HomeMy WebLinkAbout[07] EAW Authorize Publication
7
Council Agenda Item
MEETING DATE:
May 18, 2015
AGENDA ITEM:
EAW – Authorize Publication
SUBMITTED BY:
Administration
BOARD/COMMISSION/COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION:
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION:
In 2007, in conjunction with a developer proposing to develop
54 acres of farmland for commercial/industrial development, the City completed the EAW process and in
October 2007 the City executed Resolution 2007-033 Declaring FONSI for the Parkway Business Center
development.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
City staff has been working with a developer representatives to
locate a distribution center in St. Joseph. The St. Joseph Distribution Center is proposed on
approximately 98.92 acres of primarily agricultural land in St. Joseph. The project proposes a total gross
building area of 745,000 square feet. The project will be serviced by municipal sewer and water. Due to
the size of the project, it has been determined that an EAW is required. Westwood Professional Services
is working on behalf of the developer and has submitted a draft EAW for review and distribution by the
City (RGU).
It is the responsibility of the RGU (Responsible Government Unit = City) to prepare and distribute the
Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) for a project that may have potential for environmental
effects. The RGU authorizes distribution of the EAW to the Environmental Quality Board (EQB) who in
turn posts a notice in the EQB Monitor which solicits comments for a 30 day period beginning the date
the notice is published in the EQB. In addition, the City is responsible for distributing the EAW to offices
listed on the EQB’s official distribution list as well as several libraries that serve as repositories for
environmental reports, publishing the notice in the official newspaper and having a copy available for the
public to review.
All comments that are received and reviewed for potential incorporation in the document and a
determination will be made by the RGU if a FONSI (Finding of no significant impact) can be issued or if
an EIS (Environmental Impact Statement) is required.
BUDGET/FISCAL IMPACT:
The cost of the EAW is the responsibility of the developer.
ATTACHMENTS:
Request for Council Action
Draft EAW for Distribution
Publication Press Release
Distribution List
2007 FONSI
REQUESTED COUNCIL ACTION:
Authorize administration to distribute the EAW to the required
distribution list, issue the press release and publish the notice in the EQB.
This page intentionally left blank
Version 2
EAW
(EAW)
NVIRONMENTALSSESSMENTORKSHEET
St. Joseph Distribution Center
CONTENTS
Page
List of Tables .......................................................................................................................... i
List of Exhibits....................................................................................................................... ii
1. Project Title ................................................................................................................... 1
2. Proposer ......................................................................................................................... 1
3. RGU .............................................................................................................................. 1
4. Reason for EAW Preparation ......................................................................................... 1
5. Project Location ............................................................................................................. 1
6. Project Description ......................................................................................................... 2
7. Cover Types ................................................................................................................... 4
8. Permits and Approvals Required .................................................................................... 5
9. Land Use ........................................................................................................................ 6
10. Geology, soils and topography/land forms ...................................................................... 9
11. Water Resources .......................................................................................................... 10
12. Contamination/Hazardous Materials/Wastes................................................................. 16
13. Fish, wildlife, plant communities, and sensitive ecological resources (rare features) ..... 18
14. Historic properties ........................................................................................................ 20
15. Visual........................................................................................................................... 21
16. Air ............................................................................................................................... 21
17. Noise ............................................................................................................................ 22
18. Transportation .............................................................................................................. 22
19. Cumulative potential effects ......................................................................................... 27
20. Other potential environmental effects ........................................................................... 28
TABLES
7.1 Estimated Before and After Cover Types .................................................................... 5
8.1 Permits and Approvals Required. ................................................................................ 5
18.1 Trip Generation Summary ........................................................................................ 23
EXHIBITS
i
St. Joseph Distribution CenterMay 8, 2015
Site Location .......................................................................................................................... 1
USGS Topography ................................................................................................................. 2
Proposed Site Plan ................................................................................................................. 3
Cover Types ........................................................................................................................... 4
Adjacent Land Use ................................................................................................................. 5
Current Land Zoning Map ...................................................................................................... 6
Water Resources .................................................................................................................... 7
NRCS Soils ....................................................................................................................... 8
Proposed Land Zoning Map ................................................................................................... 9
ii
Version 2
EAW
(EAW)
NVIRONMENTALSSESSMENTORKSHEET
St. Joseph Distribution Center
This Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) form and EAW Guidelines are available at the
The
Environmental Quality Boards website at: http://www.eqb.state.mn.us/EnvRevGuidanceDocuments.htm.
EAW form provides information about a project that may have the potential for significant environmental effects. The
EAW Guidelines provide additional detail and resources for completing the EAW form.
can either be addressed under each applicable EAW Item, or can be addressed
Cumulative potential effects
collectively under EAW Item 19.
Comments must be submitted to the RGU during the 30-day comment period following notice of
Note to reviewers:
the EAW in the EQB Monitor. Comments should address the accuracy and completeness of information, potential
impacts that warrant further investigation and the need for an EIS.
1. Project Title:
St. Joseph Distribution Center
2. Proposer:
KDN HoldingsCity of St. Joseph
3.RGU:
John Dondanville
Contact person: Contact person: Judy Weyrens
Principal
Title: Title:Administrator
2685 Lapeer Road
Address: Address:25 College Avenue N.
Suite #206
Auburn Hills, MI 48326
St. Joseph, MN 56374
(248) 514-6543
Phone:Phone:(320) 363-7201
(248) 340-8998
Fax:Fax:N/A
johnd@D5groupllc.com
E-mailE mailjweyrens@cityofstjoseph.com
4. Reason for EAW Preparation: (check one)
Required:
EIS Scoping Mandatory EAW
Discretionary:
Citizen Petition RGU Discretion Proposer Volunteered
If EAW or EIS is mandatory give EQB rule category subpart number(s) and name(s): Part 4410.4300
Subp. 14.A.- Industrial, commercial, and institutional facilities
5. Project Location
County: Stearns County, Minnesota
City/Township: St. Joseph
PLS Location (¼, ¼, Section, Township, Range): T124, R29, S2 & S11
Watershed (81 major watershed scale): Sauk River#16
GPS Coordinates: 45.573407, -94.287887 (Project Center)
Tax Parcel Numbers: 84.53340.0027, 84.53340.0130, 84.53340.0132, 84.53340.0150, 84.53350.0025,
84.53350.0027, 84.53350.0030 & 84.53350.0050.
1
St. Joseph Distribution CenterMay 8, 2015
At a minimum attach each of the following to the EAW:
County map showing the general location of the project;
See Exhibit 1.
U.S. Geological Survey 7.5 minute, 1:24,000 scale map indicating project boundaries (photocopy
acceptable); and
See Exhibit 2.
Site plans showing all significant project and natural features. Proposed Site Plan () and
Exhibit 3
Pre-construction site plans ().
Exhibits 4-8
6. Project Description
a.Provide the brief project summary to be published in the EQB Monitor, (approximately 50 words).
The Warehouse Distribution Center is proposed on approximately 98.92 acres of primarily
agricultural land in St. Joseph. The project proposes a total gross building area of 745,000 square
feet. The project will be serviced by municipal sewer and water.
b.Give a complete description of the proposed project and related new construction, including
infrastructure needs. If the project is an expansion include a description of the existing facility.
Emphasize: 1) construction, operation methods and features that will cause physical manipulation
of the environment or will produce wastes, 2) modifications to existing equipment or industrial
processes, 3) significant demolition, removal or remodeling of existing structures, and 4) timing and
duration of construction activities.
KDN Holdings is proposing construction of a warehouse and distribution facility on approximately
98.92 acres of land. The proposed project is located in Section 2 and 11 of T124, R29, City of St.
Joseph, Stearns County, Minnesota ().
Exhibits 1 & 2
Project development will convert approximately 98.92 acres of agricultural fields to streets, surface
parking, warehouse facilities, truck fueling and maintenance and stormwater ponding as shown on
the Proposed Site Plan (). Land use within the site will include construction of three
Exhibit 3
separate buildings with a total gross building area of 745,000 square feet.
The proposed facility will connect to the existing City of St. Joseph sewer and water system to the
th
west of the project site. The project proposes to connect to an existing sanitary sewer at 19 Avenue
th
NE and to connect with an existing watermain at 19 Avenue NE and County Road 133. No on-site
sewage systems and no private wells are proposed.
Along with the buildings, access drive, parking and utility construction will be a stormwater
retention pond located within the project site. The pre-treated runoff from this pond will be directed
to the east of the site where wetlands and wooded areas are located.
