Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2000 [09] Sep 11 . . CITY OF ST. JOSEPH 21 First Avenue NW P.O. Box 668, St. Joseph, MN 56374 (320) 363-7201 Fax:363-0342 . Ilk St. Joseph Planning Commission City Hall - September 11, 2000 MAYOR 7:00 p.m. Kenneth J. Hiemenz CLERK! Call to Order ADMINISTRATOR Cari Schmidt New Business: 7:00 P.M. Lemmer Trucking - Site Plan Review COUNCILORS Bob Loso 7:30 P.M. Chester Fried Chicken - Site Plan Review Cory Ehlert .Wit 8:00 P.M. Zoning Ordinance Revisions - Recommended Changes Niedenfuer Other Business: . Pond View Ridge Six Update . Northland Addition Update Approval of Minutes - July 10, 2000 Adjourn . ~" . \;\(/ . . ~ ~h ÿCJV . CITY OF ST. JOSEPH 21 First Avenue NW MEMORANDUM P.o. Box 668, St. Joseph, MN 56374 ~ PI' . . M b (320) 363-7201 0: anmng COmmiSSiOn em ers Fax: 363-0342 From: Chad A. Carlson, Planning Commission Secretary Date: 9/1//00 Ilk RE: Summary of September 11th Agenda Items MAYOR Kenneth J. Hiemenz Lemmer Truckinf;!: Lemmer Trucking Company has purchased a lot in the St. Joseph Industrial Park. They are proposing to construct a shop to house their trucks and equipment. They have supplied a site CLERK! and landscaping plan for your review. AIJMINISTRATOR Cari Schmidt Chester Fried Chicken: Paul Sullivan will be approaching the Planning Commission with a revised site plan that COUNCILORS incorporates additional parking spaces to accommodate the Ordinance. In addition, the property owners will be providing the documentation explaining the ownership situation Bob Loso between the Taco Johns and Subway properties. An agreement was executed late this I: Ehlert afternoon and was not ready for the packet. I will be hand delivering the material on Twit September 6th. The owners of the property and Mr. Sullivan will be present. 1\i ary Niedenfuer Ordinance Revisions: Enclosed in your packet is a letter from John Scherer recommending changes to the Zoning Ordinance after the City Council adopted Ordinance 55, which dealt with existing and new rental properties. Please read the memo carefully. John is recommending the changes and the City Council will be setting a public hearing for September 21 st. The Planning Commission is required to make a recommendation to the City Council. Since the City Council is having a public hearing on September 21 st, it is a good time to review the Highway 75 Business District Ordinance dealing with exterior building materials. As you recall, interpretation of the Ordinance has caused some problems. I will have some suggestions available at the meeting. Please review the Ordinance and come with some ideas. If you have any questions regarding these agenda items, please contact me as soon as possible. Thank you. . Unofficial Minutes - Planning Commission . Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the Planning Commission and City Council for the City of St. Joseph met in Joint Session on Monday, July 10,2000 at 7:00 p.m. in the S1. Joseph City Hall. Plannin1! Commission Members Present: Chair Hub Klein. Commissioners Marge Lesnick, S. Kathleen Kalinowski, Gary Utsch, Cory Ehlert, Jim Graeve and Kurt Schneider. Planning Commission Secretary Chad A. Carlson. Others Present: Paul Sullivan and Mike Deutz. Public Hearin1! - Variance Request bv Paul-Mar. Inc. Carlson read for the record that the Planning Commission of S1. Joseph shall conduct a public hearing on Monday, July 10, 2000 at 7:00 p.m. in the S1. Joseph City Hall. The purpose of the hearing is to consider a variance request to St. Joseph Code of Ordinance 52.14 Subdivision 4 (0) which states that restaurants and cafes shall have at least one parking space for each four (4) seats used by patrons, plus one (1) space for each employee on the maximum shift. Paul Sullivan, owner, presented his plans to place a Chester Fired Chicken :lÌ'anchise in the space currently occupied by Stardust Video. Sullivan requested that the Planning Commission review the memo in their packets detailing the project and need for a variance to the parking requirements. Sullivan also described the site plan in detail and called the Planning Commission's attention to the seating area and available parking. The business is described as an express item food facility and will primarily serve take-out food. The new business would generate the same ammmt of traffic that exists with the video business, but the