Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2003 [05] May 085-8-03 Page 1 of 2 CITY OF ST. JOSEPH ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Meeting Minutes -Special Joint Session with City Council Wednesday, May 8, 2003 Present: EDA Board Members Mike Deutz, Bruce Gohman and Ross Rieke. Absent: EDA Board Members Tom Skahen and Larry Hosch. Also present: City Council Members AI Rassier and Dale Wick, City Administrator Judy Weyrens, Outsource Management Representative Dean Wick, Amy Shaffer from SEH, Public Works Superintendent Dick Taufen, Wastewater Treatment Supervisor Jim Marthaler and Cynthia Smith-Strack of Municipal Development Group. Chair Deutz called the special EDA meeting to order at 4:06 p.m. The City Council meeting was also called to order. Lease Purchase Agreement Strack indicated a copy of a revised lease purchase agreement for the Public Works Maintenance Facility was included in the packet. The revised agreement specifically grants the EDA the authority to review and approve change order requests. Strack clarified the City Council also has the authority to approve change order requests. Gohman provided input on the lease purchase agreement. Gohman requested clarification from Bond Counsel regarding a definitive hold harmless clause. He also indicated a desire to confirm that the `permitted encumbrances' clause of the agreement provides coverage for all costs typically included in a net, net, net (triple net) agreement. Gohman specified several other points on pages 10, 11, 14, 16, 22 and 24. Strack offered to verify the hold harmless clause and triple net agreement language with Bond Counsel. In addition Strack provided an overview of Section 8.7 "Release of Unimproved Lands". Moved by Rieke, seconded by Gohman fo approve the revised lease. Motion carried 3-0. The City Council also approved the lease purchase agreement. Maintenance Facility Change Orders Mr. Dean Wick of Outsource Management Group indicated he had drafted change order request #7 earlier in the day. All present requested copies of the change order request and supporting documents. Wick indicated the need for the latest change order revision was due to the fact a deeper storm water retention/detention basin is needed. Associated increased costs were reflected in the general conditions and earthwork subsections. Wick indicated the general conditions reflected an additional six weeks of work for the project and the earthwork reflected the increased excavation required. Shaffer provided an overview of the ponding requirements and earthwork needed at the site. Deutz requested information regarding the roughly $10,000 in cost savings in the earthwork line item resulting from the change in building location. Gohman expressed concerns with itemized costs included in the general conditions line item, indicating they seemed high. Wick offered to review the itemized costs with the contractor. Gohman also expressed concern with the 2 1/2 % bond upcharge, indicating industry standard for that item is one percent. Wick indicated the cost was included in the initial project contract between the builder and the city. EDA Special Meeting Minutes -May 8, 2003 Page 1 5-8-03 Page 2 of 2 Rassier questioned the need for the increased pond size, the cost of the 'general conditions' line item and expressed concern over the number of change orders to date. Strack suggested Wick review the six previous change order requests as a means of providing further context for persons not familiar with the project's history. Wick provided an overview of all previous change orders considered, who considered them, their status and the differences between the requests. Rieke requested a step by step review of all items included in change order seven. Wick provided an overview of the items. Rassier, Deutz and Gohman raised concerns about project costs. Rieke suggested Wick return with detailed information on each line item. Weyrens suggested abreak-out of costs similar to those included in engineering documents for city street and utility projects. Wick indicated the contractor may not be able to provide such specific information. Rieke suggested the Project Coordinator be present at the next meeting. Additional information and the timeline for ~athering the information was discussed. A meeting was tentatively scheduled for Wednesday, May 14 at 4:00 p.m. Moved by Gohman, seconded by Rieke to table the EDA discussion of the change order and adjourn the EDA meeting. Motio carne 3-O;iMeeting adjourned at 5:06 p.m. C~ 6~~~~' EDA Special Meeting Minutes -May 8, 2003 Page 2