The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2003 [05] May 01 {Book 27} · ityofCSt.josep# St. Joseph City Council May 1, 2003 7,:00 PM I 25 College Avenue Nort i PO Box 668 1. i 7:00 PM... Call to Order St. Joseph, MN 56374 ·1 (320) 363-7201 2. Approve Agenda Fax.: (320) 363-0342 Consent AgJnda 3. ADMINISTRATOR a. Bills Payable - Requested Action: . Approve check numbers 32698- 32745 Judy Weyrens I b. Minute$ - Requested Action: April 17, 2003 MAYOR c. Authori~atìon to Begin.AUAR Process - Arcon Development -'Requested·Action:Approve Larry 1. Hosch Resolu~ion 2003-16 requesting authorization from the EQBto begin the AUAR process. I I COUNCILORß d. Basketball Court and kit for Northland Park - Requested Action: Approve the expenditure of Alan Rassièr $7,767ifor the basketball court and $1,200 . $1,300 for the ba!;ketball kit. Ross Rieke Gary Utsch 4. 7:05 PM - fublic Comments I Dale Wick I 5. 7:10PM -~uildinglnspector Reports - Adoption of the Uniform Building Code I. 6. 7:25 PM- ~002 Audit Report - KDV I 7. Public Wor:ks Reports . ., I a. purc~ase óf a hydrant defuser and hose for the Water Department _ b. DiSCrS purchasing meter measuring·device for bulk water sales. 8. Mayor Reports I I 9. Council Reports : I I 10. City Admipistrator Reports a. Update - Storm Water Fee I b. Fund Transfer I 11. AdjÇ>ul't'I I I I I I i i I I I· I i . . t1. i h ity of St. Joseph www,aty. '~7P ,com St. Joseph CityC()uncil May 1, 2003 7:0Q,PM 25 College Avenue North PO Box 668 1. 7:00 PM .... Call to Order St. Joseph, MN 56374 (320) 363-7201 I 2. Approve Ageta Fax: (320) 363-0342 3. Consent Agenda ADMINISTRATOR a. Bills Pa~able-ReqUested Action: Approve check numbers 32698 -32745 Judy Weyrens I b. Minutesl- Requested Action: April 17,20n3 , MAYOR c. Authoriiation to BeginAUAR Process - Arcon Development ..;Requested Action: Approve Larry J. Hosch Resolution 2003-16 requesting authorization from the eaB to begin the AUAR process. i COUNCILORS d. Basket~a\l Court and kit for Northland Park - Requested Action: Approve the expenditure of Alan Rassier $7,767 t'the bask"ball court and $1,200 . $1,300 for Ibe basketball k'l Ross Rieke Gary Utsch 4. 7:05 PM - p¡ublic Comments Dale Wick ! 5. 7:10. PM - ~uilding Inspector Reports - Adoption of the Uniform Building Code I. 6. 7:25 PM - 2002 Audit Report - KDV I I 7. Public wor~s Reports a. . Purchase of a hydrantdefuser and hose for the Water Department I b. Discu~s purchasing meter measuring.device for bulk water sales. - , I 8.. Mayor Reports I 9. Council R~ports i I I 10. City AdmipistratorReports a. Update -Storm Water Fee b. Fund Transfer I ! 11. Adjourn I I I : I I I .. I I CITY' OF ST. JOSEPH 04/28/03 8:08 AM Page 1 Bills Payable ,eel<' Sea"'" ...",e : Comments " Amount FUND DEPART 08,1 , ~-"' ~698 AFSCME cøUNC'L 65 ' d,e" april ' $263.70 101 . )2699 AMCON BL?,CKAND PRECAST, 'NC 1 9'- san,'fuone', sand $354.01 101 45202 220 12700 BRANNAN [CKS""TH ¡ maorterwealhedo,,", $60.55 602 49473 230 32701 CO...MANO CONCEPTS ¡ _marn! boæd ' $195.00 101 42120 210 32702 CO......'SS, NER OF REVENUE j etale withhold 411. '" pay $55," 101 . 32702 CO......'6S' NEROF REVENUE j ,ta" withhold 411. pay $1,062.48 101 ,32703 EFTPS . .sa withhold 411. '" pay $394.66 101 '3Z103 EFTPS I fed,'" wllhhold 411. pay $2,477.34 101 ]32703 EFTPS i fed,..,_d.411. '" pay $83.59 101 132703 EFTPS fica withhold 4/16 pay $2,507.80 101 )32704 GALL'S INC console $228.20 101 42152 220 . I 032704 GALL'S INp . I Spotlight handle $27.37 101 42152 220 032705 GAMEDA r THLET'C . i V~,ay""U Net $91.54 101 45202 220 032706 GOODIN' OMPANY. I 241/2" pump gauges $169.24 602 49480 220 032707 GRANITE ELECTRONICS 1 repaired light bar $105.39 101 42152 220 032707 GAANrr~ ELECTRONICS ¡_,md...;o" "",fs offiœ $117.50 101 42151 233 032708 HAWKIN . WATER TREATMENT GRO tests $29.00 601 49420 312 032708 HAWKIN~ WATER TREATMENT GRO tests $109.00 602 49480 312 032709 HElM, GlfRALD ! rent, may $133.00 602 49490 410 032709 HElM, GIpRALD I rent, may $134.00 101 43120 410 032709 HE'''', GfLD I """ may " $133.00 601 49440 410 032710 'NG UF ,NS & ANNU'TV CO"'PANY detened -p 4116 pay $50.DO 101 032711 K.E.E.P. .S. INC .~ umforms,ean gustln $12.78 101 42120 171 ~. KREBS ACH ENTERPRISES i gas '.. ' . . $29.35 101 42152 210 . LARSO~ EXCAVATINGc ¡payment #7(final) northland platV $12,266.02 424 43120 530 032714 LAWE (ORCEMENT LABOR SERVIC dues, april $175.00 101 032715 MINNE OTA ELEVATOR, INC 1- service, april. ..' $65.00 -101 41942 220 032716 MNCHAPTER IMI 1 membershiþrenewal,Tom Loweil $25.00 105 42240 433 032717. ...N HI*HWA Y SAFETY & RESEAI>CH laW ..,fo<eement, )eff you"" $271.00 101 42140 . 331 032718 MUEL ER SALES . I···· seal & charge gauges $50.00 ·602 49480 220 1032719 OUTS ' URCE MANAGEMENT SE,RVIC . payment #3 Maintenance facility $3,315.00 429 43120 530 032720 PAPTSSEPPE, 'NC ' ma"taoanœ dept4œ $23.00 101 45203 531 032721 PERA retirement 4/16 pay -$50.00 101 032721 PERA retirement 4/16 pay $3,277.99 101 1032722 PERA _ CC : retirement 4/16 cc pay $146.00 101 032723 PURe; ASE POWER I postage $30.00 601 49420 322 032723 PUR~HASE POWER postage $270.00 101 42120 322 032723 PUR HASE POWER postage $200.00 ' 101 41430 322 1032724 AAJWWSK' HANS"'E'ER LTD Iega','amberl $142.50 101 41610 304 032724 RAJ OWSKI HANSMEIER L TO I legal-general $1,679.00 101 41610 304 032724 RAJ OWSKI HANSMEIER LTD I legal-eminent domain $228.00 101 41610 304 032724 RAJ~OWSKIHANSMEIER LTD ¡ legal-R3 ordinance requirements $95.00 101 41610 304 1032724 RAJ~OWSKI HANSMEIER LTDI legal"criminal $2,264.00 101 42120 304 032724 RAJIfOWSKI HANSMEIER L TDI legal-pondview $285.00 101 41610 304 032724 AAJ~OWSK' HANSMEIER LTD; 'egal-honer $142.50 .101 41610 304 032724 RAJ OWSKI HANSMEIER LTD legal-CR 121 $83.00 425 43122 530 1032725 RE GEL PRINTING pink parking ticket envelopes $195,53 101 42120 210 032726 SE engineering-NPDES \I permit $810.00 101 43131 303 032726 SE engineering-general $2,852.25 101 43131 303 032726 SEt engineering-city mapping $317.98 101 43131 303 1°32726 SE~ engineering-gateway commpns $1,339.50 101 43131 303 032726 SE . engineering-madison park pud $1,326.00 101 43131 303 032726 SEµ 'n~neertng.""rlhtand p'at 7 $2,764.00 428 43120 530 032726 SEengineering-new city wellfield $450.00 601 49410 530 O. SEH engineering-northland plat 6 $539.00 101 43131 303 1 ~32726 SH _ engineering-baker street lift station $216.50 501 49470 530 S H engineering-transportation planning $558.00 101 43131 303 032726 S H engineering-graceview $292.50 101 43131 303 1032726 S H engineering-2002 street imp $1,114.20 425 43.120 530 I I I I CITY OF ST. JOSEPH 04/28/03 8:08. Pag Bills Payable - Check # Search Name Comments Amount FUND DEPART OBJ ·,,;!;i;~$1!ii:ifl4&V':$i.<ijj~i>Ii5>,~ømIWffl;.YM.o~~ ~.~ - _~*#.':m#mmx*&#_~~~~.~_ØJi<>~'>'JNi!MU=.«~i;:>W'''N:W»i.';;!i,,,~m'm..~;'f¡;::h.V;<!·*~J>.W-<;!<t!U"N""""'MM:;·~':K')""(" 032726 SEH engineering-municipal state aid $1,990.00 101 43131 303 032726 SEH engineering-CR 121 $837.90 425 43122 530 032726 SEH engineering-SCDP Grant $547.13 425 43122 530 032726 SEH engineering-NPDES " industrial permit $630.00 101 43131 303 032726 SEH engineering-SE utility $1,030.00 425 49490 530 032727 STANTON GROUP reimb-f/ex dep care $820.00 101 032727 STANTON GROUP reimb-f/ex med $1,500.00 101 032728 STEARNS COUNTY RECORDER Annexation Agreement $20.00 101 41910 431 032729 ALBANY FIRE DEPARTMENT training $26.00 105 42240 331 032730 V ANDEVREDE,ADAM alcohol compliance checks $60.00 101 42120 300 032731 STAMP FULFILLMENT S. CNTR postage $829.70 101 41430 322 032731 STAMP FULFILLMENT S. CNTR postage $100.00 150 46500 322 032732 SCHREIFELS, GERALD reimb water hookup-metro plumbing $297.00 425 43122 530 032733 AT & T WIRELESS SERVICES police ear modem $147.00 101 42151 321 032734 BAUERL Y COMPANIES concrete $249.67 601 49430 220 ( . 