HomeMy WebLinkAboutFYIJL,4�
My OF 101 J()SKPH
MEETING DATE:
January 7, 2009
Council Agenda Item ,y f
The following attachments are included in your packet as information only.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Nick & Sharon Froehle — Letter regarding the proposed improvements to
16u' Avenue SE. The City is still in the data collection stage when the data is
collected the City Engineer will bring a report back to the City Council at
which time the Council can decide whether or not the project will move
forward and if it moves forward what the project will consist of.
2. St. Ben's Sewer Use — Letter to CSB Attorney regarding proposal. The staff
has not had a formal response to this letter, although the City Attorney had
discussed the proposal with their attorney at the time of submittal. We are
hoping to schedule a meeting with CSB representatives to bring a formal
response back to the Council.
Letter from "Katie " - We received a letter requesting a street light on
Jasmine and Iris, Terry is looking into this.
REQUESTED COUNCIL ACTION: No action is required these are FYI only.
�r
. AI
a4.jP 1
roll-" 4,0
AeI y�
119� -
G
1P AI o7p 3 l -
Rajkowski Hansmeier
11 7th Avenue North
P.O. Box 1433
St. Cloud, MN 56302
320.251.1055
800.445.9617 toll -free
320251.5896 fax
www.rajhan.com
Thomas G. Jovanovich
tiovanovichCcDraihan.com
December 8, 2009
VIA FAX AND REGULAR MAIL
(320) 251 -5781
Mr. John L. Greer
Attorney at Law
110 Sixth Avenue South
Suite 200
P.O. Box 548
St. Cloud, MN 56302 -0548
RE: College of Saint Benedict
City of St. Joseph
Sewer Charges
Your File No. 103 -00040
Dear John:
The City Committee designated to work on the CSB Sewer Charges has had an
opportunity to meet and discuss the proposal outlined in your letter dated October
9, 2009. While the City still has a preference to measuring usage and billing CSB
based on water meter readings, the City appreciates your movement towards
metering by proposing the installation of flow meters to measure the wastewater
discharge.
However, before the Committee can recommend to the City Council approval of
your proposal there are a number of questions that need to be addressed. These
issues can be broken down into three areas: Design, Rate Structure, and existing
Contract Provisions.
DESIGN The City Engineer and Public Works staff will ultimately need to
review any proposed design plans and specifications for the
installation of the proposed sewer flow meters. However, in the
mean time, the following items should be reviewed and addressed
in more detail as we work towards a more thorough understanding
of your metering proposal.
1. Meter Specifications — detailed information on the
proposed meter must be provided.
Rajkowski Hansmeier
;Div a Cecr direcVon
December 8, 2009
Page 2
2. Manhole Access — CSB will need to verify that access is available to each
of the manholes where the meter is proposed to be installed. Recent
platting and building have created the need to review the level of access to
the manholes at the measurement point. The City staff will have to work
in the area, using all required confined space equipment. If reasonable
access cannot be provided CSB may have to look at other alternatives.
3. Manhole reconstruction — As you are aware installation of meters will
require reconstruction of the manholes. Please provide detailed plans as to
the design. The City is of the position that CSB will be responsible for all
costs to reconstruct the manholes and they must meet all applicable
industry standards and regulations.
4. Flow Constriction — Anytime a pipe is constricted there is a potential for
obstructions. In the matter at hand, the placement of the flume in the
manhole could lead to backup of solids. Please identify, based on field
experience, the likelihood of this occurring and what can be done to
minimize the occurrence. Flow constriction was an issue when the meters
were initially installed and subsequently discontinued.
5. Pipe Grade — For the metering to be effective the appropriate pipe grades
on each side of the flume must be present. The City will need evidence on
the grade of the existing pipes and evidence that the existing pipe grade
and pipe condition is conducive to the proposed metering.
RATE If it is determined that metering the sewer flow is an effective method for billing
purposes, the City will continue to bill CSB the percent of wastewater metered
based on the monthly wastewater transmitted to St. Cloud. The rate will include
the same percentage of fixed costs as wastewater generated. Therefore, for
example, if CSB generates 45% of the wastewater, then 45% of the monthly fixed
costs will also be billed to CSB.
The City will submit bills to CSB by the 20th of every odd numbered month and
they will be due and payable within 30 days.
CONTRACT If it is determined that metering the sewer is an effective method for billing and
CSB desires to continue to operate under the existing contract, the following
contract provision must be addressed:
Section 8. User Fee Surcharge ".... St. Benedict's use of the system shall
be limited to the total existing capacity (300, 000 gallons per day)
multiplied by the percentage of the project cost ultimately paid by St.
Benedict, pursuant to Section 3 of this agreement, (300, 000 gal. X [% of
use] = daily discharge limitation).
Rajkowski Hansmeier
^rovidinc c cl:_cr : ircclicn '
December 8, 2009
Page 3
In reviewing the CSB DNR Annual Water Report, and excluding the water
appropriation permit for the irrigation well, it appears that CSB's daily discharge
limits for sanitary sewer discharge may have been exceeded on several occasions.
The current contract includes a formula for surcharging fees when the daily
discharge is exceeded, and it includes a provision to review the usage and
purchase of additional capacity if the discharge is exceeded for two consecutive
years.
FUTURE CSB will be responsible for paying a portion of the St. Cloud Wastewater
Treatment Facility upgrade and rehabilitation costs as well as a portion of the Tri-
City Lift Station rehabilitation and interceptor system repairs. These costs will be
billed by the City of St. Cloud to St. Joseph as an expense, and CSB will be billed
accordingly.
In addition to the St. Cloud Wastewater Treatment Facility upgrade and
rehabilitation, the City of St. Joseph will also eventually be rehabilitating St.
Joseph's main lift station and the downstream forcemain/upstream collection
system. CSB will be required to participate in these costs as well based on the
same percentage billed for the St. Cloud WWTF upgrade and rehabilitation.
During the past year the area Cities who are contract users of the St. Cloud
Wastewater Facility entered into new sewer use and cooperative construction
agreements. Expenses incurred to comply with the new agreements will be billed
as an expense on the bi- monthly CSB utility bill.
Please forward the additional design information so that the City Engineer and Public Works
Director can analyze the proposal outlined in your letter. Once this information is received and
reviewed we would like to schedule a meeting with anticipation of resolving the sewer
billing/contract issue.
Sincerely,
RAJKOWS
By
Tho a G.
TGJ/baw
C. City Council
Judy Weyrens
Randy Sabart
Terry Thene
d.5
f,0 ; 79
f
� lbI [ca 0 see � /
llat�I oL
,�?h Id
y t