v "'"8 ~ =-h c'r'\ a~E"" ~t\)c.;.p-'O;:..:.,-> s;' C") H S' :: P-.!~ '~o::T"(Jq '(" Ss ~-..... HOS,O", ~-"!!~~on:::S.s ;s=c5C('C~ ~ ,0 ;1 ~ ~ ~ ?r (-<'"':20 '" ~~n;:;~~~ ~~. ~ 0... 0 ~ tc:. ~ o. ~ n ~~ :::s ::T"~R' """ ",~n~ ~ 0 (/) g ~ 7 ~ q ~ B C/J~, ~ ~ ~ r- '" ~ :;;: n ;::::- (C &- 5: ~:=- ~ :;; ;:< ~ --' ~ "';., " ~ 9 ~. S ~. M ~ to ~ ~ "-r c.n '.-;i ::00 ~~ ~ 0 b ,,',', w .... r- 0 '0. ' o III ~ IT\ '::E _ 3 ~.~ III :::s w~ ....:::s,(I,)CIlCD::I tll(l)(O~"tl\ltl. .ii)' <t -0 .(1,) CD .- - Ill!,? .:.. ='~a ~,~"'(OOIll'O -L..>.CDollO.'-""'3 g. 1'.), ~ olIO.. 0- (0 ... OJ ...~ CD < <3~ S' 'E.:. !1l. 0. CD ,0 s::: -. ~... ,,::I g:. ~' g CJ) .:<:".. CDtll!'? r+::o '0:T .?<s: cl'~ _,Ill III s::: ii)' !! S' ~ III lIO.~:T s:g ~~(I,) 2::0 III 0. 0'1 <' a: ~ 0'1 CD - ~'... 1llC- o~ ; :(D~ ,g @' "'0 .e _,0 CD 3 o - ~ ~ (I,) in o "C ~ ...... o ~ Vl I ...... ...... ~ Vl PJ ~ ~ G> o I ...... o VJ o f" P ~ I ~ VJ o f" P 0. III '< t:l:l ~ ~ g'~~~~ ~ ::;. >" <:::--. ~ aq crr; =-~~~E D.c2 ~ ~ ~ a ~. C;;' ~.,~ ~ ~. D; ~ ~ V)~ tlI v g. ~.~. ~ ~ (j -.. t...,~~~ ~(1):S;:;'",Pl 5 (t;:', ';,: ~ ~ ~.'~ ~ ~ '"i ~ ~ n ~- ~ ~ ;- , ..., ;:; V) ~ ... f...J c.n.... ~ ~ ~ ~ :::s 5':"" ~ '"= P-", ~bC\ Pl ~ € ~. ~ ~ ~ o~~~~-- o "-' \'l;::, "-- -- g ~ <~. ~ e-:-r"'7 r\~ ~ ;:t &~.J;-:- ~; :::. (1) 2J 3'" k' ~. 8 ~, ~ ~ "''''~~(-< 8-~.~~~ c:;. C ~. ~'~ i'6 D; ~,' ~ '" :::s 0<:, V') "'i- l";i o' ~. ::1 ~ :: ~ 1::. tTJ ~~ k' !7 ,..to""?<~~~~ &,5"'"2...k~' Pl (}~C~~~a. E~n;~~-..)~ - ~ ~ ~ S. :::;-:1-0 ,....,I. ;:;:,... ~.~ ~ ~ ~ ~Jg g~~~g~r (6 ~ B ~~~. ~ ~ ~~a~21~a 2~g~~b~ ~ ~< ~ %; ~ ~ g ;:l (~ ~ ~~ ~ e. p- :::S~~~"rJ C ri C ~ ~ ~ ~. r-~ -< (D ~;::;; f'"} ~g~~~~e. ~;:g~':;~~ r ~ :3 ~,~ ~ S ~~Y'~~~; ~CLo~-:-~'~~ pJ Q... ~ ~ =- a &. ~ ~ ~. e-; S' ~ ;:l(Jq (Jq '" M ~ (1) 00-0.0 oCD~ 85111l (OCD'" (I,) gg' <{1:::s <Ill ~ -.'1) ~lll (I,).~ .~ ::0 <p~ 3 CD Illg, ::;: 'Ill m ... c;" ':1'::' III o ::I lil' - .~-, c;' :1':: 'Ill .0 @ .3 ;::1 o o ... ;~ a; 0'1 ~, (I,) (Xl "'" ,0 ~ a;~ 0'1(1,) ..eo (1,)'" (Xl I;"' ~ (I,) (0 ?'l . n ... ~ .;1> .(') o (l'g,. ::::5, = J>> ~ -' 0 n ::I CD ~;:::. III 0 CD@ ~'~.!. 5g":T~! (l) ::I' CD III ,-. @ III g!:t.g <t~~g'tl .. - CD ...' ,0 ' ~ g @~g. '::I ::I S:::. '< 'm. n @ m .. .5 ~ g: lri .0. 0.0. 3 l/) ..... III s::: ~.o.@ ~ ~..s1 ~ g CD ~"~S' ..~ 1ll~::E 0.0._... CD~ 0 a: .' :::s'tll ,::I o ~qo. CDw CD ::E Ul . -. :T 3 = III Ill, g5.~ c-=.?- ::::10 CD lIO. ... o.ctiil' III so >< :~~ ~;..... _::10. s:: "C III =Ill'< c:V> (") o ::ii, '- .(1) ... (I) :::I n (I) ::tI (I) tro. iii' ... ... .ll.l .... o' :::I ." (I) 51! 00 ...... Vl I ~ f" 8 ~~ g. 8 ~= '" ~ ~ ~ ;:1 <:: i'S ~ ;:1' ;s i!; '" 12: V) ~ '" ~ C)j '" 1:: " <;;- ~ :;, :;; s. ~. ;:,: ~ ~ <-, ~ ;::;. PO(.r)~ ;:l ::T"!7 0->",;;., :::,(ii n ~. ~ rJ} MOO ::E ..., n -. n' ~r :: v; __ r~' ::I: ~ 8- ~ crq n '"' ~ 0 e; (n (1J Pi ~ ~ ~c= . ~ ""<1 ::r'~ o = S~ ....~ g-- ~. o '" = ~ <{}~ g M M ::T" ("D ~ po M (D 00 f" P :;1 VJ o f" P ::I: o ... t:l:l '"' tlI f ... ~ .... '" l::::: s.. ~ " ~ '" '"' E;' '" <;' :::s \:::... >I>-. I 0\ '? P -l ..... -. c:: AI tJ) C ~ s: ~ :::tI n ::r.: N W B~$:o. o (1) g; ::t. _. ~ M ("D ~ ::i 8- ~ DD;p-n ~. ~ s: g op-ga ~'p.> 0-;' :::s n '" '" ':? >" p.> ~ p.; & 5- ~ :::s v~ ~ 0- 'p.> ;:l rJJ en ~ ~ n g..r@::r o ~ ;:l 0 o -. (1) s:.. -~::E'" up.> ..... oB2t;' ~ ~ ~ ~ O-p.;"'_ o ..., o'~ Efl ~ ~ o' 0, r:;;-;' 1:1 ~o (1) VJ _. p.;a " ~ ~ ::;' ::T" (1) 0 c......, '" ~~o:=c V1MEfltll ",::r"nl:l (D _, ~ :3 n ~ ... ~ - 1:1 _. ~ (lei .... (1) ... o (1) ::r -l""t("D :::O::E o -, '"= ;;o:;r.::lb~28-e: ~ e:..~ 0:::S CflS j::.... ~.-t c..n ("D 8"< ;:;.S;f"~i;l MI:I~n Be: on~8 ~"O n.,e: ..". 0.. po e; ..., '" "',..... ;:l o ~. ~ ~ 0.. ;.. ::Eo~p.> >-MtlI :::S-<Xj:::S ~n ~ ~ ~>O '"g Pl >-~~o rt""O A> ;:: "'-...., "'... ~ 1:1 egg S ;::l.. "'-.-' ....- ~ ~:; E1. ,ch ~ < ~i3 1h ~ =:.:. b 8-.& P- l:"::l n;- 1-1 f\ ~ ~~ '-< <:i ...... Vl '? :3 N \.)) o '? a N I Vl '" ~ Vl \.)) o '? P :E m C Z ITi fA C ~ s: :J> :::0 n ::I: N 00 (')r":I> -"CD Ci) !:!: ao. m CD -" cn~Z .. D) C (')!:!::I> o < c CD a(') (D"O YJa Q) ~ := CD c.= cn(') (') CD ::T-t\ o ~ o (j) ...... \.)) o I N '? P 8:::(iig-CJ~:;r.::l ~ ~ -< p.> ~ :s ~ P en (=b" Joooo!: r")_. :3 '" ::E c... ~ E;' tlI ~ 0 .... 0 ;:to ~ 8. ;:; if Efl ~ ~ 0 .... >" n (1)....., ..... n"::t" ~ _. Joooo!: ~ \lop( ",oo~-<~r< ~ ""'0 en (D' ~. ("D I .... :?j ::E ':; ""<1 ~g-~o~~ :::s g;";:- M")~aq 0- '-'.-t 100&_ ::T"",(ii::T" ~ o ~ ~ ~ a ::E 1j ~ ~ ~. (1) I .-t (/) ~ ~ oKS !7 ::r" ::n - (Jq ~ o~~~ ~ ~::t C:;;' (J ~ ~ ~ ~ 3' ~ ~ !fl 0 'oJ..... CI'J (1} 0- ~ 8 ~'Q ~ 5 ~ ~~,~ '" 0 n . >" :::s "< e:: ::;f1.... '" ..... n;opjO- ~. :+s ~ ~ ~. g- c...:::::2... - Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) EA W prepared by: Parkway Business Center St. Joseph, Minnesota Prepared for: City of St. Joseph & Todd Rodenwald Central Minnesota Land Development 7038 East Fish Lake Road Maple Grove, MN 55311 2/14/07 KLD Project File No. CMNLD0503 Kramer, Leas, DeLeo PC 1120 Industrial Park Road SW Brainerd, MN 56401 Phone (218) 829-5333 or (866) 816-5333 Fax (218) 829-5377 www.kldland.com KRAMER LEAS DELEO SURVEVtNG. ENGINEERING. PLANNING ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET Parkway Business Center Worksheet (Items 1 - 31) Pages 2-18 Certification by the RGU Page 19 Appendices: General Location Map 1 :24,000 USGS Topographical Map of Project Area Site Map / Conceptual Layout Project Narrative Aerial Photo of Project Area Proposed Zoning Areas DNR Natural Heritage Program Report Wetland Delineation Report Steams County Soil Survey - Soils Map Minnesota State Historic Preservation Review Executive Summary - "St. Joseph North Corridor and CSAH 2 Realignment Corridor Study Report" A B C D E F G H I J K Typical Road Section L Environmental Assessment Worksheet. Parkway Business Center ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT WO~SHEEl Note t.o ,pr~parer~.:This .form iSllvailableatwww.nmplan.state.Jnn,us.. EAWGuide#nes will beavaila.blejn~prjng 19c99attbewebsite. 'I'~eEnvironmental Assessment Worksheet provides information.,aboutapI:()jec:tthatmay have the potential for&igllificantel1yironlTIental effects: The EA W is prepared by the Responsible Governmental Unitoritsl:lg~ntstodet~rmine whether an Environmental Impact Statement should be prepared. The project proposer must supply. any rea~onably accessibledatafgr - but should notcolTIplete~thefinalworksheet. If a compIet~l:ll1swer does noLfit in. the spac.eallotted,attac4additional sheets as necessary '. The complete question asweH astheanswer)l1ustbe illcludediftheEAW.is,prePl:lredelectronically. Note to reyiewers: Commellts Inustbesulimi~edt()t4e ~GI1dyr!l1g.tp~i3p-daycommentperiod following notice of the. EAWin the.EQ13 Monitor. Comments shouldaddresstheaccurac:y.and completeness of information, potential impacts that warrant further investigation and the. need for an EIS. I. Project title: .parkway Business Center 2. Proposer: CentralMinne~9taL=tnd Development Contact. person: To.Id..Rodenwald Title:. . N/A Address: 7038 East Fish Lake Road City, state, ZIP: Maple Grove, MN 55311 Phone: 952-925-5124 Fax: 952-892-7670 E-mail: N/A 3,RGU : City of St. Josep.h Contact person: Judy Weyrens Title:N/A Address: 25 College AvenueN. City, state, ZIP: PO Box 668 St. Joseph,.MN56374 Phone:320~363-7201 Fax: N/A E-mail:iwevrens~citvofstioseDh.com 4. Reason for~AW prepar~tion. (c:heck qne) _ EIS scoopirig _ Mandatory EA W _ Citizen petition _X_ RGU discretion _ Proposer volunteered IfEA W or EIS is mandatory giveEQB rule category subpart number and subpart name 5. Project location County: Stearns City/Township: City of St. Joseph Section: Part of the Township: 124 North Range: 29 West Attach each ofthe following to the EA W: · County map showing the general location of the project. See Appendix A. · U.S. Geological Survey 7.5 minute, 1 :24,000 scale map indicating project boundaries (photocopy acceptable). See Appendix B. · Site plan showing all significant project and natural features. See Appendix C. Kramer, Leas, Deleo Pc. 2 Environmental Assessment Worksheet Parkway Business Center 6. Description a.Provide a project summary of 50 words or less to he puhlished in theEQB Monitor. ThePatkwayBusiness Cen1eris a proposed light-industria.l! commercial planned unit development located on 55.2 acres in St. Joseph, MN. .Theproject inCludes the creation of 25 lots ranging fromi.tO acres to 3.32 acres. The project will be serviced by municipal sewer and water. b.Givea complete description ofthe proposed project and related neW construction. Attach additional sheets as necessary. Emphasize construction, operation methods and features that will cause physical manipulation of the environment or will produce wastes. Include modifications to existing equipment or industrial processes and significant demolition, removal or remodeling of existing structures. Indicate the timing and duration of construction activities. The Parkway Business Center is a proposed light-industrial! commercial planned unit development located on 55.2 acres in St. Joseph, MN. The projects ca.llsfor the construction of 5 light-industrial (LI) lots, 10 commercial (B-3 - General Business District) lots, and 10 LI! B-3 Combination lots. Lot sizes range from 1.10 to 3.32 acres. Concord Street, Commerce CirCle, and Commerce Court are proposed new roads within the project. In addition, Lot 1, Block 1 ofthe adjacent Rennie Additionwas purchased to provide access from the neighboring industrial development and 19th Avenue NW. The proposed industrial park will connect to the existing City of St. Joseph sewer and water system to the west of the project. The project proposes to connect to an existing sanitary sewer at 19th Avenue NW and to connect with an existing watermain at 19th Avenue NW and County Road 133. Lot construction will occur on an individual lot basiS at the future landowner's discretion, subject to all applicable ordinances. Along with the road, utility, and lot construction will be two stormwater retention ponds located within the project site. The overflow for these ponds will be directed to an area east of the development that is planned to be the location of regional stormwater ponding facilities for possible future development. The roadway construction will occur soon after receiving approval and will continue until completed. A 40' wide paved roadway (70' wide right-of-way) with curb and gutter will be constructed according to City and County road standards and specifications (see Appendix L for a proposed typical section). The duration of the proposed road construction is approximately 120 days or until completed. Road construction, sewer and water installation, and site grading will require a Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit. All construction activity will utilize Best Management Practices (BMP's) to minimize erosion and sediment transport offsite. BMP's may Kramer, Leas, Deleo Pc. 3 r-- Environmental Assessment Worksheet Parkway Business Center includ.e but are not limited to sedimentation basins, silt fence, bale checks, and erosion control blankets. In addition, individual lot owners will be required to abide by the MPCA NPDESper:rnit requirements.. The project proposes no impacts to wetlands. Preliminary grading and utility plans. as well as a preliminaryerosioncontroLplan will be submitted by KLD priorto.PreliminaryPUD approval. SERInc.will be completing the SWPPP and final engineering plans. c. Explain the project purpose; if the project will be carried out by a governmental unit, explain the need for the projectand identify its beneficiaries.. Th~Pllrposeof the pr()jectis the conversion of agricultural.land to a light-industrial I . commercial planned unit development. d. Are future stages of this developm~nt including development on any outlotsplanned or likely to happen? _~Yes _No If yes, brieiJydescribe future stages, relationship to present project, timeline and plans for environmental. review. Although there are no plans at this time, future development will undoubtedly occur in the area around the Parkway Business Center with the creation of new infrastructure (seeEAWitems # 21,27,28). The proposer owns several hundred acres to the north and eastoftheproject site that will likely be developed. Plans for this area are contingent on the creation ofthe necessary infrastructur~,especiany related to the North Corridor roadiproject (discussed .later in this document). In addition, the City of St. Joseph. has indicated that a future Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) andlor Alternative Ur~~~}\rel;lwide Review (AUAR) will be necessary to discuss the environmental implilcts of future development in the area. However, since the Parkway Business Center is the only plan currently on the table, the City has determined that an EAW will best determine if there are likely to be any significant environmental effects that may result from this project. e. Is this project a subsequent stage of an earlier project? _Yes _X_No If yes, briefly describe the past development, time line and any past environmental review. 7. Project magnitude data Total project acreage: 55.2 Number of residential units: 0 Commercial, industrial or institutional building area (gross floor space): The maximum gross building area allowed, by ordinance, is 24.7 acres (60% of the total lot area). Kramer, Leas, Deleo Pc. 4 Environmental Assessment Worksheet Parkway Business Center Indicate areas of specific uses: Office (see B-3 below) Retail (see B-3 below) Warehouse (see Llbelow) Light industrial (LI}5.13.acres Other commercial (B-3) 10.28 acres Building height N/ A If over 2 stories, compare to heights of nearby buildings Manufacturing see LI Other industrial (combined LIIB-3) 9.25 ac. Institutional 0 Agricultural 0 The above calculations are based on the 60% maximum allowed building area. 8. Permits and approva.ls required. List all known local, state and federal permits, approvals and financial assistance for the project. Include modifications of any existing permits, governmental review of plans and all direct and indirect forms of public financial assistance including bond guarantees, Tax Increment Financing and infrastructure. Unit of government Stearns County Stearns County Stearns County Stearns County Stearns County City of St. Joseph City of S1. Joseph DNR MPCA MPCA MN Dep1. of Health MN Dept. of Health Type of application Plat Approval Re-Zoning Final Plat Approval Approval of Wetland Boundaries Entrance Permit Building Permits Industrial Discharge Permit (if needed) Dewatering Permit (if needed) NPDES/ SDS Stormwater Permit Sewer System Extension Plans / Permits Water System Plan Watermain Extension Plan Review Status Pending Pending To be applied for Approved To be applied for To be applied for To be applied for To be applied for To be .applied for To be applied for To be applied for To be applied for 9. Land use. Describe current and recent pastland use and development on the site and on adjacent lands. Discuss project compatibility with adjacent and nearby land uses. Indicate whether any potential conflicts involve environmental matters. Identify any potential environmental hazards due to past site uses, such as soil contamination or abandoned storage tanks, or proximity to nearby hazardous liquid or gas pipelines. The current zoning of the project is Agricultural, which is consistent with the previous land use of row-crop farming. A rezoning request will be submitted to change the zoning to several different zoning areas. The south side of the project is planned for Light Industrial District (LI) zoning, which will be consistent with the current light- industrial uses in the industrial park immediately west of the project site. The northeastern portion of the site, along the proposed new road corridors, is planned for a commercial district, using the General Business District (B-3) zoning classification. The rezoning request also proposes to rezone the remainder of the project site to a modified LI / B-3 zoning class. Future land uses within the proposed development must a.bideby the permitted uses of each zoning type as outlined in the City of St. Joseph Zoning Ordinance and are expected to be consistent with surrounding light-industrial and commercial uses. Please refer to the Project Narrative in Appendix D for further Kramer, Leas, Deleo PC 5 - I Environmental Assessment Worksheet Parkway Business Center discussion on these zoning..~reas, especially.r~garding the.requirements of the.LII B...3 area. An Anticipated Zoning map is also included in Appendix Dand Appendix F. Ther~isn()lmown<pastlanduseson this. property that would likely . leave soil contamillationor other.negative . im.pacts. The<alljacent land uses vary. There are agri~ulturalactivitiesanlloakwoodlandswith scatt~redwetlands. toihe north.. and east, . light industrial andcomrnercial..to. the west, and heavy. Jnc;lustriaLuses ass()ciatedwith BOl'gertProducts Inc. and Amcon Block& Precast Inc... that are immediately south of the project. site. This development will increase traffic flow (and emissions) to and from the project and adjacent roads (see discussion on traffic initem#'s 21,27,28). . Because the proposed land use is consistent with tl1e1ig'htindustrialuses intbe area and the project will connecttoexistinginfrastructure.(ineludingsewer and water), there are no other known environmental issues for the neighboring property owners. Mostofthepr()ject is contained within watershed #16012 (Sauk River). The far northern portion of thepr()Ject falls within watershed #15011 (Watab River). 10. Cover types. Estimate the acreage of the site with each of the following cover types before and after development: After o o o o TOTAL 55.2 acres If Before and After totals are not eql.;lal, explain why: Types 1-8 wetlands Wooded/forest Brush/Grassland Cropland Before o o o 53.8 Before After Lawn/landscaping 0 10.7 Impervious surfaces 1.4 39.9 Other (stormwater ponds) 0 4.6 The decrease in agricultural area would be caused by clearing for the new construction ofthe access roads and individual units/lots. This would also result in an increase in the area of lawn/landscape and impervious surface on the project site. The 10.7 acres of lawn/landscaping was based on an assumption of 20% of lawn/landscaping area per lot and another 2.5 acres for grass/lawn in boulevard areas. The impervious surface area includes the total acreage for roads, buildings, driveways, and parking lots. Density and impervious surface calculations meet all local requirements for this type of development. 11. Fish, wildlife and ecologically sensitive resources a. Identify fish and wildlife resources and habitats on or near the site and describe how they would be affected by the project. Describe any measures to be taken to minimize or avoid impacts. Since the previous land use of the project site was row-crop agriculture, the vegetation and soils have been constantly disturbed several times a year for many years, thus not Kramer, Leas, Deleo Pc. 6 Environmental Assessment Worksheet Parkway Business Center providing any significant ecological function or wildlife habitat. To the north and east of the project site, there exists a disturbed, non-contiguous oak forest with scattered openings as well as auumber of wetlands. Numerous wildlife species were observed during the wetland delineation (summer of 2006), including wild turkeys, white-tailed jackrabbits, and several species of ducks. However, this area has been significantly disturbed by cattle grazing, resulting in compacted soil, vegetation removal, and increased erosion. Although\noimpactstothis area are anticipated to result from this project, development and construction for future infrastructure will likely have some impact. It is difficult to determ.inethe nature and degree of future impacts at this time (see item 6d). b. Are any state-listed (endangered, threatened or special concern) species, rare plant communities or other sensitive ecological resources such as native prairie habitat, colonial waterbird nesting colonies or regionally rare plant communities on or near the site? Yes _X_No If yes, describe the resource and how it would be affected by the project. Indicate if a site survey of the resources has been conducted and describe the results. If the DNR Natural Heritage and Nongame Research program has been contacted give the correspondence reference number: ERDB 20060743 A request has been made to the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Natural Heritage and Nongame Research Program. No rare species were found in the vicinity ofthe project area. The results 6fthe Natural Heritage request are included in this document as AppendixG. Describe measures to minimize or avoid adverse impacts. None planned. 12. Physicalimpacts on water resources. Will the projectinvolve the physical or hydrologic alteration ~ dredging, filling, stream diversion, outfall structure, diking, and impoundment - of any surface waters such as alake, pond, wetland, stream or drainage ditch? _Yes X No If yes, identify water resource affected and give the DNR Protected Waters Inventory number(s) if the water resources affected are on the PWI: . Describe alternatives considered and proposed mitigation measures to minimize impacts. A wetland delineation has been done on this site. It is included in this document as Appendix H. The Stearns County Environmental Services Department has approved the wetland boundaries. There is no proposed filling, dredging, or alterations of any kind to the existing wetlands or public water bodies. 13. Water use. Will the project involve installation or abandonment of any water wells, connection to or changes in any public water supply or appropriation of any ground or surface water (including dewatering)? _X_Yes _No Kramer, Leas, Deleo PC 7 --I Environmental Assessment Worksheet Parkway Business Center If yes, as applicable, giveJocation and purpose of any new wells; public. supply affected, changesto~e. lnade., ~l1dwaterquantities ~(lb~ used;{he spurce,duration, quantity and purpose orallY appropriations; and unique well numbers and DNR appropriation .permit numbers, ifknown. Identify any .existing and new wells on the site map. Ifthereare no wells known on site, explain methodplogy used to determine. T.bepr(jject wiUconnecttothe (JityofSt. Joseph's public water supply at tbeexisting watermain at 19th Avenue NW and County Road 133. TheiCity'swatersystem .consistsof3municipalweUs, which can deliver 1,000 gallons per minute with an average demand of 290,000 gallons per day. Tbe City's storage cap~city is50Q.,OOO. gallons. In addition, temporary groundwater a.ppropriation may be necessary during con~truction (if so,aDNR per;mit must be obtained). 14. Water-related land use management district. Does any part of the project involve a shorelandzoning district, a delineated 100-year flood plain, ora state or federally designated wild oJ." scenic river land use district? Yes _X_No If yes, identify the district and discuss project compatibility with district land use restrictions. This project does not Jail within a FEMA 100-year floodplain, a sboreland zoning district,. or a wild and scenic river district. 15, Water surface use. Will the project change the number or type of watercraft on any water body? _Yes _X_No If yes, indicate the current and projected watercraft usage and discuss any potential overcrowding or conflicts with other u~es. There are no surface waters on the site. 16. Erosion and sedimentation. Give the acreage to be graded or excavated and the cubic yards of soil to be moved: 38.1 acres; 140,000 cubic yards Describe any steep slopes or highly erodible soils and identify them on the site map. Tbereare no steep slopes on the site. Erosion and sediment control issues are discussed below. Describe any erosion and sedimentation control measures to be used during and after project construction. Proposed construction activities will disturb more than 1 acre of land, tbus requiring an MPCA Stormwater Permit. Among otber things, this permit requires that a Kramer, Leas, Deleo Pc. 8 Environmental Assessment Worksheet Parkway Business Center StormwaterPoIlution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) be developed to utilize best management practices for erosion control and sedimentation control. Below are sediment and erosion control measures tbat maybe proposed for tbis project. A preliminary erosion control plan as well as a preliminary grading and utility plan will be prepared by KLD prior to approval oftbe preliminary plan. SEB Inc. win be preparing tbe Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) for tbis project after prelilllinaryplan approval. Tbeywinalso be preparing tbeifinal grading, utility, and road plans. Allground disturbed by construction is to be stabilized as soon as possible using tbe appropriateBMP. Silt fencing will be used at tbe down gradient perimeter of disturbed areas and . stockpiles. In addition, tbe placement of the silt fence will be inspected prior to construction. Existing trees, grass, and other vegetative cover willbe preserved where possible. MPCA native seed mixes and weed-free mulch will be used for temporary and permanent erosion control Track Equipment (Dozer) must be operated up and down exposed soil slopes on final pass, leaving track grooves perpendicular to the slope. In addition, the surface must be left rough to minimize erosion. Bale checks, stormwater retention ponds and other BMP's win be used on the site during construction. BMP'swillbe inspected weekly or after a% inch rain event by permittee/contractor and may be adjusted or increased as conditions dictate. Erosion and sediment control plans may be required for land disturbances on each lot as part of any future building permit for the construction of structures and driveways. Temporary erosion and sediment control measures will be properly disposed of within 30 days after final site stabilization is achieved or after the temporary measures are no longer needed. The stormwater retention ponds win be cleaned, if required, after grading operations and turf establishment have been completed. Stearns County Environmental Services is in charge of enforcing stormwater compliance for this project. 17. Water quality: surface water runoff a. Compare the quantity and quality of site runoff before and after the project. Describe permanent controls to manage or treat runoff. Describe any stormwater pollution prevention plans. The project is designed to meet all local and state stormwater requirements and will be monitored during construction to insure compliance. b. Identify routes and receiving water bodies for runoff from the site; include major downstream water bodies as well as the immediate receiving waters. Estimate impact runoff Kramer, Leas, Deleo Pc. 9 Environmental Assessment Worksheet. Parkway Business Center on the quality of rec~iying waters. Th~..lI1ajorityiofthe,unofffrolll..the...proposedd~velopmentwin'follo~thenatural drainage way. Runoffwillbe collected bya storll1se",er ~ystellland delivered to two individual stormwater retention ponds (see Appendix C for the locations of these ponds). These ponds.ilre.I~~sigIledt()hold...~...100..yearstormevent.antl ~illin<:lude the fono~ing.. features: .a.skilllmerstructure, ~mer~eIlcyspHlway,wetstorage,and access benching along with maintenaqc~access. The overflowforth~seponds will be directed to an area east of th~..develoPllleqt that is planned to be tile Jocation of regional stormwater,pondiqg facilities for possible. future develQpment. No adjacent / downstream water bodies willbe adversely impacted by runoff from the proposed developln~nt.... St()pmwaterrunoffwill.becollected,treated,..andreleased at.a controned.rate...of)di~fb.~~~cr~a~k:JH>t~e.crnri~~~~ent. ....t\...p..~li~inaryerosion. control plan as well asa preliminary grading and utility plan will be' prepared by KLD prior.to approval of the.prelillliqaryPUDvlanfortheParkwayBusiness . Center. SEH Inc. will be prepadqgthe Storm water Polluti{)nPrevention Plan. (SWJ>>Pl') . for this pmJectafter preliminaryPUD approval. TheywUIalso be.preparing the final grading, utility, and roadpla,ns. The rtmoffafter the develqplllentwill likely consist not only ofs~dill1ent blltalso small amounts of road sa Its, oils., and. other trace chemicals commonly associated with runoff -from roads and constructi{)ns ~ites'):BY dire.cting the runofftostormwater retention ponds, the runoffcanbeadequately collected and treated. 18. Waterquality: wastewaters a. Describe sources, composition and quantities oLall sanitary, municipal and industrial wastewater produced or treated at the site. Wastewater forcommercialand light-industrial uses was estimated on.a per acre basis. Wastewater generation rates from industry sources can vary widely de.pendent upon the type and size of the facility, the degree of water reuse, and the onsitewastewater treatment method employed, ifany. Because of this variation, which can b~ independent of the number of employees at the facilities, a wastewater flow rate of 1500 gallons per acre per day (gpad) was estimated for the site with a possible maximum of 2000gpad for medium-industrial uses, if allowed. These estimates were generated from sources such as Metcalf and Eddy, eta al. By ordinance, a maximum of 60% of the total lot area can be building space. Thus, the maximum wastewater generated by the entire projectcanbe.approximated at by multiplying the anticipated total gross building acreage ofthe.pr()posedParkway Business Center by the gpad rates oflSOO and 2000 listed above. Using these calculations results in a maximum gallons per acre per day wastewater flow rate of approximately 36,990 to 49,320gpad or 912,173.4tol,216,231.2 gallons per day. However, actual rates may be significantly less than these estimates depending oq the type of commercial/industrial uses in the proposed development. Kramer, Leas, Deleo Pc. 10 Environmental Assessment Worksheet Parkway Business Center According to the City's Sewer Use Ordinance, industrial users discharging into the City's Sanitary Sewer S!stem. "shall obtain an Industrial Discharge Permit" if notified by the City. "The criteria used by the City to determine iran Industrial Discharge Permit will be required shall include: a. An .average flow greater than 25,000 gallons per operating day, or b. A pollutant concentration of greater than 50%for one or more regulated pollutants (see Section 42.11,Subd.6) at the point of discharge, or c. Has properties in the discharge for if to be aprohibit!d discharge, or d. Has been pretreated or passed through an equalization tank before discharge, or e. A hydraulic or organic loading greater than 5% of the average dry weather capacity ofthe SSS, or f. Anindustrial process regulated by the EPAcategorical standards, or g. Other criteria as designated by the City as defined in 40 CFR 403.12 (a)." Users of the City'S SSS will be required to abide by the remainder oftheSewer Use Ordinance as well as the Sewer Rate Ordinance and Water and. Sewer System Ordinance Availability Charges. Among other things, these ordinances restrict the size, composition, acidity, and combustibility of wastewater entering the City's SSS. All permittees are required to "maintain a flow measurement device for instantaneous rate and/or cumulative flow volume determinations." In addition, self-monitoring reports must be submitted to the City. The City. may also inspect users of the SSS (including sample taking). If pretreatment is necessary it must be conducted in ~ccordance with Federal Pretreatment Regulations and all other applicable rules and regulations. Phosphorus discharge to the City's Sanitary Sewer System (SSS) is regulated by the City. According to the Phosphorus Management section oftheSewerUse Ordinance, "any significant non-domestic nutrient contributor (NDNC)of phosphorus, as determined by the City will be required to develop a Phosphorus Reduction Strategy (PRS). The NDNC will evaluate and/or update the PRS to include methods and/or steps taken to. elim.inate or reduce phosphorus loading to the SSS." All wastewater will be treated by the St. Cloud area sewer system (see item c. - below). b. Describe waste treatment methods or pollution prevention efforts and give estimates of composition after treatment. Identify receiving waters, including major downstream water bodies, and estimate the discharge impact on the quality of receiving waters. If the project involves on-site sewage systems, discuss the suitability of site conditions for such systems. After being treated by the St. Cloud area sewer system (see item c. -below), wastewater is discharged into the Mississippi River. Prior to discharge, wastewater undergoes many stages oCtreatment, including preliminary treatment, primary treatment, secondary treatment, and final clarification. In addition, the liquids flow to the chlorine contact chambers for disinfection, before final discharge to the receiving waters of the Mississippi River. Kramer, Leas, Deleo Pc. 11 Environmental Assessment Worksheet Parkway Business Center c. If wastes will be discharged into a publicly owned treatment facility, identify the facility, describe any pretreatment provisions and discl.lsS the. facility's ability to handle the volume and composition of wastes, identifying any improvements necessary. The wastewater generated in 18a (above) will be collected and treated by the St. Cloud area sewer system, wbicbserves St.Clou~and surrounding cities, including St. Joseph. The entire system has a capacity of 13,000,000 gallons/day with an averag~demand. of 9,500,000 gallons per day. The city of St. Joseph has purchased 2,100,000 gallons per day()fconyeyancespace.inptpesleadillgto th~ treatmentIjlan~. .. The city estimates.that this amount of conveyance wiUserve 24,706pel)ple, based on .anavera.gecontribution of 85 gallons per day. d.. If the.. project requires disposal ()fliql.lidanimaLmanure, describ~ disposal. technique and location and discuss capac;ity toh.alJdl~ the volume and composition of manure. Identify any improvements necessary. Describe any required setbacks for land disposal systems. Not applicable. 19. Geologic hazards and soil.conditions a. Approximate depth (in feet) to ground water: minimum: within 6 ft. averl'lge: See below The depth to groundwater varies based on soil type and geographic location within the site. Based on soil survey data and topographic information, the depth to groundwater ranges from within 6 feet ofthe surfaceto greater than 10 feet from the surface. to bedrock: minimum: See below average: See below The4.ept~ tl) be~..ocki.s 100 - ~OO feetaccorcjing tl) the Ge()logic+y.Iap ofl\1innesotl:}: Depth. to :Bedrock (198~, B.M.. Olsen and J.H. Mossier -- 1: 1 ,000,000 SCl:}le) ; . .' . .. >.~ - '.... --.. - .,.. '. ,'.. .. .'.... ",.., - .. .. .. .'. .." - .. _, c. , .. Describe any of the following geologic site hazards to ground water and also identify them on the site map: sinkholes, shallow limestone formations or karst conditions. Describe measures to avoid or minimize environmental problems due to any of these hazards. None Known. b. Describe the soils on the site, giving NRCS (SCS) classifications, if known. Discuss soil granularity and potential for groundwater contamination from wastes or chemicals spread or spilled onto the soils. Discuss any mitigation measures to prevent such contamination. The Stearns County Soil Survey lists the soils in the area as: Estherville sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes (41A) Kramer, Leas, Deleo Pc. 12 Environmental Assessment Worksheet Parkway Business Center Estherville sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes (4tH) Dickman sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes (327 A) Osakis loam (413) Estherville-Hawick complex, 2 to 6 percent slopes (875B) A soils map as well as a. complete description of each soil type listed above are included in Appendix!. Because of the granular nature of the soils on the site, there exists the potential for groundwater contamination from chemical spread or a spill. However, there are no foreseeable permanent sources of contamination from this proposed development. During construction, machinery containing fuel will be present on the site. The contractor will be responsible for maintaining the equipment, providing a suita.ble area for fueling, and cleaning up any spills that occur during construction. 