The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2000 [04] Apr 06 {Book 19} \ . CITY OF S.T. JOSEPH P.O. Box 668, 51. Joseph, MN 56 74 (320) 363-7201 I St. Joseph City Council i Fax: 363-0342 \ April 6, 2000 7:00 P.M. . \ i 1. Call to Order i 2. Approve Agenda MAYOR Kenneth J. Hiemen 3. MTC Presentation - Ed Abrams and Tom Cruikshank 4. St. Cloud Area Planning Organization - Scott Mareck -Resolution supporting the St. Cloud CL~:RKI Årea Planning Organization Endorsement of the Environmental Impact Statement Analysis for Alternatives 2,2a,3a, and 3b within the West Metro Corridor ADMINISTRATOR I Cari Schmidt I 5. 4.pprove Consent Agenda d. Authorization to send Paul Schley to Intoxylizer seminar - $400 be SEH 2000 Hourly Rate Schedule COUNCILORS c; Application for Payment No.2 (FINAL) - Design Electric - 1999 Mobile Generators - Bob Loso $6314:15 di Application for Payment no. 2 (Final) - Design Electric -1999 Electrical Modifications to Cory Ehlert Well Houses No.3 and 4/5 - $571.35 .Twit e.] Industrial Park Pond Seeding - Bid Award to Minnesota Native Landscapes y Niedenfuer jl Application for Temporary Outside Liquor Permit - Fruhlingfest :-5/7/00 ! 6. Approve Minutes - City Council Meeting 3/16/00 Joint City Council and Planning Commission meeting 3/9/00 7. Bills Payable and Overtime - 8. P~blic Comments on the Agenda - 9. St;Cloud Addendum to the Sewer Use Agreement , 10. M~intenance Facility Options 11. Employee Vacation Proposal 12. M~yors Report 13. Co~ncil Reports 14. Clerk! Administrator Report 15. Miscellaneous and Announcement Items 16. Closed Session - AFSCME. Union Contract. and Police Chief Candidate Gary Will background investigation results . 17. Adjourn . . . I I , , I I i I ----.. · ~ ~ II , , , , ÇLERK/ADMINISTRATOR MEMORANDUM ' , I I I I I MAYOR1ND CITYCQUNCIL I CARl SCIfIDT - CLERK/ADMINISTRATOR MEMO FOR MEETING OF 4/06/00 3/29/0oi\ I I tUTICiI M~dting! . reo ~dAbr...., . cpJsU¡"nH:rtl¡e MfC wIll be presontjng aproposol for b.. ,orY;ce to SOoseph, A ew months ago, the Couhcil received the results from a survey that was conducted to determine if there fas a need/desire fOrthitservice. Ed, as wellas Tom Cruikshank, fromtheMTC will be present to answer ~ny questions you havea. out the survey as welt Tom and Ed presented thisinformation to myself, the ~aYor and ç¡,ad Ca¡lson\~t a t.leyised meeting onTuesday U1U~g, One tI¡ll1g tn keep 4> mind, eve~ ff t e Council is interested in moving forward with this,. actual service is t Y2- 2 years out. .. The next step ould be the formation of acomrnission to determine a route and other details. The City may also want to volve the Colleges as s~on as possible, to start discussions of possible cost sharing ventures. · lonse.nt Agenda-SergeaAtYoung has requested approval to send Officer Paul Schley to intoxylizer aining. The cost of the training is $400 plus overnight lodging expenses. J I e submitted two final p~yment applications for approval for the generators and for the electrical odifications to the well houses. He has also included information about the industrial park pond seeding. e is recommending the ~id be awarded to Minnesota Native Landscapes. I i Trere is an application fo~ a temporary outside liquor permit for Fruhlingfest (sponsored by the Healthy Community Partnership) for your approval. . P~bliC Comments on the ligenda- Enclosed in the information section of your packet is a letter from Li~da Sîiezek. She attended a fl¡ntal meeting to discuss theissue that she outlines in her letter. I informed her thr the Committee has no ¡power to say yes or no to her request and that she should address aletter to the C· uncil. She is. asking fori an exception to. th.e Rental Moratorium. Her mother is ill and in a nursing home. They cannot sell the house:because ofa Living Trust, thus they would like to be able to rent it out. Linda jlllilœly be m attenda~c~ at the m,,"ting to address you on this matter. · rntenance Facility oPtibns -Dick Taufen will be present to discuss a number of options for. a m intenance facility. MikéKittridge has also been in contact with the City regarding his facility. Dick toÒk a look at it last week. I Although it's a nice facility it isn't much larger than the facility we have now. StLCloÙdS"",erProposa¡1 St. Cloud submí~d' propòsed .ac1dendÙm tn the Sewe, tJsdAgr¡¡ement for yo r review. Joe and Monte Eastvold(maybe) should be present for this item. E1Ptoyee Vacation proposhts - The employees have put together their vacation schedules for yourreview. A oncerted effort has bee~ made to get their accumulation down to the 80 hour maximum. I think you will , · ¡ ì I I I i ! ! ! find these requests reasonable. Also, I made a mistake in listing Mary Generous's anniversary date. Her . actual anniversary date is 10-26-92, not the earlier date that I had mentioned. Closed Session - Gary Will's background investigation has come in. If the Council approves this hire, I will inform Gary and he should be here before the end of the month. The AFSCME contract has also been submitted for your review. lmet with the union and the stewards to discuss their proposal and the reasons behind it. I've included a memo outlining some of the issues/items that are different than the current practice. Please review and at the closed session we can talk about the next steps (signing, counteroffer, etc.). Miscellaneous This is going to be a busy week. Monday night at 8 :00 PMis the informational meeting on 121 at the Township Hall. Tuesday night the rental committee meets from 5:00 -7:00 PM. Wednesday night is the informational meeting on the City Hall project at 7:00 PM at the Fire Hall. Thursday is the City Council meeting. Healthy Communities Partnership meets on Monday April lOth at 5:30 at the fire hall. There is a rental meeting and Fire Relief Association meeting on Tuesday the 11th. The College of St.· Benedict a.nd SJU are having a meeting on the 17th of April at 8 :30 AM in the TRC boardroom to talk about disorientation. They have asked me to extend the invitation to the Council members. I will be attending, along with our acting chiefJeffYoung. Have a good weekend everyone! ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ . , , I I I , I I , I I I I I , I , , , , I I , , , , I I I I , , . - 2 ~. · PRELIMINARY SERVICE PROPOSALS ST. JOSEPH . Alternative I - Limited Paratransit Service \ · Three da~s a week service. \ . · Two types sefVlces: - L6cal service in St.Joseph foI1owedbyfixedrouteservice to Waite p~kIcrossroads Conler . - P eliminary schedule: I ì C~rb-to-Curb Fixed Route Pick-up in 81. Joe Waite Park i 7:30"S:lSAM I --- ShS-9:00AM 9:00-9:4SAM 914S-IO:30AM IO:30-II:lSAM 11: lS-I2:00NOON I2:00-I2:4SPM I I2:45-I:30PM I:30-2:!SPM 2hs-3:00PM 3:00-3:4SPM · 3:14S"4:30PM 4:30-S:ISPM S:IIS-6:00PM 6:00-6:lSPM I i i · The fixed route portion of the service would travelalongHighway7S directly to I . the Crossroads Center. ¡ · One vehicle and. 1 1 hours perday/33 hours per week/I,7I6 hours per year. ! i I . Alternative n - FuIlParatransit Service I · Sevendats a week service. · Same se~ce.lype lI$;wqve.exceplsetvice would be operaled seven days per week. , i I I · One, vehiçle and.I! hours per day/66 hours.per week plus nine hours on Sunday/3¡900 hours per year. I I . Alternative ill -!RouteDeviationService I I I , · · Fixed route servicein 81. ·Joseph with routedeviation.feature, so that separate ADA serVice is not needed. Service could deviate up 3/4 mile trom the route. ! i I . , ! I I I I l..- ,l- . . . ~..¡¡..~ -;, .. I I FIGURE 1 . . c_ ST. JOSEPH TO CROSSROADS CENTER ',---[iliJ ''è;;, QJ II) $1 :> -. .. ;;... _____.__ '<C:.._ ,¿'" ~ '0. --- ~~/. 1....- -"-'- m _..______._. z c --., I. , .. ,~ ~ -----.-- , 1'ó ~ ~..- ...".1 322nd St <1.:;- No'....y,,~fu ;;OIh sJ ---"- "-,-.,. .. __ .__~ 1i ------.-----~---"--..;~~-- ~!~n R~h J---------!1201-;:-___-1 ;-____ .____ 1 (/)1 . '. 0:;--.. ' I 1 (f): r--! i ~____~.; ~ '-!!:¡.....L..., ! ('0-._,-, ------- « --.. Q, . , ,'-I 0 "-¡'34]' 3 ~------:=~; !l--::'- '" Laure(R¿; b-"::' , " Rolling RidQÞ.IRd .~'==: -..-------."-&;.-=~::_. " .~-'-" ..- w ~~__..._. (f)...-- Q)' . "-', --- > .~ ., <C ., > , . .r:: r:. , 29" h St _1_.._ ./. _ oj,,,, J.u i () - 2na-SfS:~ . ¡ ¿ C;; 1-ª~q.§t§,,1 <{-- ~ 1l~.29ºtt1$t .,l :;;~.>.-..........,..23 ~J -1.·~c....I.!,.tI.··...~1 0:: & . "_ . .I' .... h%JJ~rrl Q. ¡.... . ¡SundlaT Diì _' i ~þ"'é-." -3 r::::~ '1.----llifh,--"hf- ~ ~ ~.~. Q)j / fo..'~' :> ¡~..., ~ í ~ :/'~ Œ j0~' w ~. b ~) ~ ~ ,Z¡ i;:/ '0 (];' .:0') __~I ¿ ,~! <::.; , !!!'! 74 27011> Sl".., 164 [ili] ~t __ ŒJ 33,d S:S e~f ..e"¡~!..¡ 0" , 0~'ð .,' __.. ,;I , ./ i ;' ,I . ... . 40th 5t S .s ... -"'-- .:- _ "- ~. -..-·--7 -'''-- -- - ------. -.. ~ QJ- I ~ .~ /'// / 136 · · '" OS -- t t.' 2 2S . . .................. Streets 98 Copyright Q 1913ð-' 7. MIcrosoft C(wpot'IIlio,undlor ita suppØ.r$. All rJghCa~. ~ vft OUt' web ... II hC!p:J/mapucp.dlu:om. Ptog. 1 ~'I'.,1>' . . . . Ikl1tol) C.\:JlII1t}· . ...~ Saint Joseph Township ':"J.~~~_ ¡J¡'~\'eI1Tm~'nship I Saint Wendel Township '-'.~--_.'-' -._~.._- ---- --- '~~~:~~~.:~~)_\~,:_I~.~ \ Sartell -- 1'<1lmer Tl1WnShiPl Sa uk Rapids j-'(;~" T",",hip I ST. t:LOUD AREA PLANNING ORGANIZATION Sherburne County ._"_'__..·_._'___U' ___._._ .._---~ CI,'ud 1040 County Road 4 St. Cloud, MN 56303 Stearns County ., - ."·0..___- .. ------ S.1Ínt Joseph 320/252-7568 320/252-6557 (FAX) E-MA[L: apo@doudnet.com Waite Park March 27, 2000 ¡ MEMORA NDUM I TO: Steve Gaetz, Cio/ of St. Cloud Bob Therres, City of Sartell Bill Schluentz, City of Waite Park Chad Carlson, City of St. Joseph Mitch Anderson, Stearns County Tim Weisbrich, St. Joseph Township . Kevin Pullis, LeS~uk Township FROM: Scott Mareck :)¡!1!fA- RE: APO Policy Boa~d Endorsement of West Metro EIS Alternatives At their March 23rd meeting, the St. Cloud Area Planning Organization (APO) Policy Board was presented iith a West Metro Corridor Steering Committee recommendation to evaluate Alternatives 2, 2a, 3a and b in an Environm~ntallmpact Statement (EIS). This recommendation was endorsed by the APO Policy Board, with the following modifications (mapping of modified alternatives and corresponding data tables re attached): \ ! . ! )òi Alternatives 2a and 3b should compare the benefits of utilizing the existing Old Highway 52 corridor from. C.S.A.H. 75 to C.R. 134 verses constructing a new 28th Avenue bridge corridor from C.S.A.H. 75 to C.R. 134. ~ Alternative 3b should compare the benefits of constructing a 44th Avenue extension from 8th Street to 3rd\Street/Waite Avenue verses a 44th Avenue extension from 8th Street to 3rd Street/2nd Avenue. As a stakeholder in this process" the APO Policy Board is requesting that your jurisdiction consider adOPtingd1e~attachedreSOIUtiOq to Indicate support forEIS analysis of Alternatives 2,2a, 3a and 3b. If you would Ii e, APO staff can make a short presentation to your council/board prior to their consideratio of this resolution." will be in contact with you regarding your desire for such a presentation.! ¡ Copy: MayJ Robert pÖgatshniJ, City of Sartell Mayo~ Ken Hiemenz, CitY of St. Joseph Mayor Larry Meyer, Cityi of St. Cloud Mayor Rick Miller, City of Waite Park Mark ~akry, Steams County Board of Commissioners Paul ingsmuth, Waite Park City Council . DeWa ne Mareck, St. Cloud City Council Jim P vich, Minnesota Departmentof Transportation District 3 A Voluntary Association That is·Committed to Coordinated Long-Range Planning I Through Constant, Cooperative, Intergovernmental Communicatiòn ." ¡.; .... ~ . . . - . .~; . ....< ~#Rêsolution Supporting lC!' St.' Cloud A.~eaJ¡>lanning Organization Endorsement of . 0" , I, , " , ' . :nv'lronmental Impact Statement AnalysIs for . Altèmatives 2, 2a, 3a, and 3b I Within the West Metro Corridor \ ¡ I I , WHEREþtS, theSt. Cloud Area Planning Organization (APO) is the federally deSignatej transportation flanning agency for the St. Cloud Metropolitan Area, ~nd WHERE~S, it has been iqentified in the APO's 2020 Transportation Plan that forecasted land development in the West Metro Area will generate travel demands substantia ly exceeding e~isting Sauk River bridge crossing capacity, and , I WHERE S, the W est Me~ro Corridor Study was initiated to develop alternative road and b idge improve~ent strategies that effectively address these travel - demands, [hile minimiZiig social, economic and environmental impacts, and WHEREA'S, the West Metro Corridor Steering Committee has analyzed and .ceived PtliC input regarding numerous road and bridge improvement alternatives within the est Metro Cohidor, and \ WHEREA~,'based on a recommendation of this Committee, the APO Policy Board has endorsed Environmen~al Impact Statement (ElS) analysis of Alternatives 2, 2a, 3a and 3b, land ': I I I WHEREA i , the APO Polipy Board is seeking support of this endorsement from the County of I teams, theCit)( of81. Cloud, the City of Sartell, the City of S1. Joseph, the City of Waite Park,S1. ¡Joseph Township and LeSauk Township, as these jurisdictio s are stakeholders in the findings of aW est MetroEIS. I , NOW, TH REFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the (jurisdiction) I supports th St. Cloud Are~ Planning Organization's endorsement ofEIS analysis for Altema ives 2, 2a, 3a and 3bwithin the West Metro Corridor. 'oard Chail \Council presiðent Date i I 1 i , , I . . ~ ;¡ , .. .. .' ., . ~ ~ " u , ~ UÜâ Ii ~ -6' 'I ~i / ~ ~ l~tf~ I""f] l'! ! t".)~ if ~{ ~ ~ ~ ¡ii') !~i:¡ ~ '.... ;::¡ t !lr¡ ..... .... ~ ~Ih I:: ~ ð ~ . ~ · 1 i ì · " a .::::: ::';::::) .ê~ - - ~.§ ;-1 t::~.¡ .....Q..; ~ ~ . . . .. ~ ... to!. ... ì! ¡¡ ClQ .rï' ~ :.: -.: ~ 11 I! ~ : , ' I . .' ' '. ! ))~þ; .' , .' ' i " .' oj .. . . . ~ . . t,····..,·",·· ..i ;¡:{,t:;;;:t~~ :¡i' ~,~illft~f' ~ ;¡ oj -6' ~ ~~ ~ ';¡:p ", !Uh ~ <:.) ~ .?: 1"lp E ~ jH4 ¡ ð ~.+ / ~ i]l;} I ;::: ~~ ~ .:::~ ~n~ i ~ ;::: ~ -~ .. "" )( ~ >.: :IÌI. . i i . - . . '" ~ ~ ... ] .~ ~ ~ 1;> j a ~ 1: ! .' . oj . I . oj ~ I ~ -6' ~ , I ~ ~.I::) .;,..:.r! : ....~ li!h .g .~ .... ..::: l.sp I:: ~ iH .! ð §. / ~ 1 1l -i- s::: I I,] i:~ ",I ~ Hil; ..... I ~ ~] I .....~ .. ~ .11 ~ I , . , !.:.i :.!] .': ! I - - I - - . I 1 I ! i I 1 \ \¥êstMetroctorridor Alternative's: . . ¡ .. . Estimate Cost Breakdowns & .ssible Constructioþ Phasing I \ ~e " d4~~'¡ * 6-Lane C.S.A. .4 Bridge from Rolling Ridge Rd. to T.H. 15 * 4-Lane Pinecon Rd. Bridge from C.R. 1120 to C.R. 138 (E. or W. of 8th 51. Bridge) * 4-Lane 10th Av~nue Striping from 3rd Street N. to C.S.A.H. 75 * 4-Lane Saukvie Drive/3rd Street Bridge I ) lul1" * 6-Lane C.S.A. .4 Bridge from Rolling: Ridge Rd. toT.H. IS * 4-Lane Pinecone Rd. Bridge from C.R.120 to C.R. 138 (E. or W. of 8th 51. Bridge) * 4-Lane 10th Av nue Striping from 3rd Street N. to C.S.A.H. 75 * 4-Lane 28th Av nue Bridge from c.s.AlH. 75 to C.R. 134 , I I I Total Estimate Assumptions: .4-Lane roadwa and right-of-way costs: estimated at $1,000,000 per mile ($150.000 to 5200.000 added per home for displacements) 6-Lane roadwa and right-of-way costs: estimated at S 1.500.000 per mile . (3) 6-Lane bridge ssumed for C.S.A.H. 4: @ 122 ft. wide. all other bridges assumed to be 4-lanes@ 98 ft.~ide (4) Roadway and l>(dge lengths estimated from aeriarphotographs (5) Bridge com es imated @ $65 per square foot I 16) Anypo"nÜ"1 rlUtiOn mitigation eostslare UOt ioeloded . ~ . I I I I i [ I I West Metro Corri or Scoping Study - De~ailed Data for Alternatives Recommended for EIS Evaluation '" (Transportation Considerations) (Social1EconomiclEnvironmental Considerations) PEffORMANCEOF PERFORMANce OF PERFORMANCE OF ECONOMIC IMPROVED C.$.A.H. -4 BRIDGE h'NE'NBRIOGE 2ndNEW8R1OGE SYSTEM CONSlOEIlATlO"S I BENEFITS ESTIMATED BENEFIT "., ALTERNATIVE 1020VlC .OFI.ANES 2020 20201t1C 2020 '"'" PURPOse.. NEED PROJECT COST SOCIAL ENI/IRONMENU,l ALTERNATIVE DESCRIPTION 1'11\110 ASSUMED VOLUME RATIO ." '" SUMMARY COST ....", CONS!DERATlONS CONSIDERATtONS "DoNathl"¡" h"UngRoaowa~$_8'ooge5.P $ " .. .. .. .. 'tongPo<WXI.oI'",O<;.OSlO<ICongo"",,, · No S'll"~fC(Il ¡,1W.onm.......~ Impac\$ !BufI. P'og'ammOOlme<.....-enl. :ua,S8<I 1$<t.Sn 0c>tI. nol lII..t Purpou" N..d " " ·c.tan"""'.......<IOnot~th,.OØI""" 2 . 6-t_CSAHHlnclqflF'''''' OIIngR""JtIRdtoTH1S M..tsPUt)O..&N-.d: '~2105HomuAlongR""'an<lCR ':14 'W<KIallClImPðClO e" '·¡_e_",_" OR ',",oOR ",,,.w",,,, ."..., · ZG.144 " 13.381 .. ·23.2U -2.721 AooepIable"'OIum'!QC~y IIU ... . PØSSCIJ'fm9a<;!.VA.GoNCourMf......y ·WoootancIm~. · .·l_S_._~S1 IiI'~Corrodor RatlOforCSA.H 4 Mmlon ·POSfot,IyR_nStCk>ui;lC.tyGøtC/I..CIHou.. ·ç......_tmpad, · .·~_S{flJ>lfollo/'OIh"v..-.ue 3Nl'StrHtN (OeSIIH 75 a''''OeAte'.E.a.1IenI ·Pos$CllyRIIocaI.sP8l1a1ICroght'ofeo......bonP""" 'fioo<l¡>l¡l"Im~, NJSSy.1emConI""""Y ·PouetyO'-I1to2~"",,,o151hA.-... '2N_RrverCrossngs · Po..e... R~ Movwr>g Gu PunPS AIorQ 15m Ave 2. "6.L_CSAH<lBn<l¡¡eFrom oIin)Ro:IQeRdlOfH15 M..t.P..~..&N,"": ·~.2"'S_.AJongR""'a"ldCI\I34 ·We(~lm)a(:l' 1Wi<l.nO<l8<idge· ~·L......PneconeRQ ßnd<;elr CR l20toCR 138(EotWclCSA.H <I!,"'ge! · " ·14,«0 .2.562 ~V_IOC_V 110.. U 'PwMl/vJmpacl.VAGo/fCo..orseF_1tY 'WooølðnOlrnpacU ZN.w8f1d9" . 4-t_2!!111A.........Bn<lQrteitO'fl1iwy 52Ðn<lgeIfoMCSAH 751oCR.)oI Raliolc<CSAH <I Minion · Pouety R-..s 51 C_ C<iy GoII Cu> i'iouse · F...........IR>pad. · 4.L_SI'~oII0111A_r3rdStt_N IOCSAH 75 BtoðgeArea,e.OIIMInI 'I'oMbi'vR_flPanofl<t\ogtll.oICoo..ontlusPar1l · FIOO<\pIa.,lmpaa, NISSysl"""Cont......y '[)ospIr...3toS-'NortI101C_S_AH15...2fJ1h 'Z_R..."C",.."'9' A C..._ 3a -' 6...._CSAH 'Hlrldgelrom:SRÓQ'IR~lonll~ MHtl.PUI'pOM&NHd: '~l~"'NUf'Hi\laCRI2OiCSAH.~ ·.....'.,,<ancltmp&<;U 1 W'denedBndge . 4·l_P"""""", R0a4 e.,,,,, IOCSAH oIICR 120lnIerÞcI.... · .. ·1.83t -1.315 Ao::eø.-V"...,..,.10 Clpa<>l;y ..., <0 · R_IeIPIf1(tKnoo,lt1'oICoUnbusP""" · Woodland Imoact& 1N_Bri. . "·l_s.lh....--...8nóge1nlm ~...unvCS""H "ICR 13410-..1I(tl<ofCP..... R.IIO!orCS....H" MI1I1.... '~'3105Hom....54thAYf CotndorN_P;wI< ·F......tandlmp&<;U '~·l_S1nI>n;IofI0!11...._ 3tdSU..-IN IoCS....H 75 Bnøge""".e._ · ConsoIocIatflC.SAH oIICR 138In\otwc:t1onWIIII ·FDxIpIa"Im~. NISSyJlemCoron.llt'/ CSAHoIICR'34In1~ ·1_R_Cro.,"") 3b . 