The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2002 [03] Mar 07 {Book 24} I .' I itg of St. Joseph 25CÓl1egt: Avt:nut: NW P.O. Box 668, St. Jost:ph, MN 56374 St. Joseph City Council (320) 363-7201 March 7 , 2002 Fax: 363-0342 7:00 PM CLERK! ADMINISTRATOR Judy Wt:yæns 1. Call to Order 2. Approve Agenda MAYOR Larry J. Hosch 3. Consent Agenda a. Bills Payable Requested Action: Approve check numbers 30886 - 30942 COUNCILORS b. Minutes - Requested Action: Approve Bob Loso c. Memorandum of Understanding - Requested Action: Authorize the Mayor and City Administrator/Clerk to execute the Memorandum of Understanding regarding Planning in the Cory Ehlert Orderly Annexation Areas. Kyk Schnt:ider d. Officer Resignation - Accept the resignation of Officer Paul Schcly and authorize the filing of Alan Rassit:r said vacancy e. Gambling License Application - Requested Action: Approve the Gambling License application of the St. Joseph Recreation Association to allow lawfnl gambling at the La Playette, 20 College Avenue North and the El Paso, 200 - 2nd Avenue NW 4. Pubic Comments - Each speaker will be limited to three minutes .' 5. 7:05 PM - Bill Nelson, Variance Request, Size of a Business Sign 6. 7: 1 0 PM - Resurrection Lutheran Church, Variance Request, ROW Encroachment 7. 7: 15 PM - City Engineer Reports a. Public Improvement Hearing - 15th Avenue NE and Elm Street East b. Other matters 8. 7 :40 PM- Final Plat Approval, Graceview Estates a. Final Plat - Phase One b. Authorization for the City Attorney to prepare the Developers Agreement 9. 7:55 PM - PURD Application, Mark Lambert a. Special Use Permit to Allow the construction of a 44 unit apartment building b. Variance - 3 foot variance on the maximum height of a building , 10. DepartInent Head Reports . 11. Mayor Repor:ts 12. Council Reports I 13. Administrator/Clerk Reports a. Roske Property 14. Adjourn .:: I I I I CITY OF ST JOSEPH 03/05/02 5:07 PM Bills Payable Page 1 - ~ Amount FUND DEPART OBJ 030886 UNUM INSURANCE Ins-Feb $20.42 030886 INSURANCE Ins-Feb $11.63 101 41430 134 , 030886 UNUM INSURANCE Ins-Feb $11.64101 42120 134 030886 UNUM INSURANCE Ins-Feb $320.65 101 030887 LOSO. EMS $75.00 101 42500 300 030888 RDO CO. JD H Loader $107.699.19101 43120 580 030889 License Tabs $140.00 101 43120 446 030890 AETNA & Deferred Comp 2/20 pay $50.00 101 030891 AT & SERVIC police car modems $147.00101 42151 321 030892 AUTO PARTS STOR oil filter/brake pads $35.05 101 43120 220 030892 AUTO PARTS STOR spark plugs $14.49101 43120 220 030893 film development $4.47 101 42120 210 030894 OF REVE state v.:ithhold 2/20 cc pay $59.71 101 030894 OF REVE state withhold 2/20 pay $1,088.47101 030895 ELECTRONICS repair/solder connections $15.00 101 42120 220 030896 EFTPS federal withhold 2/20 cc pay $76.35101 030896 EFTPS fica withhold 2/20 pay $2,593.48 101 030896 EFTPS federal withhold 2/20 pay $2,500.31 101 .030896 EFTPS fica withhold 2/20 cc pay $411.74101 030897 FIRST collection fee $11.90 601 49440 310 030897 FIRST collection fee $11.90 602 49490 310 030897 FIRST collection fee $11.90 603 43230 310 030898 GALL'S strobe power supply $299.99 101 42152 220 030899 fluoride reagent, spadns $155.49 601 49420 220. 030900 WATER TREATM tests $14.50601 49420 312 030901 bridge repair supplies $103.13101 45202 220 030902 MN IAAI Arson; investigation class $170.00 105 42240 331 030903 GROUP LIFE INS life insurance-february $18.00101 030904 PERA retirefllent 2/20 pay $3,123.78101 030905 PERA - retirement 2/20 cc pay $172.00101 030906 HANSMEIER L legal-criminal $2,255.50 101 42120 304 030906 HANSMEIER L legal-Industrial $120.00101 43121 304 030906 HANSMEIER L legal-indian Hills $710.00 101 41610 304 030906 HANSMEIER L legal·Graceview $760.00 101 41610 304 030906 HANSMEIER L legal-General $559.50 101 41610 304 030907 RICK speaKer-DARE Graduation $250.00 225 42155 210 030908 RISK'S CONSUL TI 16 hour refresher class/bls p $2,712.25105 42240 443 030909 TELEPHONE telep~one reprogramming $55.00 101 42151 233 030910 SEH engineering, Graceview Esta $2,942.74 101 43131 303 030910 SEH engin,eering, Indian Hills $1,093.28101 43131 303 030910 SEH engineering, 2002 street imp $17,229.25425 43120 530 030910 SEH city engineering services $1,576.44101 43131 303 030910 SEH engineering, municipal state $816.50101 43131 303 030910 SEH engineering, Co Rd 121 impr $9,360.49 423 43120 530 030911 ST. JO GAS & BAIT excise tax credit - gas $92.16101 42152 210 . 030911 ST. JO GAS & BAIT excis~ tax credit - gas $92.16101 43120 210 030912 ST ANT~N GROUP Prefu.nd Depend Care Flex $0.00 101 030912 STANTtN GROUP Preflmd Medical Flex $775.00 101 030913 STEAR· S COUNTY AUDIT audityerification $75.00 101 41430 210 030914 TIREM XX SERVICE CENT repairs - lumina $268.05 101 42152 220 CITY OF ST JOSEPH 03/05/02507 PM Page 2 Bills Payable - Amount FUND DEPART OBJ SERVICE .40 101 421 030914 TIREMAX SERVICE CENT $21.95101 42152 220 030915 UNUM LI E INSURANCE $320,65 101 030916 XCEL EN RGY $341,68 101 41942 383 030916 XCEL EN RGY $156,29602 49480 383 030916 XCEL EN RGY $378,35602 49480 381 030916 XCEL EN RGY $59,73 601 49410 383 030916 XCEL EN RGY $692,31 601 49410 381 030916 XCEL ENERGY $287,30601 49420 381 030916 XCEL EN!ERGY $260,07601 49435 381 030916 XCEL EN¡ERGY $178,56101 45201 383 030916 XCEL ENERGY $49.14101 43120 383 030916 XCEL E IERGy $69,90602 49470 381 030916 XCEL E ERGY $38.06 101 45201 381 030916 XCEL E ERGY $199.88601 49420 383 030916 XCEL E ERGY $493,28101 41942 381 030916 XCEL E ERGY $246,94 101 41942 383 030916 XCEL E ERGY $34,39101 41942 381 .030916 XCEL E ERGY $599.65101 41941 383 030916 XCEL E~ERGY $246,25101 41941 381 030916 XCEL E~ERGY $103.53101 45123 381 030916 XCEL Et'!JERGY $44,00 101 45202 381 030916 XCEL E~ERGY $1,668,35101 43160 386 030916 XCEL E~ERGY $20,05101 42610 386 030916 XCEL EN-IERGY $57,09101 43120 381 030916 XCEL E~ERGY $545,35105 42280 383 030916 XCEL EINERGY $6.28 101 42500 326 030916 XCEL E~ERGY $267,83101 43120 383 030916XCEL E~ERGY $339,75105 42280 381 030919 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE first cabinet supplies $70.44 101 45201 210 030920 DOER/gFFICE OF Shirber-Emerg Mgmt $175,00101 42500 331 030921 ALEX AI¡R APPARATUS, INC 6 Air E with Cylinders $25,029.00 105 42220 580 030922 AUTO P,ARTS WEST, INC $23.41 105 42220 220 030923 CELLUíR 2000 $2,22 105 42250 321 030924 EARLF ANDERSON & ASS ., $1.367.23101 43120 210 030925 EL PAS) CLUB & LANES $437.70 101 49300 432 030926 FIRST STATE BANK $11,80601 49440 310 030926 FIRST ~TATE BANK $11,80603 43230 310 030926 FIRSlTATEBANK $11,80602 49490 310 030927 GALL'S INC $32,97101 42120 210 030928HAWKI~SWATER mEATM $1450601 49420 312 030928 HAWKI~S WATER TREATM acid $197,54601 49420 210 030928 HAWKINS WATER TREATM $109.00602 49480 312 030928 HAWKI S WATER TREATM $14.50601 49420 312 030929 K,E.E, ,R.S,INC $90,03101 42120 171 ., 030929 K,E,E, RS,INC $164,95101 42120 171 . 030929 K,E,E, ,R,S.INC $18,05101 42120 171 030929 K,E,E, ,R,S,INC $21,57101 42120 171 030930 LOSO'. MAINSTREET PUB $150,00101 030931 MARC BUSINESS PRODU $74,55101 41430 200 CITY OF ST JOSEPH 03/05/02 5:07 PM Bills Payable Page 3 . Check # Search Amount FUND 030932 422 030933 $236.75101 41430 030934 REGAN, $680,00 101 43120 030935 $370.00 101 41942 030936 $212.99 101 41950 030937 5T, $10,00 101 41430 030937 ST, $10,00101 41310 030938ST, $53,94105 42280 030939 $775,00 101 030940 $348.50 101 43160 386 030940 $56,14 602 49470 381 030940 COOPERATIVE $25,00101 43160 386 030940 COOPERATIVE $28,00 602 49470 381 030941 SERVICE CENT $11.95101 42152 220 030941 SERVICE CENT $61,54101 43125 220 . . DRAFT February 21,2002 Page 1 of11 Pursuant fO due call and notice th~reof, the City Council for ~e City of St. Joseph met in regular session on ~ Thursda¡, February 21,2002 at 7:,00 PM in the St. Joseph City Hall. Members Present: Mayor Larry JOSCh. Councilors Bob Loso, Cory Ehlert, Al Rassier, Kyle Schneider. City Rde,entative P",ent, CiJ AtOOffioy John Sehe"" C;¡y Engine", Joe Bertendon, police Chief Pete J"",ky, Public rrks Director Dick Tauf~n, Economic Development Consultant Cynthia Smith-Strack Others P esent: Mary Ann Graevb, Jim Graeve, Jodi Teich, Bob Herges, Rick Heid, Linda Brown, Tom Herkinoff, M.,k tert, Chri, V ¡¡nee, Shelly Mu",e, Tim Mus~e A rove A enda: Loso made a Lotion to approve the agenda as presented; seconded by Schneider and passed nanimously. I I Consent A enda: Loso made a motion to approve the consent agenda as follows: I a, Approve bills ¡J,ayable, check numbers 30790 - 30886 b. Approve the minutes of February 7, 2002 c. Issue a non int?xicating liquor license and cigarette license to JM Oil (formerly St. Joseph Gas and Bait). i d. Authorize the ltfayor and Administrator/Clerk to execute the labor agreement between the City of St. Joseph andlLaw Enforcement Labor Services for the contract period January 1,2002 through December 31, 2003. Agreement to be executed upon approval of the City Attorney. e, Accept the performance review of the City Administrator Clerk as favorable and increase the annual wage as in accordance with the employment contract. f Accept the high bid of Jim Corrigan for the purchase of the Case Loader ($18,215.00). . I I The motion was seconded by Schneider and passed unanimously. , I PUBLIC COMMENTS TO THE AGENDA I i Ma A n Graeve 0 619 EastMinnesota Street spoke in opposition to the proposed housing development of Mark Lambe1' Graeve stated that while she does not own property adjacent to the proposed development, as a resident of St. JOS~h she is affected by all decisions made by the City Council. Graeve stated that in her opinion the proposed develo ment does not fit into th~ Comprehensive PIan and should be rejected. Graeve requested the Council uphold the oat~ of office each member ~wore to before taking office whereby they are representing the entire City and make decisior in the best interest of all the residents of the City of St. Joseph. Public m rovement Hearin 1 ~th Avenue NE and Elm East: City Engineer Joe Bettendorf opened the public hearin for the proposed improvement of 15th Avenue NE and Elm Street East. The purpose of the hearing is to consid r the making an improv~ment of water, sewer, streets, curb and gutter on 15th Avenue NE and Elm Street East in the St. Joseph Business .I¡>ark. The proposed improvement is requested to allow for the development of the 10ts in he St. Joseph Business p¡ark. The estimated cost of the improvement is $ 531,246 andwill be paid for througfu. special assessments to tþ.e benefiting properties. Bettendorf requested the City Council table the public heæin1 to allow !rim additioUJÙ,tirne to verifY the "",,,ments and benefiting properti", Ehlert uestioned why Elm Str~et East is not being extended to 19th Avenue NE as it is a relatively short section of ,treet rd the I", ",etion to eOljJplete Ehn Street East Bettendon "'pouded that the property owners mfeeted by the ext nsion of Elm Street East have not requested the improvement nor have they been noticed of the public he"'1 EWert "qu"ted ~ property ownm be contacted ¡¡nd eneoumged the Council to ~pport the ex_iou of Elm S eet East to 19th A venue ~E. I . The C ' uncil by consensus tabl~d the public hearing for the proposed improvement of Elm Street East and 15th Avenue NE to March 7,2002.( I I I , ! DRAFT February 21,2002 - , Page 2 of 11 Stearns 'oun En ineer Coun Road 121 Ri ht ofWa Ac uisition: Assistant Stearns County Engineer Jodi - Teich ai,,"d hefo," Ihe Council to '"quest aulhori"'tioo for Ihe Mayor and Admiuistiator Clerk to oxecute Ihe Cost Sha e Agreement between tHe City ofSt. Joseph and Stearns County for the County Road 121 and CSAH 2 Impmve. en' pmj eo"!he agree~ut identifies Ihe responsihih~ of each P'I\Y and is Ihe s~d agr"nrent used by Stea s County. Loso made a motion authorizing the Mayor and Administrator Clerk to execute the Cost Share A reement between the City of St. Joseph and Stearns County for the County Road 121 and CSAH 2 Improv1ment project; seconde, by Rassier and passed unanimously. Teich stated that the County has qeen unable to come to agreement with two properties owners regarding the additiondl right of way needed for the CR 121 improvement. A third party has given a verbal agreement but as of this tim"the agree""nt is not in Written fmm. In order to keep the proj"t moving Ihe County is requesting Ihe Ci~ Council 0 authorize eminent donkin proceedings for the three remaining properties. As per Stearns County policy, the City ~.1 St. Joseph is responsible for all costs associated with right of way acquisition including eminent domain proceedi s. i Rassier ~ueStiOned if authoriZingithe eminent domain proceedings stops the negotiations. Teich responded the County fill continue to negotiat~ until the proceedings commence. If an agreement is reached any process started will sto~. City Attorney John Sc?erer stated that he has reviewed the properties in question and will contact the attorney~ representing the property owners to see if an agreement can be reached. Further, if the Council wishes to proceed with the eminent domai~ process a resolution authorizing such must be adopted by the City Council. Loso made a ¡motion authorizing theiMayor and Clerk to execute Resolution 2002-04 authorizing eminent domain procee~ings for the acquisition, of right-a-way for the CR 121 project. The motion was seconded by Ehlert and passed unanimously. I Resolution 2002-04 Authori:Ûng Eminent Domain Proceedings, CR 121 Improvement . WHERrAS, the City of S1. Joseph is engaged with Stearns County in a joint project for the reconstruction of a portion of County Road 121 whkh is located within the City; I i AS, the restructuring o£ County Road 121 will require the acquisition of additional property for right of way; WHER AS, the county has bee* engaged in the negotiation of the purchase of the additional right of way from the affecte property owners; I I , AS, the purchase price p.as been negotiated for all but three of the affected properties. , WHER AS, the cost of right of¡way acquisition within the City limits is a cost of the City even though eminent d<>ma~ pmceeding would he hrought in Ihe. name of Ihe Coun~; and WIlE EAS, the Coun~ snggesld that Ihe S" J o'"ph City Attorney he authorized top""ue Ihe eminent domain in the na ,e of the County as nece~sary. ¡ THE FORE, IT IS HEREByjRESOLVED: ! , 1. . That Rajkow~ki Hansmeier Ltd. is hereby authorized to represent Stearns County encing eminent domaip. proceedings to acquire the property identified belowJor right of way proposes: I . I College of S1. BenedIct Parcel No. 23 of Steams County Highway Right of Way Plat No. 19 (29,497 square feet). ! . Mollv Martin . Parcel No. 34 of Steams County Highway Right of Way PlatN'o. 19 (971 square feet). I I , , DRAFT February 21,2002 · Page 3 of 11 , obert Gamadas I arcel No. 33 of Steams ¡County Highway Right of Way Plat No. 19 (1024 square feet). I I 2. That the Stearns County Engineer has the authority to continue to negotiate with the owners of the above-d scribed parcels for the p~rchase of the additional right of way, subject to ratification by the City Council. I VIC We tTIF A lication MunIcipal Development: Cynthia Smith-Strack of Munieipal Development Group appeare before the Council on b~half of the 8t. Joseph Economic Development Authority. 8mith~8track stated she has bee working with Vic West Steel to construct a new facility in the 8t. Joseph Business Park. Vic West is conSi41ng constructing a new r.icility wit)t 67,000 square feet with a total project cost of 2,7 million. Inclu4ed in the proj ct cost is specialized eqtlipment with an estimated cost f $ 500,000. In order for the project to come t~ fruition, they are asking for financial assistance from the City of S1. Joseph. One formofpnancing is through the MN Department of Trade and Economic Development (DTED). DTED offers a revolving loan fund for qualifying projects. The amount of funding is based on the number of jobs that are created. The app' ication before the Counçil at this time indicates that Vic West anticipates adding 15 jobs with an average wage of $ 16.00 per hour. If suc;cessful in obtaining funding, the City keeps the loan as it is paid back and continu s to used the funds as a tevolving 10an fund. All costs associated with the application are paid by the petition r. ! 