Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout[04] Tom Borresch, IUPcrrvas�:Jcashra Planning Commission Agenda Item 4 MEETING DATE: July 6, 2010 AGENDA ITEM: Tom Borresch, Interim Use Permit Accessory Building Sales SUBMITTED BY: Administration PREVIOUS PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing to consider issuance of an Interim Use Permit to allow for outdoor sales of accessory buildings. During the process it was determined that the property owned by Borresch at 8850 Ridgewood Road and 9 —17th Avenue SE are out of compliance with Ordinances. Before consideration, the Planning Commission requested Borresch make the necessary improvements to bring the property into compliance. In addition Borresch waived the requirement to act on his land use application in 60 days. Borresch was originally scheduled to appear at the June meeting but he requested additional time to work on the outstanding issues. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The revised site plans have just been submitted to the City late on Thursday, July 1. Therefore, at this time the staff has not had time to review the plans. They will be reviewed with comments for the meeting. ATTACHMENTS: Request for Planning Commission Action 4:1 -2 Borresch Letter regarding project updates 4:3 Site Plans showing what recent & proposed changes 4:4 -6 Certificate of Survey [Site 1— 8850 Ridgewood Ct] 4:7 Certificate of Survey [Site 2 — 917th Avenue SE] 4:8 Extract of Planning Commission Minutes [2010 Apr 05] 4:9 -10 Extract of Planning Commission Minutes [2010 May 03] 4:11 Extract of Planning Commission Minutes [2010 Jun 07] 4:12 Findings of Fact & Decision 4:13 -14 Application for Interim Use Permit 4:15 -17 Application for Variance 4:18 -21 Property Sketch 4:22 REQUESTED PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: The Planning Commission should take action on the interim use permit, approving with conditions. 4:1 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 4:2 City Officials and Planning Commission 1. Update as to the scope of work and terms discussed by Lee Gladitsch, City Inspector, Terry Thene, Public Works Director and myself, Tom Borresch and to provide a proper site plan in applying for added product sales to various companies at two separate sites 1.8850 Ridgewood Ct, St Joseph MN 56374 2.9 SE 17th Ave, St Joseph MN 56374 To Summarize: #1 Site: All terms discussed with the above have been met to include: A. Removal of wall and proper placement of dirt and land. B. Landscaping shrubs and plants, as per original plan. C. A third move to another proposed storage building site. D. Rearrangement of employee parking. E. The seal coat and striping is under contract to be completed mid July, along with the #2 location. #2 Site: 17th Ave site depending on changes, if any to that location. A site and survey plan has also been complete at that site as Roadway Sport-n- Trailer also applying for a long term variance to sell additional products such as docks and lifts as it's a nice fit with the trailers and helps add sales in these economic stricken times, although it's very seasonal. Both sites have always been kept clean and organized. We will make improvements as logic and finances will allow. Mike Borresch, my brother, and I hope our applications and updated work will allow our further existence as full company and product operations. We look forward to continuing a good relationship with the council and planning commission. T nk you, Tom Borresch 4:3 BdocOmMoWdly ofa Jon007AL7010 Re-landscaped W-5 4:4 IIIIII -Adis Final Proposed Move 4:5 �1 y JJ i b m n■ AWIII ` a s � ' C 4:6 ooalsauoe wm aomauop'.— :alispaM Lsz315i -0ZE :xei ESWISZ-OZE apopd 10£95 NW'PnOD W!e5 41no51a3i15 PIEZ LICE a3E}jppnol) •as OIOZ 00U S3N09 �' va IZ9Z6 ON'JIl pI EL-9: :MM bC£95 NW 'Nd350('15 353 VW1LT6 6 OdOl ONV ANVONnou S3IlU3d021d 4NVIU31VM LL > pl W-90 :31V0 U :3uuyN�ls Noa>f'W 1,1NVa :3WON nlrod .weaw,mrupnnaaxe srM.�wnsnp rourwoaas rmeslwa irw wunn.enaxl MWO 903AONddtl T :I.e 03re1153a w z SIJO :A9NMYd0 U Jv /Na :Aa A3nm5 3140 NOLSIA3N 9 } w a N U I fl-A w v / III A III / I I ' / / �i i) i'j'i I I 1 i I i i i (d)3.6GISeSON 08'891 a..QT- a 3�! 