Access drive and parking construction, sewer and water installation, and site grading will require a
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
(NPDES) permit. Project construction is expected to begin in fall 2015. Full build-out is anticipated
by late 2016; however, construction timing will ultimately depend upon market and weather
conditions. It is anticipated that construction will entail moving approximately 400,000 cubic yards
of material around the site. No export of material from the site is anticipated. The only import of
material to the site will be for pavement and building construction purposes. The majority of the
98.92 acre site will be graded for streets and building pads. An additional 2.7 acres will be graded
on the parcel to the south east for stormwater ponding. Construction dewatering will be conducted
2
St. Joseph Distribution CenterMay 8, 2015
on an as-needed and permitted basis to install sanitary sewer, municipal water, and storm sewer. No
impacts to wetlands are anticipated. Best Management Practices will be implemented during and
after construction to protect water quality and reduce the potential for soil erosion and sedimentation.
c.Project Magnitude
98.92-acre main project area
Total Project Acreage
N/A
Linear project length
N/A
Number and type of residential units
Commercial building area (in square feet) N/A
745,000 square feet warehouse/storage
Industrial building area (in square feet)
distribution facility
Institutional building area (in square feet) N/A
N/A
Other uses specify (in square feet)
Approximately 45-50above grade.
Structure height(s)
d.Explain the project purpose; if the project will be carried out by a governmental unit, explain the
need for the project and identify its beneficiaries.
The purpose of the St Joseph Distribution Center project is to meet the demand for a warehouse and
distribution facility within Minnesota servicing several surrounding states. The project will be
designed and built by a private entity, KDN Holdings.
e.Are future stages of this development including development on any other property planned or likely
to happen? Yes No.
If yes, briefly describe future stages, relationship to the present project, timeline, and plans for
environmental review.
There are no planned future phases of the distribution center project. KDN Holdings does not own
or control any adjacent property.
f.Is the project a subsequent stage of an earlier project? Yes No.
If yes, briefly describe the past development, timeline, and any past environmental review.
The project has no past developments completed.
7. Cover Types
Estimate the acreage of the site with each of the following cover types before and after development.
Existing cover types and percentages were estimated using recent aerial photography as summarized
inand onTable 7.1 also includes estimated cover types after development.
Table 7.1 Exhibit 4.
3
St. Joseph Distribution CenterMay 8, 2015
Table 7.1. Estimated Before and After Cover Types
Land CoverBefore (acres)After (acres)Percentage
Wetland1.51.5
1.5%
Wooded/Forest3.363.36
3.4%
Cropland91.845.7
5.8%
Lawn/landscaping0.041.53
42.0%
Impervious Surface2.2216.43
16.6%
Stormwater Pond0.02.78
2.8%
Other/Buildings0.027.62
27.9%
Totals98.9298.92100%
If and totals are not equal, explain why:Totals are equal and estimated from available
BeforeAfter
land cover mapping.
The distribution center project would replace existing land cover with a warehouse building,
associated parking, internal driveways and parking areas, stormwater pond and landscaping.
8. Permits and Approvals Required
List all known local, state, and federal permits, approvals, certifications and financial assistance for the
project. Include modifications of any existing permits, governmental review of plans, and all direct and
indirect forms of public financial assistance including bond guarantees, Tax Increment Financing, and
infrastructure.All of these final decisions are prohibited until all appropriate environmental review has been
completed. See Minnesota Rules, Chapter 4410.3100.
4
St. Joseph Distribution CenterMay 8, 2015
Table 8.1. Permits and Approvals Required
Unit of GovernmentType of ApplicationStatus
Preliminary Plat ApprovalTo be applied for
Variance ApprovalsTo be applied for
Final Plat ApprovalTo be applied for
Grading PermitsTo be applied for
City of St Joseph
Building PermitsTo be applied for
Storm Water Management Plan
To be applied for
Approval
Municipal Water Connection PermitTo be applied for
Sanitary Sewer Connection PermitTo be applied for
Wetland Delineation Boundary
To be applied for
Approval
Stearns County
Utility and Work within Right-of-way
To be applied for
Permit
Sauk River Watershed
Erosion Control/Stormwater permitTo be applied for
District
Minnesota Department of
Water Main Extension ApprovalTo be applied for
Health
NPDES/SDS General PermitTo be applied for
Minnesota Pollution
Control Agency
Sanitary Sewer Extension ApprovalTo be applied for
US Army Corps of
Wetland Boundary ApprovalTo be applied for
Engineers
Note: The project proposer will apply for and receive applicable permits prior to project construction.
Cumulative potential effects may be considered and addressed in response to individual EAW Item
Nos. 9-18, or the RGU can address all cumulative potential effects in response to EAW Item No.
19. If addressing cumulative effect under individual items, make sure to include information
requested in EAW Item No. 19
9. Land Use
a.Describe:
i.Existing land use of the site as well as areas adjacent to and near the site, including parks,
trails, prime or unique farmlands.
Existing cover types within are depicted on and adjacent to the site is depicted on
Exhibit 4
.Currently, a majority of the site is used as agricultural land and includes a narrow
Exhibit 5
wooded area and two wetlands along the east property boundary. The current zoning of the
western portion of the project area is Light Industrial/General Business District which matches
with the zoning planned for the site. The current zoning for the eastern portion of the site is
Agriculture with a future zooming planned as Light Industrial. Variances will be requested for
proposed building heights over 40 feet and for required number of parking spaces requirements
for Warehousing/Distribution activities.
5
St. Joseph Distribution CenterMay 8, 2015
Adjacent land use consists of industrial/commercial developments to the west, south and
southeast, which will be consistent with the zoning planned for the project site. Other adjacent
land uses consist of County Road 133 to the northwest, agricultural land is to the north, wetland
areas to the east and southeast and farmstead to the east. There is no known past land uses on
this property that would likely leave soil contamination or other negative impacts. Stearns
County Snowmobile Trail is along County Road 133 outside the project boundary. There are
no parks, trails or prime and unique farmlands within the project boundary.
ii.Plans. Describe planned land use as identified in comprehensive plan (if available) and any
other applicable plan for land use, water, or resources management by a local, regional,
state, or federal agency.
The City of St. Joseph Comprehensive Plan (last modified November 2011) designates the
western portion of the site as the Parkway Business Center with creation of new infrastructure
(). The south side of this portion of the project site is planned for Light Industrial
Exhibit 6
(L1) activities which are typically industrial activities involving a minimum degree of refuse
byproducts and air or noise pollution and requiring a low level of on premise processing. The
west and central area of this portion of the project site is planned for General Business District
(B-3) which provides space for specialized business and commercial activities. The northern
side of the project site is planned for Combination uses (L1/B-3) which can either be light
industrial or commercial activities. The eastern portion of the project site is currently zoned
Agriculture, with future zoning planned for Light Industrial (L1) activities which are typically
industrial activities involving a minimum degree of refuse byproducts and air or noise pollution
and requiring a low level of on premise processing
A future land use projection is depicted inand the entire site will be zoned for Light
Exhibits 9
Industrial activities.
iii.Zoning, including special districts or overlays such as shoreland, floodplain, wild and scenic
rivers, critical area, agricultural preserves, etc.
The site is located in the Industrial Zone established for industrial activities. All developments
in this district must conform to the City of St. Joseph Comprehensive Plan (as amended and
updated).
The majority of the site is located within the jurisdiction of the Sauk River Watershed District.
The purpose of the District is to protect and enhance natural resources in the watershed.
According to FEMA Floodplain mapping, the project is located within Flood Panel
27145C0610E. Based on FEMA maps, there are no areas of the site within a 100-year or 500-
year floodplain and the site is outside the 0.2% annual chance floodplain.
There are no structures or known wild and scenic rivers, critical areas, designated shorelands, or
agricultural preserves within the project area.
b.Discuss the projects compatibility with nearby land uses, zoning, and plans listed in Item 9a
above, concentrating on implications for environmental effects.
Properties to the west, south and south east consist of industrial/commercial developments which
will be consistent with zoning planned for the project site. Other adjacent land uses consist of
6
St. Joseph Distribution CenterMay 8, 2015
County Road 133 to the northwest, agricultural land is to the north, wetland areas to the east and
southeast and farmstead to the east.
The proposed project is compatible with existing land use and planned land uses in the area as it
offers light industrial and General Business activities that are compatible with the industrial and
commercial land uses in this area as contemplated by the Citys Comprehensive Plan.
c.Identify measures incorporated into the proposed project to mitigate any potential
incompatibility as discussed in Item 9b above.
No incompatibilities are anticipated between the proposed project and the designated land use.
A variance will be requested to the City of St. Joseph for building height over 40 feet within the
proposed project site.
10. Geology, soils and topography/land forms:
a.Geology - Describe the geology underlying the project area and identify and map any susceptible
geologic features such as sinkholes, shallow limestone formations, unconfined/shallow aquifers, or
karst conditions. Discuss any limitations of these features for the project and any effects the project
could have on these features. Identify any project designs or mitigation measures to address effects
to geologic features.
Minnesota and U.S. Geological Survey data for the site area indicates most of project site consists of
coarse textured outwash with a thin, discontinuous mantle of loamy material. The thickness of the
outwash ranges from 3 feet (1 meter) to more than 100 feet (30 meters). Loamy glacial till typically
underlies the outwash. Organic material is in many of the larger basins and depressions. Recent
loamy alluvium is on flood plains. In a few areas glacial till is along steep valley sidewalls. The
western part of the area is underlain by undifferentiated Precambrian crystalline rocks, and the
bedrock under the eastern part of the area consists of numerous Cambrian-age sandstone and shale
sedimentary units.