032735 CELLULAR 2000 cell phone $6.02 105 42250 321 032736 DESIGN ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR repair street lights-CR 2 & 75 $250.13 101 43160 230 032737 . EARL F. ANDERSON & ASSOC white/yellow poly paint, thinner $2,981.38 ' 101 43120 210 032738 GENE LANGE EXCAVATING exeavate street to repair water line $844.00 601 49430 220 032739 HAWKINS WATER TREATMENT GRO hydrofluosilicicacid $335.64 601 49420 210 032740 JOE PFANNENSTEIN SIGNS compost permit required sign $37.45 603 43230 230 032741 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT sweeper, filter, oil, element. indicator cable $196.62 101 43220 220 032741 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT sweeper, gutter broom $213.68 101 43220 210 032741 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT sweeper, tube broom, gutter broom, dirt shoe $922.57 101 43220 210. 032742 MN COMMUNITY CAPITAL FUND deposit to loan fund $25;000.00 150 46500 700 032743 NCPERS GROUP LIFE INSURANCE life insurance, may $18.00 101 032744 RODENWALD. MARK reimb Rick Luethmers Coñst-install water &-sew $39,600.00 425 43122 530 I 032745 S & T OFFICE PRODUCTS binders, minute sheets, minute books $397.44 101 41430 200 """,--......"N'.""'-'''''''''',.'''''''''''"~_=_''''.= $126,470.16 I I I I I I ·1 I I I April 17, 2003 , Draft I . Pagel of 7 , I ursuanUo duè call anØ notice thereof, the Economic Development Authority and City Council for the .. ityof St. Joseph met in special,session on Thursday, April 17, 2003 at 7:00 PM ili the St. Joseph City iall. I '..' . Gitv Council Members Present: Mayor Larry Hosch. Councilors Ross Rieke, Dale Wick, Gary Utsch, and, AI Rassier. City Administrator Judy Weyrens. , I Jconomic Developrrien~ Authoritv Members Present: Tom Skahen and Mike Deutz I ditv Representatives P:esent: Monte Eastvold - Northland Securities 5thers Present: Jerry ~ettwer I . I . Public Hearin - Rede\ielo ment Plan Public Works Facilit : Weyrens stated the proposed bond issue h s been changed from: $545,000 to $700,OOOinclusive of issuance expenses. The EDA has slightly cranged the map as it was discovered that the site was not iI!ustrated on the map and the language has I Jen changed on page ,two item (e1); reverted siightly. T e Planning COmmiss\on on April 14, 2003 reviewed the redevelopment plan and made a favorable I r commendation. I . - I +ach atated item (9) w¡" stricken at the EDA meeting stating it dealt with the pubiic info structure in I c ¡eating and expanding ¡the tax base. ., ' Drtz, EDA Chair openid the public hearing at 7:00 PM. .' J rry Hettwer, 2260 Rodeo Road, Sartell MN 56377 approached the EDA and City Council stating that at I. OM time he owned the ~roperty which is now called Vic West Steel. He requested an explanation; if this a~ea becomes a Redev~lopment District, what additional opportunities present itself relative to financing, , resale, and leasing as it pertains to that property. - I H~SCh replied stating II .(,.s discussed at length at the April 16, 2003 EDA meeting, furiher statlñg that if thèy were going to minimize the boundaries to include more specifically, the site the City is acquiring or o~ening it up to the whol,e Business Park. They want to open it up to the whole Business Park because it I a~ords redevelopment opportunities that the EDA can extend as it would open the EDA's bonding . c1pacity to do low intere~ts loans and TlF. . 1 I Deutz closed the public ~earing at 7:10PM. Rieke máde a motion t~ adopt resolution EDA 03-03 approving the Redevelopment Project Area a~d Plan for the st. Jo~eph Public Works Facility including item (2a. #9 that had been previously I st ieken from April 16, ~003 EDA meeting consisting of capital improvements/info structure) fori the possibility of a water tower or treatment plant. The motion was seconded by Hosch and p ssed unanimously. I'· . Further Discussion: Monte Eastvold, Northland Securities approached the EDA and City Council I stating there is some amendments that are moving to the State Legislature right now dealing with the issues of bonds on behalf of cities and/or EDA's. Eastvold further stated the EDA in this case will own the facility and lease it to the City for 15 years. The payments made to the EDA (tax I levies) are outside of levy limits. The new proposed legislation would be, those payments made to other governmental agencies such as the EDA be included within the levy limits, if the bonds I are issued after May 1, 2003. Eastvold also stated that originally 1-2 months ago, this particular issue was coming ùp for sale and the bonds were going to be issued on May 2, 2003 which in , I result would havfJ been after the May 1,2003 deadline. If this was to happen, these payments I would have been within the levy limits and would be confining constricting to the City in the future I· if that were to pass. So, in an attempt to expedite this issue to meet the May 1., 2003 deadline, ~, not only the sale :has to occur prior to May 1, 2003 but the City has to close on this issue which is typically a three week process. I . I , Hosch requested that it be emphasized as to what the City is going to do to payoff the bond. He I also stated that tre. City is not being dependant on a levy increase to support the payment of the I i . I April 17, 2003 I Draft Page20f 7 I bond. There is fun ing in reserves and other healthyrevenue sources that can b interjected from one use to the ~ayment ofthis bond. At this 'point, the City does not anticip te having to .il increase that levy. osch further stated the City is ina healthy situation now. Wick made a motion to adbpt ~he resolution on the Council's behalf-of the Rec:level pmenf Plan~ The motion was seconde1 by Rieke and passed unanimously. ., I Rassier made a motion to authorize resolution execution delivèry of lease-option urchase agreement, allocating sm II issue and rebate exception authority. The motion was seconded by Utsch and passed unanin1ously. - '. .... I Ëastvold stated they are no~prepared tonight to issue the bonds however, they can pass a 'triggering resolution where the. EDA will issue the resolution indicating theywant to finance this proj ct throug~the I I ,. . , issuance of public revenue onds; A special meeting will beheld on April 22, 2003wher at thattime, they will be prepared to loc I into an interest rate and issue the bonds. Wick made a motion to a opt the triggering resolution; seconded by Rieke. I Ayes: Hosch, Ras ier,Rieke, Utsch, Wick, Skahen -- Nayes: Deutz Abstain: None Motion Carried: 6:1:0 Wick made a motion to a journ at 7:25 PM; seconded by Rieke and passedunani ously. I Hosch made a motion to rss for 10 minutes; ssconded by Rieke and passed u animously, 00000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000 I \ Pursuant to due call and n tice thereof, the City Council for the City of S1. Joseph met in regular session .1 on Thursday, April 17 , 20' 3 at 7:35 PM in the S1. Joseph City Hall. Cit Council Members Pre ent: Mayor Larry Hosch. Councilors Ross Rieke, Dale Wick Gary Utsch, and AI Rassier. CitYAdministrror Judy Weyrens...:. , I City Representatives Present Amy Schaefer - SEH, Dick Taufen -Public Works Direct r, Tom Jovanovich - City Attorneyl, and Dave Theisen - Fire Chief. I Others Present: Dean wick, Mark Lambert, and Stan Hanson Approve AQenda: I Rassier made a motion to approve the agenda with the folloViingchanges: Additi n, of 6a.), Surplus Tanker - Fire Truck, 13b.)¡ Fúture meeting to discuss budget/financing and deletion of1 a.). The motion I was seconded by Utsch)andpassed unanimously. ' "",. '¡ Consent AQenda: Rassier made a motion to approve consent agenda as presented. I a. Bills Payable-:-;:R.equested Action: Approve check numbers 32634 - 32697 b. Mínutes-R~.questedActíon: April 2 and April 3, 2003 I c.Preliminary / Final Plat - Requested Action: Accept the recommendation of the Planning Commission and approve the Preliminary and Final Plat for 81. Joseph Business Park Plat 2. I d. Fi.nal Plat - Requested Action: Accept the recommendation of the Planning Commission an approve the Final· Plat for Pond Vie"" Ridge Seven with contingencies. e. Police Mutual Aid Agreèment - Requ~sted Action: Authorize the Mayor and Administrator t execute the .. Mutual Aid Agreement between the five area cities. . . f. Fair Housing Initiative - Requested Action: Authorize the Mayor and Administrator to exec te a resolution in support of Create CommUnity's Fair Housing Initiative. I . I I' i April 17, 2003. . Draft 1 I , . . Page 3 of 7 . Application for Payme~t No.7, Final - Requested ~ction: Authorize the Mayor to ~xe~ute Pay Application No; 7, Final for the Nor:thland Plat Five and authorize payment to Larson Excavating In the amount of 1 $12,266.02. I . The motion was seconded by Rieke and passed unanimously. 