The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2002 [12] Dec 19 {Book 26} · if9 of St. Joseph 25 College Avenue NW P.O. Box 668, St. Joseph, MN 56374 (320) 363-7201 St. Joseph City Council Fax: 363-0342 December 19, 2002 6:00 PM CLERK! ADMINISTRATOR 1. 6:00 p.m. - Call to Order Judy Weyrens 2. Approve Agenda MAYOR Larry J. Hosch 3. Consent Agenda COUNCILORS a. Bills Payable - Requested Action: Approve check numbers Bob Loso b. Minutes - Requested Action: December 5, 2002 Cory Ehlert C. A Resolution Repealing the 1997 City of St. Joseph Comprehensive Plan and Kyle Schneider Replacing it with the 2002 Comprehensive Plan - Requested Action: Adopt Alan Rassier Resolution rescinding current plan and adopting the 2002 Plan as recommended by the Planning Commission and prepared by Municipal Development Group. d. CR 133 Designation - Requested Action: Accept the resolution of Stearns County classifying CR 133 a County State Aid road. e. Ordinance Amendment - Requested Action: Amend Ordinance 71 to allow for seasonal outside alcohol consumption. f. Gambling Premise Permit - Requested Action: Accept the gambling application for the · SI. Joseph Jaycees to conduct lawful gambling at 24 Birch SI. W. - JM Speedstop. g. Application for Payment No.3: - Requested Action: Authorize the Mayor to execute Pay Application No.3 for the CR 121 Reconstruction and authorize payment to Stearns County Highway in the amount of $817,727.67. h. 2003 Budget - Requested Action: Authorize the Mayor and Administrator to execute Resolution 2002 - _ Approving 2002 Tax Levy, Collectable 2003. i. Special Use - Accept the recommendation of the Planning Commission and grant a variance to Michael Deutz to construct a mini storage facility on 19th Avenue SE. j. Variance Request - Accept the recommendation of the Planning Commission and grant a ten foot variance on the size of a sign. 4. 2003 License Renewal - Issue the 2003 Non-Intoxicating, Cigarette, Amusement and Entertainment Licenses. 5. Adjourn · December 5, 2002 Draft ç · Page 10f. Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the City Council for the City of S1. Joseph met in regular session on Thursday, December 5, 2002 at 7:00 PM in the S1. Joseph City Hall. Members Present: Mayor Larry Hosch. Councilors Bob Loso, Cory Ehlert, Kyle Schneider, AI Rassier. Administrator Judy Weyrens. City Representatives Present: City Engineers Joe, Bettendorf and Shannon Smith. Others Present: Dave Then, Ross Rieke, Dale Wick, Approve Aqenda: Loso made a motion to approve the agenda as presented; seconded by Rassier and passed unanimously. Approve Consent Aqenda: Rassier made a motion to approve the Consent Agenda as follows: a. Bills Payable - Approved check numbers 32125 - 32170 b. Minutes - Approved Nov. 7 and Nov. 21, 2002 c. Declaration of Surplus Property - Declared the portable JVC camera and accessories as surplus, advertising for sealed bids with a minimum bid of $2;500 as requested by the Cable Commission. d. Assessment Abatement Agreement - Authorize the Mayor and Administrator to execute the Assessment Abatement Agreement between the City of Sf. Joseph and Róhert Gamades. e. Application for Payment No.2 - Authorize the Mayor to execute Pay Application NO.2 for · the SE Utility Improvement and authorize payment to Kuechle Underground in the amount of $232,349.26. f. Application for Payment NO.4 - Authorize the Mayor to execute Pay Application NO.4 for the 2002 Business Park Improvement and authorize payment to Molitor Excavating in the amount of $3,050.74. g. Application for Payment NO.4 - Authorize the Mayor to execute Pay Application NO.4 for the 2002 Street & Utility Improvement and authorize payment to R.L. Larson Excavating, Inc. in the amount of $303,904.17. h. Application for Payment No.4 - Authorize the Mayor to execute Pay Application No.4 for the 2002 East Baker Street Lift Station and authorize payment to R.L. Larson Excavating, Inc. in the amount of $135,298.44. Discussion: Loso questioned if a retainage is being withheld from the pay application for the East Baker Street Lift Station due to the recent sewer claim. Weyrens reported that the insurance companies are processing the claim and a retainage is not needed at this time. The motion was seconded by Schneider and passed unanimously. Public Comments to the Aqenda - No one wished to speak Fire Chief Report. Six-Month Activity: Fire Chief Dave Theisen appeared before the Council to present the six month activity report for the S1. Joseph Volunteer Fire Department. Theisen presented the following information: Fire Calls June 1, 2002 - November 30, 2002 City Calls 63 67 · S1. Joseph Township Calls 60 42 S1. Wendel Township Calls 14 15 Mutual Aid Calls 1 4 Total Calls 138 1-28 December 5, 2002 Draft Page 2 of e 5 . Fire Calls December 1, 2001 - November 30, 2002 Medical Calls 213 183 Fire Calls 70 67 Weather Warnings 1 0 284 250 Hosch stated that while reviewing the six month activity report he noticed that while the emergency calls have decreased the amount for training increased. Hosch questioned why training has increased. Theisen stated that the Fire Department has recently added four (4) new firefighters requiring additional first responder and fire training. The total training hours for 2001 was approximately 785 hours while in 2002 it increased to 1101 hours. Loso made a motion to accept the six month fire report, authorizing the expenditure of $ 17,510 for the payroll for June 1 2002 through November 30, 2002. The motion was seconded by Schneider and passed unanimously. Dave Then, St. Cloud APO - Transportation Study: Dave Then of the St. Cloud Area Planning Organization appeared before the Council to present a traffic study for the intersection of Minnesota Street and College Avenue. Then stated that the APO was requested to complete a traffic study for the intersection stated above based on the projected housing developments of Graceview Estates (394 units) and Arkon Development (950 units). Then stated it was his understanding that the Council was concerned if the intersection in question would be capable of handing traffic in the future. Then presented the following information: . Y' The projected traffic from the new housing developments when completed is anticipated to generate 15, 000 vehicle trips per day. Y' Of the 15, 000 vehicle trips, 19% of the traffic is anticipated to use the in!ersection of College Avenue and Minnesota Street, with the remainin~ 81 % using the southerly access to St. Cloud or the easterly access that will eventually connect to 88 Avenue (Field Street). Y' When completing the study the Highway Capacity Software was used to determine traffic at peak hours. Intersections are graded from A to D and based on the current and proposed housing, the intersection was rated a C. The rating indicates that the current intersection should continue to move traffic effectively and Then does not recommend changes to traffic control at this time. Y' The traffic study did not include analysis of other intersections and streets in St. Joseph. City Engineer Reports 2002 Street Improvement. Chanqe Order NO.4: City Engineer Joe Bettendorf presented the Council with Change Order NO.4 for the 2002 Interior Street Improvement. The change order adds select granular borrow and subgrade excavation due to poor material found under Ash Street West. The change order will increase the contract by $ 3,384.00. When questioned the status of the contingency fund for the projects, Bettendorf responded that he will prepare a statement showing all the change orders and status of the contracts. Bettendorf stated the contingency is sufficient to absorb the additional cost as stated above. Rassier made a motion authorizing the Mayor to execute Change Order No.4 for the 2002 Street Improvement, increasing the contract with R.L. Larson by $ 3,384.00 as recommended by the City Engineer. The motion was seconded by Loso and passed unanimously. NPDES II MS4 General Permit: Bettendorf stated that the City of St. Joseph is one of about 150 cities in . Minnesota that is being required by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) to comply with the proposed National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Phase II (NPDES II) general permit requirement. The permit addresses storm water management in a five year pland called a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Program (SWPPP). The permit deadline is March 10, 2003. Bettendorf turned the floor over to SEH Engineer Shannon Smith who will assist the City of St. Joseph with the permitting process if approved by the City Council. December 5, 2002 Draft . Page 3 of..5 Smith stated that the City of St. Joseph is being required to complete the permit application for Storm Water Pollution as are all the major cities in the area. St. Joseph has been tied into S1. Cloud as part of , the Urban Area, which brings St. Joseph into the mandatory compliance by March 10, 2003. Implementation of NPDES included the following two phases: Phase I: Became effective in 1992 with populations exceeding 100,000 people. Phase II: Any Municipally over a population of 10,000 people or part of an Urban Area, such as St. Joseph, must comply within the stated deadline. The regulations also affects townships, counties, universities, MN DOT, hospitals, and prisons. Smith stated that when completing the application permit the following is required: 1. NPDES II will have a General Permit Application that includes several components. Each affected City must develop a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Program (SWPPP). The SWPPP will be a working document that will be designed and managed to allow St. Joseph to reduce the discharge of pollutants from the storm sewer system, protect water quality, and identify and manage Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will support the program. 2. The SWPPP is a 5-year plan for the work that each affected City must implement over the 5 year general permit lifetime. St. Joseph will not have to have any of the BMP and education components of the plan implement by March of 2003, but the SWPPP must be written and submitted. . 