HomeMy WebLinkAbout[07a] APO UpdateC1'1'1' OF tiT.~(?5N:1'1(
Council Agenda Item 7 a
MEETING DATE: February 19, 2009
AGENDA ITEM: APO Update
SUBMITTED BY: Randy Sabart, City Engineer
BOARD/COMMISSION/COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION:
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION:
BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The APO TAC meeting met on February S, 2009, and reviewed the
following items:
1) Received a presentation by APO staff on some of the changes to the draft 2035
Transportation Plan Chapter on "Management & Operations."
2) APO staff presented a graphical look at the output from the computer traffic model for the
2035 Augmented Network Congested Lane Miles. The "augmented" model takes into
account the updated land use (population) for the 2035 plan and those construction
projects that are known or will be constructed through the 2013 TIP.
The general discussion/observation was one a disappointment and a sense of falling behind
as the model predicts low levels of service in areas where improvements have or will be
constructed.
3) Discussed the economic stimulus project solicitation.
4) Steve Voss from Mn/DOT reviewed the District 3 ATP Target Federal and State Funding:
5) Kirby Becker reviewed a status report from DSAE Kelvin Howieson on the 2009 local federal
funded projects:
6) Briefly explained a table illustrating possible federal funding exchanges between
agencies/projects for which an exchange of federal and state-aid dollars may be utilized to
help finance three particular projects:
7) Other Business: TAC discussion about adding as a TAC member a representative from APO
Bicycle Committee. While there was general acceptance that a Bicycle Committee member
may attend TAC meetings to contribute to discussions, project reviews, etc. involving
pedestrian and bicycle facilities, the consensus of the TAC was that member should not be
extended voting privileges. APO staff will review the TAC's invitation with the Bicycle
Committee.
l U~#U County Road 4, St. Cloud, MN 56303-t)643
(320) 252-?5hA • (320) 252-655', (FAX) • E-mail: admin@a-tcloudapo.org • w~vw.stcloudapo.orb
T0: APO TAC
FROM: Cathryn Hanson
DATE: January 29, 2009
SUBJECT: APO 2035 Transportation Plan -Working Draft: Management & Operations
ACTION: Information/Discussion
Purpose
The purpose of the Operations & Management Chapter is to outline strategies aimed at increasing the efficiency
of the transportation system through Access Management and incorporation of congestion management
strategies such as Transportation System Management (TSM), Travel Demand Management (TDM), and
integration of Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) applications.
Background
The foundation for many components of this chapter have remained static over the last several years; however with
continued regional growth, recognizing the value in implementing sound access management policies is increasingly
important. Additionally, incorporation of ITS capabilities and congestion management programs can serve as aids to
reducing the strain on the transportation network. During the past several years, MnDOT and local governments
have implemented several ITS applications within the APO planning area such as Opticom for signal preemption and
transit signal priority. These ITS applications aid in the efficient movement of transit services and provide for
increased intersection safety for law enforcement, fire, Emergency Medical Services, railroad operations, and the
traveling public.
Significant Changes from the 2030 Plan
• Similar to other chapters within the Plan, extensive aesthetic redesign has been completed for this chapter in an
effort to make the material more user-friendly. Several narrative portions of the plan have been converted to
tables and/or graphics to increase the visual efficacy of the Plan.
'~ RAN S • SYS'f EN MGM1 `7 (' 1'FL? E Ll.l ~ E IJ1' "1- BANS ~.YS
• Incorporation of Congestion Management Strategies (TSM, TDM, ITS, Transit)
-(~AV~~, D~MA~-D MC~M'1
• Chapter 6 (Access Management) & Chapter 8 (Intelligent Transportation Systems) of the 2030 Plan, have been
condensed and streamlined into a single chapter for the 2035 Plan, now referred to as Management &
Operations.
Unresolved Issues
• Continuing to work with staff from MnDOT and the City of St. Cloud to develop a comprehensive map of
intersections equipped with signal pre-emption and transit signal priority within the APO planning area.
• Increasing visualization components for the document that will more clearly illustrate and coordinate with the
document narrative.
