Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2002 [02] Feb 21 {Book 23}
· itg of St. Joseph 25 College Avenue NW P.O. Box 668. St. Joseph, MN 56374 St. Joseph City Council (320) 363-7201 February 21, 2002 Fax: 363-0342 7:00 PM CLERK! I. Call to Order ADMINISTRATOR 2. Approve Agenda Judy Weyrens 3. Consent Agenda MAYOR a. Bills Payable Requested Action: Approve check numbers 30790 - 30886 Larry J. Hosch b. Minutes - Requested Action: Approve c. Liquor/Cigarette License Transfer, JM Oil- Requested Action: Issue a non intoxicating COUNCILORS liquor license and cigarette license to JM Oil, formerly under the name of St. Joseph Gas and Bait. Bob Loso d. Law Enforcement Labor Agreement Requested Action: Authorize the Mayor and Clerk to Cory Ehlert execute the Labor Agreement between the City of St. Joseph and Law Enforcement Labor Kyle Schneider Services for the St. Joseph Police Officers. The agreement for January 1, 2002 through December 31,2003. Alan Rassier e. Perfonnance Review of the City Administrator. Requested Action: Accept the review as favorable an increase the annual wage as stated in the employmentcontraet. f. Case Loader Bids - Requested Action: Accept the high bid of Jim Corrigan in the amount of $ 18,215.00. 4. Pubic Comments - Each speaker will be limited to t/tree minutes · 5. 7:05 PM Public Improvement Hearing - 15th Avenue SE and Elm Street East 6. 7: 15 PM Stearns County Engineer - Right of way acquisition, CR 121 7. 7:30 PM Municipal Development Group - TIP Application for Vic West 8. 7 :45 PM Gracèview Estates - Preliminary Plat Approval, Bob Herges and Rick Heid 9. 8:10 PM Mark Lambert, PURD Application-Special Use permit for 44 unit apartment bldg. 10. 8:30 PM - City Engineer Reports a. Outlot - private ownership versus public ownership b. Transportation mapping c. Other matters II. Department Head Reports - Police Chief Reports a. Leased Car request b. Adult Diversion Program c. Discussion on proposed modifications to current Ordinances 12. Department Head Reports - Public Works 13. Maintenance Facility - Proposed Contract 14. Mayor Reports 15. Council Reports · 16. Administrator/Clerk Reports 17. Adjourn CITY OF ST JOSEPH 02/17/021:33 PM Bills Payable Page 1 . Check # Search Name Comments 'Amount FUND DEPART OBJ 030791 SEH 2001 Indian Hills Plat $9,550.13 101 43131 303 030791 SEH 2002 Street Improvements $5,629.67 425 43120 530 030791 SEH Indian Hills $1,427.90 101 43131 303 030791 SEH City Engineering SVC5 $1,837.00 101 43131 303 030791 SEH Municipal State Street $664.76101 43131 303 030791 SEH Co Rd 121 Improvement $6,977.78 423 43120 530 030791 SEH Pondview Ridge 6 CA $457.40 101 43131 303 030792 SIMPLEX TIME RECORDER Monitor Service 2002 $410.56 101 41941 300 030793 ST. JOE GAS & BAIT January Gas $11.73601 49440 210 030793 ST. JOE GAS & BAIT January Tests Sent $19.31 602 49480 312 030793 ST. JOE GAS & BAIT January Gas $11.73 602 49490 210 030793 ST. JOE GAS & BAIT January Gas $11.72 101 43125 210 030793 ST. JOE GAS & BAIT January Gas $11.72101 43120 210 030794 ST. JOSEPH CHAMBER OF Membership renewal-Larry $50.00 101 41310 433 030794 ST. JOSEPH CHAMBER OF Membership renewal-EDA $50.00 101 46500 433 030794 ST. JOSEPH CHAMBER OF Membership renewal-Judy $50.00 101 41430 433 030795 ST. JOSEPH TOWNSHIP CoRd 121-tax sharing 2001 $25,374.29 101 41910 449 030795 ST. JOSEPH TOWNSHIP DBL-tax sharing 2001 $1,706.02 101 41910 449 .030795 ST. JOSEPH TOWNSHIP Bee Line-tax sharing 2001 $373.00 101 41910 449 030795 ST. JOSEPH TOWNSHIP Borgert-tax sharing 2001 $1,328.57 101 41910 449 030795 ST. JOSEPH TOWNSHIP Wpines-tax sharing 2001 $1,476.68 101 41910 449 030796 STEARNS COOPERATIVE street lighting $66.68 101 43160 386 030796 STEARNS COOPERATIVE street lighting $86.25 101 43160 386 030796 STEARNS COOPERATIVE Northland lift station $90.37 602 49470 381 030796 STEARNS COOPERATIVE street lighting $348.50 101 43160 386 030797 STEARNS ELECTRIC ASSO 2001 Rural Dev Loan Pmt $29,154.97 321 47100 640 030798 STEARNS MUNICIPAL LEA SCML 2002 Membership Du $25.00 101 41110 433 030799 TCI TIRE CENTERS tire service $448.49 101 42152 220 030800 TRI-COUNTY PARTS SUPP work light $60.34 101 45201 220 030800 TRI-COUNTY PARTS SUPP switch for collection sys $53.75 101 45201 220 030801 UNUM LIFE INSURANCE jan disability insurance $276.96 101 030802 WALZ, JOHN Family fun days $8.10 101 45202 531 030802 WALZ, JOHN 2 park board mtgs $40.00 101 41120 103 030803 WERNER ELECTRIC SUPP bulbs/plastic ties $184.60 101 41941 220 030804 WIRZ, JENNIFER 2 park board mtgs $40.00 101 41120 103 030805 XCEL ENERGY Automatic Lighting $15.53 101 43160 386 030806 ZARNOTH BRUSH WORKS Broom-Snow Removal $236.39 101 43125 220 030807 POSTMASTER overnight computer disks $3.50 101 41430 582 030808 INTERNAL REVENUE SERV Non Profit, tax exempt $150.00 101 41120 216 030809 BRINKMAN, PAUL Bales for around bleachers $500.00 101 45202 220 030810 ST. CLOUD AREA PLANNIN Transportation Forum $20.00 101 41310 331 030810 ST. CLOUD AREA PLANNIN Transportation Forum $60.00 101 41110 331 030811 POSTMASTER Box Fee for 2002 $20.00 105 42210 322 030814 A-1 TOILET RENTAL satelite rental $63.90 101 45202 531 030815 ALL SPEC SERVICES Jan inspection services $1,132.99 101 42401 311 030816 ALL STAR TROPHEY retirement rewards $159.75 105 42210 200 .030817 BROWNING-FERRIS INDUS Refuse Disposal $8,537.97 603 43230 384 030817 BROWNING-FERRIS INDUS Refuse Disposal $57.84 602 49490 384 030817 BROWNING-FERRIS INDUS Refuse Disposal $50.61 105 42220 384 030818 CAMERA TRADER film development $18.00 101 42120 210 CITY OF ST JOSEPH 02/17/021:33 PM Bills Payable Page 2 . Check # Search Name Comments Amount FUND DEPART OBJ 030819 CELLULAR 2000 cell phone $15.22 101 45202 321 030819 CELLULAR 2000 cell phone $169.33 101 42151 321 030819 CELLULAR 2000 cell phone $28.83 101 43120 321 030820 CENTRAL MCGOWAN refill oxygen tanks $17.37 105 42270 210 030820 CENTRAL MCGOWAN refill oxygen tanks $8.68 101 42120 210 030821 CITY OF ST. CLOUD Sewer Use Rental-January $8,692.13 602 49480 419 030822 CITY OF ST. CLOUD RSVP Services - 2002 $3,500.00 101 49200 430 030823 COLD SPRING ELECTRIC S replace ballast in rink lights $295.72 101 45123 220 030824 COLD SPRING VETERINAR Boarding fees $184.00 101 42700 300 030825 COMPLETE ELECTRONICS Sales tax on 12,529.90 invoi $814.44 101 41950 580 030826 COMPRESS AIR & EQUIPM replace guage on scba com $69.85 105 42220 220 030827 FOAM SOLUTIONS repair foam system-Engine I $45.00 105 42280 220 030828 GENEROUS, MARY Office Supplies $26.62 101 41430 240 030828 GENEROUS, MARY Summer Rec $48.98 101 45120 210 030829 HAWKINS WATER TREATM tests $109.00 602 49480 312 030829 HAWKINS WATER TREATM tests $14.50 601 49420 312 030829 HAWKINS WATER TREATM tests $14.50 601 49420 312 030830 HENRY & ASSOCIATES Remote Read/Connections/ $3,207.14 601 49430 210 030831 KLN DISTRIBUTING Computer Monitor $700.67 101 42120 581 . 030831 KLN DISTRIBUTING Network service $269.45 101 41430 220 030831 KLN DISTRIBUTING Network service $82.50 101 42120 220 030832 LEE'S ACE HARDWARE Repair Supplies $65.64 101 45201 220 030832 LEE'S ACE HARDWARE Repair Supplies $42.18 101 45202 220 030832 LEE'S ACE HARDWARE Repair Supplies $25.48 101 41942 220 030832 LEE'S ACE HARDWARE Repair Supplies $81.86101 43120 220 030832 LEE'S ACE HARDWARE Repair Supplies $14.27 101 41950 230 030832 LEE'S ACE HARDWARE Repair Supplies $106.90 101 41941 220 030832 LEE'S ACE HARDWARE Repair Supplies $58;60 602 49480 220 030832 LEE'S ACE HARDWARE Repair Supplies $1.91 101 42120 220 030832 LEE'S ACE HARDWARE Repair Supplies $45.18 601 49440 220 030832 LEE'S ACE HARDWARE Repair Supplies $20.11 105 42210 220 030833 LEEF BROS clothing services-dec $26.61 602 49490 171 030834 MARCO BUSINESS PRODU Workstation $3,348.54 101 41430 570 030835 MENARDS 2x8-12'/nuts,bolts $73.10 101 43120 220 030835 MENARDS 2x8-12' ratchets/tiedowns $290.90 101 45202 220 030835 MENARDS collect sys tape cabinet $7.86 602 49450 210 030836 MIDWAY IRON AND METAL Tubing/Angles $187.24 101 45202 220 030837 MINNESOTA SPORTS FED Softball Tournament $50.00 101 45202 531 030838 MN DEPARTMENT OF REV Penalty & Int $59.56 101 41530 200 030839 MUNICIPAL DEVELOPMEN EDA Services-January $1,800.04 101 46500 300 030840 MUSKE, CHARLES Park Board 4 mtgs $80.00 101 41120 103 030841 NATIONAL PUBLIC SAFET 2002 national directory $109.00 101 42120 433 030842 OFFICE MAX Office Supplies $349.40 101 41430 200 030843 PERA 01/28/02 CC pay $184.00 101 030844 PRINCIPAL LIFE Medical Insurance $8,362.46 101 030845 RENGEL PRINTING #10 Envelopes $55.38 101 41430 200 030846 SAM'S CLUB Membership Fee $15.00 101 41430 433 . 030846 SAM'S CLUB Membership Fee $15.00 101 42120 433 030846 SAM'S CLUB Membership Fee $15.00 602 49480 433 030846 SAM'S CLUB Membership Fee $30.00 101 43120 433 CITY OF ST JOSEPH 02/17/021:33 PM Bills Payable Page 3 . Check # Search Name Comments Amount FUND DEPART OSJ 030847 SERVICE MASTER PROFE Cleaning Service $394.05 101 41942 300 030848 ST. CLOUD AREA CHAMBE 18965 $75.00 101 41310 331 030849 ST. CLOUD TRUCK SALES Drain plug/hose/worm $83.45 101 45201 220 030850 SUBURBAN HEALTH & RES Health Club Premium $1,185.57 101 030851 TREMCO POLICE PRODUC Anti Theft Systems $274.80 101 42120 581 030852 US BANK TRUST CENTER Agent Fee-2002 GO Cert of $1,500.00327 47100 620 030853 US LINK phone service $77.70 101 46500 321 030853 US LINK phone service $142.38 101 41430 321 030853 US LINK phone service $47.66 101 41946 321 030853 US LINK phone service $47.66 101 41941 321 030853 US LINK phone service $133.14 101 45201 321 030853 US LINK phone service $96.82 105 42250 321 030853 US LINK phone service $51.36 601 49440 321 030853 US LINK phone service $47.66 602 49470 321 030853 US LINK phone service $47.66 602 49480 321 030853 US LINK phone ·service . $100.70 602 49490 321 030853 US LINK phone service $292.55 101 42151 321 030854 AUTO VALUE PARTS STOR oil filters $9.99 601 49410 220 .030854 AUTO VALUE PARTS STOR fuel filters $7.36 602 49480 220 030854 AUTO VALUE PARTS STOR fuel filters $7.36 601 49410 220 030854 AUTO VALUE PARTS STOR oil filters $9.99 602 49480 220 030855 BANYON DATA SYSTEM winfund conversion $300.00101 41430 582 030856 COLD SPRING ELECTRIC S concession fixture/pole yard $489.84 101 45202 220 030857 DNR - WATERS water permit $210.56 601 49440 442 030858 DRIVERS LICENSE GUIDE 2002 id checking guide $53.25 101 42120 433 030859 FIRST STATE BANK collection fee $11.20 601 49440 310 030859 FIRST STATE BANK collection fee $11.20 602 49490 310 030859 FIRST STATE BANK collection fee $11.20603 43230 310 030859 FIRST STATE BANK collection fee $13.70 601 49440 310 030859 FIRST STATE BANK collection fee $13.70 602 49490 310 030859 FIRST STATE BANK collection fee $13.70 603 43230 310 030859 FIRST STATE BANK payroll services $30.00 101 41530 200 030860 HAWKINS WATER TREATM tests $14.50 601 49420 312 030860 HAWKINS WATER TREATM tests $14.50 602 49480 312 030860 HAWKINS WATER TREATM tests $109.00 602 49480 312 030860 HAWKINS WATER TREATM tests $14.50 601 49420 312 030861 J & M OIL CO. ups $10.41 602 49480 312 030862 K.E.E.P.R.S. INC uniforms, Pete Janssen $143.67 101 42120 171 030863 KLN DISTRIBUTING load bds, created shared dir $137.50 101 41430 582 030864 LEEF BROS clothing service-jan $55.78 601 49440 171 030864 LEEF BROS clothing service-jan $55.78 101 43120 171 030864 LEEF BROS floor runners, towels-jan $104.99 101 41942 220 030864 LEEF BROS clothing service-jan $55.78 101 45202 171 030864 LEEF BROS clothing service-jan $55.79 602 49450 171 030865 LOSO'S STORE Marshmellow $2.11 101 45202 530 030865 LOSO'S STORE Hot Chocolate $8.97 101 45202 530 . 030866 MIMBACH FLEET SUPPLY cattle gate $319.48 101 45202 220 030867 MINNESOTA TRAVEL MAN vehicle lease $327.05 101 42152 550 030867 MINNESOTA TRAVEL MAN vehicle lease $327.05 101 42152 550 030867 MINNESOTA TRAVEL MAN gas $933.15 101 42152 210 CITY OF ST JOSEPH 02/17/021:33 PM Bills Payable Page 4 . Check # Search Name Comments Amount FUND DEPART OBJ 030867 MINNESOTA TRAVEL MAN gas $791.25 101 42152 210 030868 ONE CALL CONCEPTS, INC notification fee-jan $21.70601 49440 319 030868 ONE CALL CONCEPTS, INC notification fee-jan $21.70602 49490 319 030869 PERA retirement 2/6 pay $3,090.45 101 030870 POSTMASTER 2 rolls stamps $68.00 101 41430 322 030870 POSTMASTER 2 rolls stamps $68.00 101 42120 322 030871 SCHIFFLER, JAN license tabs $32.62 101 43120 446 030871 SCHIFFLER, JAN license tabs $32.63 602 49490 446 030871 SCHIFFLER, JAN license tabs $32.62 101 45202 446 030871 SCHIFFLER, JAN license tabs $32.63 601 49440 446 030872 ST. CLOUD AREA PLANNIN dues 1st half 2002 $3,184.00 101 41110 433 030873 ST. CLOUD HOSPITAL Blood test $26.00 105 42210 305 030874 ST. CLOUD TIMES Case Loader Bids $27.82 101 43120 340 030875 ST. JOSEPH NEWSLEADE Legals - Budget Data $83.25 101 41530 340 030875 ST. JOSEPH NEWSLEADE Legals - Street Imp $41.63425 43120 530 030876 TAUFEN, DICK fluoride sample $1.95601 49420 322 030877 TIREMAXX SERVICE CENT tires and brake job $208.65 601 49440 220 030877 TIREMAXX SERVICE CENT tires and brake job $208.65 602 49480 220 030877 TIREMAXX SERVICE CENT snow tire credit -$183.24 101 42152 220 . 030877 TIREMAXX SERVICE CENT oil change $21.95 101 42152 220 030877 TIREMAXX SERVICE CENT head light $13.95 101 42152 220 030878 WAHLSTROM, ELLEN postcards ,snacks ,chart,wks $47.43 101 41120 216 030879 XCEL ENERGY automatic lighting $15.53 101 43160 386 030879 XCEL ENERGY legion utilities $196.90 101 43120 381 030880 GENEROUS, MARY Office Supplies $15.95 101 41430 200 030881 KLN DISTRIBUTING service contract $2,150.00 101 42120 215 030881 KLN DISTRIBUTING service contract $2,150.00 101 41430 220 030881 KLN DISTRIBUTING service contract $500.00 101 46500 582 030882 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES Subscription-Cities Bulletin $60.00 602 49490 433 030882 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES Subscription-Cities Bulletin $60.00 601 49440 433 030882 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES Subscription-Cities Bulletin $60.00 101 42120 433 030882 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES Subscription-Cities Bulletin $60.00 105 42240 433 030882 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES Subscription-Cities Bulletin $60.00 101 41310 433 030882 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES Subscription-Cities Bulletin $60.00 101 41110 433 030882 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES Subscription-Cities Bulletin $60.00 101 41110 433 030882 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES Subscription-Cities Bulletin $60.00 101 41110 433 030882 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES Subscription-Cities Bulletin $60.00 101 41110 433 030883 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS liability insurance $700.00 101 41941 361 030883 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS liabilily insurance $4,775.00 602 49480 361 030883 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS liabilily insurance $450.00 602 49480 361 030883 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS liability insurance $3,925.00 601 49440 361 030883 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS liability insurance $300.00 101 49200 361 030883 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS liabilily insurance $1,425.00 101 45202 361 030883 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS liabilily insurance $500.00 101 45120 361 030883 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS liabilily insurance $6,350.00 101 43120 361 030883 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS liabilily insurance $5,322.00 101 42120 361 030883 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS liability insurance $1,700.00 101 41430 361 . 030883 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS liability insurance $50.00 101 41310 361 030883 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS liabilily insurance 5500.00 101 41110 361 030883 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS liability insurance $15,000.00 105 42220 361 CITY OF ST JOSEPH 02/17/021:33 PM Bills Payable Page 5 . Check # Search Name Comments Amount FUND DEPART OBJ 030885 MENZHUBER, MARY EDA Postage $8.14 101 46500 322 030886 UNUM LIFE INSURANCE Disability Ins-Feb $20.42 101 030886 UNUM LIFE INSURANCE Disability Ins-Feb $11.63 101 41430 134 030886 UNUM LIFE INSURANCE Disability Ins-Feb $320.65 101 030886 UNUM LIFE INSURANCE Disability Ins-Feb $11.64 101 42120 134 $196,468.33 . . DRAFT February 7, 2002 Page I of5 . Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, ~e City Council for the City of St. Joseph met in regular session on Thursday, February 7,2002 at 7:00 PM in the St. Joseph City Hall. Members Present: Mayor Larry Hosch. Councilors Cory Ehelrt, Bob Loso, Al Rassier, Kyle Schneider. Administrator Clerk Judy Weyrens. City Representatives Present: Public Works Director Dick Taufen, Police Chief Pete Jansky. Others Present: Nancy Scott, Rick Breezee, Megan Enninga, Dennis Dahlman. Approve Agenda: Loso made a motion to approve the agenda with the following additions: 11 (d) Ventilating system, cable room; 11 (e) Chairs, City Council Chambers. The motion was seconded by Schneider and passed unanimously. Consent Agenda: Loso made a motion to approve the consent agenda as follows: a. Bills Payable, approve check numbers 30678 - 30790 b. Minutes, January 17, 2002 c. Authorize Mayor and Clerk to execute Resolution appointing Stanton Group as the manager of the City of St. Joseph Flexible Spending Plan. Public Comments to the Agenda: No one present wished to speak. Nancv Scott, 2001 Building Permit Report: Building Official Nancy Scott appeared before the Commission to present the 2001 Annual Building Summary. Below is a summary of activity for the year 200 I: Total permits issues 137 . Total Valuation increase $ 7,654,418 Commercial Valuation Increase $ 897,990 Residential Remodel $ 390,928 New Residential Dwellings $ 6,365,500 The City experienced a 155% increase in single family dwelling units, which is attributable to Northland Five. Lumber One Avon received over 30 buildings permits for 2001, all of which are under construction at this time. Scott clarified that effective January 1, 20002 the following changes to the Building Ordinance have been authorized: 1. Building Permits will be required for shingling and siding as required by the State of Minnesota. The building permit fee for such will be $ 25.00. 2. Mechanical and Plumbing permits are required for all mechanisms/devices over $ 2,000. Scott stated that she will be notifying all contractors of the changes in code as well as finding a manner to notify the residents. City Engineer Reports St. Joseph Business Park Improvements: Weyrens reported that the St. Joseph Economic Development Authority has two businesses that are requesting to locate in the St. Joseph Business Park. Therefore, the following improvements need to be considered: 1) 15th Avneue NE - utility, street, curb, gutter and storm sewer; 2) Elm Street - street, curb, gutter and storm sewer. The improvement costs will be assessed to the abutting property owners and the process must follow MN Statute 429 regulations. As such the Council must authorize the feasibility report and schedule the public hearing for such improvements. . Loso made a motion to adopt resolution 2002-03 and 2003-04 authorizing a feasibility report and scheduling a public hearing for the above mentioned improvements. DRAFT February 7, 2002 Page 2 of5 · Resolution 2002 -03 Ordering Preparation of Report on Improvement WHEREAS, it is proposed to improve 15th Avenue NE between County Road 133 and Elm Street East by the improvement of water, sewer, street, curb and gutter and the making of an improvement to Elm Street East between County Road 133 east a distance of approximately 975.78 feet by the improvement of street, curb and gutter and to assess the benefited property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429. . NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF St. Joseph, Minnesota: That the proposed improvement be referred to Joe Bettendorf of SEH, for study and that he is instructed to report to the council with all convenient speed advising the council in a preliminary way as to whether the proposed improvement is necessary, cost-effective, and feasible and as to whether it is should best be made as proposed or in connection with some other improvement, and the estimated cost of the improvement as recommended. Resolution 2202 - 04 Resolution Receiving Report And Calling Hearing onImprovement WHEREAS, pursuant to resolution of the council adopted February 7,2002 a report has been ordered to be prepared by Joe Bettendorf of SEH with reference to the improvement of 15th Avenue NE between County Road 133 and Elm Street East by the improvement of water, sewer, street, curb and gutter and the making of an improvement to Elm Street East between County Road 133 east a distance of approximately 975.78 feet by the improvement of · street, curb and gutter . WHEREAS, the report provided information regarding whether the proposed project is necessary, cost-effective, and feasible, NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF ST. JOSEPH, MINNESOTA: I. The council will consider the improvement of such street in accordance with the report and the assessment of abutting property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429 at an estimated total cost of the improvement of $620,000.00. 2. A public hearing shall be held on such proposed improvement on the 21 st day of February, 2002 in the council chambers of the city hall at and the clerk shall five mailed and published notice of such hearing and improvement as required by law. Department Head Reports PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR College Avenue West Improvements: Public Works Director Dick Taufen reported that he contacted Assistant County Engineer Jodi Teich regarding the proposed overlay to West Minnesota Street. As was discussed at a previous Council meeting, West Minnesota Street is beginning to deteriorate and needs to be overlayed. The road is a County State Aid road and maintenance and repair is the responsibility of Stearns County. Taufen stated that Teich informed him that the County does not cost participate in overlays. The Council was in agreement that the road needs maintenance before it deteriorates. Weyrens will contact the City Engineer regarding this matter. 1994 Retired Squad Car: Taufen requested the Council reconsider the decision to keep the 1994 squad car for · maintenance and administration. The vehicle does not have a license and if the City keeps the car it must be licenses. In addition, the car needs some minor repairs. In discussing this matter with the Police Chief, it is the DRAFT February 7,2002 Page 3 of5 . recommendation of the department heads to declare the car as surplus and dispose of properly. Taufen stated that if the City needs an extra vehicle, the Police department has offered the use of their undercover car which is licensed and maintained. Police Chief Pete Jansky stated that he discussed the car with the higher bidder from when the car was first declared surplus and he is willing to honor his bid. Rassier made a motion to declare the 1994 squad car as surplus property and sell to the highest bidder. Both bidders from the first time the car was bid should be contacted and an ad should be placed on the cable access with bids being accepted until February 25, 2002. The motion was seconded by Schneider and passed unanimously. POLICE CHIEF Monthlv Police Report: Jansky reported that he is still familiarizing himself with the policies of St. Joseph and working on improving the department with a team work concept. Jansky also reported that the lap top computers have been installed in two of the squad cars. Part Tinre Officers: Jansky reported the department is down to two part tinre officers and is requesting authorization to hire a third. Over the past year the City has employed three part tinre officers to cover vacations assist when needed. While Jansky stated he is aware of the hiring freeze is still seeking authorization to hire one more part time officer. The additional part time officer will not cover any additional shifts, rather help fill the shifts that are needed. It is cheaper to use part time officers to fill gaps in scheduling than overtime of full time officers. Schneider made a motion to authorize the hiring of one additional part time officer as requested; seconded by Rassier and passed unanimously. Leased Vehicle: Jansky requested the Council authorize the leasing of a third squad car. The 1998 Lumina has over 100,000 miles and is in need of repair. The costs to repair the vehicle will be more than leasing a new vehicle. The City is limited to the miles the two leased vehicles and at the present time too many miles are being placed on the . cars. At the current rate the cars will need to be returned sooner than anticipated. Therefore, it would be prudent for the City to lease the third vehicle distributing the miles keeping a three year rotation. Jansky stated that there are sufficient funds available for the lease in 2002 and if the vehicle is ordered today it will not be delivered until sometime late summer. In addition to leasing the vehicle, the City will need to replace some of the equipment. Loso made a motion authorizing Jansky proceed with the process to lease a third vehicle. In addition, Jansky should present the Council with the final cost for lease and equipment before the paper work is submitted. The motion was seconded by Ehlert and passed unanimously. Miscellaneous: Janksy reported that he has scheduled a meeting for all persons possessing a liquor license in the City. The meeting will be held in City Hall on February 26,2002 at 7:00 PM. Maintenance Facility: Ehlert made a motion to table further discussion on the Maintenance Facility until February 21, 2002; the motion was seconded by Loso and passed unanimously. MAYOR REPORTS Meetings Attended: Hosch reported that he attended a Session Priority Dinner sponsored by the Chamber of Commerce. The purpose of the dinner was to discuss the actions before the legislature. Combining of Services: Hosch reported that he recently meet with representatives of St. Cloud regarding services that could possibly be combined between Cities. This matter will be discussed further at the intergovernmental meetings. St. Wendel Township: Hosch reported that he and Weyrens attended the recent St. Wendel Township meeting where they discussed the proposed sewer study between St. Wendel and St. Joseph. St. Wendel Township has agreed to pay the City for services incurred in the year 2001. In addition the City will address the concerns of St. . Wendel and report back to the Council. DRAFT February 7, 2002 Page 4 of 5 . COUNCIL REPORTS SCHNEIDER Historical Society: Schneider reported the St. Joseph Historical Society recently elected the following officers: Chair - Bill Wasner; Vice Chair Ellie Studer; Treasurer - Harvey Notch; S. Miriam Ardolf - Secretary. The Society will rneet on the 4th Wednesday of each month at the St. Joseph Community Fire Hall. Park Board: The Park Board meet and discussed the parkland contribution for Graceview Estates. It was determined the park board will accept the paving of the walking path system in Graceview Estates as fulfilling the parkland requirement. EHLERT Building Committee: Ehlert reported that the Building Committee for the Maintenance Facility is waiting for the completion of the survey before meeting again. The next scheduled meeting is February 13, 2002 at 3 :00 PM. Working Meeting: Ehlert requested the Council establish a date for a working meeting to discuss current matter. The Council agree to meet on Thursday, February 14, 2002 after LELS Mediation. Fire Board: The Fire Board met on February 5, 2002 and discussed the following: · Requested authorization to advertise for the replacement of the three fIrefighter that recently retired. Ehlert stated that since the Fire Board is comprised of three entities he did not feel the hiring freeze was applicable. The Council concurred. · The following capital expenditures were approved: safety vests and change order to the ladder truck. . RASSIER Planning Commission: The Planning Commission met on February 4 and approved the following: · Reviewed and approved the site plan for the St. Joseph Business Center. The proposed building will be constructed on a portion of the Roske Property and is being developed by Bill Nelson. · The Planning Commission reviewed the plan of Mark Lambert and will forward a recommendation to the City Council for the February 21,2002 meeting. · The Planning Commission will begin reviewing the following Ordinances: Sign, Building Height and Transitional Zoning. LOSO No Report ADMINISTRATOR CLERK REPORTS Proposed Web Site: Weyrens stated that the Office staff has started looking at alternative for web site for the City of St. Joseph. Before soliciting proposals it is important to identify what the Council is looking for in a web page. The following ideas were discussed: survey tool, comments, minutes, agendas, ordinances, forms, mail and links to Councilors. Schneider stated that while he agrees the City needs to develop a website, it should start small and become more progressive with time. He also stated that the more options included in the web page, the more costly the site will be to construct. Weyrens will report back to the Council. Comprehensive Plan Update: Weyrens reported the EDA consultants have secured approximately $ 10,000 towards the updating of the St. Joseph Comprehensive Plan. . Transportation Planning: City Engineer Joe Bettendorf will present the Council with information on February 21, 2002 regarding official mapping. DRAFT February 7,2002 Page 5 of5 . Ventilating System. Cableroom: Weyrens reported that she received a price from McDowall to add a heating an ventilating system to the cable area. The unit would be stand alone and only heat/cool the cable area. Loso stated that he discussed the matter with Tom Nahan of the Cable Commission and suggested that before incurring an expense of $ 3,200, the area be ventilated with outside air flow. Weyrens stated that she will contact McDowall for alternatives. Chairs, Council Chambers: Tom Nahan is requesting the Council authorize the expenditure of up to $ 2500 for the purchase of chairs for the Council area. Weyrens stated that the chairs are sturdy and are stackable. The chairs are used and cost approximately $ 55 per chair. Through negotiations, the price could possibly be reduced to $ 50 per chair. The Council agreed to discuss this matter further on Thursday, February 14, 2002. Future Meetings: Weyrens reminded the Council of the following meetings: . February 14,2002 LELS Labor Mediation . February 19, 2002 Intergovernmental Meeting at Sartell City Hall. Adiourn: Loso made a motion to adjourn at 8:15 PM; seconded by Schneider and passed unanimously. Judy Weyrens Administrator Clerk . . . LABOR AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF ST. JOSEPH I AND LA W ENFORCEMENT LABOR SERVICES, INC. As exclusive representative of the . Officers of the 81. Joseph Police Department I . ! TABLE OF CONTENTS . ARTICLE # ARTICLE PURPOSE PAGE Article 1 PURPOSE OF THE AGREEMENT I Article 2 RECOGNITION I Article 3 DEFINITIONS 1 Article 3.1 LELS ........................................................................... 1 Article 3.2 LELS Member. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 1 Article 3.3 Employee. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I Article 3.4 Regular Employee................. ....................................... .... 1 Article 3.5 Introductory Employee. . ........ .... .. . ............... ..... ............. .. . . 1 Article 3.6 Department. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .... 1 Article 3.7 Employer.. ... .. .... ... '" .... .. '" .. .... ..... .. ..... ... ...... ........ . ., .... .. I Article 3.8 Chief............................ ............................................... 1 Article 4 EMPLOYER AUTHORITY 1 Article 5 EMPLOYEE SECURITY 2 Article 5.1 Designation of Employees as Steward.. . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 Article 5.2 Non Discrimination........... " ....... .. ......... . .. .... ......... .. ... ... . .. 