3. The SWPPP must cover all six Minimum Control Measures. For each Control Measure St. Joseph must identify and implement BMPs' that promote the Control Measure. Goals, timelines, and responsible departments must also be identified. The six Minimum Control Measures area as follows: Public Education and Outreach; Public Participation and Involvement; Illicit Discharge Detectioñ and Elimination; Construction Site Storm Water Runoff Control; Post Construction Storm Wc~ter Management in New Developments and Redevelopments; Pollution Prevention and Good Housekeeping for municipal operations. Smith presented the Council with a proposal to assist the City of St. Joseph with the unfunded State Mandate. The proposal indicated an expense of $ 16,950 of which $ 5,000 is optional software for tracking the requirements. Smith stated that she is not familiar with the software that is recommended and the tracking requires using a data base program. The Council was in general agreement to postpone purchasing the software until it is determined that it is effective and necessary. Loso made a motion to accept the proposal of SEH in the amount of $ 11,950 for the implementation of the required NPDES II Permit. The motion was seconded by Rassier and passed unanimously. Other Matters: Loso questioned Bettendorf on the status of the parking lots from the previous meeting. Bettendorf replied stating he has nothing at this time. Loso requested this matter be finalized at the December 17, 2002 Council meeting. Rick Poplinski, Madison Park: Rick Poplinski of Viking Development appeared before the Council to request annexation of approximately 34 acres of property abutting and south of Lynx Road. The property was previously owned by K & L Properties. Poplinski stated that he will be approaching the Planning Commission with a Preliminary Plat to develop the property with mixed density including single family and multiple family dwelling units. Weyrens stated that St. Joseph Township has considered the matter and . unanimously approved detaching the property as requested. Loso made a motion to accept Resolution 2002-_ approving the annexation of the following described property: The motion was seconded by Ehlert and passed unanimously. December Sf 2002 Draft Page 40fé5 Public Financing - Poplinski questioned if the Council would consider issuing municipal bonds for the · utility and street improvements. He stated that he was presented with the requirements of the City for consideration and is also aware that all bond payments must be guaranteed. Weyrens clarified the public financing would consist of a five (5) year bond that is secured by the developer both personally and by their business. If the bond payment cannot be met by the assessments, the developer is required to pay the shortfall. Mayor Hosch stated that it is his understanding that the City would be utilizing the bonding leverage of the City and this bond would not create any financial obligations on part of the City. By consensus, the Council authorized Poplinski to move forward with the application for public financing. Deferred Development Fee - Weyrens stated that when the SE Utility Project was financed, the assessment for the property being discussed at this time was deferred. The agreement required that when the property was sold or annexed the assessment would become due and payable. Poplinski is requesting that the deferred change be carried over time. The Council was in agreement that the agreement was established at the time the improvements were installed and it is important for the Council to be consistent in decision making. Therefore, the Council denied the request of Poplinski to defer the utility charges. Mayor Reports Affordable Housinq Committee: Hosch reported the Affordable Housing Committee will be interviewing service providers for the administration of the GAP financing. Interviews will be conducted on December 6, 2002 and the successful provider will be awarded the contract on December 12, 2002. Ehlert stated that a sub committee of the Affordable Housing Task Force has been meeting to discuss the market values of the homes. As of this time they have not reached consensus. EDA Announcements: LME Trucking (Lakeville Motor Express Trucking) will not be locating in the · Business Center as they have purchased a site with an existing building that meets their needs. However, it is his understanding that a second company is interested in purchasing the lot LME had an option on. Council Reports SCHNEIDER Park Board: Schneider reported that Park Board has funds remaining and they will be presenting the Council with a list of projects to expend the allocated funds. Ehlert clarified that the Park Board Funds are capital funds that are allowed to roll forward into the current year. Therefore there is not a need to spend the funds in December. Schneider would like the City to send out a thank you card to Bill Wasner who has donated his trailer for the storing of all the skateboard equipment through the winter. The Council was in general agreement. EHLERT SE Utility Improvement: Ehlert questioned if the Township has been approached regarding a possible contribution for the repairs to Lynx Road as the road was in dire need of repair at the time of annexation. Weyrens stated that she and Hosch attended a recent St. Joseph Township meeting and requested participation for the repairs to Lynx Road. The Board acknowledged that Lynx Road was in need of repair and they will consider a contribution in Spring of 2003. Each year in March the Board reviews all the Streets in the Township. During this review they will consider Lynx road. RASSIER Planninq Commission Matters: Rassier reported the Public Hearing for the Comprehensive Plan is · scheduled for December 10,2002 at 7:00 PM. Weyrens reminded the Council that the public hearing is a joint hearing of the City Council and Planning Commission. December 5, 2002 Draft . Page 5 of a 5 Rassier stated that he is in receipt of the letter from the Police Chief requesting the Council to reconsider the site plan approval of the Army requiring landscaping around the building. The letter indicates that planting trees will impede security of the site. Rassier stated that after reviewing the site plan he does not believe the trees will be an issue. LOSO Amendment to Ordinance 71 - Bistro: Loso stated that he has discussed the proposed amendment to Ordinance 71 with some of the residents and is requesting the Council allow Bistro's to operate between May 1 and November 1, not September 1 and increase the time frame from 9:00 PM to 11 :00 PM. Loso stated that October and November have the potential of warm weather, therefore creating an atmosphere for outside food and alcohol. Loso made a motion to amend Ordinance 71 to allow alcohol to be consumed outside in conjunction with food from May 1 to November 1 and to extend the time to 11 :00 PM. The motion was seconded by Ehlert. Discussion: Ehlert stated that he would agree to extend the time period but would like the opinion of the Police Chief before implementing changes to the amendment. Hosch stated that he also supports the motion, but has concerns with extending the time frame to 11:00 PM. Ehlert recommended the Council consider allowing outside alcohol consumption unti/1 0:00 PM, being consistent with Park rules. The Council was in general agreement that this matter should be reviewed with the Police Chief before amendment. . Ehlert made a motion to table amendment to Ordinance 71 to December 17, 2002 so that the Police Chief can review the recommendations of Loso. If the Chief is acceptable to the amendment the matter should be placed on the consent agenda for the December 17, 2002 meeting for approval. The motion was seconded by Hosch and passed unanimously. (Note: A motion to table takes precedence therefore the original motion of Loso is not acted upon.) Administrator Reports Public Information Meetinq: Weyrens reported that Bettendorf is requesting the Council consider conducing an open house to discuss the proposed street alignment of Field Street and Callaway Street. The City will be competing for federal funds for the transportation study and conducting an information meeting before submitting the application would be a benefit in the application process. The Council agreed to schedule a public information/open house for January 8, 2003 to discuss the transportation links on the SE side of the City. Area City Meetinq with Developers: Weyrens reported that the area City Administrators conducted a meeting with representatives of the CMBA to discuss items of mutual concern. A large part of the discussion focused on development issues such as drainage and erosion. The agenda for the meeting was divided into two parts: 1) City concerns; 2) CMBA concerns. The Committee will be meeting again on January 9,2003 to continue discussion of items of concern. Adjourn: Loso made a motion to adjourn at 9:10 PM; seconded by Ehlert and passed unanimously. . Judy Weyrens Administrator/Clerk . CITY OF ST. JOSEPH, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 2002-_ A RESOLUTION REPEALING THE 1997 CITY OF ST. JOSEPH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND REPLACING IT WITH THE 2002 ST. JOSEPH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, A COMPILATION OF POLICY STATEMENTS, GOALS, STANDARDS AND MAPS FOR GUIDING THE PHYSICAL, SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF THE MUNICIPALITY AND ITS ENVIRONS. WHEREAS, Pursuant to Minnesota Statute 462.355, Subd. 2; The St. Joseph Planning Commission may, recommend to the City Council the adoption and amendment from time to time of a comprehensive municipal plan. WHEREAS, The City Council of the City of St. Joseph with its Planning Agency, the St. Joseph Planning Commission, authorized the updating of its Comprehensive Plan in 2002; and, WHEREAS, The proposed Comprehensive Plan is based on local and regional historical facts, trends, and governmental planning standards; and, WHEREAS, The proposed City of St. Joseph Comprehensive Plan is a dynamic planning tool intended to guide the future growth and development of the city; and, WHEREAS, The attached document (Exhibit A) presents the Comprehensive Plan for St. Joseph, Minnesota; reflective of a community planning process conducted in the year 2002 and involving elected officials, appointed officials, city staff, community organizations, the public at large"St. Joseph Township representatives, Stearns County representatives and others; and, . WHEREAS, Before adopting the comprehensive municipal plan or any section or amendment of the plan, the planning agency shall hold at least one public hearing thereon; and, WHEREAS, A notice of the time, place and purpose of a hearing on the proposed Comprehensive Plan was published once in the official newspaper of the municipality at least ten days before the day of the hearing with a copy of the notice posted for public viewing; and, WHEREAS, A copy of the proposed Comprehensive Plan is on display at the City Offices for public review; and, WHEREAS, A joint public hearing by the St. Joseph Planning Commission and the St. Joseph City Council was held in the manner described in the public notice; and, WHEREAS, The proposed comprehensive plan may hot be acted upon by the City Council until it has received the recommendation of the Planning Commission; and, - WHEREAS, The Planning Commission has adopted a Resolution recommending to the City Council the approval of the Comprehensive Plan; and, NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED the City Council of the City of St. Joseph, Minnesota hereby repeals the 1997 Comprehensive Plan and replaces it with the 2002 Comprehensive Plan. . The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly made by Councilmember · , and duly seconded by Councilmember and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor: And the following voted against the same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted this ~ day of ----,-, 2000. Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk/Treasurer · · AOL.COM I MessageView Page 1 of 1 · Subj: Changes to comp plan Date: 12/11/2002 1 :02:55 PM Eastern Standard Time From: "Municipal Development Group. Inc." <mdg@bevcomm.net> To: i}Ym~s l.