Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2004 [04] Apr 01 {Book 30} I CITY OF ST. JOSEPH www.cityofstjoscph.cQm . I \ i St.Joseph City Council i April 1,2004 7:00 PM I 1. 7:00 PM - Call to Order I Adminis rdtor 2. Approve Agenda Judy Weyrens \ 3. Cdnsent Agenda Mdyor a.1 Bills Payable -Requested Action: Approve check numbers 34000-57 b. \' Minutes -Requested Action: March 9 & March 22, 2004 lorryJ r~ c... Wobegon Trailhead Grant - Requested Action: Authorize the Mayor and ,Administrator to execute the grant agreement between the City of St. Joseph and the DNR. Council )fS d. Gambling Permit - Requested Action: Accept the Gambling Premise AI Rdssi r i Permit for st. Joseph Parish for an event to be held, on July 3-4 at the ~1 I St.Joseph Church grounds. Gdry, Usch e.1 Ordinance Amendment -Authorize the Mayor and Administrator to Ddle ,Wick I,. execute the Amendment to Ordinance 52.29. / 4. Public Comments to the Agenda ! I 5. 7:0,5 PM - St. Joseph LegionPost 328 - Park Expansion I . 6. 7:15PM - CSB/SJU Request to use Centennial Park for Senior Farewell. I , I 7, 7:30PM - Sand Companies a. ¡Amendment to Comprehensive Plan b. T Re~zone I 8. 7:45 PM - Foxmore Hollow, Heid/Herges a.,¡ Amendment to the, Comprehensive Plan b. I Re~zone c. ¡·PUD & Special Use Permit d. I Þreliminary Plat I 9. ,City Engineer Reports a..1 Storm Water Utility " I 10. Police Reports a.1 Part-time officer b. J Reserve Officers 11. De~artment.of Public Works Report I a. ! Water Report i 12. Mayor Reports ¡ 13. Cowncil Reports 14. I AdTinistrator Reports . , I I zfCollcgc Avcn1ue North 'PO )ox bbs . Sdint. joseph. Minncsotd ~bU4 I Phone , 2Q , ; b , . 720 I l\~ x , Z 0 . , b; , 0,4 Z 1 i I I I . N .. TESTO T1ECQUNCIL.....,......,...... (' ~ I Utiity Franchise Fee I We have received our first payment from Stearns.Electric for the utility franchise fee, approximately $1,400.00. This number I I appears to be consistent with the projections, but we will monitor as the year progresses. Xcel will be submitting their first check this week for February. The fee was implemented January 1 with the first collection in February. He Ith Insurance The health insurance plan for the City is in the renewaLstage. At therequest oftheinsurance agent, we are soliciting quotes for health insurance. As you can see fròm the enclosed memo, we have requested all the employees to complete the application forms. Once wehave received the quotes for insurance, we will be asking to meet with the Council to review alternative plans. The City is currently covered under the small group reform., Recent changes in the reform may allow the City to administer more than one health insurance plan. ,We will ask the unions to be part of the discussion to review the plans. Whatever plan is selected must be in place by Junel, the date the current plan renews. . No se Complaint The City has received numerous complaints from the 5th Avenue NW neighborhood regarding the continuous use of a leaf blower or snow blower. In the, packet is an opinion from the Attorney as to whether or not this is considered a violation of the noise ordinance. Since it is the opinion of the attorney that it could be charged under the Ordinance, a letter is being sent to the property owner making the noise advising him that his continuous use of aleafblower does violate the Ordinance and he could be charged under the Ordinance for violation. Anyone having questions on this matter should contact Pete or myself. Se tence to Serve I have submitted an application to the Sentence to Serve program toprovideJabor to scrape and paint the old CityHall and to j remove, all the shrubs around the existing building and plant new j ones or just restore the surface. Both projects were accepted and . theywiUbegin as. soon as the whether gets warm. The Sentence to' Serve program brings along their own supervisor so we'do not need to watch over them as they work. R presentatives At meeting Tom Jovanovich and Tracy Ekolla will be present at the meeting to answer your questions; . I City of st. Joseph 03/29/04 1 :33 PM \ Page 1 Bills Payable I . ! i I g¿~~~1~~~~~:· .. i ~ ~;;E;;;gtl;~;;~;"·~-~··_~:f:;~'}~·--' 034001 A COUNTEMPS acctg 3/5 $1,000.00 101 41530 300 034002 A~TO VALUE PARTS STORES - WEST water pump-89 chev $12.62 101 43120 220 034002 A TO VALUE PARTS STORES - WEST water pump-89 chev $12.62 101 45202 220 034003 AWWA ; training handbook $39.50 601 49440 210 034004 BtOWNING-FERRIS INDUSTRIES refuse-residential $9,556.80 603 43230 384 034004 B OWNING-FERRIS INDUSTRIES refuse-water plant $53.73 602 49490 384 034004 BROWNING-FERRIS ,INDUSTRIES refuse-fire hall $53.73 105 42220 384 034004 BROWNING-FERRIS INDUSTRIES refuse-maint garage $53.73 101 45201 384 034005 C LLULAR 2000 \ cell phone $28.90 101 45202 321 034005 C LLULAR 2000 cell phone $93.51 101 42151 321 034005 C LLULAR2000 I cell phone $28.90 101 41430 321 034005 C LLULAR 2000 I cell phone $28.90 602 49490 321 034005 C LLULAR 2000, I cell phone $28.90 101 43120 321 034006 C NTRAL HYDRAULICS I fittings $14.79 101 45201 210 034007 C NTRAL MCGOWAN welder-maint shop $1,988.70 429 43120 580 034007 C NTRAL MCGOWAN . medical oxygen $28.15 105 42270 210 034008 C~Y OF ST. CLOUD i feb sewer rental $12,937.10 602 49480 419 034009 C I MMISSIONER OF REVEN'UE 3/05 coun state $71.32 101 034009 C MMISSIONER OF REVEN'UE 3/05 supp state $23.43 101 034009 C MMISSIONER OF REVENUE 3/03 pay state $1,225.65 101 034010 E TPS I 3/05 supp fed $36.97 101 i .0 E TPS ! 3/05 coun fica $488.12 101 03 1~ E TPS I 3/05 coun fed $99.55 101 E TPS I 3/05 supp fica $116.88 101 I 034010 EITPS, ! 3/03 pay fed $2,690.50 101 034010 Erps . . r 3103 po, ,,, $2,917.08 101 034011 G ANITE ELECTRONICS ,'! - radio battery $69.23 105 42250 230 034012 H RDRIVES ' I.'", salt sand $1,629.45 101 43125 210 034013 H WKINS WATER TREATMciNTGRO water tests $109.00 601 49420 312 034014 H NRY & ASSOCIATES ",[ gaskets $16.87 601 49430 210 034014 H NRY& ASSOCIATES' water meter $426.68 601 49430 210 034015 $75.00 101 034016 IN PECTRON INC i building inspection services $6,500.00 101 42401 311 034017 J M OIL CO. ! gas $98.92 101 43120 210 034017 J M OIL CO. ups $31.01 101 42120 322 034017 J M OIL CO, gas $15.03 101 42120 210 034017 J M OIL CO. I gas $98.92 101 43125 210 034018 KUN DISTRIBUTING ¡ computer support $63.65 101 42120 215 034018 Kj" DISTRIBUTING· r ",!work ,ervio.-poJ(œ $55.00 101 42120 215 034019 L AGUE OF MN CITIES \ league bulletin $65.00 101 42120 433 034019 L AGUE OF MN CITIES league bulletin $130.00 101 41110 433 034020 L AGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRUST liability insurance $90.00 101 42120 361 034021 L EF BROS, I clothing service/floorrunner $66.76 601 49440 171 034021 L EF BROS 1 clothing service/floor runner $66.77, 101 43120 171 034021 L8¡EF BROS! ' , clothing service/floor runner $66.77 101 45202 171 034021 L~EF BROS! clothing service/floor runner $66.77 602 49490 171 034021 L~EF BROS ' ! clothing service/floor runner $60.39 101 41942 220 034021 LE¡EF BROS, ' j lathing service/floor runner $20.34 101 42120 220 034022 MI S EQUIPMENT I oil. filters $184.80 101 45202 220 034023 MI CO, INC ! pc repair $211.96 105 42210 215 034024 MI NESOTA TRAVEL MANA<pEMENT gas/lease unit 4783 $811.13 101 42152 414 034024 MI NESOTA TRAVEL MANACþEMENT gas/lease unit 4182 $1,007.88 101 42152 414 .4 MI NESQTA TRAVEL MANAGEMENT gas/lease unit 4448 $755.45 101 42152 414 ~5 o FICE MAX I chair-coucil chambers $853.10 490 41430 570 034026 ONE CALL CONCEPTS. INC , jan notification fees $9.77 602 49490 319 034026 ONE CALL CONCEPTS,INC I jan notification fees $9.78 601 49440 319 034027 0r'ABOUT GEAR I 0I1"idor "I.,~.b;" $181,04 101 42120 580 . ! i City of St. Joseph 03/29/04 1 :33 PM Page 2 Bills Payable · ;heck # Search Name Comments Amount FUND DEPART OBJ 034028 PERA 3/05 supp retire $117.02 101 034028 PERA 3/03 pay retire $3,353.22 101 034028 PERA 3/05 coun retire $182.00 101 034029 POST BOARD post license, Gustin $90.00 101 42120 433 034030 PRECISE REFRIGERATION INC replace bad crank arm $76.22 105 42280 220 034031 R. L. LARSON EXCAVATING, INC liberty pointe pay #6 $7,490.75 428 43124 530 034032 RAJKOWSKI HANSMEIER L TD legal fees - eminent domain $20.00 425 43122 530 034032 RAJKOWSKI HANSMEIER LTD legal fees - northland 8 $50.00 428 43120 530 034032 RAJKOWSKI HANSMEIER L TO legal fees - bldg $230.00 101 42401 304 034032 RAJKOWSKI HANSMEIER LTD legal fees - general $4,099.00 101 41610 304 034032 RAJ KOWS KI HANSMEIER L TD legal fees - bldg $2,713.50 101 42120 304 034032 RAJKOWSKI HANSMEIER L TO legal fees - graceview $396.00 101 41610 304 034033 SEARS return -$9.63 101 45201 210 034033 SEARS wrenches, pliers, mech set $1,059.27 101 45201 210 034034 SEH Feb GIS services $399.91 428 49900 530 034035 ST. CLOUD STATE UNIVERSITY snowmobile trng (2) $562.00 101 42120 300 034036 ST. CLOUD TIMES bids-northland 8 $241.98 430 43120 530 034037 STEARNS COUNTY AUDITOR-TREAS audit verification fee $75.00 101 41430 210 034038 STEARNS COUNTY RECORDER recording fee-trail center $20.00 230 45202 530 034039 STEARNS COUNTY TREASURER deed tax-trail center $23.10 230 45202 530 034040 STRATEGIC EQUIPMENT towels $87.01 105 42281 210 034041 SUPER AMERICA feb gas $41.70 105 42220 210 034041 SUPER AMERICA feb gas $310.10 602 49480 210 034041 SUPER AMERICA feb gas $310.09 101 43120 210 · 034041 SUPER AMERICA feb gas $310.10 601 49440 210 034041 SUPER AMERICA feb gas $310.09 101 43125 210 034042 TIREMAXX SERVICE CENTERS tire disposal $174.00 101 42152 220 034042 TIREMAXX SERVICE CENTERS oil pan repair & oil change $108.34 101 43120 220 034042 TIREMAXX SERVICE CENTERS oil pan repair & oil change $108.34 602 49480 220 034042 TIREMAXX SERVICE CENTERS oil pan repair & oil change $108.34 101 45202 220 034042 TIREMAXX SERVICE CENTERS fuse-54 chev $29.95 101 41310 230 034042 TIREMAXX SERVICE CENTERS oil pan repair & oil change $108.35 601 49440 220 034043 TRAUT WELLS water test $35.00 601 49420 312 034044 TROBEC'S BUS SERVICE transporation-Iake region mtg $45.20 105 42240 331 034045 UNUM LIFE INSURANCE disability insurance $443.21 101 034046 US CABLE internet service $50.55 101 41430 321 034046 US CABLE internet service $40.55 105 42250 321 034047 US LINK february phone service $175.69 101 45201 321 034047 US LINK february phone service $44.51 101 41430 321 034047 US LINK february phone service $141.88 101 41430 321 034047 US LINK february phone service $44.51 101 41941 321 034047 US LINK february phone service $45.91 602 49490 321 034047 US LINK february phone service $44.51 101 41946 321 034047 US LINK february phone service $33.79 150 46500 321 034047 US LINK february phone service $46.96 602 49473 321 034047 US LINK february phone service $44.51 601 49440 321 034047 US LINK february phone service $42.15 602 49490 321 034047 US LINK february phone service $71.25 602 49470 321 034047 US LINK february phone service $71.24 602 49471 321 034047 US LINK february phone service $46.96 602 49472 321 034047 US LINK february phone service $89.02 105 42250 321 034047 US LINK february phone service $254.17 101 42151 321 034048 VISIONAIR rnaintenance renewal $186.27 101 42120 215 034049 XCEL ENERGY feb gas/electric $59.29 101 43120 381 034049 XCELENERGY feb gas/electric $350.77 105 42280 381 · 034049 XCELENERGY gas $187.65 101 45201 383 034049 XCEL ENERGY electric $153.54 101 43160 386 034049 XCELENERGY feb gas/electric $1,024.42 105 42280 383 034049 XCEL ENERGY feb gas/electric $2.92 101 42500 326 City of St. Joseph 03/29/041 :33 PM Page 3 Bills Payable . Check # ,Search Name Comments Amount '0"""",<!;";,;~;",.v",~""~,,,:,,::,,,,,,~:\,:,:,,,,,,~,=:,,r¡;¡;m:";:m<::w"i:'i""m~:'w,,:~::,;".';'~ " >', $3.14 101 42500 326 034049 XêEL ENERGY teb gas/electric 034049 X EL ENERGY teb gas/electric $120.77 101 45123 383 034049 XE:EL ENERGY teb gas/electric $22.94 101 42610 386 034049 XCEL ENERGY teb gas/electric $1,686.71 101 43160 386 034049 XþEL ENERGY teb gas/electric $35.56 101 45202 381 034049 XPEL ENERGY teb gas/electric $339.49 101 43120 383 034049 XfL ENERGY teb gas/electric $41.62 101 45123 381 034049 X EL ENERGY teb gas/electric $60.02 602 49471 383 034049 XELENERGY teb gas/electric $234.36 101 41941 381 034049 X· EL ENERGY teb gas/electric $756.63 101 41941 383 034049 X EL ENERGY teb gas/electric $522.68 101 41942 381 034049 XgEL ENERGY teb gas/electric $148.42 101 41942 383 034049 X, EL ENERGY teb gas/electric $16.19 602 49470 381 , 034049 TLENERGY teb gas/electric $226.33 101 45201 383 034049 .X! EL ENERGY , teb gas/electric $885.22 101 41946 381 034049 XIELENERGY , tebgas/electric $4.57 601 49435 381 t 034049 X ELENERGY \ teb gas/electric $252.21 601 49420 383 034049 XIELENERGY teb gas/electric $273.42 601 49420 381 034049 X ELENERGY \ teb gas/electric $595.93 601 49410 381 034049 X¢ELENERGY I teb gas/electric $81.61 601 49410 383 034049 X ELENERGY teb gas/electric $350.11 602 49480 381 034049 XiEL ENERGY I teb gas/electric $215.55 602 49480 383 034049 X EL ENERGY i teb gas/electric $39.53 101 45201 381 . TPSÉPH C~AMBER OF ÇOMMffi CSBISJD Do,,'" $8,000.00 230 45202 C' MMISSIONER OF REVENUE 3/17 pay state $1,062.78 101 o 1 C MMISSIONER OF REVENLJE 1/7 pay tee $48.91 101 41430 210 034052 E TPS i 3/17 pay ted $2,305.82 101 034052 E TPS I 3/17 pay tica $2,456.72 101 034053 lWKINS \'VATER TREATM~NT "RO W,,,, ohem¡"I, $285.22 601 49420 210 034054 iN UFE iNS & ANNUITY CpMP ANY 3117 pey del oomp $75.00 101 034055 P RA I 3/17 pay retire $3,262.29 101 034056 P 'STMASTER i utility bill postage $84.92 601 49440 322 034056 P 'STMASTER ¡ utility bill postage $84.93 603 43230 322 034056 PqSTMASTER ' utility bill postage $84.92 602 49490 322 034057 W YRENS, JUDY mileage reimb, HR training $60.00 101 41430 331 $99,993.25 , i, . I I : March 9, 2004 , Page 10f 1 'Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the City Council for the City of St. Joseph met in special session .. " -I· . ',' ," . .... ,,' ,,! ", . on Tuesday, March 9,:2004 at 5:00 PM in the St. Joseph City Hall. Members Present: M~,YOr LarryHosch. Councilors Gary Utsch, AI Rassier, Dale Wick, Ross Rieke. -1' , CdministratorJUdY W~yrens. fthers Present: EDAFonsUltent Joann Foust ['Aayor Hosch opened the meeting at 5:00 PM and stated thatthe purpose of the meeting was to continue the discussion of Febrwary 18, 2004 Council/Department Head retreat. Weyrens stated that the Council [equested to discuss c:ommunication concerns regarding subsidiary boards/commission and the City ~ounciL particule, rly th,ere hes been someC?ncem ~~ the. reletionsh ip beßv, een the C, ityCouncii end L::h steted thet he Jd esked thet this item be disC( ssed eshe hes received some concerns ebout L ole and functionoftha EDAand is looking for clarification. There is a perception amongsome residents hat there is a conflict of interest on the EDA and they function like a second City Councii., Wick and assierconcurred witH Utsch that there is some concern with conflict of interest and would like an ssurance the matter'¡~ being addressed. DA consultant Joann ¡Foust presented the Council with the bylaws of the EDAand the enabling Ordinance. Fouststatèd that the organization of the EDAis controlled by Statute and the Board can fonsist of three, five o~ seven members, of which two must be Counciiors. Foust also explained that in fccordance with the e~abling Ordinance, all actions concerning development districts and financing ¡eqUire approval from re City Council. Therefore the Council has final authority over the EDA. Hosch stated that he c9uld address the conflict of issue concern. Their was an issue regarding a conflict bf interest and the EDA Board addressed the concern and has implement new policies. For example, any . rember can question~nother member if a conflict exists and the questioning will be accepted without prejudice. In addition tre EDA has received signed letters, from members acknowledging that their may !\ ea perceived conflict 'of interest and they will abstain from those issues. Rieke concurred with Hosch; nd stated that he,is c1nfident that they have resolved any conflict issues. 1 he Council also discu~sed the need for all Boards, and Commission to work together as a team all , erving the best interest ofthe residents of St. Joseph. Not everyone will agree with all decisions, nor are they easy decisions to ~ake, but the end result should be whatis best for the taxpayers. TheCouncil ~greed by consensus trat the bylaws should be amended to include the regulation of conflict of interest. I addition the Council ~as in agreement to meet jointly with the EDA to discuss issues of mutual > 'oncern. Meeting with 'subsidiary boards and commission should be done on an annual basis to address I . .'. . . - . . . . . . . . . . '. . '.' oncerns before they become unmanageable and to increase communication. . osch and Rieke uPdated the Council on the goals of the EDA. The City has limited land available for I dustrial Development!, so the EDA has been researching alternative, land sites and alternative qevelopment methods.¡ The Councii agreed to discuss this matter further when they meet jointlywith the rDA. j ~ Wick mede Jmotion to adjourn at 6:20 >M; seconded by Rassie, end pessed Junan¡mOUSIY. : I \ ,udy We~ens dministrator . i I I I I I I DRAFT I i I March 22. 2004 ] Page 1 of2' . ursuantto due callan~ notice thereof, theSt. Joseph City Counéil me in joint session with St. Joseph ownship on Monday, March 22, 2004 at 7:00 PM in the St. Joseph City Hall. I . ' 1t. Joseph City Council Members Present: Mayor Larry Hosch. Councilors AI Rassier, Dale Wick. Jdm inistrator.. JudyW e~rens. 1t. Joseph Township S¿pervisors Present: Greg Berg, Joe Bechtold, Jerome Salzer. Township Clerk 1nn Reischl. : , ~eyrens stated the purpose of the meeting is to discuss items of mutual concem including the operetion o the Rothfork gravel pi\t and platting procedures within the Orderly Annexation area. Weyrens q estioned if the Rothfork gravel pit is operating under a special use permit and if they have provided the T wnship with a reclamation plan for pit. Bechtold responded that the gravel pit is a grandfathered use] ¡hiCh cannot beexpan~ed. As long as the same, grain of gravel is mined, the operation can continue. ~SSie' steted thet os t~e City g,owsend ~evelops close, to the mining operetion, it hesthe potentiel of b coming a safety hazard. In addition, he stated the City is concerned as to what will happen to the land when they are done mining. Without a reclamation plan it could be left as a deep depression. Berg tted thet since the mining operetion has been in existence fo, meny yeers, they did not require e r clamation plan. However, as times and regulations change, he suspects that all mining operations will erntuellY be required t complete such. e plen, B rg stated that he can nderstand the position of the City and agrees the City and Township should jo¡intly resolve this issue.! 'Berg stated that as a first step he would contact the County and discuss how the existing operation is governed and express the concerns of the City and Township. If another jeeting of the City and TownshiP is needed, Berg will contact Weyrens. . The second area of concern is the platting process. Weyrens stated the City was of the understanding t they Would heve en ,opportunity to review end comment on pla~ within the Orderly Annexetion Aree. In 2003 a plat was processed and the City did not have the opportunity to review it. The property owner, dt present the plat to the Planning Commission at.the end of a meeting, but stated that no action was ; n cessary. Bechtoldst~ted they had a'similarexperience with the same plat, but before ,it was approved by Stearns County they ?ad an opportunity for input. ! B rg stated that the, Merhorandum of Understanding signed by the City and Township of St. Joseph and S earns County, identifies the procedurean applicant must follow when platting property in St. Joseph T wnship. Bechtold questioned the City if the procedure outlined in the Memorandum is acceptable if it is followed. During discussion ¡twas noted that in the section describing the process the Memorandum of U derstanding,is not clear as ,it appears to be missing a sentence. T ose present identified the following as the process that should be followed. 1. The Applicant .sybmits a plan to the Stearns County Platting Committee who reviews the plat. The review of the plat is then forwarded ,to the City and Township of St. Joseph. 