Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1996 [10] Oct 03 {Book 10}
1--: oj e.- ~ , . \J~ CITY OF ST. JOSEPH ~ 1 First Avenue NW CITY COUNCIL MEETING .0. Box 668, October 3, 1996 - 7:00 P.M. t Joseph, MN 56374 312) 363-7201 ax: 363-0342 AGENDA ~ ÍAYOR 1. Call to Order onald "Bud" Reber 2. Approve Agenda LERKI 3. CONSENT AGENDA DMINISTRATOR a) Minutes September 18 and September 19 achel Stapleton b) Central Distric Water Operators School 4. Bills Payable & Overtime and Callouts OUNCILORS 5. Mayor Reports oss Rieke ,)b Loso 6. Council Reports .en Hiemenz )ry Ehlert 7. Keg Ordinance . 8. 7:30 P.M. - City Engineer Reports a) Application for Payment - East Minnesota Street b) Change Order on Sealcoating Project c) Other Matters of Concern 9. 7:45 P.M. Lori Lee - Alley Improvement Policy Change Request 10. 8:00 P.M. PUBLIC COMMENTS 11. RECESS " 12. 8:30 P.M. Refuse - Mike Deutz (Request to include Rental in City Contract) 13. 8:45 P.M. - Community Events Sign - Rich Feneis 14. Public Works Superintendent Reports - Dick Taufen 15. Clerk/Administrator Reports a) Regional Meetings League of Minnesota Cities b) Disorderly conduct - Rental c) Other Matters of Concern 16. Adjourn - - ~ . . CITY OF ST. JOSEPH ~ 1 First Avenue NW MEMO .0. Box 668, L Joseph, MN 56374 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the Council ôl2) 363-7201 ax: 363-0342 FROM: Rachel Stapleton ~ AYOR DATE: September 30, 1996 onald "Bud" Reber RE: Agenda October 30, 1996 meeting. LERKI --------------------------------------------------------- DMINISTRATOR lchel Stapleton 3 a. Corrections received for the September 19 minutes were as follows: Page 2 - Ehlert's report under the Councilors Report - OUNCILORS Item 2 (correction) begin "Ehlert reported that Ernie )SS Rieke Deidrich " )b LOBo . . . ~n Hiemenz City Engineer )ry Ehlert Page 8 - The last paragraph under the Reports is corrected to replace Mr. Stanger with "Mr. . Klocker (wishes to have more block)" and the motion for approval is corrected to allow Mr. Klocker the additional block. 3b. Dick Taufen is requesting to go to Water Operators School at St. John's University on October 30, cost is $25.00. 7. Included in your packet for consideration. A copy is being sent to the off-sale liquor license holders. 9. Lori Lee lS requesting the City change the alley " improvement policy have the city participate in to improvement of this alley at the same rate as residentiäl streets (60 - 40 split) . She contends that because two houses front on the alley it should be considered a street. She lives on the alley that has recently been before the City Council for a proposed improvement. 12. There is a proposal by some landlords to have the rental units included in the City refuse contract, and the City would do the billing also. They request to be on the city-wide clean-up and have the spring cleanup changed to coincide with school closing. Jamie from BFI will also be at the meeting. - - , . ~ -----.-. . - -- - - - . . [FmR1~u ~u~u~ [fœD[E~[ID[LW ~~(M~ ©~ OO@~Œu@~~ ~Uo JJ©~~~[}={] ~[EœWD~[ _.. . . . . 1 @ œJ[b@(Ç/XW! /-; I '~~C0~m~~· ...... Y oulll be l' - S\,\~ on JJŒ~ŒJL~œ~ SANDY . -- ---- ; TI[}u@ ®ÔmŒJiJ0oud] ~[f)(~~ôm~ôßüß KLOCKER -. IIDCü)'u,9ffiü®wm ~üo ~il®rnill - , . .' [p~[R1~u ~u~u~ . ~œD~~[ID[LW J~5~ [rfl ~ (Q) [p OO@~·[Eu@~~ ~UD JJ(Q)~~~[}=O ~~I~WD~[ - . ... . I @ !ßJ[b@(Ç/K~! _.~-_._- ---~_. - ---+-. --. - --.-" FLoraLArts J .couJ , _.~. ;: .~ Ii _¿~363. 7705u w -..-~ ,. 8Liillwu CPm@illORJ@Q The Best Move ]l;u'll Ever Make! ~. I I - - lfDu@ ~[?QO@]@DùüD@D [POm@]®®1Jù [Ki@@O{S}j7 D O[fi)@o , -.- ..,j'\ --. /. I ,- .> ! ' . ì\ ~ :. '. ,. ..1 ,,: J -_-'., ' " . .: \ " .'. ¡ ---! ... - -- '" ",. ;;EEI\IEI§~£~:rsr[1i8RRISES ,11\1[1,;' ,', I , . '. . ,.\ :x _/~Ü~ìNË\~~bß¡ÈLÔÞMENt AND: CON'SULTIN6 ." ;: ': . ..;:. )_), -r~\ú:-~._~\,\,:{._,,,,l.;¡-it:i¡J?-~-;-~)..~</~\ ,)~1~-.:,~ .,;\¿:.. \<~_~.~:,/:,:-,~'~'-.~-''-;.-~..:.~ -;~,/;-;_.;'-:..c~;~:,~- ~,~-; -~. .:,,'_.:.,:- --} . .- __ -. ' :-!":¿{->;.;-: ~\ -.. , . . "'jö6ipl'NE P.OIÑT.~ÖÀDiI,ST."GÜ)UD,'MN·56'303.- PHONE: (320) '251-6130. ;, " '0;:" ?:~,\}t!;?'~'f(:')', ;~',~;{;;~':Ef::;~F:C;:j: ,j ',:r:' : ,':: ;~';~?\', ' ',' . _ ',', :,-,,::;.:'. ,.";,. ,,'J.< ~ ,;" I .,\ ~'> 1,1 SIGN 'LEAS'EÎ' ;/'. i . ': ¡" ::" ,'," " ' 1- : - ,- " ," ~ ,<,._~ /:'~~~·I~):';/;Œ~~<.K·:':~:~:<5~r~;~·:¿}I\~~~':.> ~.:Š~~·,,:\~;~~;j'·,'·· ,..:~ :,'~~,~;~r:\~",:/~,}':'-';';'·!:~.;\~ . ;,~,,: , Oq ,this 24pax;ofSèP!~.':nbér..).~~6: :!~..~ri,d~~~~g;n~~ _ S~n~y ~~~ker,þ~y!n~,.~. pryndp~l. ~dØres~ ,",_ of 11 0-2ndSt)S¡~Suitè'~1 05 Waite 'Park;,Minnesôtá '56387 ,(theIiLessee")/hèreby makes}>'~\';/ .... . > ." . appli~atï~~~tþ, t~nei~~~t~æ~~~j'2Y1~./~,q~1~~i~i,gÒiñ'(~?'~~¿;~t,,~eÇI8li.ct, ~'~/)~?~~.(t~e.... {';;A~<,~<>·· : "Le~sor") to lease fromL~ssor ;space on. ~he Less()r's rn.~YlSlon Graphic))lsplays Jo~cated oq City' J ] .... ~ " '. _~ ___ _ } ,_ ,_ .__~ .'~' ,t. ,_. -'~1... - "_--, _,\.- .' -_·~'n-··,.,.· _.'.~ "":,,,-J .'.- -, ., '~-. ,¡ ,·,._Ie.:' ! --.: -- . ;... r. '. '. of St. 'Jo~h Goirimu'nity" Eyents'.\sign structure in' thè'squthwest comer of the intë'r'section of,' ~; . ~'--:. :.' , . :,~; ,'.~'" 'L~ r,,":..\"":-\, ,I .\.'_';">J"'~L_ __'\'>..:':.' '--..~. -,~ -. .t ",."; , '~'.' . . \ ,CSAH 75 ,and ,Col1~ge Avenue NorthlCo.untyRoad, 2;;adJa.cent t() St.''Joe Gas and BaIt ~omplex In " _ '" . . _ .' _ _ _. "._""--¡ _ /~..\ _-.-í ...-_',' ,:'--t::"--1 1>.. _ -:- _- ~ _. J- "'_)- _1>"'- _ J-":'"._. ,_, '_ - ,._ ~ - ~_ ' -- . I --.:. ·"'-t - J ~.J. , .,:i,St. JosepKMiniièsot~Üpoii'théterms/provìsiohS;:COhâiti6ns/and limitations ~hér:einafter set '~ ") , 'fOftº;:: ,~,';î!(~,;l;:~g;t'3;t~~',;?!~~rf£f;e;\Y:r:w)~:)';;' ' ':'è;r{"P:;;)i", ::' '~, .Name'ofímsÌJ!.~s;Jo'be 'displayèct o.íÌ-sfg¡{s~hqy)(¡o~k~r~ ,;~:' " '·'è. . Ad~~hí+e~{ir~~~s~\~~\1;t~,{i~)~;~';1~~"'~;, ," '~~. ,: " Size 9fspaceto be displayed ",::·X,:!:',~ 5'x]'.~II., ..:\;....~~._:5:x'15I,. ','A.' ~"ciiy,,~Ùeiitó, thÆ~t~ft~ijf~~~~"'t'¿i,~~;;,,·,.: " B,' "Feneis "·;refers tÖ F èneïs\"EntèfPns~s: Inc2],:," ':·c. .'.," ,;. ,C, "Displa¥s,ilfèf~tst'o Tri::Yisiq~JJr~p~í.c}?J~pìay.:-':.:,;', ,i,' \. .c; .;.' ','. ."",\ -, ,"> '. . - - -. :J .- - -. ~ . . - -:. ., -. -- - -,.- - . ~ .-- - . "D. :IIAdvertise('~,refersto"the Le'šsorlbusinessthat desires to advertIse on the display':- ,','·'1. ,,-' , '_:~.~--.¡''. '~". _ :...._-_ ..-'.-..,'___-.,.J:~....-'._ ,---....i..'.-·-·,..; '., ,_,-., r, -- :' _ "., ..~'- '- '(. " .,E,., "Effective Date" :.rri.eans the date this Jeas~'is accepted by Lessee and the Çity .of St., Joseph, . ,- \." _- .. _~.. .~'. ,_», _ :.'" Jl \_' -.-._."-.\.,1 -" '_ '--' ;-.:. ",' ,. -. -- - .-~ . F. ·."AdvertiserP-erit" refers Jo~he'reinövablê 'panel atÜiched to the displays that contain the\" . , I'" _' ..... _, ..:. 't_ . _ _- _, .. -0 - "" "\,,..).'. ." _ j. -' ,-...., . - -' .-".. . . , . .. -, adv¢rtiser~' la,.ýout, d~sign,"'åÏ1d. èolots to' ~e use~ on displays.': .....', ; '/.', , ' '¡ ; ,.J", ":'};f,! ì'::~('c~g:' .~~{t\~<~;,,~,·-,'/l'./ -<~~:~:~'I- '.> :: '~' :." .~). ", . '. ,;' 2. Approval to Advertise' o"IÌ 'DisphiyŠ-> The CitY of St: Joseph §hà11 have final approval of . , . . ""\ ., \ ,,:' '" \ /, ~ _ 1.._ '.,..~ '~-'. - , , .'.... l - - , , 1 -' . '- - \ -'-~ ..~ .~ layout, design, 'án~l. colors to b,e. useq by. à~veÌiiser on displays. - The city shall also havè final. .' . . ... .~. approvat'òf aÙ ~dveÌiisers who deslfë' to'adyeftis'e' on displaý as well 8:S the frequency,~' . ;:.: ,",;' \\~. ,', -:. participåt~o~·ànd timiIlg ofthòse àdvèrtlsérsl display: ," A11 åI¥rovals shall not be ì.mreasonablý' -' ".. . , " ""th~el~ !"!Ì.~':{~édW¿});,:;'~(t;s~i!;f i:~V;!;;¡C;; ,,:'~ ';'S'\ ,"'; 'S ~<'i ;Jh.~! ;,;:,,:" '.:, :'~,;' . 3, PoIicy:Cor Bu'sinesses (o'Adveiiise 'òíl_Disph\ýs;" A-business may bè al1ow~d t,o adveI1ise~,ori:. ¡ : '. '. one or botl1 sìdes ofthe,{~isplày ÖÍ1 thè"'Còmmunity-Events",:s~gñ structure for'the I'ength :òfthè ::r \'",¡ . i , -,- ,.., ,\' '-.. ": ' . . ,. - ~ - " -... > .. _ - '.- '''t - .. .~ -- -~. - ,\. - .' ~ ',-".... - -' '-.-,,,.' --' sign lease s~lect~d.· If a,bti,~ines~el~.ct~ to ~~:,ertjs~io~1 o.ne,~~d~~ of the display òn1ÿ ~'thë"disp~ay <?;" leased will be.rot~ted, on ~ sixmon~h basis,'oto the other display face available:";...· ". _ '" '. ' . ',' ',~ {,::.,>',',' ~ ,f,' ,:(~',' ':' ' " _' ' " "" (Rev. 9/24/96) .. '" ._ "-:"";">' ',., ' '·1-' ,.,~' " '... .,.- ,'.. ,'~'" ; ':", ::' '.