The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2005 [07] Jul 05 Administrdtor Judy Weyrens 1. MdYor 2. Richdrd Carlbom 3. Councilors 4. AI Rdssier Ross Rieke Renee Symdnietz 5. Ddle Wick 6. 7. 8. 9. CITY OF ST. JOSEPH www.cityofstjoseph.com St. Joseph Planning Commission July 5, 2005 7:00 PM 7:00 PM Call to Order Approve Agenda Approve Minutes 7:00 PM Public Hearing - Signature Homes Amendment to PUD - Liberty Point 7:15 PM College of St. Benedict, Variance Request Six Foot Variance request on Maximum curb cut Discussion Regulation governing maximum curb cut in R1 Zoning District Discussion on Zoning Regulations in the Original Townsite of St. Joseph Special Meeting- July 20,2005 Adjourn File 2.) College Avenue North· PO Box 668 . Sdint. Joseph, Minnesotd )6')74 Phone ,2.0.,6,.72.01 Fax ,2.0.161.0,42. st. Joseph Planning Commission July 5, 2005 FOR THE OFFICIAL RECORD PLEASE SIGN YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS NAME 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. ADDRESS lro ¡ 0 ('a ¡va ~ {'-I- J/-C" Ioq:c/ I~~ J?l'// q/t>! )l~ Planning Commission Notes................. Minutes We apologize for not having them ready. We will send under separate cover. Staff Over the past two meetings a question has arisen as to who constitutes "staff'. For clarification "staff' consists of the following: ~ Joe Bettendorf/Tracy Ekola - Engineering ~ Tom Jovanovich - Legal ~ Judy Weyrens - Administrative ~ Dick Taufen - Public Works ~ Jim Marthaler - Wastewater ~ Randy Torborg - Fire ~ Pete Jansky - Police ~ Cynthia Smith-Strack - EDA All plans are routed to Department heads at the monthly staff meeting. They are discussed and each party has one week to provide written comments. Comments received are returned to Administration and complied. As a cost savings measure the City Attorney and Engineer do not always provide written comments. If they express the comments at the staff meeting I summarize and provide the data. I Attachment: Yes or No REQUEST FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION PUD Amendment - Liberty Pointe DATE: July 5, 2005 AGENDA ITEM Public Hearing - POO Amendment, Liberty Pointe PREVIOUS ACTION Previously the Planning Commission and City Council approved a PUD for Liberty Pointe which allowed for a mixed housing development consisting of traditional homes, patio homes (attached and detached) and a future R3. The developer is having trouble marketing and selling the attached townhomes and is requesting to revise the PUD and create detached housing. They are not proposing to add any units therefore the density does not change. RECOMMENDED PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION Recommend the Council approve the POO Amendment contingent upon the developer fulfilling the financial obligations. COMMENTSIRECOMMENDATIONS Additional information is needed to verifY the distance between buildings, but we hope to have that on Monday. Also, the developer has some outstanding financial obligations which we will require to be fulfilled before the matter is placed on the Council agenda. City of St. Joseph 25 College Avenue North St. Joseph, MN 56374 PH: (320) 363-7201 FAX: (320) 363-0342 ... APPLICANT(S) NAME: Viking Development DATE: May 25, 2005 110 2nd Street South, Suite 302 ADDRESS: Waite Park, MN 56387 PHONE NUMBER(S): 320-252-9585 FAX: 320-253-9236 PROPERTY OWNER(S) NAME (if different from Applicant): Same as applicant ADDRESS: PHONE NUMBER: FAX: PLEASE ATTACH ANY ADDITIONAL NAMES, ADDRESSES