HomeMy WebLinkAbout[07b] Downtown Action Plan •
CITY OF ST. J OSFPH
www.cityof stjoseph.com
Administrator Date: July 19, 2012
Judy Weyrens
Memo To: Members of the EDA
Mayor City Administrator Weyrens
Rick Schultz
Memo From: Joanne Foust and Cynthia Smith - Strack, MDG, Inc.
Councilors
Steve Frank RE: Downtown Action Plan
Bob Loso
Renee Symanietz
Dale Wick The EDA has been asked to conduct a workshop session to begin the Downtown Action
Planning process. Enclosed are copies of the downtown area of St. Joseph. Commissioners
EDA will be asked to identify the following on their maps. Maps will be compared and discussed at
Dough Danielson
Larry Hosch the meeting, with a goal of developing a consensus, or a couple of options to seek community
Steve Frank input on. Key items the EDA will be asked to highlight include:
Tom Skahen
Dale Wick 1. Downtown Boundary — Outline in black. This is the area you believe should be in the
core downtown.
2. Locations for Parking — Highlight in orange. This may include vacant sites, current
parking lots or sites which could be redeveloped as parking lots.
3. Pedestrian ways — Highlight in yellow. This includes walkways to businesses,
connections to parking lots, connections to other trails and to the Wobegon Trail.
4. Courtyards or green space — Highlight in green. This should include areas for
community activities such as farmers market, courtyards or small pocket parks in the
downtown.
5. Redevelopment Sites — Highlight in blue. This should included areas which may be
suitable for redevelopment with commercial on a first floor and multiple - family
residential on a second floor, a multiple - family residential building or new commercial
structure.
The EDA is also asked to:
1. Identify methods of implementing a theme such as through the use of benches,
planters, design guidelines, etc Discuss methods to include stakeholders in the process
2. Identify methods of marketing the downtown including development of signs at the
entrances to the city, along the Wobegon Trail, development of print materials and
apps.
3. Define the unified vision for the downtown to seek stakeholder input on
4. Identify steps to accomplish the vision
5. Develop a phased plan for implementation and
6. Identify funding sources to accomplish identified goals.
•
CITY OF ST. J OSEPH
www. cityo(stjoseph.com
Parking Study.
At the joint Council, EDA, Planning Commission and Park Board meeting, the need for a
parking study was discussed. Enclosed for the Commission's information is an example of a
parking study which was completed in another community we work with. This will provide you
with an idea of the level of detail and type of recommendations which may result. The cost of a
parking study is estimated at $10,000 to $15,000 depending on the scope.
If the EDA believes this would be beneficial, it should be included in the 2012 budget or
recommended to the City Council for 2013.
Grant Inquiry.
In order to support the Downtown Master Action Planning efforts we prepared and submitted a
grant inquiry to the Initiative Foundation for $4,500 to assist with our consulting fees to facilitate
the process as well as meeting expenses. We expect to be notified by August 7, 2012
regarding whether or not we are invited to submit a full grant application.
N - �.....
a
■
';' „a _ a
A ,� 7
, . ,, 7 f_ ,,., .,.
MN. DESIGN TEAM
„.;;.=!,,.
FOR ALLEY: between M VISION n. & 'eon* - ' 1 '7,_::;
'''`:t4','"4
Ash Streets fro m College to ; ••-
era. std A NW
" iE 6 PLACE ,s,..1.4„..t. * , " -- - 4 , . ,a4/ A ,.'"', .. . • .` E ',71""*"' ik;:giiit4'''.1 M 4
R3
- *LW '' '', r '''''' A ' ilf,.. „
� csr
this area ; w
a is for s R" 1
s;P r » fi r
now $ ; l
t
,.
8
Tare �
€ (I1 loci
ti .�
red 4 elxo �° e tp t.
- s tP p
F
.........,, ,,, 7 .,, ,„..--.., �, Y ' " 5 1' Y -'g F p i 6 4 i - --..;.- A - 4,4 =0,..k.' =
„ ,.,‘,,i,11. % .4..