@.AQl.coffi Cc: smi1Þstrack@hotmai1.com File: Tab 4 - Land Use.doc, Tab 12 - Implementation.doc Sent from the Internet (.I2~:rnil~) Hello! Attached are the revised Chpt 4 and Chpt 12 (Land Use and Implementation Chapters) . In chapter 4 pages 29, 32 and 36 have items highlighted with the text strikethrough. In chapter 12 page 3 has #5 highlighted and illustrated with a strikethrough. Chapter 4 changes include earlier references to allowing limited industry/assembly in the new commercial district and the references to the new district for large lots. Chapter 12 simply removes #5 referencing the creation of a new district for large lots. Since the city's subdivision and zoning ordinances 80 not include maximum lot sizes and the city may issue variances for hardships (cases where utilities could not be extended, etc.) the city should · be able to annex in and allow larger lots with private systems if the annexation criteria is met, without the creation of new zoning standards. Judy, could you forward a copy of the pages with changes to Ann? If -you are comfortable with these modifications, I'll make them in final format and e-mail the final chapters! Thanks! Joanne Municipal Development Group · http://webmail.aol.comlfmsgview.adp?folder=SU5CT1 g=&uid=545 95 05 12/1312002 District Twelve · Location District Twelve includes all of the identified joint annexation area within the northwest quadrant of the City. The boundaries of this district encompass annexation areas in St. Joseph Township west of CSAH 133 and north of CSAH 2. ExistinQ Uses/Features Existing land uses within this district are primarily low density residential and agricultural. Other predominant features in this district include the South Fork of the Watab River and large areas of wetlands east of CSAH 3 and north of the railroad/Wobegon Trail corridor near the river. Soil studies indicate soil types may pose moderate to severe limitations to development. Recommendations 1. Recommended future land uses within District Twelve include: a. Single-family residential development within areas contiguous to existing urban locations. b. Park/open space. c. Tiered higher intensity uses such as commercial (new commercial zoning district) and high density residential adjacent to CSAH 2 and the roadway connecting CSAH 2 & CSAH 3. A reserve strip for highway commercial directly adjacent to the roadways is suggested. )- Implementation: City Council, Planning Commission, Park Board and City Administrator. 2. Implement design standards for highway business facilities in order to enhance CSAH 2 as a · quality entry point to the City of St. Joseph from Interstate 94. )- Implementation: EDA, Planning Commission, City Administrator and City Council. - ð-,. Create a new zoning classification to accommodate commercial uses adjacent to CSAH 2, CSAH 3, the CSAH 2/3 extension,CSAH 121 and other gollector streets. The new commercial zoning c!:a88ification8hould, .a8-38pEJcialu8e, allowforg - porcentage of 'Narehou8o, .light assembly ànd!orvorylight manuf.acturingproviding :atl03st a third of tho principal use i8 commercial in n:ature. )- Implementation: Planning Commission, EDA, City Council and City Administrator. 4. Medium density residential developments bordering commercial areas should be encouraged as they will allow for a smooth transition between commercial/industrial and residential uses. )- Implementation: Planning Commission; City Administrator and City Council. 5. Future residential development driveway access points directly onto CSAH 2, CSAH 3 and the roadway connecting CSAH2/3 should be curtailed. )- Implementation: City Engineer, Planning Commission, City Council and City Administrator. 6. The City should consider implementing a frontage road system in areas expected to develop as · commercial adjacent to CSAH 2, CSAH 3 and the roadway connecting CSAH2/3. · District Thirteen Locatien District Thirteen includes all of the identified joint annexation area within the southwest quadrant of the City. The boundaries of this district encompass annexation areas in St. Joseph Township south of CSAH 2/east of 1-94 and west of CSAH 121. Existinq Uses/Features Existing land uses within this district are primarily low density residential and agricultural. Other predominant features in this district include the some areas of wetlands and some tree massings, generally located on the perimeter of wetland communities. Soil studies indicate soil types may pose moderate to severe limitations to development. Recommendations 1. Recommended future land uses within District Thirteen include: a. Single-family residential development within areas contiguous to existing urban locations. b. Park/open space. c. Tiered higher intensity uses such as commercial and high density residential adjacent to CSAH 2. A reserve strip for highway commercial directly adjacent to the roadway is suggested. d. Tiered commercial and higher density residential or Planned Unit Developments adjacent to CSAH 121. ~ Implementation: City Council, Planning Commission, Park Board and City Administrator. · 2. Implement design standards for highway business facilities in order to enhance CSAH 2 as a quality entry point to the City of St. Joseph from Interstate 94. ~ Implementation: Planning Commission, EDA, City Administrator and City Council. 3. Create a new zoning classification to 121 and other collector streets. ~ Implementation: Planning Commission, EDA, City Administrator and City Council. 4. Medium density residential developments bordering commercial areas should be encouraged'as they will allow for a smooth transition between commercial/industrial and residential uses. ~ Implementation: Planning Commission, City Administrator and City Council. 5. Future residential development driveway access points directly onto CSAH 2 and CSAH 121 should be curtailed. ~ Implementation: City Engineer, Planning Commission, City Council and City Administrator. · 6. The City should consider implementing a frontage road system in areas expected to develop as commercial adjacent to CSAH 2 and possibly adjacent to the CSAH 121 and the intersection of a collector street. 1. in previous planning district recommendations. The City should immediately establish a fund for · environmental study and right-of-way acquisition for the development of future roadway corridors. ? Implementation: City Engineer, Stearns County, Planning Commission, City Administrator and City Council. 2. Create. a. nBwz.()nin9c13~sification.· t03cooFnmodate . 13(ge lot residential USBS, possibly in tho vicinity of the~âuk~.Î'ier. ~lmpBm9nt::Üion:nP!annin9Commissìon,. City Î\dministmtorand City Council. 3. Promote the continued existence of woodlands and open space within the district. ? Implementation: Park Board, City Council, Planning Commission and City Administrator. 4. The City and the Township should work together to monitor the amount of vacant lots available as a means of avoiding excess lot quantities, partially developed subdivisions and 'leap-frog' type developments. ? Implementation: St. Joseph Town Board, Planning Commission, City Administrator and City Council. 5. As this district further develops emphasis should be placed on retaining the small town nature of · the community. Generous parkland facilities, open space areas, tree plantings and trail amenities should be emphasized. ? Implementation: City Council, Planning Commission, St. Joseph Township Board and City Administrator. 6. The City shall continue to promote attractive residential environments that offer a broad choice of housing options including diverse life-style housing options, sizes and values. Future single- family residential housing types should be of diverse types and include affordable, market rate and executive homes. ? Implementation: Planning Commission, St. Joseph Township Board, City Council and City Administrator. 7. If an area is platted as part of a larger development project, the City should require the developer to submit a ghost plat (build out plat) of the entire development. ? Implementation: City Administrator, Planning Commission, St. Joseph Township Board and City Council. 8. The City and the Township Joint Annexation Board should review proposed developments within the District to determine: a. Impact on existing and future transportation facilities, b. Existing and future surface water management systems, · c. Adequacy of park facilities within the proposed development, d. Appropriateness of the proposed use(s), Ch. 12- · Recommendations: 1. The City Council may wish to appoint a committee to develop a plan and design standards for the revitalization of the downtown commercial business district. » Implementation: St. Joseph City Council. 2. To preserve the downtown business area the City may wish to review the uses permitted in the B-1, General Business District as well as establish minimum lot sizes within this district. » Implementation: Planning Commission with input from the Chamber of Commerce and St. Joseph Economic Development Authority and final action by the City Council. 3. To encourage beautification, especially at the entrance to the community from 1-94 and along County Road 75, the City may wish to amend the zoning ordinance to include landscaping requirements as well as expanded outdoor storage and fencing regulations for commercial and industrial developments, prior to the full development of these corridors. » Implementation: Planning Commission and City Council 4. The Planning Commission and City Council should consider an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance to include the provision for issuance of . Interim Use Permits as an alternative to Conditional Use Permits. 'The Interim Use Permit would be utilized in cases in which a use is associated with a specific time period or conditions, as outlined in state statutes. » Implementation: City Administrator, Planning Commission and City Council. · ~ » 6. The Planning Commission and Council may wish to include a new section in the Zoning Ordinance relating to "Land Preservation and Woodland Protection" to ensure the natural environment is protected (eg. Topography, soil types, slopes, tree preservation), and adverse effects of development on the environment are minimized. » Implementation: City Administrator, Planning Commission and City Council. 7. The Planning Commission and Council may wish to include a new section for a Floodplain Overlay District, as the Federal Emergency Management Administration (FEMA) has issued a flood hazard boundary map for the South Fork of the Watab River. Since this river is protected as a tributary, floodplain standards should be adopted and enforced in the designated area. » Implementation: City Administrator, Planning Commission and City Council. 