Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2004 [04] Apr 05 CITY Of ST. JOSEPH . www.cityofstjoseph.com St. Joseph Planning Commission April 5, 2004 7 :00 PM Administrdtor . Judy Weyrens 1. Call to Order MdYor 2. Approve Agenda Ldrry . Hosch 3. Approve Minutes Councilors AI Rdssier 4. 7:00 PM Public Hearing - Special Use Request, Tom Borresch Ross Rieke Automotive Sales in B2, Highway Business Zoning District Gdry Utsch Ddle Wick 5. 7: 15 PM Preliminary and Final Plat, Honer Homes Platting of 504/508 and 606/608 East Minnesota Street. Purpose: To allow existing duplexes to be sold as separate housing units. Continuation of March I, 2004 . 6. 7:25 PM WHY USA Realty - Request to conduct public hearing for rezoning - Birch Street East 7. Foxmore Hollow - Updated Plan 8. Other Matters 9. Adjourn Ale - - 2) College ^venue North, PO Box 66s . Sdint. Joseph. Minncsotd )"6,74 Phone ,20.,6".7201 I:d x ,20.,6,.0,42 . I Attachment: Yes or No I REQUEST FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION Special Use Permit -Minnesota Home Improvement DATE: April 5, 2004 AGENDA ITEM Special Use Permit Request - Minnesota Home Improvement PREVIOUS ACTION None. RECOMMENDED PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION . Recommend the Council grant the Special Use Permit with the following contingencies: l. The Special Use Permit sunsets on May 1,2005. Petitioner states that request is for a one year period. 2. Temporary Signs will not be used for advertising the sales, unless application is made in accordance with the Ordinance including the maximum number of days allowed. 3. The property will meet the all the outdoor standards for granting a special use permit in a B2 Business District. This includes screening of areas that abut residential districts. COMMENTS/RECOMMENDATIONS This matter came to light as Mr. Borresch is required to have the Zoning Administrator for the City sign the dealers license that vehicles sales is a permitted use. If approved a copy of the resolution will be forwarded with the dealer license to the appropriate agency. - - CITY Of ST. JOSEPH . www.cityofstjosèph.com City of St. Joseph Public Hearing The Planning Commission for the City of St. Joseph will conduct a public hearing on Monday, April 5, 2004 at 7:00 PMin the St. Joseph City Hall. The purpose of the hearing is to consider a Special Use Permit request to allow a trailer dealership in a B-2 Highway Administrator 75 Business District. The property is located at 9 SE 1 ih Avenue, legally described as Judy Weyrens Lot 009 Block 001 Whispering Pines. Mayor St. Joseph Code of Ordinances 52.31 subd. 4 (e) provides for the following under special uses: New or used auto dealerships in a B-2 Highway Business District. Larry J. Hosch· The request for Special Use has been submitted by MHI- Tom Borresch, 9 17'h Avenue Councilors SE, St. Joseph, MN 56374 AI Rassier Ross Rieke Judy Weyrens Gary Utsch Administrator/Clerk Dale Wick . ·...r_._ ._ ~LÇ[ ~^" II ..t'o"il¡ !'j" - 2. ., Coil e g e A v e n u e Nor t h . P 0 ß 0 x 6 68 . S ò i n t. I 0 s e ph. M inn e sot a ., 6 -',1 4 Phone ,2.0.,6j·72.01 rò x j2.0.j6,.Oj42. Attached to this application and made a part thereof are other material submission data requirements, as indicated. Applicant Signature~ () ~ Date: . Owner Signature: ~ 0 Date: - FOR OFFICE USE ONLY DATE SUBMITTED: DATE COMPLETE: DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING PUBLICATION DATE: Planning Commission Action: _ Recommend Approval _ Recommend Disapproval Date of Action: Date AppiicantJProperty Owner notified of Planning Commission Action: City Council Action: _ Approved _ Disapproved Date of Action: Dale ApplicantiProperty Owner notified of City Council Action: . - APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL USE PERMIT CITY OF ST. JOSEPH . 25 College Avenue NW Fee $ Paid P. O. Box 668 Receipt # St. Joseph, MN 56374 Date (320)363-7201 or Fax (320}363-0342 STATE OF MINNESOTA) )ss COUNTY OF STEARNS) NAME: f'l\ \'-;î: -,Ho fV\D.. '> \So ~~;::'ch PHONE: ~2.0 .. '~b 3." -4436"' ADDRESS: '1 114 ~ s.~, S7.::>o~-ei' h ('r'--. o..j , -( 3"1 .':::)..,.- 4- !/We, the undersigned, hereby make the following application to the City Council and Planning Commission of the City of SI. Joseph, Stearns County, Minnesota. (Applicants have the responsibility of checking all applicable ordinances pertaining to their application and complying with all ordinance requirements): 1. Application is hereby made for Special Use Permit to conduct the following: -Y -y'''c-. ~ I e.v- 5Ai¡;-~ 2. Legal description of land to be affected by application, including acreage or square footage of land involved, and street address, if any (attach additional sheet if necessary): . 