HomeMy WebLinkAbout[02] Orderly Annexation Area Land ManagementCTW OF ST. JOSEPH
MEETING DATE: April 19, 2010
Agenda Item 2
AGENDA ITEM: Orderly Annexation Area Land Management
SUBMITTED BY: Administration
BOARD /COMMISSION /COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: During 2009 the St. Joseph Planning
Commissions for the City and Township met several times to discuss land use applications in the Orderly
Annexation Area. The purpose of the discussions were to review the existing OA Agreement and
establish review processes for land owners that was not confusing and redundant.
The first step in the process identified the annexation process which resulted in a flow chart of process.
The chart simply illustrated the verbiage in the OA. Once this was completed the discussion centered on
applications for land use development in the OA area and the role the City has or should have in that
process. In addition, there was a desire to formulate a process that is efficient and not redundant.
The planning Commissions reviewed a proposed draft to the OA Agreement that redefined the process
and would establish one oversight board comprised of City, Township and County officials. The OA
Agreement has not been reviewed since the City and Township executed the MOU. The MOU delegates
Stearns County as the Zoning Administrator and identifies roles. Since the MOU was adopted portions
of the OA Agreement are obsolete.
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION: The City and Township entered into an Orderly Annexation Agreement
in 1992 identifying potential service areas. This agreement was amended in 2005. As stated above the
City also executed a Memorandum of Understanding with Stearns County and St. Joseph Township.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION: At the same time that the St. Joseph Planning Commissions were
reviewing the OA agreement, the City of Waite Park was meeting with Ann Reischl and Angie Berg about
the processing of land use applications identifying a more efficient process. Since St. Joseph Township
had a desire to have one process for OA management, St. Joseph was invited to the discussion to review
a proposed process. This discussion resulted in refining of the process and development of a flow chart
of how development plans will be managed.
Stearns County will continue to be the Zoning Administrator for the OA area but it will function in a
different manner. (See flow chart) The meeting at this time is to present to all the officials the
proposed process, soliciting feedback to see if staff should keep advancing the revisions. Under the new
proposal the Joint Planning Board would have final authority over land use matters in the Orderly
Annexation Area and their decision would be final. The appeal process would be district court.
The last meeting held between staff of St. Joseph (both City and Township) and Waite Park included the
attorneys for the Cities and Township. Since both Waite Park and St. Joseph use Rajkowski Hansmeier,
Sue Dege is representing both. Kirby Dahl represents St. Joseph Township
The City has a desire to be involved in the land use process so that as property develops non conforming
land uses are not created in the Orderly Annexation Areas. Future development should be guided
consistent with the long range plans. This was the intent when the oversight boards were created in the
Orderly annexation agreement.
ATTACHMENTS: Attorney Letter — Sue Dege .............................. ............................... 2:1 -3
Flow Chart — Development Process ................. ............................... 2:4
Flow Chart — Annexation ................................... ............................... 2:S
REQUESTED COUNCIL ACTION: There is no action required or requested at this meeting, as stated
above this is the beginning of dialogue to improve the delivery of service with regard to land use
management.
MEMO
TO: Judy Weyrens and Shaunna Johnson
FROM: Susan M. Kadlec
RE: Joint Planning Issues with St. Joseph Township
OUR FILE NO.: 29393
DATE: April 15, 2010
ISSUE ONE: Whether a joint planning commission is required in addition to the joint planning
board under an orderly annexation agreement ( "OAA ").
SHORT ANSWER: No. A joint planning commission is not required.
ANALYSIS: Under the existing Orderly Annexation Agreements, each City and the Township
have established both a joint powers board and a joint planning commission, with the planning
commission empowered to review land use applications and make recommendations to the joint
powers board. Traditionally the joint planning commission has met immediately prior to the
joint powers board, which has caused some confusion in the roles of each board in relation to
zoning decisions. The Cities and the Township desire to eliminate the joint planning
commission and have the duties of the commission assumed by the joint powers board.
The joint powers board is authorized to exercise planning and land use control within the orderly
annexation area pursuant to Minn.Stat. §414.0325, Subd. 5 and Minn. Stat. §471.59. The joint
powers board established under an orderly annexation agreement has all of the powers
designated in Minn. Stat. §462.351 to §462.364, the Municipal Planning statute. Therefore, the
board can act similarly to a municipality in its planning and land use controls. Under Minn.Stat.
§462.354, the creation of a planning commission is permitted, but it is not mandatory. The
annexation statute does not require a joint powers board to establish a separate planning
commission. Accordingly, the joint powers board may act on land use applications without a
planning commission to avoid unnecessary duplication of efforts. The planning commission
must be abolished by a 2/3 vote of the members of the joint powers board.
NOTE: The creation of a board of adjustment and appeals is mandated by statute. As with a
city council, the joint planning board may sit as the board of appeals and adjustments. The OAA
with the City of St. Joseph does not expressly name the joint powers board as the board of
adjustment and appeals. I recommend that this be addressed in the revised OAA or the
Memorandum of Understanding ( "MOU ").
2:1
ISSUE TWO: Whether the Cities, County and Township can jointly establish zoning controls in
the OAA area?
SHORT ANSWER: Yes.