1 I Thesec nd form of funding is T~x Increment Financing (TIF). Vic West is requesting maximum use ofTIF which will generate approximately $ 40,000 per year to off set the cost of land and improvements. The TIF proposed capturej the maximum period of)9 years. Juran and Moody was unable to produce the financial forecast for this meeting but they will be available for the final TIP application. · SmithJtrackstatedthat the EDl Board met recently and recommended the City Council approve the preliminary TIP aptation olVic West Steil. Ra8s!er qnestioned at what point "'" City is notlt1e4 of the finandal "qniremen~ ofVic ' est Steel. Smith-Strack; stated that Vie West Steel is requesting the maximum amount ofTIF. The City has a POlirhe"bY 10% of the a4~itiOnaI tauevenne ereated ~ he14 by the City, with the "uullring 90% par4 to ilie proper . owner as the taxes are paid. j Ehlert uestioned if the City has! the ability to determine the amount of TIF provided on a case by case basis. He stated f:t at semina" he has a1tays heen ins,,"cte4 to implement TIP with caution. While he snpports the pro~os . d development Ehlert st~ted he is ~ppreh~nsi:e abo~t ~oving forward ,,:ithout knowing the financial impact. Snnth- . track stated that the approval at thIs meetmg IS prehnnnary approval whIch allows the developer to move focwa~. The Conncil will have! anothe' opportunity to "view"'" application. I Mike ohman stated that W. Gohman Construction will construct the building for Vie West and lease the building to the . The term of the lease has yet to be determined but it will be either a ten or fifteen year lease. Hosch stated that tht EDA has been working 'on this project for many years and the project is not viable without TIF assistance. The pr' posed project will benefit the entire community. Hosch further stated that before a company can make applic~tion for TIF, a series oftests must be completed including a But For test. The But For test determines if a compa y can locate without TI¡.;'. If they will cannot, they are a candidate for TIF. ¡ Ehlert tated that the project before them at this time is the first major project for the City in the Industrial Park. He I further stated that considerable resources have been spentin anticipation of business/industria 1 development and he is look ng for assurance that thi~ project is viable for the City now and in the future. City Attorney John Scherer stated hat many communities ~se TIF to attract industry and they have not been afraid to use this mechanism of financfg. The TIF policy for tpe City is pay-as-you-go so the risk to the City is minimal. The property owner is only r~funded the recaptured tax after the taxes are paid. The project before the Council creates an additional 15 · jobs w ich are needed in the community. Further, if the funding from DTED is secured the City can offer a revolv ng loan fund without co~tributing the initial capital. I I I I I DRAFT February 21, 2002 Page 4 of 11 Rassier q estioned is occasion for þusinesses to request a shorter time for TIF versus the full nine years. Smith- - Strack stated that each projectis different and small projects only capture a few years. The project before the Council if requesting the full uine Ye",s to help reduce the monthly le"e payment Ehlert qu stioned if the St. Josep~ Business Park is competitive with area parks and if TIF is necessary tool to attract bU~iness. Ehlert stated that when the City first contemplated providing services to the St. Joseph Business Park an a alysis was completed o~ the cost per foot to assure that the St. Joseph Park was equal to or less than the area par~s. Smith-Strack stated t~at she will research costs of area parks and report back to the Council. She further stated thlt at this time the Counci~ is only approving the preliminary TIF application and will have another opportun'ty to review the pIan. Tre process for TIF is lengthy and requires the developer to place a deposit with the City. T1e preliminary applicatiop. is completed at this time to inquire as to the Council's wishes with regard to the project atlvancing. ¡ Loso mide a motion apprOving/the preUmfnary TIF Application of V!cW est Steel Inc and anthoriu the submitt I and collection of fees ,for the final application. Further, Juran and Moody will be consulted to preparel the TIF Plan with the fees being reimbursed through the application fee. The motion was seconded by Schneider and passed unanibIously. wObegL Welcome Center Grant. Smith-Strack stated that she has been working with the W obegon Committee to suhmit r application to the DePilr1ment ofNatnral ResoDIces for a matching grant of $ 100,00 for tlic construction of aWe come Center. If awarde~ the $ 100,000 grant the City needs to confirm that they will match the grant. Rassier questioned ifthe City hat the funds for the matching portion. Weyrens responded that that matching funds c>n he ttioO$ received ftom ~~ce organœatioM as well '" hudg~ed fimds At the present _ the S, J "seph Jaycees have been donating $ 1,900 per month and the St. Joseph Park Board has $ 18,000 of budgeted funds for the trail ce ter. Loso stated that the motion before the Council at this time is to make application for the grant and . agree t the conditions if awarded the grant. If the City receives the award, the Council will by motion accept or deny th grant. Therefore, Loso made a motion adopting Resolution 2002-05 authorizing submittal of the grant Ipplication including th¢ terms and conditions for acceptance for the construction of a welcome center for the Wobegon Trail. The motion was seconded by Schneider. Ayes: Hosch, Ehlert, Loso, Schneider Nays: Rassier i Motion Carried 4:1:0 i Resolution 2002-05 Resolution Authprizing the submittal of a Grant Application for the Wobegon Trail ARE.OLUTION (A) IN SUPPORT OF THE CONSTRUCTION OF A WELCOME CENTER ADJACENT TO T E LAKE WOBEGONj TRAIL (B) AUTHORIZING THE SUBMISSION OF A NATIONAL REC ATION TRAIL PRqGRAM GRANT APPLICATION TO THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF NAT RAL RESOURCES (0) IDENTIFYING MATCHING FUNDS FOR THE PROJECT, (D) DESI NATING THE CITY !As THE ENTITY RESPONSIBLE FOR PROTECTING, OPERATING AND MAIl TAlNING THE WELCOME CENTER FOLLOWING CONSTRUCTION, AND (E) PETITIONING STE· S COUNTY FOR DESIGNATION OF THE PROPOSED SITE WHICH IS LOCATED WITHIN AN ANDONED :RAILRdAD CORRIDOR. I WHE EAS, The Transportation Equity Act for the 21 st Century provides for a federal program to supply financial assist nce for the development and maintenance of recreational trails and trail-related projects; and, I , I WHE EAS, Approximately $¡1 ,000,000 are available for trail reimbursement projects in Minnesota in 2002 via appli ation to the Minnesota ïepartrnent of Natural Resource prior to 4:00 p.m. on February 28th, 2002; and, WH~REAS, The grant applic~tion requires evidence oflocal support for the project including: City Council . resolytion supporting the proj~ct, a fifty percent funding match and the ability of the applicant to maintain the facility; and, i WH REAS, The grant applic,ation requires the request be sponsored by a unit of government; and j I DRAFT February 21, 2002 ~ - Page 5 of 11 I - WHER¡S, The lake W obegon Trail Committee was formed by the City Council of the City of St. Joseph in April of 200 1 or the purpose of preparing the community for the extension of the lake W obegon Trail; and, WEIER ì8, T~e Lake W ObegOnlTmil will be extendedftom the City of Avon to the Gty of 81. Joseph m2003; llid WHEREAS, The Lake W obegon! Trail Committee recommends to the City Council the construction of a Welcome Center i4cluding restrooms, picnic tables and parking facilities; and, WHERIjA8, The City bas identiJed funds to be dedicated to the cOMtrnction of the Welcome Center in conjnnction with a National Recreation Trail Program grant; and, WHERJAS, The City bas identi*ed. five,yeaJ: bndget fOO" the OI"'ation, rnain~e and protection ofa Welcome Center; lnd, i WHER~AS, T~e S1. Joseph Histbri~al Society has e:,pres~ed an i~ter~st i~ using a portion ~fthe fa~ility to show caste the hIStory ofSt. Josep...r,.. ,ItS founders and ItS resIdents VIa hIstonc documents, artIfacts, pIctures and orallvid· 0 histories. Such testaments to the City's history will be available for all users of the Lake W obegon Trail; and, ' WHERfAS, The proposed W el~ome Center will be a replica of the historic St. Joseph Depot and said construction plans w re developed in cooperation with the College of St. Benedict's, St. Johns University, Stearns County Park I Board, . t. Joseph Park Board, S~. Joseph Chamber of Commerce, St. Joseph Lions Club, the S1. Joseph Legion and S1. Jose h Jaycees; and, WHER AS, The proposed Welcome Center is the top development priority of the Central Minnesota Regional . Parks a. d Trails Coordination Bbard as evidenced by its 2003 Bonding Request for Fiscal Year 2003; and, WHER¡AS' The proposed site ~s north of the Wobegon Trail (as extended) in the abandoned railroad corridor which i. controlled by the County of Stearns; and, I I WHER AS, The S1. Joseph Pa* Board has approved a resolution (A) In support ofthe construction of a Welcome Conter nd (B) reconnnending the City Cound) do the same as evidenced by its authorization of the submission of a grant request to the Minnesota qepartment of Natura 1 Resources, its approval of matching funds to support the project! its approval to protect, c;>perate and maintain the facility and its request the County support the project by dedicat on of the site. I NOW HEREFORE BE IT REßOL VED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ST. JOSEPH, MINN SOTA THAT ! The Ci Council supports the cþnstruction of a Welcome Center adjacent to the lake W obegon Trail 1. The City Council supports the construction of a Welcome Center adjacent to the Lake Wobegon Trail. . Preli . na Plat Graceview Estates - Bob Her es and Rick Heid: Bob Herges and Rick Heid appeared before the Counc 1 requesting approval of the preliminary plat of Graceview Estates. Herges stated that he along with the City Engineer, City Attorney, Mayo~ and City Administrator Clerk have met with representatives of S1. Benedict's regardt,ng an ingress/egress on ~he northern section of property owned by the College of S1. Benedict abutting County Road 121. The ingress{egress has been requested by the Planning Commission and Council to assist with the ef cient movement of traffic from Graceview Estates. At this time the College has not indicated willingness to releas property so the. ingress/bgress can be completed. . Hosch elaborated that the City submitted four alternative to the College of S1. Benedict for consideration and have not re eived a favorable respon'se. The College has submitted a letter stating they need additional information DRAFT February 21,2002 Page 6 of11 before m~king a decision and do not anticipate making a decision until April 25, 2002. Hosch stated that the road is an essential element before the final plat can be considered. Herges eJpressed frustration with ~he process and stated that he needs to move his project forward and cannot wait until APr~. He was of the understflnding that the College would render a decision on February 14 and now the date has been ushed back further. Hefges stated that he has attempted to resolve the outstanding issues of Graceview Estates bttt cannot go further with?ut owning the property in question. At this time HeIges requested the City approve the preliminary plat of G~aceview Estates as presented. The COicil Was of genernl cons~osos iliatbefo'e final approval of <Jrnceview E'''''', the developentrna' seerne a temporarl construction easement from the College of8t. Benedict to allow ingress/egress from County Road 121 to the prop I sed development. Further, the developer must provide the City with executed utility easements from the College f 8t. Benedict to allow t~e installation of utì1ìty lines along the southern edge of their development extendin to County Road 121. ¡The Council agreed to consider this matter again on March 7,2002. Scherer recomm nded the Council resolv~ the ingress/egress issue or at least have an understanding of the status of the propose northern access before ¡ipproving the final plat. , Bettend, rf questioned if the out19ts/drainage areas provided in Graceview Estates would be privately owned orifthe develop rs will be requesting the' City to assume ownership upon platting. Linda Brown stated that the development assum~ that all the holding pon4s/drainage ar~as would be privately owned either .by an association or individual prope owner. Bettendorf reql1¡ested the engmeers for the developer verify the wIdth of the proposed roads. In reviewi~g the plat it appears as the roadbeds will only be 32 feet in width and typical residential streets in 8t. Joseph are 361et in width. The developer agreed to review this matter before submitting the final plat. Bettendorf also questio ; ed the vacation of an ea$ement as requested in the development application. The easement vacation is for a portion rf 95th A venue that will þe redesigned. Scherer stated that the vacation of easement should not be conside ed until construction of the affected phase. The developers agreed withdraw the easement release request at . this ti e. I i Hosch ade a motion to appr~ve the preliminary plat of Graceview Estates with the following contingenies: 1. The developer will continue to secure a temporary construction ingress/egress from the College of St! Benedict for temporary construction in phase one and work with the City to secure a perIµanent ingress/egress for future development. Phase two of Graceview Estates cannot be approved until an access to County Road 121 is secured. 2. The develoMr will secure a utility easement for the installation of water and sewer lines from the Col,lege of St. Benedict. 3. The Engineer verifies the width of the roads in the development to the satisfaction of the City Engine~r. I The otion was seconded by ;Loso and passed unanimously by those present. Mark ambert PURD A licahon Re uestin a 8 ecial Use Permit: Mark Lambert appeared before the Council reque ting approval of a SpecÜil Use Permit to allow the construction of a 44 unit apartment building. Lambert stated that since he appeared before the Council at the last meeting he has lowered the building by two (2) feet and move, the access south appro~imately 70 feet. The Planning Commission has requested the City Council require that t e property be access at the center point of Lots 1 and 2 Indian Hills Plat with a private service road extending , to the westerly edge of the property. I I Rassi r stated the purpose oftþe service road is to prevent headlights from projecting into the neighboring homes. Rassi r further stated thatthe Planning Commission recommended the Council amend the Developer's Agreement to reI eve Lambert from cons~cting apublic road if the property is accessed at the center point for a distance ""al' than 70': Ras,i" ~" ,..ted iliat Lambort has indicated a mllingn", to pay fo, 50% of ilie Co""e overl y of Northland Drive after curb and gutter is installed. . Lam1Þert stated that he was enþouraged by the revisions approved by the Planning Commission but requested the Co bl allow the driveway as presented on the plans. Lambert stated that he has revised the plans on numerous occa ions and felt that he has 'come to a good compromise for the community. The building has been lowered by i i I I ! i i DRAFT February 21, 2002 ~ Page 7 of 11 two feet td he has provided scre~ning for the neighborhood. Lambert stated that the original Developers - Agreeme't included a provision for a second ingress/egress to the property and he would like to exercise the option. Lambert tated it is his opinion th¡t the road has been constructed too low and one access is not viable. Rassier sated the Planning Commission is adamant that both lots owned by Lambert be accessed with one common driveway The Planning Commis~ion expressed concern that precedence would be set if Lambert was allowed a second a cess. When Ted Schmid developed Northland Four, access to Northland was limited. This same procedur was used by the Plannibg Commission when reviewing the Indian Hills Park Plat. Loso stated it is his opinion t at the plan presented to ,the Council is acceptable and each 10t should be based on its own merit. Hosch st ted that he is somewhat'disappointed by the plans submitted by Lambert. He stated it was his understafding that Lambert would lower the building to a two and one half story building, provide a natural buffer and sub¥t a lighting plan. To thr best of his knowledge Lambert has not completed his plans. Lambert stated that he provird the Planning Commission with a letter from his engineer stating that the building he is proposing is not viable at two and one half stories~ As far as the lighting pIan, he presented the Planning Commission with the light heads h~ will be using but has not completed the actuallight pIan. Lambert stated that he is willing to providy a natural ence as requested by the neighborhood but is experiencing difficulty coming to consensus with the ndghbtood Laniliert took 0iose to the comnænœ ofHosoh ond ,bæd ~t he has p<e,~ed n=emn, <e. designs f the building only to have them rej ected by the Planning Commission. Schneider stated that while LamBert may have incurred costs to re-design the proposed development, the issue has not cha ged. The Planning Com'rnission and Council have requested the development be designed with one access to serve both 10ts owned by L¡¡.mbert. This issue has not changed throughout the entire development process. Therefo e, in his opinion Lambert could have resolved the issue by accepting the recommendations of the Planning Commi sion and City Council. I . Ehlert c¡oncurred with Schneiderl and stated the Council has been extremely clear with needed changes to the develonment plan. Ehlertstate4 that he would be willing to make a motion to require the road be constructed betwee~ the two lots owned by Rambert and be built to a width of 36'. Ehlert stated that it is his opinion that ~:be¡ shows a lack ohe,pect! fm the planning process and on nnwillingness to comply with the <eque,t ofthe Schere clarified thatwhen the Indian Hills Plat _ filed, tha Developer' Agreement ;nc1tides a pr","s;on wheœby the pro erty owner at the time o,f platting would donate the road right-of-way if the City constructed a road between Loœ 1 rd2 Block 1 lndion mils Plat. The agreement further 'bæ' that the City has one year tn exerdse the option nd one additional year tp construct the road. Loso ade a motion to accept! the findings of the Planning Commission (see attachment "A") issuing the specia use permit with the copditions outlined in the findings. The motion was seconded by Rassier. I Discussion: Hosch stqted that he was hoping that Lambert could reduce the height of the building further than two feet, but is wìlling to accept the recommendation of the Planning Commission to approve a three foot variance on the h~ight of the building. However, before making a final decision on thesiteplan and specíal use permit, H~sch stated that needed information is still missing. Missing items include a lighting plan, type offencing a,nd location and type ofscreening and location. Further, Hosch requested that Lambert move the caretaker unit further south and align all the garages north of the apartment unit. The realignment of garagJs wìll help deflect headlights from extending into the neighborhood homes. I I i Chris Vance of reque~ted the Council deny the request of Mark Lambert as in his opinion the building does I not meet the intent onhe Ordinance. Further, it is his opinion that the proposed site is not suitable for a 44 unit apartment compl¢x. If multiple family units are constructed he would prefer four twelve unit apartment buildings. I Vance referred to the St. Josevh Code of Ordinances whereby it states that a . proposed PURD sho~ld not negatively affect the surrounding property. I ! , I I I ! i ! ! DRAFT February 21,2002 Page 8 of 11 ~ {oel Heinen of requested the Council deny the request of Mark Lambert. Heinen stated that he requested ~uthorizatiOn to install a,driveway to Northland Drive and was denied by the City Council. He is equesting that the Council be consistent in their decision making process. . ~a"i" ,toted that it ~ not po"ible to ,alliff all the neighho", "ga,ding the desi"d ,,,eening, but a [n"",'" ,haald be "ached. The neighbarhaod ,hould meet with Lambert and agree to the amount and pe of screening. I The Council was in agr~ement that additional information needs to be presented and reviewed before the fie plan can he appl'Oved. Before the maUer can he tahled Lambert must agree to waive the este",;"n ranted the City on January 17, 2002. Lambert agreed to waive the action requirement provided the time has not already expired.! With thf consent of the property owner to waive the action requirement, Rassier made a motion to table the special use requirement for 30 days so that additional information can be obtained and revised drawings can be sUbttted to the Council fOj review. The motion was seconded by Loso and passed unanimously. Now, A rri~ to ",b1e '''''' _00"", ,"",fore <he morioo '"'" by !,ow i, no< ocœd _. Lambe,' requested <he Coµncil d~tail <he changes requested and to establisb a meeting rime to review <he pI"",, and to estab ish a sub committee to review the plans before the joint meeting. The Council agreed the following issues are outs anding: I 1. The plans nee4 to illustrate one common access to serve both properties owned by Lambert. 