2. The City and Township independently review the proposed plat and send comments and concerns to Steèrns County Environmental Services. a. Since the City and Township use the same Engineering Firm, the staff from the City and Township will coordinate revi,ew by such and the cost of the reviewwill be shared. b. The CitX Administrator and Township Clerk will share the comments from their prospective jurisdiction and if the opinions vary significantly a joint meeting may be scheduled. I I B rg stated that he will fbrward the process identified above to the County who in turn will revise the Memorandum of Unders~anding. The new Memorandum will need to be executed by all ,the parties . in~olved. I i I! I; i , I II DRAFT March 22, 2004 Page 2 of 2 Rassier suggested that the City and Township meet quarterly on a regular basis to increase II . communication and discuss items of concern. Bechtold stated that he agrees the City and Townsrip should meet, but feels that annually would be sufficient. If an issue came up the City can always rßquest a meeting or they can attend a regular meeting of the Township. Those present agreed to meet arnually with the understanding that either jurisdiction could request to meet if an issue of concern surfaces. I! Summer Recreation: Weyrens reported that the City has contacted the St. Cloud Boys and GirlsGlub to take over the Summer Recreation Program. They have completed a cost analysis to do such and Ihave estimated that their will be an annual deficit and have requested that the City guarantee payment of any deficit. The City is not in a position whereby the deficit can be paid, and questioned if St. Joseph Ii Township would contribute a proportionate share of the shortfall, based on the number of particip9nts from 51. Joseph Township. Hosch stoted thet the City will be epp,oeching 51. Wendel Township r participation as well. St. Joseph Township was in agreement that would be willing to pay a proportionate share of the shortfall based on a per student basis, and they would only be able to contribute for residents of St. Joseph Township. Adjourn: The meeting was adjourned by consensus at 8:20 PM JudyWeyrens Administrator . . I, I " , . i I Attachment: Yes, or No I 1 . I \ , I , REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION I \ I , Consent 3 (c) , I I DATE: ] Administration I RIGINATING DEPARTMENT DEPARTMENT APPROVAL i !, GENDA ITEM rant Agreement - Authorize Mayor and Administratorto execute the grant Agreement with the DNR· I PFVIOUS ACTION I .' . T e City made applicatloh for and received a$ 100,000 matching grant from the DNR. The grant r quest was for the con~truction ofthe Wobegon Welcoming Center. .. ¡ I COMMENDED COFCIL ACTION 1 thorize,theMayor an~. Administrator to execute the Agreement as presented F SCALIMPACT $ 100,000 funding for the center I i I COMMENTSIRECOMMENDATIONS I I I ! . i I I I' , i Ii I: I. I [Contract-revised December 11, 2003] I . I' I. STATE OF MINNESOTA/DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES )' SUBGRANT AGREEMENT UNDER THE FEDERAL RECREATIONAL TRAIL PROGRAM PROJECT AGREEMENT #0031-03-3C I' I I , ,. I, . Ii THIS AGREEMENT is entered into by and between the State of Minnesota acting by and through the Commissioner of Natural Resources (hereinafter "Grantor") and the City of St. Joseph (hereinkfter the "Sub grantee"); II , WHEREAS, Grantor has been granted funds by the United States Department of Transp~rtation, I' Federal Highway Administration (hereinafter "FHW A") under the Transportation Equity Act for the !121 sl I Century enacted in 1998 (hereinafter the "Fund"); and I I, I' WHEREAS, 1994 Minn. Laws ch. 578, authorizes Grantor on behalf of- the State, to accept and I " use grants of money from the United States for conservation purposes not inconsistent with Statel: law and to make sub @rants of money so received to other agencies, units of local government and privatJ non I j profit corporations; and , , I . i' WHEREAS, the FHW A has authorized Grantor to make sub grants of the federal funds tö I " qualifying recipients; and i ii I ,. WHEREAS, Sub grantee has made application to Grantor for a portion of the funds granted for I' I the purpose of constructing a trailhead facility in the City of St. Joseph for users of the Lake Wob~gon 1 , 1 Trail in the manner described in Sub grantee's Application (hereinafter the "Project") which is I , I ! incorporated by reference and attached hereto as Attachment A; I I I WHEREAS, the Project Environmental Assessment has been approved; II !i I 1 Ii WHEREAS, the application has been approved by the Sub grantee's appropriate govern¡ing entity . I as evidenced by Attachment "S" which is attached hereto and incorporated by referencel,herein; and !, I¡ ji I. WHEREAS, Grantor has approved the Project as set forth in Sub grantee's Application; I: NOW THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1 I , , 1.0 The Grant. 1 II 1 1- ¡ . I I' I i I I I' I " · 1.1 The Grantor agrees to disburse funds to Sub grantee pursuant to this Agreement on a reimbursement basis. Grantor agrees to reimburse Sub grantee fifty (50) percent of its allowable costs, up to a maximum of $100,000. 1.2 Sub grantee shall perform the work as outlined in its Application and in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement from the date the funds are encumbered by the state to December 31, 2004. Any material change in the scope of the Project, budget or completion date shall require the prior written approval of Grantor. 1.3 Funds made available to Sub grantee pursuant to this Agreement shall be used only for allowable expenses incurred in performing and accomplishing the purposes and activities specified herein. Notwithstanding any provision of this I i Agreement to the contrary, it is understood that any reduction or termination of i funds allocated to Grantor by the FHW A may result in a reduction of funds to Sub I · ¡grantee. \ 1.4 I Sub grantee a~rees to provide to Grantor,sufficient written evidence of its I authority to enter into this Agreement and be bound thereby on or before the d.ate I" ' , , I I it signs this Agreement. 2.0 Applicability of Laws. i 2.1 I Sub grantee acknowledges that the funds it is receiving under this Agreement I I are proceeds from the Fund, which are subject to certain legal restrictions and I requirements. Sub grantee agrees to abide by those and all other relevant State (and Federal laws and regulations in the fulfillment of the Project. 2.2 iThe following Federal cost principles, administrative and audit requirements I !apply to this Sub grant and are incorporated by reference: I I For local governments, the following apply: a. (i) OMS Circular A-1 02, Uniform Administrative Requirements · 2- ( I \ I ! Ii I I I I for Grants and Cooperative Agreements to State an6 Local . I! Governments; (ii) OMB Circular A-87, Cost Principles for State and Lqcal Governments; or II (iii) OMBCircular A-128, Audits of States and Local Governments. Ii (iv) If Sub grantee receives between $25,000 and $50,qOO per year, Sub grantee agrees to obtain either a /: I financial or compliance audit made in accordance ~ith the I Single Audit Act of 1984 and OMB Circular A-128, or a Ii financial and compliance audit of all federal funds. Ii (vi) Sub grantee must submit one copy of the financial 9r compliance audit to: !' Tim Mitchell, Grants Specialist Ii . II Division of Trails and Waterways I! Minnesota Department of Natural Resources I: 500 Lafayette Road I 1 I I St. Paul, MN 55155 Ii AND TO: 1 I I I' Office of the State Auditor I I I Single Audit Division I Suite 400, 525 Park Street II St. Paul, MN 55103 I' b. For nonprofit organizations, the following apply: I I! I: (i) OMB Circular A-11 0, Uniform Administrative Requirements I I: with Institutions of Higher Education, Hospitals and Other I: I! I 3- I . I I I I I, II ,I II . Nonprofit Organization. (ii) Cost Principles: a. OMB Circular A-21, Cost Principles for Educational Institutions; b. OMS Circular A-122, Cost Principles for Nonprofit Organizations; ,or c. OMB Circular A-133 Audits of Institutions of Higher Education and Other Nonprofit Institutions. (Hi) If Sub grantee receives between $25,000 and $50,000 per year, Sub grantee agrees to .obtain either a financial or compliance audit made in accordance with OMB Circular A: 133, or a financial and compliance audit . of each federal program. (vii) Sub grantee must submit one copy of the financial or " complíanceaudit to: Tim Mitchell, Grants Specialist Division of Trails and Waterways Department of Natural Resources 500 Lafayette Road St. Paul, MN 55155 AND TO: Office of the Auditor , Single Audit Division Suite 400; 525 Park Street St. Paul, MN 55103 . 4- I I I I. I: · 2.3 Sub grantee certifies that neither it, its principles, its subcontractors, nor its I /. agents are presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared II ineligible or voluntari1y excluded from participation in the sub grant by any I' Federal department or agency. 2.4 Sub grantee agrees that in the conduct of the Project it will not engage in]1 discriminatory employment practices and will comply with Minn. Stat. {18,1.59 and " I 363.03 (1992)}, subsequent amendments thereto and all applicable rules,. I' 2.5 Sub grantee agrees that in the conduct of the Project it will comply with the I' provisions for workers compensation set forth in Minn. Stat. {176.181-.182 I, (1992), subsequent amendments thereto and all applicable rules. I: II 2.6 Sub grantee shall include in any contract or subcontract such provisions :'as to I I assure contractor and subcontractor compliance with applicable State a1d Federal laws. I I I 2.7 Sub grantee agrees to comply with all applicable local laws in the perforrpance of · I this Agreement. Sub grantee is resp'onsible for obtaining all applicable ~ermits, permission and/or interests in property necessary for the performance 01] this Agreement. It is expressly understood that this Agreement does not in any way alter or diminish Sub grantee's obligation to comply with said laws or to Jbtain said permits or permission and/or property interests. 2.8 In the event of conflict between provisions of this Agreement and the Application, the provisions in this Agreement shall govern. 3. Costs. Ii 3.1 Reimbursable Costs. Ii Eligible costs shall be those costs directly incurred by the Sub grantee i~ preparation of and the actual conduct of the, Project. Eligible shall be baled upon II the approved Application and can include the following types of costs pr?vided 5- · I 1 · I thè~ a,e solely 'elated to and necessery for the completion of the Project: !Advertising costs solely for (1) Recruitment of personnel; (2) Solicitation of bids; 3.1.1 I ! and (3) Disposal of scrap materials; 3.1.2 ¡ Capital and labor expenditures for facilities, equipmèntand other capital assets , ' i I and/or thê maintenance of real or personal property which is the subject of the , , ¡approved Application; 3.1.3 Icommunication costs incurred for telephone calls and postage; i 3.1.4 ¡Materials and supplies; 3.1.5 ¡Freight transportation expenses; and , 3.1.6 "Professional services and administrative costs for the "Project" provided they do I Inot exceed 20% of the total cost of the Project; and \ ¡ 3.1.7 :Land (including permanent easements) whose value does a licensed appraiser 1, ¡establishes and whose conclusions of value are certified by the state. · Anycos:t not defined as an eligible costar not included in the approved Application shall not be paid from the funds received by Sub grantee under this Agreement. ! , 3.2 Non-re;\l1bursable Costs. " i i ' , Non-eligible costs for reimbursement means all costs not defined as eligible costs, , including but not limited to the following: 3.2;1 ! Ariy expenditure that occurs before the effective date of this agreement; ! I 3.2.2 I Fund raising; 3.2.3 ITaxes,except sales tax on goods and services; 1 I 3.2.4 i Insurance, except title insurance; I 3.2.5 ! Attorneys fees; I 3.2.6 ! Loans, grants, or subsidies to persons or entities for i i development; 3.2.7 IBad debts or contingency funds; I · 6,- , , I I I I I i I 3.2.8 Interest; . 3.2.9 lobbyists; 3.2.10 Political contributions; 3.2.11 Wages and expenses of Sub grantee's employees; 3.2.12 Fringe benefit costs of Sub grantee's employees; and 3.2.13 land appraisals. 4.0 Accounting, Audit and Reimbursement. I 4.1 Sub grantee shall maintain books, records, documents, and other eVidenbe pertaining to the costs and expenses of implementing this Agreement to {he extent and in such detail that will accurately reflect the total cost of the pJoject I: and all net costs, direct and indirect, of labor, materials, equipment, supplies, I services, and other costs and expenses. Sub grantee shall use generally I' accepted accounting principles. All records shall be retained for three (3? years after completion of the Project, except that the records shall be retained beyond . that period if audit findings have not been resolved. Sub grantee is authbrized to substitute microfilm copies in lieu of original records. I 4.2 The State, the legislative Auditor, the Secretary of Transportation, the Comptroller General of the United States and any of their duly authorized representatives, shall have the right to examine Sub grantee's books, re~ords, documents, and other evidence and accounting procedures and practicJs, I sufficient to reflect properly all direct and indirect costs. Sub grantee shJII make I available at all reasonable times adequate facilities for such examination:; and audit. I 4.3 Sub gr~ntee shall not, prior to July 1, 2024, at any time convert any propbrty acquired or developed pursuant to this Agreement to uses other than thJse I specified in this Agreement without the prior written approval of Grantor. The Sub 7- . I i , 1 I · I grantee must maintain property developed as per this agreement in a manner \ consistent with the original purpose of this grant. 4.4 ! To obtain reimbursementunderthis Agreement, Sub grantee shall provide I Grantor with sufficient evidence that the costs have been incurred. Grantor will I I make the final determination whether the expenditures are eligible for I reimbursement.under this Agreement and verify the total amount requested. Sub i (grantee shall be limited to no more than four payment requests during the period i !covered by this Agreement. The Financial Management Manual that is attached , ¡as Attachment "C" and incorporated by referenced herein will govern I ireimbursement under this Agreement. I , 4.5 1Prior to reimbursement for land acquisition, the Sub grantee shall submit a I ! ¡certified appraisal for approval by the State for value and the Sub grantee must I 1 'file a perpetual easement with the county recorder and provide a copy of the \ · isame to the Grantor as referenced in Paragraph 1 0.1 herein below for the i 'general public to use the subject property for recreational trail activities. I 4.6 ¡Sub grantee shall submit a final billing wit.hin 60 days of the end of the Project period. Sub grantee shall certify in writing to Grantor that the work as conducted conforms to the approved Application. Said Certification must be filed with 1 I ¡Grantor beforethe Grantor makes final payment. 5.0 Facility:operation and Inspections. 5.1 Sub grantee shall operate and maintain, or cause to be maintained, the property 1 brfacilities acquired and/or developed pursuantto this Agreement. Sanitation 1 and sanitary facilities shall be maintained in accordance with theapplicable I þublic health standards. Properties and facilities shall be kept reasonably safe for publiC use. All State and Federal accessibility laws, regulations and i ! standards shall be adhered to. Fire prevention, lifeguards and similar safeguards , i ! I · 8- I \ 11 and use supervision shall be provided to the extent feasible. Buildings, roads, . trails and other structures and improvements shall be kept in reasonable ~epair throughout their estimated lifetime to prevent undue deterioration and to encourage recreational use of the Project and associated facilities. FailUre to adhere to the requirements set forth in this section may result in the with10lding by Grantor of any current or future payments to Sub grantee related to this or any I other grant project and may result in ineligibility of Sub grantee to receivè any future Federal Recreational Trails Program grants. 5.2 Sub grantee shall keep the facility open to the general public at reasonable hours and attimes of the year consistent with the purpose and type of facility. 5.3 Grantor's authorized representatives shall be allowed to conduct periodiC site visits and inspections to ensure work progress in accordance with this Agreement, including a final inspection upon Project completion. Following closure of the Project, Grantor's authorized representatives shall be alloJed to . I conduct post-completion inspections of the site to ensure that the site is being I properly operated and maintained and that no conversion of use has occurred. . I 6.0 Termination. I If Grantor finds that there has been a failure on the part of the Sub grant~e to I comply with the provisions of this Agreement, that reasonable progress has not , J been made, or that the purposes for which the funds were granted have Inot been I or will not be fulfilled, Grantor may take action to protect the interests of re State of Minnesota and, if applicable, the United States, including, but not limited to, the refusel to disburse edditlonel funds, ,equiring the retum of ell 0' perti0fthe funds already disbursed and/or the retaking' of all equipment and capital !assets purchased by Sub grantee with funds provided to Sub grantee under thil Agreement. 9- . I I i · I I 7.0 Liability. I 7.1 ! Each party agrees thatit will be responsible for its own acts and the résults i I i thereof to the extent authorized by law and shall not be responsible for the acts 10f the other party and the results thereof. The provisions of the Minnesota Tort iClaimsAct, Minn. Stat. Section 3.736, and other applicablé law shall govern the I . . ¡State's liability. ¡ 8.0 Effective Date. I ! 8.1 ¡This Agreement shall become legally effective uponsuch date as it is executed \ ,by the Department of Natural Resources. No reimbursements of this grant will ,be made until this grant document is fully executed. 9.0 Amendlnents. 9.1 ¡This Agreement may be amended in writing by the mutual agreement of Grantor · ! ... ... . . ~nd Sub grantee. i 10.0 Antitrust Provision. ! 10.1 Sub grantee hereby assigns to the State of Minnesota any and all claims for pvercharges as to goods and/or services provided in connection with the ¡ Agreement resulting from antitrust violations that arise under the antitrust laws of the United States and the antitrust laws of the State of Minnesota" For all lands I ! purchased for the Project and reimbursed by the Grantor, the Sub grantee ~grees to grant to the State a perpetual easementfor the general public to use the property for recreational trail purposes 11. Assignment. II 11.1 This Agreement cannot be assigned by Sub grantee without the prior written I 90nsent of Grantor. · 10- I < ¡ r I , I I I . IN WITNESS ¡HEREOF. the parties hereto heve ente,ed into this Agreement intending to be bound thereby. I I I 3.' STATE AGENCY 1 STATE ENCUMBRANCE VERIFICATION 1 , Individual certifies that funds have been encumbered 'as Required by Minn. statl§§ 16A:15 and 16C.OS: . By: (with delegated authority) Signed: Douq Julin Title: Date: ,,',' JÞ~Y , I Date: I ' " " , I OFMS Grant contract No. A- ;s-.1.? U I ! , 2 GRANTEE Tr Grantee certifies that the FPpropriate person(s) H, ve executed the grar¡t cont~act on behalf of the Grantee as re~1Uired by applicable articles) bylaws, resolutions, or ordinances, I . I I . , I I I , I I A tachment A: Application A plicationB: Council Rèsolution A tachment C: Financial ,Management Manual . 12- I Attachment: Yes or No I · REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: March 29, 2004 dministration I RIGINATING DEPARTMENT DEPARTMENT APPROVAL , GENDA ITEM ¡ I ambling Permit I I ~REVIOUS ACTION Jone · COMMENDED BO~RD ACTION i I 1ccept the Gambling ptemisePermit for St. Joseph Parish for an event to be held on July 3-4 at the St. r ephC hUrChG,ro.u n,di,·.,. ...'."..."..",.".".,..'.'