~",.,' ,.' ,: )'¡~~}:~:;;^L:::," ',.' ,: .,,'.',. ,':;. .,(:., '. ;,~,,::':';: ,y /::'·::·'::è¡"f,,'.;,':~: .'i; r -\ , !'.' .' . . ,- -' Ii" : ". I,,' ~ (',,:\' :C, .·..·,//i,j~~.\~\~:¿::};l'" â :;,d,,' '<."" ...... .,"'1, ..... e· ~ ¡. N~ ad~e~i~~~~~i}o; a ~~~pet¡;~\~~~~ùt~1~::~~' :fi6~~~\)~'~h~,'~ame side ofthè )sig~;d~d~i ~~e '.<'/;. :). " ., ",: _ '.... ..-.-:'~' _ .' '".t. /:" .-¡. "'w '-,",. ,.-...I~·_:·_~·"_t~·'t-"'~: .'/.,". '---.....:-.' \').,.," ::,,1'- ~, '-,' , ...'-:. ......'\. . .', ';'~. ,J-,' i < sa~~rP~r!Ç~4 :t,h.e ~d~et11SerJla,~ .ms,¡aÇiV;~~!~~~~!lt~hsplfiY;~~,<>":;¡.;,~ù ';'. .,.~',- - :A' )" ,',. . 'r.> ',}..;\....'.) ..[ · -.:";", :.'. {-:._~,- ~-::: - -~>~_..:~ ,'5" :~~--:.:~,:~:-~<:;\ _~ :I.{·~ ~~,~_ ~";.-.~ !(-.~~(~-~ :-~;~:·;;::/-:~..:-:;':.~~~~3:;;:;·~·<r\~;Ä~;-·:(\:~ ¡, ..~-..)t,·'-;tr~:·;>·_~t;>-:;· :~;~ .~;/.. .~~~:; ~ ~ ..~( ."..:~ . - __ ~ ':',;~ ; _~ '\ - !.)"\<. ;:~'. ¡ __ ':1. .{ ,t: .:~'; ">;:~~ .,'-: . . i.. ._ i" .~_ 4 .<Äppr6~â(~f Adv~rlf~è; i~äš~;'tat;1ciri~~;;\fhéJjlt}r~4áìI Âpp}o{r~ thjJiciÙåI àðýériis'èf \êà~~ >.1'.." :r: "~..." .' 'I' _., ." '-I ._ - ' 'j:"-., _. i· ,-".-.. _- -.' '-:. 1'1'_/"~ .., __i_. f.;,_. ¡f \. ".~ '''__'')'I.;.r:_'P~} .~-,}-,.;_,i~·., '>t .._ ti..,. _;_ lï .:\-.í~ "\-': ;t~~· . ,-' ... ~I. .. _ . of' .~. _ . "" ....~ '''~: (~ / ,j '. '. _.- ,\ .-_f. ...-._f. -'.I ' . p-- (, ' ... ... ," . rate or fee~<which shãll be identièal for:all·pötèÎ1tial.advêitisers~·:àrid whiéh is acceptable'to:Fen~is.·':~·· ~:' " d" . , '. ," '. ..,' . '. Adjust~riÚð :Ùi~ ií¥ti~l þas~ iàt.e ºffé~(I~~~Cb~ ;b~~~d bil.'t~ê·t'¢:p ;I)pnit~ State~, ~ -h~ìris í, :/::,. );.;.;' .' : on .tÙÌì~1";1995 ~iuìd 'áð"ûsteÕãtÌtÎíi"äiC'ìheft . 'éFt~ tak~"èfÏeêt-'òhAü '- št' f of each é~òtihe-:;iì:" ').;. ; '"....:'. ~~".'. ""~'~"~·';'}:~L;·\;"P""·"",e(.é'·;"~,):,,,·,<{;,~)(j'<.,j'~¡~':;'>:';/.('i',.-..~ t-.~,(..~'~;' .:.," .y¡':\:~';';-" ,t-....':., ,-":,, ~:. agreementafterthe1ß1tla136monthpenod.r-\'-:";¡·""",¡.hi'-'",.( c,;.',"-.... '.'y.'-' 'n; õ" ".'., ··...·f . ~ '( , ".~.....I,I.f.' ~~'''·I. <,-... .'''.,'' í ( . 1~"'''1¥~':(':1~~f.~.,;'t\lv'J.··'1-'~----'tr-·I·-t''''')~''''I'/'''_'\ f;\' ""..fr·, ,,"," '"J.-< .( . (,'. -.:.1., -./",~--: /"..,"': ;,., ,'\ '. . -'. ....... ::" ," ", ''\;-''...---J ,1" (. ~, ~/ :;r':.--'.;~ ,'f', . ("', ..... ." ',.~~¡.... J, ",1 -.._/ · ! ~ I " , ' . ~\). -. ¡ ".. ')..-:,'/ ',.:ill, ].{~~ J-".;.......} ~ ~ ""~_/~;.. ... ___'..;; --¡.J- \ 1 !"l ~ l1.~/.={\¿ \~~~,.;.f-.tl t/ -{' ,.-) f'_v':v ë -~ 'i:'" . {:'ç ..1-¡ :'t~ (:1\ .... (;_-,... ( ( . J '. ! ': ( ¡}......., \ J :" . ¡,.:. \: ) ~... .-{. ") :', ,(I )'-. -"i,:....-; ,': ~)"'.. ~;', ,~.(...~.~.,~-~-'~J\ ~. --....·i';\:~,./:..~t-:, .;Y.'~ ~··t·( ::!.'. . ~:" ::-',-'J.\' r'-: "._,1;,.' ,~' .11 . ~, ,-<~ ~.-'J, <;,.,' '\" \' ,.... . J;~ ':. .' ~. '-: ',' 5.··T~~, ~~~:~J~~~~!.,.~,!lft~.!~~~e's~ll ~&J~!f~~~i~~>.~~,!~~2;E~~þ~i~~ ~ate", prov!~e4,'hþ)Y~v~J'J".>" I J f..< . . the l~ase paYIIJ,ent..proÿ!d~ her~J,I1 ~,han ~o~~nce an~. be ,P~d)t1 advance ~n !he Prst .dflY or the ,> .J'. '.::- . ;.'í ~::.)':'. ·;,·~,:ri1?R!?,n~~{ollO~~ t~e;~t;~~~H9it;~tb¢~iç~i,~~~~Xrf}i1~m~é~ï.;~~&,·.d.i~~I~~.l:.'th~)~:ti~~ ~~§ ~fPÿ~ "; ;~-,;\.., ,;. '. ' , <;\ ,rJ'leaseshaIl be 36 months after mstallatlOn ofLessee'saavertlsemenL ;-~'i ··'é:,'I..:/.·, ¡ t ",,"-. ';r.\.;(!,~ ,:,c.'_:): ,:- :-".:~ / i.~;'. -i;:,~4>';~:iiJ:r;Jë:;;;it{¿f)~~~i;;::~?/)_:~}Zš;;,,:g~:~~~;1l(,~:~~~~~i~~Sf(t:Z~,~~i'::i~~f~,;è*J~~tq·t:;~Ä"t;;«',r:·~ ,.~/'r>"(\~~:0:~~L:;~~VÇi;/;.~·· Ô' '" " . ,', . . ,\:~/ !:";,Th~~~~~è,\s~a~:b~~~0~~!i~~~~i~I};~\Y~4,~?f:;~~~~s~~~:~~np~\.:9rtþ,~ ~~p1~.~~ri?d ?fJJ~~,,~~~h~~,;:/!:\:;..'; ,.~ y': . , 1ß1tla1.t~~m.u~e~s ,th~.Le~sot:. b(L~s~~e .sþ~ ßlye :wntfen notICe t6 the other party of ItS mtent not ,,,: --'I' I F ~ -.. -.~ ·r. ; '. - .. ....r. /.,1--:( !.l..·,,'"'-flr·...·'}o- \" ',.' '\ '-I;.~-'~" ". ., \1 'i). "f-.' -, . '.' , c.: to. ~~!.l~~, 1,~,~~~ ,~Y.~c\~t1~~d, ~µ l~t1!f11, ~~;ÿW!,,~~g~~~t~~~~~t\ l~~~y~~~ety.&~~) 4.a~s_ ~r:oS tp, ~h.~th~n 'L \'J ~ : ' , . " ':- c,. .. current term. "AllproVlslqns and:cond1tlq~S of this lease shallr~maltl tl1esame dunng any renewal.)",' :. .» '. ' .', .....:'-:_ .__.,~.<_ -~. ': r ~~'r '__,"'f /.- '_'__";- __f--·'- ..1- t_ -.' '·'/..<'1' <or . ~i. "}.__ -.(;:'-' r,._:r! ,. .-_- -" -.--.. _....~ I L--' -',1 _,'\ ; ",- .-.-_.. .:.peri~d(¢~ceptforJ~è'mohtb1yr~I1tàlwhich,·šþal~ b~,mére.·~sé.âJÓ.thé ~tandard réi1t charged àIl.:,;{,:;·.:{-.~.·' :., /',' ~~'.~~~~'~:~~~~~M~:~ ¡:<', ·.,.~~(\~~.~ff9r~~f~¿sôÍ1w~åtsó~~e~:4~~~~:~,~4x~rtise~¢~t is~nótpí~çed onihe: ~isplays;: l;~s~è~i. < "< ".',. sole rèsponsibiIity shall be the'retùin ,of ànÝ, dèpôsit' p(othè(feé' pàid'by J-essee or ~ssof; a~d c: .'< :, ,.. . .- f '.. "'~. ., - ~. \ ~ (/ !. -- , J..,.;J: " ... ~... . '. "\ ~-, .' .2-;' L~~l~es~~lI~~~~n~,ft1.rt~ër~pIi.$atio#~i~~bïµtý)~~~~sôt.~h.~!So~'{er.·,";' ':.., :.<.~ ~',~- ',t ", . ".'" :-\':j :j:;~..:~1·?::,,;~,é'::~;;C',~l!:;:J-;~·.-.:,\R;'.~-s-'~:·j(?~~01'\.::~~.<;~0-";,(")' ' " /:>/" ...·.r'.. . -./0 , . 6.' .Rent and PayméIit Methò«('tThere'are four påyrhent 'Ínèthods avàilablê. They are: ¡' ,'. ~ '".' ~ ,. '? ;, ,:- ;, .' ":""7:; ,::}, ;~';.!.;,.,~t:~;:.<. "; ¡::'·(:/·~:::::~X::~:~L~{~~,'i~;0<·:,<~(\'.~·:J~':.;~~,~:'~~..~>¿,',> .~r.'{~. '!::,;.,. _ ~. - >,~.,.~ '.. '." '-. \. -.A.:MonthIy (automatically,deducted ftom checking account only) -:' , . ..~ ;"i.,;"..'" . 1\' ", Concurrently wIth theexecutlon of this lease;,Lessee'shallpay,ind Lessor hereby·'"..·c.:_ ".. .ì.' acÍmowìédge~ ië~ipt of the sum _of $19Ô~~O' -whiêh 'sh~ þèåppIièd t9 t~~ first mò~ths teI# ;~d.~' "':' .; .' the last monthÙ'ent hereúnder. 'Noïnt~rê,s(shaIl6é paid å.rí·ariY advàÌice.rent payment.·:~Dúring· '" . .,' . .':: . .' '. '. ...,....' -- ._ . f' .' ~.j._ . - ,-... \,._ .' .... .-'-., :. . ·o,-!- -'r (I '.' __ -" . . - .' - . · . thè teml. oftIµ~leaše, 4ssee shallpay~9~;t;.~~sor~"at th.~()~ce ,pfthe L~~s9r Stated abC?,ve,a,s"<' ',-' ;', \~:. ,'.l' ) rental, tlÌ~'~~~;P~ $2(85,.0.0. p~.t ~ú~rte,t_:~~ t1\~( ~st~aÿ,.?f¢~9h(,q~~rt~f g~Øri~ .t.h~ ·tþiÍn..?r..~~~·.·</ ':;':::'.; I' :.,~':< lease plus appIi,c~þl~ ~es tax, ifrpa,Ild~t~.~þyJa~,tp., th~futur~, '~xcept for tþ.e ~onths for ,wþich. ~; ,';;\ ,>';'.' {'.\ rent has been prepaid às stated above.'!Shciúld Lessee fail to påyany part of the rent Witliin Úm .:,:, ¡r·'· .... '. '0- i, ._.'-..,'-" I ~."T-'_'. i~':-l /'-;"'¡",.-" \¡(~.--:O.'''' ""_'/" -·\.,r..~.,~~ ,,',: ~, ,.\-_. (10) days after tþe 'due date~ Lessor.ipaý ph¿µ-ge alatè fee eqùa1 tofiftéeri (1 ~%) p~rcent for ~ach' , . : ~ .., t. - . ,. -, -. -.... . < \ I . ~. . ~ , . ~ . . 'I ~, 'r~' . - . "" . , __ month or port~9ri thereo(that the payment is late or the lawful contract rate prev¢ling,r whichever.. '1:" i· .' .'. \ " . .. , x· ." '¡ " '. "'" ~!' '.,:: \ ..".J.. ~ . .~ :~>- '. .) ;- ';,) l' :;.' \ :';..'.> .: ' ' . - ......-, . ~~<. :_:.~\;, -~¡. , . , .1 .~: ~"'I ··..I..·;./\...·.L~.:·... ·:.(o,"·';!i ...;(·'.;I)::"'~· - -, c· " r ' _J -,'u " :1 r I ./ .. - ' ~ ~ ~-' ' . -;' j' .:.> - "-<. .. ... ,. . . .\. :_ '.",,/\ '.' . "'.'_ _",.,.'>._, ,. . . . .J";.;;. '." !-"'. . , :¡'~:i~~e!~%=~~o;:tf,~~~rt~;i~~¡~~Jder~i~~~:~~;~~¡é:: ~;~~c~ ;re ", ....,>. , " _ , _ _. '". _ . I; .... _ I -J:" ".- ":of _ <"_', . '.: . .... '- ~ .... . -' 'r," . - -.; -' - - . - - .' ,", . . -. ~. ~. ,incorPorated heréÍn by reference.' 'Lessee shall don6thiñi~ that;cônf1ids odnterferes Withµs·sÖr's.<':·· " '.< obligátionsand cÖÍ11friitrÍ1-e~t~ tó~the-éitfòf St: )os¥þh än'd );hall abide by any and al}dete~ation .... , J . . '. _ _ _ þ _ _.r.·,_ ," ......"_ .:"!-. r:-_~\_--_"--"" "'\_~_!r_-_"'-' ~'- -:\...~ ",.'j '- - :'.' ." ' _.:-' oftheCitY:of.St.)Óseph aff~ing L¢sse'e åj1gé06peráie:tìilly.:\yith"L~ssorlIl)he peiform~née býit;·:,.. . ~ ..,. ,.J." / ..... ... " .."'. ., ·o·..-·¡i·" ".' I.,,',. "'j ", .... .... .... ." ." .' / orJts Ç>blig¡Üio~saIjd.èò~tnien~s.WiththeCityofSt.JoSeph.. / : :/.-:,/::,: .~~ / .,','; ..:~,:;.;' ~. .' .;. ...~"J¡.:.:.>; <;' <~<·~é'>;'~i.~/~~··;·.~.~·;,,'~·~;.~f!·~''<::·:>;.:\;';,;r;.:::.r~·t\'¿fi:.~:.,~':.cc~~c '~':Å'<: :,';~~> . " c/·) . . . 8.>.Maint~~~nce.: :Lessor sha~,íPaint~.iIÚhe,"4.ispl.áYê ~!Íich'_£q~\aiþ~~~;šee's: a4.yéf!i,siìíg·duri?g·'the .); . .... terrÍfofthis k~aSe.ExCépt 'as heiêinafter-prbVided,"there 'shåil not be any åbâterÍ1ën{c)f.the 'rèntr\ -::'. ., " ."" ';c"'" ,..-""... . ..., " "........, .....;.... .". , "..." -..... .... .....~,.~..