20. Solid wastes, hazardous wastes, storage tanks a. Describe types, amounts and compositions of solid or hazardous wastes, including solid animal manure, sludge and ash, produced during construction and operation. Identify method and location of disposal. For projects generating muriicipalsolid waste, indicate if there is a source separation plan; describe how the project will be modified for recycling. Ifhazardous waste is generated, indicate if there is a hazardous waste minimization plan and routine hazardous waste reduction assessments. According to the City of St. Joseph Zoning Ordinance for theLI-Light Industrial District, industrial activities should have a "minimum degree of refuse byproducts and air or noise pollution" and a "relatively low level of on-premise processing." In addition to wastes specific to the industrial use of the lot (which are difficult to determine at this time), it isanticipa.ted tlJ.at typical solid (garbage) and hazardous (paint, cleaners, etc.) waste will be generated on-site when construction of the proposed unit taken place. The lot owner is required to dispose of all wastes properly, in accordance with the City of St. Joseph Garbage and Refuse Ordinance. b. Identify any toxic or hazardous materials to be used or present at the site and identify measures to be used to prevent them from contaminating groundwater. If the use of toxic or hazardous materials will lead to a regulated waste, discharge or emission, discuss any alternatives considered to minimize or eliminate the waste, discharge or emission. None known. c. Indicate the number, location, size and use of any above or below ground tanks to store petroleum products or other materials, except water. Describe any emergency response containment plans. Not applicable. Kramer, Leas, Deleo Pc. 13 Enyironmental Assessment Worksheet Parkway Business Center 21. Traffic. Parking spaces added:.Each unit will have private individual parking areas. Existil)~s,p~pe$.;(if;projectillvolv:ese2lipal1sion).Nb\.. . '.; ... ..... .......... Esti1n:~teti totala.verag~dailytraffic generated:li:"'Y 133 = 4750.ADT(data from Minnesota Department of Transportation ..2Q()3). Estimated maximum peak hour traffic generated (if known) and time of occurrence: NIA Provideanestilllate . of the imPa.ct on traffic pong~stion on affectedroad$..anddescrib~any traffic jIUproveIU~nts necessarY..lfth~pr()ject is within the Twin Cities metropolitan area, discuss its impact on the regional transportation system. It isassllmedthat each l()twiU.have (on average} 20 trlPs;per ;d;:tyinonedirection. Aver;:tgeDailyTraffic.:::; (20trips/IInit)x(25unit~)= 5.00trips/day The project will outlet trafficto.(JduntY~~ad133, 19t1t Avenue NE (via Concord St..~~.),}~n~ .~... newr.c()ll~ctor;IJoa~I~~~.~m~~ ~~.this p()int)()..th~e~~t~ideof tbeproJect. The. City plans to connect this coll~cto..road.t.QC:QIInt;yR();:td75.jn;theruture (no location determined yet). County Road 133 and the new collector road will both likely ha.ve 'access to theNorthCo..ridor..parkway to the north (see description . below). .l'he increase in tra.ffic generated by the development will likely increase the use of County Roa(j133,i>utit's oyerallilllpact ",Hlbe difficult to deteroIinebecause traffic patterns in the area wiUhes.ignificantlyaffected. by the completion ,of the North. Corridor project. Trafficc,o...gestionis notexpected;tobeaproblembecauseofthe. aforementioned threeaccess.points. No traffic signaUights are planned atthis time, but may be needed in the future with additional development in the area. A right-turn lane will likely be necessary for County Road 133. There is sufficient line-of..sightforsafe entrance on to an roadways. According toa"St. Joseph North Corridor .andCSAH 2 Realignment Corridor Study" (see AppendixK) conducted,onbehalf oftheCity, "theSt. Joseph area transportation system . lacks both contin uouseast-west and north;.south toadways; which are needed. to serve the urbanizing metropolitan area and anticipated City growth. St; Joseph, Stearns County and St. Joseph Township understand the need to plan and define these important transportation corridors now so that future impacts can ,be avoided or minimized and development can occur in an organized and thollghtful way. .The North Corridor and CSAH 2 Realignment study is an initial. step toward develQpingthese future transportation corridors. The corridors will serve as key components in the future local roadway system and will complement other corridor studies that are already underway or soon to be initiated, including the east-westField Street Corridor planned. for south of St. Joseph and the north extension of the Southwest Arterial Corridor." There is more information on how this proposed Corridor relates to the Parkway Business Center in EA W items 27 and 28 (below). 22. Vehicle..related air emissions. Estimate the effect of the project's traffic~eneration on air quality, including carbon monoxide levels. Discuss the effect of traffic improvements or other mitigation measures on air quality impacts. Note: If the project involves 500 or more parking spaces, consult EA W Guidelines about whether a detailed air quality analysis is needed. Kramer, Leas, Deleo Pc. 14 Environmental Assessment Worksheet Parkway Business Center Additional air emissions will occur from increased automobile traffic in the area. However, the project will not cauSe any significant decreases in air quality since the resulting daily traffic will not be significant. 23. Stationary source air emissions. Describe the type, sources, quantities and compositions of any emissions from stationary sources of air emissions such as boilers, exhaust stacks or fugitive dust sources. Include any hazardous air pollutants (consult EA W Guidelines for a listing) and any greenhouse gases (such as carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide) and ozone-depleting chemicals. (chloro- fluorocarbons, hydrofluorocarbons,. perfluorocarbons or sulfur hexafluoride). Also describe any proposed pollution prevention techniques and proposed air pollution control devices. Describe the impacts on air quality. Based on the zoning classifications, there arenoperlIlitted uses that would significantly contribute to negative stationary source air emissions. 24. Odors, noise and dust. Will the project generate odors, noise or dust during construction or during operation? _X__Yes _No If yes, describe sources, characteristics, duration, quantities or intensity and any proposed measures to mitigate adverse impacts.. Also identify locations of nearby sensitive receptors and estimate impacts on them. Discuss potential impacts on human health or quality of life. (Note: fugitive dust generated by operations ma~ be discussed at item 23 instead of here.) Dust could occur during site grading. This impact is normally intermittent and a temporary nuisance, subject to varying weather conditions. If the dust becomes excessive, it should be mitigated by construction methods. Noise commonly associated with heavy equipment operation will also.occur during excavation and dirt removal for each . site, as well as during road construction, The construction activities will occur during normal working hours of contractors. Construction poses no potential impacts on ihumanhealth or quality of life. 25 . Nearby resources. Are any of the following resources on. or in proximity to the site? Archaeological, historical or architectural resources? _Yes -,-X_No Prime or unique farmlands or land within an agriculturalpreserve? _Yes X No Designated parks, recreation areas or trails? _Yes _X_No Scenic views and vistas? Yes _X_No Other unique resources? _Yes _X_No If yes, describe the resource and identify any project-related impacts on the resource. Describe any measures to minimize or avoid adverse impacts. The Minnesota State Shoreline Standards specify that local governmental units (LGUs) evaluate the presence of historic sites when considering developments (MN Rules 6120.3500 subpart 1). Accordingly, a request was made to the Minnesota Historical Society~s Historic Preservation Office. No archaeological sites or historic structures were identified within the boundaries of the project site in a search of the Minnesota Archaeological Inventory and Historic Structures Inventory (see Appendix J). The only Kramer, Leas, Deleo Pc. 15 -, Environmental Assessment Worksheet Parkway Business Center histaric structure or,archaeaIQgicalsite. identified wit~in.l mile or the project site is the Grell~ NOrthe.rnll.~ilraa<l,.s~glnentthatruns thro-.gb St. Joseph. It is unlikely that any sites of archaeolagical significance wauld be unearthed by further investjgatian. .However,ShQuldaIlY\lurials or human remains be. unearthed durin.g canst..uctian,.aJlearth"m9l"i~g'Slcti"iti~ssbouldceaseand .Iacallawenfarcement officialsn9tified~s required.\lY1\1N',StateStatute. 307;08 (or its. suc~essar.statut~). .A refJ..~selJta,.ti"efromthestatearchSl~oIQgist's..office will authenticate whether it is a b....ial siteialJ.dt~e stlltes,h.alJpa,.y for the.authentic~tio..,. markilJ.g, and rescue of any Native.Americanartifacts. 26. Visual impacts. Will the project create adverse visual impacts during construction or operatiol1? Such as glare from int~nse lights,. lights 'Visible in wilderness areas and large visible plumes from cooling towerS or exhaust stacks? ~Yes X No If yes,e}(plain. 27. Compatibility with plans and land use regulatians. Is the. project subject to an adopted local comprehensive plan, land use plan or regulation, or other applicable land use, water, or resource management plan of a local, regional, state or federal agency? _X_Yes _No. If yes, describe the, plan, discuss its compatibility with the project and explain how any conflicts will be resolved.. Ifn(),explain. ThisprQject(Zonforms to' aU . local, state, and federal regulations, ordinances, and zoning (if approve<l) for. this type of development. The propased developmentmeets or exceeds the future land use, recommendations of the City of St. Joseph Comprehensive Plan (2002). The Comprehensive. Plan states that "the northeast portion of the City has vacant land suitable for industrial growth." The City is also divided into planning <listri(Zts,,!,heproppsedParkwaYll-'siness Cent~r is . located with.i~ district .15. ~e~om...en<lati9~s f9..this~istrict ate that}ndustrial expansion sho..ldbe in "the area east,Qf existiJ;).g industrial development" and that. "future driveway access points directly QntoCSAH 134, 133, and 75 should be curtailed." The proposed Parkway Business Center does not conflict with these recommendations. This praject has been designed in accardance with the findings afthe "St. Joseph NQrth Corridor andCSAH 2 Realignment Corridor Study." The executive summary (see Appendix K) ofthisrepart identifies a new roadway that will extend westJrom Westwood Parkway in northwestern St. Cloud to Stearns CountyRoad3.and.a realigned County Road 2. The layout of the North Corridor has undergone extensive study and review by many groups and. individuals, including the Corridar Advisory Committee, focus groups, federal, state, and local offices and agencies, and the general public. The North Corridor project is now in the environmental assessment phase (to be completed in 2007 or 2008), with right-of-way acquisition and canstruction to occur at a later date. 28. Impact on infrastructure and public services. Will new or expanded utilities, roads, other infrastructure or public services be required to serve the project? _X_Yes _No. If yes, Kramer, Leas, Deleo Pc. 16 Environmental Assessment Worksheet Parkway Business Center describe the new or additionalirtfrastructure or services needed. (Note: any infrastructure that is a connected action with respect tothe projectmustbe assessed in the EAW; see EAW Guidelines for details.) The proposed Parkway Business Center inCludes the construction of a new road network (Concord Street, Commerce CirCle, and Commerce Court) that will have entrances from County Road 133, 19th Avenue NE,a future north-south collector road, and the proposed North Corridor. These roads will become public roads within the CityofStJoseph. The project will be serviced by municipal sewer and water. This project will also require the expansion of electrical, gas, communication, and television lines. The amount af additional fire and police protection from the City of St. Joseph is difficult to determine at this time. Due to the relative proximity of the project to the downtown of St. Joseph, the use of these resources will be more efficient and less costly than if the project was located elsewhere. Increased tax revenue from the project will help pay for these services. 29. Cumulative impacts. Minnesota Rule part 4410.1700, subpart 7, item B requires that the RGU consider the "cumulative potential effects of related or anticipated future projects" when determining the need for an environmental impactstatement. Identify any past, present or reasonably foreseeable future projects that may interact with the project described in this EAW in such a way as to cause cumulative impacts. Describe the nature of the cumulative impacts and summarize any other available informationrelevantto determining whether there is potential for significant environmental effects dueto cumulative impacts (or discuss each cumulative impact under appropriate item(s) elsewhere on this form). This ~roject will connect toa future . east-west parkway (North Corridor) that forms the northeastern boundary oHhe proposed ParkWay Business Center. The North Corridor has been designed to provide an efficient, safe, and reliable transportation corridor between St. Joseph and St. Cloud, prior to development in the area. This will allow for better planning, more efficient use of resources, and better use of land in the area. Limited access to the North Corridor is being planned (currently proposed access points are limited to % mile apart, and signals at ~ mile apart). Besides additional traffic, the North Corridor will generate more stormwaterrunoff and will impact several wetlands on its proposed route. Environmental assessments are currently being conducted for the North Corridor. The cumulative effects oHheParkWay Business Center project itself are expected to be minimal. There will be added demand on the City's sewer and water systems, an additional road . network, and the expansion of other City services. The creating of the North Corridor will undoubtedly have a greater cumulative effect on the area. Future development will undoubtedly occur in the area around the Parkway Business Center proposed development and the adjacent parkway and other infra.structure when completed. The City of St. Joseph had indicated that an Environmental Impact Kramer, Leas, Deleo Pc. 17 - -I Environmental Assessment Worksheet Parkway Business Center Statementand/or AlternativeU.rb1\D Areawide Review (AUAR)wiUbe. necessary to discuss the environmelltalimpacts oC'futuredevelopmentin the area. However,since the Parkway BusinessCenteriscurrentlythe only plan on the table, the City does not plan to cqnductan EIS or AUARat this time. 30. Other potential ellviromnentalimpacts. If the project may cause .any adverse environmental impacts flot addressed by items 1 to 28, identify and discuss them here, along with any proposed mitigation. None Known. 31. Summary of issues. Do not complete this section if the EA W is be ing done for EIS scoping; instead, address relevant issues in the draft Scoping Decision document, which must accompany the EA W List any impacts and issues identified above that may require further investigation before the project is begun. Discuss any alternatives or mitigative measures that have been or may be considered for these impacts and issues, including those that have been or may be ordered as permit conditions. The City of St. Joseph Comprehensive Plan (2002) lists the priorities for evaluating a new development in the northeastern portion of the City (district 15 -see Item 27). It recommends that the City and Township Joint Annexation Board review proposed developments within the district to determine: a. Impact on existing and future transportation facilities, b. Existing and future surface water management systems, c. Adequacy of park facilities within the proposed development, d. Appropriateness of the proposed use(s), e. Adequacy and quality of proposed sanitary sewer and water facilities; and, f. Sufficient capacity is available within the proposed sanitary sewer and water facilities to service the proposed development. The environmental impacts of the Parkway Business Center related to the above issues and others have been previously discussed throughout the document. Reference material is included in the appendices that follow. Kramer, Leas, Deleo Pc. 18 Environmental Assessment Worksheet Parkway Business Center RGUCERTIFlCATION. The Environmental Quality Board will only accept SIGNED EnvironmerttalAssessmertf VI ol'ksheefs for public natice in the EQBMonitor. I hereby certify that: . The information contained in this document is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. . The EAW describes the complete project; there are no other projects, stages or components other than those described in this document, which are related to the project as connected actions or phased actions, as defined at Minnesota Rules, parts 4410.0200, subparts 9b and 60, respectively. . Copies ofthis EA Ware being sent to the entire EQB distribution list. Signature Date Title Environmental Assessment Worksheet was prepared by the staffofthe Environmental Quality Board at Minnesota Planning. For additional information, worksheets or for EAW Guidelines, contact: Environmental Quality Board, 658 Cedar St., St. Paul, MN 55155,651..296-8253, or www.mnplan.state.mn.us Kramer, Leas, Deleo Pc. 19 Environmental Assessment Worksheet Parkway Business Center Appendix A - General Location Map Kramer, Leas, Deleo PC Parkway Business Center - Project Location Map This map is for visual reference only. Boundaries are approximate. Data sources: MN LMIC I DNR Data Deli Kfiif 2 I A N 2 Miles I CJ EAW Boundary ~Major Roads ~ County Roads NTownship Roads N City Streets _ Lakes F>I CitylTownship Boundaries o KRAMliR L@AS I)ILBO t\jjl\'~'tIM' . Ul.(;nHtAlI'~ . IJ.JoII~lI" Environmental Assessment Worksheet Parkway Business Center Appendix B - USGS Topographic Map Kramer, Leas, Deleo PC Parkway Business Center -USGS 1 :24,000 Topographic Map . . I I I I . ~- ()// ""!x ~\ <) -- == = =.:.. -" ........- A.~,) ~ ( ('") U /': ( \, -' /_." /.. / ,v L / V . (' '....... I '\ _ r f I I ( r" ( I :; \ '--;'...J (085 D@ . , , ';1 ) \ , i " t...-,.\ \ ' , _r \ < ..~,- ~, .,) )....."...-,.// r, · I '. ) 1,-'-'-""/ 'd \. I) ;' -'1 ) if , '. -- /, I /' " ",- ./ ., ",,,/ t., ,/ ,'''\ 1\ -1_Q7.,?...5ec-tfoff1 /l '. . 1 \ Section 11 / ~, \>--"') .r' '> (..:-~) ._\ Secti-on-12 1 ri.J' 1'- I (( j J...., / ~ .J ,.." ...,v~) I ',.J \, (/' ( -e,[ . .> ~ I -. I I I I \ -~') \::4:. (~ \~" ~~, ( t .'" ( \),,1. ") l- """ j.J- - -'!j,......... \ ( 11'.lli~. t._--...... -'. 'If ". .,,1>.4. t. l'" _'U \ \ \ ./1 ',-'" \:=, .g~\~J~. . \ / ,I '..,..\._," .' I \. I ", " ---('~-Xr> --- iJ. ~ -\~-- ---\~--f ( \ - \ I -.' -;::.,- _ .~? ./ ; / ,j 7 · I'i(~~-"'~- ~ ~ If / ...... '(..::: , ! \' : / ---~'l 1 U ( ; ./ I u' . f .......::::::---,:.... =:i::t::--- ~.t~: II ~...~ <Ji,..-:;-- ,'-"<:'- 10 -- - ....","oF ,..!>~_ ~ _ -.J __. _~ - -- ......... ,\\ Section 2 Ii II f' - ,..-",- I " , -. \.. --........ '\ ... , \ \ 'V O,\. '-- -=::-_~I ---r-----,...._ 81 .. III iIiiif?JfI ."", ~- \","'- U /~ /~ {~ _illk-' \- _~ k"", ;->"11/.....( · Ii- . · · ~ · " . ~ This map is for visual reference only. Boundaries are approximate, Data sources: MN LMIC / DNR Data Deli KilJf -~.~, .ut KIUlfIollHI LCAS alOl.liQ '''''''\l~....n",,",.. ."""l~. 0.25 I o tl N 0.25 Miles I Project Boundary AI County Roads o Section Lines Environmental Assessment Worksheet Parkway Business Center Appendix C - Site map / Conceptual Layout Parkway Business Center Kramer, Leas, Deleo PC PARKWA Y BUSINESS CENTER SITE MAP FOR PROM / FELD FARM AND PARKWA Y BUSINESS CENTER St. Joseph, Minnesota VL~. ~7:::= n~j r..ur 32~5M266 KRAMER LEAS DELEO SURVEYING. EHGINEERING . PLANNING ST. CLOUD BRAINERD I BAXTER 2/14/2007 . . I~~-~I ___L:J ....................................1 ...................................., .................................. 6 ...................................... -................................ ..................................... .................................. -- ~ ::::::::::::::::::::::::::~:::::::I ,................................ II ~ ~................................ ..........................RENNi[ ileo I T ION 6 11 : ~................................ ....................................~ ~ ......~~...........................i ~................................ 13 ~ ~ 8 . .................................. ---:------1 \ I :: I BORGERT INOU~TRI~L PARK PLAT 2 I ..........0000..................,." !................................ .,,01" i i \ 343 !.......;~......._......... i---------- ' ---- 2. 19 AC 424 1.37 AC 1.51 AC 261 227 ~ ~ POND SKN I Conceptual Layout - Parkway Business Center City of St. Joseph, Minnesota Environmental Assessment W otksheet Kramer, Leas, Deleo PC Appendix D - Project Narrative Parkway Business Center Parkway Business Center Parkway Business Center St. Joseph, Minnesota PROJECT NARRA TIVE KRAMER LEAS DELEO SUIlVEYING. ENGINEERING. PLANNING February 13, 2007 The proposed development of Parkway Business Center is located on a site that has primarily been used for agricultural purposes in the past. It is located just southeasterly of County State Aid Highway 133 and northerly of the Borgert and Amcon facilities on the property formerly know as the Prom-Feld farm. Existing natural features include rolling agricultural fields. The area of the land to be developed is appraximately 55.2 acres. This development will offer lots suited for both industrial and commercial lots. The lots will vary in size with the smallest lot being no smaller than 1 acre and the largest lot being slightly more than 3 acres. Anticipated Lot Quantities: It is anticipated that this development will provide 25 new lats. Road Design- The typical road section will cansistof a 40 foot wide paved roadway with concrete curb and gutter. The geometric layout .of the roadways is such that the project can be constructed in two or three phases. There will be access to 19th Avenue Northeast via an existing lot in Rennie Addition-that will be cleared to make way for a new east-west street. This east-west street (Concorde Street) will eventually connect to a planned north-south major collector that is shawn in the current transprotatianplan the northerly and easterly baundaries of the plat were determined using the recommended locations for the right-of-way of the planned north corridor and narth-south arterial per the current transportation plan. Refer to the Conceptual Layout Design sketch on the following page for a graphic representation of the lot and street configurations. 2 \ --.,.............. -_.;,.................J I .....:--......r....' II , _....._--.......riti ~ITION. " -.r r-'.-.' i I II . !..._........... "'-;-"'--"-"-'''1 ! It ! I :- ;# -:~_!J SIlH I Conceptual Layout - Parkway Bu'siness Center City of St. Joseph, Minnesota 3 Utilities - Connection to the City's existing sanitary sewer will be made at 19th Avenue Northeast. Watermain connections will be made to the existing watermain at 19th Avenue Northeast and at County Road 133. There will be two stormwater retention ponds constructed within the limits of this development. The overflow for these ponds will be directed to an area east of the development that is planned to be the location of the regional stormwater ponding facilities for other portions of the Prom-Feld property that will eventually be developed. Public utilities such as: power, gas, communications, and television will be installed in development. Easements for the utilities in Parkway Business Center will be provided in the plat of each phase as needed. Typical drainage and utility easements will run parallel to lot lines and road right-of-ways as required by the current ordinance. Additional variable width drainage and utility easements will be f?rovided around stormwater ponds and the structures servicing them as needed. Street Lighting - The street lighting plan will reflect streetlights being placed at roadway intersections and at spacing intervals of 400 feet or less as required. Street light types will be of the size and type that meet the current city standards. Environmental Impact - The land use for area that is to be developed is not located in a shoreland impact zone. The land that consists of the future development of Parkway Business Center is agricultural in nature. However it is adjoined by existing industrial developments to the west and to the south. There are no wetlands on the area of the lots planned in this development. There are large wetlands easterly of this development and smaller wetlands northeasterly of this development. These wetlands have been delineated and the delineation has been verified by Stearns County Environmental Services. This development will have little if any direct impacts to these wetlands. Impact to these wetlands will be assessed further as future phases of this development are designed. An Environmental Assessment Worksheet is currently being completed for Parkway Business Center. It will be distributed for comments during the approval period of this plat. 4 Parkland Dedication - Because this development is of the Industrial/Commercial nature public parks will not be constructed in this development. The developer will work with the city to determine a fair dedication of public land per the ordinance req u irements. Construction Phasing - It is currently intended that this development will be constructed in one phase. Zoning - Because the land to be developed was recently annexed into the City of St. Joseph and it is currently zoned as agricultural. It is our intention to request approval of this development as a planned unit development (PUD). The anticipated zoning classifications would be LI (Light Industrial District), B-3 (General Business District), and a combination of L-I/B-3. The requirements for the LI zone and the B-3 zone will be consistent with the current zoning ordinance requirements except that Adult Entertajnment facilities as will not be allowed. The lot requirements for the L1/B-3 zone will be as follows: Minimum Lot Area = 30,000 square feet Front Yard Setback = 25 feet Side Yard Setback = 20 feet Rear Yard Setback = 20 feet Height Requirements = 40 feet, per B-3 zoning Site Coverage = <60% per LI zoning Refer to the map on the following page for reference to these zoning areas. 5 1- ~ ! ...~ ! J , I I -=...--...--... l-..._.-~ · Ji! I ......:....-..- j iL . -; J -.;..-.-tl; · . I ! ..-......-m _lTIlR" 11 ~ r--".-'" R ! ~ · -.;...-....-.j! . . ! ~ . ! f :- ~+ _~~",,!J SlOf , ~ U (Light Industrial) ~ B-3 (General Businesa District) ~ U I B-3 Combination Anticipated Zoning - Parkway Business Center 6 Environmental Assessment Worksheet Parkway Business Center Appendix E - Aerial Photo of Project Area Kramer, Leas, Deleo PC Parkway Business Center- 2003 Color Aerial Photo This map is for visual reference only. Boundaries are approximate. Data sources: MN LMIC I DNR Data Deli K[iJf ."'11.....11;1'1 LIl...:r; DGLI;O ''''~'''M~. ..""..'... "....,~. 0.25 I A N 0.25 Miles I Project Boundary ~ County Roads CJ Section Lines o Environmental Assessment Worksheet Parkway Business Center Appendix F - Proposed Zoning Areas Kramer, Leas, Deleo PC ..............., r--'---I, ' _._.._J_~_I ....................................1 ,..................................... ,..................................... ::::::::::~::::i I::::,. :.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.~.:_:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:. ..........................~.......i ......~~..........................j ~ 6 II RENNI~ ~OITlON ...................................J ~.~.............................. : : ......~~...........................l [................................ 13 1 i 8 . ................................... --;;-.--.----,1 \_____._._ I :: I BORGERT INO~TRI~L PARK PLAT 2 I ..................................r.f r............................... .01' i 1 ~ LI (Ught Industrial) --- SKN 1 ~ B-3 (General Business District) ~ L11 B-3 Combination Anticipated Zoning - Parkway Business Center Environmental Assessment Worksheet Parkway Business Center Appendix G - DNR Natural Heritag.e Program Report Kramer, Leas, Deleo PC Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Natural Heri~aeRfalfM~b~crsearch Program, Box 25 St. Paul, Minnesota 55155-40_ Phone: (651) 259-5107 Fax: (651) 296-1811 E-mail: sarah.hoffrnann@dnr.state.mn.us July 31~ 2006 Mr. Mitch Brinks Kramer, Leas, Deleo 1120 Industrial Park Road SW Brainerd, MN 56401 Re: Request for Natural Heritage information for vicinity of proposed St. Joseph Industrial Technical Park, Tl24N R29W Sections 2 & 11, Stearns County' ' . NHNRP Contact #: ERDB 20070079 Dear Mr. Brinks, The Minnesota Natural Heritage database has been reviewed to detennine if any rare plant or animal species or other significant natural features are known to occur within an approximate one-mile radius of the area indicated on the map enclosed with your information request. Based on this review, there are no known occurrences of rare species or native plant communities in the area searched. The Natural Heritage database is maintained by the Natural Heritage and Nongame Research Program, a unit within the Division of Ecological Services, Department of Natural Resources. It is continually updated as new information becomes available, and is the most complete source of data on Minnesota's rare or otherwise significant species, native plant communities, and other natural features. Its purpose is to foster better understanding and protection of these features. Because our information is not based on a comprehensive inventory, there may be rare or otherwise significant natural features in the state that are not represented in the database. A county-by-county survey of . rare natural features is now underway, and has been completed for Stearns County. Our information about native plant communities is, therefore, quite thorough for that county. However, because survey work for rare plants and animals is less exhaustive, and because there has not been an on-site survey of all areas of the county, ecologically significant features for which we have no records may exist on the project area. Please be aware that review by the Natural Heritage and Nongame Research Program focuses only on rare naturalfeatures. It does not constitute review or approval by the Department of Nattiral Resources as a whole. If you req4ire further information on the environmental review process for other natural resource- related issues, you may contact your Regional Enviror>.mental Assessment Ecologist, Mike North, at (218) 828- 2433. An in voice in the amount of $117 .01 will be mailed to you under separate cover within several weeks . of the date of this letter. You are being billed for map and database search and staff scientist review. Thank you for cO)lsulting us on this matter, and for your interest in preserving Minnesota's rare natural resources. Sincerely, ~ JmpJ. FDf!- Sarah D. Hoffmann Endangered Species Environmental Review Coordinator DNR Information: 651-296-6157 . 1-888-646-6367 . TrY: 651-296-5484 . 1-800-657-3929 An &llInl Opportunity Employer ; ft: Printed on Recycled Paper Colltnining n '" Minimum or IOlk Post-Consumer Wnste -, Environmental Asses'sment Worksheet Parkway Business Center Appendix H - Wetland Delineation Report Kramer, Leas, Deleo PC Wetland Delineation Report Prom / Feld Farm Stearns County, MN Prepared for: Central Minnesota Land Development Todd Rodenwald 7038 East Fish Lake Ro~d Maple Grove, MN 55311 8/7/06 KLD Project Number: CMNLD0503 - Delineation and Report by: Kramer, Leas, DeLeo PC 1120 Industrial Park Road SW Brainerd, MN 56401 Phone (218) 829-5333 or (866) 816-5333 Fax (218) 829-5377 www.kldland.com KRAMER lEAS DELEO SURVEYING. ENGINEERING. PLANNING Prom / Feld Farm Wetland Delineation Report 817/06 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Table. of Contents Page Purpose I Location of Site..................................................... ....... 2 Methodology............................................................................... 3 Wetland Plant Indicator Designations................. ................ ....... ....4 Site Visit I Findings.............................................. .... ........... ........ 5 Co-ne-Ius.ion.... ................. ... ...... ........ ........ .... .... ... ..............s...........8 Certifi catia n. . . . . . ~ . . . .. . . .. . . .. .. . .. . . . . .. . . ill . .. . .. . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . ... . . . ...8 Res-o u rce-s.. . . . . .. . . . . .. . . . . .. -. .. . . .-. . . . s". . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . ... . .. . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 8 Index of Figures: Figure 1 - General Project Location Map Figure 2 - Delineated Wetlands and National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) Map Background = 2003 Color Aerial Photo (LMIC) Figure 3 - Delineated Wetlands and National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) Map Background = 1:24,000 Scale USGS Topographic Map Figure 4 - Stearns County Soil Survey, Map & Descriptions Figure 5 - Delineation Field Data Sheets - ACOE Format Figure 6 - Wetland Photos Kramer, Leas, DeLeo PC -- I Prom / Feld Farm Wetland Delineation Report 8/7/06 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ DATE: 817/06 TO: Central Minnesota Land Development Todd Rodenwald 7038 East Fish Lake Road Maple Grove, MN 55311 FROM: Mitch Brinks, Certified Wetland Delineator #1007 Kramer, Leas, DeLeo PC 1120 Industrial Park Road.SW Brainerd, MN 56401 Contact Information: Office: 218-829-5333 Toll-free: 1-866-816-5333 Fax: 218-829-5377 Email: .m.brinks@kldland.com SUBJECT: Wetland Delineation-Sec. 1,2,11,12 T124N, R29W PURPOSE: The purpose of this memorandum is to describe the extent of wetlands on the Prom / Feld Farm adjacent to the city of St. Joseph in Stearns County, MN. The information contained in this memorandum is vital for site planning and obtaining agency approvals. 'The wetland delineation was conducted at a level of care and skill generally acceptea by professionals performing this type of work under the usual constraints of time and resources. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made. LOCATION OF SITE: The site is located just east of County Road 133 on the northeast side of St. Joseph in Stearns County, MN. Please see Figure 1 at the end of the report for a general location map of the project site. Kramer, Leas, DeLeo PC 2 Prom / Feld Farm Wetland Delineation Report 8/7/06 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ WETLAND DELINEATION METHODOLOGY: Data Review Prior to any wetland delineation, a data review is performed in order to determine the probable extent of wetlands on the site. Data sources to be reviewed may include the following: aerial photography, USGS 1 :24,000-scale topographic maps, groundwater data, National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) maps, stream gauge data, DNR Public Water Inventory (PWI) maps, and county soil survey data. Field Delineation At the site, wetlands are identified and delineated using the 1987 Corps of Enaineers Wetlands Delineation Manual as required by the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act of 1991 and the Corps of Engineers regulatory program under section 404 of the Clean Water Act. This manual defines wetlands as: Those areas that are inundated or saturated by surface or ground water at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and under normal circumstances do support, a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions. Furthermore, delineations are conducted with respect to the Guidelines for Submittina Wetland Delineations to the St. Paul District Corps of Eriaineers and Local Units of Government in the State of Minnesota (1996). To be considered a wetland as defined above, a site must meet all of following three criteria: Soils A hydric soil is a soil that is saturated, flooded, or inundated long enough during the growing season to develop anaerobic conditions in the upper part. Hydrology Wetland hydrology encompasses all characteristics of areas that are periodically inundated or have soils saturated to the surface for at least 5% of the growing season (consecutively) in most years. Vegetation Hydrophytic vegetation is the sum total of plant life that occurs in areas where the frequency and duration of inundation or soil saturation produce permanently or periodically saturated soils of sufficient duration to exert a controlling influence on the plant species present. Wetland plants are uniquely adapted to life in these conditions. Vegetation, soils, and hydrology indicators are documented using methods described in the Corps of Enaineers Wetlands Delineation Manual and the Guidelines for Submittina Wetland Delineations to the St. Paul District Corps of Enaineers and Local Units of Government in the State of Minnes.ota (1996). Sample plots are taken in a transect from an obvious wetland area to an obvious upland area. These sample plots are generally located within 1 0-20 feet of the delineation line. The US Army Corps of Engineers Routine Wetland Delineation Data Form is used to show the results of the sampling. Data sheets from each wetland on a site are included at the end of this report. 