1 � II, W , w I I r / I� fir" r , I I 1 I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I , � I , I d I I I I I 1 / I I I I I I w z 1 Z 1 I Ai z 0 g U T z w z "E U vi F OU v1 � w p a 3 z 9a z O z J z 0 F S z F > 4 � o w w w � = w a °z > °z z° w 3 g w t z N I a w mw I ��m �w z q Qr I : U .) I I ti I O [f (I! W I } w a N U I fl-A w v / III A III / I I ' / / �i i) i'j'i I I 1 i I i i i (d)3.6GISeSON 08'891 a..QT- a 3�! 1 � II, W , w I I r / I� fir" r , I I 1 I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I , � I , I d I I I I I 1 / I I I I I h� ® O � h- C: vSf (� z W F o� _ a ft I �z 1 Z 1 I Ai T "E �I ° Q L f' 9a T za I I o 9 Zb p w N c QQY � °BY �\ CD I a w mw v I , z q Qr I : U .) I I ti I I F$ ' IT 1 3'-91-W-SN .__.___ (diN.6E�I�cf05 I 1 I - c4 \ L 941 Gg _ I G48 -- GBH_ G-B G-B T- II ---I - G-0 ? 5: .. /lf , h� ® O � h- C: vSf (� z W F o� _ a ft 1 9 CJ ' / I ( Wv ore sg N E E 3 0 �z ,no Eqo . T H � o ` o rnF a io EA °o � N 41 U O O OJ OA ++ -O to � O Ln 00 00 m m ° O m 0 n — � m N w a °0 1O 9? o o 3 qc vi ^'a wca o � ? 0 23 d E. at�oyL, a 'Ro ��' p p,vtl�qt8ta,nw Z �Si5�°nEu�ol7�- -« 8 L z o f U V z U K x � K ~ (% z n a CO x IV u�3 z z p z moo w . Zr 9 V �fz w Oz0 ak O�a Q O 00011669 \1669 \ :I I �z 1 Z I Ai T "E �I ° Q L i T za o G-9 1 p w N c QQY � °BY �\ CD 1 v I , q Qr I : U .) &g ti I R-W F$ ' IT 1 3'-91-W-SN .__.___ (diN.6E�I�cf05 1 9 CJ ' / I ( Wv ore sg N E E 3 0 �z ,no Eqo . T H � o ` o rnF a io EA °o � N 41 U O O OJ OA ++ -O to � O Ln 00 00 m m ° O m 0 n — � m N w a °0 1O 9? o o 3 qc vi ^'a wca o � ? 0 23 d E. at�oyL, a 'Ro ��' p p,vtl�qt8ta,nw Z �Si5�°nEu�ol7�- -« 8 L z o f U V z U K x � K ~ (% z n a CO x IV u�3 z z p z moo w . Zr 9 V �fz w Oz0 ak O�a Q O 00011669 \1669 \ :I o0alsame wo�'ooAauop'r.�w,a+: avq m SWISZ -OZE: -q E99b19i-OiE :a wgd [OE 9S NW'PnOD luleS WnoS WjS P1EZ LTLE no yIOP 10 ZS 0102 WO SLL N09 I z in O -0 z wv� 11926 ON DD of-zi-90 LV(3 bCE95 NW 'Hd350C 15 r 3S 3AV Hit 16 00 $ Od Ol ONV AatlONfT08 SKI)Ad011d ONVIU31VM p o d t N o t� > a 01 -6190 :3Ltl0 L y m 3aMVNMS � NoaawialNtlO 'MN tNMd .a.lal.l,oa. �eam.�a rM�mwNnu» :rma n�..�„una�.eluawl wO AS Oanoaddv ' oy�,n ^' vi° Ae O9r101saO ' W d L v m q 5410 Ashmm0 pQQ o 7a /Ha :Ae A3LIms 31V0 NOISTA3a c N E E � Z L o 8 ,_ o P � w z z z in O -0 z wv� °cS� v En m� ° �mv E' r'Oi v.a,N rna �`� °u o.1Oio xTq'. 3�n °V L y m V m O v S m o O o ' oy�,n ^' vi° W gEpa N ' W d L v m q c ui W o E pQQ o J9a£ Y= t01.i5aE3 o t°'J `-- c N E E � Z L o 8 ,_ o W J 0 w z z z in O -0 2 z ❑ U O T ❑ .i w O 2 V Y a ' � $ a V 0 0 `r II u v m� II N 0 E tea^ > n O V ¢ l7 J W J W (A OJ N 3 C O) i�+ Q N L n Q1 I I I I d -'i nS 3,A,-, H1:: L �' snowlwwe - r IB I \ GB Gg - - -,FrB -- (aMi.OY.ro.00N ._ / / G"B G'8 G•B G-B I6S'081 M„L£IZSoON M , _ I 1 0? � 9'lE eEi I a m i -,. 1, I t'i $ B ast Lei C) lu C� 3 6•L 69 FTZ I Ep i P ,�j m _ O r — — 'Od B-0.� m -- r + - -- )- -- � - -� - - - -- -- -- - -- IOI@ fib — — — — — — — — — — - -- - 8 3 Dear z ....0 I t; Z8 h- � \ O pp s F= I a I__ ----------------------------------- -- -- - 3 ._ -By ..— .._..— ... ET'STZ M..L£,ZSoON B9 - , 1Q �_ ......, JAM FOB FO B(d)M.Ob�b0e00N FO-B —_ _' FQ_B. —_ FO-8 %..... I I ' I I I 3S H19'. I � ` I �o a p Cu0 w z z z in O -0 2 z w £ 3 z =O m =N3 z S z w o`2 z C�u m n, � VI I^plU/1 F f£� Z V • O a n z O V ¢ l7 J F❑ > U1 O z w u u a Bryn = G> a a 3 y O O w O O w y K J V1 g U£ m H Q Q w Z ❑ w ❑ w ❑ W IL IL m a o u° t� w w t� 3 3 L9 u > > 00 Q©NO 2 W I w tt9 W (A OJ N 3 C O) i�+ Q N L n Q1 I I I I d -'i nS 3,A,-, H1:: L �' snowlwwe - r IB I \ GB Gg - - -,FrB -- (aMi.OY.ro.00N ._ / / G"B G'8 G•B G-B I6S'081 M„L£IZSoON M , _ I 1 0? � 9'lE eEi I a m i -,. 1, I t'i $ B ast Lei C) lu C� 3 6•L 69 FTZ I Ep i P ,�j m _ O r — — 'Od B-0.� m -- r + - -- )- -- � - -� - - - -- -- -- - -- IOI@ fib — — — — — — — — — — - -- - 8 3 Dear z ....0 I t; Z8 h- � \ O pp s F= I a I__ ----------------------------------- -- -- - 3 ._ -By ..— .._..