6·l_C,SAH"8r.o¡)ef<orn RII)QIfRo.dloTH.15 UHœPIItpOM&NHd: · ~L-.....NlnwyOCR t2OiC.SAH ~ 'W8I'¥IdIm~. lW1d.n...BrtdOe·4-l_P_R_ IOCSAH 4JCR 1'20.......-...:1.0'1 . 16,969 " .13.4042 -2,115 ~V_IO~ $10." U "~..Plf1dKnoo,lt1'dCok.mbusP.n 'WoQGjIf1dIm~, 2N_Bridgø . "·l_54Ih....--...~1rom '1IIn¡CSAH.fICR 13410_011<01 C 1'.- Reloo!orCS....H" NIIIIoft · ~3105Home'..S4th"Yf COrTIdorN_P.n ·F.......~Im~, '''-l_28t11....--...8od¡¡e...O ~ 5:8nógeIromCS....li 7510CR 134 8n<Ige""1I,E-çellent ·~CS""H4JCRI38lnle1wc1.onwl\h "FIooOI>I8..Jmøac1. . "-I._....Ih....--...Ex1onsøt 8tI1S1 H IOWMe......IJ.-d$t... 2nd....../3n$S!- NISS.".lemContft.Hly CS....H4ICR 13<1lnterseC:hor. '2_R",...-CroUll"l(S ·"·l_SI~OIIO!11""_J 3rdSlreo!N IOCSAH 75 ·~'310SHo:>mflNOI1tIOICSAH75.,2!!U'> 2SUlAwen...llrid". ....-..,COO'f'O)Of . r..n.l>Of1.b...._I'''9...U.....Pin........ RoacIInl.........n"wilflSill St...ltol";1I:In9b<\dgI. ··W..I.......c:onno.:uon...ume<:I'nd.t. (1)....n.m.Ii".. Endorud I.... En.,,,,,,........ 1_' tat_lIaS)""....... byth.APOPoUc:yBoatd 312:IlOO . ¡¡o.. '" " . . . . . . Bureau olf Crim'inal Apprehension I 1246 University tvenue, St. Paul, Minnesota 55104-4197 Phone: 651/642-Q610 FAX: 651.642.0618 TrY: 651/282-6555 I I Intern et:http://~w.dps.state.m n. us February2s12000 i To: All Training Officers and Coordinators Alcohol & I Gambling I Enforcement From: BCA ~reathTest Section i I Bureau of I, Criminal Re: Extra :Classes Offered Apprehension Change in Intoxilyzer Operator Course Registration Procedure I Capitol Security I I I Driver & Vehicle Dear Training Officer orTraining Coordinator: Services ¡. ./ Emergency Dueto the hIgh demand for IntoxilyzerTraining,the BCABreathTest Management! Emergency Section is otï:ering an extra Intoxilyzer Basic Operator School May 22-26, Response 2000. Those candidates who have applications on file as of the date of Commission this letter will' have priority when scheduling forthis class., This extra class . State Fire will not covet all applications on file so weare also offering a class July Marshall 17-21,2000 )f there is enough interest. Pipeline Safety I ¡ State Patrol 1 Registration for classes after May, 2000 will be subject to new procedures: Traffic, Safety \ 1. Classes will be filled on a first-come basis. 2. Candidateswill need to list three, preferred dates of attendance in order of preference on their application. Candidates will be scheduled onlyfortheir preferred class dates. ' 3. Ifa candiþatecurrently has an application on file (as of the date of this letter), th1ey will be given priority if they indicate their class preferences inwriting!byJune 1, 2000. If no preference is communicated, the BCA will attempt to use those applications to fill vacancies but placement in a class isinot.guaranteed. 4. If the three preferred dates are full, the candidate will be notified and anew application will be required. S. If a candidate is willing to fill short-notice vacancies (30 days or less), please in~icate this on the application. 6. Typically, i no more than 2 officers from one agency will be scheduled in a single class .ÞCA I i i EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER i I i I " t'··· ';þ 7. If a candidate is scheduled for a class and is unable to attend, please . provide 30 days notice. The BCA will work with the candidate for placement in the next available class. 8. If a candidate fails to give 30 days notice of inability to attend a class, they must submit a new application. 9. If a candidate is unable to attend the class, another candidate from the same agency can fill the position provided they already have an application on file. The individual who could not attend the class must reapply. 10. Classes may be added, rescheduled, or cancelled by the BCA, depending upon demand. If this occurs, the candidates or agencies will be notified where appropriate. The Intoxilyzer Basic Operator School schedule will be determined by the SCA at least one year in advance. The class schedule for the 2000/2001 school year is as f6l1ows: 2000: 2001: July 17 - 21 January 8 - 12 October 16 - 20 February 5 - 9 October 30 - November 3 March 5 - 9 . November 13 - 17 April 2 - 6 December 4 - 8 April 30 - May 4 A revised application for attendance in the Intoxilyzer Operator Course is enclosed. A new application will also appear in the BCA training catalog later this year. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call the BCA Breath TestSection at 651-642-0760. We can be contacted by FAX at 651-643- 3018. Thank you for your patience and cooperation in this time of transition. Sincerely, BCA Breath Test Section Cc: Frank Dolejsi Forensic Science Laboratory Director . . ~ I I I . Regi~tf!ati(!)mF(!)f!m I~TOXILYZER'åPERATOR CERTIFICATION J.. . . .. .. .. . ... . ... .. . . ... ... . ¡. .... .. .. . . .. . .. .. .. . .. . .. .. ~ .. . . ... .. .. . . . .. .. .. .. . .. . .. . .. . . .. .. . . ... . . .. . . . . . . . . .. . ¡lease print or typel ... R JPPLlCANrs NAME ·.PAO'····.· ..... '. .... 5'::.hle<j 10ST # · . N7 '4 .'. .F'ffit. .... DATE 0;';;; ... ·.1 Jß~j\0 P¡REFERREDCOURSE DATES\Jv/~ 17-~I. ~+ (~~JO .. . .... O(T ~ - N~{ 3 I . 1 st . 2nd . 3rd I I Yiouwill be notifiedf5 days prior to the class f~r Whi~h you are sc~eduled. EMPLOYING AGE~CY 5+. 3"O'5éP¡'" PoNe.¿ Ðepe.rfd1.¿/lf- AIGENCY'SADDR~SS po iSox. ;:)(b~.. 5'..f. Jò~Lh,' mil/5"~~?i/ . F~ NUMBER . I . E-MAIL ADDRESS 11','¡:J/P7@ Ik+ovro¿ d1Y"1- C¡OUNTY/S+t;"'r~l· . AGENCY'S PHONE NUMBER 3;?O-3G3- ~~5"O YOUR DAYTIME PIrI0NE NUMBER(8 A.M. - 4:30 P.M.) , .. Sffft1lf! C~NCÈLLATIONPbLlCY: Notice of cane.ellation mu~tbe reee!Ved by the Breath T st Section 30 day1s or more before class begins or you must reapply. Officers . W 0 fail to give can¿ellation noticé 2 business days prior to class and s bsequently do not appear in class as scheduled will be billed. I ! i , I ~erebY attest that the abQve named applicant Is andwill continue to remain an e~ ployee ofthe ag~ncy during his/her participation in the. course fora II intents afd purposes,andAartieularly (or any wo~ers' compensationciaimduring the tr . Inlng..sess.ion:.ltlrmYreSPOQStbl.li~toauthonze.paYmentupon.. recetpt.of Jlee. SIGNATURE OF plLlCECHIEF, SHERIFF, OR AGENCY ADMINISTRATOR I I 1 i TI LE DATE Return to: Breath Test ßection, MinnesotaBureauof Criminal Apprehension . 1246 University Avenue, St. Paul, MN 55104 I orfaxto651~643-3018. I \ i ... 1> t-"''' . . . y .. -SeJ=\CIII 605 Franklin Avenue NE, P.O. Box 51, St. Cloud, MN 56302-0051 320.253.1000 320.253.1002 FAX -I architecture . engineering . environmental . transportation 1 1 : , i March 42, 2000 RE: S1. Joseph, Minnesota 1 i City Engineering Services ! SEH No. A-STJOE 0001.00 i I 1 I i i Honora*e Mayor and City·Council c/o Cari I Schmidt City Adfninistrator City of 81. Joseph 21 Nort~west FirstAvenue P.O. Bo~ 668 St. Jose~h, MN 56374-0668 I. Dear M~yor and Members of the Council: ¡ In my l~tter dated December 27, 1999, I stated I would submit our revised 2000 Hourly Rate . Schedul~ for your review and approval. The proposed schedule effective April 1 , 2000, is enclosed, along w~th last year's schedule for comparison. The average hourly rate increase is 2.37 percent, except fbr the Word Processor rate, which dropped 6.38 percent. Reimbursable expenses include a Total St~tion and a Robotic Total Station; these items are charged only for the hours actually in use, and typi:cally reduce the amount of survey crew time required on the job site. We appteciate the work you have entrusted to our care, and hope you will find the enclosed rates acceptaòle. I am available to meet with you regarding this adjustment at your convenience. Thank I you. 1 i i i Sincerel]y, ~~~ ... Josph *, Bettendorf, P,E,. · Príncip~l \ 1 djg i I 1 Enclosutes 1 G:lstjoelcorrIAlÎ30a-99. wpd . I I ! ¡ i Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc. . Offices located throughout the upper Midwest . Equal Opportunity Employer 1 JiVe help you plan, design, and achieve. . 'f . . . , " ) , 605 Franklin Avenue NE, P.O. Box. 51, St. Cloud, MN 56302-0051 320.253.1000 320.253.1002 FAX architecture . engineering . environmental . transportation . SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON, INC. , I I, I Hourl~ Rate Schedule for Engineering Services I ! i í Effective April 1, 2000 , I ! j ¡ Project M~nager ..;................ ................... ... ... ............. .......... .$99.00 Project Erigineer.................................................................... $89.00 Staff Engineer.;....................................,................................ $79.00 1 Sr. Technician ................ ........ .... ........ ..... ............ ..... ... .... ..... .$72.00 . Technician.................;........................................................... $59.00 I Word Proçessors . .................................................................. $44.00 Specialist!. ......... ............... ...... .... ... ..... ;.... '" ..... .... ......... ...... Variable Reimb rsable expenses: \ Printing a?d Postage Costs ............................................Actual Cost Subconsultants ...............................................................1.1 x Actual Cost Mileage.. .i..................... ó....................;............................ $ 0.32 /Mile 1 Survey V~hic1e and Equipment .....................................$4.50 ¡Hour Total Statton..... ............................................................... $1 0.00 I Hour Robotic Tbtal Station ..... .....;........ ....................... ........... $25 .00 I Hour I i I i ! ¡ I i . Short Elliott Hendri kson Inc. . Offices located'ÎhrÔÜþ!'lout the upper, Midwest . Equal Opportunity Employer m help you plan, design, and achieve. ( "'Sm=tCIII 605 Franklin Avenue NE, P.O. Box 51, SI. Cloud, MN .56302-0051 320.253.1000 320.253.1002 FAX architecture . engineering . environmental . transportation . SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON, INC. Hourly Rate Schedule for Engineering Services Effective May 1, 1999 Project Manager.... .....,...................................... ¡.................. .$97 .00 Project Engineer................................................................... .$86.00 Staff Engineer... ... ..... ............. ......................... .... ... ...... ....... ..$76.00 Sr. Technician..................................................................... ..$72 .00 Technician............................................................................ .$57 .00 . Word Processors................................................................. ..$47.00 Specialist. ....................... ...... ... .... ... ........ ...... ..... ..... ............ Variable Reimbursable expenses: Printing and Postage Costs ............................................Actual Cost Subconsultants (survey).......... ............ ................ ........ ...Actual Cost Subconsultants (other) ...................................................1.1 x Actual Cost Mileage ... ....;........................... .......................... ............. $ 0.31/mile . Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc. . Offices located throughout the upper Midwest . Equal Opportunity Employer we help you plan, design, and achieve. .....···r I . I ArætJ=\GIII 605 Franklin Avenue NE, P.O. Box 51, 51. Cloud, MN 56302-0051 320.253.1000 320.253.1002 FAX architecture . engineering . environmental . transportation 1 · March 0,2000 RE: St. Joseph, Minnesota 1999 Electrical Modifications to Well House Nos, 3 and 4/5 SEH No. A-STJOE 9907.00 I I Honora Ie Mayor and City Council c/o Car Schmidt City of St. Joseph 21 NW First Avenue P.O.. B x 668 St. Joseph,MN56374-0668¡ Dear iayor and Members qfthe Council: 1 Enclos d please find Applidationfor Payment No.2 (FINAL) for this project. · We have reviewed this app1ication and it appears to be in order. When payment is made, sign all copies nd distribute as follows: Design Electric SEH , City ofSt. Joseph ¡ i , Also e closed for your files I are the following documents: F inrl Statement IC-1134 utwaivers i IfYOU¡aVe anyqUeSlions.1lease [edfree \OcaIJ ;:er'IY·8~ c: ~ .. .. i C fuseI' R. Bettendorf,P;E. ¡ CityE gineer \ Enclosres I · \ djg IV .stjoe\9907\specslelectrical\apl-O.wpd Short Elliott Hendri.ckson Inc. . Offices located throughout the upper Midwest . Equal Opportunity Employer ! fVe help you plan, design, and achieve. i I .. ,....... . . . . ," .., 'E'H~CI11 605 Franklin Avenue NE, P~O. Box 51, St. Cloud, MN 56302-0051 320.253.1000 320.253.1002 FAX architecture . engineering . environmental . transportation . Owner Contractor SEH APPLICATION FOR P IVMENT NO.2 (FINAL) CONTRACT FOR: 1999 ELECTRICAL MODIFICATIONS TO WELLHOUSE NOS. 3, 4, AND 5 PROJECT NO. A-STJOE 9907.00 OWNER: 'ITY OF ST. JOSEPH AGREEMENT DATE: 10/21/99 CONTRACTOR: ' ESIGN ELECTRIC FOR WORK ACCOMPLISHED THROUGH: 02/17/00 CONTRACT THIS STATEMENT ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT UNIT COST QUANTITY AMOUNT QUANTITY AMOUNT i GENERAL ¡ ELECRICAL ~RK DEPICTED ON DRAWING NO. E101 1 ATTACHED T DIVISION 16. i LS $3,175.00 1.00 $3,175.00 1.00 $3,175.00 ELECTRICAL Ò ORK DEPICTED ON DRAWING NO. E102 2 ATTACHED T DIVISION 16. .¡ LS $1,085.00 1.00 $1,085.00 1.00 $1,085.00 ¡ i OTAL ITEMS BID I $4,260.00 $4,260.00 CHANGE ORDER NO 1 3 UPGRADE T RATED TRANSFER SWITCH EA $1,600.00 1.00 $1,600.00 1.00 $1,600.00 ! Total Contract Amount $4,260.00 Change Order NO.1 $1,600.00 Revised Contract Amount $5,860.00 ¡ . he undersigned Contractor krtifies that all Gross Amount Due $5,860.00 , revious payments r,eceived from the Owner for Less Retainage (0%) $0.00 'Vork done under this c~ntract have been applied to discharge in full all obligations of the $5,860.00 ~ontractor inc~rred in conne?tion with the work $5,288.65 [''''d by ",d ,m9"''' 'ar'"t" $571.35 SUBMITTED: ESIGN ELECTRIC i Date: 3- 3 -no RECOMMENDED: lEH i Date: 'it /; !/)O 1 I , APPROVED: ITYOF ST. JOSEPH, MN 1 By: Date: ¡ I , i , i i , 1 , . I . . Equal Opportunity Employer Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc. . , Offices located throughout the upper Midwest . i W1e help you plan, Ùesign, and achieve. " DOCUMENT 00680 FINAL STATEMENT . DATE OF ISSUANCE February 29, 2000 OWNER City of St.Joseph CONTRACTOR Design Electric, Inc. Project Location: City of St. Joseph Project Description: 1999 Electrical Modifications to Wellhouse Nos. 3, 4, and 5 Owner's ContTact No. N/A ENGINEER's Project No. A-STJOE 9907.00 Agreement Date 10/21/99 Notice to Proceed. Date N/A Date Punch List Corrected N/A Substantial Completion Date 02/17/00 Expiration Date of Vegetation Maintenance Period: N/A Contractor's Statement: To the best ofmyknowlêdgeand belief: . (1) the above information is true and correct as indicated; (2) all items of work have been completed in accordance with the C()ntracrDoc~ments; (3) all progress payments received from the Owner for work under this Contract ha"ebeenapplíed to discharge in full all obligations of the Contractor incurred in connection with said work; and (4) title to all materials and equipment incorporated in said work will pass to the Owner at the time of fmal payment free and clear of all liens, claims, security interests, and encumbrances. [Authorized Signatures] RECOMMF:NDED SEH By ~~~ By: Title: Title: roiect En~ineer Date: February 29. 2000 Date: w ,\stjoe\9907\spec5\electrical\final. wpd .' 1 .. .. a.\. .... \ i "'\ . I ~ &1=-1.1:111 605 Franklin Avenue NE, P.O. Box 51, St. Cloud, MN 56302-0051 320.253.1000 320.253.1002 FAX architecture . engìneerìng . envìronmental . transportatìon r · \ \ Ma ch 30,2000 RE: St. Joseph, MiIlllesota 1999 Mobile Generators SEH No. A-STJOE9907.00 HOfablèMaYOr .and çjty Council c/o s. Cad Schmidt ! Cle k/ Administrator/Tre~surer Cityl of St. Joseph .! 21 W First Avenue \ P.O. Box.668 ¡ St. J s<ph, MN56374-0t;8 Dea Mayor and Members of the Council: 1 " , Encl sed please find Application for Payment No.2 (FINAL) for this project. · , i '1 Weave reviewed this application and it appears to be in order. When payment is made, sign all I copi s and distribute as fdllows: ummins North Cenfral EH \ I , Alsoffinclosed tòryour fil~sare the following documents inal Statement I $-134' · . onsent of Surety arranty, If Y01bave lll1yqUeSjiOn~'\r!eaSdeel tree to caJl u,. Since dy, .. . i ..<~ se R.Bettendorf"P.E. \ Project Engineer i djg \ 'Ii · Enclosures i W :\stjOe\990£peCS\generator\ap¡.O. wpd \ I Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc. I Offices located throúghout the upper. Midwest Equal Opportunity Employer I , I JiVe help you þlan, desìgn, and achìevë. I i , i ¡., "" . - . . .' '" ~ ~'\ ". ". """" 605 Franklin Avenue NE, P.O. Box 51, SI. Cloud, MN 56302-0051 320.253.1000 320.253.1002 FAX architecture . engineering . environmental . transportation , , . Owner Contractor SEH APPLICATION FOR \ AYMENT NO.2 (FINAL) CONTRACT FOR: 1999 MOBILE GENERATORS PROJECT NO. A-ST JOE 9907.00 I OWNER: \CITY OF ST. JOSEPH . AGREEMENT DATE: 07/02/99 CONTRACTOR: CUMMINS NORTH CENTRJ¡.L FOR WORK ACCOMPLISHED THROUGH: 02/24/00 CONTRACT THIS STATEMENT ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT UNIT COST QUANTITY AMOUNT QUANTITY AMOUNT 1 TRAILER M UNTED PORTABLE 80 KW¡GENERATOR SET LS $31,277.12 1.00 $31,277.12 1.00 $31,277.12 2 TRAJLER M UNTED PORT ABLE tOO n GENERA TOR SET LS $33,483.38 1.00 $33,483.38 1.00 $33,483.38 OTAL ITEMS BID $64,760.50 $64,760.50 ! Total Contract Amount $64,760.50 Change Order No. _ Revised Contract Amount $64,760.50 he undersigned Contractor ~rtifies that all Gross Amount Due $64,760.50 revious payments received from the Owner for Less Retainage (0%) $0.00 t ark done under this contrast have been applied o discharge in full all obligations of the $64,760.50 þontractor incurred in connection with.the work $58,446.35 covered by said progress payments. . rUMMINS NORTH CENT~L' INC, $6,314:15 eITTED: Date: 3/3/ev Date: 1..../ 'Z. S !t!)ð RECOMMENDED: EH APPROVED: ITY OF ST. JOSEPH, MN By: Date: ~@r@~-o-~ lª .