2 . Article 5.3 Authority for deduction of union dues..... ........ ..... ..... .. .... ..... .. 2 Article 5.4 MN Statute Authority 471.44 .............................................. 2 Article 6 EMPLOYEE RIGHTS-GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE 2 Article 6.1 Definitions of Grievance.. . .... ....... .. . ........ ... .... ..... .... .. ... .. ., .. 2 Article 6.2 Procedure ........ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 Article 6.3 \V ai ver .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 Article 6.4 Expense. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 Article 6.5 Exclusive Remedy............................................................ 4 Article 7 HOURS OF WORK 4 Article 7.1 Authority to set work schedule ............................................. 4 Article 7.2 Nonnal Work Day. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... 4 Article 7.3 N onnal Work Year. . . . . . . . . . . " . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . .. 4 Article 7.4 Posting of work schedules .................................................. 4 Article 7.5 Emergency Circumstances ................................................. 4 Article 7.6 Shift rotation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 Article 7.7 Equalization of Sundays and Holidays off....... . .. . .. .... " . .. . ..... . .. 4 Article 8 OVERTIME AND PREMIUM PA Y 5 . · Article 8.1 Work in excess of 10 hours .........,..................................... .. 5 Article 8.2 Equalization of overtime .................................................... 5 Article 8.3 Call back duty. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 5 Article 804 Court Appearance ............................................................ 5 Article 8.5 Compensatory Time .......,...................................,............. 5 Article 8.6 Pyramiding of overtime hours ............................................. 5 Article 9 HOLIDAYS 5 Article 9.1 Schedule of Holidays ......................................................... 5 Article 9.2 Compensation for working on a holiday....... ............ ...... ......... 6 Article 9.2 Payment of unused holidays ......................... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 Article 10 V ACA TIONS 6 Article 10.1 Schedule of vacation hours earned. . . . . .. . .. . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... 6 Article 10.2 Compensation for unused vacation upon separation..................... 7 Article 10.3 Vacation hours carried forward to another year.......................... 7 Article lOA Disability to waive vacation. . . . . .. . . . . .. . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . .. . . . . . 7 Article 10.5 Designation of annual vacation......................................... .... 7 Article 10.6 Compensation for lost vacation......................................... .... 7 Article 11 SICK LEAVE 7 Article 11.1 Sick Leave - earning ....... ... ......... ... ...... .... ..... ... ......... .... .... 7 · Article 11.2 Sick Leave accumulation.......................... ......................... 7 Article 11.3 Payment of unused sick leave upon separation.......................... 7 Article 1104 Uses for sick leave........................................................... 8 Article 11.5 Certification of physician ................................................... 8 Article 11.6 Eligibility to use sick leave. . . . . . . . .. . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . .. 8 Article 11.7 Abuse of sick leave ................... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 Article 11.8 Funeral Leave .. ..... ........ .... ... ................ .............. ...... ...... 8 Article 11.9 Military Leave ................................................................ 8 Article 12 INSURANCE 8 Article 12.1 Medical and Dental insurance .............................................. 8 Article 12.2 Life Insurance ................................................................. 9 Article 13 INTRODUCTORY PERIOD, SENIORITY AND RESIGN A TION 9 Article 13.1 Introductory Period ................... . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 Article 13.2 Completion of Introductory Period . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . .. 9 Article 13.3 Layoff provisions ............................................................. 9 Article 13.4 Resignation .................................................................... 9 Article 14 DISCIPLINE 9 Article 14.1 Forms of Discipline. . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 9 · Article 14.2 Suspension, demotion, discharge... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 Article 14.3 Written reprimands......................................................... 10 Article 15 WAGES 10 . Article 15.1 Compensation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ., . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... 10 Article 15.2 Differential Pay. . ...... .............. ...... ... .... .. .......... .. .... .. ........ 10 Article 16 LONGEVITY 10 Aliicle 16.1 Longevity qualification. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .... 10 Article 16.2 Payment of Longevity ......................... .............................. 10 Article 17 UNIFORMS 11 Article 17.1 New employee uniform issue. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... 11 Article 17.2 Uniform allo\vance ..................................................... ... ... 11 Aliicle 17.3 Authorized uniform vendors. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 Article 17.4 Uniform allowance carry fOT\vard ....................... ......... .. ........ II Article 17.5 Replacement of glasses. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 Article 17.6 Repair/Replacement of watches.. .. ............ ....... .. ....... ... ...... ... 12 Article 18 WEAPON 12 Article 18.1 Ammunition provided....................................................... 12 Article 19 LICENSE 12 Article 19.1 POST License reimbursement.................... ......... ..... ............ 12 . Article 20 RETIREMENT CONTRIBUTION 12 Article 20.1 PERA Contributions. ................ .. . ..... . ..... .. " ... .. ...... ... . .. ... .. 12 Article 20.2 Deferred Compensation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 12 Article 21 POLICE POLICY AND PROCEDURE MANUAL 12 Article 21.1 Employment Agreement supersedes policy manual.. .. ... .... .. .. ...... 12 Article 22 WAIVER 13 Article 22.1 Understanding of agreement. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 Article 22.2 Right of Termination of Agreement. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 Article 23 SA VINGS CLAUSE 13 Article 24 DURATION 13 Attachment - Pay Schedule 15 . . ARTICLE 1 PURPOSE OF THE AGREEMENT This Agreement is entered into as of January 1, 2002, between the City of St. Joseph, hereinafter called the "Employer", and the Law Enforcement Labor Services, Inc. hereinafter called the "LELS". It is the intent and purpose of the Agreement to: 1.1 Establish this Agreement's interpretation and/or application; and 1.2 Place in written fonn the parties' agreement upon tenns and conditions of employment for the duration ofthis Agreement. ARTICLE 2 RECOGNITION 2.1 The Employer recognizes LELS as the exclusive representative under Minnesota Statutes, Section l79A.03, Subdivision 8, for all employees of the St. Joseph Police Department who work more than fourteen (14) hours per week and 738 hours per year, excluding the Chief of Police and all other non-police Employees of the City of St. Joseph. ARTICLE 3 DEFINITIONS . 3.1 LELS: Law Enforcement Labor Services, Inc. 3.2 LELS Member: A member of the St. Joseph Police Department as described in Paragraph 2.1. 3.3 Employee: A member of the exclusively recognized bargaining unit. 3.4 Regular Employee: Employee who has completed the introductory period. 3.5 Introductory Employee: Employee who has not completed the introductory period. 3.6 Department: The City of St. Joseph Police Department. 3.7 Employer: The City of St. Joseph. 3.8 Chief: Police Chief, City of St. Joseph. ARTICLE 4 EMPLOYER AUTHORITY 4.1 The Employer retains the full and unrestricted right to operate and manage all manpower, facilities, and equipment; to establish functions . and programs; to set and amend budgets; to detennine the utilization of technology; to establish and modify the organizational structure; to LELS Contract 2002-2003 1 Page 1 ofl5 select, direct and determine the number of personnel; to establish work . schedules, and to perform and inherent managerial functions not specifically limited by this Agreement. ARTICLE 5 EMPLOYEE SECURITY 5.1 LELS may designate employees from the bargaining unit to act as steward and alternate and shall inform the Employer in writing of such choice and changes in the position of steward and/or alternate. 5.2 There shall be no discrimination, by the Employer or LELS against any employee because of age, sex, race, color, religious or political belief, or membership, or non-membership in LELS. 5.3 For such employees as authorize it in writing, the Employer shall deduct from the first pay of each month an amount equal to the regular monthly LELS dues and shall remit such monies to the Treasurer of LELS. 5.4 The Employer and LELS recognize the provision of Minnesota Statutes 471.44 regarding the furnishing of a counsel to defend Officers in certain circumstances arising from the performance of their official duties, for action brought by citizens. . ARTICLE 6 EMPLOYEE RIGHTS-GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE 6.1 DEFINITION OF GRIEV ANCE A grievance is defined as a dispute or disagreement as to the interpretation or application ofthe specific terms and conditions of employment, as outlined in this agreement. 6.2 PROCEDURE Grievances, as defined by Section 6.1, shall be resolved in conformance with the following procedure: Step I. An Employee claiming a violation concerning the interpretation or application of this Agreement shall, within t\.venty-one (21) calendar days after such alleged violation has occurred, or an Employee reasonably could be expected to be aware of it, present such grievance to the Chief. The Chief or Employer representative will discuss and give an answer to such Step I grievance within ten (10) calendar days after receipt. A grievance not resolved in Step I and appealed to Step 2 shall be placed in writing setting forth the nature of the grievance, the facts on which it is based, the provisions of the . LELS Contract 2002-2003 2 Page 2 of 15 · Agreement allegedly violated, the remedy requested, and shall be appealed to Step 2 within ten (10) calendar days after the Employer's representative's final answer in Step 1. Any grievance not appealed in writing to Step 2 by LELS within said ten (10) calendar days shall be considered waived. Step 2. If appealed to Step 2, the grievance shall be submitted in writing to the City Clerk/Administrator. The City Clerk/Administrator shall refer the grievance to the City Council for consideration at the next regularly scheduled meeting (grievance must be received at least seven (7) days before the meeting to be included in the agenda). At the meeting, either the Employee or LELS may make whatever presentation deemed appropriate to the City Council. Within ten (10) days of the meeting, the City Council shall issue a written answer to the grievance. A grievance not resolved in Step 2 may be appealed by LELS to Step 3 within ten (10) days of the issuance ofthe written decisions by the City Council. Any grievance not appealed by LELS within ten (10) calendar days shall be considered waived. · Step 3. A grievance unresolved in Step 2 and appealed to Step 3 by LELS shall be submitted to the Director of Mediation Services for mediation, subject to the provisions of the Public Employment Labor Relations Act, Minnesota Statutes, Chapter l79A. If either party petitions for binding arbitration stating that an impasse has been reached, and the Director determines that further medication would serve no purpose, the Director shall certify the matter the Minnesota Public Employment Relations Board for binding arbitration, in accordance with Minnesota Statutes Chapter l79A. 6.3 WAIVER Ifa grievance is not presented within the time limits set forth above, it shall be considered waived, absent extraordinary circumstances. If a grievance is not appealed to the next step within the specified time limit or any agreed extension thereof, it shall be considered settled on the basis of the Employer's last answer. · LELS Contract 2002-2003 3 Page 3 of 15 6.4 EXPENSES Any costs or expenses incurred to the Director of Mediation Services or . the public Employment Relations Board in conjunction with a mediation or arbitration procedure, shall be borne equally by the Employer and the Employee, with each paying one-half of the cost or expenses incurred. Each party shall be responsible for their own attorney fees with regard to any grievance procedure. 6.S EXCLUSNE REMEDY This procedure shall be the sole and exclusive means of processing a gnevance. ARTICLE 7 HOURS OF WORK 7.1 The Employer shall be the sole authority in detennining the work schedules. 7.2 The nonnal work day shall consist often (10) hours. The Employer may change the nonnal work day to eight (8) hour days by a 4/Sth vote of the City Council after consulting with and receiving a recommendation fonn . the Chief of Police. The Employer shall provide LELS with sixty (60) days written notice prior to implementing any change in the work day, unless LELS agrees to shorter notice or the change is necessitated by an emergency. 7.3 The nonna1 work year shall consist of 2080 hours. 7.4 Work schedules shall be posted one (1) week in advance, subject to change due to emergency circumstances. Trading of shifts \vill be allowed if approved by the Chief. Any department initiated changes less than one (1) week in advance after posting will be paid at the overtime rate. 7.5 "Emergency" circumstances relate solely to health and safety issues. 7.6 Shifts will be rotated insofar as practical except where some other arrangement mutually has been agreed upon. 7.7 So far as possible, Employees shall receive an equal number of Sundays and Holidays off each year. . LELS Contract 2002-2003 4 Page 4 of 15 . ARTICLE 8 OVERTIME AND PREMIUM PAY. 8.1 All work in excess often (10) hours per day or work beyond the nonnal scheduled work time shall be paid for at one and one-half (I 12) times the Employee's regular straight time rate of pay. 8.2 So far as possible, Employees shall receive approximately the same amount of scheduled overtime in anyone year. 8.3 An Employee called back to duty during hislher off-duty hours shall receive a minimum of two (2) hours at time and one half. 8.4 Employees called in for court appearances during an off duty day or vacation day shall receive a minimum of two (2) hours pay. If more than 2 hours, the Employee shall be paid for a one and one half (1 Yl) times the Employee's regular straight tirne hourly rate ofpay. 8.5 Overtime work perfonned which is compensated for by time and one halftime off, in lieu of overtime shall be called compensatory time. It may be taken in hourly or half hour increments. Employees may . accumulate up to 80 hours of compensatory time and carry forward to the next calendar year forty (40) hours. 8.6 For purposes of computing overtime compensation, overtime hours worked shall not be pyramided, compounded, or paid twice for the same hours worked. ARTICLE 9 HOLIDAYS 9.1 The following twelve days shall be paid holidays for regular Employees: New Years Day January 1 st Martin Luther King 3rd Monday in January President's Day 3rd Monday in February Good Friday Yl day and Yz day floating Memorial Day Last Monday in May Independence Day July 4th Labor Day 1 st Monday in September Veteran's Day November 11 th Thanksgiving Day 4th Thursday in Novernber Day after Thanksgiving 4th Friday in November Christmas Eve December 24th (12:00 Noon) Christmas Day December 25th . LELS Contract 2002-2003 5 Page 5 of! 5 9.2 Regular Employees who work on a paid holiday shall receive some other . day off with pay. An Employee is considered to have worked on a holiday only if the Employee's shift commenced on a holiday, regardless of when the shift ended. Should a paid holiday occur during an Employee's scheduled day off, the Employee shall receive some other day off with pay. If the Employee fails to take another day off prior to June 151 (for holidays falling on or between December 151 and May 3151) or December 151 (for holidays falling on or between June 151 and November 30th), the Employee shall be compensated for the holiday at the regular rate of pay in exchange for the day off. In addition, regular employees shall be paid at a rate oftime and one-half for all hours worked on the following holidays: New Years Day, Martin Luther King Day, Good Friday, Easter, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day Veteran's Day, Thanksgiving Day, Christmas Eve, Christmas Day, President's Day. ARTICLE 10 V ACA TIONS . 10.1 Regular full time Employees shall earn vacation benefits as follows: a) Vacation hours will be credited each pay period. b) One full year of service equals 40 hours earned. c) Two full years through five full years of service, 80 hours are earned per year. d) Six full years through ten full years of service, 120 hours are earned per year. e) Eleven full years through twenty full years of service, 160 hours are earned per year. f) Twenty-one full years of service, an additional eight hours of vacation will be accrued, with a maximum of 200 hours. 10.2 Employees leaving employment in good standing after giving proper notice of termination shall be compensated for vacation leave earned and unused to the date of separation. . LELS Contract 2002-2003 6 Page 6 of 15 . 10.3 Employees are allowed to carry forward to the next calendar year a maximum of eighty (80) hours. 10.4 No Employee may waive vacation leave in order to receive double pay. An Employee who works on a day when he or she is also taking vacation leave shall not receive overtime pay for the hours worked, unless actually working more than ten (10) hours. 10.5 Vacation preferences shall be designated by March 30, and seniority shall govern in the cases in conflict. Officers shall schedule at least eighty (80%) percent of their vacation time by May 1 sl of each year. 10.6 An Employee deprived of a vacation or any part thereof due to an emergency, shall be compensated in cash for the vacation time lost, or be allowed the vacation time taken at a later date on approval of the Employer, at the Employer's discretion. Part-time Employees shall earn vacation benefits on a pro rata basis (must work a minimum of 20 hours per week). ARTICLE 11 SICK LEAVE . 11.1 Sick Leave: Sick Leave with pay shall be earned by each regular full time employee on the basis of eight (8) hours for each month of service. 11.2 Sick leave may be accumulated up to a maximum of seven hundred and twenty (720) hours. When an officer hired prior to January 1,2002 has reached the maximum accumulation of sick days, s/he will be paid for eight hours each month that sick leave is earned but not used. When an Officer hired after January 1,2002 has reached the maximurn accumulation of sick days, s/he will be paid four hours for each month that sick leave is earned but not used. 11.3 Upon retirement or termination in good standing and after three or more years of service, Ernployees shall receive four (4) hours of pay for each day of unused accumulated sick leave. 11.4 Sick leave may be granted only for absence from duty due to personal illness, legal quarantine, or death or serious illness in the employee's immediate family, and what amount of sick leave that may be used for . LELS Contract 2002-2003 7 Page 7 of 15 death in the immediate family, and what constitutes "immediate family" . shall be a spouse, child, parent or sibling living in their home. 11.5 Certification by a physician may be required in any request for sick leave, according to the City Personnel Policy. 11.6 In order for an eligible Employee to receive sick leave, the employee must report prior to Scheduled work to the Chief the reason for a proposed absence from duty, and keep the Chiefinfonned of his condition of the absence if it is for more than three (3) days. 11.7 Claiming sick leave when physically fit except as provided by this Article may be cause for disciplinary action, including suspension, demotion or dismissal. 11.8 Funeral Leave: An Employee shall be granted three days leave with pay in the event of a death in the immediate family (spouse, children, father, mother, or legal guardian, brothers and sisters) and one day leave \vith pay for the funeral of a mother-in-law, father-in-law, grandmother or grandfather. In the event of unusual circumstances, sick leave may be taken in addition to . funeral leave on approval of the Police ChiefïCity Administrator. 11.9 Military Leave: Every Employee to whom Minnesota Statutes Section 192.26 or 192.261 applies is entitled to the benefits afforded by those sections. The state laws giving 15 working days leave per year to National Guard and Reserve personnel for training or when called into active duty is mandatory and applies to every city whether or not included in the ordinance. The section is included simply to make city officers and employees aware of the fact that the state law applies. ARTICLE 12 INSURANCE 12.1 Effective January I, 1995, the Employer will pay 85% of the hospitalization/medical/dental insurance premium and the employee shaH pay 15% of the premium, for regular fuH time employees, their spouses and their dependants. . LELS Contract 2002-2003 8 Page 8 of 15 . 12.2 The Employer shall provide regular full time employees with tenn Life Insurance with death benefits in an amount of at least $25,000. ARTICLE 13 INTRODUCTORY PERIOD, SENIORITY, AND RESIGNATION 13.1 All newly sworn police officers shall serve a one (1) year introductory period upon completion of basic training, and all other Officers with one year full time previous experience in the State of Minnesota shall serve a six (6) month introductory period. During their introductory period, employees may be tenninated at the sole discretion of the Employer. 13.2 Upon completion of the introductory period, employees shall become regular Employees within the meaning of this Agreement and shall have seniority dating from the beginning date of their continuous employment. 13.3 In the event of a layoff or recall, seniority shaH govern provided: that no regular Employee shaH be laid off while introductory employees are employed. . 13.4 The Employee shall provide at least fourteen (14) calendar days written notice of an intent to resign, specifying the tennination date, and reason for resignation. Failure to provide such notice may mean a loss of tennination benefits due under this Agreement. An unauthorized leave of more than three (3) working days shall be deemed to be a resignation without notice. ARTICLE 14 DISCIPLINE 14.1 The Employer will discipline employees for just cause only. Discipline shall be in one of the following fonns: a) oral reprimand b) written reprimand c) suspenslOn d) demotion, or e) discharge 14.2 Suspensions, demotions and discharges will be in written fann. . LELS Contract 2002-2003 9 Page 9 of 15 14.3 Written reprimands, notices of suspension and notices of discharge, . which are to become part of an employee's personnel file, shaH be read and acknowledged by signature ofthe employee. Employees and LELS shaH receive a copy of such reprimands and/or notices. 14.4 Employees may examine their own individual personnel files at reasonable times under the supervision of the Employer. 14.5 Discharges wiII be preceded by a five (5) day suspension without pay. 14.6 Employees wiII not be questioned concerning an investigation of disciplinary action unless the employee has been given an opportunity to have an LELS representative present at such a meeting. 14.7 Grievances relating to this Article and involving suspension, demotion or discharge shaH be initiated by LELS in Step 2 of the Grievance Procedure, under ARTICLE 6. ARTICLE 15 WAGES 15.1 All Employees shaH be paid in accordance with Schedule "A" attached hereto and made a part of this Agreement. . 15.2 Differential pay wiH be applied to regularly scheduled work hours from 5:00 PM through 7:00 AM. (Not to include overtime hours). It is payable in multiples of one hour, scheduled between 5:00 PM and 7:00 AM of the next day. The rate shaH be as follows: 2000 $.30 per hour 2001 $.40 per hour ARTICLE 16 LONGEVITY 16.1 All Officers hired prior to January 1,2002 shaH receive a longevity payment of $ 20.00 per fuH year of service. 16.2 Officers receiving longevity pay shall receive payment in December of each year. ARTICLE 17 UNIFORMS . LELS Contract 2002-2003 10 Page] 0 of] 5 · 17.1 All new Employees shall be provided with an initial proper uniform, provided that any employee terminated during his/her introductory period shall return all uniform items, leather, and weapons to the Employer. The City shall provide the following basic uniform for new personnel: Patrol Basic Clothing issue: One cap each - summer and winter style Two pair of shoes One jacket One overcoat Three shirts each - summer and winter style Three pants each - summer and winter style One pair gloves Two ties 17.2 As a uniform allowance, the Employer shall make direct payment to · approved vendors for uniform items purchased by an Employee. The uniform expenses paid by the Employer per year for each officer shall not exceed the following amounts: 2002 $ 505 2003 $ 525 Any uniform purchases in excess of the above stated amounts shall be an expense of the employee. 17.3 The Employer shall designate at least two approved vendors, based upon the recommendation ofLELS. New employees shall not accrue uniform allowance until completion of their six (6) month introductory period. Upon completion of the introductory period, new officers shall be entitled to a uniform allowance prorated for the remainder of the calendar year in which the introductory period ends. 17.4 Officers shall be allowed to carry forward a total of $ 100 of unused uniform allowance from one calendar year to the next. 17.5 The Employer shall cover all costs on glasses damaged or destroyed in · the line of duty. LELS Contract 2002-2003 11 Page II of 15 17.6 The Employer shall pay up to twenty-five (25) dollars for repair or . replacement of watches in the line of duty. ARTICLE 18 WEAPON 18.1 The Employer shall furnish two boxes of ammunition for each sworn police officer each month, for use in target practice and in the line of duty as needed. One month's issue of service ammunition annually maybe substituted for one month's issue of target ammunition. ARTICLE 19 LICENSE 19.1 The Employer shall pay annually the POST License for all full time regular employees. ARTICLE 20 RETIREMENT CONTRIBUTION 20.1 The Employer shall contribute to PERA for each employee as required by Minnesota Statute; the Employees shall contribute as required by Minnesota Statute. 20.2 The Employer shall make a deferred comp~nsation program a\'ailable to . all Officers. The Employer will not contribute to the program. ARTICLE 21 POLICE POLICY AND PROCEDURE MANUAL AND EMPLOYEE MANUAL 21.1 Where the Collective Bargaining Agreement conflicts with the Employee manual, the Collective Bargaining Agreement shall govern. Otherwise, the Police Officers shall be subject to the terns and conditions of the Employee Manual. The Police Officers shall also be subject to the policies and procedures set forth in the Police Policy and Procedure Manual. Where the tenns of the Police Policy and Procedure Manual conflicts with either the Collective Bargaining Agreement or the Employee Manual, the Collective Bargaining Contract and the Employee Manual shall govern. . LELS Contract 2002-2003 12 Page120f15 . ARTICLE 22 WAIVER 22.1 Any and all prior agreements, resolutions, practices, policies, rules and regulations regarding terms and condition of employment to the extent inconsistent with the provision of the Agreement, are hereby superseded. 22.2 All agreements and understandings arrived at by the parties are sç:t forth in writing in this Agreement for its specified term. The Employer and the Association agree that only upon consent of both parties may this agreement be opened during its life for purposes of negotiations on terms or conditions of employment covered by this Agreement or those not specifically referred to or covered by this Agreement. ARTICLE 23 SAVINGS CLAUSE 23.1 The Agreement is subject to the laws of the United States, the State of Minnesota and the City of St. Joseph. In the event any provision of this Agreement shall be held contrary to law by court of competent . jurisdiction form whose final judgment or decree no appeal has been taken within the time provided, such provisions shall be voided. All other provisions of the Agreement shall continue in full force and effect. The voided provisions may be renegotiated at the written request of either party. ARTICLE 24 DURA nON 24.1 This Agreement shall be in effect ITom January 1,2002 to December 31, 2003 and shall remain in effect ITom year to year thereafter unless either party gives written notice 90 day prior to any anniversary date of its desire to amend or terminate the agreement. . LELS Contract 2002-2003 13 Page 13 of 15 IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have set there hands and seals this . day of ,2002. CITY OF ST. JOSEPH LAW ENFORCEMENT LABOR SERVICES By: By Mayor President By By: Clerk! Administrator Union Steward . . LELS Contract 2002-2003 14 Page 14 of 15 Attachment "A" Wage Schedule . Police Sergeant Base January July January July 2001 2002 2002 2003 2003 2% 1.8% 2% 1.8% Step One 15.40 15.71 15.99 16.31 16.60 Step Two 16.25 16.58 16.87 17.21 17.52 Step Three 17.07 17.41 17.72 18.08 18.40 Step Four 17.83 18.19 18.51 18.88 19.22 Step Five 19.18 19.56 19.92 20.31 20.68 Step Six 19.76 20.16 20.52 20.93 21.31 Step Seven 20.27 20.68 21.05 21.47 21.85 Step Eight 21.07 21.49 21.88 22.32 22.72 . Police Officer Base January July January July 2001 2002 2002 2003 2003 2% 1.8% 2% 1.8% Step One 14.13 14.41 14.67 14.97 15.23 Step Two 14.90 15.20 15.47 15.78 16.07 Step Three 15.65 15.96 16.25 16.58 16.87 Step Four 16.36 16.69 16.99 17.33 17.64 Step Five 17.60 17.95 18.28 18.64 18.98 Step Six 18.12 18.48 18.82 19.19 19.54 Step Seven 18.59 18.96 19.30 19.69 20.04 Step Eight 19.34 19.73 20.08 20.48 20.85 . · Case Loader Bid Summary February 13, 2002 2:00 PM Donald Wangen Cambridge $ 14,027.00 DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD Mike Deutz St. Joseph $ 15,000.00 DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD Tom Henry Foley $14,377.50 · DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD Fargo Parts & Equipment Fargo $ 15,753.00 DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD Jim Corrigan Foley $ 18,251.00 DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD · . itg of St. Joseph 25 College Avenue NW P.O. Box 668, St. Joseph, MN 56374 (320) 363-7201 Fax: 363-0342 Notice of Hearing on Improvement CLERK! TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: ADMINISTRATOR Judy Weyrens Notice is hereby given that the city council of St. Joseph will meet in the council MAYOR chambers of the city hall at 7:00 PM on February 21,2002, to consider the making Larry J. Hosch of an improvement on 15th A venue between County Road 133 and Elm Street East and by the improvement of water, sewer, street curb and gutter and the making of COUNCILOR!? an improvement at Elm Street between county Road 133 East a distance of Bob Loso approximately 975.78 feet by the improvement of street curb and gutter. Cory Ehlert Kyle Schneider Pursuant to Minn. Stat. §§ 429.011 to estimated cost of the improvement is Alan Rassier $620,000.00. