Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2003 [05] May 125-12-03 Page 1 of 2 CITY OF ST. JOSEPH ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Meeting Minutes -Special Joint Session with City Council Monday, May 12, 2003 Present: EDA Board Members Mike Deutz, Bruce Gohman, Ross Rieke and Tom Skahen. Absent: EDA Board Member Larry Hosch. Also present: City Council Members AI Rassier, Gary Utsch and Dale Wick, City Administrator Judy Weyrens, Outsource Management Representative Dean Wick, City Engineer Joe Bettendorf, Project Manager Jeff Baggenstoss and Vice President Steve Schultz from Shingobee Builders, Public Works Superintendent Dick Taufen, Wastewater Treatment Supervisor Jim Marthaler and Cynthia Smith-Strack of Municipal Development Group. Chair Deutz called the special EDA meeting to order at 5:06 p.m. The City Council meeting was called to order by Acting Mayor Utsch. Maintenance Facility Change Orders City Administrator Weyrens gave a brief update on an organizational meeting held on Friday, May 9, 2003 with representatives from the City and Shingobee Builders. The purpose of the meeting was to give Shingobee specific direction on what additional bid information was needed to proceed with change order review. At the meeting, the builder was directed to reinsert previously removed items including fencing and landscaping. Baggenstoss then provided an overview of revised change order number seven which was distributed at the meeting. The revised change order indicates: four additional weeks of project management and field supervision along with additional temporary facilities, testing, permits and insurance costs; site work including the excavation of a 120' X 80' X 6' deep retention pond; water system installation; the installation of paving and pavement markings; landscaping of the site; fencing of the site; concrete work (curb & gutter, dumpster pad, bollards for dumpster pad); steel materials (bollards); and, mechanical and electrical changes. The revised change order totaled $148,088.00. Rassier and Rieke expanded on the possibility of removing the fencing and landscaping items from the contracted work. Deutz explained past discussions regarding landscaping being performed by the Public Works Department. Rassier requested comment on individual items included in the general conditions line item. Further discussion regarding the appropriateness of the itemized charges followed including, telephone, electrical, dumpster, permit, testing and surveying services. Weyrens indicated the City could waive the building permit fee for the maintenance facility affecting both the increased cost itemized in the change order and the original building permit fee for total savings of an estimated $4,600.00. Utsch questioned whether any portion of the bituminous surfacing could be removed from the contract and installed in conjunction with other street project(s). Weyrens indicated the City had previously discussed removing the asphalt from the Shingobee contract and installing it in conjunction with other street work, thereby generating cost savings and accessing other methods of payment. Weyrens indicated the water and sewer enterprise funds can be used to fund bonds for street/utility projects. Further discussion followed regarding fencing of the site. Baggenstoss indicated the low bidder for fencing was willing to honor the bid until November of this year. If the City contracts directly with the low bidder they could achieve cost savings of twelve percent which corresponds to Shingobee's increased overhead costs and bond/insurance costs. EDA Minutes -Special Meeting May 12, 2003 Page 1 5-12-03 Page 2 of 2 City Engineer Joe Bettendorf questioned the amount of granular fill needed to prepare the building pad. Bettendorf indicated he would approve of slightly adjusting the proposed site contour to allow the excavator to skim additional base material from the site. Skahen questioned the total project cost's relationship to the proceeds of the bond. Weyrens indicated if the EDA and City Council approved the change order as presented City would have to identify an additional $74,069.00 to finance the project. Skahen clarified that the City, and not the EDA, was expected to identify additional resources which may include water and sewer enterprise funds and resources previously earmarked for parks. Skahen questioned what would occur if the EDA did not support approval of change order 7R. Weyrens clarified approval by both the EDA and City Council was required. Council member Wick indicated full denial of the change order would result in costs for storage of the building materials once they are delivered. Schultz indicated commitments from the sub-contractors would also be delayed if the change order were not approved. Additional discussion occurred with comments from Rieke, Utsch and Rassier relative to the removal of bituminous paving, fencing and landscaping from the contract and the waiving of building permit fees. Deutz inquired as to whether general conditions would decrease if the items were removed from the contract. Baggenstoss indicated work on-site could be reduced by one week for an additional cost savings of $1,800.00. Weyrens and Council Member Wick reported the following estimated reduction in costs associated with removing items from the contract as discussed: Item Removed from Change Order Overall Cost Savings Removal of asphalt paving $27,031.20 $ 2,896.20 Removal of Fencing $ 7,963.20 $ 853.20 Removal of Landscaping $ 8,736.00 $ 936.00 Waiving of Building Permit Fee $ 1,452.64 $ 5,152.00 Reduction in General Conditions $ 2,016.00 2 016.00 TOTAL $47,199.04 $11,901.40" *Paving, fencing and landscaping will still be completed as separate city projects, therefore the overall cost savings is $11,901.40. EDA Board Member Skahen questioned whether a change order in the amount of roughly $100,804 would be acceptable for change order 7R. Deutz requested a summary of all costs associated with the project, assuming change order 7R remained at that amount. Weyrens reported site acquisition and assessments costs of $219,250; plus building costs of $381,750; plus a previous change order in the amount of $1,856 and the proposed change order 7R in the amount of $100,804. Asphalt paving, fencing and landscaping would be additional at time of installation. Strack noted zoning ordinance requires paving, fencing and landscaping in conjunction with the project. Gohman inquired as to additional fees for architecture and engineering. Wick indicated those costs were part of the original contract. Skahen asked about the total bond proceeds available for the project. Weyrens indicated proceeds were $654,734.81. Skahen confirmed the remaining shortfall would be covered by other City resources. Moved by Rieke, seconded by Skahen to approve change order 7R without asphalt paving, fencing and landscaping items for a change order 7R total of $100, 804. Motion carried 4-0. The City Council entertained and approved a similar motion. Moved by Gohman, seconded by Skahen to adjourn the EDA meeting. Motion carried unanimously. The EDA m eting~~adjour d of 6:1_6 p~. L~~vra~i~e ~~~ti~~ ~J~ EDA Minutes -Special Meeting May 12, 2003 Page 2