2. A naturallandscaping berm pIan be provided to serve as a buffer for the residents living adjacent to the propos~d development. 3. Overlay cost participation be guaranteed . 4. The City Engip.eer is provided with a final set of plans regarding needed easements and drainage. 5; The caretaker ,unit be relocated to provided a greater buffer between the development and the existing housipg units. 6. The garages bbrelocated and placed north of the proposed building to help provide a light buffer for the existing homes. I The C1uncìl further agreed .to ~ork out the issues jointly wit~ the Planning Commission on Monday, March 4, 2002 at 8:00 PM. After the meetmg 9n March 4,2002 Lambert wIll re-draft the development plans for approval on March ,2002. Approval on March 7,2002 is contingent upon Lambert submitting revised plans in accordance to the rec mmendation on March 4, 2002. ! Engineer Reports Outlot. , Private Ownership -vsi- Public Ownership: Bettendorf requested the Council discuss if the development hOldint ponds should be assumðd by the City upon platting or if they should remain in private ownership. Currently the Ci. has private holding po~ds in Northland Five and the developers of Pond View Ridge and Leo Buettener are requesting the City assume oWIi-ership of their holding ponds. Bettendorf stated it is his recommendation that the City a~sume ownership and ma}ntenance ofholding ponds is a City issue. Further, he was recently contacted by the developer of Northland V regarding a property owner dispute over the user rights of the holding pond on a specific parcel Platting the holding ponds as outlots and assuming ownership prevents future neighborhood disputes. Scher r stated that while he dobs not disagree with Bettendorf, there are advantages for private ownership. Such advan ages include maintenanSe. The City would not be responsible for mowing or weed prevention of the ponds. I I Linda Brown stated that public; ownership of the holding ponds is Graceview Estates could be detrimental to the devel.pment. The lots have been designed with easements for the holding ponds and some of the ponds will be owne by an association. Schð:çer stated that the Council could review the holding ponds on a case by case basis. . Ehlerlt made a motion authoJizing the City Attorney to prepare Quit Claim Deeds to allow the developers to deed he following propertie~ to the City of St. Joseph: I Outlot A - Pond Vi~w Ridge Five , I ; , I i DRAFT February 21,2002 .- Page 9 of 11 -- putlot A - Pond View ~dge Six Outlot A ~ Buettner Business Park The Citj will only accopts deed; for properties whore the taxes are paid to cumnt. The motion was seconded by Schn ider and passed unanimously. , POLICE CHIEF REPORTS Part Time Officer: Police ChiefJ¡'ete Jansky presented the Council with Dwight Pfannenstein, a new part time officer fì r the City of S1. Joseph.: Pfannenstein is employed by the City of Albany as a full time officer and is originall from the S1. Joseph area. I , 2002 Le sed Squad Car: Weyrens presented a financial breakdown of the cost to lease a third squad car. The breakdoWn is as follows: I Mont111y Lease fee $ 500.00 Monthly Gas fee $ 300.00 i ''''''ifg the fo"'¡' available for the k"ecam and tho n"ded eqnipment for the now squad, the police bndget for motor v hicles will have a short~all of approximately $ 503.98. Jansky stated that he will find an area in his budget to cove the shortfall. Schneider made a motion authorizing the completion of paperwork to lease a third squad rr from Minnesota Tr~vel Management as requested and to equip the car with the understanding that any bu· get shortfall in the motor vehicle category be accounted for in the Police Budget. The motion was secondJd by Rassier and passer unanimously. Adult 9iversion Program: Scherer reported that he has been approached by the Council Attorney to consider P"t"i~ting in the Ste"'" Coill)ty Adult Diversion Program. The program main s'co"", minor off.."s without . going tough the court process.: The program is not available for all offenses nor is it available for repeat offenders. Janksy tated that he does not recommend the Council participate in the program as he does not see a benefit for the City. Schneider made a motio~ to accept the recommendation ofthe Police Chief and notify the County Attornr of the d"tsion to no\ participate. The motion was seconded hy Ehlert. Discussion: Loso ques'tioned Scherer as to the benefits of the program. Scherer responded that the p'0gram "'pedites ,o,,\e proce"es. provides a proK"om for mino' juvenile offenses and would provide an education programfor¡minor drinking offenses. The mrion passed unanimou~ly. Ordina ce Amendments: Janks~ requested the Council authorize the City Attorney to review the Abandoned Motor Vehicl and garbage Ordinance I for possible revision. Jansky stated that it is his opinion the Ordinance needs to be modifi d for enforcement purpqses and presented the Council with sample Ordinances from the City of Albany. The C uncil recommended the City Attorney review the Ordinances for possible revision and report back to the counct at a later meeting. I Maintenance Faci1itv Architect Contract: Ehlert stated that Outsource Management Service (OMS) has provided the City w~th a certificate of insurance and waived the requirements as requested by the City Attorney. OMS will provid architectural and general contract management for the construction of a maintenance facility. Ehlert made a motifn authorizing the Mayor and Administrator Clerk to execute the contract for services between the City 0 St. Joseph and OMS ~s reviewed by the City Attorney. The motion was seconded by Loso and passed un ani ously. ; MAYOR REPORTS Onealf Cent Sales Tax: Hosph reported that if the City wishes to participate in the implementation of a one half cent s les tax a resolution of support should be passed and forwarded to the Legislature for consideration. The . Counoil was in general agreement to support the efforts of the area Cities and request the Legislature to allow the St. I Josep to impose a one half ceJ¡1t sales tax for a period of eight years. Ehlert made a motion adopting Resolution i ¡ I DRAFT February 21,2002 - Page 10 of 11 2002-06, Requesting Implementation of a one half cent sales tax. The motion was seconded by Rassier and ~ passed u animously. . RF1S0LUTION REQUESTING THE MINNESOTA I I LEGISLATURE TO APROVE A SPECIAL LAW AUTHORIZING Á ONE-HALF PERCENT (112%) LOCAL OPTION SALES TAX I ¡ WHEREAS, the City ofS1. Joseph is seeking authority to create a one-halfpercent 10cal option sales and u~e tax if conjunction with the (;i~ies of S1. Cloud, Sartell, Sauk Rapids, Waite Park and S1. Augusta for a period of eIght ye rs; and, I I WHEREAS, the City of S1. Joseph has a tax base that is 85 percent residential thereby resulting in a lower taxing c pacity than the adjoining cities; and WHEREAS, the purpo$e of the requested legislation is to establish a regional one-half percent 10cal option sales an I use tax with the procee~s to be utilized to defray the costs ofprojects that cannot be funded through general axation, in part due to b~dget restrictions and levy reductions; and ì WHEREAS, proceeds pf said 10cal sales tax received by the City of S1. Joseph, will be used to defray the costs of projects of regional significance located in S1. Joseph, such as the welcoming center for the Wobegon Bike Trail; a d I I NOW, THEREFORE; BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of St. Joseph, Minnesota: , , I 1. That the City Of S1. Joseph fully supports the imposition of the sales tax in the manner and for the purposes discJssed in this resolution. . 2. That the City of S1. Joseph respectfully requests the Legislature and Governor to approve special legislation authorizing the imposition of this sales tax. I Transp rtation Lobbying: Hosch requested authorization to participate in the Central Minnesota Transportation Alliange Washington DC fly in. i The fly in is an opportunity for the member govemmental units to lobby the federal legislatiure for funding for federal roads. Hosch stated that he would use his travel and conference budget for this event a~d any additional expen~es he would reimburse the City. Futher, Hosch stated that all conferences attended for the ¡remainder of the year wöuld be paid for by himself. Loso stated he does not see the benefit to the City and 1M Stroud A"a Planning o,gani",tion pwvide, lobbying for the City. Rru¡,ier ooncnrred with Lo,o aud 'toted that H I sch could ask the 10cal rfpresentatives participating in the program to carry forward the needs for the City of St. Jos ph. : J . COUNCIL REPORTS SC EIDER NO+' EHL RT RAS IER LOS . No R port DRAFT February21,2002 . Page 11 of 11 ADMINSTRATOR CLERK REPORTS Tax Ab tement Seminar: Weyreris reported that the St. Cloud Partnership is sponsoring a half day seminar on the benefits and procedure for Tax Abatement. The seminar is scheduled for March 14 at the St. Cloud Technical College and has a $ 10.00 registration fee. Any Council Person wishing to attend should contact the City Offices. I Ad'oum: Hosch made a motiort to adjourn at 10:45 PM seconded by Loso and passed unanimously, I Judy W yrens i Admin i trator Clerk . . . , MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE COUNTY OF STEARNS AND THE ITY OF ST. JOS]~PH-ST. JOSEPH TOWNSHIP JOINT PLANNING BOARD i I W EREAS, Steams cbunty Land Use and Zoning Ordinance, Number 209 was effì ctive April 21, 200q; and W EREAS, Section 1 ¡4B of Steams County Land Use and Zoning Ordinance Number 20 . .. states that this Ordinance shall apply to all areas in Steams County, Minnesota, "e cept as otherwise prpvided in law"; and I I I W EREAS, Minnesota Statutes, Section 414.0325, subd. 5 provides that a joint rTulion may provide i for the establishment of a board to exercise plall)1illg and land use co trol authority withil} any area designated as an orderly annexation area; and I 1EREAS' the City Or St. Joseph and theTown of St. Joseph have signed such a joint re ·olution designating the Town ofS1. Joseph as an orderly annexation area, and in a~ ¡tion, have created jhe City of St. J oseph-St. Joseph Township Joint Planning Board, w ' ich has exclusive (U~thority over land use and zoning issues within the orderly a . exation area. ! . HEREAS, the Comity and the City of S1. Joseph-S1. Joseph Township Joint Planning Bard desire to enter Üito a Memorandum of Understanding in order to provide an o portunity to cooperate in administering zoning within the County for the purpose of e suring better consistency in land use regulations and in the implementation of those regulations; and I ~REAS,the couity and the City ofSt. Joseph-St. Joseph Township Joint Plaoning Bpard desire to enter ipto a Memorandum of Understanding to ensure mutual ~derstanding of each/party to this Memorandum of their respective duties and rsponsibilities relateq to land use issues; and JHEREAS, the perrLtting process may involve provisions enforced hy the COWlty and jovisions enforced bf the City of St. J oseph-St. J o'eph Township Joint Planning Board. lOW THEREFORE IT IS AGREED, by the County of Stearns and the City of S1. Jtseph-S1. Joseph Torvnship Joint Planning Board to cooperate in administering their 1· nd use controls as s~t out in Attachment 1 of this Memorandum of Understanding. i i I ! I ,. i i I ¡ I I I . County of Steams Da e: By: Donald R. ~Ue, Chair Steams' County Board of Commissioners Date: Attest: Randy R. Schreifels Steams County Auditor-Treasurer Clerk Steams County Board of Commissioners City of S1. Joseph-S1. Joseph Township Joint Planning Board . D te: By: I I i Date: By: i I i .' · ATTACHMENT 1 , I A. Land Use and Zoning Ordinance Provisions I i 1. That after the conveyance of all residential dwelling sites in the Agricultural 40 Zoning Districts, the residual parcel shall not be eligible as a residential dwelling site. 2. Residential accessory buildings shall meet the road setbacks and in no case shall they be located closer to 'the road than the residential dwelling I 3. No residential accessory building shall be located on a lot prior to the location of a residential dwelling' on the same lot. I 4. Any manufactured ~ome to be used as a residential dwelling unit shall be no less than 20 feet in width and shall bear the Seal of Compliance issued by the State of I Minnesota. Reside:µtial dwelling units shall be no less than 20 feet in width. i 5. Home extended bu~inesses shall be allowed as a conditional use in all zoning districts in which they are a\lowed. · 6. The transfer ofresiµential development rights within the Township is allowed in all zoning districts. 7. The transfer ofresÙ:lential development rights from another Township into St. Joseph Township is prohi~ited in all zoning districts. 8. The transfer of residential development rights from St. Joseph Township into another Township is allow~d in all zoning districts. B Ad . . t . Ip .. miniS ratlve rOVlSlOns I J I 1. The Town shall conduct public hearings and act on conditional use permits for home I extended businesses. 2 The Town shall is~ue all permits, and conduct site inspections for each permit issued for any structure 0ruse allowed in item B Labove and provide the County with copies of permits and inspection reports for any permit issued therefore on a monthly basis. ! I 3 The Town shall cqnduct public hearings and act on all variances for structures for · which the Town i~sues permits, unless otherwise noted in this memorandum of understanding. I ! · 4. The Town shall conduct public hearings and act on all variances for the purposes of 1 considering varianc~ applications relating to setbacks from Township roads. 5. The Town shall not 'act on any permit or variance within the Shoreland Overlay District unless the sewage system has first been certified. 6. The County shall conduct public hearings and act on all variances for the purposes of considering varianc~ applications relating to setbacks from County highways. I i 7. The Town shall conduct public hearings and act on all variances from the Town prohibition relating ¡to the transfer of development rights. 8. The County shall administer and enforce all provisions of Steams County Ordinance Number 209; or successor ordinances within the orderly annexation areas of the Town that are not specifically administered or enforced by the Town through this memorandum of understanding. I I 9. In the orderly anne*ation areas, subdivision approvals and rezoning approvals shall be acted upon by t~e County. · 10. The plat review cOJ;nmittee requirements contained in Sections 5.3.5 and 5.3.7 of Steams County Suo division Ordinance Number 230; or successor ordinance, shall be applied to all plats proposed in the Town of St. Joseph orderly annexation areas. To accomplish the review process associated with this Section, plats shall first be submitted to the Stbams County Platting Committee for review and recommendation to the City of St. J~seph-St. Joseph Township Joint Planning Board. i I . The final plat requirements of Section 5.4 of Steams County Subdivision Ordinance Number 230; or successor ordinance, shall apply within the Town of St. Joseph. , 1 ' . The County shall issue all permits and act on all variances not specifically enumerated in subtitems 1 through 11 herein. Additionally, the County shall administer and en~orce all provisions of Steams County Ordinance Number 209; or successor ordinançes that are not specifically administered or enforced by the Town through this memorandum of understanding. I , . Respective Duties and Responsibilities I 1. The Tdwn shall provide the County with written notice of any public hearin~ regarding a conditional use permit, interim use permit or variance and a qopy of the conditional use permit, interim use permit or variance application at least 7 days prior to the public hearing. · I I ! I ¡ . 2. TheCo~nty shall provide the Town with written notice of any public hearing¿ regarding a conditional use permit, interim use permit, rezoning request þr variance and a copy of the conditional use permit, interim use permit, rezoning request or variance application at least 10 days prior to the public hearing. I I 3. The To)Vn shall provide the County with copies of variances, conditional use pefQ1its, or interim use permits granted pursuant to S1. Joseph TownsI1ip Land Use and Zoning Ordinance Number 2 and the related finding~ of fact at the time the applicable document is recorded with the CountylRecorder. 4. The Coµnty shall provide the Town with copies of all construction site permits, variances, conditional use permits or interim use permits granted pursual1-t to Steams County Land Use and Zoning Ordinance Number 209; or successor ordinance, including related findings offact, on a monthly basis. 5. The Town shall provide the County with copies of all construction site permitJ, along with the inspection report, issued pursuant to S1. Joseph Township Land Use and Zoning Ordinance Number 2; or successor . ordinance on a monthly basis. I 6. The County shall provide the Town with copies of all Provisional Uses registeted by the County on a monthly basis. I 7. The Tdwn shall notify the. County of all proposed ordinance changes prior to holqing a public hearing. 8. The qmnty shall notify the Town of all proposed ordinance changes prior to holding a public hearing. ! 9. If an o~dinance change or rezoning occurs, the County and Town shall revie1 this memorandum of understanding for potential changes. 