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed improvement will be heard at this meeting. . '--", d ;JØýi . ..mtf 1 . ¿Æ.M I . Judy Weyrens City Clerk! Administrator Published in the St. Joseph Newsleader on February 8, 2002 and February 15, 2002. . , COUNTY OF STEARNS . Department of Highways Box 246 . St. Cloud, MN 56302 (320) 255-6180. FAX NO: (320) 255-6186 I Memo To: Honorable City Council Members City of St. Joseph From: Jodi L. Teich, P.E. Assistant County Engineer Date: 02115/02 .Re: County Road 121 Reconstruction, CSAH 2 Resurfacing . At your February 21 City Council Meeting I request that the Council discuss the following two items: 1. A Cost Share Agreement between the City and the County for the County Road 121 and CSAH 2 projects 2. Eminent domain proceedings for the remaining unsigned property owners along County Road 121 I have attached a copy of the standard agreement that Stearns County uses for projects within a municipality. Please review this agreement and, if acceptable, approve it at your Council meeting. You can then forward both signed originals to me for full execution by the Steams County Board of Commissioners. A fully executed copy will then be returned to the City for your records. We have not yet reached agreement during right of way negotiations with three properties along County Road 121. The three property owners are the College of St. Benedict, Robert Gamadas and Molly Martin. In order to keep the project on schedule Steams County would like to file eminent domain proceedings in early March. While we . would make efforts to continue negotiating with the property owners, filing would ensure that the project could still begin in early June. Because all three properties are within the . Page 1 #875-8898 "Affirmative Action / Equal Opportunity Employer" · limits of St. Joseph, the costs associated with eminent domain proceedings would be the financial burden of the City. As a courtesy, Stearns County would like the City Council to recommend that we begin eminent domain proceedings. I will be attending the Council meeting to discuss both of the above issues, but if you have questions or comments before the meeting please feel free to contact me at 255- 6180. · · . Page 2 " . AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made this day of_ _,20_ by and between the CITY OF St. Joseph , MINNESOTA, a municipal corporation, party of the first part, hereinafter known as the CITY and the COUNTY OF STEARNS, MINNESOTA, a political subdivision of the State of Minnesota, party of the second party, hereinafter known as the COUNTY, WITNESSETH: That the parties of this agreement, pursuant to M.S.A. 162.17, subdivision 2, Laws 1959, Chapter 500, each in consideration of the agreements on the part of the other herein contained, do hereby agree, the CITY for itself, and the COUNTY for itself, as follows: THIS AGREEMENT shall apply only to street improvement projects CP 121-00-31. SAP 73-604-40 and SAP 233-107-0 I relating to that part of County Road 121 and County State Aid Highway 2 in the CITY of St. Joseph , between the south city limits and Ash Street , within the CITY of St. Joseph , as stated above. . That Stearns County shall be the project engineer in charge, and that Steams County shall in all respects hereafter act as the agent of the CITY OF St. Joseph in said improvement of that part of County Road No, 121 and County State Aid Highway 2 in the City of St. Joseph . as stated above. In regard to said improvement; the COUNTY shall finance the cost of the following work within the CITY OF St. Joseph: 1) All costs attributable to regrading and resurfacing the urban design section within the center 24 feet of County Road 121, rrom back of curb to back of curb on County State Aid Highway 2, but excluding the cost of removing, extending, replacing, adjusting, or placing of any sidewalk, or any utility, including but not limited to sanitary sewers, watennains, manholes, street lights or posts, or any buildings. 2) The County portion of the cost of the stonn sewer shown on the plans approved by the State, as approved by the MN/DOT Hydraulics Engineer. The CITY agrees to finance with its own funds any and all ofthe following costs arising from said improvements: I) All costs to acquire right of way or easements that may be needed to construct the project to existing State Aid Standards. 2) All construction costs attributable to regrading and resurfacing that portion of the project lying outside of the center 24 feet of County Road 121 within the City limits, outside of the backs of curbs on County State Aid Highway 2 and 33% of the total stonn sewer costs as recommended by the Hydraulics Division of the Minnesota Department of Highways. . 3) All costs incurred by removing, furnishing, installing, replacing, testing, adjusting, or maintaining any or all utilities, including but not limited to sewer lines, water lines, manholes, sidewalks, street lights, valve-boxes and curb stops, and the like. * NOTE: A SCHEDULE OF ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION PRICES AND CITY/COUNTY COST SPLITS IS A TT ACHED TO THIS AGREEMENT. . . Stearns County Highway Department Page 2 . It is agreed that financing these projects will be done in the following manner: . Payment requests shall be submitted to the City as the County makes payments to the Contractor. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the COUNTY OF STEARNS, by the authority of the Board of Commissioners, and the CITY of St. Joseph , by authority of the City Council, have caused this agreement to be enacted, the day and year first written above, and their respective seals to be hereunto attached. IN PRESENCE OF: COUNTY OF STEARNS BY Chair of Steams County Board . of Commissioners A ITEST: Randy R. Schreifels Steams County Auditor CITY OF St. Joseph BY Mayor . A ITEST: City Clerk (SEAL) . ¡ :, " ! i , :. : '. : . .' ¡:-~ : :.'.: '. . :~r '. . , ' r~~ :. " : : ~ .. ~ .' : .. ~ ~ ¡ ¡ ~ :. . . , , · . ~ ~ :~ ~ .~ . : . .: : J '. " " :' . : :- ¡.,,: : . .' : :- ¡'::::¡ :. \ ~: :1 ¡..~ ¡:.¡ :,'.: ¡ ~ '. . . ¡. ¡ i .¡ ~ :~ .: " : ¡:.'.¡ i¡::~! " : , ( r .¡ .. ~ ':¡ . . : '; , . ... r:J ;" ¡.:- ~ :1 ::.:¡ .' . : .:- · . .' . , . ¡ ; . . ¡':.:: ~) : . ~ ~ ". '. , ¡,'.¡ " " .... 0 ~ .::~ ~.. .. VI VI " X X oj oj 1ií 1ií .§ E VI 'ß JJ W '" '" c:: c:: JJ W " '" " '" .J 0 '" '" U'¡ §'.:~ ~:··.·o ~ . ~ f ~;.::.~~ , , ~ ~ ' . ~. ~ :- ,', , : ~: ~ t· ;~ ....: . . :," · ., : :. , . .' · .' ¡: · . '" '" 0 '" 0 z m 0 ...., N L~ ~ ,', :', ~ :~·~·1 :. } ~III Z;¡~t ....... I ~ ~~~ 0 (') I-;§ ~ <0 mô ai ~r- ~ "'''' ~111!¡i ~oo 0 ~"1.q " Q)~" ,,; OJ Cl)mm '" gl Eairi ri 0<0 OJ '" -~ N en ::::::: co '$.::::. X ¡:¡:;:¡ ai ñí ,§ >-00 0 co ~~"! '" w ~ OJ ~~~ c: 0 W o t.O. "It <D '" 0::"'<0 '" "OJ (') 0 Iì>;% "! N ;,;; iiii ¡,; ñi 00 ~ 00 i'~ :::I Q) o co O~ èñ '" '" 0 N d z m 0 .., N . . Date: February 15,·2002 Memo To: Mayor Hosch, City Council Members, City Administrator Weyrens Memo From: Joanne Foust and Cynthia Smith-Strack, Municipal Development Group RE: TIF Pre-Application - VicWest Steel Request Mike Gohman, representing a limited liability corporation which will be constructing a facility to be leased to VicWest Steel, has submitted a pre-application for Tax Increment Finanancing Assistance. The TIF assistance will be used to lower lease payments on the facility. A copy of the TIF Pre-application is attached for your review. Background The project includes the construction of a 67,000 square foot (7,000 office space and 60,000 production space) manufacturing facility on a 10 acre parcel (southern portion of Lot 1, Block 2 - Buettner Business Park). The single story facility will be constructed of steel and block material with ceiling heights ranging from 12' (office) to 26' (production). Construction cost is estimated at $2.7 million with an additional $500,000 for the purchase of overhead cranes and land acquisition costs totaling and estimated $380,000. Total project cost is estimated at $3.58 million. The company plans to add about 15 jobs with wages near $16/hour. . VieW est plans to move into the facility in December, 2002. TIF assistance is requested in order to help the project move forward. Without TIF the company has indicated the lease rate would be cost prohibitive and the project will not move forward. A copy of the building layout is attached for your information. TIF Policy A copy of the St. Joseph TIF Policies are attached. Standards for the use of TIF include the following: 1. General Policy: The project should serve to accomplish the goals for economic development including creation of quality jobs and the attraction of business to the City. The request meets this policy criteria. 2. Objectives: The project meets the objective of increasing the number and diversity of jobs with attractive wages and benefits. 3. Costs that qualify for TIF assistance: The TIF would be used to offset site related work and land acquisition. It is noted assessments (an eligible expense) are substantial. 4. Minimum Qualifications: a. TIF would facilitate development that will not occur without the assistance. b. But-For Test: The pre-application includes the above statement. Sources and uses of funds will be submitted with the final TIF application. c. The project is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and the Zoning . Ordinance. The industrial park is zoned industrial. d. Prior approval of the TIF Plan (after final application is submitted), financial . guarantees and credentials will be required. e. Ownership of the parcel will be required by the applicant. 5. Desired Qualifications: a. Taxes paid before and after the development will be greater than a 2: 1 ratio. Current taxes on the 10-acre parcel are estimated at $1,200. Estimated taxes after the development are expected to be between $40,000 and $50,000. A copy of the projected TIF calculations will be distributed at the Council meeting (being prepared). b. TIF should not be used for speculative projects. VieW est Steel is an existing company with an established market. They are not proposing a spec. building. c. TIF should not be used to pay for over-priced land. The EDA has a cooperative marketing agreement with the owner of the business park. The land price has been established as a fair asking price. d. The TIF should be pay-as-you go. The request is for pay-as-you go assistance. e. Preference is given to projects that do not cause extraordinary demands on City services. VicWest is a leading manufacturers and distributor of metal cladding, roofing and decking. No extraordinary demands on the system are anticipated. f. Preference is given to projects which are consistent with the comprehensive plan, which improve surrounding land uses, which provide new employment, which are financially feasible and which provide the highest and best desired use for the property. The project appears to meet these criteria. Appropriateness of TIF: . Attached is the "grading and Report Card for TIF". The proposed project received a composite score of '4' meaning it is a 'very good' use of tax increment financing. Estimated TIF Available: Juran and Moody is preparing projected tax increment cash flow figures based on certain assumptions. As indicated above, the projected tax increment cash fiow information will be distributed at the Council meeting. To summarize the information, tax increments are based on three factors: · Estimated increase in market value - the difference between pre-project and post- project market value as determined by the County Assessor (this is not necessarily equal to project cost). · Tax Capacity - Increase in market value multiplied by property tax class rate (commercial/industrial property taxed at a rate of 1.5% for the first $200,000 in value and 2% for portions of the value exceeding $200,000). · Net tax capacity multiplied by the City's tax rate. The gross tax increment available is subject to a State Auditor reduction of 0.25% and a City administration fee of 10%. The net annual tax increment is available for use as a financial incentive to development. The net annual tax increment is collected for a finite period of time and includes the school district, county and City portions of new taxes generated. The estimated tax increment cash fiow for the VicWest project will indicate an annual net tax increment of $40 - $50,000 (estimated total of $400,000 to $500,000 over the lifetime of the . district) will be available to encourage development. It is noted these are estimates only. . Recommendation The EDA reviewed the preliminary application at their February 20, 2002 meeting. Additional information regarding the EDA review will be presented at the City Council meeting February 21 , 2002. Action If the Council is supportive of utilizing TIF for this project, a MOTION is in order to approve the pre-application and authorize submittal of the final application and fee. The services of Juran & Moody, the City's Financial Advisor, is recommended to be retained to prepare the TIF Plan. . . "" GO FIlVIAN '\.'\ o· ....".JV....~".. ·:--.......:·"YA-..······· - :«.:::::~;::;~~:::::~~* - -CONSTRUCTION CO_ BOX 57 815 E. COUN1Y ROAD 75 ST. JOSEPH, MN 56374 (320) 363-7781 FAX (320) 363-7207 www.wgohman.com TRANSMITTAL SHEET TO: DATE February 13, 2002 GENERAL CONTRACTOR City of 81. Joseph I 21 NW 1st Avenue 81. Joseph, MN 56374 Building & Remodeling Commercial .Ton: Vic West Steel Proposed Project Industrial Institutional WE TRANSMIT HEREWITH FOR Information xx Proftssional YOUR - Approval Religious Pricing I Piles Correction Return . DesignlBuild 1 ea. Copies of Preliminary Application I 1 ea. Plat Plan Lot 1 Block 2 - To be subdivided for approxi- mately 10-acres of south portion 1 ea. Preliminary Plant Layout Construction A1anagement Services Remarks Yours velY truly, . W. Gohman CONstruction Co. ~;t/a~ Enclosed: xx By Michael Gohman 38 City of 81. Joseph TIF Assistance Program Preliminary Application . Please print or type General Information: . Legal name of owner/applicant: To be named LLC Operating Entity (if different): Vie ívest Steel Address: P.O. Box 57. St. Joseph, MN )ó174 Telephone Number: 320-363-77RI Fax Number: 170-% 1-7?07 Name of contact person: Hike Gohman The following information should be presented in to the 81. Joseph EDA Office as soon as possible after the initial meeting with the EDA Director. The information will be evaluated to determine if the proposed project conforms with the community's goals and objectives. =:> A map showing the exact boundaries of the proposed development. =:> Give a general description ofthe project including the following: . · Size and location of building(s) · business type and use · traffic information, including parking · timing of project · estimated market value following completion =:> The existing Comprehensive Plan land use designation and Zoning of the property. Make a general statement as how the project will conform to the land use designation. =:> A statement identifying how the increment will be used and why it is needed to complete the project. =:> A statement identifying the public benefits of the proposal including estimated increase in property evaluation, new jobs to be created and other community assets. => A written perspective of the developers company(i.e. corporation, principals, history, past project, etc.) Signature ~ ?!!... Applicants signature: ¡;;:*Þa Date: 2/13/02 . St. Joseph TIF Policy Attachment C-] 3~ . Preliminary Application Information · Description of Building Propose to build 150' x 400' production space with 50' x 140' office space and the ability to expand an additional 100' x 400' of production space. · Business Type & Use The use of the building is for light manufacturing; using light gauge metal coil stock and forming into metal building panels. Distribution is to a five state area. · Traffic Information & Parking Requires parking for 50 to 75 employees and truck parking for 24 trailers. There are to be two driveways for trucks and one driveway for personal vehicles. All areas are to be paved in a hard surface. · Timing of Project Proposed project will take 90 days for preliminary work with construction scheduled to start mid May 2002 and construction completion by December 15, 2002. · Estimated Market Value The estimated market value following completion is $3.2 million. . · Land Use Designation and Zoning Proj ect will be located in the Industrial Park and the building is designed for industrial use. · Increment Use and Why TIF is needed for this project because of the high cost of assessments on the property and to assist with the retention and expansion of an existing manufacturing business that has been here for 10 years; thereby keeping it from moving outside the area. · Public Benefits The benefits to the St. Joseph community area will include an increase in the nlimber of jobs and a significant increase in the tax value ofthe property. It will also help keep them ftom moving the facility out of the state. Additionally, this will be the first large manufacturing facility in the new Industrial Park; thereby making is easier to attract other businesses. · Perspective ofW. Gohman Construction Co. - W. Gohman Construction Co. is a Minnesota Corporation. - Officers: Bruce Gohman, President . Michael Gohman, Executive Vice President Denis Anderson, Vice President of Project Administration Dennis Klehr, Vice President ofField Operations Diane Gohman, Secretary LjV History/Philosophy . W. Gohman Construction was founded in 1950 by Willard Gohman, providing personal service and quality workmanship to its clients, On April 1, 1977, W. Gohman Construction Co. was incorporated and the management of the family business transferred to the second generation. Bruce Gohman became President in 1981 and Willard Gohman retired in 1984. Over the past 50 years, W. Gohman Construction Co. has provided its services to many communities and individuals to improve living and working facilities. Vl. Gohman Construction Co. has grown from a very small company to one of the largest management and general contracting companies in the local area for small to large commercial, industrial and institutional projects. The employees ofW. Gohman Construction Co. are very important. Our primary service area is a 60-mile radius of St. Cloud; that way employees can be home with their families in the evening. We offer a complete benefit package and competitive rates which in turn gives us employees that are happy and have longevity with the company. In the past, as in the future, we have and will operate a low-overhead, personal-touch business. We feel a credit to our success is that when someone selects our fi111l to do their work, we make sure that the work is done on schedule and with the best workmanship possible; the customer will get value for their dollar, We have the staff to . help with budgeting and complete co-ordination between and within all phases of the proj ect. Being fully computerized with state-of-the-art budget management and cost-tracking software enables us to follow the project ftom its concept through estimating, construction and completion. We pride ourselves on being exceptionally cost competitive and committed to particularly high quality work. Selected Projects that have relevancy to industrial facilities. . Park Industries, Inc. St. Cloud, Minnesota New manufacturing facility located in St. Cloud's industrial center west on a 17.5-acre site. The ne\v building consists of approximately 51,324 SF manufacturing area, 9,608 SF tech center and research and development area, 4,539 SF of support areas and 13,402 SF of office space for a total building area of 78,873 SF. Park Industries, Inc. designs and fabricates machines and equipment used in the stone fabrication process. This proj ect is a designlbuild project with a fast-track schedule. . LJ/ . · Cold Spring Granite West Plant - Shot Saw Building Expansion Cold Spring, Minnesota 35,000 SF expansion to the existing shot saw building to house six new shot saws and a wire saw. The concrete foundations for the shot saws are also incorporated into this project. This design/build project is on a fast-track schedule. · Borgert Paver Products - New Paver/Retaining Wall Plant St. Joseph, Minnesota New "Start-of-the-AIi" manufacturing facility located adjacent to their existing plant in St. Joseph, MN. The new buiiding consists of approximately 8,400 SF fabricating area, 3,600 SF aggregate area, 3,900 SF curing area, 3,400 SF warehouse area, 1,200 SF shipping area, 1,000 SF offices, toilets, break room and control room for a total area of21,500 SF. It also includes an automated kiln system for curing the finished product. Borgert utilizes the new plant for the computerized manufacturing of many styles of concrete pavers and retaining wall block. The design/build project was on a fast-track and included a 48 foot high pre-engineered building with extremely close tolerances required to accommodate the computer-controlled equipment. · Central McGowan, Inc. St. Cloud, Minnesota Design/build Industrial Distribution Center, vehicle storage and inventory storage . addition. Responsibilities included architect selection, design and complete construction with new construction and retrofit of existing space into offices and display area. Vehicle storage space included interior docks for loading and unloading oftrucks. · Cold Spring Granite West Plant - Foundry Building Cold Spring, Minnesota 15,750 SF new foundry building located at Cold Spring Granite West Plant. The new building is a design/build project that will house "State-of-the-Art" foundry and finishing equipment for specialty castings to compliment Cold Spring's wide variety of granite products with a major emphasis on dust collection, pollution control and air quality. · Cold Spring Granite West Plant - MonuWest Project Cold Spring, Minnesota 137,000 SF new "State-of-the-Art" granite processing facility including complete production/warehouse area and support services (offices) along with a sales area. This was a design/build project on an extremely fast-track schedule; construction [mished in five months, start to finish. · Cold Spring Granite West Plant - Gang Shot Foundations Cold Spring, Minnesota . Installation of 4,000 SF of new concrete foundations for new sawing equipment. Five each, heavy foundations consisting of metric layouts each into ground approximately 17' deep with over 400 CY of concrete each, heavily reinforced. 'IL · Borgert Paver Products - Addition to Original Paver Plant . St. Joseph, Minnesota Addition to paver plant located in St. Joseph, MN. The addition consists of approximately 6,000 SF of warehouse area and 800 SF shipping area. Borgert utilizes the new addition for warehousing and curing of the fabricated paver products. This designlbuild project was added to the north ofthe existing facility and included a pre-engineered addition attached to the existing structure. · Cold Spring Granite New West Plant Cold Spring, Minnesota 175,000 SF fast-track, heavy industrial new facility featuring metal finishing and gang shot sawing and slabbing building, and circle saw building. Work included designlbuild of pre-engineered building and complete construction. · Nahan Printing Plant, Phase I, II, III, IV and V St. Cloud, Minnesota Phase I ,vas started as a designlbuild project in 1990 with a new building to house a raw stock warehouse, production area, finish goods and bindery prep department, and office area with master planning for future needs utilizing a 23- acre site. Since then, expansions occurred to production warehouse, prep department, bindery and currently the new mail center. All expansions to the facility were completed as designlbuild projects using "State-of-the-Art" technology for printing, waste recovery, heat recovery, pollution control and . mechanical systems. Total building area currently exceeds 250,000 SF. · Benton County Sheriffs Office & Jail Foley, :Minnesota 65,000 SF facility incorporating a 72 bed jail complex for male and female housing complete ,vith extensive food preparation and service facilities, laundry facilities and multi-purpose activity rooms. Also the building serves as the new Benton County Sheriffs Office complete with administration support services, 911 communication, j ail booking, j ail administration, firing range and underground parking. All under tight inspection by the Minnesota Department of Health and Minnesota Department of Corrections. · Central Landscape Supply St. Cloud, Minnesota Design/build of pre-engineered 16,000 SF facility providing office, storage and cold warehouse space for wholesale landscape supply business; completed in six months. · S.L. Haehn Campus Center, College Of S1. Benedict St. Joseph, Minnesota Designlbuild of a 73,000 SF new campus center consisting of field house facility (pre-engineered building), fitness area, night club and multi-use room. . L/3 · Camp Ripley Training Facility . Little Falls, Minnesota 208,870 SF training facility consisting ofthirteen different buildings of which five were Barracks buildings each consisting of full in-house food service which was under tight inspection by state and federal requirements. · Ziegler, Inc. St. Augusta, Minnesota 23,000 SF complete construction of office, retail sales and service facility for heavy equipment repair. · Borgert Paver Products - Paver Plant St. Joseph, Minnesota New 12,800 SF manufacturing facility consisting of a fabricating area, aggregate area, warehouse area, shipping area, offices, toilets, break room and control room. This new plant was used to manufacture many styles of concrete pavers. This designlbuild project was on time and on budget. · Central McGowan, Inc. - Office & Show Room Remodel St. Cloud, Minnesota Designlbuild project for their office and show room remodel expansion. This project was completed without Central McGowan having to shut down their . business. · Northern States Power Co.-Service Center St. Cloud, Minnesota Designlbuild 25,000 SF vehicle storage and office facility. Contract included architect selection, design and complete construction. The vehicle storage space included interior loading and unloading of trucks. . L/tj P#'ftl2 t'>{/f'/ QJ~hu Pty';' ~J h J 2j~ J .-------- '-- - 8 ~ §" . :- & ~ ~ ~ §'-g::, .~{ ,.:. '" ~ ......" . 0 ~ ~~]~.f;;~ u ~ð ð "'lJ C\ '" :> ~""'" j...... ~ -...;: t-- >:;: "~ 9. ~'ó . ,.. ~ ~'" ~ ~ 15 ,,'- " "'" t¡¿<\ F ,~ g ~ . ]2 ()~()iJ ~ .,g- '''] § "I, "I ~ ~ ~ 1j~~ -¡~;:; ~ ~ ~~ ./<l.J"-' "I, _ ~ \i \.J ~ ~ 2¡~~";; ö'" 8 ]~~:s <:> - '}1 ~ nl~ .~, :!~{dn ~ ~ I ~ I ~ I I I I .Q' I I I I I I ª I I ~ I I " ~ I I '" ~ I I 8 8 ¡ 't- ':; I I . b I I '('I I ~ I f I l I ~ j j j¡ I ~ i l I 8-1 I I Œ ID Œ ~ & ID I I I I I I r;#/.()<J "Z# ,{D<J /# /.0 <J I ?\ I \'- ~ < . 4~ . . City of St. Joseph Policy and Procedures for Tax Increment Financing Proj ect For the purpose of this policy, the "EDA" shall also mean the St. Joseph Economic Development Authority, which seNes in conducting various economic development, housing and redevelopment programs and activities within the City of Sf. Joseph. I. GENERAL POLICY The purpose of this policy is to establish the position of the City of 8t. Joseph and the Economic Development Authority with respect to the use of Tax Increment Financing for private development within the City. This policy shall be used as a guide in the application for, review and consideration of any requests for Tax Increment assistance. The fundamental purpose of tax increment financing in 8t. Joseph is to encourage desirable development and/or redevelopment that would not otherwise occur "but for" the assistance provided through TIF. The City of 8t. Joseph and EDA shall consider Tax Increment Financing for projects that serve to accomplish the City's goals for housing and economic development as they may change over time. The goals include facilitating projects that would result in the creation of quality jobs(Le. stable employment arid/or attractive wages and benefits) and the attraction, retention, and expansion of business and housing options in the City. . II. CITY's and EDA's OBJECTIVE FOR THE USE OF TIF As a matter of adopted policy, the City of 8t. Joseph and EDA will consider using tax Increment Financing (TIF) to assist private development projects to achieve one or more of the following purposes: · Remove blight and/or encourage redevelopment in the commercial and industrial areas of the City in order to encourage high quality development or redevelopment and private reinvestment in those areas. · To provide for a balanced and sustainable housing stock to meet diverse needs both today and in the future. · To retain local jobs and/or increase the number and diversity of quality jobs (Le. stable employment and/or attractive wages and benefits. · To encourage additional unsubsidized private development in the area, either directly, or through secondary "spin-off' development. · To offset increased costs of redevelopment (Le. contaminated site clean-up), over and above those costs that a developer would incur in normal urban and suburban development. · To facilitate the development process and to achieve development on sites which would not be developed without this assistance. . 81. Joseph TIP Policy tfb 1 · To meet other uses of public policy, as adopted by the Council from time to time, including promotion of quality urban design, quality architectural design, energy conservation, . decreasing the capital and operating costs of local government, etc. III. COSTS WHICH QUALIFY FOR TIF ASSISTANCE · Project design fees including: utilities, landscape, architectural and engineering design. · Site related work including: permits for site work, earthwork/excavation, soil correction, landscaping, utilities, streets and roads, street/parking lot paving, street/parking lot lighting, curb and gutter, sidewalks · Land acquisition · Special assessments · Legal fees (acquisition, finance, closing) · Soil tests · Environmental studies · Surveys · Park and open space dedication fees · Interest rate write downs · Relocation assistance · Replacement or clean-up of contaminated soils which would otherwise preclude redevelopment · Rehabilitation · Any other costs allowable by Statute IV. PROJECTS WHICH MAY QUALIFY FOR TIF ASSISTANCE . All new TIF projects considered by the City of St. Joseph and EDA must meet each of the following minimum qualifications and will also be evaluated based on their ability to meet the desired qualifications for assistance. However, it should not be presumed that a project meeting any of the qualifications wi/! automatically be approved. Meeting the qualifications creates no contractual rights on the part of any potential developer to have its project approved. MINIMUM QUALFICIATIONS 1. The project should meet one or more of the Tax Increment Financing Objectives outlined in Section II of this policy, but at a minimum shall: . Remove blight and/or encourage redevelopment in the commercial and industrial areas of the City in order to encourage high quality development and redevelopment and private investment in those areas. . To facilitate the development process and to achieve development on sites which would not be developed without this assistance. 2. The developer must demonstrate that the project is not financially feasible "but for" the use of TIF assistance. 3. The project must be consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Ordinances and the EDA's Strategic Plan or require changes to the plan and ordinances must be under active . consideration by the City at the time of final TIF application submittal. St. Joseph TIF Policy 1/7 2 . 4. Prior to approval of a TIF financing plan, the developer shall provide any requested market and financial feasibility studies, appraisals, soil borings, private lender commitment, and/or other information the City, EDA or its financial consultants may require in order to proceed with an independent underwriting of the proposal. 