30" Pink 'Wetland Delineation' flags are placed approximately every 40-50' along the wetland/upland boundary. These flags are numbered / lettered and correspond to the maps at the end of this report. Kramer, Leas, DeLeo PC 3 Prom /Feld Farm Wetland Delineation Report 8/7/06 ----------------------------------~---------------~--------------------------------------------------~------------------------ WETLAND PLANT INDICATOR DESIGNATIONS: In arder to. determine whether the plant species ina sample plat meet the wetland vegetatian requirements, the wetland plant indication designatians af each af the daminant species are totaled. The indicatar status af each species is faund in the Natianal List af PlanfSoecies that accur in Wetlands (1988 - US Fish and Wildlife Service) and is described belaw: Obligate Wetland (OBl) Species accurs almast always (estimated prabability >99%) in wetlands under natural canditians. Facultative Wetland (F ACW) Species usually accurs in wetlands (estimated probability 67 to. 99%) but accasianally faund in nan~wetlands. Facultative (FAC) Species equally likely to. accur in wetlands and nan~wetlands (estimated prabability 34 to. 66%). Facultative Upland (FACU) Species usually occurs in nan~wetlands (estimated prabability 67 to. 99%) butoccasianally is faund in wetlands (estimated prabability 1 to. 33%). Obligate Upland (UPl) Species accurs in wetlands in ather regian but, under narmal canditians, accur almast always (estimated probability >99%) in nan~wetlands within the regian specified. Species that do. nat accur in wetlands in any regian are nat faund an the Natianal List. No Indicator Status (NI) Insufficient infarmatian available to. establish indicatar status. A plus ar minus sign fallawing the indicatar status refers to. which end af the prabability range the specie falls. To. meet the wetland vegetatian criteria, mare than 50 percent af the daminant species from each stratum must be OSL, FACW, ar FAC (FAC- daes nat caunt) under narmal circumstances. Kramer, Leas, DeLeo PC 4 Prom / Feld Farm Wetland Delineation Report 8/7/06 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ SITE VISIT: The site was visited on 7/25/06, 7/27/06, 7/28/06, 7/31/06, 8/2/06, and 8/4/06. The vegetation on the site was in full bloom qut was starting to show signs of dryness. . The precipitation levels during the time period prior to the site visit were below normal. Mitch Brinks and Bernie Doucette performed the wetland delineation. FINDINGS: A cursory walk of the property indicated that there were many obvious wetlands located at the bottom of topographic depressions. While conducting the field work, a number of smaller, less obvious wetlands were also discovered and delineated. Sampling consisted of at least one transect per wetland. This transect was comprised of a wetland sample pit and an upland sample pit. In addition, four additional sample pits were taken on the site in possible wetland areas, such as depressions and drainage-ways. These are labeled as "Test Pits" and are included in Figure 5. Below is a description of each wetland encountered as well as the Circular 39 Type (using the best professional judgment of the Delineator). Data sheets and photos of each wetland are included at the end of this report. Wetland "A" (Type 1) is a small seasonally flooded basin located in a depression in a cornfield south of the farmstead. The vegetation and soils were disturbed due to tilling and application of herbicides. There was no standing water in the wetland at the time of delineation. Wetland "B" (Type 2,3) is a wet meadow / emergent marsh located south of Wetland A at the south and eastern edge of a cornfield. It was bordered on the south and east by an alfalfa field. The wetland itself was relatively undisturbed except for a small amountof mowing, which has taken place along the outer edge of the wetland. Wetland "e" (Type 3,4) is a large emergent marsh complex located in a depression along the southern edge of the property. Portions of the wetland had over a foot of standing water at the time of delineation. This wetland was relatively undisturbed. There is an upland island within the boundaries of the wetland (see figures 2 & 3). Wetland "0" (Type 2,3) is a wet meadow / emergent marsh located in a depression in the middle of a cornfield. The outer portions of this wetland had been disturbed by tilling in the past. Standing water was observed only in the very center of the wetland. Wetland "E" (Type 2,3) is another wet meadow / emergent marsh located northeast of Wetland D along the eastern boundary of the project site. It is also located in a depression in the middle of a cornfield. The outer portions of this wetland had also been disturbed by tilling in the past. Standing water was observed only in the very center of the wetland. Kramer, Leas, DeLeo PC 5 Prom /Feld Farm Wetland Delineation Report 8/1/06 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Note: Wetlands "F" to tV" are aI/located in a pasture area with scattered trees and compacted soil due to cattle grazing. It appeared that each of the wetlands had been used by cattle as a watering hole. Wetland "F" (Type 3) is an emergent marsh located in' a slight depression north of Wetland E in the eastern portion of the project site. Standing water was observed only in the very center of the wetland. Wetland "G" (Type 3) is a large emergent marsh that is located just north of Wetland F. Some standing water was observed throughout the wetland. Wetland "H" (Type 2) is a wet meadow with an attached drainage-way (on the northeast) located just west of Wetland F in a slight depression. There was no standing water in the wetland at the time of delineation. Wetland "I" (Type 2) is the very tip of a wet meadow located in a depression along the eastern boundary of the project site northeast of Wetland F. No standing water was observed in this wetland at the time of delineation. Wetland "J" (Type 2) is a wet meadow also located along the eastern boundary of the project site. No standing water was observed in the wetland at the time of delineation. Wetland "K" (Type 2,3) is a large emergent marsh with a wet meadow drainage-way (on the northwest) located just north of Wetland G. Standing water was observed in portions of the wetland. Wetland "l" (Type 2) is a small wet meadow located in a depression in the northeastern portion of the property. There was no standing water in the wetland at the time of delineation. Wetland "M" (Type 2) is long and 'narrow wet meadow located between Wetland J and Wetland L in the northeastern portion of the property. There was no standingwater in the wetland at the time of delineation. Wetland "N" (Type 3) is a large emergent marsh located in the bottom of a topographic depression west of Wetland K in the north-central portion of the property., Standing water was observed in several portions of the wetland. Wetland "0" (Type 2,3) is a small wet meadow I emergent marsh located in a slight depression southeast of Wetland N. Up to 1 foot of standing water was observed in the wetland at the time of delineation. Wetland "P" (Type 2) is a small wet meadow located east of Wetland O. No standing water was observed in the wetland at the time of delineation. Wetland "Q" (Type 3) is an emergent marsh located in a slight topographic depression. It was filled withstanding water at the time of delineation. Kramer, Leas, DeLeo PC 6 Prom I Feld Farm Wetland Delineation Report 8fl106 -------------------------------------------------------------------------~---------------------------------------------------- Wetland "R" (Type 2,3) is a wet meadow / emergent marsh located in a slight topographic depression. It was filled with stand'ing water at the time of delineation. Wetland "5" (Type 3) is an emergent marsh located in a slight depression just south and east of the existing barn. The wetland appeared to have been a part of the feedlot in the past, but was now separated from the pasture area by an electric fence. There were several inches of standing water in the wetland at the time of delineation. Wetland "T" (Type 2,3) is a small wet meadow I emergent marsh located in a slight depression east of Wetland Q. Up to 1 foot of standing water was observed in this wetland at the time of delineation. Wetland "U" (Type 1) is a small seasonally flooded basin located just east of wetland T. Due to cattle traffic, there was very little vegetation in this wetland at the time of delineation. Although there was no saturated or inundation in the wetland, water stain lines were observed on several rocks in the wetland (see Figure 6). Wetland "V" (Type 1) is another small seasonally flooded basin. It is located just north of the house / outbuildings and was also heavily disturbed by cattle grazing. There was no standing water in this wetland at the time of delineation. Kramer, Leas, DeLeo PC 7 Prom / Feld Farm Wetland Delineation Report 817/06 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 'OONCLUSION: The wetland delineation line was placed where vegetation and soils transitioned. The delineation line also coincided with a break in topography around many of the wetlands. Many of the wetlands fairly closely followed those shown on the National Wetlands Inventory (NWI). However, a number of additional wetlands not shown on the NWI were observed and delineated. 30" pink wire flags were placed in the ground at the delineation line. The flags were atso located by Kramer, leas, Deleo PC. at the time of the delineation. CERTIFICATION: This delineation was conducted by or under the direct supervision of: Mitch Brinks, Minnesota Certified Wetland Delineator #1007 WETLAND RELATED RESOURCES: htto :/Iwww.bwsr.state.mn.us/wetlands/index.html htto:/ /www.nowrc.usQs.Qov/resource/1998/mnolantlmnolant.htm httO:/Iwww.fws.Qov/nwi/bha/list88.html htto://www.eoa.Qov/owow/wetlands/ htto:/Iwww.mnwetlands.umn.edu htto://www.mvo.usace.armv.mil/reaulatorv/ Kramer, Leas, DeLeo PC 8 Prom / Feld Farm Wetland Delineation Report 8/7/06 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ure 1 - General Project Location Map . This map is for visual reference only. Boundaries are approximate. Data sources: MN LMIC f DNR Data Deli Kfiif 2 , ~ N CJ.Project Boundary I),lMajor Roads N County Roads NTownship Roads /\ / City Streets .. Lakes ~ City/Township Boundaries KRAMER LEAS OEl.EO u.~....._. u~"'..~"'~. 'h~"n o 2 Miles , Kramer, Leas, DeLeo PC Prom / Feld Farm Wetland Delineation Report an /06 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Figure 2 - Delineated Wetlands & National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) Map Background: 2003 C%rAeria/ Photo (LM/C) KLD? D. N o 500 Feet , KRAMER LEAS DELEO ..'...n..~. u"',..~u,..<:. .,~",.,..c 500 , Kramer, Leas, DeLeo PC NWetlands (Lines) -CJ Wetlands (polygons) . Sample Pits Project Boundary D CityfTownship Boundaries CJ Section Lines 1:3 Section 1/4 1/4s CNWI Prom / Feld Farm Wetland Delineation Report 8/7/06 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Figure 3 - Delineated Wetlands & National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) Map Background: 1:24,000 USGS Topographic Map l)) ) ,;.;:.. "n'- ==~,:~ -~ ~;:.. . I Ij .....'..., 1 I ) ,11 /l~~ .', \ ! '. /.\ Ii \-.L.-),'- ~,_ 133 (H , , II ]) I '\, \. \ rj ;;f. V ....-__ .L , '" "r ~. 111 Section 2 "section 11 I , r~./i ./ /' (;................/,_. J fl ,'j It, " - _. --. a_ --'. - -. -'.. .... \\ I I . . '--,,\ ! ~!.:.J- \) . I ~ 'ff!J!- ;",i" . ! Map is for visual reference only. Boundaries are approximate. '. f Il .! I Ii (I II ~ KRAMER LEA.&- DELEC! Utr~u>l'" tHilN~n"I'. tU"'''''' 500 , o 500 Feet , ~etlandS (Lines) l:IWetlandS (Polygons) . Sample Pits a Project Boundary c:J CitylTO'lMlShip, Boundaries L:J Section Lines f..J, Section 1/4 1 14s CNWI KfiJf tJ. N Kramer, Leas, DeLeo PC Prom / Feld Farm Wetland Delineation Report 811/06 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Figure 4 - Stearns County Soil Survey, Map & Descriptions Soils Map (from Stearns County Soil Survey) D = Denotes Approximate Project Location Kramer, Leas, DeLeo PC Prom / Feld Farm Wetland Delineation Report 817/06 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Soil Map Unit Descriptions (from Stearns County Soil Survey) Estherville sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes (41A) This is a nearly level, somewhat excessively drained soil on broad flats and low, convex rises on outwash plains and stream terraces. The areas vary in shape and range from 5 to 200 ,acres in size. Typically the surface layer is black sandy loam about 5 inches thick. The subsurface layer is very dark grayish brown sandy loam about 7 inches thick. The subsoil is dark yellowish brown and is about 12 inches thick. The upper part is sandy loam, and the lower pa"rt is loamy coarse sand. The underlying material is yellowish brown, calcareous gravelly coarse sand to a depth of at least 60 inches. In some places the depth to sand and gravel is less than 15 inches. Also, in some places the surface layer in lighter in color. In places, the subsoil has more clay. . Included with this soil in mapping and making up 5 to 10 percent of the map unit are small, areas of Hawick and Regal soils. Hawick soils are excessively drained and are on the most exposed, convex part of rises and ridges. Regal soils are poorly drained and are in wet, concave swales. Permeability is moderately rapid in the loamy mantle and rapid in the sandy underlying material. The available water capacity is low. The content of organic matter is moderate, and natural fertility is low. Surface runoff is slow. The seasonal high water table is at a depth of more than 6 feet. Estherville sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes (41 B) This is a gently sloping, somewhat excessively drained soil on crests and side slopes of stream terraces and outwash plains. The areas vary in shape and range from 4 to 40 acres in size. Typically, the surface layer is black sandy loam about 5 inches thick. The subsurface layer is very dark brown sandy loam about 5 inches thick. The subsoil is dark brown sandy loam and dark yellowish brown loamy coarse sand and is about 8 inches thick. The underlying material is yellowish brown, brown, and pale brown, calcareous gravelly coarse sand to a depth of at least 60 inches. In some places the depth to sand and gravel is less than 15 inches. Also, in places the subsoil has more clay and is finer textured. Included with this soil in mapping and making up 5 to 10 percent of the map unit are small areas of Hawick and Regal soils. Hawick soils are excessively drained; they are on the most exposed, convex part of rises and ridges. Regal soils are poorly drained and are in wet, concave swales. Permeability is moderately rapid in the loamy mantle and rapid in the underlying material. The available water capacity is low. The content of organic matter is moderate, and the level of natural fertility is low. Surface runoff is slow to medium. The depth to the seasonal high water table is more than 6 feet. Kramer, Leas, DeLeo PC Prom / Feld Farm Wetland Delineation Report an /06 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Dassel sandy loam (183) This is a level, poorly drained and very poorly drained soil in wet drainageways and depressions on outwash plains and valley trains. The areas vary in shape and range in size from 5 to about 40 acres. Typically, the surface layer is black sandy loam about 8 inches thick. The subsurface layer is black and very grayish brown sandy loam and is about 3 inches thick. The subsoil is about 17 inches thick. It is olive gray and grayish brown, mottled sandy loam, coarse sandy loam, and fine sandy loam. The underlying material is light olive brown and olive gray, mottled loamy sand and gravelly coarse sand to a depth of at least 60 inches. There are some bands of fine textured and coarse textured material in the subsoil and underlying material. Included with this soil in mapping and ma~ing up 2 to 10 percent of the map unit are small areas of Estherville and Litchfield soils. Estherville soils are well drained; they are in higher positions than the Dassel soil, and they have no banding. Litchfield soils are moderately well drained. They are on higher lying flats and low, convex rises. Permeability is moderately rapid in the upper part of the soil and rapid in the underlying material. The available water capacity is moderate. The content of organic matter is high, and natural fertility is medium. Surface runoff is very slow. The seasonal high water table is at a depth of 0.5 foot to 3 feet. Cushing sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes (2048) This is a gently undulating, well drained soil. It is on convex and concave parts of knolls and side slopes on ground and end moraines. The areas vary in shape and range from 5 to 50 acres. Typically, the surface layer is very dark brown sandy loam about 5 inches thick. The subsurface layer is dark brown sandy loam about 10 inches thick. The subsoil is dark brown and brown loam and sandy clay loam about 32 inches thick. The underlying material is dark brown sandy loam to a depth of 60 inches or more. In some places the subsoil and underlying material are coarser textured than is typical or have a yellower hue. Also, in places the surface layer is thicker. In some areas the soil is moderately well drained. Included with this soil in mapping and ma\<ing up 5 to 15 percent of some mapped areas are small areas of DeMontreville, Nokay, Jewetti and Prebish soils. The well drained DeMontreville soils have a sandy mantle 20 to 40 inches thick over brown sandy loam glacial till. They and the Cushing soil are in similar posi,tions on the landscape. The somewhat poorly drained Nokay soils and the very poorly drained Prebish soils are closely intermingled in depressions and drainageways. The well drained Jewett soils have a silty mantle 15 to 30 inches thick over brown sandy loam glacial till. They and the Cushing soil are in similar positons on the landscape. Permeability is moderately slow, and the available water capacity is moderate. The content of organic matter is moderately low, and, the natural fertility is medium. Surface runoff is medium. The seasonal high water table is at a depth of more than 6 feet. Kramer, Leas, DeLeo PC Prom / Feld Farm Wetland Delineation Report 817/06 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Cushing sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes (204C) This is a rolling, well drained soil on knolls and concave side slopes of ground and end moraines. The areas vary in shape and. range from 3 to 50 acres in size. Typically, the surface layer is very dark grayish brown sandy loam about 5 inches thick. The subsurface layer is dark brown and yellowish brown sandy loam about 7 inches thick. The subsoil is about 19 inches thick. The upper part is dark yellowish brown sandy loam, and the lower part is dark brown sandy clay loam. The underlying material is dark brown sandy loam to a depth of at least 60 inches. In some places the subs.oil and underlying material are . coarser textured than is typical or have a yellower hue. In some areas the soil is moderately well drained. Included with this soil in mapping and making up 5 to 15 percent of the mapped areas are small areas of DeMontreville, Nokay, Prebish, and Jewett soils. The well drained DeMontreville soils have a sandy mantle 20 to 40 inches thick over brown sandy loam glacial till. They and the Cushing soil are in similar positions on the landscape. The somewhat poorly drained Nokay soils and the very poorly drained Prebish soils are closely intermingled in depressions and drainageways. The well drained Jewett soils have a silty mantle 15 to 30 inches thick over brown sandy loam glacial till. They and the Cushing soil are in similar positons on the landscape. Alstad sandy loam, 1 to 4 percent slopes (2928) This is a nearly level to undulating, somewhat poorly drained soil on ground and end moraines. It is on flats and on the lower part of side slopes. The areas vary in shape and range from 5 to 30 acres in size. Typically, the surface layer is very dark brown sandy loam about 7 inches thick. The subsurface layer is dark grayish brown, mottled sandy loam about 6 inches thick. The subsoil is about 33 inches thick. The upper part is dark brown, mottled sandy clay loam, and the lower part is dark brown, mottled sandy loam. The underlying material is dark brown, noncalcareous sandy loam to a depth of at least 60 inches. In some places, the subsoil has less clay than is typical and does not have a very firm and dense layer. Also, in some places the surface soil and subsoil have a higher content of silt. In some areas, the soil is moderately well drained. Included with this soil in mapping and making up 5 to 10 percent of some mapped areas are small areas of Prebish soils, which are very poorly drained. Prebish soils are in depressions and drainageways. Permeability and the available water capacity are moderate. The content of organic matter is moderate, and natural fertility is medium. Surface runoff is slow to medium. The seasonal high water table is at a depth of 1 foot to 3 feet. . Dickman sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes (327 A) This is a nearly level, well drained soil on broad flats on outwash plains and stream terraces. The areas vary in shape and range from 5 to 50 acres in size. Typically, the surface layer is black sandy loam about 9 inches thick. The subsurface layer is very dark grayish brown sandy loam about 5 inches thick. The subsoil is about 20 Kramer, Leas, DeLeo PC Prom / Feld Farm Wetland Delineation Report 8/7/06 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ inches thick. The upper part is dark yellowish brown sandy loam, and the lower part is dark yellowish brown sand. The underlying material is dark yellowish brown coarse sand to a depth of at least 60 inches. In some places, the surface layer is more than 16 inches thick. Also, in some places, the underlying material is mildly alkaline or moderately alkaline at a depth of less than 48 inches. Included with this soil in mapping and making up 5 to 10 percent of the map unit are small areas of Duelm and Hubbard soils. Duelm soils are moderately well drained to somewhat poorly drained. They are in lower positions on the landscape than the Dickman soil. Hubbard soils are excessively drained; they are on the most exposed convex rises. Permeability is moderately rapid in the upper part and rapid in the underlying material. The available water capacity is low. The content of organic matter is moderate, and natural fertility is low. Surface runoff is medium. The seasonal high water table is at a depth of more than 6 feet. Dickman sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes (3278) This is a gently sloping, well drained soil. It is on crests and concave slopes on outwash plains and stream terraces. The areas vary in shape and range from 3 to 30 acres in size. Typically, the surface layer is very dark brown sandy loam about 10 inches thick. The subsurface layer is dark brown sandy loam about 4 inches thick. The subsoil is about 17 inches thick. It is dark yellowish brown coarse sandy loam in the upper part, brown and dark brown coarse sand in the middle part, yellowish brown sand in the lower part. The underlying material is brown coarse sand to a depth of at I~ast 60 inches. In some places, the surface layer is less than 10 inches thick or more than 18 inches thick. Also, in some places, the underlying material is mildly alkaline or moderately alkaline at a depth of less than 48 inches. Included with this soil in mapping and making up 2 to 5 percent of the map unit are small areas of Hubbard soils. Hubbard soils are excessively drained; they are on the most exposed crests and on convex side slopes. Permeability is moderately rapid in the upper part and rapid in the underlying material. The available water capacity is low. The content of organic matter is moderate, and natural fertility is low. Surface runoff is medium. The seasonal high water table is at a depth of more than 6 feet. Osakis loam (413) This is a nearly level, moderately well drained soil on concave slopes and in swales. The areas vary in shape and range from 5 to 200 acres in size. Typically, the surface layer is black loam about 9 inches thick. The subsurface layer is very dark grayish brown sandy loam about 4 inches thick. The subsoil is dark yellowish brown and is about 11 inches thick. It is sandy loam in the upper part and mottled loamy coarse sand in the lower part. The underlying material is grayish brown, mottled, calcareous coarse sand and grayish brown, calcareous gravelly coarse sand to a depth of at least 60 inches. In some places, the depth to sandy and gravelly material is less than 16 inches or more than 30 inches. Also, in places there is more gravel in the underlying material. Kramer, Leas, DeLeo PC Prom / Feld Farm Wetland Delineation Report 8/1/06 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Included with this soil in mapping and making up 5 to 15 percent of the mapped areas are small areas of Estherville and Regal soils. Estherville sOils are somewhat excessively drained and are on the higher convex rises. Regal soils are poorly drained and are in concaVe swales and small depressions. ,Permeability is moderate to moderately rapid in the upper part and rapid in the lower part. Th,e available water capacity is low. The content of organic matter is moderate, and natural fertility is medium. Surface runoff is slow. The seasonal high water table is at a depth between 4 and 6 feet, but it drops considerably during extended dry periods. DeMontreville loamy sand, 2 to 8 percent slopes (4538) This is an undulating, well drained soil on ground and end moraines. It is on convex and concave knolls and on side slopes. The areas vary in shape and range from 5 to 20 acres in 'size. Typically, the surface layer is very dark grayish brown loamy sand about 7 inches thick. The subsurface layer is about 21 inches thick. It is dark brown loamy sand and coarse sand. The subsoil is dark brown sandy loam about 17 inches thick. The underlying material is dark brown, noncalcareous sandy loam to a depth of 60 inches or more. In some areas the sandy mantle is more than 40 inches thick. Included with this soil in mapping and making up 5 to 15 percent of some mapped areas are small areas of Cushing, Nokay, and Prebish soils. Cushing soils are well drained. They developed in sandy loam glacial till and are in positions on the landscape similar to those of the DeMontreville soil. Nokay soils are somewhat poorly drained, and Prebish soils are very poorly drained. Nbkayand Prebish soils are closely intermingled in depressions and drainageways. Permeability is rapid in the upper part and moderately slow in the lower part, The available water,capacity is low. The content of organic matter and natural fertility are low. Surface runoff is slow to medium. The seasonal high water table is at a depth of more than 6 feet. DeMontreville loamy sand, 8 to 15 percent slopes (453C) This is a rolling, well drained soil on ground and end moraines. It is on convex and concave side slopes of ridges and knolls. The areas vary in shape and range from 3 to 25 acres in size. Typically, the surface layer is very dark grayish brown loamy sand about 7 inches thick. The subsurface layer is dark brown loamy sand and coarse sand and is about 21 inches thick. The subsoil is dark brown sandy loam about 17 inches thick. The underlying material is dark brown, noncalcareous sandy loam to a depth of 60 inches or more. In some placess the sandy mantle is more than 40 inches thick. Included with this soil in mapping and making up 5to 15 percent of some mapped areas are small areas of Cushing, Nokay, and Prebish soils. Cushing soils are well drained and developed in sandy loam glacial till in positions similar to those of the DeMontreville soil. Nokay soils are somewhat poorly drained, and Prebish soils are very poorly drained; they are closely intermingled in depressions and drainageways. Kramer, Leas, DeLeo PC Prom / Feld Farm Wetland Delineation Report 8/7/06 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Permeability is rapid in the upper part of this soil and moderately slow in the lower part. The available water capacity is low. The content of organic matter and natural fertility are low. Surface runoff is slow to medium. The seasonal high water table is at a depth of more than 6 feet. Prebish-Nokay complex (873) This mapping unit consists of level to nearly level Prebish and Nokay soils in slightly concave depressions, potholes, and drainageways on glacial moraines. The areas vary in shape and range from 4 to 40 acres in size. This map unit is about 45 percent Prebish soil and 35 percent Nokay soil. Prebish soil is in the concave center of depressions; it is very poorly drained and is subJect to ponding. Nokay soil is on narrow edges, small rises, and the upper parts of drainageways, and it is somewhat poorly drained. The minor soils are interspersed between the Prebish and Nokay soils and vary in drainage. The areas of the maJor soils are so intricately mixed or so small that it was not practical to separate them in mapping. Typically, the Prebish soil has a surface layer of black loam about 18 inches thick. The subsurface layer is very dark gray sandy loam about 8 inches thick. The subsoil is gray and grayish brown, mottled sandy loam about 25 incrnes thick. The underlying material is dark brown, mottled sandy loam to a depth of at least 60 inches. In some places there is an organic layer as much as 6 inches thick. Typically, the Nokay soil has a surface layer of very dark grayish brown fine sandy loam about 4 inches thick. The subsurface layer is dark grayish brown, mottled sandy loam about 11 inches thick. The subsoil is 33 inches 'thick. The upper part is brown, mottled loam, and the lower part is dark brown, mottled sandy loam. The underlying material is mottled sandy loam to a depth of at least 60 inches. In some areas the surface layer is silty. Included with these soils in mapping and making up about 20 percent of the mapped areas are small areas of Alstad and Cathro soils~ Ca:thro soils are very poorly drained; they have organic material 6 to 51 inches thick that is underlain by loamy material, and they are in depressions. Alstad soils are moderately well drained; they are on higher lying flats and in undulating areas. Estherville-Hawick complex, 2 to6 percent slopes (8758) ~ This map unit consists of somewhat excessively drained Estherville soil and excessively drained Hawick soil. The areas vary in shape and range from 10 to 200 acres in size. Estherville soil makes up about 55 percel1lt of the map unit, and Hawick soil makes up about 35 percent. The soils are gently undulating. Estherville soil is in lower lying positions on toe slopes and in swales and on long, smooth side slopes. Hawick soil is on more sloping, convex knolls and ridges. The individual areas of the soils are so intricately mixed or so small that it was not practical to map them separately at the scale used in mapping. Typically, the Estherville soil has a black sandy loam surface layer about 7 inches thick. The subsoil is dark yellowish brown and is about 12 inches thick. The upper part is sandy loam or loam, and the lower part is loamy coarse sand. The underlying material is yellowish brown, calcareous gravelly coarse sand to a depth of at least 60 inches. In some places, sandy material is at a depth of at least 60 inches. In some places, sandy material is at a depth Kramer, Leas, DeLeo PC - I Prom I Feld Farm Wetland Delineation Report aHI06 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ of less than 15 inches. Also, in places the surface layer has been mixed with the brownish subsoil by plowing. Typically, the Hawick soil has a very dark brown loamy sand surface layer about.8 inches thick. The underlying material to a depth of about 22 inches is dark brown and dark yellowish brown, calcareous gravelly coarse sand; below that, it is yellowiSh brown, calcareous coarse sand to a depth of at least 60 inches. In some places, there is more gravel in the ' underlying material. Also, in some areas the surface layer is lighter in color. Included in mapping and making up about 10 percent of the mapped areas are small areas of Biscay, Osakis, and Fairhaven soils. Biscay soils are poorly drained; they are in deeply set swales and depressions. Osakis soils are moderately well drained; they are on lower lying flats. Fairhaven soils are well draihed; they are on toe slopes and in concave swales and drainageways. Permeability is moderately rapid in the upper part of Estherville soil and rapid in the underlying material. Permeability is very rapid in Hawick soil. The available water capacity is low in both soils. The content of organic matter is moderate in Esthervillesoil and low in Hawick soil. Natural fertility is low in both soils. Surface runoff is slow to medium on Estherville soil and slow on Hawick soil. The seasonal high water table is at a depth of more than 6 feet. Histosols and Haplaquolls, ponded (1055) This mapping unit consists of level, organic and mineral soils in shallow ponds, sloughs, and undrained closed depressions that are filled with water throughout most of the year. Some. of the areas go dry late in summer or in years of drought, but most areas have open water during the growing season. The vegetation in the shallower parts and around the edges in an area consists of cattails, reeds, sedges, and other water-tolerant plants. Included in this mapping area are areas of sandy, loamy, organic, and calcareous mucky lake sediments. Open water normally covers the central part of a mapped area. Kramer, Leas, DeLeo PC Prom / Feld Farm Wetland Delineation Report 8/7/06 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Figure 5 - Delineation Field Data Sheets - ACOE Format Kramer, Leas, DeLeo PC DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION (1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual) Project/Site: Prom I Feld Farm Date: 7/25/06 Applicant/Owner: Central Minnesota Land Development County: Stearns Investiaator: Mitch Brinks State: MN Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? ~Yes DNo Community ID: Wetland A Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? ~Yes DNo ~ransect ID: 1 Is the area a potential Problem Area? DYes ~No Plot ID: Wetland Pit (If needed, exolain on reverse.) ." VEGETA liON Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator . Dominant Plant Soecies Stratum Indicator 1. Digitaria sanguinalis H FACU 9. 2. 10. 3. 11. 4. 12. 5. 13. . 6. 14. 7. 15. 8. 16. Percent of Dominant Species that are OSL, FACW or FAC (excludina FAC-\. 