— ... ET'STZ M..L£,ZSoON B9 - , 1Q �_ ......, JAM FOB FO B(d)M.Ob�b0e00N FO-B —_ _' FQ_B. —_ FO-8 %..... I I ' I I I 3S H19'. I � ` I tea_ WV ZE :B OTOZ /OE /9 �o a p Cu0 ° z in O -0 2 z w £ 3 z =O m =N3 z � z w o`2 z C�u m u � VI I^plU/1 F f£� Z zO7 5 • O tea_ WV ZE :B OTOZ /OE /9 Extract of Planning Commission Minutes — April 5, 2010 Public Hearing, Interim Use Permit/Variance — Tom Borresch 9 17th Avenue NE: Kalinwoski called the hearing to order and stated that the purpose of the hearing is to consider an Interim Use permit to allow outdoor sales and a variance to place items within the view shed of CR 75. The property is legally described as Lot 002, Block 001, Neu Addition, located at 8856 Ridgewood Road. St. Joseph Code of Ordinances 52.07 subd. 4(a) allows for an Interim Use Permit as follows: Purpose: The purpose and intent of allowing an interim use is: 1) To allow a use for a limited period of time that reasonably utilizes the property in the manner not permitted in the applicable zoning district; 2) To allow a use that is presently acceptable but that, with anticipated development may not be acceptable in the future. St. Joseph Code of Ordinances 52.21 limits the storing or display of goods from the view of the corridor roadway. The request for Interim Use and Variance has been submitted by Tom Borresch. Kalinowski opened the Public Hearing. Al Stellmach approached the Commissioners in reference to the proposed Interim Use. He stated that he owns Ridgewood Storage adjacent to the property seeking a variance and he has no objection to the proposed use. The public hearing was closed at 7:13PM. McDonald began by stating that he does not believe that the sheds located entirely on his property. Meyer questioned the Standard Procedures if the property owner requesting a variance /interim use does not attend the public hearing. Weyrens stated that in the past the Commission has tabled action on the matter, notifying the property owner that unless they attend the next regular scheduled meeting, the Commission may deny the request. Meyer made a motion to table the request of Tom Borresch for an Interim Use Permit/Variance at 8856 Ridgewood Road. The motion was seconded by Orcutt. Discussion: Wick questioned whether this will meet the 60-day rule to which Weyrens stated it would. Deutz stated that there are a lot of things to be discussed and asked for some history on the property. Weyrens advised the Commissioners that the application came in late with the initial application for a Special Use Permit. In reviewing the proposed used, the correct process would be an Interim Use Permit. Since the subject property is in Corridor Overlay District a variance was needed to place outdoor sales in the front yard green space. After the application was reviewed it was determined that the existing building is constructed across the property line. In additional the outdoor sale items are located on property not owned by the petitioner. While reviewing the current land use request, the previous land use items were reviewed. The existing facility was allowed through the issuance of a variance and special use. The variance provided relief from the exterior requirements and the special use allowed a warehouse facility in the B2 Zoning District. The special use limited the storage of material to that used by MN Home Improvement or Leaf Guard. In a separate action, the property owner secured an interim use permit to allow trailer sales at the property owned across CR 75, located at 9 —17th Avenue NE. The Interim Use was approved for a one year period. If the property owner wished to continue the use, the parking lot must meet 4:9 the Ordinance regulations. At this time the property is not compliance with the Ordinance and the Trailer Sales are still occurring. Weyrens stated that Borresch was contacted on Friday and the morning of this meeting and he did not return the calls. Staff had wanted to discuss some of the outstanding items. McDonald questioned Weyrens as to how a building is constructed outside the property line. Weyrens stated that at the time the facility was constructed the City outsourced the