. ......... .",..' .. ...",.. ',." . I. . " . ' .,. ' ¡ ISCAL IMPACT I ! OMMENTS/RECOM;MENDA TIONS I I ! · i I I I I I i \ ~~ Minnesota Lawful Gambling Page lof2 06/03 , LG220 Application for Exempt Permit Fee $50 For Board use only . . Fee Paid Organization Information Check No. Organization name Previous lawful gambling exemption number Church of St. Joseph 7361 ð Street (mailing address) City State/zip code . County 12 West Minnesota SL St. Joseph MN 56374 Stearns Name of chief executive officer (CEO) Daytime phone number of CEO First name Last name Include area code Rev. Gregory Miller, OSB (320)363-7505 Name of treasurer Daytime phone number of First name Last name treasurer. Include area,code Bill Lorentz, Trustee ( 3 20:> 363- 7 5 0 5 Type of Nonprofit Organization Check the item that best describes your organization: Fraternal ~ Religious ~ - Veteran ~ Other nonprofit organization Check the item that indicat~s the type of proof your organization attached to this application: _ IRS letter indicating income tax exempt status (501 c designation) ~ Certificate of Good Standing from the Minnesota Secretary of State's Office (must be current _ A charter showing you are an affiliate of a parent nonprofit organization ~proof pr:Yiou~ly submitted and on file with the Gambling Control Board Cathol~cD~rectory . Gambling Premises Information , Name of premises where gambling activity will be conducted (for r~ffles, listthe site where the drawing win take place) Church of St.Joseph, Church and School Grounds . . Address (do not use PO box) City State/zip code County 12 Wes UHi1innesota St. St. Joseph MN 56374 Stearns Date(s) .of activity (for raffles, indicate the date of the drawing)' 3 and 4 July 2004 Raffle Drawing July 4, 2004 Check the item( s) that indicate the typè of gambling activity your organization will be conducting: ~ *Bingo ~ Raffles (cash prizes may not exceed $12,000) X *Paddlewheels -X. *Pull-tabs _ *Tipboards *Equipment for these activities must be obtained from a licensed distributor. ThisJorm will be made available in name and address win be public Board whose work assignment requires alternative format (i.e. large print~ Braille) information when received by the Board. that they have access to the information; upon request. The information requested All the other information that you provide the Minnesota Department of Public on this form (and any attachments) will be will be private data about you until the Safety; the Minnesota Attomey General; used by the Gambling Control Board . Board issues your permit. When the Board the Minnesota Commissioners of (Board) to determine your qualifiætions to issues your permit, all of the information Administration, Finance, and Revenue; the be involved in lawful gambling activities in that you have provided to the Board in the ,Minnesota Legislative Auditor, national and Minnesota. You have the right to refuse ,to process of applying for your permit will international gambling regulatory agencies;' supply the information requested; however, become public. If the Board does not issue anyone pursuant to court order; other if you refuse to supply this information, the you a permit, all the information you have individuals and agencies that are Board may not be able to determine your provided in the process of applying for a specifiælly authorized by state or federal qualifications and, as a consequence, may permit remains private, with the exception law to have access to the information; refuse to issue you a permit. If you supply of your name and your organization's name individuals and agencies for which law or the information requested, the Board will and address which will remain public. I~ al order authorizes a new use or sharing be able to process your application. Private data about you are available only to of information after this Notice was given; Your name and and your organization's the following: Board members, staff of the and anyone with your consent. . I , I Page 20f2 LG220 Application for ExemptPermit 06/03 I ' , ", Organization Name ' . . Local Unit of Government Acknowledgment If the gambling premi~es is within city limits, the If the gambling premises is located in a township, both city must sign this application. the county and township must sign this application. On behalf of the city, 11 acknowledge this application. On behalf of the county, I acknowledge this application. , I Check the action that Check the action that the, city is taki?g on this applicátion. the county is taking on this application. o The city approves ¡the application with no o The county approves the application with no waiting period. i ' waiting period. ' I , o The city approves ¡the application with a 30 day o The county approves the application with a 30 day waiting period, ancl allows the Board to issue a permit after 30 da~s (60 days for a first class waiting period, and allows the Board to issue a permit after 30 days. city). I \ '0 The county denies the application. o The ,city denies th~ application. , Print name of county Print name of city (Signature of city personnel receiving application) (Signature of county personnel receiving application) Title '. ' I Title Date ___L---.!_ . Date----1----!--L. TOWNSHIP: On behalf of the township, I acknowledge that the organization is applying for exempted gambling activity within the township limits. [A township has no statutory authority to approve or deny an application (Minn. Stat. sec. 349.213, subd. 2).] Print name Qftownship (Signature of township official acknowledging application) Titlé Date-----1----1_ hief Executive Officer's Signature he information provided in this application is com lete and accurate tQ. the best of my knowledge. X hief executive officer's ~ignature L ame (please print) IRev. Gregory Date 03 /1:LJ.QL ail Application an',d Attachments t least 45 days prior to Iyour scheduled activity date send: · the completed application, · a copy of your p~oof of nonprofit status, and · a check for $50. Make check payable to "State of Minnesota". Application fees bre not prorated, refundable, or transferable. . ' ., ,I Send to: Gambling Control Board . 171,1 W~st County Road B, Suite 300 South Rosevil!e, MN 55113 I \ i I I I · j I Attachment: 'Yes or No. I i I REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION I Ordinance Amendment - R3 Zoning District I DATE: , 0 GINATING,DEP ~TMENT DEPARTMENT APPROVAL ¡ I I ¡ I ¡ AGENDA ITEM, : fendment toR3 ~n+gD)Smct P VIOUS ACTION ¡ I i B fore the Ordinance was revised in 2003, all R3 Development with greater than 12 units were required · to complete the PUD pr<?cessand secure a special use pennit. The discussion during the Ordinance r~, ision was if a piece of property is zoned R3, it should be allowed to be developed without a hearing p ~cess. The Planning ctommission has realized that the fonner ordinance allowed the City to better m nage R3 property and have conducted a public hearing to revert the Ordinance back to the original fohnat. The hearing no~ice was published and no one present wished to speak. I I COMMENDED COBNCIL ACTION ¡ Accept the recommendation ofthe Planning Commission and adopt the Amendment to Ordinance 52.29 a~ presented in your packet. , F SCAL IMP ACT C MMENTS/RECOMMENDATIONS · AMENDMENT TO ORDINANCE 52 ZONING ORDINANCE The City Council for the City of St. Joseph hereby ordains that Ordinance 52 is amended to · read as follows: 1. That Section 52.29, Subd. 2 (a) ofthe St. Joseph Code of Ordinances is hereby amended as follows: "(a) Multiple family dwelling structures containing more than twelve (12) units shall be allowed pursuant to a Planned Unit Development (PUD) and a conditional use permit, and shall be controlled by the PUD Ordinance, Section 52.09, except that the provision requiring a minimum oftwenty (20) acres will not apply." 2. That Section 52.29, Subd 4, ofthe St.Joseph Code of Ordinances is hereby amended by adding the following section: "(e) Any multiple family dwelling structure of more than twelve (12) units." 3. That Section 52.29, of the St. Joseph Code of Ordinances is hereby amended with the addition of Section 15 consisting of the following language: "Subd. 15: PUD. In the event a developer requests a multiple dwelling structure · containing more than twelve (12) units under Subdivision 2(a) of this Section, that developer shall abide by the requirements set forth in the PUD Ordinance of Section 52.09, except that the provision requiring a minimum of twenty (20) acres will not apply. "( a) lfland is rezoned as an R3-PUD under this Section, a developer shall have no longer than one year in which to begin construction of the multiple dwelling structure. If the project has not begun within one year from the date of rezoning, the land shall revert back to its prior zoning classification before the request for the R3-PUD." These amendments are adopted the _ day of , 2004, and shall be effective upon publication. CITY OF ST. JOSEPH By Larry Hosch, Mayor By Judy Weyrens, Administrator/Clerk These amendments were published on ,2004 · L:\city\stjoe\2004 1 . I' Attachment: Yes or No I REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION ST.rosepbAmerican Legion - Monument Addition I DATE: Aprill, 2004 I i ¡ I ! i i RIGINA TING DEPARTMENT DEPARTMENT APPROVAL I \ jGENDA ITEM ! ,.' I S . Joseph American Leigion Post #328 I ! VIOUS ACTION \ T e City Council authotized the Legion to construct a monument in Memorial Park honoring fallen v terans. The monumeAt was installed and funded fully by the American Legion. I ' .' , , , ' , I . I I I I COMMENDED COùNCIL ACTION i ~I c~t fue llli&capmg rl~Offue..AmWClli.Le~ön llid.uthO=fueaddlôontOfu.epa'k~ea f~lMPACTI C MMENTSffiEcotNDATIONS·. ........ ................ ............................ .. ............i....... ..... .... ......... .. ................................... ~rs matter was sent to the Park Board for review on Monday night. In talking to some of the members o the Board, they did n9t oppose the idea and it was actually part of the plan submitted in the beginning. T. e development was tq occur in two stages, with this being stage two. Unless Dale provides information to the contrary, the City:should accept the donation of the Legion and authorize them to improve the park b sed on the submitted plan. I I . ~ ~ . ic~ I I ~ u ~ . ~~J~ I Æ j . ~.w~l~þ ~ -J~~~j ,~~i j ~ ! j'$$(ltO!Oø 0 . ©ð'5~~ e\JRS©~(Õ tr) .......,..........., '-' ~ "-' '--'......... F '-" I I 1 I I' Attachment: Yes or No I I · I I REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION !SJU/CSB Student Senate -Outdoor Event DATE: Aprill,2004 ! i "I Administration! rømATWGDEP1TMENT DEPARTMENT APPROVAL ~ENDA ITEM I S udent Senate - Ouid+ Event P VIOUS ACTION I 1 I I 1 I , · I RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION Aþprove the Outdoor E+ent License and one day temporary liquo, license for an event to be beld at Centennial Park on MaJ17, 2004. Contingent upon ~ see below. , I I F SCAL IMPACT C MMENTS/RECOMMENDATIONS + atteched £0' deteikl ~the license is granted, ¡the Senate must deposit with the City an amount for the security, p,ovide a sktch plan of the layout and provide a copy of the flyer distributed to neighbors infonning them of the ~'Ient. In addition, the.qity will need to receive a copy of the caterers license for O'Haras and proof of 1 surance. ' · MEMORANDUM · Date: March 30, 2004 To: Honorable Mayor Hosch and Members of the City Council From: Judy Re: Senior Farewell The St. John's Student Senate has requested to book Centennial Park for Senior Farewell on May 7,2004. The plans for the event are as follows: Time of event: 5:00 PM to 9:00 PM Food Service: Catered by St. Ben's Food Service and food will be available between the hours of 5:30 PM and 8:00 PM. Alcohol: O'hara Brothers will be catering the alcohol and it will be available between the hours of 5:00 PM - 8:00 PM. They will only be serving 3.2 Malt liquor. Patrons will only be allowed to purchase · three drinks during this time period and will wear an arm band that will be punched to indicate the number of drinks served. Security: The senate will be required to hire 3 or 4 off duty Police Officers to staff the event. The St. Joseph Police Department will make the arrangements and the senate will pay the actual costs. The area will be fenced so only seniors will be allowed to enter and the gate will be staffed with senate members to assure that only seniors enter. In addition to the main gate, their will be a tent located in the park that will be fenced for security where alcohol can be consumed or purchased. This gate will be staffed with off duty patrol officers. Music: KCLD will provide the music at a reasonable level, the same as íevel as they did for the community picnic. The music will end at 9:00 PM. The student senate will notify the neighbors on Birch Street and Cypress Drive of the event. Cleanup: They will clean the park immediately following the event so that it is ready for the next day when the park is reserved. When the City receives a request to use the park for major events such as this, we increase the damage deposit to $ 500.00. They have been told of the expectations and how the damage deposit could · be affected. ¿ I CITY OfS[. }OSEPJ-I I . www.citydst)oseph.com (. V Ké!-/e If f'e r p. ô. i30~&6 '- CENTENNIAL PARK CO J Uye-Uì((e¡{I"û RESERVATION FORM ;5"'t. "32 ( I Date: ~ ! :Contact Person/Or,ganization: 3&-3~ I ' Administrator Address: 3 S'I./ udy~.yrens I Telephone Number: 1 Mayor I I Larry . I hereby certifY that I have read and understand the park rules andregulationsas listed on the reverse sIde of this form. !further agree that any false statements contained in the application ort failure to follow park rules will result in the forfeiture of the damage deposit, I , termination' of the shelter rental agreement, and rejection of future applications for park shelter rentalf On behalf of lyse If and the organization that I represent~ I agreeto indemnify and hold harmless the [City of St.Joseph, its agents or employees, from any claims, injuries, or damages an9 all occurrences resulting from or relating to the use of the said CityPark whether occr1ng on the ~ off premises. Ie ~ I~ ~ . YZ:7/t1+= S¡g",~ I~ Date ì/?A("r - . ! FOR OFFICE USE ONLY $1 ~ $oo.Op Date '~I Refundable Damage De os it f ' $63.90 I Non-Refundable/Non-Transferable Rental Fee Eq~ipmenl JheCknSI: Damage De os It Returned L Stove Refrigerator , ,,' 6 ;. Picnic Tables (Indoors) ", 3+ Picnic Tables (Outdoors) Horseshoes VolIevbaII Key Returned ' I NOTE: Pe'k ¡ISO fealures ,unning wale" restrooms, end elecl,iclty. ie I I 2.~ College ^ver~ue North' PO I:'>ox bbs ·Stiint. Joseph. Minnesota rb,74 rhO"' '20·'&'·729' I'" '20.'&'.014' ,Order of St. Benedict Collegeville, Minnesota 56321 PURCHASE ORDER No. 92095 . (Conducting S1. John's Abbey and St. John's University and St. John's Preparatory) DATE o St. John's Abbey o Bookstore SHIP TO: g'St. John's University o Liturgical Press DEPARTMENT o St. John's Preparatory o Alcuin Library v o Food Service FEDERAL JD # 41-0693973 TAX EXEMPT # 8339951 I V<~ O{ ~~. ~Úkp~ I IMPORTANT INSTRUCTIONS , 0 \ :::> o'¥. (Q ~9 1. INVOICE IN DUPLICATE TO: 0S-CùlL~Tf'W€-.V: . ORDER OF ST. BENEDICT, INC. COLLEGEVILLE, MN 56321 L sl· cr6~P YnÑ Sb~1 'f 2. ORDER NUMBER AND DEPART- -1 MENT MUST APPEAR ON ALL SHIPMENTS AND INVOICES. Quantity Description - òúm~ ~~tt 9)0·Ct) VfJl ~l. ':t e e- (j; 3 .<:[,-0 . APP~Y VENDOR COpy ~¿¡/~ . '- I I Attachment:iYes or No I I . i I REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Sand Cpmpanies - Amendment toCompPlan & Rezoning DATE: i RIGINATING DEPARTMENT DEPARTMENT APPROVAL 1 i ! I TENDATfEM I S nd Companies - MO~ingSide Acres Development 1 VIOUS ACTION I 1 I e Pla~nin,g Commiss~on cons,idered this matter in Fe~ruary and Mar~h. Part oft?e plan~or Sand ompallIes mclude semior housmg and work force housmg, both of whIch are multIple famIly. The ~ropreheosive Plan doþ' not include any R3 zoning in this area. The Planning Cormnission agreed 'Vith t e concept plan, but has not seen the preliminary plat yet. The Planning Commission has concerns with d signating an area for R3 without considering a specific plan. ill reaction to this concern, the Plannmg ~ommissionis recomm~ndingthe Council amend the R3 Zoning district to require all R3 development . f¡ roo\<)ban 12 unitslte secure a special use pennit and complete the PUD process. This action was p aced on the consent agenda for adoption. The City Attorney has previously stated that zoning cannot be c nditional, either a site! is suitable for a particular zoning district. The resolùtion to this is requiring a d velopment plan that ca.n be approved and if the development is not constructed the zoning reverts back t the 'original zoning cl~ssification. i .. I I COMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION ~ccept the reconnneriJtion of the P!annmg Cormnission ;nnendingthe Comprehensive Plan as requested amd Zoning Momingsi& Acres a combination of RI and R3. The Council also considered a special use a d PUD application to tallow the construction of the R3 StrUctures. However, since a plan was not s bmitted, the PlanningiCommissioned denied the request. F SCAL IMPACT \ COMMENTS/RECOM~ENDATIONS ! 1 A more detailed resolution will be forwarded tomorrow . I I I i I I. Attachment: Yes or No I (. I I I I REQ~ST FOR,PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION Pub'icHeåring -' Comprehensive Plan ,Amendment I DATE: MarchI, 2004 i ¡ AGENDA ITEM i ' plblic Heariog - coJ.hensive Plan Amenchnent \ ' "! I ' 'i " , , PfVIOUS ACTION \ ' T e Planning Cornmissiþn has been approached by two developers, Rick Heid/Bob Herges and Sand C mpanies, to construc~ R3 housing in developments located adjacent to County Road '121. Heid/Herges:Requested to construct a R3 structure on the portion of the Walz property that abuts the Wilshire Apartments. The remaining development will consist of single family homes. I. ".'.. " " .' '. .... . " .:', . . , The Planning Cþrnmission at the January 5,2004 viewed the proposed concept plan and authorized the hearing for the amendment. , ' Sand Companies: Requested to construct workforce housing on the southern portion of the (. property knownl as Morningside Acres. The housing will be attached single family home with income qualific?-tions. I I COMMENDED PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION I ! i CfMMENTS/RECOM~ENDATIONS, ' 1c process for amendiJgthe Comprehensive Plan is newto the Planning Commission. Previous C mprehensive Plansdi!d not include future land uses. The process for reviewing Development requests inf"de the impact to th~ Comprehensive Plan. If the proposed development is not consistent ~th the C mprehensive Plan a public hearing is requested. Procedurally, we are requiring that the Planning I C mmission determine if a request for public hearing will be accepted. The property owners abutting the PfPerly within 350 fee~ have been ootiftcd of the proposed amendment. In reviewing sectioo ei~t (Heid/H~geS), the only R3 illustrated on the future land Use map is adjecenÚo 9 th Avenue and behind the single family homes on County Road 121. ill reviewing section thirteen, a section abutting CR 1211 from the St. Joseph Township Hall extending to the Sauk River is proposed for R development. ¡ \ ! i B , th of the requests bef?re the Commission abut either existing R3 or future R3 land use. (. I \ ¡ I , www.cityofstjoseph.com ity ofSt~Jo$e'Ph I ' . ¡ . I I I I City of St. Joseph I ¡ Public Hearing 25 College Avenr North ¡ PO Box 668 The 81. Joseph Planning Commission will be conductin~'a public hearing on Monday, March St. Joseph. MN(374 1,2004 at 7:00 PM inthe CitY Hall. The purpose, of the hearingis to consider amending the (320) 363.7201 future land ~se map for Planning District 8 and 13. The proposed amendment would allow Fax: (320) 363·0342 multiple fa1þily dwellings in sáid Districts. The amendment is being requested to allow for ADMINISTRATOR mixed densfty developments. Judy Weyrens 1 I An personslwishing to speak will be heard and oral testimony will be limited to 5 minutes. MAYOR Anyone wi~hingto present written testimony may do so by submitting testimony to: City of Larry J. Hosch 81. Joseph, fO Box 668, 81. Joseph MN 56374. COUNCILORS Alan Rassier Judy Weyrens I Ross Rieke Administrator , Gary Utsch Dale Wick Publish: F~bruáry 20, 2004 0 -.'''''.... . - i Plannir;'9 District 8 ~ .. . I I I .¡ I ¡ D r ... '. \ I ) /i('\¡ I' (,'.',.'./ !! ~¡ \r~ I 1 I j ¡ ¡ i I ! I l ~ i I " I !ï t--j j ¡ , \ ! l! I I I ¡ i 1 I Z l'! -:; 1----1 I i ! .¡ i ! ¡ .~. In' <.i hi· . ~ ~~II z!z z II-I < ~~ I -: c> w :E ~ ~U~ I II! Ii ~ ~ ~ ~ Æ I '7 ~ ~ !I!~ ~ ¡ul l~ I « z ::) 9 (fJ : Ü " , ~ Ii i g i~5i~' . (f) ~ 0 llJ Q lib III š I!hl liM 8 I ~ ~ ,,/19 / lõ " I (I) ~ /// I~I tfF'r=' :~,>.'". // / : ~ / w C' . //// I: . . // , / , , / I Z· / Ü ! /4 Z ¡ ~ //,h/ (J) ~ I ~ / ~:.)~! /', ..c::. I " (,</ i -1 0 <C I ~ I ¡ ::::2: ILL -< œI \ ~Ct:w \ ~ ~,." I ~~g I ! 2(J)(J) ! ('-J ¡ I ! I:L I I I ! ! ¡ (J) I ! ¡ 0~ \. W (f) I' I \ u,W I ¡ r- V) I ¡ ~¿ ! i ! --1 I Lu,--,--,----,----------------i 0 0 ! ! I I' I ! i I ¡ ! ZOrn 11' , I :> _ Vi [-----..-----------------------..-,j " :> I- I- I ! ! '\ O<CO ! : 0 ~ 1-~-1 1 1 ", <.D I ! ::. ~ I 1------------- "9' 0-J CD OJ I ¡ .~~ n ~ N I ~ I ; I .1----- ~ 'c' i \ ~ ~ \__n_________________________ :", ..9_..", ,û-.O>\ 2 L-----------------____ ! ~ ~ 0! ~ ¡f) I ¡::: ;:) N ..- ¡ I z i g ~.. g \ ~O-.19ì..... \6,·....0 I ~ ! G ~ I U) ~--------------------------- ~ N b ('.-J "<t I '0 ..-- .r ! :: ! = '1 1 3. í Co ~ ~-------n------------n----- 'EoA' _0' 'c 0 , ! I : = ~?7 ~ 't~c ~ I- '.. /" ~ ~----------------------------.- / f .0- .OV i . . l ~_ n:::¡¡ I 2 // ,. . I ~/~/ / i--'---------------------------- '", .-&7 / / ..0 ,£e j ..0 ,çg .o-,m . I / I . I J i ";n / ,m Of , I ~./ f .i! "0 // ) §?/ CO '",I c ,., .q r-·---------------- / / / f'. '0 31 U! ~ '" I / / I '. ß ,6£1 / j . 0 I /' I .1 I / r-.. . ( ,0-:£9' I 0- 06 , ", to ! I I I I! ~O ,n: 7 ~---h~-------~--------l i . I ¡ ~ i I I I I I ¡ ,o-.m , IiI I i I I iL I! i ! ¡ N -----__________________--,--__J ¡¡I I I' ¡ ¡ I I I I I I I I l' ..O-,Çïll 1 I I I ~ I I I ! I I I i ~ I 1__n_____________L..n____...L Ii. .o-,m I -.-.--....--.-'-'-'...-.----------.----.-.------------..--.-,---.-,..,-.-.-----..-, .--.-.-------.-,-- I 6l~ Joll1 S l NOIl::J3S t / IMS 3NIl 153M I I I ¡ . . . i APPLICATION EORiPLAN NINGCONSI DERATION CITY OF ST.-JOSEPH (e 25CqllegeÄvenueNW ~:~d$ P.O. Box 668 Receipt # Date St.Joseph, MN56374 (320)363-7201.. or Fax (320)363-0342 sITE OF MINNESOTA ))5S C1UNTY OF STEARNS) I'/jME: · Sand~es,InC PHONE: 320.,202-3l00 A~DRESS: 366 south~Oth Ave' POBox 727 Waite Park, MN 56387 ' I~e. the undersigned, hereby makeithe following application tothe City Council and Pianning Commission of the City ofSt.Joseph, Steams County. MiÓnesota.. (Applicants have the res'ponsibility of checking all applicabie ordinances pertaining to their application and complying with all ordinance re uirements): ", ,I 1. Application is hereby made for: (Applicant must check any/all appropriate items) I ' , " . ". -4--' Rezoning ! _ Zoning Ordinance Amendment ~ Home Occupation Permit 1 I _ Surface Water ~anagement Plan (Grading Permit) _ PUD _ Building Mover's Permit _ Building Moving ~ Owner's Permit ----' DevelopmentPlan Approval _ Ottier, please specify: I (e 2. legel~escripjlon ofland to be affectedby"pp,lic~tion, including acreage or square footage, of land inv,ol,ved, and street address, ifany: Outlot A J10rmnqslde Acres 21 acres " .. ¡... .-- i 3. Present zoning of thea~ove described property is: Aq 4. Name, address and phqnenumber oUhe present owner of the above described land: Sand ~roperties;r Inc. 366 South lOth, Ave PO Box 727 Waite Park., :MN 56387 320..,..202..