AND TELEPHONE NUMBERS OF ANY OTHER PERSONS, iIRM AND CORPORATION HOLDING INTERESTS IN SAID LAND. IfW e, the undersigned, hereby make the following application to the Planning Commission and City Council of the City of St. Joseph, Steams County, Minnesota. (Applicants have the responsibility of checking all applicable ordinances pertaining to their applicalion and complying with all ordinance requirements): A. Application is hereby made for: (Applicant must check any/aU appropriate items) Prel1minary Plat Review X Final Plat Review Planned Unit Development Plan Review Minor Subdivision Review 8453550.018, 8453550.023 through 8453550.028, 8453550.079, 8453550.080, B. Parcel Identification Number(s) of Property: 8453550.083 through 8453550.085, 8453550.070 through 8453550.078 Legal Description of Property: (Please Attach Metes & Bounds Description) Lots 19, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28 and 29, Block 1, Lots 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24 and 25, Block 3, Lots 1, 2, 5, 6 and 7, Block 4, LIBERTY POINTE, according to the recorded plat thereof Stearns County, Minnesota. C. Required Information: 1. Name of Plat: Liberty Pointe 2nd Addition 2. Location: 16th Avenue SE and Dale Street St. Joseph Development Manual Forms for Platting, Zoning, and Building Application for Subdivsion Review Updated 04/04 3. Gross Area: 7.9 ac+/- 4. Number of Lots: 19 5. Current Zoning Classification(s): PURD 6. Desired Zoning Classification(s): PURD 7. Current Zoning Classification(s) of Adjacent Parcels: PURD North, Unplatted East and South 8. Name of Pending Street Name(s) Included in Development: n/a 9. Name & Address of Land SurveyorlEngincer: Westwood Professional Services, Inc. 3701 12th Street North, Suite 206 St. Cloud, MN 56303 D. Does the proposed preliminary plat require rezoning? Yes, Explain X No E. Is the proposed preliminary plat consistent with design standards and other requirements of the City of St. Joseph Subdivision Ordinance, Zoning Ordinance and Comprehensive Planning documents? X Yes, Skip to F No, if 'No' applicant must complete items below in italicized print The request(s) which ¡/We desire for our property require a variance from the following section(s) of the St. Joseph City Code: Section: Section: Section: Proposed variances(s): What special conditions and circumstances exist which are particular to the land, structure or building(.ç) involved which do not apply to the land, structures or building(s) in the same zoning classification (attach additional pages as needed)? Do any of the special conditions and circumstances result from your own actions (if the answer is yes, you may not qualify for a variance)? What facts and considerations demonstrate that the iiteral interpretation of the zoning or subdivision code 01- St. Joseph Development Manual Forms for Platting, Zoning, and Building Application for Subdivsio"n Review Updated 04/04 .1 other City code/plein would deprive you of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties itz the same district under the terms of the zoning code (attach additional pages as needed)? State your reasons for believing that à variance will not confer on you any special privilege that is denied by the code to other lands, structures or buildings in the ,wme district: State your reasons for believing that the action(s) you propose to take is/are in keeping with the spirit and intent of the code? State your reasons for believing that a strict enforcement