A, $ ,� '
-T.
,,,,,..,,,- s ", `
mieims
x,,,,,,,.. r :,.....,•,:' .„,,, ''' r' ...v,e :, F ez :.' a r ,
ARCHWAY
tom
Mei
5' gg
- n
wa _ � � �� � � " ! Mil
J
�L _
, 4 cif` -''. ,--,-------< „z ° "'""°A
-t .i' ,,.. z ' 'V x m p g «�- # _ "
Consulting Engineers & Surveyors
12224 Nrcollet Avenue •Burnsville, MN 55337 8
, , Phone (952) 890 -0509 * Fax (952) 890-8065
www.boUQn- rnenk.corn
MEMORANDUM
Date: September 30, 2011
To: Tim Loose, City of Jordan
From: Bryan Nemeth, P.E., PTOE
Jacob Bongard, E.I.T.
Subject: Jordan Downtown Parking Study
Study Results and Recommendations
Project No.: T14.103187
Introduction
As requested by the city of Jordan, a parking analysis was completed for the City of Jordan, MN
regarding the occupancy of and need for additional parking spaces in the historic downtown area
as shown below. To gain a complete understanding of the conditions currently present in the
downtown area, a parking inventory was performed along with a parking generation study and
parking use study. From these studies, the parking needs in downtown Jordan are determined
and recommendations are posed to make effective use of the existing parking and add parking
where needed.
STUDY
AREA
g„ ➢� O F
H:UORD \T14103187 \docs\Final Report 093011.doc
DESIGNING FOR A BETTER TOMORROW
Bolitni & Meek is an equal copporturtit 3 ernplcoyer
0
,4 .
I-
., Page 2
Parking Inventory
A preliminary study of the project area was performed to evaluate the quantity and use of
parking spaces present in downtown Jordan. This includes an inventory of both public and
private spaces with notes tying the private spaces to properties. This is used to determine where
existing parking is located for use by the community. Existing parking signing and striping was
also documented to gain an overall understanding of the parking available in downtown Jordan.
Figure 1 displays the collected information and provides the names of businesses currently
serving the area. Handicap spaces are identified on the existing parking conditions figure but the
handicap parking signs have been omitted to reduce clutter. There are a total of 621 parking
spaces currently available in the study area, split among public, private, and handicapped spaces.
10 S.aces
® • Public
� � ,`
Private
v
■ Handicap
H:UORD \T1 4103187 \docs\Final Report 093011 doe
DESIGNING FOR A BETTER TOMORROW
Bolton & Menk is an equal opportunity employer.
'a, of +- ,kf � « "d ,,, ¢..
!::°;:-..--.., r � y ,- t ' � $ ,, !� � i ° �' ; :� ,
s. , It 1 u,�a i ds ; `1t 1 P 1.T1 7 ' ''g
z5 E 1' '`t Ai r I P VI iy i„ •
fz ; p lli t t ' � . . i ' 3 a
1 a i ce a
f l
a • _� �� 4•�i R a t ail :' � . .
ii fx _, a a� m ?S c ' 1 , E � tzl �' :se z
> ▪ kl t,``,� - d 4 $ ) g u r, ° z v,
r I � LIZ
I I ._ ._.. 1. ..1,_ �, $ I € x a 0 ,L,.. . . y s M m .+ s r _ p - a� ,. I„ 3 � �� Q
0
5 s
, ' t .T �. "- "' fi e ,,, ,.,, ,., �'t ; , ,., '^ �r i..'Q Y
w n Pi � , +r r ,. ' i .' � td i . .., e
x
„� ^g
x � 3JY " ��.6cs� � M u. � " i n
... /��1 w :.
1 �� � �37m t t i � � a rr �-
a 3' �i � a m - � � S ' ''',1"'" ,yr
S y s � § � u �>m /r* � �
s, t T. - 1 `, , „,-
s `' mix '�
2y9 4 �Ct#R3 r .n � � , Z s?a � �� „Y�f {F7i v $3�Yd$ a S��Ydr S tuft X i •+ M
y � '.''.1' fin
a N ec
.. a , . f u g %l '',' �" ., a � > S ' per' ' " �. Z ,§
,,,., • f c .. ,:'' i ,r ' ' E i Ca a kp " � ff � 'y " a te ,. '' n.