3. Present zoning of the above described property is: 4. Name and address of the present owner of the above described property is: 1 H-o rY'\Pú" Bnl"V'i': "h. 5. 6. Will the proposed use depreciate the area in which it is propos~d? Please explain: -+v ..'. "'" - - . o..~ -~ . -J.-e.., ~A. -Y\.-.. 12,...,," ~ \ , e-\"v'"\.. .~ç;.\ ì Q~' \ P,,,,,v\~e....,-1 ~ .....,........."-/ 'e. ')I::.n·.....r '^ ¡;;,\ \...¡ bi'_ v€''''........ 0..' (1.cá 1 1)6 \......i', \ \ 7. 8. Are local streets cap~ble ~f handling traffic which is gen~rated by t~e proposed use? Please explain: 'Ye. ":-. ~ t::...dd:~~L. L :-;"~:£'H:.~-r- < b€-~-:::r (~i 1\ be- Co:" ~'v...y? \ ~ ",. - .e-f>e.-, \ '-FLY"~ d c-_: t ~ - - · CITY OF ST. JOSEPH *Explanation of retail-service plan for MHI Trailers. vVhat we want to do is sell trailers. . . mostly new at the Minnesota Home Improvements building site for 1 year as we wòuld like to in the future move most all operations, including the trailers, Minnesota Home Improvements warehouses, and trucks to the Ridgewood road site, across the county road 75 Highway where we are currently completing a large building. Scherer trucking leases a site, for their tractor trailers, near that building in which the lease would then not be offered to them next year in exchange for the approved MHI trailer site, but for the present time we need approval for this site Lots 7-8. of the whispering pines addition in St. Joseph \vhich is a commercial site. The trailers y currently see there have been a part of the business for years past. V\T e usually purchase trailers for the business then resell them after about 5 years because of the wear on them, then we buy new trailers to replace the aging units. vVe now have an opportunity to sell new trailers right from the manufacturer so we'd like to take advantage of this situation. We'll promise to keep the site very clean just as we have in the past with the Minnesota Home Improvements Company as well as LeafGuard Gutters. My questions are though with no application for a new building for the business, because we would use a portion of the Minnesota Home Improvements building, just permission to use our land and lot sites for the service, would \ve need to fill out the application as thoroughly as stated? Again all we need is permission after zoning requirements are met, to proceed \vith the application for the dealer license as we outlined? Also then what area's of the application do we need to cover prior to the meeting and when could we get on the agenda? Thank You, CÀ-D-f? Tom Borresch - - 9 SE 17th Ave, PO Box 248, St Joseph MN 56374 Phone 320-353-7531 Fax 320-363-8397 Toll Free-888-363-3305 I . 4. A protective canopy located over the pump island(s) may be an accessory structure on the property; however, adequate visibility both on and off site shall be maintained. 5. An internal site pedestrian circulation system shall be defined and appropriate provisions made to protect such areas from encroachments by parked cars or moving vehicles. b) Office warehousing. c) Lawn and garden temporary sales area. d) Lumber yards and home improvement retail centers. e) New or used auto dealerships. f) Stone building material sales and service. g) Recreational vehicle sales and services. h) Transportation terminals, public utility and transfer stations, without storage yards. . i) Equipment Services. 1. Radio and television shops 2. Appliance repair shops 3. Appliance show rooms j) Recreational Services. 1. Theaters 2. Bowling establishments 3. Clubs and lodges k) Hotels 1) Motels m) Drive-through and convenience food establishments, provided that an internal site pedestrian circulation system shall be defined and appropriate provisions made to protect such areas rrom encroachments by parked cars or moving vehicles. n) Commercial car washes (drive through, self-service and mechanical) provided - that stacking space is constructed, subject to approval by the City Engineer, to - 52.31-3 2. Dental clinics 3. Veterinary clinics . 4. Other institutions providing health care. e) Fanners Market for the sale of produce only. Notification and the submittal of a plan to the Planning Commission is required. £) Movie and Perfonning Arts Theaters. g) Other use detennined by the Planning Commission to be of the same character as contained in this Subdivision. Subd.3: Pennitted Accessory Uses. The following uses shall be pennitted as an Accessory Use in the Highway 75 Business District and subject to all the requirements in this Section: a) Commercial or business building for a use accessory to the principal use, not to exceed 30% percent of the size of principal structure. b) Signs which meet the criteria of Subdivision 9 of this section. c) Temporary buildings for construction purposes for a period not to exceed constructi on. d) Off-street loading and parking areas, subject to applicable section(s) of this . Ordinance. e) Fences, landscaping. Subd. 4: Uses Under Special Use Permit. The following uses shall require a Special Use Pennit based on the procedures set forth in Section 52.07.03 ofthis Ordinance: a) Auto malls and/or automobile service and gas stations, provided that: 1. Motor fuel facilities are installed in accordance with state and city standards. 