0 Remarks: Sample plot taken in depression in corn field. Field has been tilled in 2006 - vegetation has been disturbed. HYDROLOGY 0 Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators: o Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators: o Aerial Photographs 0 Inundated o Other ~ Saturated in Upper 12 Inches [gJ No Recorded Data Available 0 Water Marks 0 Drift Lines 0 Sediment Deposits Field Observations: ~ Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Secondary Indicators (2 or more required): Depth of Surface Water: N/A (in.) ~ Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches 0 Water-Stained Leaves . Depth to Free Water in Pit: N/A (in.) 0 Local Soil Survey Data 0 FAC-Neutral Test Deoth to Saturated Soil: At Surface (in.) 0 Other (Exolain in Remarks) Remarks: SOILS Map Unit Name Estherville sandy loam, Somewhat Excessively (Series and Phase): 2 to 6 percent slopes (41 B) Drainage Class: Drained Field Observations Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic Hapludolls Confirm Mapped Type? DYes 181 No Profile Descriptions: Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Abundance/ Texture, Concretions, (inches ) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Size/Contrast Structure, etc. 0-24" A 10YR 2/1 Loam Hydric Soil Indicators: 0 Histosol 0 Concretions 0 Histic Epipedon 0 High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils 0 Sulfidic Odor 0 Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils 0 Aquic Moisture Regime 0 Listed on Local Hydric Soils List 0 Reducing Conditions 0 Listed on National Hydric Soils List ~ Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors 0 Other (Explain in Remarks) Remarks: High organic content. WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? I8IYes DNo (Check) (Check) Wetland Hydrology Present? I8IYes DNo Hydric Soils Present? I8IYes DNo Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? ~Yes DNo Remarks: Sample pit taken 15' from delineation line. The vegetation criteria was not used as a determining factor do to disturbance. Since the sample plot has hydric soils and wetland hydrology, it would likely support a dominance of hydrophytic vegetation under "normal circumstances." Approved by HQUSACE 3/92 Forms version 1/02 - -- r DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION (1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual) ProjecVSite: Prom I Feld Farm Date: 7/25/06 Applicant/Owner: Central Minnesota Land Development County: Stearns I nvestiaator: Mitch Brinks State: MN Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site?', ~Yes DNo Community 10: Wetland A Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? ~Yes DNo Transect 10: 1 Is the area a potential Problem Area? DYes ~No Plot 10: Upland Pit (If needed, exolain on reverse.) VEGETATION Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Soecies Stratum Indicator 1, Digitaria sanguinalis H FACU 9, 2. Zea mays ssp. H U 10. 3. 11. 4. 12. 5, 13. 6. 14. 7. " 15. 8. 16. Percent of Dominant Species that are OSL, FACWor FAC - {excludina FAC-t 0 Remarks: Sample plot was taken in a corn field. Field has been tilled in 2006 - vegetation has been disturbed. HYDROLOGY 0 Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators: o Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators: o Aerial Photographs 0 Inundated o Other 0 Saturated in Upper 12 Inches [gj No Recorded Data Available 0 Water Marks 0 Drift Lines 0 Sediment Deposits Field Observations: 0 Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Secondary Indicators (2 or more required): Depth of Surface Water: N/A (in.) ~ Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches 0 Water-Stained Leaves Depth to Free Water in Pit: N/A (in.) 0 Local Soil Survey Data 0 FAC-Neutral Test Deoth to Saturated Soil: N/A (in.) 0 Other (Exnlain in Remarks) Remarks: SOILS Map Unit Name Esthervillesandy loam, Somewhat Excessively (Series and Phase): 2 to 6 percent slopes (418) Drainage Class: Drained Field Observations Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic Hapludolls Confirm Mapped Type? DYes 181 No Profile Descriptions: Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Abundance/ Texture, Concretions, (inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Size/Contrast Structure, etc; 0-24" A "1 OYR 2/1 Sandy loam Hydric Soil Indicators: D Histosol D Concretions D Histic Epipedon. D High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils D Sulfidic Odor D Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils D Aquic Moisture Regime D Listed on Local Hydric Soils List D Reducing Conditions D Listed on National Hydric Soils List ~ Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors D Other (Explain in Remarks) Remarks: WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? DYes [8lNo (Check) (Check) Wetland Hydrology Present? DYes [8lNo Hydric Soils Present? I8IYes DNo Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? DYes ~No Remarks: Sample pit taken 5' from delineation line. Vegetation criteria was not used as a determining factor do to disturbance. Since the sample plot has hydric soils but does not have wetland hydrology and there is a break in topography from the wetland to the upland, it would not likely support a dominance of hydrophytic vegetation under "normal circumstances." Approved by HQUSACE 3/92 Forms version 1/02 - I DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION (1987 COE Wetlands. Delineation Manual) ProjecVSite: Prom! FeldFarm Date: 7/25/06 ApplicanUOwner: Central Minnesota Land Development County: Stearns Investioator: Mitch Brinks State: MN Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? ~Yes DNo Community ID: Wetland B Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? DYes 181 No n-ransect ID: 1 Is the area a potential Problem Area? DYes 181 No Plot ID: Wetland Pit (If needed. explain on reverse.) VEGETATION Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Soecies Stratum Indicator 1. Phalaris arundinacea H FACW+ 9. 2. Carex lacustris H OBl 10, 3. Polygonum amphibium H OBl 11. 4. 12. 5. 13. 6. 14. 7. 15. 8. 16. Percent of Dominant Species that are OSl, FACW or FAC (excludina FAC-). 100 Remarks: HYDROLOGY D Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): ~etland Hydrology Indicators: D Stream. Lake. or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators: D Aerial Photographs 0 Inundated o Other ~ Saturated in Upper 12 Inches [gJ No Recorded Data Available 0 Water Marks 0 Drift Lines 0 Sediment Deposits Field Observations: ~ Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Secondary Indicators (2 or more required): Depth of Surface Water: N/A (in.) 0 Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches 0 Water-Stained leaves Depth to Free Water in 'Pit: N/A (in.) 0 Local Soil Survey Data , ~ FAC-Neutral Test Deoth to Saturated Soil: At Surface (in.) 0 Other fExnlain in Remarks) Remarks: SOILS Map Unit Name Estherville sandy loam, Somewhat Excessively (Series and Phase): 2 to 6 percent slopes (41 B) Drainage Class: Drained Field Observations Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic Hapludolls Confirm Mapped Type? DVes 121 No Profile Descriptions: Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Abundance/ Texture, Concretions, (inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Size/Contrast Structure, etc, 0-11" 0 1 OYR 2/1 Loamy muck 12-15" B 10YR 3/1 Coarse sand Hydric Soil Indicators: 0 Histosol 0 Concretions [gJ Histic Epipedon [gJ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils 0 Sulfidic Odor 0 Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils 0 Aquic Moisture Regime 0 Listed on Local Hydric Soils List 0 Reducing Conditions 0 Listed on National Hydric Soils List [gJ Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors 0 Other (Explain in Remarks) Remarks: WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? I2IVes DNo (Check) (Check) Wetland Hydrology Present? I2IVes DNo Hydric Soils Present? I2IVes DNo Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? [giVes ONO Remarks: Sample pit taken 12' from delineation line. Approved by HQUSACE 3/92 Forms version 1/02 1- DA TAFORM ROUTINE WETLAND. DETERMINATION (1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual) Project/Site: Prom I Fald. Farm Date: 7/25/06 ApplicanUOwner: Central Minnesota Land Development County: Stearns Investiaator: Mitch Brinks State: MN Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? I8IYes DNo Community 10: Wetland S Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? DYes ~No ransect 10: 1 Is the area a potential Problem Area? DYes ~No Plot 10: Upland Pit (If needed. explain on reverse.) VEGETATION Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Soecies Stratum Indicator 1. Medicago sativa H U 9. 2. Trifolium repens H FACU+ 10. 3. Taraxacum officinale .H FACU 11. 4. 12. . 5. 13. 6. 14. 7. 15. 8. 16. Percent of Dominant Species that are OSL, FACW or FAC (excluding FAC-\' 0 Remarks: Sample plot taken in an alfalfa field. It is unknown how long it has been since the field has been tilled. HYDROLOGY D Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators: D Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators: D Aerial Photographs 0 Inundated D Other 0 Saturated in Upper 12 Inches [gj No Recorded Data Available 0 Water Marks o . Drift Lines 0 Sediment Deposits Field Observations: 0 Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Secondary Indicators (2 or more required): Depth of Surface Water: N/A (in.) 0 Oxidized Root ChannelS in Upper 12 Inches 0 Water-Stained Leaves Depth to Free Water in Pit N/A (in.) 0 Local Soil Survey Data 0 FAC-Neutral Test Depth to Saturated Soil: N/A (in.) 0 Other (Explain in Remarks) . Remarks: SOILS Map Unit Name Estherville sandy loam, Somewhat Excessively (Series and Phase): 2 to 6 percent slopes (418) Drainage Class: Drained Field Observations Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic Hapludolls Confirm Mapped Type? ~Yes ONo Profile Descriptions: Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Abundance/ Texture, Concretions, (inches ) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Size/Contrast Structure. etc. 0-15" A 10YR 2/2 Sandy loam Hydric Soil Indicators: 0 Histosol 0 Concretions 0 Histic Epipedon 0 High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils 0 Sulfidic Odor 0 Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils 0 Aquic Moisture Regime 0 Listed on Local Hydric Soils List 0 Reducing Conditions 0 Listed on National Hydric Soils List 0 Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors 0 Other (Explain in Remarks) Remarks: , WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? DYes ~No (Check) (Check) Wetland Hydrology Present? DYes ~No Hydric Soils Present? DYes ~No Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? DYes ~No Remarks: Sample pit taken 12' from delineation line. Approved by HQUSACE 3/92 Forms version 1/02 -I DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION (1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual) ProjectlSite: Prom I Feld Farm Date: 7/25/06 Applicant/Owner: Central Minnesota Land Development County: Steams I nvestiaator: Mitch Brinks State: MN Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? [giVes DNo Community 10: Wetland C Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? DVes [gINo ransect ID: 1 Is the area a potential Problem Area? DVes [gINo Plot ID: Wetland Pit (If needed, exolain on reverse.) VEGETATION Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Soecies Stratum Indicator 1. Phalaris arundinacea H FACW+ 9. 2. Carex lacustris H OBL 10. 3. Iris versicolor H OBL 11. 4. Verbena hastata H FACW+ 12. 5. 13. 6. 14. 7. 15. 8. 16. Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC (excludina FAC-). 100 Remarks: . HYDROLOGY 0 Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators: o Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators: o Aerial Photographs D Inundated o Other ~ Saturated in Upper 12 Inches [gj No Recorded Data Available D Water Marks D Drift Lines D Sediment Deposits Field Observations: ~ Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Secondary Indicators (2 or more required): Depth of Surface Water: NIA (in.) D Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches D Water-Stained Leaves Depth to Free Water in Pit: NIA (in.), ~ Local Soil Survey Data ~ FAC-Neutral Test Deoth to Saturated Soil: At Surface (in.) D Other (Exolain in Remarks) Remarks: " SOILS I Map Unit Name I Poorly and Very Poorly , (Series and Phase): Dassel sandy loam (183)' Drainage Class: Drained : Field Observations Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic Haplaquolls Confirm Mapped Type? I8IYes DNo , , Profile Descriptions: I Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Abundance/ Texture, Concretions, (inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Size/Contrast Structure, etc, 0-12" 0 10YR 2/1 , Loamy muck 13-16" B 10YR 2/1 Loamy coarse sand ; Hydric Soil Indicators: D Histosol D Concretions I.2J Histic Epipedon I.2J High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils D Sulfidic Odor D Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils D Aquic Moisture Regime I.2J Listed on Local Hydric Soils List D Reducing Conditions I.2J Listed on National Hydric Soils List I.2J Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors D Other (Explain in Remarks) Remarks: WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? I8IYes DNo (Check) (Check) Wetland Hydrology Present? I8IYes DNo Hydric Soils Present? I8IYes DNo Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? I.2JYes DNO Remarks: Sample pit taken 10' from delineation line. , Approved by HQUSACE 3/92 Forms version 1/02 ,- DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION (1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual) ProjecVSite: Prom I Feld Farm Date: 7/25/06 Applicant/Owner: Central Minnesota Land Development County: Stearns Investigator: Mitch Brinks State: MN Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? ~Yes DNo Community ID: Wetland C Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? DYes ~No ransect ID: 1 'Is the area a potential Problem Area? DYes ~No PlotlD: Upland Pit (If needed,eJCQIain on reverse.) VEGETATION Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator 1. Rhamnus cathartica H FACU 9. 2. Cornus racemosa H U 10. , 3. Maianthemum canadense H FAC 11. 4. Toxicodendron radicans H FAC+ 12. 5. Rhamnus cathartica S FACU 13. 6. Quercus macrocarpa T FAC- 14. 7. 15. 8. 16. Percent of Dominant Species that are OSL, FACW or FAC (excluding FAC-). 33 Remarks: HYDROLOGY 0 Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): ~elland Hydrology Indicators: o Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators: o Aerial Photographs 0 Inundated o Other 0 Saturated in Upper 12 Inches [8J No Recorded Data Available 0 Water Marks 0 Drift Lines 0 Sediment Deposits Field Observations: 0 Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Secondary Indicators (2 or more required): Depth of Surface Water: NIA (in.) 0 Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches 0 Water-Stained Leaves Depth to Free Water in Pit: N/A (in.) 0 Local Soil Survey Data 0 FAC-Neutral Test Depth to Saturated Soil: N/A (in.) 0 Other (Explain in Remarks) Remarks: SOILS Map Unit Name Estherville sandy loam, Somewhat Excessively (Series and Phase): 2 to 6 percent slopes (41 B) Drainage Class: Drained Field Observations Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic Hapludolls Confirm Mapped Type? ~Yes ONo Profile Descriptions: Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Abundance/ Texture, Concretions, (inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Size/Contrast Structure, etc, 0-14" A 1 OYR 3/2 Loamy sand Hydric Soil Indicators: D Histosol D Concretions D Histic Epipedon D High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils D Sulfidic Odor D Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils D Aquic Moisture Regime D Listed on Local Hydric Soils List D Reducing Conditions D Listed on National Hydric Soils List D Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors D Other (Explain in Remarks) Remarks: WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? DYes ~No (Check) (Check) Wetland Hydrology Present? DYes ~No Hydric Soils Present? DYes ~No Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? DYes [8]No Remarks: Sample pit taken 15' from delineation line. Approved by HQUSACE 3/92 Forms version 1/02 DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION, (1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual) ProjectlSite: Prom I Feld Farm Date: . 7/25106 Applicant/Owner: Central Minnesota Land Development County: Stearns Investiaator: Mitch Brinks State: MN Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? ~Yes DNo Community 10: Wetland C Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? DYes ~No Transect 10: 2 Is the area a potential Problem Area? DYes ~No Plot 10: Wetland Pit (If needed, exolain on reverse.) VEGETATION Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Soecies Stratum Indicator 1. Phalaris arundinacea H FACW+ 9. 2. Carex lacustris H OBL 10. 3. Carex stricta H OBL 11. 4. POlygonum amphibium H OBt. 12. 5. 13. 6. 14. 7. 15. . 8. 16. Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC lexcludino FAC-l. 100 Remarks: HYDROLOGY D Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): ~etland Hydrology Indicators: D Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators: D Aerial Photographs 0 Inundated D Other Igj Saturated in Upper 12 Inches ~ No Recorded Data Available 0 Water Marks . 0 Drift Lines 0 Sediment Deposits Field Observations: Igj Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Secondary Indicators (2 or more required): Depth of Surface Water: N/A (in.) 0 Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches 0 Water-Stained Leaves Depth to Free Water in Pit: N/A (in.) Igj Local Soil Survey Data Igj FAC-Neutral Test Deoth to Saturated Soil: At Surface fin.) 0 Other lExolain in Remarksl Remarks: SOILS Map Unit Name Poorly and Very Poorly (Series and Phase): Dassel sandy loam (183) Drainage Class: Drained Field Observations Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic Haplaquolls Confirm Mapped Type? I8IYes DNo Profile Descriptions: Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Abundance/ Texture, Concretions, (inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Size/Contrast Structure, etc. 0-14" 0 1 OYR 2/1 7.5YR 4/6 Common. Distinct Loamy muck 15-20" B 10YR 3/1 7.5YR 4/6 Common, Distinct Loamy coarse sand Hydric Soil Indicators: 0 Histosol 0 Concretions [gJ Histic Epipedon [gJ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils 0 Sulfidic Odor 0 Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils 0 Aquic Moisture Regime [gJ Listed on Local Hydric Soils List . 0 Reducing Conditions [gJ Listed on National Hydric Soils List [gJ Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors 0 Other (Explain in Remarks) Remarks: WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? I8IYes DNo. (Check) (Check) Wetland Hydrology Present? [8JYes DNo Hydric Soils Present? I8IYes DNo Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? [gJYes ONo Remarks: Sample pit taken 10' from delineation line. Approved by HQUSACE 3/92 Forms version 1/02 -'-I DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION (1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual) Project/Site: Prom I Feld Farm Date: 7125/06 Applicant/Owner: Central Minnesota Land Development County: Steams Investiaator: Mitch Brinks State: MN Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? ~Yes DNo "'ommunity ID: Wetland C Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? ~Yes DNo ransect ID: 2 Is the area a potential Problem Area? DYes ~No Plot ID: Upland Pit (If needed, exolain on reverse.) VEGETATION Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator 1. Zea mays ssp. H U 9. 2. 10. 3. 11. . 4. 12. 5. 13. 6. 14. 7. 15. 8. 16. . Percent of Dominant Species that are OSL, FACW or FAC . (excludina FAC-). 0 Remarks: Sample plot taken in corn field. HYDROLOGY D Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): fJvetland Hydrology Indicators: D Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators: D Aerial Photographs 0 Inundated D Other 0 Saturated in Upper 12 Inches [gJ No Recorded Data Available 0 Water Marks 0 Drift Lines 0 Sediment Deposits Field Observations: 0 Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Secondary Indicators (2 or more required): Depth of Surface Water: N/A (in.) O. Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches 0 Water -Stained Leaves Depth to Free Water in Pit: N/A (in.) 0 Local Soil Survey Data' 0 FAC-Neutral Test Death to Saturated Soil: N/A (in.) 0 Other (Exolain in Remarks) Remarks: SOILS Map Unit Name Estherville sandy loam, Somewhat Excessively (Series and Phase): 2 to 6 percent Slopes (41 B) Drainage Class: Drained Field Observations Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic Hapludolls Confirm Mapped Type? I2IYes DNo Profile Descriptions: Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Abundance/ Texture, Concretions, (inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Size/Contrast Structure, etc, 0-14" A 10YR 3/2 Sandy loam Hydric Soil Indicators: D Histosol D Concretions D Histic Epipedon D High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils D Sulfidic Odor D Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils D Aquic Moisture Regime D Listed on Local Hydric Soils List D Reducing Conditions D Listed on National Hydric Soils List D Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors D Other (Explain in Remarks) Remarks: WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? DYes l8INo (Check) (Check) Wetland Hydrology Present? DYes l8INo Hydric Soils Present? DYes l8INo Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? DYes C8:1No Remarks: Sample pit taken 8' from delineation line. The vegetation criteria was not used as a determining factor do to disturbance. Since the sample plot does not have hydric soils nor wetland hydrology, it would not likely support a dominance of hydropl1ytic vegetation under "normal circumstances." Approved by HQUSACE 3/92 Forms version 1/02 1- DATA FORM ROUTINE WEtLAND DETERMINATION (1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual) Project/Site: Prom I FeldFarm Date: 7/25/06 Applicant/Owner: Central Minnesota Land Development County: Stearns I nvestiaator: Mitch Brinks State: MN Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? ~Yes DNo CommunitylD: Weiland D Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? DYes ~No Transect ID: 1 Is the area a potential Problem Area? DYes I8JNo Plot ID: Wetland Pit , (If needed, exolain on reverse,) VEGETATION Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator. Dominant Plant Soecies Stratum Indicator 1. Sagitta ria latifolia H OBL 9. 2. Garex lacustris H OBL 10. 3. Phalaris arundinacea H FACW+ 11. 4. POlygonum amphibium H OBL 12. 5. Scirpus cyperinus H OBL 13. 6. 14. 7. 15. 8. 16. . Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACWor FAG (excluding FAG~). 100 Remarks: HYDROLOGY 0 Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators: o Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators: o Aerial Photographs 0 Inundated D Other ~ Saturated in Upper 12 Inches ~ No Recorded Data Available 0 Water Marks 0 Drift Lines 0 Sediment Deposits Field Observations: ~ Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Secondary Indicators (2 or more required): Depth of Surface Water: NIA (in.) 0 Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches 0 Water-Stained Leaves Depth to Free Water in Pit: NIA (in.) ~ Local Soil Survey Data ~ FAC-Neutral Test Deoth to Saturated Soil: At Surface (in.) 0 Other (ExDlain in Remarks) Remarks: SOILS Map Unit Name Poorly and Very Poorly (Series and Phase): Dassel sandy loam (183) Drainage Class: Drained Field Observations Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic Haplaquolls Confirm Mapped Type? I8IYes DNo Profile Descriptions: Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Abundance/ Texture, Concretions, (inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) . (Munsell Moist) Size/Contrast Structure, etc, 0-11" 0 1 OYR 2/1 Loamy muck 12-16" 8 1 OYR 3/1 Loamy coarse sand . Hydric Soil Indicators: 0 Histosol 0 Concretions ~ Histic Epipedon ~ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils 0 Sulfidic Odor 0 Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils 0 Aquic Moisture Regime ~ Listed on Local Hydric Soils List 0 Reducing Conditions ~ Listed on National Hydric Soils List ~ Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors 0 Other (Explain in Remarks) Remarks: WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? I8IYes DNo (Check) (Check) Wetland Hydrology Present? I8IYes DNo Hydric Soils Present? I&IYes DNo Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? ~Yes ONO Remarks: Sample pit taken 10' from delineation line. Approved by HQUSACE 3/92 Forms version 1/02 OATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION (1987 CDE Wetlands Delineation Manual) Project/Site: Prom I Feld Farm Date: 7/25/06 Applicant/Owner: Central Minnesota Land Development County: Stearns Investigator: Mitch Brinks State: MN Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? ~Yes DNo Community ID: Wetland D Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? ~Yes DNo rrransect ID: 1 Is the area a potential Problem Area? DYes ~No Plot ID: Upland Pit (If needed, explain on reverse.) VEGETATION Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator 1. Zea mays ssp. H U 9. , 2. Digitaria sanguinalis H FACU 10. 3. 11. 4. 12. 5. 13. 6. 14. 7. 15. 8. 16. Percent of Dominant Species that are OSL, FACW or FAC (excludina FAC-\. 0 Remarks: Sample plot taken in a corn field. HYDROLOGY 0 Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators: o Stream, Lake. or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators: D Aerial Photographs D Inundated D Other D Saturated in Upper 12 Inches rzI No Recorded Data Available D Water Marks D Drift Lines D Sediment Deposits Field Observations: D Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Secondary Indicators (2 or more required): Depth of Surface Water: N/A (in.) D Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches D Water-Stained Leaves Depth to Free Water in Pit: NIA (in.) D Local Soil Survey Data D FAC-Neutral Test Depth to Saturated Soil: NIA (in.) D Other (Explain in Remarks) Remarks: SOILS Map Unit Name Estherville sandy loam, Somewhat Excessively (Series and Phase): 2 to 6 percent slopes (41 B) Drainage Class: Drained Field Observations Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic Hapludolls Confirm Mapped Type? [8JYes DNo Profile Descriptions: Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Abundance/ Texture, Concretions, (inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Size/Contrast Structure, etc, 0-14" A 10YR 3/2 Loamy sand Hydric Soil Indicators: 0 Histosol 0 Concretions 0 Histic Epipedon 0 High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils 0 Sulfidic Odor 0 Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils 0 Aquic Moisture Regime D Listed on Local Hydric Soils List 0 Reducing Conditions D Listed on National Hydric Soils List 0 Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors D Other (Explain in Remarks) Remarks: WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? DYes [8JNo (Check) (Check) Wetland Hydrology Present? DYes [8JNo Hydric Soils Present? DYes [8JNo Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? DYes ~No , Remarks: Sample pit taken 10' from delineation line. The vegetation criteria was not used as a determining factor do to disturbance. Since the sample plot does not have hydric soils nor wetland hydrology, it would not likely support a dominance of hydrophytic vegetation under "normal circumstances." Approved by HQUSACE 3/92 Forms version 1102 1- DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION (1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual) Project/Site: Prom I Feld Farm Date: 7/27106 Applicant/Owner: Central Minnesota Land Development County: Stearns Investiaator: Mitch Brinks State: MN Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? I8IYes DNo Community ID: Wetland E Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? DYes l8INo ransect ID: 1 is the area a potential Problem Area? DYes I8INo PI.otID: Wetland Pit' (If needed, explain on reverse.) VEGETATION Dominant Plant Species Stratum indicator Dominant Plant Soecies Stratum Indicator 1. Verbena hastata H FACW+ 9. 2. Typha latifolia H .OBL 10. 3. Phalaris arundinacea H FACW+ 1( 4. Polygonum amphibium H OBL 12. 5. . 13. 6. 14. 7. 15. 8. 16. Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACWor FAC (excludinc FAC-). 100 Remarks: HYDROLOGY 0 Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators: o Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators: o Aerial Photographs 0 Inundated o Other ~ Saturated in Upper 12 Inches ~ No Recorded Data Available 0 Water Marks 0 Drift Lines 0 Sediment Deposits Field Observations: .~ Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Secondary Indicators (2 or more required): Depth of Surface Water: NIA (in.) 0 Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches 0 Water-Stained Leaves Depth to Free Water in Pit: NIA (in.) 0 Local Soil Survey Data ~ FAC-Neutral Test Deoth to Saturated Soil: At Surface (in.) 0 Other (Explain in Remarks) Remarks: SOILS Map Unit Name Poorly and Very Poorly (Series and Phase): Dassel sandy loam (183) Drainage Class: Drained Field Observations Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic Haplaquolls Confirm Mapped Type? DVes 181 No Profile Descriptions: Depth Matrix Color Mollie Colors Mollie Abundance/ Texture. Concretions. (inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Size/Contrast Structure, etc. 0-16" 0 1 OYR 2/1 Loamy muck . . Hydric Soil Indicators: [2] Histosol 0 Concretions 0 Histic Epipedon 0 High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils 0 Sulfidic Odor D Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils D Aquic Moisture Regime 0 Listed on Local Hydric Soils List 0 Reducing Conditions 0 Listed on National Hydric Soils List 0 Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors D Other (Explain in Remarks) Remarks: WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? ~Ves DNo (Check) (Check) Wetland Hydrology Present? I8IVes DNo Hydric Soils Present? ~Ves DNo Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? [2]ves ONo Remarks: Sample pit taken 10' from delineation line. Approved by HQUSACE 3/92 Forms version 1/02 DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND. DETERMINATION (1987 CCE Wetlands Delineation Manual) Projec:tlSite: Prom I Feld Farm Date: 7/27/06 Applicant/Owner: Central Minnesota Land Development County: Stearns Investiaator: Mitch Brinks State: MN DO Normal Circumstances exist on the site? I8IYes DNo Community ID: Wetland E Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? DYes I2JNo rrransect ID: 1 Is the area a potential Problem Area? DYes I2JNo Plot ID: Upland Pit (If needed, explain on reverse.) VEGETATION Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator 1. lea mays ssp. H U 9. 2. Digitaria sanguinalis H FACU 10. ~ 3. 11. 4. 12. 5. 13. 6. 14. 7. 15. 8. 16. Percent of Dominant Species that are OSL, FACWor FAC (excludinQ FAC-). 0 Remarks: Sample plot taken in a corn field. Field has been tilled in 2006 - vegetation has been disturbed. HYDROLOGY 0 Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): ~etland Hydrology Indicators: o Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators: o Aerial Photographs 0 Inundated o Other 0 Saturated in Upper 12 Inches ~ No Recorded Data Available 0 Water Marks 0 Drift Lines 0 Sediment Deposits Field Observations: 0 Drainage Pattems in Wetlands Secondary Indicators (2 or more required): Depth of Surface Water: N/A (in.) 0 Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches 0 Water-Stained Leaves Depth to Free Water in Pit: N/A (in.) 0 Local Soil Survey Data 0 FAC-Neutral Test Death to Saturated Soil: N/A (in.) 0 Other (Explain in Remarks) Remarks: SOILS Map Unit Name Estherville sandy loam, Somewhat Excessively (Series and Phase): 2 to 6 peroent slopes (418) Drainage Class: Drained Field Observations Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic Hapludolls Confirm Mapped Type? ~Yes DNo Profile Descriptions: Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Abundance/ Texture, Concretions, (inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Size/Contrast Structure, etc, 0-16" A 10YR 2/2 Sandy loam Hydric Soil Indicators: D Histosol D Concretions D Histic Epipedon D High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils D Sulfidic Odor D Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils D Aquic Moisture Regime D Listed on Local Hydric Soils List D Reducing Conditions D Listed on National Hydric Soils List D Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors D Other (Explain in Remarks) Remarks: High organic content. WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? DYes [8] No (Check) (Check) Wetland Hydrology Present? DYes [8] No Hydric Soils Present? DYes [8] No Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? DYes IZINo Remarks: Sample pit taken 10' from delineation line. The vegetation criteria was not used as a determining factor do to disturbance. Since the sample plot does not have hydric soils nor wetland hydrology, it would not likely support a dominance of hydrophytic vegetation under "normal circumstances." Approved by HQUSACE 3/92 Forms version 1/02 1- - DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION (1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual) PrOject/Site: Prom I Feld Farm Date; 7/27/06 ApplicantlOwner: Central Minnesota Land Development County: Stearns Investicator: Mitch Brinks !state: MN Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? l8IYes DNo Community ID: Wetland F Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? DYes 181 No ransect ID: 1 Is the area a potential Problem Area? DYes 181 No Plot ID: Wetland Pit (If needed, exolain on reverse.) VEGETATION Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator 1. Phalaris arundinacea H FACW+ 9. 2. Typha latifolia H OBL 10. 3. 11. 4. 12. 5. 13. 6. 14. 7. 15. . 8. 16. Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACWor FAC (excludino FAC-) , 100 Remarks: HYDROLOGY D Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators: o Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators: o Aerial Photographs 0 Inundated o Other ~ Saturated in Upper 12 Inches [gJ No Recorded Data Available 0 Water Marks 0 Drift Lines 0 Sediment Deposits Field Observations: ~ Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Secondary Indicators (2 or more required): Depth of Surface Water: NIA (in.) 0 Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches 0 Water-Stained Leaves Depth to Free Water in Pit: N/A (in.) 0 Local Soil Survey Data ~ FAC-Neutral Test Depth to Saturated Soil: At Surface (in.) 0 Other fExnlain in Remarks) Remarks: SOILS Map Unit Name Alstad sandy loam, Somewhat Poorly (Series and Phase): 1 to 4 percent slopes (2928) Drainage Class: Drained Field Observations Taxonomy (Subgroup): Aquic Eutroboralfs Confirm Mapped Type? I8IYes DNo Profile Descriptions: Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Abundance/ Texture, Concretions, (inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Size/Contrast Structure, etc. 0-10" A 1 OYR 2/1 Mucky loam 11-16" B 10YR 2/1 7.5YR 4/6 Common. Prom. Sandy clay loam Hydric Soil Indicators: D Histosol D Concretions D Histic Epipedon D High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils D Sulfidic Odor D Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils D Aquic Moisture Regime D Listed on Local Hydric Soils List D Reducing Conditions D Listed on National Hydric Soils List ~ Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors D Other (Explain in Remarks) Remarks: WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? I8IYes DNo (Check) (Check) Wetland Hydrology Present? I8IYes DNo Hydric Soils Present? I8IYes DNo Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? ~Yes DNo Remarks: Sample pit taken 10' from delineation line. Approved by HQUSACE 3/92 Forms version 1/02 DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLANDDETERMINA TION (1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual) Project/Site: Prom! Feld.Farm Date: 7/27/06 Applicant/Owner: Central Minnesota Land Development County: Stearns Investiaator: Mitch Brinks State: MN Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? I2lYes ONo Community ID: Wetland F Is the site significantly distljrbed (Atypical Situation)? DYes ~No ransect ID: 1 Is. the area a potential Problem Area? DYes ~No Plot 10: Upland Pit (If needed, explain on reverse.) . VEGETATION Dominant Plant Species ( Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator 1. Taraxacum officinale H FACU 9. 