Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1994 [12] Dec 01 {Book 06} ~L .=rv I <') ~_ ì' ~ ~- ~~ Mayor "1 I !'\:;~. Donald "Bud" Reber Councilors Ken Hiemenz Ross Rieke . First A venue NW Bob Loso .0, Box 668 Stephanie Hazen St. Joseph, Minnesota 56374 City Clerk/Aäm (612) 363-7201 FAX # 363-0342 CITY OF ST. JOSEPH Rachel Stapleton CITY COUNCIL MEETING December 1, 1994 - 7:00 P.M. AGENDA 1. Call to Order 2. Approve Agenda 3. Approve Minutes November 10 & November 17 4. Bills Payable 5. Mayor Reports 6. Council Reports 7. Clerk\Administrator Reports . a) Department Head Report b) status of Borasch Property Cleanup c) Budget Information for Taxation Hearing c) Other Matters of Concern 10. 8:00 P.M. OPEN TO THE PUBLIC 11. Recess 12. OLD BUSINESS * a) Police Federation Contract b) Access Channel Equip. c) Sidewalks d) ROW Property Request e) Police Chief Contract f) Comprehensive Plan g) Shared Ride Taxi h) Address, Minn st & 91st Ave i) Tape Recording Equipment j) Exempt Non-exempt Emp1. k) Vacating Alleys l) Visibility by Grand Slam 13. 8:30 p.m. City Engineer Joe Bettendorf Reports a) College Avenue/Minnesota Street Four Way stop b) Wellhead Protection Plan c) Water System Improvements 14. Affordable Housing 15. Adjourn. . . " Benton CourJ'ly @_,saintJosePhTownShiP Haven:Township ~PO ",' Saint Wendel Township .Uk Township ""- Sartell t Augusta Township ~ _ .. _ Sauk Rapids Saint Cloud ST. CLOUD AREA PLANNING ORGANIZATION Sherburne County Saint Cloud Township 665 Franklin Ave. N.R ' St. Cloud, MN 56304 Stearns County Saint Joseph 612/252-7568 Waite Park November 21,1994 Mayor Bud Reber P.O. Box 313 st. Joseph, Minnesota 56374 Re: Affordable Housing Dear Mayor Reber: As you are aware" the Executi ve Board discussed in further detail the merits of st. Cloud Area Planning Organization (APO) involvement in the Affordable Housing issue for the metro area. The APO's involvement could consist of coordinating efforts to identify needs and develop strategies for removing barriers to affordable housing throughout the metro area. This involvement . could also include staff time to analyze housing with census information and utilize our Geographic Information System (GIS) capabilities upon completion of a metropolitan parcel base map. Since this is an issue that transcends political boundaries and requires the active involvement of all metro units of government to be successful; the Executive Board is requesting you to ascertain your jurisdictions interest in the affordable housing issue and your support-for APO involvement. I have attached a copy of the Final Report prepared by the st. Cloud Area Affordable Housing Task Force for review with your policy board and/or planning commission. Please be prepared to address this issue' at the Executive Board meeting in February. William G. Hansen Executive Director WGH/jh enclosure . A Voluntary Association That is Committed to Coordinated Long-Range Planning Through Constant, Cooperative, Intergovernmental Communication " . . . " . - , . St. Cloud Area Affordable Housing Task Force Final Report 2-24-94 . . > To: St. Cloud Planning Commission . From: St. Cloud Area Affordable Housing Task Force Co-Chair Doug Clark, St. Cloud Area Legal Services Co-Chair Ken Croat, Croat Kerfeld Construction Date: 2-18-93 RE: Final Report The St. Cloud Planning Commission directed St. Cloud Planning Staff to assist in the creation of the St. Cloud Area Affordable Housing Task Force in June of 1993.1 The charge of the Task Force was to "Identify and recommend strategies for removing barriers to affordable housing within the St. Cloud area through a process that is multi-jurisdictional in review and participation". This Task Force was given