10. This Memorandum of Understanding may be terminated by mutual agreerµent, however, if the parties are unable to mutually agree, then any party can unilaterally without cause terminate the Memorandum of Under~tand on ninety (90) days written notice. I ! I I , . I I I i I v - - 560 OthAve 8 #202 W1 Park, MN" 563871 Mar h 3,2002 ' Chiel Jansky ) 25 College Ave ¡ St. J seph, MN 56374 .1 . Dj CbiefJansky, i Tbi~ ætrerm ro llûonn yLfuatI illn res~mg ITommy posttron as sPolice Qffiper wtth the 1 ity of 8t Joseph effective March 20, 2002. I am thankful for the time I have been able to serve the, 8tJoseph Community, however, as you are aware, I have accepted em~loyment with the City of Anoka as a Police Officer. ) , I I . i¡I( Ps¡) SChle~ i j I ! I I I . I 1 I I jl . ".' ,.'. ...........i Metndrandmn i I I To: Council PerJons CC: From: Peter E.¡Jansky., ChiefofPolice I Date: 03/04/02 I Re: Hiring of ReJlacement Officer I I . ¡ As you maybe aware of, Paul Schley has submitted his resignation effective March 20th. I would ~ike to replace him as soon as possible. There are three options I would like to look atlfor his hiring his replacement. i . Option 1 I We would prqmoteone of our part-time officers to full-time status. Jeff and I would look overthe three part-time officers and choose the one to fill the position. I Option 2 We would one of our part-time officers to full-time status. Jeff and I along with the City or a member of the Council would interview the three candidates choose the one to filIthe position. Option 3 Take and choose the top 10 candidates to interview. Hire Tom Doom to top two and make our choice from there. I would hope have the position filled by April 1 st if we choose one of the part- time officers. If we take applications, we are looking at 30 to 90 days to bring this person on Please contact me if you have any questions. ~.or.IATIOkt» @ì ~-·1 State of Minnesota For Board Use Only /' Gambling Control Board Premises Permit Renewal Application Amt. Pd I ~~# . LG214PPR Priîted: 11/2/2001 ! License N ber:B-02021-001! Effective Date: 6/1/2000 Expiration Date: 5/31/2002 1 Name of Organization: St.Jos!eph Lions Club , ! Gambling Premises Information I 1 establishment wher~ gambling will be conducted ! EI Paso Sp rts Bar & Grill I Note: Our records show the premises 200 2nd A e NW! is located within the city limits St. Joseph, MN 56374 ' County: . tearns ! 1 I I ~_D I Lessor Information c'(...Au [)E. ""ENZ"'V~n:.....i i It ~ \ ~\. ::rC>Se.r>H J MN. S¡'3~4 Name Ofthl property own",,· (Ifidifferent): Square footage leased per month: 40 I Rent paid per month: ..- 800 . 1 Square footage leased per bingo occasion: Rent paid per bingo occasion: Bingo Activity Our records JndiCRte that Bingo is not conducted on these premises. ¡ Storage Information I Hwy 75 Co Rd3 : St. JO'. ePJ' MN 5637.4... ... . . ... . . Bank Information 1st State Bank of St. Joseph Gambling Bank 25 N Col~ge Ave, Account Number: 1066706 St. JosepT MN56374 I On the lines I1rovided below list the nam~, address and title of at least two persons authorized to sign checks and make deposits and withdrawals for the gambling account. The organization's treasurer may not handle gambling funds. I 1 Name Address City, State, Zip Code Title Gi.....,£::'· 'Bo'lse.., St. Joseph, MN 56374 V t c.e: Pi. . Scott Davi Bloch 17975 St. Anna Dr Avon, MN 56310 i ~rr\a. ~G.I? 8S8 ~ST'''SIoW Dtl.. S,.....:3'b ept-t trW~' ~E:S (Be sure to complete the reverse side of this application) This form w 11 be made available in alternative format (ie. large print, braille) upon request. Page 1 of2 (Continued on Back) I I I Acknowledgment Page 2 of2 Gambling Site Authorization Oath 6. any changes in application infonnation . I hereby consent'that local law enforcement I declare that: will be submitted to the board and local officers, the board or agents ofthe board, or 1. I have read this application and all unit of government within ten days of the commissioner of revenue or information submitted to the board is true, the change; and public safety or agents of the accurate, and complete; 7. I understand that failure to provide commissioners, may enter the premises to 2. all other required information has been required information or providing false or enforce the law. fully disclosed; misleading information may result in the Bank Records Information 3. I am the chief executive officer ofthe denial or revocation of the license. The board is authorized to inspect the bank organization; records oftht: gambling account whenever 4. I assume full responsibility for tht: fair and nt:cessary to fulfill requirements of current lawful operation of all activities to be gambling rules and law. conducted; Signature of the chief executive Organization License Authorization 5. I will familiarize myself with the laws of I hereby authoriZe the Gambling Control Minnesota governing lawful gambling and officer (Designee may not sign) Board to modifY the class of organization rules of the board and agree, iflicensed, to license to be consistent with the class of abide by those laws and rules, induding permit being applied for. amendments to them; Date Local Unit of Government and On behalf of the city, I hereby acknowledge this application for lawful gambling activity at the premises located within Print name of city the city's jurisdiction, and that a resolution specifically approving or denying the application will be forwarded to the applying organization. Signature of city personnel receiving application I I Title Date For the township: On behalf of the township, I acknowledgt: . that the organization is applying to conduct lawful gambling Print name ofto\\TIShip activity within the township limits. A township has no statutory authority to approve or deny an Signature of township official receiving application application (Minn. Stat. sec. 349.213, subcl 2). I I Title Date For the county: On behalf of the county, I hereby acknowledge this application for lawful gambling activity at Print name of county the premises located within the county's jurisdiction, and that a resolu tion specifically approving or denying the Signature of county personnel receiving application application will be forwarded to the applying organization. I I Title Date The information requested on this form (and Your name and address will be public Board whose work assignment requires any attachments) will be used by the information when received by the Board. Ihat they have access to the information; - Gambling Control Board (Board) to All the other information that you provide Ihe Minnesota Department of Public determine your qualifications to be involved will be privatt: data about you until the Safety; the Minnesota Attorney General; in lawful gambling activities in Minnesota, Board issues your license. \\Then Ihe Board the !Vfinnesota Commissioners of and to assist the Board in conducting a issues your license, all of the information Administratio n, Finance, and Revenue; the background investigation of you. You have that you have provided to the Bo ard in the Minnesota Legislative Auditor, national the right to refuse to supply the information process of applying for your license wiII and international gambling regulatory req uested; however, if you refuse to supply become public. If the Board does not issue agencies; anyone pursuant to court order; this infonnation, the Board may not be able you a license, all the information you have oIher individuals and agencies that are to determine your qualifications and, as a provided in the process of applying for a specifically auIhorized by state or federal consequence, may refuse to issue you a license remains private, with the exception law to have access to the infonnation; . license. If you supply the information of your name and address which will remain individuals and agencies for which law or requested, the Board will be able to process public. legal order authorizes a new use or sharing your application. Private data about you are available only to the following: Board members, staff of the State of Minnesota For Board Use Only Gambling Control Board Premises Permit Renewal Application Amt Pd - Check # _ LG214PPR Printer12/3/2001 I License Num~er: B-02960-002 Effective Date: 7/1/2000 Expiration Date: 6/30/20021 N fO I. . St. Joseph Recreational Assoc ame 0 rg IzatlOn: I Gambling Premises Information Name of the 1tabliShment where gambling will be conducted Laplayette B r & Restaurant Note: Our records show the premises 19 N College Ave is located within the city limits St. Joseph,MN 56374 I County: Trns fæ..-; œ-kß~ÞNM~2- 1 Lessor Information ;¿oN· I Ikge IW~ i pj ~ ~Jó~h MN ?lP??1f :2.L\- Name of the rperty owner (If different): Square footage leased per month: . Rent paid per month: 4t \ I oùö . to Square footage leased per bingo occasion: Rent paid per bingo occasion: Bingo Activity Our records in icatè that Bingo is not c6nducted on these premises. I Storage Information Co Rd 3 St. Joseph, N 56374 Bank Information 1st State Ba k Gambling Bank 25N Colle eAve ¡ Account Number: 108286106 St. JOSePh'r 56374 I On the Ime'1 ¡dod below li~ the name, L..", ""d tit" of at lea" two pc"o", ,",h<,,~od '" ,¡gn _'" and =\œ d,!",,¡to ;md withdrawals for the gambling account. Th~ organization's treasurer may not handle gambling funds. I ame Address City, State, Zip Code Title Kevin Kosel 34294 Co Rd 4 St. Joseph, MN 56374 tß> Michele Glo ia Muske P.O. Box 443 St. Joseph, MN 56374 ~~iY1þt \Ý1~) P(õ\M;:¡ee- I I (Be sure to complete the reverse side of this application) This form will be made available in altern~tive format (ie. large print, braille) upon request. Page 1 of2 (Continued on Back) Acknowledgment Page 2 of2 Gambling Site Authorization Oath 6. any changes in application information . I hereby consent that local law enforcement I declare that: will be submitted to the board and local officers, the board or agents of the board, or L I have read this application and all unit of government within ten days of the commissioner of revenue or information submitted to the board is true, the change; and public safety or agents of the accurate, and complete; 7. I understand that failure to provide commissioners, may enter the premises to 2. 'all other required information has been required information or providing false or enforce the law. . . fully disclosed; misleading information may result in the Bank Records InformatIOn 3. I am the chief executive officer of the denial or revocation of the license. The bo,'" i, ~tho"z'" to iru;p<ct the bank ",..nimOon; ~w records of the gambling account whenever 4. I assume full responsibility for the fair a . "\ _ necessary to fulfill requirements of current lawful operation of all activities to be ~ ð1 gambling rules and law. conducted' / Organization License Authorization 5. I will familiarize myself with tht: laws of Signáture ~fthe chief ex~cutive I hereby authorize the Gambling Control Minnesota governing lawful gambling and officer (DesIgnee may not SIgn) Board to modifY the class of organization rules of the board and agree, if licensed, to license to be consistent with the class of abide by those laws and rules, including permit being applied for. amendments to them; Date _. ...... WE-' . -rt."'f-~. --~. .L~i=Vn~of~!el'Dm~~~~oYVIi}~d~~~nt ~~AeEI royal.. '''''''''''''''~~",'''_~'''''~ç"",'_-; g', ,,"'" " ·-¡ilium· p,. '.. ·seS'd.S:WlUIllllC.JNdJI}1U:s,.we::cnv;mUSt;SJ niUllS';' cöUon'<UlI..t: Yluca.reso utI~-j~~",:ß!1;",\œ-1;e-._1'!:g:¡".·\¡¡"j'!jii¡¡iî'~;jk!i\~ L= '-~'- . ";~4tÚ - ,--~~~~-i~,,,~~<,~¥~'¿~:~~--~~~-Be:,*~1õ~imJ1!~-'1ti.¡~~~:~~ù~!1!g~~~~~1L~_~~l;>~~~~~~T~~W;k~¡l¥~;;PR~ On beh alf ofthe city, I here by acknowledge this app licati on for lawful gambling activity at the premises located within Print name of city the city's jurisdiction, and that a resolution specifically approving or denying the application will be forwarded to the applying organization. Signature of city personnel receiving application I I Title Date For the township: On beh alf of the township, I acknowledgt: . that the organization is applying to conduct lawful gambling Print name ofto\\nship activity within the township limits. A township has no statutory authority to approve or deny an Signature of township official receiving application application (Minn. Stat. sec. 349.213, subd. 2). I I Title Date For the countv: On behalf of the county, I hereby acknow ledge this application for lawful gambling activity at Print name of county the premises located within the county's jurisdiction, and that a resolu tion specifically approving or denying the application will be forwardoo to the applying organization. Signature of county personnel receiving application I I TI~ D~ The information requested on this form (and Your name and address will be public Board whose work assignment requires any attachments) will be used by the information when received by the Board. thatthe)' have access to the information; Gambling Control Board (Board) to All the other information that you provide the Minnesota Department of Public dt:termine your qualifications to be involved will be private data about you until the Safety; the Minnesota Attorney General; in lawful gambling activities in Minnesota, Board issues your license. When the Board the Minnesota Commissioners of and to assist the Board in conducting a issues your license, all of the information Administration, Finance, and Revenue; the background investigation of you. You have that you have provided to the Board in the Minnesota Legislative Auditor, national the right to refuse to supply the information process of applying for your license will and international gambling regulatory req uested; however, if you refuse to supply become public. If the Board does not issue agenci es; anyone pursuant to court order; this information, the Board may not be able you a license, all the information you have other individuals and agencies that are to determine your qualifications and, as a provided in the process of applying for a specifically authorized by state or federal consequence, may refuse to issue you a license remains private, with the exception law to have access to the information; license. If you supply the information of your name and address which will remain individuals and agencies for which law or . requested, the Board will be able to process public. legal order authorizes a new use or sharing your application. Private data about you are available only to the following: Board members, staff of the I . J)e.ttl~e a motio. to reco..Lend the Conn"l approve the one _nndred forty seven (147) reet and ""eept . the fOllorwmg findmgs: ....¡. : RESOLUTION OF FINDING I The request of Bill Nelson for a ~ne hundred forty seven (147) foot variance on the maximum size of a business sign came before the Planning CoIl1l1#ssion at a Public Hearing held on March 4,2002. The purpose of the hearing was to eoust' a vamnce to '¡¡o" ad.. ditiunalsiw>j'ge. The Variance request is to '¡¡o". one,hundred and forty seven foot varnce on the maximum s~ze of a business sign. The property is legally describeq as follows: All that part of Lot One (1) Block (2) of Roske Addition, lying easterly of the fdllowing described line: Beginning at the southwest corner of Lot 1, Block 2 Roske Addition; Thence North 89° 29' 8" East 421.64 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described; Thence North 00° 04'23"; East of the Noh line of Lot 1, Block 2, i Roske Addition andsaid Line there terminating, according to the plat and survey thereof, now on file and ofrecorp in the office of the Stearns County Recorder. S1. Jose h Code of Ordinances 52.14 subd 12 states that the area on one side of all such signs erected on one street frontag of anyone premise shap not exceed fifty (50) square feet. In cons deration ofthe informaìÍon presented to the Planning Commission and its application to the Comprehensive . I . . Plan anCl Ordinances of the CityjofS1. Joseph, the Planning Commission makes the following fmdings: FIND IG: The proposed plan Is consistent with the following provisions: 81. Joseph Code of Ordinances 52.8 subd ( a) states: "That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances' or cond1tions applying to the property in question as to the intended use of thepropcrty that do not apply generally1to other properties in the same zoning district. The exceptional or extraordinary . circumstances must no:t be the result of actions taken by the petitioner. ¡ 81. Joseph Code of Ordinances 52.8 subd. (b): "states that the literal interpretation of the provisions of this Ordinance would deprive the petitioner of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same district I .. . under the terms of this Ordinance". I i 8t. Joseph Code of Ordinances 52.8 subd.(c): "states that granting the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege thatis denied by this Ordinance to other lands in the same district". I 81. Joseph Code of Ordinances 52.8 subd. (d) "states that the proposed variance will not impair an adequate supply ofli&ht and air to adjacent property, or diminish or impair established property values within the surrounding area, or in any other respect impair the public health, safety or welfare of the residents of the City"!, i 81. Joseph Code of O}dinances 52.8 subd. ( e) "states that the condition or situation of a specific piece of I ... .. property, or the intended use of said property, for which the variance was sought, is not of so general or recurrent a nature as to make reasonably practicable the formulation of a general regulation for such conditions or a situation". FINDING: ¡The Planning Commission previouslyhas stated the existing Ordinance is too prohibitive )herefore previous variances have been granted. 1 The otion was seconded by Rassier . Ayes: Utsch, Kal~nowski, Schneider, Deutz, Rassier Nays: Graeve ¡ Motion Carried 5:1:0 ! CITY OF ST.]OSEPH 25 College Avenue North ) PO Box 668 - St. Joseph, MN 56374 320-363-7201 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION ¡ ! Applican: B i ~1I II)S;L scr-tJ Owner: ßI J f lVþ""'¿'s'o·"./ Address:lp,(5) ..- a Ö"-¡" L-:d-. Address: S ...(11\.,/7:. l-o, ~:VJ--l':~J]¡; M tV S"G iJ LJ ") Telepho e (W): ð L}-D ....7'~ Ò-~ ôlð"ð-- ð- Telephone (H): '3?O - 5 1../ ') ~ '2 fOG ,.[\ ~~ ~ Conditional Use Permit Vacation of ROW/Easements '-f-- Variance Non-conforming Use Permit ' Planned Unit Development Rezoning Sign· 1 Subdivision () TOTAl!, FEE $ Date fee received S"5.J D;;lte application received' , I!\,'. PETIT! NER MUST PROVIdE THE FOllOWING ~~~ . A list andlTlailing labels of all property owners within 350 feet of the boundaries of the' property. (This information must be! obtained from the Steams County Auditors Office) 1 · Twfnty-one full size foldødcopies of detail site plans. 