1 FUrlherDiscussi9n: Wick questioned what the status was with the contingencies on the. plats. Weyrens reporlep that Pond View Ridge Seven portion along the outlot will not be paved. They will stop at the end of the lots, provide a turn around, and barricade it off. , I ' .' . 1 ' Pu lic Comments: No One wished to speak ' I ~ . ' Su plus Tanker: Dave Theisen, St. Joseµh Fire Chief approacheq the City Council stating bids for the , SurPlus Tanker were opened at 3:00 PM on April 17, 2003 at City Hall. One bid was received from , 1 PafhfinderVillage in the amount of $4,776. Theisen is asking the City Council to accept the bid with the. co~tingencY that Joe Bechtold approves the amount of the bid. I ' ' I RI ke made a motion tcj accept the bid for the Surplus Tanker in the amount of $4,776 with the co tingency that Joe B~chtold approves the amount of the bid. The motion was seconded by Rassier and passed un~nimousIY. ' I' oJtsource Mana ement L Public Works Facilit Pro osed Chan e Orders: Dean Wick a representative fro Outsource Management approached the City Council to review the changes that were made. ./ The building was: requested to move towards Elm Street with bituminous parking area in. front. I ./ The drainage pond has bee;' to the moved to the northeast corner with the, pipe down to the southeast corner." A fence was added along the backside of the property with class 2 crushed granite. Showed locations for the future salt shed, topsoil storage, aggregate storage, and a diesel fuel 1 tank. I . The transformer ~ill be coming off of the south sid~ of the property along with city water..and city sewer. There will also be a 25-foot row gate and dumpster pad. I One overhead do or and a walk d 00 r have bee.n relo~atedfrom th e west side of the building to-the north side. I , '. , , I ./ There is a location for a future Police Department and water tower. It as questioned why the costs have almost doubled from movirig the building. Dean replied stating with 1 pUftin g the build in g closer: to ElmS tre et the costs have increased due to the bitum in ous parking lot and , CI ss-2 crushed granite yvithcosts at approximately $25,000, the fence at approximately $9,000, and the ea hwork at approximately.$35,000. 1 ¡ .' , H sch stated he feels he; is not ready to make a decision on these change orders and recommends doing sOte further brainstorming. ,Rieke feels the City is m,aking good and sound decisions even though they ar occurring quickly and personally does not have a problem with moving forward. Rassier feels the 1m jor increase woùld be:coming from paving the parking lot, finishing the back lot, and fencing. Rassier fefllS the City should move ahead. Utsch feels everyone is in an agreement of the plan, however he st ted a cap shoùld ,be placed on the project. 'I' , ' 1 It I as questioned if the City Council does not approve the change orders presented tonight, can they still m~ve forward with th~ me ,nufacturing of the building and the grade work. Weyrens asked if they would be ab e to make a motion to! approve the relocation of the building to start the grading. Dean answered 1St ting as long as the co~tractor knows that the City would pay them for their grading work, it could be, aPrroved tonight. I' ' . H~SCh made a motion ~o move forward on the location of the building which allows for the 1 prIduction of the buildfng as placed, .and the site grading as presented; seconded by Rieke. Ayes: Hosch, Rieke, Utsch, Wick ' . Nayes: Rassier I Abstain: None Motion Carried: 4:1:0 _ ., ' . I, . I M rk Lambert - Re uest for Draina e Easement: Mark Lambert of Summit Management Inc. approached th City Council to,ask f~r their approval in granting them the drainage easement so the Indian Hills site ~ mr drain to the City's hring pond near the abandoned railroad, April 17, 2003 I Draft Page 4 of 7 _I Stan Hanson ofl3onestro~, Williamson, and Kotsmith approached the City Council stati 9 City Engineer, . Joe Bettendorf mcommen~s Hanson's firm to, put together hydrology calculations regar ingthe Indian , I Hills site on the impacts to the abandoned railroad. ,- , Hanson state, d that the eff" r~ ts the 7 -acre development ,~OUI~ have with routirig the drai age entirely to I the railroad embiankment ~nd is that it would raise the high water level one footfor1 0 -yearevent. Hanson further stated thaJ1 with Indian Hills added, we are under:Y:z of the total volume f. the pond which has plenty of capacity. " . Rassier asked Scheefer if sometime in the future when the City develops to the west of Indian Hills area I and needing to cross the rainagearea, is this going to cause problems. Schaefer ans ered stating the - pipe is underground, it WOrlld all be storm sewer, and the drainage pond would still be a cessible. I Hosch stated he has no p oblem with granting the easement however, his concern isw th the federal mandates with the NPDE · and feels the developer should incur the cost for the usagef the City pond. Hosch furth~r stated that t e City needs to be fair and consistent with other surroundin cities. - _ I Weyrens stated the City h s talked about extending a 16400t water main along the rail oad tracks and Lambert stated tlhat the lagemap in Jovanovich's possession shows the 16-foot water main that had been designed. Rassier made a motion 0 grant the use of the 2-P, arcellot to drain into our City hiding pond; I seconded by Wick. Further Discussio : Hosch stated he feels it would very irresponsible for the Ci y to do this without a mechanism for fonfrontation on this. Hosch furtherstated the City is providi g a definite seNice, we are o'fening up a use for land, and the City incurs specific costs wi h the maintenance .1 of the holding P01d. Hosch also stated that the City needs to eva/~a!e its cost . , Jovanov'ich stateq that under the NPDES"theCity will incur substantial costs i the future in, ~ I maintainling the h~/ding ponds and maintaining storm water run off facilities. en the new zoning Olrdinancerwas passed, there were a number of pròvisions regarding su ace water management. Jo anovich stated-the way it works is the deve{oper has to payor the onsite and offsite drainage a ong with paying for the sewer to get the storm water to the m nicipalsite.' I Another P/i, OV, iSiO,' ~allows ,n,or an assessme,n t" the èosts of maintaining t, he com on site, which is ' the proposal that as been presented. Right now, we are looking at a number f ways to reasonably and f¡ irly assess those costs. It is very similar to water hookup an sanitary sewer I fees. The City ha¡s in the past and in the future, incurred greater costs in mana ement of storm water. .Jovanovic also stated by law, the City has 60 days in which to consid r a request like this in which the 0 day period would run until May 23, 2003 and if need be, th y can extend it for another 60 days. " I Rassierquestion d i(the City Council adopts a new resolution; would anyone ho is using a City 'drainagE~ pond in ura fee for water and sewer like everyone else. Jovanovich replied stating no, I that tlie City cannot chàrge existing people the fees, it would be those going fo ard. Lambed stated hT is willing to explorer with the City Administrator and City Aft mey different solùtions to this ;~sue with the understanding that they are trying to re-coop co ts. He further I stated he is certar'Y willing to pay the costs tómaintain the holding pond. and ove forward. Utsch questioned if the City Council was to approve the easement with the co tingency on the price; this comes JO the Planning Commission that the City Council approved e easement I which was one o~the stepping stones in approving the plat; the plat gets appro ed, and then the City Council notifips the developer, of the amount and he decides not to pay; b tthe plat is - . alreadY, approvedf you cannot change it. Utsch is wondering where the City C uncil sits at this I point and further fated there is too many loose ends. Utsch stated he does n t have a problem with the easement if the council is going to do something, Utsch recommends 0 do it all at one ~ I . I 1 April 17, 2003 Draft 1 Page Sof 7 I I' I i Jovanovich suggests if the City Council should approve the easement, to make ifcòntlngent upon .