Q
en y ' Ci '- a o 2 t W
¢ g y; E.-1‘',.. E' S,w,J� t,J $�fiG£ H��°` L.
i ,, N�t�eMrt ; r
: r a f ,, ^
bd �
£ - Yw 6.. . 13 r. 5' for
it tl ` b
, L_ � i •. � 6.....!..i � � e, .. � .,fie. N �. [��^ � r p4 � �"h ^s � ,.. 4
n � -- ?:.4 frs El V'� _ {v
, v . + 1 „ • 6 .. �. I � Mme 5
� . ,
2 b „ ` 3 :>v 41 ' . S§ YdS a . � . -3`�✓c sfSi
S dS 1 kf L A �a y iIl11 $>k �: • '; ' 9 53 dt E 33
, �. Z '
� � t � S33Y 33 � ti °
temi,i_ . a ...4.14,, . i;::_,..,.... , ., .,,,, .. t r
x
, p:',',,:r -.:-i' ' .4' .t ; .. t t
...,...., . ,,i1. .. , .. , ,,, ,
''.....;: . > 4.; w
.. _it. ,.., - .3.,, E p +�'x a y , ..„,..,. ,,....,,_:,,,tt..,,,, . , .
k \tEti1P - \, Ike L!'? Ort i 1 � ;,,,,,t,
'CI' '9 k3 BOO -1p0 O4gQ
R ' A 41 11,
Page 4
Parking Generation
A study was completed to estimate the number of parking spaces required to accommodate the
number of local businesses and apartments within the project area. Methodology from the
Parking Generation Manual 4th Edition was used to analyze both occupied and unoccupied
buildings to ensure results are compatible with a fully occupied downtown. The parking needs
estimates were obtained from the approximate square footage of each businesses and the number
of residences. Initial results indicate that there is adequate parking available downtown but there
are parking issues in certain areas.
Sato coy
■TotaI A, ilaLle
Total R.cu'red
0 1 200 300 400 500 600 700
The study indicates that 1 Street E from Rice Street to Broadway Street (Block D), Water Street
from Rice Street to Broadway Street (Block G), Broadway Street from Water Street to l Street
(Block N), and Broadway Street From 1St Street to 2 Street (Block M) may benefit from the
implementation of additional parking spaces as shown in Tables 1 and 2.
Both weekday and weekend studies indicate that action may be needed to better manage existing
parking issues by informing motorists of alternate parking locations. There is an excess of 156
and 111 parking spaces during weekdays and Saturdays that are not used.
Blocks are designated as shown in Figure 2.
H:VORD \T14103187 \docs\Final Report 093011.doc
DESIGNING FOR A BETTER TOMORROW
Bolton & Menk is an equal opportunity employer.
Page 5
Table 1: Weekday Parking Generation Table 2: Saturday Parking Generation
Downtown Jordan ParkingSoaces (Weekday' Downtown Jordan Parking Spaces (Saturday)
Total Total Total Total
Block Required Available Difference Block Required Available Difference
A 0 42 42 A 0 42 42
C 34 72 38 C 37 72 35
a sa r er".' ; ;.e M .
E 18 55 37 E 19 55 36
G 77 49 -28 G 85 49 -36
I 14 46 32 I 16 46 30
K 4 9 5 K 5 9 4
remwavnr, r1 n ,. om a 71;17:f ✓.:
M 41 38 -3 M 46 38 -8 x
0 9 32 23 0 9 32 23
The bar graphic below visually shows the Saturday (highest use day) block -by -block analysis of
total parking spaces available versus total required. As indicated, many blocks do not use all the
spaces available but certain blocks show additional parking space need.
o ,
M
r
K
a ■ Total Avaitable
C
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
Number of Parking Spaces
H:\JORD \T14103187 \docs\Final Report 093011.doc
DESIGNING FOR A BETTER TOMORROW
Bolton & Menk is an equal opportunity employer.
ii z;
Page 7
Parking Use
Field studies performed July 9 and July 26, 2011 reveal that the number of parking spaces
available to customers and residents may be adequate for current conditions present in the area.