93 '. Payment of all associate9 fees must be made in full when application is made. " , C!y of full legal description. ¡ ~' Na rative of projectscopr' " ' I This a plication must be co~pleted in full and be typewritten or clearly printed and must be accompanied by all i~formation and plans required by applicable City Ordinance provisions. Before filing this I appfic9tion, you should conf~r with the Planning Department to determine the specific ordinance and l procedfural requirements ap~licable to your application. A dete mination of completeness of the application shall be made within ten business days of the I applic lion submUæl. A wril~n nolice QI appilcation deficiencies shall be mailed to the ,applicanI within ten businJss days ofapplicationl This I~ to certify that I am mlkin9 appliCation lor /he described action by /he Cily and that I am responsible for all pity requirements Wit~ regard to this request. ,This application should be processed in my name and I am tt;¡e party whom the City should contact regarding any matter pertaining to this application. I have j attach!ed a COpY,. of proof of 9wnership (either copy of Owner's Duplicate Certificate of Title, Abstract of , Title or purchase agreemen\), or I am the authorized person to make this application and the fee owner ha¡:9ned/hiS apPH~rn. I. . ¢7 ,/' i)11tt;), ~ I j-, - CJ z I si9Treol Applicant i Date I Si9ntre of Fee Owner Date itg of St. Josepli. 25 College Avenue NW P.O. Box 668, 51. Joseph, MN 56374 (320) 363-7201 City of St. Joseph Fax: 363-0342 Public Hearing CLERK! ADMINISTRATOR The Planning Commission for the City of St. Joseph will conduct a public hearing on Judy W¡:yrens Monday, March 4, 2002 at 7:00 PM in the St. Joseph City Hall. The purpose of the hearing is to consider a one hundred and forty seven (147) foot variance on the size of a business MAYOR sign. Larry J. Hosch The property is located east of the First State Bank ofSt. Joseph and legally described as all COUNCILORS that part oflot one (1) block two (2) of Roske Addition, lying easterly of the following described line: Beginning at the Southwest comer of Lot 1,m Block 2 Roske Addition; Thence Bob Loso North 89° 29' 58" East 421.64 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described; Cory EW¡:rt Thence North 00° 04' 23; East of the North line of Lot 1, Block 2, Roske Addition and said Kyle Schneid¡:r Line There terminating, according to the plat and survey thereof, now on f:ùe and of record Alan Rassier In the office of the Stearns County Recorder. St. Joseph Code of Ordinances 52.14. subd 12 states that the area on one side of all such Signs erected on one street frontage of anyone premise shall not exceed fifty (50) square feet. The request for variance has been submitted by William B. Nelson; PO Box 42; Long Prairie MN. . Judy Weyrens Administrator/Clerk Note: State Law requires mailed notice to all properly owners within 350 feet of a variance, special use, rezoning or preliminary plat. Publish: February 22, 2002. .' I 1 I I I I ;... I ¡- I U co I . '" I '" I - - 1 _.... c.. ,.. ... ...----- I ..J ..-- - ~ ;:¡ I :;: 7' I I I I I I I 1 I I I \ \ I .:I: 1 1 ¡ :=.. 1 1 .~ o 1 I ... -: I t; ~ ~ 0 \ 6' ,- I ~ I É- - .. j - ~ \ ..".. 1 . -\ \ \ , \ i \ 1 \ I I I \ I i ~,..... . :.." . ..:.... ¡"-'-. -..... '" ! ; i- 40" --! . Î ~ , i I , ! i i j ! ¡ i I I I ! i i ! z i 9 I m \ 'f' i I 0 i U) :::: I ~ () - q ¡¡; <. ~ I (/ i () 8 - 0 i \J) .... j ~ ! "U 0¡ß "'0 ~ S~;,~5: 5" i 00:;' . - 00 ..t: () I 6g a 3 i . 1". I) ~ ! :::. ~ ¡ :::: W "- - .... CJI ";t t: ~ ~ 3 5" J .::r. I) - ! () ! Q. :::: ¡ ~ (I) ! G) o· '" ......(. :::: » "U :¡: (" ¡ ñ ::- '" I) I vt :::: I :::: . uj !t ! !:7"U1')~;a~ ~ ¡ ~!J);!:: mr- :::: - ;;;õ[1):;~~ ~ () I ~ I ,."",O¡¡; "i- I ~~ö:~..~ I ß 1I~~ëõ I ~õoz I' í ¡~(!J1') i "U;S:r: <::¡ ;c.:.ð ~ I š:°6 I Z2... ~ i ¡ "- I I 31 ~~. I ~I ï II~&~ - .' I ¡:! P I i¡~I{ ~! f ;~~~ ~ ! I 1 , , , Deutz mrdea motion to recomrþend the Council· approve the 6.4 right-of-way encroachment for a distance of . twenty rt nnd .ccept the fo~~w;ng firnUngs: . 1 . RESOLUTION OF FINDING Thcreq~st of Ro.nræction LUthb. Chorchfor . Vori.ánC' to.encroach the rigbt'of-waY orca = h.fore fu. Planning Commission at a Public: Hearing held on March 4,2002. The purpose of the hearing was to consider a variance Ito allow an addition to ~esurrection Lutheran Church. . The Variance request is to allow an encroachment of 6.4 fer in the public right-of-way area for a distance of twenty feet. Th. pro~crty i.l.gally described ¡as follows: The property i. located at 610 County Road 2 ."d is legally describ d as follows: That part of the Northwest Quarter Northwest Quarter (NW Y4 NW 14 ) of Section ofTen (10) in T¡ownshipOne HundredTwenty-four (124) North of Range Twenty Nine (29) West, which lies Northeasterly of the Nlrtheasterlyright of way lineofthe Burlington Northern Railroad, Northerly of the North line of Lot 12 of Auditor' Subdivision No.4 and ;Easterly of the centerline oÍDew State Aid Road No; 2, LESS AND EXCEPT the North 2 rods of said NW 1,4 N'Wi 1/4, all in the City of St. Joseph, Stearns County Minnesota. In consiLration of the inforrnatión presented to the Planning Commission and its application to the Comprehensive Plan and! Ordinances of the City Of St. Joseph, the Planning Commission makes the following fIndings: FINDINb: The proposed plan is consistent with the following ~rovisions: ' S1. Joseph Code of Ordinances 52.8 subd (a) states: "That there are exceptional or extÎaordinary circumstances or condit~oIl$ applying to the property in question as to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same zoning district. The exceptional or extraordináry circumstances must not ,be the resú1t of actions taken by the petitioner. FINDING: The property in question is triangular in shape therefore creating some building . restrictions. 1'he denial of the variance would create a hardship to the property owner as the building coul~ not be expanded and would no longer meet the needs of the property owner. St. Joseph Code of Ordinances 52.8 subd. (b):. "states thatthe literal interpretation of the provisions of this I Ordinance would depriye the petitioner of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same district under the terÌns of this Ordinance", St. Joseph Code of Ordinances 52.8 subd.(c ): "states that granting the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any sp~cial privilege that is denied by this Ordinance to other lands in the same district". St. Joseph Code of Ordinances 52.8 subd. (d) "states that the proposed variance will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property, or diminish or impair established property values within the surroundinglarea, or in any other respect impair the public health, safety or welfare ofthe re~idents of the City". I St. Joseph Code of Ordinances 52.8 subd. (e) "states that the condition or situation of a specifIc piece of property, or the intendfduse of said property, for which the variance was sought, is not of so general or recunent a natùre as t~ make reasonably practicable the formulation of a general regulation for such conditions or a situatibn". The re ommendation is conting1ent upon the following: . I I I I The City Engineer verify that the proposed encroachment will not interfere with future utility. or street . improvements. The motion was seconded by 1<-alinowski and passed unanimously. I I I I 1 I I I CITY OF ST. JOSEPH ,-J,., tí 0'0 25 College Avenue North l.it;"; .. ?. . <.:?A: J/~ fr:r' . - PO Box 668 --- ) St. Joseph, MN56374 I 320-363-7201 I DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICATION AppHca t: Owner: I Address: !PIO OJ 2- Addres~: ~::i'b '3 7 Teleph ne (W): Telephone (H): 32.0 "-3· 42. 3L Conditional Use Permit Vacation of ROW/Easements "- Variance Non-conforming Use Permit Planned Unit Development Rezoning Sign . Subdivision TOTAIl. FEE $ Date fee received Date application received -I' PETITIONER MUST PROVIDE THE FOllOWING · A Ii~t and mailing labels of all property owners within 350 feet of the boundaries of the property. (Thfs information must be ¡obtained from the Stearns County Auditors Office) · Twenty-one full size fold~d copies of detail site plans. · Pa~ment of all associ9teq fees must be made in full when application is made. · COrY of full legal description. . Na rative of projecfscopé. . I This a~PliC~tiOn must be combletedin full and be typewritten or clearly printed and mustbe accompanied i I by all i I formation and plans rrquired by applicable City Ordinance provisions. Before filing this ¡ apPliça~on you should confe,r with the Planning Departmentìo determine the specific ordinance and : proced ral requirements applicable to your application. A dettination of comPlete~ess of the application shan be made within ten business days of the I appilc tion submittal. . Awr~n notice of application denclencies shan be maned ill the applicant within ten I busine s daysofapplication. , . I· '.. . / I This is to certify that I am making application for the described action by the City and that I am responsible for aU City requirements withiregard to this request. This application should be processed in my name and lam tie partywhom the City; should contact regarding any matter pertaining to this application. I have ! attach d a copy of proof ofo~nership (either copy of Owner's Duplicate Certificate of Title, Abstract of Title 0 purchase agreement), or I am the authorized person to make this application and the fee owner . has al 0 signed this applicati:on. I I I I. I , ("J 2.. - l :3 ..- c::.~ z... Date Signa ure of Fee Owner Date .' ...... .'- , ï . ::I I - ~ o~ ¡ ø" . :1 ¥ " ... ~ ~ ;II -< t -------- --. J.iR01:) l.Vo:I ":)xu.11X!I ~ ~------------ ,.', .. i .. ~. ~ .: "" Dº o~ nr I~ :z ------ I eO ' n ~'C )0 I di ~~ · :¡;: I - - -Fit -J~-:: I:~ r 0 I ::I .. ~~ c; I r-z: 0111 ~ )0 0-1 " ..~ I n I Ii J ;II ~ 0 I :I J I 0 - .¡ '. i e) 1r4- 1/02 , ¡ ?) \~' ;bi~ "X" G<Vl-M..... -<.41 ....~'724(J ~ ~.7i:h /fU#4lÀ'cf ""'^ q,J,J.,,-w4 lJJ iL.L~ \. I~ /~ '7 ~L .~ · .. l .. ..... ..... Á4 [" ..j. .. ... . . ... .. '<--' ~ ,p ~,~~ I~¡'.'.·j r····· '1 ~~ '~~j~ r ~.~.~..~..;b~j~ ~ ~i.~··~~'4~ 'ì . þCe-r. t ¡ r~ ~ ~l, '. j , . lîJ~ .~ ...,----~~---------------------- -- -- -- I j~~~~ I !~..~ I .~ I I ¡ I. I I 1 I ¡ . îf:Jj ofSt Jqsepfi 25 Col1t:gt: Avt:nue NW P.O. Box 668, St. Joseph, MN 56374 (320) 363-7201 City ofSt..Josepb Fax: 363-0342 Public Hearing CLERK! ADMINISTRATOR The Planning Commission for the City of St. Joseph will conduct a public hearing on Judy Wt:yrens Monday, March !4,,2002at 7:20 PM in the St. Joseph City Hall. The purpose of the hearing is to consider a ,\ariance to allow the expansion of Resurrection Lutheran Church. The MAYOR proposedexpansionwill.encroach the public right of way by 6.4 feet on the northwest Larry J. Hosch comer. The encroachrnent will be for a distance of 20 feet. . , CQUNCILORS The property is lbcatedat61OCounty Road 2 and is legally described as follows: That part Bob Loso of the Northwest Quarter Northwest Quarter (NW Y4.NW Y4) of Section ofTen (10)in Cory Ehlt:rt Township One F,l.undred Twenty-four (124) North of Range Twenty Nine (29)West, which Kyk Schneider li~s Northeasterly of the Northeasterly right of way line ofthe Burlington Northern Railroad, Alan Rassier Northerly of the North line of Lot 12 of Auditor's Subdivision No.4 and Easterly of the centerline of new State Aid Road No.2, LESS AND EXCEPT the North 26rods of said NW Y4 NW 1/4, all ihthe City of S1. Joseph, Stearns County Minnesota. The request hasþeen submitted by Resurrection Lutheran Church, 610 County Road 2, St. . Joseph MN· 563.74. Judy Weyrens ! Administrator qIerk I I Note: State la~ requires mailed noticetöall property owners within 350 feet of a variance, special use or ve;triance request. I I ¡ I ! I I. I 1 , I I I . ~.:'::~.: I·~::~':-::~··?~·' '. ..;:' ¡--:-.- '-'. ...- \ "~"'_~'''"'''':''''I_-''' ._. \ ,'-:-"1-'-;-' "." " ~. I \ \ . . . ..-..,"" ">, 1"-"'''; : , .. "7;" ~~._., I ..~ ~ . J Q]-. I l'. -," .. .: . ,:" -~ .;.-f'~:: ='-; -~ I¿~-:" . ...1-:.... " I ... " I _..,__.__... ~ I . - I . .-.------ . .-.;. ..-- I , I ~ -.-----. I' '\ ¿r ~ ,I . I ..:" 1/ \ ~. ';:i:~ I !.~ ',!.: '..' II' " .,1 \ ~. I œ·\IIIIIII~ ~: J~ I, I :~. \111111'/' ,/.. __\JÇ"" 0J/ I , ,'_ _.... ~VV\.Y-· / ' ' I ," '"'''''' ,0 //: I J 1,,1 '..:.: I I 1 , I I I I . . ..'/' I \ 1\\.r7-., ~íí : \ /i /... I I \' Cf0'~ / I 1 /'/ ! \ .0'\..l~'\k@· ¡ ... : I ~ o~~;--~.. .: U~/ i /.' ¡ , ~' ,,' ,'. I ¡ // ' \ ~:---' ,-,".:- -X ',(~ - I' . .. / : , ~ ,~___' ~; I I y.' I ~ \ §:j . - : ! (' /../ ¡ _ _____.__fT\ n~%~\ /~~ i ¡q n¡·)\ ! ~I ~~ ~~~,,\I I .1 ' , \::;::> ~~,?~-.--L- . ---,' / , ' 1 ,........,~ç.: ç;...:?' -- -' / I ! ; (C¡~ \ IJ~~~\! ~~."""!"";h7T-¡ : J ' I ¡i:L! 'f::::i'~~~ =-: '7 / JJ' ' ~l U I ~.~~ :lUi':.'!I¡~;¡¡¡- .f· ./ ~,,,,& ¡ O n I \ í,............ ,....-j-'- ~ ;: - --'0- -~. -.-\11 I ' \1 \ \ç:::..-', ....-.-~.Ç:::; ~ ~ ==-- -;--ÿ , / Cb ~ I : , .. ..<é.-6 e~ __r":J = '¡ .. "- 1 1 .. . ~~:~:::= vO =:;--: " \ I \ II \ \ \ II ,..--,~' -:::,;=:::::C¿ ~ ~: : ' ! ' .~.' .\ .11 p,. ~_:-~J} C!J ì! 7'=- ~. ". v ! I I H' U ,~, . '", - , . I / , II . '\ .' I I ~~ I,I,I!! L;illÜ\¡-J.!,-~-,m'1 :--;---/'.'.., U¡ ¡ II ¡ \ \ ! .11' 1'\ ' , ~, " ,- , ,- - ,.. .. ! 1'\\\\\\ =====~=._==:nl ;----f I~ I 1'"""", 11' I . I I 00 \ ' '._ r-=:-.. ...._.. ,II G." :..:' :'~" · '; " .. ,;"j ;: : I lí'l1\\\f-===r=m nil' ;-".!,:~~"" -: I 'I ,,~1== ='" 'I. . ' ; - .. ., = --: ' \ š' I: I \ I \ 1-<--- -:-'1 r:·--:.......: I . , I I , ~I , I ' ' ,;:::] =" · I 00\ ¡;.~7 ,~=- '¡'I i!I'¡I'I.··~rl ~ I I' '.'__' -I 1111 I . :::"'" .. ~ l ,., ,.~.. - .. ~ - I . '.' I I 'I II-' . ',"." I .., j.' .,;-:--, I < - I I \1111 í ¡"N.c...-:-. ,- ,,:n \, : ¡ I ': ' ! , ' , ¡ .: ~ ~/;:] ¡ r-.' ,¡ ~;~_ '~ .-___.. ,~u___cC~. - I '-W/ ~ I I \ ail "~. ". " '---j I \: [I 1"- -L---' -------\ "'....:;;[ ~ Z -, .' III f "~. . . - .- I I i '-4""""=-'" ._,.' I --: ---, ....-.... I _ ..", ' ~'-; ~ .. ,.... I ~ ~ .. ,,' , " I g I.~.::. ,~:_.:~,-i\ ¡~ i " I ~~: \ l ~ ü""-' '~~ 4 I I I - .- I I "" IIII~\-· ¡ II . I I ,..,," - , ¡ \ I " I , " I. I r-:"": \--1. :: \ I """ I ." .. ~ ' , , ! I I ....., , I ""II"¡;;:-¡¡----- I I, \ \ ~ j .. "'_ " "" " ~ --.J ' " I '" I \ I I I W.I , I' ¡ " I ¡-.. . n. . u' \ \ I; :: ¡' i = ) þ ...,-" ,,""'-'-" " .., ...,.a) '.,r-o'::--r-; I I I I I I ! I I î' ¡ I ì II (/: :: ¡ "., " , ,"" " .. C-'- ^ ' I _" ~ II I I I I I i 1 Y ~I \ : ,,~ ; 1 G rI---ill.LL'-'~ i '.'." "'If ,',I I i I "... . ¡ i pl,llllln:'-i I'~__~~~ I ' " " ' I R~-...' ,_I ~ -I I' '~ I I HlllluR \===== <:::.e:::::; . ~.~_\.~\.¡-~~ \~.~,n ! i! ¡ I I 1111118J\ \ I I~::::-J\ : !i~ : \' li..J I I 1 I I I l.LW I I IIII-JH f-+-J ~ 1_1.[____ ~ : ' ~ïTlîr-~---",,=--~ n \ \ ~ ~ I : ----------' I \ ~-¡¡¡L...Jn~' I II I.I~' I ~~ " : . : '\ ---;------------ !. I . \....t\f.' I \_U I :: : I ~ \ : I ~ I I 1 ç:;---¡ I ¡- , , P, ~/~~:Þ~:-'I'" ,I, I : H ~,.! ,. /I. \.,' ~ P I '~'R: 11/ \. i i ",_ - ' I ¡ '\ . I _ 1-' I ¡,-j. 1\ W ¡,! ' ' ' : _ \R~.~_~,,! I ¡j~ 1111~lJ: ¡hi: ~ \ \ \ I I I \ I I \ \ I \ \:: I \ I , I µ.j : I /:; ~ I I It I I I I I ' . '" I I 11""';-" Yil \"~' ~"i §~~ íYn¡!,L,J¡ \ 1·\·\\' 111'\'1\'11 ' r ,.' I~ i, ,I I" I -< - I ~:---! 1 ~ ~ ...._ \ __.__...._ ____ ~... ~·__I_~·~~ :!Y I \ \ \ I \ 1\ \ ¡-I"I""\ \! CI I ~1rr" I II (") I '- I I - I - I -1 I : ~~ . r-- I I ~ I . ~ 1- I I I ~\' -- \ \ . " . , I ' f-..... \ '< r--j , I I '/~L-// I \ / /' I '1'ir;/ \ II , / .: II ~ \ ! . I 2.10 1'01 aU:2.11 W CON"OCTO TO CITT ----- FIRST AVENUE NOFn'¡'¡!:lAST ~UTUTY '- - - - +---- ----- - '-- _ __I~S_~ W . . -j[- -'--' ".R.... __.........~....... ~_.~.~-.,._....~.. -""- ·.._...R....._._~._. / ~.................... f / ........ f f f / I .' ........... ! :<P,,/ .... >-.... ¡¡,-o/ ~ ~./ ~ ¡¡,-'<,/ »~ ~,."" .... 10,' Q W/ n¡ I ~ ..,. "Iii ".:f'/ .. Y'O¡¡'-/ ~ I ~ CJ *' ... p/ :"Y',?,- 0' "S '" ... .... ~. ,,0.,/ tv ~ ;?,/ . " .. (i!/ / 4:)",./ I .... tvo . -..... .... .. ~ /' I .. .. ~ "'~ '1 .' ) .. 1 "- '""" .. ~ '. / '. ,/ ~·C.d/ ... 0' ... .. 1;¿ NOTES, .... -", .,' . ",. ,/' .. I ~~..," 0'<,; 0" -0 ..~ ... ,/ ... LINe. / :I CUT TO REMAIN. ~NOUS . TO REMAIN. -. SIDeWALK TO RENAlI'!:. - LINE TO REMAIN" THIS AREA. _XIST. TREes THIS' ARE!A AS NECESSARY. o ;;~I~~: .I:~;- A N '1" ACCESS AISLE TO R MAIN. '1" PARKIN" STALLS TO, REMAIN. ::e. rTOOp. TO BE F'ROVIDED BY OWNER. LL TO ¡¡¡EMAIN. NIT ARY SEWER. ¡ .......-.... ".. . ......... ,.,.'_....~ ...". " . .. ", .......-........--., ...... .... ".. ¡ CONTRACTOR NOTE: These plans are depicted 10 the best of the Arc and understanding of existing conditions. Any d during demolition or construe lion should be brou' j of the Architect for further review, ." _._M. .___.._...._.H__.__.....__.....__.._..__......... "'__" ..._,,,_.. ._... I . I i 4SeHI 1200 25th Avenue South, P.O. Box 1717, St. Cloud, MN 56302-1717 320.229.4300 320.229.4301 FAX Novel:r6,2OO1 ' architecture . engineering . environmental . transportation . RE: Sf. Joseph, Minnesota i Railroad Crossing First Ave NE ! I SEH No. A-STJOE 0201.00 14 1 I I I Ms. Ju I y Weyrens City A1ministrator City ofl Saint Joseph ! 25 COlrge A venue North I P.O. B x 668 I ! S1. Joseph, MN 56374-066~ 1 Dear J dy: ! crOSSIn at FIrst A venue N~ by the MIll. The survey you provIded me prepared by Dave Regan for Mark ambert, shows MrJ Lambert's property extending completely across First Avenue NE. Thoug the crossing at CoIlege A venue would be subject to the road easement, my guess is this is not th~ case at First Aven~e NE where the. old crossing was abandoned (though we still have . utilitie there). In view of t*is, ¡. don't. see much sense in pursuing the crossing unless we still have the easfment, or unless we¡ acquire at least the easterly 66 feet of the Lambert parcel. I believe it would re good for the City!to acquire the entire Lambert parcel so there is also ample room for the. Wobegon Trail Facility. ' I am c pyingJohn Schererjon this letter, and ask that John look into this issue. Specifically, I ask that JOI detennine whether or not we still have the crossing easement, and advise on the acquisi ion of the Lambert parcel. Please dvise on how to probeed. Thanks. smc~ .. I ~ (~~ // . 