- D[!~ ~ ~ MAR 0"'1 2000 SHORT, ELLIOTT,'HÊNDAICKSON . ·SAICLOUD MN Short Elliott Hen rickson Inc. . Offices located throughout the up·per Midwest . EqualOpportunify Employer Wti help you plan, '}¡esign, and achieve. ", ';}- ~.;.. .. . .:., ,.. . . .\ ~¡ 09:55 FAX 320 SEH.RCM ST CLOUD --7 ST JOSEPH ~OO2 ;; ... ,1-; !It '. ,. 605 Franklin Avenue NE. P.O. Box 51, St. Cloud. MN 563œ;-0051 320.253.1000 320.253.1002 FAX architecture . engineerít¡g . enlJirqnmelual . transpqrtation M h 31,2000 RE: . St. Joseph, :MN Industrial Park Pond Seeding SEH No. A-STJOE 9904.00 I H noråble Mayor and qty Council .. .. cf, I Ms. Cari Schmidt, Clerk/Administrator ~. Ci of St. Joseph It, , I ¡.. 21 NWFirstAvenue I ~~ P Box 668 J St. Joseph MN 56374-068 I \ I I . Dew: Mayor and Membefs of the COWlcil: ~ were receiv~ònMtuch 24, 2000 for seeding native prairie grasses on the new )wIding po d site in the St. Joseph Business Park. Two 'quotes were received: Minnesota Native Landscapes oiroley, Minnesota subImtted a quotation in the amount of$11,415.00; and Prairie Restorations, Inç.ofPrinceton, MinnesOta submitted a quotation of $17,336.00. The Prairie Restoration bid was not signed, and the Minnesota Native Landscapes bid had two erroneous unit prices but the totals wdre coaect. Both elTO~ are minor irregularities that can be corrected. Prþe Restorations æ.J volunteered to reduce It's bid to $10,085.00 if oat straw mulcb is used inStead of prairiestraw mUlch as specified. Since we did not include this as an alternate, no similar . reduction was submitted I by Minnesota Native Landscapes, which bid the project with the prairie 1 muI,,!,- The prairie straw muJch is prefolred because of its beavier consistency 8Dd additional capacity. j Since the specifications ok wlûch the qu~tes were supposed to be based requjred pmirie straw mulch, I 1COmménd award to Minnesota Native Landscapes. If you wish to consider going to the straw m lch, it should be negotiated as a change after award. Plr contact me ifYOU!bave anrqnestÌODS. Sincerely, 1 ~~ß.~ I . . , : " ( c.,~ Joseph R. Bettendorf, P .E. ' ' Gr.~ ~,.-. ¡. cb h ,¡ Enclosure: Quotations crom Minnesota Native Landscapes and Prairie Restorations. , a:...........lbtlllprllirie.. Mrt 'IIIot' l'""""" 'ne . Offices located throughout the upper Midwest ' . Equal Opportunity Employer m htlp you plan. design, and amievc. ; . '" *Þ . .. i., ,,' 09:.55 FAX 320 253!100~. SEH.RCM.S~ CLOUI? " ... ST JOSEPH ~OO;i ~ . c~.24;"2Ò.ÓO: .::.....:.:..:..: ....1:·· .... " : .;..:., .:;' ".:, _.. :. :. RE.i.;'·,~ Sf Jos'èph~ Mi~ri~~~ta ..:<:<.... . . ", :",.. . .:1,:'.' . .' ~'.,'" ,2@os~.Josep11BusúißS$Park· . . .' St..' oseph Económic'Dè:Veiopt1Í,~ïit.Dir~tor .,". ".. : ..':' . . . . . ,; . . . P· Boo t::68"" ".: I '. . ", . , :' . " ',:. ," . .' . .'. ;. ox v .... '. "","". . ' '., '. .. . . . Sttse¡¡li, MN'~637~68 . ,. . . ....... ...... ....... . . . ,,' ::t:Z1i¡;~:~~~Y~~~~,~LI0'¡~~~~~~~Zenó~Þ~Tb. . . .' ,< . Ju~p:~mfor'.W9[kas'~p~q~fi(4)~ :~J?;3~.?:,1ÔQ'.::A.,ttø~p'ät~~1~¥;'.th;~}o/()f.k:~~~d~~ dcínefqi< ,<... '", , " . ~. '. '" . :,. ,$lQ~085~OOîf'èlèan;;oatstråw::1Uul~h::~.$,'usedjrtstead::of.pt~ìr.~,~tté$:mulçh;., "; :':<' '. ::,'. ,,". ." "" ..' ...., f~~~;idé;¡j,g~¡~~~~i in:.....~~ rii ~~;¿f811~~at (¿2) 3B9-13Ì4 it ': .... '.. , '..... " :~]:~,a.Y;i0~OÇr,;·;? ....:': ..... ,.':;: .:.i ,;". .....'........: :i..;I,...i....·i.· '. ..... :~...; ,.. .:.;..: .........,....:..;..'. . ...... '. '.. . . .cP'~:~... .",','., .,". '. ".'.".'. '.... . ::'·'~·I.··· ':- '., " :: . :.:-:"',,,.;. ',::,', ... '.:,,:' ...::..,....'............ ::" ":,..' ',,",' ',' ."'. ,: '..' ....' '., ." ClùtJS Mursu: . .". .' .. '. " '. " ..' '. .'. . ' . '. .' ',' ".' . . , . . ..' ""'1', ' " "'" '<. i", ., ',Bringln'g:.~ëoP'le·'tOgètfi~~'.w¡Ui·thð':¡ànø ...,::.....:........,' "... ".:: ...::,:,. .',:' ...... ¡...._~-,...,_..._,- ¡-....~:'~.ww~_. ,\ If "'."", ...........04~...._:-":-f"!......'"":""""-~--'-_.:.."":"~~_~i"""':"'¡.,¡.,...,~,~.......;ï, 09:57 FAX 320 253 1002 SEH.RCM ST CLOUD 4 ST JOSEPH IqJ 0 Oil ~;" ~i :t ~ . QUOTATION FORM Contractors Name n' Prairie Restorations. Inc. ,. PROJECT IDENTIFICATION: 2000 St. Joseph Business Park ,~ 'I.! St. Joseph, Minnesota æ SEH No. A-STJOE 9904.00 '11" ~ THIS BID IS SUBMITTED TO: Mr. Chad Carlson Economic Development Dit'ector City of St. Joseph P.O. Box 668 St.loseph, MN 56374-0668 " H- I. The undersigned BIDDER agrees to establish wildflowers and native grasses at the Business Park storm water . detention basin site. 2. A Bid Bond is not required. A Perfonnance and Payment Bond is not required. A certificate of insurance satisfactory to the City is required. 3. BIDDER has visited the site and become familiar with it and is satisfied as to the general, local, and site conditions that may affect projectcost., progress, performance, and furnishing of the work. 4. BIDDER is familiar with and is satisfied as to all federal, state, and local laws and regulations that may affect cost, progress, performance, and furnishing of the work. S. BIDDER does not consider that any additional examinations, investigations. exJlorations, tests, studies, or data are necessary for the determination of this Bid for performance and furnishing of the work or in accordance with the times, price, and other terms set forth in the enclosed Scope of Work. 6. BIDDER is aware of the general nature of Work to be performed by Owner and others at the site that relates to Work for which this Bid is submitted. 1. 7. This Bid is genuine and not made in the interest of or on behalf of any undisclosed person, firm or corporation '_:+" ~, and is not submitted in conformity with any agreement or rules of any group. association, organization or ~. corporation; BIDDER has not directly or indirectly induced or solicited any other Bidder to submit a false or ~ j,,-, sham Bid; BIDDER has not solicited or induced any person, firm or corporation to refraÌl\ from Bidding; and BIDDER h~s not sought by collusion to obtain for itself any advantage over any other Biqder or over OWNER. 20005t. Joseph Business Park Quotation Form 1. A·5T JOE 9904.00 1 t 0.:58 FAX 820 253 ~002 SEH.RCM ST CLOUD ~ ST JOSEPH ~OO5 i I , 1 BI 1 DER will complete the! WorkJor thefollowing pricc(s): I i UNIT PRICE BID , 1 I' UNIT OF APPROXIMATE ITEM DESCRIfTlON MEASURE QUANTITY UNIT PRICE AMOUNT ,¡,' , NATIV ~ GRASS AN)) FLOWER SIŒDlNG I LUMI) I PRELIMINARY SPRAYING SUM 1.00 $3P·00 $375.00 i I 2 NATIVE GRASS SEED LUMP 1.00 (MATERIALS) i ~ SUM $1,100.00 $1,100.00 3 NATIVE FLOWER SEED LUMP 1.00 (MATERIALS) SUM $3.250.00 $3,250.00 1 DRILLGRASS SEE,? (2 LUMP $11 ,861.00 $11 ,861.00* 4 PASSES), BROADC~ST 1.00 FLOWER SEED, CULTIPACK SUM 1 5 FIRST YEAR MAINTENANCE (2 LUMP 1.00 MOWINGS) ! SUM $750.00 $750.00 í i TOTALBIDIFOR ALL UNIT PRICES $17,336.00 I ., i 1 * #4 Alternate price or $4.610.00 if mulched with oat straw instead of prairie straw. I .,' ,; B1 DERagrccs thattheWorkwill be substantially complcte and completed and ready for fìnalpaymcnt in ac ordance with the dates ~stabJjshed in the enclosed Scope of Work. ~ I 1 1 ,'... .. . .) ¡~~ 10. Communications concerning this BidshalJ be addressed to the address of BIDDER indicated below. ';SUB~JtDon Maroh 24tb; .' ,20~ I i , I f BIDDJ~iS: : Án Indiv dual B (SEAL) I .. (Individual's Name) lB hnsine~as B siness Address ~ 1 Pone & FAX Nos: i I ì I I 1 Quotation Form 2 ," 09:58 FAX 320 253 1002 SEH. RCM ST CLOUD -+ ST JOSEPH IaJ006 . j;.< . A Partnership .. By (SEAL) (Finn Name) ~ (General Partner's Name & Signature) Business Address "é J'~ Phone & FAX Nos: ..)", , .~. I '. .~~. A Corporation fk~Æ·.···lt2, ~~ . By Prairie RestorationSt Inc. P4Zé'7:~r (Corporation Name) Minnesota " (State of Incorporation) .... .. ;~ :j~ II ~; _··ßy Ronald W. Bowen - President 'r '·:"'~~:"_~:~~/~··. (Title, Name & Signature of Person Authorized to Sign) Ir' '. '~'. .,..\ ~ . ",.."'-' If "~':~ ~'(':\(..' · ::¡Z;orp~~~al) > ~ ~/;:¡~!;ß ~....:. :;...,,~t.te¢ Amy L. Olson ......=~_..~,...~.-. ":: -.. ....~..,. (Secretary) . . ",." .,.-<o..~.......~ Business Address PO Box 327 - ptinceton. MN . 55371 Phone & FAX Nos: 763-389-4342 Fax# 763-389-4346 ACCEPTED BY: City of St. Joseph Name ! Title Date 2000 81. Joseph Business Park Quotation Form .'; A-ST JOE 9904.00 3. t If .,' .l... . . I I 13/31100 09: 59 F.AX 320 253 1002 . SEH. RCM STCLOUD ~. ST JOSEPH [jiJ 007 0: RIY UIS II tW~;tIR-4;j11¡ trOll: nargl tireöl!\œK1 via 8tUX.CIIIØ f1¡ f.f ¿ IJJ-tlf·'" 111'10 m '....... ·~·l ! ~. ... i .."., CERTIFICA TEOF LIABILITY INSURAN·CEC$ft UI3I (",,;1: ¡MIo1ItA:JIV') . . ... . I. . ,. ... FRAIR-l 03/24/00 P¡¡,:.C\JC¡¡* 1 -- Tio!'S ceRTIFICATE is ISSUEif'Ãš A MATTER OF INFOAMATIÕÑ ONL.Y AND CONFER$ NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTll"tCATI!. Mabowa d Insurance Aqency I HOLOER. THIS CERTI!"ICATE OOES Nor AMEND, EXTEND OR ~. O. :II: 12~ AL TEr< '!'He COVeRAGE AFFOROeO 8Y ¡HI! POLICI!S ee!..ow St. C1 ud HN 56302 I Phonej.320_251_'751 fax: 320-251-2373 L INSURERS AFFORCING COVERAGE IT;,:ïP.Tr.i --...----..---r----------- ~"'ÕllR<:~'\ - St. Påúl c~ã~~!____________.___ I mllRe~ e . . ¡ .;I)RE~..... ----------. P~au.:r::J.e Retðtoratiol15, Inc. _..:...-......:-________.___. ___ P.O. Box 321 1 N!!u~n ~ l'r.inaeton I1N 55371J -----____.__...___ L i r¡¡U~E~ E COVER.'I·3ES I THE F'OqCIE,s OF !N..'ltJRANC! LISTED aeLOWMAVEBEEN '$6~ED TO THE INSlIREDNMtED "BeNE FOR THE POLICY PfRIOO INDICATED. NOrWIT¡.¡sr,~[HNG . AoY REqlJIREMENT. TERM OR CONDITt~ OF ~NY CONrMCi OR OrneR DOCUMENT WITH Ri:SPECT TO WHiCH THIS c;eRTIFICATE MAv liE 1:S~IEOOR .' 1IIA'1 PE 'fAIN, THE INSUR,l.NCE AFFORCEO,8YTHE POllC,ES DESCRI8EOHEREIN IS SUBJECTTOAlL THETE~Ms, EXCLUSlON$ANO CONDITIONS OF SUCH POL!::IE . AGGREGATE LIMi"S SHOWN rlll\l WIVE BEEN ItEOUCEO 8Y P¡'.ID CLAIMS. . '!"'<T. -- -·:·-::-7--·--;----r·---r-~·:·- ==4 :~Ê"~ t:,...ç.i1ïE~þ-crc~'~T---·----·---·~---·-··- \ l1:"· j(P. \.'-IIJ;:URM~..E: ',,', I .".. ,Pcr..lt:'-NIJli~~ ,", .'). "" :'~-il~¡"'''' [rlf,rE ~V)¡4;OOf'(Y}1 , "",' , ',," I.IMITS , ¡- ;.2::~'¡: hi. ~'ASl\. ~I II .1' I . l.!.:~~~ OC"~'RREI,,,~e ._ I" lOOOOCQ. I It. ~J!.i r';·¡"ME~·.\. "'I7'€r>A~ llf,¡¡1 IT¥ : C~063099U 07/01/99 ¡ 07/01/00 ~r.J'lE O"\I~~~~Anr~~OO¡ $ 10º-~!?-º-_..___ :'_..~i w. t~'U~.\::>E [iJ oO;;\~\J~ I I I ~M!E'ËY.'" '~1!.' ~ c.",,,,.!.. & 500-º-___ : ·.1 ¡; Ç'F.R\;~'I'¡AL t. ~;j" r:.~.'RY > 1.000000 I·..·.· ..' .... .-.. ...-._......._~ ,I . II, ! t;';Ë;ië~AL"~;;RË~;iË-· ·~·2õõ·õ·õ-ÕÕ··--···- __I .---...-------\ I I I·~·----·-· .--...- ¡ (~¡q:l ~.."'¡¡.t;'~;.~.TF..I.~W~F~l.lF".Pf.r<··1 I·. ... I ...1.. ,r·RQDl.('TS.cO¡Ii:',r,i"~~G 1,2000000 "lli~1,;:!' r-}"Ll..o..., D7IOi¡::;-:;/.1/.. ~~.;'~:;;;]I:~~;~·_~~. f. _I F. ",'w'n=,'" Jr..)." I I I ~"()I~ y It~JI;R',' T. r .... $: ;Herf..llEC' ALrrO$ 'I I ! (P!o~ P!""('''Õ; .. . . .J ~-:-! I I r-·---·---·-~--_..L..-·---·-·-·--- L~.I rl "L' ol.liO:; I ¡ i I ¡;·)Dll.¥ iNJl:lR·' I ~ 'X~N ,., ·"·"·'E-· ,. f'···.>: , f 'P. a.f.I,'"".) . ' . ,.-..... " ". "., I I I . r-·· I -·-----·~---·I·_··--- I I .,,' ".n,'" ~~ ,....~:v¡ ... I'· -1··....-·..···"······-··..-"·----·-·---·1... ! .. I.. . .,.' 1_~\·:~E;iJ.;;,f""·'E i~ I riA"""" F U.&.T'{ f--! --r-. I 'U;(.' .........., e:~ 4.:CC,Elo!T ¡ ~ t..:IA:'Y M'T') lip· ·1. .r,~·;~~;-:~~~-·-··-i:¡:r;;;.:li-·-·-· .",,--. It'·1 ! ! " ", "',',' ,"",' ," '",.'. ".',.,"", ,; ··AU Ó~I!'Ll" ..... ... ·..~I;';:;' $. . .- -d-·- . -7-!-- t~!:,.', l14BR.ITY ._.! .' . ,. .. .. .. ! . ~~!~~~''¡':E ?~.!I~~O A·.f 'I()·r·r..\!~ 'L' ¡';L"!\<:',M"(\~ CKOEi30eel6! 0 7/01/991 07/0'J./OO·¡'''~~M" ry.' '-' .'.-' I .. ---....--"4-;--- L_, I I . I ¡---..------ I --. C-1~·l'~C IP.<l, ¡ . Ii . I .. 1--.____._+-___.__ ~rt',·ITI.;)·,i $ . . .1.1. .. I .' I.. i~ ! W:.f'''R~'';:;~,Pl:NSA·'·:,I0''''> . ... I 1 .. . .. ...., , I .,.. ,1- I I t·;:,R~l:.\t$1 i\'J~' Ai "l.~I"...rl.~.¡;....'..~.... ~..e..\ITY..J...m.. 'l'A,.....U02.7D.. 7....... ..·....',..........,.,....I.Q7/..0...1: .....1.9..9. 1...0..1...../01/00 ~.~ :'·.'H~c:y:eN· S.§OOOÕÕ___ , ' '.'<> .. ...." .. '.. <[ ~~'~. '......, I , .. . i · ~~'~ ~""""' "5.00.' _C~__lL-· i . _ _L _ r~,~~:·t(~.sç.ç..·~r;~~l.I;L~C '.~.T.(~~~.Ó'fl ~;~~>'!..,~.e ~'w..'l [~~.~'~ ~~~~. '1f:~.~ ~R ~F.i)'~;~~'\2~~~I:t.l$- h St. 1".rince ton, t-JN :) ... ''''' 1..., .1..~, ~""".., -:.d -, "'do1ph, ... _ _CO, I Busine a ~arkSto:r:m Water Detent1an.lasin. 1 I CE~TIFIC¡f.TE ¡';OLe~R ¡ N ¡ Al"';T~)N'~ IN:'-lIF'¡;¡-¡.liUmI'R ..:rn::¡;. .,.- CANCEL\..ATlCN ," ... CI~O!'4 $H:.">I.II. ~ A~Y ';IF ·''IE ,,~I)vf: DE$'::RtIõ€D FÓI.:~1f$I!¡¡ <:lJoI':::I.!.;O ;¡¡¡¡FÇRe TI"iE E¡("'1i ~Ti<.1N n. Of. TliERf.:J¡:. lNf.,IS$..;N(; Il.¡st ~EP W \ l Ç; \t1e..'.,)R TO I~Ail 10 D.'V\> Wo,l!TEN N(\1!(:¡; T(. fl"E ':;<.;J:1;FV;i\ TU":"'OE~ w."< ¡;, ~,;IT!-i¡:¡ C:i.t of St. JOlla b i l~;r.IS.JrF~ll,r'E:(; r.'\~ r;.: ~'<A"\. ,",POf£ NO "~¡I).ArJC1+'~~ I.Àel".1'1 Of' Att~; CÞad Carl~on. Ally I<.I'IC\ ~"r: rt-E N!>lJ!'~ç:.I'i" ,,1j,;W~:::OR REf'Rf.:";¡:¡'¡T¡;n.es P.O. 80x 668 i ~: ~... o1o...pb ~.!!:.O.6_~,e crc__ r4.CORO 25 S (7I'ifI) .. ACO~D CORPORATION 1988 i I I I 1 10:00 FAX 320 253 1002 SEH.RCH ST CLOUD ~ ST >JOSEPH ~008 A; · ~, QUOTATION FORM . Contractors Name IIhvMe? t).{Jl /V~II¿· ~ttfe -> PROJECT IDENTIFICATION: 2000 St..1oseph Business Park St. Joseph, Minnesota SEH No. A-SnOB 9904.00 THIS BID IS SUBMITTED TO: Mr. Chad Carlson :J .!,.:r~ ø ( Ecohomic Development Director City of St. Joseph P.O. Box 668 St. Joseph, MN 56374-0668 .. 1. The undersigned BIDDER agrees to establish wildflowers and native grasses at the Business Park storm water · detention basin site. 2. A Bid Bond is not required. A Perfonnance and Payment Bond is not required. A certificate of insurance satisfactory to dle City ,is required. 3. BIDDER has visited the site and become familiar with it and is satisfied as to the general, local, and site conditions that may affect project cost, progress, performance, and furnishing of the work. I' 4. BIDDER is familiar with and is satisfied as to an federal, state, and local laws a.nd regulations that may affect cost, progress, performance, and furnishing of the work. ili BIDDER does not consider that any additional examinations, investigations, explorations, tests, studies, or data ;;r, are necessary for the determination of d1is Bid for performance and furnishing of the work or in accordance ~:,,:'il": with the times, price, and other tenns set forth in the enclosed Scope of Work. ;~t,,?\~ '.,~~ 6. BIDDER is aware of the general nature of Work to be performed by Owner anQ others a~ the. site that relates "t~> '¡4· to Work for which this Bid is submitted. ....'~' ,~~ This Bid is genuine and not made in the interest of or on b~half of any undisclosed person, firm or corporation ,::~~:' 100_ and is not submitted in conformity with any agreement or rules of any group. assl?ciation, organization or .~ ....- II':" corporation; BIDDER has not directly or indire~tly induced or solicited any other Bidder to submit a false or "¡;¡i::¡, sham Bid; BIDDER has not solicited or induced any person, firm or corporation to refrain from Bidding; and .:>11'¡ BIDDER has not sought by collusion to obtain for itself any advantage over any ot~er Biqder or over OWNER. . 2000 St. Joseph Business Park Quotation Form · . A-ST JOE 9904.00 1 1."- 1tI" \r ,., I.' I 1 10:01 FAX 320 253 1002 SEH,RCM ST CLOUD -) ST JOSEPH ~009 I " I '. ! ~ i i . 8. BlD[jER will com~letel the Wort< fur tl¡e folloWing priée(s): ,~: I 'UNIT. PRICE BID r~' , ' ITE f I UNIT OF APPROXIMATE NO ITEM DESÇRIPTION MEASURE QUANTITY UNIT PRICE AMOUNT " \ i NA 11IVE GRASS AND FLOWER SEEDING I , LUMP It 3,"~ 0 ~ t PRELIMINAR Y SPRA YJNG SUM 1.00 7s-0 I ~~. I "" IISD .e.. f /35{)ÐØ ::~- . 2 NA DYE GRASS SEED LUMP 1.00 (MA1ERIALS) I SUM ¡ l 3\ I ~' O~O" NA TIVE FLOWER SEED· LUMP 1.00 ~" ~ (MA 1ERIALS) . i SUM '/O~ I DRILL GRASSS~ED (2 LUMP '1" I ~"5;1:0 4 PASSES), BROADcAST 1.00 ¥,5(.5,DC. FLOWER SEED, GUL TIPACK SUM I 5 FIRST YEAR MAINTENANCE (2 LUMP 1.00 ¡ <Øt> l~()D I MOWINGS) I SUM I ! ff"¡4 .415".0 ð TOTAL BID FOR ALL UNIT PRICES I n"~ I , I I 9. JUDDER agrees that thelWork will be substantialJy complete and completed and ready for final payment in froanee wIth the date, ...tablished io the enclosed Scope of Wort<· 10. . ommunieatiuns con=1ing this Bid !'hall be addressed tp the address ofBlDDER ¡""icote<! helo\y. SUBMron t:"3>/~ ':t . .. · . ,20 Or> . , IfBIDJER is:. I An Ind~vidual 1 y (SEAL) dtng business as Bhsiness Address. Pone & FAX Nos: I , ! , . ! 2000 St. Joseph Business Park i Quotation Form A-STJO~ 9904.00 2 ~ , \ i 1 10:02 FAX 320 253 1002 SEH.RCM ST CLOUD ~ ST JOSEPH ~OHJ ,~ ,r," A Partnership . By (SEAL) ~! (General Pa '.~, . ,¿ :,,1' ".V'-'. it.. Business Address ."r"l'\t .,.,....., Phone & FAX Nos: l' . , AcorporatiO/h'" . k' N' L~ "t;-· By ,/I1/l~ .' ~iVe' · '.. >C4:pe' (Corporation Name) , . .. . ~ ..I'~ , By "".. ignature of Person Authorized to Sign) ,.. ",..... "'".- ;:...',.. (Corporate Seal) Œ ,I .1' )i ~:,! ~ Attest .-- ".'* I~:: 1"'''.1 (Secretary) . ~:~' ,I'" Bu,inessAddress . {ito3ß H>1l-.¡ q~¡./ç .~ l)1ftl~6)d1 .... ; ·,·1,1 .. .. ~ml Phone & FAX Nos: é:i V "fh't- t.rl. ' (:3 ;;)~) r~tl- . )""1! ¡;"''!"''f! ........ ACCEPTED BY: iì;'-~14 ,-. "q~: City of St. Joseph ./tti ~, ! -~, . II Name Title :\,/' 1 'J','>l:'~ '";_'.; 'H'. ,~ ~, .' It", . '....~.. Date r'·' ¡ .... ""1 ."' '~1\t "~r.t "1Iio..... ~, . I,; . "..- ~¡ -f "!"" G " .,' 'p'~ 200081. Joseph.Business'Park Quotation Form '}H! . ~~! II A-ST JOE 9904.00 . 3 -r . 'I ~ ;., -~,. '...~ '.... (-', .' ,,!".rZ:' ~' ,~ ':t"·, ]~!",'."";11 ~ I ,. \ I , i . APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY OUTSIDE LIOUOR PERMIT \ Fee: $ Date Paid: I I Þ.ð I , , i : ! i 1. Name of applisant: 2. Address of ycer'ed premises: 3. Date of outsid~ activity: From to \ 1 4. The. activity toþccur will consist of: 'e{'" 5. The area desiJated for 0\ltside liquor will not exceed square feet. 6. Ingress and egrþsswiIÎbe~ontruÎ1ed by:· ·'f!h.,../ Ie; þ-rJ ·lr£))1 ¿Ø/ i 7. A tent_ will;l.Awill not cover the area. I , 7JßtJ i . 