-."',". . "'.... .' ,".' ., ,...p~)'~bl~pu~gan)i~~o~ i}l~þi;C~'~h~ ªI~;~~y.~shåHÞ~·~?mn~g~d~r iri()p~r~~l~~ s~t?~g}f~ss·or",;..- J" 1 . <shall ac!~th rêas9~abl~ pr<?mptne~sto_hayedlSplaysrepa1fêd.\µ~sorshallnot be respons!~le for..·· . 'c . .':.:de~~Ys jn ~ßia:lcinfreþáiis d4e.té> 's!~es:'èåšiÙÍltY,'co~~r~iàl' åelayš6r òthet ·c~a(Is~sbeYóÍlèl~/.:;:". ~'" . .'. " :;r;~S~%:';~:~~Jt¡rh¥'j·~e~~g'!'~&~;~i~~~;!-&;~'t0~~i~~·!.'y ;, ..~,;\,:,~:~};,ø, ."2;',' ' '¡ /. '.9.' ,N odc.e of Dä.riuige>I.;ess~shall prbmpi1Yii9tify'~Les'so(of anýdamagetóór ~dis[~ajf ofthe f-;;'c .'- ? :di~~la;:>',>?F '':}\~~:¿;:'i5:~/:''>~,(:;:'j:; !,:!' ',: .'~ " ,'r\<,~ '" .'. ; 10.' possession. ~Léssor,~pr itÚ1S>signs, 'shim reiãin th,e possessÍon'aÍ1d ownërship,-oft~e displays' '. ,. . .' _ . I! / ..' ' "c < . -' '-. '.'~ . . . .... '.' . ~ , . du$g tÞ.eentire termòf this lèase.~Lessee. slllill há'{e)io~ right to the possession òfthe ,displays, . andshallhávé th~"rightÓnJy.to haye hfaay~rtising< orrdisplaYs. :S i(: <"~ .'~"" . {::";! ..; >," . ,.:::.(:\:,.'. v . . <.;r,;,;: '.'~>\'~è:<.<",:;<,~:,:::;I'~{:':'·.~~<I';:Ji;.:·;~>·i'.;.'~{./.'.'~ . -'..~<',...' ;;. .'. '~ '. ,'., . ...5 11.: :;~s. s()r' S..·Rig~~/to ¡\S~. ig~.... \s.,~bje..ét. .·to. itiß~.~:.mê~i~t~·t? ,.,e. ç~ty, 4~s~~ ~? .~~~.s.oris' .~':' '~'. : . ......:: ,'" ass~gns s~all have the _contmulIlg f1~t .tQ, a~slgn tþi~ ,lease~' . "'. > . . '.:- '''', -7~ ','c '-- .' ;'. "'~.~,:'-!/'. ....t ".'. ...,;c.... <~,.,,~.;:.{:<.\, <: r,~..,·c ~.>.>~,> .... '.. .~i'·· .", ;~.~.~-".\( ~:' 12.~Le.~see N:ot to Assi~. Le,ssee' s~all pot ;assign or sublet this leã~e or the displaysþace l~àsèd . ~ hereúÍ1derWIthciut LesSor's prioí\vIjttén' èonsént.r;,:·. . : .( . ',< . -.,\..<"'.'-:,'.:. .~"""::' '. .<.... ..o',.:' '::~f\ .,r........'.' ")'." ...,-'0···· -....,.'......".... . ",\ '13 ".p~fault. ~~y! of th~fo~0WÌE_g ~yè~ts ~~~ Fo~~ti~:è,a n;aìerial ";eve~~ : of deráult"- b~' th~ .. " < Lessee: ,;:~ ~ ~è>r ~,"-",,¡Y,'~ . . ,', h .;'<; .' ..... :- .' .' (á) :,Default in thepaymentof rent beyond ten (10) days 'following the'date such rent is due;, /, \; '''. ",>,.:.,;y:_~c. '1/:,<:;'.'...'" '. '<.....:'.:~c-; ~\ . .-:',:; ~_ ". c./ , " (b fI?efaulthin-the pàyment orlíeno'ffiiance of ~y' oth~rlfäbility, 6bligaiìo'l\:còve~anto~ i . ~. ,reprèse~taiion of Lès'seé tb 'iAssorårid theëoIltinuari~e'of sUèh default for ten 'c\·., / {-,'\ . .':. (10) dayš·åfterWritten. noiici'ôfLessee;' "-1"":,. '; '~ '~"'...". " ! ': ~I" .~.~. >" . "'::. , " '.,'" '".-," ,-.' c,:. ~... '. .-':", '~":~; ';"'/' . _.::~ '" . '-. . '~-, ," ",: , c:_ . ,;.~ ", ,,'j" ',' . ( c) Breach 'of any of the war:rarities~ certifications or repres'entàtions made by' Lèsseê herein;' . . . :. ''-', ·J/.i-,:.'~'-·/-;~.· ''': ,.....:.:\<~.\.:,. '~S~.'V,.·>;-,·~:;\/:·:)·::.::>::~,.,':~;',.. . ~. '.:; '.,.~t .~< '. .::": . '.' , (d) Insolv¢rlcŸ of,orthe-milirig of an àssignment (orthe'~benefìt.of creditors by the Lesse{ >. '.' ,.' . . .: . ". .' . . .. .' ." . ,_ ,. J '. . , .' ... . ,. . . ' ":: .'. 'or any guarantors of this lease; . .<, ", .~ '. .' '.:," '.' ,c.'"·-· . '. ' . .'::..' :''>;':',.' '" / :'" ....<>~:..'::~: ::'F-':zJ"'!: .,:......,'.,. ..," ....... . (e) The institution. of bankruptcY,fe~ôrganizatio~ liqùidatio'nor reCeiver'ship .' I .: J' . proceedings by oragalnst Lesseè oraÌlY guarantors 'ofthis lease;' . :..' "'.. :'. .... : "\:' .'. '. j, :,:. ., \ :'>,~: . ~-.,;.'. ': " : .;:.:, .:.... 1 , . .- (Rev, 9/24/96) " ",~3~ '; ,'; " ' - . I ::'r " ..f ., . / ~ , . "':"___ _I.." . . "" . ì'· . \ . , .. ''\ -, . .', ,'.:.', ·'·:¡/:"l:""f;,>t,o"{;,., ' ";"r?;("\ . :~,\ . . . I ~ _ ~ ,'_" .¡ ...', "'¡'attemptby Lessee to sell,·asslgn,"encumber.or óthefWlse transfer· the Sign space orany: '~'~<': ,. "', , " . , . :/\".' . /X(a)~To decIarè the entrreamöunt of rent and i)ther.obligatlons hereunder nnmédlately d.ue· ~'-?:'..;'. tf :}. ':1" . .....'... , . ;';, : ;".... ,¿,.",.,(\ 'J "';';^';M,r~''';': ~'fi:¡r.,\c >'0' .:·:~;'>;\i;'~). .:'fA ~:~ '"'~d '--'::Uâ~:b, r:·",,· 0-6' . "':{ .!.~',' ~>.; .~.:/:, ':'"..:.J'.¡/< ~'l'; L.::~·,:· ..\ .J. c' ,:;.' c~:..,!!j ',í~.",¡" ..";l..>\,an pay e;~t outnotlce;or eman to', ssee-'C>r aranor;";'::";<·;,I.~·,,:.··;·\>(\,·:,<. .,::"..(""';.::: .' ;. .~.~ 'r:)' '. . ~:·;~~~:·;~:j.'·;<J.i/:tJ;t;~0~i<~Þ2;:!{.~:t~1~~jÆf.~}J~~~~~$~~~~~f;~¡;~~·i{·;:·~~t':~~:J~~::~:,: ;'-.f;tf'~'J':':' '~',:~~~;: ·~:('~~~~~./)::~:,~~~f :h:L~:::~~:'T? '~j .,,'. >.~). " " . .::.\(~) } r 0 ,~µ~ fê>(. aQ.d j'ecpyerall !en.tsJi1).d 9the~: P~Y1!1~p:ts ~he~ aqc~ed or~ t~ere¿¡ft~r" ?7:" r:~' .;; .: \" :);"~. ;. ;":~ ~~;~·~~~~i . .'" ','. ~.'': :"', j' i: .;(~) ':J'o xëmoyeifom:. dlsplaY~JheJ..:e~~er;~B;ºyert~smg;· wljiCI1 ~¢tI0J? sþ~ not ~pqye "/!" '! >:\. ~I::: ~':-~~~ ::>:. '&1Y;;~ßr>;~fiii'ï~ir~1~~~ïl~~~r~~%~fï~1Ìe2;~~~,~t(:<;~~t1}~¿~~\; "j:. . ...~..- ;.'-:< ~'{d}~To ténnmale''this leáse ahd bé>fréeofany further',bbligátioris'under this'".'. :<\~;F:~' ¡:.i:;¿:',/,:;,·. ."':i>, , ' . )jincurred by~LeS'sôi'iÌ1 'exerèising' any ôf i1:s rlglits~Ôt 'remediè's' herëunder or enforcing' ány 'of thè~' ". './ ,,~. ,,':'~: ; ;., '\. . ....., ·~:·c '."" ···..·:1·....· ....--. '..' . "" :; "'-":'.-.-¡' ).-...·.·...(·c..I:.''-->\_.... '.' .~ ~ _ ',_" .~. :.. . . ..",. ,I-~_ .,.:.,.__-.{ __ ':.' ,<. terms, çôp.~itioÏ1S ~òr proVišÍQ1! hereof, or :dèfendmg any èlàinl¿hy Lessee agairišt Lessor, if Lessor ,,: /..' .... .... , . .' c. . ,.>. :C,' í",·i: ..::-~, ',..;,i .......; ...','o*":..:_""-.'s=. ::'~"'f'~';" " '. . ',.' ., .".' _.' """. prevaIls; , r \'¡,. ,..., "', .". '<,I' "'':j',,7, -' i- -.¡-,.:.- '~"./. ··~o·'~ ". _ ~ .; ".' -/""-'(,', ." .'.... :. ....;. '~. ~:.; ',: ;~~ .·~"···:~··á>d<\~.:~~~~·}·;\·;~·~·,~~,~;;~:,::,,jj.~;; ::;~:~j~~:~:~~\~~~;.:"...;~"~::~'~;_' '¿:: ........ . .; ,.'~~ ~ ;}.:~'.;.\~..¿ '. :.,:' ..>; '~'. ~ ,. ?:. ., , ,': ". ;"' ,¡., ._ Lessor may .exerCI~e all rem~dles sl1I1ultanemisly, 'pursuant to the terms hereof and any' '. .- :." . ~ -'. ~'I' ..~..-, '1 . ~"-.~ _ ~.." 1:"-'",,· -{-... 1- - ~~ ~ ,/ f '- '-' _, ~";, _' . '''+=/ - .' . : , . " such action sháll hot operate to 1."elèåsé'the 'Les'see ftoÌn thè obligation to pay the full amount òf "" ,: ;.', '.. ~ " ':.- th~'re~talsdÌi~·iå~~,t~.Èë9,ò~~;dÙê)i~4, â~(~th~{S!Ít1Ì~·t9<þ~p~4·hè¥~ù~der ~ave\b~n pai4.4Ú~a~h:;i-·; ":, " ·..l¡~:,·. ...:-:--~;~~~~".;?>~~,.,.,'~;'.;~, :r;,~: «~,.(j,::'~/ ~:;,~,V';c }(;<~::.'{i,~.:.~:,jJ.:~~', "j ~ /',~.:. \". .\"'> (t·>·· ;~" " . ',:;,' >- .:. Nò ì-émedy ofLessòihêrt~ùndershal1b'éexclûsiv~·coyany' othér"reìnèdy herem or by'law ',~: .' >,(~".'; :',': .J ' .~;. ....··;...·...t····..' }. ~-./j....--."....., . ";--~1"i:' .... ;. .....f-. ~'._J¡, . "n'Â."¿ ./ i""· . ¡--..J.,.. '. ~,' \':':'. .J. proVided, but~achshall be'cumulative andiIfaddi!ioiÚò :eVérý other rèmedy, and removing the;·:·OJ.;,l.. ',;,'¿, . .' ~ ", -.l·'~!: ~I"""'·.·.'_'''···· ......'.1 ..._.... '.' ...·t' ....!" - "'\ '."'J '._ 1- ,...n. . .' _""'.1 '. . .ß... '~'."..J'., "', advertismg ffó~!:li.sþlayš·shall nòfdeprly~Léss·ór·öÎthè·right toreceive'àll rentaIs:provide,dhereirt _'. ::,1::.:-- ¡"?: :.... n,·. .'1 ..' .'~ . . f..~ .'r'?' .,'j. _:-,:'.~J....;¡ ".... "\.'::::'_"'. '-. ',. \.' . . .... ',' '._' ~.'~',.., ..,. I~_\~" '~::-., :. or to. acèelerate ,thé pa'ymént theteof:-.-.,,~,:::.>.t.~I; ,. .. I, ,~,', ..L'C'; J . '.j¿ <,', :.:¡~ " ~..' ":" '.. : :~}' ": .." " .. '.' ....,~',... ?}<~.....~/ :-~~.~,..." ":- <-::~::":~' i,~.~"> :'~_:,", ..\~ :;}~>;.·-.:;~<~.r ~ ..:'. ...,.~ .-..:>.:. (/ . 15.' Maµnèr of Acceptª~ce.~ ··The applica~i9n by L~ssee .for,thè lease shall be deemed orily ~. (. ..::. ~ : ~.,,'..'::.. ~ ..... ~ / ~. . ...... ....... ". }"~. ~.<. #"."'1 .),..\" , .'" -'",>, .. . ".' t ',¡. ..:.....- \ ", .' offer by Lessee-to Lessôr for 'å leaSèù'ndèithè tenris'describèd herein; urtless and lÛ1til acéèptëd m "q"" ~j~~:" .) (: ". :" :; ,...!) . " ,-' ~ ..:.~" .: ~-"""".' - ~ .."¡-. k ,'.' .:. ..' .1;-1 :,...1 /I:~·1-~·.f.\~ ';;(..... I. ...PJ:· .'~' ".;..~; v·:o:.:. : .~":~'J.,'~~'~,' "" .' '.:.¡ i ,".."-:: f:'............ >. '.00" ". .:'.. ," ~ .;." " \,. ..;'.~;¡" ....-:. _. ....... >; . . ,wntmg ~y Fenei~~on.~~h>ålf 0.f!-èssor) U~~sàáÌJ.d ~~~il soåÇ?~pt~d,þy ,Fen~is on~~half ofLes~or/>:J~.><::.:.~ ¡ -; the lease. shall be·ho#::þ!tid~g\)Ï(.~.esS?~..¡-¥t~~IÍí~a.ry. ~êt, "stai~m~nt o~ t~pr~s'~~ta!iori by ~!1Ÿ '·,>i" '.,". ,'" pers0I). .other that). ,F en~IS WIth regard ~o acceptance of fliis lease or any other m~tter shall be . -> ,'".. '. . ',' \. ".~ ..... ;-.... ~_. '. .