2. Plantago major H FAC+ 10. 3. Poa compressa H FACU+ 11. 4. Juniperus virginiana S FACU 12. 5. 13. 6. 14. 7. 15. 8. 16. Percent of Dominant Species that areOBL, FACWor FAC , (excludina FAC-). 25 Remarks: HYDROLOGY 0 ReCOrded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators: D Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators: D Aerial Photographs 0 Inundated D Other 0 Saturated in Upper 12 Inches [g] No Recorded Data Available 0 Water Marks 0 Drift Lines 0 Sediment Deposits Field Observations: 0 Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Secondary Indicators (2 or more required): Depth of Surface Water: N/A (in.) 0 Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches 0 Water-Stained Leaves Depth to Free Water in Pit: N/A (in.) 0 Local Soil Survey Data 0 FAC-Neutral Test Depth to Saturated Soil: N/A (in.) 0 Other (Explain in Remarks) Remarks: ( SOILS . Map Unit Name Cushing sandy loam, (Series and Phase): 2 to 8 percent slopes (2048) Drainage Class: Well Drained Field Observations Taxonomy (Subgroup): Glossic Eutroboralfs Confirm Mapped Type? I8IYes DNo , Profile Descriptions: Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Abundance/ Texture, Concretions, (inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Size/Contrast Structure, etc, 0-14" A 10YR 3/2 Loamy sand -- Hydric Soil Indicators: D Histosol D Concretions D Histic Epipedon D High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils D Sulfidic Odor D Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils D Aquic Moisture Regime D Listed on Local Hydric Soils List D Reducing Conditions D Listed on National Hydric Soils List D Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors D Other (Explain in Remarks) Remarks: WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? DYes 181 No (Check) (Check) Wetland Hydrology Present? DYes 181 No Hydric Soils Present? DYes 181 No Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? DYes ~NO Remarks: Sample pit taken 10' from delineation line. Approved by HQUSACE 3/92 Forms version 1/02 r~-- DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLANDDETERMINA TION (1987 COE Wetlands DelineatiohManual) Project/Site: PromIFeldFarm Date: 7/27/06 Applicant/Owner: Central Minnesota LandDevelopment County: Stearns InvestiQator: Mitch Brinks State: MN Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? I8IYes DNo Community ID: Wetland G Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? DYe.s l8]No r-ransect ID: 1 Is the area a potential Problem Area? DYes l8]No Plot ID: Wetland Pit (If needed, exolain. on reverse.) VEGETATION Dominant Plimt Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator 1. Phalaris arundinacea H FACW+ 9. 2. Carex lacustris H OBL 10. . 3. Ulmus americana T FACW- 11. 4. . 12. . 5. 13. 6. 14. 7. 15. 8. 16. Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC (excludina FAC-). 100 Remarks: HYDROLOGY D Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators: D Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators: D Aerial Photographs D Inundated D Other ~ Saturated in Upper 12 Inches IZI No Recorded Data Available D Water Marks D Drift Lines D Sediment Deposits Field Observations: ~ Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Secondary Indicators (2 or more required): Depth of Surface Water: N/A (in.) D Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches D Water-Stained Leaves Depth to Free Water in Pit: N/A (in.) D Local Soil Survey Data ~ FAC-Neutral Test Deoth to Saturated Soil: At Surface (in.) D Other (Explain in Remarks) Remarks: SOILS Map Unit Name Alstad sandy loam, Somewhat Poorly (Series and Phase): 1 to 4 percent slopes (2928) Drainage Class: Drained Field Observations Taxonomy (Subgroup): Aquic Eutroboralfs Confirm Mapped Type? l8IYes ONo Profile Descriptions: Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Abundance/ Texture. Concretions. (inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Size/Contrast Structure. etc. 0-7" A 1 OYR 2/1 Mucky loam 8-14" 8 10YR 3/2 7.5YR 4/6 Common. Distinct Loamy sand . Hydric Soil Indicators: D Histosol D Concretions D Histic Epipedon ~ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils D Sulfidic Odor D Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils D Aquic Moisture Regime D Listed on Local Hydric Soils List D Reducing Conditions D Listed on National Hydric Soils List ~ Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors D Other (Explain in Remarks) Remarks: WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? IZIYes ONo (Check) (Check) Wetland Hydrology Present? l8IYes ONo Hydric Soils Present? IZIYes ONo Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? ~Yes ONo Remarks: Sample pit taken 10' from delineation line. Approved by HQUSACE 3/92 Forms version 1/02 DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION (1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual) Project/Site: Prom IFeld Farm Date: 7127106 Applicant/Owner: Central Minnesota Land Development County: Stearns Investiaator: Mitch Brinks State: MN Do Normal Circu'mstances exist on the site? l8IYes DNo Community 10: Wetland G Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? DYes [gJNo !Transect 10: 1 Is the area a potential Problem Area? DYes l8INo Plot ID: Upland Pit (If needed, exolain on reverse.) VEGETATION Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator , Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator 1. Poa compressa H FACU+ 9. 2. Ribes cynosbati H U 10. 3. Juniperus virginiana S FACU 11. 4. Quercus rubra T FACU 12. 5. 13. 6. 14. 7. 15. 8. 16. Percent of Dominant Species that are OSL, FACWor FAC (excludina FAC-). 0 Remarks: HYDROLOGY D Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators: D Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators: D Aerial Photographs 0 Inundated D Other 0 Saturated in Upper 12 Inches !Xl No Recorded Data Available 0 Water Marks 0 Drift Lines 0 Sediment Deposits Field Observations: 0 Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Secondary Indicators (2 or more required): Depth of Surface Water: N1A (in.) 0 Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches 0 Water-Stained Leaves Depth to Free Water in Pit: N1A (in.) 0 Local Soil Survey Data 0 FAC-Neutral Test Deoth to Saturated Soil: N1A (in.) 0 Other (Exolain in Remarks) Remarks: SOILS Map Unit Name Cushing sandy loam, (Series and Phase): 2 to 8 percent slopes (2048) Drainage Class: Well Drained Field Observations Taxonomy (Subgroup): Glossic Eutroboralfs Confirm Mapped Type? ~Yes DNo Profile Descriptions: Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Abundance/ Texture, Concretions, (inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Size/Contrast Structure, etc, 0-2" A 10YR 3/1 Sandy loam 3-14" B 10YR 3/2 Loamy sand Hydric Soil Indicators: D Histosol D Concretions D Histic Epipedon D High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils D Sulfidic Odor D Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils D Aquic Moisture Regime D Listed on Local Hydric Soils List D Reducing Conditions D Listed on National Hydric Soils List D Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors D Other (Explain in Remarks) Remarks: WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? DYes ~No (Check) (Check) Wetland Hydrology Present? DYes ~No Hydric Soils Present? DYes ~No Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? DYes I2JNo Remarks: Sample pit taken 10' from delineation line. Approved by HQUSACE 3/92 Forms version 1/02 DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION (1987 COE Wetlands. Delineation Manual) Project/Site: PromIFeld Farm Date: 7/27/06 Applicant/Owner: Central Minnesota Land Development County: Stearns Investioator: Mitch Brinks State: MN Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? ~Yes DNo Community ID: Wetland H Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? DYes [gfNo ransect ID: 1 Is the area a potential Problem Area? DYes [gfNo Plot ID: Wetland Pit (If needed, exolain on reverse.) VEGETATION Dominant Plant Species Stratum I nd icator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator 1. Phalaris arundinacea H FACW+ 9. 2. Carex lacustris H OSl 10. 3. Impatiens capensis H FACW 11. 4. Ulmus americana S FACW- 12. 5. Fraxinus pennsylvanica T FACW 13. 6. 14. 7. 15. 8. 16. Percent of Dominant SpeCies that are OSl, FACWor FAC (excludino FAC-)' 100 Remarks: HYDROLOGY 0 Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): lWetland Hydrology Indicators: o Stream, lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators: o Aerial Photographs 0 Inundated o Other [gI Saturated in Upper 12 Inches ~ No Recorded Data Available 0 Water Marks 0 Drift Lines . 0 Sediment Deposits Field Observations: [gI Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Secondary Indicators (2 or more required): Depth of Surface Water: N/A (in.) 0 Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches 0 Water-Stained leaves Depth to Free Water in Pit: NIA (in.) 0 local Soil Survey Data [gI FAC-Neutral Test Depth to Saturated Soil: At Surface (in.) 0 Other (Explain in Remarks) Remarks: SOILS Map Unit Name Alstad sandy loam, Somewhat Poorly (Series and Phase): 1 to 4 percent slopes (2928) Drainage Class: Drained Field Observations Taxonomy (Subgroup): Aquic Eutroboralfs Confirm Mapped Type? [gIYes DNo Profile Descriptions: Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Abundance/ Texture. Concretions. (inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Size/Contrast Structure. etc. 0-7" A 10YR 2/1 Mucky loam 8-14" B 10YR 3/2 10YR 4/6 Common, Distinct Loamy sand Hydric Soil Indicators: 0 Histosol 0 Concretions 0 Histic Epipedon [gl High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils 0 Sulfidic Odor 0 Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils 0 Aquic Moisture Regime 0 Listed on Local Hydric Soils List 0 Reducing Conditions 0 Listed on National Hydric Soils List [gl Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors 0 Other (Explain in Remarks) Remarks: WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? [gIYes DNo (Check) (Check) Wetland Hydrology Present? [gIYes DNo Hydric Soils Present? [gIYes DNo Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? [glYes ONo Remarks: Sample pit taken 10' from delineation line. Approved by HQUSACE 3/92 Forms version 1/02 -I DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION (1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual) Project/Site: Prom IFeld Farm Date: . 7/27/06 Applicant/Owner: Central MinnesdtaLand Development County: Steams Investioator: Mitch Brinks State: MN , Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? I2SJVes DNo Community ID: Wetland H Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? DVes I2SJNo Irransect ID: 1 Is the area a potential Problem Area? DVes ~No PlotlD: Upiand Pit (If needed, explain on reverse.) . VEGETATION Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Speciell Stratum Indicator 1. Poa compressa H FACU+ 9. 2. Viola sp. H NI 10. 3. Taraxacum officinale H FACU 11. 4. Fragaria virginiana H FAC- 12. 5. Zanthoxylum americanum S U 13. 6. Juniperus virginiana S FACU 14. 7. Quercus macrocarpa T FAC- 15. 8. 16. Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC (excludin!:l FAC-). 0 Remarks: HYDROLOGY 0 Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): ~etland Hydrology Indicators: o Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators: o Aerial Photographs 0 Inundated o Other 0 Saturated in Upper 12 Inches [gJ No Recorded Data Available 0 Water Marks 0 Drift Lines 0 Sediment Deposits Field Observations: 0 Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Secondary Indicators (2 or more required): Depth of Surface Water: N/A (in.) 0 Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches 0 Water-Stained Leaves Depth to Free Water in Pit: N/A (in.) 0 Local Soil Survey Data 0 FAC-Neutral Test Depth to Saturated Soil: N/A (in.) 0 Other (Explain in Remarks) Remarks: SOILS Map Unit Name Cushing sandy loam, (Series and Phase): 2 toB percent slopes (204B) Drainage Class: Well Drained Field Observations Taxonomy (Subgroup): Glossic Eutroboralfs Confirm Mapped Type? I8IYes ONo Profile Descriptions: Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Abundance/ Texture, Concretions, (inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Size/Contrast Structure. etc. 0-6" A 10YR 3/2 Sandy loam 7-14" B 10YR 6/2 Loamy sand Hydric Soil Indicators: D Histosol D Concretions D Histic Epipedon D High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils D Sulfidic Odor D Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils D Aquic Moisture Regime D Listed on Local Hydric Soils List D Reducing Conditions D Listed on National Hydric Soils List D Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors D Other (Explain in Remarks) Remarks: WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? DYes I2SINo (Check) (Check) Wetland Hydrology Present? DYes I2SINo Hydric Soils Present? DYes I2SINo Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? DYes ~No Remarks: Sample pit taken 10' from delineation line. Approved by HQUSACE 3/92 Forms version 1/02 -r- DATA . FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION (1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual) Project/Site: Prom I Feld Farm Date: 7127106 Applicant/Owner: Central Minnesota Land Development COLlnty: Stearns 1 nvestiaatar: Mitch Brinks State: MN Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? jgIYes DNo Community ID: Wetland I Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? DYes jgINo Transect 10: 1 Is the area a potential Problem Area? DYes jgINo Plot ID: Wetland Pit (If needed; exOlain on reverse.) VEGETATION Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator 1. Phalaris arundinacea H FACW+ 9. 2. POlygonum amphibium H OSl 10, 3. 11. 4. 12. 5. 13. 6. 14. 7. 15. 8. 16. Percent of Dominant Species that are OSl, FACWor FAC (excludina FAC-)' 100 Remarks: HYDROLOGY 0 Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators: o Stream, lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators: o Aerial Photographs 0 Inundated o Other ~ Saturated in Upper 12 Inches ~ No Recorded Data Available 0 Water Marks 0 Drift Lines 0 Sediment Deposits Field Observations: ~ Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Secondary Indicators (2 or more required): Depth of Surface Water: N/A (in.) 0 Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches 0 Water-Stained leaves Depth to Free Water in Pit: N/A (in.) 0 local Soil Survey Data ~ FAC-Neutral Test Depth to Saturated Soil: At Surface (in.) 0 Other (ExDlain in Remarks) Remarks: SOILS Map Unit Name Cushing sandy loam, (Series and Phase): 2 to 8 percent slopes (2048) Drainage Class: Well Drained Field Observations Taxonomy (Subgroup): Glossic Eutroboralfs Confirm Mapped Type? DYes ~No Profile Descriptions: Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Abundance/ Texture, Concretions, (inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Size/Contrast Structure, etc, 0-16" A 10YR 2/1 Sandy clay loam Hydric Soil Indicators: D Histosol D Concretions D Histic Epipedon D High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils D SulfidiC Odor D Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils D Aquic Moisture Regime D Listed on Local Hydric Soils List D Reducing Conditions D Listed on National Hydric Soils List ~ Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors D Other (Explain in Remarks) Remarks: . WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? ~Yes DNo (Check) (Check) Wetland Hydrology Present? ~Yes DNo Hydric Soils Present? ~Yes DNo Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? ~Yes DNo Remarks: Sample pit taken 12' from delineation line. Approved by HQUSACE 3/92 Forms version 1/02 -I. DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLANDDETERMINATIQN (1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual) Project/Site: Prom I Feld Farm Date: 7/27/06 Applicant/Owner: Central Minnesota Land Development Caunty: Steams Investigatar: Mitch Brinks State: MN Do. Narmal Circumstances exist an the site? I2JYes DNo Community 10: Wetland I Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situatian)? DYes 121 No. ransect 10: 1 Is the area a patential Problem Area? DYes 121 No. Plot 10: Upland Pit _(If needed, explain an reverse.) VEGETATION Daminant Plant Species Stratum Indicatar Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator 1. Trifolium repens H FACU+ 9. 2. Zanthoxylum americanum S U 10. 3. Juniperus virginiana T FACU 11. 4. Quercus macrocarpa T FAC- 12. 5. 13. 6. 14. 7. 15. 8. 16. Percent of Daminant Species that are OSL, FACWor FAC (excluding FAC-). 0 Remarks: HYDROLOGY 0 Recarded Data (Describe in Remarks): rvetland Hydrolagy Indicatars: o Stream, Lake, ar Tide Gauge Primary Indicatars: o Aerial Phatagraphs 0 Inundated o Other 0 Saturated in Upper 12 Inches [gJ No. Recarded Data Available 0 Water Marks 0 Drift Lines 0 Sediment Depasits Field Observatians: 0 Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Secandary Indicatars (2 ar mare required): Depth af Surface Water: N/A (in.) 0 Oxidized Raat Channels in Upper 12 Inches 0 Water-Stained Leaves Depth to. Fre!:! Water in Pit N/A (in.) 0 Lacal Sail Survey Data 0 FAC-Neutral Test Depth to. Saturated Sail: N/A (in.) 0 Other (Explain in Remarks) Remarks: SOILS Map Unit Name Cushing sandy loam, (Series and Phase): 2 to 8 percent slopes (2048) Drainage Class: Well Drained Field Observations Taxonomy (Subgroup): Glossic Eutroboralfs Confirm Mapped Type? I8IYes ONo Profile Descriptions: Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Abundance/ Texture, Concretions, (inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Size/Contrast Structu re, etc, 0-2" A 10YR 2/2 Loam 3-14" B 1 OYR 4/2 Sandy loam Hydric Soil Indicators: D Histosol D Concretions D Histic Epipedon D High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils D Sulfidic Odor D Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils D Aquic Moisture Regime D Listed on Local Hydric Soils List D Reducing Conditions D Listed on National Hydric Soils List D Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors D Other (Explain in Remarks) Remarks: WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? DYes 181 No (Check) (Check) Wetland Hydrology Present? DYes 181 No Hydric Soils Present? DYes 181 No Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? DYes [g]No Remarks: Sample pit taken 10' from delineation line. . Approved by HQUSACE 3/92 Forms version 1/02 -- I DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION (1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual) Project/Site: Prom I Feld Farm Date: 7/27/06 Applicant/Owner: Central Minnesota Land Development County: Steams Investiaator: Mitch Brinks State: MN Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? ~Yes DNo Community ID: Wetland J Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? DYes ~No II ransect ID: 1 Is the area a potential Problem Area? DYes l8lNo Plot ID: Wetland Pit (If needed, explain on reverse.) VEGETATION Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator 1. Phalaris arundinacea H FACW+ 9. . 2. Polygonum amphibium H OBL 10. 3. 11. 4. 12. 5. 13. 6. 14. 7. 15. 8. 16. . Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, F ACW or F AC (excludina FAC-). 100 Remarks: HYDROLOGY 0 Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators: o Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators: o Aerial Photographs D Inundated o Other [81 Saturated in Upper 12 Inches ~ No Recorded Data Available D Water Marks D Drift Lines D Sediment Deposits Field Observations: [81 Drainage Pattems in Wetlands Secondary Indicators (2 or more required): Depth of Surface Water: N/A (in.) D Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches D Water-Stained Leaves Depth to Free Water in Pit: N/A (in.) D Local Soil Survey Data [81 F AC-Neutral Test Depth to Saturated Soil: At Surface (in.) D Other (Explain in Remarks) Remarks: SOILS Map Unit Name Cushing sandy loam, (Series and Phase): 2 to 8 percent slopes (2048) Drainage Class: Well Drained Field Observations Taxonomy (Subgroup): Glossic Eutroboralfs Confirm Mapped Type? DYes 181 No Profile Descriptions: Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Abundance/ Texture, Concretions, (inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Size/Contrast Structure, etc, 0-4" A 10YR 2/1 Sandy loam 5-12" B 10YR 5/2 10YR 4/6 Common, Distinct Loamy sand Hydric Soil Indicators: 0 Histosol 0 Concretions 0 Histic Epipedon 0 High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils 0 Sulfidic Odor 0 Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils 0 Aquic Moisture Regime 0 Listed on Local Hydric Soils List 0 Reducing Conditions 0 Listed on National Hydric Soils List ~ Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors 0 Other (Explain in Remarks) Remarks: WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? I8IYes DNo (Check) (Check) Wetland Hydrology Present? I8IYes DNa Hydric Soils Present? I8IYes DNa Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? ~Yes ONo Remarks: Sample pit taken 12' from delineation line. Approved by HQUSACE 3/92 Forms version 1/02 I -- DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION (1987 COE Wetlands Delin.eation Manual) Project/Site: Prom I Feld Farm Date: 7/27/06 Applicant/Owner: Central Minnesota Land Development County: Stearns Investiaator: Mitch Brinks State: MN Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? I:8JYes DNo Community 10: Wetland J Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? DYes I:8JNo ransect 10: 1 Is the area a potential Problem Area? DYes /ZINo Plot 10: Upland Pit (If needed,exolain on reverse.) VEGETATION Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Soecies Stratum Indicator 1. Carex pennsylvanica H U 9. 2. Plantago major H FAC+ 10. 3. Taraxacum officinale H FACU 11. 4. Zanthoxylum americanum S U 12. 5. Juniperus virginiana T FACU 13. 6. Quercus rubra T FACU 14. 7. 15. 8. 16. Percent of Dominant Species that are OSL, FACWor FAC lexcludina FAC-). 17 Remarks: HYDROLOGY 0 Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators: o Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators: o Aerial Photographs 0 Inundated o Other 0 Saturated in Upper 12 Inches rgJ No Recorded Data Available 0 Water Marks 0 Drift Lines 0 Sediment Deposits Field Observations: 0 Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Secondary Indicators (2 or more required): Depth of Surface Water: N/A (in.) 0 Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches 0 Water':Stained Leaves Depth to Free Water in Pit: N/A (in.) 0 Local Soil Survey Data 0 FAC-Neutral Test Deoth to Saturated Soil: N/A lin.) 0 Other IExolain in Remarks) Remarks: SOILS Map Unit Name Cushing sandy loam, (Series and Phase): 2 to 8 percent slopes (2048) Drainage Class: Well Drained Field Observations Taxonomy (Subgroup): Glossic Eutroboralfs Confirm Mapped Type? IZIYes DNo Profile Descriptions: Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Abundance/ Texture, Concretions, (inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Size/Contrast Structure, etc, 0-2" A 10YR 3/1 Loam 3-14" B 1 OYR 4/3 '10YR 4/6 Common, Faint Sandy loam Hydric Soil Indicators: D Histosol D Concretions D Histic Epipedon D High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils D Sulfidic Odor D Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils D Aquic Moisture Regime D Listed on Local Hydric Soils List D Reducing Conditions D Listed on National Hydric Soils List D Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors D Other (Explain in Remarks) Remarks: WETLAND' DETERMINA TION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? DYes IZINo (Check) (Check) Wetland Hydrology Present? DYes ~No Hydric Soils Present? DYes 181 No Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? DYes [:gINo Remarks: Sample pit taken 8' from delineation line, Approved by HQUSACE 3/92 Forms version 1/02 - ['-- DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION (1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual) ProjectlSite: Prom 1 FeldFarm Dale: 7/27/06 ApplicahtlOwner: Central Minnesota Land Development County: Stearns I nvestiaator: Mitch Brinks State: MN Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? I8IYes DNo Community 10: Wetland K Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? DYes 181 No ransect ID: 1 Is the area a potential Problem Area? DYes I8INo Plot 10: Wetland Pit (If needed, exolain on reverse. \ VEGETATION Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Soecies Stratum Indicator 1. Phalaris arundinacea H FACW+ 9. 2. Polygonum amphibium H OSl 10. 3. 11. 4. 12. 5. 13. 6. 14. 7. 15. . 8. 16. Percent of Dominant Species that are OSl, FACWor FAC (excludino FAC-\. 100 Remarks: HYDROLOGY D Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): twetland Hydrology Indicators: D Stream, lake, of Tide Gauge Primary Indicators: o Aerial Photographs 0 Inundated o Other ~ Saturated in Upper 12 Inches ~ No Recorded Data Available 0 Water Marks 0 Drift Lines 0 Sediment Deposits Field Observations: ~ Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Secondary Indicators (2 or more required): Depth of Surface Water: N/A (in.) 0 Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches 0 Water-Stained leaves Depth to Free Water in Pit: N/A (in.) ~ local Soil Survey Data ~ F AC-Neutral Test Depth to Saturated Soil: At Surface (in.) 0 Other (Exolain in Remarks) Remarks: SOILS Map Unit Name Very Poorly Drained / (Series and Phase): Prebish-Nokay complex (873) Drainage Class: Somewhat Poorly Drained Field Observations Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic Haplaquolls / Aeric Flagiaqualfs Confirm Mapped Type? ~Yes ONo PrOfile Descriptions: Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Abundance/ Texture, Concretions, (inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Size/Contrast Structure, etc, 0-5" 0 1 OYR 2/1 Loamy muck 6-14" B 10YR 3/1 10YR 4/6 Common, Faint Loamy sand Hydric Soil Indicators: 0 Histosol 0 Concretions 0 Histic Epipedon rgj High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils 0 Sulfidic Odor 0 Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils 0 Aquic Moisture Regime rgj Listed on Local Hydric Soils List 0 Reducing Conditions rgj Listed on National Hydric Soils List rgj Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors 0 Other (Explain in Remarks) Remarks: WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? ~Yes ONo (Check) (Check) Wetland Hydrology Present? ~Yes ONo Hydric Soils Present? ~Yes ONo Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? rgjYes ONO Remarks: Sample pit taken 12' from delineation line. Approved by HQUSACE 3/92 Forms version 1/02 ,- DA TA FORM ROUTIN.E WETLANDDETERMINA TION (1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual) PrCljectlSite: Prom I Feld Farm Date: 7/27106 Applicant/Owner: Central MinnesotaLand Development County: Stearns Investigator: Mitch Brinks State: MN Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? I8IYes DNo Community 10: Wetland K Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? DYes 181 No ransect 10: 1 Is the area a potential Problem Area? DYes [2JNo Plot 10: Upland Pit (If needed, exolain on reverse.) VEGETATION Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator 1. Poa compressa H FACU+ 9. 2. Glecoma hederacea H FACU 10. 3. Zanthoxylum americanum S U 11. 4. Quercus macrocarpa T FAC- 12. 5. 13. 6. 14. 7. 15. 8. 16. Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC (exCludina FAC-\. 0 Remarks: HYDROLOGY 0 Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Iwetland Hydrology Indicators: D Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators: D Aerial Photographs D Inundated D Other D Saturated in Upper 12 Inches ~ No Recorded Data Available D Water Marks D Drift Lines D Sediment Deposits Field Observations: D Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Secondary Indicators (2 or more required): Depth of Surface Water: N/A (in.) D Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches D Water-Stained Leaves Depth to Free Water in Pit: N/A (in.) D Local Soil Survey Data D FAC-Neutral Test Depth to Saturated Soil: N/A (in.) D other (Explain in Remarks) Remarks: SOILS Map Unit Name DeMontreville loamy sand, (Series and Phase): 2 to 8 percent slopes (453B) Drainage Class: Well Drained Field Observations Taxonomy (Subgroup): Arenic Eutroboralfs Confirm Mapped Type? l8IYes DNo Profile Descriptions: Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Abundance/ Texture, Concretions. (inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Size/Contrast Structure. etc, 0-2" A 10YR 3/1 Loam 3-14" B 1 OYR 4/3 10YR 4/6 Common, Faint Sandy loam . Hydric Soil Indicators: D Histosol D Concretions D bUstic Epipedon D High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils D Sulfidic Odor D Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils D Aquic Moisture Regime D Listed on Local Hydric Soils List D Reducing Conditions D Listed on National Hydric Soils List D Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors D Other (Explain in Remarks) Remarks: WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? DYes l8INo (Check) (Check) Wetland Hydrology Present? DYes l8INo Hydric Soils Present? DYes l8INo Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? DYes !8]No Remarks: Sample pit taken 12' from delineation line. Approved by HQUSACE 3/92 Forms version 1/02 DATA FORM ROU.TINE WETLAND DETERMINATION (1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual) ProjectlSite: Prom IFeld Farm Date: 7128/06 ApplicantJOwner: Central Minnesota Land Development County: Stearns Investiaator: Mitch Brinks, Bernie Doucette State: MN Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? ~Yes DNo Community 10: Wetland l Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? DYes 181 No ransect 10: 1 Is the area a potential Problem Area? DYes I8INo Plot 10: Wetland Pit (If needed,explain on reverse.) VEGETATION Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant SpeCies Stratum Indicator 1. Carex intumescens H FACW+ 9. 2. POlygonum amphibium H OBl 10. 3. 11. 4. 12. 5. 13. 6. 14. 7. 15. 8. 16. . Percent of Dominant Species that are OBl, FACW or FAC (excludina FAC.). 100 Remarks: HYDROLOGY D Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators: D Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators: D Aerial Photographs 0 Inundated D Other ~ Saturated in Upper 12 Inches ~ No Recorded Data Available 0 Water Marks 0 Drift Lines 0 Sediment Deposits Field Observations: ~ Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Secondary Indicators (2 or more required): Depth of Surface Water: NIA (in.) 0 Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12/nches 0 Water-Stained Leaves Depth to Free Water in Pit: NIA (in.) 0 local Soil Survey Data ~ FAC-Neutral Test Depth to Saturated Soil: At Surface (in.) 0 Other (Explain in Remarks) Remarks: SOILS Map Unit Name Alstad sandy loam, (Series and Phase): 1 to 4 percent slopes (2928) Drainage Class: Somewhat Poorly Drained Field Observations Taxonomy (Subgroup): Aquic Eutroboralfs Confirm Mapped Type? ~Yes DNo Profile Descriptions: Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Abundance/ Texture, Concretions, (inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Size/Contrast Structure, etc, 0-14" A 10YR 2/1 Fine sandy loam . Hydric Soil Indicators: 0 Histosol 0 Concretions 0 Histic Epipedon 0 High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils 0 Sulfidic Odor 0 Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils 0 Aquic Moisture Regime 0 Listed on Local Hydric Soils List 0 Reducing Conditions 0 Listed on National Hydric Soils List ~ Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors . 0 Other (Explain in Remarks) Remarks: WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? ~Yes DNo (Check) (Check) Wetland Hydrology Present? ~Yes DNo Hydric Soils Present? ~Yes DNo Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? ~Yes ONo Remarks: Sample pit taken 12' from delineation line. Approved by HQUSACE 3/92 Forms version 1/02 DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION (1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual) PrOject/Site: Prom IFeld Farm Date: 7/28/06 ApplicantJOwner: Central Minnesota Land Development County: Stearns I nvestioator: Mitch Brinks, Brenie Doucette State: MN Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? I8IYes DNo Community ID: Wetlarid L Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? DYes 181 No ransect ID: 1 Is the area a potential Problem Area? DYes 181 No Plot ID: Upland Pit (If needed, exolain on reverse.) VEGETATION Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Soecies Stratum Indicator 1. Carex pennsylvanica H U 9. 2. Plantago major H FAC+ 10. 3. Taraxacum officinale H FACU 11. 4. Trifolium repens H FACU+ 12. 5. Cirsium arvense H U 13. 6. Zanthoxylum americanum S U 14. 7. Acernegundo T FACW- 15. 8. Ulmus americana T F ACW- 16. Percent of Dominant Species that are OSL, FACW or FAC (excludina FAC-) , 38 Remarks: HYDROLOGY 0 Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators: D Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators: D Aerial Photographs D Inundated D Other D Saturated in Upper 12 Inches ~ No Recorded Data Available D Water Marks D Drift Lines D Sediment Deposits Field Observations: D Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Secondary Indicators (2 or more required): Depth of Surface Water: N/A (in.) D Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches D Water-Stained Leaves Depth to Free Water in Pit: N/A (in.) D Local Soil Survey Data D FAC-Neutral Test Deoth to Saturated Soil: N/A (in.) D Other (Exolain in Remarks) Remarks: SOILS Map Unit Name Cushing sandy loam, (Series and Phase): 2 to 8 percent slopes (2048) Drainage Class: Well Drained Field Observations Taxonomy (Subgroup): Glossic Eutroboralfs Confirm Mapped Type? [8IYes ONo Profile Descriptions: Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Abundance/ Texture, Concretions, (inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Size/Contrast Structure. etc. 0-14" A 10YR 2/2 Fine sandy loam Hydric Soil Indicators: D Histosol D Concretions D Histic Epipedon D High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils D Sulfidic Odor D Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils D Aquic Moisture Regime D Listed on Local Hydric Soils List D Reducing Conditions D Listed on National Hydric Soils List D Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors D Other (Explain in Remarks) Remarks: WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? DYes [81 No (Check) (Check) Wetland Hydrology Present? DYes [81 No Hydric SoilS Present? DYes [81 No Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? DYes [8jNo Remarks: Sample pit taken 12' from delineation line. Approved by HQUSACE 3/92 Forms version 1/02 r-- DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION (1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual) Project/Site: Prom I Feld Farm . Date: 7/28/06 Applicant/Owner: Central Minnesota Land Development County: Stearns Investigator: Mitch Brinks, Bernie Doucette State: MN Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? ~Yes DNo Community ID: Wetland M Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? DYes ~No ransect ID: 1 Is the area a potential Problem Area? DYes ~No Plot ID: Wetland Pit (If needed, elCQlain on reverse.) VEGETATION Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator 1. Carex intumescens H FACW+ 9. 2. Carex lacustris H OBL 10. 3. Acer rubrum T FAG 11. 4. 12. 5. 13. 6. 14. 7. 15. 8. 16. Percent of Dominant Species that are OSL, FACW or FAC (excluding FAC-). 