1 ~~eph . Bettendorf, P .E. 1 . City E gineer I 1 djg Enclos , re: Survey of Lambert Property c: Jo I Scherer, City Attorney (w/enclosure--Iarge copy) Bo Loso, City ofS1. J~seph (w/enclosure) Dic Taufen, City ofS1.lJoseph (w/enclosure) . w:\stjoe\coIT\1 070.I~city IT crossing*).doc I Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc. . Your Trusted Resource . Equal Opportunity Employer I I 1 I I " . lLJ lJ...::) O~ lLJ ~:'>>.. O'«..J n:: V)f--lLJ~ ~V)~f-- lLJ-n::lLJ f-- OlLJ XlJ...lJ...n:: lLJO~f-- V) >"lUf-- ..J~V)C n::-'«<t lU..Jl1JO :t: :t:n:: f--I-f--..J n::V)n::- 0q::0'« ~lU:2:n:: w_ -- - -6~H- oïÎ 1-01 -, J3< '.;í MN- J"'/I- M¡¡-;¡Õ - 3N 11-¡;;'3 -- -;1 - -- _u ~~7 ----\\ -~- - u -- - ----- ul- / 0<{." ' , }. ~~ ~ Oº-~~.Q N 1_ o ~ "3 a / ~ .. ~.... . <v 1 N '0 o '7 ,,~~ " 'AV' lS/<> (\ 1 / « ~.C) :i I ,," <J ~ 4b <)' ;', II- ~",'~ ,r I ~C) \>. \:)' () I,. J J ll.l &¡;¡: .: lu " ,,0 ' 0 .; I lL. \? \. . Y " , :' I <:] æ <:1 ~ ": '~ :; i "" I ~ I~ 0 ~ - 0/ - : ~- <:1: / c.; I - u, a (f) / C) ~ ' /1 99 I . ~ ~ l1J ~ C"'J a ' h :::J V) ~.. l1J __ Q\ I \) ~ . V) ~::¡ !¡! --: ": ~. V) , \J 0 <t lUm <t '0 lr) () I ~ ' 0 V) V) V) ~ \-. lr) «) ,: I. 0 0- ::) V) ~'Lu ' -.J - " ~ UJZ;;~' ' t f.......,' I CC-l UJ ~ Z "'J' ',- '0 ,,'v I '^ 0..; / ¡ 1-- Q. 0 '- ç ',ç.iì ct: V) --a "'J / 'Y" .- ~ l1) J "I lU >- ,,~ " ""'0 - - 0/ - ,,-- '" - -, - 1-' - f--- V) o<t::):!::lU dt' -, U. I n:: 0:: 0 .. ........" .1J \) -~ LL ~ t-.. '0 -._. ~ .",iV / V) V:> ~ V) ¡ ."'\_ :;: , . "1.. - - >_ % "" <') . S' "0 '" <c <..J I I n:: (.J <...:) -" ............. -- I ' <t % lU ~ 0:: 0 (\, I ' '0 ¡. OJ ~ lU _0:: ~ ~ ~ ; I" / -J m '" ~ ~ ~ "'_ __ /__ CD ...J i V) "I--.. 0 0 0 " !! Lu l -- __ I, ' :t. "!::==" v)<': / /. i l- V) V) ,. ~ ", -. l1J G l1J ' ~, lJ... I--..I!J I--.. ~ ~ ' 3nN 3/\ 'tf P<) 0 ~ ~ §E ~ __ "'J ~ 'v~1 ~ 0- - __ ,___ _ ,___ _ , r') <': 0 ~~ ~;" ,";; ~~ ~/ a""A?---' ~-'Tw ! I 1 I- 793 7 (OJ¡~ - \-. <t I--.. <': lU / ~ '? ~\:) / J I ,V) I a ¡ ! - 0:: 0 / / ~ I I I ! ~ I ~,I i / /' , / , ' \Q I : I! ¡ : i , ~ '" ¡ I ; , 'I .I .<...: ~ ~ I. ! I (, 0.5' - - <..J - '0 I .1 ;..... I -.. ¡ ~ 0 V) / "., r -J ì[ 1 ~ U) , ~, l.J / ":v. / '. CC II 0 j f:r> 0 / ~, /'\~1 0 - ~ 0 -.J :;,: / ;J , '\>-<v/~ ' "U)- --- -j ~ t- V) CC () / ~ . '\/ ,~ ~, -.- :2: ''v / ,I - , / "-0 ->,,;-0- ~ I ¡ a :...J! 0 >- / 0;::: 't-\/', a lu I -J -- / lU-- 6~ - I r -- i f ~.. a , <':C' - / .. -- . .J - C) ,. / I I - ,- -, f /.- () -J<t :::.::: 99 I <:( \-.:¡: <..J v)\-. <::> <t'O -J lU V) Q) lJ.... 00 V) <':0 O-J ~ V). ;(:(\ u.J f-:.:: xU lUO ..J >-m ..J n::. l1J'<t :t:- h n::\-. 00 <': _J .. . . Z C 0 I]>~ o ~ ~ ~ . . éÕ ~ ~ N ~ ....Jo. J\J ....Jo. b ....J,. Q. .....Jr. ~ I\) ....Jo. -1rr. N ~ b ....Jr. cE' ~ c.... . . .- ~ .......:;' (J) 0 Z CD !II (/) !!! !: Q. - 3 ,. 3 -{ en -{ en CD-g. ~ -{Q)~ ~ ~ -{Q)~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~g~~~ww~~~õ ~ ~ ~g~~~ww~~~õ ~ ~ ~!: (/) ~~CD ~ ~ ~~CD ~ en !:~ - -~ <!) Q)~ <!) 3~ ::¡ (') ~ (') ~ CD ~ 2 íD 3(/) o !II 3 !II(/) ~ ~~~~~~~~o~~ ~ ~~~~~~~~o~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~~~cD~~WOw~ w ø ~~~~cD~~WOw~ w ~ ~ !II -..~~~co~ ~w~g¡ . -..~~~CO~ ~w""g¡ ~ ~ < N W CD .0 . ~ .0 ~ CD N CD CD $ ~ro $ ~ro ~ ::¡ ~ $ ~ ~~ > ~ ~ ~ Ã~ .. -.. ~~~~~ ~ +(/) _ -.. ~~~~~ .... +(/) - ~ ~w~~~ w - ~ - ~ ~w~~~ w - ~ ~ ~ ~~"".o~ .0 ~æ ~ ~ ~~"".o~ .0 ~ffi~ m ~ ~~~~t ~ õ~ ~ ~ ~~~~t ~ õ~~ 8. w .... -.. .... ~ .... ¡ .~ ....-.. ,-:: 11.1'0: ,;-"' D' ~ '; > '.,'iiili...,.".li,...·.·..,' 1::..1..··. ,m'i"i YD.',.".'.'" .i".·.·.·¡t'/iim..·.,. ,.......,.', X?D\....,'" ~ ~ :¥;'w ~ 11 !; ~ I~I¡¡::¡I,~T ~ ~ ::¡i,t rm I~ ., it"'} ., .' ID¿t ~W ~ ~i~:~i~i¡1 ~~~',., :; $ <" ~ () .....Jr,. .., -1rr. 0 ~ CD ~ ~~~~~$~~ ~~ m ~ ~~ ~~_~~~.....Jr.W~ æ wco CD w~ Ø....~WOWcDW~~ Q. .o~ ~~ww~~~ ~O .... ~~$o-..ww~ø~ a.o c; - C> 0 -.. N <» w .r;' .... CJ1 ,',., 0 ~ .~.~.. ~1!~~=1~=~:1 -.. il'Ø '<' 'Nil IN) ~. 'IØ'I'Ø IN)I'Ø ~ø CD -.. :¡;¡; liÌi .' .' ,. ". .. 7@ ., 7R 'n? ........,. (') i~ ~ ill ¡~ ,I!!'I,~ ~.,i'. ~ - ~ :..~we~.llj ~ ~ _...~.~.~I. co - ~~ $1~1í'l~íl,~¡i! ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ cD ~ cD W ~w >3 cD o ~ ~ ~ ~~ Q) ~.~ ~ ~b~~ ~ ,¡sæ ~ ,ro n,! ii',,"""D; i..,. .G)~::i/"" ¡n ¡"'!i!"o" o ; ~ii:i e e ~::;~:' 0 '" ~ .. ,'" .. i"'''''¡,'' .0 ;<» :Ç! ,~ .0 ,~ !Ø) ;ø ,~;, ~ ~ $ $ $$ ~ . -1rr. W -1rr. -1rr. W-lrr. m ~ .....Jr. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ m3 -1rr. o 0 ~ -.. ~co Q) CO ~$$~$~-..$ CD~ ..~. 0 ,~.~. 0 ~ IIN'¡i'O '""D , ¡,ii' ¡Wt ,'.' . ..... .' "'~ ~ ~m ~ ". ~ ~ k61R ~ ~ ~ rB~gEI~ N ~ ~ ¡ ~~i;¡~I:~ ~ -1rr. ~ ID ID()ro ~ -1rr. w... ...(J)_~3 CÑ .0 -...... ~ Q) WcD $$$$~$-.. ro -11iI''''OOOO'~O:~' ,'.' .....'. .......' ¡~. G).......";'... ~ ~ i 1_ ~ $ $ ~ ~ $ $ $~$> ~ ~$$~~W~~3-{ ~ ~$-..~~~-..~~~OO ~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~~CID ~ ~~cD~co~-..~~~:J- (j)CO~~w-..CO~(j)w.- .þ.o.....OJCO............~-.¡O m 1IIIIIiiili m . MEMORANDUM Date: March 5, 2002 To: Honorable Mayor Hosch and Members of the City Council From: Judy Weyrens Re: Graceview Estates The Planning Commission recommended the Council approve the final plat of graceview estates with the following contingencies: 1. Procurement of a utility easement from the College of St. Benedict along the southern edge of their property for the installation of water and sewer lines. 2. Procurement of a temporary ingress/egress easement from the College of St. Benedict along the northern edge for construction traffic. 3. Approval of the City Engineer If the City Council approves the fmal plat, the Council will also need to authorize John to draft the Developer's Agreement. . This afternoon I talked to Jim Fredricks regarding the temporary easement for construction traffic and the utility easement. The College is willing to sign immediately the utility easement, but not the temporary easement along the northern edge of their property. Jim stated that the College believes the road is not needed and they are still negotiating with Centra Care and do not want the road to be an issue. As an alternative the College is willing to incorporate a temporary easement along with the utility easement. I discussed this matter with Bob and Rick and they would make accommodations for such. As of this memo I have not discussed the information with Joe Bettendorf. On Thursday afternoon I have a scheduled meeting with Jim Fredricks and Sue Palmer to try and negotiate the northern access. John, Joe and Larry will be attending the meeting as well. We will update the Council after the meeting. - I -.- H3J.VM. ~ ,~....._._.... ..-" J ------=.O~ () ~.~L-çra-1L' ;j IIO~_II ~ "= ~~ 13$ lH3I'fnNOrc NOOI S310ÞGCJ 0 _ _ _ _ _ --..-'!ì ts:~~l~içl~~rrj ~~.=::::~ cIOfX) : =: 310d æMOd ~ lÐ.:J NJ ~ - - - - - ---~ 8L£9Ç Nn 'SO~ )4n't'S = SiNOU'ú'ÐfN üœ "VlOS3NND'I NO 3iYJ$ 310d ~ .<.::_" OQZ 00 ~ 0 ::::::¡ SJ.N3I'(3SY.3 JJllun ONY 3~ l.:J S .~ mws ONZ iol:t ~ ~OtZ:~ JHfdII()Q )"t)H¡tG "B)X3 3H1. JO SM.V1 3H1 H3QN'1 ~S otH1 V fIN I J.'t'K1 t.sw HOly:) 0 ~ a:u:Jl(X) NO H.IJ!iCIHS Sf S)OdIßS S3PIOH AW ~NI J.:()HN3)(l:I3H NMC.IHa Iœa-tLZ--œ£ 3NOHdJU1 :J'MUW1 O~~l?~.~N~l~~~ ~ ~ (~~)~g:~=~~ Loœ'~N>N~ns ~==-~ !M)=~!S~ ' :sMIJHW SY S3Nn x:JI'8J.§ Ðf«fIrII 0IC031 ',_ S3:J1NJ3S ..uJl1lI1 :>S»'I KtHi~ - - __ _ (~:'~ l2t~~S~ ~r~c~ ~¡~i== ~t~>i~l=~ _ ._ __ _ __ __ _ __ __ _ _ d].'_l'{ --- MðlH 'Ntt~ 'ç~ ~ IAðlY 'Htt.x '~I MQtJ.03S "j! 3~uì3nCJv¡' ~ " 3H1'..J ~. ~ W·), ~.~ .tœiir'lliJi'.ø.- HdJSO' 'JS "" .........u' £ ¡ 'oog No 6g 90 69 S -- -1mSOr 'JS "" -'-~~ . AllOSJJIII'I3J.'fI()dOOO JH3ftd013/OO 1IIUOOS3!I JH\ <BIMJ ~z W5UdUlSd "MKU~-y 3NOZ ÐHINULtH15D(j ~m ¡¡;;i ~!i1 f'~ i z o q 01 ~ q :ii -7!:::- To the City Council //'''''" /.: " Re: Graceview Access Earlier today we met with representatives from the College of St. Benedict to discuss \ acquisition of the access road along Kennedy School as well as the utility easements on the south edge of their property. They were ofthe position that they would grant the utility easement and temporary construction access only if the City abandoned the concept of a road along Kennedy. The temporary access road would be on the south edge of their property. After some discussions, St. Ben's softened their position somewhat and would be agreeable to terms similar to the following: ~,,,= 1. The City would not commence eminent domain proceeding s to acquire the LIIMK1J 3. Kennedy access road for a period of at least two years. (00,0;0)-/'------ OO'oos 3.0l.60J 2. The College would granbac.permanent utility easement and a temporary :'" :~~ ~;r: construction access easement along the south edge of their property. 3. During the next two years, the College and City will work together to try to find a location for the Kennedy access road that will fit the development plans of the College. The road will link with Graceview at the location shown on the W' preliminary plat. "EtEE]j 4. The costs associated with the road and utilities will be assessed to St. Bens based lJN/l 01 upon their use to the improvements. Hook-up fees will be consistent with City ITtIJ policy. If the College doesn't want the road in two years, the City can proceed 'L.E:2:LJ- with condemnation. If an agreement can't be reached on the College's ~? 0 ¡- contribution to the project costs, the City reserves the right to assess as [[!::D , appropriate. lJNII , (.oa 'N Advantages: We are no worse offthan we are now. If things aren't cleared up within ~ two years, the City can condemn and assess. If the meantime, as the Colleges decides what to do with their property, we may be able to reach an agreement that will avoid those issues. Since the road will probably not be constructed until the second phase is '%%s:r:W..:"fl built, the delay does not adversely affect the City. In the meantime, the City remains on ~~v.= good terms with the College and may have better leverage later to negotiate a favorable .ó ¡¡ \ ,a deal ~I ~~r' . ~ ,,,,.,,,, Disadvantages: Issue is not totally resolved. No firm agreement as to who pays for the ~ . road or the improvements (although we would not get that now). Other Issue.. . Developers contribution toward road costs. dV'1'I )J.lNI:JIA One suggestion would be to establish an escrow fund to hold funds contributed by the developer as the land is developed. An agreed upon amount per acre is contributed to the ~"'t:'~~~:'='~~',\,,~ fund as the final plats are approved. The money would be applied to the road and utilities uo 1J.¥Id 0 o¡ ¡,eel O~£ tQJOU Itnp ~ ~J o;z: "¡MAl. " -':,..... '::s~ ~o~~...~ to the extent not covered from other sources. If the road is not built with 7 years, the 3N IICß WU4 ~ œ£L '\88M. A\l\UI.LI LL -.&lðep sa IJIM "'¡cd_.,_......_p,...'""""'~""¡ø.. . d h d I - eo .......... '" ..... .... _1 '., money IS retume to t e eve Oper. it' 't/l3N ..liMN IiCA þO }JOd ¡£KU :ldJ:))(] 0tN SS31 '0} .........,..._ u _ (ISZ) __ _ ~ (t~J) JI"IOš-4uu.L p&IpWIH ~ ~.1 UI '(sn) t»eYIJ 10 (tolL3M ..liMN) "vono ~I,ßJON etA jO .-qJDRO ~ -- puo ~ JO ~ MA 0} }M Lt"BLa uon:»s PfM tRJON a(ß ðwp IUM a:x*ß :~ PfÞI JD .-woo \&l*R. ~ ~ it"O££L P NUO}IJP I) atllI }IØ] Ptot: 6uosD ~ ~~OL ~OOf.A.JOHeot.IMß~P1o.lO. II4J 0} }M ~'eLi D ~ D :,./I.3N t/tJH ptoe. ¡o MIl ~-'- ~~3N ~;"3~~II~~~r: tf~~·C:L~. D t/tiN to/LiM PfI» jO MIl ~ IMß Ißl.a l4Þ.lOd ¡;&OJ I gz 88¡nutW 60 MJðep 00 I.AI"IOS KIUeI.A ~p .-q o:¡ p to ðup.w¡ðeq jl'J \UiOd eq. o¡ IMI ooç jl'J ~ D 't/UH - tßJOH "A 6uoto 6uJ.C*l ~ W 1.10 ~i ~ :t/L3N ~J;"~=~~~~:~~ (.,,) "'.J-_1 ........ OUO ..........1 'I '(.,) -.... þO bh3N t/L~) nµono ~ Mß ID '»"'000 ~ 'fO&*R ~J O£ ~3 &I.A OH! SS31 ~=~}(:~ ~~~~ .' ~.i~1 (*4IUf'H IMJQ ~J. Ui (Ot) uti! p (t ) .MqJDnC) ~ -.&A 10 ~ÞnO ¡aM1(V\ NOUdI>IOS3C _ . n --~'::;..:f.L 'VI--s::r7PT3///:::JJP"èfCl :TCFIV7cT-XèJTT1í1TrV17JêCl- I . 0__. 1-:;:: 00 -t;:O -t -:r: -1>.111 ';:0 r- UJ-< r- 0111 Í).;: ;><;-t Ir¡ N:;:: '(J) - 1-0 0:;:: V) 00 .'r¡ to (J) r- IT] ()¡:t:. 0 -;V) () :r:-t )::.. 66 I :::J;: Þr- -I I I ..) I /, CJ- ' \.J '" r- - -, þ. -- .. i ~ /"",' CJ :;:: , / \.) -- -,~ ;\'6 ;: /0 / -- r- I ,." \::J r- I I \::J I ! /0 ^'~ ~'r¡ ,~ I --¡ 0 I r- i i -~,J -.. f ~ - I ¡ ~~'y~<~" ; ~~ ./ c), OJ 0) ~ -¡ 1 - ---- -.. r- 0 - 0 c_ J ! 0 '" / '0 I I l)J 0) / $0 ~~' / 0) ~ i (') i J L r- J ^ (J) 0 r I I , /. I ¡ --- (') - - , '- -t ::-::- i . I I <J / I I i I I\) I I /~ ;' , I I j I I I ()) / ~ I I G..¡ I , -¡ / 0 , I I I =r:: ::u . / Co, ~ / ;:0 I ¡ -1 / .' - : \::J I <.t) ! I /' /;.. ~\S ; IT] , , () :;:: I _ ,,' ~_,_.=-.. _. /~~ ~'L [ J -t l I- i . 0 -; I '4 c,. :'Y / Þ -t ~- ÇQLL£G£ '1" ~~ I ~~ I' 1-' r" CJ - -- :!:;:U () N-' ~ IT] Þ IT] ~ '?' ~ /^- IT] ~ ;:0% A VENUE '- - "- 0 ;><;0 0 Lo.I ~' -; iT¡"'i 'r¡ Lo.I -'¡ ~ / '" 111 eJIT] -- V) (J) -t 1 . ~ ~V) iC: ~ :I: ,." / - '- -.. I , -, / 0 i 00 ...,...... (J) ~ :r:N i r- , -NŒJ c: I OJ "/ . · IT] cu s:: ::.:,- IT] ~ r- / -I>.o:t:. IT] IT] ~ ,- I NO;:O Þ 0 i ()¡ " is -"'- ~ C)O ;:0 I / -. ........-. -". . - -1 -,'1:. I () 0> 4~ ' /' '·4 0"-< 'r¡ ~_ ¿ - I ()¡"JC) l' I <.t) '" C:J V) . . G) n- '. ,/ 1tÒ'''· Æ> IT]~ o ::u ::u ~ 'f ,1\)-_, ~ or¡ '"'.... ... c: ÞO V) -t . , ,. <> ". ¢' % -t~ -< f1l I CJ -- (J) , Vl/ ~ . / '- , 0'11 :::0 " ^''' . '- ........ %-- -i I III I I ", ¢' '11 :c: 1: , D ~ IT] r- OO ,." I " 'y hÇ)~ - c: (J) -, -r- -' S::(J) 0 'j O,l11-; (J) :b " UJIT] 0 I i lJ¡()¡:t:. 0) 1T1-t Þ 0 (') I <.I) ,. ~ ~ ;:0 (J) ~-Î) Þ X IQ -- IT] (J) . I, I -..:;:: c: I -f 0 t\.JCJ s:: Þ !'v- i/ t\.J IT] Ii Lo.I CJ CJ ~ 66 ()¡ ~ ~f) / ~ - I / þ -"'-1 i <J r- - . ~ / rl¡ 0' '1>. _ ~ <: i. " /~' ;, g t::::- 2.. I I. ;~ r , c., ~ I ;. () n':)' , If] : '. ~ '. <-, ~ ' II] I J ". "ò\) ,~ '4 a -¡ I " · "'j; , ~ \.() q, ~'4 (') c.,' , - þ. () <b-', b [ N 0> 1ST A V. ~ cf '~I» ~ / g 0> NE ,?',4> .~ / . Ç)~ ' n -¡ N 02-;00 ;Ù-Ë ' \. ~0 ,i \ j"" I I \. .. L_______h_..____ ___\.\___ -1 EAST LINE. OF NW //4 OF NW //4. SEC. /O-T/24-R29 \ - ----_____u___ ____ _..______ ____________._______ _________________ ::U~IT]~ :t:.o:t:.o -:Q(J):Q r--t-t-t ;:o:r: :r: 0l11r-IT] þ:t:.-;:o C](J)~r- -tl11-..:: (J) -;.....0111 I ::U'r¡'r¡).;: 1110 -i I11;:O-IT] -ts::V)~ ~I11-i(J) ;:0 - r-:t:.o I -<~~ IT] ~o C:'r¡ IT) I I . :,,- Z C 0 I>~ o "0 ï'" <n. . CD ~~N~...Jo.f\,)....b.... C. ........N........N....O.... <ê: ~t.. u .- a -::s (nO Z ~ QI <n¡g s:: - a. Cñ 3"0 3 -Qlro ø -~ro "0 ~~ ~ 030 ~ ~ 030 ~ - am ~ oom~~~WWN........O N ~ ro~~~~WWN........O ~ - ~c <n -~CD 0 ~ -"'CD 0 ø c<n ~ ø~~ ~ ~ ø~~ ~ ~ 3~ ~ ~ ~ m 2 CD 3<n o QI 3 QI<n ~ ~~~~~~~~o~~ ~ ~~~~~~~~o~~ g ~~ ~ ~~~~CDOO~WOW~ W ~ ~~~~CDOO~WOW~ W.., .., QI ~~N~OO~ ~w~CD - ~~N~OO~ ~w~CD H ~ < (J N (J._ ~ 0 ¥ ~ 0 ... ~ N CD ~ ~ ~m' ~ ~ro ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~ ~ ~~ > ~ ~~~~~ ~ ~~ QI ~ Nw~œ~ w - ~ - ~ NW~OO~ W - ~ ~ CD ~~~oœ 0 ~~ ~ CD ~~...o= 0 ~~~ Œ ~ ~ß~~t ~ õ~ ; ~ ~ß~~t ~ õ~~ ~ W ... ~ ... = ... if L-BW ... ~..._ ~'m CD ~ ; I~I; !~I!I~!ii:l¡ ," ~j>::m l ~ ~ ~ ;~. . N 'N Ñ! Ff.S ~ !,.': ~;!i ~ ~ ,~!:~ '[jj! 1$ $1 ~ I ,~;;!;! ~. ~ () .., ~ 0 ~ ~ ~~~~~~~s:: m ~ ~~ ~~~~~~....w~ m ~ woo ~...=WOWCDW~N a. ~~ ~~~~~~~ ~o ... oo~o~ww~~~ 0.0 ~ L- ~. i;. O,,~~, .= W 0'" ;:~ ~ ~ ;'¡"Ii':!::';!:: ,. '. .' " .' ',. .0 .'. 0 'En.' ',' .'EØ 'EØ !(fl ¡Ø' 'En ¡Ø'liJ ,W," ~. ~ ·1iØ '1iØ I!Ø IiØ .I!Ø ,W I!Ø if'" ;~ ,. CD ~ Ò1. '.' p) ~ ~.(¡) ~.'.;.'''. !tG.' 'êN." f~ .)? . ~ ;fß t~ ~:~ ,~¡~ ~lt€Ø ~.i" ~:: ;~ I ~ /¿;1 ~ !':' ~ ~i~ . ~ ¡tß i~=:!i := 11:& ~ ~II W "c ~1 ~ ~ ~mii!lllil~! ~ ~ ~ ID ~ tl ~~ ~ ~ ~ CD ~ CD W ~w ~3 CD o N ~ ~ ~~ QI .~ ¡5; ~ ~Ií~ ~ ¡s '~m¡t~ '. .....,¡.<Ð ~ i. ~ .i': ~ ¡æ t ¡';l ~ o j;;;...".. ~2 .. ',3, 80.."'" 82.""'."; ¡I¡!¡¡¡I~.. ... '):>0 ",' 0 Xi! ;(R' 'W .w i"¡!il'~; ¡' :œ \CQ ~ m ,(;4 k¡j '0.> '!e9 ,,;,j' ~ ~ø~~ø~ ~~ø~~ .... 00 ~ ~ ~~ ~ . .... w........ w.... ro.... .... .... ~..-....I...f:¡.. 1'>.9' CJ3 .... o 0 ~ ~ ~~ QI ~ ~~~~~N~~ ~ OOO~O~NO '" ~ ~ ~~j ii!.~~ ~ ~ .... ~ ~ ~~ro .... ....J. W... _Œ ....þ.\./3 W o ~ ~ ~ QI ~ ~~oE/)~~~~ ~ ~ oooo~o~ '" .-'" 'iF ~ ~~m,t . - v~ >Uò <Àj.t!m:~< -" i·::::: _,. ¡:-:<: Þ ,_ _ ~ <F!::.i-;'\ ~ ~ "'., ..' 'i.. .. §TI ~:ji; ~ í ~ f~ ~ ¡~ .æiûl"} ~ ~ ~ oE/) ~~~~ ~ ~~~"""~WN~3- ~ OO~~~~~~~~~OO ~ ~ ~~~P~~~~~~CID ~ . ~NCD"'~~~~~"'~- ~~NN""~~~~""- ..þ..O~(x)CO-'¡~~-.JO ~ 11111111111 ~ . MEMORANDUM Date: March 5, 2002 To: Honorable Mayor Hosch and Members of the City Council From: Judy Weyrens Re: Graceview Estates The Planning Commission recommended the Council approve the final plat of graceview estates with the following contingencies: 1. Procurement of a utility easement from the College of St. Benedict along the southern edge of their property for the installation of water and sewer lines. 2. Procurement of a temporary ingress/egress easement from the College of St. Benedict along the northern edge for construction traffic. 3. Approval of the City Engineer If the City Council approves the [mal plat, the Council will also need to authorize John to draft the Developer's Agreement. . This afternoon I talked to Jim Fredricks regarding the temporary easement for construction traffic and the utility easement. The College is willing to sign immediately the utility easement, but not the temporary easement along the northern edge of their property. Jim stated that the College believes the road is not needed and they are still negotiating with Centra Care and do not want the road to be an issue. As an alternative the College is willing to incorporate a temporary easement along with the utility easement. I discussed this matter with Bob and Rick and they would make accommodations for such. As of this memo I have not discussed the information with Joe Bettendorf. On Thursday afternoon I have a scheduled meeting with Jim Fredricks and Sue Palmer to try and negotiate the northern access. John, Joe and Larry will be attending the meeting as well. We will update the Council after the meeting. . . To the City Council Re: Graceview Access Earlier today we met with representatives ±rom the College of St. Benedict to discuss acquisition of the access road along Kennedy School as well as the utility easements on the south edge of their property. They were of the position that they would grant the utility easement and temporary construction access only if the City abandoned the concept of a road along Kennedy. The temporary access road would be on the south edge of their property. After some discussions, St. Ben's softened their position somewhat and would be agreeable to terms similar to the following: 1. The City would not commence eminent domain proceeding s to acquire the Kennedy access road for a period of at least two years. 2. The College would granba.:-permanent utility easement and a temporary construction access easement along the south edge of their property. 