Inspection Services and once the permit was issued, the inspector was to complete the necessary inspections. The prints submitted to the City indicated the correct setbacks, but what happened in the field cannot be traced. The building inspector relies on information from the property owner. The process today is much different. McDonald then questioned the use of viewsheds and stated that he cannot see how this fits in entirely with CR75. He believes that a viewshed should be used to protect something of value to nature. In his opinion, there needs to be a compromise somewhere. Orcutt stated that used car lots are required to have asphalt and while reviewing the site before the Commission the existing parking lot for the facility is not paved nor is the area where the accessory buildings are located. He questioned Weyrens as to whether or not this is like a used car dealership and if bituminous surfacing should be required. Weyrens replied that car lots are approved through the Special Use Permit process and the allowance for the use remains with the property. An Interim Use Permit is a temporary use that is not permitted in the specific district, but is a use that is acceptable short term. Interim Use Permits have specific terms that expire. Meyer added that the property being discussed operated in the Township as a business and the regulations in the Township were not as stringent. Uses and conditions allowed in the Township are not necessarily those accepted by the City. Therefore some of the concerns are grandfathered. The Planning Commission; however, has the authority at this time to request modifications so the property is conforming. With reference to Ordinances 52.21: Transportation Corridor Overlay District and Design Standards, Deutz stated that he would like to review the entire ordinance, in a working session, rather than picking out certain items for discussion. According to Deutz, it is apparent that the Ordinance was not followed with either the Coborns project or the CentraCare project. He added that the City cannot pick and choose who to apply the Ordinance too. McDonald agreed. Weyrens suggested that they discuss this at their meeting in May and hold the Public Hearing in June. Meyer added that 300' does seem extreme for a setback in the Overlay District. Wick clarified that if this item is tabled until the May meeting, the public hearing would be closed. Weyrens replied that no additional public testimony would be accepted; however, Borresch would be able to speak regarding his request. The motion passed unanimously. 4:10 Extract of Planning Commission Minutes — May 3, 2010 Interim Use, Variance — Tom Borresch: Weyrens stated the Planning Commission tabled action on the Interim Use request of Tom Borresch to allow for display and sale of accessory buildings in a B2 Zoning District. The matter was tabled in April as the petitioner /owner was not present. In reviewing the plans it was noted that the accessory buildings were located on property not owned by Borresch and members identified some compliance issues that needed to be addressed. Therefore the matter was tabled to this meeting. Tom Borresch approached the Commissioners as the owner of the parcel in question. He stated that he has met with Weyrens and understands that the accessory buildings he has already placed on the property are not located on property he owns. He also stated that he has been made aware of some Ordinance compliance issues. As of this time he has not had the opportunity to determine how to resolve the outstanding issues and would like some additional time so that he may meet with the Building Official and Public Works Director to receive feedback and direction. With regard to the structure he placed in the railroad right -of -way, he has contacted a representative of the rail company leasing the tracks to determine setback areas. He again stated that he would like some additional time so that he can get a better understanding of what exactly he can do and then propose what can be done. Weyrens stated that the matter before the