HomeMy WebLinkAbout2010 [11] Nov 18November 18, 2010
Page 1 of 6
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the St. Joseph City Council for the City of St. Joseph met in
regular session on Thursday, November 18, 2010 at TOOPM in the St. Joseph City Hall, opening the
meeting with the Pledge of Allegiance.
Members Present: Mayor Al Rassier, Councilors Dale Wick, Renee Symanietz, Steve Frank, Bob Loso
and City Administrator Judy Weyrens
City Representatives Present: City Engineer Randy Sabart, Finance Director Lori Bartlett, and Public
Works Director Terry Thene
Others Present: Tim Borresch, Margy Hughes, Thomasette Scheeler, Emily Grunke, Herman Gangl, Tom
Gustafson, Dick Taufen,
Mayor Rassier thanked Councilor Wick for acting on his behalf during the last council meeting
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Mangy Hughes, 128 Able Ct E, approached the Council to invite them as we as the public to an event to
be held downtown beginning on Friday December 3 on the corner patio. The event is called "Something's
Up Downtown ".
Tim Borresch, 11 3'd Avenue NW, advised the Council that he has some concerns regarding his utility
bills. His concern is that of the line charges as he is being charged four line charges for each of the
apartments in his home. With house values declining and property taxes rising, he asked for some relief.
Approval of the Agenda: Frank made a motion to approve the agenda with the following
additions /deletions:
Delete 2.1 Special Recognition Award
Add 6b Park Terrace Update
The motion was seconded by Symanietz and passed unanimously.
Consent Agenda: Wick made a motion to approve the consent agenda as follows:
a. Minutes — Approve the City Council minutes of November 4, 2010.
b. Bills Payable — Approve check numbers 043452 -043522 and EFT numbers 000467- 000475,
000521 - 000522.
c. Donations — Accept the donation for the disc golf in the amount of $21.50.
d. Treasurer Report — Accept the October 2010 Treasurer Report and Cash Position.
e. Interim Use Permit — Authorize the Mayor and Administrator to execute the Findings of
Fact accepting the recommendation of the Planning Commission issuing a conditional
Interim Use Permit to allow the issuance of a rental license to Cory Ehlert for 29 MN Street
E.
f. Gambling Report — Accept the 3`d Quarter Gambling Report as presented.
g. Proclamation — Proclamation declaring November 26, 2010 as Loso's Store Day.
The motion was seconded by Symanietz.
Discussion: Loso questioned whether or not 29 MN Street E requires the property to be half
business, half rental. Weyrens stated that the current Ordinance does not have that provision so it
does not have to have a retail component.
The motion passed unanimously.
Public Hearing — 2011 Fee Schedule: Lori Bartlett, Finance Director for the City approached the Council
to give a brief presentation of the proposed fee schedule for 2011. Based on Borresch's comments,
Weyrens advised the Council that the line charge is based on the number of single- family equivalent
units. Bartlett added that the purpose of the line charge is for everyone to pay an equal amount of the
November 18, 2010
Page 2 of 6
fixed costs to include treatment, buildings, personnel, etc. She stated that the line charge was
implemented about five years ago. Weyrens reminded the Council that, previously, there was a minimum
charge and people used more water because they paid for it. Now, by paying for what they use, residents
tend to use less water. The City needs to meet certain conservation rates so we need to promote
conservation. Bartlett stated that staff began reviewing the fees this summer along with the budget
process. There are proposed increases to the Park/Fire Hall Rentals, Land Use /Development Fees,
Compost Permit Fees and Utility Fees.
Park/Fire Hall Rental Fees: Bartlett suggested that these fees be increased to cover increased
costs related to maintenance staff time and new equipment in the parks. She provided the
Council with information on how St. Joseph compares to the area cities. The proposed increases
are as follows:
Current Proposed
Resident $75 [+ tax] $80 [+ tax]
Non - Profit $75 [+ tax] $80 [+ tax]
Profit/Non- Resident $100/$75 [+ tax] $105 [+ tax]
Damage Deposit $100 [Parks] /$200 [Fire Hall] No Change
• Land use /Development Fees: Bartlett advised the Council that the proposed changes include:
Current Proposed
Annexation Fee $300 $400
Joint. Planning Application n/a $200
Lot Split Fee $300 $400
Water Access Fee $4,200 $4,300
Bartlett stated that the Annexation and Lot Split fees are proposed to increase to cover
administration costs associated with the hearings. The Joint Planning Application fee is a new fee
for 2011 due to the creation of the Joint Planning Board. This is board consists of members from
the City of St. Joseph, St. Joseph Township and Stearns County who review planning matters in
the annexation areas in the Township.
Bartlett explained that the Water Access Fee [WAC] is proposed to increase by $100 as was
originally intended to help cover the water filtration debt. The proposed increase is due to a set
increase of $100 annually to a max of $5,000.