~''''''''.- '.':' -..... .. -,.',' ". -. Invalid and ofno,èffect whatsoever, ~d.Lessee by tendering thi~offer acknowledges that the only:.;':"" . .... -- mannef~which"Jhis'l~asé ~aybe 'ac~~pted üÏthe manner prèšçri~ed herein, then.this, Je*se~ _'~" . .', :~; ::< ~-- - subject to the lipùt~ti9ns, expressed, shall bèbindingtipò¡iand inµre to the benefit of the parties ~.., .: ~ '" , ../ '. o· ., .... . . , "". \ , (Rev. 9/24/96) ,'. ..:'.,. :;~. ':4-'. .' '.. . d. .;. .\ .' . '~C' '" . . .:'-"(~,~,;:(@~['~:\~¡(';,;,:\'.), ::' 1;~;":~' j;;>~i'· '.'.', '~.~' ':, ~','- ,':~.':':~;~~:·/",:r;<';~;;""'~:~ " i· _4" ,\ "\ _.: .'~ ... _._ . -"..'. ::::;. .{ - " / ...., _.- OJ \ "I . -.... +,"_ L" ~ __-,. ....' . . ..h;~et~,:hei;:;;'~J~~;~rs~~Si~S'Þei~s;~~:¿~~+~7~;:S:~t;~~:~;d. .... .. . . . .... . . ,',' :: ,_ ,16 ,',Entire ~greeñient,'¡Thís leåseéonstltutes, the~ en*~ 'ägièement b~tWêen Lessor and Lessee' ,'<'..' , ~ '> wi1:h\esp,ect tdthe šubjèèt mattei,òfthis'leåsel.ànd noÏ'epresen'iatiori; agreement or promise ofany;- , " i ~' offiéer,-emplóyeë'or àg~nt öft~eLéssòr shall hi'i!hy,way'~éétthe',obUgatiônsofthë parties " (. '" , , ." . h,eretoas he,rêin ,~:et'fo.rth.'<,:N ~ ,tènnš 9Ü>n)~si~ñ': 9£ ~& Jè~s(maybe,éhanged,)mended or:- ':'" "" > :',i, " .-,: terÌñiI1~!eçi éj{qépt, by. Writie~ àgí-(emeI}t .,signed. by~~~;so.Y'~d ',Less~e;' or ,t~e,ir duly_ authorize~. :" ", " "re~ref~nlà~p¡'I;.j~'f,f{:'~ . ··,r>1,;;.!',;G"~:j~~~£%z:fiß!~~";X:¡·\h,·;·.·. .., ..L:.·.·.·· " li,Waiver.:~Fàil{¡réÔtLèsso¡' to .e~orce any :ngQ.(hereûnder.sh~l(hotbé,deèmed a,wiú~er' of;:~, ':, ' ~' "'such'right..Nó 'êövenar1't';:éóndition 'ò(provÍsiüíj'óftÞis"lèåsè 'êá.rÍ-bé'\v81Yèd exèèpt by the writfen :~,: ; : .- -; .'_ _-,~ . '''. 0 ~_., -'. ~f "..0:0' /....-·.__'r~\",.·i.·......:.-~'_(',_~--::.__, \..~.~..._.. ~,,{~;, _. -. . . _.-'..' ,_", -_'~_-. > .' cûnsejlt 'QfLessor;"any sûéh 'waiver in 'onein,ståhce shàll nót,consÜtutè a waiver 'of subsequent' !',de[.~~~~ög;ot~i:t&1,';i¡sr\\7;':.·;;<~ilj't;:~~;'.(:;,~'?¿j; f;:0·t·Ú,~... " " ..', ..·r , .': 18¡:N~tice,,'Allpotic~s Jò',bè givenþnderthis leas~šhall~e ¢ Writingand mailed to. the other, ': ,',: 'partÿ. ~f~qead'drè~s 'proVi?e~' pr~at~'}¡ëh~ å~dr.~ssis:s~c?,þ~:~aYP'~9Vide in \vri~g fr0!ll~iÌn~~ ::to tiin~:,Any suchnotieerhailed to such address shill1'be'etfeëtive when depòsitedin aU,S. ,Mail. , ~ depository 'duiý' addresse'd and With pÖ'stáge' pre-pald.·,~) ,,,, < f:,,· ¡;:',/;' -v~': ç'-"'> : '. f. :". >~.: , ',~;' ',:- ....y:,: '~-:;'~.'\ -"., '~:-:', ':, ';.....,,:\~':< ..\~/\['; '," ',' ,,~~ '-', ..~,', ,.,~ « "19.' Cáptió~s:~The ¿ápÜò~)nCthÍs'lèàse~ke for cò~~ecie~èe,~freferèncè~~dihall riofdefuie9r. /:>.5', .. . ',: "r~hZ:i:::i,~:;~;r~~:I:;r{!~L';f'~I~:~p~ètl¡¿c~dmg y.j¡~~,·~terprei:tibri};". and enforcement by'the laws of the Státê of ~Ìmesôta>/',' ~ ..:-,:..- ~, ,- -. .~: " , 0 ' '-- ~ ,'.- ...' ".; ._..~_ -.: _ _. -.~_~:~-~;~,~- ,~,-_~';:. -~ - - ·_,·~>J.l'_:_·"-__:·_ I.J':~~::..~~' ~ .-.;~ .'.- -~'.r" :~:'" -'_~\"_-'_-~~ ,_' ~._ _. .-,-'" ,,~ 2 L,Sev~rabilitY. ,';Anypfovi;si~n'9f thi; í~~~e\~l?i~h is ~~ohibit~çi~~\!1~~á~rceable in ,ánY .', ~ .:: :... ' , jurisdiction shàll, :~s tosuchjúrisdiction, be .i~effçctive !o'thè yxtent 'ò(~uclÌ prolúbiÙon or nori~ ':-:. "', . c;. enfo~ceabilitYWithout 'invàlidatmg'the remaining provisiôIlsherèof, ãtid any such prohibition ot .-::".,;. " . ,'--" .. ",'. -- ,; -.' , non-enforceabilityiÌ1 8;riyjuri,sdicti<?? shallrio~ iri.v!Ùidat~ ôr ·reÎ1~er'µneñ.fQrc~able such provision in',: ',' . , any otheLjurisdictìòn.' TQthe ~Xtent pe~tt~d ÞY.iapplicable law.( ~èssee 'hereby waivesany.·' ':.~ provi~ion ofla~ wl¥ch renders any provision hereof proþibitive,or urieriforceable1n any respect. ';" .' . 1 ", (. :. \. l '-i. -.1 .1 . - _ . _r . <'!:...- ! .~ 'j' j~ ..1 ,~ . __. ,'... . _ . -J -i..., r# -. , '-, ~ WITNES,S WHEREOf, the Lessee has hereunder set its hand the' day and date first b- -'OJ'" ~-..,.-.,-;,~ /~. ",.._~.!..- \,".t! ~- .;\.~:.:,~"'._." ( .~,..." a ove wntten.' 'i ' . ~ " ' .,;, J < , ' .. 7 ! ' ';" ""). .':. ," _ """""::,.,,,,:,(::,>'::.,,:,',. . :" c/ ..'. , - . - . ~ . . J . ~ .,.,." . . ~~. ,,',; '('~0 ,<:::: ,': .... ~ '~,~:~: ~:,' ~' " ~ . ,C . ..- - " .~'-' \ .--:- .- ;........... . (-"~::. ".).:~'.\. . . -.-.; ~. .; ....... -~. ~ " \. . :-, .' - - -: .- , ." ..; '\.." " . ," '.',. ...... . -. -...- . . ; .:...-.. " \. - <., ~ ,. . - ';.-" . ~ -' . .... . . ~/ (Rev, 9/24/96) . " ,_:·-5- .' / - '." . . . '" <. ': :. ,., ;", ",' "\ . . ,,::\ _u-Y. \ -"oJ' ;.-: -......~~ : }, \__.~: \ .\;-. . .'. , ' . ,:·":~o ",.\' .:~',:;;:( ,::,,",:,' . . ."L;.,~ ;-.. --,' :;'.1:' , f···· \-.r, fo, '... .'/ ,:,. ,'/'.';" i " ~". J.;, .n;., ,_ 'f );'. ;(", "..' ,) i·' .c.: ." ':' f '.' " . :,:, i-J.,., " . ., , GUARANTY,~,. ' .. 'r'. ,: ',-," .. >,;';~'í~ '~';:j:~ . " -o-;.~ "'e ~ /<. :-'," .'-:.\/, . ,,'.,'.: .'~). ,',~._,,~:~'-" "\ . '.. . , ' ':In consideration of thèagreement of Lessor' to'leás~' spade tó the Lessee for~he Lessee's -. .' .-' [ ~\ ,'.' ":ladverÌisirig,öñ the Lessör'sdisplaýs, the tindérs!grted,jqintly ~md s~ver~IY2do her~by guaranty. ,'. ,'. " ' . ( '.- --, .-- ~ '-. . -'</ '. , - . t .' ~ - - .' .' -.-- - ." _ -...- -. " . , .' ..... " '\ t~e pròmpfpay¡µent .of allJ~n¥~ an~ ot,her ~umstoLes~9fbyLesse.ein,~h.~.iE~erand under t~e ", -:"'. . ~. " .terms' as provided ¡in thislease, -'ând àlsoguàfánty the promptperformance of all <?fLes~ée's . . '.'" ..., ....: ~ ..oþµgati,?nS ~~re~~,ri;a~e·d..·Thê}l9~~fsiin~d. dè{als()-<~#è~t,i¡{~i~ai~_le~~fAg¡:eême~(may be ' .,;" ." ,.~ modificit bfthè pårtie'S' ar-'ariy'tiñië ána no delay in' enforcement 'or,Waiyefof any .obligation of '. , . <> "." ", h;ssee'~t modificåtiüh 'ofL6šsêe's' obligaÙons; shå1Ï tþeiât~ to .reIeåse thé:·gUfu:imtors. /,' r': " . ',' . :: '_. ).' ~·Jv,·~,r-<· ',<'," (.'>-'--~'··i,,: 'Ò ": ' "':",·.:'.(~_~;,~~~·..}ç;',,:.j;/:'~<v>-l','1 '>..:;::t, ~,_ ::. ,. ~ì . -.r . . .~. ,. t', : .,. ..-,::--,: . , " ' ,-:' , '- ~.'" , ;'«;{':·,:~"'F;\ ' _,>;: :::, . \.--: '[ .:: tV -. c_ ~ '. ( ,.' . ~';'~',)f:~~',,: , _ ~;:;:>! >':.>-:~~;</'; ,~:::',,)'.~/,; ~ '.' ',:-" >,' '~.'"('-- . ..:-.. '.. '. . ',. .:', ;;~. -- . "'..~ '.,"';', ..,)\)"" , ,-I .. ; ~':''';'':,' . (:AC~I.'TANÇJ!;O~ßIGNLEASEAPPLItATIONc". ':~'~"\~',.. ,". ".'7\ - ._ -- . ,. - /.- ...-J.~.... --;r ._",.' -_ - ,~- - -__ .. '.- _. _'~ ".,__ .".':' ~ .\ '. . .:' ~'(;,~e~~!s ¥~terp1sés,_Inc:! bý, ~fhardF~neis, ~~ t~e<Ma!ò! o~thè qtY,~f St. :~~š:~h,þèreb¥ ..-. . '..i.':~ .... '. \~~c:e~t~}_~e~see's f~~7go~~~lgtl t.ea~~ Applicatl()n, '~l:!~Ject:~ all the te~~, pr?yt~lo.ns,'co.ndltl0ns .,~.. . 'flI1d fu:IDtations then?of, the .:;;c. c' ·day.of I. "'1' ~1995., '.'0 .J,::,,~ .: ' "','. . ,.r:,"'J " " . .:.' . " '~<:\ . ":" _ .' ,/' , ~...~;:\ \>"ç,. ,: ......' ,;:,><,~,'; ~ .. ,; CITY OF ST. JOSEPH -' - ,". ·,FENEIS ENTERPRISES, INC., / ",. ' f.. , '. '" J " ':~..' -: ../.. ~. . '. ".' -:., . ~ r' " _ ,,',J . . .' - ; ... - ; -- .. , . ., - ~y)\:):'_" ··>~:'i ;~'-~/";., .~ By" ...J / .~~ ,. May~r '- ,'" . 'President . ''--''':-:-. I \ T·; ''-. '-.~""'" 1 }-..~ ,- ·~'I.l \- "'-""'-'u '.! . . ,., ';ç ": : I" _ .., ~ , .,:....,T '!' ' 1 ~I ." l - ! ¡ .' ~ \ ' . -...- : . ·1 '.\?.I ".'. _ ..... -. ~ ~. ..:..' .::.. .' ¡.. ',i i ,"<'<t< > ,<' ': ''.'' ',": ~ .'. .' :~ '..---:,~:_~"\---..- \-, r.o#'·' _"\:.~ .:' . ~~< ì. . .~ \. . / . . _. J ~ '" ..... .' <' . '.-'" ,'-, - .-. .- '-- [, ~, ~ ·l " .'. ; ..., - (Rev'~ 4/19/96) . .' . , ,. .~.. ''- -6.! /, .\. . "'J ...... '" ,," .:--\. ~ , \ ' . . r ..... . -, .' .... . .~ ........ ..- .' ',-.- t { . - .' .,. ì ~ '~ . -- ~ ~ :r: 3 \ ¡ ~ ~ DO W ~ J:] þ® @ B 8~ c::J r::;:,. ~ 0 8b ÇJ c::::::J 2. W J @ ~ C3~ g \0 :l ~E; @ v @) <t @ ÇD ~-- 'êJ \U ~' ~ J I I~ @¡ .J (y\ ~ C~) ~ = " V\ -~ kQ D~ ~ ~Ç1 1t fS ~ ~ @ D - :.J\- I» c¡g --------J ~ . ~ 8 ~ b ~@1 ~ ~ ~ Jt g - c ~ _ © ,~p ." 0\ .:;:::. '~' ,......-) _//~. , e' tW'~ CJ ~~ §j o~ 8 cs;5 18 8, . ~. O§ 9 @ =~ B 0 ce3 " . B 8 ~ 8 q ((~ 2J ok 8 r -- (=) ~ - ~~ ~ ;s - ~ -JDv) @ @ v~ ~g§ '. . 2 j 11 \.!) -'\ -. /)~ =~ ~ ~ Q fB0 )¿ï'" Jí= }~ " ...... 28 : \ \ J: V -' '~ý >- ~ - . '0 y- . /"" . /' , < . ~ " BLACK f<l:::i) ¡-1ií2.- tJ.J / v-J -r-r p t;; ~ j 11 L7~@@L7~L733L733~~@ BLAu<. WI WM-CTC Nee " ~ 14- I ì - 4'~(f "B 'f I-t í b /-I T - - , I . . ~ tlV. Ÿ'2- ~ . ~..J ç>¿ . '\' 'C. /d;: ¿) 3/1 ." r~ ~_<::: V Ú i 0('... Y'/ i . I . í ! > ~m~~~ ®U£U~ (œOjrNìrmn \''17 _ ~&[M~ ©IF Lf,U\JL0lbU ¡ ~UD JJ(Q)@~~[f(] [}{]@~[Eu@~~ OA/@ œJ&©)(~!X$¡ ~[EœWD~~·· I· /' i ¡ I . '(ZeD . R.e.V· ~_. ^, ~~ AR.Rû\..v -S ~,rlJ,\(t UC0C l'-;\':>~ f2¡ ut:::,M W / z. LU W {< .,.., ¡;¡. ^' i" r~: (;tJ-n \ ON T'/PE ....