2. Adequate space shall be provided to access gas pumps and allo\v maneuverability around the pumps. Underground fuel storage tanks are to be positioned to allow adequate access by motor fuel transports and unloading operations minimize conflict with circulation, access and other activities on the site. 3. Wherever fuel pumps are to be installed, pump islands shall be installed. - - 52.31-2 . Subd.5: Conditions Applicable to All Special Use Pernlits. The following conditions are applicable to all uses under a special use permit: a) When abutting a residential use in a residential use district, the property is adequately screened and landscaped. b) Parking areas shall be screened from the view of abutting residential districts. c) , Vehicular access points shall be limited, shall create minimal conflict with through traffic movements, shall comply with all appropriate Chapters of this Ordinance as may be amended and shall be subject to the approval of the City Engineer. d) Provisions are made to control and reduce noise in accordance with MPCA standards. e) The entire site other than that taken up by a building, structure or plantings shall be surfaced so as to control dust subject to the approval of the City Engineer. f) The entire area shall have a drainage system subject to the approval ofthe City Engineer. . g) The architectural appearance and functional plan of the building and site shall not be so dissimilar to the existing buildings or area so as to cause impairnlent in property values or constitute a blighting influence within a reasonable distance of the lot. h) All outdoor storage shall be completely screened from view. - Special Use - Ordinance Extract Page 1 of 4 . Subd.3: Special Use Permit. a) Purpose and Scope. The purpose ofthis Section ofthe Zoning Ordinance is to provide the Planning Commission and City Council with a reasonable degree of discretion in determining the suitability of certain designated uses upon the general welfare and public safety. b) Issuance. Special use permits may be issued for any of the following: 1. Any of the uses or purposes for which such permits are required or permitted by the provisions of this Ordinance. 2. Public utility or public service uses or public building in any district when found to be necessary for the public health, safety, convenience or welfare. 3. To classify as a conforming use any non-conforming institutional use existing in any district at the time ofthe establishment of such district. c) Application. Applications for Special Use Permits and required fees shall be submitted the City Administrator/Clerk. The application shall be accompanied by a site plan containing such information as is necessary to show compliance with this Ordinance, including but not limited to: . 1. Description of site (legal description). 2. Site plan drawn at scale showing parcel and building dimensions. 3. Location of all buildings and their square footage, and the location of easements. 4. Curb cuts, driveways, access roads, parking spaces, off-street loading areas and sidewalks. 5. Landscaping and screening plans. 6. Drainage and erosion control plan with pertinent elevations. 7. Sanitary sewer and water plan with estimated use per day. 8. Soil type, the location of wetlands as defined by Minnesota Statute 1036.005, Subd. 19, or absence thereof as verified by a statement from the Stearns County Environmental Services Office. 9. Any additional written or graphic data reasonably required by the City - Administrator/Clerk or the Planning Commission. _r Special Use - Ordinance Extract Page 2 of4 10. Proof that the Applicant is the owner of the parcel in question. . d) Procedure. The City Administrator/Clerk shall forward said application to the Planning Commission for consideration at their next regular meeting. l. The City Administrator/Clerk shall review all Development Review Applications and upon verification that the Application is complete and meets the requirements of the Ordinance, the City Administrator/Clerk shall schedule a public hearing. The City Administrator/Clerk shall complete the review process within ten (10) days of receipt of the Application. Notice of such hearing shall be published in accordance with State Law and notice shall be published at least once in the official paper of the City and mailed to individual properties within three hundred fifty (350) feet of the parcel included in the request not less than ten (10) days nor more than thirty (30) days prior to the date of said hearing. Failure of a property owner to receive said notice shall not invalidate any such proceedings. 