Commission is a land use matter that requires action within 60 days of submittal unless the petitioner or City extends the time requirement. Weyrens stated that prior to the meeting she discussed the requirement with Borresch and he stated that he would be willing to extend the time requirement. Borresch presented the Commission with a letter waiving land use action within 60 days of application. McDonald made a motion to accept the waiver of the 60-day land use requirement and table action until a future meeting. The motion was seconded by Meyer. Discussion: McDonald spoke to Borresch and stated that he appreciates him moving the buildings back. In his opinion, it looks a lot neater and they are now located on his property, but yet they are still visible from the road. Borresch added that they also have a parking issue that they must deal with. McDonald questioned whether they will see what can be done with the property across the street as well to which Borresch stated they will. He added that he needs to talk to the City about the proposed improvements to 16`" Avenue as well to see how /if he will be impacted by those improvements. The motion passed unanimously. 4:11 Extract of Planning Commission Minutes — June 7, 2010 Tom Borresch, Interim Use Permit: Weyrens advised the Commissioners that Tom Borresch recently met with the Building Inspector and the Public Works Director regarding outstanding site conditions. Borresch has removed the accessory building that was constructed in the Rail Right -of -way and he is working on restoration. In addition the accessory buildings for sale have been moved to behind the existing sidewalk, outside the front yard setback. Borresch has requested additional time to complete the necessary work so that both of his properties are in compliance with the Ordinance. 4:12 City of St. Joseph IN RE: FINDINGS OF FACT Application of Minnesota Home Improvement, Tom Borresch AND DECISION Interim Use Permit — Outdoor Sales Variance Request — Viewshed, Intent 709 County Road 75 East FINDINGS OF FACT On April 5, 2010 the St. Joseph Planning Commission conducted a public hearing to consider the application of Minnesota Home Improvement/Tom Borresh for an Interim Use Permit to allow for outside display sales and a variance to have such display in the Transportation Corridor Overlay District. The matter was duly published and notice was provided to property owners within 350 feet of the above referenced property. The Planning Commission hereby finds the following facts as it relates to the request of Tom Borresch to secure an Interim Use Permit to allow for outside display sales and a variance to have such display in the Transportation Corridor Overlay District. I. In May 2006 the Planning Commission reviewed the Zoning Ordinances for potential amendments. At this time the Planning Commission was presented with a new Ordinance entitled Transportation Corrldor Overaly. The intent of the transportation Corridor Overlay District is to enhance the visual appearance and continuity of development from parcel to parcel within highly visible, high - traffic corridors and to maintain the long -term function of arterial and collector roadways. 2. On December 4, 2006 the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed zoning amendments which Included adoption of the Transportation Corridor Overlay District. The Planning Commission unanimously recommended the Council approve the Ordinance as drafted. 3. On December 17, 2006 the St. Joseph City Council unanimously accepted the recommendation of the Transportation Corridor Overlay District and the Ordinance was published and became effective in December 2006. 4. In addition to adhering to guidelines in the B -2 Zoning District, the property also falls under the regulations of the Transportation Corridor Overlay District which was established by Ordinance in 2006. The purpose of the overlay district is to protect and promote the health, safety and general welfare of the public, to enhance the visual appearance of the corridor, to protect and promote the appearance, character and economic values along the corridor and the surrounding neighborhoods. 