stay by the patrons would be less time consuming. Sullivan compared the operation to Val's Restaurant on the east side ofS1. Cloud. Utsch questioned the number of booths in the new business. Sullivan stated that there are two full booths and one half booth, providing seating for 10. Sullivan added that the restroom facilities would be shared between Taco Johns and the new business. . Klein questioned if a drive-through operation would exist and expressed concern with parking spaces 3,4,5, and 6 of the current parking scheme. Sullivan stated that the new business would not have a drive through and did acknowledge that the south parking spaces on the current site do get blocked in when the drive through at Taco Johns is busy. Lesnick stated that adding this type of business without the necessary parking would only contribute to the parking problems in this area. The need for additional parking would overflow to neighboring businesses. Lesnick stated that she received a call :lÌ'om Kay's Kitchen stating their disapproval of the proposal. Ehlert questioned if an arrangement of could be done with Subway to purchase or construct additional parking spaces on the north end of their lot. Sullivan stated that he will be speaking with the owners of the Subway property to discuss a proposal to create diagonal parking behind their drive-up area. Sullivan added that the need for parking is based on the business cycle. Taco Johns and Subway are extremely busy during the noon hour. However, the Chester Fried Chicken operation would be busy during the dinner hours of 4-6 p.m. Utsch expressed his concern with the City accepting ''handshake'' agreements. The Planning Commission and City Council should require the agreement in writing. Utsch further stated that the business would be excellent for St. Joseph, but the parking issue must be resolved. Graeve stated the variance being requested doesn't meet the conditions of a Variance as stated in the Ordinance. Variances are exceptions to the Ordinances and should not be a common occurrence. Utsch stated that the Planning Commission and City Council worked extremely hard in defining ordinances for the . Hwy 75 Business District. Utsch stated that he is concerned with setting a precedence in the district for existing and new businesses. The new business would not make the parking situation in the area better, but is could make it worse. July 10, 2000 Minutes . Kalinowski expressed her concern that sitting down and eating dinner would take longer than renting a movie. She disagrees that the new business would have less of an impact on parking then the video store. Graeve suggested that the booths be taken out and the business only serve take out food. Sullivan stated that he did consider this option. but the Ordinances actually require more spaces for a take out operation. Carlson concurred. Schneider stated that he is concerned that Taco Johns doesn't have enough parking with all the traffic that occurs during a busy day. Schneider questioned if a variance was given to Taco Johns. Carlson answered no and the current businesses meet the parking requirements. Graeve moved to recommend the City Council deny the variance request submitted by Paul-Mar, Inc. as it doesn't meet the requirements as stated in Sections a. b. and c of Ordinance 52.8 ofthe St. Joseph Code of Ordinances; Seconded by Utsch. Discussion: Sullivan requested the Planning Commission suggest some alternatives that they would consider. Lesnick and Ehlert stated that the Planning Commission's only concern tonight was with the lack of parking spaces for the new business. They suggested Sullivan find a way to acquire additional spaces and present a new plan to the Planning Commission. Sullivan stated that he will continue to work with Carlson and the owners of Subway to work out an agreement that satisfies the Ordinances for parking. The motion passed with the following vote: . Ayes: Klein, Lesnick, Kalinowski, Ehlert, Schneider, Graeve and Utsch, Nays: None Motion Carried Resolution of Findiol! The request of Paul-Mar, Inc. for a variance came before the Planning Commission at a public hearing held on July 10. 