2. The Planning Commission shall consider possible adverse effects of the proposed special use and what additional requirements may be necessary to reduce any adverse effects, and shall make a recommendation to the City Council within the guidelines as mandated by State Law. 3. The City Council shall act upon the report and recommendation from the . Planning Commission \vithin the guidelines as mandated by State Law. Upon receiving the report and recommendation from the Planning Commission, the City Council shall have the option of holding a public hearing if necessary and may impose any conditions deemed necessary. Approval of a special use pennit shall require passage by a majority vote of the full City Council. e) Standards. The Planning Commission shall recommend a special use pennit and the Council shall order the issuance of such pennit ifthe application confonns to the specific standards set forth below, as it would apply to the particular use at the proposed location: l. Will not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, morals, comfort, convenience or general welfare of the neighborhood or the City. 2. Will be hannonious with the general and applicable specific objectives of the comprehensive plan of the City and this Ordinance. 3. Will be designed, constructed, operated and maintained so as to be hannonious and appropriate in appearance with the existing or intended character of the general vicinity and will not change the essential character - of that area, -- Special Use - Ordinance Extract Page 3 of 4 . 4. Will not be hazardous or disturbing to existing of future neighboring uses. 5. Will be served adequately by essential public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water and sewer systems, and schools. 6. Will not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community. 7. Will not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property, or the general welfare because of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare or odors. 8. Will have vehicular approaches to the property which are so designed as not to create traffic congestion or an interference with traffic or surrounding public thoroughfares. 9. Will have adequate facilities to provide sufficient off-street parking and loading space to serve the proposed use. . 10. Will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of a natural, scenic, or historic feature of major importance. ±) Denial For Non-Compliance. If the Planning Commission recommends denial of a special use permit or the Council orders such denial, it shall include in its recommendations or determination findings as to the ways in which the proposed use does not comply with the standards required by this Ordinance. g) Conditions. In recommending or approving any special use permit, the Planning Commission and the Council may impose conditions which are considered necessary to meet the standards ofthis Ordinance and to protect the best interests of the surrounding area or the City as a whole. Violation of any such condition is a violation of this Ordinance. These conditions may include but are not limited to the following: 1. Ingress and egress to property and proposed structures thereon with particular reference to vehicle and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, and access in case of fire or other catastrophe. 2. Off-street parking and loading areas where required and the economic effect, noise, glare, or odor of the special use on nearby property. 3. Refuse and service areas. - Special Use - Ordinance Extract Page 4 of 4 4. Utilities with reference to location, availability and compatibility. . 5. Diking, fencing, screening, landscaping or other facilities to protect adj acent or nearby property. 6. Signs, if any, and proposed exterior lighting with reference to glare, traffic safety, economic effect and compatibility and harmony with properties in the district. 7. Required yards and other open space. 