4:13 S. The proposed site plan indicates that outside sales will be located within the view shed area which is not permitted in the Overlay Ordinance. 6. Site Management that is not consistent with the Corridor Overlay district may make application for a variance and granting of a variance must meet the statutory findings as identified in St. Joseph Code of Ordinances 52.07 Subd. 2. 7. The subject property is zoned B2, Highway Business. As such the Ordinance does not list outdoor display sales as a permitted use or a use under special use permit. However, 2 Joseph Code of Ordinance 52.07 Subd. 4 allows for Interim Use Permits that allows for uses for a limited period of time. Granting of an Interim Use Permit must meet the standards identified in Subd 3. DECISION AND CONCLUSION Based on the Finding of Fact, the St. Joseph Planning Commission recommends of the Interim Use Permit based on the following: Based on the foregoing Finding of Fact and Decision and Conclusion of the St. Joseph Planning Commission, the request for Special Use is forwarded to the City Council as a recommendation for Passed by Resolution of the St. Joseph Planning Commission on April 5, 2010. CITY OF ST. JOSEPH By Kathleen Kalinowski, Chair By Judy Weyrens, Administrator 4:14 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss COUNTY OF STEARNS ) NAME: tom borresch APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL USE PERMIT City of SC Joseph 25 College Avenue N PO Box 668 St. Joseph, MN 56374 Phone (320)363 -7201 or Fax (320)363-0342 Cs$sG (0�5e wood PC( ADDRESS: 917th ave se stjoseph mn. 56374 PHONE: 2,503,303 Fee $ 400 0? Paid X Dare . IS. 10 I/We, the undersigned, hereby make the following application to the City Council and Planning Commission of the City of SL Joseph, Steams County, Minnesota. (Applicants have the responsibility of checking all applicable ordinances pertaining to their application and complying with the ordinance requiremer*L) 1. Application Is hereby made for aSpeddUse PWnnit to conduct the Wowing; & sell storage buildings on land we currently pay taxes on. 2. Legal desgiPdon ofIWW to be affected byappl/catlon Including acreage or square footage of land ►nvokv4 and street address Many (attach additional sheet /fnecessaryA add lot 002 block 001 subdivsioncd 00069 section 11 township'! 24 range 029 3. Presentzoning of the above described prolmay1& 112 - Highway 75 Business 4. Nome and address of the present owner of the above described property; as above S. Is the proposed use compatible with the future and present land uses of the area? Please explain: R Yes r' No currently selling home improvement type products out of the same location 4 :15 6. Will the proposed use depredate the area in which it is proposed? Please explain: r Yes Dz No businesses along corridor display similar products or items. 7. Can Me proposed use beaecornodated with existing City seM a without oveftrdeft the system ? Phrase explain: 19 Yes r No selling exact items along business corridor S. Are local streets capabkofhandNng trall9cwhlah is ge wotedbydwproposed use ? Please exploht pZ Yes r No end road AttKbed to Ws apppcatim awl made a part tbareef, an eeber malarial submbdoo diet requinm*rt% as Wi iatet Applicant Signature: - -� Date: 3.15.2010 Property Owner Signature: J ; Date: 3.152010 Date application submitted: bate application eompkted: Planning Commission Action r Recommend Approval r Recommend Disapproval Date of Action: City Council Actiotx r Approved r Disapproved Date of Action: Date Applkan0roperty owner notified of City Council Action: 4:16 City of St. Joseph Required Material Submission Special Use Material Completed applications for Special Use requests and required fees shall be submitted the City of St Joseph Zoning Administrator at least 20 days prior to the proposed date of consideration by the City. The twenty days allows the City to review the application, forward the application to other entities for review as required and notify the public