3. During the next two years, the College and City will work together to try to find a location for the Kennedy access road that will fit the development plans of the College. The road will link with Graceview at the location shown on the preliminary plat. 4. The costs associated with the road and utilities will be assessed to St. Bens based upon their use to the improvements. Hook-up fees will be consistent with City policy. If the College doesn't want the road in two years, the City can proceed with condemnation. If an agreement can't be reached on the College's . contribution to the project costs, the City reserves the right to assess as appropriate. Advantages: We are no worse off than we are now. If things aren't cleared up within two years, the City can condemn and assess. If the meantime, as the Colleges decides what to do with their property, we may be able to reach an agreement that will avoid those issues. Since the road will probably not be constructed until the second phase is built, the delay does not adversely affect the City. In the meantime, the City remains on good terms with the College and may have better leverage later to negotiate a favorable deal. Disadvantages: Issue is not totally resolved. No firm agreement as to who pays for the road or the improvements (although we would not get that now). Other Issue.. .Developers contribution toward road costs. One suggestion would be to establish an escrow fund to hold funds contributed by the developer as the land is developed. An agreed upon amount per acre is contributed to the fund as the final plats are approved. The money would be applied to the road and utilities to the extent not covered from other sources. If the road is not built with 7 years, the money is returned to the developer. . 9.lVldLO£LO + SllI3l'l3SV3 JJJ1UII ONV 3tMIMIQ 'L Ot 0<lIO-<£II-000"'- Zim: 'ON 3SK3Of1 3iVO == ~ ONnoJ lN31'fr\l'Ðn NmlI S3l0N30 . - - - - - -="01 KU-tO~ (Ol~) XVJ £~~~~~ .I.!WIC(I~ ~ "= ~ J3S JJI3~nNO~ NOOI S310IGQ 0 _ _ ~ ~ _ --./" K~t-8"~ (œ£) ttit-jK-II1< dODO :>Qüoro SIIIt'3JS 310d æMOd tJ¡ ill .133J NJ 3'l"t:)S - - - - - --"g 8L£9Ç Nrt 'SOJdT"d >lnYS LtZO-0i6-œ£ SHOl1YNJtN N3WS 310d mÐfl ,-. (f;;!. 00£ OOZ om 0 s..t.H3fGS't3 AJIll1n at« 3ÐVNMJO ',U g HJl:K)N .I.33W.S ONZ tZt L ~~..IJNcHtOO ).ÐIi.IO 1DG 3HL j() S¥.Vl 3H.L H3CN't HQ.I.3AW1~~:: 13f~ NIStB ~ .' 0 ~ :::::J fMIIMIQ Q3OO1OO NO HMOHS Si S)I:JWJ3S 9IOH ÁW ":)HI 'Jj()HN3>U:GH NN.OWI ,œ:sHa-œ£ 3NOHdJU1 ThœW1 ONY NOISInßdl1S ..L33H1O )1'i ~Nn 00 3ft JS a3Wd3Hd f;ttM. 3I\1fA11W tt (S3frJH A"'UtiJ 31ÐHtS) ..J33J at >I:JWQ13S OWÅ 3QlS "t. llóU::-tI6-~g¡ S'IÐ "'MM\L-.M tWH.WCIH llK)d3ij YO 'J.3..'Hf'IS 'NY1d SIU 1'fHl ~ A83H3H I ~ r £HiItIWO Q3WITI')J NO NMOHS S1/ 5)OI'B13S mNA JJØU 'L tOOl: L M)N ~ns LOU-('K...œt Hd3SOt ".15 JfJ )JJ:) 0!a03'I 7 ... ....."OW S't 53"" """"'" ON<I'.rø S3:>1ÆI3S .UJlUf1 H138;;g~ : ~ ~ ~ : d"6"~~;': ~ ..J."~ - _ ~;.,:~- - _''''''..'JI-=S: ~'J;".C'~ ~!",,: ~'¡'''2'=) ._ _ _ - n - U - - "J'1>'/ :.....--« Qd'7UGJl NæH 'Ntl:~ 'ç, ~ : ~ ::::! I ~.u g'81 If.S.n 'Mt~}'¡ ';1 ~ ').I 3!J!13f1C:)'i':' , ]' 3Hlt~~t~ ¡);~ ' -- 3Klt~~t~ ~_~;1i"~ ~ 'æo~~ ' ~TOOS No 6S 90.69 S ÅIJ:I!¡¡,""'4r~ -~~ r z o q U1 "!. q =E '" ~ ~~ a ~8 m rq »=r, ~(~ ~~ .~ 'J.W3dOId l:)3NJt'oS NO ~ SQIMJ]I, ON ....00_ n " I~ ~ ~'l<>~'l~~ ill1Un o /,':/..,'<1 0.1 I o::f ( . '" 19'£ '-\ 8 1011110 ~ \ "" ;, áw,,~ 8~' " ÚH3\'V1NOI'IJJJ<t\OO) .... ?~ J--:---/'---- . (ÇÇ'8I'> < OO'OOS 3 .Ol,60.ç9 N . ....~ 'N?Z:Ij. 'Ç¡I ~ IOUH ON I ,./1 JH t/' 3H ~.L:J ~ 1 3Hl j() 3:HIl'H1HON~' I ' i djJlllHd ~ 12 Tj'IHJ¡i'¡ Çi; WL " /~'- ~¡::,:---~ 'BJm ¡¡! : ;~~~-l- ~-~ -u?' ¡- -~":~ T - ~c:~j elM -"~.ò s ~ ~~ EŒE ¡ Vi)i~lVd i 'i!:A~l';'J 1 JO I .:¡: -,SS';IH. q £.." " I ! ;0;' Nil'\:ßH i~' liV,'ii:!3ri ! L ] _9;.£".w h ;;.'- ! ¡ I r 061 ~~ , 'h \ I. 1 6 '" -- ~. :y L 1 HZ~:"" ; ;i'~ .[[JJJ _.L ~ ~ - _L_ ___ ~ \. 3 ~;S6>" "~ & lJ:;' to ~ \~~~:;~_-1 ~ ...., (Da_ ~ '",""lIH-';:: ¡ d~~;7¡"i~! ¡ -- - - - ¡ 1~ I r:;r3lS ! I I :iNn >t<Mi13S ocnB I I I-----+--~- j rJt.fÆ 1 :'~ii:,m i ,~3{'f~7~ i ¡ ! I ¡Ii i I I 1 I ~-~~~~;~~~\ 1 ¡ I ~~ I ¡ , d~ ALINI:>b\ ! 'ä1~:~~~: : '~~¡~~~: I I ~ +_~~~__: I ·e.u.I~ þlJ MOd IMß o¡ 1M Q;Z: ~ AVtYiw II M&1&.p 6S l..un S.1I'Cfl i 3lWOóttOO: I ~ Iß.ION ~ tAJON fI!Oe' ðuo¡o ~ :~ ptÞt !O IMI!I tß.JON 8CA .. ¿ uo ~ 0 01 ¡MJ 01£ I.QJOU enp IOt*A ~ em: '}N.t, MVlUJW d::ic)d )'¡<¡';¡ ¡,')Q r-, I ;:? U 1MJ&ep Ii IW'IOS ~ ~ OL~ IQI'IOS a'\P .~a¡.lOt\O ::!3~nd 1;'(jt.¡:JjS ~ I ':' iH*D=,~lIYMœ~~~~=:-~~ :'" ~j,..~'t' )2 l-jil'1aS! µ¡!Od~J:O~~:~~~~1~5~ J ~l ! ~ '" ',/1'" t/lMN .... 1> W \Þ«l 'Jd30)(3 _ SS31 'OONWO"" . I JJI1lO ',(¡unoo auoe¡s UI ¡MM (SZ) ~-..f¡tJuJ. t6u>y ,JO "4+l0N (t~l) JtIOj-4uNl ~H a.uo ~l. UI '(sn) ~ UOß»s -----+ - -.- - .-- -¡ . r"-~;\~~_:::ª:i:::..-=---==-=-------=-~_-=-":=-- lO (..h3N ../UäN) .µono ¡,IOtI,ßJON ~ jO AlJDno ¡&MLAJON a4.U. -4~! ~~--........- -H-¡ ___1____ .... ~ '0 _ .... .. .... i".,. ~",,,,::: G'~d8 ':'nd],.' , i ,.. i ~~¡r-~L}Ø:=:~=:'~~~ o~:~~;';~: dT~n~"~~;i j NI;;A_~~~ I .~J; Vtild':.1 ¡ J -II ~o;-;::¡!;6<?il~~:~;:::ir~PI~r»,t':H.::i : -? S"i~'¡¿r-ií ]~ 1l3!lV . J ¡ \ -1 t r ----- :t~3N~~~~/:=~r::~~'~1~":;:: ~ ~---~-~~, ~ , i; ~:u t~~ :, ~ \88M.ou:: ~':.~eq ~::::: "-:i ~ - - - -, ! r- , ~ tquufðeq jO MOd 8q. 01 IoMI OQÇ ~ ~ D 't/J::f~ _ : .. I I WOH~"AO~=~::~~~"'/':':~ Û I , _'.(¡L<>o:¡IW_.._(",)___~...,..." , i' I (.~I) >Mj-_l _ ouo dNwaOl "I '(ç,) uoow "'1_ u. - ~ --'-¡.- ~ ò,. " , . ! þO Ct/l3H t/L::I\I) øµono ~ Mß 10 --1Jono ~OH ~ . - ¡ t- - - - - -¡ .tl'\,;'] ,-,:¡ ¡ I ; -- ___--- ,¡ S38:JÞ'LO'l6. .. . ·1 'JOa*ß ~I O£ ¡aD3 ~ J.c:I:r.))(3 ¡ ¡ ~-.: :.--: ! OIl)'srn~=':.'(:l)~_~~~'~ n-~+-'----l' ..wJ50¡> '.15 ..:10 .JJ.I:J ! O(.~~~~~=:: -LNJf1/d07J.~7t7/-LNJOI5J¿¡ -LINfl OJNNt/7d' . 5J-L VJ.5J MJII13:JV¿¡D ..:10 -L Vld Á¿¡VNlf1/17J¿¡d . To the City Council Re: Graceview Access Earlier today we met with representatives :trom the College of St. Benedict to discuss acquisition of the access road along Kennedy School as well as the utility easements on the south edge of their property. They were of the position that they would grant the utility easement and temporary construction access only if the City abandoned the concept of a road along Kennedy. The temporary access road would be on the south edge of their property. After some discussions, St. Ben's softened their position somewhat and would be agreeable to terms similar to the following: 1. The City would not commence eminent domain proceeding s to acquire the Kennedy access road for a period of at least two years. ., 2. The College would granba:.permanent utility easement and a temporary construction access easement along the south edge of their property. 3. During the next two years, the College and City will work together to try to find a location for the Kennedy access road that will fit the development plans of the College. The road will link with Graceview at the location shown on the preliminary plat. 4. The costs associated with the road and utilities will be assessed to St. Bens based upon their use to the improvements. Hook-up fees will be consistent with City policy. If the College doesn't want the road in two years, the City can proceed with condemnation. If an agreement can't be reached on the College's . contribution to the project costs, the City reserves the right to assess as appropriate. Advantages: We are no worse off than we are now. If things aren't cleared up within two years, the City can condemn and assess. If the meantime, as the Colleges decides what to do with their property, we may be able to reach an agreement that will avoid those issues. Since the road will probably not be constructed until the second phase is built, the delay does not adversely affect the City. In the meantime, the City remains on good terms with the College and may have better leverage later to negotiate a favorable deal. Disadvantages: Issue is not totally resolved. No firm agreement as to who pays for the road or the improvements (although we would not get that now). Other Issue. . . Developers contribution toward road costs. One suggestion would be to establish an escrow fund to hold funds contributed by the developer as the land is developed. An agreed upon amount per acre is contributed to the fund as the final plats are approved. The money would be applied to the road and utilities to the extent not covered from other sources. If the road is not built with 7 years, the money is returned to the developer. . NORTH 1;4 COR. If, ROSKE . SEC. 'O-TI24-2Ø .: ICOIII/TY C.I.II. I . ¡ BEARINO NOTE 1:1 T/Œ EST LINE OF NORTHEAST OUARTER ..; OF SECTION 10. TOJlHSHIP 124. RANGE 10 1; IS AUUIIED TO HAVE A BEARING OF HORrn ::¡ 00 DEORŒS 00 "'/HUTES 00 SECONDS EAST. ì' o DENOTES //2 'Hal IRON PIPE SET AND .. JlAR/ŒO IflTH REOISrRATIOH NUIIBER 1223ð :0 . DENOTES IIOMJ/ÆNT FOlINO I~ --- '8 ,:'. ... ; ---~'" ':: I ------- .~.-. f.O: ...:\ . ¡'f .-l..¡(:. ~ 'oo ,.. 0.. ..... '0' . ;:"5 ;-------_ )...............~.......... -"-" ................... S 88'4S'OS'E 2JO.00 2 .........~.. 255.07 '" RETk~~1~~ ~~~~~ENTI ::¡ ~ S~·~: : /..:.! ['¿E' : 04.: ~? , : ... ~-:- ",: "'8 , 2 --8 OUTLOT -A' II. OJ AC..I, IJ.08 AC.'I,I .... .... 8- /I.J8 AC. ,1,1 rr- H '20'$ 'E g~ . :':;'i: o'{ \ ," 220.00 __z '" (STORM irA TEj ~ 8RETENSION EASEl :! ò OUTLOT"S --\:, 8~ 10.78 AC.'I-J -------:.: I!! ------ S SO'20'S8'" 8ofO.50 I I 2 :,.:{. : ,'.f I '::;:' : 0°': :'U¡' : ......:- I ',",.. : ... J~ /1.80 AC.'I,I I CURVE DEL TA ANGlE RAIIIUS ARC TAllO .¡ C / 2'IJ'/O' IIJ8of.'8 4ofO,08 22 - Lit C 2 J8'$0'$8' ;.f2.00 2J2. 7S 12 ~ 0 C J Jof'J8'04' JSJ. 00 2J/.JO /I, i~ I ~ ~ '" } C 4 Jof'02'Ol' JI7.00 188,JO 0 ~ ~ ~g8 C $ 3e·5P'SC· 408.00 277,71 14 Ii C 8 JI'2/ 'Jo' of OS. 00 22J. J2 /I Ii i 8' . C7 7'J8'I7' 408. 00 Sof.Jo 2 ~ ~ § .:: c S 22'47'54' Jof2.00 IJS.08 S 8- - Co IS'/2 'or J0f2.oo 08.70 4 ~ ~ LI ..-..-..-'.- S8S",'5 1/ 102.IS ::;T¡~!::E'T ~ .... . -,.-'.- LI/Œ BEAR 1 NO DISTANCE l I $ 85" r '57'W JO.J$ l 2 N J8'J4'IO'E 2$.J/ L J H 00'25'Jo'l/ 48.25 œ L 4 H J8'Jof'IO'E 25.JI L 5 S 00'04 '2J'W J7./8 I /webI oorI!fy _the _ on the lone! L 8 H 88'29'$8'E 78.00 L 7 N 15'50 '$8'E 87.00 19.1L.. end trInIfer.-.lol'lld. L 8 N 70'SO'58'E 87.88 08 L 0 S 74'J7'OJ'E JJ,88 I L 10 S 74'J7'OJ'E 181.$$ rro..,. '-7.'11 Y L I I N 00'00'00'. oJ.07 Dole L 12 H 00'00 '00'. 12.00 tJ-t6v.. L IJ $ '9'2P'58'" 1.04 ~ .rAfL ~_,T__ I hoAby oorI!fy _ tI1Is tnsIn.-t was ft () u..f'\ c.. .10jL.~o PIoICabInot~- ~ ORA' NAGE 4. UT IL , TY EA$EIÆNT l ~ :.. -\,,- :;;bð.L..."'-"" By~ ---- ---- ----- EASE\lENT .,om AS LABELED .' 0 100 200 DA V, D P p:: LAND SURVE SCALE IN FEET irA I TE PAl PII. 1-.J2O-j . DATE: February 28 2002 MEMO TO: Mayor Hosch, Council Members, City Administrator Weyrens FROM: Joanne Foust & Cynthia Smith-Strack, Municipal Development Group RE: Economic Development Report - February, 2002 Municipal Development Group has been interacting with a number of prospects throughout the past month. Following is a summary of activities that have transpired. If you have any questions on any of these or other projects, please do not hesitate to contact us at 952-758- 7399. Business Prospects have been identified by a project number to protect the confidentiality of the businesses. Project 01-Ä: The company has been considering the construction or leasing of a newly constructed 65,000 square foot building in St. Joseph Business Park. The project was discussed in detail at a . meeting with the Company, City representatives and Construction Contractor representatives on February 13th. The Company proposes the leasing of a building constructed by an LLC from the area. Local financial incentives are being sought to lower the lease price. The Company plans on creating 15 new jobs paying an estimated $16/hour. A preliminary application for the use of Tax Increment Financing to assist the project in moving forward was approved by the EDA and the City Council. The prospect intends to move into the new building in December of 2002. Project 01-F: This prospect is working with a local commercial brokerage to secure a parcel for the development of a fast food restaurant. MDG contacted the realtor on February 26th for an update on the status of the project. MDG's assistance in reviewing possible locations for the development was requested. Information on a possible location was shared. Additional review by MDG was requested. Project 01-1: This company is proposing the construction of a 12,000 square foot facility on approximately 5 acres in St. Joseph Business Park in the spring of 2002. On January 22, 31 and February 5, 2002, MDG left messages checking with the owner to see if the site plan would be ready the next week. The Developer responded indicating the site plan would not be prepared for review in conjunction with a request for a lot split by the March meeting of the Planning Commission. The Developer indicated the proposed 12,000 sf facility is being enlarged and revised plans will be available for review at the April Planning Commission meeting. Project 01-0: This company is considering the construction of a 30,000 square foot manufacturing facility in St. Joseph Business Park. On January 31, 2002 MDG left a message for the contractor for the project. On February 5th MDG left a message for one of the owners regarding status of the project and any assistance we could provide to assist in the coordination of the project. On February 19, 2002 a representative for the prospect phoned MDG. The representative I -r: . -<--.. j W l1..::) O:<?: I W :<?:>>- O~..J - 0::: V)....W~ 2:V)~"" I W-o:::W .... OUJ xu. 1.1. 0::: UJO~"" V) >-W.... -J:<?:V)C O:::-'<{<t W--JUJO J: J:o::: ................J 0::v)0:::- O<tO<t 2:W:<?:o::: ''--- - '6'" ,--61'01 --: '"S : Þ ¡T .Ñ 3D' 'IÎ-- MNdÖ -- ON 1'i'Ii'i" -- ;-7 --, - '-' ~::7 -- -"'-\y~- -- ,-,--- --- ,- ---l , ~~, '\ }.Ll.OO.ZO NI I 0. ~6 /7 -; --- - a / ~,¡: /" 3N '0 __ _ ~ 1 / ,¿;. ~ ~ ~~ ~'bÇ) '\ ~. A V' 1 S J $) I I-- ' ~. ,~ I, I ~() þ. b' Ç)~ I,. ; r Lu 'J.:( -; l1J i ,0 ~ ' \ (j .; Q I -- ' ~ ", <::J "2 -<l ~ <: '~ " ":: "" / ~ t, 0 "j 'y , : ;:: <:¡ / c.; I - u a () ~ V) /' 99 ¡ I'<') a UJ I'\ /1 {"J..q: ~ II .- ()I'\ 0 ' I :J 2: .-- V) '<{ W -, 01 I $ h ~. ~ ~ u--"- y V) 0 " h '" ~" , ,,' U Wm <t \() If) () I ~ ' () V) V) V) ~ h ll) <Q ",; I. 0 ~ lLJ ~ ~~. % 'l',I I lJ.J ' Ci5 - -l .. ct. "-). " v ,- 0 / I ~ ~ ~ " ¿ '. '\. <. (i} / I a:: \I) --0 "-) I ~ . ~ lI) J ' UJ ~ 6~'3 ~ '" ~.~ 'OIV" 0/ " ,.<'. If-' , f...- 0:: 0:: 0 . '- 'CJ .JJ ~-~ 1.1. ~ ~ :0 "" Þ' '.'. / \I) ~ V)! "- . - ~ - . ~_ :: ~ ? . - S' ,..", <0 <J! ¡ 0::: U ~ .", '. -- ' "1 %UJ è5 0:: 0 (\.¡, I ' \() J. () ..~ ~ ~ -r>: ~ ~ ? :" I / -1 <,n~ ~"'-- " /' co -J I V) .....h 0 00 I I' -, I " ~ :it;: V) ~ /' . ._.. I~ ~ Lu l 1.1. ~ô ~ ~. ~~ " ' 3nN31\'V P') o ~ ~ 0 4J ~/ - "- - . '" ~ ~§: ~:~ f/ ~Jj /-c='r- II I f- T93ï(()jl~ ~ / ~ Co:¡ i ! V') I a ¡ I o I ~ I I (~I ~ I i / ' ' / I{) I : I ! i ¡ , ~~ <'. ¡ I ;, I I I / ~ ,!,! . ~,--, I , ~ 0.,. - u ' ,I I ,f- I I I ~ 0 V') / '\. ./ ZI,' r -J 1 r 1 ~ V) Cl) i :z: . fV) U / N /. i I () í . O· ¡ ~ /'\~1 0 - ~ 0 -1.:~ / ~ ~~/~ r hU)- ._--, ~ ~ V) co 0 I ~ . 2: '"I I 1 + - -.- y. / . I - ' / "- '" ..~() . :3 i I a : -J 0 " / 0 ;:::: ~ \,/ ' a Lu I.-J -- / 4J ',Å ~ - I r - - - ~ a ::ë:a ; - / -- if· -- .J - Ó -a / / I I I I ... . --J <t ~ 99 I <1: ....::r: <J V)h 0 '<:(\() -J UJ V) CO 1.1.' 00 V) ~Q O--J - v). <':(\.¡ UJ h::..:: ><U UJO --J >-m ..J 0::' UJ'q' J:- h 0:::.... 00 ::ë:-J . . . · MEMORANDUM Date: March 5, 2002 To: Honorable Mayor Hosch and Members of the City Council From: Judy Weyrens Re: Graceview Estates The Planning Commission recommended the Council approve the final plat of graceview estates with the following contingencies: 1. Procurement of a utility easement from the College of St. Benedict along the southern edge of their property for the installation of water and sewer lines. 2. Procurement of a temporary ingress/egress easement fÌom the College of St. Benedict along the northern edge for construction traffic. 3. Approval of the City Engineer If the City Council approves the [mal plat, the Council will also need to authorize John to draft the Developer's Agreement. · This afternoon I talked to Jim Fredricks regarding the temporary easement for construction traffic and the utility easement. The College is willing to sign immediately the utility easement, but not the temporary easement along the northern edge of their property. Jim stated that the College believes the road is not needed and they are still negotiating with Centra Care and do not want the road to be an issue. As an alternative the College is willing to incorporate a temporary easement along with the utility easement. I discussed this matter with Bob and Rick and they would make accommodations for such. As of this memo I have not discussed the information with Joe Bettendorf. On Thursday afternoon I have a scheduled meeting with Jim Fredricks and Sue Palmer to try and negotiate the northern access. John, Joe and Larry will be attending the meeting as well. We will update the Council after the meeting. · · To the City Council Re: Graceview Access Earlier today we met with representatives from the College of St. Benedict to discuss acquisition of the access road along Kennedy School as well as the utility easements on the south edge of their property. They were of the position that they would grant the utility easement and temporary construction access only if the City abandoned the concept of a road along Kennedy. The temporary access road would be on the south edge of their property. After some discussions, St. Ben's softened their position somewhat and would be agreeable to terms similar to the following: 1. The City would not commence eminent domain proceeding s to acquire the Kennedy access road for a period of at least two years. 2. The College would granbac-permanent utility easement and a temporary construction access easement along the south edge oftheir property. 3. During the next two years, the College and City will work together to try to find a location for the Kennedy access road that will fit the development plans of the College. The road will link with Graceview at the location shown on the preliminary plat. 4. The costs associated with the road and utilities will be assessed to St. Bens based upon their use to the improvements. Hook-up fees will be consistent with City policy. If the College doesn't want the road in two years, the City can proceed with condemnation. If an agreement can't be reached on the College's · contribution to the project costs, the City reserves the right to assess as appropriate. Advantages: We are no worse off than we are now. If things aren't cleared up within two years, the City can condemn and assess. If the meantime, as the Colleges decides what to do with their property, we may be able to reach an agreement that will avoid those issues. Since the road will probably not be constructed until the second phase is built, the delay does not adversely affect the City. In the meantime, the City remains on good terms with the College and may have better leverage later to negotiate a favorable deal. Disadvantages: Issue is not totally resolved. No firm agreement as to who pays for the road or the improvements (although we would not get that now). Other Issue.. .Developers contribution toward road costs. One suggestion would be to establish an escrow fund to hold funds contributed by the developer as the land is developed. An agreed upon amount per acre is contributed to the fund as the final plats are approved. The money would be applied to the road and utilities to the extent not covered from other sources. If the road is not built with 7 years, the money is returned to the developer. · Z c: 0 ¡>!a o " ï'" !II . . c;) ~~f\)....Jr.....Jr.f\.)