• Compost Permit Fees: According to Bartlett, there are a few concerns regarding the compost site.
The current compost space is encroaching on the area neighbors and disc golf. Staff is also
concerned about the introduction of Ash Bore in the wooded area. She also addressed some
needs for the compost to include purchasing future land or modification of current operations or
possibly a joint venture with the City of Waite Park. The compost fee is proposed to increase as
follows:
Current Proposed
City Residents $15 $25
SJ Township Residents $15 [ +250 SJT Subsidy] $25 [ +$250 SJT Subsidy]
She provided the Council with a comparison of the area cities as well. Along with the $10
increase, staff is recommending that St. Wendel Township Residents no longer have the option of
using the site to minimize the use.
• Utility Rates — Water, Sewer, Stormwater and Refuse: Bartlett advised the Council that the refuse
rates are not proposed to increase as the City remains locked into a three year contract with
Allied Waste. The proposed utility rate increases are as follows:
Water Use
Water Line Charge
Sewer Use
Sewer Line Charge
Storm Water [SF Residential]
Current
$2.40/1,000 gallons
$10.30 /bill
$2.40/1,000 gallons
$11.50 /bill
$7.50 /bill
November 18, 2010
Page 3 of 6
Proposed
$2.70/1,000 gallons
$11.00 /bill
$2.70/1,000 gallons
$12.50 /bill
$9.50 /bill
Bartlett stated that the Water & Sewer Rates are proposed to increase due to the following:
• Cover current debt costs
• Cover operational costs necessary to treat water to MN Dept of Health Standards
• Cover depreciation to replace infrastructure
• Cover proposed capital equipment purchases
She stated that the proposed sewer rates were based on the following:
• Cover current debt costs — City of St. Cloud
• Rehabilitation /upgrades to treatment plant
• Interceptor repairs
• Tri -City Lift Station rehabilitation /upgrade
• Operational supplied increased to slow down rapid deterioration of St. Cloud interceptors
• Cover depreciation to replace infrastructure
• Cover proposed capital equipment purchase
According to Bartlett, ideally, the City would like to cover 100% of the depreciation. The City is
trying to get that close to 50 %. She added that the interceptor repairs were not included into the
previous rates.
She advised the Council that the Storm Water Fees are proposed to increase due to the
following:
• MPCA reporting requirements /protect waters
• Cover proposed capital purchases
• Cover operational costs to maintain system — including depreciation
■ Ponds, curb /gutter, mains
Bartlett stated that the percentage increase in the Storm Water Fee for single - family residences is
similar to the percentage for other users.
Frank made a motion to open the public hearing at 7:30; seconded by Loso and passed
unanimously.
Tim Borresch approached the Council for a second time questioning why the City of St. Joseph has the
highest percentage spike and why we are the highest paying place in the surrounding area. He expressed
his concern about the compost permit and stated that the compost was there prior to the disc golf course
and he does not feel that the pile has grown over the past five years. In his opinion, things are getting out
of hand.
Herman Gangl, 7t' Avenue SE, approached the Council and questioned Bartlett as to what the proposed
percentage increase is per utility bill to which Bartlett replied 13 %.
Thomasetfe Scheeler approached the Council as well to ask them to provide the residents with some
education on how to conserve water minimizing the increase in rates.
Margy Hughes appeared before the Council and questioned if the biggest culprit is the water filtration
plant and the fact that the City did not receive the homes as projected. Rassier stated that those are two
factors; however, the sewer repairs were another big expense. He added that the Lift Station repairs were
unexpected. Hughes also questioned whether or not the Industrial Park has City services to which
Rassier replied that the Industrial Park located behind Coborns does.
November 18, 2010
Page 4 of 6
Jane DeAustin approached the Council to speak on behalf of the CMBA. She urged the Council to
carefully consider the fees for development and building. According to DeAustin, the number of residential
buildings has declined over the past few years. She reported that from January through October, 2005,
there were 100 residential building permits pulled compared to 9 last year and 7 this year. She added that
the good news is that the numbers are stabilizing. The decreased number of new homes is due to the fact
that a comparable home is much less expensive for the buyer. DeAustin asked the Council to consider
freezing the WAC fees or, do what other cities are doing, which is to defer the WAC /SAC until the
Certificate of Occupancy is released or until the time of service. She added that this is being done in other
cities and it seems to be working.
Symanietz made a motion to close the public hearing; seconded by Loso and passed
unanimously.
Loso advised DeAustin that the City has already deferred the WAC /SAC fees as requested by a
developer. Frank stated that he would like to see that as a standard for the City rather than done on a
case by case basis.