The downtown section regularly featuring the highest occupancy rates are Broadway Street
between 1 st Street and 2 Street (Block N) and Water Street between Rice Street and Broadway
Street (Block G). During the two hour period (12:00 PM — 2:00 PM) on a Saturday, the parking
spaces of these sections had an average occupancy rate over 60%. Table 3 displays these results.
Table 3
Study Parking Observation and Generation
Field Study
Parking Spaces (% Occupied)
Black Weekday 1 Weekend
41% � -
43% ,
38°10 �� ?
7,
t 7 77:77 . 77 7,
42% 6
0
21%
_" 58 %x
13% X ,3 ..
The results also indicate that there is a low turnover of some spaces on Broadway Street and on
Water Street and First Street just east and west of Broadway Street. Over a four hour study
period, many vehicles did not move from their parking space.
H *JORD \T14103187 \docs\Final Report 093011.doc
DESIGNING FOR A BETTER TOMORROW
Bolton & Menk is an equal opportunity employer.
a ,
Page 8
Conclusions and Recommendations
To better orientate the parking downtown for the building locations and needs, additional parking
or signing to the existing underutilized parking may be needed. The goal is to provide additional
parking for the central area by surrounding Downtown Jordan with parking, similar to what
Northfield has accomplished. The main parking areas to serve downtown are defined in Figure 3.
Area 1:
Parking spaces west of the railroad tracks
• Existing parking spaces are underutilized.
o Railroad tracks are a barrier to use.
o Increase use of parking spaces through additional signing.
o 68 spaces available.
Area 2:
North of First Street
• Additional parking recommended.
o Difficult to construct a new lot.
o Current lack of available space may require demolition of an existing building
prior to construction of new parking.
o Work with owner of Jordan Executive Office Suites to allow some public parking
in private lot.
• Change of signing would be needed.
o Only need a maximum of 17 additional spaces in the area.
Area 3:
East of Broadway Street
• Additional parking recommended.
o Demolition and cleanup of an existing building would be required to provide the
necessary space for construction of a new parking lot.
o Pedestrian facilities and access to and from the west side of Broadway is key to
lot being used.
o Additional study recommended to better accommodate pedestrians crossing
Broadway Street.
H:UORD \T14103187 \ does \Final Report 09301 1.doc
DESIGNING FOR A BETTER TOMORROW
Bolton & Menk is an equal opportunity employer.
,1"° a.
_, $� Page 10
o Figure 4 shows some of the difficulty in crossing Broadway. The sight lines of
pedestrians are highlighted to indicate areas where the pedestrian cannot easily
see traffic from the curb.
• Curb bump -outs, reduce parking to clear sight lines, or additional signing
may increase driver awareness but may also distract the driver more.
Pedestrian traffic is light for most of the day so some type of pedestrian
signal will not be justified
• Public Works Staff is opposed to curb bump -outs due to the obstacle they
present during plowing, requires extra time and effort to clear snow
• Need to work with Mn/DOT on any changes proposed.
• A pedestrian gap study may need to be completed depending on changes
proposed.
o Need around 100 additional spaces to meet fully occupied needs, 85 spaces to
meet existing needs.
Area 4:
Gravel Lot South Of River
• Parking lot is available for use by the public.
o Pedestrian facilities across Sand Creek are key to lot being used.
o Upgrade from gravel to a paved bituminous parking lot that is striped and signed
may increase use.
o Implement guide signs to inform public of parking lot location.
o Approximately 20 spaces available.
H:UORD \T14103187 \docs\Final Report 093011.doc
DESIGNING FOR A BETTER TOMORROW
Bolton & Menk is an equal opportunity employer.