-31001 5 Persons, firms, corporations or other than applicant and present owner who mayor will be interested in the above described land or 'proposed improvements within one year. after issuance of permit applied for, if granted, are: :;3ame .., I ' i 6 Attached to this application and ma a part thereof are additional material submission data requirements, as indicated; ! pplicant Signature: Date: wner Signature: Date: DATE SUBMITTED: DATE COMPLETE: DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING PUBLICATION DATE: Planning Commission Action: 1_ Recommend Approval _ Recommend Disapproval Date of Action: Date Applicant/Property Owner notified of Planning Commission Action: I . City Council Action: ---L Approved . ___ Disapproved Date of Action: ( Date Applicant/Property OwnEir notified of City Council Action: i p' - APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL USE PERMIT CITY OF ST. JOSEPH .. Fee $ ( ,25 College Avenue NW Paid · P. O. Box 668 . Receipt # St. Joseph, MN 56374 Date (320)363-7201 or Fax (320)363-0342 STATE OF MINNESOTA) )ss COUNTY OF STEARNS) NAME:. Sand Propertìes,::r:nc PHONE:. 3?o:':'?rr?:'-:3Tno :-... ., -." - . ADDRESS: 366 South lOth Ave PO Box 727 'Waite ?ð.1:k, ':MNS638T I/We, the'undersìgned, h~reby make the following applicafionto the City Council and Planning Commission of the City of St Joseph, Steams County, Minnesóta. (Applicants have the respoñsibility of checking all applicable ordinances pertaining to their application and complying with all ordinance requirements): . ~ 1. Application- is hereby made for Special Use Permit to conduct the following: Dewlo{' 21' àcre~ for 2Q' ~ingle ~J.da5It.âwo~~g~¡¡¡f/ObCJIœt/~mî:~Q to â~â'.~ldf3St~~ for . ,e ¡r. or ousmg, 1. ' egap 1.n e " . 0 ." oeep .- 2. Legal description of land to be affected by application, including acreage or square footage of land involved, and street address, if any (attach additional sheet if necessary): Outlot A M::>rrrinqsíde Acres I · 3, Present zoning of the above described property is: Aa - - 4. N~at~~Æ~~~1f:e~~~w~6gtt~o~~e11f~eÂ~¡gpeWdsEux ~~~ 727 ~Jttite P~, J:~ 56387 5. Is the proppsed use compïible .with pre~ent and future laQd uses o~e 9.îa? Please l~in:, tí:t' 1 . YèS s1.llgèê fa:rm. y 1.5 'ádJa~ to s1.llgle a:mJ. y use, . ..' dens1.ty 1IIl1.L -:-. anu. y 1.S south oj: proposed street, next to vacant~pe:t?tY:11l the 'l'C:MnS.Sip and Park 6. Will the proposed use depreçi?te the areq in which it is proposed? Please ex:plain:. . No we are propos:æmg 29 s.1.Ilgle farro..ly lots: that,a.dJo.tnother s:lI1gle fa:mJ.ly use. 'Ihe proposed lower density multi....famìly is to tf¡e South 7. Can the proposed use be accommodated with existing City service without overburdening the system? Explain: yes;, accordlDng to Ci:ty staff services are ad.eqeate to accomodate ,our' DroDOsal. 8. Are local streets capable of handling traffic which is generated by the proposed use? Please explain: Yes, with recent uparaàes to Countv'Road 121, thís should not be a Droblern \ · . .-.. ! ¡ Attached to this application and made;a partthereofare ()ther material submission datarequirements, as ,indicated. - el, 40<f- Applicant Sirature: Date: Owner Signa ure: Date: FOR OFFICE USE ONLY ATE SU'MfTTE!> ~ DATE '"",,l£TE: i DATE DF PUBUG HEARING PU'ue,"ION DA1E: Planning Commission A lion; _ Recommend Approval _ Recommend Disapproval Date of Action; Date ApplicantJProperty wner notified of Planning Commission Action; I- I' City Council Action: _ Approved l Date of Action; ______ [!Isapproved Date Applicant/Property Owner notified of City Counel,1 Action: I I. ( - . I . Public Hearing City of St. Joseph TheSCJ~seph Planning Commission shall conduct a public hearing on Wednesday,. MaJ."ch 24,2004 at 7:20 PM. The purpose ofthe hearing is to consider rezoning the property I described below as Rl, Single Family and consider a special. use permit to allow the property to be dev~loped with mixed density. The property is legally described as: Outlot A of I . .. Momings¡ide Acres. I The requ¿st for rezoning and special use has been submitted by Sand Companies; 366 _lOth Avenue; to Box 727, Waite ParkMN 56387. I I i Judy WeJirens Adminis#ator . ~~m.n,. \ 3 ROPOSED SITE . I ! ¡ WEST LINE SWI/4 SECTION 15 T124 R29 ------- ----------- -_...--..---------_._----_._--~"'---_..._-------------_.._---------- 12'-0 T-----¡-------, ~ I I I I I I ~. - I I I \ I ' I q \ I I I I I m'- . I I I I I II I I I \ I !: I \ \ I I r--L---...,-----,' I i. N I I I I \ I I I . I I \ I I I I I 125'-0' I I I I I \ j I I ~ I I I \ I ~----_----'---I I œ b 23'-0' I I 7- (.,. . ~ I I o. b I I 139'-0' . _ _ I I œ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -----------1 I (II ..þ. ~q q 0 1 I h. q \ I '2 '-0' 85'-0' 65'-0' I I ------------1 I I I I I I I -----------~ § \ I X I I ~ I I'" \ ------------¡ :!: I I~I i ~ I. ¡¡ \~I ;:::; ó, ___________..1 VI I I ~ I ,.,'.0' I 51 I:: \ ~ 1"'\ -----------1 ... \ ~ I Z; ~ . I ~·I ç !, I 13 I 6 1><"6' I '" I ------------1 I I I ~ I I I .þ. I \ I \" ¡ -----------1 i " ! . I I ,,! I I I -"VJ ) I I I OJ N '\ ------------1 \ I I I I I u - ~ I. I II I »0 ç \ " ' I I -f:::2: z \ 1:------------.-1 I I - 0 I I I I OZ I \ I I I I I II I) I I I II I - I / I I I I 0 0 if r--------;----î I I.s:C \ \ I I I I [Tl(f) \ I ~ I I I I (f) [Tl I \ N I II II 1 (f) I \ . 1\ \ t I I I I I \ ~ I I I I I I \ I I , I \ I (f):5: I N \ I ~ F- 11 \\/...--...---..---- _.-·-·--'-----l,Z;·l-ã'v'o~")JNnõ5'------------------- /' .;.--- .. I 0 - I I /' ..----. II :::0 ;: I! /// ./../...-- I ./ . I -rn' :5: y' / I' '* I_ I /: ./ I s:,o r I /, ' ./ I -"-,C -< r , · / I r (f) I Y I Z Y'/I I C) . I ./ I () ~~~~~ ~g~~~ ~ ~, ~~~~ ~ ~ o· liïfl:lð~'" O!!:Qm(IJ 11) (9 if~°6: ~~ ~ en m 0 a ~øQ 8g§~~ ~ ~~~ri ~[ ~ w ~ :-I < . š: ~. ~~~ i5~Q~~ ;g ¿~~m ~.~ ~§~. ~ ::: . c...mI-o ~.. ~~~~fj ª U~3 ~~n~~~ ~ o r Q.»cn 2~~"ti~ :z :i~~~ ~7:3w..;.¡..c§. ~ (f) I Cf) 0 C Z » ~~ ~~~~~ ~ E~~~ ,~~~~~:;¡ 'ª I m ..,..,C/)Z "<w -¡mOm ,,>-<- '>.'>..., '<,~ ~ '" I I"T"'I '-' 'm B~ ñI~ªQ U1=:::~ r':I,~::¡~ ~;:j So ~~ ~ " ~ V m - '0 ð ;:r!-oÕ ~~~~ ~ ~~~W......;: , ' I ::Þ",Z en- , mm~2:¡ !:>:n. ~~_w,¡Qc,"C ~. ~ G) - ' ~~~~ ~~~~ §§~~~ ~ ~ ,==- m _~gž~ ~~!*J~ ~. ã' ;j ~ ~,~ ., :::::.. Z Z -:zc:Pm-lñ¡¡:(') .. ~ ::: ' Z () ;¡~~-I »~-<~ g ~ ~ --I 2~-<ffi gj' ~ Si,=: . '~ 0 '~ i I I Attachment: Yes or No I · REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Foxmore Hollow - Development DATE: Administration GINATINGDEPAR MENT DEPARTMENT APPROVAL Fo more Hollow - Devel6pment issues I I P VIOUS ACTION Th Planning Commissiov considered this matter in February and March: . Part of the plan for Foxmore Ho low included an R3,structure. The Comprehensive Plan does not include anyR3 zoning in this area.. It I as the opinion of Heiclmerges, that with Wilshire Apartments adjacent to this property, it made sense to 50nstruct an R~ struct~~e.!h~y do not ~el.ieve they could ~ell Rl structures on thi~ portio~ of the plat. W en they submItted the prehmmary plat, It mcluded a 23 umt apartment complex wIth multIple be rooms. The plan did ~ot seem to fit the neighborhood and the n~ighbors objected. Heid and Herges . ha e withdrawn that plan but would like to pursue a different type ofR3 use. The Planning Commission did recommend the Counblapprove the amendment to the Comprehensive Plan, R3 and Rl Zoning and me t with the neighbors tp discuss-the new plan. The Planning Commission also agreed to allow FmfmoreHollow to be d~veloped as a PUD and granted reliefonth,e ?epth ofthe lots as they are ,only 120 feet. The PUD was recommended as the lots meet or exceed the mInImUm square footage and wIth wi 1 ths are far greater than 75 feet. I I i COMMENDED CO#' ClL ACTION Ac ept the recommendat on of the Planning Commission amending the Comprehensive Plan as requestejd an1 ZOning MomingstdeAcres a cornbinatioo ofRI and R3 and ap )tove the Preliminary pIal including. th reduced lot depth. ' I C MMENTS/RECOM~ENDATIONS ore detailed resolution will be forwarded tomorrow . I www.cityotstjoseph.com itg 0iSt. Jose¡tn I I (e I i I I City of St. Josèph Public Hearing 25 College Avenue N ,rth PO Box 668 The St. Joseph Planning Commission will be conducting a public hearing on Monday, March! St. Joseph. MN 56374 1,2004 at 7:00 PM in the City Hall. The purpose of the hearing is to consider amending the .(320) 363.7201 future lànd use map for Planning District 8 and 13. The proposed amendment would allow Fax:: (320) 363·0342 multiplefamil)f dwellings in sàid Districts. The amendment is being requested to allow for ADMINISTRATOR ' mixed density developments. . . I Judy Weyrens All persons wi~hing to speak will be heard and oral testimony will be limited to 5 minutes. . MAYOR Anyone wishirig to present written testimony may do so by submitting testimony to: City of Larry J. Hosch 8t: Joseph, POiBox 668, St. Joseph MN 56374. COUNCILORS Alan Rassier Judy Weyrens I Ross Rieke A.dministrator] Gary Utsch i . Dale Wick Publisb:. FeblaI)' 20,2004 ...... ] 0 -I' I e i I Planning District 8 Þ- I ... Ie ( I Attachment: Yes or No I . REQUEST FOR PLANNING COMMlSSION ACTION Public Hearing - Comprehensive Plan Amendment DATE: March 1, 2004 AGENDA ITEM Public Hearing - Comprehensive Plan Amendment PREVIOUS ACTION The Planning Commission has been approached by two developers, Rick HeidIBob Herges and Sand Companies, to construct R3 housing in developments located adjacent to County Road 121. HeidlHerges: Requested to construct a R3 structure on the portion of the Walzproperty that abuts the Wilshire Apartments. The remaining development will consist of single family homes. The Planning Commission at the January 5, 2004 viewed the proposed concept plan and authorized the hearing for the am~ndment. Sand Companies: Requested to construct workforce housing on the southern portion of the I property mown as Morningside Acres. The housing will be attached single family home with . income qualifications. RECOMMENDED PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION COMMENTSIRECOMMENDATIONS The process for amending the Comprehensive Plan is new to the Planning Commission. Previous Comprehensive Plans did not include future land uses. The process for reviewing Development requests include the impact to the Comprehensive Plan. If the proposed dèvelopment is not consistent with the Comprehensive Plan a public hearing is requested. Procedurally, we are requiring that the Planning Commission detennine if a request for public hearing will be accepted. The property owners abutting the property within 350 feet have been notified of the proposed amendment. In reviewing section eight (HeidlHerges), the only R3 illustrated on the future land use map is adjacent to 95th Avenue and behind the single family homes on County Road 121. In reviewing section thirteen, a section abutting CR 121 from the St. Joseph Township Hall extending to the Sauk River is proposed for R3 development. Both of the requests before the Commission abut either existing R3 or future R3 land use. (, . 2 ~ Kî,..,Çt ~ - I i~ I 1\'1.)YI.Çl ~] ! ~ § 1 ~ ~ ~!I i§I!!~811~~ bª= ~ B i!f ¡fld~Î:::~ j<d ª ! I, ~~! i':¡fZo~.'!~~ ~ ~..~ ¡¡; II! I '!u~~~h:n . §'lj ~ § § :59 !!. !'õ'õ·¡:¡~::"h~ Þi~ 0 II ~r§ ~ -gi~~:I:-2~T! 'I¥-. 10 ~~ãa l:~15&1'õ8~ 1 eld . &2~ ~l ~~ ! ..'.q- r-f tiil!lUai 0 o. 'ii; '~.,..., !"~I!"f'õ~"'§ '" ." ~ 1- ""~æ .,.,.,... ;,,1.00 .. t~. I~J';¡ -\- :' . .'... : ... ' . . "_ "l ~ II;¡; . .. '. '.'-- ". ..-.' .r: ~:5 ~ 01%-21;0 f5 i :.'..,', .,.,".'; ~r <>'õi]r~~!~!j :s 0, 8 ~ 3 m '.. . n§~"jl!"¡¡¡~ ¡¡ ::! :;¡ .J\ <-. ~.. Œg:Cšri õ';;š ~wz~ '-11 ,...,: )# .~i'8::J!..~18Š.t; ~~::£ª , ,'< , ].hti·Eloja·· ~"''('6 (\.. ~ f11,$., ¡1111:7' 0,,,,,,, 'õHu:Lh¡¡J 1 '" ~iEg~ -~ ~,<. W .:-~'~-.~- tl _C' i co ~J Lil 5_.J ,-<- f.. -¡'*>£- ~$'" "~8.~î~6~ ~ !!-O~ ~Ii:··¡;<>".é z" 0 ~g¡t;;t? , h¡:J'õ~~.tlhi '] - ~ ~ ,1:S-:1-~"'õ-'õ'õ . ~ ~ Iâ ~U-f~Hi ~ ¿ tl z ! "'~"''õ~g8'~'' ¡o; "'~æ ~ b~ ~~!~;o"o~ <.1 c: !j!U!;,.l~!j ~ I I hi' i f;¡~~Ll ¡:¡~ ~ 8 ". Ä@@ ) ~$i'õf~Jihl:·· ~ I . šj~l~i~:sQl 'õËE~"at~p~ . , j" h¡-§'¡¡.. j·r I .' "'1!~~j2 gù!.. _"I.5gÎ$l$¡! ~ ) fÜH 8J~~'õ ~~i l~"~OI . -"-"-"-"-"-"_"1 ~~Š§§'õË"8~¡ ." -- ~z x M g. ! Ii - . , , ,,0 ~ l" $'" hJ -II" , - >+-:;>:-- -x----;:::>-r' ' '-J I 'õl"~;&"JU; J '(1~:J ~ m:oN ''V·s·:).¥. \ ....... I ~ H!;?;:.¡¡r ~'.I!~ :.. /' \ ' "'J i5t- ~i"~8g N ......cr, .......1 . ~'1§.&g,1~H"g "'~:¡ r I m.....v;:...J '/--- § \:)-~ iJ ~J-:i-.. 8 oJ" ¡:wt ,............( .,.......', I I ~ ~-1,¡!5~ §,,'õ ~iõ;; (/ "".1 ~ I "" I ~ !~$!~'õ}~~i~ "'~ "..........,·1<;, I 15~ f.. m, a I!j '" I I I g d'õ~HJ~h~ 5~~~__ì J I ~x J~§ \ l~x : _ w! T-J., :i~~: . I ~ g¡¡¡¡; %' \ I I ~¡¿ /' ~ S _1.___1 i~tI ð; ~. oi '2 I \ I I -;~s / I § --_"'_, ;r¡¡!~¡¡ I I ~ ~I.. ~\f ¡ '.' /1" t¡i9~tI N w __:..1 x., ' .' leI W!. 13 : I ! ~ I I I f·....··.,., 1 / I j ~; I "~;r ~ ~ ~ I 1 I ¡ ~ I U_ -'" 1. i! r - - ¡ ·!I IIIB. ~.'-J oj I /: rlo~ , \ -,I I J I I I J ~ x xµ,~ '" ~ ~ u . ~, _ ~ I!! ~~$~ ~ L - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - A I "'¡; -~ ' .1 I ~' 9 N I ~\!;~~t ~ 1 II :~~~'.DI~ I I C(I'J 0 ~ ~t ~~ g W SI1.~ Q){--./ Z 0 w~~1- a. I ::z~_ov) <r- oe( 0 ZOIO....\& ........ -.::lì2i _ . . ...:J I ""_0:; a ""~ I W~D,=I" /-+ :« ~ w &;<"'''1:: ¡:-'l ... ~"'.. I ~.. 5!r~V) ~o: l; 13 ñ,... o ~ 0) 0 ù.. w.....z . ..-- 0 _ ~. fa u ~ , zg.z~o iõ°w~ Î ! ~- -- ¿ I z :3 I- i ~ª¡:" i. ~ '\. z IJ) 0 " w ~vi ..ð -~ x ,...;,... x- I \:) ~ -J :z~ .... ot\ .s> ~ .~.~ VI- ...c a:: :J.,.TÓ Q J! J>. r. --1-- fu ~ ~ IS 0t;;:'W \ ~ ~ '\ Î'\ . .,. '" Z Ii:. -; ,,~¡:;¡¡¡¡; \ x x x _ \ I l a=> ~1'1 ~__-<r--4 I ........... ~8~ eLl: ~ ~, ì "__ I __ 3 ~~~ è3 J!.....~~\ ~I ~/ . __I /. r If) ~o: ~ ß ~ ~ "-, ì <-,o81 __ ~ -- . I()f.~:! ~ ,...¡ z ã I" ~-: __ x .ç~ 0) ."r () ..., u ~ 0 N ," ,__ ~.. ~ I " "N I w~-~ <;).>\0- 'f, __ -- __ _-,,,,.- I ~ I t;; >-<8 ß ¡J iõê~t Ii; , - ....... -- - 11.1 '" ~ \!;!¡!;; I -- 'f" ~ m r - - o w;t;1- rr)' ~ I ~ ~ f€~ I ~~~~~~ ~ Q:: alE : CD ~ ,-@ ~~ 1,..;;;;1 I :1:: ~ ~~- ~ N -- ~N "'...;. If) FOZ.,. .. 92',' ~~~5 t;¡ I ([ :i:~ wot&.~ Lt.I t) , š:g~~ / ~ ~ ¡i:¡ -~ '" æ C( ~~~¡; /......,... ;:¡;; _ _ VJ J- ~... -t ~~ ~ ~ Iw....~ ",:i '" ,¡:I", '" ~~ "''' ~~ ~\!;iõ;; ~ ~~~ \ ~- x I~¡¡¡~ 1/ 2 í __~i ~ ~ / -- ~ . ~ I ~ r ~ L = c '" -, ~ '\. ~ x I ---, ¡ <. II '" f- \- _ R x w :.., ¡:~ \ ~Y'"~X _______ ~~~a: . ~ I - Lr.~~~ I ~ I ;111&; . æ I t2 @if ~;~~ ~ i Z . ~ ~:;¡¡¡¡¡; r .'à': IF - - _ _ _ _ Ww @ .. I;:; 1~¡1 ~ l " 8 <It::.,;:: ....... 0 I a::_ c( ~r-. . 0 ~ ...~ I l'i l.z g I . NO CO i.! .. r..o,¡ ;:k~ ~d ~!~ N : ~~~!i ¡q ~!¡¡ c~ ~~E I I ~;~ ~ I ~ ~: Zz ~~ð. ~Mz ~ I 15~ I:~¡;¡ I I iJ¡¡¡¡¡~~ I; I ~~ I ~..~ I . ,. ¡i ~ I ~~ 7 ¡I/ I -, <t:.-..r ¡...:::-.' -" - ,. -., -.. - ,. -,. -., -, ·Og',;.- '. _.' _..~.._.. -.' _i. -.. - ,. -. '-" J,...~::::~/. _.. _.. _ I /.... . i ··'~·.M~" (a) Hi. .9r,lt.oo N ../' .............. i¡ (W) M-.lO,£t.1O N .... .... 8 .~n_.~'_ Çg'L~t Nt. ..l.O,t"t.IO Ii h.. ,..: W . co o ~ <> (I) . · Public Hearing City of St. Joseph The S1. Joseph Planning Commission shall conduct a public hearing on Wednesday, March 24,2004 at 7:20 PM. The purpose ofthe hearing is to consider rezoning a portion of the property described below as Rl, Single Family, a portion of the property R3, consider a special use permit to allow the property to be developed with mixed density and consider a preliminary plat for a development to be called Foxmore Hollow. The property is legally described as: The South 25.5 acres of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter (SW II. NW II. ) of Section Fifteen (15), in Township One Hundred Twenty-Four (124) North, of Range Twenty-nine (29) West, in Stearns County, Minnesota, LESS AND EXCEPT the Southerly 30 feet of the Northerly 1834 feet of the Easterly 660 feet of the West One-half of the Northwest Quarter (W Y2 NW If.) of Section Fifteen (15), in Township One Hundred Twenty- four (124) North, of Range Twenty-nine (29) West, ALSO LESS AND EXCEPT the Easterly 435 feet of the southerly 600 feet of the Northerly 1102.18 feet of the Southwest Corner of the Northwest Quarter (SW If. NW If.) of Section Fifteen (15), in Township One Hundred Twenty-four (124) North, Range Twenty-nine (29) West, ALSO LESS AND EXCEPT that part of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter (SW '!. NE II.) of Section Fifteen (15), in Township One Hundred Twenty-four (124) North, Range Twenty, nine (29) West, in Stearns County, Minnesota, described as the follows. To-wit; Beginning at · the West Quarter comer of said Section 15; thence North 00 degrees 14 ' 36" West on an assumed bearing along the West line of said Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter )SW II. NW II.) a distance of 841.50 feet to its intersection with an existing fence line; thence North 89 degrees 07' 27" East along said fence line a distance of 260.00 feet, thence South 00 degrees 47" 36" East a distance-of 845.47 feet to its intersection with the South line of said Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter (SW If. NW If.); thence West along said South Line a distance of260.02 feet to the point of beginning, subject to township and right of way, all being in Stearns County, Minnesota. The request for rezoning and special use has been submitted by Bob Herges and Rick Heid, , 25 - 11 th A venue North, S1. Cloud MN 56303 Judy Weyrens Administrator · · · · ~ > .~ '" '" ¡: '" ¡¡¡ c: ~" . ""~ ~ 2 ~ IN"" ~~ o.¡ ~ ~B§ ~ ~ _ T"" (t) ~~ 9 - ~ . ~ U~ ~ ~ ~ ~ j i ,.... ~~ ~ ~ !' ~ ~ ~~a ~ B ~ ~ . "'" ~~ ~ ~ ~! ~ ~ i ~ ~H ¡ ~ ~ ~ Ii I~ ~ IU ~ ~ .- ¡~ . I; . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~> ~ ~ ~. I! - '" '" '" ~ tn ~< . ~. ~ "L ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~;! ~ ~ a ~ ì ~ i!i ~ U:\ 2 ~ ~ ~ ~ F ~~ ~,~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~~; < § ~ ~ '" ~, !l ~~ ~ ~ ¡¡ 3 ~ "': ~ 0 ih i t ~ ~ JI~~~~ ~ ~ ~!( ß~). () ~ It: t: .J « ~ It: «8~ . fj ~ ~ ê' T"" .... (f) N . ..., ~ K 2 . ~ F L < . > " ." k ~~ ~~ ~ ~ \S ~ ,% ~ ~!¡L ~ 2 ~ ~ ~2 ! ~~ ~;! I ,,~ ~ I ~ ~"~;¡ ~ 2 ~~o ~ 2 § ; ~§ % I C <" ~~' to < 2 Ii 8 ~ . "I ~ û~ ~ 3 9 ' <. 8 i "" " ~ ~~ "~~ t~~~ ~ ~ ~ g . ~;I < e§îj Q ~ ~ ~ ~~ š, -; -; -; '" '" '" '" (.) Lt .J:¡ f} L It ~.:. z:t ~ < CI.... i f.... ö ai I/) en I/) II) II) I.l) II) ~i H.:UiUUHid! ;~n! H ~ U H h !~! II~~~~ ._ ~~ ~ ... uQ2 .~- )- It: ~ IJ S ().J ..I ::t:S:o ~ i:.J ~ :ioU ií - 2 ,... ... ffi ~~ ; inhh~ II H i ~ H niU;I ~ ~ i ~~ ~ L i i c ; c .. ... i~ 8;!~ ;!2°m i ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ i i ~ ~5~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ I ~ ~ ¡ ï i ¡ i .. ä .. '" to '" g¡ fa ~ ~~t ~ f; Þi~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ e ~ ~~~~ ~ · ~ ~i jl !!:I ~ § ! ~ ~ E" .g>~ jó I 5 i~n h ~h~~~ P P Ii H HUi L I ~ h I·~ ß h H I ~ en äj~ ~ I d E II. ~H ~ h ~m~~ ~ ~ ~ i J 3 ~ I ~~~ ~s ~ ~ ~~ f :r: ~ ~ ~ ~ h .5 Uj¡¡ ä'5 I f ~~p ~q~~~~i H H II H ~ §;~p~ H ~~ i~ ~ ~ ~ n H ~ .. 8£U ~! U H CI) <I: ~51 ~ 2~ ~~îm i ~ ~ ~ 9 · ~ ~ ~ i·~~ ~ñ ~ t ,,~~~ " 'õ' ~ l 0 ~ ~ '5! i -§ "' ~ giP~1 ~~m2 ¡¡ i i; d d : ;lt~qd: :H~ ~ I .;... ct ~;F. .3 ~ &~;;:~~ ~ .s:: ~ ~.~ ! o~ ~;I;I;I;I~ > ;I ~ . ~ :I ~ ~ 8 g~o~ ~~ 9 ~Ii ~ ~~ z 5 m Hi ~;!wq I n U Hd ~dnn 3g ~H~ ~ > d~l;¡ (.) I tn I I ŒI'ON 'H'V'S'O Qa'Qa2lM..¿o,18. ion -- - -"1'"""- - - , I g ŒI'ON 'H'V'S'O g EB : z <=>= -- "'I r------~~~~~~~~~-----~ I ~ ~ t: ¡:!: ,~ '"' (1) !2 --I I I ~ E It) I 8:1 . ~ ~II ~ I ~ ß 101 t: ca Ë 'I CO Co ¡ II I ii: <C ~ 1 (1) bl§ ,- ~"ê ~ en ca.oJ I ~ ë I èñ "- .c ..... - - It) I ~ ~ I =: ------ I I-- I I I 1_ ~ I ~ I - -.- · r -- I I I ~i ~ ~ ~ - Z !' ce, g¡ ..J ':' ~ I D. ~ g « - _œ_ ~ I" t:!:! ~ .00'4"'~'~04 I ëñ j '1 7 . 20 ' 1 0 . ~ 300.00 ~ ~. \ . .1,' 0 I ~. I I i I I J f Z'";i . æ ~ " IB: Z : . . . · . . t: C) -- In CÞ C (.) -- .. ca I E I ~~~ ~ -\ \ .c LL- r-. . Ij ;; ¡1 -, ;1 I" II: #, f/-JJ ¡ II Iii '-Ii' 1/ j' qd," I ili t/) t 1'1 ! II, i .=- I~ ~!( I --, '," I~ I I~ I ¡'. I i -JII I Ii /1¡ il rl ~!I' . I .",__.~·c _._~ .~L '~ Ji 3 f !i -'~--. -- --- -- I. II \1 ); ¡~."1 f~-,~~ '. I ( ; \;t ' ¡~~¡¡ i-i, i -"' j¡ ",,'." .p,; '111;' i ! ! "~1\C";,;~Jj_;;~;Jr 'j \'! ~I~' . . ' J, t I ¡ I J~ i~II-\:,I I I 1'1 ~-I ! I~" 'I : I'~, - -..111 tn I ~~~!I ... Ii II C ...,. I ,. 'i tn CI) "" j II c: E ¡ ; 0 ~ ! ~ ~ i i C'Ø C'Ø c j > a..- f ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ W ~ i ~ ... _ 0 o .- "") ._ E tiŠ ... C'Ø oS ~ II¡ j W ~ fi , - '" I ::J g¡ I ~ ;,·-i ¡ , J I ¡ I , I I . I I T/ , 1.7 ~, J if ~ V (~ 't\ ' í\ 1~ ! ~ ; , ..., ¡ '\.. - -.1 ! ~ ¡ .~ 1 \~""'I: \\ ~- -- - ,~~\.'.":," , ' . I I ¡ hllll Zl~ P IF I u f e> (5: ~ I : z: c: en -- (/) Q) c (J -- .... ns E (J) .s:: z z « ~ -I a.:. a. o:::~ 0::: 0' 0 o~ 0 -IJI -I LL~ LL I ! . . . . . . . . I I I I Z: " 10: (D " ill ,: Z· . . . I Inspectran Inc. , i i i . i i " I i I I emo I I , To: Judy Weyrrns,CityAdministrator From: Ron Was~und, Building Official Date: 3/22/2004 \ I Re: Heid & HergesApartment Proposal I I BackQround \ i I I As part of their proposed Plan Unit Development (P.U.D:) for the property located at C.S,J.H.121 and 295th Street, Rick ~eidand Bòb Herges are proposing a 3 story, 24 unit apartment building. The proposed mixof units is: \ 4 - 1 bedrdom units \ . 5 -2 bedro:om units _ 8 - 3 bedro~m units 6 .,.. 4-bedroom units I , The apartment building will be located within 300 feet of an R-1 development. I To support ,the req!uiredparking on site, four detached garages are proposed. These accessory, buildings total 7,568isq. ft. The principal structure has a footprint of8,490 sq. ft. The combined building square footage of 16,058 sq. ft. represents 17% ofthe reported 94,986 sq.ift. of lot area. I I , Adding 300 sq. ft. per unit to the basic unit lot area requirements and then subtracting 150 sq. ft. per unit for lot coverage! of less than 20% results in a minimum lot area requirement of 91 ,950 sq. ft. The proposed lot area 0(94,986 sq. ft. ,exceeds the required lot area by 3,036 sq. ft. or 3%. I , The required parkirig on site totals 82 based upon the unit mix proposed. 