5. The developer must provide adequate financial guarantees to ensure the completion of the project. These may include, but not limited to: assessment agreements, letter of credit, personal deficiency guarantees, maximum cost contract, etc. 6. Any developer requesting TIF assistance should be able to demonstrate past successful general development capability as well as specific capability in the type and size of development proposed. TIF will not be used when the developer's credentials, in the sole judgement of the City, are inadequate due to past track record relating to: completion of the projects, general reputation and/or bankruptcy, or other problems or issues considered relevant by the City and EDA. 7. The developer shall retain ownership of the project at least long enough to complete it, to stabilize its occupancy, and to establish the project management and initiate repayment via the TIF assistance. DESIRED QUALIFICATIONS 1. TIF proposals creating a higher ratio of property taxes paid before and after redevelopment will receive priority consideration. Given the different assessment circumstances in the City, this ratio will vary widely. A 1:2 ratio of taxes paid before and after redevelopment is desired. . 2. TIF proposals should normally not be used to support speculative industrial, commercial, office or housing projects. In general, the developer should be able to provide market data, tenant letter of commitment or finance statements which support the market potential/demand for the proposed project. 3. TIF will normally not be used in a project that involves an excessive land and/or property price. This will normally be where the acquisition price is more than 20% in excess of the market value as determined by an independent appraisal of the property. 4. TIF will not be used in projects that would give a significant competitive financial advantage over similar projects in the area due to the use of tax increment subsidies. Developers should provide information to support that the TIF assistance will not create such a competitive advantage. Priority consideration will be given to projects that fill an unmet market need. 5. TIF will be provided on a pay-as-you-go basis. Any request for up front assistance will be evaluated on its own merit in accordance with this policy. Projects requesting pay-as-you-go financing will receive priority consideration. 6. Preference will be given to projects that do not place extraordinary demands on City services. If it is determined by the City's Public Works Director and City Engineer that an extraordinary increase in public service would result because of the project, TIF financing will not be considered. . 81. Joseph TIF Policy LjEJ 3 7. TIF will not normally be used for projects that would generate significant environmental · problems in the opinion of the local, state, or federal governments. Priority will be given to project that aim to clean-up existing contaminated sites and would facilitate the location of an industry or business that has an environmentally sound track record, or meet a housing need in the City. 8. Preference will be given to projects that meet good public policy criteria as determined by the EDA and City Council, including: · Projects that are in accord with the Comprehensive Plan, Strategic Plan, Zoning Ordinances and other redevelopment plans of the City and EDA, · Projects that provide significant improvement to surrounding land uses, the neighborhood, and/or the City, · Projects that provide a significant increase in tax base, · Projects that provide significant new, or retained employment, · Projects that meet financial feasibility criteria established by the EDA, and · Projects that provide the highest and best desired use for the property. V. TAX INCREMENT PROJECT EVALUATION PROCESS The following five methods of analysis for all TIF proposals will be used: 1. Consideration of project meeting minimum qualifications. 2. Consideration of project meeting desired qualifications. 3. Project meets "but for" analysis and statutory qualifications (Exhibit A). 4. Project Report Card (Exhibit B). 5. Project is deemed consistent with the EDA Strategic Plan and the City's Comprehensive Plan. · Please note that the evaluation methodology is intended to provide a balanced review. Each area will be evaluated individually and collectively and in no case shall one area outweigh another in terms of importance to determining the level of TIF assistance. VI. APPLICATION FOR TIF ASSISTANCE FOR ALL TIF DISTRICTS AND , PROJECT AREAS The City's tax increment financing program will be administered by the St. Joseph Economic Development Authority (EDA). The St. Joseph EDA will require a non-refundable application fee in the amount of $2,000 for its processing of the application. The application fee shall be paid to the EDA at the time of final TIF application is submitted. At the time a final TIF application is submitted, the applicant shall also deposit $8,000 with the EDA if the project cost is estimated at $750,000 or less or $15,000 if the project cost is estimated at $750,001 or more, with the EDA to cover its attorney's and consultant's costs incurred as part of amending or establishing a TIF District, drafting and negotiating a development agreement, and conducting and fiscal analysis that may be require to meet the requirements of utilizing TIF. If additional costs are incurred beyond the $15,000, prior to the execution of a development agreement, the EDA shall notify the applicant in writing and the applicant will be required to deposit additional funds upon notice. If the project is approved and the applicant proceeds with the project, the EDA shall reimburse the applicant any unused portion of the deposit as of the date of execution of the development agreement. If the applicant does not proceed with the project, the EDA shall reimburse the · applicant for the unused portion of the deposit as of the date that the EDA is notified in writing that the applicant desires to withdraw its application. St. Joseph TIF Policy iff 4 . VII. APPLICATION PROCESS The application process is a two-step process and must be completed in accordance with the TIF applicátion procedures (Exhibit C). The purpose of this approach is to give an applicant the opportunity to present a development proposal without expending a great deal of money and time in pursuing a development that may conflict with the City's and EDA's goals and objectives. VIII. OTHER POLICY ISSUES FISCAL DISPARITIES Does not impact the City of St. Joseph according to State Statute. Loss of Government Aid At any time, if the formation of a new TIF district or the use of an existing district to finance a project will subject the City to an LGAlHACA penalty or local contribution to a project, the transaction shall be structured so as to have the ultimate cost the City minimized to the greatest extent permitted by law, so as to have the project bear the cost of the penalty or contribution. Public Use of Tax Increment The City and EDA shall follow applicable state laws in terms of potential public improvement financing with TIF. It shall be the general policy of the City and EDA to identify public improvements at the time of adoption or amendment of the TIF Plan. . PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED this ~ day of ,1998 by the City of St. Joseph. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED this _ day of , 1998 by the St. Joseph EDA. Mayor EDA Chair ATTEST: City Administrator EDA Director Attachment A "But For" Worksheet Attachment B In-house Grading and Report Card . Attachment C Application Procedures 81. Joseph TIF Policy 5D 5 Attachment B . TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PROPOSAL Gradin2' and Report Card 1. Ratio of Private to Public Investment in the Project: Grade: A 4- Private FundsrrIF $ 3¡\W,®b Private Investment $5:1 A $ "'¡cq 000 TIFlPublic Investment 4:1 B $ 6,'15/ f Ratio of PrivatelPublic Financing 3:1 C , 2: I D Below 2:1 F 2. New job creation in the City: Grade: L. ~ New employees in St. Joseph as a 50+ A / F result of the project 25+ B 15+ C <15+ D None F . 3. Ratio of City Financing to new jobs created: Grade: F- $ ~CO, aOD TIF assistance requested $8,000 or less per job A Is::- New jobs created $10,000 or less per job B $- 2~,100 TIF/Job $12,000 or less per job C $15,000 or less per job D More than $15,000 <f) 4. Pay Level of Jobs: Grade: L Pay Range # of Employees in Range Total Wages Grade $45,000/yr or more A $35,000/yr or more M.33, U30 B $30,000/yr or more X \ ') © . $20,000/yr or more D Less than $20,000 F .- .- .- / Total Wagesj\.Mq"öd # of employees (FTE) ~S' = Average wage $ 3)1 ~t5D - . 6/ . -\- 5. Increase in Real Estate Value: Grade: A . $:(1 J.;?{¡., 82D Value of site after development Ce5+; ma..tL) Before/After Development , 1:5 ŒJ $ 2-71, CfDo Value of site before development 1:4 B "1 ~ .J, 1:3 C Ratio of value before/after development 1:2 D 1:1 F Bonus Points (5 points total) · The project adds value to the neighborhood and/or business community â)points and adheres to the Comprehensive Plan. · The developer agrees to the Pay-as-you-go fmancing. (!)oint · The proposed project will redevelop a previously contaminated or 2 points environmentally challenged site. · Mixed use project bonus 2 points Total Bonus Points Available 7 points . - . 5¿ PROJECT REPORT CARD . BUSINESS and COMMERCIAL PROJECTS Ouestion Grade Points 1. A- S A Excellent =5 B ~d =~ 2. L :) C Average =3 D Below Average =2 3. F I F Fail =1 4. c... 3 5. ¡A s Bonus Points 3 TOTAL POINTS 1-0 /5 = Y GPA . . 53 Extract of the January 17, 2002 City Council Meeting Graceview Estates . Graceview Estates. Bob Herges and Rick Heid: Bob Herges and Rick Heid approached the City Council requesting approval of the preliminary plat for Graceview Estates. The Planning Commission on December 19,2002 recommended the City Council approve the Preliminary Plat for Graceview Estates with the following contingencies: 1. The following Avenues are posted as 7 ton roads: 4th, 5th, and 7th 2. The northern access to County Road 121 will be moved to Lot 5 Block 8 3. The property abutting 95th Avenue will be developed with bay homes rather than the proposed townhomes. 4. The Park Board allows the paved walking path to meet the park dedication requirement. 5. A temporary construction road will be located at the access mentioned in #2 above. 6. Only phase one of thè development can be approved without a paved access to County Road 121. It shall be the responsibility of the developer to come to an agreement with the adjoining property owner to secure access to County Road 121. If an agreement cannot be reached the developer should notifÿ the Planning Commission. 7. Approval of the City Attorney and Building Inspector. 8. Approval of the City Engineer - meeting all the requirements detailed in a letter from the Engineer dated November 28,2001 Herges stated that the frrst phase of development will include 27 single family homes and 28 bay homes. In an attempt to resolve the access issue, Herges stated that he met with representatives of the College of St. Benedict and they have not expressed interest in selling any additional property. The College is working with Centra Care to construct a medical facility near this site and the proposed road would abut this property. Rassier stated that the Planning Commission has concerns if the development proceeds without an access to County Road 121. The residential streets adjacent to the proposed development were not designed to handle the volume of traffic that would be generated by this development. . Herges expressed ITustration and stated that he started the platting process in October, and the access was not discussed until December. Based on the favorable response of the Planning Commission and City Council Herges received in October he closed on the property. Ifhe had been aware of the concern there is a good chance this issue could have been resolved. However, Herges stated he has made numerous attempts to purchase the property to provide an additional access and has not been successful. City Attorney John Scherer responded that the City is supportive of the development and is willing to work together to resolve the outstanding issues. However, the concept plan presented in October is not a detail plan and until engineering reviews the plan and the public hearing is conducted the issues cannot be identified. City Engineer Joe Bettendorf stated that the access to County Road 121 may not be logistically possible for 2002 as County Road 121 will be reconstructed. When questioned if Stearns County will grant an additional access to County Road 121, Bettendorf responded that the accesses will be limited with stricter provisions for driveways. The proposed road recommended by the Planning Commission would serve both the Graceview development and the remaining property owned by the College of St. Benedict. Loso questioned the need for the additional access and indicated in his opinion the additional access could cause a traffic problem at County Road 121. Hosch stated that a road needs to service the proposed development so that excessive traffic is not routed through existing neighborhoods. Loso responded that constructing a road does not guarantee that people will use the road and typically people will take the shortest route possible; which in this case may be the residential neighborhood. Ehlert stated that he is not in favor of generating additional traffic through the Eastern Park Addition. The roads were not constructed to handle considerable traffic and the roads are narrow. Ehlert suggested that as an alternative the Council look at East Baker Street and change the characteristics similar to that of Minnesota Street. Removing the stop signs would move traffic faster and may entice residents to use this route. . Extract of the January 17, 2002 City Council Meeting Graceview Estates Bettendorf stated that before the COlUlcil accepts the preliminary plat the access issue and utility easements should . be secured. At this time the utility lines are proposed to be extended along the southern property line of the College of St. Benedict and then into Graceview Estates. The developer should negotiate the easement and include the document with the preliminary plat. EWert concurred with Bettendorf that the two remaining issues should be resolved, as it is his understanding once the preliminary plat is approved it cannot be altered. Hosch stated that he has some concerns as to where the proposed southern access, (known as Field Street), has been placed on the preliminary plat. At a recent meeting facilitated by the St. Cloud Area Planning Organization they infonned the City that before a road can be mapped an extensive study must be completed. Therefore, Hosch requested the COlUlcil consider requiring the developer to designate the southern 60 feet of the plat as a right-of-way easement. Herges stated that he is willing to change the plat to accommodate the 60' right-of-way for the purpose of construction of a roadway. Herges questioned whether the preliminary plat can be approved and at the same time he would continue working on the access and easement issues. Herges stated that due to the cost of holding the property, he would like to continue in an expedient manner so that construction can begin this summer. Scherer recommended that the preliminary plat approval be tabled lUltil the issues have been resolved. However, in an effort to assist the developer the [mal plat and preliminary plat could be worked on simultaneously with one presentation to the COlUlcil. Linda Brown and Tom Herkinoff, engineers for Graceview, stated they could make the changes as requested by the Council and have the information ready for the next meeting. Hosch concurred with Scherer and the proposed developers along with City Staff should meet with representatives of the College to further discuss the access. Herges questioned the fate of the project if the access issue can be resolved. Scherer stated that the City has the ability to use eminent domain, but considers this a last resort. He is confident that an agreement can be reached. Ehlert requested that Scherer provide the COlUlcil with an outline of the condemnation process. Hosch made a motion to table the PURD application requesting a special use permit to develop 91 acres . known as Graceview Estates until February 21, 2002. The tabling is necessary to try and secure right-of-way for an access to County Road 121 and utility easements along the southern property line with that owned by the College of St, Benedict. The motion was seconded by Loso and passed unanimously. Rassier made a motion to extend the 60 day action requirement on a land use request until February 21, 2002. The tabling is necessary to secure the road right-of-way and utility easements. Discussion: Ehlert requested clarification on the motion and if the property owner is required to request extension of the 60 day requirement. Scherer responded that the City can extend the 60 days if additional information is needed and at the time of the extension the Council must clarify what information is needed. The motion was seconded by Schneider and passed unanimously. . Draft December 19, 2001 Page 1 00 . Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the Planning Commission met in Special Session on Wednesday, December 19,2001 at 7:00 PM in the St. Joseph City Hall. Members Present: Chair Gary Utsch. Commissioners S. Kathleen Kalinowski, Marge Lesnick, Kurt Schneider, Mike Deutz, Jim Graeve. Council Liaison Al Rassier. Administrator Clerk Judy Weyrens. Others Present: Bob Herges, Rick Reid, Tom Herkinoff, Linda Brown. Approve Agenda: Deutz made a motion to approve the agenda with the addition of Commissioner announcements; seconded by Lesnick and passed unanimously. Bob Herges, Rick Heid - Graceview Estates Preliminary Plat: Utsch stated that he along with the City Engineer, City Administrator and Public Works Director met with the developers to review the proposed development. The following is a list of issues raised at the public hearing along with possible resolutions. CONCERN RAISED AT HEARING POSSIBLE RESOLUTION The proposed development will create additional traffic 4th, 5th and 7th A venues will be posted with seven ton through residential neighborhoods. weight restrictions. Construction delivery vehicles cannot access seven ton roads. Rather than extending 4th Avenue SE, 5th A venue SE could be extended. This change would not move traffic straight through to County Road 75 and people may choose an alternate route. . A temporary construction road should be installed adjacent to Lot 5 Block 8 Residents on 95th A venue requested the developer The developer has already changed the plan to change the design so that similar style of homes will be construct bay homes adjacent to 95th A venue rather adjacent to their property. than the original design where Town homes would abut 95th Avenue. Access to County Road 12l/College Avenue South The developers do not own the property that abuts should be required. County Road 121 Therefore, they cannot construct a road from the proposed development to County Road 121. However, the property owner, (College of St. Benedict), has agreed to allow a temporary construction road. The City Council and Planning Commission have agreed that an east/west corridor (Field Street) needs to be constructed at the southern edge of the proposed development. However, the construction of Field Street will not occur until at least 2006. Park Dedication Fee The Park Board will be meeting to discuss allowing the developers to pave walking trails and connect the . trails to Klinefelter park in lieu ofpayrnent of the Park Dedication fees Draft December 19, 2001 Page 2 of3 The Commission spent considerable time discussing access to County Road 121(College Avenue South). Berges ., stated that he and Heid recently met with the College of St. Benedict to discuss access to County Road 121. The College is in the process of selling a portion of the property in question for a commercial building. The proposed access to County Road 121 has the potential of benefiting the commercial project. Therefore, Herges stated that he and Reid are trying to come to an agreement with the College. At this time the College is in the process of appraising the land and once the appraisal is completed they will meet again with the College of St. Benedict. Berges is hopeful that they will reach an agreement with the College. Deutz questioned if the City has the authority to condemn property for the purpose of providing access roads. Weyrens stated that although the City does have the that authority it is hoped that the College and the developer will come to an agreement. Schneider questioned if the City could give the developers a deadline as to when they have to have the access completed. Weyrens stated that the issue before the Planning Commission at this tinle is the preliminary plat. It is important to make sure the road connections are planned and secured within the development. After the preliminary plat is approved the developer will come back to the Planning Commission requesting [mal approval of the fIrst phase of the development. The Planning Commission could consider limiting the number of homes to be built before the access to County Road 121 is complete. Herges stated that if they owned the property to County Road 121 they would build the access in the first phase. However, since they do not own the land they have no right to construct the proposed road. Graeve stated that the road to County Road 121 is crucial in making the downtown area easily accessible to residents of this area. Rassier made a motion to recommend the City Council adopt the following Resolution of finding, approving the Preliminary Plat for Graceview Estates; the motion was seconded by Kalinowski and passed unanimously. Resolution of finding The request of Bob Herges and Rick Heid for a P.U.R.D. application and rezoning request came before the Planning . Commission at a public hearing held on December 3, 200 I. The purpose of the hearing was to consider a preliminary plat, P.U.R.D. application issuing a special use permit to develop approx. 91 acres with mixed housing; and to reione the property from current Agriculture to R-l Single Family. The property is located south of Baker Street and West of 7th Avenue SE/95th Avenue. The property is legally described as: The Southeast Quarter of The South East Quarter (SW 'I. SE 'I.) of Section Ten (10) in Township One Hundred Twenty -Four (124) North, of Range Twenty-nine (29) in Steams County, Minnesota, LESS AND EXCEPT; The North 66 feet thereof AND ALSO LESS AND EXCEPT the East 30 feet thereof. The Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter (NE '!. NE 1/4) of Section Fifteen (15), in Township One Hundred Twenty-four (124) North, Range Twenty-nine (29) West n Steams County, Minnesota, LESS AND EXCEPT: Commencing at The Northwest comer of said NE 1/4 NE 'I.; thence East on an assumed bearing along the North line of said NE '!. NE '!., a distance of 500 feet to the point of beginning of the land to be described; thence South 00 degree 09 minuets 26seconds East paranel with the West line of said NE '!. NE '!. a distance of 1330.93 feet to the South line of said NE '!. NE '!.; Thence North 89 degree 57minutes 43 seconds East along said South line ofNE '!. NE 'I.; a distance of 819.95 fee to the East line of said section; thence North 00 degree 10 minutes 42 seconds West along said East line a distance of 1330.38 feet to the Northeast comer of said Section; Thence West along the North line of said Section 819.47 feet to the point of beginning and there tenninating. AND The Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter (NW '!. NE '!.) of Section Fifteen (15), in Township One Hundred Twenty-four (124) North, of Range Twenty-nine (29) West in Steams County, Minnesota, LESS AND EXCEPT: That part of the NW '!. NE '!., of Section 15, Township 124, Range 29, described as follows: Beginning at the NE Comer of said Quarter-Quarter, said Point being south 89 degrees 1 I minutes West, 1320 feet from the NE Comer of said Section; Thence along the East line of said Quarter-Quarter, due South 310 feet; thence South 89 degrees 11 minutes West 250 feet; thence due north 310 feet to a point on the North line of said Section; thence along said North line North89 degrees 11 minutes East, 250 feet to the point of beginning. . Draft December 19,2001 Page30f3 · The request for preliminary plat and P.U.R.D. development has been submitted by Bob Herges and Rick Heid; 25 N 11th Avenue, St. CloudMN 56303. In consideration of the information presented to the Planning Commission and its application to the Comprehensive Plan and Ordinances of the City of St. Joseph, the Planning Commission makes the following fmdings: The proposed -development is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan and meets the requirements of the St. Joseph Code of Ordinances. Therefore, based on the above fmdings, the Planning Commission makes the following recommendation: Approval of the P.U.R.D. application granting a special use permit to allow for the development of 91 acres with mixed housing and to rezone the above mentioned property from Agricultural to R-1 Single Family. Approval is contingent upon the following: I. 4th, 5th, and 7th Avenues are posted as 7 ton roads 2. The northern access to County Road 121 will be moved to Lot 5 Block 8 3. The property abutting 95th Avenue will be developed with Bay homes rather than the proposed Townhomes. 4. The Park Board approves the Park Dedication Fee - allowing the paved walking path to meet the park dedication requirement. 5. A temporary construction road will be installed at the access mentioned in #2 above. 6. Only phase one of the development can be approved without a paved access to County Road 121. It shall be the responsibility of the developer to come to an agreement with the adjoining property owner for access to County Road 121. If an agreement cannot be reached the developer should notify the Planning Commission. · 7. Approval of the City Attorney and Building Inspector 8. Approval of the City Engineer - meeting all the requirements detailed in a letter dated November 28,2001 (See exhibit "A") Lesnick made a motion recommending the City Council mapping the northern County Road 121 extension to Graceview Estates on the Official Transportation Map; and, if the developer cannot reach an agreement with the property owner the City will construct the road within the means available to municipalities assessing affected property owners. The motion was seconded by Deutz and passed unanimously Miscellaneous: Graeve reported the Fruelingsfest plaÌ1ning will begin on January 14,2002 at the St. Joseph Community Fire Hall. The theme for the 2002 event is "Celebrate Historic Basebal1." Adiourn: Deutz made a motion to adjourn at 8:30 PM; seconded by Lesnick and passed unanimously. Judy Weyrens Administrator/Clerk · PRELIMINARY PLAT OF GRAC£V7EW ESlATES . - l.£GIL DESCRWTlON / I- . PLANNED' UNIT'RESIDENT/AL DEVELOPMENT Th.5ou\h....au....,.,th._..Quort"(SWI/.SE1/.).. ....... MCÖOn Tin (10) In Townahrp One Hundred Twenty-Feu (124) I OE ';:- - L . /"'/TY 01 L ST. I,r) C' L rJ'H I H'''''. of "'''' T....,.-.,oo (U) ,. sto<rn. Coo"". WlM...t.. /~oLiyCl, :.--'1........;::.. ;'~ =.:~T¡::·::):-.¡ V~ r . vV..JC/ I r-----+---- W"~~=kTMfM\~.::.(..t the~ NiD H.so LESS NiO ROHlIK 'OJ I ,...~>..::.,: ,...,.,,, 91.07 ACRES ...1 1 ., I {----__-/ OENNIS &._,'.'1...... , . ~~ _ 12 " I "::1 . I ~~ I. I Cw.RlES &: CONNIE ¡n /f.. ~.<:~ x.. /OOUG.&i" ~(~: .. ." .-.-"'" ~:31 ! I I Lt.! AMY :". L - - - - ~ I ~.;.I ~:i· I 11111 HorIhealt Quarter of the Northeott Quarter (NEI/'" HE1/4) 01 I ~~5~l ~5 I-.!-~CKEN 8 I I' I [f't~~N " C' ·'·'Y_~, \- I 2' I ;-~: lEHN ''':_'. I I ¡~:¡t------~--- SeetfDn flftnn (16), In Towmhlp OM HtJndr.d T'InIftty-Four (124) 1-------1 BR~ "'&--¡(n1"·!¡~·fr~:-.; ,~~~\.-;:?~t, J ~~El & r----3-l ~:! -~.Ä_:L:.. I ROBERT &. I ?~I ¡ 1:2 G t'::-..ngnGC~~~~~lh~J~~=.tCo~;r':fr::Q· , 1 GERAlD & 1 DENISE ~ .1..···1···· .1 . ÁlÎÔRtIiN....'~ I"~ )... SHAW I WAN & I ~,. f;; ..... '. --1, KATHLENE I 1,·,' SCOTT I PETER & HEI/' NO/., ..""" .... 011 on _omod ....., .Ionv ... No'" I JUDY ¡4/:~·KLEIN :} I I MARY ............ ....(', I JUDY I 1·::(1:;..::..)" lYON I ::r: I FRANK LEOTA'l'III of øoJd I {I- SCHWEGAI......; ---1 I J<lRIXIUS ..- ì \ \ ' 1 NmER I .1. ....: I I IH_ I I HONER HEt/4 NE1/4. a dIstance 01 ðOO tNt lo 1M polnt at beglnnTnø of I -----+------ I ª-ê~ r-~___ !~, ,. '....... .~~. ::;::·r" BRANDON L 1,,-_ I the land to be daøerlbed; thInetI Scuth oo~..- D9 mJnutø 215 KEN I JOHN &: 1.a! I IJAMES & I (,"'; I 1 EVE - - - I 1 \ ANTHONY 1-- ":.0-.',:- I !.... SAND - - - - --i - ~ _ _ _ _ _ _ -=ond. Eod pmv!l.l "IÜI the Wed In. of Mild NEI/4 t€I/4 a SPOHN i) (;; £RIK '"" ÞNDREA !ü ;.' Sf N -, \ -::.-:;-.... -::-1 ,. ---- I --- dI.tclnçtl af 1330.'3 tMt to th. South Un. of IiQJd NEI ... Nfl 4: _ _ _ :.. J '3 ~im'N 1 "' I SCHlANGEN 'v I UPHOFf I $: I 1 lOSO ,4 I. \.. ,UINNICH I .,;::...,> <, I I'J) -- 4 -j I ~ 2 :; ...~. North .. d..~ 57 mi.,:," 43 .......... E." .'.. ..,(. -- \-------1>, . ------+_____-I·"I ---__ - '2 \ \ ... I·. 1 1 1 AIl.EN'- I z h= THOUAS& JOOY'. _.......,"'N"/.NEI/.............81....'"',.... --, -'f __ - - \ ...... I 1- m &:: I 0:. I ~ ¡z I IX ralt 8M of Rrd ~Uon; thwIetI North 00 deQre8 10 mlr.utes 42 OONAW & I· ANTHONY &I~· 1 I IRENE 1,-1 1 0011 & \ L'lNDEl &\ JOSEPH" I I ~HERI I JEm I ~ ~ SHELIA I ROBIN ........ "... .,'''''',,''' r...·'............ .,1330.38 ,... to . GLADYS G 14 CA.THERlNE I ~~ I MARTH', ¡Z I SYt.W.IlÐZ ¡¡ ~.; I I MARYANN n. I lICE 'BARBARA \ I KIM I LOEHNER MARTHAlER .,o¡ ¡ Itfj NA~ I OPATZ the tIotthocst carner of .u1d SccUon; thencw Wen alcnsJ the North SCHNEIDER I SAlZ£R .,¡. MERDAN ~.. 1 BRUNO ,.-- BR .JC.OMPTON I ZIEBEL I I I I J ;: I~ 1M of .a1d $eçUon 818.47 fHtlo tiw pofn~ of b.;¡lnnlng and 1 I ~ [ DEWENTE~ \ ·L . L --1 ..... """,.at!.. ( ED RI SINGLE AMILY RESlUE ) L -1.J _"---1_____-" ____ _____~ ~------ ---- . ..L. -.J 2"· SIORW 27· 51 ...J 30· TOR&l5rt'ER AND !="Þ.S ¡ ßt:j(ER STRtf."T 8- s DIP ~ . 5E"M!...__ thill Ncrlh.-nt. Quarter of thlll Horthftld Cuorhr (HWI/4 NEt 4) of g1359 W -G T ---r- s.dIan F1ft..., (15). In Towmhrp OM Hund..! T~-tout'" ~24) ð ' z I North. of Rano¡. Tnnty-ntn. (2i) wnW fn St.Gm. Caunty, r 147 I ~ 61 £J&tAmr-?40.J :~'~ I : ~~;,.~:~ ~~~n~~~::'':1{~~/4. of 15291 Sf":t I r.fKPO~37Œ! DSÐIEHT I tr II I ~!nn]t!9 at the HE Comsr af 11C11ð Quartar-Qucrtsr. 101<1 pofnt I~ - - ., °1 'J (.") be1ng SoIlUl 69 dei;¡rees 11 minutes West. 1320 teet from the HE' '" 8 U' 50 'fJ7 100 I w BRIAN &: I JAMES &: I Camw 01 11011:1 s.cIIon: tMnce ol~n~ the ro.t On. or MIld 1-. 1 .." I Z BRENDA RENEE 1 Qucrl.r-Guortor. "'" South 310 '"" th_ South 80 dtg_ 11 't)'-110-- g ROONNAY I popp I ~~w.:.~.:~~~~~:c:~1~~~an::"H~.: '" : CORf'OR.\TE'lßIrTS atY I 89 degwes 11 mfnute. Edit, 2:K) teet to th poInt or beglmlnll. '" r -~..K>,Fs't- -- + ;!. I TOOO& I TOOD& I ~ I JENNIFER I JENNIFER I VICINITY MAP ¡g I SPYCHAlA I SPYCHAIA I Õ I 1;- I <, "...' r"\$11 ~~.~ 0........ I I - I -11f ¢l1';;\-~~~I.!}.b.~rt.f;';:-~ì:ffi. ~~ I I I ~1rØ~~t fb¡_~~~i~.,·[_! ,~~.~"'!.,J'(1 1~ Ii .! -~~;J+~;=~ *': ;,1~~~;\~~ I 6 I I . . I I I OWHFR ANn nFVFI OPFR I STEVtN &. I STEVEN & I POND VIEW RIOGE UP ~: ~~=ER I ~=ER ~~~D.~,r~1 " I I 1 320-=-'7011 ~ -----+----+ ~: I 1 W, 12 I . I I I I EUGENE & 1 STEVEN & I N I ~~~EI;5~SKII ~=ER I rO:P~ ~=HOII'" r- w ~ k U;::S l:.ti:~!J.lt: "'-':'~"iW NI£ "'; I III 4~ ~ n~,:::;. , \~-~~~-~T~~~fl: DIn ~~ ~ I'" 9 I >: 1 " '" I EEtE COs :- L 190 I ... ::t I I I t:i~ ~ r ~ /----..!.~.!...--_ ~i:: I HERMAN & I HERMAN (( I II: '-'-- ~ g 1..., .......... 1.._, I PATRICIA I PATRICIA I , :: -« Z r:. ~. ''Zo.':{ ~""'y1~ f~- IfANGl I GANGL I I. f3ß r ",:x.~ (Ja ~II L -____J.__ï_.L 10 UNIT gi5 I~ ¿,' L~--1- :[;1" I BIa3 u~ 1° .. :..t..___.... I I~ -' RICHARD & I 3 I ... k I 0 TAtMRA. I V1 I lanr( ~\! ,.. lø SCHULTZ I ~ " .. I P I~ ~_______--1 .. ~ no 8lOO SE1BACK lINE { 105 98 I !' 118 107 I I" N I bi2~ ! I I El, 'I: 2 DARWlN & I !;!;?~ &! I 10' gg ,- I 115 108 1 l'1;' Is V1CTORIA I !Ii "I .1 1 1- r.: 10 ERICKSON I !!i ', 103100 'I! .!J "' 109 II ~ I~ ¡'-Õ:;'CHAEl " Ci~" - 1 1 1- I "'-------- I4ti ~d I 101 1 Iii 113 110 1 ¡Ii I~ MICHAEL 8< : nSCHER4 / : ..ií~ I I_ 112 I,. 117 ~ I~ PHILLIP? I L.. ' I ;>¡¡¡¡ 1 J 111 I., I I .----w."tIt N~ ~.THE r. x}:4!;!.. L;. -'-___L--.l_________ FT EA5ó.lEHT SECTION I~, f124H. R2 2S 11;11"'( CASUNE ~______..!5 NO. 141101 (818,55) ~Œ~~~ ~ V~~~ N 89'09'20' E 22M / ~~~~ ~~T124H.R2S11 DOC. NO. 488315 @Q (COUNTY MONUMENT) rA5EIIENT PrR DOC. NO. B&»5 EASEJ.