2000. The purpose of the hearing was to consider the issuance of a variance for to the parking requirements in the B-2 Highway 75 Business District. The variance is requested to allow for the existence of a Chester Fried Chicken restaurant rranchise in the Taco Johns building on Highway 75. St. Joseph Code of Ordinance 52.14 Subdivision 4 (0) states that restaurants and cafes shall have a least one parking space for each four (4) seats used by patrons, plus one (1) space for each employee on the maximum shift. The request has been submitted by Paul-Mar, Inc. 211 County Road #75 West, S1. Joseph, MN 56374. Notice of this matter was du1y served and published. In consideration of the information presented to the Planning Commission and its application to the Comprehensive Plan and Ordinances of the City of St. Joseph, the Planning Commission makes the following findings: The proposed variance is not consistent with the standards for a Variance as stated in St. Joseph Code of Ordinances 52.8 Subd. (a., c and d). Therefore, based on the findings above, the Planning Commission makes the following recommendation: Denial of the Variance request of 3 parking spaces for the property located at 211 County Road #75 West for the purpose of establishing a Chester Fried Chicken restaurant franchise within the Taco Johns . facility. Chair Klein closed the hearing at 8:05 p.m. July 10,2000 Minutes · Joint Trenchin1! Discussion: Graeve suggested that the Planning Commission consider recommending to the City Council a policy mandating joint trenching for utilities in new developable areas. Graeve referenced a meeting held in May regarding the Pond View Ridge Sixth Addition. All utilities agreed it was a good idea, but Stearns Electric Association has decided not to participate at this time. Their lines are placed in the easement area within the property line. In the Pond View Ridge Sixth Addition, the emphasis was placed on saving trees and safety. Graeve further stated that none of the communities in the St. Cloud Metro Area require joint trenching. St. Cloud has a "gentleman's" agreement that has worked but carries no teeth. From an environmental and safety standpoint, Graeve suggested that the Planning Commission make a motion to have the City Council research and create an Ordinance/Policy mandating utility companies be located in a joint trench. Carlson stated that he has researched the idea with the League of Minnesota Cities and they have not found one community in Minnesota with such an Ordinance. John Scherer will be looking into this situation. Carlson further added that Stearns Electric is concerns with placing their lines in the road right-of-way fearing that the road will be disturbed and lines would have to be replaced at their expense. Klein stated that all the utility companies are in the same boat. Why aren't the other companies concerned? · Carlson stated that the other companies are larger and can cover the costs of replacement easier then a small rural electric operation. Ehlert stated that relocating roads and major redesigns are a thing of the past. The APO and County are very good at analyzing future development areas and placing roads in our area. There is very little risks for utility companies. Schneider stated that in his opinion it not an issue of joint trenching but rather placing all the utilities in the road right-of-way and not in the easement areas. Schneider stated his concern over safety with joint trenching and all the utility lines in one small area. Klein stated that he spoke with a representative ITom Stearns Electric regarding this issue and the Pond View Ridge Six development. Stearns Electric is not opposed at locating their lines in the right-of-way and their intentions are to save as many trees as possible in the development. Graeve moved to recommend that the City Council adopt a policy that in aU new developments utilities shall be placed in the road right-of-way and in a joint trench when possible; Seconded by Lesnick. Discussion: Schneider stated that he supports the motion but would like the City Council to look into the safety concerns and the City Public Works Department is comfortable with placing all the utilities under the road right-of-way. The motion passed with the following vote: Ayes: Klein, Lesnick, Kalinowski, Ehlert, Schneider, Graeve and Utsch, Nays: None Motion Carried · Approve Minutes: Lesnick moved to approve the June 5, 2000 minutes as presented; Seconded by Kalinowski. The motion passed with the following vote: - -- Å)Ia: KIIin, Lesnick, Schneider, Ehlert, Kalinowski, and Utsch, ~ ~0IIe Motion Carried Abstain: Graeve . Mike Deutz Variance Request: Lesnick questioned Ehlert and Carlson regarding the City Council's denial of the variance requested by St. Joe Gas and Bait. Ehlert stated that the City Council denied the Variance as it didn't meet the requirements of a variance, didn't meet the intent of the Hwy #75 Business District regulations, new or any expansion will meet the 50010 exterior requirement, and the City Council felt Mr. Deutz didn't exhaust all his options with Steams County. Carlson added that the City Council questioned if the addition should be held separate under the ordinance or does the addition require the entire structure be brought up to compliance with the exterior materials. Carlson also confirmed that City Council felt additional options where available to Mr. Deutz without the need for a variance. Utsch stated the Mr. Deutz explained he was on the property line and in order for him to place a facade with footings, he would have to encroach on Highway #75 right-of-way. Utsch stated that he has found out that the existing building is 3 feet ITom the property line and he would have room. Carlson informed the Planning Commission that he has been working with Mr. Deutz to develop a new plan that would bring the complex into compliance with the Ordinance. Carlson suggested that the Planning Commission consider rewording the Ordinance to specify the exterior requirements in greater detail. 2000 Auto Body: Carlson provided the Planning Commission with a detailed landscaping plan for the Property owned by 2000 Auto Body within the Industrial Park. Carlson requested comments ITom the Planning Commission and none were made. Pole Barn Ordinance: Klein questioned the status of the amendments made to the residential district regarding the construction of pole . barns. Carlson stated that the City Council has adopted the amendment to the ordinance and pole barns are no longer allowed in a residential district. The City Offices will continue to work with the building inspector to make sure a similar situation doesn't occur again. Farmers Market: Kalinowski and Graeve gave a report on the activities of the Farmers Market and it's successful grand opening. Adult Land Uses: Utsch requested that Carlson confirm that our adult land use ordinance is sufficient and complete in light of recent rulings in the City of St. Cloud. Specifically the definition between "adult vs. grown up". Carlson stated he would look into the ordinance and confirm with John Scherer. Quonset Hut on Birch Street: Lesnick questioned if the City Offices are looking into options to clean up this area and if the business located in the facility will leave once St. Joseph Auto Sales closes. Carlson stated that the City Administrator and the Police Chief have looked into the situation. Complaints and citations have been made. Adjourn: The Planning Commission meeting adjourned by consensus at 8:35 p.m. Chad A. Carlson Planning Commission Secretary . July 10,2000 Minutes . ,- .~~It 0/ 7e¡d Jjtt . . VRaikOWSki 11 Seventh Avenue North ~~~~~A~~l Ud. P.O. Box 1433 St. Cloud, MN 56302-1433 August 24, 2000 320-251-1055 Toll Free 800-445-9617 Ms. Cari Schmidt Fax 320-251-5896 City Administrator City of St. Joseph P.O. Box 668 rajhan@cloudnet.com St. Joseph, MN 56374 Re: Amendment to Ordinance 55 Our File No. 20390 Dear Cari: Enclosed herewith is a copy of a formal amendment to the Housing Ordinance recently . approved by the City Council. Please review this document against your notes and let me know if you feel that any changes, additions or deletions are appropriate. I have also had an opportunity to review the Zoning Ordinance. I would recommend that the Council consider the following changes: Frank J. RajkowsKi .. 1. Section 52.12 Subd. 9. I would recommend that this Section be amended to specify that there is a loss of "grandfather" status if the use is involuntary Gordon H. Hansmeier discontinued due to a revocation of a permit. Frederick L. Grunke Thomas G. Jovanovich' 2. I would suggest that the parking provisions located in Section 52.14 Subd. 3 be changed as follows: John H. Scherer' Paul A. R..JJk.C\'Jskje a. That fractional units when determining the required number of parking Kevin F. Grav units be rounded to the next highest number in all cases. William 1. CJshman b. That the parking requirements for rental properties should be those set ~ichara W SooalvaffO