HomeMy WebLinkAbout2013 [01] Jan 03January 3, 2013
Page 1 of 3
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the St. Joseph City Council met in regular session on Thursday,
January 3, 2013 at TOOPM in the St. Joseph City Hall, opening the meeting with the Pledge of Allegiance.
Members Present: Mayor Rick Schultz, Councilors Renee Symanietz, Dale Wick, Steve Frank, Bob Loso
and City Administrator Judy Weyrens
City Representatives Present: Police Chief Pete Jansky, Public Works Director Terry Thene, Finance
Director Lori Bartlett.
Others Present: Matt Staehling
Oath of Office: Weyrens administered the Oath of Office to the following:
• Mayor— Rick Schultz
• Councilors — Bob Loso, Renee Symanietz
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Approval of the Agenda: Loso made a motion to approve the agenda as presented; seconded by
Wick and passed unanimously.
Consent Agenda: Wick made a motion to approve the consent agenda with minor corrections to the
Minutes of October 18, 2012; seconded by Symanietz and passed unanimously:
a. Minutes — Requested Action: Approve the minutes of October 18, November 1, and
November 15, 2012.
b. Bills Payable — Requested Action: Approve check numbers 046088 - 046165 payroll EFT #
000752 - 000759.
Ordinance Amendments: Weyrens stated that previously the City Council discussed adopting a Social
Host, Keg Permit and Disruptive Intoxication Ordinance. All three Ordinances are utilized by the City of
St. Cloud and the Council requested that the City Attorney from St. Cloud attend a Council meeting to
discuss the pros and cons of the Ordinances.
Social Host: Matt Staehling, St. Cloud City Attorney approached the Council and stated that the
three Ordinances before the Council are tools for combating livability issues, noise and high risk drinking.
St. Joseph, like St. Cloud finds themselves balancing the concerns of the long term residents against the
residents that reside in the community for nine months. Since St. Cloud has implemented the Social Host
and Disruptive Intoxication the City has noticed a considerable decline in violations such as urinating in
public, open container and noise. St. Cloud has also seen a decline keg violations but that is due to a
change student drinking as more students carry alcohol in their backpack so kegs are not the prominent
alcohol source.
Staehling stated that since they implemented the Ordinances the offenses are charged as misdemeanors
and the Courts system has reacted favorably. Frank questioned what type of fine is assessed for
misdemeanors to which Staehling stated up to $ 1,000 and /or 90 days in jail. Typically for a first offense
the courts are assigning a $ 300.00 fine and two days in jail or an equivalent in community service.
Frank also questioned Staehling if he were to re -write the Ordinance today, what he would change.
Staehling stated the Ordinance as drafted is similar to what all Cities in Minnesota that have adopted the
Ordinance are enforcing and he would not change anything. The Ordinance is affective and has been
upheld in the court system.
Symanietz questions the implications to the homeowner regarding the social host ordinance and
questioned whether or not homeowners can be charged if they are not home. For example she
questioned if her children hosted a party and she were out of town could she be charged. Staehling
responded that first a situation has to occur which triggers police attention and the police have the
responsibility of providing evidence that the property owner was aware of the party with the potential of
January 3, 2013
Page 2 of 3
minor consumption. The property cannot be cited if they were not aware of potential minor consumption.
In St. Cloud the Ordinance violations have centered on landlord tenant, not typical single family homes.
Weyrens questioned Staehling if a Social Host violation is cited are other citations issued at the same
time such as noise. Police Chief Pete Jansky and Staehling stated that typically it is a noise violation
brings police attention to the property so, yes; a noise violation citation is also issued. Jansky clarified
that in the event a noise citation is issued, the property owner would be required to appear before the
Council as in the past.
Schultz questioned how St. Joseph can effectively manage the students walking around with alcohol in
their backpacks. He stated that he had the opportunity to ride with the Police Chief one weekend and
experienced large groups of students walking around, some carrying out disruptive activities. Jansky
stated that the proposed Ordinance Disruptive Intoxication would be a tool for the officers to utilize. Loso
stated that it is not uncommon for a group of homes to host a party, such as on Cypress Drive, and
questioned if each property owner would be cited to which Staehling stated yes.
Frank questioned if the College of St. Benedict and St. John's University are supportive of the proposed
Ordinances. Weyrens and Jansky stated that they are supportive and have offered to provide education
and outreach to the students so that they are aware of the Ordinances before spring.