83 parking spaces are proposed including. 33 spaces of garage parking. Ordinance Section 52.29 Subd. 3a establishes the! total floor area of priyategarages at 300 sq. ft. per dwelling unit. 24. units x300 sq. ftIunit = 7,200 sq. ft. I maximum floor area, 7,568 sq. ft. are proposed. The parking lot is proposed to be paved with bituminous paving n1,aterials. i Ordinance SeCtion 52.29 Subd. 8 establishes a maximum structure height of 40 feet. The proposed 3 story building is 35 f~et high. The exterior of the principal structure aQd the accessory structures will be a mix of rock ,face block veneer,EFIS and brick veneer. The rock face block will be a wains coat, specific gable ends will be, brick veneered, and the balance of the walls wiU be EFIS materials. The I i I \. I I . Page 1 i I , i I I I I pitched roof-will have asphalt shingles. The masonry trash enclosure will match the principal structure ( in color and materials. · The site access will primarily be off 295th. The front of the principal building will face south. The proposed 35' front yard setback matches the required front yard setback of 35'. The side and rear yard setbacks for the principal structure are exceeded. The accessory buildings are all set 5' or more from the rear property line. Ordinance Section 52.29 Subd. 7(b) requires the side yard to be 30 when it abuts a street or highway. The west side property line is parallel to an internal street of the proposed R-1 Subdivision. The accessory structure in the northwest comer of the site is shown with a 20 ft. setback. All parking lots are required by Ordinance 52.10 Subd. 5(i) to be screened from abutting residential uses or districts by a wall, fence, or densely-planted hedge or tree cover. The proposed parking abuts residential districts on the south and west sides. Boulevard linden 2:V2 Caliper trees are shown spaced 40'feet apart along the south frontage of the property. Nothing is shown for landscaping along the west side parking lot. The parking lot circulation aisles for 90 degree parking are required by Ordinance 52.10 Subd. 5(k)to be 26' wide to accommodatè emergency vehicles. The proposed plan shows only 22 feet on the west and east sides of the parking lot. The front bumpers of parked vehicles will overhang the sidewalk 2.5 feet on the north and west side of the principal structure. The narrow drive aisle and 90 degree corner between curb and accessory the building in the northeast comer could make access with fire trucks or delivery vehicles difficult. Findinqs. 1) The principal building appears to comply with ordinance for height, location on property and exterior building materials. ( · 2) The lot area complies-with ordinance for minimum size based on the mix of unit designs. 3) The minimum number of off street parking spaces complies with ordinance when the spaces in the garages are included. 4) The parking spaces adjacent to the sidewalks allow the vehicles to overhang the 5' sidewalk 2.5 feet. 5) The drive aisles are proposed at 22 feet. Ordinance requires 26 feet. Ordinance requires 26 feet. 6) No fire hydrants are shown on site. l · . Page 2 -.. '-- --. ._~ ._,' . ...... .... - .- I i I ¡ £ . I . MEMORANDUM ¡ ¡ I I Judy VI eyrcns City of St.. Joseph. MN ! i Tracy Ekola. 'PE Sr.PrÒfessional Engineer I DtTE: Marc~ 19. 2004 , ,I J: Foxmòre Hollow St. J 0~eph7 Minnesota SEHNo.A-STJOE·'0401 14 T ., foUowing ."'my Jeweomß1entsforFoXn¡ore HoUoW', Prci.exy Plac I I G neral j 1) Consideration sHould be given to annexing Reichl's Hillside Estates and 295th,stICCt. A por:ion of 295th Street right-of-way is located within the Foxmol'e Hollow plat. Dedication of half str'~t$ is not allowed p~r the City's subdivision ordinance. Furthe.nnore, 295th street is the onlyac¡;ess to Foxmore Honþw. (e 2) Consideration s~, ould also be, ..,giVe to upgrading 295th Street t,o meet· City sta,ndar.ds for street , width (36-fcet), ,curb and gutter and extending utilities along 295th Street to west edge ,of pla.t. Sanitary sewer ap.d water main should be localed in roadway if improvements arc considered on 295th Street. Pro/ide proper drainage to ad.iacent properties from the 295tb Street improvcme:nts. The drainage pl~ shl)uJd accommodate 295th Street improvements anddr.ainagefrom adja.::e.nt property . 3) Pond location, an' d discharge outlet shan, b,e approved by S, teams County Highway Department. . . . . ....) .... .. ..... . . .. . . ... Pond grading encroaches on CSAH 1.21 right-of-way. Per the City's subdivision ordmance, the pond area should be planed as outlet. Vehicular acceSs should be provided to the pond. i i 3) Plat should be s~bmitttd to Steams County Environmental Service Department (wetlands). Sauk RiverWatershe~ District. and Steams County Highway Depamnentfor revic-W;. , . 4) Will sidewa.1k b~ considercdalongthe north side ,of 295th Street? Seet~ . . 5) Provideaccess!o 295thStreet at all times during' construction. Piovide tempor.\ry bypass road from,CSAH 121 ¡to 295th Street if normal accessisblocked during constrUction. i 6) Modify e~isting arivcwaYfor Lot 7., Block 1. Eliminate the split driveway and island CUld r(~placc with.onedrivew~y to 295th or Foxhollow Drive with a maximum wjdthof 18-feet. All other lots shall have only dne access on to Foxhollow Drive and no driveway access to 295th Street. i " (e ; I I Shon EUlO~ Hendrickson Ine., 1200 2SthAvenua South, P.O. Box 1717, $1. Cloud. MNS6302-1717 SEH is an equal Dpportunity employer Iwww.&l.Ihinc.comI320.229.430Q I ,800.572.0617 I 320.229.4301 iWl i , 1 I i i i I i \ REIIVED I PETITION r,~ ~R' 2003 I March 2004 I ( .....¡Tfft· T ci°SEPf-i did h F H 11 p' hi h' 1 d 23 . . . e ¡un erslgne are oppose to t e oxmore 0 ow rOJect, w c mc u es umts m an~artment complex: and 32 single lots. There is already a section of 4 isolated 8-unit ap ments along CRl:21. The rest of the surrounding area is R-l. The 23-unit apartment will Fhange the character of the neighborhood and will increase the traffic to an unsafe sta~rWe feel R-l isjthe best zoning forthis parcel of property. We oppose rezoning this parc Lfrom R-l to R-3. ' I i i ADDRESS ({)lfqa-c¡ ç~ '?i $f, )dlg-- 2. 9.s-~ . . Sr.- ::Jf2r s"ffi. .~ .' .$t. :rue. +. ! ~5 "6 5-1. :7.,$ ß.q;.. ~ jr..7óM/.I, ....·--1··....·.......... , " '. __.'f ..-'-W - -. 'v ._" '.' ~.., Jø." -.. ___~ .....,;._...,. ..;"._.._ :if:j' ¡¿:i J.ou;e I.. .I.f: J..i. '.:S:¿tJ~:.:::¡~~:OI)J. '::I (.."i! HERGE5 ,...¡:':¡\:IC, 1:1:> ' . fftΡ,I~I.;? ! ¡ ',\" ~ i ~ <~~~:.'": , ¡ t APPUCATI,N FOR PLANNING CON IDERATION . CITY OF ST. JOSEPH , 25 College Avenue NW I P.O.Box868 .. ! I St.Joseph,MN58374 (320)363"7201 or Fax (320)383-D I st :FE OF MINNESOTA) . I , ~ , COUNTY OF STRARNS) ±f"\lmDr~tl",l\d\0\.Lt, . PHOI<F< ;;- \+h'" . k1 ES$: ' " :6..-'""7......4_".."""-\...-............ (I\p :1IicaJIIt iIINo, "'~iI1 CiI dW:IàIIItllll lJlUøalllè IIIdin8ncu lIII1aift1ftg to """ ~n 'J: I , " , .,' 1. ~.--r7--..~~1 ~ ' . _ Rezoning '_ ZCltr\9 ordlntnc:e Amenc:IrrIIM. , _ _ SUfø Water Mtn8gemfJnI Plan (GI8Ci~ Pemit) __ PlID Bulfdlnø Mover. PermIt I ¡/, _~MoOng-~.~ _~Aa1~ i ", ?fe.JJrnll\ó..f~ Plat) I . legal de4cription of land ~ bet affecied by.cet Jntludl1Sl ac:reage 01' $~m foci otland involv\tl:l, ønc$lItmet '- adctress, it any:, ! Prœønt%Ofllng of Þ.J.e cI8IsarIbÐd Pl'CP8riy b: - I . N...., ecIdIœsand~ lUl'lberof the lowoerof Chel boya ~I~. i '* ' ~ I ' , ¡ 5. h\1obtJ, filmS, corøora~ crother thin 8R.I\iœltand pl8MC\t owner Who "..,orwl! describøclllndtll'~~wIthin_yet(l.iasuanceofpwm1t I I, &. MaaW to_ appticàlorl...... a pattlheNof.readditlonal maIIøtat IGbm IJIdIclkd. "1 Apþliclnt _...... ! D* 0WIIer SllIIIbøe: Delle: FOR OFRCE USEONLV :tESUIJMITtEOt_ IDA1ECOMPt.eTE: DA'TEOFPUBUCIEARING_ AJSI.ICAT/QrllDA1E:_ IIInIIIngCcnl\cl8l!llrmAeaon:!_ ~d~1__ Recomrt1encIDicapproIIaI Date A*n: ~~""of~CcJd~Adcn: OounciIMtion._ ~_ ~ DaleofAcfC3Ð; ~ awn.:IIOtIW ofCityCcunl::il ACIkHI: '- I I I d I ~ ' . fEH MEM1RANDUM TO: JudylWeyrens City bfSt. Joseph, MN \ Tracy Ekola, PE Sr. Professional Engineer ! I March2S,2004 i I Foxmore Hollow St. Jqseph,Minnesota SERNo. A-STJOE 0407 14 i ¡ \ T e purpose ofthis,merlOrandum is to provide additional comment in response to the March 24, 2004, Panning Commission Meeting and Public Hearingregarding the Foxmore Hollow Preliminary Plat. The s bject is regarding itefn number 2 from my March 19, 2004, memorandum (SEH engineering review c I mments for the Foxmore Hollow Preliminary Plat) which stated that consideration should be given to u grading 29Sth Street to meet City standards and extending utilities in the roadway. 29Sth Street was i¡I't.iallYPlatted asp art Ó,i..""."fReichl's, Hillside, Esta tes, St. Joseph T, own,. ship. It is m,y understanding th att.,h e n. rtherly half of 29Sth Street has been annexed to the City of St. Joseph and is included in the Preliminary Pat of Foxmore Hollow. i . T eFoxmore Hollow preliminary and grading plans indicate the only access to the development will be a s~bstandard roadway ~29Sth Street).fu order to provide adequate access to the Foxmore Hollow dïvelopment, the full sveet width should to be upgraded to meet City standards (i.e. 36' width, curb & gftter, adequate sub grade, base, and bituminous thickness). If the roadway is not upgraded at this time, ~r0visions should be ~ade to establish how the developer would address the substandard street/access Issue. , T efollowing are alterrlativesthe City could consider with regards to improvements to 29Sth Street: 1. City constructs fl streetto city standards as a local improvement project and passes the costs on to benefiting pro~erty owners (Pondview Ridge, LLP and possibly defer assessments to those properties not cprrently in city limits). 2. City requires a financial guarantee from the developer to construct the street to city standards ata future date wheµ area to the south of Foxmore Hollow is annexed. 3. Developer,builqs the entire street to city standards up to the west edge of the plat. Drainage from the township rQadway located west of Foxmore Hollow would need to be maintained. (Note: Due to the rural design, upgrading only half the street is not possible since the urban design will require lowering the roadway, installing curb and gutter, and eliminating the ditches.) 1 I C: Joe Bettendorf, SEH Dick Taufen, City or St. Joseph I i J w ! . x:\ \stjoe\040700\C01T\m~weyrens 032504.dpc \ I I Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc., 1200 25th Avenue South, P.O. Box 1717, SI. Cloud. MN 56302-1717 SEH is an equal oJportunityemployer I www.sehinc.comI320.229.4300 I 800.572.0617 I 320.229.4301 fax \ I I . I Attachment: Yespr No I REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION City Engineer Reports (a) DATE,: April!, 2004 DEPARTMENT APPROVAL I I \ I E gineering- Storm W~ter Utility P VIOUS ACTION T e City Council for discussion purposes established the monthly residential storm water fee at $ 2.25 per m, nth. The City then advertised in both the St. Joseph Newssleaderand St. Cloud Times that an in offi1ational meeting w:as tobe conducted to accept input on the proposed fee., As some of you are a~are, no one came to t*meeting.We will be putting the Storm Water Information Sheets on the Web P ge so residents can ac«ess the information. I . In addition to establishitiga monthly storm water fee, the Council also established a developmentfee o£ .2 per net developable ~quare foot, minus the cost of any storm water infrastructure installed. We have al eady implementedthi~ fee,'but need to clarify the language in the Ordinance. Since this part of the fee is 'nthe Zoning Ordinance, the City Will conduct a public hearing at the next Council meeting. This item willl then come back as al consent agenda item. . COMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION A tborize the Mayor an~ Administrator to execote Ordina¡¡ce 44 Storm Water a¡¡d canse the same to be p lishedin the Newsle de(. The COlIDcil will also need to affirm the rate for residential which will th"" be used to determine thelremaining classes, I i '. FIfCAL IMPACT \ ~ll help offset thecost'of implementingNPDES II Permitting and Erosion control including street ,s eeping. I C MMENTS/RECOM~ENDATIONS T e attached spreadsheets illustrate the proposed revenue stream and is the same information previously . co sidered by the Counc~1. . ORDINANCE 44 STORM WATER UTILITY Section 44.1: PURPOSE. This Ordinance sets forth unifonn requirements for the . establishment of a Stonn Water Utility. The purpose is to provide a funding mechanism for the following services: a) The administration, planning, implementation, and maintenance of stonn water Best Management Practices (BMPs) to reduce the introduction of sediment and other pollutants into local water resources. b) The administration, installation, operation, maintenance and replacement of public drainage systems. c) Activities necessary to maintain compliance with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Pennit requirements established by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, including preparation, implementation and management of a Stonn Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) to address the . following control measures: 1) Public education and outreach on storm water impacts. 2) Public involvement/participation. 3) Illicit discharge detection and elimination. 4) Construction site stonn water runoff control. 5) Post-construction runoff control in new development and redevelopment. 6) Pollution prevention for municipal operations. d) Other education, engineering, inspection, monitoring, testing and enforcement activities as necessary to maintain compliance with local, state and federal stonn water requirements. Section 44.2: ESTABLISHMENT OF A STORM WATER UTILITY. There is hereby established a public utility to be known as the Stonn Water Utility for the City of St. Joseph. The Stonn Water Utility shall be operated as a public utility pursuant to the City Code of Ordinances and applicable Minnesota Statutes. The revenues derived therefrom shall be subject to provisions of this Section and Minnesota Statutes Section 444.075. The Stonn Water Utility shall be part of the Public Works Department and shall be administered by the Public Works Direètor. This Ordinance shall apply to the entire City ofSt. Joseph. Section 44.3: DEFINITIONS. Unless the context specifically indicates otherwise, the . folÌowing tenns, as used in this ordinance, shall have the meanings hereinafter designed. ! ! . " Subd. 1: UtilitY, Fac~or: For purpose of this Ordinance, the "Utility Factor" is defined as the ratIo of runoff volume, m mches, for aparticularland use, to the runoff, in inches for an a~lerage single ,fam ily ',l,eSiden tialp 1"Op ert,y, assum ing ,a2",.inc h ra infa,Ilan<! N',t. ural Resources C , nservation servjpe'!(NRCS) "Type B" soil conditions. Subd. 2: Unit Area. For the purpose ofthis Ordinance, the "Unit Area" ("UA") of a gi en parcel shaH be determined by the following formula: I ' I I Fi st, determine the percentage of total runoff in St Josephwhich is attributed to single family re idential property. The fee per acreJor single family residential shall be established by co putingthe productlofrunoffpercentage and the Storm Water Utility Revenue divided by the es imated total acres o~ singlefamily residential land uses in the City of S1. Joseph. The m nimumUA value fotanyparcel shall be 1.0. : Subd. 3: ResidlntialEQUiValenCY Factor. A "Residential Equivalency Factor" ("REF") is the ratio of the vOlume[ofrunoffgenerated by a Unit Area ofaparticular land use to the volume Of\runOff generated by ~ Unit Area of a single-family residential property based the Utility Fctor. I T e REF forvarious ltd-useswithin 1I1e City shall be considered to be as foI1ows: TAX CLASSœ1ICATION* REF . Single-FamilY! 1.00 Multi-Family I 2.72 Apartlllents/Cohdos/Townhomes 2.72 commerCial"'l 4.23 Industrial 3.30 Institutional 3.30 ?ublic/Quasi E blic EXEMET Parks/Open Sp~ce/Cemeteries EXEMPT Road Right-of-yYay EXEMPT Lakes/Streams/Wetlands EXEMPT Agricultural, vkcant, EXEMPT * The Tax Clas~ifiCatiOn uses listed in this table are the classifications on record at the St ams County Recor1ers Office. The REF for Táx Classifications not listedinthe foregoing table shall be determined by th City Engineer base~ on probable hydrologic response. I Section 44.4: RiATES AND CHARGES: Subd. 1: Establlshing Unit Rate: In determining charges, the Council shaH by resolution, . fT m time to time, cstatIish a basic Unit Rate (UR)to be charged per one (1) REF. The charges I to be made against a given parcel of land shall then be determined by multiplying the Unit Rate · (DR) by the parcel's REF times the parcel's Unit Area (UA). Storm Water Charges = Unit Rate x Residential Equivalency Factor x Unit Area = (DR) x (REF) x (VA) Subd. 2: Standardized Charges. The following rules shall apply for the purpose of simplifying and equalizing charges: 1) Each single-family and patio home parcel shall be considered to have a UA value of 1.0. 2) Parcels containing townhouse, duplex, twin home, and detached townhouse housing units, including manufactured home parks, shall be considered to have a UA value of 1.0 per each housing unit situated on the parcel (for example, a parcel that contains 4 townhouse units shall be considered to have a UA value of 4.0). Parcels subject to these Standardized Charge provisions shall not be eligible for Adjustments to Charges or Adjustments to Area as defined below unless they meet the criteria of the credit policy. Subd. 3: Adiustments to Charges. The City Council may by resolution adopt policies providing for the adjustment of charges for parcels or groups of parcels based upon hydrologic response substantially differentftom the REF being used for the parcel or parcels. Such · adjustment shall be made only after receiving the recommendation of the City Engineer, and shall not be made effective retroactively. If the adjustment would have the effect of changing the " REF for all or substantially all of the land uses in a particular classification, such adjustment shall be accomplished by amending the REF table in Subdivision 3 ofthis Ordinance. Subd. 4: Adiustment to Area: The total parcel area as shown in the City Assessor's records will be used to calculate the parcel Unit Area (VA). It is the responsibility of the owner or manager of any premises to provide the City with necessary land surveys and other information as the City may reasonably request to determine if a parcel, or a portion of a parcel qualifies for and Exception or an Area Adjustment. Requests for Exceptions and/or Adjustments will be reviewed after the receipt of all required information. Exceptions and/or Adjustments must be approved by the City Engineer and Public Works Director, and shall become effective at the beginning of the next billing cycle following approval. Subd. 5: Exceptions. The following land uses are exempt ftom the Storm Water Utility Fees established herein: 1) public street right-of-way, 2) wetlands and public waters as defined by state law, 3) ponds designated and used exclusively for storm water retention or treatment purposes up to the 100-year flood elevation, 4) undeveloped parcels, 5) publicly-owned park lands, natural areas, and recreational fields, 6) railroad right-of-way, 7) cemeteries, 8) unsewered parcels situated within the AG (Agricultural) zoning district of the City, and 9) City-owned land. · . Subd. 6: Falsification of Information. Wì1lful failure to provide information that the City may r asonably request related to the use, development and area of a premise, or falsification of such l fOrlIlation, shall cofstitute a violation of this Ordinance. i I Subd. 7: Estimated Charges. If, for any reason, preciseinformation related to the use, devel pment or area ofa rrmsesis not available, then Storm Wate( ptilityCharges for such premre shall be estimate , and billed, based upon information then evailable to the City. Sùbd. 8: Bì1ling Method. Storm WaterUtility Feeswì1lbe computed and collected by the City ogether with other City utility fees, in accordance with the procedures set forth in Section 41 01 this Code. I Subd. 9: Delinqueht Accounts. Storm Water Utìlìty Fees past due on October 1 of any year fla)' be certified to ~e County Auditor for collection with real estate taxes during the fOilIng y- or any ye .. there~r m the manner prescnbed ill Sœtion 41 of this Code, purs ant to Minnesota St tute 444.075, Subdivision 3. Subd. 10: APpeJ If a property owner believes that the fee charged a particular property is in orrect, s/he may request review and re-computation of said fee. I I i . . AMENDMENT TO ORDINANCE 52 ZONING ORDINANCE . The City Council for the City of S1. Joseph hereby ordains that Ordinance 52.18 is amended by the addition of Subdivision 18 which reads as follows: "Subd. 18: Surface (Storm) Water Development Fee. Following approval of a surface (storm) water management plan, applicants shall pay to the City a surface (storm) water development fee based upon the square footage of the project's Net Developable Property. "Net Developable Property" is defined as the gross land area minus the streets and other land area dedicated to the public. The per square foot fee shall be set by the City Council and adjusted ÍÌom time to time by resolution. The City, in its sole discretion, may allow the applicant to offset the cost of construction or maintenance of community surface (storm) water management facilities designed to serve multiple land disturbing and development activities." This amendment is adopted the _ day of , 2003, and shall be effective upon publication. CITY OF ST. JOSEPH By . Larry Hosch, Mayor By Judy Weyrens, Administrator/Clerk These amendments were published on ,2003 L:\city\stjoe\2003 . 