8. The estimated *umber' of people attending will be I The number of1employees working at the time of the event will be. .;;:-7 ". . 9. . l. .. rn i.I')/c. 10. The activitìesl ich mv; cr~ate ~ other than general conversat~s, are ttIe foll,owing J-ðCpI/Yl/5!('dh s - F(71/~rs < )e dT'fÞRd¡ tJ~ ( '?V(",Y'.5 . ;' . 11. The fOllowings~sWill be t~ken to. reduce. noise: .- ,d rn V J I Cd n~ . )'. Or Ir' I '1 J./- ~ / 17' - I 1 12. Thistype of eve~t _ has /Æhas not occurred in the past. 13. Additional secuLv will be retained by the licensee in, the form of I . i 14. , ¿o~ a.) b.) c.) I /1 .. Datb Signature .of Applicant " . This application was reviewed by an offer of the St. Joseph Police Department on 3....&3, t:-'}D. . The Department recommends that the. Council: - Disapprove the application because: ~. Approve the application with the followings terms and conditions in ad those s t forth in the applicati~n: This application came before the St. Joseph City Council on . Based upon the information and evidence presented, the Council hereby resolves: . - The application is granted subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the application and recommended by the Police Department as hereafter modified:. _ - The application is denied based upon the following findings: Mayor Clerk/ Administrator l ( ". s: \ CHy \S<)OC \ af07 1:96-'52 . :- I I . AMENDMENT TO ORDINANCE 71. LICENSING AND REGULATION OF ! CONSUMPTION OF INTOXICATING LI()UOR 1«,<, .,' . , The CitY Council for the City"f St. Io.eph hereby, RESQL YES that Section 71M, S u 4, 6, of the Code ÛqrdÎI¡ance. isrescindedand thefolldwÎI¡g enacted iri iÞ¡ place: i i , Subd. 6: Temporary Outside Liquor Permit. . 0- I I a) Notwith~tanding the provisions of Section' 11, Subd.'s 2, 3 and 4 herein, a licensee shall be ~llowed to sell intoxicating liquor and may allow persons to possess and consumel·aid intoxicating liquor out.ide of, the building of an "on-..le" business, pursuant to a special permit from the City. E~ch permit issued by the City shall be applicable for a single designated period not to e~ceed, 48 hours. Applica lion for permit n]ust be, mad" to, the City Clerk at leasttbirty days prior to the date for which the permit is to apply. Application shall be on a form prescribed by the City Council. I Application shall be made in the name of licensee, and the licensee assume. :full responsibility for any violation of the terms ,of the permit, this OrdÎI¡aoc¡' or other law re.ulting frol]1 acts orc~~ductoccurring on the licensed premises hu the time the permit is in effect. Application for ,a permit shall be accompa~ied by a permit!ee established and amended from time to time by Council resolution. The fee is non-refundable. ! . b) Upon recþipt, the Clerk shall forward the applicatioh to the Chief of l'oUce for review, cqrnment and recornmendation.Upo~ completion of police review" the applieatio& shall be considered by the Çouncil at a public meeting: Prior to meetÎI¡g, the, ,appliqmt shall notify the owners of property adjacent to the location of the proposed outside liquor of the pending application. c) At the mLing, the Council may either deny or grant the permit and establish reasonabl~ conditions and regulations controlling the permitted activities. ¡ When con*dering a permit request, the Council shall consider the following factors: (i) Protection of the peace and repose of the residents of the City. (ü) The safety of City residents and their property. (ill) The reasonable Concerns of City' residents within the, vicinity of the 1 d " propose actIvIty. (iv) T~enature ofthe actiyity proposed and the månner in which the licensee in~ends on controlling the activity. (v) The general land Use of the, surrounding neighborhood. (vi) Pa:st experience with eVents of a similar nature and events held by the applicant. (vü) R~commendationsof the Police Department relative to public safety, law enforcement and the creation of disturbance. I (vill) Whether the event'is one of general community interest or is in the nature of a civic event. . 1 , . .tIII".._~ ".~ d) In granting a permit for temporary outside liquor, the Council shall establish · reasonable conditions to protect public health, safety, repose and property. The conditions established by the Council may include, but are not limited to, the following: (i) Limitation of the time of outside activities. (ü) Limitation of the specific activities permitted. ( ill) Require measures to limit or regulate. noise. (iv) Limit the number of participants. (v) Require the licensee to provide special security. (vi) Make special provisions for additional parking. (vü) Dictate cleanup of area. e) In addition to those stated in the permit, all temporary outside liquor permits shall be subject to the following terms and conditions: (i) Outside liquor shall only be allowed in an area adjacent to the licensed premises. (ü) Ingress and egress to and from the area in which liquor is served, consumed or possessed must be effectively controlled by a fence, tent wall, building or other structure. (üi) The licensee, his/her agents or employees shall supervise the activities or persons within the outside liquor area for the purpose of enforcing the state and local liquor laws, and controlling ingress and egress to the area. · (iv) No live or recorded music may be played within the outside liquor area after 9:30 p.m., unless the source of the music and all speakers or amplifiers are enclosed within a tent having walls and a roof. (v) The permitted outside liquor area shall not cause an obstruction of a public street, alley or sidewalk, unless specifically permitted by the Council. (vi) The licensee shall repair any damage to public property directly resulting from the activities, including damage to pavement caused by tent stakes and supports. This Arriendment shall be effective upon approval and publication. Adopted this day of August, 1996. - .. - Mayor Clerk ":\Clty' $I 10013(\)71 ;";>6.151 · 2 i '" \ \ \ City of St.Jos~ph City Gouncil.M~eting . 3/16/00, 7:00PM 1. Call t~Ord~r. g~rs.U~qIIO dJe callaod ""Ii"" Wk(~~¿ th~;bII'CoUn~iI (od~"City of SI Joseph met~:>nThun;day,March 16,2000 at 7:00 p.m. in the SLJoseph City Hall. I I Members Present: Mayor Kenneth J. Hiemenz, Bob Loso, Cory Ehlert,Ken Twit, Mary Niedenfuer,~nd Deputy ClerR JudyWeyrens and ClerR-Administrator Cari Schmidt. ....<.>.-....:.:'..:..:.'.:>..'. . 'ì Others Present: ~0r1te Eastvold,', Hub Klein, .. Mike Kittridge,' Joe Bettendorf, EDA Director Chad.carl~ori,JerryLahr,MitchAnderson, Sergeant Jeff Young and Dennis Dalman. '( I ' , " ,,' 2. Approve Agenda. ,Schmidt stated that there is one. addition to the agenda. Th~ Lions brought in their 2 year renewal for their pull tab .license for Loso's Main Street Pub and the EI Paso. Schmidt stated. that this would have waited until the next agenda but that the Lions need .it sybl11it~ed to the State' by April, 6th. It sh8uld be a routine item. and could be added to the consent agenda. . Schmidt also asked if item 14, the City andTownshiplot itemcould be bumped up in ~he meeting so Joe Bettendorf would not have to wait until the end of the meeting to m.ake comments. Loso made a motion to approve the changes to the agenda, seconded by Twit.. The motion passed unanimously. Twit made a motion to approve the agenda, seconded by Loso. The motion passed unanimously. I \ 3. Public Hearing - CedarStreet Turnback - Schmidt read the notice of thepub.lic hearing. "The Stearns.cpunty Board of Commissioners will be holding a special f!lE:!eting in conjunction with. their regular City Council meeting at the City of St. Joseph City Hall on March 16, 2000\ at 7:00 PM for the purpose of receiving testimony concerning the Board's proposal to turnl¡back RightofWay as described asJollows: all that part of Highway Right of . Way Iyingnorth~rlyofaline drawn 95' parallel and perpendicular tothecenter/ine of the east bound lane of C$)AH 75 as traveledfrom the westerly Right of Way line of.tst Avenue NEto the north south 0uarterline of Section 10, T124N, R29W. Also, all that part of Right of Way lying southerlyard adjacent to Lots 1-7, Pete Loso's Addition, Section 10, T124N, R29W. If this Right of Way is revoRed by the Board, it will revert to the City of St.Joseph. Additional information can be obtained from the Stearns County Highway Dept., 455 28th Ave. So, Waite Park, MN 56387,'\ telephone (320) 255-6180." Jerry Lahr, Stearns County Right of Way Engineer, and Mitch Anderson,' Stearns County Engineer, were present to answer any questionsJrom th'.e public. Loso asked about future plans to turn back that portion of Cedar that runs ,in front of Subway and Kay's Kitchen., Lahr stated that at this time, the County has no plans to turn t~at portion, of the road, back to the City. Ehlert asked for clarification of where this turnback starts and stops. Twit stated that it appears as though this portion is Larger than whadhey originally anticipated. ' I Mitch Anderson stßted that the agreement was thafthe County would not be maintaining the frontage road. Thi,s was contemplated when this was initially brought up, but the paperwork was never comple~ed and the hearing never held. , Hiemenz asked Ahderson what action they needed from the Council at this time. Anderson explained the process. Ehlert made a motion to accept the aforementioned parce/as turned back to the. City of St- Joseph. Niedenfuer seconded. the motion and it pas$ed unanimously. \ 4 Public Hearing - Çreationof a Redevelopment Project Ar.ea,- Schmidt read the notice of public hearing, which ,states; "Notice is hereby given that the City Council of the City of St. Joseph, Minnesota,'lwillhold a public hearing on Thursday, March 16,2000, at a meeting of the Council beginning at approximately 7:00 PM, Central Daylight Savings Time, at the St. . Joseph City Hall, 211 First Avenue NW, ,St Joseph, MN, relating to the proposal of the St. 1 \ \ i i \ i . ~ Joseph Economic Development Authority to establish a Redevelopment Project Area in connection with the acquisition of certain land and the existing building thereon to be . remodeled, constructed and equipped for use as a city hall (the "Redevelopment Project Area"); and adopt the Redevelopment Plan for the Redevelopment Project Area (the "Plan"); all pursuant to and in conformity with applicable law, including Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.001 through 469.047 and 469.090 through 469.1081. A copy of the relative documentation proposed to be considered at the hearing will be on file and available for public inspection at the office of the City's Clerk-Administrator-Treasurer at the St. Joseph City hall at least 10 days prior to the public hearing." Carlson stated that the redevelopment plan is.for the purchase.and construction costs for the new City hall. There is an actual dollar figure quoted in the plan. The EDA will be financing this project on behalf of the City. Carlson stated that Monte Eastvold is present and will be discussing the different bond options that are available to the City. Schmidt stated that before Monte makes his presentation that she would like to mention that the City received a letter from its bond counseL Initially, ¡twas thought that we could only bond up to $1 million. Our bond counsel has informed us that we can in fact bond up to $1.6 million dollars. The $1 ,235,000 General Obligation Bonds of 1997 for the fire hall are exempt from our net debt calculation. This allows the City to bond for more than we initially thought. Monte Eastvold, of Juran & Moody, addressed the Council. Eastvold explained. that the Council has before them six different scenarios to consider: $1 million at 15 years and 20 years, $1.3 million at 15 years and 20 years, and $1.6 million at 15 years and 20 years. Eastvold explained that if the Council issued a $1 million dollar bond over 15 years, the impact on a $100,000 home would be $98.29/year, or $8.191 month. Over 20 years, the impact on a $100,000 home would be $82.91/year or $6.91/month. Eastvold explained that if the Council issued a $1.3 million dollar bond over 15 years, the impact on a $100,000 home would be $128.23/year or $10.77/month and that $1.3 million over 20 years for a $100,000 . home would be $109.67 per year, or $9.13 per month. Ea~tvold explained that if the Council issued $1.6 million dollars over 15 years, the impact on a $100,000 home would be $158.87/year or $13.24 per month, and over 20 years the impact would be $134.76/year and $11.23/ month. Ehlert asked if we are hand tying other EDA projects by using all of our bond capacity for this project. Eastvold explained that this could only be used for public projects of this type and not private sector development projects. Ehlert stated that he is hesitant to do 1.6 million. However, he stated that the City should be looking at doing this right the first time and getting away from the band aid approach. Ehlert is concerned however that we don't build the Taj Mahal. The citizens will be asking for some type of return on their investment and we have to be able to justify the expense. Schmidt stated that even if the Council authorizes the City to issue $1.6 million in bonds, the Council would not have to issue that much. We should have a better idea of the actual remodeling costs before the actual bond sale date. By authorizing the $1.6 million, we are just allowing ourselves to go that high if necessary. Schmidt also stated that it's important to remember that the funds are not solely being used for remodeling. Over $500,000 is being used for the actual purchase of the land and building. Twit expressed concern that if the City would bond for 1.6 and we only actually spend 1.1 there would be serious penalties for the over bonding. Eastvold explained that there are repercussions for over issuance, but that it sounds like we can get closer to the actual number in the next few weeks. Before the bonds are issued, we should have a clearer understanding of how much money will be needed. 2 . I . i It was questioned Why the City must decide this now. Eastvold explainedthatthe interest · rates are expected I to go up. In addition, we cannot issue the bonds untif we actually own the property. Twit made a motion to authorize the City to issue up to $1.6million dollars at 20years, with the idea that this n~mber will most likely be lowered as we get clearer numbers for our remodeling costs. Niedenfuer seconded the motion. 1 , Twit stated that thiS gives us a working window in which to decide. Ehlert stated that the City will soon be dealing with another issue in its maintenance facility. He suggested that perhaps theCityshouldbe considering including the maintenance facility in this bond issuance and killing two birds wit~ one stone. If the City really wants to getaway from the band aid approach, maybe thisis the time to do this too. Ehlert .asked how much money we have already in the Main~enance fund for this. ! Schmidt stated that if the bonds were going to be issued for thisaswell, we would have to have a site alreadyi picked out. Eastvold explained that the City would actually have to own the property before¡the bonds could be issued. Carlson added that the maintenance facility would also have to ,be included in the redevelopment project areaand that we probably wouldn't want the Maintenance shop located in the center of town with City hall. Carlson stated that wewouldbasically have to start from scratch with the documents that have already been þasséd and signed. I Loso stated that m6st of the maintenance department likes it where they are already. Ehlert stated that perhaps! then if there isn't a new facility picked out, we should still bond for the full !. . ...... ,"" . .... .. " .... '. .... . , .... .......,'". '..:' .' , amount and used the remainder to fix up the current maintenance facility. Eastvold stated that this wouldn't be possible as these funds can only be used for this project. Schmidt stated·that it might be better not to do anything now than to expend some funds now for a fix · up and then ask fori a new facility later. It might come across better to the public to just wait. Hiemenz called thel question. The motion. to authorize the issuance up to $1.6 million dollars at 20 years; with the idea that this number will most likely be lowered as we get clearer 1 numbers for our remodeling costs passed unanimously. 1 , Ehlert stated that he isjust trying to be forward thinking and avoid the band aid approach that the City has been u~ing for so long. Ehlert stated that he thinks that the City paid too much for the bank inthe first place. It all comes down to dollars and cents. Ehlert stated that it is just his opinion but~hat the City has to quit using the friendly approach to business. He said he thinks that Greg .Reinhart of the bank would agree with him. There are no nice guys in business. If the balk is going to be staying in the building after we own it, then some sort of compensation shou d be had. Weyrens explained that the bank made compromises in lieu of not paying a lease, such as not charging interest to the City during the time before the second payment comes due.> The bank is allowing the City to pay a portion at closing, and the remainder45 days later. . Ehlert stated that he would like to see the numbers that show that this isa benefit;to the City. He is just being business minded and again stated that he thinks that Greg Reinhart wouldn't have a problem with this. I 5. Public Hearing - Delinquent Utility Bill Hearing- There were no residents present for this item.. .