- negotiating a Developer's Agreement which is satisfactory to the City, and that part of the . Developer's Agteementwould be what type of an assessment would clearly be imposed for the sewer and wat~r management costs under the St.' Joseph Ordinance. , I I ¡SSier made a motion to amend his previous motion to Include ''we are granting the use of the e sement to the retaining pond with the contingency that when the new government standards a e worked out and how the City is going to charge people to use public ponds to keep the I ur-p, h will also bel contingent upon the Developer's Agreemenf'; motion carried. I CITY ENGINEER REPORTS I Libertv pOinte.Feasibilit~ Report:AmySchaefer¡SEH reviewed Libertypointe's Feasibility Report and stated that PoplinskiwoUld authorize the production of pJansand specs. Rkssier made a motio~ to accept the feasibility report for 2003 Liberty Pointe with the I urderstal1ding that the grading and the prep of the private street to be removed from the fe¡asibility report leavi~g the sewer, water, and sanitary for the private street in the report; 1conded by Wick, I . I ' Ayes: Hosch, lJtsch, Wick, Rassier " Nayes: None I Abstain: Riek~ ' Motion Carried: 4:0:1 P blicFinancinQ Eliaibiliitv List - Water Filtration: scnae~er reported thattheestimated water treatment I Pfnt and well will costa'pproximately$2.9 million. Schaefer stated if the City Council is looking to , ' c ' nstruct a new water tr~atment plant and well in 2004; the City needs to get on the project priority list for thr PFA by May 23, 2003. By being on the priority list, it would give the City a lower interest rate of 3-4%. I. If he City would like to move forward, they would need to reissue documentation thatwould go onto the iInded Use Plan for ttie PFA by mid June 2003. The funding for SEHto 9"mplete the necessary p . perwork would be coming out of the Water Fund. . ,I, ",<" ., I '/, , I H· sch f~els there istoo1much planning thatis needed inord~r toe!1able constru~tion in 2004. Rieke's' ferling is thatit is the City's highest prio~ity and the City needs to getthings moving; iUs only going to get more expensive if the City waits. , . ' I 1 I U sch asked Taufen whét his feeling is and he replied stéttinga wellwill need to be looked atwithin the , ',,' 1 n xt year and thetreatm.ent plant would need to be looked at no later than two years, I I R ssier questioned if it i~ feasible to separate the two alld file the letter of intent for one of them. now, and fil the other next year. Schaefer recommends having them together. . H· sch feels at' thi~ pOint) can we realistically say this will be done ne2<t year. Ri~ke stated-that it is not the I m ment that it will be done, but now., Rieke, further stated that we know the City is going to do it, it is . gr 10 cost more W it i~ deiayed, and by putting things off whafs the next priority issue that will be d layed. I . I , I I R ssiermade a motiò" to move forward having SEH prepare the letter of intent between now a~d ~f mid June deadline.! We have 10 make that call fo~ Intent to build or not. We investigate, gel e erything we have to do, to get this right. The motion was seconded by Rieke and pas$ed I U\ animouslý.\ , " " " , . , I U date on Count Road 1121: Schaefer reported that the sewer for County Road 121 is much cleaner I th nthefirst time. Ther~does notappearto be any leaks inihe joints, there is approximately 6-7 joints th~t have not been drivenaltogether at this time. There maybe rangesanYWherefrom 1-4 inches of a g p but none of the joint$areleaking.AII the tests that were do.neon the sanitary sewer passed. There .. isrome type of caulking\thatthey would like to put on the 3-4 inch joints to prevent lèaking in the. future. Ut ch questioned if ttJe shortage of joint was due to being installed improperly or due to the settling and st etching of the, pipe. Schaefer stated that it could be either and further stated the 3~4 inch gaps we're I . . I I I 1 . I· I I April 17, 2003 . I Draft Page 6 of 7 I found to be locateid on the outh end of the County Road 121 project where the pipe wa deeper and settling. . Utsch questioned if the pip could still be stretching due to the wetness back then. His oncem is the I , pipes pulling apart after ev rything is signed and the City is then held liable for the issue Rassier questione~d whose responsible to fix the piping; the City, County, or both. Scha fer stated she I believes it would be the co tractor's responsibility, they are still under warranty (liability). She further stated that there is a coupl of different options the City would have without digging up t e streets. Rassier questiòne~d as a c9uncil, to say that anything over a certain amount of inches w uld need to be I repaired and questioned who makes the decisions as to what gets fixed. Schaeferstat d Taufen and the City Engineer would be res onsible. .... . I this. Schaefer replied, stat ng that for the most part, the contractor is done, it is just a m tter of the Lift Station. She further stated there is a lot of issues. . . I '. Jovanovich questioned Sc aefer that under the contract, would this be acceptable the. aythe pipes are right now. Schaeifer state that the fact that they are not leaking, that it would be accept ble. Rieke I stated since the base coat is competed, he feels this is the time to fix the pipes. Schaef r stated that if they do need fixing, there i other ways to fix the pipes without having to dig' up the road Hosch encouragl:ls anothe televising of the pipe before the two year warranty expires. eyrens. I questioned how much inp ·t will the City have since the County has the contract. Schaeer stated that as far as the utilities areconèrrned, the City has all the input. .' . .1 Other Matters: Wick qúes~ioned what the status is for paving Monument, Memorial, and Millstream Parks. Schaefer stated there is SJrne issues that need to be resolved. MAYOR REPORTS - I Hosch requests the City 90uncil to consider and adopt the resolution concerning legisl It involves cuts to the City of St. Joseph and further stated the bill affects all cities. I Hosch stated that in 2003) the cuts were $120,000 but with the alternative, it would red ce it to $85,000. Governor Pawlenty's propred cuts in 2004 estimate $228,500 with the alternative, it w uld be reduced to approximately $102,00 . I J Rieke made a motion to approve the resolution as presented. The motion was s conded by Utsch and passed ummimoUSr . . I Hosch reported Senior ARpreciation week will be held April 21-26, 2003. Hosch reported that on A~ril 24, 2003 Herman Boone, will be -at the St Cloud Civic Cen er at noon and I speaking at 7 PM. COUNCIL REPORTS I Rieke - Reported thatthe Maintenance Facility Building is developing. Rassier - RepOlrted that t e Historical Society is. investigating the old mills in town looki g for additional I information.. Rassier also reported the Emergency Services team met to review the re ¡sed manual and further stated the final ve sion will be held at City Hall. .. Wick - None I . I I I April 17, 2003 ! Draft Page 7 of7 I i i " I tsth - Reported the Compost will be open on April 30,2003 from 4-8 PM. The schedule of the .. dompost will be W edn~sdays and Fridays 4-8 PM and. Saturdays 9 AM - 1 PM. Compost stickers can be, . Ibtained at City Hall. [ . ' .. ..' , I tsch questiohed the status on Lynx Road stating he had spoken with the St. Joseph Township and they I dvised him to contact them in April. Weyrens stated it is still in progress and they are set up to do the r ad inspection possibly in the next two weeks. .. I· I I ADMINI,STRATOR REPORTS I 1 I Budqet/Financiallssues: Weyrens recommends the City Council meet in a special session to further discuss the budget andjfinanCial issues, ft was consensus to meet on Aprl122, 2003 at 5:30 PM. I ~eter Theisman. Stearns County Parks: Weyr~ns reported that Peter Theisman of Stearns County Parks rparlment is working òn grants for the Wobegon Trail and Is looking for a letter of supporl to conlinue s eking funding to expand the trail and is wondering if the City Council would support a resolution for I f rther funding purposes. 