Groundwater is abundant in unconsolidated sand and gravel in the surficial drift and buried drift
aquifers throughout this area. The deposits may be discontinuous in the buried drift, where lenses of
sand and gravel are separated by lenses of till. The till helps to protect the buried drift aquifer from
contamination from surface activities. Except for iron levels, the groundwater is of good quality and
is suitable for all uses with minimal treatment.
b.Soils and topography - Describe the soils on the site, giving NRCS (SCS) classifications and
descriptions, including limitations of soils. Describe topography, any special site conditions relating
to erosion potential, soil stability or other soils limitations, such as steep slopes, highly permeable
soils. Provide estimated volume and acreage of soil excavation and/or grading. Discuss impacts
from project activities (distinguish between construction and operational activities) related to soils
and topography. Identify measures during and after project construction to address soil limitations
including stabilization, soil corrections or other measures. Erosion/sedimentation control related to
stormwater runoff should be addressed in response to Item 11.b.ii.
The Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) digital database for Stearns County (USDA NRCS,
Accessed 2015) indicates that four mapped soil units occur on the site. The mapped units are 327A
Dickman sandy loam 0 to 2 percent slopes, 41A Estherville sandy loam 0 to 2 percent slopes, 875B
Estherville-Hawick complex 2 to 6 percent slopes and 413 Osakis loam (). All four of
Exhibit 8
7
St. Joseph Distribution CenterMay 8, 2015
these mapped soil units are nearly level soils dominated by sandy loams or loamy sand soils.
According to the SURRGO Web Soil Survey, interpretations for specific uses are not available and
onsite investigation is recommended. Soil boring data will be used to determine if there are site
specific soil limitations and what, if any, soil corrections might be needed for the site. Site grading
will encompass a portion of the project area which is approximately 65.4 acres.
Contour mapping from the MnDNR MNTOPO online mapping tool indicates surface topography in
the site area is flat, with elevations ranging from 1075 in the southeast to 1085 feet in the northwest
above mean sea level. The site gently slopes from northwest to southeast. There are no naturally
occurring steep slopes on the site.
Erosion and sedimentation control BMPs related to stormwater runoff are discussed in greater detail
within Item 11.b.ii.
NOTE: For silica sand projects, the EAW must include a hydrogeologic investigation assessing the
potential groundwater and surface water effects and geologic conditions that could create an increased
risk of potentially significant effects on groundwater and surface water. Descriptions of water
resources and potential effects from the project in EAW Item 11 must be consistent with the geology,
soils and topography/land forms and potential effects described in EAW Item 10.
11. Water Resources
a.Describe surface water and groundwater features on or near the site in a.i. and a.ii. below.
i. Surface water - lakes, streams, wetlands, intermittent channels, and county/judicial ditches.
Include any special designations such as public waters, trout stream/lake, wildlife lakes,
migratory waterfowl feeding/resting lake, and outstanding resource value water. Include water
quality impairments or special designations listed on the current MPCA 303d Impaired Waters
List that are within 1 mile of the project. Include DNR Public Waters Inventory number(s), if
any.
The distribution center mostly lies within the Sauk River Watershed which drains to the
Mississippi River. A portion of the site to the North falls within Watab River Watershed, which
drains to the Watab Creek and ultimately the Mississippi River. The Minnesota Department of
Natural Resources (MN DNR) Public Water Inventory Map (PWI), the 2015 update of the
National Wetland Inventory (NWI) Map, and the National Hydrography Dataset (NHD) were
reviewed. Two NWI-mapped wetlands are depicted within the site (). The MN DNR
Exhibit 7
PWI and NHD dataset mapping indicates 107 wetlands and freshwater ponds within one mile of
the site; none of the waterbodies are named waters. NWI mapping indicates two wetlands
within the project area, and no impacts to the wetland from the proposed project are anticipated.
A Wetland Delineation will be conducted, and wetland boundaries will be approved by the US
Army Corps of Engineers and Stearns County Environmental Services.
Impaired Waters
According to the 2012 Minnesota impaired waters inventory and the MPCAs impaired waters
viewer (IWAV), no impaired watercourses or waterbodies are located within the site. The nearest
impaired water is the Sauk River (070102020-02344), located approximately 1.5 miles south and
east of the project area. The Sauk River (last inspected 2011) is impaired for nutrients and PCB in
fish tissue.
8
St. Joseph Distribution CenterMay 8, 2015
ii. Groundwater aquifers, springs, seeps. Include: 1) depth to groundwater; 2) if project is within
a MDH wellhead protection area; 3) identification of any onsite and/or nearby wells, including
unique numbers and well logs if available. If there are no wells known on site or nearby, explain
the methodology used to determine this.
One surficial sand and gravel aquifer provides public groundwater supply in the city of St Joseph.
The sand and gravel aquifer is adequate to meet the city's current and future water demand.
Groundwater elevations within the vicinity of the site are between 1061 to 1182 feet above sea level
based on the Geologic Atlas of Stearns County, Minnesota (1995) C-10, Plate 4. Topographic
mapping indicates that elevations on the site range from approximately 1075 to 1085 feet above
mean sea level. The proposed building will be at 1182 feet above sea level and groundwater is not
anticipated to cause any issues during construction.
No new water wells are planned for the project. The Minnesota Geological Surveys (MGS) County
Well Index (CWI) indicates there are no registered wells within the project Site. Other Unique Well
numbers identified nearby, but outside the site area, include: 176564-Right Way Machine for
industrial use, 457306-Borgert Concrete Company well, 400415 and 421836 for domestic use.
The site is not located within a Minnesota Department of Health Wellhead Protection Area.
b. Describe effects from project activities on water resources and measures to minimize or mitigate the
effects in Item b.i. through Item b.iv. below.
i.Wastewater - For each of the following, describe the sources, quantities and composition of all
sanitary, municipal/domestic and industrial wastewater produced or treated at the site.
1)If the wastewater discharge is to a publicly owned treatment facility, identify any
pretreatment measures and the ability of the facility to handle the added water and
waste loadings, including any effects on, or required expansion of, municipal
wastewater infrastructure.
Wastewater generation rates from industry sources can vary widely dependent upon the
type and size of the facility, the degree of water reuse, and the onsite wastewater
treatment method employed, if any. Because of this variation, which can be independent
of the number of employees at the facilities, wastewater generation estimates were
derived using information provided by the Project Proposer for waste water generated by
similar facilities that the Project Proposer operates. This information indicates that
approximately 30,000 gallons of waste water will be generated by the facility each
month.
According to the Citys Sewer Use Ordinance, industrial users discharging into the
Citys Sanitary Sewer System (SSS) shall obtain an Industrial Discharge Permit if
notified by the City. The criteria used by the City to determine if an Industrial
Discharge Permit will be required shall include:
a.An average flow loading greater than 25,000 gallons per operating day; or
b.A pollutant concentration of greater than 50% for one or more regulated
pollutants (see 360:50, Subd. 6) at the point of discharge; or
9
St. Joseph Distribution CenterMay 8, 2015
c.Has prohibitive discharge properties (see 360:40.); or
d.Has been pretreated or passed through an equalization tank before discharge, or
e.A hydraulic or organic loading greater than 5% of the average dry weather
capacity of the SSS, or
f.An industrial process regulated by the EPA categorical standards, or
g.Other criteria as designated by the City as defined in 40 CFR 403.12 (a).
The distribution center is not expected to need an Industrial Discharge Permit as the
average flow rate is estimated at around 1,000 gallons per day. In addition, the project is
not expected to exceed any of the other criteria listed in determining if an Industrial
Discharge Permit is needed. If one of the other criteria is met, then the Applicant will
apply for an Industrial Discharge Permit.
Users of the Citys SSS will be required to abide by the remainder of the Sewer Use
Ordinance as well as the Sewer Rate Ordinance and Water and Sewer System Ordinance
Availability Charges. Among other things, these ordinances restrict the size,
composition, acidity, and combustibility of wastewater entering the Citys SSS. All
permittees are required to maintain a flow measurement device for instantaneous rate
and/or cumulative flow volume determinations. In addition, self-monitoring reports
must be submitted to the City. The City may also inspect users of the SSS (including
sample taking). If pretreatment is necessary it must be conducted in accordance with
Federal Pretreatment Regulations and all other applicable rules and regulations.
All wastewater will be treated by the St. Cloud Wastewater Treatment Facility.
Sewer System Connection and Capacity
The wastewater generated in the project site will be collected and treated by the St.
Cloud wastewater treatment facility, which serves St. Cloud and surrounding cities,
including St. Joseph. The facility is designed to treat an average flow of 13,000,000
gallons per day. After being treated by the St. Cloud area sewer system, wastewater is
discharged into the Mississippi River. Prior to discharge, wastewater undergoes many
stages of treatment, including preliminary treatment, primary treatment, secondary
treatment, and final clarification. In addition, the liquids flow to the chlorine contact
chambers for disinfection, before final discharge to the receiving waters of the
Mississippi River.