Wick questioned provision 75.04 whereby it states that the ordinance does not apply to situations where
underage persons are lawfully in possession of alcohol or alcoholic beverages during the course and
scope of employment. He stated that why wouldn't the host of a party indicate that the underage person
was in charge, thereby exempt from violation. Staehling stated that in the situation stated by Wick the
underage person is not in lawful possession of the alcohol nor is he an employee of the person hosting
the party. The exemption stated in the Ordinance relates to an underage person that is employed within
a licensed establishment.
Keg Ordinance: Jansky stated that the proposed amendment to the Keg Ordinance would
require any persons wishing to have on keg on their premises to first obtain a permit from the City Offices.
Staehling stated that the City of St. Cloud has had a permitting process for some time and it allows the
police department to know where the parties will be located. The Council requested Staehling detail the
process used in St. Cloud. Staehling stated that permits are only available during business hours at the
City Offices. So as not to discourage residents from purchasing permits, the fee is nominal at $ 5.25.
While the fee does not generate revenue, it provides the police department with the information they
need. Staehling clarified that it is not the responsibility of the liquor stores to enforce the Ordinance, the
responsibility lies solely with the purchaser.
Frank questioned if a permitting process has implications for cultural or religious residents. Staehling
stated that he is not aware of any implications a typically ceremonial events don't include keg type alcohol
consumption. Frank stated that he recently read an article where the City of Cloud discussed limiting
licenses to property owners who have outstanding fees on their property including property tax and any
city fees. He questioned the application of such a policy. Staehling stated that the City of St. Cloud has
taken the position that if a property owner is requesting a license from the City, all fees should be current.
St. Joseph would have to verify the enabling language in the Ordinance if the opted to do the same.
Wick questioned the provision in the Keg Ordinance whereby it requires the return of the prior issued
permit before another permit can be issued and what happens in that case. Staehling stated if the prior
permit is not returned, the property owner must wait 30 days before another permit can be issued.
Disruptive Intoxication: Staehling stated the purpose of the proposed Ordinance entitled
Disruptive Intoxication is to provide the Police Officers with a tool for when people are congregating in
areas creating a disturbance. In St. Cloud the Ordinance is used to help control walking traffic coming
and going to the bar or parties. Jansky stated that the courts have recently ruled that standing in one's
yard yelling profanities is not a violation. The proposed Ordinance could help manage this type of
complaint.
January 3, 2013
Page 3 of 3
Wick questioned if the proposed ordinances or amendments require a public hearing to which Weyrens
stated no, they require Council action and publication of the adoption. Due to the proposed impact on
residents, Loso made a motion to conduct a public hearing on the proposed Ordinances and
amendments at the January 17, 2013 Council meeting. The motion was seconded by Frank and
passed unanimously.
Appointments: Weyrens stated annually the Mayor presents recommended appointments for the
various boards and commission. The appointments, with the exception of the Acting Mayor are typically
ratified by the City Council. The Acting Mayor appointment must go through a nomination and voting
process. Loso made a motion to accept the appointments as presented by Mayor Schultz. The
motion was seconded by Frank and passed unanimously.
Discussion: Loso questioned the EDA appointment to which Schultz stated Gary Osberg is a
resident of St. Joseph, is employed by Minnesota Public Radio and has held various board /commission
positions. Frank questioned that while he is not opposed to Osberg, he was hoping to add some diversity
to the Board. Schultz stated he only received on application for the EDA member. Frank questioned the
Health Board and whether or not the Board is active. Weyrens stated that the Board is used when a
situation arises.
Acting Mayor: Symanietz made a motion nominating Dale Wick for the appointment as Acting
Mayor; seconded by Schultz and passed unanimously.
Administrator Reports — No Report
Mayor Reports — No Report
Council Reports
FRANK — No report
LOSO — Questioned the status of the Facility committee and if the project is moving forward. Loso stated
that he recently had a discussion with one of the consultants and as a small firm they need to know that
status as they plan their work for 2013. Schultz reported that Wick will be resuming the committee
meetings, garnering additional community comments.
WICK — No Report
SYMANITEZ — No Report
Adjourn: Loso made a motion to adjourn at 8:00 PM; seconded by Wick and passed unanimously.
Judy Weyrens
Administrator