8. The Planning Commission and Council may wish to update the Zoning Ordinance to include minimum lot sizes and maximum lot coverage standards in the B-1, Highway 75 Business District. · » Implementation: City Administrator, Planning Commission and City Council. City of 81. Joseph Comprehensive Plan, 2002 Chapter 12, Page 3 COUNTY OF STEARNS · Department of Highways Box 246. St. Cloud, MN 56302 (320) 255-6180 . FAX NO: (320) 255-6186 Memo To: Judy Weyrens St. Joseph City Admi~istrat~ From: Jodi L. Teich, P.E. 01./\ Assistant County Engineer Date: 12/09/02 Re: County Road 133 · - Approval was recently given to Stearns County to change the designation of County Road 133 to County State Aid Highway from CSAH 75 in the City òf St. Joseph to CSAH 78 in the City of Sartell. In order for us to complete this designation change, it is necessary for the St. Joseph City Council to pass the attached resolution approving the designation change. I have also attached a copy of the Steams County Board resolution. I would appreciate it if your council could pass the attached resolution at its earliest convenience. Please contact me at 255-6180 if you would like the resolution emailed to you so it can be modified to your city's format, or if you have any questions or comments. · . Page 1 #875-8898 "Affirmative Action I Equal Opportunity Employer" · RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the County Board of the County of Stearns did adopt a resolution on November 19,2002, establishing designation of County State Aid Highway No. 133 within the corporate limits ofthe City of St. Joseph, as follows: 7.01 miles of County Road 133 from CSAH 75 in the City of St. Joseph (NE y,¡ of Section 10, T124N, R29W) to CSAH 78 in the City of Sartell (north line of Section 28, T125N, R28W) NOW. THEREFORE. BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of St. Joseph that said revision is in all things approved. ADOPTED ,20~ · Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the above is a true and correct copy of areso1ution duly passed, adopted and approved by the City Council of said City on ,20_. City Clerk, City of St. Joseph · RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING A COUNTY STATE AID IDGHWAY e WHEREAS, it appears to the County Board of the County of Stearns that the road hereinafter described should be designated County State Aid Highway under the provisions of Minnesota Law. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the County Board of the County of Stearns that the road described as follows, to-wit: 7.01 miles of County Road 133 from CSAH 75 in the City ofSt. Joseph (NE y.¡ of Section 10, T124N, R29W) to CSAH 78 in the City ofSartell (north line of Section 28, T125N, R28W) be, and hereby is established, located, and designated a County State Aid Highway of said County, subject to the approval of the Commissioner of Transportation of the State of Minnesota. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the County Auditor is hereby authorized and directed to forward two certified copies of this resolution to the Commissioner of Transportation for his consideration, and that upon his approval of the designation of said . road or portion thereof, that same be constructed, improved and maintained as a County State Aid Highway of the County of Stearns, to be numbered and known as County State Aid Highway 133. Adopted by the Stearns County Board of Commissioners this 19th day of November, 2002. ATTEST: O~:Rú~ ~hr~ Donald R. Otte, çounty Auditor - Treasurer Chair of the Board of County Commissioners CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the above is a true and correct copy of a Resolution duly passed, adopted, and approved by the County Board of Commissioners of said County on the ~day of November , 2002. (SEAL ) ~ßz~ . ndv SchreIfels ,; County Auditor - Treasurer · AMENDMENT TO ORDINANCE 71: LICENSING AND REGULATION OF CONSUMPTION OF INTOXICATING LIQUOR The City Council for the City ofSt. Joseph hereby ordains: That Section 71.11 Subd. 6 of Ordinance 71 of the St. Joseph Code of Ordinances be amended as follows: Section 71.11: RESTRICTIONS ON PURCHASE OR CONSUMPTION. Subd. 6: Temporary Outside Liquor Permit. a) Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 11, Subd.'s 2, 3 and 4 herein, a licensee shall be allowed to sell intoxicating liquor and may allow persons to possess and consume said intoxicating liquor outside of the building of an "on-sale" business, pursuant to a special permit from the City. Each permit issued by the City shall be applicable for a single designated period not to exceed 48 hours. The permit shall designate whether it is an "event permit" or a "seasonal permit." An event permit shall be applicable for a single designated period not to exceed 48 hours. A seasonal permit shall be valid ftom May 1 through November 1, or a designated portion thereof. Application for permit must be made to the City Clerk at least thirty days prior to the date for which the permit is to apply. Application · shall be on a form prescribed by the City Council. Application shall be made in the name of licensee, and the licensee assumes full responsibility for any violation of the terms of the permit, this Ordinance or other law resulting frQm acts or conduct occuning on the licensed premises at the time the permit is in effect. Application for a permit shall be accompanied by a permit fee established and amended ftom time to time by Council resolution. The fee is non-refundable. b) Upon receipt, the Clerk shall forward the application to the Chief of Police for review, comment and recommendation. Upon completion of police review, the application shall be considered by the Council at a public meeting. Prior to meeting, the applicant shall notify the owners of property adjacent to the location of the proposed outside liquor of the pending application. c) At the meeting, the Council may either deny or grant the permit and establish reasonable conditions and regulations controlling the permitted activities. When considering a permit request, the Council shall consider the following factors: 1) Protection of the peace and repose of the residents of the City. 2) The safety of City residents and their property. 3) The reasonable concerns of City residents within the vicinity of the proposed activity. · 4) The nature of the activity proposed and the manner in which the licensee intends on controlling the activity. 5) The general land use of the surrounding neighborhood. e 6) Past experience with events of a similar nature and events held by the applicant. 7) Recommendations of the Police Department relative to public safety, law enforcement and the creation of disturbance. 8) Whether the event is one of general community interest or is in the nature of a civic event. d) In granting a permit for temporary outside liquor, the Council shall establish reasonable conditions to protect public health, safety, repose and property. The conditions established by the Council may include, but are not limited to, the following: 1) Limitation of the time of outside activities. 2) Limitation of the specific activities permitted. 3) Require measures to limit or regulate noise. 4) Limit the number of participants. 5) Require the licensee to provide special security. 6) Make special provisions for additional parking. . 7) Dictate cleanup of area. e) In addition to those stated in the permit, all temporary outside liquor event permits shall be subject to the following terms and conditions: 1) Outside liquor shall only be allowed in an area adjacent to the licensed premises. 2) Ingress and egress to and rrom the area in which liquor is served, consumed or possessed must be effectively controlled by a fence, tent wall, building or other structure. 3) The licensee, his/her agents or employees shall supervise the activities or persons within the outside liquor area for the purpose of enforcing the state and local liquor laws, and controlling ingress and egress to the area. 4) No live or recorded music may be played within the outside liquor area after 9:30 p.m., unless the source of the music and all speakers or amplifiers are enclosed within a tent having walls and a roof. 5) The permitted outside liquor area shall not cause an obstruction of a public street, alley or sidewalk, unless specifically permitted by the Council. 6) The licensee shall repair any damage to public property directly resulting from the . activities, including damage to pavement caused by tent stakes and supports. . f) In addition to those stated in the permit, all seasonal permits shall be subject to the following terms and conditions: 1) Notwithstanding Subd. 5, outside liquor shall only be allowed in a sidewalk area directly in front of and adjacent to the licensed premises. 2) Persons may be served and may consume liquor only while seated at tables in the sidewalk area. 3) . Seating in the outside area shall be limited to 4 tables of 6 or fewer persons. 4) The licensee, his/her agents or employees shall supervise the activities or persons within the outside liquor area for the purpose of enforcing the state and local liquor laws and controlling ingress and egress to the area. 5) Liquor shall not be served in the sidewalk area after ,10:00 p.rn. 6) The permitted outside liquor area shall not cause an obstruction of a public street, alley or sidewalk, unless specifically permitted by the Council. 7) No live music shall be permitted in the sidewalk area. No recorded music shall be played after 9:30 p.rn. 8) The licensee shall repair any damage to public property directly resulting from the . activities, including damage to pavement caused by tent stakes and supports. This Amendment to Ordinance 71 was passed the _ day of , 2002 by the City Council for the City of S1. Joseph. Mayor Clerk! Administrator . CITY OF ST. JOSEPH · AMENDMENT TO ORDINANCE 71: LICENSING AND REGULATION OF CONSUMPTION OF INTOXICATING LIQUOR SUMMARY PUBLICATION The City of St. Joseph has adopted an amended ordinance regulating the licensing and regulation of intoxicating liquor within the City of St. Joseph. The amended ordinance (1) allows persons under 21 to be present at a licensed premises as a guest at a private party; (2) allows a licensed premises to create a separate enclosed area for persons under 21; and (3) allows the City to grant seasonal permits for the sale of intoxicating liquor in an outdoor sidewalk seating area adjacent to a licensed premises. This material is a summary of the amendments to Ordinance 71. The full text of Ordinance 71 is available for inspection by any person during regular office hours at the office of the St. Joseph City Clerk. · This Ordinance was adopted by the City Council ofSt. Joseph on the _ day of- , 2002, and shall be effective upon publication. Mayor Clerk Administrator · Page 1 of 3 7/01 Minnesota Lawful Gambling FOR BOARD USE ONL Y . LG214 P . P ·t A I· t· Check # Amount , remises erml pp Ica Ion ------------ -------- Expiratation date Class of Permit Premises Permit Fee During 2nd year of Check one Two years organization license D Class A - Pull-tabs, tipboards, paddlewheels, raffles, bingo $400 $200 [i] Class B -Pull-tabs, tipboards, p-addlewheels, raffles $250 $125 D Class C - Bingo only OR bingo and pull-tabs when total gross $200 $100 receipts does not exceed $50,000 per year D Class 0 - Raffles only , $150 $ 75 Organization Information Organization name (as it appears on documentation filed with Organization license number Minnesota Secretary of State or Internal Revenue Service) St. Joseph Jaycees B-03011 Name of chief executive officer (cannot be yourgambling manager) Daytime phone number, including area code Deedra Deuhs 320-262-0257 Gambling Premises Information . Name of establishment where gambling will be conducted Street-address (do not use a P.O. box number) JM Speeds top . 