=~ < ~Ò '~ - . . . ;//J¡i'Þ/Jj 6~ Þk. ~ Rt:ÐJ ~0i Fl.ORAL A R'-S I ~ I ! 1 , ora r s \ 'J '" ., . V ./ "'t::. . /v·...-~ 10 <- c ~ð'P , "" " i v Ii- J'?- . ~ <r. ·~~3 3-7705 : j-: ~J~ ; 1 '@} ''" '1<!é'S , ' " - - -- r ¡M,tfft ~¿:~:; - -nil W~l ß~ ~~; ~ "- UK' bl~ec-ì\J , . p:::: c,.J ¡::: LO v...;(.::¡e5 J... ~ (FT'S G<i~LUJ-"::L- i..Ù/ Y e-LLG~v T'ï' \:: _ .- ð ú.) \41 -n..= 0 ~ ÖE H- \ NOS A - IIf.¡'b/lT YC#6úJ 1/; f'rltJ ! 55% ~ o 4 P, 1 . Ii . 09,25.19% 16:55 FROM . , , - - I -_. - - - - ~ ~ - You'llbe ~ - I eMa . - - - - Jo..~, . . V RAJKOWSKI HANSMEIER LTD. Attorneys at Law Reply to: St. Cloud ST. CLOUD September 18, 1996 11 Seventh A venue North P,O. Box 1433 St. Cloud, MN 56302-1433 320'251'1055 Ms. Rachel Stapleton 800'445'9617 Clerk Administrator FAX 320'251'5896 City Hall P.O. Box 668 MINNEAPOLIS St. Joseph, MN 56374 3908 IDS Center RE: Supreme Court decision - disorderly conduct - rental 80 South Eighth Street Our File No. 17693 Minneapolisl MN 55402 612'339'9206 Dear Rachel: 800'445'9617 FAX 320'251'5896 I have enclosed for your review a recent decision of the Minnesota Supreme Court . addressing whether or not the revocation of a rental license constitutes an unlawful INTERNET ADDRESS taking of property without compensation. In this case, the Supreme Court found that there was not an unlawful taking. It appears as though the facts are more rajhan@cloudnet.com aggravated than those that we sometimes deal with due to noise violations. It also appears as though there were several complaints before action was taken. Therefore, in a general sense, I believe that this case confirms our authority to FRANK J. RA/KOWSKI . t revoke or suspend rental licenses, but does not specify whether or not such a GORDON H. HANSMEIER revocation would be upheld for a first offense of a noise ordinance. FREDERICK L. GRUNKE THOMAS G. JOVANOVICH Of particular note, I would also call your attention to footnote #1 found on the first JOHN H. SCHERER page of the decision. That footnote discusses a disorderly use ordinance included PAUL A. RA/KOWSKI t in the Minneapolis City Code. This is similar to the "disorder house" concept that KEVIN F. GRAY I had suggested earlier this summer. I believe the designation of a disorderly house WILLIAM J. CASHMAN could be another method of controlling unlawful activity occurring at a rental home. RICHARD W. SOBALVARRO An ordinance of this nature would make the tenants criminally responsible for BRIDGET M, LINDQUIST activities occurring on their premises, even if we are unable to identify the tenants as participants in the activities. In fact, we may not need to show that the tenants were actually present. /.-\,\IE5 H. KELLY. MD" F.A.C.P. Something else that I think that the City Council may want to consider is providing ~fE01C\L CO:\:SCLT:\:\:T the police with more discretionary authority when addressing noise complaints. For FR.\~"'- J. R\!!(O\\-:-:KIIS .-\D\IITTEO TO PR.\c;.CE instance, if the police receive a noise complaint and find that the tenants I:\: NORTII D:\KOD.. inadvertently left open a window before turning on their stereo, but there is no other CtìRLX):\: H. H"\:\"S~1EIER I:\: !'''\.'RTH D.--\"OT..\ .--\:\:0' VISCO:\;51,,\:. loud activity occurring, a simple verbal warning may be sufficient. Under that - scenario, the police would not consider the activity to be the first violation of the P.\CL :-\. R'\I"O\\"~"II:\: \VI5C("I:\:~L\.- - \Vn LIc\\! J. C\:'H\!A:\; I"\: Sl1CTH n--\Kl"'L\. noise ordinance. On the other hand, where the first violation involves a large party, . \1E\IBER OF A\lrRlC-\:\ a discretionary warning would not be appropriate. Bl1.-\RD OF TRL\l AO\'LX".\ rES. t QUI.IFlED ADR :-J1'L'TR.'l. ~ . · Ms. Rachel Stapleton September 19, 1996 Page -2- I simply present this information for consideration and discussion. Very truly yours, RAJKOWSKI HANSMEIER LTD. mS/baz Enclosure 1: \gen \17693\af091896.011 · · v ~ " . AUGUST 23, 1996 FINANCE AND COMMERCE APPELLATE COURl'S EDmaN .. :. S U P R E M E C 0 U R T t, . C I V I L 0 P I N I 0 N 5 of his rental property, namely drug deals and associated violence. Zeman brought this action seeking, in part, reinstatement of his license and, some 20 months after the city revoked it, the trial court ordered the license rein- stated, concluding that the~city had acted precipitously: the ordinance requires three instances of "disorderly use" involving occupants of the dwelling before a rental dwelling license may be revoked and the two of the three instances cited by the city did not involve occupants of respon- Robert Zeman, dent's rental property. On the related takings question, the trial court Respondent, determined no taking had occurred. The court of appeals remanded the case to the trial court for new analysis, concluding the trial court had vs. employed a mistaken legal standard. The city appealed and we reverse. City of Minneapolis, et aI., petitioners, Since 1975 Zeman has owned a m!1Iti-unit residential building located Appellants. in Minneapolis and has been licensed to operate the building as rental property. The city maintains rental licensure requirements to ensure that Filed: August 22, 1996 operators of rental property comply with the housing code, which estab- Office of Appellate Courts lishes basic minimum standards for the buildings and their operation, in Lower Court Judge: Hon. Franklin J. Knoll order to protect public health, safety and welfare. Minneapolis, Minn., Code of Ordinances § 244.20 (1995). Appellant's Attorney Address: Surell Brady (Minneapolis City Attorney), In 1991 the Minneapolis City Council amended the housing code to James A. Moore and Caroline Bachun (Asst. City Attorneys) 333 So. include a provision requiring rental licensees to respond to activities on Seventh ST. #300, Minneapolis, MN 55402 their properties that require police intervention. The new ordinance pro- vided that "[i]t shall be the responsibility of the licensee to take appropri- Respondent's Attorney Address: Kenneth Hertz; Hertz and Assoc.; 4001 ate action, with the assistance of · · · the Minneapolis Police . Stinson Blvd. #312, St.Anthony, MN 55421. Department, following conduct by tenants and/or their guests on the David P. Frank, 2074th St. NW, Bemidji, MN 56601 licensed premises which is determined to be disorderly, in violation of SYLLABUS any of [several listed statutes and ordinances] to prevent further viola- The temporary taking of a rental dwelling license under a city ordinance tions." Id. § 244.2020. does not result in a taking of the owner's property, under the United States The police department's community services bureau, which is responsi- and Minnesota Constitutions, where the ordinance was properly designed ble for the enforcement of the provision, is empowered to determine that as a means for, and likely to succeed in, preventing harm to the community. disorderly conduct, as described above, occurred at a licensed premises. Reversed. Once it makes such a determination, the bureau will notify the licensee by Heard, considered and decided by the court en banco mail and direct that appropriate action be taken to remedy the problem. Id. § 244.2020 (c). If another instance of such conduct occurs within OPINION twelve months, the bureau wiJI again notify the licensee by mail and GARDEBRING, Justice require a written report of the actions taken or proposed. Id. § 244.2020 In this case we must determine if the actions of the City of Minne~polis (d). If yet another instance occurs within twelve months, the licensee's revoking respondent Robert Zeman's rental dwelling license constituted a rental dwe11ing license may be denied, revoked, suspended or not temporary taking for which the United Srates and Minnesota renewed. Id. § 244.2020 (e). Constitutions require compensation. Zeman received his first notice of disorderly use for the property on Pursuant to a city ordinance, the Minneapolis City Council revoked June 30, 1992. In response to the notice, he met with an officer from the Zeman's license for failin!: to adequately address "disorderly uses"! community services bureau. On March 12, 1993, he received a second 1 A disorderly use is defined as a violation, on the licensed premises, of any of the tol· notice; he