HomeMy WebLinkAbout1999 [09] Sep 08OJfcial Minutes- EDA Board
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the Economic Development Authority for the City of St. Joseph met
in special session on Wednesday, September 8, 1999 at 8:00 a.m. in the St. Joseph City Hall.
Members Present: Chair Kenneth J. I-Iiemenz. Board Members Ken Twit, Bruce Gohman and Mike
Deutz. EDA Director Chad A. Carlson. Absent: Ross Rieke
Others Present: Cari Schmidt, City Administrator, Ellen Wahlstrom
Approve Minutes: Twit made a motion to approve the Juiy 22' 1999 minutes as presented; Seconded
by Gohman and passed with the following vote:
Ayes: Chair Hiemenz, Twit and Deutz
Nays: None
Abstain: Gohman
Business Park Update: Carlson presented a letter from SEH/RCM summarizing the development of the
Joseph Street and Business Park utility construction projects. Carlson informed the EDA Board of the
locations of the utilities to be constructed. Carlson stated that the contractor, S.J. Louis, will be starting
construction this 'Thursday or Friday. During thepre-construction conference, issues surfaced regarding the
completion date and the number of crews the contractor will have on site. Mr. Bettendorf, City Engineer,
will be addressing these issues.
Deutz questioned if the base bid included the Joseph Street Project. Cazlson stated that the base bid
includes all the utility work associated with the Business Park and Joseph Street. Alternate D is a separate
project that will be completed if agreements can be executed with the property owners.
Deutz questioned if the $200,000 commitment to the Joseph Street Project from the City of St. Joseph is
still firm or has it been reduced because the cost of the overall project has decreased. Twit stated that the
City has committed the $200,000, which will reduce the cost of the project for the property owners and
created awin-win situation for all involved with the project.
EDA Project List: Cazlson presented the January to September 1999 project list to the EDA Board.
Twit questioned the definition between "active" and "monitoring". Carlson stated the difference is in the
amount of contact he has on a monthly basis with the project. Active meaning that contact is frequent
during the month, while monitoring indicates very little contact has been made since the initial contact.
However, the project still exists and has potential to occur in the City.
Twit questioned a clarification on the additional job column for Company B and asked if 14 additional jobs
would be created. Carlson stated an error in the job column was made and the number represents their
current employment figure. Cazlson made the correction.
Rp~~ntion Visits: Carlson requested volunteers for the following retention visits:
Sunset Manufacturing, Inc. -September 21~ 9:00 a.m. -Hiemenz and Deutz
Accuserve, Inc. -September 21~` 1:00 p.m. -Rieke
DBI, Labs -date and time are pending -Gohman
N,ew Business
St. Cloud Area Profile: Carlson presented the 1999-24100 St. Cloud Area Profile prepared by St. Cloud
State University and the St. Cloud Area Economic Development Partnership. Cazlson informed the EDA
Board that this profile will not be updated until the new sus data is available to avoid duplication in
reports.
Carlson further stated that he is disappointed in the fact St. Joseph is not listed as a separate community
within the Profile. Currently, St. Joseph is included in Steazns County's figures. Cazlson will work with
the St. Cloud Economic Development Partnership to ensure further studies identify the St. Joseph area data
and tables.
Twit discussed the lazge percentage increase in the usage of the St. Cloud Airport. I-liemenz stated that St.
Cloud Airport is doing extremely well and they are in the process of completing a 20-year expansion plan
for the facility.
Gohman stated that rider ship has increased which has created a pazking problem at the Airport. Gohman
stated that there are plans to construct additional parking areas at the facility.
MN Business Subsidy Act: Carlson reported on the new Minnesota Subsidy Act. Carlson stated the law
has many potential impacts on completing projects and the function of the EDA as an entity of the City of
St. Joseph. Carlson discussed the eight elements of the subsidy agreement that must be completed for each
project receiving financial assistance from the community. However, the section of the law that states
municipal governments must approve all subsidy agreements after a public hearing may have a negative
impact on the EDA when they construct deals and subsidy agreements. Basically, the law takes the power
of the EDA and gives it the municipal government.