of the provisions of the code would cause undue hardship. Undue hardship mean that the property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under the conditions allowed by the code. Economic considerations alone shall not constitute an undue hardship under the terms of this code as referenced in state statutes: F. Describe the physical characteristics of the site, including but not limited to, topography; erosion and flooding potential; soil limitations; and, suitability of the site for the type of development or use contemplated. St. Joseph Development Manual Forms for Platting, Zoning, and Building Application for Subdivsion Review Updated 04/04 .. { The half wooded site has sloping terrain and is bordered to the north and south by small wetlands and the southeast by a pipeline easement. G. Describe the fiscal and environmental impact the proposed development win have on adjacent property owners and the City of St. Joseph. A wetland permit has already been issued for minimal wetland impacts. Stormwater plans have been completed. The fiscal impacts would be that residential development would provide the revenue to pay for the infrastructure in the immediate area. Yearly taxes paid on residential property should be capable of sustaining municipal services. H. If Application is for a PUD, provide a statement that generally describes the proposed development and the market which it intends to serve and its demand in relation to the city's Comprehensive Plan and how the development is designed, an-anged and operated in order to pennit the development and use of neighboring property in accordance with the regulations and goals ofthe city. This is a revision to a previously approved Final Plat. It maintains the same density as the previous plat. The obligations and rights of the Homeowners Association remains in affect. The proposed units as sil'\gle family residences will have a higher value than the originally proposed duplexes and should therefore raise the tax base and increase values of neighboring homes. T. Applicants for preliminary plat review must provide with this application the names and addresses of all adjoining property owners within 350 feet of the subject property. n/a J. Attach completed' copy of applicab]e submittal checklist(s) with application.. IJWe understand that any work to be done will require reimbursement to the city for engineering, consulting, mapping or studies that may have to be done in conjunction with this subdivision. This includes any fees in conjunction with prehminary or fma] plats. In addition a check for the appropriate fee(s) must be submitted·along 'Nifu the application. By signing this application below, l!We are hereby acknowledging this potential cost. .~ . ---..... " '-----.. ... ~'1- - _____ ------d:-- ........ ~ ~_ ~~ph¿an - . e !:' 2S- ¿; s;- Date .-/----~-----~ ~,,~ Property Owners Signature ÇZS-¿» Date St. Joseph Development Manual Forms for Platting, Zoning, and Building Application for Subdivsion Review Updated 04/04 I :t o ~ ...... Q Q ~ ~ C\I ~ ~ <:) C\.. ).... I--. If¡ ~ ...... I....~~ ,,-- ~~;::~c: ¡::::~0t:() CS.s t 8 ~ c...... ~'b 0 q: () ....-c: a-Q.lotl) <: Clc: I/) tI) C\ctl°Q.t) J...J:::.~:.§ c: ~ Õ ~ ~:Š a " Q ~ c: c: Qj )...Q6õ~ ~~~.QQ ~2~~] -JI,J trio ~ ~ 1? ~ .~ o ~ ~ õup~~ __ Q. Crt...... "-~ " ()Q.I.........Q ~~:E~2 6§~~~~ "t)~~§~ Q.\)O-...-t: ''@~ Ci..2.~ ~tJ~~-C: {;:g~~~ ~~~~~ ~~u &õ o ~ ~ Q~~8g-: Q. (!) ~ D ;: :S * ~:: ~ 1: Ò ..c:'3: ~ ~ ::::: c:~ ~ o~ ~ ·2 ~ & c: C) Q.t5E°(,)u) 1:) -.. ::) CI.I t c) 5~Õ~Q.