100. Remarks: HYDROLOGY 0 Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators: D Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators: D Aerial Photographs 0 Inundated D Other [8) Saturated in Upper 12 Inches [gJ No Recorded Data Available 0 Water Marks 0 Drift Lines 0 Sediment Deposits Field Observations: [8) Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Secondary Indicators (2 or more required): Depth of Surface Water: N/A (in.) 0 Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches 0 Water-Stained Leaves Depth to Free Water in Pit: N/A (in.) 0 Local Soil Survey Data [8) FAC-Neutral Test Depth to Saturated Soil: At Surface (in.) 0 Other (Ex--"'ain in Remarks) Remarks: SOilS Map Unit Name Alstad sandy loam, (Series and Phase): 1 to 4 percent slopes (2928) Drainage Class: Somewhat Poorly Drained Field Observations Taxonomy (Subgroup): Aquic Eutroboralfs Confirm Mapped Type? DYes 18I No Profile Descriptions: Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Abundance/ Texture, Concretions, (inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Size/Contrast Structure, etc, 0-4" A 1 OYR 2/1 Clay loam 5-12" 8 1 OYR 3/2 5YR 4/6 Few, Faint Loamy sand Hydric Soil Indicators: 0 . Histosol 0 Concretions 0 Histic Epipedon 0 High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils 0 Sulfidic Odor 0 Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils 0 Aquic Moisture Regime 0 Listed on Local Hydric Soils List 0 Reducing Conditions 0 Listed on National Hydric Soils List ~ Gleyed or Low~Chroma Colors 0 Other (Explain in Remarks) Remarks: WETLAND . DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? l8IYes DNo (Check) (Check) Wetland Hydrology Present? [21Yes DNo Hydric Soils Present? [21Yes DNo Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? [gIYes ONo Remarks: Sample pit taken 12' from delineation line. Approved by HQUSACE 3/92 Forms version 1/02 -- -[ DATA FORM ROUTINEWETLANDDETERMINA nON (1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual) Project/Site: Prom IFeldFarm Date: 7/28106 Applicant/Owner: Central MinnesotaLand Development County: Stearns Investigator: Mitch Brinks, Bernie Doucette State: MN Do Norma:! Circumstances exist on the site? I%IYes DNo Community ID: Wetland M Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? DYes I%INo ransect ID: 1 Is the area a potential Problem Area? DYes 1%1 No PlotlD: Upland Pit Jlf needed, explain on reverse.) VEGETATION Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Soecies Stratum . Indicator 1. Poa compressa H FACU+ 9. Quercus rubra T FACU 2. Cornus racemosa H U 10. 3. Maianthemum canadense H FAC 11. 4. Viola sp. H NI 12. 5. Juniperus virginiana S FACU 13. 6. Ribes cynosbati S U 14. 7. Ageratina altissima S FACU 15. 8. Quercus macrocarpa T FAC- 16. Percent of Dominant Species that are OSL, FACW or FAC (excluding FAC-). 11 Remarks: HYDROLOGY D Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): ~etland Hydrology Indicators: D Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators: D Aerial Photographs D Inundated D Other D Saturated in Upper 12 Inches ~ No Recorded Data Available D Water Marks D Drift Lines D Sediment Deposits Field Observations: D Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Secondary Indicators (2 or more required): Depth of Surface Water: N/A (in.) D Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches D Water-Stained Leaves Depth to Free Water in Pit N/A (in.) D Local Soil Survey Data D FAC-Neutral Test Depth to Saturated Soil: N/A (in.) D Other (Explain in Remarks) Remarks: SOILS Map Unit Name Cushing sandy loam, (Series and Phase): 2 to 8 percent slopes (204B) Drainage Class: Well Drained Field Observations Taxonomy (Subgroup): Glossic Eutroboralfs Confirm Mapped Type? I8IYes DNo Profile Descriptions: Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Abundance/ Texture, Concretions, (inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Size/Contrast Structure, etc, 0-2" A 10YR 3/2 Loam 3-16" B 1 OYR 4/2 7.5YR 3/2 Common, Faint Fine sandy loam Hydric Soil Indicators: D Histosol D Concretions D Histic Epipedon D High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils D Sulfidic Odor D Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils D Aquic Moisture Regime D Listed on Local Hydric Soils List D Reducing Conditions D Listed on National Hydric Soils List [g] Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors D Other (Explain in Remarks) Remarks: WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? DYes \ZINo (Check) (Check) Wetland Hydrology Present? DYes \ZINo Hydric Soils Present? I8IYes DNo Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? DYes [8'jNo Remarks: Sample pit taken 12' from delineation line. . Approved by HQUSACE 3/92 Forms version 1/02 ,- DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION (1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual) Prqject/$ite: Prom I FeldFarm Date: 7/31/06 Applicant/Owner: Central Minnesota Land Development County: Stearns Investigator: Bernie Doucette State: MN Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? I8IYes DNo Community 10: Wetland N . DYes trransect 10: Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? 181 No 1 Is the area a potential Problem Area? DYes 181 No Plot 10: Wetland Pit (If needed, explain on reverse.) VEGETATION Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator 1. Carex strieta H OBL 9. 2. Iris versicolor H OBL 10, 3. Sagittaria latifolia H OBL 11. 4. Scirpus cyperinus H OBL 12. 5. 13. 6. 14. 7. 15. 8. 16. Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC (excludin~ FAC-). 100 Remarks: HYDROLOGY' 0 Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators: o Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators: o Aerial Photographs D Inundated o Other [gI Saturated in Upper'12 Inches ~ No Recorded Data Available D Water Marks D Drift Lines D Sediment Deposits Field Observations: [gI Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Secondary Indicators (2 or more required): Depth of Surface Water: N/A (in.) D Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches D Water-Stained Leaves Depth to Free Water in Pit: N/A (in.) [gI Local Soil Survey Data [gI FAC-Neutral Test Depth to Saturated Soil: At Surface ,(in.) D Other (Explain in Remarks) Remarks: , SOILS Map Unit Name Histosols and Haplaquolls, (Series and Phase): ponded (1055) Drainage Class: Very Poorly Drained Field Observations Taxonomy (Subgroup): Borosaprists Confirm Mapped Type? [8IYes DNo Profile Descriptions: Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Abundance/ Texture, Concretions, (inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Size/Contrast Structure, etc, 0-8" 0 1 OYR 2/1 Muck 9-16" B 1 OYR 4/2 Coarse sand . Hydric Soil Indicators: 0 Histosol 0 Concretions 0 Histic Epipedon jg] High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils 0 Sulfidic Odor 0 Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils 0 Aquic Moisture Regime jg] Listed on Local Hydric Soils List 0 Reducing Conditions jg] Listed on National Hydric Soils List 0 Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors 0 Other (Explain in Remarks) Remarks: WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? [8IYes DNo (Check) (Check) Wetland Hydrology Present? [8IYes DNo Hydric Soils Present? [8IYes DNo Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? jg]Yes ONo Remarks: Sample pit taken 12' from delineation line. Approved by HQUSACE 3/92 Forms version 1/02 DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINA nON (1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual) Proje.c:tlSite: Proml FeldFarm Date: 7/31106 Applicant/Owner: Central Minnesota Land Development County: Steams Investiaator: Bernie Doucette State: MN Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? ~Yes DNo Community 10: Wetland N Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? DYes ~No rrransec:t 10: 1 Is the area a potential Problem Area? DYes ~No Plot 10: Upland Pit (If needed, exolain on reverse.) ^ Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator 1. Carex pensylvanica H U 9. 2. Amphicarpaea bracteata H FAC 10. 3. Comus racemosa H U 11. 4. Corylus americana S FACU- 12. 5. Zanthoxylum americanum S U 13. 6. Juniperus virginiana T FACU 14. 7. Quercus rubra T FACU 15. 8. Quercus macrocarpa T FAC- t6. . Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC (exc:ludind FAC-)' 17 Remarks: VEGETATION HYDROLOGY 0 Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Netland Hydrology Indicators: D Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators: D Aerial Photographs D Inundated D Other D Saturated in Upper 12 Inches ~ No Recorded Data Available D Water Marks D Drift Lines D Sediment Deposits Field Observations: D Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Secondary Indicators (2 or more required): Depth of Surface Water: N/A (in.) D Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches D Water-Stained Leaves Depth to Free Water in Pit: N/A (in.) D Local Soil Survey Data D F AC-Neutral Test Deoth to Saturated Soil: N/A (in.) D Other (Explain in Remarks) Remarks: SOILS Map Unit Name Dickman sandy loam, (Series and Phase): 2 to 6 percent slopes (327B) Drainage Class: Well Drained Field Observations Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic Hapludolls Confirm Mapped Type? ~Yes DNo Profile Descriptions: Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Abundance/ Texture, Concretions. (inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Size/Contrast Structure, etc. 0-4" A 10YR 3/2 Loamy fine sand 5-16" B 1 OYR 4/3 Loamy fine sand Hydric Soil Indicators: D Histosol D Concretions D Histic Epipedon D High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils D Sulfidic Odor D Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils D Aquic Moisture Regime D Listed on Local Hydric Soils List D Reducing Conditions D Listed on National Hydric Soils List D Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors D Other (Explain in Remarks) Remarks: WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? DYes ~No (Check) (Check) Wetland Hydrology Present? DYes ~No Hydric Soils Present? DYes ~No Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? DYes [8JNo Remarks: Sample pit taken 12' from delineation line. Approved by HQUSACE 3/92 Forms version 1/02 DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION (1987 caE Wetlands Delineation Manual) Prqject/Site: Prom/Reid Farm Date: 7/31/06 Applicant/Owner: Central Minnesota Land Develepment County: Stearns Investiaator: Bernie Doucette State: MN Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? ~Yes ONo Community 10: Wetland 0 Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? DYes ~No ransect 10: 1 Is the area a potential Problem Area? DYes ~No Plot 10: Wetland Pit (If needed, eJ<QIain on reverse.) VEGETATION Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator 1. Phalaris arundinacea H FACW+ 9. 2. Polygonum amphibium H OBL 10. 3. 11. 4. 12. 5. 13. 6. 14. 7. 15. 8. 16. Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC . (excluding FAC-). 100 Remarks: HYDROLOGY D Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators: D Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators: D Aerial Photographs D Inundated D Other ~ Saturated in Upper 12 Inches [gJ No Recorded Data Available D Water Marks D Drift Lines D Sediment Deposits Field Observations: ~ Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Secondary Indicators (2 or more required): Depth of Surface Water: N/A (in.) D Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches D Water -Stained Leaves Depth to Free Water in Pit: N/A (in.) D Local Soil Survey Data ~ .FAC-Neutral Test Depth to Saturated Soil: At Surface (in.) D Other (Explain in Remarks) Remarks: SOILS Map Unit Name Cushing sandy loam, (Series and Phase): 2 to 8 percent slopes (2048) Drainage Class: Well Drained Field Observations Taxonomy (Subgroup): Glossic Eutroboralfs Confirm Mapped Type? DYes I8l No Profile Descriptions: Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Abundance/ Texture, Concretions, (inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Size/Contrast Structure, etc, 0-8" A 10YR 2/1 Sandy muck 9-18" B 10YR 5/1 7.5YR 4/6 Abundant, Prom Sandy loam Hydric Soil Indicators: 0 Histosol 0 Concretions ~ Histic Epipedon ~ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils 0 Sulfidic Odor 0 Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils 0 Aquic Moisture Regime 0 Listed on Local Hydric Soils List 0 Reducing Conditions 0 Listed on National Hydric Soils List ~ Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors 0 Other (Explain in Remarks) Remarks: WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? l8lYes DNo (Check) (Check) Wetland Hydrology Present? l8lYes DNo Hydric Soils Present? l8lYes DNo Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? ~Yes ONO Remarks: Sample pit taken 12' from delineation line. Approved by HQUSACE 3/92 Forms version 1/02 - r DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLANDDETERMINA TION (1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual) Project/Site: Prom 1 Feld Farm Date: 7/31/06 Applicant/Owner: Central Minnesota Land Development County: Stearns Investioator: Bernie Doucette State: MN Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? ~Yes DNo Community 10: Wetland 0 Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? DYes ~No ransect 10: 1 Is the area a potential Problem Area? DYes ~No Plot 10: Upland Pit (If needed,exPlain on reverse.) VEGETATION Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator 1. Geranium macula turn H U 9. 2. Viola sp. H NI 10. 3. Taraxacum officinale H FACU 11. 4. Maianthemum canadense H FAC 12. 5. Ribes cynosbati S U 13. 6. CorllUS racemosa S U 14. 7. Quercus macrocarpa T FAC- 15. 8. 16. Percent of Dominant Species that are OSL, FACW or FAC (excludino FAC-). 14 Remarks: HYDROLOGY 0 Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): ~etland Hydrology Indicators: o Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators: o Aerial Photographs 0 Inundated o Other 0 Saturated in Upper 12 Inches ~ No Recorded Data Available 0 Water Marks 0 Drift Lines 0 Sediment Deposits Field Observations: 0 Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Secondary Indicators (2 or more required): Depth of Surface Water: N/A (in.) 0 Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches 0 Water-Stained Leaves Depth to Free Water in Pit: N/A (in.) 0 Local Soil Survey Data 0 FAC-Neutral Test Depth to Saturated Soil: N/A (in.) 0 Other (Explain in Remarks) Remarks: SOILS Map Unit Name Cushing sandy loam, (Series and Phase): 2 t08 percent slopes (2048) Drainage Class: Well Drained Field Observations Taxonomy (Subgroup): Glossic Eutroboralfs Confirm Mapped Type? l8IYes DNo Profile Descriptions: Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Abundance/ Texture, Concretions, (inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Size/Contrast Structure, etc, 0-3" A 10YR 3/3 Fine sandy loam 4-8" 81 10YR 3/3 Sandy loam 9-16" 82 10YR 5/3 7.5YR 5/4 Common, Distinct Sand Hydric Soil Indicators: D Histosol D Concretions D Histic Epipedon D High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils D Sulfidic Odor D Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils D Aquic Moisture Regime D Listed on Local Hydric Soils List D Reducing Conditions D Listed on National Hydric Soils List D Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors D Other (Explain in Remarks) Remarks: WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? DYes 181 No (Check) (Check) Wetland Hydrology Present? DYes l8INo Hydric Soils Present? DYes 181 No Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? DYes [glNo Remarks: Sample pit taken 12' from delineation line. Approved by HQUSACE 3/92 Forms version 1/02 ,- DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION (1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual) Project/Site: Prom! FeldFarm Date: 7/31106 Applicant/Owner: Central Minnesota Land Development County: Steams Investigator: Bernie Doucette State: MN Do NOrmal Circumstances exist on the site? J21]Yes DNo Community ID: Wetland P Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? DYes J21] No ransect ID: 1 Is the area a potential Problem Area? DYes J21]No PlotlD: Wetland Pit (If needed, explain on reverse.) VEGETATION , Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator 1. Phalaris arundinacea H FACW+ 9. 2. POlygonum amphibium H OBL 10. 3. 11. 4. 12. 5. 13. 6. 14. 7. 15. 8. 16. Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC (excludina FAC-). 100 Remarks: HYDROLOGY 0 Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): ~etland Hydrology Indicators: o Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators: o Aerial Photographs 0 Inundated o Other (gI Saturated in Upper 12 Inches ~ No Recorded Data Available 0 Water Marks 0 Drift Lines 0 Sediment Deposits Field Observations: (gI Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Secondary Indicators (2 or more required): Depth of Surface Water: NIA (in.) o . Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches 0 Water-Stained Leaves Depth to Free Water in Pit; NIA (in.) 0 Local Soil Survey Data (gI FAC-Neutral Test Depth to Saturated Soil: At Surface (in.) 0 Other (Explain in Remarks) Remarks: SOILS Map Unit Name Alstad sandy loam, (Series and Phase): 1 to 4 percent slopes (292B) Drainage Class: Somewhat Poorly Drained Field Observations Taxonomy (Subgroup): Aquic Eutroboralfs Confirm Mapped Type? DYes ~ No Profile Descriptions: Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Abundance/ Texture. Concretions, (inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Size/Contrast Structure. etc. 0-6" A 1 OYR 2/1 Muck 7-18" B 2.5Y 3/2 7.5YR 4/6 Common, Distinct Fine sand Hydric Soil Indicators: D Histosol D Concretions D Histic Epipedon ~ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils D Sulfidic Odor D Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils D Aquic Moisture Regime D Listed on Local Hydric SoilS List D Reducing Conditions D Listed on National Hydric Soils List ~ Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors D Other (Explain in Remarks) Remarks: WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? ~Yes DNo (Check) (Check) Wetland Hydrology Present? ~Yes DNo Hydric Soils Present? ~Yes DNo Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? ~Yes DNo Remarks: Sample pit taken 12' from delineation line. Approved by HQUSACE 3/92 Forms version 1/02 r --- -- DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION -(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual) PrpjecUSite: Prom IFeld Farm Date: 7/31/06 Applicant/Owner: Central Minnesota Land Development County: Stearns Investiaator: Bernie Doucette State: MN Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? IEIYes DNo Community ID: Wetland P Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? DYes 181 No ransect ID: 1 Is the area a potential Problem Area? DYes lEI No Plot ID: Upland Pit (If needed, explain on reverse.) VEGETATION Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator 1. Carex pensylvanica H U 9. Acer rubrum T FAC 2. Quercus macrocarpa H FAC- 10. 3. Taraxacum officinale H FACU 11. 4. Maianthemum canadense H FAC 12. 5. Zanthoxylum americanum S U 13. 6. Juniperus virginiana S FACU 14. 7. Juniperus virginiana S FACU 15. 8. Quercus rubra T FAC 16. Percent of Dominant Species that are OSL, FACW or FAC (excludina FAC-). 33 Remarks: HYDROLOGY 0 Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Vvetland Hydrology Indicators: o Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators: o Aerial Photographs 0 Inundated o Other 0 Saturated in Upper 12 Inches ~ No Recorded Data Available 0 Water Marks 0 Drift Lines 0 Sediment Deposits Field Observations: 0 Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Secondary Indicators (2 or more required): Depth of Surface Water: N/A (in.) 0 Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches 0 Water-Stained Leaves Depth to Free Water in Pit: N/A (in.) 0 Local Soil Survey Data 0 FAC-Neutral Test Depth to Saturated Soil: N/A (in.) 0 Other (Explain in Remarks) Remarks: SOILS Map Unit Name Cushing sandy loam, I (Series and Phase): 2 to 8 percent slopes (2048) Drainage Class: Well Drained Field Observations Taxonomy (Subgroup): Glossic Eutroboralfs Confirm Mapped Type? [8IYes DNo Profile Descriptions: Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Abundance/ Texture, Concretions, (inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Size/Contrast Structure, etc, 0-3" A 10YR 3/3 Fine sandy loam 4-8" 81 10YR4/3 Loamy sand 9-16" 82 10YR 5/4 Loamy sand Hydric Soil Indicators: D Histosol D Concretions D Histic Epipedon D High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils D Sulfidic Odor D Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils D Aquic Moisture Regime D Listed on Local Hydric Soils List D Reducing Conditions D Listed on National Hydric Soils List D Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors D Other (Explain in Remarks) Remarks: WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Hydric Soils Present? DYes [8INo (Check) DYes I8INo DYes [8INo (Check) lis this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? DYes rgjNo Remarks: Sample pit taken 12' from delineation line. Approved by HQUSACE 3/92 Forms version 1/02 -I DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAN.D DETERMINATION (1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual) Project/Site: Prom I Feld Farm Date: 8/2/06 Applicant/Owner: Central Minnesota Land Development County: Stearns Investiaator: Bernie Doucette State: MN Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? I2lYes DNo Community 10: Wetland Q Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? DYes [gINo Transect 10: 1 Is the area a potential Problem Area? DYes 181 No Plot 10: Wetland Pit IIf needed, explain on reverse.) VEGETATION Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator 1. Lemna minor H OSL 9. 2. POlygonum amphibium H OSt 10. 3. Digitaria sanguinalis H FACU 11. 4. 12. 5. 13. 6. 14. 7. 15. 8. 16. Percent of Dominant Species that are OSL, FACWor FAC fexcludina FAC-l. 67 Remarks: HYDROLOGY 0 Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators: o Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators: o Aerial Photographs 0 Inundated o Other 12:1 Saturated in Upper 12 Inches [2j No Recorded Data Available 0 Water Marks 0 Drift Lines 0 Sediment Deposits Field Observations: 12:1 Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Secondary Indicators (2 or more required): Depth of Surface Water: N/A (in.) 0 Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches 0 Water-Stained Leaves Depth to Free Water in Pit N/A (in.) 0 Local Soil Survey Data 12:1 FAC-Neutral Test Depth to Saturated Soil: At Surface (in.) 0 Other (Explain in Remarks) Remarks: SOILS Map Unit Name Estherville sandy loam, Somewhat Excessively (Series and Phase):. o to 2 percent slopes (41 A) Drainage Class: Drained .. Field Observations Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic Hapludolls Confirm Mapped Type? DYes ~No Profile Descriptions: Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Abundance/ Texture, Concretions, (incheS) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Size/Contrast Structure, etc, 0-4" A 1 OYR 2/1 Loamy sand 5-18" B 1 OYR 4/4 7.5YR 5/8 Common, Distinct Loamy sand Hydric Soil Indicators: 0 Histosol 0 Concretions 0 Histic Epipedon 0 High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils 0 Sulfidic Odor 0 Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils 0 Aquic Moisture Regime 0 Listed on Local Hydric Soils List 0 Reducing Conditions 0 Listed on National Hydric Soils List 0 Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors ~ Other (Explain in Remarks) Remarks: Inundation. Soils were bright, but the sample was taken at the edge of the pond where there was over a foot of standing water. WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? ~Yes DNo (Check) (Check) Wetland Hydrology Present? ~Yes DNo Hydric Soils Present? ~Yes DNo Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? ~Yes ONO Remarks: Sample pit taken 4' from delineation line. Approved by HQUSACE 3/92 Forms version 1/02 DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLANDDETERMINATJON (19.87 COEWetlands Delineation Manual) Project/Site: Prom I Feld Farm Date: 8/2/06 Applicant/Owner: Central Minnesota Land Development County: Stearns Investiaator: Bernie Doucette State: MN Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? ~Yes DNo Community 10: Wetland Q Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? DYes ~No Transect 10: 1 Is the area a potential Problem Area? DYes IEINo Plot 10: Upland Pit (If needed, exolain on reverse.) VEGETATION Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator 1. Poa compressa H FACU+ 9. 2. Trifolium repens H FACU+ 10. 3. Taraxacum officinale H FACU 11. 4. Z I . S U 12. anthoxy um amencanum 5. Juniperus virginiana S FACU 13. 6. 14. 7. 15. 8. 16. Percent of Dominant Species that are OSL, FACW or FAC (excludina FAC-\. 0 Remarks: HYDROLOGY 0 Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrolagy indicators: o Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators: o Aerial Photographs 0 Inundated o Other 0 Saturated in Upper 12 Inches ~ No Recorded Data Available 0 Water Marks 0 Drift Lines 0 Sediment Deposits Field Observations: 0 Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Secondary Indicators (2 or more required): Depth of Surface Water: N/A (in.) 0 Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches 0 Water-Stained Leaves Depth to Free Water in Pit: N/A (in.) 0 Local Soil Survey Data 0 FAC-Neutral Test Depth to Saturated Soil: N/A (in.) 0 Other (Exolain in Remarks\ Remarks: SOILS Map Unit Name Estherville sandy loam, Somewhat Excessively (Series and Phase): o to 2 percent slopes (41A) Drainage Class: Drained Field Observations Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic Hapludolls Confirm Mapped Type? !8IYes DNo Profile Descriptions: Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Abundance/ Texture, Concretions, (inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Size/Contrast Structure, etc, 0-4" A 1 OYR 2/1 Sandy loam 5-18" B 10YR 5/3 Loamy sand Hydric Soil Indicators: D Histosol D Concretions D Histic Epipedon D High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils D Sulfidic Odor D Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils D Aquic Moisture Regime D Listed on Local Hydric Soils List D Reducing Conditions D Listed on National Hydric Soils List D Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors D Other (Explain in Remarks) Remarks: WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? DYes !8INo (Check) (Check) Wetland Hydrology Present? DYes !8INo Hydric Soils Present? DYes !8INo Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? DYes [glNo Remarks: Sample pit taken 10' from delineation line. Approved by HQUSACE 3/92 Forms version 1/02 --I DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION (1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual) PrpjecVSite: Prom J Feld Farm Date: 8/2/06 ApplicanVOwner: Central Minnesota Land Development County: Stearns I nvestiaator: Bernie Doucette State: MN Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? ~Yes DNo Community 10: Wetland R Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? DYes ~No irransect 10: 1 Is the area a potential Problem Area? DYes ~No Plot 10: Wetland Pit (If needed, exolain on reverse.) VEGETATION Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator 1. Verbena hastata H FACW+ 9. 2. Phalaris arundinacea H OBL 10. 3. 11. 4. 12. 5. 13. 6. 14. 7. 15. 8. 16. Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACWor FAC (exeludina FAC-). 100 Remarks: HYDROLOGY . 0 Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): ~etland Hydrology Indicators: o Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators: o Aerial Photographs 0 Inundated o Other ~ Saturated in Upper 12 Inches [g] No Recorded Data Available 0 Water Marks 0 Drift Lines 0 Sediment Deposits Field Observations: ~ Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Secondary Indicators (2 or more required): Depth of Surface Water: NIA (in.) 0 Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches 0 Water-Stained Leaves Depth to Free Water in Pit: N/A (in.) 0 Local Soil Survey Data ~ FAC-Neutral Test Depth to Saturated Soil: At Surface (in.) 0 Other (Explain in Remarks) Remarks: SOILS Map Unit Name Estherville sandy loam, Somewhat Excessively (Series and Phase): o to 2 percent slopes (41A) Drainage Class: Drained Field Observations Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic Hapludolls Confirnn Mapped Type? DYes ~No Profile Descriptions: Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Abundance/ Texture, Concretions, (inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Size/Contrast Structure, etc, 0-4" A 1 OYR 2/1 , Sandy loam 5-16" 81 1 OYR 2/1 Clay loam 17-24" 82 10YR 4/2 10YR 5/6 Abundant, Prom. Clay . Hydric Soil Indicators: D Histosol D Concretions D Histic Epipedon D High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils D Sulfidic Odor D Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils D Aquic Moisture Regime D Listed on Local Hydric Soils List D Reducing Conditions D Listed on National Hydric Soils List [gI Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors D Other (Explain in Remarks) Remarks: WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? ~Yes DNo (Check) (Check) Wetland Hydrology Present? ~Yes DNo Hydric Soils Present? ~Yes DNo Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? [gIYes ONo Remarks: Sample pit taken 12' from delineation line. Approved by HQUSACE 3/92 Forms version 1/02 - I DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION (1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual) PrOject/Site: Prom J Peld Farm Date: 8/Z/06 Applicant/Owner: Central Minnesota Land Development County: Stearns Investiaator: Bernie Doucette Istate: MN Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? l8IYes DNo Community 10: Wetland R Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? DYes l8INo ITransect 10: 1 Is the area a potential Problem Area? DYes l8INo Plot 10: Upland Pit (If needed, explain on reverse.) VEGETATION Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator . 1. Poa compressa H FACU+ 9. 2. Trifolium repens H FACU+ 10. 3. Taraxacum officinale H FACU 11. 4. Plantago major H FAC+ 12. 5. Juniperus virginiana S FACU 13. 6. Acernegundo T FACW- 14. 7. 15. 8. 16. Percent of Dominant Species that are OSL, FACW or FAC (excludina FAC-). 33 Remarks: HYDROLOGY D Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators: D Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators: o Aerial Photographs 0 Inundated o Other 0 Saturated in Upper 12 Inches rgj No Recorded Data Available 0 Water Marks 0 Drift Lines 0 Sediment Deposits Field Observations: 0 Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Secondary Indicators (2 or more required): Depth of Surface Water: N/A (in.) 0 Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches 0 Water-Stained Leaves Depth to Free Water in Pit: N/A (in.) 0 Local Soil Survey Data 0 FAC-Neutral Test Depth to Saturated Soil: N/A (in.) 0 Other (Exolain in Remarks) Remarks: SOilS M<lp Unit Name Cushing sandy loam, (Series and Phase): 2 to 8 percent slopes (204B) Drainage Class: Well Drained Field Observations Taxonomy (Subgroup): Glossic Eutroboralfs Confirm Mapped Type? I8IYes DNo Profile Descriptions: Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Abundance/ Texture, Concretions, (inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Size/Contrast Structure, etc, 0-3" A 10YR 2/1 Loamy sand 4-16" B 1 OYR 5/2 Loamy sand . Hydric Soil Indicators: D Histosol D Concretions D Histic Epipedon D High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils D Sulfidic Odor D Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils D Aquic Moisture Regime D Listed on Local Hydric Soils List D Reducing Conditions D Listed on National Hydric Soils List D Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors D Other (Explain in Remarks) Remarks: WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? DYes 181 No (Check) (Check) Wetland Hydrology Present? DYes ~No Hydric Soils Present? DYes 181 No Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? DYes [glNo Remarks: Sample pit taken 12' from delineation line. Approved by HQUSACE 3/92 Forms version 1/02 1- DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION (1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual) ProjeCt/Site: Prom I Feld Farm Date: 8/2/06 Applicant/Owner: Central Minnesota Land Development County: Stearns InvestiQator: Bernie Doucette State: MN Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? ~Yes DNo Community ID: Wetland S Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? DYes ~No Transect ID: 1 Is the area a potential Problem Area? DYes ~No Plot ID: Wetland Pit (If needed, explain on reverse.) VEGETATION Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator 1. Polygonum amphibium H OBL 9. 2. Phalaris arundinacea H OBl 10. 3. Typha latifolia H OBL 11. 4. 12. 5. 13. 6. 14. 7. 15. - 8. 16. Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC (exCluding FAC-). 100 Remarks: HYDROLOGY 0 Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Netland Hydrology Indicators: o Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators: o Aerial Photographs D Inundated o Other ~ Saturated in Upper 12 Inches [X] No Recorded Data Available D Water Marks D Drift Lines D Sediment Deposits Field Observations: ~ Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Secondary Indicators (2 or more required): Depth of Surface Water: N/A (in.) D Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches D Water-Stained Leaves Depth to Free Water in Pit: N/A (in.) D Local Soil Survey Data ~ FAC-Neutral Test Depth to Saturated Soil: At Surface (in.) D Other (Explain in Remarks) Remarks: SOILS Map Unit Name Estherville sandy loam. Somewhat Excessively (Series and Phase): 2 to 8 percent slopes (41 B) Drl inage Class: Drained Fie d Observations Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic Hapludolls C. nfirm Mapped Type? DVes ~No Profile Descriptions: Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mo Ie Abundance/ Texture. Concretions, (inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Siz /Contrast Structure, etc. 0-18" A 10YR 2/1 Loamy muck I ~ I Hydric Soil Indicators: ~ Histosol 0 Concretions 0 Histic Epipedon 0 High Organic 90ntent in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils 0 Sulfidic Odor 0 0"'00" Stre'r '0 St"" SoU, 0 Aquic Moisture Regime 0 Listed on Local Hydric Soils List . 0 Reducing Conditions 0 Listed on Natio al Hydric Soils List 0 Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors 0 Other (Explain In Remarks) I Remarks: . WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? I2lVes DNo (Check) (Check) Wetland Hydrology Present? I2lVes DNo Hydric SOils Present? I2lVes DNo Is this Samplin~ Point Within a Wetland? ~Ves DNo Remarks: Sample pit taken 15' from delineation line. Approved by HQUSACE 3/92 Forms version 1/02 .- I - DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION (1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual) Project/Site: Prom I Feld Farm Date: 8/2/06 Applicant/Owner: Central Minnesota Land Development County: Stearns I nvestiaator: Bernie Doucette State: MN Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? I8IYes DNo Community ID: Wetland S Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? DYes ~No ransect 10: 1 Is the area a potential Problem Area? DYes ~No Plot ID: Upland Pit (If needed, eXPlain on reverse.) VEGETATION Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator 1. Poa compressa H FACU+ 9. 2. Chenopodium album H FAC- 10. 3. Taraxacum officinale H FACU 11. 4. Artemisia absinthium H U 12. 5. 13. 6. 14. 7. 15. 8. 