1 . i I 0 C> 0 0 C> "iii 0 0 0 0 0 (:) 0 0 0 0 0 C> 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C> 0 0 0 0 0 C> C> - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C> 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C> C> 0 0 LÓ LÓ 0 LÓ c;¡) (ó * 0 0 0 * Ò * * LÓ LÓ 0 0 0 * Ò Ò 0 ~ ~ M ~ N ~ It) ~ It) "I N N 0 ~ 0> I/) .... * * * * ~ (') ~ * ... * (') (.I) I * * <h <h I I I i I co 0 0 0 0 0 0 C> 0 0 0 0 C> 0 ....1/) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C> 0 0 0 ,,' 0 C> 0 I/) 0 ....CIO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C> ~ 0 0 0 C> C> .... <~ 0::> (') 0 * 0 * LÓ LÓ 0 * * 0 0 * Ò LÓ 0 0 LÓ u) u) N Z M rri ø> N LÓ ~ * * f ~ N (.I) N * '" N CIO """ <h M <D.... * * * * (It 6/ - ... (It ...CIO 6/ - (It 6/ - I \ ..... 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C> 0 0 0 0 0 0 0::>0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C> 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N""" 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I/) 0 0 0 0 I/) <~ 0 .... 0 It) q 0 0 0 0 I/) N * r-: LÓ 'i 0 * * 0 0 * r-: * LÓ LÓ LÓ LÓ 0" r-: N Z 0 0; u) ~ 0 ~ N I/) N ~ N CIO (') "" """""" EI7 * EI7 .... 6/ - (It 6/ - * * 6/ - * ....... , 6/ - * 0 I I ¡ CD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C> 00 C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C> I/) 0 0::>0 11:1 0 It) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I/) 0 0 0 0 0 I/) "I <I:~ ... ( ) 0 LÓ r-: rri LÔ ..¡ 0 (It * 0 0 EI7 ..; * LÔ 0 LÔ 0 u) ai N Z .... ..; Ò N * * EI7 EI7 (It ~ ~ N (.I) N LÔ N N .... M 6/ - N "".... \~ * 6/ - EI7 (It EI7 * 0 .... EI7 ...(.1) I 6/ - EI7 .,. I ! Ie i ll- I :æ I./') 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C> 0 0 0 0 0 0 ., 0 C> . 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C> 0 101/) ,Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C> 0 0 0 0 0 0 C> C> <~ ....... 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C> :r. LÔ LÔ rri LÔ rri 0 EI7 LÔ 0 0 EI7 ui EI7 LÓ LÔ 0 LÔ 0 u) ~ N Z'<t o;ui' N <1 ~ N (.I) N N N .... """ N ...( ) I./') EI7 EI7 EI7 * W EI7 EI7 ... EI7 * EI7 EI7 EI7 .,. .... ... EI7 ....1/) ~ ... <i7 0 j - j i I , ¡ ¡ "'" 0 0 0 0 0 d 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.... 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I/) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ...: .... <~ ""I ) 0 LÓ LÓ rri LÔ rri <Ô EI7 LÓ 0 0 EI7 Ñ EI7 LÒ LÔ * LÔ EI7 u) .... z... ..¢~ N ... ~ N .... N M 0 N ON EI7 EI7 EI7 EI7 EI7 ~ <i7 * 6/ - EI7 EI7 EI7 .,. ... ... EI7 ... 1t) 6/ - *0 :P i } I ê) ~ li- I e t¡ ;¡¿ e '5 0 I e t< ~ - i 0 10 ro I @. I N ::¡ E .!. (¡j ~ J!J Q) > Q) I w .... ê 0> e .c .c c Q) e Q) (J) Q) ( ) 0 (J) E E '0 U E '8 ro Q.. , Q) 0 ro C/ e (¡j .J:J > :2: f!? Q e .£2 ::¡ ~ .§ .!!! ~ e -. e. ;; .2 ë. e. e Õ VI ro (J) B e. (J) u) I/) ro E ::¡ c c 0 B ::¡ É (J) c ~ "S; ro > 0 0> Ü ~ Q) Q) :¡:¡ 0 Q) .5 0 -0 e .5: e 0::: ::¡ CD ;; E ü I/) , Ü e e '0 ro '0 Qi Q) Ë ëñ .2 e E (,) c: '0 ro ro e e e "ë' É ~ c ..,¡ c 2 e "8 ';S 1ií ~ :ê <C '0 -0 -0 0 e ro ro ro Q.. 0> e e e g ro I/) 0 ~ (J) e (J) ë: E :2: ~ '13 ro ¡¡; Q) E ro ro ro fj 5 13 0 B .¡;;¡ E E Q) u.. 0 e; 0> E :2: C/ E Q.. ~ º Ü 11:1 e. (J) ro ..91 l- I!! Q) ( ) Q) a.. ::¡ e Q) '¡:: E tš Q) :2: E '0 C> Q) ... ~ 2 E I/) e Q) ui ! Q) 'E E Õ '0 E 0 êl.O c 0 'E '5 ~ ~ ~ e ::::s B ~ Q) I- ro c æ 0 I/) e. Ü Q.. 0 - Q) > .E I- ü5 ( ) Q) x e. 0 ~ 0 0> Q.. :s ro c 0> I/) e !!J Q) (J) ã; g; ... g Q) 0 .!!! 0 ro å> ro È a.. (j) E ë. l- e. e :;: 0::: ¿ à:1 (t E '0 C ~ e .E e. .a ( ) 0) > '0 Q) ( ) (t É ( ) e. t¡ (t 0::: e .... S (¡j 0) e .2 0 C5 E e Q 0::: 2 Q) E I/) u.. 0 0 '§¡ ro Co :2: 0> 2 .5 - 0) ::¡ ro '@ cñ U5 I/) Q) .!!! > l- ( ) ~ >< ~ e l- e ~ (J) E ro Q) ~ 2 e 0> 0> C 0> 2 '5. E I- 0) C> o 0) i ~ =ª ª ::¡ Q); .s ro W Q.. (¡j ro 0 0::: ro 1-0::: ~ Q..I '5. ~ c- O) W c ('C '0 a. t: c Q) ¡¡¡ "iii 0) '0 ro ::¡ ¡¡; U5¡¡¡ ..J '0 0::: ü5 '0'0 E as as w ro I/) I/) ro :2: a ~ Q) I/) 1/)1 ro 0 :2: Õ - Q) » ""ffiõ <C (J) lB$ E ê w g ~ ,2 wI :2: ëñ ê "õ. ê :5 ê ]! l- I/) 0) 0 (¡jíii u u 0 :õ 'S: ¡¡; - ( ) a. ::¡- ~ e. ::¡ ::¡ Q) 0) ~ ::::s .9 [l. [tl I/) .9 .c ('C .9 ~ .9 ~ ~ I/) 0 e.J:J 0 0 e e 'õ' 'õ' 5 :5 ::¡ <9 Q) Q) :::I e :::I ~~ . en I/) Z Q.. ZI 0::: c:J I/) UJ U I/) I/) <9 à: <II) ~ à: a:à: ¡e ~ :::: ~~ ~ "- r---: M ¡:"":"";<"i r-i. . 'EZ'''''' - ~ L() ::I~ N =:; N ¡:¡::'-' ffi. ::> ,U'> 1<-'> .". r- r- - 0:::: '''! I"" <'! 0) 0) ..... co woo - 00 CII 0> CO ::J .. ~i' ~ ~~ ::I~ > ~~ =~ CII "t"t ¡:¡:: ._ a:: C") ...... ~ ~ ~~ CII EI7E17 Z 0\ '" r- '" ~ - "'? r; "'? ") ") CII l{) l{) M 0 - ::J COCO ::I s::: "t. "t. o !::: CII C") C") ~O~ > ~~ ::I ::I V) CII ...... ...... ~='-' a:: EI7E17 '" ¡:¡:: I/ ¡:¡:: I/ o ... C). .... N '" N 0000 f- t"Q~Zr- 00 0\ 0000 = ::I-=U U~.s,-, - '" 'S! - r- t-- -.t: -: ") -.t:-.t:E-<E-< E-<E-< ~ g M ~~~~ ~~ -- 8 '" .... <A <A....~~ ~~.. ~~ ~ ~8 r.;¡r.;¡ r.;¡r.;¡æ"t gg ...... "'t: xx xx~~ :J:J '-' ... C'; ,., ,_, ,., ,., .. "t :!::: :!::: L{) .. ... - - - - =: CO ëi5 ëi5 C'.! ¡:¡:: ~ ri .~ £ N ~l{) ~~ è EI7 ~...... s:::c C'; II ... EI7 ro ro >- 8 ......~ ~ :::: ;:::!;;:.". ~ è:'è:' . ::: 8 '<:t E ,.," r..: 0 ,...; <i <i ëi5-ëi5 ._ ~ ~ ro '" t¡ <A ~ ~ ~ ~ .g .g - ~~ ~< cc ::> ~ II ~ ::: ::: ~ ::I ø~ ~~ .s ~ o.~ ;D g h ~:;:: ~ ~~ CIS '" <!.(f) M 0 N MOO r- > ¡:¡:: ........ N "<t- ",- <A <A M ro ro ;:> ... ø ø <A .... <A _ ._ ._ - 0.. 0.. '" e e E ; øø C/) øø ~ ::I:J:J _ 0 EE o 0 CC "'~ - EE èñ ~ ~~ -;~:a ~ 88 &~ ~"'E z ........ ~ E-<to w 00 c.. ëë ¡:¡::8 ü :::~ Q) 0 0 '-" ", .- .- _ __ u, ~~ - ~~ ~ !! ~ EE ë5 üü :J :J llJ _0 _0 ....; (/) en 0:: 0..... 0....... tJ) ~~ ü ~ß - ~ ~ gg - .":8 Þ8 N <i MM ~·=1Js=~ ¡:¡:: Q", C'; ..... C'; r.;¡... ;;;J... ~ ~ :2 ':; : ~ ~ g I~ ~ l{) l{) \1.) ~ ~ ~ -M:::~ \0 ~ 0 ~ "! " ..... N 0 ~~~ ~ ~<~ Ñ V) EI7 ~ d) ~ 19 ?fg ~ » §. »,3 S~M -» .- _ ¡:;tlS°>' ;;;J .- - - _ > - "'.... .:=;:¡ 0 M- -= ¡::: õJ 'E õJ .~ tIS 0 S '" ." ~ t:: -¿;; d ¡:; . '2 ::I ¡¡¡.- ¡:¡',ë u = ,.., ." U "" tIS tIS·- ¡:¡ 0 "-< ¡:¡ . = ~dæ~~d} g.gv".:a...r~~ ~5 [)~~~§ ~ Æ ~ .,.!.. ~ ~ VI .a .~ u =" - ~ "'0 P. "'d N .2 ~ 0.0'- .=:.- E _ ::s.- - "¡::: cu ~ ß ~ 01} .- +-> Q) 'tri t)() ( ) ~V]::s{/}S-'"Ot)..c 0 ~... ~U) CI:I{/} 1::::;> ü3~~~88 .s.sæ~~ O~ ü3~ 8~]ü3~ I Attachment: Yes or No I . REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: March 30, 2004 olice ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT DEPARTMENT APPROVAL \ .. . .. . ',. [ \ GENDAITEM I 1 1 I art-time Officer \ I 1 I. I I I REVIOUS ACTION ! i None ,'¡ . ~COMMENDED BOP ACTION rpt resoluhon 2004T . . ... Pi SCAL IMP ACT I. I 1 one ! i I 1 I COMMENTS/RECOMMENDATIONS I I i P RA requires that the Council by resolution approve part-time officers. They are required to participate i PERA.I I \ ! I I \ I , ! I . I 1 i I i i I I I I i I i \ ! I I i I RESOLUTION 2004..13 I · I Resolution Authorizing Enrollment in PERA WHEREAS, the policy of the State of Minnesota declared in Minnesota Statutes 353.63 ìs to I I give special· consider~tion' to . employees who perform hazardous work and devote their time and skills to I protecting the prope4Y and personal safety of others; and i WHEREAS!Minnesota Statutes 8ecrion 353.64 permits governmental subdivisions to request coverage in the Pub lib Employees Police and Fire plan for eligible employees of police departments whose I I position duties meet the requirements stated therein and listed below. I ! 1 BE IT RESÚLVEDthatthe City of8t. Joseph, hereby declares that the posirion titled Police \ i Officer/Chief, currently held by, Ann M. Klein meets all of the following Police and Fire membership I I requirements: I i i 1. Said po:;¡irionrequires a license by the Minnesota peace officer standards and training board under secrion 626.84to 626.863 and this employee ìsso licensed; I I 2. Said po~irion's primary (over 50%) duty is to enforce the general criminal laws of the state; · 3. Said poJition charges this employee with the prevention and detecrionof crime; \ i 4. Said posirion gives this employee the full power of arrest, and I I 5. Said position is assìgned to a designated police or sheriffs department. I " " . , I BErT FUR'f¡HERRESOL VED that this governing body hereby requests that the above-named i employee be I accepted as a member of the Public Employees Police and Fire Plan effective the I date of this eþployee' s initial Police and Fire salary deducrion by the governmental subdivision. STATE OF LSOTA I COUNTY OF STEARNS I I, Judy W eyr~ns, clerk of Cìty of 81. Joseph, do hereby certify that this is a true and correct I I transcript of the resolution that was adopted at a meeting held on the day of , ¡, - I 2004; the Original of which is on file in this office. I further Certify that _members voted in favor of this íesolution and that _ members were present and voting. I Signed: I Date: · I Attachment,..III.orNo I . REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: March 30, 2004 'ublic Works RIGINATING DEPARTMENT DEPARTMENT APPROVAL I ! i i I lOENDA ITEM 1 I I I ate, ~eport i i i I. ' I P EVIOUS ACTION I \ . i ¡COMMENDED BOr ACTION one I I \ I I, F SCAL IMP ACT MMENTS/RECOM~ENDATIONS I ! Eery year a report is done to show the water usage for the City: It shows the totals for the year as well as th totals broken up by the month. I i 1 . \' I I i . City of St. Joseph Water Department , 2003 Summary I With all theactivity/n 2003 the City meet the DNR requirement to account for a minimum of 90% of the waterpumpe'd. ,In 2003 the City had six construction projects and combining that with fire department training, flushing of hydrants, flooding the skating rinks, flushing the sewer lines (twice) and sprinkling of the baseball fields, the City accounted for 92% of the water pumped. , i The meters from wE1l1s 3, 4, and 5 were tested on site July 31, 2003 with the following results: · Number 3 rryeter was 90% accurate, registering high · Number 4 meter was 81 % accurate, registering high I · Number 5 meter was 100% \ I Water Department Activity I , , I April City! hired a firm to detect for water leaks and a major leak was discovered on 2nd Ave I SE and Able St. E. In addition four hydrants and one townhouse service cont:1ection was found to be leaking. All the leaks have been repaired. May Large change in meter readings, a result of the repaired leaks. The City begins accQunting,for over 90% of water pumped. I September Influ:ent meter stopped operating and had to be sent in for repairs. Annual Water Summary . The City installed (nEfw) approximately 15,000 feet of water main in five different projects. I Water pumped in 2003 136,222,000 Gallons I Well 3 29,060,000 Gallons I Well 4 54,986,000 Gallons i I ' Well 5 52,176,000 Gallons The totals ¡were adjusted due to Wells 4 and 5 as a result of the meters regìsteringhigh. Water decrease from 2002 25,654,000 Gallons Water usage calculations by City Offices 114,709,000 Gallons Water measured at the influent meter at the Water Treatment Plant 124,222,000 Gallons I (11 months only) \ Water measured at the effluent meter at the Water Treatment Plant 121,950,000 Gallons Cities appropriation water pumping permit with the DNR 150,000,000 Gallons \ Average amount of water pumped per day 362,247 Gallons I The highest pump day was September 2,2003 878,000 Gallons i Hydroflouisic acid used (fluoride) 811 Gallons We" 4 was cleaned in May 2003 (Acid and jetting with air) I 1 Water Projects I The City completed J test well project on the Kip Cameron property, located west. of the City, near interstate 1-94. The results indicated that there isa large amount of water and wouldbe a good place to locate a well field. At the same time a pilot plant was connected to the test well to determine the qualitXofwater. The test results indicated that the water contains Iron Bacteria and Manganese, both of which can be treated by a filtration system. In summary the quality and . quantity of water ma~es the test site viable for a well field. I I i , i I I I '. . January 2003 I Well 3 Well 4 Well 5 1-4 :21,000 1,339,000 429,000 5-11 1,0,20,000 1 ,085,000 971,000 12-18 1,2110,000 969,000 928,000 19-25 1,4þ9,OOO 1,187,000 523,000 26-31 7p8,000 803,000 734,000 Total 4,4r 8,000 5,383,000 3,585,000 . 13,386,000 Gallons M~nth Total Average Per Day 431,806 Gallons Acid Used 72 Gallons Influent Reading 11,560,000 Babkwashed 212,300 Reblaimed 217,230 (Backwash meter not registering correct) February 2003 Well 3 Well 4 Well 5 1 143,000 214,000 42,000 2-8 51'4,000 1,110,000 1,190,000 9-15 7qO,000' 1,336,000 916,000 16-22 4~8,OOO 1,849,000 665,000 23-28 7 ~6,000 1,391,000 454,000 . Total 2,5,1,000 5,900,000 3,267,000 I MOr;1th Total 11,758,000 Gallons Avðrage Per Day 420,893 Gallons Acid Used 60 Gallons InflÚent Reading 11,640,000 , , Backwashed 175,700 Reclaimed 216,970 March 2003 Well 3 Well 4 Well 5 1 43 000 31,000 332,000 ' , 2-8 41p,OOO 1,171,000 1,246,000 9-15 53p,000 1,030,000 1,403,000 16-22 263,000 1,203,000 1,547,000 I 1,372,000 869,000 23-29 81~,000 30-31 28, ,000 625,000 0 Total 2,35f'000 5,432,000 5,397,000 Mon1th Total 13,182,000 Gallons I 425,225 Gallons ,Average Per Day Acid Used 72 Gallons Influent Reading 13,495,000 I 197,300 Bac~washed . Reclaimed 231,300 . April 2003 Well 3 Well 4 ~ 1-5 278,000 612,000 1,240,000 6-12 528,000 1,715,000 982.000 13-19 561,000 956,000 829,000 20-26 535,000 306,000 1,142,000 27-30 318,000 375,000 611,000 Total 2,220,000 3,964,000 4,804,000 Month Total 10,988,000 Gallons Average Per Day 366,270 Gallons Acid Used 67 Gallons Influent Reading 11,140,000 Backwashed ' 220,600 Reclaimed 233,960 May 2003 Well 3 Well 4 Well 5 1-3 400,000 0 809,000 4-10 540,000 0 1,528,000 11-17 622,000 722,000 899,000 .' 18-24 253,000 964,000 905.000 25-31 270,000 1,854,000 541,000 Total 2,085,000 3,540,000 4,682,000 Month Total 10,307,000 Gallons Average Per Day 332,000 Gallons Acid Used 66 Gallons Influent Reading 9,913,000 Backwashed 226,500 Reclaimed 253,820 June 2003 Well 3 ~ Well 5 1-7 310,000 1,231,000 1,629,000 8-14 535,000 940,000 667,000 15-21 524,000 1,540,000 2,037,000 22-28 601,000 1,379,000 261,000 29-30 0 0 552,000 Total 1,970,000 5,090,000 5,146,000 Month Total 12,166,000 Gallons Average Per Day 405,533 Gallons Acid Used 68 Gallons Influent Reading 11,379,000 Backwashed 213,500 . Reclaimed 196,450 I I I , 1 . I July 2003 Well 3 ~ ~ 1- , 82,00~ 1,155,000 467,000 6-F 510,00 509,000 1,117 ,000 1 ~-19 243,000 886,000 1,083,000 20-26 342,OOq 953,000 1,351,000 2~-31 427,000 1,234,000 1,003,000 T tal 1,604,000 4,737,000 5,021,000 ! 1 Month 110tal 11,362,000 Gallons AVerag~ Per Day 366,516 Gallons Acid USrd 73 Gallons Influent Reading 11,790,000 Backw~shed 250,600 i Reclaimed 205,620 August 2003 Wel3 We\l4 ~ 1-5 268,OpO 40,000 303,000 ~-9 68,OpO 1,275,000 1,667,000 11°-16 749,000 1,650,000 2,072,000 117-23 1,090,000 2,648,000 1,223,000 ~4-30 1,105,0,00 2,332,000 1,440,000 . 31 iO 692,000 0 I otal 3,280,000 8,637,000 6,705,000 I MonthlTotal 18,622,000 Gallons Average Per Day 600,709 Gallons Acid Used 89 Gallons Influe~t Reading 14,805,000 Backwashed 237,800 Reclai'med 173,330 ! 1 I I September 2003 WL3 ~ Well 5 1-6 636,000 2,523,000 871,000 7-13 871,000 1,185,000 1,624,000 14-20 200,000 1,401,000 795,000 21-27 233,000 1,482,000 804,000 28-30 217,000 473,000 307,000 Total 2,157 ;000 7,064,000 4,401,000 Mont~Total 13,622,000 Gallons Average Per Day 454,067 Gallons Acid 'Used 69 Gallons Influént Reading 13,077,000 (Meter out for repairs) Backwashed 254,800 Recl~imed 173,310 . i i i October 2003 Well 3 Well 4 Well 5 . 1-4 477,000 445,000 440,000 5-11 303,000 1,216,000 1,214,000 12-18 313,000 1,039,000 791,000 19-25 720,000 853,000 855,000 26-31 883,000 1 ,364,000 81,000 Total 2,696,000 4,917,000 3,381,000 Month Total 10,994,000 Gallons Average Per Day 354,645 Gallons Acid Used 65 Gallons Influent Reading 11,078,000 (Meter out for repairs) Backwashed 238.000 Reclaimed 199,980 November 2003 Well 3 Well 4 Well 5 1 52,000 45,000 313,000 2-8 484,000 752,000 849,000 9-15 397,000 908,000 794,000 16-22 894,000 499,000 697,000 23-29 756,000 732.000 466,000 30 0 299,000 0 Total 2,583,000 3,235,000 3,119,000 . Month Total 8,937,000 Gallons Average Per Day 297,900 Gallons Acid Used 56 Gallons Influent Reading 8,759,000 Backwashed 200,900 Reclaimed 212,310 December 2003 Well 3 Well 4 Well 5 1-6 571,000 1,179,000 248,000 7-13 444,000 924,000 631,000 14-20 495,000 431,000 1,073,000 21-27 783,000 668,000 484,000 28-31 604,000 262,000 232,000 Total 2,897,000 3,464,000 2,668,000 Month Total 9,029,000 Gallons Average Per Day 291,258 Gallons Acid Used 54 Gallons Influent Reading 8,663,000 Backwashed 230,000 Reclaimed 154,850 (Dumped for Backwashes) . I Attachment: II or No I · REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: March 29, 2004 EDA rGWATmGDEP1~ENT DEPARTMENT APPROVAL GENDA ITEM E A annual report. · I ! COMMENDED BOARD ACTION ¡ Fir review and approv~l. [ FI CAL IMPACT NJA. C MMENTS/RECOM~ENDATIONS I E I A monthly report offered for your review and approval. i ! · ~. . MUNICIPAL DEVELOPMENT GROUP. INC. DATE: March 29, 2004 MEMO TO: Mayor Hosch, City Council Members, City Administrator Weyrens j1V}F C ~ FROM: Joànne Foust & Cynthia Smitfì-~ ck, Municipal Development Group RE: Economic Development Activity Report - March 2004 Municipal Development Group, Inc. has been interacting with a number of prospects throughout the past month. Following is a summary of activities that have transpired. If you have any questions on any of these or other projects, please do not hesitate to contact us at 952-758-7399. A project number has been assigned to protect the confidentiality of the business prospects. Project 01-E: This project involves the expansion of a service within the community. MDG has been keeping in touch with the project contact over the past two years, the latest communications, occurring frequentl~, have been regarding possible sites for the service facility. Meaningful exchanges occurred on March 3rd, 17'h, 18 h, 22nd and 29th. Project 01-F: This company has been in contact with the EDA regarding potential sites for a commercial business since August, . 2001. MDG has forwarded the contact information on a number of sites. The last contact was via email on March 10th and 29th. Project 01-J: This developer owns a commercial subdivision in St Joseph and has constructed a commercial building. MDG has been working with the developer and has forwarded potential business leads. MDG placed a follow-up calls on March 10th and March 17, 2004. ' Project 02-E: This company is looking for approximately 1 acre of land for an industrial use for an expansion. MDG followed up with the company representative via mail on March 22, 2004. Project 02-L: This company is finalizing construction of a 12,000 square foot facility in Buettner Business Park. MDGspoke to the contact on March 22, 2004. He noted they plan to occupy 4,000 square feet and have a 10-year lease for 4,000 square feet. The final 4,000 square feet area is still available. Project 02-R: This company initially contacted the EDA in June of 2002. In July of 2003 they noted they had entered into a 5-year lease in another community. MDG, Inc met with the project representative at the company's request on March 29th regarding the status of the development. The company has entered ,into a purchase agreement for an 8.31 acre parcel in Buettner Business Park. MDG and the Developer discussed various financial assistance programs available including TIF, MIF and MCCF. The Developer projects construction of a facility in Spring of 2005. The initial construction will be a smaller size with options for expanding. . EDA Monthly Project Report - March 2004 Municipal Development Group - Page 1 Proj ct 02-Y: . This prospect contacted MpG on October 7, 2002 regarding new construction in the Buettner Business Park. MDG has ad numerous follow-~p conversations with the company and supplied information requested on other sites. MD followed-up on Marc~ 3, 2004 and spoke with representative on March 29th. ProJ ct 02-AA: I . " . " . This rusiness purchased Iqnd in Buettner Business Park earlier this year. They are starting bUilding and site ~Ians fo, PfPosed construction i~ the sp,ing of 2004. MDG lest followed up with the business contect on Merc/1 10' end 22"'. The e'chitect is curreft'Y working on building end site piens fo' submittelln the next month 0' two. Proj ct 02-FF: This ~rospect contected MþG ebout e yeer ego regerding eveileble acrooge within the Buettner Busln~ss Perk. MDG followed-up most recently via phone on March 9, 2004. ! Proj~ct 03-A: i' Thes~ developers e'e inte'~sted In e lerge highwey commerciel development in an erea not yet ennexed into the City, MDG has been working with them over the past several months. Additional contact with the developers occurred on March 3rd, 10th,! 