27 W. Birch St. City & county where gambling premises is 10cated-OR-TownshIP & county where gambli~g premises is located if outside city limits. St. Joseph, Stearns Is the premises located within city limits? Yes ~ No 0 If No, is township: 0 Organized o Unorganized o Unincorporated Does your organization own the building where the gambling will be conducted? DYes ß No If no, attach (1) the appropriate lawful gambling lease form, and (2) the sketch of all leased areas with dimensions and square footage clearly defined A lease and sketch are not required for class 0 applications. Name of legal owner of premises Address City State/Zip Deutz Investments PO Box 634 St. Joseph MN 56374 Address(es) of Storage Space of Gambling Equipment List all locations where used and unused gambling product Is stored. Do not use a P.O. box number. (Attach an additional sheet if necessary.) Address City State/Zip 24 W. Birch St. St. Joseph }1N 56374 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 8484 County Road 75 St. Joseph MN 56374 tilt -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- LG214 Premises Permit Application Page 2 of 3 7/01 Bingo Occasions for Class A or C Permits · If applying for a class A or C permit, enter day and beginning/ending hours of bingo occasions (indicate A.M. or P.M.). No more than ten bingo occasions may be conducted per week. An occasion must be at least one and one-half hours, not to exceed four hours. .!&Y Beqinninq/Endinq Hours .!&Y Beqlnninq/Endlnq Hours º-ª.Y Beqlnninq/Endinq Hours ----- -------- to -------- ----- ---------- to --------- ----- --------- to ----- ----- --------- to ------- ----- --------- to ---------- ----- --------- to ------ ----- ---------- to ------- ----- --------- to ------- ----- -------- to --------- ----- ---------- to --------- Noon Hour Bingo Only !Æ¿ Beqlnninq/Endlnq Hours .!&Y Beqinninq/Endlnq Hours Dav Beqinninq/Endinq Hours ----- ---------~ to -------- ----- -------- to -------- ----- ---------- to ---------- ----- ---------- to -------- ----- ------- to ------ ----- ----- to --------- ----- -------- to -~----- Gambling Bank Account Information Bank name Bank account number* 107660506 Bank street address City StatelZip code 400 4th Ave. NE PO 159 St. Jose h MN 56374 * New organizations: The account number may be obtained and submitted to the Gambling · Control Board within ten days after you receive your premises permit. Name, address, and title of members authorized to sign checks from the gambling account. The organization's treasurer may not handle gambling funds. Name Street Address City Zip Code Title , Jon Rist 6901 236th St. St. Cloud 56301 Gambling Hgr Jane Litchy 10998 County Road 4 St. Joseph 56374 Nember Acknowledgment Oath Gambling site authorization I declare that: I hereby consent that local law enforcement officers, I. I have read this application and a1l information submitted the board or agents of the board, or the commissioner to the board is true, accurate, and complete; ofrevenue or public safety or agents of the 2. a1l other required information has been fully disclosed; commissioners may enter the premises to enforce the 3. I am the chief executive officer of the organization; law. 4. I assume full responsibility for the fair and lawful Bank records information operation of all activities to be conducted; The board is authorized to inspect the bank records of 5. I wi1l familiarize myself with the laws of Minnesota the gambling account whenever necessary to fulfill governing lawful gambling and rules of the board and requirements of current gambling rules and law. agree, if licensed, to abide by those laws and rules, including amendments to them; Organization license authorization 6. any changes in application information will be submitted I hereby authorize the Gambling Control Board to to the board and local unit of government within ten days modifY the class of organization license to be ofthe change; and consistent with the class of premises permit being applied for. 7. I understand that failure to provide required information or providing false or misleading information may result · in the denial or revocation of the license. -~--------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------- Signature of chief executive officer (Designee may not sign) Date LG214 Premises Permit Application Page 3 of 3 · 7/01 Local Unit of Government Acknowledgment and Approval If the gambling premises is within city limits, the city must sign this application and provide a resolution. On behalf of the city, I hereby acknowledge this St. Joseph application for lawful gambling activity at the premises located within the city's jurisdiction, and that a resolution specifically approving or denying the application will be forwarded to the applying organization. f city per nnel receiving application Z / /s~~1ov Date Ia(ólo z.-. If the gambling premises is located in a township, both the county and township must sign this application. The county must provide a resolution. For the township On behalf of the township, I acknowledge that the organization is applying to Print name of township conduct lawful gambling activity within the township limits. A township has no statutory authority to approve or Signature of township official acknowledging application deny an application (Minn. Stat. 349.213, subd. 2). Title Date For the county On behalf of the county, I hereby Print name of county acknowledge this application for lawful gambling · activity at the premises located within the county's jurisdiction, and that a resolution specifically Signature of county personnel receiving application approved or denying the application will be for- warded to the applying organization. Title Date The information requested on this form (and any premises permit, all of the information that you have attachments) will be used by the Gambling Control Board provided to the Board in the process of applying for your (Board) to determine your qualifications to be involved in premises permit will become public except for your Social lawful gambling activities in Minnesota, and to assist the Security number, which remains private. If the Board does Board in conducting a background investigation of you. not issue you a premises permit, all the information you You have the right to refuse to supply the information have provided in the process of applying for a premises requested; however, if you refuse to supply this permit remains private, with the exception of your name information, the Board may not be able to determine your and address which will remain public. qualifications and, as a consequence, may refuse to issue you a premises permit. If you supply the information Private data about you are available only to the following: requested, the Board will be able to process your Board members, staff of the Board whose work assignment application. requires that they have access to the information; the Minnesota Department of Public Safety; the Minnesota This form may require the disclosure of your Social Attorney General; the Minnesota Commissioners of Security number. If so, your Social Security number will Administration, Finance, and Revenue; the Minnesota be used to determine your compliance with the tax laws of . Legislative Auditor, national and international gambling Minnesota. Authorization for requiring your Social regulatory agencies; anyone pursuant to court order; other Security number is found at 42 US.C. 405 (c)(i). individuals and agencies that are specifically authorized by state or federal law to have access to the information; Your name and address will be public information when individuals and agencies for which law or legal order received by the Board. All the other information that you authorizes a new use or sharing of information after this provide will be private data about you until the Board issues Notice was given; and anyone with your consent. your premises permit. When the Board issues your · Questions? Call the Licensing Section ofthe Gambling Control Board at 651-639-4000. If you use a TTY, you can call the Board by using the Minnesota Relay Service and ask to place a call to 651-639-4000. This form will be made available in alternative format (i.e. large print, Braille) upon request. Stearns County Highway ITNW(Q)IICCJE P.O. Box 246 . St Cloud, MN 56302 320-255-6180 Fax 32Ò-255-6186 INVOICE NO: 127-02 DATE: December 9, 2002 To: City of St. Joseph JudyWeyrens, Administrator PO Box 668 St. Joseph, MN 56374 .. -,~ CP 121-00-31; County Road 121 Reconstruction QUANTITY DESCRIPTION . UNIT PRICE AMOUNT City cost of Co. Rd. 121 Reconstruction - Bill No.3 $817,727.67 SUBTOTAL SALES TAX SHIPPING & HANDLING TOTAL DUE $817,727.67 eakeall checks payable to: Stearns County Highway you have any questions concerning this invoice, contact Mark Plantenberg, Office Manager 320-255-6180 THANK YOU FOR YOUR BUSINESS! CP 121-00-31; County Road 121 Reconstruction . City of St. Joseph; Bill NO.3 Right of Way City Share of Right of Way (to date): $ 118,430.77 Appraisal Fees (to date): $ 4,404.00 Subtotal: $ 122,834.77 Construction Costs MSAS Funds (SAP 233-107-01): $ 177,513.19 (Job 2059) City Costs (County Non-Participating): $ 1,035,897.24 (Job 2063) City Portion of CSAH 2: $ 22,425.94 (Job 2061) 33% of Storm Sewer: $ 66,554.57 (Job 2062) Subtotal: $ 1,302,390.94 Total City Costs To Date: $ 1,425,225.71 Less Amount PreviouslyPaid: $ 607,498.04 TOTAL AMOUNT DUE: $ 817,727.67 . . . -- RESOULTION 2002-_ ADOPTING PROPOSED TAX LEVY APPROVING 2002 TAX LEVY, COLLECTIBLE IN 2003 . BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of St. Joseph, Stearns County, Minnesota, that the following sums of money be levied for the current year, collectible in 2003, upon taxable property in the City of St. Joseph, for the following purposes: GENERAL FUND LEVIES General Fund Tax Levy 372,703 BOND INDEPTEDNESS 1992 Street Improvement 9,000 1993 Street Improvement 22,000 1997 Fire Facility 50,038 1996 East MN Street 46,000 1998 Street Improvement 7,450 1999 Stearns Cooperative Loan 29,863 2000 City Hall 95,000 . 2002 Equipment Certificates 43,000 2002 Street Improvements 50,500 Be it further resolved that these levies will support a general fund budget of$ 1,537,298.38 for the year 2003. The City Administrator/Clerk is hereby instructed to transmit a certified copy of this resolution to the County Auditor of Stearns County Minnesota. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL THIS 17TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2002 Larry Hosch, Mayor ATTEST: Judy Weyrens, Administrator . . NON-INTOXICATING/ CIGARETTE/AMUSEMENT / ENTERTAINMENT LICENSE APPLICANTS 2003 DUE JANUARY 2003 Licensee Name Cigarette Off-Sale On-Sale Amusement Entertainment Strong Beer License Non-Intox Non-Intox License License License Am Leqion X 4 1 Bo Diddley's X Casey's X CSB X 4 X EIPaso X 11 JM Oil Co. X X La Playette X 10 Lighthouse Loso's Pub X X 8 1 Loso's Store X Sal's Bar X X 7 1 SJ Amoco Liquor X X SJ Gas & Bait X SJ Liquor Shoppe X SJ Rec Assoc X SJ Saints X Superamerica X For approval at the City Councillvfeeting of December 19, 2003. . · RESOLUTION PC-2002- ST. JOSEPH PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR MIKE DEUTZ TO CONSTRUCT A MINI STORAGE FACILITY WHEREAS, Mike Deutz of St. Joe Mini Storage has submitted a request for a special use permit to construct a mini storage facility, and WHEREAS, the applicant has submitted required site plan and building plans for review; and WHEREAS, Section 52.9 of the Zoning Ordinance outlines requirements for the issuance of a special use permit; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the proposed site and building plans. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE ST. JOSEPH PLANNING · COMMISSION THAT: The Planning Commission does hereby recommend the City Council of the City of St. Joseph approve the special use permit for Mike Deutz for the construction of mini storage units, contingent upon the following conditions: 1. A slatted and gated fence must be installed no later than December 31,2004. 2. Landscaping must be completed within six-months upon completion of the fence. DATED THIS 2ND DAY OF December 2002. ATTEST: Gary Utsch, Planning Chair Judy Weyrens, Administrator · , . .. itg of St. Joseph 25 CollegeAvenueNW P.O. Box 668. St. Joseph, MN 56374 (320) 363·7201 Fax: 363-0342 c' CLERK! ADMINISTRATOR City of St. Joseph Judy Weyrens Public Hearing MAYOR Corrected Notice - Legal description of previous notice was incorrect Larry J. Hosch ' . COUNCn.ORS Bob Loso . The Planning Commission for the City of St. Joseph shall Cory EWert, conduct a public hearing on Monday, December 2, 2002 at 7:00 Kyle Schneider p.m. in theSt. Joseph City Hall. The purpose of the hearing is to Alan Rassier consider a special use permit to allow for the construction of a mini storage facility. The property is zoned Industrial and is legally described as: . LOT-D03 BLOCK-DOl T. J. ADDITION AND A SOUTHERLY 100 FEET OF LOT-002 BLOCK-OOl The request for this special use permit has been submitted by·St. Joseph Mini Storage: Mike Deutz;PO Box 634; St. Joseph, MN 56374. Judy Weyrens Administrator Note: State Law requires mailed notice to all property owners. within 350 feet of a variance, special use, or rezoning request. . I I' :. I ~i \ . I . - ~------- ---- - -- I L&j z ¡J I ~ :z: l- I ~ I ~ I I ¡J z ui ~ - :z: l- .. Z 1¡ 1¡ l- ii: 1M ELM ST. E. '" ~ ~ ~ ~ --- ---------- --- - - BURLINGTON NORTHER; - - ~R.R. --- CSAJ; 75 -... -..--- - -- -- --- ..... ..... . .......... ............. Arsæ 1200 25th Avenue South, P.O. Box 1717, Sl. Cloud, MN 56302-1717 320.229:4300 320:229.4301 FAX architecture . engineering . environmental . transportation ¡. November 27, 2002 RE: St. Joseph, Minnesota St. Joe Mini Storage SEH No. A-STJOE 0301.00 14 Ms. Judy Weyrens Clerk! Administrator City of St. Joseph 25 College Avenue North PO Box 668· St. Joseph, MN 56374-0668 Dear Judy: I reviewed the site and drainage plans for the St. Joseph Mini Storage buildings by Mike Deutz. Everything appears to be in order for approval. This concludes my remarks. Please call if you have any questions. . Sin~ìß~ ~ Amy B. Schaffer Project Engineer djg c: Dick Taufen, St. Joseph Joe Bettendorf, SEH Jerry George, SEH w:\stjoe\corr\l-city ministorage-112702.doc . Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc. . Your Trusted Resource . Equal Opportunity Employer LJ =:J 111 V V ~ ":::::'",,) tj tj ""'"'-'....""'.....u I'............,......' L Og~ ~ l---" --' -L- . V I -./ '-../ ~ ~ V "f" 30\>'801.8 INllI\I ·30r '1.8 -.."vÞlOI\Utf(~ ·_Ie . , W , CJ « cc ~~; ßß a: (f) ~~ ."" I- m3 55 W ¡.¡~~ ¡-==. W ~ 50. ~H ~i5 ~2 1 ° ð15 ~:¡ 1; ~i 0 I ~ G:~ . ~ t¡~ § · I (f) g: M£ ~ o n.:5 0 ~ ~~ d- :¡¡~ n LL b mo. § " t-- 0 '" o~ m ¡;¡ ~ ~IJ¡" ; ~ ~ I- g :(rn ::I _ t5 ~~~ >< a..;:g;tn-, < : ~ ::e~~:! 0 X .~~~ 3' ~I 0 w z /;í 0=>3' we: ~ Ii .N~g '" ;;. ° ~5zßa.~ 98%"" N ~¡ )oO~ -en 0 Ii: ug¡~i~ ~~~ >< Z ¡;:: t¡jz~!:::o::~ j~- I I 9 J: h¡ .. <) wm~ug~ m ~~ I w -: ~~5~- N ¡." - If] I-- 0 ¡¡¡otl~~", o~ÿJ§~"'" iN-::IE i ~;8w~~ fP< 0 ..X o g " 0 " t;:¡ í íí.....N .. ~~~ææ" ~~-d & !!!iJ; w ~i!§ ~!~~' ~ ¡¡¡. rn ~!Q..\:.J: - - <) ~ ~~dU ~~~§~ ~ ~¡ . t-- Z d N iii 0 g;~ ~ ;;; !I!~ I-- ¡;w - w,.., C>ð I~~ !1 ~ ~ 1-0 60 " ",rn,.., ~~ '" >- ..., <0 ~ -''''UJ ~~ 0::: ~ ~~z~ ~¡; 1- ~ " 0 ~~d~~T ft¡:> z a:0 I- b~tIRgm 00 i~1 * Il.w Ü ~"'~i!i .3'" gF ~ W ;¡:':J:r:~z<)ô 000 ~~¡,; ~ W 0::: ~¡~t3~tïiE §6 !iJ o.;~ " 0 0 Œ~ ~ ~~ 01 I WI- If t;;¡J Fro i B~ ~ 0 I- 60 Ü I ~~ W .. ~ ffi~ ~ ~~ ~ .... J .., <0 5 ~~ 0 '" ! is ~ ~g is 0" ¡¡ --.> 0::: ~ WW 2 ~ 0... '" F~ \1 5 rcb gj wvfu~ t; rt:::ol"')(J) <: ~w ~Çjô. ~ . {5~~tlië.· 8 I- , en . , , F =I.J- V I J U ~ ~ v :P d =J I H V V \J 2~~J j tJ Ij 3ÐV'80~~~~:~~sE l 090_ . 8 ...is ~'1 ~ wllJ < ",,53 0 0 0 I- Q IS, I Q~ 0 zi ~ ~ ~ ~ ¡~~ :~ ~ ~ ~! g~~~ ~~~~;¡~ ~;¡ .§~~ ~ 11'lf! ~ð~~~~ ~¡; ~ \; ~- ~!J<5 ;¡;;=~ ~" &~~~"!!'>- ~¡gg~~ ¡¡ªtif£>-Õ¡.1ii! IfllP, Of5~;¡Šiö % . <: U '-'Z;¡: <:..J;;; 0:: 5~l-m <tI:::).J ¿ e <wo< II. 1 <VI~ B « - 5 I- W \.oJ .,.1' ~ '\' w!f~!j ~~~ "; ~ "~Rg;)\<§ ~~i\I!j~§ 5~g~I';=i5~ I ,¡It ~g~~!!,i'i I'! ~ ~ ¡i ~ u $' ~ o. 'f ~ \, ,¡;ô ~~ 0 ~ ~ Fgg~ r~B â ~w ~~~c.gO> ~5&Ü:~ ~Õ ~~~~O> a: J I I ~e¡~ I-¡ ð ~ :i ~. ~ ~ ... ~...J . ~ ¡ ð U i ; ~ :~8~ ~I~ g ~~ ~d!~~~ !d~~~ ~i~n~~; I !b'Î ~~~::~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i ¡ ~ ~ : ~ ~ ~ d ~ ~ * (j) 0'8 ~ ~ ~ ~8~~ §lõ6 0' !1ª i5~I:i~~n~ tW~¡1j ª~~~¡¡~h 8 fl¡I, Uª~~g t:J ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ :I g '" ~ !J :I ~ ~ Q ~O· !~~ ~ ~ ~ ~d~ i~~ i ~~ ~~~~6~~ ~~~~~~ ~¡j~~~R¡¡;~ ~ Ji',:' ~tJl_~~!~ ~ h ~ ~ ~~. m ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ffi ~ ~ U ~ Z::I:: B" < >- z~ 3 oge:: t5 e z ¡!: 8~ °51- Ow ...Ið"'"' ug¡~ ~ JI f c:= <¡r:æta ~ 0 w ~ t;¡ u Z ~ ~ cr ~ 9 :f . z 5ffig ~ o~ ~ ~~OCl: ~~õ d ~~ ~~~~~<~ ~B~~~fE VZ~~~~tjgt ~ 11 ~ ~ Q:oflcr~ ~ g 5 ~ tII ~!i ~ i5 ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ < ~ ~!a: -1 ~~~ ~ U g ~~~g ~~! ~ ~~ i8~~~~~ 8~~ti~ê ~~§~§~~~~. ~ II~tIJ ~~~~~~~ ~ i H~ L- ~ ~ ~ d ~ ~ :: H ~ ~'g « g¡~~ f ~~ ~ g1ìêg ~~õ ìj ~~ 6:~~~~~ ~~~~~~ ~~~~g~ß~:; ~ ¡IIf I ~tJ~~~~~ ~" '" 0 . ," 0::: ~~'" ~ 5§ ~ ;;;;§~ ¡¡sf! ~ ~g ~~Fw~i!J~ ß~~~o~ ~&~~8~~~~ i= >II.!, 3¡sl:ig8i5 I'! ~ ~ I ~ w W ~ ~ ~ ,. ~ ~ ~ , § " ~ ~ ~I~ ~ :~: !i~¡ ~~i ~. ~I ;;i;;~~ ~:n~ii ~~U¡~;~i ~ IHlii. U~~:~! I h h ~ h :! !: ~ è ~ Ii á h ~! U ~!; " i!l! II! I¡II ¡ii Ii iil ¡m!:!, ¡¡I¡!ii ¡¡¡¡¡¡I!¡ ¡ i¡¡¡lil III!!!!! ¡¡¡ !!! Ii i! h ¡ 1i!!Ii: Hi ¡!! II m 8~~ ~~i i=* : ~t;J~n. ~išo( ~a: §<~ ~~:gi1j1..~Z~ ð~~ ~~~ ti~~V1~~CI ~ª g; Itf~f}f ~2~~....~~. ~ J i ~ ~ _ ð ~ ~ ~ g @ ~ ~:J: ~ ê ~ ~ 0 § ~ ~ : ~ ti ~ w ~ ~ ~ 5~~ ~g $s ã ~~B~ß ~ti~~ ffi~ o~tl dzg~~~~1.J ~~~~8¡S~ ~~~~~Q~~i5 & nt ~§ ffi~~ßg~5§ ..: g g g Ñ ~ 9 ri Ú ~ ~ « :! .¡ ~ ~ ò a 8 < ~ ~ ¿ ~ ~ ~ t1 ~ ~ ~ § ~ ~"'~ u< 0 w %,,'W>- x.:; % IS':; <zz z'" %,,~UU ",,,,-5 <;z '" <>-¡¡ O~¡¡ fi III II '!:.~::¡~"w" 1.Ú¡,j Vlf5 z~ 111 <¡::<F':' u~ëf~ Œl} w~r~ t.iJ~~ffitíWz.z G:FJ-U~:::¡ o....i!1..I. i:5!:!'~ J 5a...~%:J:Jt:c ~a...~ ë dœ ci ~~W~ Nß5~ ~o 45~ ~8 ffi~~~ ¿~8ão~~ ~<O~t~~ŒW d J w - ~õ~ NÇ,< 1'1% 1'10- !'"} I")«co<$ "'UlLO ,..,~ na:lO ..,ø~~ß..:Juu na...l.LuuV¡:i' "'F(iIDV)<:t~F .., tud I ~Fj~~j!;"~i! 'žW w "z g~¡¡~ 8" ;~>- 15 1;115 ¡¡; 5 U ;l g ~¡¡; ~ 8; w 0 ~j:!: F!: 111< Q () W !-~ ~~;.J o~ u. 5 E ~ (,1 ~ W 1.1 -'e I.:~ . c= i ~ I ~o z Ii ~~ BI~;= ~ 0 ~~~ 1:ii5~ " ~ I~ I ,,~~ k ªõ",¡;ô dw o~ ~ ~~ g~Q!!' i\" w 8 ~ bê~~B ~~~8~1~~~~ ~~z~ ê ~~~~! ~~~§ ~§ ~ ~~ ,5 ;¡~~ ~~; ~~~~~ ~~ ~~ ~: ~~ ~~~ ~~ i ~~ ~wij ~ 5 ~~~~Õ ~o~~~~~~~g ~i~~ ~ ~~~~Æ ~~~~ ffi~ ~ ~~ ~ ~!~ ~,i8~ ¡~~~§ ~~ B~ s~ ~~ ~~~ ~§ z ~~ ~Io ~ g ~ ~~œ ~~~ 111 ~~~~ ~ ~ ~~~~~ ~Oº ~~ E ~~ ~ ~o< SX fu~ ~5 2~ .0 °ð ~u g~ <~ffi ~~ 8 ~o ~~~ (j) ð ~ ~m~~~ ~~¡~~d~~~ ~~~~ ~ ~ ~I~~~ i~~~ ~; ~;~ ~~ ~~~ isi~;, ~ 5~,<I~~ ~~ ~; ~~ ~~ i~e:m ~ ~; ~~M ~ ~ ~ßz ~~~ffitl8a~~~ ~Ö6Õ ¿ § ~ æ~~ æ~Q2 wô ~ 0y 5w ~ãg ~gg<~ ~ ~ ~~ð 6! ~~ z~ §ffi~ ~~~ ~ E B~ ·æõ ~ ~ Iffi !~;~; I~~il~;¡:! :~8~~ ~~ ~ ~;~:ê ~!il§~! ~ ~~ :¡ ill ~e~~¡ ~ !¡i~! ~¡ I~ iï ii: ~~~ ~: ~ ~~s ~I~: z c::.;: W~ 8 ·t3<oc oJ-iS w~oJ~< ¡:~ _::E fit..! II) eõElO~ a.JG o:::t ~ :.r:û tu 5d~ ~tl)Gw~ ~ ::z:::!í~ 1.:1 :J Oð: t1::1 ~IJQ. _~w FG ~ f:'J~9 ~ I.L ~ ~g ~~!~~ ~S~~~g~~~~ ~~~~ ~~ ~ ~§~~~ ~~~~~ ~~ ~ ë~ ~~ ~~B~ g~~~~ a ~~~~~ ~~ ~5 g~ ~~~ i5~ ~B ~~ ~~~ ~~~~ --1 !:! "' t;'a::~S~ zfu5œ!io~~~:::E ~:i83: zl?;:) I 1:;] :1:z C:o I:J ü::l VI ~~ oU;=o ~ ;¡;Uð~o ê ~ oD;r 08 £5~ ~b -::Iu a:~g ž9 õã ~êffi zaw~ O:::w<C ~~~! ~~il~ i~~~!~~~:: ~~i! ~: ~ :~;i~ ¡~~I~:: ic ~i ¡~ ~;:~ :~i~!, ! ¡¡I~: ~~ !i~ ~~ i~~ ::~ !; i~ ~~~ I!~~ 5 < z0>' ~ Õ u¡ <:( ~~~ [3ë:! 11)0 ::.:-Õ:::i:;! z< Q VI t] ::;)-' ZO ¡::: -< o..~ ::I ~ 0: ...·w zO z- 0..0 u< z~zw ~ ~~ ~~, ~g~~~ ~g~~~~~~8~ ~~§~ ~~ I ~[~~~ g~~ê~ ~~~ ~~ :~~ ~~ ~~~: ~~8~~ ~ ~!~~I ~~~ ~~~ ~~ ~~~ ~~~ ~@ ~~ ~~g ~.~~~ o G~ g::;)~~ ðª~~~w~;=~3 ~8~õ ~~ G ~c~~Æ ~ð~~~ !ðè ~w a~g ~~ w~~c B-~~b ~ ~~~z~ ~ ffi ~ð~ ~. ~~x ~ß~ G~ ~g ~ ~ z () ~I ~~ !~:â~ ~~~gg~i~~~ ;~~: ~=! ~ I i~~~~ :~~§~ ~:~ ~¡ ;~~ ~~ ;si~ ~~~~! g ~~~~: ~I~ :~~ ~I~ ~~~ ~~~ ~~ i~ I~: ~. ~ I: !~ ~~~~m ~:~~~~~~;~~ ~~~~ ~!~: i~3~~ ~~g~~ !I~ I; !;i I~ i~~~ ~:~i~ ~ ~Ii~; ;~~ ~~~ ~S: ~~~ ~~~ ~I ~i ~I¡ ~i~ ~ ~z ~ ~VI~~ ~~W~ U2 JO 0 W ~uo~~ ~o ~z ~~~ ~ 0 tt w~ J :JZ~ ~ z~ r ~ ~ U o..u ~ ~o ~ ~~ ~! ~~!~; ~1:~I~lšš;i ::~~ 1~I¡i ¡¡i~~s ~~~i¡ ~:: ~I I~~ ii ~Îlg ~Ij~~ i I~!~~ 1:1 I:! i~i li~ I!~ I; I! ~~i il~i~ ~& ~~ ~~~~~ ~bª<~~~ffiffi~~ ~~ - ~<d~ù ~Õwzww ~~~w2 ~~d ~w :o~ Ñ~ ~wu~ :§~f~ ~ :~~§~ ~5E Ð ~ ~ ~ ~w :5~ ~~ ~g ~~§ ~~§~§ ~< 1'10 n~~<a ~zffi~~~~oo0..8 ~E~~ ~ 0 ~~~~j:!:~ ~~~~::;) o!~ _~ _~g _0 _~~< ~~~oœ _ _~äOg _~~ _5< _~~ N~~ NU~ I'I~ N~ Nb< N<~œU . cJ=:i I H V v \12:::_) 0 tJ ..L.._<:I.1.~ Hd:~UI l Og~ II ¡ l':::> ::::I..L V I J \.....J ':::> ':::> V .:p 3Ð'VI::IOJ.S INI[I' ·30r:J.S ....,.. Pw ICIISfI P'It.Id ÞfoJdl . , , I i , , ' , I ---~..:!...-Št~l-M:';ž-:S;:¡'ë-Š---------------1 ~t--- ì b ¡ I I I ¡:¡ I ,..-. , I I ÐHlOlIne 1Ð't1I0lS I Y .uax.ot ONllSlX3 I i ~ I I 1 I ~~! I Ie-- I · I I .-' z .~ <> , I ~ , n. 1 ~ ~ '" · ã: & I Ii x 0 , 'z B I J ª b ONlGlmB 3ÐYHolS ~ I ,.. ~ .'t~x.ot ÐHU.S!X3 , < I ¡ ~ i~i) <> F , g¡ , ~~ I~ " ~I ,.¡- . y DNlOlIna 3Ð'f'H01S i: ..; ~ .1UX,ot ÐNU.SX3 t:,1 10 0, 10 gl /l~ .....1 .o-.ot. ., .00,I1;t /-9-... 10 "'I . . Z h-~-F::------------------------------= ~ I I I ~ I I--- ¡ io I I ' I I : . I . 0 I W ! I ~ '1 ~ i w I l cr: ; ¡- I--- I i 1 .D-,ot 'T .o-,l~~ ~ I Ul g¡ I , i>1,,- I , , I I<- - I I ' . \, I I Y I , -' I I b ~ I D- o N _ I · . I W I ~ . ,,~ i I I ~ ..... Ul -;- , --¡.-. ------------~-------------- '{ T--- -- "- 0 ' I . I I '1 I I ! ;; I ~ ' I , , , )-1 ¡ I Q. I I I I D- I 1...1 I ! g !1 n.¡ I I ¡ g. ~ I w ~ I I ~ !i I z , I ¡¡ Iii '0 '" o I l;j ~ 10 0: . ~I ~ ~ 0 II ~I ~: IN I I 'w .. ' I ' . t: 5: b 0 01 1 I 10 ~ 5: ~ 10 - 01 01. 0 °1 ~I . II b hi '0 o wI I "" ~! . IZ , iii' , I oj I .' I 0' -t -I j ""'011119 ÐNUS1X3 i .o-.ot I · ! I 111 V V~ ..,T.".,.. J t=1 tJ ...I...-I...u..J...1..,...:I 111..J...h.1VI l l---' --' -'- V I -./ '----' ~ ...-J V -r c....J .::=J 3Ð\f8018 INIV'I '30r '18 o;~ -"XN"'-=t:~ " -JWY ,Ð ~"'J j~ .O-.O~ t~ ~l .O-,ot l iF" Jõ'F-'L I. l '\ .r-:z;'I L .O-,i 'I .0-,; , .0-,& , .O-,! , .o-,i CD ® ® ® (1) .0-,01 ,0-,01 a Q I , , I ~ Q - - .0-,01 .0-,01 - I .o-.Ol ~ I I \¡> ~ b 0 I® '7 ? 0 0 I",) I I I I ~ ." ." 12 " .., I ! 0 b '7 \¡> t.f.\ 0 I , I 12 .., .., ~ ~ - '<r ® ".,1 " 0 '<r 0 1 1 - ~ ;;'1 .: .., ~ 0 I I I " II '7 J II® " b 0 I I - 12 Q 1 ~ Ii '1 ! 0 I " - µ"t .~ 1m ~ ! 0 ~~!I- . .y ~I ' ~ 0 .' I 0 - -+-- , {~I I - ~ .....' ic I ! .'<r~I® 0 ® 0 I 1 " ,. o . ~ - I - - 0 ® 0 ¡If!) I I " ,. I: i 0 - 1 ~ 0 ®i 0 I 1 1 " I .. 0 ®I t I , ;''''1 . + 0 (H'I i .' 0 \¡> I 12 ;, I . 0 ®I ~r 1 I : " i " . I ~ -"<=- ".- / ; I I . I 'I 0 J " \¡> 0 ~I ~ I (;11¡ ~ I ~ ~ ! .., !2 ~è:! -{~11H- 61 I ......,.,-: ~ I ~ i (ß) \¡> 0 (11' \¡> 1 '" !2 .., !t : !j I, [I .1 . . . V .,SI CJ -. I........ V V \ "'- J tj tJ ~~tj.l~ Hd~~UI' ('lJ l-.