six months to return with recommendations to the planning commission, The first step in the planning process for the Task Force included the identification of the need for affordable housing2. Once the need was established, subcommittees met to help establish specific goals to help remove local barriers . regarding public perception, municipal policy and availability of financing. The need for affordable housing in this area has been documented by several different sources over the past few years. The Maxfield Study identified both a strong need for housing affordable to low or moderate income households and a strong gro\vth in future housing demand on the area, The study pointed out that "The private sector cannot produce or maintain housing for the entire segment of low income persons who need housing.", Their final assessment was that there will be an increasing need for housing affordable to singles, families and seniors in the 1990's. They specifically endorsed the idea that local efforts should concentrate on developing housing that is affordable to low- and very-low income families. 3 The St. Cloud Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS), completed in December of 1993, also identified a strong need for affordable housing, Local barriers identified in the CHAS included a lack of affordable land for development I A list of the Task Force membership is attached below, 2 Affordable is defined as housing that costs a maximum of 30% of a family's gross income, The families . targeted in this study earn less than 80% of area median income, ) Market Analysis and Forecast Report for the Update ofSt. Cloud's Comprehensive Plan. Maxfield Research Group Inc.. July 1992. Pp,I27-128, I ~ , , " and NIMBY (Not In My Back Yard) attitudes in the area.4 The CHAS provides a , detailed strategy to meet the needs of area famiJies and supports the development . of a continuum of affordable housing options and strategies.s The Task Force attempted to meet its mission by developing strategies that would allow the private housing market to provide as much affordable housing as possible. This effort targets roughly 44.6 percent of area households - specifically, those households that earned less than $25,000 in 1989. The Task Force acknowledged that in order for this to happen, however, there needs to be public intervention in the private market. Affordable housing will neither be produced nor preserved without active intervention of the public sector. Governmental units must make full use of their regulatory powers and financial resources to preserve whatever affordable housing already exists and to produce other affordable housing. The enclosed "Affordable Housing Action Plan" are steps to help remove local barriers and promote the availability of affordable, housing in the area. The entire action plßn was approved by a majority of the Task Force, special notations identify the steps adopted in unanimity. A complete list of Task Force membership is attached. . Several strategies are included in the action plan. The plan does not provide specific suggestions to amend any single municipality's policies; rather, it gives general goals or strategies that all municipalities may -adopt. The St. Cloud Area Affordable Housing Task Force sees a need for on-going efforts to address the need to provide affordable housing for area families. This Task Force is viewed as a first step; without the continued commitment and effort of all local municipalities, real change cannot happen. As you review these recommendations consider the thousands of single parents, families working for low pay, elderly households and special needs households - and all others in our communities who live at risk. On their behalf, we thank you for your commitment and your leadership. And we encourage your timely and detennined response to these recommendations. 