1 . , I . Jeke made a motion \0 approve the resolution in the support for further funding purposes, The I otion was seconded; by Utschand passed unanimously. . . I I . , Atiiourn: Utsch made a fTlotion to adjourn at 9:15 PM; seconded by Wick and passed unanimously. I , I I I I I I I 1 I I. I i I I I I 1 I I I I i I I, I I i 1 I 1 I I [ I 1 I , I ! I I 1 1 .. I i i I I ! I I I I . I I .\ Atta~hment:' t:~:~or No I .. ; ! . REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION I' I Consent 3 (C) ,i DATE: May I, 2003 I· I Admini . \ I stratlon; - I RIGINATING DEPARTMENT i I I ,. .: ' ., . jGENDA ITEM I , I I ' uthorization to Begin ~UAR Process .- Arcon Development I I I IIt April Tim Erkilla of Westwood Professionals presented the Council with information regarding an I environment process that will be èo:rppleted for the development of the Heim and Bechtold Property. I con Development is proposing to develop life cycle housing andare choosing to use the AUAR . E vironmental Process. \ The City Council notified the Environmental Quality Board of the i,ntent to I. c mplete an AUAR. AIl costs associated with the AUAR will be borne by the developer and Arcon has d posited $ 5,000 for su~h.· I I - ! COMMENDED BOARD ACTION 1 1 I A prove Resolution 2003-16 requesting authorization from the EQB to begin the AUAR process. ,I ' ! I I ¡ , jCALIMPACT I e developer will reimJurse the City for all costs. As stated above the developer has already provided a I dd osit of$ 5,000. ¡ . I i. I ì C I MMENTSIRECOMiDATIONS .. . . . . . .. I en Westwood present~d the AUAR process to the Councd It was lilltIal reactIOn of Joe Bettendorf that . th ,City should consider including the area between the Arcon site and the southern City BoUndary in the S~dy. We havç since r~ceived a proposal to inc1udethe remaining area and the cost for such is $ 12,000. I In luded in this packet is :an emai1 from Joe Bettendorf where he indicates that their may not be an ad antage to the City including the additional area as the parcels remaining are not large and involve se arate owners. Therefqre, staff is recommending that the additional area not be included in the AUAR. .. I . I RESOLUTION NO. 2003-16 I A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE Pij.EPARATION OF AN AL TE NATIVE -. URBAN AREAWIDE REVIEW PURSUANT ,TO THE STATE OF MIN ESOTA ENVIRONMENTf. REVIEW PROGRAM RULES FOR A PR POSED RESIDENTIAL D VELOPMENT LO~ATED IN THE SOUTHERN POR ION OF I THE CITY OF S NT JOSI:;PH, STEARNS COUNTY, MINNESOTA' WHEREAS, the City of Sai t Joseph has adopted a Comprehensive Plan that includes panned land uses I and infrastructure needs th t applies to the Arcon and adjoining properties; WHEREAS, urban developrreent is anticipated to occur within the Arcon and adjoining pr pertiesover the I nex! twenty years in a man rr that is generailyconsistent with the type 01 land uses (resi ential) reftected in the Comprehensive Plan WHEREAS, the City of Sai t Joseph has determined that the Alternative Urban Areawid Review (AUAR) I process is an appropriate ~nvironmental review procedure for theArcon and adjoining p operties because it will allow for public revievy of cumulative impacts of multiple projects, allows the City to integrate environmental review with he projeCt approval process, allows for the potential avoidan e of I environmental features in f nal design of projects, and benefits developers by avoiding individual project review provided that the pr ject is consistent with the AUAR assumption and mitigation. WHEREAS, the City has a opted comprehensive planning documents that meet thecrit ria of Minnesota I Rules Part 4410.3610, Su d.1 that includes the following: 1. The Comprehensi¡ e Plan (2002) for the City of Saint Joseph: the 2002 plan ncludes a general .1 description of futur land uses, transportation, sewer and water facilities and n implementation section for the Ci y. The Compre.hensive Plan also includes a general land se, staged futur~ growth, future land use, cand a transportation plan that encompasses the A con and adjoining properties. j , I 2, The St. Cloud AJ;r Joint Planning Distlict Plan (2000): the City 01 Saint Jose h participateo w,th ' other govern men 'al units in the region to develop this plan that guides the local government approach and dec sions regarding land use, annexation, and infrastructure pha ing. .' I 3. A Transportation ¡Plan Update for the St. Cloud Metropolitan Area (1998}:p epared by the S1. . Cloud Area Planrg Organization, this plan incluoes the location ano lunetio 01 ail roaos within ·1 the study area (e cept local roads) to the year 2020. ' NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY 0 SAINT JOSEPH, STEARNS COUNTY, ST fE OF MtNNESOT A, as loilows: 1. That the speciftc boundaries 01 the AUAR stuoy area are oepicted on the atiached map and I located in portion 'of Sections 15, 16, 22 and 23, T124N, R29W, Saint Joseph Minnesota. 2. That the City c~uncil orders that one development scenario is to be revie ed by this AUAR I consisting of: L nd use types and public improvements that are consistent with and up to the higher range of i tensities within the City of Saint Joseph Comprehensive Ian. This scenario also meets the g ,als of the developer and thus meets the requirements for sc narios in an AUAR I as stated in Minn sota Rules Chapter 4410.3610 subp.3. 3. That the Saint Jo eph City Council finds that the environmental review for the rcon and adjacent propertiesqualifi s under Minnesota Rules 4410.3610 and authorizes the preparation of the I AUAR in accorda ce with the Minnesota Rules 4410.3600. .. I -- I I he motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly made by Council Member ,. and seconded by Council Member I and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor I I I I nd the following voted against the same: , , I ! 1 I [ I I and the following abstained: I I ¡ I i , I ! I and the following were bbsent: , 1 I I. whereupon said resolution was declared duly adopted by the Saint Joseph City Council on this the 1 stday o May 2003. ' i . ! . , i I I 1 1 Larry Hosch, Mayor of City of Saint Joseph 1 I Al TEST: : I I I ,. i I I ,. I 2 . I I I I Attachment: II or No I ,- REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION I Consent Agenda Item - 3( d) DATE: May 1, 2003 I 1 Maintenance De artment I flGINATING DEPf1MENT I " I . AGENDA ITEM I I . I I Ifamtenance Departm¡nt - Basketball Court for Northland.Park l , i REVIOUS ACTION ¡ I i I I I I. I I rCOMMENDED BdARD ACTION ~o approve the expen~tiJre of $7,767 for a basketball court for Northland Park. ' I 10 approve the expenditure of$1,200 - $1,300 for the basketball kit consisting of the poles, backboards, rims, and netting. : . I tC~~Acr I .. . .' I e improvement will be expended from the Park DedIcatIon Fund rather than the CIty Budget Funds. , , I I r COMMENTSIRECOMiENDATIONS I · The cement slab needs to be installed prior to landscaping and seeding. · The basketball poles will also need to be installed at the same time the concrete is poured. . Landscaping and seeding to take place mid May. I . Court will be 40 x 50 feet. I I 1 ,. I . I I . I Attachment liIIor No I · REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION I Building Inspector DATE: May 1, 2003 I I DEP ARTMENT APPROVAL I IGENDAI'IEM. I uilding Inspector Reports - Adoption of the Uniform Building Code I I . 