responded with a letter indicating that he maintained a policy lowing: of evicting problem tenants. He received a third notice of disorderly use (1) Minnesota StaMes, Sections 609.75 through 609.76, which pro- on April 21, 1993, which included an advisory notice that the community hi bit gambling; services bureau was recommending that the City Council revoke Zeman's (2) Minnesota StaMes, Sections 609.321 through 609.324, which rental dwel1ing license. prohibits prostitution and acts relating thereto; Zeman appealed this recommendation to the Rental Dwelling License (3) Minnesota StaMes, Sections 152.01 through 152.025, and Board of Appeals. The Board concluded that three instances of disorderly Section 152.027, Subdivisions 1 and 2, which prohibit the unlawful sale or possession conduct, as defined in section 244.2020, occurred at the property, that Zeman of controlled substances; failed to take appropriate action, and that his license should be revoked. (4) Minnesota Statutes, Section 340A,401, which prohibits the Subsequently, the Minneapolis City Council voted to revoke his license. unlawful sale of alcoholic beverages; Zeman initiated this lawsuit against the City of Minneapolis seeking (5) Section 385.110 of this Code, which prohibits noisy assemblies; reinstatement of the rental dwelling license, compensation for the alleged (6) Minnesota StaMes, Sections 978.021, 978.045, 609.66 through taking of his license, and other claims that are not before us today. The trial 609.67 and 624.712 through 624.716, and section 393.40, 393.50, court, observing that section 244.2020 specifically applies to disorderly 393.70, 393.80, 393,90, and 393.150 of this Code, which prohibit the unlawful possession, transportation, sale or use of a weapon; or conduct by persons "occupying" the rental premises and that two of the ! (7) Minnesota Statutes, Sections 609.72 and Section 385.90 of this three instances of disorderly use upon which the revocation was based did Code, which prohibit disorderly conduct, when the violation disturbs not involve occupants of the rental premises, determined that the rev0C3- ~9 peace and quiet of the oœupants of at least two (2) units on the tion of Zeman's license was in error and ordered his license be reinstated. lICensed premises or other premises, other than the unit oœupied by , ?n the takings issue, the trial court heard testimony from Zeman's expert \ . the person(s) committing the violation. wttness, a real estate appraiser, on whether or not the temporary revocation Minneapolis Housing Maintenance Code § 244.2020 (a). constituted a taking. The appraiser testified that he had visited the proper- Supreme Court 14 '"'-' . - .__.~.~.~... -- - -- .. -~ _.. " . I FINANCE AND COMMERCE APPElLATE COURTS EDmoN AUGUST 23.1996 ~iewed the applicable' zoning restrictions, and 2u.s. Const., amend. V (guaranteeing that no 'private property be taken ~ public use without just corrr ed on sales of similar IbIS in the neighborhood. He pensatlon"); Minn. Const. art J, § 13 ("{pjrivate property shall not be taken, destroyed or .damaged for at the building and lot were presently worth about public use without lust compensationj. ' ' . '. ,. "negative $20,000 to $25,000" at sale. Given that rezon- ensure that the government cannot force "some people alone to bear' public burdens ing for commercial or industrial use was unlikely, the wit- which, in all fairness and justice, should be borne by the public as á whole."· Armstrong ! ness noted that the only possible use was residential. v. United States, 364 U.S. 40, 49 (1960). Thus, to determine an answer to the question Under questioning by the court, the witness stated that the confronting us today, we must attempt the unenviable task of sorting through the complex economic value of the property as it sat was "very close to law of takings. See San Antonio River Auth. v. Garrett Bros., 528 S. W.2d 266, 273 ¡ zero," largely due to the economically depressed nature of (Tex. Ct. App. 1975) (labeling takings law a "crazy-quilt pattern of judicial doctrine"). the neighborhood. According to the appraiser, it was Modem regulatory takings law stems from the nebulous notion that when the exercise of ¡ unlikely that a buyer would purchase, as a start-up ven- state police power regulation of private property "goes too far" it will amount to a taking. , ture, a rental property in such a neighborhood;. the proper- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. Mahon, 260 U.S. 393, 415 (1922). Unfortunately, the law does ty was only profitable because Zeman a!teady owned it. not become clearer with later cases. In general, it can be said that no firmly established I Thus, under Zeman's theory, the revocation eliminated test exists for determining when a taking has occurred, instead takings law turns largely I the only economically viable use for the property and on the particular faclS underlying each case. See Penn Central, 438 U.S. at 124. i effected a regulatory taking. See Lucas v. South On these faclS, the factors listed in Penn Central and the themes drawn from past tak- ! Carolina Coastal Council, 505 U.S. 1003, 1019 (1992). ings cases, especially the line of cases involving regulations designed to prevent hann to i The trial court ruled that Zeman had failed to establish the public, beginning with Mugler v. Kansas, 123 U.S. 623 (1887), appear to provide the a takings claim viable under either the federal or best analytic framework.3 - ., Minnesota Constitutions and granted partial summary 3Scholars seem to agree that Penn Central provides the best formulation of the factors the Supreme judgment in favor of the city. According to the trial court, Court deems important to takings anafyses. John E. Nowak and Ronald D. Rotunda. Constitutional Law Zeman's witness "fail[ed] to establish that [Zeman] has been deprived of all economically viable uses of his property." In addition, Zeman did not demonstrate to the court that no alternative use for this property existed. The court observed that evidence of the diminution of market JONATHAN J. FOGEL value to which Zeman's expert testified was insufficient to establish a total deprivation. Zeman· had offered no testimony as to the existence of alternative uses for the property. Also, despite the lack of any impediment to his doing so, Zeman had not reapplied for a new license. The trial court observed that Zeman's ability to sell the prop- IS PLEASED TO ANNOUNCE THE OPENING _had not been impaired, as a new owner would have ply for a new license in any event. See Minneapolis OF THE NEW FIRM ode of Ordinances § 244.1900. Therefore, the trial court concluded that Zeman's claim was actually a tort claim - that is, simply a ciaim for recompense for the unlawful revocation of his license, not for the taking of his property - - and that Zeman was simply attempting to get around the city's statutory immunity, which would FOGEL LAW OFFICES likely bar recovery. Zeman sought review by the court of appeals, which reversed. The court of appeals observed that the trial I court had analyzed this case under the rule of Lucas, 505 U.S. 1003, which held that regulation that denies all eco- nomically beneficial or productive use of land is a tak- ing. Id. at 1019. However, the court of appeals decided '. i the proper analysis was that described by the Supreme Court in Penn Central Transp. Co. v. City of New York, 438 U.S. 104, 124 (1978), and utilized by the THE FIRM WILL PRA01CE IN THE AREAS OF court of appeals in Woodbury Place Partners v. City of Woodbury, 492 N.W.2d 258 (Minn. App. 1992), pet for FAMILY LAW, PERSONAL INJURY AND rev. denied (Minn. Jan 15, 1993), cert. denied 508 U.S. 960 (1993). Detenniningthai this case was analogous to GENERAL LITIGATION. Woodbury Place, the court of appeals remanded to the trial court for consideration of the factors described in the Penn Central analysis. Zeman v. City of l\1inneapoUs, 540 N.W.2d 532, 536 (Minn. App. 1995). 250 SECOND AVENUE SOUTH SUITE 145 The question before us today is whether the revocation ¡ otZeman's rental dwelling license constituted .