Next Steps
APO staff will continue to refine the 2035 Management & Operations chapter to include additional visualization
components and congestion management program information.
ltep~z~se»lirrR fhe Fullou~ink,Jr~~isdicrinus
Benton County • Havrn Township • LeSauk Township • tit. Augusta • St. Claud • tit. ioseph
St. ioseph Township • Sartell • tiauk Rapids • Sherlxirne County • Stearns County • ~~aitc Pork
r' ~.
r
2035 Au mented Network ~~,, ~~~_.
__-____
Con ested Lane Miles ~ ~ ~-
g
l ': ~ ~`~' ----
~ '- J
N
LEGEND
Roadways
--- Level of Service E - 140 Miles
Level of Service F - 157 Miles j
SCALE
;miles;
~ ~ 1 2
D
D
('7
rn
z
n
tanuay 2009 - m. r*;usser
gtrapc transportatior, plans/road~.vay/2035JCOngested pane miles 2035
DRAFT ATP-3 TARGET FEDERAL AND STATE FUNDING
2010-2013
ATTACHMENT D
FEDERAL FUND TARGET
Statewide ATP-3 Federal
Year Federal
Forecast Target Percent Base Level SAFETEA-LU
Total
HSIP Setaside Discretionary
Increase Formula
________ 2010 $392.0
--- ~ _10.2 $40.00 $0.00 $40
00 $2
99
___ 2011
$392A
10.2
-'-- - _
__ $40.00
--
--- $0.00 .
$40.00 .
$2.99 $37.01
$37
01
__ 2012
2013 $392.0
$392
0 10 2
,-
10
2 $40.00
---- - $0.00
-- $40.00
--- __ $2.99
-- .
-- $37.01
. . $40.00 $0.00 $40.00 $2.99 _ ~"_..~J1
District 3 Federal
Formula @
75% BAP
Redistribution
BAP Reduction HSIP
Total
$27.76
$27.76 $3.40
_ $6.60 $0.00 $1.12
$0.00 $1.12 $32.28
$35.48
$27.76 58.20 -$0.40 $1.12 $36.68
$27.76 $8.50 -$21.10 51.12 $16.28
STATE FUND TARGET
Statewide
Year Federal Target Percent Base Level Hold Harmless Total
Forecast
2010 $275.00 10.6 $29.00 $2.40 $31
40
2011 $275.00 10.6 $29.00 $2.40 .
$31
40
2012 $275.00 10.6
~. $29.00 $2.40 .
$31
40
2013 $275.00 10.6 $29.00 $2.40 .
$31.40
COMBINED FEDERAL AND STATE FUND TARGET
Year Federal Funds State Funds Total
2010 $32.30 531.40 $63.70
2011 $35.50 $31.40 $66.90
2012
2013 $36.70
$16.30 $31.40
$31.40 $68.10
$47.70
Total $120.80 $125.60 $246.40
DRAFT FY 2013 DISTRICT 3 ATP FEDERAL FUNDING TaRt;FT
~ /,
Year Target Approved HSIP Setaside State/Local State Local
Millions$ Target Million$ Distribution 75 Percent ~6-f~rr_ent
2013 $392.00 $40.00 $2.99
$37.01
$27
76
$9
25
~ r~ic trio} '] ATD
T-,.....a ..a ~ n nn
i .
_.. .
I
._. _ ... .~.-. ... ....~,v
DRAFT FY 2013 FEDERAL FUNDING SUBTARGETS BY REGION
Region Target °/, Target
Millions$
Region 5 32.65 $3.02
Region 7E 13.82 $1.28
Region 7W 33.00 $3.05
APO 20.53 $1.90
Total 100.00 $9.25
y
p ~ ~ ~ 00
.~ w .-~ a ~
oo 'd
p r
_
~
'~
~ O O to O~
O O ~ t~ O~
A ry
~ ~.
a
'~
'
0 0 0 .=~
00 W W o
~1 p?
~ {
1; ~q1
~ ~ .
~
A ~
N
~
69 69 69 69
~ a ~
b9
~ W
v
"
~ ~
N w v,
OC a A O _
N
~
t~ r
~D
J
N
A ~C O~ O
O a O O
O A a O
O
O
O
,.~ _
*_±~
O
O O O O O
O 0 0 O O
C
'
O
C7 ~
O
°~
a.
~
~
pCp~~
p
'+
O
x
~ ~,
~
~~.