1 ¡'h, 20th, 22nd and 29th. A meeting is planned for April 4th, proje1ct 03-1: I This }ontect phoned the c;¡y lest spring regerdlng 5,000 s.t. of ,efeilloose speco. MDG hes been following up . routin Iy with the contact. The last contact occurred March 3rd. The contact is interested in finding a franchise owne ¡lOCallY, , ' Proje t 03-R: This ompany contacted thE! City in the fall of 2003 regarding the purchase of approximately one acre of industrial prope ty. ~~G has ?een ro¡lJtineJy following up and keeping in touch regarding the provision of additional industrial acrea e within the City. Th~ last contactoccurred on March 17'h. , . Pr~je t ~3-S: I . . '. '. . This WOJect Involves tr1e possible expansion of the Industrial acreage In the community. MDG has been working with t e pro~erty owners oh the project since August of 2003. MDG followed up with the property owner on Febru ry 25t and met with t:wo of the property owners on March 3rd and followed üp via phone on March 17'h and 29th. DG has been worki~g with the City Engineer and fiscal advisor regarding the feasibility constructing and fundin the project, including! a meeting and follow up with the City Engineer on March 9th, 17'h and 22nd, On March 24th DG met with a repre:sentative from SEH to receive initial cost projections for installation of utilities and roadw ys at the site. The riepresentative from SEH will be revising the scope of the project with new estimates expec ed in April. Proje t 03-T: This prspect contected the iCity in the in the fell of 2003 'egerdlng comme'ciel ec,eege in the downtown. MDG last fol owed up via phone on! March 9th. Projeat 03-U: I Inquiryl forwarded to MDG Or] October 1, 2003 regarding a potential commercial development in St. Joseph. MDG followed up occurred on Mer 17'". p'OJei 04-A: . Confid ntial lead: wholesal r/re-packager in St. Cloud Area seeking to relocate. Offers from three other comm nities (Milaca, Foley Big Lake) are existing. MDG followed up on several occasions, including March 3rd, 9th, 11~ and 1th. Contact onlthe 17'h revealed the company has determined it best to stay in the community where they a e currently located following a Council decision to vacate a street at the project site. On the 17'h MDG mailed the owner a letter con:gratulating him on his opportunity and its benefit to the larger, regional economy and indictin if another opportunity presented itself the St. Joe EDA staff would be pleased to offer assistance. . I . Projec 04-8: I This St Cloud area commeroial construction company called the City on March 16th regarding the purchase of an industrl I lot fo, the develoP1"nt of e business incubeto' feclli!y. Steff ,eviewed aveileble lots, confect informetion EDA Monthly Project Report - March 2004 Municipal Development Group _ Page 2 I I I I for the property representative, zoning criteria and applicable covenants. MDG followed up with a letter on March 1th. The company phoned MDG on March 22nd regarding the whether or not the purchase price of the proposed lot included assessments. MDG contacted the property owner's representative. MDG followed up with the . developer on March 29th. The developer indicates they are currently conducting financial analysis to determine if the project is feasible. Project 04-C: A request for information was received from the Stearns County HRA relative to a large scale development (50 to 100 acres) proposed for somewhere within a 45 - 75 minute drive from the Twin Cities metropolitan area. General information regarding the City of St. Joseph was forwarded to the HRA on March 23rd following discussion by the City Council. Other: MDG participated in a meeting with City Administrator Weyrens, Public Works Superintendent Taufen and City Engineer Bettendorf and School Superintendent regarding a possible site for a school. Business assistance reports were completed and submitted to the Department of Employment and Economic Development. . . EDA Monthly Project Report - March 2004 Municipal Development Group - Page 3 M i nnesotaPollution . Control Agency ~~Iii7 lŸ->I 1?'T4, !.Wi.":li~ ff fÐ1n~t!I!! . March12,2004 i i I I The Honorable L~ Hosch Mayor, City ofSt. Joseph Saint Joseph, MNls6374-0668 I I RE: Letter ofWJming Wastewater Ffrastructure Needs Survey (WINS) I Dear MayorHosch: I I This is a Letter of \Warning (LOW) issued by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) to the city for failure to submit the Wastewater Inrrastructure Needs Survey (WINS) . . The MPCA has sufficient infonnation to indicate that City of St. Joseph has violated the following provisions of state statute: I Minn. staJ.§ 115.03. subd. 1(rn):- "Theagenqy is hereby given and charged with the following powers and duties: To requird each governmental subdivision identified as a permittee for a wastewaterl treatment works to annually evaluate in every odd-numbered year the condition o'fits existing system, and identify future capital improvements that will be needed fO attain or maintain compliance with a National Pollutant Discharge Eliminati01 System or State Disposal System permit" The cityhas failed to submit the Wastewater Infrastructure Needs Survey (WINS) I I System report due to the MPCA on November 24,2003. ! I Within ten days th~city shall submit the WINS report to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, 520 LafaYðtteRoad North, S1. Paul, Minnesota 55155-4194 (Attn: Jim Anderson). I Failure to submit tHe missing report may result in escalated enforcement action, which may include monettu-y penalties. I . , i I i I , ' _ 520 Lafayette Rd. N.; Saint Piaul, MN 55155-4194; (9i51J296-6300(Voice); (651) 282-5332 (TTY); www.pca.state.mn.us St. Paul · 8~ainerd · Detroit Lakes · Duluth · Mankato · Marshall · Rochester · Willmar Equal Opportunity Employer· Printed on recycled paper containing at least 20 percent fibers from paper recycled by consumers. I i . I I ! Renaissance Act Summary u.s. Senator Norm Coleman 2550 University Avenue I St. Paul, MN55114 i 651-645-0323 I ¡ V oWíing to help rebuild Main Street and revitalize the economy in rural MinneSota communities and ationwide, Senator Norm Coleman (R-MN) introduced the $50 billion Rural Renaissance Act 1 esigned to provide r;esources for small communities to improve infrastructure, generate jobs and improve their quality of life. . Co- ponsored by senatoJ Mike DeWine (R-OH) and Lindsay Graham (R-SC), the Rural Rentssance Act would ¡Jay for this $50 billion investment inf\1fal America by the issuing of $65 billi, n in bonds by a nonrprofit Rural Renaissance Corporation (RRC), with bond bearer inve¡stors earning federal ¡tax credits instead of interest. $50 billion of the proceeds would be ID] avaílableto eligible projects intheform of grants, The RRC wOµld dístribule the $50bilUon 10 the following rural projeèts and initiatives to pro ide. critically needed~'flexible and supplemental funding for these priority needs, with not less than $500 million designated to each state. ! I I i I . '''1;U1~''¡'B',~ · ~ ~¡~~~r~", N OR ~\w""E~t:!EMAN I~~~~~~~,~rt~~{;f~~íi\ , . UNITED ST~~~~~~~~[q.~&!~~I1' NNESOTA -~Ú\~1i~~~\;~~=6;i-::,~:I;~~ 3 2~¥1iI~'~¡;SË~Ä];a13'û'ÚfDING . 1~J;;>; ~:~~~~i:~~~~:t:~~{:~::~¥~r~~~~~~ WASHING~ON'~t~8~2'6"~b--, 50 I """.,' ,'18 r.:;;l "I>"~' qifi!l1$l;¡ii~'io\~"'~ CONTACT: TOM STEWARD (202) 253-448 I (202) 224-2995 Executive Summary of Senator Norm Coleman's Rural Renaissance Initiative: Across'America our rural communities are struggling to improve the quality and livability of their cities. In Minnesota, local leaders are hard at work to confront issues and identify assets in order to fashion a brighter future for their cities and towns. However, during difficult economic times their struggles are compóunded by a shortage of the funding options and development tools they need to grow jobs, expand business, encourage existing residents to reinvest in their homes and lure new residents to live in rural communities. Throughout the past seven months, Senator Norm Coleman and his Senate Office have been to all of Minnesota's 87 counties. In the process they have met with over 200 Mayors, City Council members, Economic Development professionals, City Planners, Foundation representatives and other officials. · The clear message coming from these meetings is two fold: 1. Rural Minnesota leaders have good ideas and are working hard, but they need sIgnificant help to do what needs to be done. 2. And, while a strong farm policy is important to rural America, we need a more comprehensive, integrated approach to rural economic development. Most regional centers in Minnesota have growing populations and robust local economies. The success of these regional cènters provides an opportunity for towns within a25 to 3º"mile radius to capitalize on the success of the regional centers. But to do this they must be able to provide attractive housing, quality schools, basic city services, adequate health care facilities and the kinds of amenities it takes to make their towns attractive places to live. Yet, for even the most motivated rural community in Minnesota, it is a struggle to provide even the basic quality of housing as a result of a lack of solid infTastructure. There are serious problems in Minnesota and American rural communities. Populations are falling. Businesses fail or move overseas. This brings us to several communities with declining school enrollments and an aging population. This is not just a Minnesota issue. All across America there is an economic crisis that has nothing to do with Wall Street or the price of wheat. It has everything to do with whether a city has clean water, a functioning sewer system, access to high speed internet, the ability to maintain its existing housing stock, keep its schools open and retain its hospitals along with the capital and wherewithal to build new homes and help expand businesses. Along with his colleagues, Sen. Coleman has already committed to incentives meant to bolster rural · America: . B ild America Bonds C -authored by Sen. Coleman, legislation called "Build America Bonds" will provide $50 billion in nl transportation infrasb-ucture funding. This one-time federal bonding program will empower st tesand local govemm~nts to complete significant infrastructure projects across all modes of tr sportation including toads, rail, transit, aviation and water. I T eNewHomestead Ac~ It rttempts to provide individuals incentives to live and work in greater Minnesota, Sen. Coleman also c~-authored Senator Byrpn Dorgan's "New Homestead Act." It will provide opportunities for in¡(lividuals and businesses that choose to locate in high out-migration (see complete report for d1fmition of out-migratipn county). Incentives would include repayment of college loans, tax credits fì home purchases, and!unique ,aviugs accouuts to assist with small husiuess loaus;educatioo e penses, first-time home purchases and un-reimbursed medical expenses. I I Renewable Fuels 'I S n. Coleman is the fourder and co-chairman of the bipartisan Biofuels Caucus, with Democrat S nators Tom Harkin a11d Blanche Lincoln and Republican Senator Jim Talent, and he is convinced t at renewable fuels will be a keystone of a rural renaissance. And, there was good news for r newable fuels and rur~l Minnesota in the Energy Bill passed by the Senate in July. The bill i' eludes a number ofprpvisions that will be beneficial to the rural Minnesota economy. Sen. ~Olemen wilhvork wi~sen. Chuck Gres¡le~ and the Bush AdD1iuistration to develop and move forw rd aggressively over th(~ course of the next year wìtha series of initiatives designed to promote Rura Economic Developm6nt. The Rural Renaissance Program is a work inprogress. But, the core princ'ples offocusing on physical, economic and financial infrastructure will likely remain intact and will . enco ,pass the following: I 1 Rural Renaissance Act would vrovide one-time $50 billion investment for: > Water and waste treatment projects > 'I Affordable housing i ' > Community facilities inbluding hospitals, fire and police stations, as well as nursing and assisted > J'ving homes' "i Rural venture capital pr/ojects > Distance learning and telemedicine > Jobs training I > High speed internet acc1ess > Rural teleworks I > Incentives for health care professionals to work in rural areas > Farmer-owned value-aclded agriculture and renewable energy projects and initiatives > Conservation assistanc~ to. enhance water and air quality and to. protect wetlands and wildlife i . I CIIYO F SI. IOSEP H í . www. cityofstiose~h. com I Administrator ~emo Judy Weyrens I 1 i , Mayor To: ~I Employoos ~i Lôrry I. Hosch I From: J~wero 001 City Coun Councilors 3/2612004 .. .. ... AI Rôssier Date: Ross Rieke I Re: ¡ Insurance Forms Gàry Utsch i Dale Wick i Please find enclosed insurance forms for three different carriers. The Insurance Agent has Is~ggested that we quote insurance again as rates have changed and different services are available.' The small group reform also allows small groups to have more . thaj one insurance plan. The, unions will part of the decision making process after all the data is collected. The proposal would include reviewing the rates and then meeting with the Council and the uniqn stewards to review the alternatives. Since' we must have a decision by June 1, 20Q4, it is important that we begin the process at this time. I 1 I Please fill out the enclosed form where it is highlighted and return sealed in the en~elope provided. To be in compliance with HIPPA regulations, I would ask that you make sure you seal the envelope before returning. All sealed envelopes will be retÚrned directly to the insurance agent who will open the envelopes and verify that the forms have been filled out completely. If they notice that something, is not complete, th~y will call you directly. i Ag~in, I want to stress that we have not decided to change the plan, but would like to se~ if we could get better rates and see what other opportunities are available. If you haye any questions please do not hesitate to stop by the Office or call me. Please return your form no later than April 7, 2004. I Thank you II II! II ! II II II I I I I I i I . '1 Z ~ Coil c g c ^ v e rju e N 0 rt h . POI) 0 x b b 8 . S tli n 1. 0 S C ph. M inn es 0 t à r b , 7 4 iP h 0 n e ,H)"b,,7Z01 ¡:ð x ,zo ,b,.O·HZ i i I I , i i . S . JOSEPHTOLBOARD PLANNING ,COMMISSION J~e Bechtold,Chaifman Ralph Eiynck 28263 Jade.Road¡ 12838 287th 8t ~t. Cloud, MN~56~Ol St. Joseph,MN 56374 363-4483 ./ 363-8126 ~omeSa1zer, Supervisor 8747 KelpRoadf 't. Joseph,MN 5~374 63-4384 ! i i I ) i eg Berg, 8uperíisor Doug Fredrickson 1 832 Hawthome . oad 26545 Jade Road I , t. Cloud,MN 56ß01 8t.8t. CloudMN 56301 54-6968' I 363-4709 ~Obert Rassier, Tþasurer Matt Symalla . I 9748 9pt Ave I 2835 Meadow Lane 81. Joseph, MN56374 Waite Park,MN 56387-2042 363-8427 I 251-4650 AnnReischl, Cle}k Jeff Janssen 10187 295th 8t I 10803 270th 8t 81. Joseph, MN ~6374 St. Cloud, MN 56301 363-8825 i 363-4321 I I IF YOllTHJ}\jK YOUARE TOO SMALL TO BE EFFECTIVE, THENYOUHA VE NEVER BEEN IN BED WITH A MOSQUITOJ! I i I i ! ! . ¡ i I i I · I I i ! i March 30, 2004~ . Edward Joseph acures 107 5th Avenue Northwest I St. Joseph, MN )56374 Re: Noise O:rdinance Violation Warning ! 1 , I Dear Mr. Kacures: This firm repreients the City of St. Joseph in ordinance enforcement. I am contacting you regarding J possible noise ordinance violation. Numerous neighbors have raised concerns that ypu have been using a snow blower and/or leaf blower in a manner so as to breach the peage, annQyand disturb neighboring property owners. The City'of st.1 Joseph has a noise ordinance that is triggered when a person makes "a loud audible nbise that is likely to unreasonably or unnecessarily annoy, disturb, injure or endanger the cbmfort, repose, health, peace, safety or welfare of any person or precludes their enjoymerlt of property or affects their property value". (St. Joseph's Ordinance · 102.01). .1 It has come tolthe City's attention that you have beep using equipment either in the capacity of snbw blowing or leaf blowing for numerous hours every day. There have been some coAcerns raised by neighbors that this use has, become unreasonable and ! ,0 unnecessary. ¡Complaints have been made that your snow blowing/leaf blowing has caused annoyance and disturbance of neighboring property owners. I I Please considþr this letter a warning and a demand that you immediately cease snow blowing and/9rleafblowing excessively on your property. Whìle the city understands some use of s,now blowing equipment and/or leaf blowing equipment is necessary in homeownersnip, your use has become excessive and unreasonable. Should the +y .continue to receiv¢ uoise complaints as a res1l1t~fthese actions, it will be forced to iss Ie you a citation in violation of the CitySt. Joseph ordinance 102. A violation of this ordinance is a misdemeanor and carries with it 90 days in jail and/or a $1,000.00 fine. Should you have any questions or concerns feel free to give me a call. I ! j Sincerely, RAJKOWSKI HANS MEIER LTD. I By · Sarah L. Smith-Larkin SLSL:acv 1 ! cc: Chie'fPete Jansky (via emaìl) i I , I I i I I Page 1 of2 Jud We ren "Ter~aar, Jody" <JTERHJR@CSBSJU,EDU> "Gell~r, Mary" <MGELLER@CSBSJU.EDU>; "Laker, Jason"<JLAKER@CSBSJU.EDU>; "Masman, T. Todd" <TMtSMAN@CSBSJU.EqU>; <stjosephpd@cji.net>; "Judy Weyrens" <jweyrens@cityofsljoseph.com>; "Yierzba, Sha1n" <SYIERZBA@CSE}SJU.EDU>; "Schumann, James" <JSchumann@CSBSJU.EDU> Sent: Tues¡day, March 30, 2004 6:53 PM Subject: senr Fe'ewell I spoke vyith Judy today regarding the meeting she had this morning with the two students (Luke and Elissa) regardin~ their plans for Senipr Farewell at Centennial Park. Here are some issues that still need attention. The students will be going before the City Council on Thursday to request approval to use the park. Prior to that tim~, some of these que~tions need to be answered. I am rather uncomfortable with them seeking approval!,when we've not yet! seen final plans nor discussed some of the issues listed below. However, their timeline for getting, approval from the city means they needto meet with the council this week. ¡ location · Given th, e residential areêl,isurrounding Centennial Park, is this really the best place to hold this event? 1 · Have all the locations atSJU been thoroughly evaluated in terms of feasibility? IS,an on-campus location betterthan Centennial? I . . If thete vent is held, ,at C e~., te nn'lal, howw ill th ß ne"g hbors be not ¡fied sPes notto be alarm ed, by the crowd and t e noise? I", , · How I ill the area be secyredsothat it remains an event for CSB/SJU seniors and faculty/staff? Who will provitle the hired security? · ,The Jtudents really'belie~e that holding the event in St. Joe is the best plan and believe this has the support and ndorsement of the SJPD. · The roposal from the students apparently includes the serving of hard alcohol which was a surprise to me. r thihk the event, given it's focus on being a CSB/SJU community event, should not include hard liquor. S tu~"le,n,t sw'lllhave "ple,n.ty i'~fti,m.e to drink aft. er the eV,e nt, . The city could approve the event on the condition that only.3.2 non-intoxicating liquor be served. I · Wh t is the plan for dealing with people who arrive atthe event already intoxicated? · HOI will the serving of ~Icohol be monitored? Food ~ Howill fOQd bß prepâ~ed and mádß. .á\lallabl~? Part oftheiJpal is to meke su,e students have!opd in thßir sto~achs before they h~ad out for additional drinking. There needs to be a good plan to make sure there is sufficient and' appropriate food. I Focu of Event . . 1 u dßrstend this!O be lat\~wy.¡ay Of telebretlng senior Farewe)I. Tñß goal is to háVß á good e)lßnt and a fu ,event and to includ~ faculty/staff. Students will view ,the event differently and perhaps drink differently I 1 i ! 