as required. Only completed applications will be accepted. it is the applicant's responsibility to submit required materials. If an application is determined to be incomplete, notification, which indicates which portion of the appikation is incomplete, will be mailed to the applicant within 10 days following submission of the application. REQUIRED MATERIALS - The applicant shall provide the following: MATERIAL REQUIRED 1. Additional written or graphic data reasonably required by the Zoning Administrator or the Planning Commission as described below- AN applkatlons mast brdude a nanvtke of the spedal Use requa L The spedal Usa application mat be compbad inks emhe" iedsafrgdw masons "to whir the Plannbg Co wnhsion and City Council should app r o-a thrmquest. I Site Plan containing the following: - Legal description - Site plan showing parcel & building dimensions - Location of buildings showing square footage. easements, curb cuts, driveways„ access roads, parking spaces, off - street loading areas, sidewalks - Landscaping and screening plans - Drainage and erosion control plan with elevations - Sanitary sewer and water plan with estimated use - Soil type and location of wetlands - Proof of ownership 3. Required Fee. 5400.00 Of held during a regular scheduled meeting) $000.00 (If a special meeting is required) 4. Payment of Addltiomi Fees. COMPLETE COMMENTS 57 Yes No ST. So�� ►►� w � t 1 ...+: 1 � -� ran ar • G v►r F?- Yes No inJ i l I b �. w-� �'..! I'�"'� S � �ca►Lt -w��� car -../ I .,, -,�; �,.sr►.es] r.tr}' ciO�r� V.ta1 ex o" o vr.: C-0.. t % y ` r%&&j Yes No W e. �-.c. r \c. Vw a understand that VWe are responsible for reimbursing the City for any additional legal, engineering, building Inspection or planning fees associated with my request. Applicant Signature: C T� Date: 3 , 15. 20 10 4:17 APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE Cky of SL Joseph 25 College Avenue N PO Box 668 St Joseph, MN 56374 Phone (320)363 -7201 or Fax (320)363-0342 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss COUNTY OF STEARNS ) Paid Date 3, 27. 10 Me, the undersigned, hereby make the following application tothe City Cound and Planning Commission of the Cityof St. Joseph, Steams County, Minnesota. (Applicants how the responsibility of cheddng all applicable ordinances pertaining to their application and complying with the ordinance requirements.) PROPERTY OWNER NAME - ro M V o r YtS c _ , x-11 ww►c PROPERTY OWNER PHONE NUMBMk '3Z0 . j'5-0 . 330-a, 32 to, ._q PRMM Y OWNER ADDRESS: 6 8 Ci lC2 , d si a I"J a O j Cam'. SO'-,1 0S Q43 1% M PJ • .51x31 C� ZONING DISTRICT: 13 _ Z LEGAL DESCRIPTION: h a- to add 104- 00-L 61 ot-lc 00 1 S 1A b d ; vis i �n.ccl UO n � 5 PROPERTY OWNER SIGNATURE(S): SC.� 11 w rt S 1• .a 1'L 4 1. The request(s) which we desire for owprgpertyls/areIn confect with the fokmft sectlon(s) of ft St Joseph City Code: gym* S 2 . "Z Section: Section: 2. Proposed non-confovmanceft- _ Tv h + s !_ ra.+�s �.. 1r , we.\ ► �.. ; t r-, S�a�.o.d,� ►a .,. ; 6w 0r4 1 ur. t,J , M \ d b.a.- - L- O 0* 0-- g rtis. (1 vM b w .' \ d "l y • r+ .. .. o�s,�. 4i,,ytr- tR.a a d - = w: 1 \ 1�iyo - l-�.a_ ten► -s.� w e,t ► nw r : CA, eb wr.Y�, \r►. cam. ) c.�d xca p ir., S i hn► �o. �-d_a, w �I cov�.a_ '1'v ST_ 3- Whatspedal=Wk kkmand dOwnstances edst whkh are partkuMrto dwland, smxture orbuMngM btrolMedwhich db not appy to the land, stnxtwes orbtdkong(s) in the sum zoning dassilkationt (ottam oddflional pages as neso A0 o vd 1 NA -p"Sk. w G..L 1 S- lri'N.► ZC: -+-as .� "1 S a Mw hS Odd -�'\ w• W�ry :�}ov- w ��. o...� • ltrvo w tad �t i� -s..�- Q„01.� b:�r w.+� d Is p Ley c»F S�)'4rS � � V i c.t s j..�ri.a.. a. �vr v �. d v►c � H•q .d d v t�,�� 1. i ,.0 � ci '� m `n v � ..o c%G� -.j W a.e3 Q%e� �✓�!�'^' Ir—Not Qo s v a c9 �r •v�v P r e e1 �.► c.,L 1 v►► So 3 t . Wrb o pay "r. �. � e. �•or`'d -f -t- a►,c w ►'s e. r i f w... c�.'� �.►�� o...v- o S �'c w �. y p .�. ► ;- . A 11 C94-%-4w%0- "S , w �-•y m r► s-a- s �_ 5 t�t•.�p 1• \x. d rte.e,c..., ►Y. -%>�. J ► s� 6y CIA p-V a d %^ C.* S 060,0v%63 rn c..',j P-ra.w'VV s %%k FS•P � r.