out under Subd. 4(b) for Boarding Houses. The provisions of Subd. 4(a), for single family or two family residence, should only apply to Lotte R. Hansen non-rental dwellings. This may result in a requirement of more ?JtflC~ J. LafK:n parking spaces for a rental home. .Jr. 0 F,we· ;usar ,'...1 O"-'lJC' Fra¡1/( J .qd ,'\O\.V").,; .mct RX".1ra 101/ 50balvdrro are Xlm/rtea to pr.J(ticc In NOrTh Dakota, Gordon H. H.1flSmeler '11 North Dakota and Wisconsin, Paul A. Ra}ko'N5i<Î in ~Vìsconsin and Wil/iam J. Cashman in South Dakota. -Member of American BO..lfd of Trial Advocates. -Qualified ADR Neutral. t · Ms. Cari Schmidt August 24,2000 Page 2 3. I would suggest that we look at the uses permitted in a single family residence district under Section 52.17. I would suggest that permitted uses be limited to "single family - owner occupied residential use." Rental is prohibited. Uses pursuant to a Special Use Permit could include rental if"owner occupied." Nonowner occupied rental would be prohibited. 4. I would suggest that we also look at Section 52.18 (R-2 Zone Regulations) and restrict Permitted Uses to owner occupied rentals. Non-owner occupied rental may be permitted by a Special Use Permit. 5. With regard to Section 52.19, I suggest that Subd. 2, stating for Permitted Uses, be changed to allow for multiple dwellings of up to 12 dwellings per structure. I suggest that we remove the tenn "family" as that may suggest that a rental dwelling would be limited to three unrelated persons. 6. The Highway 75 Business District does not provide for residential rental use. I don't believe that further clarification is needed. It is my understanding that the · council wants to take a look at some clarification language dealing with required building exterior material to exclude windows or doors, that is fine. Cari, I also took a look at the Noise Ordinances as it relates to rental issues and I offer the following suggestions: 1. I would suggest that the Council consider the following to make it easier to enforce and protect against innocent violations by our pennanent residents. a. I would suggest that we take a look at the definition of a "noisy party or gathering." I believe that this definition should be viewed ITom two angles. First of all, during any time of the day, if there is a gathering which is so loud that it unreasonably and unnecessary noise, disturbances or endangers the comfort and peace of others, it's a violation of the ordinance. However, if the party is occurring after a certain time of night and creating noise that is heard outside the limits of the property in which the party is occurring, then there is a violation of the ordinance. A backyard picnic at 4:00 in the afternoon does not create the same nuisance that the same gathering would create ifheld at 1:00 in the morning. I think that the . ordinance should reflect this difference in community standards based upon the time of day or night which activities are occurring. I would suggest that 10:00 in the evening be established as a time which parties must move · inside or risk violating the noise ordinance. .... I' ';- ~ , . Ms. Carl Schmidt August 24,2000 Page 3 2. I believe that the manner in which this ordinance is enforced, especially in conjunction with the Housing Ordinance, should be reviewed. The City Council may want to consider giving the Police Department a little more discretion when determining whether or not a noise violation occurred. For instance, if the situation is one where the renters simply forgot to close a window before playing a stereo while having a guest or two over at 10:00 at night, a simple warning may be appropriate. On the other hand, where there is a group of20 or 30 in a yard, and other activities which should lead one of the occupants to reasonably presume that they may be disturbing others, a noise violation would be appropriate. I believe that a little use of discretion would cut down on the number of complaints to be addressed by the Council. It would give the Council greater latitude to, take stronger action against the more serious violators. 