~ MINNEAPOLIS MI'NNESOTA 55401 within e meamng 0 t e mte tates and Min onstItutlOnS. A13 t e trial court s ru mgs resulted, essen- tially, in summary judgment in favor of the city, on appeal we must inquire whether there remain any gen- .e issues of material fact and whether the lower court TELE: (612) 335-8233 FAX (612) 334-3339 ! ed in its application of the law. State by Cooper v. French, 460 N.W.2d 2, 4 (Minn. 1990). The city revoked Zeman's license by means of a regu- ~ latory ordinance, but did not physically appropriate Zeman's land. The Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment and the similar provision in the Minnesota Constitution2 15 Supreme Cou;: r(~ :,. .....- ÅUGmiT 23, 1996 ¡I FINANCE AND COMMERCE APPELLATE COURTS EDITION J --._----- ~ 10. . 463 (5th 00. 1995); See Rank I. Michelman, Prope!1}', UtIlity, and Fairness: Commentaries on the 4A ~r sa ~ception to the general approach exists, where the reg- Ethical Foundations or -Just Compensation" Law, 80 Harv. L Rev. 1165, 1184 (1967). ulati~:m depnves the property owner of all economically viable uses : i,r~' ~owever, analysis of takings cases often relies heavily on reasoning by analogy to previous of his or her property. On such facts, the CourtlWill1ind a taking. ¡ . takings cases. The inost relevant line of takings cases to the issue before us today involves See, e.g., Lucas, 505 U.S. 1 003. In the instant case, we determine reg~d~?ons designed to prevent hann to the public and protect life and property from noxious that the Lucas rule does not apply. I, ' actiVities. In MogIer, the progenitor oftbis line of cases, the Court held that a state statute To determine th'e applicability of the Lucas rule, we Ii preventing the manufacture of beer was not a taking of a beer maker's property. Writing for must examine Zeman's reasonable investment-backed \, the Court, Justice Harlan noted that depreciation, perhaps extreme, in the value of the beer expectations as to what use he has put his property. " manufacturer's buildings and machinery was likely, but t!tat the state nevertheless possessed Lucas, 505 U.S. at 1027-31. The trial court concluded the power to regulate alcohol for the protection of the health, morals, and safety of the public. that Zeman's witness, who testified that Zeman's proper- Mugler, 123 U.S. at 661-62. The Court rejected MugIer's argument that the state's regulation ty had no value without the rental license, was not per- ha.d amounted to a taking without just compensation. Since Mugler, the Court has kept alive suasive. The trial court determined that Zeman's witness thIS .brand o.f ~oncompe~ble takings. Generally, the regulation must directly ameliorate the did not establish that Zeman had been deprived by the noxIous activity emanatmg from the private lands at issue. See Lucas; 505 U.S. at 1025-26 & city's action of any economically viable use for" his n.J2; Nollan v. California Coastal Comm'n, 483 U.S. 825, 841 (1987). property. Rather, the trial court viewed the testimony as . Under Penn Cent~1, a court considering a takings claim must review I) the economic "indicat[ing] that the market value of [Zeman's] property Imp~ct of the reguJatlon on the person(s) suffering the loss, 2) the extent to which the reg- has been adversely affected by the Jicense revocation." ulatIOn interferes with distinct investment backed expectations, and 3) the character of the Moreover, Zeman did not demonstrate to the court that government action to assess whether the complained of action effected a taking of private no alternative use for this property existed. The trial property for pubJic use. Connolly v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp., 475 U,S. 211, court correctly observed that, if an alternative use is 225 (1986) (quoting Penn Central, 438 U.S. at 124). The third factor closely parallels a available, even if it is not the best or most profitable use, Mugler-based analysis. the regulation has caused merely a decline in the proper- The cru~ o~ this case is the degree of impact that the city's attempt to fulfdllts poJíce ty's value, not the denial of all economically beneficial po~er objective has upon Zeman's abiJity to put his property to some economicJlly bene- use; a& tJ:¡e trial court noted, a decline in value is insuffi- fiCJ3l use. Til~ a~pellant city argues that its exercise of poJice power to prevent nuisances, dent to bring this case within the ambit of Lucas. See such as the cnmmal conduct in Zeman's apartment building, is proper and that its actions Lucas, 505 U.S. at 1019, 1030. should ~ot give rise t~ a taking unJess its reguJation results in the total deprivation of all It was for the trial court to listen to Zeman's witness economIcally beneficial uses of the property. See Lucas, 505 U.S. at 1019. For his part, and credit that testimony ~ccordingly; this court will not Zeman makes much of the fact that the city misapplied" its own ordinance -- and was set aside the trial court's findings .unJess they are clearly therefore effectively operatin~ .outside the boundaries of its laws - but generally sup- erroneous. Minn. R. Civ. P. 52.0t: We are not convinced ports the court of appeals decIsIOn to remand the case to the trial court. that is the case here. Our takings analysis must begin with the fact that Zeman's Jicense. which was reinstat- lJ,.nder this analysis, a general property reg::Hlation will ~d by the trial court, wa~ thus taken, if at aU, only temporarily. Howe~er, this will have no not result in a takin "unless the ro crt owner demon- ~mpact upon our analys.ls. J'!1e United States Supreme Court has held that temporary tak- strates that t e regulation has resulted in a severe eco- . . lOgS, even those later mvahdated by courts, are not different from permanent takings. nómic loss to the property owner and that the govem-" First English Evangelical Lutheran Church v. County of Los Angeles. 482 U.S. 304, llJent action is not rationally relater! to any legitimate 321 (19~7)..A property owner whose property has been taken by governmem regulation governmental interest. However, the Court has prÒvided may maIO tam an action, such as the instant one, in inverse condemnation. Id. at 315. no clear guideJines for lower courts when they examine We turn, then, to the Penn Central factors described above.4 the nature of the harm caused to" the property owner in such cases * * *." Nowak and Rotunda, Constitutional Law, supra, at 464. We must scrutinize the economic I impact of the regulation on the property owner and the extent to which the regulation interferes with the proper- ty owner's investment-backed expectations as well as - consider the nature of the regulation. The city argues that the ordinance at issue here is a valid exercise of municipal power to ameJiorate a nui- sance, namely criminal activity in a residential neighbor- hood. Zeman does not chaUenge this characterization, Donn N. Peterson, PE, President but points to the fact that the city erroneously employed its own ordinance. This seems to us to be irrelevant: if the ordinance indeed is a proper effort to protect the Forensic Engineering health, morals, or safety of the community which has the effect of prohibiting a particular use of a property, then Forensic Engineering Services and there will be no taking. See Mugler, 123 U.S. at 661-62. Expert Witness Testimonies Since 1971 The first two of the Penn Central factors involve the economic impact of the regulation on" the person suffer- · Accidental Reconstructions · Product Liability jng the loss and the extent to which the regulation inter- · Mathematical Modeling · Slip and Fall feres with distinct investment backed expectations. Penn Central, 438 U.S. at 124-25. Certainly, as Zeman's wit- · 3-D Computer Animations · Fire and Explosion ness testified, the economic impact on Zeman has been PETERSON substantial; the best use for his property is as an apart- ment building, and without a rental dwelling license he ENGINEERING . cannot operate it as such. Moreover, rezoning of the prop- erty for another use is unlikely and, given the economi- calJy depressed nature of the neighborhood, so too would - INCORPORATED be locating a buyer. Also, as Zeman has operated this property as a rental dwelling, since acquiring it in 1975, it - would appear that he has some investment-backed expec- (612) 551-7959 tations in its use as such. Thus, the first two Penn Central , 4455 Hwy. 169 North #201. Plymouth. MN 55442-2856 factors militate towards a decision in Zeman's favor. Consideration of the third factor, the character of the ------- -- Supreme Court 16 · ~- FINANèE AND COMMERCE APPEIl.ATE COUKfS EDmoN AUGUST 23,1996 cO 'go.emment action, however, favors the city. Under this factor, we must examine the regulation at issue, with emphasis on its purpose and the possibility of achieving .t purpose with this regulation. While this iltalways an . portant consideration in a takings analysis, in cases . nvolving a regulation aimed at the protection of the pub- lic health and safety, it becomes paramount. If the state ¡ regulation appears genuinely designed" to prevent hann to the public and is likely to achieve that goal and the hann suffered by the property owner does not appear to ; be one that should be borne by the entire community, we ! will not find a taking. See, e.g., Mugler, 123. U.S. at 661- I 62; Keystone Bituminous CoalAss'n v. DeBenedictis, 0 ROE R S ! 