3BŒ2004 ì I I I I i I Page 2 of2 I 1 · if they~now thatlò~ of factltv and staff will be at the event tò œleb,ateWltn them. . . How W~I the event be merkrted so thetpeople understand the chenge in te,ms of what the event i~ and how th t may impact behavior? · . Howwtfaculty/staffbestrþnglyenCOUraged end Werm;¡l.nvited tò attend? I tl]ink it is imperativetò have a lot oJ faculty and staff pr~sent to change the tone of the event and the perception students have in regard to thei drinking for this portion of the evening. I i j Cleanin I UR . The p ,k hes to becle~neupby 7:00amtne following morning. IS\he'ea planto insu,e that thi~ happe ssothat forfeiture 6f the damage deposit and/or incurring additional fees does not happen? , ! I ! i I - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1- - - - - - - - - Jody L. Tbrhaar Dean of 1tudents College f Saint Benedict I 37 South College Avenue I I Saint Joseph, MN 56374 ! I PH: (32 ) 363-5601 or (320)36~-5580 Fax: (32 ) 363-5006 · j!grhaarcsbs·u.edu · 3/30/2004 ) i ! I I DRAFT I ! March 18, 2004 i Page 1 of 4 I · Pursu nt to due call and noti~e thereof, the City Council for the City of St. Joseph met in regular session on ThrSday, March 18, 2001 at 7:00 PM in the St. Joseph City Hall. Memb¡ers Present: Mayor Larry Hosch. Councilors Gary Utsch, AI Rassier, Ross Rieke, Dale Wick. City AdmiJistrator Judy weyrens City Rrp,esentetives P,esen\: City Engineer Joe. ßetlendort Appro! eAQenda: Rassier ~ade amotion to approve the agenda with the deletion ofthe approval of the March 9, minutes and the following additions: 6 (c) Engineering- Future Industria,l Park 10 (b) Funds Transfer Request The otion was seconded by Utsch and passed unanimously. I Cons nt AQenda: Wick made a motion to approve consent agenda as follows; seconded by Utsch d I d . I I an, passe unanimous y.! ! a. BillsPayable - ,Requested Action: Approve check numbers 33933-33999 b. Minutes- Requ~sted Action: February 26, 2003 and March 4, 2004 c. Transportation Planning - Requestêd Action: Authorize the Mayor and Administrator to execute Resol4tion 2004-10 obligating City funds to provide a 46% match for the St. Joseph North east/wes¡tCorridor Study. d. TransportationlPlanning - Requested Action: Authorize the Mayor and Administrator to execute Resolûtion2004-11 obligating the City to construct the North east/west corridor within 1 0 year~ of completing the Transportation Study. e. Gambling Perrflit - RequestedAction: Accept the Gambling prêmisePermit for the St. · JosephY2K Lions for an event to be held on April 30, 2004 at the ElPaso l3ar & Grill. I f. One'Day Liquor Permit - Authorize a.one day liquor permit for the Church of St. Joseph, Waite Park forian event to be held at Millstream Park on May 23,2004. Pub ic Comments to the A enda: No one present wished to speak. St. loud Bo s and Girls Club Discussion on Summer Recreation - Tom Wicks, Director of Programs for the t. Cloud Boys and Girls Club appeared before the Council to present a proposal for the summer rec eation program. Wic~s stated that he was contacted by Weyrens inquiring if whether or not the Boys and! Girls Club would be willing to take over the summer recreation program. In response to that inquiry, Wi;S presented the Council with a proposed operating budget for the 2004 Summer Recreation Pro ram. The proposed budget includes three (3) scenarios based on projected enrollment. In rerng the p,ojeet cos~ It appears as though the p,oject wiUheve e detieitof epproximele,y $ 7,000 Th Boys and Girls Club if not in a position where they can operate a program with a deficit/ Therefore, if the, operate the summer recreation program, the City would have to reimburse the Boys and Girls Club en1operetingshortfells. Ho ch stated that he WOU;ld like to see a summer recreation program back in St. Joseph and he has no prdblem authorizing the City to pay for the, program for St. Joseph residents, but as a City we can't pay for thd portion for St. Joseph! Township and St. Wendel Township. Weyrensstated that in the past the pr~gramdeficit was conv~rted to a perstudent cost and St. Joseph Township contributed that amount for ea h student participating from St. Joseph Township. St. Wendel Township was asked to provide the sere <;onl'ibution end th.y ,efused, The p'ogrem wes cenceled in2003. esit w~s not cost effective and pe Heipelion heddropped in 2002 as e ,esult of the City ehe'glng e hlghe' student fee fo, those residing in St Wendel Township. I I i · T~e Council was in general agreement that the City could not subsidize the Summer Recreation Program for participants that did n10t reside within the City. Weyrens stated that she would check with the auditors to vêrify that the City could contribute an amount to the program for those students residing within the i i i I I I i DRAFT I March 18, 2004 I i Page 2 of4 I . City. ;jeyrens further stated ~hat she has contacted St. Joseph Township and they would be willing to ?O~tri?~.te at th~ same le~e t~~y did in the past, t~e shortfall divided .by the number of students with each JUrlsdlc Ion paYing for their re~ldents. The Council agreed to meet with St. Wendel Township to request tile sT funding level es ag\eed to with St. Joseph Township Weyrens clarified the Council will be meetin with St. Wendel TOWrShiP on April 6 and this item can be added to the agenda. Rassirmade a motion totable a decision on the Summer Recreation Program until the City meets with St. Wendel Tow!nship on April 6, 2004. The motion was seconded by Rieke and passed . I ,,' i unammous y. I : i CITY ENGINEER REPORTS Northl nd Plat 8 Bid Resultsl: City Engineer Joe Bettendorf presented the Council with the following bid result for the improvements¡ for Northland Plat 8. Molitor Excavating $ 311,641.90 RL larson Excavating 312,541.25 I Ku~chle Underground Inc. 314,164.60 Lar~on Excavating 314,722.96 Rar:'dy.Kramer Excavating 323,040.56 Visser Scraper 324,585.55 JR Ferche Inc. 326,275.25 RPIUtilities Inc 326,755.35 Burski Construction 337,198.00 I Bett~ndOrf stated that after reviewing the bids received, he recommends awarding the contract for the . Nort çand 8 Improvements ~o Molitor Excavating. Utsch questioned if the City has worked with Molitor Exc~atingin the past, and ¡if so, was the, projected completed as bid. Bettendorf responded that St. Jose h has worked with M9litorExcavating and have been satisfied. Wick questioned when the project is anrciPated to begin, t01hiCh Bettendorf responded mid April. Ra"["'mednmotlon to eccept the low bid of Mollto, Excavating Inc. In the emount$ 311,a41.90 for t e 2004 Northland Plat 8 Improvements. The motion was seconded by Wick and passed una imously. i Fea ibilitv Report - Sand Companies: Bettendorf reported that Sand Companies has requested to pub\icly finance the Improvements for Morningside Acres. If the City finances,the improvements, the Coyncil must authorize SEH to prepare a feasibility report. Bettendorf stated that he is in the process of preparing the feasibility report for the abutting property owners along 295th and 103rd Street and it makes senke to construct Morningside as a City project. Utsch questioned if publicly financing the project prre...a risk to theCi~.I. Weyrens sætoo thet the. City requieM the deve'ope,. to submit a letter of credit eq al to 80% of the asses'sments, which eliminates financial risk to the City. Ut ch made a motion to! adopt resolution 2004-_, Ordering the Preparation of the Feasibility Re ort for the Improvements to Morningside Acres. The motion was seconded by Rieke and pa sed unanimously. I I En ineerin costs for future a industrial ark: Bettendorf reported that the' EDA has requested an es imate on the possible extension of utility services for a future industrial park. The property being crderooet this time Is jloceted norihend adjacent to the existing Industrie,. Park. Bettandon e.timeted th engineering services to provide a cost estimate for services would not exceed $ 3,000., In addition to ex ending the existing w~ter and sewer lines, the lift station on Ridgewood Road must be reviewed to de~ermine and establish~he service district. Bettendorf estimated the total cost to review the possible . ex~ension of services, including the lift station analysis to be $ 10,000.00. Hosch questioned how the e, penditure wouldbefuDded. Weyrens stated that the engineering expenses would be expended from th Trunk Utility Fund. j I I ! I I I i DRAFT II March 18, 2004 Page 3 of 4 . Wick made a motion to accept the estimated budget for engineering services for a future indust ial park, not to exceed $ 10,000, which will be expended from the Trunk Utility Fund. The motio was seconded by Utsch and passed unanimously. ¡ I I MAYOR REPORTS APO eetin: Hosch reported that he attended a recent APO Executive Committee meeting where the Trans ortation Bill was discu~sed. I Schoo Committee: Hosch ryported that the School Committee has been meeting regularly and will be meeti1g with the Survey COrt¡'pany from SCSU to discuss the potential costs for conducting a survey. The surve)( will help the SchoolG!ommittee determine the needs and wishes of the St. Joseph Area. ¡ COUNCIL REPORTS I UTS H PlanninQ Commission: Utsch questioned when the Planning Commission members will receive the uPdaï'ed Ordinance Books t6 which Weyrens responded they should be ready for distribution on March 24,2 04. I WIC - No Report ' RIE IE - No Report i I RAS IER I . Mee~inQ at St. Cloud City Hall: Rassier reported that he attended the area Cities meeting on March 13, 2001wher~ the main topic 'of discussion was the proposed extension of the oM-half cent sales tax. The proppsal is to request Legi~lative Authority to extend the one-half cent sales tax for an additional 20 year. . I ADMINISTRATOR REPORTS Pub ic Hearin Fees: We~rens requested the Council, consider amending the Public Hearing Fee for land use requests. With the Ci\y expanding the boundaries, it is becoming difficult for residents to identify the pro erty when requesting (and use consideration. Increasing the fee $ 50.00 would allow the City Office I to Pi' blish a map \Nith all hraring notices. The map would provide a quick illustration as to the general ViCi¡ityof the land use request. Ra.' sier made a motion~o increase the Public Hearing fee for land use requests $ 50.00 to cover thlexpense ?f publishi~g a map with the legal notices. The motion was seconded by Wick and pa sed unanimously. I Fu LdS T rens, ler: W eyren~ reported thet during tho P'pce8s 01 finlshi09 theeccoÌJnting 10' 2003, the Co ncil needs to considet the following fund transfers: ! 1. Close Construction Fund 424 Northland Five into Bond Fund 324 Northland Five Bond 2. Close Bdnd Fund 308, East Baker Street to Bond Fund 332 Crossover refunding 3. Close Bond Fund 312, West Minnesota Street to Bond Fund 332 Crossover refunding 4. Close BondFund 315, .East Minnesota Street to Bond Fund 332 Crossover refunding 5. Transfer! the annual debt requirement for the Sewer Capacity (2002 and 2003), $ 124,800 . i ¡ I I , DRAFT I March 18, 2004 ! 1 I ' Page 4 of4 . Rieke made amolion 10 er'izelhe fund transfers as ,equesled; seconded by Ulscþand passed unani ously. AdiOU¡n' Ulsch medea mJon 10 adjourn a17:45 PM; seconded byWlck and pessed unanimously. JUdY~Weyrens ¡ Admi ' istrator I . . Page 1 of2 I "Die rich, Ernest" <EDIED~ICH@CSBSJU.EDU> <jwe rens@cityofstjoseph.com> I Mon~ay, March 22, 200412:39 PM FW: rbor Day Proclamation ¡ Here it is! I i 1 1 ì Ernest Diedrich "The real work ofplanet,$aving will be small, Economics Profe sor humble, and humblinl, and (insofar as it CSB/SJU involve$ love) PleasJg and rewarding. Its 1 tel. #320-363-3518 I jobs will be too ma~y to count, too many to I , I fax # 320-363-32 8 report, too many to! be publicly noticed or i rewarded, too small t6 make anyone rich or I famous. Wendell Berry I i --·--Original Mes age----- ! , From: Diedrich, ¡Ernest ¡ S~Onday,~arCh 22, 200412:37 PM T rens@ci1¡yofstjoseph.gov' ¡ Subject: FW: A bor Day Proclamation! i I i Hi Judy, I i A group of int¡erésted St. Josep~citizens have gotten together to promote trees and tree-planting and as part of our discusîions, we propose 1hat the City formally adopt an Arbor Day proclamation to coincide with Earth Wéek, and th¡e Fruehlings Fest çm April 30th . We will bring this forward at the next St. Joseph City Council Meeting on V"rsday, April 1 st'1.1hough if the Mayor would like to make this proclamation on his own,that would be fin too. We'd like,to have him read or present it at the Fruehlings Fest on April 30th, when folks will planttre s around the Lake'WobegonWelcome Center., The proclamation, copied from one adopted by St. Cloud, re ds as follows: ! Proclamation i I i Wherea , Minnesota fordst treasures were a significantattraction to. early settlers because of their usefulness r the beautiful tironment they provided; and Whereat, trees are a yital rešource.in ~innesotatoday,enrich our liveš by purifying air and Water, caerving oil andenergy,cr<;>atingjobs through theJorestproducts industry, serving as recreational s gs, providing habitat for wildlife and making our cities more livable; and ¡ I i J I I ! I I 3/31/2004 I ! I Page 2 of2 ! Whereas, uman activities such as constructiondamage and pollution, as well as disease and insects, t_ten our tre~s, creating the neød for concerted action to ensure the future of urban and rural forests in o tate, count, , and world; and I ~ I "', ' Whereas, ach year the last Friday in April is designated as Þ,rborDay. People of Minnesota pay special aüenti7 to the wondertul treasure that our trees represent and dedicate themselves to the continued health of our st te's stock of trees; I , Now, therefore be it reisolved, that I, Larry Hosch, Mayor of the City of St. Josep~, Minnesota;, do hereby proclaim April 3qth, 2004 I I Arbor Day I I and the month of May to be r Arbor Month i 1 ¡ i In the city of t.Joseph. By so doing, I urge all citizEmsto participate in tree planting programs that will ensure a gree¡n Minnesota in de¿ades to come, and to plant, nurture, protect, and wisely use Minnesota's greattreasuTof trees. ! c.rs, ¡ i Ernie Diedric~ I I I I I I I ¡ ¡ 1 , i i I I I I I I I , r i I í , r I i i I ! ! i ¡ , I . , I j I 3/31/2004 ! · Apri 1,2004 i St. Ben's and St. John's i Senior Farewell 2004 i i This year the Senates wo~ld like to hold a different style event for the graduating seniors. We W01d ltke ~ hold w eve~ngh~b~ue to celeb~e mfu seniOrs, J~ul~, sMf wd niouastics ou Frid y, May 7 ftOni 5 to rO/9 at Centeunial P~k in St. Joseph. The Event Sen~or Farewell is an event for seniors, faculty, staff and monastics to come together to celebrate fue rlmination of fue p:bt four years. All Seniors ~e invited to (his event, wd we mil be invi ing members of the follege community through invitations and email. ,Our hope is that with a stl10ng presence from the faculty, staff and monastics the atmosphere will be one of casual ce$ration wd respectrJI behavior.. .The senates. ,eU·t -shnis to fue Semors· which act es fuerr ad ission into the barbe1que. Students can only purchase one t-shirt under the condition that they ,ho . fuey are a memb10f fuesenior cles,: we have lists of all fue graduating seniors which we wil~ mark off to double heck their status. We would like to see a barbeque complete with gri~ing burgers and.brat~, etc. We have a meeting with Foodservice about the menu on Friday aft moon. The Senates iwould also like to set up a beer garden at the park for the event. With the ¡exception ofa handwl of Seniors, most students will beat least 21 and of legal drinking age. Weare planning on having KCLD provide music for the event and a loudspeaker to aid the door pt giveaways. W e f~elfue door prizes mil be an e"traincentive for students to stay at fue · ev nt. As a security measure, no backpacks will be allowed into the event. I í Lo¡cation I After looking at locatiohs both at CSB and SJU we had a large meeting on March 11 and present w~e staff ftom C=I',* Securities, Deans of Students, Student Activities, foöd Service, wd Tr nsportation. Many factors ledto the recommendation from the group that we investigate the po sibilities for a city dark location for the event. Friday is the main move-out day on both ca puses, whichmea~s everywhere on campus will be a high traffic area and it would be di ficult to restrict acc~ssto.invited persons to the event. Another concern was the logistics of tr sportation to and f~om the event. Iftheevent is held at St. John's there is a strong chance th t we would need almost 16 buses at one time to transport students back from St. John's to St. B n's at the close of tlje event. The Senates were asked to investigate Millstream Park as a p I ssible location. MiHstream Park is unavailable due to construction, but Centennial Park was ~mlable.. Wefeel CelltennialPmk is a good 10cationJorfue event. It hesall fue benefits that illstream Park offer~, including a shelter, ' fencing, and the crossing of CR-75 will no longer be a concern. Communit~ BBQs at Centennial have been successful in the past, the location is well own to students and the park is easily accessible. The location makes it very feasible for s udents to walk fromicSB or to be dropped off by the Link on its way to St.Ben's. Hopefully t is will reduce the n~mber of students driving to the location and potentially will decrease the c ances of drunken d1'iving later in the evening. The park has a sand volleyball court, a b¡asketball court, and plenty of lawn space for Frisbees and other outside activities for students to participate in. One cqncernthat has been raised is the residential location of the park and if that ill be a problem as å result ofthe possibilities for students to come and go as they please during · t eevent. We feel th~ location is an asset rather thana concern. We do not foresee problems I i j í i i i I ¡ I i , I . with fencing off the area *ith snow fence to more easily regulate the traffic into and out of the park.l~ We are 100kingint1 renting tents so we can still use the park if it is raining, and it will pro~'de shade from the st¡n. I ' Foo ' f As ,entionedearlier, weihave a meeting scheduled with Foodservice for Friday afternoon. The Serurtes will be grillmg tlieburgers onJocation, wifu allfood bei1¡gprovided by Roodservice. It is i~portant to the barbe4ue atmosphere that we serve food, and it is also a strategic move to encourage students to have full stomachs before consuming alcohol. Bee~. Garden ,i The Senates would like tp have a beer garden. We have a meeting scheduled with the St. Joseph Cit I Council regardingt~is matter on the evening of Thursday, April 01. The seniors are of age (witr the exception of aÞ.andful of them) and we feel are responsible enough to handle this opportunity. We have c~mtacted O'Hara's in St. Cloud about providing a cash bar. The have a vali,~catering lice,n,se.,a.,n"â.',W,',il,1 W, ork 'W"l'th,u sto"filn,da.,su itab Ie 10 cation within the par k,to hayethe bee garden.' Weare aw~re we will need to cordon off a separate section for this area and will not be able to have the~ntire park designated for the garden. It has been mentioned that only 3-2 bee be served and that i~fine. One of the St. Ben's Senate advisors had mentioned that serving wi e may be a desirabl~ alternative for faculty, staff, and monastics. Pe school rules, we m~stlimit the students and guests to one drink perhour of the event. To do thi we plan on purchasing wristbands with tear-off tabs, that can be removed when a drink is . pu chased. We will wotk closely with O'Hara's making sure that no student who is obviously int xicated will be servbd alcohol. Only students who are of age and produce valid ID will I re'1';ive, a wris,tband',and,i 'will be ,limited" to one, Wristban, , d. Be,' fore the event we will sit dOW, n with 0't,J.ara's, the Senates, .andlaw enforcement officers to make sure we areall on the same page an~ that intoxicated stûdents will not be served. The area will be clearly marked off and security Wi~l1,b, eonhand,to mak",es ure no underage per s on s are served or able to" obtaina,lCOhOl.,Sen ators m y also be available tb make sure no alcohol is brought into the grounds and that no one is , al owed to remove dririks from the area. As mentioned before, backpacks will not be allowed on th grounds as a precaJtionary measure. Pre-education about the expectations for the event will b clearly explained to! students when they are purchasing their t-shirts/tickets and also through e ails, articles.in the ~chool newspaper and posters. , ¡ E(lucating the Students W;e,nstudentspurcha~etheir t-shirts/tickets they will be handed, a sh{jetofpaper spelling out the efpectations for the e~ent along with a description of the event. · Included in the information s eet will be the Good Neighbor Policy and the consequences of misbehavior. It will be made c ear to students throJgh thisinfonnation sheet, emails, posters, articles in the school newspaper, a d word of mouth th~t misbehavior will not be tolerated. I i I I ducating the,Comnmnity he.,Senates will be r~sponsible for notifying the neighbors about the upcoming event. We will odoor todooranswÐring questions and explaining what will be happening so people 'are aware . fthe event. We can!also hand out flyers to members of the community so they have the I I I I I 1 i I I 1 i i I i I . infration in writing, 'ind to leave et residences when no one is availaþle. We can. contactthé Ian ,lords of the surrounding rental ,housing to be sure they are aware of this event. The El Paso Will also be contacted regarding the event andhopefu11y will agree to not serve intoxiceted ind viduals. The Senate1s can begin this task as soon as possible. I se~uritY and Staffing ~heEvent . Th St.Ben's andSt. John's Senates will be requiring members to help set-up, staff, and clean- up this event. As for Security for the event, we will have hired law enforcement officers pre ent as well as Senat~members. We are in the process of working with Chief Jansky to make thi happen. I believe 4) officers per hourJor the entirety ofthe event is what has been discussed. Th Senates will pay for these extra officers during this time period. ! I CI an-up ! Su set is approximately 8.30 PM on May 7th, so we hope to end the event around that time to Ie ve an adequate amo~t of time for clean-up. Senators will be responsible for cleaning up the gr"unds and the snow ~ence at the end of the event. Lots of garbage receptacles will be made av ilable to aid in the clean-up. The tents will be taken down that evening or early the next m ming. I i C I nelusion I T is plan has been thrqugh all kinds of changes and modifications resulting in this plan. The . ~nates feel we have t*ought through this very hard and want to make this a successful event. Ie are trying very hard to predict problems and take care of any concerns that have been brought up. Miscommkicationhas definitely been an issue surrounding the planning, and this Enot been intention¡\¡, bnt rather" result of the numerous meetings III)d modifications which I h ve occurred during tre planning of this event. There are many people involved and this is a 10 g !'f0cess. Ultimately,. we want this eVent to be a positive and memorable experience for all p, ies involved and ~e believe that by working together we will be able to have a achieve a 1"at Senior Farewell. Tp the best of our knO~It1dge and ebility the information contained in thîs doenl11ent is correct, cFent, and up todete. We will do our best to address !lilY questions or concerns you mayhavé P ease contact us for dlarification or more information. I Sincerely, I ! lissaPfannenstein ! Luke Hellier t. Ben's Senate Senibr Events St. John's Senate Men's Iss\les Rep ~apfannel1st@csbsiu.~du lmhellier@csbsju.edu 63.63261 363.3594 I I , , , , i .. ¡ I I i I i