,moo"'
Page 12
Signing and Striping
Figure 5 displays a concept to provide better turnover for high demand parking spaces. The plan
incorporates additional parking regulation signs at select locations within the study area to allow
for more frequent turnover in locations where parking is at a premium. If instituted, regulatory
parking signs could greatly increase availability of select parking spaces. The segments listed in
Table 3 are the main focus of the study due to high occupancy and turnover rates observed
during both weekdays and weekends. A combination of street signs and pavement markings are
recommended to improve upon the current parking conditions in the downtown area. Shorter
term parking is provided on high use blocks.
• Implement some 1 hour parking signs from 7:00 AM to 6:00 PM throughout the project
area to make some spaces available for quicker trips.
• Implement some 10 minute parking signs from 7:00 AM to 8:00 PM at the beginning of
blocks on Broadway Street to provide ample space for quick errands in the area. These
spaces at the beginning of each block make it easy for traffic to load /unload while cars
that are parking longer use the spaces further along the block.
• Implement three (3) additional handicap parking spaces throughout the project area to
provide convenient access for all users. This results in at least one handicap space per
block.
Aside from regulatory parking signs, additional signing and striping is recommended to better
manage and optimize the number of available spaces.
• Design and implement "Additional Parking" signs intended to direct traffic to often
overlooked parking spaces west across the railroad tracks (Area 1) and south across the
bridge (Area 4).
• Directional signs are recommended at two locations along 2 Street and along Broadway
Street to guide vehicles to downtown Jordan. See Figure 3 for locations.
• Paint parking lines on Broadway Street to separate parallel parking spaces and ensure
available space is fully utilized.
The intention of these recommendations is to develop a more organized and better performing
parking environment. By implementing parking regulation and informational signs along with
additional striping along Broadway Street, the availability of parking spaces should be ample to
serve customers visiting the stores and shops of downtown Jordan and for the residents in
downtown Jordan.
The signing and striping change recommendations along Broadway Street (TH 21) and Second
Street (TH 282) may need to be approved by Mn/DOT as they are the roadway jurisdictional
authority.
H:\JORD \T14103187 \docs\Final Report 093011.doc
DESIGNING FOR A BETTER TOMORROW
Bolton & Menk is an equal opportunity employer.
r
0
Page 14
Summary
o There is enough parking available downtown.
o Based on the parking use study there is enough parking available at this time on each and
every block.
o If the downtown area is fully occupied there is a significant shortage of parking on some
blocks.
o Recommendations:
• Implement on- street parking restrictions on some spaces (see Figure 3)
• Water Street and First Street
— 1 hour parking restrictions from 7 am to 6 pm
— Implement based on community reaction and as needed
• Broadway (more immediate)
— Parking striping
— 10 minute parking restrictions from 7 am to 8 pm
• Construct additional parking lot(s) as downtown occupancy increases
• Obtain new parking lot locations as properties become available
• Improve the existing parking lot south of Sand Creek
• Install parking directional signs
• Work with private owner(s) of the lot next to the Post office on an agreement to
allow some public parking
• Improve pedestrian facilities that are needed in conjunction with parking lots
H:UORD \T14103187 \docs\Final Report 093011 .doc
DESIGNING FOR A BETTER TOMORROW
Bolton & Menk is an equal opportunity employer.
r
..,, Page 15
Appendix A
H:UORD \T14103187 \docs\Final Report 093011.doc
DESIGNING FOR A BETTER TOMORROW
Bolton & Menk is an equal opportunity employer.
Weekday Trip Generation Values
Section Identifier FT' Business Parking Residential Parking Total Required Current Public Current Private Current Handicap
FT Spaces Units Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces
A 1 I 27 15
Q 9114 -
- - - ; - - 864 B K 8000 8000 j 20 1 1 22 12 45 1
A 1500 i 1 •
6 3900 1950 1 3 I
C 5556 2778 i 1 1
D 4360 2180 : 1
C E 3250 ! 25 1 10 34 46 26
R I 1
5 6647 1170 : 2
U/V 3104 1552 1
W 4720
G 1426 713 1 •
H 5264 3948 1 1 I
J 5556 4167 � 1 i
L 10200 10200 .