2)If the wastewater discharge is to a subsurface sewage treatment systems (SSTS),
describe the system used, the design flow, and suitability of site conditions for such a
system.
Wastewater discharge will not be to a subsurface sewage treatment system (SSTS).
3)If the wastewater discharge is to surface water, identify the wastewater treatment
methods and identify discharge points and proposed effluent limitations to mitigate
impacts. Discuss any effects to surface or groundwater from wastewater discharges.
Wastewater discharge is not to surface water. No effects are anticipated to surface or
groundwater as treatment will go to the St. Cloud Waste Water Treatment Facility.
10
St. Joseph Distribution CenterMay 8, 2015
ii.Stormwater - Describe the quantity and quality of stormwater runoff at the site prior to and post
construction. Include the routes and receiving water bodies for runoff from the site (major
downstream water bodies as well as the immediate receiving waters). Discuss any environmental
effects from stormwater discharges. Describe stormwater pollution prevention plans including
temporary and permanent runoff controls and potential BMP site locations to manage or treat
stormwater runoff. Identify specific erosion control, sedimentation control or stabilization
measures to address soil limitations during and after project construction.
Pre-Construction Site Runoff
Currently, stormwater runoff is from the vacant land on the site and is not treated. Given the
project area is currently undeveloped, it is reasonable to assume that a portion of stormwater
leaves the site as runoff. Runoff primarily drains away from the site to the east into the wetland
area, and leaves the site via overland flow.
Construction Stormwater and Erosion Control BMPs and Permitting
The City of St. Joseph Storm Sewer System is required by federal and state law to obtain and
implement a NPDES Stormwater Permit administered by the MPCA. MS4s are required to
develop and implement a stormwater pollution prevention plan program (SWPPP), and submit
an annual report to the MPCA. A SWPPP will be prepared for this project.
To obtain a building permit for the project, the applicant must obtain approval from the City for
a Stormwater Management Plan, which among other measures, would require temporary BMPs
to treat stormwater runoff prior to discharge to the MS4 infrastructure.
Because the project will involve disturbance of more than one acre of land, application for
coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System/State Disposal System
(NPDES/SDS) General Permit will be submitted to the MPCA prior to initiating earthwork on
the site. This permit is required for discharge of stormwater during construction activity and
requires that Best Management Practices (BMPs) be used to control erosion, and that erosion
controls be inspected after each rainfall event. Erosion control practices that will be
implemented on the site include, but are not limited to:
1.Silt fence and other erosion control features installed prior to initiation of earthwork and
maintained until viable turf or ground cover is established on exposed areas.
2.Street-level inlet protection.
3.Periodic street cleaning and installation of a rock construction entrance to reduce tracking of
dirt onto public streets.
4.Stabilization of exposed soils, phased with grading, and
5.Use of sod and landscaping to stabilize exposed surface soils after final grading.
Erosion control plans must be reviewed and accepted by the City of St. Joseph prior to project
construction. Because the above BMPs will be implemented during and after construction,
potential adverse effects from construction-related sediment and erosion on water quality will be
minimized. Stormwater treatment facilities would also be designed and implemented to meet
City, Watershed and MPCA requirements.
Post-Construction Site Runoff
11
St. Joseph Distribution CenterMay 8, 2015
After construction, most of the stormwater runoff will come from rooftops, sidewalks, and
parking areas. Stormwater runoff will be to the east into the proposed pond and infiltration area
prior to discharging offsite. Stormwater will be treated in accordance with City of St. Joseph,
State of MN, and Sauk River Watershed requirements. It is expected that the post-construction
runoff volumes will increase compared to current conditions, but that runoff rates and volumes
will be controlled by the proposed stormwater treatment system.
The water quality of the stormwater runoff from the site will be improved by rate control and
sedimentation facilities. Because the project is creating 1 acre or more of new impervious
surface, the MPCA post-construction stormwater management requirement of the NPDES permit
will also apply to this project. The project will be treated by a single stormwater retention basin
located on the southeast portion of the project site. The basin will be approximately 3 acres in
size and is planned as a dry, infiltrating pond. The pond will be designed to meet the infiltration
requirements of the Sauk River Watershed District and the State of Minnesota.
iii.Water appropriation - Describe if the project proposes to appropriate surface or groundwater
(including dewatering). Describe the source, quantity, duration, use and purpose of the water
use and if a DNR water appropriation permit is required. Describe any well abandonment. If
connecting to an existing municipal water supply, identify the wells to be used as a water source
and any effects on, or required expansion of, municipal water infrastructure. Discuss
environmental effects from water appropriation, including an assessment of the water resources
available for appropriation. Identify any measures to avoid, minimize, or mitigate environmental
effects from the water appropriation.
Connection to a public water supply system
The St. Joseph public water supply currently uses and relies on one source water aquifer - the
Surficial Sand and Gravel Aquifer. The sand and gravel aquifer is adequate to meet the city's
current and future water demand.
The permit numbers of public water supply wells located within a mile of the project location
ranging from 39 to 86 feet deep are as follows: 1999-3166, 1999-3189, 1990-3499 and 2011-
0322. The permitted capacity of these wells range from 2 to 33 million gallons per year.
Water use for the project is estimated to be 110% of the waste water generated, or 1100 gallons
per day for the facility. The City of St Joseph uses and relies on one source water aquifer - the
Surficial Sand and Gravel Aquifer. The sand and gravel aquifer is adequate to meet the city's
current and future water demand. The city operates two filtration plants that receive water from
six wells, purifying and placing into the distribution system. The original plant renovated in
1996, has the capacity to treat 1.5 MGD (million gallons per day) and the new facility
constructed in 2006, and has the capacity to treat up to 3.0 MGD. On average the city treats
approximately 400,000 gallons per day, peaking at 1 million gallons per day during the summer
months. The City of St Joseph has adequate facilities in place to support the water needs of the
proposed project.
Dewatering
It is unlikely that construction dewatering will be necessary for utility installation. If
groundwater is encountered during utility installation, it will be discharged to temporary
sediment basins, screened and discharged, or otherwise managed in coordination with City Staff.
If construction dewatering and pumping from the proposed development becomes necessary,
permits from the MN DNR will be obtained. If the quantities exceed the 10,000-gallon per day
12
St. Joseph Distribution CenterMay 8, 2015
or 1,000,000 gallons per year thresholds, a DNR Water Appropriation Permit will be obtained.
However, it is not anticipated that construction dewatering or pumping from the proposed
development will be extensive or continue long enough to require a permit from the DNR.
iv.Surface Waters
a) Wetlands - Describe any anticipated physical effects or alterations to wetland features
such as draining, filling, permanent inundation, dredging and vegetative removal.
Discuss direct and indirect environmental effects from physical modification of
wetlands, including the anticipated effects that any proposed wetland alterations may
have to the host watershed. Identify measures to avoid (e.g., available alternatives that
were considered), minimize, or mitigate environmental effects to wetlands. Discuss
whether any required compensatory wetland mitigation for unavoidable wetland impacts
will occur in the same minor or major watershed, and identify those probable locations.
Two mapped NWI wetlands are located on the eastern side of the site and no
impacts to the wetlands are anticipated. Wetland delineation will be conducted
during the growing season and will be confirmed with the US Army Corps of
Engineers, the City of St. Joseph and the Sauk River Watershed District and Stearns
County Environmental Services.
b) Other surface waters- Describe any anticipated physical effects or alterations to surface
water features (lakes, streams, ponds, intermittent channels, county/judicial ditches)
such as draining, filling, permanent inundation, dredging, diking, stream diversion,
impoundment, aquatic plant removal and riparian alteration. Discuss direct and
indirect environmental effects from physical modification of water features. Identify
measures to avoid, minimize, or mitigate environmental effects to surface water features,
including in-water Best Management Practices that are proposed to avoid or minimize
turbidity/sedimentation while physically altering the water features. Discuss how the
project will change the number or type of watercraft on any water body, including
current and projected watercraft usage.
Best Management Practices to avoid or minimize erosion and sedimentation during
construction will be described in the project SWPPP, and deployed as needed. No
physical effects or alterations to surface waters are anticipated as a consequence of site
development.
12. Contamination/Hazardous Materials/Wastes
a.Pre-project site conditions - Describe existing contamination or potential environmental hazards on
or in close proximity to the project site such as soil or ground water contamination, abandoned
dumps, closed landfills, existing or abandoned storage tanks, and hazardous liquid or gas pipelines.
Discuss any potential environmental effects from pre-project site conditions that would be caused or
exacerbated by project construction and operation. Identify measures to avoid, minimize or mitigate
adverse effects from existing contamination or potential environmental hazards. Include
development of a Contingency Plan or Response Action Plan.