\ 6. CityfTownshipownedloton4thAve and Minnesota - A letter was sent bySt.Joseph Township regarding'the jointly owned lot on 4th and Minnesota. The letter read: "The Town Board has reviewe~ the summary of the Roske Property Funds presented to them on February 15,2000. If the city's portion of the projected fund balance has not beenbudgeted for another project, the Town Board would be willing to negotiate on the present jointly owned · corner lot on 4th Avenue and Minnesota Street. The original price of $11,000 will again be 1 3 ! i I , i . . offered to the City if the lot is used for public use. The Township would receive no return on their investment by donating the interest on the St. Joseph Township mon~y that had been . invested in the property for five (5) years. If the property is used for other than public use, the 50% ownership reverts back to the Township bringing the Township back in the negotiation. The Town Board is willing to negotiate on an outright sale. Please review this matter and let us know your decision." Loso stated that there is no benefit for the City to own the lot. If we change the use to anything other than public, they are asking us to give them 50% of the. funds from the sale. Hiemenz stated that it is currently zoned public use. If anyone wanted to put something that doesn't fit those zoning requirements on that land, they would have to come and request it from the City. Twit agreed that there is no benefiUo do this now just so that we can pay them if it sells. Loso made a motion to leave the property in its jointly owned status with the Township. Niedenfuer seconded the motion and it passed unanimously. Bettendorf requested a meeting with the Council prior to the meeting with the. Township on the 3rdof April. The Council decided to meet with Bettendorf on Thursday, March 30th at 3:30 PM to discuss 121 and the presentation to the Township. 7. Consent Agenda - a. St. Joseph Parish - 4 day Temporary 3.2 on sale liquor license for 4th of July Celebration . b. St. Joseph Parish..., Gambling permit application for July f1 and 4th c. Lions 2 year gambling license renewals Twit asked why the Parish needed a four day liquor license for a two day event. Hub Klein addressed the Council and stated that beer is usually served on the day they set up and the day they take down. Twit stated that he has some concern about having City personnel and equipment there if alcohol is being served on those days. Niedenfuer made a motion to approve the Consent Agenda, seconded by Ehlert. . The motion passed unanimously. 8. Approve Minutes -Ehlert made a motion to approve the minutes of March 2, 2000. Ehlert . seconded the motion and it passed unanimously. 9. Bills Payable and Overtime/Callouts - Weyrens reported that staff has another request that isn't listed in the bills. Last year the DARE fund paid for the lab school kids to go the Law Enforcement Center and woùld like approval todo the same this year. Loso made amotion to approve the funding of the Lab Schools bus trip to the Law Enforcement Center, seconded by Twit. The motion passed unanimously. Weyrens also reported that the disbursement to Craig Bartson will be reimbursed by the Lions club. Loso asked how long the silt fence must stay in the pond. Hiemenz explained that it stays there until enough vegetation has grown to establish a natural barrier. Weyrens also reported that St. Joseph, as well as other communities, are having difficulty with St. Cloud and their computer system. Staff is seeking authorization from the Council to begin discussions with Sartell about possibly linking to their system. There is a desire to create our own network with other communities. This would also serve as leverage in dealing with St. Cloud and their system. Sergeant Jeff Young stated that the biggest issue now is that we can't get a straight answer out of St. Cloud. Hiemenz stated that he knows that St. Cloud is working on the issue and that it will take some time. Young stated that another problem is that they want complete control of the information in terms of input and output. St. Cloud is essentially holding the system hostage now. Weyrens explained that all of the other Cities are in the same boat now too. This could be éI good bargaining chip to deal with St. Cloud. Loso asked if staff would still comeback to Council for final approval and staff said they would. Loso made a motion to authorize staff to begin discussions with Sartell about possibly creating their own computer network. Twit seconded this motion and it passed unanimously. 4 . I I I ¡ ¡ I I I , Twit made a motio~toapprove the bills payable 27344 through 28091. Niedenfuer seconded · the motion and it passed unanimously. i I Twit made a. motioq to approve the overtime and callout~,seconded by Loso. The motion passed unanimously. . .... .....'..... o. Public commentslon the Agenda - Hub Klein addressed theCounciland stated that he had received acon)plaint from Fred Reber about the drainage into his backyard. Hiemenz stated that hespok'e toJoe Bettendorf about it and that he would be taking a look at it. , ; Klein also stated th~tas itisgettingwarm again, there are going to be morekidsouton skateboards and roller blades. He. is concerned that someone is going to get hit if the City doesn't d<)SOmethir9 about it. Mike Kittridgeaddressed the Council. He stated that his shop will be for sale and is curious to see if the City would be interested in purchasing it. He stated that some of the Maintenance guys had already bøen out to take a look at it.. If the City wants. to buy the shop, he would sell it for $275,000. He' is seHingit because he can't afford to have two places. It's 50' x84' with an upper office. It's two years old and has 14ft. doors. There isa drain in the floor and a loading dock in the ,back. It's over 4000 square feet. It cost him $550 to heat it last year in total so it's pretty energy efficient. Kittridge stated he is open to any proposals or options. The new state mandated zoning is requiring him to move pretty fast. I 11. Treasurer's Repor¡t - Weyrens reported that as of December of1999, the General fund has abalance of$951,~69.41. There is approximately $74,000 in the lift station fund. She explained that the City is carrying a balance of $1 ,229,222.26 (twelve months worth of operating.expense~) which is included in the designated reserve. · .Twit stated. that he stopped by the office to clarify some questions he had on the Treasurer's Report. It's a little cpnfusing as there are salaries that are split between departments. Twit expressed concerniwith some areas where we are over budget and others where we come in under.Weyrens explained that especially in regard to the Maintenance Department, it is impossible to predict to a high degree of certainty how much money will be spent on areas such as snowplowi~g and overtime, etc. These items are determined by the weather and the amount of activity t~atis needed, which makes it hard to predict. i Twit stated that if th,e departments are not being held to their budget in certain areas and are just allowed to take[ it from ()ther parts of the budget, there will be no incentive to make an effort to watch the dollars being spent. i I Twit also stated that he is bothered that the City does not budget for depreciation. Weyrens explained that we cbn budget for depreciation, but that the numbers will. always be six months behind. I Hiemenz questione~ whether or not the Mayor was covered by Worker's Compensation. Weyrens explainedithat this is. something that the Council discussed and voted ?n last year. The City was given fa rate for the City Council and the Mayor. The rate is different for everyone and higher for the Police, Fire, and Water and Sewer departments. Loso made a motion to accept thf( Treasurer's report, seconded by Twit. The motion passed unanimously. I 1 . St. Joseph· BrochUre - Chad Carlson presented the new promotional brochure that was put together by the Stat City Commission. Elness Designsdidthe layoutand design work. The I . ... City has the softwa~e to reproduce the inserts at the back of the brochure, as this information is likely to change. This will. ensure that the brochures do not become easily dated. The brochures are free to anyone that would like a copy and can be obtained at City Hall. The · Star CityCommissibn is very pleased with the results. The Council expressed their 5 i I I I I I appreciation to the Star City Commission and stated that the brochures looked fantastic. Carlson stated that as long as he is there, he is requesting that the Planning Commission · attend a training session. There is enough money. in the budget tosend them to training if they waive the per diem. Carlson stated that there is an introductory class and an advanced session. .. They would like to send everyone to the beginner's class. . Twit stated that it's important that the Planning Commission is making .educated decisions. Twit made a motion to send all of the Planning Commissioners. to the training session and pay their per diem. Ehlert seconded the motion and it passed unanimously. 13. . Amended Purchase Agreement for First State Bank Property· Schmidt stated that the amended purchase agreement authorizes the City to pay $350,000 at closing, and the remainder of $195,000 within 45 days of closing. Loso made a motion to approve the amended purchase agreement, seconded by Niedenfuer. The motion passed unanimously. 14. Police Department Vacation Policyl Employee Vacation Policy - Schmidt stated that the Police Department has submitted a request dealing with their vacation policy. As long as this was going to be on the agenda, Schmidt thought it would be a good time to deal with the vacation policy for the other employees as well. There are a number of employees that have their anniversary dates coming up and a few that have already passed. Loso stated that in the past we have faced this issue over and over. There are always extenuating circumstances that make it impossible for the employees to get their vacation time down. Twit stated that the employees were in agreement with this last year when it came up. Loso stated that they address this year after year and that it's time that the City just put its foot down and stick to the policy. Schmidt stated that even if there was agreement from the employees, there have been a number of events that could not have been foreseen by the employees. The City was without an Administrator for 9 months. The. City has been without a Police Chief since October. One · of the Maintenance employees has been out for surgery. These are all extenuating circumstances beyond the employees control. . Weyrens added that although no-one told her that she couldn't take vacation, there was an enormous amount of work and not very many people to do it.. Schmidt stated that the City has very dedicated and hard working employees and they should not be punished for that. Ehlert stated that he agrees, but there has to be a time when the Council sticks to the policy. Schmidt stated that the Personnel Manual states that if the employees do not feel they will be able to take their vacation by their anniversary date, that they should approach the Personnel Committee. As there is no longer a Personnel Committee, Schmidt wanted to bring this forward for Council consideration. Ehlert stated that he was never in favor of getting rid of the Personnel Committee. Schmidt stated that regardless, she sees this as part of her position, whether the Personnel Committee was in existence or not. Twit stated that the employees should come back to the City Council with a proposal outlining how they plan to use their vacation-or some kind of a buyout proposal. The numbers need to come down and there will always be some sort of extenuating circumstances. Schmidt stated that the Police are also facing this issue. They are requesting that something be done that is similar to what was allowed for the other employees last year. Sergeant Jeff Young submitted a request to the Council: "As. of this year, along with the new contract, we will be accumulating.vacation hours as we earn them with each pay period. However, we all received the hours we had earned last year plus the carry over we had. The problem arises in that most ofthe officers in our department will have too many hours to try to get down to the 40 hour carry over allowed in the union contract. For myself, it would amount to over three months vacation by the end of the year 2000. What we are asking, is that we be · 6 , >- i ¡ I I ¡ allowed to carry over 200 hours this year and .100 hours in 2001. By 2002 we should be back · to the 40 hour requirement.·· We. are not asking for something out of the ordinary but just that we be allowed to sc~le the vacation back over two years as was done for the other employees when they went to the present system of earning vacation. I am requesting this clarification at this ti&,eso that we are not left with everyone scrambling to get their vacation in prior to the end ofl2000 or losing it." Twit stated that the Police are asking for what the rest of the employees asked for last year. They are one year bøhindbecause of the union contract. Young pointed out that this is really only an issue for the! long term employees, himself, Brad Meyer and Jean Gustin. The rest of the officers are too new.tohave that much of an accrual. Twit made a motion that Jean Gustin, Brad Meyer ~nd Jeff Young be allowed to carry over 200 hours this year, and 100 hours in 2901, with the understanding that by 2002, they would be back to the 40 hour I requirement. Ehlert $econded the motion and it passed unanimously. I I 1 . Mayors Report -liiemenzreported that he had received a number of complaint$ that he wanted to report. AI Kramer is reporting rust in his water. Dick Taufen, the Public Works Directorwill be looking into that. . Fred Reber is complaining about drainage into his yard, and Hiemenz stated that! he spoke to Joe Bettendorf about looking into the problem. i Hiemenz reported t~atwe will be receiving a letter from St. Cloud regarding costs and paymentschemes.¡rhey would like our Council to approve something before it actually goes before the St. Cloud! City Council. Hiemenz stated that the City would be investigating floating a bond to pay forthe expansion. Hiemenz reported that he attended Borgert's open house. He also.repórted that there will be a meetingwithMTC to discuss bus service to St. Joseph at City hallob March 28th at 10:00 am. This meeting will also be televised. I I 11' Council Reports -Loso had no report. Niedenfuer reported that the Heaithy Communities · Partnership group had its first televised meeting. The meetings are now being held the second Monday of every month at the Fire Hall. Niedenfuer reported that Fruhlingfest has been scheduled for May ¡th at Millstream Park. There will be a variety offarm related fun activities. Niedenfuer also stated that the City might want to consider updating its letterhead with a graphic simila~ to the one on·the St. Joseph Brochure. Ehlert reported that he attended the St. Wendel Township meeting. He is also meeting with the St. Wendel Athletic Association forthe Park Board, Ehlert stated that he would like to take back his statem:ent about the bank. In a typical buy/sell situation there would be some compensation in a si,tuation like this. This has been a successful transaction so far though, and he doesn't want1to say it hasn't been. Ehlert stated that if he had been given more information up front by staff, he would not have questioned it at the meeting. Twit stated he had nothing to report but would like to encourage Schmidt to work out a reasonable vacation !arrangement with the employees to get this issue resolved. I ! 1 I Clerkl Administrat1r Report - Schmidt reported on a few upcoming meetings. 18t Miscellaneous and rnnouncementltems - There were no miscellaneous items to discuss. 19 Adjourn - 10:15 Lqso made a motion to adjourn, seconded by Ehlert. The motion passed unanimously. RreCtfUIIY SUbrnitte" · C~ri Schmidt I CI rklAdministrator ! 7 1 ! \ ¡ I ¡ i ~ i; ··v· City of St. Joseph . . . 8 -. . City 0' St. Joseph .. I Joint pity Council/ Planni~g Commission Meeting 03/09/00, 7:00 PM ¡ 1. cIII to Order. pursuani to due call anq notice thereof, the City Council for the City of St. Joseph m t on Thursday, February 9,2000 at 7:00 p.m. in the St. Joseph Fire Hall. M mbers Present:< Mayþr Kenneth J. Hiemenz, Bob Loso, Mary Niedenfuer, Cory Ehlert and Clerk~ iministratorCari Schmidt, EDADirector Chad Carlson,Planning commi:sion Chair Huh Klein, S. K thleen Kalinowski, Gary Utsch, Jim Graeve. Members Absent: Marge Lesnick, Ken Twit. \ 2. Peliminary Plat Process a.1 Cui-de sacs - HiemEmz asked that this item be placed on the agenda. There are a number of pr blems that the. City rJns into in the maintenance area. Cul-desacs are difficult to snowplow. The re idents end up havingitheir driveways plowed in. They are difficult to maintain without expensive e uipment. Hiemenz inqicated that he has received complaints about this issue from residents in P ndview Addition. Klein stated that even though they may be a problem, people want them. They w nt the privacy and don't want to live. on really busy roads. .' Carlson stated that Cul-desacs are often th best way to save as h,anytrees as possible. Ehlert stated thatfamilies love them and there is a ta; benefit as well. Perhaps the City just needsto inform the residents ahead of time that they Wi'.1 be th last ones to get plo~ed out. At least that way, they will have been warned. Klein asked the Mfyorwhat he was asking for. Hiemenz stated that it would be in the best interest ofthe City to keep these development designs to a minimum. The planning commission will see the plans first so they shbuld keep this in mindi as much as possible. ! b. Arteriole roads - Hiemenz stated that he has received a number of complaints already about 1 ih avenue. The streets are only going to become busier and we should try to keep as few lots . as possible from fronting on to these streets that will be so much busier in the near future. The I same situation is present in Northland. ! , c. Subdivisions -So Kathleen Kalinowski requested that this be placed on theagenda. There has been some confusior as to what the process is for approval of subdivisions. Carlson presented the group with a sub:division checklist that is used in the City offices. The Council and Planning Commission can use itfor guidance as well. Loso stated thatit was developed back in 1991 when no-one knew tre process. It was created by Judy Weyrens. The Council and Commission discussed the fact that the preliminary plat for Pondview Six was approved by the Planning Commission. They were under the impression that they were approving it with conditions. Did they] do something wrong? Carlson assured them that they did approve it with conditions and they yvill have the opportunity to makes sure the conditions are met when they see the final plat. The firyal plat will go the the City Council as well as the Planning Commission. i 3. Difcussion on Lots 1,2, and3 of the Pond View Ridge Six Addition - Hiemenz reported that the agreement with Kostreba was never fully executed. Hub Klein stated that these three lots shouldn't e1n be in Pond View 6.