-J .-J -L- V I ---- '-.-J "-' - I . -' I I . ...::: wu . ' ,3Ð'tHOJ.S INI::':c:.r: ':;:S09:"" d < IIIJ W W b :5 Z . C'...J WZW æ~~ UJW...J W ~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~%~~~~~~~x~~~x~~~~~~~~~~~~~~%%~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 2 ~ ¿ oooooooooooooodoOOOOdo~ododoooooooooooooodôooooooooooo0000 « ~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ o D:::' ~ ::E::E::E::E::E:::Ie::E::E::E:::t:l.::E::E::E::E:IE::E::E::IE::E::E::E::E:Ii:::l ::E:E:E 22:::1::E ::E::E:E:::t:E::E::E:E 2:2::r::E.:E:::!!::E::E::::II;::E::E:::E::E::E:::E:::E::E::E i Z8 J ~ ooooooobbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb~booobbb~bbboeoo . « 0 W " .I -' .I ,I ,I .I .I -' ,I .1 " .I ,I .I .1 .I .1 -' .r .1 .. .. ,I .1 -' -' .1 -' .' ,I .I .I .1 -' .I .1 -' .I .1 .1 .' .1 LI " .1 .I ) .' .1 -' -' .1 -' .I .' .1 -' .' N I ~~~o~~~=~=mmQQmammQQ~mmmQmmQQmmmmmQmmmmQQmmQmQQQQQmmQQmama ~o wi ~ JJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJ I ~mmm~+*+++mmmmmmmm+++++T++++mmmmmmmmmmmmmmÐmmÐmmmm~mmmmmmm o '" o ~ §~ª2~~~~2~Eg~;~~~~aEE;~~9~~§6a6~~~ß~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~aa~~~ ::;: "-III-III . ..,::11111111'111 ~ "..:::111111111111 S~ . ~q:.>:..:II'111111111 ~ ~¡ . ..~:IIIIIIIIIIII: 8 . a" . . -- æ z~ ~~ .'1; "111111111111 I: .111111111111 '" \¡¡~ .. '. III III ð w n '_111_111' <=> <{ ~ ~¿=dJ" III III : ~ IlIlflllllllllll"' ~ ~ III III III "'.. ... ¡;! ~ ~ ~ ð '"i¡¡g 6 ~ ~ ~ffi OJ Š Il: a: ~ b:: ~z~~ ~ ~ :J h", 8 ¡¡ ~ Ii: " ~~~I:!¡;~¡j ~D........Ii!¡;; ::I~O~~~!2 '" w D. "- ~ " ~ ~ º~ ~ ~.> '" -' -,. <{o 3~ tO~ w::::- (:~) .:J ~ ~ ~ Ii: }:ìa'" ~. {5 !5 ~ !i ~ ? ~~. ~ ~ ... ~¡¡;!: ~õ ~:'¡.¡ ~ '- o ¡:¡ , u < :t.:! ~'Z JJ¡: ~h ~'" _'" . ... . . ,..p.!5 I . · Resolution PC2002'- RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING'APPROVAL OF A·SIGN VARIANCE I I FOR DAISY A DAY I WHEREAS, Daisy A Day has submitted a request for varianç;e from the Zoning Ordinance regulating maximun: size of a business Sign, and I , WHEREAS. the applicant has submitted the required site plan and development application forreview; I and WHEREAS, Section 52.14 subd. 12 (a) requires that the area on one side of all such signs erected on . one street frontage of anyone premise, shall not exceed (50) square feet. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the proposed variances as they relate to the findings for granting a variance as defined in Section 52.8 of the Zoning Ordinance, and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has made the following findings relating to the front yard setback request: Extra ordinary circumstances apply to Daisy A Day as the Planning Commission has 1. reviewed the current sign Ordinance and is recommending the Council increase the maximum size of a business sign. Further, the Planning Commission has granted variances to property owners in anticipation of the new Ordinance and is requesting the same privilege; and I 2. Grallting of the variance will not impair adequate supply of light and air to adjacent · properties or diminish or impair the public health or safety NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION THAT: the Planning Commission does hereby recommend the City Council of the City of St. Joseph approve the following variance for Daisy A Day: I . 1. Variance from Section 52.14 subd. 12 (a) Business Sign - granting a twelve foot variance. ¡ I I DATED THIS 2nd day of December 2002 Gary Utsch, Planning Chair I Judy Weyrens, Administrator I I , I · I I - - . r I / . I':> /t--,v\ ; -'\ ;; . r.tJt lb. ,. 1P~;~;;¡.::J' Lc~"!!E!T .. .rP~Y¿"n~:t . 5i~""'" ~ î f!uv"".....+-i IiÐf , ,- ~:.--. .~ r- ;¿g 3 ~ J.5 r , ...! >Y ,,",' " rn Cì\. .I I !1 !~I ~ ~Ò\¡-e.r: po..."h ¡ ~ì '4..: D\) Bl () ., ~._---- -- _lJ lÐ-7 r. . ,,: ¡. . \ I rn 0 <.0 . C;:~ ~i I ~2 ~i I i.~ I I I 3u ad. iVlÓ- .1 . ¡ ¡ ! r1" )~i 5'1 A DlÃ1 I ' " IJJ '. -þ ~I '::3- . ill \61 I - I . ! . \!¡ '1'----7> .~ I r r ! f ¡ ì I j ! f ¡ ¡ . i ¡ i ; 'I ¡ I ~ ~ I 1 8 - I _. CITY OF ST. JOSEPH, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2002-_ A RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING THEREPEAL THE 1997 CITY OF ST. JOSEPH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN · AND THE REPLACING OF IT WITH THE 2002 ST. JOSEPH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, A COMPILATION OF ÞOLlCY STATEMENTS, GOALS, STANDARDS AND MAPS FOR GUIDING THE PHYSICAL, SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF THE MUNICIPALITY AND ITS ENVIRONS. WHEREAS, Pursuant to Minnesota Statute 462.355, Subd. 2; The St. Joseph Planning Commission may, recommend to the City Council the adoption and amendment from time to time of a comprehensive municipal plan. WHEREAS, The City Council of the City of S1. Joseph with its Planning Agency, the S1. Joseph Planning Commission, authorized the updating of its Comprehensive PlEin in 2002; and, WHEREAS, The proposed Comprehensive Plan is based. on local and regional historical facts, trends, and governmental planning standards; and, WHEREAS, The proposed City of S1. Joseph Comprehensive Plan is a dynamic planning tool intended to guide the future growth and development of the city; and, WHEREAS, The attached document (Exhibit A) presents the ComprehensivePlan for S1. Joseph, Minnesota; reflective of a community planning process conducted in the year 2002 and involving elected officials, appointed officials, city staff, community organizations, the public at large, S1. Joseph Township representatives, Stearns County representatives and others; and, WHEREAS, Before adopting the comprehensive municipal plan or any section or amendment of the plan, the planning agency shall hold at least one public hearing thereon; and, WHEREAS, A notice of the time, place and purpose of a hearing on the proposed Comprehensive Plan · was published once in the official newspaper of the municipality at least ten days before the day of the hearing with a copy of the notice posted for public viewing; and, WHEREAS, A copy of the proposed Comprehensive Plan is on display at the City Offices Jor public review; and, WHEREAS, A joint public hearing by the S1. Joseph Planning Commission and the S1. Joseph City Council was held in the manner described in the public notice; and,. WHEREAS, The proposed comprehensive plan may not be acted upon by the City Council until it has received the recommendation of the Planning Commission; and, NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED the Planning Commission of the City of St. Joseph, Minnesota hereby recommends the City Council the repeal of the 1997 Comprehensive Plan and replacement of it with the 2002 Comprehensive Plan. The motion' for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly made by Commissioner , and duly seconded by Commissioner and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor: And the following voted against the same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted this;.,dâYdfc:, 2000. Planning Commission Chair · ATTEST: City Administrator . - itg of St. Joseph 25 College Avenue NW P.O. Box 668. St. Joseph, MN 56374 City of St. Joseph (320) 363-7201 Public Hearing Fax: 363-0342 CLERK! The Planning Commission for the City of St. Joseph shall conduct a public hearing on Monday, December Á.I.?~TOR 2, 2002 at 7:05 PM in the St. Joseph City Hall. The purpose of the hearing is to consider a twelve (12) foot Judy Weyrens . variance on the siZe of a business sign. MAYOR The property is legally described as follows: Larry J. Hosch .75 Acres of the West 200' of the E 631.57' ofSE4NW4Lying North of Highway 52 & South of RR .07 Acres for highway. COUNCILORS Bob Loso St. Joseph Code of Ordinances No. 52.14 Subd 12(a) states that the area on one side of all such signs Cory Ehlert ~rected on one street frontage of anyone premises, shall not exceed fifty (50) square feer. Kyle Schneider Alan Rassier The request for a variance has been submitted by Daisy-a~day, PO Box 148, St. Joseph, MN 56374. JudyWeyrens Administrator/Clerk . Note:' State Law requiTes mailed notice to all property oWners within350 feet òf a variance, special use or rezoning request. . ¡. --.-.0- j i~ \ . Of \ I I - I i \ . ~.~ I . . I \ . . ~'" \ G\-· w. I -- ~-+------ , I.. .......... I ..... ..... ..... ..... ¡J ;c ¡J ;c GUWiR£E ST. E. ~ ¡¡J ~ ~ .~ ~ c - (.) . II: W.I :z I..... -10.. u¡ ~1f1~'. . , . öJJ:] w. ~EU,ST. E. ..... ~tl1r " w ....... "--- ~rnm ~ ; !ÏillJ§ [[[¡]¡ CSAH 75 , tP/ APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE 1t I~o-- · CITY OF ST. JOSEPH Fee $ I 25 College Avenue NW Paid P. O. Box 668 Receipt # St. Joseph, MN 56374 Date (320)363-7201 or Fax (320)363-0342 STATE OF MINNESOTA) )ss CqUNTY OF STEARNS) I INJe, the undersigned, as owners of the property described below, hereby appeal to the City Council' and Planning Commission of the City of SI. Joseph, Steams County, Minnesota to grant a variance from the St. Joseph City Code; (applicants have the responsibility of checking all applicable ordinances pertaining to their application and complying with all ordinance requirements): j ,I,' . PROPERTY OWNER NAME(S): ./7 0 &<J LA!.. , . _._~ - I PROPERTY OWNER PHONE NUMBER(S): ADDRESS: .:2/ q Z. ~ A1.f 'j' -é>!- .ç0bLpÂ.. .-l4h· 5h37t../ ZONING DISTRICT: I LEGAL DESCRIPTION: PROPERT~OWNER(S)' SIGNATU~~~~-"'-'_ I · I The request(s) which we desire for our property Is/are in conflict with the 0 oWing section(s) of the St. Joseph City Code: I Section Section Section I I Proposed non-conformance(s): What special conditions and circumstances exist which are particular to the land, structure orbuilding(s) involve which do not apply to the land, structures or building(s) in the same zoning classification (attach additional pages as ne~ded)? C~;;;;~ðAJ;"ii~i!:f7f;,· . ~:iß;e:' i~ ¿þ%~ Do any' of the s~ial conditions and circumstances result from your own actions (if the answer is yes, you may not Rualify for a variance)? . What facts and considerations demonstrate that the literal interpretation of the zoning code would deprive you of rights commonly enjoyed by other propertie in the same district under the terms of the zoning code (attac~ additional pages as needed)? -/ -~ State your reasons for believing that a variance wjll n t confer ~ou any special privilege that is denied by the zoning code to other lands, structures or buildings In the same district: ~ /' .' "'v¡, /0 '¿:;-é. -:/- · 7Z/:/S1d: f~~~A -/~/,.,-vJ~ /:~/d//~~~ 11~:~ ' t" :?..e:.... I "'L::' '/ ,f, ./ ú Ó . ~ /7fÁ. / ~ ~/-). I I , .'. I^"'&'"rv '2 " :,1 '.-' .¡, .... I g g- I I . State your reasons for believing that a strict enforcement of the pr~ of the zoning code would cause undue hardship. Undue hardship means tha~ the property In question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under the conditions alloweð by the zoning ordinance. Economic considerations alone shall not constitute an undue hardship under the terms of this code as referenced in state statutes: - I Attached to this application and made a part thereof are other material submission data requirements, as indicated. APpli~antSlgnatur.: -.