A majority of the project site is agricultural land, which has been the consistent use historically. A
review of historical aerial photographs from 1991 to 2014 shows the project area is unchanged since
1991. Project area is generally agricultural with some natural and wetland areas. The parcel
immediately to the east of the project area is open space, consisting of wetland and woodland areas.
13
St. Joseph Distribution CenterMay 8, 2015
The site was also reviewed using the Minnesota Pollution Control Agencys (MPCA)Whats In My
Neighborhood (WIMN) online tool. This tool is used to find information about environmental
permits issued by the MPCA, registrations and notifications required by the MPCA, and
investigation of potentially contaminated properties undertaken by the MPCA and its partners.
Results of this search found no records associated with the site. A review of the WIMN database
results for an approximate 1 mile buffer surrounding the Project Area revealed 57 sites consisting of
industrial or construction stormwater permits, leak sites, tank sites, feedlot and listings for small to
minimal quantity hazardous waste generators:
Metro Plumbing & Heating - petroleum brownfield, leak site (listed active, no further info
available)
Former Tom Thumb Store - leak site (closure 4/11/2002)
Great Plains Supply Co Inc - leak site (closure 5/7/1993)
Borgert Products Inc - leak site, tank site, industrial stormwater permit, hazardous waste, small
to minimal quantity generator (closure 1/20/1999)
Joe's Auto Parts - leak site, hazardous waste, small to minimal quantity generator (closure
12/9/1994)
Gene Scherer & Sons Trucking Inc - tank site
W Gohman Construction Co - tank site
US Army AMSA 101G - tank site; hazardous waste, small to minimal quantity generator
Bee Line Service Center - tank site; hazardous waste, small to minimal quantity generator
CentraCare Clinic Saint Joseph - hazardous waste, small to minimal quantity generator
Corbons Pharmacy 2039 - hazardous waste, small to minimal quantity generator
Fouquette Furniture Restoration - hazardous waste, small to minimal quantity generator
Scherer & Sons Trucking Inc - hazardous waste, small to minimal quantity generator
Styles Cotton & Milbert DDS - hazardous waste, small to minimal quantity generator
Amcon Block & Precast Inc - St Joseph - hazardous waste, small to minimal quantity generator;
industrial stormwater permit
Amcon Block & Precast Inc - industrial stormwater permit
Best Way Fabricating - industrial stormwater permit
Best-Way Fabricating Inc - industrial stormwater permit
Borgert Products, Inc. - industrial stormwater permit
Brenny Specialized Inc - industrial stormwater permit
Brenny Specialized, Inc. - industrial stormwater permit
Central Minnesota Prefinishing - industrial stormwater permit
Central Minnesota Prefinishing - industrial stormwater permit
Fabral - industrial stormwater permit
Fabral - industrial stormwater permit
Joe's Auto Wrecking - industrial stormwater permit
joe's auto wrecking - industrial stormwater permit
US Army Reserve Area Maint Sup Act - industrial stormwater permit
Knife River Corp N Central St Joseph - hazardous waste, small to minimal quantity generator;
industrial stormwater permit
FABRAL Inc - industrial stormwater permit, air permit
2010 16th Ave SE Improve STJOE110062 - construction stormwater permit
Army Reserve Training Center - St Joseph - construction stormwater permit
Bliss Direct Media - CSW - construction stormwater permit
BTL Properties, LLC - construction stormwater permit
Central MN Federal Credit Union - construction stormwater permit
14
St. Joseph Distribution CenterMay 8, 2015
Coborn's Superstore - construction stormwater permit
Manion's Wholesale - construction stormwater permit
Manion's Wholesale Storage Area - CSW - construction stormwater permit
McDonald's Restaurant - construction stormwater permit
Northland Phase II - construction stormwater permit
St. Joseph Professional Plat - construction stormwater permit
SUNSET RIDGE - construction stormwater permit
The Bluffs of St. Joseph - construction stormwater permit
Dave Feld Farm - feedlot
Gerald Gohmann Farm - feedlot
LeRoy & Lois Warnert Farm - feedlot
Robert & Rita Rassier Farm - feedlot
Urban Warnert Jr Farm feedlot
Immediately adjacent to project area:
Dbl Labs - voluntary investigation & cleanup (VIC) (Project Area, cert. of completion
12/15/1995)
DBL Labs - SW - industrial stormwater permit (Project Area)
Essilor Coating Center - hazardous waste, small to minimal quantity generator; industrial
stormwater permit (adjacent west)
Vicwest Steel - hazardous waste, small to minimal quantity generator (adjacent west)
DBL Labs Inc - St Joseph - hazardous waste, small to minimal quantity generator (adjacent west)
Express Eng & Mfg Inc - hazardous waste, small to minimal quantity generator (adjacent west)
S & S Automotive Inc - hazardous waste, small to minimal quantity generator (adjacent west)
American Mfg Co - hazardous waste, small to minimal quantity generator; industrial stormwater
permit (adjacent west)
Riteway Machine - hazardous waste, small to minimal quantity generator
Although voluntary work at the Metro Plumbing and Heating Brownfields site appears to be still
active, the site has not been referred to a higher-level program, and the site is located approximately
0.61 miles west of the Project Area on the other side of County Road 133. Given this distance and
voluntary cleanup status, this site is not expected to affect planned future use of the Project Area.
Cleanup work has commenced on the Former Tom Thumb Store site, the Great Plains Supply Co Inc
site, the Borgert Products Inc site, and the Joe's Auto Parts site, and all four of these sites have
achieved closure status with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA). Therefore, none of
these closed leak sites are expected to affect planned future use of the Project Area.
The DBL Labs VIC site has received a certificate of completion from the MPCA for cleanup work at
the site. Therefore, this site is not expected to affect planned future use of the Project Area.
No other identified environmental sites are expected to affect planned future use of the Project Area.
The National Pipeline Mapping System (NPMS) Public Map Viewer was accessed in April 2015 to
determine the presence of hazardous liquid or natural gas pipelines on or adjacent to the site. Based
on the NPMS mapping, there is one Natural Gas Transmission Pipeline operated by Northern Natural
Gas Co. which is located approximately 0.8 miles east of the project site. The NPMS indicates the
15
St. Joseph Distribution CenterMay 8, 2015
commodity type as natural gas. No other gas transmission or hazardous liquid pipelines were
identified by the NPMS on or adjacent to the site.
b.Project related generation/storage of solid wastes - Describe solid wastes generated/stored during
construction and/or operation of the project. Indicate method of disposal. Discuss potential
environmental effects from solid waste handling, storage and disposal. Identify measures to avoid,
minimize or mitigate adverse effects from the generation/storage of solid waste including source
reduction and recycling.
No significant volume of solid waste is anticipated to be generated or stored during construction of
the project. Construction activities will generate wastes typical of light industrial development
operations. The contractor will dispose of wastes generated at the site in an approved method by
using commercial dumpsters and disposing construction wastes at an MPCA-permitted landfill. The
contractor will minimize and mitigate adverse effects from the generation of solid waste from
construction activities by recycling construction waste that can be recycled, when feasible. No
storage of significant volumes of solid waste is anticipated with the construction of the project.
According to information provided by the project proposer based on similar facilities, following
project construction, approximately 335 tons per year of solid waste will be generated at the site.
Trash compactors will be used to dispose the waste generated at the site. Other wastes generated at
site such as pallets, cardboard, metal scraps, aluminum and battery will be recycled or shipped for
recycling. There will be minimal generation of hazardous waste from truck maintenance and fueling
facility.
c.Project related use/storage of hazardous materials - Describe chemicals/hazardous materials
used/stored during construction and/or operation of the project including method of storage.
Indicate the number, location and size of any above or below ground tanks to store petroleum or
other materials. Discuss potential environmental effects from accidental spill or release of
hazardous materials. Identify measures to avoid, minimize or mitigate adverse effects from the
use/storage of chemicals/hazardous materials including source reduction and recycling. Include
development of a spill prevention plan.
It is not anticipated that construction of the proposed project will require usage or storage of
significant amounts of hazardous materials. Hazardous materials such as fuels (small quantities
stored above ground) and specific construction materials would be on site during construction. Any
hazardous material will be stored and handled in conformance with state and federal regulations to
prevent accidental spill or release. Builders and contractors are responsible for proper management
of hazardous materials utilized during construction. The contractor will minimize and mitigate
adverse effects from the use and storage of hazardous materials by developing a spill prevention plan
for the project and recycling hazardous materials that can be recycled.
Operation of the project will need truck maintenance and fueling facility on site. Fuel will be stored
and handled on site in conformance with state and federal regulations to prevent accidental spill or
release. Other hazardous materials that will be stored in the proposed distribution center are aerosols,
oils and household chemicals. The project is anticipated to use batteries for lifts and liquid ammonia
in sealed systems for coolant/refrigeration systems. Fuel oil will be stored in separate aboveground
storage tanks. The tanks will have secondary containment constructed in accordance with the
Minnesota Rules Chapter 7151 and the Minnesota Uniform Fire Code. No ammonia storage outside
of the sealed cooling systems is proposed for the site. Maintenance to the cooling systems will be
conducted by licensed heating and cooling contractors.