[ He stated that putting it together gets him around the variance. Chad C rlson stated that they ~ill have another chance to review the plans when the final platcomes in. It willi have to be approved I by the City and the Planning Commission. . Klein stated that the lots for three holmes don't meet the wi,dth requirements. Gary Utsch stated that they told him to come back with tw~lots instead· of three.j Jim Graeve asked if the Planning Commission had the right to change it no¡ ? Klein stated that n,ow the. Council knows how the Planning Commission feels on the topic too. Ehlert stated that he thin~s there might be enough room for three. St.Joseph has extremely large lotb. ,A question was als9 raised as to which direction the driveways would face. Carlson stated that heldidn'tthinktheCountYWOUld allow them all to front Minnesota Street. S. Kathleen stated thatit's good that the City Counçil now knows the feelings of the Planning Commission on this matter.. . 4. U date - Rental Housi~gOrdinance Task Force - Schmidt stated that at the February3rd Council meting, the City Counciil passed a Special Interim Ordinance that places a rental housing I '¡ , i /.. .~ moratorium for a· period of 180 days. This moratorium, may also be extended for an. additional period . of 30 days by Council resolution. The moratorium prohibits the issuance of any new rentalli.censes in the City, but will not affect renewals of already existing licenses. The ordinance also states that. the Council will appoint a Rental Housing Committee to study the existing ordinances and practices and report to the City Council with recommendations within 90 days of the effective date of the Ordinance. The Committee has already started meeting every Tuesday from 5:00 PM-7:00PM. Schmidt stated that at thelastmeeting,therewas.a group of residents that came to the meeting. It was slightly disruptive as none of the items on the agenda were able to be discussed, TheCommittee decided to dedicate the first half hour of every meeting to citizens questions or comments. The public is welcome to attend the meetings, but after this 30 minute period, the committee needs to. be able to focus on the task that the Council laid outtor them. CoryEhle~rtstatedthat he was at the meeting too. He suggested that a student from one of the Colleges be asked to be a member of the committee. He stated that their input is important, and although Jim Hardwick, a current member of the committee works at St.Johns, he won't offer the student perspective the way a student could. Loso suggested thatinstead of adding another person to the Committee afterthe Council has already made their appointments, that students be invited to the meetings for input.., Schmidt stated that she would pass this recommendation on to the Committee. S. Kathleen Kalinowski stated that she heard that twelve licenses were issued during the time that the Planning Commission recommended a moratorium and when the Council enacted it. She wanted to know why it took so long and what would be done with those licenses. Schmidt stated that there were legal notice requirements and questions that had to be answered before the moratorium could be put into place. Schmidt stated that she knew of only two licenses that were issueddLiring that week, not twelve. ,.. Hiemenz stated that these lic~nses were issued for mor~.people. than are legally allowed to.be there and thaUhe City will be doing something about that. Schmidt stated thatsh~ has . not sent letters to these license holders, as there is disagreement on the part of the Council as to what should be done with this situation. Some of the Council members say that this is how it's always been done and others say that it's wrong. Loso stated that it's clear there are problems with the ordinance and that things need to be more clear. However, historically,.the City has granted licenses in R-2 and R-3 based on square footage. He stated that this occurred after Mark Lambert put in his Campus Villas. Hiemenzdisagreed and stated thaUhe main problem is that the Rental Inspector was using an old set of ordinances and wouldn't use the new ones. Gary Utsch stated that he believes that all of the rental licenses should go through the Planning Commission for approval. The Rental Inspector should make a recommendation to the Planning Commission for the final determination. Schmidt stated that she would pass this on to the Rental Committee as well. Schmidt stated that it's clear there is a lot of disagreement and confusion over this issue. This should not be the time to place. blame or point fingers at anyone. The. Rental Çommittee has been established to layout what the problems are and to make recommendations to the Council to. fix them. We should be looking forward and not dwelling onwhat has been done in the past. 5. City Hall Project - Schmidt stated that the Building Committee has been meeting with the architect to layout the plans for the new City hall project. Schmidt stated that she's heard a lot of speculation and comments on the "million dollar renovations" that the City is making. She said that it's important to remember, that part of that cost was also the purchase of the land and the building itself. The funds that the City will bondforwill not only be to cover the. renovation costs, but also to cover the cost of the building and the land. . .... ~ . I I 1 I I . U sch stated that hethi~ks the City should be looking at creative ways to use all of the buildings. The C'ity should also be loo~ing at options to share the Township Hall or utilize the Fire Hall more often. S~hmidt stated thatther~ wil.1 be. a public information meeting in the near future to layout the plans for tJe new City hall. . i 6. Other Items -Jim GraJve asked the question whether or not the City has the right to require tPanies to place theirutilities in ~enght 01 way . Does the CITy have the legal authori~ to do this. S hmidt stated that sheiwould pose that question to City Attorney John Scherer. A question was also raised about the punch lists for Pondview 3,4 and 5. Hiemenz reported that the 1jon~ 01 the issues h~ve.been taken care of· E lert expressed someboncern about the timeliness of the reports we.receive from our City grglneer.lt'.sdifficult toireact 10 i.nformation ~at is given to the Pla~ningCommlssio~ on ~e .same r ghlert also raise9 the issue about heavy tæffic on Gumtree. Hiemenz stated that Gumtree was d . signed to carry the tréJffic. I i , T \ e City Council and Planning Commission agreed to try and meet on a more regular basis, perhaps IrterlY . 7. Ajourn -Ehlertmade,~ motÎon to adjourn at 9:00 PM, seconded by Hiemenz. The motion passed u animously. j I i . \ , , .' ilL.· !r.." . . t. '. pU8ðcWOR~' DE1RTMENT OPEAATlON AND MAINTENANCE DIVISION 400- 2nd Street Sout 1200- 15th Avenue S.E. 51. Cloud, MN 56301 51. Cloyd, MN 56304 Phone: (320) 255-724 Phone: [(320) 650-2900 Fax: (320) 255-7250 Fax: (3?0) 255-7237 , i I · i Stephen D. Gaetz I Director of Public Works/City ,Engineer I , Eugene LAnderson Gerald¡Zirbes Assistant City Engin er Assistant Director of Operation and Maintenance I Stephen D. Foss I Assistant City Engin er : I MW7 29, 2000 ' i KennethJ. Hiemenz, MLor City f StJoseph I P.O. ox 668 i I St. J ,seph,MN 56374 i Dear Mayor Hiemenz: I \ A co y of the propose~ Addendumtoithe<Sewer Use Agreement is attached for your revier·and consideration. Per ~cJour request, this Jddendum contemplates thatSt.Joseph would ma~e payments to st. Cloud over a fivejyear period. The proposed payment schedule>is based on equal · princ,pal payments. An alternate payment schedule, based on equal tota/payments, is encldsed for comparison purposes. IfthiJ Ad8endumis acJePtable;PI~asé submit ittoyour ,City Council for approval, then returm two signed copi~s to me. I will then forward the Addendum to the St. Cloud City cou.1Cil for consi.derati~.n.and. if approv.ed' ",ill return a fully exe.cute.d. cOpy.tOYOU Pleaje call 1118 at 255-7240. if you have any questions, or if you would like the A.ddjndum. to be reviser.... to include the alternate payment schedule. ~.~ Step~en Gaetz \ .ra DirejOr .of PUblicservifes Encl1sures . : Cc: !Larry Meyer I <Chris Hagelie ¡ · Jan Petersen . http://cLstcloud.mn.us I ¡;.e e" qf St. Cloud. ~lrnesota will not discriminate on the ~asis of race. color. creed. religion. national origin, sex. disability. age. mantal status. status with regard to public assistance. familial status or sexual '''''',''", Upo" "'T ",",mm,""" "'~pm'''d lOr'" "d''''', .. """", '" ",m""," ".. ;Iy..",,,~. p._.~ 'd'''''", c FIRST ADDENDUM TO THE SEWER USE AGREEMENT . BETWEEN THE CITY OF ST. CLOUD AND THE' CITY OF ST. JOSEPH THIS ADDENDUM is made and entered into by and between the City of St. Cloud, a Minnesota municipal corporation, (herein called "ST. CLOUD") and the City of St. Joseph, a Minnesota municipal corporation, (herein called "ST. JOSEPH"). RECITALS ST. CLOUD and ST. JOSEPH entered into a Cooperative Construction Agreement for the Waite Park Interceptor dated February 25, 1985. That agreement established charges and discharge limitations for ST. JOSEPH's use of the Waite Park Interceptor sewer. ST. CLOUD and ST. JOSEPH entered into a Sewer Use Agreement dated February 6, 1986, providing for the transportation and treatment of ST. JOSEPH's sewage at the ST. CLOUD Wastewater Treatment Plant. That agreement established charges and discharge limitations for ST. JOSEPH's use of the Pan, Metro and Waite Park Interceptor sewers. " Projected growth within the corporate limits of ST. JOSEPH has led to a need for . additional sewage transportation capacity. ST. CLOUD currently has excess sewage transportation capacity available within the portion of its interceptor sewer system that serves S1. JOSEPH, and is willing to make this transportation capacity available to ST. JOSEPH under certain terms and conditions. To accomplish this objective, S1. CLOUD and S1. JOSEPH negotiated amendments to the existing Sewer Use Agreement addressing sewage transportation. Those amendments are reflected in this FIRST ADDENDUM. COVENANTS NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the recitals and the mutual obligations of the parties expressed in the existing Sewer Use Agreement, the existing Cooperative Construction Agreement, and in this FIRST ADDENDUM, ST. CLOUD and ST. JOSEPH do agree as follows: 1. Section 4 of the Sewer Use Agreement, relating to discharge limitations shall be amended by adding new subsections 4.d. and 4.e., which shall read as follows: . . 'i I First ddendum toSe1er Use Agreement - cont. i i · I d. ST!.. CLOUD .will allocate an additional 2.312 CFS (1.495 MGD) average flow, and 5.780 CFS (3.735 MGD} peak flow, of sewage trarsportation capacityi to ST. JOSEPH for a one..time charge .of $722,222. I Th¢ total sewage transportation capacity available to ST. JOSEPH shall then be 8.10 CFS (5.234 MGD), instantaneous peak flow rate. , \ : The one-time charge of $722,222 is·effective January 1, 2000, and: sh~1I be adjusted byaddinginterestthereto at the rate of seven I pe~cent (7%) per year to payments made after January 1, 2000. I 1 i STI. JOSEPH shall make payment to ST. CLOUD.in five (5) annual installments with the first installment payment due on January 15, 2001. To the first installment shall be. added interest at the. rate of seven percent .(7%) per year computed from January 1, 2000, to , th~ payment date. of January 15, 2001. To each subsequent ins~allment, when due, . shall be added interest for one year on the unpaid balance. A payment schedule.is attached hereto. ST. JOSEPH may, at anytime,. payoff the .entirebalance with · intyrest accrued at the rate. of seven percent (7%) per year. e. Seþtion 4.c., relating to ST. JOSEPH's share of existing co~veyance and treatment facilities,shall be amended to read as follows: i c. i ST. JOSEPH's share· of the existing conveyance and treatment facilities is hereby established as follows: AVERAGE PEAK CAPACITY CAPACITY ST. JOSEPH'S FACILITIES (CFS) (CFS) SHARE (CFS) Waite· Park J I nterceptor/PS -- 34.95 8.10 (23.18%) Pan Interceptor -- 43.33 8.10 (18.69%) Metro I nterceptor/FM -- 80.30 8.10 (10.09%) Treatment Plant 20.12 -- 0.93 (4.62%) 2. Allother~erms of the· existing Sewer Use Agreement shall remain· in full force and! effect. · . - First Addendum to Sewer Use Agreement- cont. . " IN WITNESS WHEREOF, ST. CLOUD and ST. JOSEPH execute this FIRST ADDENDUM in their corporate names, this day of , 2000. THE CITY OF ST. CLOUD: THE CITY OF ST. JOSEPH: By: By: Mayor Mayor By: By: City Clerk City Clerk I' . . , . . . . , , Attachment to Addendum Number 1 i For sewer Use Agreement Between city of st. Cloud and City of st. Joseph 5-Year payment Schedule <EQual principal payment i I Annual Principal I D~te payment principal Interest Balance 1L/OO I $772,222.00 I 1/1:5/01 , , $154,444.40 $56,277.00 $210,72r.40 617,777.60 1/115/02 197,688.83 154,444.40 43,244.43 463,333.20 i 1/115/03 186,877.72 154,444.40 32,433.32 308,888.80 1/115/04 176,066.62 154,444.40 21,622.22 154,444.40 I 1/15/05 165,25,5.51 154,444.40 10,811.11 0.00 I I . $936,610.08 $772,222.00 $164,388.08 j' ) i , i I i ! , , . I I i i i i . f>.. A Alternate Payment Schedule . Attachment to Addendum N,umber 1 . For Sewer Use Agreement Between city of st. Cloud and City of st. Joseph 5-Year payment Schedule <Equal Annual Payment Annual principal Date Payment principal Interest Balance 1/1/00 $772,222.00 1/15/01 $188,844.11 $132,567.11 $56,277.00 639,654.89 1/15/02 188,844.11 144,068.27 44,775.84 495,586.62 1/15/03 188,844.11 154,153.05 34,691.06 341,433.57 1/15/04 188,844.11 164,943.76 23,900.35 176,489.81 1/15/05 188,844.10 176,489.81 14,354.29 0.00 $944,220.54 $772,222.00 $171,998.54 ,. . . I , i ¡ . Memo: , i I ! Public Works Director ! I To: Honorable Mayor Hibmenz and Members of the City Council , I From: Dick Taufen I Date: 03/31/00 Re: Maintenance Shop oþtions \ i Appro imately a year and a Half ago I proposed to construct an addition of 45'x 60' to the existing maint nance shop. At that tithe I did not have enough money in my budget and there were sOUle other conceItIls that put the project oµ hold. The project surfaced again last year when Mr. Lambert approached the City Jith some building options and again when Mr. Kittridge appeared before the Council. At this time the City h s the following options: , 1. Stay where we are located currently. Remember that the Maintenance Shop, fence , . surrounding the wastewater pump station, Boy Scout Building, and salt/sand shed are all located on ilie 50 foot easement. i 2. Work with ¥r.Lambert to relocated the maintenance shop on the property he recently acquired. . 3. Look at the property offered by Mr. Kittridge, keeping in mind that this property is not much I larger than tl}.e existing shop and expansion would not be feasible. i 4. Look at the property owned by Gene Lange located at 30937,30955, and 30977 Joseph Street. We have met with Mr. Lange to discuss the option and he will begetting back to the City by Mori,day.The property contains the following: , , 0 13 Lots totaling 4.5 Acres 0 ,Steel Building 60 x 104 0 5 Bays 20' x 60' with 16' overhead doors 0 ,Salt and sand shed o iAllöws for future expansion ! These are the options that I am aware of atthis time. , I i . I i , opal ! i i ! ! · · · \ I , I i I I i . .......'..... I \1 I Men10randmn I I I i To: Mayor and City Council \ \ From: Cari Schmidt I Date: 03/3 yoo Re: Vacation Proposal I I i i Dick TaufeD -'(Anniversary Date- 9-8-68) Dick will use the following vacation hours: I March - 32 h04rs, April- 64 hours, May - 56 hours, June - 60 hours, July - 60 hours, August- 88 hours, Septem~er - 32 hours for a total of 392 hours leaving 80 hours to carry over. R. <~~I¡:!~~htOld f (Anniversary Date 9-9-74) Ray will use the following vacation hours: ,::::::'.'''::::'''0''':'::.;.;;'" I .A..priF~i:il().5 ho,urs, May - 24 hours, June - 24 hours, July - 64 hours, August - 64 hours and Septe~b¢r- 3~ hours for a total of 218.5 hours . ' JÌlnN1Jä.dhaler (Anniversary Date 5-2-77) Jim is requesting approval to carry over his unused va.(¡a.tìQllbalan6e for an additional 90 days beyond his anniversary date of May 2nd. He has a major ....,....... I l1()~e:f¢m()deling project scheduled for these days and will need the time off.then. He agrees to have l1ìS:'~o~~r'down\to 80 by August 2nd. l\1.i){'êSworski (Anniversary Date 9-28-92) Mike will use the following vacation hours: I May - 16 hour~', June- 32 hours, July 24 hours, August- 16 hours, September - 24 hours for a total of 112 hours. . Mary Generous (Anniversary Date 10-26-92- This date was misstated on the chart given to the Council at thep~evious meeting). Mary will use the following vacation hours: April- 8 hours,\May - 8 hours, June -72 hours, July - 56 hours, August - 48 hours, September - 8 hours, October 24 hours, December - 40 hours for a total of 264 hours by the end of the year (224 by her anniversary !date) Judy WeyreDs (Anniversary Date - 8-4-86) Judy will use the following vacation hours: March - 16 hours, April - 48 hours, May - 48 hours, June 64 hours, July - 48 hours, August - 56 hours, September - 32 hours, October - 48 hours, November - 40 hours and December 52 hours for a total of452 hours by ¡the end of the year (224 before her anniversary date). I The employees made a concerted effort to schedule their vacation time to bring their accruals down. This is a¡very workable solution that I hope meets with your approval. . 