3. I would also encourage the police, while on patrol, to approach houses before a noise ordinance complaint is received, and let the occupants know if the activities are generating noise which may be heard off premises. By doing that, the police will cut down on the disturbances occurring within a neighborhood. If they wait . until there is a complaint received before taking action, then the damage is already done in the sense that the neighborhood is disturbed. If the police stop and warn the residents of the potential for a noise violation, then the surrounding neighborhood is saved ITom having to endure the noise before calling the police later that evening. It would also serve to improve police relations with the rentors. Carl, if you anticipate any other issues or questions, please let me know. Thank you. Very truly yours, RAJKOWSKI HANS:MEIER LTD. JHS/kjp Enclosure . . AMENDMENT TO ORDINANCE 55: HOUSING, MAINTENANCE AND OCCUPANCY ORDINANCE The City Council for the City of St. Joseph hereby ordains that Ordinance 55 is amended as follows: 1. Section 55.2 Subd. 1 (c) is amended to read as follows: "The director of security (at minimum of once a month)." 2. That Section 55.2 Subd. I(t) is amended to read as follows: "Residence Assistants (live with students)." 3. That Section 55.2 Subd. 1 (h) is amended to read as follows: "Residence Directors (live with students)." 4. That the following is enacted as Subd. 6-1 of Section 55.3: "Subd. 6-1: Family - - shall have the same meaning as adopted in Section 52.4 . Subd. 22 of this Code of Ordinances." 5. Section 55.4 Subd. 3 is amended to read as follows: "Subd. 3: Maintenance of Occupied Areas. Every occupant of a dwelling, dwelling unit or rooming unit shall maintain in a clean and sanitary condition that part or those parts of the dwelling, dwelling unit and premises thereof, that the person occupies and controls in order to prevent any health, safety or fire hazard." 6. Section 55.4 Sud. 6 is amended to read as follows: "Subd. 6: Responsibility for Storage and Disposal of Garbage and Rubbish. a. Every owner of rental dwellings shall supply facilities for the sanitary and safe storage and/or disposal for rubbish and garbage. In the case of all other dwellings, it shall be to the I other responsibility of the occupant to furnish such facilities. b. The provisions of ordinances 107 and 108 of this code relative to weed and brush control, and garbage and rubbish disposal, shall apply to all residential rental property and be enforceable against both the owner and . occupant of the property." , , - 7. That Section 55.4 Subd. 16 is amended as follows: ~ "Subd. 16: Maintenance of Driving and Parking Areas. The owner of a multiple dwelling or other rental property shall be responsible for providing and maintaining in good condition parking areas and driveways for tenants as mandated by the provisions of Section 52.14 of this Code of Ordinances." 8. Section 55.8 Subd. 1 is amended by changing the term "25%" contained therein to "15%". 9. Section 55.8 Subd. 10 is amended to read as follows: "Subd. 1 0 Yard Cover. Every yard on a premise on which a dwelling stands shall be provided with lawn or combined lawn cover of vegetation, garden, hedges, shrubbery, and related decorative materials and such yards shall be maintained consistent with prevailing community standards. Motor vehicles may not be left parked and unattended on or within a yard. Grass shall be maintained so not to exceed a height of 6 inches." 10. Section 55.10 shall be amended to read as follows: "Fire Protection. All rental dwelling units shall be equipped with at least one fire - extinguisher and one carbon monoxide detector placed at locations within the dwelling as - approved by the compliance officer. Each rental dwelling unit shall also have an operating smoke detector on each level of the unit. All buildings shall be subject to the Uniform Fire Code." 11. Section 55.11 Subd. 1 (c) shall be amended to read as follows: "( c) The name and address of the owners agent for the receipt of notices of violations of the provisions of this ordinance and other applicable ordinances of the City of St. Joseph. The owner may designate any person residing within a 30 mile radius of the city limits of the City of St. Joseph as their agent for this purpose." 