....Jo.b....Jr. ~ ....Jr.....Jo.f\)....Jr.....Jr.N....Jr.Q....Jr. cë: ~t... .. ....... a """':s en 0 Z CD III !II !!! !:: Q. - 3'" 3 -I en -I en CD -g. ~ -Iro~ œ" -Iro~ œ ~ ~~ ~ ~g..,~.>.ww~~~o ~ ~ ~gª~.>.ww~~~o ~ ~ ~!:: !II _..,@ 0 ~ _..,@ 0 en !::!II ~ fII~~ ~ CD fII~~ ~ ~ 3~ ~ - 3CD ~ 2 CD !II o III 3 III !II ~ ~~~~~~~~o~~ ~ ~~~~~~~~o~~ g ~~ ~ ~~~O)~~~wow.., w ø ~~~O)~~~wow~ w.., .., III ~.>.~~~.>. .>.w~m . ~.>.~~~.>. .>.w~m ~ ~ < ~ w CD 0 . g ß ¡¡) CD ~ ~ro I ~ ~ro ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ > ~ ~~~~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ w ~.>. - ~ ~w~~~ w ~.>. !II ~ P ~@ ~ ~ ~~~p~ p ~@~ m ~ ~ õ~ s ~ ~ßm~t ~ õ~~ ø ~ m w~~~= ~ ID P- ~ ~;;~~.' ~ :j.....:: l III ','m:::: ':= .... ,·~'¡i 0 ~ ~ ¡,Î¡~i i '~¡m¡:- :; (" ~ () .., ~ 0 CD .>. ~~~~~~~!:: m m ~~ ~....Jr.~....Jr.~~....Jr.w~ m CD w~ ø~~wow~w~~ Q. ~~ ~~ww~~~ ~o ~ ~,~~o~wwO)ø~ ~o o oo~~~wo~~ 0 ~ ~ -I liiiiid",J ~ ~ =1~~~~n.~I~ ~ ~ ....~....-. ~ -., .... ,. - . - - -". .. »'0 ~ .··B~·M·pq. ~.., ~'~ I~.~ .¢5..~ ~ ¡@ :~ 'møY~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ w ~w >3 ~ o . ~ ~ ~~ ro ~ 8;~~!:~:n~¡s~~ ro ~ -.~ ~L'~~'j,¡:1 ~ o '......... -.w. ..m '.~. ¡0ill.'· ..'ill lb>...: ii. ~:: C> .. ¡t.).Ki).~,;o; ~ ~-- -._..~> ~ 00 ~ ~ ~~ ~ . ....Jr. w....Jr.....Jr. W....Jr. ~....Jr. ....Jr. ...l. ~:'I ..:f:t....'" fO OJ ::J ....Jr. C> 0 ~ ~ O)~ ro ~ O)~~~~.~~ ro - ;¡ i ~1iIi:r~:I':::· C> :ø["',' ,I. .;;;~.: ." Illj,:' II..' .. '. H'. '~;'''~':.' '.... ~ ~ 00 ~1~ìi~~1 t't ~ ....Jo. ~....Jr. ~ ~ :... w:=> ~ .~()~ w o ~ ~ ~ ro ~ ~~~~O)~~ ro ~ _.:;¡ OOO¡~I;¡C>:;I'i ~ ~ m . , .. ... """~Æ' .>. ~ '.._' ';:"'."'_"'" ...::~'V , :"¡~;" ;~:o'; . .::';: . ;00 .~1¡ _ ~ .:w:o,~:¢;¡ ~ ..... ~ ~ .~.> ~ ~..""'.w~""'3-1 ..... ~·~.>.O).>.~.>.~.....oo ~ ~ ~~~:=>~~~~~~!::W ~ . O)~~.....~.>.~~~.....~- O)~~~w~~.>.O)w- .þ.Q....Jr.OJCO.............Jr.....Jr..........O t.... !,-,;' ;;' . '.' ,"" :.:::L· ...::ni'~'i¡~:..<+.; DC. i'Ii i11m , ., '" ..., hi .'-ill ;G) ~ I¡I;~_.~~~~ ~ 0) .g; %3i ~g g I~, _., _,,, _'.' ~"% ,~@¡ 0) i~ IIII!; ~ [I m [I ~:11'~ . To the City Council Re:Graceview Access Earlier today we met with representatives ±Tom the College of St. Benedict to discuss acquisition of the access road along Kennedy School as well as the utility easements on the south edge of their property. They were of the position that they would grant the utility easement and temporary construction access only if the City abandoned the concept of a road along Kennedy. The temporary access road would be on the south edge of their property. After some discussions, S1. Ben's softened their position somewhat and would be agreeable to tenns similar to the following: 1. The City would not commence eminent domain proceeding s to acquire the Kennedy access road for a period of at least two years. .- 2. The College would gran~ennanent utility easement and a temporary construction access easement along the south edge of their property. 3. During the next two years, the College and City will work together to try to find a location for the Kennedy access road that will fit the development plans of the College. The road will link with Graceview at the location shown on the preliminary plat. 4. The costs associated with the road and utilities will be assessed to S1. Bens based upon their use to the improvements. Hook-up fees will be consistent with City policy. If the College doesn't want the road in two years, the City can proceed with condemnation. If an agreement can't be reached on the College's . contribution to the project costs, the City reserves the right to assess as appropriate. Advantages: We are no worse off than we are now. If things aren't cleared up within two years, the City can condemn and assess. If the meantime, as the Colleges decides what to do with their property, we may be able to reach an agreement that will avoid those issues. Since the road will probably not be constructed until the second phase is built, the delay does not adversely affect the City. In the meantime, the City remains on good tenns with the College and may have better leverage later to negotiate a favorable deal. Disadvantages: Issue is not totally resolved. No finn agreement as to who pays for the road or the improvements (although we would not get that now). Other Issue. . . Developers contribution toward road costs. One suggestion would be to establish an escrow fund to hold funds contributed by the developer as the land is developed. An agreed upon amount per acre is contributed to the fund as the final plats are approved. The money would be applied to the road and utilities to the extent not covered from other sources. If the road is not built with 7 years, the money is returned to the developer. . . DATE: February 28 2002 MEMO TO: Mayor Hosch, Council Members, City Administrator Weyrens FROM: Joanne Foust & Cynthia Smith-Strack, Municipal Development Group RE: Economic Development Report - February, 2002 Municipal Development Group has been interacting with a number of prospects throughout the past month. Following is a summary of activities that have transpired. If you have any questions on any of these or other projects, please do not hesitate to contact us at 952-758- 7399. Business Prospects have been identified by a project number to protect the confidentiality of the businesses. Project 01-Ä: The company has been considering the construction or leasing of a newly constructed 65,000 square foot building in St. Joseph Business Park. The project was discussed in detail at a . meeting with the Company, City representatives and Construction Contractor representatives on February 13th. The Company proposes the leasing of a building constructed by an LLC from the area. Local financial incentives are being sought to lower the lease price. The Company plans on creating 15 new jobs paying an estimated $16/hour. A preliminary application for the use of Tax Increment Financing to assist the project in moving forward was approved by the EDA and the City Council. The prospect intends to move into the new building in December of 2002. Project 01-F: This prospect is working with a local commercial brokerage to secure a parcel for the th development of a fast food restaurant. MDG contacted the realtor on February 26 for an update on the status of the project. MDG's assistance in reviewing possible locations for the development was requested. Information on a possible location was shared. Additional review by MDG was requested. Project 01-1: This company is proposing the construction of a 12,000 square foot facility on approximately 5 acres in St. Joseph Business Park in the spring of 2002. On January 22, 31 and February 5, 2002, MDG left messages checking with the owner to see if the site plan would be ready the next week. The Developer responded indicating the site plan would not be prepared for review in conjunction with a request for a lot split by the March meeting of the Planning Commission. The Developer indicated the proposed 12,000 sf facility is being enlarged and revised plans will be available for review at the April Planning Commission meeting. Project 01-0: This company is considering the construction of a 30,000 square foot manufacturing facility in St. Joseph Business Park. On January 31, 2002 MDG left a message for the contractor for the . project. On February 5th MDG left a message for one of the owners regarding status of the project and any assistance we could provide to assist in the coordination of the project. On February 19, 2002 a representative for the prospect phoned MDG. The representative 91YldLO£LO ..... 'ON 3SIOOI1 31'1'0 d01S!i!l'O" + CNna> lN3~11NO!'i NmlI S3J.ON3O . S!N31'OSV3 A1JlW1 ~"!' ~O·.ul 01 ~~~ ~ ..... OW'" "" - tt<l-to< (O<fa) XVJ I -o9t-OZt JJWOO SIIN3IS ..... RftJJHjS "'''' 135 lN3~nNO~ NO!!I S31OII3O 0 ç tC"-8Ç< O<C) '£8<.~. ~ ~'^= ..~.. 1ß03S"""",,,;¡¡s ------./ ..~-ill. ~~~~- n>d !I3MOd ~ Cü l33.J NI :rnœ - - - - - ~~ 8lí11Ç N~ 'S<JkMI ~nvs ~ SNOIl'IIUH IGIDS 710d lHÐr1 ~ (!! OOC OOZ 00 I 0 SJ)GI'OS't'3 .unun OIN 3(M1M1(1 .u ç HllK>N l33!11S ON< 0<01 lot.~ ""''''"''' - 'DO:G 3111 JO ......, 3HJ. IßOf1 """"""'~ :tl,"J:~ =' 0 > ~ .......... - NO - 'iN SJ<MI3S S3IIOH '-\9 'ONI 'JJOHN3>I!i3H N!I.OIIB loza-tU-œ< J>QW1U Th!IÐIt'1 OIN NQISWI3dOS lO3IOQ )J'f 113QHn "" 3~ )S 03!Nd3!Id Sfll. ~....taJ"''''' (S3I'IOH KV1HJ ;JlONIS) £n 01 ,."aJ3S <RNA ](IS 'Z. ....--,.. "'" 'MO'\l.... IIIBIU>ION llIOd3II "" ',œ¡¡ns '1N1d SIU. !VH1 .uwoo J.B3H!H I ToOIOMt _ ~ , ......... - NO - 'iN S>ØI913S C1IH'- INOIU '1 loœ I !.ON O3ß'oIIns IOU-u.:-œ< H<OSOr .,. JO """ =" , :sIIaT1W ..., """ """"'" 0fI0 Irs S3:J1NJ3S ÅU1I.Lf1 i 'i!>h:, _ d"<S'~l>'...J."~~- ~~~-- (O.,,-'~~~S'()~'=Ü~~¡~~~"";~'=)_-.____-_--j dJ'1i< ,~ ..... 'Nt.~ '0' M 1 '1' =,' ...,.... ON 000 ~J.J 0'.' ..... ......~ '01 HQU:3S I ';< ]'HnnC)Vi' , .. 3II10~~0~ U::; ~ -- 3H10~~~ ',¡;¡,.&~:jj'~ ~'æo~" £\'OO~ No 6~90.69 S ' ~~~ _=~~ r JIGIW(J'G\1O 1IUJ(J<JS¡!! !HI (ßf'(1d ÐNNOl ~d "Mif1fYtOOÐt'-V 3NOZ ÐHINOZ ~ ~~ ..;~ ~~ i"~ i z ~ (\ ~ q =;: '" ~ ~~ }." , :Dt.-) ;=..- -I ~~ '\ f,~ '.wßd<>!d ~I lO3/'8tIS NO ~ SQIMI3I. ... .,.00""""""" ~ tä ~~ ~ <i\i SJJI01 ....JDJ. ... >~ 'l't.lW:t.lJftI1 OW O'I"=.J""~h-. t¡ S1JN(1OQ _4< """'" <)-I SJJNn Qo . .-...oJ. (IMI-O¡) 0 / ~ SJJNn ., ,'ì~'l{. AII1lli\ ~~). o {f /,'1 .-...oJ. OHM) II O{ / SlINI\ '0 -::i ( T '" In S3IIOii '-Y8 '''3dSd3/iÏvd '\ a lOlinO S3I'IOIi ~J "J!o..s 'J'd '" \ " 3 "Iq,-,,-.-, \ :øsnoH .:IU NMUWi"~ , --<:!, '" tt\£09 "W ~ "'" lN3I'OSV3 ot£ÇII 'ON '000 "'" 00I'I3SV3 ~,,,= õõI,..... ~<:' J:'~ /IßH>I(X) 3N .. "'" lIGIOSV3 ,_ C _ "n _ _ 0'"'' .","'''' , -- (ÇÇ"6-LR) '.¡ :- - - -- ~ ~~~ ---------,,---- .--,.\ u-. 79 I I I U zu i ~_c~ ~'~~: _ _~ J £11 ~¡¡ .! -¥ ~~ "I JIll 001£01 ~ ;i~i~~a~~7\ ~ ¡ ~ ~: 66 9_~~ ! :y W.',\~iQ ~i I I 96 , ., r; :-~,;":~i:- ~¡ , ..-- ,~ ,0 ""'hil 0, I ~ i "()d';rléi" _Sf I £ ",0 ~.,':,,~;::;r,,;æ~1 ~ : ·::E: ~!! 'BID I" I1WH3H I" IiV,'"3" L 3 -'.>.".'. h __0 '.. \' ~~. \ o.~ m ~~ lINn . I ..1, , \ \ ,,,..,, .' . . ~ 2 u, I '.[ .' L '"' =;: "-S ill]] I -'- r 3 _9> "., " , _ __ _ __ _ _ __ 'S \ 0\' ,) ;.::; N N N U \ \ 0'1 {\ ..~,;, 0 I k ,f J5~Ð::1 -.J ~ -, - -- .... .9" ,X; -~'N -T1IH" ~~ I d~ir;';'Îi;l I T ,¡j13lS "T--, I 3Nn ><MI13S ocns ! I +----+---- u~¡~:W:~ I ~3;~~~~~ ~-lIiVl. (H)d ! "? i Y;" fn:.jJ.:; ~ I ¡ ¡ I::! .ó 6 ' I I .'1-~ I ~ I ,,- - ~ ~~~~~:~~~~~=- ~~ O~:: :----¡- ----I ~§ : : : S~ " I ! ,- avv; JJ.INIJIA : 'i;~:?;~¡ : Vi~;¡ii;;]¡ I ., I 'I QuO, I "Gce'J I ~ -t -~Uor~~--, "ðulUUJ&eq JO ¥J!C'd Mß at. ~ QÇl: ~ AVlU\W u .....ðe9 68 I.ut:) SlI'Ul¡31'f'dOóttOO I ~ \ß.JONMII.AJON~6uo!.D~:~ptOt:J.OIÞUIIl\JONMA ~-' uo ~ D Q} }MJ 0\£ IQJOU enp aoI.*'A ~j QÇ?; ~... MV\U¡W d:JOd ).\"1-;; :Ja H' U IIMJ~ 6i ~ ~ ~ OH: W'OS InP .~~ :B~r:¡;j ';'Qì{i:i'i ~ I '" "'" =.~....:,::. -=.~~.':' ~ ~ I " S],.,~", '1 ",,~8 81 os \LIP:! PP '''~no-.-µøno PiCC jD ..II1JJCI'J ;iN IMA ~ Cut~ i 1 A' I "I H ðd YY :UOfO so ~ 'Ii~ eðuoH 't~J ~.1 'ÇL ~ I -! Ot Iii ~ O '0/1'" 0/1"" "'" .. """ ...u <1d3O><3 _ SS31 '_J'I '" I r - -g - -. - - (m) :~~::o(~~~t=": ..:= _L~- -- -'- _ _ ':" -p-, . 0 """ O (t/13H 0/-) .¡mnQ __N "'" O _00 _ "<1 m. ON{ -...... ..:"",~~::"'~~';:-".1.=-~::: ~. o¡ \Mj Q£·oœL iO ~CÞ}¥ 0 IIUI ~ PiØtI ~ ~ IIpUOOH ..r..-::rOO~~I~::¡.:~PI~.......:.~" :Q ,oj r . /" ,.7,"3N ~:,_~.<:'::::~ 01"'::~':'~':: - - --I ' . 0/13N 0{13N ..,. O .., - "'" .... ",- - ...- ,- - - - -- ' ., ~...::'~~~OOO'l~~=p.i/~/:;:: I : -¡ Pt08JOMJII. .. . 'ßJOH ~ 6uoo &uJDeQ peuI'*D UD uo ~] ~ :t/LiN t/L3H :J? I L ..,::,:,. ';::'=.:"":' ~z="<;:~"'.f'~ ' i (""za) Jt'\oJ-~.1 ~H auo dNw»O.1 UI 'On) \.IINW uonoes --...1--r - - - -- - -i P b./L3N t/L~) ...vono ~ MA jO "¡.lone ~OH eI.I.1.. i L 'i 'S3Y:JV LO'lô ..... ,. ._,.., 01: _ "1\ 1£.)X3 ' ' I ~ '15 I I ,/') ,,;, 0NfSS31~=':'<::)~;:.¡.~"$".~ ----T-----1 ' 'd350f" ..:10 /l...LIJ·· ...."""'-=.:.-;-.:,:=:: lN3tvd073 7VllN30IS3¿¡ liNn 03NNtTld' . .ç-:¡ / I;IJ53 M3//13JI;I¿¡,9 ..:10 J Vld /-.¿¡I;INlf1/173¿¡d ROSKE NORTH 114 COR. If; . SEC. 10-T/24-P .: rCOUHTY C.I.II. I . ¡ BEARING NOTE . :! THE II£ST LINE OF NORTHEAST QUARTER . L OF SECT/ON /0. TOI/HSHIP 124. RANGE 10 i~ IS AISUIIED TO HAVE A BEARING OF NORrH .; 00 DEGREES 00 AliI/UTES 00 SECONDS EAST. ì' o OENOTES 1/2 INCH IRON PIPE SET AND ... IlARKEO "ITH REGI SmATI 01/ /MIBER /22Jð :0 . DENOTES IIOtMIfHT FOUND I~ =-_ t-=:;=:--f.='mi":.::::;. ". A. H.-NO. 75-----__ 230.00 ....."..-..., 2 255.07 RETk~m~ ~~r~~eNTJ ::¡ ~ ::';¡.y; /.1. i'.;i:· ; /.1. . ~ g I' .... '. . "". t\ . I --8 OUTLOT ".' 8 rU8 AC.'/-J 2 . on .. ?~ 11.38 AC.'/- ".:;' rr-N '20'S8'E 0'" . ~ . 0° , . 220 00 ot? .~ . to . _3: . . '" ISTORM WATe' - ~ gRETeNSION EASEl ~ Ò OUTLOT "8 _ _ ~ . \t\ fO.7tJ AC../-J ____n S 89'Z9'58'W 640.50 SEi DUtrL I I SEC. 2 I I :. .::.. : ,'.f ~:: ¡:' . eO J"" 11.80 AC.,/-I I :'if!': ... ..> I I ...... " . . - p ~ CURVE DELTA AH<II.E RADIUS ARC TANG .' 202 JI C I 2'13'/0' 11584. /8 440,08 22 , _. C 2 58'59'58' ð4Z.00 25Z.78 /2 I 9 C 5 54'58'04' 585.00 251.50 II' "R ~ '" IoU C.. 34-02'0,4 317.00 186.30 P I !! ! ~ 8· C 5 58'59'58' 4.,.00 277.7/ 14 ~ , I. i ·88 C 8 5/'2/'50' 408.00 225.52 II ii, 8.;..; C 7 7'58'17' 0408.00 54.50 2 ú ~ § ~2! ~ C 8 22'47'54' 542.00 158." 8 8 II e 0 CO /O'IZ'OZ' 542.00 08.70 4 ~ 2. 6{5 U .._..-..-"- s 85'/1'5 W '02.18 ':::'i~¡:ï:'T ~ ..,. .",,'" ..-..-..- UHE BEARING DISTANCE LIS 85' JI'57'W $0.55 L2 N58'54'10'E 25.51 L 5 N 00'2S'59'W 48.25 œ L 4 N 58'54'10'E Z5.5I t ~ : ~g:g::~::: :~:~ Ilwebvoortlfy_the_onthelMd ~ ~ = ~~:;::;::~ :~:: 19..!L."tI'-...-..,.¡, Oð LOS 74'57'05'E JJ,88 +. I L /0 S 74'$7'0$'£ 101.55 ~ """S' ..... /.~ I.." L /1 N OO'OO'OO'W 05.07 DoI4It . L 12 N 00'00'00'" 12.00 0v... L IS S 89'20 'SB'" I. 04 .to..-..: 1t KTAfL Oop<j)oAudllor-T__ 'Iwebv certify _ this InsInrnenI WBS n cr~n~ .10.1Lot~o Plot CobInet~tbrber ~ ORA' NAGE .s. UT I L , TY EASEII£NT ~ . :;j,.. . l L -\r_ &...~ By Oop<j)o ---- ---- -.--- EASEWEflT WIDTH AS LABElED .' 0 100 200 DAVID P .. LAND SURVE SCALE IN FeeT irA' TE PA' plI. ,.!2Ø-: . indicated the project is on hold for one year. The representative also indicated the City of St. Joseph is the only location under consideration for the project. Project 01-Q: Jeff Schlingman of the Partnership contacted MDG on December 28th and noted they have an inquiry for a 5-7 acre industrial lot for a 60,000 square foot tip-up-concrete facility with an estimated 55 employees. He requested a letter outlining available lots, land and assessment costs and incentives available, by January 2, 2002. MDG prepared a location map and letter and sent it to the Partnership on December 28th. After several follow-ups as indicated in previous Council reports, MDG contacted Mr. Schlingman to inquire as to the status of the project and to confirm whether or not the prospect was DBL/MCO. Mr. Schlingman indicated the name of the prospect had not been disclosed and the City of St. Joseph had not been ruled out as a site. MDG contacted the Partnership on February 26th to check the status of the project. Mr. Schlingman indicated St. Joseph had been ruled out as a possible location. Project 02-Ä January 8, 2002, this contact called the city looking for a retail space. MDG contacted owners of the building adjacent to the laundromat and provided the information to the contact. On February 22, 2002 MDG received a call from the prospect representative requesting additional follow up with the owners of the parcel of interest. MDG followed up and left a message for the owner of the parcel. Project 02-8 This contact previously contacted MDG noting they are looking for a highway commercial site and need assistance in compiling demographic data on the city. A follow-up phone call was initiated on January 31,2002. . Project 02-C The business owner saw the sign in the St. Joseph Business Park and called for more information regarding lot sizes, prices and zoning or covenant regulations. This is a small manufacturer looking for agproximately 2 acres. Lot prices, assessments and covenants were discussed. On February 5 MDG left a message offering to meet to review the information sent or provide additional assistance. Project 02-E This contact currently owns and operates a business in St. Cloud. The contact is considering the construction of a facility primarily industrial in nature with some showroom space in the St. Joseph area. On February 15th MDG returned a hone call to the prospect. Issues identified were amount of space, possible locations and proper zoning class. A meeting was set for February 20th. MDG met with the prospect and provided brochure information, zoning information and site options. Other: MDG followed up with County Staff, City Administrator and City Attorney regarding TIF District 1-3 and the partial payment. Modifications were made to the inserts to the St. Joseph brochure and quotes for printing new inserts were obtained. Funding for the updated printings was obtained from Xcel Energy. MDG spoke with a party interested in leasing 1,000 sf of existing office space that is handicap accessible. MDG researched available existing office space and forwarded information regarding developers planning office space construction. . MDG spoke with a party proposing a second principal use for a single parcel. MDG forwarded zoning information to the prospect. . . Overtime and Callouts February 15 through February 28, 2002 2/25/02 5.50 hrs Snow Plowing/Sanding 2/20/02 4.00 hrs Slippery Streets callout 2/25/02 6.00 hrs Snow Plowing/Sanding 2/20/02 2.00 hrs Snow Plowing/Sanding 2/25/02 5.50 hrs Snow Plowing/Sanding 2/26/02 4.00 hrs Use of Force Training 2/23/02 2.00 hrs Weekend Work 2/17/02 6.00 hrs In-Custody Paperwork 2/24/02 2.00 hrs Weekend Work 2/26/02 4.00 hrs Use of Force Training 2/25/02 5.50 hrs Snow Plowing/Sanding . 2/26/02 4.00 hrs Use of Force Training 2/16/02 2.00 hrs Weekend Work 2/17/02 2.00 hrs Weekend Work 2/18/02 2.00 hrs Holiday Work 2/25/02 5.50 hrs Snow Plowing/Sanding 2/18/02 5.00 hrs Holiday Pay .