4 St. Cloud CHAS. "Community Profile" December 1993. Pp. 1-47. S CHAS. P. 48. . 11 St. Cloud Area Affordable Housing Task Force · Action Plan for Affordable Housing 1. Request St. Cloud Mayor's office to invite all area jurisdictions to develop a joint affordable housing policy team, possibly under the jurisdiction of an organization that has area wide representation like the Area Planning Organization. II. All local Planning Commissions/Staffs should establish policies which require and/or provide incentives to the development of permanent housing affordable to low-income households - i,e., households with incomes below 80 percent of area median incomes. Such policies may include: * A. Inclusionary zoning policies which mandate development of additional permanent housing units affordable to low-income households by: 1. requiring that a minimum percentage of each new housing development be affordable to low-income households; 2. requiring payment of an "in lieu of' fee for developers unable to meet these requirements-which will be placed into a fund for · affordable housing development; 3. requiring that a: developer unable to meet these requirements be mandated to donate appropriate and suitable land for affordable housing development by local nonprofit or other private developer. *Some Task Force members did not support item II. A.. AND/OR B. Providing financial incentives to encourage development of affordable housing for households with incomes below 80 percent of area median Income. 1. These financial incentives could be provided with such options as: a. reducing or waiving municipal fees; * *b. allowing density bonuses or relief from certain non- · critical improvements; 1 " . , , "c. providing Federal/State block grants to affordable . . developments; d. targeting Low Income Housing Tax Credits and other locally controlled financing sources to developments which provide certain levels of affordable housing. Special care should be taken when providing any financial assistance to avoid concentration while providing funds only to projects that provide a significant amount of affordable housing to lower income households. **Some Task Force members did not support item II. B. b.. AND / OR C. Requiring and/or rewarding affordable housing developments which assure long-tenn affordability. 1. Wherever feasible, financial incentives and zoning requirements should insist on the long term affordability . for the proposed affordable housing. 2. At a minimum, financial incentives should be directed only to developments which assure that if the long-term affordability is ever threatened, all such financial incentives be recaptured for future affordable housing developments. III. Local jurisdictions should band together to develop an anti-NIMBY ("Not In My Back Yard") public relations campaign. This effort needs to educate politicians, government officials and the general population regarding the urgency of the local need for affordable housing. IV. Local jurisdiction's planning bodies should work together to reduce the use of larger lot zoning (e.g. RI in S1. Cloud) and increase the use of Planned Unit Developments. This is especially important in urbanized areas. V. Local jurisdictions should work toward the development of a fund to assist . in the creation of affordable housing opportunities for very low- income households, such as a Housing Trust Fund. (It should be noted 2 some jurisdictions may be unable to expend funds for housing in another . jurisdiction.) This fund can serve a variety of purposes, such as; A. providing incentives for the creation of affordable housing, B. providing resources to leverage other funds, C, and providing a jurisdiction an additional means of local control over projects. VI. Local jurisdictions should coordinate annexation policies in urban growth .' areas, A. Set urban/suburban development growth boundaries to inhibit urban spraw 1. 