~-f- ~ ~' '?~ p1
~ N (gyp
A
c O ~ ~
;c ~~ ~~
~ ~ ,
~^
~ ^> o
y.
ti
~o G a
7
~
x
y ~
~
~ ~--~
p.
o
~ Cn
N
~
O X7"1
~
~
•-~ ~
~
n
~ w
~
°o
~`1 p
'*
~p
y
R
0
O N
A
Q
~
~ J
J
~ ~1
~-'
~ N
0
A
0o
O
w
O v
~ ~
O
~~-- ~
N O
A N
w ~D
O~
'-' ~ ~ O o
J O~ ~-'
n n n
b b b
~ ~ C .- a ~
, o v. o
W ~ W ~ o o ~
o
~
i ,
7C' ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~' ~' ~ N
O ~
K '
~
U
Cn
G
' rq
~~+
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
p
Q,
CT R
O O O O O O O ~ ,~. ~
N ~ r-~ O O ~ p. ~ • ~ n
~+ ~
bg .~ Ff~
1` ~ n i w N E~ ~ -
~A o
o v
i W
A
O to w O O O ~D N O°
~
p i+~ tJ O O O C~ A A
~ N O
W ~ V
i O O O O ~
° 0 0 ° ° ° 0 °
°o 0 o o 0 o
CA
o '~.>
c. tJ
c J••
~ O~
a
~ ~l
~.
oo PJ
w
c q.:
.-: OC
c ~I
-- U
c, J
v,
v,
~
~. C -
a,
_] j''
C
J c
'/~
N
v.
oo o
J °
O c: e
~
+~ o
..~ c
V. c
V~ Z
~
w ~'' Y c
~ -,
nc a
~ R
a C y r:
~
R, -.
+r=• ~ -,
u it
0. G
~ f
ai
~ 7e f ~ ~ ~ t
C O ry O C, C ~ O ry C, C
r;
C Q=
G OL (fl
O ~
G. C
~
C ~ O fL C ~ G h O ~t to
O V, a .. r.' G .~-. O
a ~ C V, W to C O ~
n
f
a c ~ p ti ~ x ~ r%, ~ ~ ~ ~ q
n
~ 7 `.;
rt ~ a v, n. 3 rt x R. ~ ~ . . a
r .~
.-a .D ~ r ` .L ~ w .
r .
..+
a
r ~
o :~
.
~
~ v, ._
r ~ , _ u ~
,.:., ~.. p Z
~ v.
~ ~ O .. x .-.
c _ C C ~Ji O; ~ ~ ,
~ O y Q
z < -- ~ ~ ~ w y
~
~
~
~
C
°
~
~
h _
~~ c .o u c ~ a ~. o~ ~ R, N ~
S ~ ~ ~ ~? " c ~ v. ~ N
. ~
a
vo c~ ~
W = C.
C t
~ ~
Uc ~ ~
~ d
~, .~
y
~ ~
G-
~ r
C
~.
C
~• s ~ o• a
c ~
c
" o
c
~ a
~' x
R ~, .
~; ~
a
c~ '~_
C O
tr i
O O O C C po O
n 6• o o' O
O
o O
o
c ~/,
,c
c C
~o
c~
O
\
N
7
O O
o~ o
6.,
a
x
is,
J V'
N
v,
-
~,
-
En
to
to
~O
~:
t .:
v
C
v,
C.i
tiJ
Fn
t1.
rn
~-- i+'•
'"
C
J Ef
O
W
to
~D
to 'Tl
O.
W
.A N
O O
C J
w C~ N
.C -
C v,
t.~ --
1=• •oo P
C --
S~ =.
Oc C` O C
O
c -
- O
o C
c oc
a O~
~:. O
o C
c c
c :~
;oo C
0 O
o O~
c A
c O
o ~
a
o
c
o o
o c
c
c
~
c
~
o
o
c
c
O
N
o ''
n ~ v:
R ~ ~ ~
-- • r ~
a
~ ~ ~ ~ c ~ r
ti
C
~
~ ~
<
n m
«
d
~
=
n
~ a
~
~
c
.. ,
-
~_
.
~ w
`<
i9
~
a. c
~
~
n
~
q
o
n
~
oc ~ ~
ti ~
~ _ y D
a y
o ~ (•..
== ~
o ~ w
?o ~ a. ~
~ ~
ti a ~ ~ a .+
v c o , o °
r
n
~'
n
N
O
0
N
C
0
3 1N3WH~tflld
ATTACHMENT F