ŒHT PrR DOC. NO. 853134- A~AXIVlIrN oç J.mIISIHG SIlG...£ F,w¡y HOIoES 125 UWIS OutlOT B B\Y HOIÆS 3," N; :t 41 UN!1S 11 (<-I.m TOHItJOIe .. UN!1S . (8-1JIf1) TtM!KII£S 18 UHßS . (lo-l.m TtJO!IIÐIE5 .. UNITS t-(3 srom) N>NmÐfJ so UHfTS ~ .-~~=~ 80 IIHIT5 TnT'" J5~ 408 WlAl UNITS ð ~ B!I ~ PER W£TTECH ~ ~ ENV1RQNMEHTAL. z IÐ 1IEt1NI05 ÞÆ iillI :;;~'."" \ t;~ / ~~ /" ~!:i => " ~~ / ~: fuû ~~ q ~~ ...Jo N .u- St:!. ~ I:ñn. ~ ~o Ow ~ ~5 . õð o '" 10 b o z ~ ~ t :~ a~oð ~~ ~~N EXI!rnNO ZOHINC 20NE A-AGRICUl.1\1FW. ~~n~ oonoPt.lENT l J - ~T :W~~ OIlY _ S 89'0659" W 500.13 DUANE & ~Ws'l. J05EPI """"'I\ (...lfD~~ I ~ .u~~ r.1I<£ - -- SOOTH UNE Of'1I<£ LOYOlA I . t~~~ELINE K. I _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _S!.~6.1.-!~ '6..~._R"" ~~.fi~ ~~ ~ '{,~4II, 1m" GNDA LEONARD &-1 : (STEARNS COUNTY ZONING DlSTRICT-;;.4õ)-----~~ use -,~~ 4B7 ~~BETH I UTllnY SERVICES -................ ........., - 0 aT( or ST. JOSEPH 320--301-'1201 SURVE'YED NO'{ 1. 2001 ~:m= Y~~~ ..:~~ Ctt.ORED ~--......, '........ 0 JU.NHOL.E I HEREBY CERnFY"TH'T 1HIS PUll SURVEY OR REPORT HORTHmt HÞ;n.ßW.. GAS 15ð1-ia2-2121 2. SIDE YARD SETBACK 10 FEET'" 8 ~Ti.VALIJE WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER 'NY DlREéT SUPÐMSIOH Nfl) UJŒD.I.I.E TrLm-tOI£ 320-274-8201 BROWN HERI<ENHOfY. Ir£ 0 ~TCH ¡W;IN THAT I No! A. LNm SUIM:(CR UNDER THE LAWS Of" lHE EXen. DŒRCY ~Pmt ~~ 142+ 2ND STREET NoRTH' 5 FT. DRAINAGE AND IJ11UTY £ASEMEHTS 0 100 200 11011 &~[POlE STA.TE ON &.nNNESOTA. ""'" t1I«IIATOO!I ~m-œ~1 SNJK iW'1DS. \IN 56379 5...... - - - - - scm: IN FEU . PC1IIEII POU: S1tW<S ElEImtIC COOP 21&-588-4744 (320) 259-1234 5r-- - - - - - S1SW 510"" SEWER S1'FJftHS ctUßY 320-55&-Jfll fAX (320) 203-1234 0 DENOTES IRON MONUMENT SET SI.NSW SNo/rrNn' SE1'£R ~l£ =~~~ 10 A~~EAÑÕ I1I1UTY EASEIdOOS . DEN01ES IRON "ONUMENT FOUND ~ ~W~ DATE LICENSE NO. 23582 . . .~~ College of Saint Benedict · 37 S. College Avenue St. Joseph, MN 56374-2099 February 18,2002 Judy Wehrens, City Administrator Saint Joseph MN 56374 Dear Judy, Thank you for your written correspondence dated February 6, 2002, which helped shed li~lt on issues regarding the pro~osed Herges development. I distributed your information to CSB oard members who are on t e Buildings and Grounds sub-committee of the Board. These Board members, at the time, were located In Florida, South Dakota, and Minnesota. They reviewed your correspondence and had several questions, and therefore, were unable to make a recommendation to the Executive Committee of the Board, who met on February 14, 2002. The Executive Committee was updated on the correspondence and they outlined the following process. They would like the College Administration (Susan Palmer and myself) to get clarification on a number of issues. After which, the item would be put on the next Buildings and Grounds sub-committee meeting agenda. The Buildings and Grounds sub-committee meets next on April 25, 2002. The strong consensus of the Board was that the property was Eurchased for the Colle~'s expansion for decades to come. The purchase of the Eroperty was ma e on the basis of availa ility and not on identified need. Therefore, there should e a strong commitment to reserve the property until needs have been identified. Some of the questions in need of clarification are as follows: 1. Because the develo~ment is a multi-year project, what is the immediate impact of the · traffic concerns in t e first year, year two, year three, and so on to 2005 (the estimated completion date)? 2. You estimated that traffic on the proposed road would be 750 cars per d&;. Was this estimate based on all of the residents using only this road, and based on the evelopment being completed? 3. What is the traffic capacity of nearby roads and how would they be impacted? 4. What alternatives were considered before it was determined an additional road was needed? 5. Could the southern road be develobed sooner then the timetables indicated in your correspondence? Could this road e used for a detour during this summer's road construction of Steams County Road #121? 6. Availability of utility services is unclear, what is available now and for the future? What are all the options and associated costs to potential users? 7. m regards to your written correspondence, there were several questions specifically directed to the purchase price, the specific cost of assessments, and for alternative options. 8. What is the City's assessment policy? As you can see, there were several questions in need of clarification before the College of Saint Benedict can respond to your information. If you have any questions fclease contact me at 363-5507. Please contact Sharon, my assistant, at 363-5985 to schedule a fol ow-up meeting with Susan Palmer and myself. · Sincerely, ~ mes Fredricks hiefPhysical PlanVFacilities Management Officer cc: Susan Palmer Extract of the Draft Recommendations of the Planning Commission Special Use Permit to Construct 44 Unit Apartment Complex and Caretaker Unit February 4, 2002 · Rassier made a motion to recommend the City Council adopt the following findings of the Planning Commission, recommending issuance of a special use permit to allow the construction of a 44 unit apartment complex and caretaker unit. RESOLUTION OF FINDING The request of Mark Lambert for a PURD application requesting a special use permit came before the Planning Commission at a Public Hearing held on December 3,2001. The Planning Commission on January 7, 2002 recommended the City Council deny the request and on January 17, 2002, at the request of the property, the matter was referred back to the Planning Commission for reconsideration. The purpose of the hearing was to consider a P.U.R.D. development plan to construct a 44 unit apartment building under a special use application and to consider a fifty foot variance on the size of a business sign. The proposed development is to be located on the following described property: Lot 1 Block 1 Indian Hills Park. St. Joseph Code of Ordinances 52.19 subd. 4 provides for a special use permit to develop multi family dwellings over 12 units through the PURD procedural process. St. Joseph Code of Ordinances 52.14 subd. 12( a) allow for business signs provided that the area on one side shall not exceed fifty square feet. The proposed plat has been submitted by Mark Lambert, 10 1 - 5th Street, Suite 910; St. Paul MN 55101. In consideration of the information presented to the Planning Commission and its application to the Comprehensive Plan and Ordinances of the City of St. Joseph, the Planning Commission makes the following [mdings: · Based on the contingencies stated below, the plan is consistent with the requirements for issuance of a special use permit. Therefore, based on the above [mdings the Planning Commission recommends approval ofthe application for special use permit contingent upon the following: 1. The road access should be placed as in accordance to the Developer's Agreement, allowing for one common entrance with the parking lot for the proposed apartment complex being accessed on the western edge oflot one block one Indian Hills Plat. 2. The City Engineer review and approve the [mal plans including drainage, curb and gutter, easement locations, and proposed overlay of Northland Drive. 3. A six foot bermlbuffer will be provided to the north ofthe proposed building. The fence will be six feet in height and be wood or maintenance fÌee material. A chain link fence will not be considered. 4. A lighting plan is submitted to verify the lights will not project into the neighborhood. 5. A property area will be provided for snow removal along Northland Drive. 6. A twenty foot flat area will be provided around the building for fire access. The motion was seconded by Deutz. Ayes: Utsch, Kalinowski, Rassier, Schneider, Deutz Nays: Lesnick, Graeve. Motion Passes 5:2:0 · Extract of the Draft Recommendations of the Planning Commission 3 Foot Variance on the Maximum Height of a Building February 4, 2002 · Deutz made a motion to recommend the Council approve a three (3) foot variance on the maximum height of a building and accept the following findings: RESOLUTION OF FINDING The request of Mark Lambert for a five (5) foot variance on the maximum height of a building came before the Planning Commission at a Public Hearing held on December 3, 200I. The Planning Commission on January 7, 2002 recommended the City Council deny the request and on January 17,2002, at the request of the property, the matter was referred back to the Planning Commission for reconsideration. The purpose of the hearing was to consider a variance with regard to the construction of a 44 - unit apartment building. The variance request is to allow a five-foot (5') variance on the maximum height allowed, or the construction of a three story building. The property is legally described as follows: Lot 1 Block I Indian Hills Park Plat. St. Joseph Code of Ordinances 52.16 subd 7 (a) states, ''No building hereafter erected or altered shall exceed 2 ~ stories or shall it exceed 35 feet in height, except as hereinafter provided". In consideration of the information presented to the Planning Commission and its application to the Comprehensive Plan and Ordinances of the City ofSt. Joseph, the Planning Commission makes the following [mdings: FINDING: Based on the contingencies stated above for the issuance of a special use permit, the proposed use is consistent with the St. Joseph Code of Ordinances regarding the issuance of a variance. · Therefore, based on the above [mdings the Planning Commission recommends approval of a three foot variance. The motion was seconded by Kalinowski Ayes: Utsch, Kalinowski, Rassier, Schneider, Deutz Nays: Lesnick, Graeve. Motion Passes 5:2:0 -' · p.2 Jan 28 02 02:50p · t· TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY FOR ~K LAMBERT Nß- SCALE:::~~ I. i I __I" '1--- j', .~ I _--I......', \. / -I- I \ \ \ / / I t I I -- -- \2 , .-- -- --- I : \ -..../ J~¡ / ,... - -.... I I ¡ J I I rl -So-/ I I I I I I 'I ./ II 1 /,) I / II I · / ,/ II ,I ~I ~ I c:¡1 ' / (I, -1/ I . /, I /' , . .....--/ // I ,¡ /'.-- \ II -- 7"-----.-- ": I ~I' ~ ---- ._n:;. ..--- I ~ ¡ .-- I / / ~' I -- / / / I -- /' ./ / , I' - ,.- I I I -....- .".. / ,e - / / ~ I/t\\ I / / / I / / / / II " ~ / / / I \ II ./ ,/ 7'--'/_-L... I I I ,.. / / ,/ ,- . ,/ ./ ,/,/ / I I, ..- // ,/ ,/,/ / I , \~ ..-"- ..- ,/ ,/ / ./ / \ ,.. ',.- / / / / / \ / ,/ ,/ ,/ / / / ,/,/ / / I I" / ,/ / ,/ / / I -" \ I I ,/./ ,// ./ / / I I \. \ / / ./ ./ / / I J / / ./ / I, " / / " / / / I I / / / / I , / / / / , \ -.....-./....- ---~ ----.Z'.-- I I \ \ / / \.~ ( -".. -- ...., ,-....: - I HEREB't' CERTFY THAT TIflS PLAN, SURVEY, OR REPORT -Bl.J11I.INa.~ AI - - - - WAS PREPARED ØY ME OR UNDER ..... DIRECT SUPEfMSIOH AND -----!:!:9:-RlJjff/!!!J@fJ?(J,.f¡J- ~T I NA A DULY LICENSED LANO SURVEYOR UNDER 1HE LAWS --- - ---:- - - - OF niE STATE ON MINNESOTA. ~ -- LINDA H. BROWN DATE UCENSE NO. 23CS82 . a PROFILE ELEV. 02014 ~§ . Z ~oW O~F c.. ~ UJ W C::Q.0 c::::¡Z §S OV)::» ~tfš ~~ e ::¡Q~ ~~~ 0 Z h ~ ~~c 1.oJ t)~ ~ ~S ~ Z sa::¡c¡5 1.oJ a u :I:~1.oJO ::J ~CJ ~ l-o!Q!ß t3 ~ I.LJZ :::> ¡!:1.oJUZ ~::J2 ~< CQ ?;:fD~z ~~ a ~o::»o a ôJ 1.oJ0 i ~¡<~ 0 ~¡..;:: ~ fDfu~tn CI: sgs ~ a:I wCl: 1.oJ :i ~Q.- :::s ês ~!(¿~: ~ ~<: ~ ILl _~I-O Z ~ :s a: ::J 0 .. lJ.J~ ~ ;::!~ kJ . ~~ I,¿J ~ 'It ~ 8:ã5 ~ Lu 0 CI) (,,) 0.; ~ Œ h ::::> l- e a ~ 0 -.J V) Ii) .... 0 ti 0 .... W I.J... ~ ~ ð 0 (f'¡ It") 0 . g'd dos:~o ~o 6~ uer . ~~ ZI.&J 3: 5:~¡: C'I 0 fu~ffi ~ 0 I") z C'I :¡:: o:: ,¡Jo Q,z Iñ o::=>=> 0(1) w .,..0:: :x: ~~o <.:> r o::õi 1.1.. =>~=> Ó 0 (I) (/) z ::::J ~ffiQ I.&J ~ (I) -...- z en. 0..03 4/ a.r<') /I)~ß~ (.) f( 0- ::¡ 1-- - 0 ï=O::(/)/I) ozw ...... !;( ,¡J~~ ï=:::E::¡~ ~~ è;:~~z ::>0 Z ~oo ~ LSC) ~~<~ )..eJ~t) ŒI ~<: iXlo:: I.&J ~ ,¡JQ.-J: ë§ ffi~¡.,"" ,¡J a::5 J: <l1. Z 1i e:~ -~¡:Eo ::¡ 0 0:: ~ . ~Q <t' .... ~<: -10 ø an - ,¡J. Z co 0 (Ø ~E õ N C'I :s: ..J 0 ... 5 ,...., a. Oixl Lu 4/0:: ~~ Cl)w ll:() ~I Co ~ëij fõ .- oS ...... , Q 0 -J 0 t:ï .- L\J La.. ~ !5(/)a¡ ~ ~5a:: z=> 0 -0 Iñªa. tI) II) It: I: 0 ...- Ü:ŒlF- "<f' ~t::ò ...- ...- 0 ~f% ¡": . ~~ ~~ a.w 10.10 0 ....- l1....- u.: 1\ aBO:~O GO 6G uer god ~ Oil) . 0 ~~ 0 z ~ z !i::0W I- 0!ãF= (/) fb~~ L.U ::r: "WIJJ G Il.O :E ,,~z l.L o(/');:j ~ 0 ~t~ ~~ E: ~ë~ ~~~ 0 ~a:O z ...... IJJ Il.~Š (/') tñ~ z ~~8~ IJJ U ~a:II)5S ::ï ~Q .."oz~ ~wIJJZ 2UZ ::J5! ~~ ~~~~ ~:5 ~Q;:j ~ wO ~!i<~ lJ:~ ffi~¡~ a: CD ~g¡ 0::1l.-J..J :i ~!í2~~ ~ W ~<: _~I-\5 Z ~ S ::ï .. (j) lu~ ó . (j) ;:::!~ C\ ~g ..,. - 0 ~ 2:ã5 ,," ...... 0 a 10 .... -.J 0 0 t:¡ .... L.IJ LI. 0:: ~ O(/') 0;:)1:0 L.IJ -loa: u.z;:j ð ;: \¡¡:iU ~ .... "êa. V'J .... ¡¡:m¡2 ::.: II ~(;j (;j~ u.;t::d a.Q -1/0 ....co¡...: wO ~.... u:íì . 0 ~'d dSO:OÞO ~O 6~ uer · ~ c z i§ § Z t:oL&J o!ã¡; &1 e:ïffiffi co a::c..O I') o::::>Z C'I ol/)::J ~. gil ;:)0 E: ~~~ ò Z ~ffio w Q~ I/) I- !Q~fi:)~ æ t)~ () ¡t:a::ffio ::J o ffi !ëëwo¡ ~C ¡;::E:::::¡5 ~~~z ~< ~ ::;)0 i 00 ~~ ¿ ¿ ~ u~« ~ æ~~t;) a:I LJ:I' a::c..-~ :i · 0:: ~~!;(.... ë§ ¿ ffic ~ -~¡t:~ z ~ r..: ::J ~<: e :s 1"1 .. lLJ~ . ~~ ~ ... ~g ~ 1&.110 0 ICÌ ~ã5 ~:: c..1I CJ::j ... 0 I- 10 .... a , -J 8 ~ 0 0 w .... ~ 0:: ~ oU') w ~~~ -I ~5B ð 0 .- (I) 10 -.t' ü:ª~ · ~ .- ID.... ~II e U;t:d L5i:J i:JC! a.d -,I') I&..ID¡": we . .- I&..~ ......: II 0 p·d dBO:pD GO SG ueL O(/) . ~~ z t:¡:0W -:I: o(/)~ ~ o.~Ct: W W a:: a. ° I") Ct:~Z N ~ O(/)~ ~Ct: ~UO >~~ f2 !šÕ~ en >-::1 Ò .:E en Z ~ ~ ~o::O W ~~ ~ a.~~ en z ffi SQ~o~ (.) C:I ¡;Ct:~o ,:j ~~ -.J f-:°æ~ .' t3 s ~W(.)Z ::E::J~ ~<: (t) :is c::~?:iz ~~ a ~O~O ~ ß wO ~~<~ u::¡..::: ~ ~ ffi~~t) ~~ :i a::o._W ~ Q. ~!;2~¡; ~ ~< a a -~¡:~ z ~ :$ :t ~ ,:j Ci ... kJ""" ~ a:~ Lw ... . lL.J ~ .... ag 0 N 0 8:55 C:I V5 4.J Cj LC) ~ Œ t-.. ::) ~ a a C) 0 CI) 10 -.J <: ... 0 0 B .... I.L.. ~ ~ 0 (J') It) 0 . l."d d1S:¡:::O ¡:::O 6 ¡::: uer . CD CD ...... ...... ) I!') I!') ...... ...... '<t '<t ...... ...... C'? C'? ~ ...... ...... N N ...... ...... ...... ...... ~ ...... ...... 0 0 ...... ...... 0'> 0'> ~ -e .91 ì co co g 'S :2 r- r- #. c ..... "C C1I CD fI CD I'G !!:! I.) .5 () "C e: I'G I!') œ « 'é fI C1I .... C1I .... fI 000 '<t C;; ë¡j enO '<t C;; fI 00..... r- e: en..... r-- C1I Q)- Ó 0'> .. ê<i: ó 0'> fI '<t c:« C') u) C1I '<t C') u) fI ,i) + ..... ,i) + I'G .... r- < .... r- en ::3.>C ~ '<t ::3-,,<:: ~ '<t e: 11)0- E.'7 . 11)0- E.'7 C1I en N C1I en ,Q .... c M c C1I N > ~ N ~"""8~r-'<tCO"""N'<t!¢ ui ~"""8~r-'<tCO"""N'<t!¢ I'G .. ... C'? t3~ór-.:.o~~~",,:Lqcri M ...M . . .COO'>CD......I!') . .c: I'G Q) ~ u 'or-I!') . . . . '0'> "C C. ~ ,Q «co.......... r-'<tNO'>C'?CD «co............ r-'<tNO'>C'?CD fI I'G E I'G Õ fI E CI) ::s CO .. ~ E ë. ..... () ,Q ..... () .5 CI) .::t::. '-CQU') CI) .x:: So... co en .- ::s u.. ~CI) en () Q)....- U Q)'-- !!! .~/ ..... N ..Q............NC'?C'?'<tI!')....~~ ..... N ..Q............NC'?C'?'<tI!')....~~ C1I œ- e: ë. 11) 0ml- ë. 11) 0ml- ,Q .c: C1I en 11)1- en 11)1- E ~~I ëã "C ::s C1I Z ) fI fI .5 ë¡j o Q) OT-NT'"""r"'""N"r"'""T"" 0.,..... C\I.,......,.....C\I.,......,..... ¡¡¡ ., fI C) ...... "C ...... êi5~ .¡: ....I c.. ....I Õ 0 ::> z 02/18/02 17:22 FAX 320 229 4301 SED ~ ST JOSEPH 1m002l002 . Ar5eJ MEMORANDUM TO: St. Joseph Administrator, Mayor, and Council FROM: Joe Bettendorf DATE: February 18,2002 RE: Stormwater Detention Facilities 8EH No. A-STJOE 0201.00 14 There are cun'endy three ways that stonnwater detention facilities (holding ponds) are handled: L Private Ownership and Maintenance: We have no plivate facilities that I am aware of. 2, Private Ownership on Public Easement: We have two facilities of this type in Northland Plat Five. The ponds are located in back yards of lots on a drainage easement. The City assumes maintenance of these facilities. 3. Public Ownership and Maintenance: The land encompassing the pond is dedicated to the public, and maintenance tasks are performed by the City. This is the way holding ponds on the Roske site, East Minnesota Street, and the Business Park (southeast pond) were handled. . Private ownerslúp and maintenance is problematic in several ways. The property owner seldom gets the full information necessary to understand hislher responsibilities from the Realtor. Maintaining a facility that collects water from numerous lots in the development is not what new homeowners eKpect. As a result. regular maintenance is simply not pelformed. This alternative can work if the pond is part of a common area or open space within a development, where a homeowners association would have responsibility for maintenance. Private ownership on a public drainage easement works if the City assumes responsibility for maintenance and remains vigilant. Property owners are often inclined to alter or modify the pond slopes ot' structures to meet their landscaping desires. This option works better if the ponds are adjacent to and part of a larger drainage area or wetland. Pub1ic ownership and maintenance is the preferred alternative. This is usually accompHshed by creating an Outlot, which is dedicated to the public in perpetuity. The permanence of any facility rests with ownership. You don't have to deal with competing uses of the land, and can perform maintenance tasks when and where you like. The decision to fence or not to fence rests with the City Council, without the direct involvement of a private propelty owner. My recommendation is to plat these facilities as Outlots, and to dedicate these Outlots to the pubJic for drainage purposes (option 3 above). c: John Scherer \\.",h<o3\g"""ral"''''''lpcrs\I>eU\hold~l& 1"00 P'u.y.dne . - Short BlioU Hendrickson Inc. 7?{ VOl) ' Trusted Resource ( Equal OppÐnlB1lty EmplOyer . . . Financal Summary of Leased Police Vehicles Unit Number 3893 Lease Actual Mileage Total Rate Miles Cost Cost April 242.65 2,484 372.60 615.25 May 316.50 3,730 559.50 876.00 June 327.05 2,921 438.15 765.20 July August 327.05 2,456 368.40 695.45 September 327.05 684 102.60 429.65 October 316.50 3,625 543.75 860.25 November 327.05 327.05 December 316.50 4,145 621.75 938.25 , 2,500.35 1 I 20,045 , J 3,006.75 ~ I 5,507.1 0 ~ Unit Number 4182 August 327.05 3,127 469.05 796.10 September 327.05 327.05 October 316.50 2,331 349.65 666.15 November 327.05 1,994 299.10 626.15 December 316.50 3,692 553.80 870.30 I 1,614.15 , I 11,1441 1,671.60 ~ I 3,285.75 ~ . Total Lease Cost 2001 4,114.50 31,189 4,678.35 8,792.85 Equipment for Leased Cars 8,337.88 Total Capital and Lease 1 12,452.38 1 Less: Budget2001 (7,500.00) Less: Budget Rollover (12,000.00) Remaining Carry over (7,047.62) Projected Lease Vehicles 2002 Lease Rate Annual Per month Lease Unit 3893 320.90 3,850.80 Unit 4182 320.90 3,850.80 Unit 2002 500.00 3,500.00 I 11,201.60 1 Budget 2002 12,000.00 Budget Carryover 7,047.62 Sale of Surplus Equipment 650.00 Funds Available for lease and Equipment I 19.697.621 Less: Lease (11,201.60) Less: Equipment, New Car (9,000.00) (20,201.60) . Surplus (Shortfall) I (503.98)1 . V Rajkowski 11 Seventh Avenue North ~~~~~~~! Ltd. P.O. Box 1433 St. Cloud, MN 56302-1433 January 30, 2002 320-251-1055 Toll Free 800-445-9617 Fax 320-251-5896 Ms. Judy Weyrens Clerk Administer City of St. Joseph. rajhan@rajhan.com P.O. Box 668 www.rajhan.com S1. Joseph, MN 56374 RE: Stearns County Adult Diversion Program Our File No.: 21793 Dear Judy: Our office has been contacted by the Stearns County Attorney, Roger Van Heel, seeking . the participation of S1. Joseph in the Stearns County Adult Diversion Program. The Diversl()n..Progr,am hél~ b~eparound for several yeats. I believe that the City has look~çi at this issue previously and has declined to participate:' The Comity Attorney has asked us to take another look at participation. I have prepared this letter to outline the significant aspects of the program, and the pros and cons of participation as I see them. Frank J. Rajkowski .. The Diversion Program is the child of a statutory mandate. In 1993, the legislature Gordon H. Hansmeier passed a law requiring county attorneys to set up Adult Diversion Programs for certain type of offenses. The Diversion Program is not available to all adults. It is not available Frederick L. Grunke with regard to all offenses. Thomas G. Jovanovich" John H. Scherer' An offender is only eligible for the Adult Diversion Program if he/she is over 18 years of age, has not had an offense which has been handled through the Diversion Program Paul A. Rajkowski" previously, has had no prior convictions for felonies, non-traffic gross misdemeanors, and Kevin F. Gray non-traffic misdemeanor offenses within the past five years or ordinance convictions. To be eligible, a person may not have any pending criminal charges or any felony delinquent William J. Cashman convictions occurring after the offender's 16th birthday. A person must show the ability Richard W. Sobalvarro to comply with the supervision requirements of Stearns County Community Corrections. Patrick J. Larkin A person may not have participated in the juvenile diversion program within six months of the current offense. Susan M. Dege LeAnne D. Bartishofski Likewise, a number of offenses are not divertible. I have enclosed a "laundry list" of non- . J. Rodlund divertible offenses. People charged with any crimes falling within the categories öfthis list would have their offenses handled in District Court under the current procedures. Sarah L. Smith Frank J. Rajkowski and Richard W Soba/varro are admitted to practice in North Dakota, Gordon H. Hansme;er in North Dakota and Vlisconsín. Pau/.it Rajko!NSki in VliscofJs;n and I;Vil/iam 1. Cashman in South Dakota. IIMember of American Board of Trial Advocates. 9Qualified ADR Neutral. V Ms. Judy Weyrens . January 30, 2002 Page 2 They could not participate in the Diversion Program. The Diversion Program is not mandatory. Many adults find it easier to simply pay a fine by mail rather than participate in the Diversion Program. The County Attorney has advised me that approximately half eligible adults choose not to participate in the Diversion Program. A benefit of participating in the Diversion Program is the ability to avoid having a criminal conviction on your record. If a person participates in the Adult Diversion Program, he/she must pay a participation fee to the County, and are subject to terms or conditions established by Steams County Community Corrections, such as payment of restitution, completion of community service, participation in treatment, counseling, educational training or vocational training as recommended by a Community Corrections, or other appropriate measures. If a person complies with the conditions set by Stearns County Community Corrections, and remains law abiding for a six month to one year period established by Community Corrections, he/she is discharged and the offense is dismissed. I believe that the program presents the following advantages to the City: 1. The program may reduce the cost of prosecution. In Cities where prosecution is set on a . flat fee or a cap, this may not result in any savings to a City. 2. The program provides an alternative to the Court system and the remedies therein available. A resident charged with an offense can avoid having a conviction on his/her record by complying with the Diversion Program. As a practical matter, most of the conditions established under the Diversion Program (such as treatment or counseling) could be made part of a Court sentence following conviction if deemed appropriate by the Judge. Therefore, although the Diversion Program may offer some additional alternatives, most of the conditions of Diversion are available within the regular Court system. 3. People within the County will be treated in a similar manner. An individual committing an offense in the City of St. Cloud (which may be subject to diversion) would have the same choices if committing the same offense within our City. On occasion, we have some individuals who are upset because diversion was not available to them. 4. The program is operated at no direct cost to the City. Potential reasons for not participating in the Diversion Program would include the following: 1. The City would receive no fine money nor would the City share in any fees charged for . participation in the Diversion Program. If · Ms. Judy Weyrens January 30, 2002 Page 3 2. The City does not have the ability to control prosecution policy with regard to offenses that are subject to diversion. Ifthere is a particular problem within the City that can be addressed by more stringent prosecution of a certain law, if that law is subject to diversion your effectiveness in addressing the problem would be reduced. 3. We do not have the ability to ask that certain offenses be omitted £rom the Diversion Program. In other words, if an issue arises that which can be addressed by prosecution of a certain law, and we would like to have that offense removed £rom the Diversion Program, we do not have the right to do so. 4. The element of communication between the police department and the City prosecutor, allowing the police to have input into the manner in which individual charges are handled, would be lost with respect to those that are subject to diversion. If you or the City Council have any additional questions regarding the Diversion Program, please let me know. Quite honestly, I do not have a strong feeling for or against the Diversion Program. I believe that the Diversion Program has some merit, but on the other hand I have some reservation in having the City relinquish control of prosecution and the fine money which it · generates. If the City has interest in participation in the Diversion Program, please let me know and I will contact the County Attorney to request a copy of the agreement for the City to review. Very truly yours, RAJKOWSKI HANSMEIER LTD. JHS/mrm / I \ · Page 1 of3 St. Joseph PD ,- . From: Albany City Half To: St. Joseph PD <stjosephpd@cji.net> Sent: Friday I February 08, 2002 9:45 AM Subject: Abandoned Vehicle ORDINANCE 75: ABANDONED MOTOR VEHICLES Section 75.1. Purpose. Abandoned motor vehicles, abandoned appliances and discarded furniture constitute: Subd. 1. A hazard to the health and welfare of the people of the City in that they can harbor noxious disease, furnish shelter and breeding places for vermin, and present physical dangers to the safety and . well-being of children and other citizens. Subd. 2. A blight on the landscape of the City and are detrimental to the environment. Subd. 3. A waste of a valuable source of useful metal, in the case of abandoned moto vehicles and appliances, It is in the public interest that the present accumulation of abandoned motor vehicles, abandoned appliances and discarded furniture within the City be eliminated and that future abandonment be prevent. Section 75.2. Definitions. The terms used in this Ordinance shall have the meanings given them in this Section, Subd. 1. "Abandoned vehicle" shall mean a motor vehicle that: A. Lacks vital component parts or is in an inoperable condition so it has no substantial potential for further use consistent with its usual functions; and B. Has remained for a period of more than 48 hours on public property illegally (or more than four hours if posted); or . C. Has remained on private property for more than 24 hours (or immediately, if posted) without the consent of the Person in control of the property , 2/8/02 Page 1. U1 j Subd. 2. "Abandoned appliance" shall mean a household appliance lacking one or more vital component parts or in an inoperable condition. . Subd. 3. "Discarded furniture" shall mean an item of furniture originally intended for use within the interior of a building but left or stored outdoors. Subd. 4. "Junk vehicle" means a vehicle that: A. Is extensively damaged, with the damage including such things as tires or broken or missing wheels, motor, drive train or transmission, so as to render the vehicle in operable; or B. Has not had a valid, current registration plate, or has not been properly licensed for operation within the State of Minnesota for a period of thirty (30) consecutive days or greater. Updated 7109101 Subd. 5. "Motor vehicle" or "vehicle" has the meaning in Minn. Stat. § 169.01, as amended. Subd. 6. IIPrivate property" shall mean any real property within the City which is privately owned and which is not public property as defmed in this Section. Subd. 7. IIPublic property" shall mean any street, alley or highway which shall include the entire width between the boundary lines of every way publicly maintained for vehicular travel, and also means any . other publicly owned property or facility. Subd. 8. II Unauthorized vehicle" shall mean a vehicle that is subject to removal and impound under the law. Subd. 9. "Vital component" shall mean a part of a motor vehicle or appliance essential to its mechanical functioning. Section 75.3. Excel1tions. A vehicle shall not be an abandoned junk or unauthorized vehicle, and an appliance shall not be an abandoned appliance when kept: Subd. 1. In an enclosed garage or storage building. Subd. 2. On the premises of a junkyard or a motor vehicle or appliance repair business when such junkyard or business is maintained and/or licensed in accordance with Minnesota law or City Ordinances and zoning regulations. In the case of a repair business, each motor vehicle or appliance must be actively and consistently worked on and maintained or stored in an area screened from public view by an appropriate fence, Subd. 3. In an appropriate storage place or depository maintained in a lawful place and manner by the City or authorized by the City. Subd. 4. A classic or pioneer car, as defined in Minn. Stat. §168.10, as amended. . 2/8/02 Page 3 of3 Section 75.4. Nuisance. The presence of any abandoned junk or unauthorized vehicle, abandoned . appliance, discarded furniture, or parts of the furniture, on private or public property is a public nuisance which may be abated under this Ordinance. Section 75.5. Public Property. No Person shall park, store, leave or permit the parking, storing or leaving of any abandoned, junk or unauthorized vehicle or parts of a vehicle, abandoned appliance, or discarded furniture of any kind, whether attended or not, upon any public property within the City. Subd. 1. A Police Officer may impound any abandoned junk or unauthorized vehicle, abandoned appliance or discarded furniture on public property within the City, or that causes an obstruction and hazard, the Police Department or City may remove it under State law after giving proper notice under this Ordinance. Section 75.6. Private Property. No Person owning, in charge of, or in control of any real property within the City, whether as owner, tenant, occupant, lessee, or otherwise, shall allow any abandoned motor vehicle, abandoned appliance or discarded furniture of any kind to remain on such property longer than ninety-six (96) hours. Section 75.7. Removal Procedure. Subd. 1. Notice to Remove. Whenever it comes to the attention of the Police Department or other City officials than any Person has any abandoned junk or unauthorized vehicle, abandoned appliance or discarded furniture on the Person's property, the City or Police Department shall serve a notice in writing upon the Person requesting the removal of the nuisance in the time specified in this Ordinance. . Subd. 2. Responsibility for Removal. Upon proper notice, an owner of the abandoned, junk or unauthorized vehicle, abandoned appliance, or discarded furniture, and the owner or occupant of the private property on which the same is located, shall be jointly and severally responsible for its removal. Subd. 3. Notice Procedure. The Police Department shall give notice to the owner or occupant of the private property where it is located by sending a copy of the notice by certified mail to the owner or occupant of the private property at the Person's last known address. Subd. 4. Content of Notice. The notice shall contain the request for removal within ten (10) days after the mailing of such notice and the notice shall advise that failure to comply with the notice to remove shall be a violation of this Ordinance. Section 75.8. Impoundment. If the nuisance is not abated under this Ordinance after proper notice, the City or the Police Department may impound the vehicle according to State law and Section 51.9 of this Code. Section 75.9. Penalty. Any Person violating this Ordinance shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. Each day the violation continues unabated shall constitute a separate and distinct violation. . 