16
St. Joseph Distribution CenterMay 8, 2015
d.Project related generation/storage of hazardous wastes - Describe hazardous wastes
generated/stored during construction and/or operation of the project. Indicate method of disposal.
Discuss potential environmental effects from hazardous waste handling, storage, and disposal.
Identify measures to avoid, minimize or mitigate adverse effects from the generation/storage of
hazardous waste including source reduction and recycling.
Outside of the materials described above, the project is not anticipated to generate or require the
storage or disposal of any other hazardous wastes during construction or operation.
13. Fish, wildlife, plant communities, and sensitive ecological resources (rare features):
a)Describe fish and wildlife resources as well as habitats and vegetation on or near the site.
Publically available data and imagery available through USGS, the MN DNR, and Google Earth was
used to conduct a desktop analysis of cover types, habitats, and wildlife resources. The site is
currently a combination of undeveloped agricultural land and open space with mapped wetlands.
The site is bounded on the northwest by County Road 133. North of the site is agricultural land,
west of the site are all industrial/commercial developments and to the east is wetland and wooded
areas.
Natural communities that would have been on the site historically have been significantly altered by
nearly 100 years of farming and human development. As a result of these historical land uses, many
of the wildlife species that would otherwise occur have declined or been extirpated. The project site
does not include habitat types that are unique or rare in this area, and the low vegetative diversity of
the habitat generally supports few wildlife species.
To the east of the project site, there exists non-contiguous woodland with scattered openings as well
as a number of wetlands and freshwater ponds. The woodland likely provide habitat and cover for
species commonly found in the upper Midwest such as woodcock, thrushes, blue jays, woodpeckers,
chipmunks, gray squirrels, cottontail rabbits, and raccoon. The wetlands and ponds near the site also
provide potential fish habitat.
b)Describe rare features such as state-listed (endangered, threatened or special concern) species, native
plant communities, Minnesota County Biological Survey Sites of Biodiversity Significance, and other
sensitive ecological resources on or within close proximity to the site. Provide the license agreement
number (LA-) and/or correspondence number (ERDB-) from which the data were obtained and
668
.
attach the Natural Heritage letter from the DNR. Indicate if any additional habitat or species survey
work has been conducted within the site and describe the results.
A data request to the Minnesota Natural Heritage Information System (NHIS) was submitted on
March 31, 2015 for a review of rare features on or near the project site that may not be accounted for
in our mapping and database search.
In addition, the MNDNR Regionally Significant Ecological Areas (RSEA) was reviewed for
resources on and around the site. There are no RSEAs indicated within the site. The closest RSEA
is ¼ mile north of the project area and extends to the north and east of the site.
17
St. Joseph Distribution CenterMay 8, 2015
c)Discuss how the identified fish, wildlife, plant communities, rare features and ecosystems may be
affected by the project. Include a discussion on introduction and spread of invasive species from the
project construction and operation. Separately discuss effects to known threatened and endangered
species.
Project development will convert existing cropland into an industrial development. The common
species that use the site will likely be displaced by the development. About 25% of the project site
will still remain undeveloped and some limited developed open space will remain after project
development and could still serve as usable habitat for common species. Similar cropland and
developed open space land uses are located adjacent to the site that could be utilized by displaced
species.
14. Historic properties
Describe any historic structures, archeological sites, and/or traditional cultural properties on or in close
proximity to the site. Include: 1) historic designations, 2) known artifact areas, and 3) architectural
features. Attach letter received from the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO). Discuss any
anticipated effects to historic properties during project construction and operation. Identify measures
that will be taken to avoid, minimize, or mitigate adverse effects to historic properties.
A database search request was submitted to the Minnesota State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO)
who conducted a search of the Minnesota Archaeological Inventory and Historic Structure Inventory
for the project area. Based on their review, no previously recorded archaeological sites, historic
structures, or traditional cultural properties were identified in the database for the immediate project
area. Additionally, background research was conducted at the MN SHPO and the MN Office of the
State Archaeologist. No other previously recorded archaeological sites or historic properties were
identified at or immediately adjacent to the project area. Also, no archaeological sites were
identified within one-mile of the project area.
Several historic structures have been inventoried within one-mile of the project area, in the City of
St. Joseph. Two of these inventoried structures have been certified as eligible for listing on the
National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). The certified eligible structures include the Great
Northern Railroad: Collegeville Segment (SHPO Inventory #SN-SJT-001) which is located
approximately 0.25 miles south of the project area and the Rassier Farmstead (SHPO Inventory #SN-
SJC-091) which is located approximately 0.9 miles south of the project area. No physical or visual
impacts are anticipated upon identified historic structures due to the distance of the project from
historic properties, as well as visual screening by present, intervening structures.
15. Visual
Describe any scenic views or vistas on or near the project site. Describe any project related visual
effects such as vapor plumes or glare from intense lights. Discuss the potential visual effects from the
project. Identify any measures to avoid, minimize, or mitigate visual effects.
There are no scenic views or vistas located on or near the property, and no non-routine impacts or
visual nuisances are anticipated. The proposed industrial land use is consistent with other
established uses in the area, and therefore will not create a significant change in visual aesthetics.
Exterior lighting on site will follow appropriate guidelines and requirements to prevent off-site
impacts.
18
St. Joseph Distribution CenterMay 8, 2015
16. Air
a.Stationary source emissions - Describe the type, sources, quantities and compositions of any
emissions from stationary sources such as boilers or exhaust stacks. Include any hazardous air
pollutants, criteria pollutants, and any greenhouse gases. Discuss effects to air quality including any
sensitive receptors, human health or applicable regulatory criteria. Include a discussion of any
methods used assess the projects effect on air quality and the results of that assessment. Identify
pollution control equipment and other measures that will be taken to avoid, minimize, or mitigate
adverse effects from stationary source emissions.
Ammonia will be used for coolant/refrigeration systems. The ammonia coolant systems will be
sealed systems and will be maintained by a qualified heating and cooling contractor. No emissions
from the cooling systems are expected. No other impacts to air quality are expected as a result of the
project.
b.Vehicle emissions - Describe the effect of the projects traffic generation on air emissions. Discuss
the projects vehicle-related emissions effect on air quality. Identify measures (e.g. traffic
operational improvements, diesel idling minimization plan) that will be taken to minimize or mitigate
vehicle-related emissions.
Increased traffic will generate a relatively small corresponding increase in carbon monoxide levels
and other vehicle-related air emissions. The project is expected to have a negligible impact on air
quality. Consequently, baseline air quality monitoring, or predictive air quality modeling, has not
been contemplated at this time, and no measures to mitigate air quality impacts have been
considered.
c.Dust and odors - Describe sources, characteristics, duration, quantities, and intensity of dust and
odors generated during project construction and operation. (Fugitive dust may be discussed under
item 16a). Discuss the effect of dust and odors in the vicinity of the project including nearby sensitive
receptors and quality of life. Identify measures that will be taken to minimize or mitigate the effects
of dust and odors.
Project construction and occupancy is not expected to generate objectionable odors or dust. Odors
and dust generated during construction and occupancy will meet the requirements of the MPCA and
applicable local regulations. Minor odors generated during construction will be typical of those
associated with the construction process, such as exhaust from diesel and gasoline powered
construction equipment. The construction process is expected to generate some dust, but it is not
anticipated that fugitive dust will be generated in objectionable quantities. During mass grading and
construction, contractors will follow best management practices to reduce dust emissions.
Suppression of airborne dust by application of water will be implemented if fugitive dust generation
occurs that is greater than expected during normal construction practices.
17. Noise
Describe sources, characteristics, duration, quantities, and intensity of noise generated during project
construction and operation. Discuss the effect of noise in the vicinity of the project including 1) existing
noise levels/sources in the area, 2) nearby sensitive receptors, 3) conformance to state noise standards,
and 4) quality of life. Identify measures that will be taken to minimize or mitigate the effects of noise.
19
St. Joseph Distribution CenterMay 8, 2015
It is anticipated that noise levels will temporarily increase locally during project construction, but are
expected to return to intensities and levels consistent with the existing environment. Noise levels on
and adjacent to the site will vary considerably during construction depending on the pieces of
construction equipment being operated simultaneously, the percent of time in operation, and the
distance from the equipment to the receptors. Noise levels following construction are anticipated to
be consistent with other sources in the vicinity of the project area and in conformance with city and
state noise standards.
18. Transportation
a.Describe traffic-related aspects of project construction and operation. Include: 1) existing and
proposed additional parking spaces, 2) estimated total average daily traffic generated, 3) estimated
maximum peak hour traffic generated and time of occurrence, 4) indicate source of trip generation
rates used in the estimates, and 5) availability of transit and/or other alternative transportation
modes.
1.Existing and Proposed Additional Parking Spaces
The existing land use is agricultural on the parcel. There are no existing parking spaces on the
parcel. The proposed driveway to the site is right turn from County Road 133.