12. The following provision is added to Section 55.11 Subd. 1: "Prior to the issuance of any new rental license, the Planning Commission shall approve the registration and application to insure that the proposed rental use of the property complies with the requirements of the St. Joseph zoning ordinance and other ordinances of the City. " 13. Section 55.11 Subd. 9 is amended to read as follows: "Occupancy Register Required. Every owner of a licensed rental dwelling shall - keep, or caused to be kept, current register of occupancy for each dwelling unit which provides for the following information: - . VRaikowski 11 Seventh Avenue Nortn ~~~rrA~~ lid. P.O. 80x 1433 St. Cloud, MN 56302-1433 August 25, 2000 320-251-1055 Ms. Carl Schmidt Toll free 800-445-9617 Clerk Administrator for City of St. Joseph 21 FIrSt Avenue Northwest fax 320-251-5896 P.O. Box 668 St. JOseph, MN 56374 rajhan@cloudnet.com Re: Rental Housing Sunset Provision Our File No. 20390 Dear Carl: I took a closer look at options relative to ~cting a sunset provision for rental housing. Minnesota Statutes specifically prolnòit a city ftom etJ~r.tñ,g any ordinance which . e1imin:rtes or terminates a use by amortization which was lawful at the time that the use was commenced. The only exception is foe adult entertainment establishments. This is not a statement of opinion or interpretation. The City is flat out prohibited doing what has been proposed. Let me know if you have any questions. f,ank J. Rajkowsxi .. Very 1ruly yours, Gordon H. Hansmeier Frederick L Grunke RAJKOWSKI HANSMEIERLTD. Thomas G. Jovanov'Cho ~É- Jonn H. Scherer 0 Paul Ä. RaJKowS_<je Kevin F. Gray 'vVdliam J. Casnrr.ân lliS/baz Richard W. SOba¡varro Lotte R. Hansen PatrIck J. Larkin g(!an P. Far~e! .an M. Dege "an< J. Ra,kcW<X1 ana RXi".arri VI Sobalvarro are acmtrtPa to r;racvce tn Ncnh DaKota. Goroon H. HansmeJe( in '.¡cr.:: .::at= ¥C,,~ ~ A '.ajlcc-N!ici ¡, Wisa:r.5in ønd l'I'iIiam _ Cilshr.an in South Dakota Or.,1emoer at Ämencan Board at Trial Advoc3"te!.. °Qu¡¡if~"'Of! Hoeutra. ::11 om OSt', "ZL-~'~ 6ZBB-E98 OZ8 :XV.il N3113 ~- Z9109-&98-0Z8 ::mOHd __.nGIIIII_~_1JIY~ a.I ..._ _118 V ¿899 NY( 'H&lSor ·.LS urœm 1JIY __.1._ __ mu8UII _ 80 _ ,.,-.. If CIIIØmIIIJ.'JDoI ¡( ( laY OO/bt/' Ç)31?!:1V ^ ~3WW31 WOJ.. .L:iI:mts avcrna .LSV:¡ 80S --- ---~- SH~Q1In8 ~1ÅJ,S~t!lI1 All __ _ w.rIœ IIUIaØI All ~ IØK_ --- WIr.) - t - -- - . ---- t ----------- _________ .____..___ n. .Þ- ;l£ -~-----------~-- --_..__.~.__.__.--_._--_. -.----------------. ___.______._.~. _u______ ------------- t t -~.------ t t t --------------_.-~- --~._-_._---_.__._---- .0-.8 .0-.8 .0-.8 -------_.-----,---- .0-.8 ----------------- -,---_.~----_.._._- --,._-._--- - - ---------_.~--- -------------..--- ----------------------, · 0 ~ ~---------_.---_.._-- ----------------------_.- -_._._-~-----._---_.- ____.___.__.__u"____ _n_._ b ----------.----- --.--.--..------..------- 1 _.____._____n____._.__~ -,--.-----..----.-- ~ '" -.." -- _.._----._-,- -. ----.-----..--. .,-_..__.~._--_..-..~...._-, I --.------------------ ________h______ ____.~n__. --- ---._,-~.__._- ________._h__ -~--------- I ! _h__·____________ -~-----~------- _____________________!J C) --- z -]C :J - -- -- /, C ¡¡¡ I ='-- --- 0 ----- _._- <0 · 0 -_. x . ~ N J') $ ~ x -- ~ ~ --~--- --- ---------- -.-. .-- ~ " }.. }.. ¡:.:: I J .- r----------------------- r-----------------------I ~ I I I (/) -- I I I (/). I I Zb -- I I «I z'i' I I o~ '0 I I 1 '0 -'~ - . ~ I a... { I II I-~ I I I ~ " II J «- I a:::;;¡ iii, J ~~ .. g~ ~ ~Ij --. - w § -' - . -- lL. -~_._----~_._----- _._-------~------------- __________h______._.__. ------------~-~--- 5 _~__~____________·__.____h__ " --_._~---------_.._-_. -, · -------.--------------- 0 -----~._-_.._-----_.--- ).. I ---~---------_.~-------- }.. -------~-_.- _________.___h .__~____________._______h_________ ----._--------_._------~- .._..____.__~__.. ___4____________·_ ---=-':'::::-'::18--::-=-==':::'::::-":::: .---- ----------- -_.._,--~- " .------.-.------.- ;~~~~~~ ~~ :~~~~~~~l~ --_._._-----~.__._._-----_._-------- ---- ---- ------------------- .-- ... ~ _'.__._._u _ .0- ,tt ï ~ I IiI I . 11 ~ ~¡I I! I I I I I ~ I I i E I b If '" i .. I I .. t: \I ¡ " II D I Z I 0 I ! · ï= ü w I~I (/)'0 I -,i ~ " -'~ " « - i ¡ ~~ ¡ « . ü ~ .0-," .0-.1 . .. .0-.1 I 133~lS Hd3S0r ,09 0 0 Z rì IN3~3::> ,9 ( "O-,90~ 1 Z ~O::>UJ ~o::>(/) wow wow 5crcrW 5crcrW cr <~ cr <~ o I IlL. o I IlL. m(/)UO ~UJ~O cr -l <~::>(/) <~::>(/) Ww:EW WW:EW ocr 0 9~cr9 -C>~- :Ecr UJ :Ecr<(/) ffi~8::J ffi~8::J a.WU< a.wU< ~ Ö -l C> ~ Zh ~ ~ cr < < a. a. 0 I 0 0 It) C> Z 9 5 ,p-¡;. m ~J<;V 'è-.I ,., x 'è-.I "<t- . 0 I 0 0 It) ~ .-- '--/ W Z 0 Y:: U Sz mO I- ~ G~O Z NO ..-- Y:: '--/ « U Ww ::> >- 0:: ---12 I- Wz 0:: sW 1-0:: W ¿ I-LL ¿ 00 W ---1 ---1 , . . . .\ ..