D Z 6180 1545 1 72 2 I 9 80 55 21 4
AA 4704 4704
AB 3336 1668 1 . 1 1
AC 2064 1 1 i
AD 7235 1205.833:
E N 19880 3313.333! 8 8 ! 10 18 34 20 1
T 6647 1661.75 i 1 1
U/V 1
F X 2925 2925 ! 17 ! 5 22 39 9 1
Y 4527 2263.5 � 1 �
AN i 1
AO 2446 2446
AP 2360 2360
A
1
Q 6647 3323.5 1
AR 1075 1075 1
AS 2550 1275 . 2 •
G AT 4136 2068 1 63 1 I 14 77 45 3 1
AU 1098 1098 1
AV 2376 1188 : 1
AW 4183 2091.5 I , 2 1
AX 7615 3807.5 i 2 i
BA 1652 826
BB 6643 3321.5 ! 3 3 !
H
AL 12576 6288 i 23 1 4 27 40 0 1
BC 8756 2918.667', 3
I AM 6708 5031 1 13 1 1- 1 _ 14 29 16 1
1 j ; 19 3
K F 1662 1662 : 4 4 6 3
L Z 6180 1545 1 4 1 1 1 5 2 3
BF 1
M 3779 3779 .
M 0 968 968 I 40 1 1 41 11 27
P 4326 4326
N 19880 6626.667. 0 •
AD 7235 2411.6671 4
AE 3118 1559 . 1
AF 800 400 1 1 1
AG 2064 1032 1 1 1
AY 4368 2184 : 3 •
AZ i I
2137 217 , N BA 1652 826 . 87 23 110 20 3
1 1
AH 7766 3883 : 5
Al 3944 3944 ' 1
Al 4292 2146 i 3 �
AK 1827 913.5 : 1
AL 12576 12576 1 1
0 BC 8756 1459.333 4 1 1 5 9 7 24
BD 3269 1634.5 ; 3
381 68 84 465 - 392 218 10
Saturday Trip Generation Values
Business Parking Residential Parking Total Required Current Public Current Private Current
Section Identifier FT Handicap
FT Spaces Units Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces
Spaces
A 1 1 27 15
Q 9114 - - - _ - - -
1
B BE
K 8 864 1 000 8000 20 � 1 22 12 45 1 0
A 1500 1 •
B 3900 1950 1 3
C 5556 2778 ; 1 1
D 4360 2180 : 1
C E 3250 1 28 ! 10 37 46 26
R 1 1
5 6647 1170 : 2
U / V 3104 1552 1
W 4720
G 1426 713 1 1 1 •
•
H 5264 3948 1 1 1
1 5556 4167 • 1 •
L 10200 10200 .
D Z 6180 1545 1 81 2 I 9 89 55 21 4
AA 4704 4704 :
AB 3336 1668 1 1
AC 2064 1 1 1
AD 7235 1205.833:
E N 19880 3313.333! 10 8 10 _ 19 34 20 1
T 6647 1661.75 j 1
U/V 1
F X 2925 2925 1 20 ! 5 25 39 9 1
Y 4527 2263.5 ; 1 �
AN 1 }
AO 2446 2446 ! 1
AP 2360 2360 �
AQ 6647 3323.5 •
AR 1075 1075 1
AS 2550 1275 • 2 •
AT 4136 2068 1 71
G 1
1 • 14 85 45 3 1
AU 1098 1098 1 1
AV 2376 1188 : 1
AW 4183 2091.5 1 2 1
AX 7615 3807.5 2 1
BA 1652 826
BB 6643 3321.5 1 3 1
H AL 12576 6288 26 1 4 30 40 0 1
BC 8756 2918.667: 3
I AM 6708 5031 1 14 1 1 1 16 29 16 1
1 j ; 19 3
K F 1662 1662 ; 5 5 6 3
L Z 6180 1545 1 4 1 ! 1 6 2 3
BF 1 1 1
M 3779 3779 ;
M 0 968 968 ! 45 1 1 46 11 27
P 4326 4326 •
N 19880 6626.667• 0 •
AD 7235 2411.6671 4 1
AE 3118 1559 • 1 •
AF 800 400 I 1 I
AG 2064 1032 1 1 1
AY 4368 2184 : 3
I 1
AZ 2137 2137 .