16. Percent of Dominant Species that are OSL, FACWor FAC (excludina FAC-)' 0 Remarks: HYDROLOGY D Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators: D Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators: D Aerial Photographs 0 Inundated D Other 0 Saturated in Upper 12 Inches [XI No Recorded Data Available 0 Water Marks 0 Drift Lines 0 Sediment Deposits Field Observations: 0 Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Secondary Indicators (2 or more required): Depth of Surface Water: N/A (in.) 0 Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches 0 Water-Stained Leaves Depth to Free Water in Pit: N/A (in.) 0 Local Soil Survey Data 0 FAC-Neutral Test Depth to Saturated Soil: N/A (in.) 0 Other (Explain in Remarks) Remarks: SOILS Map Unit Name Estherville sandy loam, Drlage Class: Somewhat Excessively (Series and Phase): 2 to 8 percent slopes (41 B) Drained Field Observations Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic Hapludolls ctnfirm Mapped Type? ~Yes DNo Profile Descriptions: I Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mo Ie Abundance/ Texture, Concretions, (inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Siz /Contrast Structure, etc, 0-3" A 10YR 2/1 Sandy loam 4-20" B 10YR 2/2 I Loamy sand I I = Hydric Soil Indicators: D Histosol D Concretions D Histic Epipedon D High Organic rntent in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils D Sulfidic Odor D Organic Strea ng in Sandy Soils D Aquic Moisture Regime D Listed on Loca I Hydric Soils List D Reducing Conditions D Listed on Natioral Hydric Soils List D Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors D Other (Explain In Remarks) Remarks: WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? DYes ~No (Check) (Check) Wetland Hydrology Present? DYes ~No Hydric Soils Present? DYes ~No Is this Samplin Point Within a Wetland? DYes I:8JNo Remarks: Sample pit taken 6' from delineation line, Approved by HQUSACE 3/92 Forms version 1/02 - 1- DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND.DETERMINATION (1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual) Project/Site: Prom I Feld Farm Date: 812106 Applicant/Owner: Central Minnesota Land Development County: Stearns I nvestiaator: Bernie Doucette State: MN Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? jgIYes DNo Community 10: Wetland T Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? DYes ~No r-ransect ID: 1 Is the area a potential Problem Area? DYes ~No Plot 10: Wetland Pit (If needed, exolain on reverse.) VEGETATION Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator 1. Polygonum amphibium H OBL 9. 2. Phalaris arundinacea H OBL 10. 3. 11. . 4. 12. 5. 13. 6. 14. 7. 15. 8. 16. Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC (excludinQ FAC-). 100 Remarks: HYDROLOGY D Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): ~etland Hydrology Indicators: D Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators: D Aerial Photographs D Inundated D Other [8] Saturated in Upper 12 Inches [g] No Recorded Data Available D Water Marks D Drift Li nes D Sediment Deposits Field Observations: [8] Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Secondary Indicators (2 or more required): Depth of Surface Water: NIA (in.) D Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches D Water-Stained Leaves Depth to Free Water in Pit: N/A (in.) D Local Soil Survey Data [8] FAC-Neutral Test Deoth to Saturated Soil: At Surface (in.) D Other (Explain in Remarks) Remarks: SOILS . Map Unit Name Cushing sandy loam, (Series and Phase): 2 to 8 percent slopes (2048) Dra1nage Class: Well Drained Fiell:! Observations Taxonomy (Subgroup): Glossic Eutroboralfs ~fnfirm Mapped Type? DYes I2S:INo Profile Descriptions: I Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors MOlle Abundance/ Texture, Concretions, (inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Siz /Contrast Structure, etc, 0-4" 0 1 OYR 2/1 ~ Loamy muck 5-16" 81 10YR 3/1 Loamy sand 17-24" 82 10YR 4/2 7.5YR 5/6 Abundant, Distinct Sandy clay ~ ~ Hydric Soil Indicators: 0 Histosol 0 Concretions 0 Histic Epipedon [gI High Organic 90ntent in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils 0 Sulfidic Odor 0 0",,,,, s'""r '0 S"dy Soil, 0 Aquic Moisture Regime 0 Listed on Local Hydric SoilS List 0 Reducing Conditions 0 Listed on Natio al Hydric Soils List [gI Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors 0 Other (Explain n Remarks) Remarks: WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? ~Yes DNo (Check) (Check) Wetland Hydrology Present? ~Yes DNo Hydric Soils Present? ~Yes ONo Is this Samplin ' Point Within a Wetland? [gIYes ONo Remarks: Sample pit taken 12' from delineation line. Approved by HQUSACE 3/92 Forms version 1/02 - - 1- DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION (1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual) projectl$ite: Prom I FeldFarm Date: 8/2/06 Applicant/Owner: Central Minnesota LandDevelopment County: Stearns Investiaator: Bernie Doucette . State: MN Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? !8JYes DNo Community ID: Wetland T Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? DYes l8lNo ITransect ID: 1 Is the area a potential Problem Area? DYes l8lNo Plot 10: Upland Pit (If needed, explain on reverse.) VEGETATION Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator 1. Fragaria virginiana H FAC- 9. 2. Carex pennsylvanica H U 10. 3. Ribes cynosbati H U 11. 4. Zanthoxylum americanum H U 12. I 5. Juniperus virginiana S FACU 13. 6. Acer rubrum T FAC 14. 7. Quercus rubra T FACU 15. 8. Quercus macrocarpa T FAC- 16. Percent of Dominant Species that are OSL, FACW or FAC (excluding FAC-). 13 Remarks: HYDROLOGY D Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators: D Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators: D Aerial Photographs 0 Inundated D Other 0 Saturated in Upper 12 Inches ~ No Recorded Data Available 0 Water Marks 0 Drift Lines 0 Sediment Deposits Field Observations: 0 Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Secondary Indicators (2 or more required): Depth of Surface Water: N/A (in.) 0 Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches 0 Water-Stained Leaves Depth to Free Water in Pit: N/A (in.) 0 Local Soil Survey Data 0 FAC-Neutral Test Depth to Saturated Soil: N/A (in.) 0 Other (Exolain in Remarks) Remarks: SOilS Map Unit Name Cushing sandy loam, (Series and Phase): 2 to 8 percent slopes (2048) Drafage Class: Well Drained Fiel, Observations Taxonomy (Subgroup): Glossic Eutroboralfs Confirm Mapped Type? l8JYes DNo Profile Descriptions: Mot Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Ie Abundance/ Texture, Concretions, (inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) SiZE /Contrast Structure, etc, 0-3" A 7.5YR 4/2 Loam 4-18" B 10YR 5/3 I Loamy sand ~ Hydric Soil Indicators: D Histosol D Concretions D Histic Epipedon D High Organic C ontent in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils D Sulfidic Odor D Organic Streak'ing in Sandy Soils D Aquic Moisture Regime D Listed on Local Hydric Soils List D Reducing Conditions D Listed on National Hydric Soils List D Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors D Other (Explain in Remarks) Remarks: WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? DYes l8JNo (Check) (Check) Wetland Hydrology Present? DYes l8JNo Hydric Soils Present? DYes l8JNo Is this Samplir g Point Within a Wetland? DYes [gjNo Remarks: Sample pit taken 12' from delineation line. Approved by HQUSACE 3/92 Forms version 1/02 -- --I .DA TA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION (1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual) PrQjectlSite: Prom I Feld Farm Date: 8/4/06 Applicant/Owner: Central Minnesota Land Development County: Steams Investicator: Mitch Brinks, BernieDoucette State: MN Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? IEIYes DNo Community ID: Wetland U Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? DYes I21lNo ransect ID: 1 Is the area a potential Problem Area? DYes 181 No Plot 10: Wetland Pit (If needed, explain on reverse.) VEGETATION Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Soecies Stratum Indicator 1. POlygonum amphibium H OSl 9. 2. Com us racemosa S U 10. 3. Ulmus americana S FACW- 11. 4. 12. 5. 13. 6. 14. 7. 15. 8. 16. Percent of Dominant Species that are OSl, FACW or FAC (excludino FAC-)' 67 Remarks: HYDROLOGY 0 Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): fNetland Hydrology Indicators: o Stream, lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators: o Aerial Photographs 0 Inundated D Other 0 Saturated in Upper 12 Inches [gI No Recorded Data Available ~ Water Marks 0 Drift Li nes 0 Sediment Deposits Field Observations: ~ Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Secondary Indicators (2 or more required): Depth of Surface Water: N/A (in.) 0 Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches 0 Water-Stained leaves Depth to Free Water in Pit: N/A (in.) 0 local Soil Survey Data ~ FAC-Neutral Test Deoth to Saturated Soil: N/A (in.) 0 Other (Exolain in Remarks) Remarks: SOILS Map Unit Name Cushing sandy loam, (Series and Phase): 2 to 8 percent slopes (2048) Drainage Class: Well Drained Fiel1d Observations Taxonomy (Subgroup): Glossic Eutroboralfs C nfirm Mapped Type? DYes ~No Profile Descriptions: Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mo Ie Abundance/ Texture, Concretions, (inches ) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) =r/contrast Structure, etc, 0-5" A 10YR 2/1 Sandy loam 6-15" B 10YR 5/2 7.5YR 4/6 1undant, Prom. Loamy sand ~ Hydric Soil Indicators: 0 Histosol 0 Concretions 0 Histic Epipedon 0 High Organic ( ontent in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils 0 Sulfidic Odor 0 Organic Strea ing in Sandy Soils 0 Aquic Moisture Regime 0 Listed on Local Hydric Soils List 0 Reducing Conditions 0 Listed on Nati nal Hydric Soils List ['gI Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors 0 Other (Explain in Remarks) Remarks: WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? ~Yes ONo (Check) (Check) Wetland Hydrology Present? ~Yes DNo Hydric Soils Present? ~Yes ONo Is this Sampli g Point Within a Wetland? ['gIYes ONO Remarks: Sample pit taken 15' from delineation line. Approved by HQUSACE 3/92 Forms version 1/02 - I DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION (1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual) Project/Site: Prom 1 Feld Farm Date: 8/4/06 Applicant/Owner: Central Minnesota Land Development County: Stearns Investiaator: Mitch Brinks, Bernie Doucette State: MN Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? ~Yes DNo Community 10: Wetland U Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? DYes ~No ITransect 10: 1 Is the area a potential Problem Area? DYes ~No Plot 10: Upland Pit (If needed, explain on reverse.) VEGETATION Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator 1. Galium boreale H FAC 9. 2. Ribes cynosbati H U 10. 3. Ulmus american a S FAGW- 11. 4. Zanthoxylum americanum S U 12. 5. Rhamnus cathartica S FACU 13. 6. Ulmus americana T FACW- 14. 7. Quercus macrocarpa T FAC- 15. .. 8. 16. Percent of Dominant Species that are OSL, FACWor FAC (excludina FAC-). 43 Remarks: HYDROLOGY 0 Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): ~etland Hydrology Indicators: D Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators: D Aerial Photographs D Inundated D Other D Saturated in Upper 12 Inches ~ No Recorded Data Available D Water Marks D Drift Lines D Sediment Deposits Field Observations: D Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Secondary Indicators (2 or more required): Depth of Surface Water: N/A (in.) D Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches D Water-Stained Leaves Depth to Free Water in Pit: N/A (in.) D Local Soil Survey Data D FAC-Neutral Test Depth to Saturated Soil: N/A (in.) D Other (Exolain in Remarks) Remarks: SOILS Map Unit Name Cushing sandy loam, (Series and Phase): 2 to 8 percent slopes (2048) Dr~ inage Class: Well Drained Fie d Observations Taxonomy (Subgroup): Glossic Eutroboralfs C nfirm Mapped Type? [8]Yes DNo Profile Descriptions: Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mo tie Abundance/ Texture, Concretions, (inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Siz /Contrast Structure. etc, 0-3" A 10YR 2/2 = Sandy loam 4-14" B 10YR 3/3 Loamy sand j ~ Hydric Soil Indicators: D Histosol D Concretions D Histic Epipedon D High Organic (I ontent in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils D Sulfidic Odor D Organic Streai ing in Sandy Soils D Aquic Moisture Regime D Listed on Loca Hydric Soils List D Reducing Conditions D Listed on National Hydric Soils List D Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors D Other (Explain in Remarks) Remarks: WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? DYes [8] No (Check) (Check) Wetland Hydrology Present? DYes [8] No Hydric Soils Present? DYes [8] No Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? DYes IEINo Remarks: Sample pit taken 12' from delineation line. Approved by HQUSACE 3/92 Forms version 1/02 I DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION (1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual) Project/Site: Prom I FeldFarm Date: 8/4/06 Applicant/Owner: Central Minnesota Land Development County: Stearns Investiaator: Mitch Brinks, Bernie Doucette State: MN Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? t&!Yes DNo Community tD: Wetland V Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? DYes t&!No ransect ID: 1 Is the area a potential Problem Area? DYes t&!No PlotlD: Wetland Pit (If needed, exolain on reverse.) VEGETATION Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Soecies Stratum Indicator 1. Polygonum amphibium H OSl 9. 2. Acer negundo T FACW- 10. 3. 11. . 4. 12. 5. 13. 6. 14. 7. 15. 8. 16. Percent of Dominant Species that are OSl, FACWor FAC lexcludina FAC-). 100 Remarks: HYDROLOGY D Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): ,^,etland Hydrology Indicators: D Stream, lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators: o Aerial Photographs 0 Inundated o Other t8I Saturated in Upper 12 Inches I:gj No Recorded Data Available 0 Water Marks 0 Drift Lines 0 Sediment Deposits Field Observations: t8I Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Secondary Indicators (2 or more requIred): Depth of Surface Water: N/A (in.) t8I Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches 0 Water-Stained leaves Depth to Free Water in Pit: N/A (in.) 0 local Soil Survey Data t8I FAC-Neutral Test Deoth to Saturated Soil: At Surface (in.) 0 Other IExolain in Remarks) Remarks: SOilS Map Unit Name Estherville sandy loam, Somewhat Excessively (Series and Phase): o to 2 percent slopes (41A) 01'''' Cl," Drained Fie d Observations Taxonomy (SUbgroup): Typic Hapludolls C ' nfirm Mapped Type? DYes ~No Profile Descriptions: Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mo tie Abundance/ Texture, Concretions, (inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Siz /Contrast Structure, etc, 0-6" A 10YR 2/1 Loamy muck 7-14" B 10YR 3/2 ~ Loamy sand ~ ~ Hydric Soil Indicators: 0 Histosol 0 Concretions 0 Histic Epipedon [gI High Organic I ontent in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils 0 SulfidiC Odor 0 Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils 0 Aquic Moisture Regime 0 Listed on Loc I Hydric Soils List 0 Reducing Conditions 0 Listed on N ati ' nal Hydric Soils List 0 Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors 0 Other (Explair in Remarks) Remarks: WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? ~Yes DNo (Check) (Check) Wetland Hydrology Present? ~Yes DNo Hydric Soils Present? l2lYes DNo Is this Sampli g Point Within a Wetland? [gIYes ONo Remarks: Sample pit taken 15' from delineation line. Approved by HQUSACE 3/92 Forms version 1/02 -- - r- - DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION (1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual) Pr()jectlSite: Prom / Feld Farm Date: 8/4/06 ApplicantlOwner: Central Minnesota Land Development County: Stearns Investiaator: Mitch Brinks, Bernie Doucette State: MN Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? [8IYes DNo Community 10: Wetland V Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? DYes [81 No Irransect 10: 1 Is the area a potential Problem Area? DYes ~No Plot 10: Upland Pit (If needed, explain on reverse.) VEGETATION Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator 1. Cirsium arvense H FACU 9. 2. Poa pratensis H FAC- 10. 3. Plantago major .H FAC+ 11. 4. Taraxacum officinale H FACU 12. 5. Arctium minus H U 13. 6. Acernegundo T FACW- 14. 7. 15. 8. 16. Percent of Dominant Species that are OSL, F ACW or F AC (excludina FAC-)' 33 Remarks: HYDROLOGY D Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): ~etland Hydrology Indicators: D Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators: D Aerial Photographs 0 Inundated D Other 0 Saturated in Upper 12 Inches rgj No Recorded Data Available 0 Water Marks D Drift Lines D Sediment Deposits Field Observations: D Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Secondary Indicators (2 or more required): Depth of Surface Water: N/A (in.) D Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches 0 Water-Stained Leaves Depth to Free Water in Pit; N/A (in.) D Local Soil Survey Data D FAC-Neutral Test Deoth to Saturated Soil: N/A (in.) D Other (Explain in Remarks) Remarks: SOILS Map Unit Name Estherville sandy loam, Somewhat Excessively (Series and Phase): 2 to 6 percent slopes (41 B) Dr~ inage Class: Drained Fie d Observations Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic Hapludolls c, nfirm Mapped Type? l8IYes DNo Profile Descriptions: MoL Ab,""oow Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Texture. Concretions, (inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) ~/contrast Structure, etc. 0-2" A 1 OYR 2/2 Sandy loam 3-5" 81 10YR 3/2 -.J - Loamy sand 6-14" 82 1 OYR 4/3 I Loamy sand -.J -1 I Hydric Soil Indicators: D Histosol D Concretions D Histic Epipedon D High Organic (I ontent in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils D Sulfidic Odor D Organic Strea ing in Sandy Soils D Aquic Moisture Regime D Listed on Loca Hydric Soils List D Reducing Conditions D Listed on Natic nal Hydric Soils List D Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors D Other (Explain I in Remarks) Remarks: WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? DYes l8INo (Check) (Check) Wetland Hydrology Present? DYes l8INo Hydric Soils Present? DYes ~No Is this Samplir g Point Within a Wetland? DYes l2lNo Remarks: Sample pit taken 12' from delineation line. Approved by HQUSACE 3/92 Forms-version 1/02 - -~ I - DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION (1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual) Project/Site: Prom/. FeldFarm Date: 8/4/06 Applicant/Owner: Central Minnesota Land Development County: Stearns Investiaator: Mitch Brinks, Bernie Doucette State: MN Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? I8IYes DNa Community 10: Test Pit Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? DYes 181 No ransect 10: 1 Is the area a potential Problem Area? DYes 181 No Plot 10: (If needed, explain on reverse.) VEGETATION Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator . 1. Z . H U 9. anthoxylum amencanum 2. Rhamnus cathartica H FACU 10. 3. Zanthoxylum americanum S U 11. 4. Ulmus americana T FACW- 12. 5. Quercus macrocarpa T FAC- 13. 6. 14. 7. 15. . 8. 16, Percent of Dominant Species that are OSL, FACW or FAC (excludina FAC-\, 20 Remarks: HYDROLOGY D Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): rvvetland Hydrology Indicators: D Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators: D Aerial Photographs 0 Inundated D Other 0 Saturated in Upper 12 Inches [gJ No Recorded Data Available 0 Water Marks 0 Drift Lines 0 Sediment Deposits Field Observations: 0 Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Secondary Indicators (2 or more required): Depth of Surface Water: N/A (in.) 0 Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches 0 Water-Stained Leaves Depth to Free Water in Pit: N/A (in.) 0 Local Soil Survey Data 0 FAC-Neutral Test Deoth to Saturated Soil: N/A (in.) 0 Other (Explain in Remarks) Remarks: -SOILS Map Unit Name Dickman sandy loam, in~e CI~s (Series and Phase): 2 to 6 percent slopes (327B) Well Drained Fie d Observations Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic Hapludolls C ' nfirm Mapped Type? I8IYes DNo Profile Descriptions: Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mo Ie Abundance/ Texture, Concretions, (inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) ~/contrast Structure, etc. 0-2" A 10YR 2/1 Sandy loam 3-14" B 1 OYR 2/2 I Loamy sand I ~ ~ ~ Hydric Soil Indicators: D Histosol D Concretions D Histic Epipedon D High Organic I ontent in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils D Sulfidic Odor D Organic Streal ing in Sandy Soils D Aquic Moisture Regime D Listed on Loca Hydric Soils List D Reducing Conditions D Listed on National Hydric Soils List D Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors D Other (Explain I in Remarks) Remarks: WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? DYes [8] No (Check) (Check) Wetland Hydrology Present? DYes 181 No Hydric Soils Present? DYes [8] No Is this Samplir g Point Within a Wetland? DYes ~No I Remarks: Sample pit taken at the bottom of a topographic depression. Approved by HQUSACE 3/92 Forms version 1/02 r DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION (1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual) ProjeCtlSite: Prom IFeld Farm Date: 8/4/06 Applicant/Owner: Central Minnesota LandDevelopment County: Stearns I nvestiaator: Mitch Stinks, Bernie Doucette State: MN Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? I%IYes ONq Community ID: Test Pit Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? DVes 1%1 No ransect ID: 2 Is the area a potential Problem Area? DVes 1%1 No PlotlD: (If needed, explain on reverse.) VEGETATION Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator 1. Zanthoxylum americanum H U 9. 2. Taraxacum officinale H FACU 10. 3. Carex pensylvanica H U 11. 4. Rhamnus cathartica S FACU 12. 5. Zanthoxylum americanum S U 13. 6. Ulmus americana S FACW- 14. 7. Acer negundo T FACW- 15. 8. 16. Percent of Dominant Species that are OSl, FACW or FAC (excludino FAC.). 29 Remarks: HYDROLOGY 0 Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): ~etland Hydrology Indicators: o Stream, lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators: D Aerial Photographs 0 Inundated D Other 0 Saturated in Upper 12 Inches [gJ No Recorded Data Available 0 Water Marks 0 Drift Lines 0 Sediment Deposits Field Observations: 0 Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Secondary Indicators (2 or more required): Depth of Surface Water: N/A (in.) 0 Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches 0 Water-Stained leaves Depth to Free Water in Pit: N/A (in.) 0 local Soil Survey Data 0 F AC-Neutral Test Depth to Saturated Soil: N/A (in.) 0 Other (Explain in Remarks) Remarks: SOILS Map Unit Name Dickman sandy loam, DJinage Class: (Series and Phase): 2 to 6 percent slopes (3278) Well Drained Fiid Observations Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic Hapludolls crnfirm Mapped Type? [8]Yes DNo Profile Descriptions: I Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mrle Abundance/ Texture, Concretions, (inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Sie/Contrast Structure, etc, 0-2" A 10YR 2/1 ~ Sandy loam 3-14" B 1 OYR 2/2 I Loamy sand I ~ J J I Hydric Soil Indicators: D Histosol D Concretions D Histic Epipedon D High Organic pontent in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils D Sulfidic Odor D Organic Stre~ing in Sandy Soils D Aquic Moisture Regime D Listed on Loc I Hydric Soils List D Reducing Conditions D Listed on Nat~onal Hydric Soils List D Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors D Other (Explai in Remarks) Remarks: WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? DYes [8] No (Check) (Check) Wetland Hydrology Present? DYes [8] No Hydric Soils Present? DYes [8] No Is this Sampl ng Point Within a Wetland? DYes ~NO Remarks: Sample pit taken at the bottom of a topographic depression. Approved by HQUSACE 3/92 Forms version 1/02 , - . - DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION (1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual) Project/Site: Prom I FeldFarm Date: 8/4/06 Applicant/Owner: Central Minnesota Land Development County: Steams Investiaator: Mitch Brinks, Bernie Doucette State: MN , Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? ~Yes DNo Community 10: Test Pit Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? DYes ~No ransect 10: 3 Is the area a potential Problem Area? DYes I2SJ No Plot 10: (If needed, explain on reverse.) VEGETATION Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator 1. Ribes cynosbati H U 9. 2. Artemisia absinthium H U 10. 3. Glechoma hederacea H FACU 11. 4. Viola sp. H NI 12. 5. Rhamnus cathartica H FACU 13. 6. Z h . S U 14. ant oxylum amencanum 7. Ulmus americana T FACW- 15. 8. Acernegundo T FACW- 16. Percent of Dominant Species that are OSL, FACW or FAC (excluding FAC-). 25 Remarks: HYDROLOGY D Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators: D Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators: D Aerial Photographs 0 Inundated D Other 0 Saturated in Upper 12 Inches rgJ No Recorded Data Available 0 Water Marks 0 Drift Lines 0 Sediment Deposits Field Observations: 0 Drainage Pattems in Wetlands Secondary Indicators (2 or more required): Depth of Surface Water: N/A (in.) 0 Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches 0 Water-Stained Leaves Depth to Free Water in Pit: N/A (in.) 0 Local Soil Survey Data 0 FAC-Neutral Test DElJ:lth to Saturated Soil: N/A (in.) 0 Other (Explain in Remarks) Remarks: SOILS Map Unit Name Dickman sandy loam, (Series and Phase): 2 to 6 percent slopes (3278) Dr~ inage Class: Well Drained Fie d Observations Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic Hapludolls c. nfirm Mapped Type? I8IYes DNa Profile Descriptions: Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mo Ie Abundance/ Texture, Concretions. (inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Siz~/Contrast Structure. etc. 0-14" A 1 OYR 2/1 I Loamy sand I "I ::J I I I Hydric Soil Indicators: D Histosol D Concretions D Histic Epipedon D High Organic I ontent in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils D Sulfidic Odor D Organic Strearing in Sandy Soils D Aquic Moisture Regime D Listed on Local Hydric Soils List D Reducing Conditions D Listed on NatiTnal Hydric Soils List D Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors D Other (Explain in Remarks) I Remarks: WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? DYes 181 No (Check) (Check) Wetland Hydrology Present? DYes 181 No Hydric Soils Present? DYes IZINo Is this Sampli I 9 Point Within a Wetland? DYes 0No Remarks: Sample pit taken at the bottom of a topographic depression. Approved by HQUSACE 3/92 Forms version 1/02 - r - DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION (1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual) Project/Site: Prom I Feld Farm Date: 8/4/06 Applicant/Owner: Central Minnesota" Land Development County: Stearns Investiaator: Mitc:hBrinks, Bernie Doucette State: MN Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? ~Yes DNo Community ID: Test Pit IS the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? DYes ~No Transect ID: 4 Is the area a potential Problem Area? DYes ~No Plot ID: (If needed, explain on reverse.) VEGETATION Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator 1. Rhamnus cathartica H FACU 9. 2. Zanthoxylum americanum H U 10. 3. Amphicarpea bracteata H FAC 11. 4. Rhamnus cathartica S FACU 12. 5. Rhamnus cathartica T FACU 13. 6. Quercus macrocarpa T FAC- 14. " 7. 15. 8. 16. Percent of Dominant Species that are OSL, FACW or FAC (excluding FAC-). 17 Remarks: HYDROLOGY D Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): tvvetland Hydrology Indicators: D Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators: o Aerial Photographs 0 Inundated o Other 0 Saturated in Upper 12 Inches ~ No Recorded Data Available 0 Water Marks 0 Drift Lines 0 Sediment Deposits Field Observations: 0 Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Secondary Indicators (2 or more required): Depth of Surface Water: N/A (in.) 0 Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches 0 Water-Stained Leaves Depth to Free Water in Pit: N/A . (in.) 0 Local Soil Survey Data 0 FAC-Neutral Test Depth to Saturated Soil: N/A jin.) 0 Other (Explain in Remarks) Remarks: - SOILS Map Unit Name Dickman sandy loam, (Series and Phase): 2 to 6 percent slopes (327B) Dr~ inage Class: Well Drained Fie d Observations Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic Hapludolls C nfirm Mapped Type? [giVes DNo Profile Descriptions: Ml"""""",,,,, Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Texture, Concretions, (inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Siz~/Contrast Structure, etc, 0-2" A 1 OYR 2/1 ~ Sandy loam 3-14" B 1 OYR 2/2 I Loamy sand I ~ I I I Hydric Soil Indicators: D Histosol D Concretions D Histic Epipedon D High Organic I ontent in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils D Sulfidic Odor D Organic Strea~ ing in Sandy Soils D Aquic Moisture Regime D Listed on Loca Hydric Soils List D Reducing Conditions D Listed on National Hydric Soils List D Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors D Other (Explain in Remarks) Remarks: WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? DVes [gINo (Check) (Check) Wetland Hydrology Present? DVes [gINo Hydric Soils Present? DVes [gINo Is this samPli1g Point Within a Wetland? DVes [gjNo Remarks: Sample pit taken at the bottom of a topographic depression. Approved by HQUSACE 3/92 Forms version 1/02 -- r-- Prom / Feld Farm Wetland Delineation Report 8/7/06 Figure 6 - Wetland Photos Wetland A - Type 1 Wetland B - Type 2,3 Kramer, Leas, DeLeo PC Prom / Feld Farm Wetland Delineation Report 8/7/06 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Wetland C - Type 3,4 Kramer, Leas, DeLeo PC Wetland C - Type 3,4 Prom / Feld Farm Wetland Delineation Report 8/7/06 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Wetland 0 - Type 2,3 Kramer, Leas, DeLeo PC Wetland E - Type 2,3 Prom / Feld Farm Wetland Delineation Report 8/1/06 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ - Wetland F - Type 3 Kramer, Leas, DeLeo PC Prom / Feld Farm Wetland Delineation Report an /06 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ .. Wetland H - Type 2 Wetland I - Type 2 Kramer, Leas, DeLeo PC Prom / Feld Farm Wetland Delineation Report 8/7/06 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Wetland J - Type 2 Kramer, Leas, DeLeo PC Wetland K - Type 2,3 Prom / Feld Farm Wetland Delineation Report an /06 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Wetland L - Type 2 Wetland M - Type 2 Kramer, Leas, DeLeo PC Prom / Feld Farm Wetland Delineation Report 8/7/06 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Wetland N - Type 3 Wetland 0 - Type 2,3 Kramer, Leas, DeLeo PC Prom / Feld Farm Wetland Delineation Report 8/7/06 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Wetland P - Type 2 Wetland Q - Type 3 (Not Pictured) Wetland R - Type 2,3 (Not Pictured) Wetland S - Type 3 (Not Pictured) Kramer, Leas, DeLeo PC Prom / Feld Farm Wetland Delineation Report an /06 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Wetland T - Type 2,3 1$ Wetland U - Type 1 Kramer, Leas, DeLeo PC Prom / Feld Farm Wetland Delineation Report 8/7/06 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Water Marks on Rock in Wetland U Wetland V - Type 1 Kramer, Leas, DeLeo PC Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act Notice of Wetland Conservation Act Decision Name and Address of Local Government Unit: Steams County Environmental Services, Room 343, 705 Courthouse Square, S1. Cloud MN 56303 Name of Applicant: Central MN Land Development Project Name: Pronv'Feld Farm Application Number: 31.06"246 Type of Application (check one): D Exemption Decision D No Loss Decision D Replacement Plan Decision D Banking Plan Decision X Wetland TypelBoundary Decision Date of Decision: October 24,2006 Check One: X Approved D Approved with conditions D Denied Summary of Project/Decision: Steams County has approved the wetland boundary and decision of wetland type as reflected in the Wetland Delineation Report dated August 7, 2006 for the Prom/Feld Farm. Property is located in parts of Sections 2,1, 11 and 12 T124N, R29W, St Joseph Township, Steams County. Twenty-two wetlands were found on the site. List of Addressees: Central Minnesota Land Development, 7038 East Fish Lake Road, Maple Grove MN 55311 Kramer, Leas, DeLeo PC, 1120 Industrial Park Rd SW, Brainerd MN 56401 Yvonne Berner, US Army Corps of Engineers Wayne Cymbaluk, Stearns County Soil and Water Conservation District . Gregory Bechtold, Steams County Environmental Services Keith Grow, Board of Water and Soil Resources-Brainerd Department of Natural Resources Regional Office, Reg. Env. Assess. Eco!. Div. Eco!' Services, 1200 Warner Road, S1. Paul, MN 55106 Mike North, DNR-Ecological Services Sauk River Watershed District Linda Peck, Audubon Society You are hereby notified that the decision of the Local Government Unit on the above-referenced application was made on the date stated above. Pursuant to Minn. R. 8420.0250 any appeal of the decision must be commenced by mailing a petition for appeal to the Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources within thirty (30) calendar days of the date of the mailing of this Notice. THIS DECISION ONLY APPLIES TO the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act. Additional approvals or permits from local, state, and federal agencies may be required. Check with all appropriate authorities before commencing work ill or near wetlands. LOCAL GOVERNMENT UNIT BWSR Notice of Decision - Page 1 of2 9/16/04 .