1. All three county planning bodies should be consulted as boundaries are set. B. Annexation policies should include all afforda~le housing policies. VII. All jurisdictions should adopt "Affordable Housing Financing Policy . Statements" indicating the intent to aggressively use financing tools available to municipalities that can assist with the development of affordable housing for lower income households. Each step in this action plan was supported unanimously except for those noted. . . 3 " . . Task Force Membership List ~ . David Popken Tarryl Clark Dave Kuefler Health Director Legal Services of S1. Cloud Multiple Housing Assoc. City of S1. Cloud 830 West S1. Germain 816 W. S1. Germain 200 4th A venue South S1. Cloud, MN 56301 S1. Cloud, MN 56301 S1. Cloud, MN 56301 Lynn Machula Gary WaIIinga Bill Beuning Benton County Planning Sierra Club Human Rights Commission 531 Dewey Street 3123 Alder Lane 1810 Minnesota Blvd. Foley, MN 56329 St. Cloud, MN 56301 S1. Cloud, MN 56304 Marty Reker David Werschay Russ Porte Ie Reker Construction Croat / Kerfeld Construction Board of Realtors 11555 - 39th A venue NW 118 12th A venue North 3419 West Division Rice, MN 56376 St. Cloud, MN 56303 S1. Cloud, Mn 56301 Ken Croat Frank Johnson Brian Benson Croat I Kerfeld Canst. School District #742 Sherburne Planning Dir. 118 12th A venue North 87 WoodhiJl Road 327 K,ing Avenue St. Cloud, MN 56303 S1. Cloud, MN 56304 Elk River, MN 55330 . Steve Gaetz Carol Gaetz Kim Salisbury Ass1. City Engineer Planning Department Neighborhood Info. Exchange City of St. Cloud City of S1. Cloud 2123 Shannon Drive 400 2nd Avenue South 400 2nd Street South S1. Cloud, MN 56301 S1. Cloud, MN 56301 S1. Cloud, MN 56301 Susan Lorenz John Mertens Karen Young City of Sauk Rapids Human Rights Commission NSP Co. 15 North 2nd A venue 2005 Centennial Drive 3515 North 3 rd Street Sauk Rapids, MN 56379 S1. Cloud, MN 56303 S1. Cloud, MN 56303 Joe Torborg Mike Podawiltz Jerry Korte Torborg Construction Podawiltz Development Environmental Council PO Box 184 101 7th A venue South 1577 52nd S1. SE St. Cloud, MN 56302 S1. Cloud, MN 5630] S1. Cloud, MN 56304 AI Grapentin Mike Brown Doug Clark Town of St. Cloud SIC Housing Coalition Legal Services 5855 Rolling Ridge Road 8] 0 W. S1. Germain 830 West S1. Germain St. Cloud, MN 56303 S1. Cloud, MN 5630] St. Cloud, MN 56301 . . 1 Brian Myres John Massmann Duane Wrightson . Citizens Savings Bank St. Cloud Planning Commission Sartell Public Schools . ] 113 S1. Germain West 908 South 11 th A venue PO Box 328 S1. Cloud,?v1N 56301 St Cloud, MN 56301 St. Cloud, MN 56377 Steve Mooney SCSU College of Business 720 South 4th A venue S1. Cloud, MN 56301 . . 2 ., . '." .. '.'.. -," . :" <, .' I..... ..._'of.,.... .~.. ,.....:,:,.,...... .·i............ ..1 ....--',~__ T Growth Task force :on affordable :area housing .unveils plan :Report to planning : panel stresses unity .. :By Jeff Fox TlME5PHOTOBY JASONWACHT[R ,TIMéS STAFF WRITER .. 