8. General compatibility with adjacent and other property in the district. h) Expiration. If substantial construction has not taken place within one (1) year after the date of a special use permit, the permit is void except that, on application, the Council, after receiving the recommendation of the Planning Commission, may extend the permit for an additional period not to exceed one (1) year. A special use permit authorizes only the conditional use specified in the permit and expires if, for any reason, the authorized use ceases for more than one (1) year. . - . I Attachment: Yes or No I REQUEST FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION Preliminary and Final Plat - Honer Homes DATE: April 5, 2004 AGENDA ITEM Preliminary Plat - Honer Homes PREVIOUS ACTION The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing for the Preliminary Plat for Honer Homes, allowing the existing duplexes to be sold as separate housing units. While those present were not objecting to the splitting of the property, they requested that the Commission reduce the density of the four units in they event they become rental units. The Planning Commission tabled action on this matter to receive an opinion from the City Attorney. The opinion is included in your packet. . RECOMMENDED PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION Recommend the Council approve the preliminary and final plat as presented, COMMENTS/RECOMMENDATIONS I have not reproduced the copies from the last meeting. Therefore, please bring your packet with you from the last meeting. - - . MEMO TO: Judy Weyrens FROM: Laurel Pugh DATE: March 31, 2004 RE: Grandfather Clauses in St. Joe Ordinances FILE: City of St. Joseph - 23426 ISSUES (1) If property under grandfather clause is sold as a rental property to another owner, may the City require four rental licenses instead of two? (2) May the City limit the total number ofumelated occupants to three instead of the . grandfathered five occupants? (3) Is there a grandfather clause that applies to the number of parking spaces available? SHORT ANSWERS (1) Yes, the City may require four rental licenses instead of two. (2) Probably not. Whether the City may limit the total number of occupants depends on whether there has ever been a lapse or revocation of the rental license. (3) No, there is not a grandfather clause that applies to the number of parking spaces available, and thus, the City may require licensors to comply with the parking space requirements for each dwelling. DISCUSSION (1) Licensing St. Joseph Ordinance § 55.11 governs licensing of rental units. It provides that rental property occupied on or before February 1, 1981, must file a registration before that date. In the case of rental property ready for occupancy after February 1, 1981, the owner must file a - registration statement and rental license before renting the building. - . At first glance, it seems that because the property in question was "occupied" before February 1, 1981, the grandfather clause would apply. However, the Ordinance continues to state that the registration form must contain the following information: name, address and phone number of the owner; name and address of the rental property and the number of units; name and address of owner's agent where violation notices may be sent; and other information that the Council may require. Because the registration requires the above-mentioned information, it only makes sense that new owners must register and license their properties. Otherwise, tenants would be unable to identify the owner or its agent for purposes of making complaints or notifYing the agent about violations ofthe Ordinance. Also, the Ordinance does not contain a transferability clause. Based on these reasons, the City may require a new rental license and registration for any newly owned rental property. (2) Limitation of Occupants St. Joseph Ordinance § 52.04, Subdivision 31 defines "family" as, "any number of persons living together in a room comprised ofa single housekeeping unit and related by blood, marriage, adoptio~ or any unrelated person who resides therein as though a member of the family. Any group of three or more persons not so related but inhabiting a single house, . shall...be considered one family." This ordinance contains a grandfather clause. That clause provides that any rental unit licensed after October 15, 1990, shall maintain the definition of "fanilly" as five unrelated persons, not three. This provision is transferable, which means it will apply to any subsequent owners and occupiers. However, the current definition offanilly will apply to rental units licensed after October 15, 1990 if the property has ever had a lapse or revocation of the rental license. Because the provision is transferable and the property was licensed before October 15, 1990, the five-occupant limit will apply. However, the City should research whether there was ever a lapse or revocation in the rental license. Only if there has been, will the City'will be able to limit the occupancy of unrelated to persons to three. The City may have another option to limit occupants. S1. Joseph Ordinance § 55.09 provides limitations on the maximum number of persons living in a single dwelling unit. It states: Every dwelling unit shall have at least one room which shall have not less than 150 square feet of floor area. Other habitable rooms, except kitchen, shall have an area of not less than 70 square feet. Where more than two persons occupy a room