ANALYSIS: The proposed zoning for the OAA area is the Stearns County Urban Overlay
District which will be adopted by the County Board prior to the effective date of the amended
OAAs. The Overlay Zoning will be incorporated into the OAA by the MOU. It is anticipated
that the County, the Township and the applicable City will be represented on the joint powers
board, with the City and Township each having four representatives, and the County having one
representative. The OAA delegates various duties and obligations among the parties to the
agreement. Allowable uses within the OAA area will be established in the MOU.
While there is no one statutory authority which encompasses all of the issues being addressed in
the OAA and MOU, there are separate statutes authorizing each part of it. The county is
authorized to enact zoning controls applicable in the township pursuant to Minnesota Statutes
Chapter 394, and such controls shall prevail over a Town board's less restrictive controls.
Minn.Stat. §394.33. A municipality may establish a joint planning district with a county, the
purpose of which is to adopt a single plan for the district. Minn.Stat. §462.3535, Subd. 3. The
city may delegate its authority to adopt official controls to the board of the joint planning district.
In addition, a municipality may contract with the county for planning and zoning services to be
provided by the county, including the adoption of zoning controls Minn. Stat. §394.32. A city
and township may, in an OAA, designate what land use controls will be applicable in the OAA
area. Minn.Stat. §414.0325, Subd. 5(c). The joint powers board is empowered to adopt its own
land use controls within the OAA area, as it has the same authority as a municipality in regards
to enacting zoning ordinances. Minn.Stat. §414.0325, Subd. 5(a). And finally, the joint powers
statute allows for two or more governmental units to "jointly or cooperatively exercise any
power common to the contracting powers or any similar powers, including those which are the
same except for the territorial limits within which they may be exercised." Minn.Stat. §471.59,
Subd. 1.
There is an unpublished Minnesota Court of Appeals case regarding a joint powers board which
included one representative from the County. Gold Nugget Development, Inc. v. City of
Monticello, 2001 WL 683488. The appellants argued that the member appointed by the County
violated the statutory requirement that the board be representative of the parties to the agreement.
The Appellate Court did not agree, but instead applied broad definition of "representative."
Because this case is unpublished, it does not constitute binding authority. It is likely, however,
that the reasoning would be followed if the issue came before the Court for review.
In my opinion, the various statutes provide sufficient authority for the acts contemplated by the
OAA and the MOU.
NOTE: To the extent that the MOU is establishing allowable uses in the OAA area, which differ
from the uses allowed under Township zoning, and which are not expressly stated in the Overlay
District, it is my recommendation that the MOU be adopted by the joint powers board, following
notice and public hearing consistent with the adoption of a zoning ordinance. This may be
2:2
overly cautious, but the established uses will not be subject to later contest if adopted with the
same safeguards as any other zoning ordinance.
2:3
Land Use Management of Orderly Annexation Area
ICity of St. Joseph /
City of Waite Park
Platting
Application received by
County. County reviews
to determine
completeness and
conformance to County
Ordinance and City/Twp
land use.
County sets public
hearing, prepares
notice, mails, publish
County forwards staff
report to City/Twp.
City responsible
for preparing
meeting material
City prepare final
findings of fact
and record action
Orderly Annexation
Agreement & MOU
Zoning Administrator
Stearns County Environmental
Services
Interim /Special Uses
Variances
Application received by
County. County reviews
to determine
completeness and
conformance to County
Ordinance and City/Twp
land use.
County sets public
hearing, prepares
notice, mails, publish
Rezoning
Application received by
County. County reviews
to determine
completeness and
conformance to County
Ordinance and City/Twp
land use.
County sets public
hearing, prepares
notice, mails, publish
Township of St. Joseph
Lot Split
Administrative Division of a
split for the quarter
purpose of section
attachment
Administrative
split for the
purpose of
treatment
system
County forwards staff County forwards staff
report to City/Twp. report to City/Twp-
Joint Planning Board
Membership:
City —1 Council, 3 Planning
Twp —1 Board, 3 Planning
County — District Commissioner Township
Responsible for
minutes
Conduct Public Hearing
IAdopt final findings of I
fact
Boundary line
adjustment
Administrative
split for the
purpose of
securing a
mortgage
County staff
review with
consultation of
the City and Twp
Note: The Joint Planning Board has flnol
authority on land use matters.
2:4
The application is complete,
criteria met, fee, legal
description and tax statement
received.
The petition is placed on the
Council agenda for approval
and a copy is forwarded to St.
Joseph Township.
Resolution is prepared and
forwarded to MN Planning,
copy to St. Joseph Township.
City Receives notification
from MN Planning that
annexation has been
ordered. The City map is
updated with the new
boundary.
Annexation Illustration
Adopted .2010
Annexation
Petition
received
Administrator reviews
petition to see if the
request meets the criteria
for annexation
Application does not meet
criteria —Joint Planning Board
meeting scheduled.
Joint Planning Board makes
recommendation to Joint
Powers Board :1
Joint Powers — authorize Joint Powers —
public hearing for annexation is
annexation H I premature and denied
The public hearing results in
the Joint Powers Board
approving the request. Each
jurisdiction must act
separately on the request.
Upon verification the
Township has approved the
annexation request the City
Council approves the
annexation and forwards to
MN Planning, copy to St.
Josenh Townshin
City Receives notification
from MN Planning that
annexation has been
ordered. The City map is
updated with the new
boundary.
The public hearing results in
the Joint Powers denying the
request. Each jurisdiction
must separately act on the
request.
Upon verification the
Township has denied the
annexation request the City
Council denies the annexation
and the property owner is
notified. The matter is
considered closed.
2:5