5t Cloud aroa ·t· d t· Kim Salisbury, St. Cloud, has served on the SI. Cloud Area Affordable Housing . .... Cl lCS an coun ICS arc :being urged to joinùy come up with a Tas~ Force to help find affordable housing for low-Income resIdents. ,strategy to make housing more afford· necded to get enough affordablc hous· cities and counties to put togethcr a :able to low-income residents. ing built, Clark said. While the demand "housing policy tcam," Mayor Chuck : "I think the general theme that the for housing grows, about half of the Winkelman said Monday a coordinatcd .' ,task force would like to put forth is that households in St. Cloud havc incomcs approach sounds like a good idea. , ·we're all in this together," said Doug of $25,000 or lcss, according to a city - Require that pans of new devel· 'Clark of St. Cloud Area Legal Ser· study conducted last year. opments be sct aside for low·income vices. 111at translates into a family earning housing, Clark, a member of the St. Cloud that much being able to afford no more - Provide grants, from state or fed· Area Affordable Housing Task Force, than about $500 a monlh for housing eraJ mOllcy, for housing, will present recommendations from and utilities, hc said. - Rcduce 101 sizc requircmcnts. ThaI wc task force 10 the St. Cloud Planning The task force rcport caJ!s on local would mcan ¡¡¡orc homcs in a givcn ¡¡rca Commission ¡¡t 7 tonight in City Hall. governmcnts to lakc ,I more activc rolc but abo ;It a lowcr cost. With the area's high number of low· in finding solutions. Among thc olher · [)evelop'l housin¡~ tnJ.\t fund 10 pro, paying service sector anti clltry,!cvel recommcndalions: vide incentives ,llId match olher funds jobs, governmcnt help prob¡¡bly \\'iJ! bc . GCI thc mayor of SI. CJoud 10 j,)I")te f'lcJse sce HOUSING, 4A ~ H. mcms and morc cxpcnsive hOlnes 011 SI. ousmg Cloud's nonh sidc. "And II seClllS to , work well," shc s;lId. City councils and area rcsiden ts need whep nee~cd. to be convinccd thaI a mix of housing , , Kim Salisbury, ~ t¡~sk force m.e~ber will work as well as it has in (¡Ihcr cities, , ' . " .. .': , .:' from St. Cloud, said ['S oftcn dlff¡cult shesaid. ,:.:. '::,,'.. '.:: : ," ). ',:: ".:,' .'\ ...' -: , .', ' " : :..:::: for people wit~ low in~omcs ,I~ find af· AJ;olher hurdle could be gctr ing " ., ,.','.' . "\ . .' : ': ' .,', " '.. 'fordable hous1l1g. Vnlll sh~ JOined t~lC cities and counties to agree on joint .. . . , .... ' .." '., ,'., task force last s~mmcr, SalIsbury said, planning. . ,." ',:' ,.,. '. , '... ..." she nevcr realized the scope of the "Gclling all of thcm is prob¡¡bly .' .' . '. '" , ' .' .. pr~b~em...., ..' going to bc difficult jU,sl because ,. ,.' , ". , it s devast~,tlng, she saId. It Just therc's so many," Clark said. The area , . . took me \,Jack., is a single economic unit and should ap· ,. .. ',' .,' . She sa!d one of thc blggcs~ obstacles proach housing that way, ',', ':",;' ,.' ". IS ~ not'1I1.m!.:bac~yar~ attllude that While not ¡¡¡ying oul specifics of how ., , ..,.... .'. '.' , bO.llsdownto. Ist!;lsg01l1gtoaffectthe some of thcecollomic incclllivcs would ,', . '. ' pnce of our house. work the task forcc wanled to offcr .::' :.....;. :<..,,:.. :"':... '" '...' "SaliSbUry pointed to the mix of ap"t' some' opl ions. CI"k "id. 0, 4 . . . . :,,;' ".,...........,. '::.....'.:::, ,>...':.;,'..: .. .. .. I. .:',','. .. '.. 0 ,...., '. . ' . , 'I. ° o. . . .... ' \ 0 ~ _0· _ 0...1 .. '. o. . .... :. ' ,. .;. .'0 '. . . :.. " o. :.. '0 I ';' .:.::';... ' ... ~~: ~ ~::/. ... _. ':... : .. ;" ..':...: ::-":-.'. :,:'::',::/,::.<' ....'.::,'::..::::). :,:.::,;"':" :., ',/:,~':;.