N BA 1652 826 98 23 121 20 3
1
AH 7766 3883 : 5
Al 3944 3944 1 1
Al 4292 2146 � 3
AK 1827 913.5 : 1
AL 12576 12576 1 1
BC 8756 1459.333 •
0 4 1 I 5 9 7 24
BD 3269 1634.5 • 3 •
426 68 84 510 392 218 10
Jordan Downtown Parking Study Counts
Average # Occupied # of % Occupied % Occupied
July 9th, 2011 Weekday Average Spaces (Weekend) (Weekday)
A 3 N/A 3 27 11% N/A
B 0 N/A 0 12 0% N/A
C 10 9 10 46 22% 20%
D 12 22 18 55 22% 41%
E 7 15 11 34 21% 43%
F 4 2 3 39 11% 5%
G 30 17 23 45 67% 38%
H 15 17 16 40 38% 42%
4 N/A 4 29 14% N/A
J 4 N/A 4 19 21% N/A
K 0 N/A 0 6 0% N/A
L 0 1 1 2 0% 68%
M 1 2 2 11 13% 21%
N 14 12 13 20 69% 58%
-
O 1 1 1 8 17% 13%
yam N T
`
cn
a ° „',tiw 0 - i
v
, 0 *V 4:2, co
3 F.,
tn
, -! w hd£ M a � t c.
t�
f•'"
IT
1 - a y, ,d
< -1 el i garn mo
-- w 'r s
n oo y w `°
La
n L a dZ 11 CiTIC 4. 0
O
11 — - -4— 0 -
�1 f ,
f::) 3 .-.1 1 6 1, 1 0 .4
0000
y�f , N V
(1) .---' \ CI t �� '4 .�dde'O V = e = v .----- MN /1V L - N AV
no
4 '� o ew l—' M rd '' ^ -1 I
I
a
to p ¶ '' _ — — 1
111- 1 000 0 eri k ' t
:no „► I '� o
, .
' rt w — I — -4+t 0 0
I irl 0
a r
D_ 0 .� . - A f � � f -- — — — — k i d 0
h ” y } 4
n v, '� k nr y — —
9. 0 , ‘ --- --- ...'- *4: --- --' 11 _4 \ ----"-----% '111 711, 1 00 ; ,
----- 01 0 ------- 6 •• D � w yM 0 � r r
_ l r �"� ,, ,.,rte !, - - O 4 . �� J � y an P
=‘ - al 4d 2J1 3 _ r '' Q \ — 1 - rD
be DI - ~
0
V O O O O O
La
co
p
El co CO ° Im'�c = w� y+ ---'1c-V7.-01- % 10 II I-- N g 0 0 0 0 (A l e N j�� N ,�.r I + I ,
O O V V I _ I O
`r) I w f'— a o
�� } L °� LN AV L r f � N -n � � I 3N n' - I ` o
3S pd L MVP
(`� � I - -. ring 3
cu
it ` —'�w t 1 ,-..,
r oe c a m °o m La
I o es m . .
d �, � m a " 0 w ° - ... "4 °°
m -T w
_--..0 _--..0 . a `�
0 ■ • ■■ F . ‘ ❑ R z\ kzkk '
c? iffiffiiiizlit w w t o 0 -a * al * w ak an w at a g 8 i fl= f a mw azci . i
i itai? . : a 1
m 2. 1 3 4 r . . i
rt i = a
co
(D a
al
7
a
-n
fD
a
CD
b
- ---.1 W
UQ
CD
N �.
O
O
•-i,
N