2/8/02 Page 1 of 5 St. Joseph PD · From: Albany City Hall To: St. Joseph PD <stjosephpd@cji.net> Sent: Friday f February 08, 2002 9:32 AM . Subject: Nuisance CHAPTER 7 NUISANCES AND OFFENSES ORDINANCE 70: PUBLIC NUISANCES · Section 70.1. Public Nuisance. A Person shall be guilty of maintaining a public nuisance if the Person: A. Maintains or pennits a condition that unreasonably annoys, injures or endangers the health, safety, morals, comfort or repose of the public; B. Unduly interferes with, obstructs or renders dangerous for passage any public highway, waterway, right-of-way, or other public property; C. Has control of real property and pennits it to be used to maintain a public nuisance or lets the same, knowing it will be so used; or D. Is guilty of any other act or omission declared by law or this Ordinance to be a public nuisance. Section 70.2. Public Nuisances Affecting Health. The following shall be public nuisances affecting · health: A. Stagnant Water. Stagnant water on private property, 2/8/02 Page 2 of5 B. Diseased or Vicious Animals. Diseased or vicious animals . running at large. C. Dead Animals. Dead animals or carcasses remaining exposed on any premises, unless the animals are to be processed to be used or sold as food products. D. Refuse. Any manure, excrement, ashes, tin cans, garbage, tires, trash, litter, household appliances, automobile bodies, discarded machinery or .other refuse arid debris, not contained in an odor and fly-tight covered receptacle, that accumulates on any private property, and dumping or throwing refuse materials on private or public property not set aside for refuse collection. E. Odorous Vehicles. Any vehicle containing any animal, manure, decaying animal or vegetable matters offensive to the human senses parked more than twenty (20) minutes on any private or public property in the City. F. Keeping Animals. Keeping or harboring any chickens, doves, pigeons, or other fowl, rabbits, foxes, deer or other animals on any privately owned premises, unless confined and kept in such manner with regard to noise and/or odor as to not upset the tranquility of the neighborhood. . G. Water Pollution. Polluting any well or cistern, stream or lake, canal or water body with sewage, industrial waste, or other substances. H. Air Pollution. Dense smoke, noxious fumes, gas, soot, cinders, dust or other airborne materials in unreasonable quantities. I. Noxious Weeds. Noxious weeds, grasses over eight (8) inches tall, and other rank vegetation growths on public or private property . J. Contagious Diseases. Public exposure of a person with a contagious disease. K. Offensive Businesses. Any offensive trade or business not operating under a local license or permit. L. Inflammable Materials. Store, pile, place, keep or maintain any large quantity of combustible and inflammable material, including but not limited to tires, old boxes, barrels, paper, paint, and similar materials likely to be set on fIre by design or accident in any . exposed place near any building within the City. Section 70.3. Public Nuisances Affecting Morals and Decency. 2/8/02 Page 3 of5 A. Gambling Devices. Gambling devices, slot machines and punch . · boards not permitted by law or this Code. B. Betting. Betting, bookmaking and all apparatus used in these occupations. C. Prostitution and Gambling. Houses kept for prostitution or promiscuous sexual intercourse, gambling houses, houses of ill fame and bawdy houses. D. Obscenity. Showing, displaying or offering for sale to any minor any indecent or obscene picture, book, pamphlet, magazine, newspaper, drawing, writing, motion picture or movie. E. Peeping Toms. Peeping into or through doors, windows, or openings of private homes by methods of stealth and without proper authority . F.· Vehicles. Using any vehicle to illegally transport intoxicating liquor or any other immoral or illegal purpose. G. Public Urination and Defecation. Urinating or defecating in the City while outside of a building or structure when the Person is: · (i) On or in a public street, alley, sidewalk, boulevard, park or parking lot, (ii) In a private parking lot open to public use, (iii) On private property without the owner's permISSIOn, or (iv) On private property and performs the prohibited act where others off the property can observe it. Section 70.4. Public Nuisances Affecting Peace and Safety. A. Traffic Obstructions. Trees, hedges, bushes, billboards, signs or other obstructions that prevent people from having a clear view of all traffic approaching an intersection. B. Wires and Tree Limbs. Wires and tree limbs that are so close to the surface of a street to constitute a danger to vehicles or pedestrians. C. Noises. Unnecessary noises and annoying vibrations. · D. Excavations. Any open trench, basement, gravel pit, well, cistern, hole or excavation that constitutes a hazard to the public, unless proper warnings of peril are placed for the public's 2/8/02 Page 4 of5 convenience and safety. . E. Antenna. Radio aerials, television antenna or transmission towers erected or maintained in a dangerous manner. F. Crowds. Any use of property abutting a public street or sidewalk or any use of a public street or sidewalk that causes large crowds of people to gather obstructing traffic and the free use of the street or sidewalk. G. Signs. All hanging signs, awnings and other similar structures over streets and sidewalks that endanger public safety. H. Precipitation. Allowing rain, water, ice or snow to fall from any building or structure upon any street or sidewalk or to flow across any sidewalk. I. Barbed-Wire Fence. Any barbed-wire fence, 1. Dangerous Machinery. All dangerous, unguarded machinery in any public place or situated on private property to attract the public. . K. Injurious Material. Placing or throwing on any street, sidewalk or other public property any glass, tacks, nails, bottles or other substance that may injure any person, animal or tire. L. Firearms. No shooting or carrying of firearms which are not encased shall be permitted unless specifically authorized. (i) Shooting shall mean the firing of firearms of any kind whatsoever regardless of the method of propulsion of the ammunition and shall include but not be limited to the firing of shotguns, pistols, rifles, air rifles, B-B guns, sling shots and bows propelling a pointed arrow. (ii) Encased shall mean any weapon included in the above definition of shooting, placed in a case in such manner as to prevent the shooting of the same. (iii) Nothing shall prohibit anyone from using firearms or any other instrument or device in protection of persons or property consistent with the laws of the State of Minnesota and this Ordinance. . M. Fireworks and Explosives. It shall be unlawful to use or display fireworks, explosives, or flammable liquids in any manner other than in conformity with federal, State and local regulations. 2/8/02 Page 5 of5 N. Medicine or Drug Samples. The distribution of medicine or -. drugs or samples shall be unlawful unless placed in the hands of an adult person according to the law and then only by someone properly licensed to do so. O. Burning. It shall be unlawful to burn any garbage, brush, trees, yard waste, refuse, hides, feathers, tires, oil, grease, or other organic matter which will cause any bad or objectionable odor or , soot. P. Defacing Public Property. Defacing or destroying any public property . Q. Engine Retarder Brakes. Using engine retarder brakes within the City limits, except in an emergency. R. Other Nuisances. Other nuisances shall be deemed all other acts or commission of acts, occupations and uses of property which are deemed by the Board of Health or the Health Officer to be a menace to the health of the inhabitants of the City at large or a considerable number of people in the City. Section 70.5. Enforcement. The City Council, or its authoriied agents, shall enforce this Ordinance and . may inspect private premises and issue abatement orders. Whenever in the judgment of the officer charged with enforcement, it is determined upon investigation that a public nuisance is being maintained or exists within the City, the following shall apply: Subd. 1. Notification. The City Council shall notify in writing the person committing or maintaining such nuisance and require the person to terminate and abate the nuisance and to remove the conditions or remedy the defects. The written notice shall be served upon the person committing or maintaining the nuisance in person or by registered mail. If the premises are not occupied and the address of the owner is unknown, service on the owner may be had by posting a copy of the notice on the premises. Said notice shall require the owner or occupant of such premises, or both, to take reasonable steps within five (5) calendar days to abate and remove said nuisance. The maximum time for the removal of the nuisance after service of the notice shall not in any event exceed ten (10) calendar days. Service of the notice may be proved by filing an affidavit of service with the City Clerk! Administrator setting forth the manner time. Subd. 2. Nuisance Abatement. If, after service of notice, the person served fails to abate the nuisance or make the necessary repairs, alterations or changes according to the order, then the City Council may abate the nuisance and recover its expenditures by assessing the cost of the enforcement action against the real property upon which the nuisance existed and to certify the same for collection in the same manner as taxes and special assessments are certified and collected. Section 70.6. Waiver. The City Council may waive any Ordinance provision if it determines that strict enforcement of the provision would cause any undue hardship. . Section 70.7. Penalties. Any person who creates a nuisance or permits any nuisance to be created shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. 2/8/02 OMS . -=~~ 841 2nd Avenue South Waite Park MN 56387 320.259.4179 February 15, 2002 Ms. Judy Weyrens Clerk Administer City of St. Joseph P.O. Box 668 St. Joseph, MN 56374 Re: Rajkowski Hansmeier Ltd. Letter dated January 28,2002 Judy, . I received a copy of Mr. Scherer's letter concerning our contract for the design of the maintenance facility for the City of St. Joseph. A reply to each question follows: 1. Attached is a copy of the professional liability insurance secured through Security Insurance Company of Hartford. 2. Since the above referenced letter was written, the City of S1. Joseph updated the site survey. This was done to establish the exact location ofthe easements in the area. I waive the requirement for an electronic version of this survey to be provided to OMS by the City of St. Joseph. If it is required, OMS will contact the surveyor directly. 3. Under our standard contract, OMS lists the requirement for a geotechnical survey to protect the owner from existing soil conditions. OMS will waive this requirement with the understanding that neither OMS nor consultants of OMS will be held liable for any problems or expenses that arise due to existing soil conditions. This letter and referenced attachments are hereby considered a part of the contract dated November 15,2001. Sincerely, Acknowledgement ~ . Dean A. Wick City of St. Joseph,MN n:'D- l,- -'::VVC. lJJU Uc..'Vf III 11. I.... illll.oLb';'J,\ C, II,)....V\} (lit) [\VI ...J...'- Ul,)v LVL" I, lL. I ACORD", CERTIFICATE OF lIABILITY INSURANCE 1 g;ìi:~:~ \ I rRopuC¡¡~ (951)893-1933 FAX. (952)893-1&19 THIS CERTiFICATE IS ISSUED AS A. MATTER OF INFORMATION H. RQb~rt Anderson & Ass~., Inc. 0Hl y A~[) CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPOH TH~ CERT/FJCATE HOLDER.. THIS CERTIFtCAT£ POES NOT AMEND, EXTI:ND OR ¡ 4600 West 77th Str~t ALTER THE COVERAGE: AFFORDED BY rH~ POI.ICIES BELOW. Suite 105 INSURERS AFFORDING COVERAGE Edina, MN 55435 /1';$UR!iD CO c Group Arc lt~CtS Ir~SU!\f:í\A Security ¡n~, Co. of Hartford llO Znd Stre~t South INSI,JREn ! ; Suite 400 INsurŒR c: Waite Park, MN 56387 INSURER D. INSI,JRFR E COVERAGES THE: rOU(~I<:S OF INSURANCe:; u~m:D BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE: INSURED NAMEPA80VE FOR 1l-IE POL~Y PER-loo fNDIC-ATf.D. NOn\'ITHSTANDJNG ANY REQUIRF.MI:N r. TERM OR CONOltlON OF "Ny COOTAACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT VilTH RESPECTTO W-!l~ THIS CERTIFICATE MAY aE. ISSUCD OR MIIY ÞERTAJI'i, THE INSUAANCEAFFOP,D¡:O evTH~ PO'.JClES DESCA.IßED HEREIN IS $UIIJQCTTOALL TJiETEItIM3. EKCLUSIDl-l$ AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. MCW-EGATE LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE seeN REDUCED BY PAID CI.AItr1S, ~ .!Yf'1:: QF IN5URANC¡¡ ~HUJ.\e~ [I,P..ri',moDIYŸ¡ ru.TE"'~ LIMITS ~tiP.'\L U^BJLrry ¡:A(;H occ~¡: $ CO~!,fŒRCIi\l. GrNr.RAl UAarLlTY FRE DAAI/IG¡¡ (Any 0.... Ho) $ : ---< 'I (;IAII.'S MADE 0 OCCUR MFO t:JIJ" (Any one per,,,,,) $ - ----1 I'¡;Rr,OHAL~.AD\I t-¡¡urw . -- GENERAl. AGGR83A11: S ~r AGGI1~n LlMlr Al'n PUR; PRODUC ¡ S - COMPtOP AGG $ -~ POf.l~Y m~''Ï LOC Aurouoeu Ui\DIUTY COMBUiW $lNGlI: ut.4i'T >o- S Nt( AU! 0 E B .scç! ØI \1) - - ALL owm:O^VTOS COO!l,( IHJl.Xl.Y SC1l8)\Jl ill AurnS (l'vr ponon) ~ - - H f;(-DHJ1DS BOOIl V IN..I.JR'I' NOWoOWNC:DAV1Oa (!' or Kd<IenIJ. ~ - PROf'löl'l tv DAIM,GE $ (Per~ GAAACEUhtllLITY AUTO t;:r>:L Y - fA ^,-"CIDENT $ =1·mr AlrrD l)'r~R 'TMAN fA,a,cc I NJTO om Y. AGG .$ EXCtsS UAJ'1IU1 't ~AGH OCCURru:NCE $ t:locCUR 0 CWIIMS 1AADE. AGGRC~TE $ $ =i ~rDUC7Jn¡.E S RI:1 EN'\' ION S . I'JOlIKEf!$ Ç(\l, l'EflSATION A/Ø I r¿~ lí1JrYš I I(lJ~'1 EMPLOYrRS' U¡\I11!.ITY E I.. Ei\Ct1 AGCI!JCNl S E.L DLSliASE- EA I!tIf'LOyz:r) $ ¡¡ L DISEASE. POI.\cY lllól'1' I ¡ ~~~s5ional Liability SAEOl10331 02/27/2002 02/27/2003 Each C1~im: $500,000 A Mn'l Agg: $1,000,000 lX~tlO/ or DPQ!ArJONSILOCAno~ r\POEQ BY ~/'ECfA1. PROVISIONS CERTIF1CA~ HOI..DER r 1 AOOI'OONAI. ~IfSIJRmL.Ern:R: CANCELI.A TlON 5110ULD NIY OF THE.tJ!O'r't: ØE$!;RJ813> ~IC ¡;S BE CANCEll.t;O AEFORE THE: ~'TION IMTE TJta!£OI'. 'n1~ IMUlNG COM PNO' YI'ILL LNDEAVO~ TO MM. 30 OAYSWIIITiÐ/ NOTJc:;ê ro TI4ECGRTJI-' Q\'n: HOlDI:R tll\l,I~1;I TOTl1E LEFT, OUT PÞ.lLwœ TO MAlL $lJCH If(TTJCE 5!iALL It.IPOSE WO ODUGAT10~ OR llhBIUTY Of' /f,,'ff KIND Uf"ON n4Iõ. ÇOwoANY, ITS ~ OR I\EP RI:S BiT A. TM:5. For IlJformat;OI1al Purposes Only A.UT} OIlIUO REFRESDlT A TJ\I£ . ACORD 25-6 ('7m) @AcORD CORPORATION 1S8/S . Date: February 15, 2002 Memo To: Mayor Hosch, City Council Members, City Administrator Weyrens Memo From: Cynthia Smith"Strack, Municipal Development Group RE: Welcoming Center Grant Submission Request Municipal Development Group was asked to assist in the preparation of an application for a National Recreation Trail Program grant. The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources is administrating the program in the State of Minnesota. As a part of the application procedure, the DNR requires evidence of local support for the project. Background The Lake Wobegon Trail Committee was formed by the City Council of the City of St. Joseph in April of 2001 for the purpose of preparing the community for the extension of the Lake Wobegon Trail. Said extension is scheduled for 2003. The Lake Wobegon Trail Committee is recommends the construction of a Welcome Facility including restrooms, picnic tables and parking facilities in the abandoned railroad corridor adjacent to the Wobegon Trail (as extended). . The proposed Welcome Center will be a replica of the historic St. Joseph Depot. Plans for the construction are attached for your review. The project is expected to cost approximately $250,000. Construction plans were developed in cooperation with the College of St. Benedict's, St. Johns University, Stearns County Park Board, St. Joseph Park Board, St. Joseph Chamber of Commerce, St. Joseph Lions Club, the St. Joseph Legion and St. Joseph Jaycees. The St. Joseph Historical Society has expressed an interest in using a portion of the facility to showcase the history of St. Joseph, its founders and its residents via historic documents, artifacts, pictures and oral/video histories. Such testaments to the City's history will be available for all users of the Lake Wobegon Trail. The proposed Welcome Center is the top development priority of the Central Minnesota Regional Parks and Trails Coordination Board as evidenced by its 2003 Bonding Request for Fiscal Year 2003. Due to the state budget shortfall the request is not expected to be included in the bonding request. Therefore, alternate funding mechanisms are being sought. The Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century provides for a federal program to supply financial assistance for the development and maintenance of recreational trails and trail- related projects. Approximately $1 ,000,000 are available for trail reimbursement projects in Minnesota in 2002 via application to the Minnesota Department of Natural Resource prior to 4:00 p.m. on February 28th, 2002. A local unit of government must sponsor the grant application. An additional requirement is evidence of local support for the project including: City Council resolution supporting the project, a fifty percent funding match and the ability of the applicant to maintain the facility. The grant request will be in the amount of $100,000 (maximum available). . City Administrator Weyrens has identified funds to be dedicated to the construction of the Welcome Center in conjunction with a National Recreation Trail Program grant. Administrator Weyrens has also created a five-year budget for the operation of the Welcome . Center which indicates sources and uses of funds. A summary of the matching funds and a five-year 0 & M budget are attached for your review. The proposed site for the Welcome Center is in the railroad corridor north of the Wobegon Trail (as extended) adjacent to the Lutheran Church parking lot. The site is approximately 110' by 50'. The property is currently under the control of Stearns County. A representative from Municipal Development Group will be available at the meeting to address questionslcomments. Recommendation Earlier this week the S1. Joseph Park Board approved a resolution: 1. In support of the construction of a Welcome Center at the proposed location, and 2. Recommending the City Council do the same as evidenced by: a. Authorization of the submission of a grant request to the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources; b. Approval of matching funds to support the project; c. Assumption of on-going operation and maintenance expenses associated with the facility. d. Petitioning the County support the project by dedication of the site. Action Resolution 2002-03 is attached for City Council consideration. If the Council is in support of the resolution, a MOTION to approve the resolution is in order. Approval of the resolution signifies: 1. The City Council supports the construction of a Welcome Center adjacent to the . Lake W obegon Trail. 2. The City Council authorizes the submission of a National Recreation Trail Program Grant Application in the amount of $100,000 to the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, prior to its February 28, 2002 deadline. 3. The City pledges matching financial support to the project when NRTP grant funds are secured. 4. The City Council designates City Staff as responsible for protecting, operating and maintaining the Welcome Center upon completion of construction. 5. The City hereby requests Stearns County designate the proposed site for the construction of the Welcome Center. . · CITY OF ST. JOSEPH RESOLUTION 2002-03' A RESOLUTION (A) IN SUPPORT OF THE CONSTRUCTION OF A WELCOME CENTER ADJACENT TO THE LAKE WOBEGON TRAIL (B) AUTHORIZING THE SUBMISSION OF A NATIONAL RECREATION TRAIL PROGRAM GRANT APPLICATION TO THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES (C) IDENTIFYING MATCHING FUNDS FOR THE PROJECT, (D) DESIGNATING THE CITY AS THE ENTITY RESPONSIBLE FOR PROTECTING, OPERATING AND MAINTAINING THE WELCOME CENTER FOLLOWING CONSTRUCTION, AND (E) PETITIONING STEARNS COUNTY FOR DESIGNATION OF THE PROPOSED SITE WHICH IS LOCATED WITHIN AN ABANDONED RAILROAD CORRIDOR. WHEREAS, The Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century provides for a federal program to supply financial assistance for the development and maintenance of recreational trails and trail-related projects; and, WHEREAS, Approximately $1 ,000,000 are available for trail reimbursement projects in Minnesota in 2002 via application to the Minnesota Department of Natural Resource prior to 4:00 p.m. on February 28th, 2002; and, WHEREAS, The grant application requires evidence of local support for the project including: City Council resolution supporting the project, a fifty percent funding match and the ability of the applicant to maintain the facility; and, WHEREAS, The grant application requires the request be sponsored by a unit of government; and, WHEREAS, The Lake Wobegon Trail Committee was formed by the City Council of the City of S1. Joseph in April of 2001 for the purpose of preparing the community for the extension of the Lake Wobegon Trail; and, WHEREAS, The Lake Wobegon Trail will be extended from the City of Avon to the City of S1. Joseph in 2003; and, WHEREAS, The Lake Wobegon Trail Committee recommends to the City Council the construction of a Welcome Facility .cluding restrooms, picnic tables and parking facilities; and, WHEREAS, The City has identified funds to be dedicated to the construction of the Welcome Center in conjunction with a National Recreation Trail Program grant; and, WHEREAS, The City has identified a five-year budget for the operation, maintenance and protection of a Welcome Center; and, WHEREAS, The S1. Joseph Historical Society has expressed an interest in using a portion of the facility to showcase the history of S1. Joseph, its founders and its residents via historic documents, artifacts, pictures and oral/video histories. Such testaments to the City's history will be available for all users of the Lake Wobegon Trail; and, WHEREAS, The proposed Welcome Center will be a replica of the historic S1. Joseph Depot and said construction plans were developed in cooperation with the College of S1. Benedict's, S1. Johns University, Stearns County Park Board, St. Joseph Park Board, S1. Joseph Chamber of Commerce, S1. Joseph Lions Club, the S1. Joseph Legion and St. Joseph Jaycees; and, WHEREAS, The proposed Welcome Center is the top development priority of the Central Minnesota Regional Parks and Trails Coordination Board as evidenced by its 2003 Bonding Request for Fiscal Year 2003; and, WHEREAS, The proposed site is north of the Wobegon Trail (as extended) in the abandoned railroad corridor which is controlled by the County of Stearns; and, WHEREAS, The S1. Joseph Park Board has approved a resolution (A) In support of the construction of a Welcome Center and (B) recommending the City Council do the same as evidenced by its authorization of the submission of a grant request to the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, its approval of matching funds to support the project, its approval to protect, operate and maintain the facility and its request the County support the project by dedication of the .ite. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ST. JOSEPH, MINNESOTA THAT: 1. The City Council supports the construction of a Welcome Center adjacent to the Lake Wobegon Trail. 2. The City Council authorizes the submission of a National Recreation Trail Program Grant Application to the . Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, prior to its February 28, 2002 deadline. 3. The City pledges matching financial support to the project when NRTP grant funds are secured. 4. The City Council designates City Staff as responsible for protecting, operating and maintaining the Welcome Center upon completion of construction. 5. The City hereby requests Stearns County designates the proposed site for the construction of the Welcome Center. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was made by Councilmember and duly seconded by Councilmember and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor: And the following voted against the same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted this 21st day of 2002. Mayor ATTEST: . City Administrator . . CITY OF ST. JOSEPH PARK BOARD RESOLUTION A RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING THE CITY COUNCIL (A) SUPPORTS THE CONSTRUCTION OF A WELCOME CENTER ADJACENT TO THE LAKE WOBEGON TRAIL (B) AUTHORIZES THE SUBMISSION OF A NATIONAL RECREATION TRAIL PROGRAM GRANT APPLICATION TO THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES (C) IDENTIFIES MATCHING FUNDS FOR THE PROJECT, (D) DESIGNATES THE CITY AS THE ENTITY RESPONSIBLE FOR PROTECTING,· OPERATING AND MAINTAINING THE WELCOME CENTER FOllOWING CONSTRUCTION, AND (E) PETITIONS STEARNS COUNTY FOR DESIGNATION OF THE PROPOSED SITE WHICH IS LOCATED WITHIN AN ABANDONED RAILROAD CORRIDOR. WHEREAS, The Transportation Equity Act for the 21 5t Century provides for a federal program to supply financial assistance for the development and maintenance of recreational trails and trail-related projects; and, WHEREAS, Approximately $1,000,000 are available for trail reimbursement projects in Minnesota in 2002 via application to the Minnesota Department of Natural Resource prior to 4:00 p.m. on February 28th, 2002; and, WHEREAS, The grant application requires evidence of local support for the project including: City Council resolution supporting the project, a fifty percent funding match and the ability of the applicant to maintain the facility; and, WHEREAS, The grant application requires the request be sponsored by a unit of government; and, WHEREAS, The Lake Wobegon Trail Committee was formed by the City Council of the City of S1. Joseph in April of 2001 for the purpose of preparing the community for the extension of the Lake Wobegon Trail; and, WHEREAS, The Lake Wobegon Trail will be extended from the City of Avon to the City of S1. Joseph in 2003; and, Ø;:HEREAS, The Lake Wobegon Trail Committee recommends to the City Council the construction of a Welcome Facility cluding restrooms, picnic tables and parking facilities; and, WHEREAS, The City has identified funds to be dedicated to the construction of the Welcome Center in conjunction with a National Recreation Trail Program grant; and, WHEREAS, The City has identified a five-year budget for the operation, maintenance and protection of a Welcome Center; and, WHEREAS, The S1. Joseph Historical Society has expressed an interest in using a portion of the facility to showcase the history of S1. Joseph, its founders and its residents via historic documents, artifacts, pictures and oral/video histories. Such testaments to the City's history will be available for all users of the Lake Wobegon Trail; and, WHEREAS, The proposed Welcome Center will be a replica of the historic S1. Joseph Depot and said construction plans were developed in cooperation with the College of S1. Benedict's, S1. Johns University, Stearns County Park Board, S1. Joseph Park Board, S1. Joseph Chamber of Commerce, S1. Joseph Lions Club, the S1. Joseph Legion and S1. Joseph Jaycees; and, WHEREAS, The proposed Welcome Center is the top development priority of the Central Minnesota Regional Parks and Trails Coordination Board as evidenced by its 2003 Bonding Request for Fiscal Year 2003; and, WHEREAS, The proposed site is north of the Wobegon Trail (as extended) in the abandoned railroad corridor which is controlled by the County of Stearns; and, NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PARK BOARD OF THE CITY OF ST. JOSEPH, MINNESOTA THAT: The Park Board Recommends: 1. The City Council support the construction of a Welcome Center adjacent to the Lake Wobegon Trail. . 2. The City Council authorize the submission of a National Recreation Trail Program Grant Application to the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, prior to its February 28, 2002 deadline. 3. The City pledge matching financial support to the project when NRTP grant funds are secured. 4. The City Council designate City Staff as responsible for protecting, operating and maintaining the Welcome Center upon completion of construction. 5. The City request Stearns County designate the proposed site for the construction of the Welcome Center. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was made by Commissioner and . duly seconded by Commissioner and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor: And the following voted against the same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted this _ day of 2002. Park Board Chair ATTEST: . . ~~bl · Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the Planning Commission for the City of S1. Joseph met in regular session on Monday, February 4, 2002 at 7:00 PM in the S1. Joseph City Hall. Members Present: Chair Gary Utsch. Commissioners S. Kathleen Kalinowski, Marge Lesnick, Jim Graeve, Kurt Schneider, Mike Deutz. Council Liaison Al Rassier. City Administrator Clerk Judy Weyrens. Others Present: Bill Nelson, Ted Schmid, Mark Lambert, Chris Vance, Mel Butkowski, Matt Chouiard, Tim Muske. Approve Agenda: Lesnick made a motion to approve the agenda as presented; seconded by Graeve and passed unanimously. Apf)rove Minutes: October 1. 2001: Kalinowski made a motion to approve the Planning Commission minutes of October 1, 2001 with the following corrections: [indicates revised wording] Page 1: Correction to September 10 minutes: change the last word of the proposed correction from contaminations to [spoilJ s. Page 1: Bob Henæs Site Plan: Remove [and Monastery of St. Benedict} from the third sentence. Page 2: 2nd sentence -.. as well as [52J apartment units... Page 2: Mike Deutz. Rezoninf! request: Change R3 Multiple Family to [HB Highway BusinessJ Page 3: Paragraph 9, sentence 5: remove [for not} The motion was seconded by Rassier and passed unanimously. December 19. 2001: Rassier made a motion to approve the December 19, 2001 Planning Commission minutes with the following correction: Page 3: Motion regarding official mapping: Change the word mapping to [mapJ · The motion was seconded by Kaljnowski and passed unanimously. January 7.2002: Kalinowski made a motion to approve the January 7,2002 Planning Commission minutes with the following corrections: Page 4: The last paragraph to be amended as follows: Utsch made a motion to recommend the Planning Commission adopt the following findings: denial of the PURD Application requesting a special use permit to construct a 44 unit apartment complex. The motion was seconded by Lesnick. Ayes: Utsch, Kalinowski, Lesnick, Graeve, Deutz, Schneider. Nayes: Rassier. Page 5: Vote call on the motion recommending variance approval: Remove [Deutz} as voting Nay. The motion was seconded by Rassier and passed unanimously. Ted Schmid - Site Plan Presentation. Northland Six: Ted Schmid of Avon Lumber One appeared before the Planning Commission to present a concept plan for the proposed development of Northland Six. The site of the proposed development is north of the existing development abutting Northland Drive. The proposed development will include approximately 107 single family lots, with 34 lots requiring a variance on subdivision regulations. The variances are being requested to construct attractively priced lots. Schmid stated that the proposed development will also include additional park land and he will be approaching the Park Board with some ideas for park development. Rassier questioned if the park area will be developed with utility services for future development of the Park. Lesnick stated that Northland Park already has utility services and the Park Board is in the process of establishing a development plan for the Park. At this time Schmid requested to leave the parkland dedication as a separate issue until he has the opportunity to approach the Park Board. Schmid stated that he recently meet with the City staff (City Engineer, Public Works Director, Fire Chief, City Administrator and Planning Commission Chair) to present the proposed site plan. The initial review of City staff resulted in the following changes: · 1. The cul-de-sac on abutting the northern edge of the plat will include easements if the road is to be extended north at a later time. lvo.