The proposed land uses and corresponding parking supply proposed for this site include:
a.745,000 square feet warehouse/storage building
b.177 surface stalls for tractors and trailers
c.260 surface stalls for employee vehicles
2.Estimated Total Average Daily Traffic Generated
The table below shows the total average trip generation for the site as being approximately 916
trips per day.
Table 18.1. Trip Generation Summary
WeekdayAM PeakPM Peak
ITE
TypeLand UseCodeSizeEnterExitEnterExitEnterExit
General Light
WarehouseIndustrial110300employees4584581252630115
TOTAL916151145
3.Estimated Maximum Peak Hour Traffic Generated and Time of Occurrence
The table above shows the trip generation for AM and PM Peak Hours. The estimated
maximum peak hour traffic will be generated in the AM Peak Hour (151 trips/hour).
4.Indicate source of trip generation rates used in the estimates
20
St. Joseph Distribution CenterMay 8, 2015
Source: Trip Generation Manual, Ninth Edition, Institute of Transportation Engineers,
Washington, DC, 2012.
5.Availability of Transit and/or Other Alternative Transportation Modes
Currently, no transit is available adjacent to this site.
b.Discuss the effect on traffic congestion on affected roads and describe any traffic improvements
necessary. The analysis must discuss the projects impact on the regional transportation system.
If the peak hour traffic generated exceeds 250 vehicles or the total daily trips exceeds 2,500, a traffic
impact study must be prepared as part of the EAW. Use the format and procedures described in the
Minnesota Department of Transportations Access Management Manual, Chapter 5 (available at:
http://www.dot.state.mn.us/accessmanagement/resources.html) or a similar local guidance,
A 2013 traffic volume study done by MnDOT shows County Road 133 Avergae Daily Traffic
(ADT) was 6301 with 5.9% Heavy Commercial Average Daily Traffic (HCADT). The study
showed ADT of 8800 from CSAH 75 to Elm Street and 6300 from Elm Street to the St. Joseph city
limits. No traffic impact study or mitigation is required as the peak hour traffic that will be
generated from the site is less than 250 vehicles and total daily trips will be less than 2,500.
c.Identify measures that will be taken to minimize or mitigate project related transportation effects.
A right turn lane into the facility is proposed for County Road 133. No other mitigation
measures have been identified as being required for the project.
19. Cumulative potential effects: (Preparers can leave this item blank if cumulative potential
effects are addressed under the applicable EAW Items)
a.Describe the geographic scales and timeframes of the project related environmental effects that
could combine with other environmental effects resulting in cumulative potential effects.
It is anticipated that the project construction will start in fall 2015. Full build-out is anticipated by
late 2016; however, construction timing will ultimately depend upon market and weather conditions.
Cumulative effects of this project on natural resources and infrastructure are expected to be roughly
proportional to the impacts discussed in this EAW. The City of St Joseph has planned for future
growth and development in this particular area as part of its Comprehensive Plan, Surface Water
Management Plan, Water Supply and Distribution Plan, Sanitary Sewer Plan, and Transportation
Plan. These efforts will ensure that the cumulative impacts of future growth and development to the
environment, and to the Citys service capacity, are anticipated and mitigated.
b.Describe any reasonably foreseeable future projects (for which a basis of expectation has been laid)
that may interact with environmental effects of the proposed project within the geographic scales
and timeframes identified above.
The project proposer does not currently own or have options on adjacent lands.
Parcels to the north and east of the proposed project area are currently undeveloped and zoned
Industrial. In keeping with the citys comprehensive plan, these parcels are expected to develop in
21
St. Joseph Distribution CenterMay 8, 2015
the future to similar uses. Undeveloped parcels immediately surrounding the proposed development
site contain similar land uses and land features as the project site.
c.Discuss the nature of the cumulative potential effects and summarize any other available information
relevant to determining whether there is potential for significant environmental effects due to these
cumulative effects.
The proposed project will result in conversion of agricultural lands to non-agricultural uses.
Consequently, cumulative impacts to natural resources are anticipated to be minimal.
Development of surrounding parcels will also result in cumulative impacts to city infrastructure such
as roads, sewer, and water. These cumulative impacts have been thoughtfully contemplated and
addressed in the Citys Comprehensive Plan, Storm Water Management Plan and Transportation
Plan.
Mitigation for anticipated minor cumulative impacts in the area will include pretreating stormwater
and controlling stormwater rates and providing adequate municipal facilities such as potable water
and wastewater treatment. These provisions will help minimize potential cumulative effects of past
developments and future developments within the region. Given the nature of potential cumulative
effects, the evaluation of available and relevant information, and mitigation efforts proposed, the
potential for significant environmental effects due to these cumulative effects appears minor.
20. Other potential environmental effects:
If the project may cause any additional environmental effects not addressed by items 1 to 19, describe
the effects here, discuss the how the environment will be affected, and identify measures that will be
taken to minimize and mitigate these effects.
No other additional environmental effects are anticipated as a result of this project. Potential
environmental effects have been addressed in Items 1 through 19.
(The Environmental Quality Board will only acceptEnvironmental
RGU CERTIFICATION.SIGNED
Assessment Worksheets for public notice in the EQB Monitor.)
I hereby certify that:
The information contained in this document is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge.
The EAW describes the complete project; there are no other projects, stages or components other
than those described in this document, which are related to the project as connected actions or phased
actions, as defined at Minnesota Rules, parts 4410.0200, subparts 9c and 60, respectively.
Copies of this EAW are being sent to the entire EQB distribution list.
Signature ________________________________ Date _______________________________
Title: ________________________________
22
evA dr37
N
2 daoR ytnuoC
Data Source(s): ESRI WMS World Imagery (Accessed
St Joseph Distribution Center
2015); U.S. Elevation Data (NED) (10m Resolution) to
generate contour;
Legend
City of St Joseph, Minnesota
±
Proposed Site BoundaryStormwater Ponding
Proposed Site Plan
BuildingsAccess Roads & Parking
Feet
0400
Grading Limits2 Ft Contour
EXHIBIT 3
St Joseph Distribution Center
Data Source(s): ESRI WMS World Imagery (Accessed 2015);
Legend
City of St Joseph, Minnesota
Agricultural Cropland (92.87 acres)
±
Wetland (1.5 acres)
Cover Types
Woodland (3.36 acres)
Feet
EXHIBIT 4
0400
Proposed Site Boundary
Agricultural FieldAgricultural Field
Industrial/
Wetland
Commercial
Area
Farmstead
Industrial/
Commercial
Wetland
Area
Industrial/
Commercial
Industrial/
Industrial/
Commercial
Commercial
Agricultural Field
St Joseph Distribution Center
Data Source(s): ESRI WMS World Imagery (Accessed
2015); MN DOT Data (2014);
City of St Joseph, Minnesota
Legend
±
Proposed Site Boundary Adjacent Land Use
Feet
Roads
0500
EXHIBIT 5
Urban
Urban
Light Industrial
Light Industrial
Expansion
Expansion
General Business
General Business
(UE)
(UE)
District
District
(L1/B-3)
(L1/B-3)
General
General
Business
Business
District
District
(B-3)
(B-3)
L1/B-3
L1/B-3
L1/B-3
L1/B-3
Industrial
Industrial
Light Industrial
Light Industrial
(I)
(I)
General Business
General Business
District
District
(L1/B-3)
(L1/B-3)
L1/B-3
L1/B-3
Industrial
Industrial
(I)
(I)
St Joseph Distribution Center
Data Source(s): ESRI WMS World Imagery
(Accessed 2015); Stearns County, MN Zoning
District Dataset (2015); MN DOT Data (2014)
City of St Joseph, Minnesota
±
Legend
Zoning Map
Feet
Proposed Site Boundary
0400
EXHIBIT 6
PEMC
PEMC
PEMC
PEMC
PEMC
PEMC
PEMF
PEMC
PEMF
PUBF
PUBF
PUBF
PUBF
PEMC
PEMC
PEMF
PEMC
PEMC
PEMC
PEMC
Data Source(s): ESRI WMS World Imagery (Accessed 2015); MN
St Joseph Distribution Center
DNR Division of Water (2013); MN DNR Minor Watershed
Boundaries (2009); U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service National Wetland
City of St Joseph, Minnesota
Legend
±
Proposed Site Boundary
Water Resources
Mapped NWI Wetland
Feet
MN DNR Minor Watershed Boundary
0600
EXHIBIT 7
327A
327B
Dickman sandy loam,
Dickman sandy loam,
413
204C
0 to 2 percent slopes
Osakis2 to 6 percent slopes
Cushing sandy
loam
loam, 8 to 15
percent slopes
204B
Cushing sandy
loam, 2 to 8
percent slopes
41A
Estherville sandy loam,
0 to 2 percent slopes
41B
Estherville sandy loam,
2 to 6 percent slopes
41A
Estherville sandy loam,
0 to 2 percent slopes
41B
Estherville sandy loam,
2 to 6 percent slopes
875B
Estherville-Hawick
complex, 2 to 6
percent slopes
41B
Estherville sandy loam,
2 to 6 percent slopes
183
Dassel sandy loam
41B
Estherville sandy loam,
2 to 6 percent slopes
41A
Estherville sandy loam,
0 to 2 percent slopes
183
Dassel sandy loam
Data Source(s): ESRI WMS World Imagery (Accessed 2015); U.S.