for sleeping purposes, the required floor area shall be increased at the rate of 80 square feet for each occupant in excess of two. 2 . There is an exception to the Ordinance for the use of an efficiency living unit within an apartment complex. I do not believe it would apply here, but I advise you to look at it and let me know if you believe it would apply. I advise the City to calculate the living space in the property at hand. If more than two persons are required to share a room, then the owner will either have to remodel the dwelling to allow for the additional space, or limit the occupants to two persons per "room for sleeping purposes." (3) Parking St. Joseph Ordinance § 52.10, Subdivision 4(b) provides that multi-family dwellings require 1 Y2 parking spaces for each single bedroom dwelling, 2 Y2 spaces for each two-bedroom dwelling, 4 spaces for each three-bedroom dwelling, and an additional! Y4 spaces for each additional bedroom thereafter. There is no grandfather clause relating to this Subdivision. Although there is a grandfather clause under Subdivision 5, it only applies to construction of parking lots and not the number of parking spaces required for certain dwellings. Therefore, the City may require new licensors to comply with the parking space requirements of Subdivision 4(a). . 3 - I Attachment: Yes or No I ~ REQUEST FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION Request to Conduct Public Hearing DATE: April 2, 2004 AGENDA ITEM Request to conduct a public hearing - Birch Street PREVIOUS ACTION The City had previously initiated a hearing to rezone the property along Birch Street to Highway Business. The matter raised considerable objection and the rezoning was denied. RECOMMENDED PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION - - Accept the request and schedule the public hearing for May 3, 2004. COMMENTS/RECOMMENDA TIONS WHY USA has purchased the property at 119 - I st Avenue NE and have a buyer looking to use the property for a business use. I have requested that they survey the neighborhood and provide the City with the necessary signatures to move the matter to a public hearing. There are six properties north of the east/west alley between I st Avenue NE and the north/south alley. WHY USA reality has provided a request from three of the property owners. - - Subd. 5. Text Amendments and Rezonina of Parcels Depicted on the Official Zonina Map. - a) General. This Ordinance, which includes the official zoning map, may be amended by ~- following the procedure specified in this section. b) Initiation. An amendment may be initiated by the following procedures: 1. Upon the initiative of the City Councilor the Planning Commission, or 2. By petition of fifty percent (50%) or greater of the property owners affected by the proposed amendment and fifty percent (50%) of those property owners within three hundred fifty (350) feet of the proposed change. If a property owner initiates a rezoning request the owner shall provide a boundary survey and preliminary building and site development plans prior to consideration of the request. 3. If the proposed rezoning request is consistent with the proposed future land use identified in the City's Comprehensive Plan, an owner may petition for the rezoning without signature of 50% of the affected property owners within 350 feet. If a property owner initiates a rezoning request the owner shall provide a boundary survey and preliminary building and site development plans prior to consideration of the request. c) Action by Plannina Commission. 1. An amendment not initiated by the Planning Commission shall be referred to the Commission for study and report, and the Council shall not act on the amendment until it has received the recommendation of the Planning - Commission or until sixty (60) days have elapsed from the date of reference of - the amendment without a report by the Planning Commission. 2. Before any amendment is adopted, the Planning Commission shall hold at least one (I) public hearing thereon after a notice of the hearing has been published in the official newspaper at least ten (10) days and no more than thirty (30) days prior to the hearing. When an amendment involves changes in district boundaries affecting an area of five (5) acres or less, a similar notice shall be mailed at least ten (10) days and no more than thirty (30) days before the day of the hearing to each owner of affected property situated wholly or partly within three hundred fifty (350) feet of the property to which the amendment relates. 