>,>'.:, "."," ',...... co U NTY 0 F STEARN S . . environmental Serviced ::Department Administration Center Rm 343 · 705 Courthouse Square · St. Cloud, MN 56303 612-656-3613 · Fax 612-656-6130 November 23, 1994 Rachel Stapleton St. Joseph City Clerk P.O. Box 688 St. Joseph, MN 56374 To: All Local Units of Government RE: 1995 Revisions to Stearns County's Comprehensive Water Plan . Stearns County is planning to revise its current comprehensive water plan. In the near future, ,a notice of the county's intent to revise the plan will be sent to you. As a part of this revision process, we are soliciting information from all applicable entities who are directly or indirectly . involved in the county's water plan. As a result, and as required in Minn. Rules pt. 9300.0030, subp. 4, Stearns County Environmental Services Department is requesting from all local units of government having jurisdiction within the county to provide the following information to the county within 60 days: 1. any existing water and related land resources plans and official controls, and 2. any conflicts, problems, or opportunities that local units of government want examined and/or addresses in the comprehensive water plan. We are asking you to submit this information as soon as possible, but no later than January 23, 1995. If you do not have any information to submit, please let us know so that we may remove your name from our list. Should you have any questions regarding this request, please contact Annette Elliott or Chelle Benson, of my staff at (612) 656-3613 or 1-800-450-0852. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. . ~~.LM.,. Donald W. Adams, Director Environmental Services Department #875-2984 Affirmative Action / Equal Opportunity Employer .. co U NTY 0 F STEAR N S · Assessor's Office Administration Center Rm 37 · 705 Courthouse Square · St. Cloud, MN 56303 612-656-3680 FAX 612-656-3977 November 22, 1994 Rachel Stapleton St. Joseph City Clerk! Admin P.O. Box 668 St. Joseph, Minnesota 56374 Dear Council Member: At the 1994 Stearns County Board of Equalization, a question was asked about the status of the 1994 assessment done by assessors hired by the local districts. A motion was passed to have my staff to physically review a sample of the local assessor's work and report back to them. I selected twelve parcel from each district and assigned a staff appraiser to review · them. The local assessor was given the change to participate in these reviews. Your local assessor, Ollie Lesnick, work was reviewed in August and September of this year. According to the information I received from the staff appraiser, the following is what was found during the review of the twelve parcels. Eleven residential properties and one apartment was reviewed. The staff appraiser noted that the assessment of St. Joseph City was in good condition. Minor problems included incomplete field cards, errors in measurements, and math errors. Ollie's work is acceptable. He takes a lot of pride in his work and it shows. When the motion was made to review the work of the local assessor, I originality thought that this would cause a conflict between this office and the local assessor and the local districts, however, I believe that this process has been a good tool for this office to help understand the philosophy of each individual assessor and their district. For those assessors who are not meeting the requirements of their position, we have made them aware of the problems we see and what is required. We will again review these districts next year. We are expecting improvements in the areas which we have discussed. For those assessor who are doing a satisfactory job, we have offer our help and direction in making their job easier. · #875·2984 Affirmative Action / Equal Opportunity Employer . In conclusion, I offer my appreciation for your understanding and patience on this matter. . Your input has and will continue to be helpful in making this job of taxation easier. If their are any problems or questions, you may feel free to contact me at this office. tere1Y, ~ .