1 Employee Anniversary Date as of Vacation Accrued . 3/16 Raymond Bechtold 9-9-74 , 168.24 Chad Carlson 6-10-97 . 23.45 Wendell Deluge 9-3-99 - Gary Donabauer 11-1-99 - Mary Generous 10-26-92 284.92 Virginia Gustin 5-6-91 (full time 1/1/93) 60 Jim Marthaler 5-2-77 .... 299.37 Lorraine Minier 9-27-99 - Brad Meyer 5-1-87 90 Paul Schley 9-10-99 - Carl Schmidt 8-16-99 46.12 Mike Sworski 9-28-92 124.06 . Dick Taufen 9-8-68 377.74 Judy Weyrens . 8-4-86 373.35 Jeff Young 3-10-75 220 . . I .¡ · Mem .·from staff on amended 'purchase agreement for First State Bank Lettej from Eldora Studer i Lette from City ofKasota I St. ~r Area Eeonowe q",elopmentp_er~~ ~de ofE~cs Lette from Linda Sniezek reg1arding Rental Moratorium Whi ey Senior Center Trainihg April Calendar I Stea ,s County Collection Date information GLT . utes and timetable 1 · · . . . . . i , . I City Offices I i i 1 M~m() , . ! i i ¡ To: Honorable Mayor Hiemenz and Members of the City Council From: Offic~ Staff Date: 03/1 7/00 Re: Amended Purchase Agreement - First State Bank . At the MarcH 16th Council meeting, there was discussion regarding the amendment to the purchase agre~ment for the First State Bank of St. Joseph. Please find below the chronological events which1\,:ad to the Amendment. ' f March 7,200Q- Monte Eastvold calls to discuss the proposed public project revenue bonds. Through this discussionMqnte infOlms staff that the bonds cannot be sold untilthe City has title to the Bank Further, Monte stated that the bond rates are increasing and it would be in the. best interest of the I City to issue ili.e bonds as1sobn as possible. Office staff discusses available funds and alternative methods for financing. Greg Reinhart is called to see if he would be willing to close on the bank property within one week and allow the City to pay for the bank in two installments. The City does not have $545,000 readily available ',..... I and coulq. make an initial payment of $ 350,000 with the balance being paid within 45 days. Reinhart state~that he would consider the matter and call back on March 8th. " Office Staff cbntacts Johif'Scherer to see if he can think of any alternative financing methods or other means oftransfering¡Jroperty. . ..1'1:;' \ , March 9,200þ Greg Reinhart calls the City. Office staff and agrees to the concept. of the . Amendment , and i ',' questions whö will draft the agreement. Further, the attorney for the Bank will be leaving town so the docum~nts will have to be prepared by early afternoon. . i . Page 1 . Staff contacts John Scherer. John states that he can prepare the amendment and will fax the document for It review and comment. Also discussed was the lease arrangement. Greg had stated that he did not want to pay a lease to continue operating until the new bank was completed. Greg also said that a lease agreement would disqualifY the bank under the 1033 tax free exchange status. Further, the City cannot charge a lease on property and then threaten condemnation to the same party we are threatening condemnation with. (Term in the original agreement) Through discussions it was suggested that since the City would have to take a loss on an investment or borrow funds if the full purchase price was to. be paid at closing, the City would not charge the bank lease fees. The only reason that Greg was agreeing to close on the bankwas to help out the City and if he had to pay lease fees he would not close early. There was no advantage to Greg for closing early. The decreased bond rates and not charging the City interest on the remaining balance was a good compromise and met the needs of both the City and the bank. John Scherer submits a draft for Greg and the City to review. March 10, 2000 Greg Reinhart calls the City with minor corrections to the amendment. Staff also notes minor corrections and John Scherer is contacted to prepare the final agreement. - . March 13, 2000 City staff delivers fmal draft for bank review. Greg calls back and states the document is fine. Closing is then set for March 17, 2000. EDA meeting is scheduled for March 16th. March 16,2000 . EDA meets and approves amendment. NOTE: Staff refers to Cari, Chad, Judy . . Page 2 . . ,- . 'I . I I . ! ,'I'" '.-':i~~ ~;r:.k-::~*j 7; I .. ......., . '. . . . .. · \ . · . . ...... .. ..v . , ~~~~#-~~~.~.,~ i ,,·(J'd-q§\t-~ 'f-'~~"""~ !>ii'~;¡·.·~···A-·~+~ ---1... .~_ U¿d~~~~........... ... ..-c-~. -j~~... ~... <-/~...~~~---- c_) --__.~.~~~~.--A~-~~~-~~~---~ . \ . --- i--.c----.M,-~-d~~~~~~~--~-~~..þ~-- -.l·-4~~£,~-~Ç.···~,~¿,~=J.' f·"c,.,~š~.~~-~:.,,~,-~- ! J--¿;?~.~'.. ..~ ~ ~~ 'I:==~'=~~E~i:s~ i j~~'zr:::::;;:~;::::;::~~~.....~ . $-- . ! ~.~'~ _._L~...-._____ ··--.";..----------------------1-· -'--7-;'-'---'-';-7'-'~:'---~ .... ..-;-----.---___--...--.--.- ¡ I i . . . I 1 . i I i , i . i I . -- I - ..---.-..-,,,-. i ~~.~~~~.~~-- I ! ·.···k~~ ;_~~d4.'-.' ~z- ~ ~___._ - i.· ~~..~ß-\~ _.L___~-----Æ' ·7U~fL· d~ .J~' -(- 4'~ I . ...,.. .." ... -_.-~- 'I -- i .~~ .... .-~~~-- ,,~~ .: ~-4-L.~~.'~ ~ k' !~~ l-i.~-~~..~~~ (II 0 en· . .¡geE' f ¡ - ::r~g., i ..~~ ~ ... II 7' -- -. ., z"{i : I 8H~.:. I ~~ ~-- i ..' e- ~ ;.~~__L'~ I, ~ ~ '.' '-: .., -. '--c----~ -~ -~-'''----- , ~. (;í-~---··--·------------·-·------"'·-----------"-"'~·c._.._-..--.-------------.-----.- " I ~. -¡---------"...-...-....--....--...-.---.--.-..-.--..-.-...............--.-..-"-....---...".--..-...-----...,,....-----...---...................-...---- \ 1',,::;', iJ>"i ! I ~. .c.' Ó ~o '\ .' "t 'o"n . ".<.,C",.:"'_"'" , . . . . . . I \ CITY OFKASOTA I . I ! Box 218 I Kasota, ·MN 56050 I , I M ch 6, 2000 I I City of St. Joseph i St. Joseph, Minnesota p6374 At ention: Cari Schmidt, City Administrator: I i 1 The city of Kasota wou1ld like to thank you for your generous donation of Christmas dertions.we would, also like to thank you fur holding these until we could make arr. gements to drive up to get them and also for the help in Joading these decorations. Our Park and. Recreation Department was very thankful for these decorations asthis D~ artmentwork on a yery limited budget. (. \ .·,.1 ",/~~~.d.J J AiY (!hJ.2£ It Council I Cit ofKasota , . I I P. I .Box 218 i Ka ota, Mn 56050 i I I I I I ¡ . . . . . . St. Cloud Area Economic Development Partnership CODE OF ETHICS I I ¡ IIOOUCTION , T e Partnership i committed to the eLnomic development and "growth of the St. Cloud area (Benton, Sherburne, Steamscounûes~ The Partnership bri,ng,s together the interesta pfa broadrangepf public and private groups to promote the area as a single economiq entity, recognizing that we all benefit from the growth and prosperity of the area. The collab ration of such a variety of groups and interests requires that certain standards of conduct must be developed and adhered to for the Partnership to meet its goals. This· Code of. Ethics represents the standards that ea~h membe of the Partnership sppports and practices in its daily conduct of business. , I CODE OF ETHICS I \ I · Ware committed tott~epromotion of the area as a desirable business location for new and ex andingcompanies.iWhen representing the Partnership, we shall endeavor to sell the area as w II as individual cOl11niunities. ! · W will honor the confidentiality requested by both our fellow members of the Partnership and our prispects.lnformation', shared wkh fellow members In confidence shall remain In confidence. . · . Ware sensitive to the concept of competition for new and expanding businesses among our indiividual communities. I, The Partnership staff will promote the individual strengths and unique ch~racteristics of each rrember butwill handle prospects according to the~xpressed ñeeds of the prospect. i >,' · we1are committed ~o shiari~g among our members. as much information as is necessary and prudent on ~ny activity undertak.en by or in the name of the Partnership. Our guiding principle shall be that "m re information is better than less." . I HANDLING PROSPECTS FROM WITHIN THE ST. CLOUD AREA , , · No rnemberorganizationl will solicit or recruit the relocation of an area business. {This'vvillnot prerude general advertiîing however.) . · If c I ntacted by a busine~sfromanother community within the area, a member will: · Thank the comp~nyfor their interest. · Suggest that the ¡company contact their home city. · Inform the company that we will not engage in intra-area bidding for buildings, and that we I will inform the home city of the company's interest, I · Contact the Part~ership staff so that they can notify the ap~ropriate members of the ·company's. intention to seek a new location in the St. Cloud area. I '! \ · Contact the hom~ city regarding the company's intentions. · Partrnership staff, ifconta~ted by an area business about relocation, will: \ , I I · Inform the compary that we will not facilitate, an intra~area bidding for buildings" and that we will inform th~ home city of the company's interest in moving. I . , I · Suggest that the çompany contact their home city. · Contact. the homei city regarding the company's interest. i . ~EDP:96\ðthjcs > I . · · · I i . I . I \ I I RE: RENT AL MORATORIUM. I . ¡ I i I Dear Honorable Mayor i& Council Members, \ i , We would liketoaddre~s you for our mother, Rose Viehauser, since she is unable to do so r herself because o~her Alzheimer's Disea,se. Du to our father, Rob~rt Viehauser's untimely death, and our mother' sillness, we are left r a diffic¡¡lt sitoatio!Hegarding oor parent's home at 212 E.A$h St., St. Joseph. Thihoosejsìn a "LiVìn~ Trusf, whi6hmeansthat while our mother is. alive, we can µot sell ter home. : Presently,' M0l11 is in Arlington Place, here in' St.. J("~Ph, because. we feel herqoality of life s better there, ratherithan a nursing home. : . The problem that we ar~ faced with, is we need to rent out her house, because we need the ~come to help pay f~rher expenses. ¡ We are hoping. that yoµ will make a special exception in giving us a variance, or wha ever is needed for Os to be able tq .rent out tbe hqose. We have possible reuter.s alre dy, all of which, a¡-e[families that we already know. We leel that not beiµg ~~le to rent oot the house is àrealÌtardshipandhope th~t yoo take this ro accoont ""hen yqu consider our situation. We lCnow thafwhen YOU~ut on the moratorium on rentals,. that you. did not intend to hurt our lderly. I ! i Tank you in advancel for your consideration in this matter. I Th~ Robert Viehauser family , ! i i t!~. , , ! I . , ! I .. . . . WHITJEYSENIOJ CENTER PRESENTS: 1 . ¡The NationalIssues Forums- · Building Community through Public Deliberation I ..... In a democr~cy,citizens must cole togetherto find answers they can all live with- while acknowledging that individuals 1ave differing opinio~s. Forums help people find the areas where their interests and goals overlap, This allows . public voice to emdrge that can give direction to public policy. The forums are nonpartisan and do not advo ate a particular solution to any public issue, nor should they be confused with referenda or public opinion poll, Ratherthe forum~ enable diverse groups of Americans to determine together what direction they want policy 0 take, what kinds of action and. legislation they favor, and what, for their common good, they oppose. i Come and p ieipate inadelibJative democracy using the National Issues Forun1S (N1F) civic discussion ~ ,.. .", ,.. program.. . is an effective tool to promote thoughtful, deliberative dialogues in which people address controversia topics from the per~pective of both an individual and asa member of the wider community. Participants ¡;ill examine the NIIì fhµnework,revieviavailable discussion guides (issue books), and have fun learning abo t the democratic process, N ationai IstS.F oru=brmg. tp Jclhe( cicizensaround the, nation to. iliscusschailengmg 'SOClai. and: POlltlCai issues of the day. They have addressed issues such as the economy, education, healthcare, foreign affairs, poverty and crime. Thousands of civic, service, and religious organizations, as well as libraries, high schools and co liege] have sponsored fo;ms. ,~the F orun)£'Pamcip ants share their opinions, thek COncen)£, and their knowledge. Forums enrich parti~ipants' thinking on public issues. · About the . ur scheduled Foru'ms- Location: Whitney Senior C'enter - Rooms C-D-E Time: 1 :00 - 4:00 p.m. ! , Dare: March 15 - The Troubled American Family: Which Way Out 01 the Stonn ... i .. " Date: April 12 -_A Nice Place to Live: Creating Communities, Fighting Sprawl ':";f- . ,-' \ Datë: May 17 - J:>l1blicSchools:ls There a Way to ÞlX Them Date: June 14 - Gambling: 1sIt aProblem? What Should We Do? FaÓlitator: r Lin<ia Hayir,Profe,.sor of Sociology! Anthropology at S1. Cloud State Uniyersity March 15.2 ·.00 -The TrQub¡edAmericanFa~;¡y - Society has seen many changes in the past30years. Many of our social probk~ve Þecomewors~. It is hard to figure out why this hashapperied. But most Americans. focus on the family. They believe that families ~ail to teach their children basic social values. , Choice 1. alls for. going back to 1950svalue, Thîs view centers on the importance of traditional faITÙly. That means twô married arentswho stay toget~erto raise their children.- Choice 2., ays the most important family value is responsibility. Society should insist that parents provide for their children. idgovemment should ~tep in if they do not. , i Choice 3. F, cuses on society's resþonsibility for its children, All children should be welcome. And a program should help all fami ies to. raise them. , · Made possiþle by a graritTromthe ~.oesotaHum~ities Commissiou. Ff mi,re inlorn1ation coli: Ge.evieY~ at 650-3081. IVt R ~ J I S !¡-tJ ~ I (,rì ~ ~ ____ /r-Jr f:/r! i I I , , , ! i ] , I · ~N ~ """ \C ~b N woo ~ W Q\ ;::~ Q~ '" ¡ ~ ;:sO ..... :.z .... ~ ~ òQ' '" ~ ~ ;:s b;:¡'" ~ ~ >- ';¿ S· ~ '" N ~ ~~.~ """ ~;p~~ """ ::x::!;,~ ~~~ w ~ ... (j ~ ,s:. ~ ~ ~ ::!.;¡! I:> Q ~ ~g ,.""'''''' c:::.c:::. ;;;'8 :... ~,::z :: §: .....:¡;;..... ~. ts1 ;p 0 ~:::::~ ~3§-.¿ "->::."-> :.z .............. ~. § ~ !;,~ ~ c:::.:.. -. -6"' ~ ~.::;. § ::. b:> õ' ¡;¡ ~ ¡;¡ :..~ ~ g ~ ~ § ~. ~,. ~ >- ~ ~oq ~ ::. N"t ~ ., 0.. """ """::!""" :"'0. """ """ ... ~ 011:> ~ ~ '. I QCI(1:) 1 .... '. """ I " '" "'" .... "'" ~ ~~. c;:> "'-.) , (1:) "'-.) C c:::. "'-.) §ã b:> ~ '... ~ ~. ~ ~ C ~ I:> b:> ~ ~. ~ Et~ ~ I:> 5' ~ ~ §'~ 00 ~ is' is' is' ~ ::.:::>.. ..... ..... ..... ~ ~ ~ ~ ::! ::! ~ c:::. ~ ~ ~ ::J ~. , """ ~iš~ \Jt ~ N """ Q\ \C N ~.....c :::::.;¡ c ~ > .... ~ ~ ~.~ (1:) :.z ~ Q ::! ~ ~òQ' ~ ... c 00 ~;:s ~ ..... . · ~ Q >- ~ ~ ~ r../:J , 0 N ;0 ~ N ::! ~ ..... ~ Q\ ~ ~ '-.J '" ~ Q ~§: W C == '" c:::. C (D c D <€ ~'2' Q ~ ., ~. ~ ~ Oo~ ~ ~ '. .... ~ " c:::'" ~ 00 ::. " C ~ -. ¡:: ~ -. ;:s >- ~ (D -. ..... ~ ::J N Ç)'~ (j ..... '-.J ~ QCI C ~ -. ... ~ c;:s~ :::...c~ ~ c ~ ~ .... ;:s ..... -. 'è'> ..... >- ~....Q.. ';¿ 1.; ~ ~ N N ..... 00 .....00 \C N 01 >- ~ ~ Š ~ · c' · · · ~tearns l.,OUllI.'y .. ~ CODLECnÖN DATES- (PLEASE POST) . . .' .1 April 4, 2000 in Ä1bany from 9:00 aim.. to3:00.p.m.attheMN DOT Albany Truck St~tion, 34916 County RoadlO, Albany, JY1N, i.1 · phone#320-S45-r175 . April 6, 200Q in~auk Centre fronr9:00 a.m. to· 3:00 p.m. at Beunings Ag ServicelUnìted Æg Products, 80.1 Beltline Road, Saul< Centre, . phone #1-800-69,8-7533 . . / . . Any questions, please call John 'W aldorf,Stea.--ns County Ag Inspector at 320-256-3308. · ....- .. .. .'-.-.. '..- ~.. ...... .. ~eMinne$otaD:epartment of Agriculture ; I aste Pe$ti1ide Collection Program I . Pestic:des areproduc:s cQniainingchemicals that p(!srfcidt~ at thee~doftheir UJ'able life. An bntrol pests. They support the prod!J.crion oj safe estimated two miilion pounds of waste pesricid bnd abundantfoodl fuel ar.dfib'l,r, ofi':rir:g are stored in Minnesota. I . fr . . d . . d' r.rotecMn om mseclf,:-o ~ms. w;!eas ar:~ pLant diseases.: Like usahlepesticides.. unwcmted and unusable ~ I . pesr'.cid" pOferisks tOpubIic health ond our esriddes are haza:-dous totar$eredpeszs. eJ!Vironment ifrzot managed carefully. "I l(!erbiCf.des, ir.secticides, fungicides, roderztici des . ~nd di.sirlecrcnts are· ~he most common pesržcidesl The Mir.nesota DepartmentofAgriculture'$ W .! au! there are many mqre. Pesticide Collecrion Program Didloses of was , . ,. pesticiåes safely. Mana~ng and ispo.rlng of Proper we minimizes ¡risks to non-targeted wa.rte pesticides proper:y eliminctes the risks I · species and assures the safery ofhwnans, QJ well post. as pro¡ection oflanå ~r.d water resources. i I" ( Sžncethe program bepanin 1990,hundreds of Frequently,farmers. ~mall businesses afld t07'.$ 01 wasrepesticiaes na'/t b~e~reTTloved fro nomeow1!ers end up 1th waste pesticides-:- Minnesota. ..... .... ... .. . . .... . .... . ! , c ,. · · · "".;,..,-,--~ Ilil GLTA R G HIT E CT S . Grooters Leapa1dt Tideman , , i i Main Office I 808 Courthouse Square· SI. Cloud, Minnesota 56303 Phone 320.252.3740 . Pax 320.255.0683 28 March 2000 www.gltarchitects.com Ms. JI SchmIdt City o~ St. Joseph I 21 Firs Avenue N.W. I , St. J08 ph,MN56374 í 1 , i Re: St. Joseph City Hall St. Joseph, Minnes~ta Dear Cari, i FOllOwling is a preliminary s¿hedule forthe referenced project. This schedule assumes we move forward with t1e plans approved at the meeting of March 22, 2000 without significant change. The proposed schedu e is as follows: I , Complete Schematic Design, April 3, 2000 . Public rresentation . 