Gohman stated that the EDA shouldn't dictate job and wage goals since mazket factors play a major role in
determining them. A wage and job policy will not be beneficial and may deter economic development in
competing communities.
Carlson stated that the Quad County Committee would be meeting on Thursday, August 9, 1999 to discuss
and get clazification to the Business Subsidy Act. Cazlson will report back to the EDA at their next
meeting. Hiemenz added that the law puts the EDA into an advisory role to the City Council, eliminating
certain authorities of the EDA.
City Hall Project: Carlson discussed the progress on the new bank building and city hall project. Prior to
the discussion, Gohman stated for the record that he will abstain from any discussion or vote regarding the
development of the First State Bank of St. Joseph.
Cazlson stated that John Scherer is in the process of developing a purchase agreement between the EDA
and First State Bank of St. Joseph for the purchase of the facility. Due to the critical timing of the project
and delay in the execution of the purchase agreement, Carlson suggested that the EDA Board consider the
use of Eminent Domain to obtain the facility for new administration offices.
I-iiemenz stated that the City Council is also interested in seeing the execution of the purchase. Due to
timing and contract issues with the bank constructing a new facility, the threat of Eminent Domain may
assist in the execution of all agreements.
Twit stated that it is to the advantage of the EDA to get the project rolling and completed in a timely
fashion. Twit questioned if the City Attorney has been consulted. Carlson informed the EDA Board that
the City Attorney is aware of the EDA's concern and is comfortable with the process.
Deutz stated he was not aware that the City Council requested the EDA purchase the facility. Hiemenz
stated it has been discussed that the City Council at prior meetings as the best option for the City to obtain
the building. Deutz suggested that the EDA Board reveiw the terms and price of the purchase agreement
and make official motion at the next board meeting to execute the agreement.
Deutz made a motion to issue a letter to First State Bank of St. Joseph stating the EDA is considering
the use of Eminent Domain to acquire the First State Bank of St. Joseph for a municipal facility,
pursuant to the City Council decision to authorize the EDA as the purchasing agent of the facility;
Seconded by Twit.
The motion passed with the following vote:
Ayes: Chair Hiemenz, Twit and Deutz
Nays: None
Abstain: Gohman
Motion Carried.
Public Comments: Ellen Wahlstrom stated her opinion regarding the public perception of the St. Joseph
Economic Development Authority. Wahlstrom further stated that the EDA meetings should be broadcast to
the public to avoid the perception of secrecy surrounding the EDA's activities. Wahlstrom specifically
sited the EDA confidential project list.
Wahlstrom further stated that in her opinion the public is an enemy of the EDA and they should be
partners. The EDA is not willing to work with the residents of St. Joseph and strictly focus on business
and industrial development at the expense of the City.
Twit stated that the sole function of the EDA Board is for the advancement of commercial and industrial
expansion and development in the community. However, other City Ordinances and development
regulations work hand in hand with the EDA. Public comments and input are always welcome.
Gohman stated that the confidential project list needs to stay confidential and only available to the Board
Members due to the information contained in the list regarding each project. Carlson stated that each
company researching locations in St. Joseph specifically request that the information be kept confidential.
The EDA is not in the position to make the information public due to the risk of losing the prospect.
Wahlstrom stated that the public needs to be aware of potential businesses to express their support or
disapproval of a company wishing to locate in the community. Wahlstrom sited the proposed bulk natural
gas facility as an example where public input put a stop to a bad project.
Hiemenz stated that the City and EDA has created cxiteria that businesses must meet. The EDA is
responsible for protecting the interest of the community as companies approach the City for building sites.
Once a commitment from the company has been made, the public process of permitting is done.
Wahlstrom stated that she believes the intention of the EDA is good, but the public has a different opinion.
Adjourn: The meeting was adjourned by consensus at 9:15 a.m.
.,,
,~~
~,.. ,.
~ had A. arlson
Economic Development Director