~ Gary Grossinger Stearns County Assessor cc: Ollie Lesnick . . , , ,. .. . · STAR CITY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES: OCTOBER 24,1994 Members present Judy Weyrens; Ken Hiemenz; Linda Sniezek; Mariterese Woida, 05B; James Smith; Greg Reinhart; Andre' Marthaler, OSB. Committee Reports: Information Gatherin~ Most reports are incomplete. Discussion on the format brought us to a consensus that the format in the 1960 NSP Census Report .ill: the format in the Planning Commission book. A-28 ---A-3D will help to plot the information we gather. End Product After all the information gathering and all the forms are completed and all the committees have passed on our presentations, St Joseph should be a marketable product Assignment for next time: each committee will indicate that it has begun or completed its information gathering. · Chamber meetin~ On November 15.12 noon. El Paso Restaurant and Lounge, Bill Hanson. St Cloud Area Planning Organization (APO), will discuss transportation plans - what needs to be done re: transportation in the St Joseph Area by the year 2015. The Commissioners should be interested and are invited to this meeting. Meeting adjourned early. Andre Marthaler, OSB Secretary pro tern · , , ,~ . . . DEPARTMENT HEAD MEETING 9:00am Friday, November '0 1994 .LV, Rachel * Council approved purchase of a new copier machine for the City Offices. * Council approved ,p' 1 payment on Old Hwy h0 project. .Llna.L "" * Payment of rebate ....~ residents in~v"ol ,red in Minnesota St E project ....u to be mailed today. * Council approved purchase ~,p the Roske property. U.L * Council requested a letter be sent to Tom Borresch encouraging the continuation of his clean-up efforts on his property located adjacent to CSAH 75. * Dry Riders Club will be allowed to rent Millstream Park on Memorial Da7- weekend with the same stipulations as ln the past. * Council, upon recommendation of the Planning Commission, approved the remov"'al of parking requirements ,p-~ Sal's Bar as established in .LV.L 1991. The Council ...¡~...¡ .... require that a permanent lease -,p adjoining U..LU nOlJ V1. parking areas j..,~ g l,ten the new owners. uc; * Request of Dennis Stueve for additional parking spaces ,p-~ snow 1.V1. birds was denied. * Council approved Joe Bettendorf to assign numbers ....~ Northland III ....u and Minnesota Street East. Bettendorf will also report on the . '"V'isibili ty issue near Grand Slam Pizza. * Council reviewed video on the Open Meeting Law. * Park Board disagrees with placement of snow fencing on sledding hill in Memorial Park. Councilor L~~~ to meet with Maintenance uo::>u Department on this issue. * SlJ.nset Manufacturing revised plan for construction of storage approved by Council as recommended by Planning Commission. * Council discussed issues regarding the election of November 0 v, 1994. Lindg:ren * Council approTýed Lindgren ....~ make application for a Federal grant ....u entitled Fast Cops. This grant provides 7 hOI of the funding for a full- " /0 ..... officer f-~ a period of three J'ears. ....lme V1. * Council approved receipt of a '00,) Reliant to be used as a .1.~Vv D.A.R.E. vehicle or to be used for undercover work. Marthaler * fti"", +- _....... ser'v'ice will be interrupted in Park Terrace Addition on nQ.l,..t=L Tuesday, November 22nd from 1:00 DM to 4:00 PM. ..L 1'.1 . ., . . · 1995 Proposed Tax Levy Proposed Tax Levy $ 257,250 Proposed Levy Breakdown General Fund Levy $ 230,250 1993 Bond Levy (East Baker & 7th Ave) $ 19,000 1992 Bond Levy (Water storage) $ 8,000 · · . . . Tax Impact, General Fund 1994 General Fund Levy $ 157,342 1995 General Fund Levy $ 230,250 Increase Levy 72,908 Net affect of Proposed General Fund Levy Increase: Home Value Tax impact 1994 Impact Increase 60,000 l63.41 l19.51 43.90 90,000 326.82 239.02 87.80 . . ~ . . !