'he City had been enfÖrcing the uniform building code for the past years, 1 I. I , rCOMMENDED BOARD ACTION, . . . ' I\ccept the proposed Jdiuance o~ the City Attorney and schedule a public hearing for the revision of the - .zJoning Ordinance.! . I I , , . e City will not have L expense, However all building permits with the exception of roofing, siding and window installatio~ will be charged a plan review check fee. . : 1MMENTSœEco1NDATIONS TeState of Minnesota r mandating all Municipalities that enforce the State of Minnesota Building Code . to edopt the Internation 11 Building Code. i I : .. I . ,IISp(!ç" Serv'i~es,LLC ,I 14562 Rqnß.eby Road NE, Foley,MN 56329 I ' (320) 293-5298 - Phone (320) 387-"2703 - faX ' "Quality Building Inspection ~ Guarante~d" -. - : ,!ì I' '''' ~',..¡]J Me 1 To: All Jurisdictions 'I II "' From: ; Nancy J. Scott, " I ,~, " "~". Date: April 4, 2003 , Re: , New International Cod~ . - , .1 ' , , . , I ~ Enclosed pleas~ find sa - pIe ordinances provided by- the State of Minnesota Building C des J and Standards Division at are d~ign to adopt the new State Building Gode as it adopt the ".1 1 ' International Building Co e. ,please have your attomey review these documents and ma e a ,I recommendation. """:, , - - . I "'''M - " t -:1 "I , ~--il I 1 - \ I , " - ..1 , :.. 1 I . k 'I FAX NO. P. 02/03 I AP'-23-2003 WED 11:2~ AM I I I I I i .. 1r!~ 'i Hansmeìer Ud. . "j"-"""'" i ATTOßN'YS^TIAW , I I P.O, Box 14fJ I I ' , St. CI"'.Ii, Mil ~&302 '413 1 I I April 23, 2003 I . J:!O.~ 51 105~ I '·'T-"" . VTA I1AX - 363-0342 F~x 320. 51.1iS9G I I I I r.IJ¡'...n'~ ~jh~n.(on, Ms. JudyWeyrens I City Administrator for the City ofSt. Joseph Vll\rJW.'f,,}h,n,Com 25 Norq1 Collcgo A venue I St. Joseph. MN 56374 RE: IJte1'11ational Building Code - Pl'opo$ed Ordi.nances I bur File No. 22641 ' 1 I I Dear Judy: I. i 1 havo reviewed tJ1e proposod ordiu¡mces regarding the ncw International Building Code. T would feconll1lcnd replacing the existing Section 51.4 with language that would I inéQlporato future_amendments to the buiIdÎ11g code, rather than going with the proposed form ordinances. Section 51.4 can be amcnded as folJows: I I I "~1.4: BUILDING, CODE. The Mi nnesota State Building Code, estabJishcd GOld(>n H, H~rwll"'ur pursuant ¡to Minnesota Statutes 16H.59 to 168.75, including a11 of the amendlUcnts~ rulc:s fredeltck ~ (jrunko and regulatiOl1s established, adopted and pubJishcd from time to time by the Minnc$ota I Thamas å. r(>V~novch· Commissioner of Admin.istration, through the Building Codes and Standa.rds Division is hereby adopted by l'eference wÎth the exception of optional chapters. unless specificaJly p~u A R...jltowskt adopted ill this ordinancß, The Minnesota State Building Code. a copy of which is on file I Kevin ~. (;¡'J., in the office orthe City Clerk. is hereby incorpot~ted in this ordinance as if ruBy set out Willinm J. CLhfllC1I1 ' herein." I ow:", w, I,.....,,,, In the existing ordinance, there is a change section ullder Subdivision 1 regarding the plumbing! codo. This chango seotion would be preserved by the amendment I am ~u~n M. Dre proposing, as well as the City's permit, penalties and other provisions. The optional I ......"" 'T'''ol.' provj$iOll~ at this juncture govern special fire protccqon $ystems, flood proofing Teg111atio~s. and grading. I do not have a copy ofthese opUona1 provisions and make no S7\rah L. Sm. h rocommendations rogarding whether tho City should adopt them. Jo:oph M. ¡¡~amcIDm I I CirC!lory J. H "11M .. I I :-) Fronk J n~JkøW'JÛ Mc/ 1I.:J,b,tI IN. Soh.'/V,117'O Dr~ .,/",ICI",;I w "roröc<! i" Nu,lh b~kQt4. C;".IIJ"" 1J.1/,lnsmcfor In NtJ,lIl ""knl., and WI.«OI!,ir¡ ! Þ~III A. ¡¡'Vku....Jci IJn(/ $,"\1/) l. Sill/tI,l" WilrofI$Ïl1, Ô/fItI WiIlÎ~1f J. (nd¡mQfI 1/) Suuth D.'&ora I I IMrmbcr of,^nll.lriwn e".1'd (1' TI~ÞI Allvuto\llll.l. 'Q\'alir,cd ^CR Nuulr"l. I . I I ..' (sampleorqinance) , O:rdiD8D~No. Adopting the Minnesota State BuDdmg Code' ¡ I ~ ORDINANCE ADOPTING THE MINNESOTA STATE BUILDING CODE. THIS &RDINANCE: PRQVIDES FOR THE APPLICATION, ADMINISTRATION, AND I NFORCEMENT OF THE MINNESOTA STATE BUILDING CODE BY GULATING THE ERECTION, CONSTRUCTION, ENLARGEMENT, {\tTERATION, '~AIR, MOVING, REMOVAL, DEMOLITION, CONVERSION, I pCCUPANCY, EQplPMENT, USE, HEIGHT, AREA, AND MAINTENANCE OF ~L BunJ)INGS AND/QR STRUCTURES IN TBISMUNlCIPALITY;PROVIDES' FOR . ~ ISSUANCEOFPERMrrS AND COLLECTION OF FEES THEREOF; PROVIDES I I ENALTIES FOR VIOLATION TllEREOF;RE?EALS ALL ORDINANCES AND ARTS OF ORDINANCES THAT CONFLICT THEREWITH. . ¡ , ' '. , , ., , I I 'sm~cipality do~sordain as.follows: 1 . , ection, ¡~J,\pp~ti~D, Administn1.6~~,and~~fo.t:cement. The application, administratiOI4 I deDf0rcementoft1iê'codë Shan Dfdn aècórdáDce with Minnesota Rule Chapter 1300. The , ~ode. s~l be enforced within.the ~to~allimi~ permitted by Minnesota Statutes, 16B.62, rVJSJOD I, when IjO estabhshed by this ani......"": . I. ~ code enforcement agency of this municipality is called the . 1 ' , . I - pñs 'code shall,beenforced by the ,Minnesota Certifiéd.Building Official.designated by this Municipality:to admiriister the code-(MiDnesotastatute 16B.65) subdivisionl. ' ' I ".'" , 'I .. ! ,0' I I ,~eetiÓn2. Permits a~d Fees. The issuance of permits and the collectionoffees shallbe as uthorized in Minnesota Statutes, 16B.62, subdivision,}· ' . . I' . \ " '. i ,,' , , ',' , I . I . trmit fees shall be~sessed for work governed by this code in accordance with the fee schedule opted by the municipa.lîty in ", (ie City Code #.' Ordinance #etc, .," * In addition, a surcharge Jee shallbe collected !onall permits issued for work governed by this code in accordance with I, rooesota statute 16¡.70. ' ' . ~ection 3. ,Violation$ and Penalties. A violation of the code is a misdemeanor (Minnesota 1 r 16B.69) and ~esotaRu1es, Chä¡Jter.1300 " don 4. BuI1diag J:ode;. The Minnesota State Bui1dû>g Code, established ¡nu:Òuant to I ~esota Statutes 1~.S9to ·16B. 75 is hereby adopted as the building code for this " ~paJity. The "fishereby iDcorpotated in this ordinaDce as ¡ffully set outhereñi I . t*The Minn~s~ta Sj'Building Code ,includes th~ f~1l0wing chapters' of Minnesota Rules: .. l1300, AdI11inistration of the Minnesota State BuildingCode; " .1301, Building OfficiaL Certification; , I . I I I . (sample ordinance,self-pèrpetuating)' .' Ordinånce No. Adopting the Minnesota State BuDding Code ' I AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING THE MINNESOTA STATE BUILDING I ORDINANCE: PROVIDES FOR THE APPLICATION, ADMINISTRATI - . . ENFORCEMENT OF THE MINNESOTA STATE BUILDING CODE BY I REGULATING THE ERECTION, CONSTRUCTION, ENLARGEMENT,' ALTERATION, REPAIR, MOVING, REMOVAL, UEMOLITlON, CO OCCUPANCY, EQUlPMENTj USE, HEIGHT, AREA, AND MAINTEN I BUILDINGS AND/OR STRUCTURES IN THIS MUNICIPALITY; PRO ES FOR' THE ISSUANCE OF PERMITS AND COLLECTION OF FEES THEREO ; PROVIDES , ' PENALTIES F()R VIOLATION THEREOF; REPEALS ALL ORDINAN ES AND I . PARTS OF ORDINANCES THAT CONFLICT THEREWITIL·THIS 0 INANCE SHALLPERPETUALL Y IN~UDE THE MOST CURRENT EDmON FTBE MINNESOTA STATE BUILDING CODE WITH THE EXCEPTION OF I . OPTIONAL APPENDIX CHAPTERS. OPTIONAL APPENDIX NOT APPLY UNLESS SPECIFICALLY ADOPTED. This municipality does ordain as follows: I Section 1 Codes adopted by reference. The Minnesota State Building Code) adopted by the .1 Commissioner of Administration pursuant to Minnesota Statutes chapter 16B;5 to 16B75, including all. of the amendments, rules and regulations established, adopted and ublished from time to time bi the Minnesota Commissioner of Administration, through the Bu lding Codes and ~I - Standards Division is hereby adopted by reference willi the exception of the op onal chapters, unlèss specifically adopted· in thisordnancè, The Minnesota State Building Cod is hereby incorporated in this ordinance as iffully set out herein. I Section 2. Application, Administration and Enforcement. The application, . istration, ahd enforcement of the code shall be in accordance With Minnesota State B uil . ng Code. The I code shall be enforced within the extraterritorial limits permitted by Minnesota tatutes,16B.62, subdivision 1, when so established by this ordinance. Thé code enforcement agency of this municipality is calledthe . I . This code shall be enforced by the Minnesota Certified Building Official.desi ted by this I Municipality to administer the code ~esota statute 16B.65) subdivision 1. Section 3. Permits and Fees. The issuance of permits ånd the collection of fee shall be as I authorized in Minnesotà Statutes, 16B.62, subdivision 1. Permit fees shall be assessed for work governed by this code in accordance wi the fee schedule I adopted by the municipality in ie: City Code #. Ordinance # etc . In addi 'on, a surcharge fee shall be collected on all pennits issued for work governed by this code in ordance with Minnesota statute .16B. 70. .. I . I I Attachment: Yes or IH2I .- REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION I DATE: May 1,2003 I I I 1 I ,I i i I Pu ¡ chase of a hydrant de~user and hose for the Water Department. ~ ' I I P VIOUS ACTION : Cu eully have a two and ;one half-inch defuser, A larger size is necessary for newer hydrants, I. I , RECOMMENDED BOARD ACTION I Au horization of funds to þurchase of a 4-inch hydr~nt defuser and hose. I I FISCAL IMP ACT I Est mated cost is $1100.00 i I I i MENTS/RECOMMENDATIONS I I 1 I I I I I· I . [ 1 I I ,. I, I Elections 101-41410-580 12,761.50 7,300.00 20,061.50 City ffice 101-41430~570 13,979.11 1,300.00 15,279.11 City I ffice 101.41430-580 0.00 0.00 0.00 I City 1 ffice 101-41430-58'1 3,355;66 3,000.00 6,355.66 'Gene I GOy't 101-41942-530 ' 4,625.00 0.00 4,625.00 Gene I Gov't 101-41946-530 3,400.00 400.00 3,800.00 Gene I GOy't 101-41950-580 0.00 1,200.00 1,20º.00 I Polic 101-42120-570 0.00 600.00 600.00 Polic 101-42120-580 1,993.67 2,000.00 3,993.67 Polic 101-42120-581 1,856.71 5,000.00 6,856.71 Polic 101-42151-580 153.06 400.00 553.06 I Pölic ., Auto 101-42152-550 0.00 30,000.00 30,000.00 Emer ency Siren 101-42500-580 10,400.00 1,000.00 11 ,400.00 Anim I Control 101-42700-580 355.00 0.00 355.00 I Stree s 101-43120-520 1P1,723.87 20,000.00 121,723.87 Stree s 101-43120-530 27,375.58 4,000.00 31,375.58 Stree s 101-43120.,580 27,188.61 25,000.00 52,188.61 snol Removal 101-43125-580 8,674.25 30,000.00 38,674.25 I. Stree Lighting 101-43160w530 2,307.00 1,200.00 3,507.00 Side alks 101-43220-580 5,361.00 2,000.00 7,361.00 Parks 101-45202-530 9,000.00 .1,700.00 10,700.00 I Parks 101-4520~~580 38,729.29 10,000.00 48,729.29 Parks 101-45203-531 6,307.22 5~500.00 - ,11,807.22 Parks 101~5203w532 2,427.93 1,500.00 3,927.93 Parks 101-45203-533 23,962.89 1,500.00 12,800.00 12,662.89 I I 305,937.35 154,600.00 12,800.00 447,737.35 i Undesignated Balance 796,778.71 490,841.36 I Transfe~ to DesignatedCqpital Outlay (305,937.35) (154,600.00) I I Undesignated Balance after Transfer 490,841.36 336,241 .36 ! ',' . I I ! , I 1 i I 1 I I I I I ! I I I ,- I . I I - I Desigllated for Operating Funds 250,000.00 I Designated for Capital Expenditures (55,371.63) Designated for Debt Service 174,744.55 Designated for Fire 308,354.07 I Designated for Economic Development (14,601.50) Total Designated General Fund 663,125.49 I Undesignated 796,778.71 Total General Fund Equity 1,459,904.20 I I I .1 - I - I I I I I I -I I . I I I Attachment: II or No I - I ,REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION I DATE: April 23, 2003 I ~~Þ:~d EDA I RIGINATING DEPARTMENT DEPARTMENT APPROVAL 1 I I I I i I I 1 I , ' ! A monthly activity ~report. I I I i ,I I ! 1 1 , , onthly departmenta~ report. I- i 1 i I, COMMENDED BOARD ACTION I I F r'review and appro~al. I 1 I I F SCAL IMPACT I N/A. I ! I 1 1 A monthly report offered for your review and approval. I I I 1 I I I ¡ I, I .- I i I 1 I I . I I DATE: April 23, 2003 -. MEMO TO: Mayor Hosch I City Council Members City Administrator Weyrens hIM~ ~~ . FROM: J nne Foust & Cy .' Smith-Strack, Municipal DevelopmentGroup I RE: Economic Development Activity Report- April, 2003 Municipal Development Group has been interacting with a number of prospects th oughout the past I month. Following is a summary of activities that have transpired. If you· have any q . estions on any of these or other projects, please do not hesitate to contact us at 952-758-7399. I Business Prospects have been identified by a project number to protect the co fidentiality of the businesses. I Project 01 ME This project involves the expansion of a current service business. The actual c nstruction is not anticipated for another couple of years. MDG continues to be in touch with the prospec 's contact. Follow- ' I up with this lead and 03-A was completed on 4-1-03. Project 01-F: _I This project involves the locating of a fast food restaurant in the City of st. Joseph. MD followed-up with this lead on 3-19-03, 3-21-03, 3-26-03 and April 16th. Project 01-J: I This developer owns a commercial subdivision in St. Joseph. MDG followed u-p on 3- 9-03, 3-26-03 and April 16th. Project 01-N: I This commercial business is considering the construction of a 3,000 square foot ffice facility in 81. Joseph. MDG conducted follow up conversations most recently with the company 0 March 13th, 18th, 19th, 23rd and 26th. The Company's Board of Directors met on 3-18-03 and expre sed an interest in I commercial lots which were for sale but are no longer are listed at this time. The co pany is looking at other commercial lot options in the city and other communities. MDG placed a follow up calls on 4-8-03 and April 23rd. I Project 02-E: This company contacted the City in February, 2002 regarding commercial sites % to 1 acre in size for a 5,000 square foot commercial enterprise. He has indicated his project is on hold until f II, 2003. MDG left I a message on April 15t and sent a follow up letter on April 16th. . Project 02-L This company plans to construct a 16,000 square foot multi-tenant building in St. Jo eph business park, I with plans for an additional 16,000 square feet. The EDA reviewed/approved the buil ing and site plan at their March 19th meeting. Additional contact with project representatives occurred 0 March 26th, March 31st, April 8th, April 9, 2003, April 16th and April 23, 2003. The site plan will be revie ed by the Planning I Commission when the application is complete. Project 02-R -. City Council Departmental Report - April, 2003 Municipal Development Group Page 1 I . I I \ I I, i his company is interé:sted .in a site. for a 7,000 square foot building. MDG hascorresponded with the .- c mpany on numerousioccasions.MDG followed-up via e-mail on March 12, 2003 and sent a letter on j~rch 26, 2003, left a¡es$,age on April 9,2003and em ailed on April 23, 2003: Aroject 02~Y - .' i I T is prospect contacted MDGon October7,2002 indicating he had met with City representatives a.few y ars agoregarding néw construction in the Buettner Business Park. MDG followed up with the contact o numerous occasions, including April 16,2003. ' . . I I I P oject 02~Z . ......... \. . . . . Tpiscompany contacted the MDGre~arding relocation ottheir current commercial facility on October 31 , 2 02. MDGfollowed upon March 26 hand 31standApril gthand 11th; MDG met with the Developer on I A ril 23, 2003 to discuss the use of redevelopment TIF in conjunction with the project. ! ' P oject 02-AA i ...... .', I Tis prospect closed.on a.loti~the business parkin early February, 2003. .MDG contacted Developer wth additional information regarding àssessment terms on 3-26.:03 and 4-1-03. .MDG followed up again ° ¡ April 16fu. i . I P oject 02-88 . i.. .' .'. . ..' . Tfuis prospect contacte,d the city in November seeking information on. 300 - 400 s.f. of available 1mmerCiallease space. MDG attempted to follow up w~h additional Information February-April 1, 2003, I h wever the phone was I disconnected. No number available from directory service. . , " p~Oject 02-CC!.. . . . T . is prospect ccmtacted MDG on November 22,2002 regarding available acreage within the Buettner .