-64<¡I ~/~ Date: / Ò~ 3ò -10~ - ---- Owner Signature: Date: I FOR OFFICE USE ONL Y DATE APPLlCA nON SUBMITTED: E APPLICATION COMPLETE: , I . Planning Commission Action: _ Recommend Approval _ Recommend Disapproval Date of Action: Date Applicant/Property Owner notified of Planning Commission Action: ity Council Action: _ Approved _ Disapproved Date of Action: Date Applicant/Property Owner notified of City Council Action: I I I I I I I I I i.' I One new 15' oah dIf illuminated pylon sign. 6'1-3/4" x 10' dIftype I internally illuminated cabinet. ,-\\e(? . . I' \~ ¡ ~e('J ~r , (b' \!ß/ QAH- 15' SALESMAN: JOHN œZ'JfìlK _-!~~~~f7 Sl!E· ó·1-.}/4" x 10' dll f 1f'!fBilldtv iIIum!nated cctinet wl1excî ~V! i1!L5 è1!'ME: œfADAY-l .CDR SQ.M. 61 .-!!j LOC;,.>¡¡CN: ST. JOSEPH. MtJ c......fj. CQtCR- TED c_ SCALf-. .3/8- == l' F-]lE COLOR- mc PG:"';:::"i 1 --~-.- DATE: 04105102 QI'"'W JUtI r:I ,..,r.nuAI.....uu ,,..... ,...~"U(~" NOTES. ____h_ AOL.COM I Message View Page 1 of2 · Subj: [legislative] Budget Update Date: 12/12/2002 11:02:49 AM Eastern Standard Time From: "Peterson. Lynn" <lpeterson@LMNC.ORG> To: "Generallegi.s1ative" <legis1ative@listsery,1l111lc.cu:g?': Rep1y- To: "Genera11egislative" <legis1ative@listserv.lrnnc.org> Sent from the Internet (Details) Here's the latest update on the state budget deficit and the possibility of December aid cuts: On Tuesday, we talked with Governor Ventura's chief lobbyist, Paul Aasen, and he assured us that as of Tuesday, the governor does not intend to cut or delay the December payments to cities. He said that he would let us know if anything changes but at this time, he said the governor has not backed away from he earlier statements about "letting the legislature solve its budget problem." He said that they have not heard anything from the Pawlenty transition team about their desire to have the Ventura administration cut or delay the December aid payments. We have also talked to a key staff member at the Department of Revenue and he indicated that there is a rumor floating around that the Pawlenty transition team may ask Ventura to withhold a portion of the December aid payment. We have not confirmed any such rumor and in fact, that may be the same rumor that was circulating before the budget forecast was released. We will be talking to the Commissioner of Finance-designate, Dan McElroy, this afternoon (Thursday) and we will send along any additional information we receive at that time. · In any event, the budget crisis is very real and we'll have to watch closely to see if anything develops over the next couple of weeks. Without a doubt, next year's aid payments will be under the gun as the legislature struggles to balance the state's budget. - We will update you as additional information becomes available. Gary Carlson and Eric Willette --- You are currently subscribed to legislative as: jweyrensl@aol.com To unsubscribe send a blank emai1 to 1eave-1egis1ative-3762X@listserv.1mnc.org This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs SkyScan service. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit http://www.message1abs.com --- You are currently subscribed to legislative as: jweyrensl@aol.com To unsubscribe send a blank email to 1eave-legis1ative-3762X@listserv.1mnc.org · This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs SkyScan service. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit http://www.message1abs.com http:/ /webmail.aol.com/fmsgview.adp?fo1der=SU5CT1g=&uid=5467729 12/1212002 y'¿ I State of Minnesota Conciliation Court County c::: l I Judicia~ District 5/ Ca~ NOn Ç/ \ I ...)--Tecr- y ~\ 1 . ~ - Dol -,/ I...,JU . STATEMENT OF CLAIM AND SUMMONS Plaintiff #2 p Name L Address i E Û A ~ City/State/Zip V'1\ tv 5'fs::.37 S City/StateíZip ~ I E YS. Z I' Defendant #1 p Defendant #2 0 ~ I Name c..¡+ cf.;. R Address 0 '('" I N T PLAlNTIFF'S STATEMENT OF CLAlM " ~ 1. The Defendant(s) owe(s) me $ /?,Có u7:f , plus filing fees and costs of $ ;j{) Ó , for a total of $ ì 'X 36 o~ because (state what happened and when it happened): 6ve Y - G:. -SSe'S'5 0\ po ""'+ C> ç h é u.. '5 e . .~t,G.:,rì. Dr C-Ói..L.n 1Lr ~¿co'\J'S a. '5 /66 Y c:,gÇf- Ac+i..I..G..) '[f, L( 56 ç¡L ~C>:"?~ 'b\.JO-~ \-\- ~" l'1~3 '* n A- -k 'Ì""lAi.= ,1\ ~~-e.. bvevc-k,,- rye. - e"5 ¡+fì)4., +pcl 'i:aco jjp (' '-f'ð.s..Y' ~ ;<é6. c-)<. '1 (.,1'''5 ~ / <g CX5 0<, I o 2. The Defendant(s) ~as/have the following property that belongs to me (list property), valued at I $ , plus filing fees and costs of $ , for a total of $ I . I I want the Court to order this property returned to me or make the Defendant(s) pay me money for the value of I the property. I 3. I believe the person(s}I am suingisíare at least 18 years old and not in the military service. [II 4. I undersænd that ifIdo not come to court on my hearing date, my case will be dismissed and I may have to pay money to tl1e Defendant(s) on any counterclaim that has been filed. I NOTARY STAMP OR COURT SEAL SWORN TO BEFORE ME ON: THEABOVES ATEMENT OF CLAIM IS I \ \ ì ç _0' C.ORRECTTO ESTOFJ W I Date: ...... ~ c:7--.. SIgnature: I Signature:~Q0Cvv3- Nam~:DeY'n~e-H-e fowex's " TlIle-{lfrepresentatlVe): .. I Telephone:3~O ~ 1?-. ¿f - /7' ere:¡ I I . I ¡ NotIce of Settlement I i The above-entitled case having been settled, the same may be and hereby is dismissed with my consent. I Date: Plaintiff's Signature: I SUMMONS: IMPORTA.NT NOTICE TO THE PARTIES I You must come to court for a hearing on D (2Vrì.L;:M/l.. ..3/ J e:2L"O;;L at I : 30 f2-.m. at I Î. ,r9ate Tlme' / 6/;:¡ (,ou/"v+hoUd-f UaJ,¿Æ. ·51 .l~¿DV-¿) n/}u .~303 . ;. Location/Aòòress i If you do not come to courtfor this hearing, you may lose the case and have to pay money to the other : party. .. ¡ Dated: /1- <>'¿ -O<~ Court Administrator/Deput0~ f~"'oÆ0#J . St. Cloud Area Cities and CMBA Meeting on Building Issues December 5, 2002 Sartell City Hall, Pine Cone Road 9:00 a.m. to 11 :00 a.m. Al-wI M+1 I (q f 03 Agenda Introductions A. City Issues 1. Grading and Drainage Problem: Site grading is being changed from the original grading plan approved in the platting process. Drainage improvements are made for one or more building sites that create drainage problems, (usually ponding on private property) for other building sites in the same or adjacent subdivision. Proposed Solution: Require construction plans to include a site plan with elevations that are compatible with the grading plan approved as part of the platting process. . Furthermore, at the time building permit is issued, require the builder to sign a memo acknowledging the approved grading plan and the site plan with elevations. 2. Erosion Control Problem: Soil is eroding òff the construction site causing environmental degradation, dirty streets, and clogging of storm drains Proposed Solution: Follow erosion control practices as required by the MPCA. If practices are not followed, the city will request the MPCA to assist the builder. 3. Premature Occupancy of Residents Problem: . Occupancy of building before all necessary approvals and/or before infrastructure is in place may expose occupants to unsafe and/or unhealthy conditions. Proposed Solution: Not allow occupancy before a Certificate of Occupancy has been issued. If Occupancy does occur before a certificate is issued, the City will shut off the water to the property. 4. Emergency Vehicle Access to Construction Sites and Properties with Private Drives. Problem: Fire safety codes applicable during construction are not being uniformly followed. Propeliies are difficult to locate because of a lack of addressing or signing. Proposed Solutions: Subdivision agreements will include language requiring the developer to provide and maintain temporary street and address signs during . construction. The city will install permanent signs at the time the first paving lift is placed. Problem: During construction, some temporary streets do not accommodate . emergency vehicle (fire truck) access. Proposed Solution: Construct a temporary street capable of suppoliing a fire truck and other large vehicles needed for construction. Problem: Addressing of homes on private streets is causing confusion and making it difficult for emergency vehicle operators and the general public to find properties. Proposed Solutions: In subdivisions with private drives, the subdivision agreement will require the developer/builder to place permanent address range signs adjacent to the public road serving the property. 5. Sixty Day Rule: Posting of Inspection record card and approved plans Problem: If the city staff is forced to issue building pelmits in a 60 day time frame, all construction plan components, i.e. site, mechanical, electrical, plumbing, fire protection system, etc, could not be review and approved in the time allotted. Proposed Solution: Submit all plans together and in enough sets to allow simultaneously review by the multiple agencies responsible for revie\'\'ing the plans. City staff will meet weekly to coordinate, review and move plans through the system. 6. Limiting Cul-de-sacs in New Residential Subdivisions Problem: Cities experience an extraordinary high cost to remove snow and ice from cul-de-sac streets. The small turning radius, the high number of driveways accessing on to a cul-de-sac, the very limited area to store snO\'\' and the special equipment needed (i.e. . front end loaders and/or special plows) make cul-de-sacs very expensive to maintain. Proposed Solution: Limit the use of cul-de-sacs to provide access to lots that have unusual topographic features and/or wetland areas. B. CMBA Issues 1. Turn Around Time for Building Permits Problem: Delays in issuing building penllits also mean construction delays. Proposed Solution: Additional staff, especially at peak building permits in spring and fall, could alleviate permit delays. Review processes and time at each step to determine \"lhere bottlenecks occur, and adjust. 2. Tapping Mains Problem: St. Cloud requires that water mains be tapped by city employees, limited to four per day, \"lhich delays construction. Proposed Solution: As in other municipalities, allow road contractor (with credentials) to tap water mains to avoid construction delay. 3. Sidewalk Requirement Problem: Sidewalks required for every lot in all developments even when there is little or no benefit/usage for the cost. . . Proposed Solution: Sidewalks not be required for every lot in every development where there is little or no benefit to the residents. 4., Drive over Curbs Problem: Drive over curbs are not an option to full curbs. Proposed Solution: Allow drive over curbs, as they are a low cost option and can meet the same functionality as full curbs. 5. Over Engineered or Designed Problem: Solutions are often over engineered/designed and too expensive for the problem. Proposed Solution: Discontinue reimbursement of designing fees as a percentage of total cost, design to straight fee structure and to logical solutions. 6. Testing of Sanitary Sewer and Water Mains Problem: Tested in stages over several days that can result in delays to construction. Proposed Solution: Change testing procedure to complete testing at one time avoiding delays. 7. City's Untimely Installation of Infrastructure Problem: Construction and occupancy delays because city and/or city's road . contractor do notbegin and complete road on schedule. Contractor penalty amount is . minor compared to the builder's penalty for delayed construction time. Proposed Solution: Adopt aggressive contractor penalties, less rigid on weather rules for roadwork. .