480 U.S. 470, 488-93 (1987). ..' "'.k í . ;{~FI"__f_øl{Wfl.g;.1.% ~7:1.'&®¡¡flti@I~111¡lírr@1\i : MugIer held that a state could prohibit a use of a prop mID<mi1r, ··&rx&T..Jþ....p.~.........".~,.¡^u········"Im.···'·~~w.······'.~'''''Ø'i;·lId!J··'''·q''·w.w , ~~Ilt~at~~~~~~~~neS~;~ybea~nj~~~~~;f~~e~o~~~~~i IJtîlílll!í".1þ.'fj~~.~:Y·"¡il.¡i..llli'IÎlltllilfl ! enforcemen.t of a statute prohibiting the manufacture. of :~;X;;~;itío~ft;~ ~:':::~';~;'t~~' P~~;Î~~~~~::i~7·=~~t~:t::ïïi,u".'muuu.u.. ¡ alcohol ag?Inst MugIer, a beer ~aker, would substant!al- Petitioner. ' Iy deprecIate the value of his property, no takmg 0 DER occurred. Mugler, 123 U.S. at 656-57, 668-69. Since R MugJer, the Court has upheld as valid state regulatory On October 27, 1995, this court suspended petitioner James L. Lawton, III from the efforts - denying compensation for alleged takings - practice of law for a period of 6 months. Petitioner has filed a petition for reinstatement the destruction of infected trees jeopardizing local and a Panel of the Lawyers Professional Responsibility Board held a hearing on the peti- orchards, MiUer v. Schoene, 276 U.S. 272, 279-80 tion pursuant to Rule 18, Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility. At the conclusion (1928), the banning of brickyard plant operations in of the hearing, the Panel found that petitioner has undergone the moral change necessary urhan areas, Hadacheck v. Sebastian, 239 U.S. 394, to again be certified to the public as trustworthy and that he is presently fit for reinstate- 410-11 (1915), and strict limitations on coal mining ment subject to certain conditions. activities, Keystone, 480 U.S. at 485. This Court, having considered all of the facts and circumstances surrounding this mat- A hann-prevention regulation, if not a ruse for a state ter, the petition for reinstatement and the Panel recommendation, NOW ORDERS: purpose other than protecting the public from noxious (1) That petitioner James L. Lawton, III is reinstated to the practice of law subject hann or illegal activity, is a powerful rationale militating to the provisions of this order. against finding a taking. See Bruce W. Burton, (2) That petitioner is prohibited from engaging in the solo practice of law until Regulatory Takings and the Shape of Things to further order of this court except where he is working as an independent contrac- Come: Harbingers of a Takings Clause tor or has associated with another experienced practitioner who is jointly respon- .econstellatiOn,72 Ore. L. Rev. 603, 618-19 (1993). A sible for the representation of clients. e:iewing court. must look to the nature o~ t~e regula~ion (3) That petitioner shall successfully complete the professional responsibility por- ~l1h an eye on Its ~urpo:e and th: probability of a~hle~- tion of the bar examination by November 10, 1996. mg that purpose with this regulatIOn. If the regulation IS (4) That petitioner be placed on 2 years' supervised probation subject to the fol- drawn to prevent harm to the ublic, broadl d fined, an seems a e 0 ac leve this goal, then a takin has not occurred. e, e.g., Keystone, .S. at 488-93. The cit 'š decision to engage landlords and the lice department In a coo ra we e 0 to rotect resl ential ~~~~:~~~hO~~aSn w:s. well :C~:~~n ;:~the~ ~~~Ii~ as o~~~ !:¡:!¡:!¡!i¡¡:!¡li¡¡ii~¡:¡¡ii'i:i.ii¡.g!:~;:¡;!·~::;'!:1::~::'!¡;::':'¡'::¡:::::'::::i::¡¡¡¡i!;:':::;:¡':'~Ji';i¡.::;.::;;:¡,,;.::¡:::,:::.;:,'::::':;::::':::¡::::¡:;":i:i:;i¡:¡'i·¡¡:¡;;;:;!;¡;¡;¡¡¡;¡;,:¡;"::[·:i!·!:¡[:,::;;:;;::i::¡;1: "'been recognized to carry some mdlvldual burdens, ·....·..·..........IBI.i:ILNIi~191..·...·..·......·... ................. Íncludin the re lato rohibition of certain uses of n- ¡:;:::::::II¡:i::;:I:;:;::;II::::::¡¡I:¡t::¡::tt:::It:;::tI:'Ii;iIi'i'::t::::!:'t:;:IIi;¡;::m:i:::::t:t::¡::::¡I:::I;::;i:::;::ff':'Eit::::'..:::¡:;:::::¡'I?::··:;:: ~v~t.. ¡m/pl/rty. Indeed, as Professor urton points out, government regulation directed towards hann prevention .... has been. the "preeminent theory by which the state has · 40 years of architectural/engineering experience traditionally been able to avoid" paying compensation. . Building and safety codes knowledge Bu~ton. Re!p1lato~ .Takings, s~pr~, at 6,17-18.. Th~s . Building design and construction expertise ordinance, viewed In lIght of the city's Inter,t m passmg It,. . seems to us to be just such a harm-prevention regulation. . Construct~on and consultant agreements analysIs This ordinance is designed to serve a legitimate public . Cost studies interest, deterring criminal activity in residential neighbor- · Standard of care inquiry hD<?ds, by eruisting the ai~ of landlords. The ordinance is . Construction industry standards review wn.lten to foster cooperalIon.betwee.n landlords and the . Personal injury case support polIce department's commumty semces bureau to work towards a solution. See Minneapolis Code of Ordinances § 244.2020. As the city points out, all of the conduct speci- D D Harry Schroeder fie.d in the ordinance is crimi.n~I!~ed by. the state of Schroeder Associates, Ltd. Minnesota. Further, the responslbIlllIes ascnbed to land- . . lords do not appear to be severe and may, we think, be D 0 Archltects/Ei}glneers properly deemed incidental to operating rental dwellings in Planners . an urban area. Where landlords do not cooperate under the Construction Managers tenns of the ordinance, they contribute to the continuation of illegal activity in their buildings. In the face of such action, the city is well justified in revoking their licenses. 930 Lawnview Ave., St. Paul, MN 55126 As the Keystone Court explained, (612)483-9400 17 Supreme Court . ;t'· . ~.JlÇ'~ St. Joseph Parks Commission ~~ . ':"" '\ ( -* :' ~/ . St. Joseph, Minnesota 56374 ~ - -- . - - -- Minutes of meeting September 23, 1996 Meeting was called to order at 6:30 pm by Jogn Anderson. # Members present: John Anderson, Joe Braun, Irma Lanier, Marge Lesnick, Claudette Klein and Liaison, Bob Loso. Liaison Report Soccer field is getting underway. Hopefully the landscaping will be done this week. Bob will meet with Engineer to move the dirt around. The council rejected the bid for the trail in Klinefelter Park. The bid was $72,000. We will try to bid again in February for the trail. We have until next fall to use the grant money. The budget for 1997 was cut by $7,000 and as of now it is $18,000. We have $11,287 left from 1995 and 1996 thus far. Summer Recreation Program Dave Heideman gave a report on the Summer Recreation Program. 200 children took part in the program, a very good turnout. They had an end-of-year picnic and . about 250 people attended. Prizes were donated and thank you notes were sent. They received donation of $400 from Legion and Jaycees. A suggestion was made to have some of the ball games in the evening so parents could see their children playing. They will look into this. Marge made a motion to have Dave Heideman and his staff do the program next year. The motion carried. Because of the donation from Klinefelter's relative for park equipment, Marge checked with Game Time to do a computer projection for that park in regard to feasible equipment. New Business Camping rules should be set for Millstream Park. John, Irma and Marge will s~t up rules for camping. ideas were presented to dress up the park with Cloverdale Park was discussed: flowers, possibly a trellis to the entry, benches, all to enhance the esthetics of the park. Membership: We could change the by-laws next year to add a person(s) (7-10) because we are short a few members because of resignations. Meeting adjourned at 7:25 pm. , Next meeting will be October 28 at 6:30 in City Hall. Respectively submitted: ~,UCZ;; I~;~ .- Claudette Klein, Sec. -