Frank stated that it is the assumption that St. Joseph is the highest. The Council needs to look at what it
takes to operate and look at the current charges, budget and go from there. He questioned whether or not
we are the highest. He stated that the City cannot change the fact that the St. Cloud updates needed to
take place. Assuming that those were repairs were necessary, he questioned how the City compares and
what is meant by covering capital expenditures and capital depreciation. Bartlett stated that it is hard to
compare one City to another because each City has a different way of charging fees and each City has a
different agreement with St. Cloud based on their needs. If refuse were removed, St. Joseph is in the
ballpark. Bartlett added that other cities have different revenue streams as well. She explained that the
capital expenditures are determined by looking at the Engineer's CIP and the Public Works CIP since
capital projects are slotted in different years. Bartlett advised the Council that the water tower is in need of
repair and the wastewater plant is scheduled for rehabilitation in 2012. These projects are included in the
fee schedule.
Weyrens suggested that they re -look at the rates to see if they can be reduced. This would be brought
back again at the December 2 meeting.
Frank questioned the status of the sewer use agreement with St. Ben's. Loso advised the Council that
they are back in negotiations with them. Bartlett stated that the proposed fee schedule includes the
revenue stream based on estimated usage for CSB; however, Rassier stated that we cannot make
decisions based on their usage because we do not have actual numbers. Rassier expressed frustration
with the lack of an agreement with St. Benedict regarding their sewer use and stated it has gone on too
long and it is hard to stay positive.
CITY ENGINEER/PUBLIC WORKS REPORTS
Update on 16'h Avenue SE: Sabart stated that, at the last council meeting, they were advised that this
project is in the winding down stage. The contractor will be back tomorrow help clean up the street and
remove the stormwater protection items. He advised the Council that there is a small amount of turf that
has not yet been placed due to weather as well as the fact that some trees have yet to be transplanted.
That process has been delayed until next spring.
Sabart also addressed the drainage issues along the Vogel and Pueringer properties. He stated that it is
feasible to extend a storm drain behind those two properties; however, he is not sure how this would
affect the buried utilities in that area. Both Vogel and Pueringer have been accessing the back side of
their properties through Outlot A. According to Sabart, they have not yet solicited any pricing nor have
they discussed costs with the property owners. Loso questioned Sabart as to whether or not the Liberty
Point Development is the cause for the drainage to which Sabart replied that it is reasonable to say that
as the drainage is ending at the bottom of the hill. Sabart advised the Council that he estimates the
construction costs to be between $10 and 15,000. He suggested that they use a concrete pipe rather than
November 18, 2010
Page 5 of 6
plastic as vehicles will continue to use this alley and it is not paved. Frank questioned who would be
responsible for this to which Sabart stated that is the question and added that it needs to be fair and
equitable. Loso expressed his desire to see the drainage issues in the spring. Rassier and Frank both
stated that they would like to see some preliminary cost figures.
With respect to the 16th Avenue SE assessments, Weyrens stated that the City recently sent out notices
of a re- assessment and there has been some contention. The current assessment is a legal assessment
and the Council is being asked to keep it as is. The Homeowner's Association is the legal owner and they
have been advised that if they can get all of the affected property owners to sign an agreement to pay,
the assessment could be re- allocated.
Loso made a motion to rescind the hearing for the re- assessment of the 16th Avenue SE
Assessments. The motion was second by Frank and passed unanimously.
Loso stepped down from his chair.
Park Terrace Update: Sabart stated that, last week, an informal neighborhood meeting was held with the
residents of Park Terrace and there were about a dozen residents who participated. They discussed
concerns relating to access issues, utilities, etc. He sees this as a good starting point to solicit feedback
from the property owners. When looking into this, Sabart stated that there was not a lot of record
information available. As part of the Feasibility Study, he stated that they would like to do a topographic
survey to identify all the manholes and corresponding depths. The anticipated survey cost is $ 1,200 and
can be completed before the end of 2010.
Frank made a motion authorizing the expenditure of $ 1,200 to complete the survey as requested;
seconded by Symanietz and passed unanimously.
Loso resumed his chair.
ADMINISTRATOR REPORTS
Upcoming Meetings: Weyrens stated that there will be a budget meeting on November 22 at 5:3013M. The
Intergovernmental meeting will be held on November 30 at which the agenda item is legislative priorities..
MAYOR REPORTS
St. Augusta: Rassier stated that the City received a letter from St. Augusta thanking the Public Works
staff for helping them with their sewer system jetting. He stated that we need to work with other
communities as, in the future; they may be able to help us out.
APO Executive Meeting: Rassier reported that he attended the APO Executive meeting. He advised the
Council that a lot of changes are coming and a lot of projects are being re- looked at. They have no clue
what will be happening until the new elected officials take office.
COUNCIL REPORTS
SYMAN I ETZ
Upcoming Meetings: Symanietz reported that the APO will not have a meeting in November or December.
She also advised the Council of the Park Board meeting on Monday, November 22.
WICK — No Report
LOSO — No Report
FRANK — No Report
November 18, 2010
Page 6 of 6
Adjourn: Loso made a motion to adjourn at 8:40PM; seconded by Symanietz and passed
unanimously.
ke�y
s° 7 A tor