- B~siness Parkfora9,200squarefootfacility. MDGfollowed-up most recently on April 1,2003 and April 21,2003. Developer h~s indicated he is busy with another construction. project for the next two months, b)t will call following thar _ ' . I P oject 02-DD I T+S prospect contacted, the City in Deêember of 2002 inquiring about the 'availability of residential and cor.merCial/industrial aCreage. MDG has followed upon several occasions, the latest April 16th 2003. I PrpJect 02-FFI . . . . . . 1~iS developer contacted the City on December 26,2002 regarding a specific parcel in the Buettner B siness Park. EDA staff has followed up· with this contact on. several occasions including a phone I mrsagemost recently on March 26, 2003. On April 9, 2003 MDG and the prospect discussed the timing of the projectwhich incl4des purchasingpropertyjhisyear.OnApril 23, 2003 MDG forwarded a copy of thlproposed re-Platoftie Buettner Business Park indicating the proposed lot divisions. . I Project 03-A¡ Tte developers are iníerested in a highwaycommercial development in an area not yet annexed i~to th City. MDG has been vitorkin~ with them over tne past several months. Follow-up correspondence I oc urred on March 10t\111th, 12t, 17th, 19th, 21 st, and 24th. A meeting with the developers was held on A9ril1stwith the City Adrrinistrator, City Engineer, County Engineer, Stearns Co.,Environmental Services, DNR WatersandMDG representatives.MDG preparedafoUow up letter on April 2nd. MDG contacted the I dro~.on'April9'..2003 regarding incl,usioQ Of,pmj~.in a pmpœed alternative uroan areawide review for environmental purpos,es. MDG followed upon April 16th, 1 ih and 23rd. ,. , i Pr ject 03-D I . I St. Cloud Area economic development contacts were invited to a presentation at. theSt. Cloud Area EcromiC Development Partnership on Friday, January 10, 2003, At the. meeting two entrepreneur's sh red their interest pursuing pr9Ject involving processing plant which would ftavor pre-dressed poultry for '- dis ributionto the home replacement meal market Follow up phone calls and discussions occurred March I 6th and 19th with an attempt to contact the company regarding a site visit made on April 1, 2003. A new nTber for the pm$pect rs obtained on 4'7-09, Two atte",pls to contact via phone were made on April I. Cil Couœil DepartmenW ~<! - Ap¡;il, 2003 MUnicipal Development Groop - Page 2 , I . '. . I I 9,2003 with an em ail message delivered. MDG spoke with project representatives on pril 23, 2003 and -. set up a meeting/site visit for May 6th follow up confirmation letter mailed. ,Project 03-E This prospect met with MDG on February 19, 2003. They inquired about land in Buett er Business Park. MDG provided the prospect with site information, assessment and covenants. Th prospect will be I meeting with business associates to discuss the information. MDG followed up on arch 12th and 26th and April 9, 2003. A letter was mailed on 4-23-03. Project 03-G I This prospect contacted the city in February, 2003. MDG followed up on March 26, 2003. Project03-H I , This is a new project that a local commercial realtor is facilitating for a portion of Lot 2, Business Park. A request for re-subdivision of the lot is expected in conjunction with th I Project 03-1 This prospect contactedthe City on April 21st regarding 5,000 s.f. of lease retail spac . MDG mailed a packet' of information including: potential sites, zoning regulations for the B-1 nd' B-2 districts, I demographic information and traffic counts. Other: I MDG has been working on the development of economic development related material for the City of St. Joseph web site, including an inventory of available commercial/industrial properties. MDG has completed an update of the City's Community Profile, which is on file with the Department of 'I " Trade and Economic Development. - ,MDG is assisting the City Administrator by coordinating EDA elements otthe lease-re enue bond for the I city's maintenance facility. MDG is continuing to work with local cable providers on the installation of high-speed data lines in the industrial portions of the City. I MDG submitted 2003 Business Assistance Reports to the Department of Tra e and Economic Development on March 26th. " I . , A request to replat a portion of the lots in Buettner Business Park is anticipated for the ay EDA meeting. I I I I -. City Council Departmental Report - April, 2003 Municipal Development Group Page 3 I ~ I' I" .e I . I .~ L"'S ' · r:/J. 0 ~ ~, ~,~ · ,~' t'~ · ~ 8. ~ ~~~~ I 0 ~~' , rLJ 'r:/) ~ , '~~- ~ ._ §S ~ I ' '.~ ~ ~ I ~' ,~~ , ~' I bJ) 00 00 ~ Q),Q) . ~ ;::i 51J . . > g' § I 0 ~ u I ~ ~ I' - I . ... , " I . .. . -I - , ·1 . ~·.,I ~~. - ,~ ,~ ;:., '.,.' . ~ .~ ·00 ~ I cod .g ~' . ' r~ (1). V7 . I "V ~.~ ~ .s' 0 'bD I o . ~~ . ÇQ. 0 .~ . - .~ ~ I Cl) \0. ..¡...J S-· '-. ~ rfJ. .~ ~ .,..... ~. ~- .~~ I '. ~U ~ ..¡...J . (1)- ~~. ~ ,> 0Œ I ~, 0 Urfl N ~ \,,;.../ 0 I (j) I cd b.O - . --. _. ~ _. .(1) à:) cd . N. ~ U, Of) ~, '""CI .E--< 3, ..... . o. ~ .~Cl) (1)' . I " "'\ . --J. '.' rT, ~ < 'J....' r--I,....., -" I"-'-( - u ,~ ],,~, I ·0, ,I' I . lit - Q.) - ~ .'bI) ~. . cd >. - o. .~ - ~ N . ~ '"' I - . ~. 00 . I""'. N"'\. ~ o' ~. rz¡ ,..-.t - r",.......{ . H ~ - - v --. · ,....¡ ~ ~ \J .l. · ~ b1) tr) ~,oo 2!J cd o ~ ~.,....¡ -+=- Q.) 0 ..,....¡ . 0 I .U· Q.)' ~ f'V". ."J- ~ _ ~. ,.J ,..-..1- ~ ~ ~ (l) I ~,~ . ,..-..1 pa-- U'J -€A- C-H · ,....¡ . . d ~ . . I ~ ·0. 8. - ~ ~- (J) È5 ~ 0 . o .þ ~.~ §.cd·~ 0]· ~.' I ~ 0 v ..¡...J - ~ ~ U'J..¡...J S rl"\ 0- o' ~ U'J (1) v U'J - .~- .- \I..J. ~ ~ .0 > (J)..,....¡ 0 .e'\$ - "Uj g? µ..~ 0 ~ ~ z, ,'~ I "¡:: ;:J, I I ~ I I I I _. -, U ' · · .. . , . "I I- I· .- ,[5 .~ .l() I ~ '+- (j') Q) ~ 0 -.!.. '- . s u ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ > ê £ I ,~.~.......... c:: (.) " '= 0 en ~..... Oeo ' .~ T- CD ~ Ü c. I ,..J C) ~ eo ~ 0 'õ c 0 == " ' Ü ~ U cO S $ ..c: . I ~ () ro Ü...-; :!::: ~ . J-,f\ .- >. '..-"'C S jlf '" '-"-J "'C _ U ro ~ I ' ...., $:1 CD ':> · ..... 0 to"i >. ~ S 2 m ~ œ: 'E-1 ~ I- bIJ 0 l? I ~ ê ". .c "~ +-t+-t cd co 0 C) · · ~ ~ .f;~, ~ i · §. Ï cd ~2 ~. :::J. ~, en · ~ ~ ~ - · a 0 ,~ ~. () ü en ~ u.. ~ ü CD · ~~ ~ c:~:j 00 c~ ',~ ~æ ,. . CD . cd 0 ' C ..J ~ µ,..:.:: CD CD C/) -+-> :.:: 2 1.O C\S 0 "'C...... · () == c:5 >. ~ == co 0) r:/l :.:: ~ èi5 o 'V 2 ~'+-o ~ ~o 2 cci<";J I ~ Õ 0) rl'\ · ~ ! I::> _ L.U So... co I I'" ..l 00 CD '-..c: CD::::. ~ ...... Q) '-" C"'p ::J CD 0) eï:I, CD >:5 . ,....; C\! c c: ~ () ~ 0 c._ ~ "¢ Q)._ -+-> (\') 0 ro · ~:> ó'? u..Q I U EfT Z 3: 00 EfT Ü 2 · E ~ 'I I æ I I . ~" · '~ . I . . 'I- ,~ ; . : . - .' . '. ., , I · I I I . 00 ,A ' ,-, 00 Q) ~ ;j ~' ~., o· 00 I ~-: cd·· .1"-1 Q) . , ~ ~ Q) (]) . ~ V.Ã. ~. . ~ . I . ~ t)., .(]) r.,..;· . 0 ~ · ,....¡ CO ~ .. ,....¡ '(]) t ~,oo" ,,~, t;) I fV'I cd 0 () õ . () ~ ~ U ~.'oo .,...('.~ I o ,(l) .cd·O)· ,~ ~' 00 bJ) +-> :>~'.;3 ,~ 0 ~ d 'Q) Q) L..';::: , ..... u ~I .~ 00 ;"1 L" O,~ ~ ,I 0 , Q)r/1 , - t ¿3 I '0) ~'~ . ~, Þ:cd '~ ~ .f""'t . ' U 0 ~,~. ~ ',~ I ' t:r ' +->',..q OJ I-< Q) cd _ H "~ ' ~,~ ~ .8 ¿) ~ I O ,..-.. 0 :> 0, U. . 00 ~ .,....¡ ~ CD ' ~ U· L.,¡ rJJ 00 0 ,...J I ' ' ~. ~, 0) ÖrFl· ~ ~ · ,....¡ cd ~ .-:;: ~ C) ~ 00 '~~~.~ ,~ 0' I ,~ .,~. t;) rfj ~':~ , (l)' ~. r.,.."1 .~. 'a ;>:..,....¡ ~, , .-, ' ~ ~ '0) ~ · ,....¡ ~ ~ I ~ Ot;) ~""õ ,~, '~ 0 o ';>-.cd ~ Q 00 ~ P:: I ctl~ 00 .C)~ ~ ,. ~ 00 '"d ~ 'õ 00 bO . ·~rIJ .~' ~U,.· d .~.' .9 I ' (/) H ,0 cd '.;3. ~ Q) U <. . 0). ~ &. . ~ 0 rR . ~ I . rJJ ~ ~ '~ ~ ~.~ ~" ;:J'~ ~ u ~ O~ _, . .. .'. . '"I ., J . .. .-' I I Overtime and Callouts .- April.11, 2003 through April 24, 2003 I I I Holiday Pay 3/ 1/03 4.00 hrs Street Cleaning 4/18/03 5.00 hrs I , 4/ 9/03 3.00 hrs YVeekend Work 4/20/03 5.00 hrs Holiday Pay I 4/ 0/03 3.00 hrs reekend Work I ~ 4/12/03 2.50 hrs Finished Reports 4/12/Q3 3.00 hrs \{Veekend Work 4/18/03 5.00 hrs Holiday Pay I 4/13/03 3.00 hrs Weekend Work 4/20/03 5.00 hrs Holiday Pay i I I I 4/18/03 5.00 hrs Holiday Pay I 4/20/03 5.00 hrs Holiday Pay I- I - I I I I I I I- I . 1