St Joseph Distribution Center
Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation
Service, Web Soil Survey (September 2014);
Legend
City of St Joseph, Minnesota
±
Proposed Site Boundary
NRCS Soils
NRCS Soil
Feet
0400
EXHIBIT 8
Roads
Urban
Urban
Expansion
Expansion
(UE)
(UE)
Light Industrial
Light Industrial
Industrial
Industrial
(I)
(I)
Industrial
Industrial
(I)
(I)
St Joseph Distribution Center
Data Source(s): ESRI WMS World Imagery
(Accessed 2015); Stearns County, MN Zoning District
Dataset (2015); MN DOT Data (2014); City of St
Joseph Proposed Zoning Information (2015)
City of St Joseph, Minnesota
±
Legend
Proposed Zoning Map
Feet
0400
Proposed Site Boundary
EXHIBIT 9
This page intentionally left blank
By May 25,2015
St. Joseph Newsleader
PO Box 324
St. Joseph,MN 56374
Phone: (320)-363-7741
Fax: (320)-363-4195
Re: Press Release for the St Joseph Distribution Center Development for
Publication in the St.Joseph Newsleader
Dear Editor:
In accordance with Minnesota Environmental Quality Board(EQB)rules,we are submitting the
following Press Release for publication in the St Joseph Newsleader to announce the availability of the
St Joseph Distribution Center Environmental Assessment Worksheet(EAW)for public comment.
Sincerely,
Mr. Matthew Vollbrecht
Westwood Professional Services,Inc.
cc:
KDN Holdings,Mr.John Dondanville
2685 Lapeer Road,Suite 206,Auburn Hills,MN 48326
Rice Building Systems Inc.,Attn:Chris Rice
1019 Industrial Drive South,P.O.Box 128,Sauk Rapids,MN 56379
Westwood Professional Services,Inc.,Attn:Mr.Rob Olson
3701 12th Street North,Suite 206,St.Cloud,MN 56303
Environmental Quality Board,Environmental Review Progam
300 Centennial Office Building,658 Cedar Street,St.Paul,MN 55155
St Joseph Distribution Center EAW—PRESS RELEASE
The St. Joseph Distribution Center is proposed on approximately 98.92 acres of
primarily agricultural land in St. Joseph. The project proposes a total gross building
area of 745,000 square feet. The project will be serviced by municipal sewer and
water. Anyone wishing to submit comments on the EAW can view a copy of the
document at the City of St. Joseph and send written comments to Ms. Judy Weyrens,
City Administrator, 25 College Avenue, St. Joseph, MN 56374. Comments on the
EAW must be received by the City of St. Joseph no later than 4:30 p.m. on June 24,
2015.
MEMORANDUM
DATE: May 22,2015
TO: EAW Distribution List for the St. Joseph Distribution Center
FROM: Matthew Vollbrecht,Environmental Scientist
RE: Review and Comment Period for the St.Joseph Distribution Center EAW
Enclosed for your review is/are the number of the St. Joseph Distribution Center(s)
indicated for distribution to your agency on the enclosed EAW Distribution List. As
required under Minnesota Environmental Quality Board(EQB)Rules,the abstract for
this EAW has been submitted for publication in the May 25, 2015 edition of the EQB
Monitor and a public notice is being submitted for publication in a local newspaper.
Comments on this EAW must be received by Ms. Judy Weyrens, City of St. Joseph,
City Administrator, no later than 4:30pm on June 24, 2015.
St Joseph Distribution Center EAW, City of St.Joseph,Stearns County,Minnesota
EAW Distribution List
State Agencies Number
of Copies
Environmental Quality Board,Environmental Review Program 1
300 Centennial Office Building,658 Cedar Street, St. Paul,MN 55155
Board of Water and Soil Resources,Attn: Travis Germundson 1
One West Water Street, Suite 200,St. Paul,MN 55107
Department of Agriculture,Attn: Becky Balk
90 West Plato Blvd.,St. Paul,MN 55107 1
Department of Health,Environmental Health Division,Attn: Michele Ross 1
625 N Robert Street St. Paul,MN 55101
Department of Commerce,Attn: Ray Kirsch 1
85 Seventh Place East,Suite 500,St. Paul,MN 55101
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources,Attn: Kate Franz 3
Environmental Review Unit, 500 Lafayette Road, St. Paul,MN 55155-4010
Minnesota Department of Transportation,Attn: Debra Moynihan 1
Mn/DOT Office of Environmental Stewardship, 395 John Ireland Blvd.,MS 620,St. Paul,MN 55155
Minnesota Historical Society, State Historic Preservation Office 1
345 Kellogg Blvd. West,Level A,St. Paul,MN 55102
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency,Attn: Dan Card,Supervisor 2
Environmental Review Unit-4`"floor, 520 Lafayette Road, St. Paul,MN 55155
State Archaeologist,Fort Snelling History Center 1
St Paul,MN 55111-4061
Libraries
Great River Regional Library 1
405 St. Germain,St. Cloud,MN 56301-3697
Technology and Science,Hennepin County Library-Minneapolis Central,Attn: Helen Burke 2
300 Nicollet Mall,Minneapolis,MN 55401-1992
Federal
U.S.Army Corps of Engineers,Attn: Tamara Cameron
Regulatory Functions Branch,Army Corps of Engineers Center, 190 Fifth Street East,St. Paul,MN 1
55101-1638
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service,Twin Cities Field Office E.S. 1
4101 East 80th Street,Bloomington,MN 55425-1665
Indian Affairs Council,Attn: Melissa Cerda 1
161 St Anthony Ave,Suite 919,St Paul,MN 55103
Other
KDN Holdings,Mr. John Dondanville
2685 Lapeer Road, Suite 206,Auburn Hills,MN 48326 1
City of St Joseph,Ms. Judy Weyrens,City Administrator 6
25 North College Avenue, St. Joseph,MN 56374
Stearns County Environmental Services 2
Administrative Room 343,705 Courthouse Square,St. Cloud,MN 56301
Stearns County SWCD(1 copy)
110 2"d Street South,Waite Park,MN 56387 1
Sauk River Watershed District
524 4th Street,Sauk Centre,MN 56378 1
Westwood Professional Services,Inc.,Attn: Matthew Vollbrecht 1
3701 12th Street North, Suite 206,St Cloud,MN 56303
Any other person who has submitted a written request for notification(None at this time)
0
Total Number of Copies to Distribute 31
Resolution 2007-033
A Resolution Declaring No Significant Environment Impact
Parkway Business Center
Whereas, Kramer, Leas, DeLeo PC (KLD) prepared an Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW)
for Parkway Business Center proposed commercial/industrial development pursuant to Minnesota Rules
4410.4300 Subp. 19B; and
Whereas, the EAW was filed with the Environmental Quality Board (EQB) and notice of its
availability was published in the EQB Monitor on February 12, 2007. A copy of the EAW was sent to all
required persons on the EQB distribution list as per Minnesota Rules 4410.1500. A press release announcing
the availability of the EAW was published in the St. Joseph Newsleader; and
Whereas, the 30-day EAW public review and comment period began February 12, 2007 and ended
March 14, 2007; and
Whereas, the EAW is incorporated by reference into this record of decision on the determination of
need for an Environmental Impact Statement; and
Whereas, the proposed project includes the creation of 25 new commercial/industrial lots. The
project will be serviced by municipal sewer and water; and
Whereas, during the 30-day public review and comment period, the City of St. Joseph did not
receive any written comments.
Now therefore be it resolved by the City Council for the City of St. Joseph that:
1. The City of St. Joseph has fulfilled all procedural requirements of law and rule applicable to the
need for an Environmental Impact Statement for Parkway Business Center.
2. The identified environmental effects of the project will not be significant.
3. There are no elements of the project that pose the potential for significant environmental
effects that cannot be addressed through the permit and regulatory processes.
4. Based on consideration of the criteria and factors specified in the Minnesota Environmental
Review program rules to determine whether a project has the potential for significant environmental effects
and on the finding and record in this matter, the City of St. Joseph determines that Parkway Business Center
does not have the potential to cause significant environmental effects.
5. An Environmental Impact Statement on the proposed development of Parkway Business Center
in Stearns County is not required.
6. That any Findings that might properly be termed Conclusions and any Conclusions that might be
properly termed Findings are hereby adopted as such.
Be it further resolved that the City Council for the City of St. Joseph determines that an
Environmental Impact Statement is not required for Parkway Business Center.
. '; l
Dated this 1- day of ~'cf:-.
.2007
~Ld-~
AI Rassier, Mayor
ATTEST