3. Following the hearing the Planning Commission shall make a report of its findings and, unless the amendment has been initiated by the Commission and the Commission determines not to recommend it to the Council, it shall file a copy with the City Administrator/Clerk within fourteen (14) days of the meeting at which the date of the hearing was set. When the amendment has not been initiated by the Planning Commission, the report shall, in any event, be filed not later than sixty (60) days from the date of reference of the amendment to the Commission. Failure of the Planning Commission so to report on an amendment not initiated by it is deemed to be approval by the Commission of the amendment. - - ~ My name is Janel Weisen, I am a realtor at WHY USA EQUITY REALTY, in St. Joseph, MN. - This letter is a request to the Planning Commission. I ask that you would once again consider re- zoning the six to general business that are located north ofthe all on Birch St in St. Joseph. I currently have a Purchase Agreement for the home located at 38 Birch St. St. Joseph. The offer is from Superstar Sports, a business that is currently in the St. Joseph business center. Superstar Sports would like to purchase this home for office space. They currently are open Monday-Friday from 7:30-5:00, because they are not a retail outlet, there would not be a lot of traffic due to them moving in to this property. Please take note of the attached signatures, from 50% of the home owners that this re-zone would affect. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. Janel Weisen WHY USA EQUITY REALTY 259-4990 - ~ · Please circle one of the options and return to me in the enclosed envelope no later then Wed Feb 18th, Thank you again for your time. YES ~ INFA VOR ~F_~-z~;;iN~' ~ - NO I DO NOT WISH TO HAVE THIS RE-ZONED AT THIS TIME SIGNATURE -. -(J_ .0--J4<:1~, f. .:.t (¿r Á~".."1 ;f <~'- \ ~ S-~ /\. ADDRESS L-A&~\ -;--"'. \Ì.\'C\ ...... - 0/ - - -- - F AX NO. P. 02 P ~I)$C cir¢lc ono ofth~ options and return to mo in the enclosed envelope. no later then . Wcd Fcb J gill. n.ank you a~ain for YOUr timc. . "..' _. .__._-......-...... _.__n__' -"..._..._.~~.__._~ C-ý~'lS . ] AM INf A VOR OF ~F,-7.0NrNO :J . .....~--..... NO {DO NOT WISH TO HAVE TIllS ARM RU-ZONED AT THIS TIME SIGNATURE 4 K ..~.,-........-..--_._....,-- I AD})RnSS___~u~.-=: .~ - - --«III . Please circle one of the options and return to me in the enclosed envelope no later then Wed Feb 18th, Thank you again for your time. ----------~~~._---<-,.- . '----~ YES I AM INF A VOR OF RE-ZONING"'" ~--".-- - ..-.-._~.. NO I DO NOT WISH TO HA VE THIS AREA RE-ZONED AT THIS TIME SIGNATURE ~M;'d- (þ, lJi/ L ADDRESS J! 7 /AlE - . S-'-- 11 k:r .~ ~ /_--L' . i.'ut . c '¡ 7\ t;¿'- - ) v , - - ~ I -.. --.J I DATE.3T.E ¡......> IJ.] .~ 1-3 ~ COUNTY. ROAD. E ~.-- BJRCH; ST.E COUNTY. ROAD 75 E I I II I . I Attachment: Yes or No I REQUEST FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION Foxmore Hollow DATE: JUDe 2, 2003 AGENDA ITEM Foxmore Hollow - revised site plan PREVIOUS ACTION The Planning Commission considered the development at the March 24, 2004 special planning Commission meeting. The developer was requested to revise the R3 plan to reduce the size of the building. He was asked to meet with the neighbors and submit a compromise. Since that time, the developers have presented the City with a revised concept, 2 - 12 plexes. . RECOMMENDED PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION COMMENTS/RECOMMENDATIONS This discussion for this the Planning Commission is not to approve the Special Use Permit, rather to give the developer's direction as to whether or not the new plan is worth investing money in detailing. Since the timing of the meeting was so close to the Planning Commission meeting, the City Office staff mailed a notice to all the residents in the area and provided a sketch plan of the new proposal. A copy has been included for your consideration. . CITY Of ST. JOSEPH . WW'X'. cityofstjoseph .com MEMORANDUM Administròtor Date: April 2, 2004 Judy Weyrens From: Judy Weyrens Mòyor Lòrr~' . Hosch Re: Foxmore Hollow Councilors AI Ròssier The Planning Commission will be discussing a revised proposal for Foxmore Hollow. As Ross Rieke you are aware, the developers had proposed a 23 unit apartment complex that ran parallel to Gòry Utsch 29Sth Street. The developers have within that plan and have submitted a new concept plan that will be discussed on Monday, AprilS, 2004. The new plan includes constructing two Dòle Wick (2) 12 plex units that wi11 be two stories. The developer is just looking for input on the concept, approval will be at a later date. For your convenience we have enclosed a copy of the new proposal. The matter will be on the . agenda at approximately 7:30 PM. - 2.)' College Avenue North' PO 130x 668 . Sòint. joseph, Minnesotò )'6')74 Phone ,2.0.,6,·72.01 I'd X )2.0.,6,.0,42. , I ) - i __ ----J . , t - - ------' , :; J1 '" ~ · ,H · ~ · ! · 1 - S> , g en -. - CD 1J - Q,) ! ::¡ - I ¡ ; , . - - ; i î , . - , - - EBZ - .. -- - é:.,?AJ-1., þ I Z I -