7:00-8:30 p.m. on AprilS, 2000 Compl te Construction Documents May 1, 2000 Bid May 23,2000 I Contracts j May 30, 2000 RemO~eling Construction Substantially Complete August 31, 2000 New instruction Completel November 30, 2000 The c instruction schedule may be optimistic by 1-2 months, depending upon the availability of constr ction materials. Please advise if there are an~questions about this schedule. I Sincer Iy, I I I DAL/ s CC: Stephanie Howe (9928C 07) . Branch Office 475 Second Avenue· Newport, Minnesota 55055 Phone 651.459.9566 . Pax 651.458.5615 David eapaldt . Daniel Tideman . Steve Paasch . John Frischmann . ~''!''-' ;,,<, ^.. III GROOTERS LEAPALDT TIDEMAN A R C HI.TE C T S . MEETING MINUTES 22 MARCH 2000 ST. JOSEPH CITY HALL ST. JOSEPH, MINNESOTA PRESENT WERE: Peter Janssen Police Lorraine Minier Police Ken Hiemenz Mayor Cari Schmidt City Administrator Dick Taufen Public Works Jeffrey Young Police Chad Carlson Economic Development Director Paul. Schley Police Cory Ehlert City Council Bob JLoso City Council ., Mary Niedenfuer City Council Tom Nahan Cable Commission Ken Twit City Council Stephanie Howe Grooters Leapaldt Tideman Architects David Leapaldt Grooters Leapaldt Tideman Architects Issues discussed: . 1. Stephanie reviewed the modifications that were made to the floor plan since the last meeting.· The Squad Room was made larger with 6'x6' work stations for 6 police officers. There is a small waiting area east of the Dispatch area with a security door located to the north of this area. The Public Works office was moved to the Administration area, and the Mayor's office was moved next to the Council Chambers. Two additional offices were created from a portion of the Council Chambers. 2. Tom commented he would like to switch the Video Room location with the Public Works office. Several solutions were discussed, and it was agreed the video room would be located in the northeast comer of the new addition. 3. We discussed raising the floor of the Video Room for visibility. To meet ADA code, a ramp would be required, and for every 1'-0" of rise there would need to be 12'-0" of run plus a landing. Tom agreed the ramp should be left out. 4. We discussed locating the .Public Works office in this building. It was agreed there. would be a Public Works office located in the Administration side of the building so all of the public files could be in one location. 5. We discussed the Mayor's office. Ken H. expressed the need for a separate office, and there were no objections. Mary suggested the Mayor's office should be located on the east side of the new addition to be closer to the Administration entrance. 6. We discussed the revisions to the Police. area. All agreed there is adequate space in this layout for the Squad Room. We reviewed the location of the communication window into the Dispatch area. Because there are windows on the south side as well as the east side, it was agreed this issue could be decided at a later date. 7. Ken H. questioned if there is enough room for .another person to be located in the Dispatch area. As cUITently shown on the plan, there is potentially enough room for 2 to 3 people in that area. . ... ;.-.\ St. Joseph City Hall 22 March 2000 i St. Joseph, MN . Page 2 8. We discussed the safety concern for city employees. David questioned the nature of the security needed for the Squad Room, and· if there is a need for the Administrative. Assistant to have a physical barrierfrofu the Public Waiting. It was agreed security for the Squad Room is so the I public does not hav~ access to the files and paperwork in that room. It was agreed that it would not be necessary to p.ave a wall and windows into the Administrative Assistant area, and that a partial height gate and a·transaction counter in front of the Admit1istrative Assistant would .be an adequate barrier. , 9. We discussed wherei a large number of clients would wait if one police officer is on duty during evening hours, and. if it would be necessary to install a gate to lock the Administration area from the Public Waiting iu-ea. David suggested the Lobby to the east could be loc.ked off from the entire building, and 6lients could wait there. It was agreed this arrangement would work. 10 David reviewed the I size and configuration of the Council Chambers. As shown it isa 32'x 32' room, and there is approximately seating for 60 people plus the Council. Everyone agreed the size is and the configuration is adequate as shown. 11. We discussed the Locker Rooms and the shared Shower Room. Mary suggested we could leave the basement as is and the Police could use the showers in the Fire Hall. Jeffthoughtthis would work, if the Police w'0uld be given keys to the facility. 12 David reviewed th~ updated cost estimate~ The results of the contractor's estimate and the previous estimate w~re. close to. the previous estimate; .. however David said the mechanical and electrical estimate continues to be based on a cost per square foot. Copies of the estimates were . distributed at the meþting and are attached to these minutes. 13 Ken H. questioned ,the comfort level of this revised estimate. David said in his professional opinion, it is a good :estimate. However, given the volatility of the market, and infonnation he has seen that indicates c9nstruction costs are projected to rise approximately 12.9%, there should be a contingency built into the budget and alternates built into the documents for flexibility. 14 We discussedpoten~ial alternates for the project. David suggested several items could be listed as alternates, such a~ the basement remodeling and the. detached garage. 15 We discussed. what ¡fixtures, furniture, and. equipment would be needed for the· building. Cari said the City has purþhased much of the furniture from the bank.. She agreed the staff would need to figure out what a~ditional items would be necessary. 16 Cari discussed the Council would need to decide on what amount to bond for this project, and how to present toth~ public. It was agreed the public meeting would be held on AprilS from 7:00 p.m. to 8:30 p.m., and GLT would present the final option that was agreed upon and the cost estimate for that opt~on and would have the previous options available for review. 17 David. questioned whether GLT should move forward with the documents. Everyone agreed the , project should mov~ forward with the plan modifications as discussed. .David agreed he would prepare a document ~chedule and.a preliminary construction schedule for review. The foregoing constitutes our understanding of items discussed and conclusions reached.. Other participants are requested to I· ... .... ! review ese items and a,dvise the ~riginator in writing of any errors or omissions within ten days of receipt. CC: those present Wayne Meyer . SHIsh (9928NOO7) 1 , ! I r-,·" . . Saint Joseph City- Hall March 22, 2000 Saint Joseph, Minnesota . Preliminary Cost Projections With Without Chambers Chambers Concept C -All services at the Bank Building General Construction General Requirements $ 44,830 $ 36,803 Earthwork (see notes) $ 38,114 $ 10,830 Concrete Work $ 7,100 Masonry Work $ 31,632 Metals $ 6,475 Carpentry $ 29,063 $ 15,400 Thermal and Moisture Protection $ 7,369 $ 17,703 Doors Windows & Glass $ 32,574 $ 43,312 Finishes $ 52,197 $ 1,123 Specialties $ 1,190 Elevator - two stop hydraulic $ 42,000 $ 42,000 Subtotal General Construction $ 292,544 $ 167,171 Mechanical & Electrical Construction (see notes) $ 78 020 $ 40.350 Subtotal Construction $ 370,564 $ 207,521 Contingency (10%) $ 37,056 $ 20,752 . Fees $ 49,760 $ 43,540 Project Expense $ 4,000 $ 4,000 Fixtures, Furnishings & Equipment ???? ???? "'-'-'-'- ............... Total $ 461,380 $ 275,813 Alternates 1 Build Unheated, wood framed, insulated police garage $ 48,033 $ 48,033 2 Finish lower level $ 55.334 $ 55.334 Total with Alternates 1 & 2 $564,747 $ 379,180 Cost of Funeral Home Property ???? ???? Notes: 1 Owner shall provide Builder's risk insurance SAC & WAC fees, if any, soil borings (if any), survey, temporary services 2 Included in the estimate with the new councìl chambers above are the following allowances of cost; Sitework clearing earthwork excavation & backfilling $ 5,000 Paving repair & replacement $ 4,800 Curbs & walks $ 1,750 Landscape allowance $ 5,000 Stone Veneer on addition ($20/s.f.) $ 26.000 Carpeting @$22.00/yd Two automatic aluminum entrance doors (ADA) $ 3,200 . Casework - all plastic laminate finish $ 14.160 Building Pennit $ 2.158 3 No fire sprinkler of the upper level inclUded.. .. . .. ... ... ........> . . 4 The estimate without council chambers doesn't include any costs for any exterior work (existing driveup is not rE!movEKj). 5 M&E const. estimate assumes existing units can be used, and the electrical service and communications service are adequate.. 9928.x15 J j.¡ ,> . ~ CITY.OF ST. JOSEPH 21 First Avenue NW P.O. Box 668, St. Joseph, MN 56374 (320) 363-7201 i ì Fax: 363-0342 I EMORANDUM' I . l:st.JosePhCity80unClLiii . ii .i ... i·... .... .·ix~ ¡rom: Chad A Carlso~, Planning Commission Secretary ,¿tv · MAYOR Date: Apri I 4, 2000 ,! Kenneth 1. Hiemenz e: Planning Commiss'ion's Recortunendation for Access to Northland Drive I CLERK! he PlanningCOmmilion, April3rd, heard a request from Mr. Steve Symanietzreøarding Lot ADMINISTRATOR Cari Schmidt , Block 30f the North!and IV Addition. The request was to have the lot's driveway access ocated on Northland Drive rather than Gumtree Street. COUNCILORS rrding to the North!ancj IV Developer's Ag"",ment, Section 4.13 (b), lots that abut Bob Loso Cory Ehlert orthland Drive, shall be denied access to Northland Drive. ' Mr. Symanietz requested that the .it lanning Commission .recommend that the City Council waive this requirement in order for him N Niedenfuer ~o construct a hometh:at works with the lot grading. According to his contractor, a severe slope rxists on the north end of the lot, abutting Gumtree Street. In order to work with this severe slope, the constructio~ of the home would be a bi-Ievel with a tuck under garage or an rnormous amount of ~II would be required. Mr. Symanietz would like to construct a walk out rambler on this lot. ! , I have included the following items for your review prior to your decision: 1) Letter submitted by Mr. Symanietz detailing his concerns; I 2) Copy of the Northland IV Plat; 3) Northland! PlatlV Developer's Agreement Section 4.13 (b); and 4) The Planning Commission's Motion in its entirety. ! Mr. Symanietz requested that City Council consider the Planning Commission's recommendation at th'e April 6th meeting. Since this is a not a controversial issue,Cari stated that the recqmm~ndation could be a9~1iic: ~8 th~ ~aftnqft t~at evening, Mr. Symanietz will be attending the meetingl Councilor Ehlert can provide additional background regarding .the discussion at the Planning Commission meeting. ! , , If you have any questions prior to the City Council meeting, please contact as soon as , possible. Thank you. !Chad ! . " . ~\.¿ . .." ... . ;. . . . . . . . . N¢tit'"l"¡'AL.ANP PJ..,A-rP=ØUR I tt:>ItTM LINI! Cf' 'fie lell. "" 'fie ,.1 S ~.,,'11" [ . 2&4000 -.J r - I . -y- - - N-šV"'18' ,-0\" - - 32U. - - - "T - Irrn.~ - ~ 1 I" .. . \ I J NORTH 1/4 ~ OF NORTH V" (.G'IIIII:NØt ~ __ I I '.' .>. ' SI!G. 10, T12.... ~ I SI!G. 10, 112.... 0l20I0< I S'ÆARHf> G()Ur(Ty GMT S~ c.GUfT'T' G-A5T -1 ./ I IRON ~ I IRON-..-,. -- ./ \ 1 ;;¡:::\,,;.,,( ~ ) i ,I ' . 1 -" .L.. I I I 1"-. / --- --- I ~I I ----. . --;J I' ~ 8 I ¡ !I 10 _M / I ~ I~ ;0 ~\) ."+/-) I / i ~ I~ I~ ., Kl 1 11.026 , U j ..i,i l'..l I~ ,.... .. ~ ~~ 2 1I.ooc 3 1I.ooc · 21-'01 r- ":~~ l,-, I ~~ ~~ '\ , 21'- ~~ I ~ ~ {J~ 6 10."60 I ' i ~ ~ ¡..'<" ~'J , 1I.ooc e 1I.ooc ~~ : ~I~ ... <: · l3.oee I ;: : ~,~ I ." 1 13.- I r-T-T-T- i _", I 2 1'.24& , 13":26 · *O,cnl , IO.~ , 7i 7-¡-- I 6 12,qpo II I , I /, I T---r-""li ..;, 1 I.""" I I I I I I i II '> I I I I ~"4.'te"E 14700 2 16.211 , . I -1 1 I ' "- I I - - -=1~ I ~,150 L - - -r- - - - - - -lJ .4- -1 ¡.. ~..I ( ~ ~ ¡- , --1 " "'1- : , /EA5T£f<L;- "'('- - _ L ~:J / \ ~ ~ :g EX'TEH5ION OF , . - L... S8J" . -:. .- -~ l ,1 I SQITH LINE OF{)" r I'E!>T LINE OF --- Jt'QJ"f: r --- --- - i--L!:0T t- - '-. . eLO<.K 3 '87.5.1 ...~. 1 4- ~ ., I 66 I LOT I, eLI(." I......ŠOUTlHlNE OFl..6~\.' - - _~ :g ., ...J'~J....::¡.... u I \" L01I BU<."""" 1/1 r, l- - onjol r::¡ I.. . . I \ . I) I ... ,. - :J04 ., " ". ,¡ ¡,,'';;i'::::J ,.::: ~ "fÒ ~- r - - ,203.SO '.~' I~GORNER""iD 40 40 r-- _ I' ., ~: '".' ":\",-""""" ~ _ I '00.,.- ~ ~;J I I .. ,I 'J7.(IO I 33 33 ~~ I ...., 'J ".' li\ ~ /~ t I /& <, , . I' . /~~ . OJ , ' 1'1 l- I i I a' I!? l~l.OGlO 50VTM LINE !!LO'-> \ ~ , ~. - -t 1,1 ./ SWSO', 35000 I~ , &I ~ ' 137.(10 . I . ~ I, , "-",,, ¡' , '.... , , ,3. .......uu I ~~ II II! 2 I s: I'" I~ I 2 '>~;"SJ'[2 ~I ~ '15.00 .~". SW4,'07"E -, ¡- ~ 'I ~ : ~ 'FJ.·, ~ _..~ ,.... ' ....~ ,.... , 'n _"w C ~ joI _"'07'[ 0( Ii! I 85.00 10.00 10.00 85.00 I ~ I I :J IS I s' ~ I='. I" I" I" I 1 3 I l- - - ~ : ~ 1~.(IO i: ~ I :~ f"l ª i 4 ª i 5; i 6 ~: . ¡; 2 ~ ~ I I ~ I I _4"07'[ I!I ~ ',.vI : ~ I ~ I I - ~ I :i~ 3~23 _I!?:.J!. _!!I'!!!)_ _I!:.C!. __I4-""-.J 40 L!2IL.OO.... , ...37·..·....\ :\1:3: ., +::¡ /I I Î -- I R-e,OO '\ .~ ~ sør",,'16'E 374.7 ., . . sa"~'6'E ::¡ :J .. 5177 O,,'Oò - _ _ _ _ _ I 9M; Go....... ."4/ . ,,'00- I::¡ FRAZER STREET ::¡ . ::¡ 14000 ::¡ . I ...., Cf'Lor, ")...._ ~. ~ I~ f !!LXI(. I 1 ". ~ ,,.;~. 71.42 IO.ÕÒ IO~ as'37 1 4O~1 40 r '00.00 _ ~ ....".,...... - ~ ~ ~ I" I" I" , , .J .6 ¡..'<" E"6TeOL'I' ~ .'" ~ _ ~ f ~ f X f ~I I" I'X X -- Q:-':~:: ~ 5 r:;~6r:;1'r:;lðr;;lqr:;I;1 'r;¡'4r;; <"..> - I - - - -I ~ 1- _ : .:~ L _ _ _ .~ , , -.-- -_'--L _ _ _'b~ --'!,'Y-- -!!I..!!I- _IO..:.C!. _!!-2!.I_ _~.C!!-' 40 40 L_'2!.I..!!I_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ V NerSO"8"W 858.22 5OIIT1eAS'I1!OIL 'I' E~ ( SQITH LIIe Cf' TIe Of' ne !.ArðT!N. Y Lit«! Of' I - ....,..QfE ne fell" LOT e. I!LOGK · ~. 10, T124N. 0l20I0< ~. ~onestroo ~AINAQ[ ANO U1I.ITY EASEWEN1S SHO... THUS.. IIEAIIINC; OIIIOITATION.. OIIIENTATION OF THIS IIEAIIINC; mn:W J' , l " a.sm ON TI1E PlAT OF ~ §,'lIIamson -----+--- -- PlAT THRŒ WHICH ASSUIotES TI1E ,: IJN[ OF TI1E HE'/4 OF THI: .'/4 ( SECTION '0. Tl24N, R2,w II(NIS ~ a....·'a· WEST, . Kotsmlth 0 100 ;200 , I ~. ......... ! 6ftNIMG. ~e IN IftT - '0 rttT III .0111 ANI) AOJOINç SmuT .......... IIIONT OF WAY lJN[S ANI) PlAT IOUNDMY ANI) i. ~ IR()t4 MOIU-eNT I'OUc) , rttT III .0111 ANI) AOJOINç LOT UNES .S SHO" ON TI1E 'L'T. UNl£SS o~ i 0 ØI!!MOtft V2 IØt er M INCH ~SION(). , 1R()t4__"'1H~T1G , "IJþ II!) I'I1M _ ~ , . . . . '. ~e~e+Qf"~. ~tI\...~..f . I," , ç "'.."',' ,'"-""---~-""'~"-',"1" -------. \ i I . Ii: 4.12 Upon approval and execution of this Agreement, the City shall approve the Subdividh's plat provided it otherv.rise meets the requirements of the City's Ordinanc~ Q:overning Subdivisions. I - i 4.13 The fono~ing additional agreements are being made a part of this Subdivision .( Agreeme* to continue in force and effect as though they were dedications of the plat propôsed to be developed by the City, unless according to their terms are intended tb terminate earlier: i I (a) TKe Subdivider shall file protective covenants for the Subdivision in the for;m attached hereto as Exhibit B. . I ì (b) Houses constructed. on any lots which abut NortWand Drive and another , street shall be constructed to front on the street other than NortWand Dnye, and the driveway access tothe lot shall be from the street other than NortWand Drive. , 4,14 The provi~~onsofChapter5 of the St. Joseph Code of Ordinances (1992 Edition) are hereby ~dopted by reference in their entirety, unless specifically excerpted, modified, or varied by the terms of this Agreement, orby the final plat approved . as approve~ by the City. I ThisAg eement shall be binding onthe successors and assigns, heirs, and personal representatives of the parties.! Signed td e,œcuted by th~ ~artíeS hereto on thi~ day of~ ' 1999. ATTES . CITY OF ST JOSEPH By{L·~i\ By Can -e Schmidt, City Clerk . ... s 'f \ i,l I' i (. ',è ... . . . . '. > . . . J F1LANNINGCOMMISSION MOTION .. a~ Ubch made a ~on W ~mmend ~at ~e SLJoHph CiW ~uncll~we S~oo 4113 (b) oftheNorthla~d,IV Developer's Agreementfor Lot1, Block 3,ofthe Northland IV ~ddition, provided th~t the property owner construct a turnaround area on the property i1 order to access N0r"land Drive in a forward driving position. Jim Graeve seconded1themotion. Discussion: . ~urt Schneiderquestio~ed the motion by stating that access to Northland Drwe was eliminated ue to the traffic pattel1')s that will exist on Northland Drive. Schneider cited that the same 9Onversations took plaqe during the construction of 1ih Avenue in the Pond View Ridge idditions. 1 Ehlert added that the APO's 2020 Transportation Plan does connect Northland Drive to an east ~estcollector street, w\;1ich connects County Road 2 and County Road 134. Traffic will be very ~eavy on Northland Driye when the co.nnectlon is made in the Mure. .. ctmeider further stat~ thai the next phase of the Northtand AdditiOl1 assumes homes9l9ng t e park, which would ~equire the lots to access Northland Drive. The Planning Commission should consider constructing the street adjacent to the park in order to eliminate future access .1 ' ! Issues. : . Jesnick stated that she: is concerned with large amounts of traffic adjacent to the park and 'foUld support homes ~Iong the park, which will create a buffer between the park and the reet. j . chneider stated that ~()fthland Drive was designed as a wide street to accommodate the t:raffic volumes that woyld occur in the area. Providing additional access to Northland Drive 'fOuld defeat the purpqse of its design and safety is a major concern with the location of this lot. Schneider further stated the Planning Commission should be prepared for similar requests by other property owners along Northland Drive. ~tSCh clarified that theimotion is made to waive the requirement just for Lot 1, . Block 3 and .!tdditional requests would be consider on a case by case basis. The motion does not eliminate fection4.13 (b) entirelr from the developer's agreement. The motion carried ~ith the following vote: Ayes: Klein,¡ Kalinowski, Lesnick, Utsch, Graeve, Schneider, and Ehlert Nays: None! Motion Carried , ! . i i I . '>/' ,.~ .' . .