\ � W a \ \ �, r .►gam, ��- S ►.nc. \ \ P i C � 1... •� S .+.5 �'Y1'� a M OlY► u c. �. - 1'1r-Q. G �"'J CJ 4:18 4. Do any of the special conditions and circumstances result from your own actions? ffthe answer is yes, you may not qualify for a variance. r Yes No i ^ 9s.3 PIC^ 5. whatfacts and conskkrodons demonstrate that the ?herd lnterpretatiorr ofthe zoning code wouId dgxbvyou ofrights commonly en/oyed by other propenies In the some district under the terms of the zoning code? (attach addidond pages as needed) No cYJ'f- ar Go.,�i , '-'n "I - �f-'l�.a.r & — I / d o ✓f-t �-'�... S.o�..,NC_ -�'V. v� r Ik J ti. staeeyow masons for belkvimg dwt o variance wiA not confier onyou anyspedalp►hvi W that h deo by thezoring code to other Iandr, structures orbuildkW In the same dlstrkt /► j/1i.e.v .. P i,.�s� �Jyit/ c� X19 fi..S t lsi.J o�.v � TM- v�3'►�w.. � ..rti+. "�/4.a.. Gr3^ -I'-� ri 1 �i.,,•., es , ��''S 1r�e -}fir, v^� G) tb�''1J-�". '�L�e.� w w b C.sl�,.•' 7. state your reasons for believing that the oakn(s) you propose to take is/areIn keeping with the spk*and the knentof the zoning co& T 1 h L ' ) S P,s -4-o 93,c1 4-vJ • .. a r h/ t y 1. 5 �...� s ✓tar S . v �. 5.`// w� /) e.:,� -{..L7 VAA- S (3 1P '� J.j L C Q'Y+ C av'i_/. JJt-Z bPPW u V Ci L . & state your reasons for believing that In asakt enforcement oftheprovislomofthezoni g code would muse undue ha . Undue hardship means that the property in question cannot be put to reasonable use If used under the conditlonsalk wed by the zoning ordinance. Economic considerations alone shall not consthute an undue hardship under the terms of this code as rehrencedIn the slate statutes. • TNfT rr,ek;>:,f �o,d S74ay.S ,Fa 1 law A - c1 a p I c y S .:, j ^0 1Ni.� -t 1-. rr�1 �. �r► A- v�e...� ` o ,� p n•aya . 2 t7 - (ae.ispla_ o �- S w•.-+� p o � ►.* � �a-s, b�- o cam y ,� � m -�.d � u.4. , !3 arts . �- 4:19 Attached to this application, and made a part thereof, are other material submission data requirements, as indicated. Applicant Signature: l J ., Date: 3, Property Owner Signature: (� _..�.�� Date: 3 r Date application submitted: Date applica*m completed: Commission Action: r Recommend Approval r Recommend Disapproval Date of Acdon: ICity Council Action: Approved Disapproved Date of Action: Date ApplkanVPropeRY owner notrad of City Council Action: 4:LU City of St. Joseph Required Material Submission Variance Material Completed applications for variance requests and required fees shall be submitted the City of St. Joseph Zoning Administrator at least 20 days prior to the proposed date of consideration by the City. The twenty days allows the City to review the application, forward the application to other entities for review as required and notify the public as required. Only completed applications will be accepted. It is the applicants responsibility to submit required materials. If an application is determined to be incomplete, notification, which indicates which portion of the application Is incomplete, will be mailed to the applicant within 10 days following submission of the appikatbm REQUIRED MATERIALS - The applicant shall provide the following: MATERIAL REQUIRED COMPLETE 1. Additional written or graphic data reasonably r Yes required by the Zoning Administrator or the Planning Commission as described below: r No M "O1cwdons must km*W1a a nwn dw eIFdw radsm mqua L "w variance appO=t1 n mobs completed In its ontir"indudirg the masons as to why the Mannil" Can n*sion and City Cowxg shouid approve the requast. 2� � S Yes r No a regular scheduled rneethrg) 3'i $800.00 Of a special meeting is required) 7 3. Payment of Additional Fees. COMMENTS oil I c.—.d o ,-,J e,,,.i y a 4-0 bwr i re s.t G-1 i••r u�aL, I/we understand that I/we are responsible for reimbursing the qty for any additional legal, engineering, building Inspection or planning flees associated with my request. Applicant Signature: �C.� cam 4:21 f7 3 N N r s s 3 l i fi 0 + O s 0 7 T n w ILI y 3 0 S 10% CA r S J I j s � T y a - x S 1► c 4:22 J Y �.b fi 0 + O s 0 7 T n w ILI y 3 0 S 10% CA r S J I j s � T y a - x S 1► c 4:22