Çr- 2. Utility easements have been provided on the southwest section of the plat for the . extension of water and sewer 3. The housing proposed east of Northland Drive have been omitted 4. The drainage has been relocated on the eastern edge of the plat abutting Northland Drive 5. The streets have been redesigned decreasing the curve radius' . Rassier questioned if the development will provide an ingress/egress to County Road 2. Schmid stated that the proposed development will occur in three stages, with an ingress/egress to County Road 2 in phase three. Schneider stated that Northland Drive has considerable traffic and the development of an additional 107 units has the potential of creating a safety hazard. Therefore, Schneider questioned if the ingress/egress to County Road 2 could be constructed with phase one. Schneider suggested that Second Avenue NE be extended to reach an interior road with a direct connection to County Road 2. Schmid stated that opening Second Avenue NE would require considerable reconfiguration of the development and he will have the potential oflosing at a minimum two lots. Deutz recommended that Schmid review the location of the utility extension and possibly extend the width of the easement to accommodate a road. Schmid agreed to review the plat for possible revision. Grave and Schneider questioned if the City has considered reopening First Avenue 1\TE, allowing ingress/egress to County Road 2 from the Northland Addition. Schneider stated it is his opinion that the City needs to review the traffic generated on Northland Drive and there is an alternative to create a second access that is convenient that people would use instead of Northland Drive. As the area is currently developed, the most convenient ingress/egress to County Road 75 is Northland Drive, with the main feedor Gumtree Street East. Weyrens stated the City has received some correspondence from the City Engineer regarding the proposed opening of 15t Avenue NE. The information will be forwarded to the City Council for consideration. Ellen Wahlstrom questioned if the area proposed for development contains wetlands. Schmid stated there is a wetland on the south east section of the proposed development and he will need to complete an analysis before submitting the fmal plans. Depending on the outcome of the analysis, the number of houses may need to be . reduced. The Planning Commission by consensus authorized Ted Schmid to begin the preliminary plat process to include the scheduling of a public hearing. Bill Nelson. St. Joseph Business Center: Bill Nelson of Long Prairie appeared before the Commission requesting site plan approval of the proposed development of an eight suite office building. The building will be located on the Roske property adjacent to the First State Bank of St. Joseph. The suites will eventually be condominiumized with private ownership. The proposed businesses will be destination business such as an attorney, abstract/title company and possibly a fitness center. Weyrens presented the Planning Commission with comments from City Engineer Joe Bettendorf regarding the proposed development. Bettendorf recommended the following: 1) drainage for the property should include a storm sewer drain and piping to guide surface water to the holding pond; 2) the roof system be designed with an internal roof drainage system with one outlet; 3) verification from the Fire Chief that the building has adequate fire lanes. Nelson stated that he will modify the plans to meet the requirements of the City Engineer. Graeve questioned the ingress/egress for the development. Nelson responded he received a copy of a letter from the Stearns County Engineer whereby the property would be granted an ingress/egress from 8th A venue SE. The ingress/egress will need to be on the south property line. Nelson further stated the site will have a significant amount of green space and he will save as many trees as possible. Through review of the applicable Ordinances, the Commission was satisfied that the development plan meet or exceed the Ordinance requirements with exception of the sign Ordinance. The letter on the facia of the building cannot exceed 50 square feet. The plan submitted exceeds the requirements by 150 feet; therefore a variance will be required. Lesnick made a motion to accept the site plan of Bill Nelson authorizing Nelson to make application for a building permit, The motion was seconded by Kalinowski and passed unanimously, Mark Lambert, PURD Request to Construct a 44 Unit Apartment Building: Mark Lambert appeared before the . Commission to present a revised plan to construct a 44 unit apartment building with caretaker unit on Lot I Block I ·r Òva f-' · Indian Hills ParI<;. The Planning Commission had previously recommended the Council deny the request of Mr. Lambert based on the site plan submitted. The City Council requested that the Planning Commission review the revised plan submitted to the City Council on January 17, 2002. Lambert presented the following changes to the plan reviewed on January 7,2002: 0 The ingress/egress has been moved approximately 60 feet removing the public safety issue. 0 A twenty foot fIre lane will be adjacent to the building for fIre protection 0 Changing the pitch of the roof has lowered the building approximately five feet, reducing the variance request to three feet. 0 If it is the request of the Planning Commission to use one common access, the plan provides for a road parallel to Northland Drive. 0 A berm is not feasible as for each foot of berm six additional feet ofland is required. Therefore the benn is not feasible. Lesnick questioned Lambert if the building would require an elevator if the building is reduced to a two and one half stories and it was her understanding that the building needed be forty feet in height to accommodate the elevator. Lambert stated that he would install an elevator in the building regardless of the number of stories constructed. As far as the height, the reduction in variance is as the result of a change in the pitch of the roof. Utsch stated that he attended a rneeting with City Staff where all the outstanding issues were addressed. At the end of the meeting he felt a fair compromise was reached. Utsch expressed frustration that all the issues discussed at the staff meeting are now not attainable. The following is a summary of the staff meeting, at which Lambert was present and agreed to the following: Lambert agreed to review lowering the building, constructing a two and Variance - Height one half story building. At this time a variance on the height of the · building would not be needed Roof Pitch The pitch would be reduced, lowering the height of the building Overlay The City Engineer is requesting that after construction is complete and curb and gutter is installed, a one inch overlay be placed on Northland Drive with the cost being absorbed by the developers. The cost is anticipated to be $ 8,000. Lambert agreed to participate Drainage Plan Lambert agreed to submit the required information to the City Engineer to review and comment. Entrance In consideration of the compromises reached at the staff meeting, the ingress/egress illustrated on the site plan would be adequate. The ingress/egress has been moved south to remove the public safety concerns. Berm Lambert agreed to construct a berm and provide the neighbors with a tree allowance to provide a natural buffer. This allowance would also alleviate the potential safety issue of young snow sledders entering the parking area. Fire Acces Lambert has agreed to provide a twenty foot area for fIre access. Snow Removal The City Engineer has requested that Lambert assure that a suffIcient area is provided for snow removal along to Northland Drive. Easements Lambert agreed to provide the City with easements required by the City · Engineer. In turn the City will release the un-necessary easements. DYcP6 r Lambert stated he left the staff meeting with the understanding that he would check with his engineer if the building . could be lowered. His engineer has stated that the building cannot be lowered due to required handicap accessibility. Lambert further stated that he meet with a landscaper who suggested that pines trees be planted as a buffer. The trees would be planted fifteen feet apart and would be six feet in height. Based on the footage of the plat, 50 trees would be planted. Lambert stated that he proposed this plan to the neighbors who requested that two rows of trees be planted. Lambert further stated that he would be willing to construct a fence along the property line ifthat would be acceptable to the abutting property owners. Graeve questioned if Lambert has considered constructing three 12 unit buildings. Lambert responded that he has considered alternative housing plans, but feels that plan presented is the best for the community. If the variance request and site plan is denied he will construct four 12 unit buildings. However, Lambert stated that the buildings will not be the same quality as the one building and he is concerned that he will not attract the senior market. Constructing one building allows him to put amenities in the building that will make it attractive to St. Joseph. Lesnick stated that while she agrees the building appears to be a good plan, maybe it is in the wrong location. Lesnick stated the Planning Commission has received testimony from the neighborhood that the building will be detrimental to the neighborhood and is not compatible. Graeve concurred with Lesnick and stated that he believes the Planning Commission and City need to be consistent with how developers and residents are treated. Recently a resident was denied the opportunity to place a driveway for a residential home on Northland Drive. The reason for denial was safety, as the City is limited access to Northland Drive. Therefore, it is the opinion of Graeve that the developer before the Commission at this time is being given preferential treatment. 'When the Planning Commission recommended approval of the Indian Hills Plat, it included on access to Northland Drive on both the east and west side. Therefore, Lambert should revise his plan to provide for one access for both lots one and two. Lambert responded that he has prepared a second site plan that utilizes a road at the center point of lots one and two. . However, the road to service the apartments would run parallel to Northland Drive and in his opinion is not a viable option. The road to service the apartment would have a steep grade and would not be visually pleasing. Lambert further stated it is his opinion that Northland Drive was constructed too low, therefore on common access does not work. Schneider stated that he too believes the property would best be served with on access point. The Planning Commission is concerned with safety and considerable discussion lead to the fmal decision to recommend one access on the east and west side of Northland Drive. Eventually an signal light will be installed at County Road 75 and Northland Drive. When the light is completed Northland Drive \vill be a major ingress/egress for the Northland Development. Therefore, one ingress/egress at the centerline of lots one and two would be in the best interest of the City. Chris Vance spoke in objection to the proposed apartment complex. Vance encouraged the Commission to recommend the Council deny the special use permit as the proposed development, in his opinion, will have a negative impact to the neighborhood. Vance stated that the St. Joseph Code of Ordinances regulating a PURD application stated that the petitioner must minimize damage to the adjoining neighborhood. Vance further stated that it should be the burden of the petitioner to demonstrate that the damage has been minimized. In his opinion this has not be done. Further, Vance expressed frustration Lambert has agreed in the past to construct a berm and suddenly it is not feasible. Vance encouraged the Commission to recommend denial of the PURD application. Deutz stated that in reviewing the plans he believes the property can be accessed with one common access and the driveway for the proposed apartment complex be constructed as far to the west property line as possible. By placing the driveway on the western edge of the property, some of the concerns of the neighborhood will be addressed. The headlights from the cars will not be shining into the existing homes on Fir Street and the safety factor of Northland Drive has been addressed. Deutz further stated it is his opinion that this proposal would be beneficial to the property owner and increase the value to the undeveloped property. Lambert stated that he does not feel that the option presented by Deutz is viable. Their would considerable cost to . extending a private driveway the distance Deutz is requesting. Schneider stated that he concurs with Deutz and the ÎXcfb r' . proposed road would be beneficial to Lambert. Schneider further stated that their should be a cost saving to Lambert when access both properties with one road. Further, if the road is constructed at this time, the lower lot woùld be accessible for development without additional cost. Rassier made a motion to recommend the City Council adopt the following findings of the Planning Commission, recommending issuance of a special use permit to allow the construction of a 44 unit apartment complex and caretaker unit. RESOLUTION OF FINDING The request of Mark Lambert for a PURD application requesting a special use permit came before the Planning Commission at a Public Hearing held on December 3, 2001. The Planning Commission on January 7, 2002 recommended the City Council deny the request and on January 17,2002, at the request of the property, the matter was referred back to the Planning Commission for reconsideration. The purpose of the hearing was to consider a P.U.R.D. development plan to construct a 44 unit apartment building under a special use application and to consider a fifty foot variance on the size of a business sign. The proposed development is to be located on the following described property: Lot I Block I Indian Hills Park. St. Joseph Code of Ordinances 52.19 subd. 4 provides for a special use permit to develop multi family dwellings over 12 units through the PURD procedural process. S1. Joseph Code of Ordinances 52.14 subd. 12(a) allow for business signs provided that the area on one side shall not exceed fIfty square feet. The proposed plat has been submitted by Mark Lambert, 101 - 5th Street, Suite 910; S1. Paul MN 5510 1. . In consideration of the information presented to the Planning Commission and its application to the Comprehensive Plan and Ordinances of the City of S1. Joseph, the Planning Commission makes the following fmdings: Based on the contingencies stated below, the plan is consistent with the requirements for issuance of a special use permit. Therefore, based on the above fmdings the Planning Commission recommends approval of the application for special use permit contingent upon the following: 1. The road access should be placed as in accordance to the Developer's Agreement, allowing for one common entrance with the parking lot for the proposed apartment complex being accessed on the western edge of lot one block one Indian Hills Plat. 2. The City Engineer review and approve the fmal plans including drainage, curb and gutter, easement locations, and proposed overlay of Northland Drive. 3. A six foot berm/buffer will be provided to the north of the proposed building. The fence will be six feet in height and be wood or maintenance free material. A chain link fence will not be considered. 4. A lighting plan is submitted to verify the lights will not project into the neighborhood. 5. A property area will be provided for snow removal along Northland Drive. 6. A twenty foot flat area will be provided around the building for fIre access. The motion was seconded by Deutz. Ayes: Utsch, Kalinowski, Rassier, Schneider, Dentz Nays: Lesnick, Graeve. Motion Passes 5:2:0 Utsch requested the Commission formulate a recommendation to the City Council regarding the five foot variance request on the height of the building. Kalinowski stated that she encourages the Commission to review the Ordinance regulating the maximum height requirement in the Ordinance. She stated it is her understanding that the ~ requirement was necessary at one time for fire safety concerns. The City has recently purchased a new ladder truck - and the Fire Chief should be consulted to verify if the 35 foot requirement is appropriate. Dv-1ft- Deutz made a motion to recommend the Council approve a three (3) foot variance on the maximum height of · a building and accept the following findings: RESOLUTION OF FINDING The request of Mark Lambert for a five (5) foot variance on the maximum height of a building came before the Planning Commission at a Public Hearing held on December 3,2001. The Planning Commission on January 7, 2002 recommended the City Council deny the request and on January 17,2002, at the request of the property, the matter was referred back to the Planning Commission for reconsideration. The purpose of the hearing was to consider a variance with regard to the construction of a 44 - unit apartment building. The variance request is to allow a five-foot (5 ') variance on the maximum height allowed, or the construction of a three story building. The property is legally described as follows: Lot 1 Block 1 Indian Hills Park Plat. St. Joseph Code of Ordinances 52.16 subd 7 (a) states, "No building hereafter erected or altered shall exceed 2 1f2 stories or shall it exceed 35 feet in height, except as hereinafter provided". In consideration of the information presented to the Planning Commission and its application to the Comprehensive Plan and Ordinances of the City of St. Joseph, the Planning Commission makes the following [mdings: FI1\TDING: Based on the contingencies stated above for the issuance of a special use permit, the proposed use is consistent with the St. Joseph Code of Ordinances regarding the issuance of a variance. Therefore, based on the above [mdings the Planning Commission recommends approval of a three foot variance. The motion was seconded by Kalinowski Ayes: Utsch, Kalinowski, Rassier, Schneider, Deutz · Nays: Lesnick, Graeve. Motion Passes 5:2:0 Miscellaneous Matters: The Commission agreed to begin reviewing the following Ordinances: Sign, Height of Building and to begin looking at Transitional Zoning. Adiourn: Lesnick made a motion to adjourn at 9:30 PM; seconded by Rassier and passed unanimously. Judy Weyrens Administrator Clerk · CITY OF ST. JOSEPH 02/16/02 2:32 PM Page 1 Summary of Overtime . Year: 2001 Bechtold, Raymond $ 1,219.23 Donabauer, Gary $2,066.35 Gustin, Virginia $2,175.86 Janssen, Peter $1,389.54 Marthaler, Jim $4,214.52 Meyer, Brad $58.02 Schley, Paul $1,714.41 Sworski, Mike $2,240.53 Taufen, Dick $3,286.98 Young, Jeffrey $3,557.74 Total Overtime Paid 2001 $ 21,923.18 . Overtime and Callouts February 1 through February 14, 2002 11>"_111°0'. 1#"D0}0#i;i#"11 ",11, +',...;...3.,*..................../... . .. ,jmt.~IIª";i:::· 2/9/02 2.00 hrs weekend work 2/11/02 1.00 hrs sewer callout 2/10/02 2.00 hrs weekend work 2/8/02 2.00 hrs water shutoff 2/10/02 2.00 hrs clean sidewalks & sand streets [Ï¡S«IIIIÎ~II .1'"."*1I:eIli111 02-08-02 2.00 hrs 115 College Ave S ...;i ';;.gm:L.".,~,....'..~;i' 02-10-02 2.00 hrs street sanding 02/02/02 2.00 hrs weekend work 02/03/02 2.00 hrs weekend work li!!f'·"··"'··'····'· ~. . "rKtJ:"'išäi ".._~J......I,J§..A..' l¡aln~JJnJI ,_;:':;;""",_,_,_,_,_,"_'_'_'_'_'_'_'_.,_»:'C:,,_,'_,_,_,_;-,_. ,...,=, 02-01-02 1.00 hrs assisted w/911 hangup 02/07/02 1.00 hrs cover shift 02-02-02 1.00 hrs finish accident 02/12/02 1.00 hrs warrant arrest 02-14-02 3.00 hrs defib training \ 02/14/02 4.00 hrs defib training lilllllllll - 02-14-02 4.00 hrs defib training - CITY OF ST JOSEPH 02/15/027:28 PM Council Expenditure Monthly Report Page 1 · Current Period: February 2002 MTD YTD % OBJ OBJ Descr Budget Exp Expense Expense Balance of Budget FUND 101 General DEPART 41110 Council 101 Salaries $16,000.00 $0.00 $1,200.00 $14,800.00 7.50% 104 Taxable Per Diem $1,700.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,700.00 0.00% 121 PERA Contribution $800.00 $0.00 $60.00 $740.00 7.50% 122 FICA Contributions $992.00 $0.00 $74.40 $917.60 7.50% 125 Medicare Contribut $232.00 $0.00 $17.42 $214.58 7.51% 151 Worker's Compo In $50.00 $0.00 $0.00 $50.00 0.00% 200 Office Supplies $50.00 $0.00 $0.00 $50.00 0.00% 331 Travel & Conferenc $2,000.00 $60.00 $60.00 $1,940.00 3.00% 361 General Liability In $500.00 $500.00 $500.00 $0.00 100.00% 433 Dues & Subscriptio $9,000.00 $3,424.00 $3,449.00 $5,551.00 38.32% DEPART 41110 Council $31,324.00 $3,984.00 $5,360.82 $25,963.18 17.11% DEPART 41120 Legislative Committies 103 Legislative Bodies $5,000.00 $80.00 $820.00 $4,180.00 16.40% 151 Worker's Camp. In $75.00 $0.00 $0.00 $75.00 0.00% 200 Office Supplies $400.00 $0.00 $0.00 $400.00 0.00% 331 Travel & Conferenc $800.00 $0.00 $0.00 $800.00 0.00% · 340 Advertising $1,000.00 $0.00 $70.20 $929.80 7.02% 433 Dues & Subscriptio $100.00 $0.00 $0.00 $100.00 0.00% DEPART 41120 Legislative Commit $7,375.00 $80.00 $890.20 $6,484.80 12.07% DEPART 41130 Ordinance & Proceedings 210 Operating Supplies $100.00 $0.00 $0.00 $100.00 0.00% 304 Legal Fees $500.00 $0.00 $0.00 $500.00 0.00% 322 Postage $200.00 $0.00 $0.00 $200.00 0.00% 340 Advertising $700.00 $0.00 $77.70 $622.30 11.10% DEPART 41130 Ordinance & Proce $1,500.00 $0.00 $77.70 $1,422.30 5.18% DEPART 41310 Mayor· 101 Salaries $7,500.00 $0.00 $640.00 $6,860.00 8.53% 104 Taxable Per Diem $700.00 $0.00 $0.00 $700.00 0.00% 121 PERA Contribution $350.00 $0.00 $32.00 $318.00 9.14% 122 FICA Contributions $425.00 $0.00 $39.68 $385.32 9.34% 125 Medicare Contribut $125.00 $0.00 $9.28 $115.72 7.42% 151 Worker's Camp. In $15.00 $0.00 $0.00 $15.00 0.00% 331 Travel & Conferenc $1,200.00 $95.00 $95.00 $1,105.00 7.92% 361 General Liability In $50.00 $50.00 $50.00 $0.00 100.00% 433 Dues & Subscriptio $150.00 $60.00 $110.00 $40.00 73.33% DEPART 41310 Mayor $10,515.00 $205.00 $975.96 $9,539.04 9.28% DEPART 41410 Elections 580 Other Equipment $7,500.00 $0.00 $0.00 $7,500.00 0.00% · DEPART 41410 Elections $7,500.00 $0.00 $0.00 $7,500.00 0.00% DEPART 41430 Salaries & Adminstrative 101 Salaries $85,000.00 $1,797.17 $7,219.82 $77,780.18 8.49% 121 PERA Contribution $4,500.00 $99.39 $360.54 $4,139.46 8.01% 122 FICA Contributions $5,270.00 $106.56 $442.78 $4,827.22 8.40% CITY OF ST JOSEPH 02/15/027:28 PM Council Expenditure Monthly Report Page 2 Current Period: February 2002 . MTD YTD % OBJ OBJ Descr Budget Exp Expense Expense Balance of Budget 125 Medicare Contribut $1,232.00 $24.93 $103.55 $1,128.45 8.41% 131 Health Insurance $10,000.00 $155.20 $405.40 $9,594.60 4.05% 132 Dental Insurance $1,000.00 $19.54 $52.64 $947.36 5.26% 133 Life Insurance $200.00 $5.54 $14.77 $185.23 7.39% 134 Disabilty Insurance $900.00 $24.67 $37.71 $862.29 4.19% 136 Health Club Premi $300.00 $0.00 $ 11. 66 $288.34 3.89% 151 Worker's Compo In $500.00 $0.00 $0.00 $500.00 0.00% 200 Office Supplies $2,600.00 $420.73 $746.59 $1,853.41 28.72% 210 Operating Supplies $700.00 $0.00 $0.00 $700.00 0.00% 220 Repair and Maint S $4,000.00 $2,419.45 $2,465.99 $1,534.01 61.65% 240 Small Tool & Minor $500.00 $26.62 $239.61 $260.39 47.92% 300 Professional Servic $700.00 $0.00 $0.00 $700.00 0.00% 321 Telephone $2,500.00 $142.38 $271.64 $2,228.36 10.87% 322 Postage $2,100.00 $68.00 $170.00 $1,930.00 8.10% 331 Travel & Conferenc $3,000.00 $0.00 $25.00 $2,975.00 0.83% 361 General Liability In $1,700.00 $1,700.00 $1,700.00 $0.00 100.00% 410 Rentals $100.00 $0.00 $0.00 $100.00 0.00% 433 Dues & Subscriptio $400.00 $15.00 $65.00 $335.00 16.25% 435 Books & Pamphlet $250.00 $0.00 $0.00 $250.00 0.00% 570 Office Equipment $1,600.00 $3,348.54 $3,348.54 -$1,748.54 209.28% . 581 Computer Hardwar $1,500.00 $0.00 $10,694.36 -$9,194.36 712.96% 582 Computer Software $500.00 $437.50 $441.00 $59.00 88.20% DEPART 41430 Salaries & Admins $131,052.00 $10,811.22 $28,816.60 $ 1 02,235.40 21.99% DEPART 41530 Accounting 101 Salaries $35,000.00 $2,147.25 $4,617.94 $30,382.06 13.19% 121 PERA Contribution $2,176.00 $118.74 $251.06 $1,924.94 11 .54 % 122 FICA Contributions $2,170.00 $125.34 $278.53 $1,891.47 12.84% 125 Medicare Contribut $507.00 $29.31 $65.13 $441.87 12.85% 131 Health Insurance $5,000.00 $47.50 $95.00 $4,905.00 1.90% 132 Dental Insurance $250.00 $6.78 $13.56 $236.44 5.42% 133 Life Insurance $30.00 $1.84 $3.68 $26.32 12.27% 134 Disabilty Insurance $352.00 $13.03 $26.06 $325.94 7.40% 136 Health Club Premi $140.00 $0.00 $0.00 $140.00 0.00% 200 Office Supplies $750.00 $89.56 $109.56 $640.44 14.61% 215 software support $1,200.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,200.00 0.00% 331 Travel & Conferenc $1,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,000.00 0.00% 340 Advertising $1,100.00 $83.25 $83.25 $1,016.75 7.57% 430 Miscellaneous $250.00 $0.00 $0.00 $250.00 0.00% 433 Dues & Subscriptio $100.00 $0.00 $40.00 $60.00 40.00% DEPART 41530 Accounting $50,025.00 $2,662.60 $5,583.77 S44,441.23 11.16% DEPART 41540 Audit Service 301 Audit & Accounting $9,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $9,000.00 0.00% DEPART 41540 Audit Service $9,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $9,000.00 0.00% DEPART 41550 Assessing . 101 Salaries $10,700.00 $0.00 $1,015.68 $9,684.32 9.49% 122 FICA Contributions $664.00 $0.00 $62.97 5601.03 9.48% 125 Medicare Contribut $155.00 50.00 $14.73 $140.27 9.50% CITY OF ST JOSEPH 02/15/027:28 PM Council Expenditure Monthly Report Page 3 · Current Period: February 2002 MTD YTD % OBJ OBJ Descr Budget Exp Expense Expense Balance of Budget 200 Office Supplies $150.00 $0.00 $0.00 $150.00 0.00% 331 Travel & Conferenc $100.00 $0.00 $0.00 $100.00 0.00% 433 Dues & Subscriptio $300.00 $0.00 $0.00 $300.00 0.00% DEPART 41550 Assessing $12,069.00 $0.00 $1,093.38 $10,975.62 9.06% DEPART 41610 City Attorney 304 Legal Fees $13,000.00 $0.00 $977.00 $12,023.00 7.52% DEPART 41610 City Attorney $13,000.00 $0.00 $977.00 $12,023.00 7.52% DEPART 41910 Planning and Zonning 431 Annexation Fee $500.00 $0.00 $0.00 $500.00 0.00% 449 Property Tax Shari $3,500.00 $0.00 $30,258.56 -$26,758.56 864.53% 451 Joint Planning $100.00 $0.00 $0.00 $100.00 0.00% 452 S1. Wendel Sewer $500.00 $0.00 $0.00 $500.00 0.00% DEPART 41910 Planning and Zonn $4,600.00 $0.00 $30,258.56 -$25,658.56 657.79% DEPART 41941 Community Center 101 Salaries $2,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $2,000.00 0.00% · 121 PERA Contribution $105.00 $0.00 $0.00 $105.00 0.00% 122 FICA Contributions $125.00 $0.00 $0.00 $125.00 0.00% 125 Medicare Contribut $30.00 $0.00 $0.00 $30.00 0.00% 131 Health Insurance $300.00 $0.00 $0.00 $300.00 0.00% 132 Dental Insurance $50.00 $0.00 $0.00 $50.00 0.00% 133 Life Insurance $10.00 $0.00 $0.00 $10.00 0.00% 134 Disabilty Insurance $16.00 $0.00 $0.00 $16.00 0.00% 210 Operating Supplies $300.00 $0.00 $0.00 $300.00 0.00% 220 Repair and Maint S $1,500.00 $106.90 $368.37 $1,131.63 24.56% 300 Professional Servic $600.00 $0.00 $410.56 $189.44 68.43% 321 Telephone $500.00 $47.66 $95.34 $404.66 19.07% 361 General Liability In $700.00 $700.00 $700.00 $0.00 100.00% 383 Gas Utilities $8,000.00 $0.00 $396.50 $7,603.50 4.96% DEPART 41941 Community Center $14,236.00 $854.56 $1,970.77 $12,265.23 13.84% DEPART 41942 City Offices 210 Operating Supplies $300.00 $0.00 $0.00 $300.00 0.00% 220 Repair and Maint S $1,500.00 $130.47 $234.46 $1,265.54 15.63% 300 Professional Servic $3,600.00 $394.05 $394.05 $3,205.95 10.95% 361 General Liability In $700.00 $0.00 $0.00 $700.00 0.00% 381 Electric Utilities $5,000.00 $0.00 $488.40 $4,511.60 9.77% 383 Gas Utilities $4,000.00 $0.00 $413.69 $3,586.31 10.34% DEPART 41942 City Offices $15,100.00 $524.52 $1,530.60 $13,569.40 10.14% DEPART 41946 Community Sign 230 Repair & Maint $1,300.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,300.00 0.00% · . 381 Electric Utilities $300.00 $0.00 $0.00 $300.00 0.00% 530 Improvements Oth $600.00 $0.00 $0.00 $600.00 0.00% DEPART 41946 Community Sign $2,200.00 $0.00 $0.00 $2,200.00 0.00% DEPART 41950 Cable Access CITY OF ST JOSEPH 02/15/027:28 PM Council Expenditure Monthly Report Page 4 Current Period: February 2002 · MTD YTD % OBJ OBJ Descr Budget Exp Expense Expense Balance of Budget 103 Legislative Bodies $4,480.00 $0.00 $520.00 $3,960.00 11.61 % 210 Operating Supplies $400.00 $0.00 $0.00 $400.00 0.00% 230 Repair & Maint $500.00 $14.27 $14.27 $485.73 2.85% 580 Other Equipment $1,200.00 $814.44 $1,241.99 -541.99 103.50% DEPART 41950 Cable Access $6,580.00 $828.71 $1,776.26 $4,803.74 26.99% DEPART 42120 Crime Control & Investigation 101 Salaries $310,000.00 $10,604.36 $32,883.72 $277 ,116.28 10.61% 102 Reservists $1,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,000.00 0.00% 104 Taxable Per Diem $300.00 $0.00 $0.00 $300.00 0.00% 121 PERA Contribution $28,210.00 $959.19 $2,930.44 $25,279.56 10.39% 122 FICA Contributions 5966.00 $44.42 $128.96 $837.04 13.35% 125 Medicare Contribut $4,385.00 $149.69 $472.75 $3,912.25 10.78% 131 Health Insurance $31,000.00 $1,139.31 $3,184.32 $27,815.68 10.27% 132 Dental Insurance $3,600.00 $177.62 $491.60 $3,108.40 13.66% 133 Life Insurance $500.00 $31.18 $88.04 $411.96 17.61% 134 Disabilty Insurance $2,000.00 $132.86 $254.08 $1,745.92 12.70% 136 Health Club Premi $1,008.00 $0.00 $45.98 $962.02 4.56% 151 Worker's Compo In $6,500.00 $0.00 $0.00 $6,500.00 0.00% · 171 Clothing Allowance $4,500.00 $143.67 $665.92 $3,834.08 14.80% 200 Office Supplies $1,500.00 $0.00 $70.27 $1,429.73 4.68% 210 Operating Supplies $3,000.00 $26.68 $163.25 $2,836.75 5.44% 211 AWAIRE Supplies $100.00 $0.00 $0.00 $100.00 0.00% 215 software support $2,000.00 $2,150.00 $2,320.00 -$320.00 116.00% 220 Repair and Maint S $3,500.00 $84.41 $392.19 $3,107.81 11.21 % 240 Small Tool & Minor $500.00 $0.00 $136.62 $363.38 27.32% 300 Professional Servic $1,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,000.00 0.00% 304 Legal Fees $33,600.00 $0.00 $2,500.00 $31,100.00 7.44% 307 Community Policin $500.00 $0.00 $0.00 $500.00 0.00% 322 Postage $1,000.00 $68.00 $170.00 $830.00 17.00% 340 Advertising $100.00 $0.00 $0.00 $100.00 0.00% 350 Printing $200.00 $0.00 $0.00 $200.00 0.00% 361 General Liability In $5,000.00 $5,322.00 $5,322.00 -$322.00 106.44% 430 Miscellaneous $100.00 $0.00 $0.00 $100.00 0.00% 433 Dues & Subscriptio $600.00 $237.25 $532.25 $67.75 88.71% 446 License $270.00 $0.00 $0.00 $270.00 0.00% 570 Office Equipment $600.00 $0.00 $532.50 $67.50 88.75% 580 Other Equipment $400.00 $0.00 $0.00 $400.00 0.00% 581 Computer Hardwar $5,000.00 $975.47 $5,433.4 7 -$433.47 108.67% DEPART 42120 Crime Control & In $452,939.00 $22,246.11 $58,718.36 $394,220.64 12.96% DEPART 42140 Police Training 210 Operating Supplies $2,000.00 $0.00 $523.98 $1,476.02 26.20% 300 Professional Servic $1,500.