-"'"' l\J c.J ,¡::.. ()l (j.) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 > r--3 ~ c:r p; µ; P "<1 X > () <: 0 PJ p I r-cJ n µJ 0 I-' p.. 0 0-3 W. f---J . P.J 'ï;j X '1 c+ .....- (') ~ ~ p) (JQ 'ï;j ::E P.J () p) .....- . .....- ~ n ~ "<1 CD ::d '\j 0 PJ p; ~ '1 S CD þ;;" Uì W. PJ ¡:: r-c þ;;" \r) (') ~ ÇJ CD <>' ~ <5' c- -1 f-1 '1 CD f=J . w. U) ("'<- - 0 "-I ..J:) 0 .J:J Uì - ~ CD o( 'ï;j þ" . " . . * * * :s: 0 :s: * * ØJ ..... ØJ * \D 0\ ,þ. 11 rT \D 0\ ,þ. 11 0 0 0 ::>i' '< 0 0 0 ::>i' .. ... ... (I) ... ... ... (I) t/) t/) t/) 0 0 0 rT 8 0 0 0 rt" (I) (I) (I) 0 0 0 ØJ 0 0 0 1:::111 ttJl1 "t:I t/) ( )I't:P~ 11 0 0 0 <: >; 0 0 0 <: ØJ < ØJ < ØJ ::s rt" 0 ..... < ØJ ØJ ..... ..... tn ..... 11 0 11 ...... 11 ..... ...... "t:I ..... ......0 ....·0 ;;ço ~ (I) ..... (I) 0 ¡:: (I) ¡:: "< (I) o (I) en (I) 0 (I) (I) 11 (I) en en ::tIrt"(I)"t:Ien Z 0 ~(I)en 11 .1:;; (I) 11 ØJ"O S "t:IO"O ØJ ~ (I) trl1 ::00 11 rt" 11 '< en 0 -0 (I) < 0(1)0 '0(1) (I) < o ØJ rTO< 0 ØJ ..... ..... 11..... (I) rt"..... 0 '0< ~ø.. (I) o ..... ø.. S (I) (I) .....(1) ØJ rt"O(l) tx:I "0 11ø.. rt"ø.. rt" .....::s ø.. en ØJ ... þ"' ..... 0 rT 11 ..... ..... 0 ::s ..... "t:I ..... (I) o ::s ::s ::s ::s ::s (1)9 ø.. ØJ 0 0 0 0 11 ØJ I"1rT rt" rT · · · ('T rT 1"1P- "OP- p- O) ,þ. I\,) 1:::1(1) 0 ....... ..... ..... 11 ..... ..... \D 01 I'.) ØJo. \D (I) en (I) en en '< ...... \0 0 11 S * * * 0 ..... w ..... <..n ..... 0 ....·0 0 ..... < I\,) 0\ ....;¡ rT ø..ØJ ¡:: ØJ ØJ rt" ..... 0\ W \D t-3tx:1 "< (I)...... S..... ...... '< ::s . . . ØJ en -0 0 0 IQ 00 ,þ. 0\ >;rt" t-3 .....¡:: o ¡:: ¡:: 8 I\,) ..... ....;¡ ..... ØJ . <..... p-..... ...... ØJ 0 9 >; (I) ØJ ØJ ØJ ØJ ~ 0 ØJ I"1rT ::Jrt" rt" en rt" 0 (I) ..... ::J ..... ..... rT (I) 0 0.0 (I) 0 0 tn 0- 9 ::s .....::s ::s .. "0 en ØJ ..... ..... ..... tJj 11 ::s ::s ::s ØJ ..... 0 0 0 tn tn ...... ..... ..... "t:I ..... 0 ¡:: ¡:: ¡:: (I) 0 ::s 0- 0- 0. 0 0 0 11 (I) (I) (I) · · · (} .. .. .. I'.) I'.) I\,) I:::1ØJ \D \D \0 ØJtr "<...... * * * (I) 0 * * * "t:I ..... e e e (l)rt" . . . 11"< 0) ,þ. I\,) \0 <..n I\,) 1:;;8 t/) ØJ ØJ .rT * * * '<~ 8· 0 0 0 ..... · · · SO ,þ. ,þ. ,þ. (1)- ,þ. ,þ. ,þ. en 0 ¡:: * * * 0- * * * * * * . , .. /==à . (Q CD C)l ':rj ~ ¡...... J-I. ~ ¡.þ.. ( ) co 0 ~ ~ ':rj tJ 0) ~ ( ) 0 co Þ ( ) 0 þ CO ........ cr' 0.. 0 ( ) ~ ~ tv c+- -.J A' CO ~ ........ w ¡.þ. 0 0) ( ) CJ1':rj -.J ~ G) ,~ Ul <I -.J J-I. Þ () p., (/) ( ) ~ M Xi . ~ rc ¡...... p) CD c+- O) ( ) co ~ H ~ ~ ¡....J ........ ~ ~ 0) ::J w 0.. ( ) ¡.......J ~ ........ ~ ~ c-+ CJ1 ( ) ( ) ~ co I-i 1--1> ~ co ~ N ~ c..J íJ} -.J ~ ~ (D ~ N 0) Þ co ~ CD 0-. 0 ~ ::J U1 0-. . .-:r 0 r+ Il' .. - . 0 ø ~ "1 Il' - to "'.j r:: s:; 1:1 1-/. 1--1 p,. 0.. ~ 1-/. J->.::J 't:1 "'1~ ø ~ 1:1 co 1-1 p,. co::J ..... r+ OW ~ '1::J ~ , l'û en ~ Ü'1'1:1 * P') 0 co 1-/. W W 1--1 Cù W 1-/. ~ (""'I- () O() (") U> l'û;;5 com 1-/. (""'l- ce I.<:: C)) J->.( ) l'û(""'l- ~ ~ W "'1, J->. l) J->. "'11--1 O)W ~ 1--1 ::J 0)' 0 ¡þ.,to ~ Nr:: 1-/. 1--1 0.. 1-/. ::J . ~ I W t-' d § ~ > ~ '1:1 0.. ~ l) J->.S '"i 0) 1-/. ~ þ:;" ~ t-t ::J co~ W 1-/. m 1-/. ¡þ.,Jg ~ W ! rJJ "'1(""'1- .;~ () "'1 1-/. O)""i , ~ rJJ co~ co( ) "'1...... O() ~ "'1~ (""'l- i-<: c.J 1-/. 1-/. Ü'1~ "i ¡þ.,c-!- 0 1-/. ( ) ~co ( ) < ::J ~ l'û'1:l ( ) r+ 1-/. 0 co..... ::J Nó c-!- ( ) () (""'I- ....... 0 ::J . . .' '" · Budget Presentation/Cuts Department Draft 1 Draft 2 Final Legislative 47,774 47,774 47,774 Administrative 167,593 167,768 163,768 City Hall/Buildings 16,542 17,642 17,642 Police 272,708 256,308 256,308 Building Insp/Misc 14,790 20,490 17,990 Streets/Snow 237,14l 231,141 212,716 Parks/Recreation 96,505 81,905 8l,905 · Misc/Fire Protection 36,280 37,292 38,292 ------- ------- ------- Total 889,333 860,320 836,395 ·