~~~, Signature October 24.2006 Date Susan McGuire, Stearns COUIitv Environmental Specialist BWSR Notice of Decision - Page 2 of2 9/16/04 Environmental Assessment Worksheet. Parkway Business Center Appendix I - Stearns County Soil Survey Map & Descriptions Kramer, Leas, Deleo PC Soils Map from Stearns County Soil Survey D = Denotes Approximate Project Location Soil Map' Unit Descriptions from Stearns County Soil Survey Estherville sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes (41A) This is a nearly level, somewhat excessively drained soil on broad flats and low, convex rises on outwash plains and stream terraces. The areas vary in shape and range from 5 to 200 acres in size. Typically the surface layer is black sandy loam about 5 inches thick. The subsurface layer is very dark grayish brown sandy loam about 7 inches thick. The subsoil is dark yellowish brown and is about 12 inches thick. The upper part is sandy loam, and the lower part is loamy coarse sand. The underlying material is yellowish brown, calcareous gravelly coarse sand to a depth of at least 60 inches. In some places the depth to sand and gravel is less than 15 inches. Also, in some places the surface layer in lighter in color. In places, the subsoil has more clay. Included with this soil in mapping and making up 5 to 10 percent of the map unit are small areas of Hawick and Regal soils. Hawick soils are excessively drained and are on the most exposed, convex part of rises and ridges. Regal soils are poorly drained and are in wet, concave swales. Permeability is moderately rapid in the loamy mantle and rapid in the sandy underlying material. The available water capacity is low. The content of organic matter . is moderate, and natural fertility is low. Surface runoff is slow. The seasonal high water table is at a depth of more than 6 feet. Estherville sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes (41 B) This is a gently sloping, somewhat excessively drained soil on crests and side slopes of stream terraces and outwash plains. The areas vary in shape and range from 4 to 40 acres in size. Typically, the surface layer is black sandy loam about 5 inches thick. The subsurface layer is very dark brown sandy loam about 5 inches thick. The subsoil is dark brown sandy loam and dark yellowish brown loamy coarse sand and is about 8 inches thick. The underlying material is yellowish brown, brown, and pale brown, calcareous gravelly coarse sand to a depth of at least 60 inches. In some places the depth to sand and gravel is less than 15 inches. Also, in places the subsoil has more clay and is finer textured. Included with this soil in mapping and making up 5 to 10 percent of the map unit are small areas of Hawick and Regal soils. Hawick soils are excessively drained; they are on the most exposed, convex part of rises and ridges. Regal soils are poorly drained and are in wet, concave swales: Permeability is moderately rapid in the loamy mantle and rapid in the underlying material. The available water capacity is low. The content of organic matter is moderate, and the level of natural fertility is low. Surface runoff is slow to medium. The depth to the seasonal high water table is more than 6 feet. Dickman sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent s.lopes (327 A) This is a nearly level, well drained soil on broad flats on outwash plains and stream terraces. The areas vary in shape and range from 5 to 50 acres in size. Typically, the surface layer is black sandy loam about 9 inches thick. The subsurface layer is very dark grayish brown sandy loam about 5 inches thick. The subsoil is about 20 inches thick. The upper part is dark yellowish brown sandy loam, and the lower part is dark yellowish brown sand. The underlying material is dark yellowish brown coarse sand to a depth of at least 60 inches. In some places, the surface layer is more than 16 inches thick. Also, in some places, the underlying material is mildly alkaline or moderately alkaline at a depth of less than 48 inches. Included with this soil in mapping and making up 5 to 10 percent of the map unit are small areas of Duelm and Hubbard soils. Duelm soils are moderately well drained to somewhat poorly drained. They are in lower positions on the landscape than the Dickman soil. Hubbard soils are excessively drained; they are on the most exposed convex rises. Permeability is moderately rapid in the iJpper part and rapid in the underlying material. The available water capacity is low. The content of organic matter is moderate, and natural fertility is low. Surface runoff is medium. The seasonal high water table is at a depth of more than 6 feet. Osakis loam (413) This is a nearly level, moderately well drained soil on concave slopes and in swales. The areas vary in shape and range from 5 to 200 acres in size. Typically, the surface layer is black loam about 9 inches thick. The subsurface layer is very dark grayish brown sandy loam about 4 inches thick. The subsoil is dark yellowish brown and is about 11 inches thick. It is sandy loam in the upper part and mottled loamy coarse sand in the lower part. The underlying material is grayish brown, mottled, calcareous coarse sand and grayish brown, calcareous gravelly coarse sand to a depth of at least 60 inches. In some places, the depth to sandy and gravelly material is less than 16 inches or more than 30 inches. Also, in places there is more gravel in the underlying material. Included with this soil in mapping and making up 5 to 15 percent of the mapped areas are small areas of Estherville and Regal soils. Estherville soils are somewhat excessively drained and are on the higher convex rises. Regal soils are poorly drained and are in concave swales and small depressions. Permeability is moderate to moderately rapid in the upper part and rapid in the lower part. The available water capacity is low. The content of organic matter is moderate, and natural fertility is medium. Surface runoff is slow. The seasonal high water table is at a depth between 4 and 6 feet, but it drops considerably during extended dry periods. Estherville..Hawick complex, 2 to 6 percent slopes (8758) This map unit consists of somewhat excessively drained Estherville soil and excessively drained Hawick soil. The areas vary in shape and range from 10 to 200 acres in size. Estherville soil makes up about 55 percent of the map unit, and Hawick soil makes up about 35 percent. The soils are gently undulating. Estherville soil is in lower lying positions on toe slopes and in swales and on long, smooth side slopes. Hawick soil is on more sloping, convex knolls and ridges. The individual areas of the soils are so intricately mixed or so small that it was not practical to map them separately at the scale used in mapping. Typically, the Estherville soil has a black sandy loam surface layer about 7 inches thick. The subsoil is dark yellowish brown and is about 12 inches thick. The upper part is sandy loam or loam, and the lower part is loamy coarse sand. The underlying material is yellowish brown, calcareous gravelly coarse sand to a depth of at least 60 inches. In some places, sandy material is at a depth of at least 60 inches. In some places, sandy material is at a depth of less than 15 inches. Also, in places the surface layer has been mixed with the brownish subsoil by plowing. Typically, the Hawick soil has every dark brown loamy sand surface layer about 8 inches thick. The underlying material to a depth of about 22 inches is dark brown and dark yellowish brown, calcareous gravelly coarse sand; below that, it is yelloWish brown, calcareous coarse sand to a depth of at least 60 inches. In some places, there is more gravel in the underlying material. Also, in some areas the surface layer is lighter in color. Included in mapping and making up about 10 percent of the mapped areas are small areas of Biscay, Osakis, and Fairhaven soils. Biscay soils are poorly drained; they are in deeply set swales and depressions. Osakis soils are moderately well drained; they are on lower lying flats. Fairhaven soils are well drained; they are on toe slopes and in concave swales and drainageways. Permeability is moderately rapid in the upper part of Estherville soil and rapid in the underlying material. Permeability is very rapid in Hawick soil. The available water capacity is low in both soils. The content of organic matter is moderate in Estherville soil and low in Hawick soil. Natural fertility is low in both soils. Surface runoff is slow to medium on Estherville soil and slow on Hawick soil. The seasonal high water table is at a depth of more than 6 feet. Environmental Assessment Worksheet Parkway Business Center Appendix J - Minnesota State Historic Preservation Review Kramer, Leas, Deleo PC THIS EMAIL IS NOT A PROJECT CLEARANCE. This message simply reports the results of the cultural resources database search you requested. The database search produced results for only previously known archaeological sites and historic properties. Please read the note below carefully. For further information contact Kelly Gragg-Johnson by phone at 651-296-5462 or email at kelly.gragg-johnson@mnhs.org. No archaeological sites were identified in a search of the Minnesota Archaeological Inventory and Historic Structures Inventory for the search area requested. A report containing the historic properties identified is attached. The result of this database search provides a listing of recorded historic architectural properties that are included in the current SHPO databases. Because the majority of archaeological sites in the state and many historic architectural properties have not been recorded, important sites or structures may exist within the search area and may be affected by development projects within that area. Additional research, including field survey, may be necessary to adequately assess the area's potential to contain historic properties. With regard to Environmental Assessment Worksheets (EAW) , a negative known site/structure response from the SHPO databases is not necessarily appropriate information on which to base a "No" response to EAW Question 25a. It is the Responsible Governmental Unit's (RGU) obligation to verify the accuracy of the information contained within the EAW. A "No" response to Question 25a without written justification should be carefully considered. If you require a comprehensive assessment of a project's potential to impact archaeological sites or historic architectural properties, you may need to hire a qualified archaeologist and/or historian. Please contact the SHPO by phone at 651-296-5462 or by email at mnshpo@mnhs.org for current lists of professional consultants in these fields. The Minnesota SHPO Survey Manuals and Database Metadata can be found at http://www.mnhs.org/shpo/survey/inventories.htm '- 0 .. " bD ... '" ,:, P- C = Z ... a .. <::> '" ,.:. ... = ...., ... UJ .. I .s Z UJ r-l 0 Q roo. r-l >- U =- ; Z .... .. C> =- .. ~ ~ rLJ " '" C 0 ...... rLJ u5 :;;;J '" .. :! .. .. = 0- ... ::: ... 00 ... '" Ill) '" = .. ~ '" ... ~ '" Eo< Q) ~ 00 00 ~ r-l U ~ Q Q) Q < ~ ci. .~ ~ ~ '" Eo< ,g = ..c: U - '" "S: = ~ " ~ III .. bfl .... ..., ..2 ~ 00 .... "0 00 U \0 -ti a Ii.: a " '" r-l ... ~ V)^ ~ == ~ '" ~ < rLJ ;>, 0 Z Z E '" ;;.. >- ~ ...... ~ ~ Eo-< 0 ~ ~ 00 Z ~ 0_ 1l r-l ;;l Z 5 " .~ =- 0 ... d 8 :: ~ 0 f-< " bfl f-< ~ U ... .... " =- U tI", Environmental Assessment Worksheet Parkway Business Center Appendix K - Executive Summary "St. Joseph North Corridor and CSAH 2 Realignment Corridor Study Report" Kramer, Leas, Deleo PC ST. JOSEPH NORTH CORRIDOR AND CSAH 2 REALIGNMENT CORRIDOR STUDY REPORT - EXECUTIVE SUMMARY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I. Introduction and Background The St. Joseph North Corridor and County State Aid Highway 2 (CSAR 2) Realignment Study was undertaken by the City of St. Joseph, Steams County, St. Joseph Township and the St. Cloud Area Planning Organization (APO) in an effort to define new, primary transportation corridors before the area develops. The purpose of the study was to identify preferred corridor alignments that would provide safe, reliable, and efficient mobility for both motorized and non-motorized travel in and around the St. Joseph area. The North Corridor and Realigned CSAH 2 will serve as key arterials in the area's future transportation system. The study area boundaries extend north from Interstate 94 (1-94) across CSAH 75, along CSAH 3 and- then east, north of the City of St. Joseph to Westwood Parkway in St. Cloud, as shown in Figure ES-1. The study area presently lacks east-west and north-south roadway continuity. It is primarily agricultural and is experiencing significant development pressure but includes important environmental resources, such as wetlands and biodiversity areas. The City of St. Joseph, Steams County, St. Joseph Township and the APO understand the importance of identifying the preferred corridors now, even if the roadways will not be constructed for a number of years. Identifying the corridors now will allow the city and county to make efficient use of public funds for right-of-way acquisition. In addition to fiscal awareness, early corridor identification provides the city and county with more opportunities to avoid or minimize impacts to the area's social, economic, cultural, and natural environment and to support organized, thoughtful development in the area. The findings and recommendations discussed in this report are the basis for subsequent environmental documentation processes that will follow completion of the corridor study. The findings and recommendations from this study will also complement other corridor studies presently underway or soon to be initiated, including the east-west Field Street Corridor, located south of St. Joseph city limits and the northern extension of the Southwest Arterial Corridor, located east of St. Joseph city limits (see Figure 1). II. Purpose and Need The first step in developing transportation alternatives is identifying the area's transportation needs. The study identified transportation needs through a data collection process that included traffic volume forecasting and capacity analysis. Additionally, the study identified features that affect the appropriateness of transportation alternatives. The following are key needs identified during the data collection process: ES - 1 ~ e ~ ~ ~ ~g I v <0 t:? l:: H f" f jli~ ! ~ """ ~ III CI) QJ -J ~ I- ~ ::: ~ .::: g. II) ~ ... ., ..... I m e :::s .~ u: <( w ~ <( > c :::>> I- en f- ee o c.. UJ cr. >- o ::J f- U) cr. o o cr. cr. o U f- ::2 UJ 2 ::2 C!:l ::i <( UJ cr. C'l :c ex: U) u>, 0- 2C: <(6 cr.U Oen o E C2m cr. - aU) U -0 :c ~ f-..r=; cr.c. OCD ::2~ :c -;) Eb.....: U)U) 0'0 -;)>, 1--=- U)U <J .?:i '"' " to 1* 0 " 0 " '" . " 0 0'> ~ 0 ~ C'l Z C'l 0 ~ u ST. JOSEPH NORTH CORRIDOR AND CSAH 2 REALIGNMENT CORRIDOR STUDY REPORT - EXECUTIVE SUMMARY · Capacity - The study partners recognize a need to provide a network of local arterials that support CSAH 75. · Safety - The study partners want to provide a safe route for regional traffic traveling around St. Joseph. · Roadway Deficiencies - The study partners recognize that the skewed intersection at CSAH 75/CSAH 3 is geometrically deficient. · System Linkage - The study partners recognize that the area presently lacks a network of continuous east-west and north-sout? roadways. · Modal Interrelationships - The St. Joseph area road network carries trucks, transit, bicycles, and pedestrians. The existing CSAH 2 truck route is presently designated on 2nd Avenue NW. An objective of the study is to move the truck route outside the St. Joseph Central Business District (CBD), outside residential neighborhoods, away from a city historic site, and away from key city parks to a more appropriate location. · Consistency with local highway plans - Three transportation plans, the St. Cloud APO 2030 Transportation Plan, the City of St. Joseph Comprehensive Plan (2002), and the Stearns County Transportation Plan (1999 and update in progress), call for construction of the North Corridor and CSAH 2 realignment. · Social demands and economic development - the study partners recognize that the City of St. Joseph is growing and that the area needs a transportation network that provides access to its existing and growing areas. · Proiect status - The study partners recognize that project readiness is a key factor in the completion of projects. When preliminary or prerequisite studies are complete and funding is in place, projects are poised to move toward construction. The roadways are included in regional, county, and city plans, the study team has completed this corridor study, and are now poised to complete required environmental documentation for the roadway projects. Funds for a portion of the CSAH 2 Realignment, from 1-94 to approximately CSAH 75, are also included for right-of-way acquisition in 2008 and construction in 2009 in the Steams County Capital Improvement Program. As stated, the purpose of the North Corridor and CSAH 2 Realignment study was to identify and evaluate corridor alternatives to select and implement subsequent activities for preferred alignments. To achieve this purpose, the study partners along with its Corridor Advisory Committee (CAC, see Section V: Public Involvement) identified the following four key goals for the outcome of the study: ES - 3 ST. JOSEPH NORTH CORRIDOR AND CSAH 2 REALIGNMENT CORRIDOR STUDY REPORT - EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. Ensure safe and efficient mobility for the traveling public 2. Ensure consi~tency with regional and local transportation plans 3. Ensure consistency with local land use, growth, and economic development plans 4. Document the project's readiness to advance to provide a basis for environmental documentation Goals one through three identify what this study is aImmg to achieve for the recommended preferred alignments. The purpose of goal four is to identify wha,t this study is aiming to achieve in terms of the project development process. Although the goals focus on different components of the project, each goal is key to the successful completion of the study. To further these goals, the study team developed a set of measurable criteria that link the identified needs and . goals. The measurable criteria were used to evaluate the performance of each alternative in accomplishing the study goals and addressing the project purpose and need. The measurable criteria can be grouped into three categories of focus: (1) transportation, (2) social, and (3) project readiness. III. Alternatives Based on the corridor vision and design standards established by the Corridor Advisory Committee and shown in Table ES-I, the study team developed the set of 11 alternatives shown in Figure ES-2. The alternatives were divided into three groups based on their location, and each group was identified by color using Blue, Green, or Yellow. The multiple alternatives identified within each geographic area ensure that a range of alignment combinations were considered. . CSAH 2-South: Blue 1. 2. 3. and 4. These alternatives extend from existing CSAH 2/Minnesota Street to CSAH 75. All alternatives are new, 4-lane roadways located on new alignment (2-lane rural cross-section initially). .. CSAH 2-North: Green 1. 2a/2b. and 3. These alternatives extend from CSAH 75 to existing CSAH 2 north of the City of St. Joseph. These alternatives link the Blue and Yellow alternatives. Alternative Green 1 is assumed to consist entirely of existing roadway that would be expanded to 4-lane from north of the City of St. Joseph to CSAH 75. At CSAH 75, CSAH 2 would be rerouted to run concurrently with existing CSAH 75 until intersecting the Blue alternatives west of the City of St. Joseph. CSAH 2 would then traverse north-south on the Blue alternatives described above. Alternatives 2a/2b and 3 are new 4-lane roadways located on new alignment. . North Corridor: Yellow 1. 2. and 3. These alternatives extend east from the Green alternatives. The Yellow alternatives extend from existing CSAH 2 north of the City of St. Joseph to Westwood Parkway in St. Cloud. These alternatives are new, 2- to 4-lane roadways located on new alignment. ES -4 1- E i IHJ1H iiii~fl f } hi 10 :s~ ---]z , , , ! 18 . ~ I if..j ~ ~ 0, f : ; ~ m I I !j!)! Zh !liiHllJii 1i31~ O~a~..,o~o ~~~~~JlfJl~~~~ . . 0 !]n~@@~ C'l ~ e ::J .!2I u:: I- 0:: o BJ 0:: >- ~ UJ 0:: o C ~ o o I- ~ ~ (!) :::; liS 0:: '" ::r: ~ o o z <('" 0::1:: 0'" CO _0 0:: "' O::E 0'" o~ en ~." o::g O.s::: <:Co Q) ::r::g BJ: ~~ -,0 i-:~ UJO CI) ~ ;:: ~ ffi j.;; ..,J o::c ..,J ~ ~ lh (.) <: o (.) )... a: ~ :e ~ If ~I ~ j ST. JOSEPH NORTH CORRIDOR AND CSAH 2 REALIGNMENT CORRIDOR STUDY REPORT - EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TABLE ES-1 CORRIDOR VISION AND DESIGN STANDARDS (1) Functional Classification Desi n Seed Typical Roadway Section Minor Arterial Minor Arterial Minor Arterial 45-55 m h 4 lane divided urban (may be constructed as 2 lane rural initially, but initial 2 lane urban alternative to be studied) Separate bicycle path 45-55 m h 4 lane divided urban 45m h 2-4 lane divided urban Yz mile for signals V4. mile restricted 150 feet Yz mile for signals V4. mile restricted 150 feet Separate bicycle ath Yz mile for signals V4. mile restricted 150 feet Separate bicycle path Notes (1) See Figure 3 for a map defining these areas. (2) Path is proposed on east side of roadway only. The intent is to keep the trail along the road and closer to downtown St. Joseph. The study partners and CAC used a screening process based on the project purpose and need to identify those alternatives that should not be carried forward for further study. Specific baseline measurable criteria were collected. Based on this analysis, the study team dismissed the following six alternatives from further consideration because they did not address the project purpose and need: · CSAH 2-South - Blue 1, Blue 2 · CSAH 2-North - Green 1, Green 2a/2b · North Corridor - Yellow 3 The study team felt the following five alternatives addressed the project purpose and need and retained them for additional study: · CSAH 2-South - Blue 3, Blue 4 · CSAH 2-North - Green 3 · North Corridor - Yellow 1 and 2 After reducing the field of alternatives from 11 to five, the study team prepared preliminary designs for the five alternatives meeting the project purpose and need and conducted a broader evaluation. The broader evaluation added new goals, objectives, and measurable criteria. The following five goals were added: ES-6 ST. JOSEPH NORTH CORRIDOR AND CSAH 2 REALIGNMENT CORRIDOR STUDY REPORT - EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. Minimize expected future public expenditures for roadway development 2. Avoid or minimize impacts to the natural environment 3 . Avoid or minimize impacts on cultural resources 4. Avoid or minimize and mitigate impacts on public lands 5. Minimize social costs and impacts Each objective and measurable criteria was again related to one of the nine study goals (four initial goals, five added goals). As noted earlier, measurable criteria were developed as a means of evaluating relative impacts of alternatives for comparison purposes. The study team gathered information to provide estimated values for each area of impact for each alternative in this phase of the corridor study. It should be noted that these values were estimated based on the information available at this point in the process and should not be taken as final, precise measures of impact. These values will change as more detailed analysis is undertaken with preparation of an environmental document. However, the estimated values are used here to guide the study team in better evaluating the relative levels of impact among the alternatives. To simplify the comparison of alternatives, the study team combined the Green and Yellow alternatives. As a result, the technical evaluation analyzed the following alternatives: · CSAH 2-South o Blue 1 o Blue 2 · CSAH 2-North/North Corridor o Yellow 1 (includes Green 3) o Yellow 2 (includes Green 3) Up to this point in the study process, the study team evaluated the alternatives using two techniques: (1) ability to meet the purpose and need of the project, and (2) preliminary technical evaluation. Based on these methods, the study team finds that the following alternatives best meet the project purpose and need and address the study goals and objectives: · CSAH 2-South o Alternative: Blue 4 o Termini: 1-94 to CSAH 3 near the Lake Wobegon Trail · CSAH 2-North/North Corridor o Alternative: Yellow 1 (includes Green 3) o Termini: CSAH 3 near the Lake Wobegon Trail to Westwood Parkway ES-7 I - ST. JOSEPH NORTH CORRIDOR AND CSAH 2 REALIGNMENT CORRIDOR STUDY REPORT - EXECUTIVE SUMMARY These evaluation findings were brought forward to the public and key agencies for input. This input, along with other issues, was considered by the study partners in the selection of Preferred Alternatives. V. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION The corridor study process sought to promote effective. decision-making by fostering a cooperative spirit ~ and building trusting relationships among state, regional and local partners, and the public. These relationships were important elements in completing the corridor study. The various study partners worked together to develop a corridor plan that improved safety and mobility, addressed environmental concerns, and respected community values. The North Corridor and CSAH 2 Realignment Study used the following means to promote public involvement: · Corridor Advisory Committee (CAC) - The Committee, composed of elected and senior technical staff of local decision-making bodies, met regularly during the study period. The Committee guided the overall study process, digested input from public involvement activities, participated in the technical analysis, and made recommendations to the St. Joseph City Council and Steams County Board of Commissioners. Committee activities included reviewing and evaluating alternatives and recommending a preferred alignment. · Focus group meetings - The groups provided input on needs, issues, constraints, and opportunities early in study process, and again on alignment alternatives during the evaluation process. At these meetings the study team learned which CSAH 2-South and North Corridor alternatives were preferred by key landowners facing the largest impact from these future roadways. The groups also suggested new alignment and access alternatives that the study team had not considered earlier. These suggestions were presented to the CAC for consideration. · Open house public meetings - The meetings provided opportunities for the general public to participate in the corridor planning process. The meetings also provided opportunities for key stakeholders to come back and take a second look at materials presented during the focus group meetings and bring family/friends/other affected parties to learn about and comment on the study. Open house input was recorded and provided to the CAC for consideration. · Review agency and kev stakeholder coordination - The study team met with officials from the Federal Highway Administration (FHW A), Mn/DOT, and the Steams County Technical Evaluation Panel (TEP) two times during the study process. Through these meetings FHW A and Mn/DOT officials provided insight into appropriate environmental documentation, while the TEP provided insight into wetland and local development issues. ES - 8 ST. JOSEPH NORTH CORRIDOR AND CSAH 2 REALIGNMENT CORRIDOR STUDY REPORT - EXECUTIVE SUMMARY . Presentations to governing bodies - The study team met with the St. Joseph City Council and Steams County board at several points throughout the study process. The presentations briefed officials on key study recommendations and allowed the study team to seek comments, input on policy, final decisions, and final approval of study products. . Proiect website - A section of the St. Joseph website was used to disseminate important study information, including focus group/public meeting materials, CAC agendas, CAC meeting summaries, and public meeting notices. VI. STUDY FINDINGS AND RESULTS The corridor study process found that two alternatives, Blue 4 and Yellow 1, best addressed the project purpose and need and met established study goals (see Section IV - Technical Findings). However, they were not identified as Preferred Alternatives (to be carried forward into environmental documentation) in Section IV because the environmental documentation requirements anticipated for the study area changed during the study process. The study team originally understood that one Environmental Assessment/Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAlEA W) would be suitable documentation for the entire study area. However, as the study progressed, it became clear that one EA/EA W would not be appropriate environmental documentation for the entire study area after forecast traffic volumes and roadway capacity needs were identified. Based on this unanticipated situation, the study team felt it needed to identify the appropriate environmental documentation approach, before Preferred Alternatives could be identified. Through the study process it became clear. that the study partners intended to complete parts of the North Corridor/CSAH 2 Realignment project independent of one another. The County had programmed the CSAH 2-South realignment project in .its Capital Improvement Program (CIP) using county and state aid funds allocated in 2008 for ROW acquisition and in 2009 for roadway construction. The City recently negotiated development of the Feld farm (a 300-acre farm located north of CSAH 75 and east of CSAH 133, immediately adjacent to the existing industrial park), which would include part of the eastern portion of the North Corridor (part of the roadway extending from CSAH 133 to Rolling Ridge Road). Neither agency, however, had a time line in mind for construction of CSAH 2-North (approximately CSAH 75 to existing CSAH 2) or the western end of the North Corridor (existing CSAH 2 to CSAH 133), and, instead hoped to officially map the corridor to protect the future ROW from encroaching development. Working closely with officials from FHW A and Mn/DOT, the study team reconsidered the number of highway projects included in the original North Corridor and CSAH 2 Realignment study area. FHW A regulations (23 CRF 771.111(f)) state the following in regard to identifying a highway project: In order to ensure meaningful evaluation of alternatives and to avoid commitments to transportation improvements before they are fully ES - 9 ST. JOSEPH NORTH CORRIDOR AND CSAH 2 REALIGNMENT CORRIDOR STUDY REPORT - EXECUTIVE SUMMARY evaluated, the action evaluated in each E1S or finding of no significant impact(FONS1) shall: 1. Connect logical termini and be of sufficient length to address environmental matters on a broad scope; 2. Have independent utility or independent significance, i.e., be useable and be a reasonable expenditure even if no additional transportation improvements in the area are made; and 3. Not restrict consideration of alternatives for other reasonably foreseeable transportation improvements. Based on these guidelines, the study partners, after input from FHW A and Mn/DOT officials, concluded that the original study area consists of three, independent projects for which different environmental documentation should be prepared. Figure ES-3 shows the three, independent projects are the following: - · CSAH 2-South o Line Color on Map: Blue o Termini: 1-94 to CSAH 3 near the Lake Wobegon Trail · CSAH 2-North/North Corridor-West o Line Color on Map: Green and Yellow o Termini: CSAH 3 near the Lake W obegon Trail to CSAH .133 · North Corridor-East: o Line Color on Map: Yellow o Termini: CSAH 133 to Westwood Parkway Based on the logical termini-independent utility/significance discussion and the possible environmental documentation options available, the study partners considered results from the screening and technical evaluation processes and input from agencies, the public, the Corridor Advisory Committee, S1. Joseph City Council, and Steams County Board and arrived at the following conclusions: · CSAH 2-South Realignment Project o Termini: 1-94 to CSAH 3 near the Lake Wobegon Trail o Anticipated Environmental Documentation: state-level Environmental Assessment Worksheet (since federal funds will not be used for construction, a federal-level Environmental Assessment is not needed.) o Preferred Alternative: Blue 4 ES - 10 ~ ~ i ~ v "!Idlll~ iiiii~~tl ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ f ,~ .iLlj!! ~ : I .I i D !hl! nUL . ILl... I jv~ m ~~!! ~~~~ " "" C{ f3 e ::s .~ u: I- 0:: o it 0:: >- g I- (/J 0:: o Cl 1t 0:: o o l- i (!) :J us 0:: '" :I:: ~ o ~ <(>, 0::1: 05 gt) 0::'" O::E 0'" o.g! (f) i!:-g 0::", 0.<: <g. :I::'" Q..ll ltJ. (/J(jj ~o I-'~ (/Jt) CI) ~ a:: OC( >- g j.;. CI) ~ o i:: ~ ~ ~ u o Q ..,J ~ ~ ~ o $ :::i ~ iJ! ... ~. . ~ j ST. JOSEPH NORTH CORRIDOR AND CSAH 2 REALIGNMENT CORRIDOR STUDY REPORT - EXECUTIVE SUMMARY · CSAH 2-North Realignment/North Corridor-West Project o Termini: CSAH 3 near the Lake Wobegon Trail to CSAH 133 o Anticipated Environmental Documentation: federal- and state-level Environmental Impact Statement o Preferred Alternative: No Preferred Alternative identified. A Preferred Alternative will be identified as a result of the anticipated Environmental Impact Statement process. · North Corridor-East Project o Termini: CSAH 133 to Westwood Parkway o Anticipated Environmental Documentation: federal-level Environmental Assessment and state-level Environmental Assessment Worksheet o Preferred Alternative: the alignments for Yellow 1 and 2 are the same in this portion of the study area. The study partners recommend combined Yellow 1-2 as the Preferred Alternative in this area. This approach was selected because it fits the. anticipated environmental documentation and best meets the project goals, purpose, needs, and objectives. Agencies and the community also largely agreed that these alternatives have the fewest anticipated impacts on the study area. The Corridor Advisory Committee unanimously supports the findings of this study. VII. NEXT STEPS With the corridor study complete, the anticipated environmental documentation identified, and the Preferred Alternatives identified for CSAH 2-South and North Corridor-East, the study team will transition into the environmental documentation process. The environmental documentation process will produce more detailed information which will permit study partners to address issues not resolved during the corridor study process. The unresolved issues were identified as the study team moved through the public involvement process where the public, the St. Cloud APO, the St. Joseph City Council, and the Stearns County Board provided comments regarding several design details. Public comments focused on adjustments or modifications to proposed alignments. St. Cloud APO comments focused on the intersection spacing shown on the alignments. 1 Elected body comments focused on possible modifications to the alternatives considered for the CSAH 2-North Realignment/North Corridor-West project. 1 The St. Cloud APO is concerned about access spacing, especially on new roadways. The access spacing shown on the preliminary designs was developed based on assumed local road networks (e.g., extensions to existing roadways) and nearly meets the access spacing standards. However, not all intersection locations shown in the preliminary designs meet St. Cloud APO access spacing guidelines. During the environmental documentation process, the St. Cloud APO would like to work with the other study partners to reinvestigate the assumed local road network and develop plans for a supporting local road network where its intersections with CSA....l.f 2-South, CSAH 2-North, and the North Corridor meet access spacing guidelines. ES - 12 ST. JOSEPH NORTH CORRIDOR AND CSAH 2 REALIGNMENT CORRIDOR STUDY REPORT - EXECUTIVE SUMMARY These design details are best handled during in the environmental documentation process. Specifically, these issues include the following: . CSAH 2-South Realignment o Investigate the possibility and impact of shifting the Minnesota Street/CSAH 2 intersection to the north in an effort to extend Minnesota Street to the west. This west extension of Minnesota Street would begin to establish a local street system west of CSAH 2. The intersection realignment would also include realigning Leaf Street to intersect the west extension of Minnesota Street (rather than intersecting CSAH 2-South directly). o Investigate the possibility and impact of shifting the northern end to the west in an effort to create a larger, useable parcel in the east quadrant of the intersection. o Reconsider the locations of proposed intersections (i.e., Minnesota Street, Leaf Street, and second local intersection south of CSAH 75) in an effort to meet access spacing guidelines and provide a backbone for a supporting road network as the area west of downtown St. Joseph develops. . CSAH 2-North Realignment/North Corridor-West o Investigate the possibility and impact of shifting the western end of the CSAH 2-North Realignment to the north along existing property lines in an effort to reduce the number of severed parcels. o Investigate the possibility and impact of creating another alignment alternative that combines the alignment of the northern shift for CSAH 2- North with Yellow 1 for the North Corridor-West. o Reconsider the locations of proposed intersections in an effort to meet access spacing guidelines and provide a backbone for a supporting road network as the area north of downtown St. Joseph develops. . North Corridor-East o Reconsider the locations of proposed intersections (e.g., CSAH 133, 20th Street Extension, and northern extension of the Southwest Arterial) in an effort to meet access spacing guidelines and provide a backbone for a supporting road network as the area northeast of downtown St. Joseph develops. The EA/EA W processes are anticipated to be complete in Spring 2007. The EIS Scoping Process is anticipated to last six to nine months. Following the Scoping Process, the study team anticipates completion of the Draft and Final EISs (traditional or tiered). Official mapping of CSAH 2-North/North Corridor-West and North Corridor-East will be prepared following completion of their respective environmental documentation. ES - 13 Environmental Assessment Worksheet Kramer, Leas, Deleo PC Parkway Business Center Appendix L -Typical Road Section ~ - . in~ -~ ~ c ~ ~ \0 ~ E ~ W; ~ ~ 18 ..J~ :E :s ~ W~ 0 ~~-g' ~ C. ; 'l:~.s!: C')l ..J ~.:m~ ~ ~ () ::~tJ) ~ U);..: ~;r _ 1i~ : ~ .!IIIIII~. ~ E m \ II:: ~ ~'" z ~ \- ~~ U 0 c-l ~ ~ ~ >- t3 [ tlj \S) <( ;: ~~~ ~ ~ ~ gs ~ ~ ~<J)~ <( \- ~ .S 3: U -!l ~-- OE3~ - ~ ~ ~ ... l;l..c:: \l. \>l. ~ ~ ~ c. >- ;: \j~~ \- - ~ gs 0 ~.S ~ r-- a. ~~ ~ ~ \S) in ~ ~p tljtljC ~ tf) ~~ \l. ~ O~ ~ ~ \l. ~ o ~ ~ N ...... -= , ~ ~ - . -~ 1f),< -~ ~ C ST. JOSEPH CITY COUNCIL March 7, 2007 FOR THE OFFICIAL RECORD PLEASE SIGN YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS NAME ~~1<t:~ Ga e IVeu nJQ V) J) C\\( ~ ~t\~\L VJ (If' 0") ~ n;) /' }-~1~ if: cJ{ LL. 1/ ' /,}. . (j r?~"V( ?U{c/ / ~ ...5/1 fJA IcL LJoeL/v J 6-wc I-... JD H~';') 0 (J .' '7-i 12, <f a~ !t/l!~ 2. 3. 4, 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. " ADDRESS /') , S I- ?> . ~ d;;-- h~--'J' " ~ft ,-" . <n?f~7 c..-"' d ..;>V J.J.e.--.,-,,-'J J07 Cj~~..~ ~\'~ f()H\ AJ~Sz. 1/0&- q~Ave Sc . ~OS :)y:L Ie cSt E \ oq ~~ f\vc ~f 0'1. E' jr~j " ;f / 7 . -;b&.._ _T T' I. ('7 /' ~ if) e'" p?t/(e.r :> 'f c; C 7 J}l2le xC' V\\' :>~:; )()' . 4v S:C (,. - ., it /J e .:J -3 oS /'2 f.l2V! - ..,E_ .'