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,500.00 0.00% 331 Travel & Conferenc $1,500.00 $0.00 $189.00 $1,311.00 12.60% DEPART 42140 Police Training $5,000.00 $0.00 $712.98 $4,287.02 14.26% · DEPART 42151 Communication Service 210 Operating Supplies $250.00 $0.00 $0.00 $250.00 0.00% 233 Telephone/Radio R $500.00 $0.00 $102.10 $397.90 20.42% CITY OF ST JOSEPH 02/15/027:28 PM Council Expenditure Monthly Report Page 5 . Current Period: February 2002 MTD YTD % OBJ OBJ Oeser Budget Exp Expense Expense Balance of Budget 321 Telephone $5,500.00 $461.88 $1,062.72 $4,437.28 19.32% 580 Other Equipment $400.00 $0.00 $0.00 $400.00 0.00% DEPART 42151 Communication Se $6,650.00 $461.88 $1,164.82 $5,485.18 17.52% DEPART 42152 Automotive Services 210 Operating Supplies $10,000.00 $1,724.40 $2,173.86 $7,826.14 21.74% 220 Repair and Maint S $750.00 -$147.34 $301.15 $448.85 40.15% 550 Motor Vehicles $12,000.00 $654.10 $1,308.20 $10,691.80 10.90% DEPART 42152 Automotive Servic $22,750.00 $2,231.16 $3,783.21 $18,966.79 16.63% DEPART 42401 Building Inspec. Admistration 200 Office Supplies $200.00 $0.00 $0.00 $200.00 0.00% 304 Legal Fees $200.00 $0.00 $0.00 $200.00 0.00% 311 Inspection Fee $25,000.00 $1,132.99 $1,132.99 $23,867.01 4.53% 433 Dues & Subscriptio $100.00 $0.00 $0.00 $100.00 0.00% 438 State Sur Charge $5,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $5,000.00 0.00% DEPART 42401 Building Inspec. A $30,500.00 $1,132.99 $1,132.99 $29,367.01 3.71% . DEPART 42500 Emergency Siren 230 Repair & Maint $500.00 $0.00 $0.00 $500.00 0.00% 300 Professional Servic $300.00 $0.00 $0.00 $300.00 0.00% 326 Fire Siren $100.00 $0.00 $6.28 $93.72 6.28% 331 Travel & Conferenc $1,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,000.00 0.00% 340 Advertising $100.00 $0.00 $0.00 $100.00 0.00% 580 Other Equipment $2,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $2,000.00 0.00% DEPART 42500 Emergency Siren $4,000.00 $0.00 $6.28 $3,993.72 0.16% DEPART 42610 Signal Lights 386 Street Lighting $500.00 $0.00 $20.25 $479.75 4.05% DEPART 42610 Signal Lights $500.00 $0.00 $20.25 $479.75 4.05% DEPART 42700 Animal Control 210 Operating Supplies $100.00 $0.00 $0.00 $100.00 0.00% 300 Professional Servic $700.00 $184.00 $184.00 $516.00 26.29% DEPART 42700 Animal Control $800.00 $184.00 $184.00 $616.00 23.00% DEPART 43120 Street Maintanence 101 Salaries $66,000.00 $3,831.40 $10,602.26 $55,397.74 16.06% 121 PERA Contribution $3,650.00 $211.88 $545.52 $3,104.48 14.95% 122 FICA Contributions $4,092.00 $224.15 $643.93 $3,448.07 15.74% 125 Medicare Contribut $957.00 $52.42 $150.61 $806.39 15.74% 131 Health Insurance $12,000.00 $568.87 $1,439.52 $10,560.48 12.00% 132 Dental Insurance $900.00 $62.36 $160.90 $739.10 17.88% 133 Life Insurance $300.00 $8.94 $22.65 $277.35 7.55% . 134 Disabilty Insurance $500.00 $48.23 $89.02 $410.98 17.80% 136 Health Club Premi $140.00 $0.00 $17.26 $122.74 12.33% 151 Worker's Compo In $1,500.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,500.00 0.00% 171 Clothing Allowance $600.00 $55.78 $82.39 $517.61 13.73% 200 Office Supplies $200.00 $0.00 $0.00 $200.00 0.00% CITY OF ST JOSEPH 02/15/027:28 PM Council Expenditure Monthly Report Page 6 Current Period: February 2002 . MTD YTD % OBJ OBJ Deser Budget Exp Expense Expense Balance of Budget 210 Operating Supplies $6,500.00 $0.00 $462.54 $6,037.46 7.12% 212 Safety Program $1,500.00 $0.00 $187.50 $1,312.50 12.50% 220 Repair and Maint S $7,000.00 $154.96 $160.50 $6,839.50 2.29% 240 Small Tool & Minor $600.00 $0.00 $0.00 $600.00 0.00% 300 Professional Servic $100.00 $0.00 $0.00 $100.00 0.00% 321 Telephone $600.00 $28.83 $57.66 $542.34 9.61% 331 Travel & Conferenc $200.00 $0.00 $0.00 $200.00 0.00% 340 Advertising $100.00 $27.82 $27.82 $72.18 27.82% 361 General Liability In $6,100.00 $6,350.00 $6,350.00 -$250.00 104.10% 381 Electric Utilities $1,300.00 $196.90 $278.26 $1,021.74 21.40% 383 Gas Utilities $5,000.00 $0.00 $257.02 $4,742.98 5.14% 384 Refuse Disposal $100.00 $0.00 $0.00 $100.00 0.00% 410 Rentals $1,600.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,600.00 0.00% 433 Dues & Subscriptio $100.00 $30.00 $59.16 $40.84 59.16% 446 License $100.00 $32.62 $32.62 $67.38 32.62% 520 Buildings & Structu $10,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $10,000.00 0.00% 530 Improvements Oth $3,200.00 $0.00 $0.00 $3,200.00 0.00% 550 Motor Vehicles $3,200.00 $0.00 $0.00 $3,200.00 0.00% 580 Other Equipment $14,400.00 $0.00 $1,667.00 $12,733.00 11.58% DEPART 43120 Street Maintanenc $152,539.00 $11,885.16 $23,294.14 $129,244.86 15.27% . DEPART 43121 Industrial Development 303 Engineering Fee $4,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $4,000.00 0.00% 304 Legal Fees $1,000.00 $0.00 $225.00 $775.00 22.50% DEPART 43121 Industrial Develop $5,000.00 $0.00 $225.00 $4,775.00 4.50% DEPART 43125 Ice & Snow Removal 101 Salaries $21,000.00 $241.30 $2,918.56 $18,081.44 13.90% 121 PERA Contribution $1,161.00 $13.35 $156.38 $1,004.62 13.47% 122 FICA Contributions $1,302.00 $14.96 $180.97 $1,121.03 13.90% 125 Medicare Contribut $305.00 $3.50 $42.32 $262.68 13.88% 131 Health Insurance $2,500.00 $0.00 $345.49 $2,154.51 13.82% 132 Dental Insurance $300.00 $0.00 $39.22 $260.78 13.07% 133 Life Insurance $40.00 $0.00 $5.62 $34.38 14.05% 134 Disabilty Insurance $70.00 $0.00 $17.24 $52.76 24.63% 210 Operating Supplies $9,000.00 $0.00 $3,146.34 $5,853.66 34.96% 220 Repair and Maint S $9,500.00 $0.00 $500.59 $8,999.41 5.27% 300 Professional Servic $1,500.00 $0.00 $1,395.00 $105.00 93.00% 410 Rentals $2,000.00 $0.00 $600.00 $1,400.00 30.00% 580 Other Equipment $8,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $8,000.00 0.00% DEPART 43125 Ice & Snow Remo $56,678.00 $273.11 $9,347.73 $47,330.27 16.49% DEPART 43131 Engineering Fee 303 Engineering Fee $15,000.00 $0.00 $14,753.19 $246.81 98.35% DEPART 43131 Engineering Fee $15,000.00 $0.00 $14,753.19 $246.81 98.35% . DEPART 43160 Street Lighting 230 Repair & Maint $250.00 $0.00 $16.46 $233.54 6.58% 386 Street Lighting $30,000.00 $15.53 $2,199.25 $27,800.75 7.33% 530 Improvements Oth $1,200.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,200.00 0.00% CITY OF ST JOSEPH 02/15/02 7:28 PM Council Expenditure Monthly Report Page 7 · Current Period: February 2002 MTD YTD % OBJ OBJ Descr Budget Exp Expense Expense Balance of Budget DEPART 43160 Street Lighting $31,450.00 $15.53 $2,215.71 $29,234.29 7.05% DEPART 43220 Street Cleaning 101 Salaries $4,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $4,000.00 0.00% 121 PERA Contribution $207.00 $0.00 $0.00 $207.00 0.00% 122 FICA Contributions $248.00 $0.00 $0.00 $248.00 0.00% 125 Medicare Contribut $58.00 $0.00 $0.00 $58.00 0.00% 131 Health Insurance $500.00 $0.00 $0.00 $500.00 0.00% 132 Dental Insurance $75.00 $0.00 $0.00 $75.00 0.00% 133 Life Insurance $15.00 $0.00 $0.00 $15.00 0.00% 134 Disabilty Insurance $38.00 $0.00 $0.00 $38.00 0.00% 210 Operating Supplies $2,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $2,000.00 0.00% 220 Repair and Maint S $4,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $4,000.00 0.00% 331 Travel & Conferenc $100.00 $0.00 $0.00 $100.00 0.00% 580 Other Equipment $2,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $2,000.00 0.00% DEPART 43220 Street Cleaning $13,241.00 $0.00 $0.00 $13,241.00 0.00% DEPART 45120 Participant Recreation · 101 Salaries $13,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $13,000.00 0.00% 122 FICA Contributions $806.00 $0.00 $0.00 $806.00 0.00% 125 Medicare Contribut $188.00 $0.00 $0.00 $188.00 0.00% 151 Worker's Compo In $100.00 $0.00 $0.00 $100.00 0.00% 210 Operating Supplies $2,000.00 $48.98 $48.98 $1,951.02 2.45% 240 Small Tool & Minor $400.00 $0.00 $0.00 $400.00 0.00% 300 Professional Servic $2,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $2,000.00 0.00% 330 Transportation $1,500.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,500.00 0.00% 340 Advertising $100.00 $0.00 $0.00 $100.00 0.00% 361 General Liability In $500.00 $500.00 $500.00 $0.00 100.00% DEPART 45120 Participant Recrea $20,594.00 $548.98 $548.98 $20,045.02 2.67% DEPART 45123 Ball Park and Skating Rink 101 . Salaries $3,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $3,000.00 0.00% 122 FICA Contributions $186.00 $0.00 $0.00 $186.00 0.00% 125 Medicare Contribut $44.00 $0.00 $0.00 $44.00 0.00% 151 Worker's Compo In $50.00 $0.00 $0.00 $50.00 0.00% 210 Operating Supplies $200.00 $0.00 $0.00 $200.00 0.00% 220 Repair and Maint S $500.00 $295.72 $364.16 $135.84 72.83% 381 Electric Utilities $1,000.00 $0.00 $36.74 $963.26 3.67% 410 Rentals $200.00 $0.00 $0.00 $200.00 0.00% DEPART 45123 Ball Park and Skati $5,180.00 $295.72 $400.90 $4,779.10 7.74% DEPART 45201 Maint Shop 210 Operating Supplies $2,200.00 $0.00 $0.00 $2,200.00 0.00% 220 Repair and Maint S $1,025.00 $149.09 $680.56 $344.44 66.40% · 240 Small Tool & Minor $500.00 $0.00 $240.56 $259.44 48.11% 321 Telephone $1,600.00 $133.14 $266.63 $1,333.37 16.66% 381 Electric Utilities $800.00 $0.00 $38.64 $761.36 4.83% 383 Gas Utilities $2,600.00 $0.00 $139.84 $2,460.16 5.38% 410 Rentals $100.00 $0.00 $0.00 $100.00 0.00% 580 Other Equipment $2,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $2,000.00 0.00% CITY OF ST JOSEPH 02/15/027:28 PM Council Expenditure Monthly Report Page 8 Current Period: February 2002 . MTD YTD % OBJ OBJ Oeser Budget Exp Expense Expense Balance of Budget DEPART 45201 Maint Shop $10,825.00 $282.23 $1,366.23 $9,458.77 12.62% DEPART 45202 Park Areas 101 Salaries $43,000.00 $1,031.62 $4,332.57 $38,667.43 10.08% 121 PERA Contribution $2,378.00 $57.04 $210.43 $2,167.57 8.85% 122 FICA Contributions $2,666.00 $59.20 $263.85 $2,402.15 9.90% 125 Medicare Contribut $625.00 $13.85 $61.71 $563.29 9.87% 131 Health Insurance $4,000.00 $113.86 $339.96 $3,660.04 8.50% 132 Dental Insurance $600.00 $18.22 $56.41 $543.59 9.40% 133 Life Insurance $100.00 $2.64 $7.83 $92.17 7.83% 134 Disabilty Insurance $300.00 $13.13 $27.71 $272.29 9.24% 136 Health Club Premi $140.00 $0.00 $6.06 $133.94 4.33% 151 Worker's Compo In $1,300.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,300.00 0.00% 171 Clothing Allowance $450.00 $55.78 $82.39 $367.61 18.31% 210 Operating Supplies $8,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $8,000.00 0.00% 212 Safety Program $1,000.00 $0.00 $187.50 $812.50 18.75% 220 Repair and Maint S $4,500.00 $1,829.64 $1,840.06 $2,659.94 40.89% 240 Small Tool & Minor $600.00 $0.00 SO.OO $600.00 0.00% 321 Telephone $200.00 $15.22 $30.44 $169.56 15.22% . 340 Advertising $100.00 SO.OO $0.00 $100.00 0.00% 361 General Liability In $1,200.00 $1,425.00 $1,425.00 -$225.00 118.75% 381 Electric Utilities $1,100.00 $0.00 $43.02 $1,056.98 3.91% 384 Refuse Disposal $2,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 S2,000.00 0.00% 415 Other Equipment R $500.00 $0.00 $0.00 $500.00 0.00% 433 Dues & Subscriptio $100.00 SO.OO SO.OO $100.00 0.00% 446 License $50.00 $32.62 $32.62 $17.38 65.24% 530 Improvements Oth $1,500.00 $ 11. 08 $74.98 $1,425.02 5.00% 531 Park Development $17,950.00 $113.90 $193.98 $17,756.02 1.08% 532 Tree Fund $1,500.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,500.00 0.00% 533 Northland Park De $7,000.00 $0.00 SO.OO $7,000.00 0.00% 540 Heavy Machinery $5,600.00 $0.00 SO.OO $5,600.00 0.00% 580 Other Equipment $6,000.00 $0.00 $639.00 $5,361.00 10.65% DEPART 45202 Park Areas $114,459.00 $4,792.80 $9,855.52 S104,603.48 8.61% DEPART 46102 Shade Tree Disease Control 210 Operating Supplies $75.00 $0.00 $0.00 $75.00 0.00% 331 Travel & Conferenc $100.00 $0.00 $0.00 S100.00 0.00% DEPART 46102 Shade Tree Disea $175.00 $0.00 $0.00 $175.00 0.00% DEPART 46500 Economic Development Authority 103 Legislative Bodies S700.00 $0.00 $0.00 $700.00 0.00% 151 Worker's Compo In $180.00 SO.OO $0.00 $180.00 0.00% 200 Office Supplies $500.00 $0.00 $104.39 S395.61 20.88% 300 Professional Servic S20,000.00 $1,800.04 $3,253.62 S16,746.38 16.27% 304 Legal Fees $1,000.00 SO.OO $0.00 $1,000.00 0.00% 321 Telephone $1,200.00 $77.70 $148.94 $1,051.06 12.41% . 322 Postage $200.00 S8.14 $8.14 $191.86 4.07% 331 Travel & Conferenc $500.00 $0.00 $0.00 $500.00 0.00% 340 Advertising $500.00 $0.00 $74.93 $425.07 14.99% 433 Dues & Subscriptio $8,500.00 $0.00 $50.00 $8,450.00 0.59% CITY OF ST JOSEPH 02/15/027:28 PM Council Expenditure Monthly Report Page 9 . Current Period: February 2002 MTD YTD % OBJ OBJ Descr Budget Exp Expense Expense Balance of Budget 587 Special Projects $13,087.00 $0.00 $0.00 $13,087.00 0.00% DEPART 46500 Economic Develop $46,367.00 $1,885.88 $3,640.02 $42,726.98 7.85% DEPART 49200 Communty Support 361 General Liability In $300.00 $300.00 $300.00 $0.00 100.00% 430 Miscellaneous $9,000.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $5,500.00 38.89% DEPART 49200 Communty Suppor $9,300.00 $3,800.00 $3,800.00 $5,500.00 40.86% DEPART 49300 Other Financing Uses 432 Team Building $500.00 $0.00 $0.00 $500.00 0.00% DEPART 49300 Other Financing U $500.00 $0.00 $0.00 $500.00 0.00% DEPART 49305 Fire Protection 300 Professional Servic . $57,927.00 $0.00 $25,507.70 $32,419.30 44.03% DEPART 49305 Fire Protection $57,927.00 $0.00 $25,507.70 $32,419.30 44.03% FUND 101 General $1,378,450.00 $69,986.16 $239,989.63 $1,138,460.37 17.41% . FUND 105 Fire Fund DEPART 42210 Fire Administration 101 Salaries $3,500.00 $0.00 $0.00 $3,500.00 0.00% 103 Legislative Bodies $120.00 $0.00 $0.00 $120.00 0.00% 121 PERA Contribution $175.00 $0.00 $0.00 $175.00 0.00% 122 FICA Contributions $225.00 $0.00 $0.00 $225.00 0.00% 125 Medicare Contribut $250.00 $0.00 $0.00 $250.00 0.00% 151 Worker's Compo In $4,500.00 $0.00 $0.00 $4,500.00 0.00% 200 Office Supplies $400.00 $159.75 $159.75 $240.25 39.94% 215 software support $600.00 $0.00 $0.00 $600.00 0.00% 220 Repair and Maint S $200.00 $20.11 $185.11 $14.89 92.56% 301 Audit & Accounting $6,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $6,000.00 0.00% 304 Legal Fees $500.00 $0.00 $0.00 $500.00 0.00% 305 Medical & Dental $1,000.00 $26.00 $312.00 $688.00 31.20% 322 Postage $200.00 $20.00 $20.00 $180.00 10.00% 340 Advertising $80.00 $0.00 $0.00 $80.00 0.00% 432 Team Building $800.00 $0.00 $0.00 $800.00 0.00% 446 License $100.00 $0.00 $0.00 $100.00 0.00% 581 Computer Hardwar $1,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,000.00 0.00% 582 Computer Software $500.00 $0.00 $0.00 $500.00 0.00% DEPART 42210 Fire Administration $20,150.00 $225.86 $676.86 $19,473.14 3.36% DEPART 42220 Fire Fighting 101 Salaries $42,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $42,000.00 0.00% 122 FICA Contributions $2,604.00 $0.00 $0.00 $2,604.00 0.00% . 125 Medicare Contribut $609.00 $0.00 $0.00 $609.00 0.00% 210 Operating Supplies $1,800.00 $0.00 $124.78 $1,675.22 6.93% 211 AWAIRE Supplies $400.00 $0.00 $0.00 $400.00 0.00% 220 Repair and Maint S $1,800.00 $69.85 $105.11 $1,694.89 5.84% 240 Small Tool & Minor $1,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,000.00 0.00% 361 General Liability In $15,000.00 $15,000.00 $15,000.00 $0.00 100.00% CITY OF ST JOSEPH 02/15/02 7:28 PM Council Expenditure Monthly Report Page 10 Current Period: February 2002 . MTD YTD % OBJ OBJ Oeser Budget Exp Expense Expense Balance of Budget 384 Refuse Disposal $700.00 $50.61 $101.22 $598.78 14.46% 447 State Aid Reimbur $20,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $20,000.00 0.00% 448 Pension Relief Fire $5,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $5,000.00 0.00% 580 Other Equipment $18,000.00 $0.00 $65,704.00 -$47,704.00 365.02% 584 Equipment Reserv $10,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $10,000.00 0.00% 585 Firefighter Equipm $10,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $10,000.00 0.00% DEPART 42220 Fire Fighting $128,913.00 $15,120.46 $81,035.11 $47,877.89 62.86% DEPART 42240 Fire Training 104 Taxable Per Diem $2,500.00 $0.00 $0.00 $2,500.00 0.00% 122 FICA Contributions $155.00 $0.00 $0.00 $155.00 0.00% 125 Medicare Contribut $37.00 $0.00 $0.00 $37.00 0.00% 331 Travel & Conferenc $3,750.00 $0.00 $565.00 $3,185.00 15.07% 433 Dues & Subscriptio $1,000.00 $60.00 $615.00 $385.00 61.50% 443 Personnel Training $5,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $5,000.00 0.00% DEPART 42240 Fire Training $12,442.00 $60.00 $1,180.00 $11,262.00 9.48% DEPART 42250 Fire Communications 230 Repair & Maint $500.00 $0.00 $0.00 $500.00 0.00% . 321 Telephone $1,400.00 $96.82 $193.79 $1,206.21 13.84% 580 Other Equipment $1,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,000.00 0.00% DEPART 42250 Fire Communicatio $2,900.00 $96.82 $193.79 $2,706.21 6.68% DEPART 42260 Fire Repair Service 220 Repair and Maint S $1,500.00 $0.00 SO.OO $1,500.00 0.00% DEPART 42260 Fire Repair Servic $1,500.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,500.00 0.00% DEPART 42270 Medical Services 210 Operating Supplies $500.00 $17.37 S51.27 $448.73 10.25% 230 Repair & Maint $600.00 $0.00 $0.00 $600.00 0.00% 580 Other Equipment $500.00 $0.00 $0.00 $500.00 0.00% DEPART 42270 Medical Services $1,600.00 $17.37 S51.27 $1,548.73 3.20% DEPART 42280 Fire Station and Building 220 Repair and Maint S $5,000.00 $45.00 $1,007.06 $3,992.94 20.14% 300 Professional Servic $1,000.00 $0.00 SO.OO $1,000.00 0.00% 381 Electric Utilities $4,500.00 $0.00 $343.88 $4,156.12 7.64% 383 Gas Utilities $5,000.00 $0.00 $321.01 $4,678.99 6.42% 530 Improvements Oth $500.00 $0.00 SO.OO $500.00 0.00% DEPART 42280 Fire Station and B $16,000.00 $45.00 $1,671.95 $14,328.05 10.45% FUND 105 Fire Fund $183,505.00 $15,565.51 $84,808.98 S98,696.02 46.22% FUND 308 '92 Improvement Bonds . DEPART 47100 Bond Payment (P & I) 600 Debt Service - Prin $15,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $15,000.00 0.00% 611 Bond Interest $6,635.00 $0.00 $0.00 $6,635.00 0.00% CITY OF ST JOSEPH 02/15/02 7:28 PM Council Expenditure Monthly Report Page 11 · Current Period: February 2002 MTD YTD % OBJ OBJ Deser Budget Exp Expense Expense Balance of Budget DEPART 47100 Bond Payment (P $21,635.00 $0.00 $0.00 $21,635.00 0.00% FUND 308 '92 Improvement Bonds $21,635.00 $0.00 $0.00 $21,635.00 0.00% FUND 309 '92-A improvement-Water Storag DEPART 47100 Bond Payment (P & i) 600 Debt Service - Prin $45,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $45,000.00 0.00% 611 Bond interest $11,243.00 $0.00 $0.00 $11,243.00 0.00% DEPART 47100 Bond Payment (P $56,243.00 $0.00 $0.00 $56,243.00 0.00% FUND 309 '92-A Improvement-Water St $56,243.00 $0.00 $0.00 $56,243.00 0.00% FUND 312 East Minnesota - Utility Impro DEPART 47100 Bond Payment (P & i) 600 Debt Service - Prin $35,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $35,000.00 0.00% 611 Bond Interest $15,310.00 $0.00 $0.00 $15,310.00 0.00% DEPART 47100 Bond Payment (P $50,310.00 $0.00 $0.00 $50,310.00 0.00% · FUND 312 East Minnesota - Utility Impro $50,310.00 $0.00 $0.00 $50,310.00 0.00% FUND 314 '96 Water Filtration Improv DEPART 47100 Bond Payment (P & I) 600 Debt Service - Prin $25,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $25,000.00 0.00% 611 Bond Interest $39,655.00 $0.00 $0.00 $39,655.00 0.00% DEPART 47100 Bond Payment (P $64,655.00 $0.00 $0.00 $64,655.00 0.00% FUND 314 '96 Water Filtration Improv $64,655.00 $0.00 $0.00 $64,655.00 0.00% FUND 315 '96 East MN Street improvement DEPART 47100 Bond Payment (P & i) 600 Debt Service - Prin $75,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $75,000.00 0.00% 611 Bond Interest $52,175.00 $0.00 $0.00 $52,175.00 0.00% DEPART 47100 Bond Payment (P $127,175.00 $0.00 $0.00 $127,175.00 0.00% FUND 315 '96 East MN Street Improvem $127,175.00 $0.00 $0.00 $127,175.00 0.00% FUND 317 Fire Facility, 1997 DEPART 47100 Bond Payment (P & i) 600 Debt Service - Prin $45,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $45,000.00 0.00% 611 Bond Interest $58,055.00 $0.00 $0.00 $58,055.00 0.00% DEPART 47100 Bond Payment (P $103,055.00 $0.00 $0.00 $103,055.00 0.00% · FUND 317 Fire Facility, 1997 $103,055.00 $0.00 $0.00 $103,055.00 0.00% FUND 319 '98 Street improvement DEPART 47100 Bond Payment (P & I) CITY OF ST JOSEPH 02/15/027:28 PM Council Expenditure Monthly Report Page 12 Current Period: February 2002 . MTD YTD % OBJ OBJ Descr Budget Exp Expense Expense Balance of Budget 600 Debt Service - Prin $30,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $30,000.00 0.00% 611 Bond Interest $21,988.00 $0.00 $0.00 821,988.00 0.00% DEPART 47100 Bond Payment (P $51,988.00 $0.00 $0.00 $51,988.00 0.00% FUND 319 '98 Street Improvement $51,988.00 $0.00 80.00 $51,988.00 0.00% FUND 321 Joseph Street Improvement DEPART 47100 Bond Payment (P & i) 600 Debt Service - Prin $70,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $70,000.00 0.00% 611 Bond interest $59,726.00 $0.00 $0.00 $59,726.00 0.00% 640 Stearns Cooperativ $29,155.00 $0.00 $29,154.97 $0.03 100.00% DEPART 47100 Bond Payment (P $158,881.00 $0.00 $29,154.97 $129,726.03 18.35% FUND 321 Joseph Street Improvement $158,881.00 $0.00 $29,154.97 $129,726.03 18.35% FUND 322 City Hall Project, 2000 DEPART 47100 Bond Payment (P & I) 600 Debt Service - Prin $40,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $40,000.00 0.00% . 611 Bond Interest $59,240.00 $0.00 $0.00 $59,240.00 0.00% DEPART 47100 Bond Payment (P $99,240.00 $0.00 $0.00 $99,240.00 0.00% FUND 322 City Hall Project, 2000 $99,240.00 $0.00 $0.00 $99,240.00 0.00% FUND 601 Water Fund DEPART 49301 Transfer to other Funds 700 Misc $35,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $35,000.00 0.00% DEPART 49301 Transfer to other F $35,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $35,000.00 0.00% DEPART 49410 Power and Pumping 220 Repair and Maint S $9,000.00 $17.35 $17.35 $8,982.65 0.19% 303 Engineering Fee $3,500.00 $0.00 $0.00 $3,500.00 0.00% 321 Telephone $700.00 $0.00 $0.00 $700.00 0.00% 381 Electric Utilities $11,000.00 $0.00 $676.69 $ 10,323.31 6.15% 383 Gas Utilities $ 1,700.00 $0.00 $90.66 $1,609.34 5.33% 530 Improvements Oth $10,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $10,000.00 0.00% DEPART 49410 Power and Pumpin $35,900.00 $17.35 $784.70 $35,115.30 2.19% DEPART 49420 Purification 210 Operating Supplies $2,000.00 $0.00 $360.89 $1,639.11 18.04% 220 Repair and Maint S $2,600.00 $0.00 $0.00 $2,600.00 0.00% 303 Engineering Fee $100.00 $0.00 $0.00 $100.00 0.00% 312 Tests $2,000.00 $58.00 $117.92 $1,882.08 5.90% 321 Telephone $400.00 $0.00 $0.00 $400.00 0.00% . 322 Postage $100.00 $1.95 $1.95 $98.05 1.95% 381 Electric Utilities $4,600.00 $0.00 8245.54 84,354.46 5.34% 383 Gas Utilities 83,000.00 $0.00 $132.17 $2,867.83 4.41% 530 Improvements Oth $5,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $5,000.00 0.00% CITY OF ST JOSEPH 02/15/027:28 PM Council Expenditure Monthly Report Page 13 . Current Period: February 2002 MTD YTD % OBJ OBJ Descr Budget Exp Expense Expense Balance of Budget DEPART 49420 Purification $19,800.00 $59.95 $858.47 $18,941.53 4.34% DEPART 49430 Distribution 210 Operating Supplies $3,400.00 $3,207.14 $3,515.27 -$115.27 103.39% 220 Repair and Maint S $6,500.00 $0.00 $186.06 $6,313.94 2.86% 340 Advertising $350.00 $0.00 $0.00 $350.00 0.00% 580 Other Equipment $10,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $10,000.00 0.00% DEPART 49430 Distribution $20,250.00 $3,207.14 $3,701.33 $16,548.67 18.28% DEPART 49435 Storage 200 Office Supplies $500.00 $0.00 $0.00 $500.00 0.00% 303 Engineering Fee $2,500.00 $0.00 $0.00 $2,500.00 0.00% 381 Electric Utilities $2,400.00 $0.00 $251.74 $2,148.26 10.49% 530 Improvements Oth $5,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $5,000.00 0.00% DEPART 49435 Storage $10,400.00 $0.00 $251.74 $10,148.26 2.42% DEPART 49440 Administration and General . 101 Salaries $55,000.00 $2,349.96 $8,592.13 $46,407.87 15.62% 121 PERA Contribution $3,041.00 $129.99 $463.82 $2,577.18 15.25% 122 FICA Contributions $3,410.00 $136.34 $523.38 $2,886.62 15.35% 125 Medicare Contribut $798.00 $31.90 $122.39 $675.61 15.34% 131 Health Insurance $10,000.00 $402.80 $1,299.19 $8,700.81 12.99% 132 Dental Insurance $900.00 $47.74 $146.57 $753.43 16.29% 133 Life Insurance $200.00 $5.87 $18.27 $181.73 9.14% 134 Disabilty Insurance $412.00 $35.87 $68.02 $343.98 16.51% 136 Health Club Premi $280.00 $0.00 $14.33 $265.67 5.12% 151 Worker's Compo In $1,200.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,200.00 0.00% 171 Clothing Allowance $600.00 $55.78 $82.39 $517.61 13.73% 200 Office Supplies $500.00 $0.00 $0.00 $500.00 0.00% 210 Operating Supplies $2,400.00 $0.00 $462.56 $1,937.44 19.27% 212 Safety Program $2,000.00 $0.00 $187.50 $1,812.50 9.38% 215 software support $1,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,000.00 0.00% 220 Repair and Maint S $1,500.00 $253.83 $253.83 $1,246.17 16.92% 310 Collection Fee $400.00 $24.90 $28.65 $371.35 7.16% 319 Gopher State Notifi $500.00 $21.70 $62.78 $437.22 12.56% 321 Telephone $900.00 $51.36 $100.94 $799.06 11.22% 322 Postage $500.00 $0.00 $107.10 $392.90 21.42% 331 Travel & Conferenc $400.00 $0.00 $100.00 $300.00 25.00% 361 General Liability In $3,700.00 $3,925.00 $3,925.00 -$225.00 106.08% 410 Rentals $1,596.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,596.00 0.00% 433 Dues & Subscriptio $500.00 $60.00 $484.17 $15.83 96.83% 441 Sales Tax $1,500.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,500.00 0.00% 442 Water Permit $600.00 $210.56 $210.56 $389.44 35.09% 444 Annual Water Con $4,600.00 $0.00 $0.00 $4,600.00 0.00% - 446 License $150.00 $32.63 $32.63 $117.37 21.75% 530 Improvements Oth $10,800.00 $0.00 $0.00 $10,800.00 0.00% - 550 Motor Vehicles $4,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $4,000.00 0.00% 580 Other Equipment $5,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $5,000.00 0.00% DEPART 49440 Administration and $118,387.00 $7,776.23 $17,286.21 $101,100.79 14.60% CITY OF ST JOSEPH 02/15/027:28 PM Council Expenditure Monthly Report Page 14 Current Period: February 2002 . MTD YTD % OBJ OBJ Descr Budget Exp Expense Expense Balance of Budget FUND 601 Water Fund $239,737.00 $11,060.67 $22,882.45 $216,854 .55 9.54% FUND 602 Sewer Fund DEPART 49450 Sanitary Sewer Maintenance 101 Salaries $26,500.00 $854.03 $3,082.19 $23,417.81 11.63% 121 PERA Contribution $1,465.00 $47.21 $142.21 $1,322.79 9.71% 122 FICA Contributions $1,643.00 $50.33 $188.47 $1,454.53 11.47% 125 Medicare Contribut $384.00 $11.76 $44.07 $339.93 11.48% 131 Health Insurance $4,000.00 $162.24 $428.71 $3,571.29 10.72% 132 Dental Insurance $400.00 $17.48 $48.97 $351.03 12.24% 133 Life Insurance $75.00 $2.04 $5.79 $69.21 7.72% 134 Disabilty Insurance $250.00 $13.32 $23.86 $226.14 9.54% 136 Health Club Premi $139.00 $0.00 $3.32 $135.68 2.39% 151 Worker's Compo In $1,200.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,200.00 0.00% 171 Clothing Allowance $100.00 $55.79 $55.79 $44.21 55.79% 210 Operating Supplies $600.00 $7.86 $7.86 $592.14 1.31% 220 Repair and Maint S $2,800.00 $0.00 $0.00 $2,800.00 0.00% 240 Small Tool & Minor $300.00 $0.00 $0.00 $300.00 0.00% 303 Engineering Fee $700.00 $0.00 $0.00 $700.00 0.00% . 530 Improvements Oth $1,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,000.00 0.00% 550 Motor Vehicles $2,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $2,000.00 0.00% 580 Other Equipment $5,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $5,000.00 0.00% DEPART 49450 Sanitary Sewer Ma $48,556.00 $1,222.06 $4,031.24 $44,524.76 8.30% DEPART 49470 Sewer Lift Station 230 Repair & Maint $1,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,000.00 0.00% 321 Telephone $1,000.00 $47.66 $95.34 $904.66 9.53% 381 Electric Utilities $2,500.00 $0.00 $165.41 $2,334.59 6.62% 383 Gas Utilities $200.00 $0.00 $0.00 $200.00 0.00% DEPART 49470 Sewer Lift Station $4,700.00 $47.66 $260.75 $4,439.25 5.55% DEPART 49480 Sewage Treatment Plant 101 Salaries $15,000.00 $1,244.28 $2,951.15 $12,048.85 19.67% 121 PERA Contribution $830.00 $68.81 $160.85 $669.15 19.38% 122 FICA Contributions $930.00 $73.58 $179.41 $750.59 19.29% 125 Medicare Contribut $218.00 $17.21 $41.96 $176.04 19.25% 131 Health Insurance $3,600.00 $247.92 $559.42 $3,040.58 15.54% 132 Dental Insurance $450.00 $34.07 $76.43 $373.57 16.98% 133 Life Insurance $50.00 $3.86 $8.67 $41.33 17.34% 134 Disabilty Insurance $200.00 $18.41 $27.04 $172.96 13.52% 136 Health Club Premi $140.00 $0.00 $7.90 $132.10 5.64% 171 Clothing Allowance $100.00 $0.00 $0.00 $100.00 0.00% 210 Operating Supplies $750.00 $0.00 $0.00 $750.00 0.00% 220 Repair and Maint S $2,200.00 $284.60 $292.68 $ 1,907.32 13.30% 240 Small Tool & Minor $500.00 $0.00 $803.91 -$303.91 160.78% - 303 Engineering Fee $500.00 $0.00 $0.00 $500.00 0.00% 312 Tests $2,000.00 $242.91 $538.22 $1,461.78 26.91 % - 321 Telephone $700.00 $47.66 $174.77 $525.23 24.97% 331 Travel & Conferenc $400.00 $0.00 $0.00 $400.00 0.00% 361 General Liability In $5,000.00 $5,225.00 $5,225.00 -$225.00 104.50% CITY OF ST JOSEPH 02/15/02 7:28 PM Council Expenditure Monthly Report Page 15 . Current Period: February 2002 MTD YTD % OBJ OBJ Oeser Budget Exp Expense Expense Balance of Budget 381 Electric Utilities $4,000.00 $0.00 $348.50 $3,651.50 8.71% 383 Gas Utilities $3,000.00 $0.00 $134.97 $2,865.03 4.50% 419 Sewer Use Rental $138,000.00 $8,692.13 $18,634.76 $119,365.24 13.50% 433 Dues & Subscriptio $100.00 $15.00 $30.00 $70.00 30.00% 520 Buildings & Structu $5,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $5,000.00 0.00% 530 Improvements Oth $1,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,000.00 0.00% 580 Other Equipment $5,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $5,000.00 0.00% DEPART 49480 Sewage Treatment $189,668.00 $16,215.44 $30,195.64 $159,472.36 15.92% DEPART 49490 Administration and general 101 Salaries $15,000.00 $0.00 $509.12 $14,490.88 3.39% 121 PERA Contribution $700.00 $0.00 $26.37 $673.63 3.77% 122 FICA Contributions $870.00 $0.00 $31.57 $838.43 3.63% 125 Medicare Contribut $200.00 $0.00 $7.38 $192.62 3.69% 131 Health Insurance $4,000.00 $0.00 $110.18 $3,889.82 2.75% 132 Dental Insurance $500.00 $0.00 $16.39 $483.61 3.28% 133 Life Insurance $200.00 $0.00 $1.86 $198.14 0.93% 134 Disabilty Insurance $100.00 $0.00 $7.50 $92.50 7.50% . 136 Health Club Premi $140.00 $0.00 $0.00 $140.00 0.00% 151 Worker's Compo In $800.00 $0.00 $0.00 $800.00 0.00% 171 Clothing Allowance $700.00 $26.61 $26.61 $673.39 3.80% 200 Office Supplies $400.00 $0.00 $0.00 $400.00 0.00% 210 Operating Supplies $1,000.00 $0.00 $462.55 $537.45 46.26% 212 Safety Program $1,000.00 $0.00 $187.50 $812.50 18.75% 215 software support $500.00 $0.00 $0.00 $500.00 0.00% 220 Repair and Maint S $400.00 $0.00 $0.00 $400.00 0.00% 240 Small Tool & Minor $100.00 $0.00 $0.00 $100.00 0.00% 310 Collection Fee $400.00 $24.90 $28.65 $371.35 7.16% 319 Gopher State Notifi $500.00 $21.70 $62.77 $437.23 12.55% 321 Telephone $1,500.00 $100.70 $201.42 $1,298.58 13.43% 322 Postage $500.00 $0.00 $107.09 $392.91 21.42% 331 Travel & Conferenc $300.00 $0.00 $40.00 $260.00 13.33% 384 Refuse Disposal $1,700.00 $57.84 $115.68 $1,584.32 6.80% 433 Dues & Subscriptio $100.00 $60.00 $89.17 $10.83 89.17% 446 License $100.00 $32.63 $32.63 $67.37 32.63% 580 Other Equipment $2,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $2,000.00 0.00% DEPART 49490 Administration and $33,710.00 $324.38 $2,064.44 $31,645.56 6.12% FUND 602 Sewer Fund $276,634.00 $17,809.54 $36,552.07 $240,081.93 13.21% FUND 603 Refuse Collection DEPART 43230 Waste Collection 101 Salaries $9,000.00 $441.52 $1,767.56 $7,232.44 19.64% 121 PERA Contribution $500.00 $24.40 $94.59 $405.41 18.92% - 122 FICA Contributions $550.00 $25.77 $107.97 $442.03 19.63% 125 Medicare Contribut $150.00 $6.03 $25.26 $124.74 16.84% - 131 Health Insurance $4,000.00 $91.18 $238.14 $3,761.86 5.95% 132 Dental Insurance $700.00 $13.58 $35.46 $664.54 5.07% 133 Life Insurance $200.00 $1.55 $4.01 $195.99 2.01% 134 Disabilty Insurance $52.00 $6.35 $10.23 $41.77 19.67% CITY OF ST JOSEPH 02115/02 7:28 PM Council Expenditure Monthly Report Page 16 Current Period: February 2002 . MTD YTD % OBJ OBJ Descr Budget Exp Expense Expense Balance of Budget 200 Office Supplies $350.00 $0.00 $0.00 $350.00 0.00% 215 software support $400.00 $0.00 $0.00 $400.00 0.00% 230 Repair & Maint $100.00 $0.00 $0.00 $100.00 0.00% 300 Professional Servic $800.00 $0.00 $0.00 $800.00 0.00% 310 Collection Fee $400.00 $24,90 $28.65 $371.35 7.16% 322 Postage $500.00 $0.00 $107.11 $392.89 21.42% 340 Advertising $300.00 $0.00 $0.00 $300.00 0.00% 384 Refuse Disposal $100,000.00 $8,537.97 $16,824.15 $83,175.85 16.82% 430 Miscellaneous $10,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $10,000.00 0.00% DEPART 43230 Waste Collection $128,002.00 $9,173.25 $19,243.13 $108,758.87 15.03% FUND 603 Refuse Collection $128,002.00 $9,173.25 $19,243.13 $108,758.87 15.03% $2,939,510.00 $123,595.13 $432,631.23 $2,506,878.77 14.72% . - - · St. Joseph 2000 Project Schedule February 4, 2002 2002 Street Improvement Project Complete Plans Mar 29 Submit Plans to State Aid Mar 29 State Aid Approval Apr26 Notice to NewspaperlBulletin Apr29 Advertise for Bids May 3 Open Bids May 24 A ward Contract June 20 Begin Construction Jul8 Complete Construction Oct 15 County Road 121 Improvement Complete Plans Mar 1 Submit to State Aid Mar 1 State Aid Approval Apr I Open Bids Apr 24 A ward Contract May 7 · Begin Construction May 28 Substantial Completion Oct 15 Complete Wear Course May 23 '03 Industrial Park Streets/Utilities Order Feasibility Report Feb 7 Conduct Public Hearing Mar 7 Complete Plans Mar 15 Notice to NewspaperlBulletin Mar 18 Advertise for Bids Mar 22 Open Bids Apr 12 A ward Contract Apr 18 Begin Construction May 15 Complete Construction Jul 31 Baker Street Lift Station Complete Plans Mar 15 Notice to NewspaperlBulletin Mar 18 Advertise for Bids Mar 22 Open Bids Apr 12 A ward Contract Apr 18 · Begin Construction May 15 Complete Construction Jul31