~ ~~E-6'~~ ::....g..:::::: ...... ~ §!....°'2-.õ ~~~%~li) I....-QJ 0 OJ.... Q.. 'b ....... 22i:5~ \)~o....c -- c: 0 c: tJ°o~Q.~ !: ~ Õ Õ ~ ·s ~~2~:-g ¡V):Oè5o~ 1.,)'- ~ ~ ò CI.I :::..,.v¡\)ChQ.l1) .Q ~ §.s.; Õ (f) ~:~b.~~ ..c::2c:~~.2 __ 0 \.. 'tJ Q.. " ~ o ~ ~ " " ~:S o~ èO .2 Q. -" 00> &~ ~ ~ 00 "I: ~.~~ ~ 5 ~ .~ ~.2 ~~ô iH ~~~ 0" 0 G1~ c~~ "0'" [~ tt} ~Q.E ~.~ 2 a::¡;¡;; o>0~ ~ 0 ~g~ 2 ~8 "'c 0" ~~:S ~.§~ ~~~ l...J ~.~ ",c~ ~8~ ~~~ Cb-22- " ~ '" -'< "- ð.3-g §§i ~ ~,~ :;(.2 th " ~ $ ï::'¡¡ a&-o <¿ ~~ I'" 10 I~ I'" I~ I", I~ i< I'" I'" 1< 1\2 I"" I~ 10 I~ 1< I~ I, I~ :~ It\: I::' I'" I~ 13 I~ I", I~ I~ '" '" :;;-:, ~ ~ 1l..J ~~ J~ ~ (¡) 1<.0 ::¡; '" I. '" a :;: C) ~ Is- ~ <::: 18 ~ 5 IV} V) t.) "Ì ~ '" ,,0 ~¡>. o ~ ,,"- ()~ õ~ " ~ "" -O~ ~ 0 ~& .g .~ o -gt o ~ <~ gõ aQ. ~.~ -c "'- ~õ I:;!~ ~~ O-c Q'" ,,~ ,-0 ~~ '" c ~Ë "''' o ~ ,,2 " ~5 Q... ,,~ §~ ,,~ ~3: ( " ~ " tI:I:::: -0 " ~ .0,,- o ~ -~ Ë~ 0-0 '" ~ ,,"- -c " --c ,,- "0 "'- ~ 0" "õ *~~ :t:~õ õ .x " -0 ì 01 o '" è i '" :.r.:~ -0 E~ ~~ ~E .o~ ,,< " " 0>", "c "" 1:.~ 0"" ~~ 0", ~:g s·£ ::¡; ~~ ~ ~ .::,~ .~ tX 0>" .~ § 0..., '" "" ~~ "" ~:3 '1 I o o ,,'" -0 ~ .::! ¡¡ '" " Q. " '" " oS " " '" ~ o~ "0 ~~ -c" ~. I :31 i:' I o I ~.~ l)oS ~ I '" , .~ ¡ ::, 1 o I I o , ,s J ,'" §-;t::;1 i:' I <.01 , ~ I " I I: I g.: 11 " a 0> ~ " '" '" ~ o ~ " -c S '" ~-O ~" .~ ~ 0> ,s't'¡ è " ;} '" (j ~ Q' ::> a f3 '- ~ i¡! '" '" <.0 ~ S I I I I I I I I t~ I < I ~ l) , I , , I I I I I I 1 I I 1 I'" I~ I~ I", <5< ¡¡¡~ ::, '" Q ~ " ::¡; 0: a '" " 0" < ::¡; '" a '" '" < ~ ~ -I co! o '" ~ o 2 " I I I I I ~ -c ¡} '" ~ ¡;; ~ o b G " oS è ~ o .¡;; 'ê I: <3 '" c ,: c o Q " oS .2 " ~ i:' & « ~~ 00 "I .g 1 , , , I I I I , I I I ~I I E : ~ : ~I " I .oj " , ~ ¡ g "2 1:'-: ~ I~ ~ ¡~ g 10 I '" I" ~ I: 10 ~ ~ I~ a 2 I~ ~ t;:; I.Q <: .£ 1 c ~ 0> 10 "'a ~ ·õ I g Q\ 1:'-: ~ ~ ~ I~ ~ 5 Q) I~ V) 0 ~ 10 " 0: '" ~ b{ I I I I I , I I I , I I I '-' '" I:;! '- « "< ~ « (; I I I , I I I I I I I I I I I I I å t5 Ùj o Õ '" " ~ ~ ,,~ .0 o ì, 10 C)~ 0- "'" . ~ '0 1° 1- I~ I" II: liS- 10; I~ I" la 10> 1.£ I~ I" '1 J o '" ~ o 2 " '" ~ ò Õ '" " ~ -s ::, -c' ¡} '" -'5 Vi ~ o ~ c ~ o " b G " oS " -0 " <!1 i:' ~ ~ (5 ~ G I , I I I I , I I I , I I I I I , I I I I I I I I I I I I I I .:.: '" ~ « 0: §? « ::, , I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ß t5 Ùj ~ o oS ~ " " " -0 ~ " -c '1 ci a '" è ~ " -'!) oS 11 o Q. is- ... ~ " " ~ " I: I: o " ~ " ~ o " 1! " " -c " c " " .0 '" o -c :¡; "- '1 c1 ~~ ! i " I " I '" I " I o I " I '" , .g I ~ò § 5- E-" 8 I " I .,= I ~ fJ)1 -.J:(: ,,- ~ I § 1 ..., I o I o I '" I " I ~ I ~ ! I o ~ <5 '-1 ..., I ..., I '" I " I c I o I ~ I ~ I ·2 ¡ U I 2 I ;;; I ~ I 8 : " I ~ I o I 0; I "Õ I ..., " ".0 .~ ~ ~ 0> g .~ ~ " -c.o S 0 ",- ~~ ~ ~ ."::: I{.¡ S '" ~ .s "- I I , I I I , I I I e¡ '" ::, ::, < b{ g ;!; a i :;; 0: §? ~ 0: ::, '" ~ Š a " '" ~ « I:;! '" j tl < :¿ G: 6 >:: l) ::, go '" < a l) ~ « ~ :s ... o !i. " oS ~ ... o -~ "- t> Q ~ I I I I I 10: I'" I~ ¡~ I~ I I 10: I~ 1- 'g J« ,,, 1'- IŠ 10 Il) I", 1< 10: 1« II:;! I", I I I I '0: I", I~ I::, 1< , lö 10: 1« Ill. 1>< I'" I I I I I I I I I I I I I~ 10: I::> I'" 1« I'" 19o I, 10: I~ liS I::, 1« I" 1,- I::, I~ la ~ ~ o " " " ~ ~ o ~ " " 1 :S ~ 1 .£ I " I " I ~ I ~ 10-,< I :i: g 1 c ~'"G I " 0 I I: I 2 I ;;; I .£ Õ I '" 1 ~ ì ..J Õ 81 (þ ::S C\ .c I: " < I u -a-= VI' o ~ o .~ ::aJ: --iii +'5 ut '¡¡; c.u ~ ;:~ i:! l:J ð; '" '" a '- l:J ð; '" ~ " t<)c "ð Õ 0" Qj", . E ",0 "''' "iñ ~~ 00 ...~ "'1! ...,.- "'õ C\¡~ Q. "''' " -." "'6 ," a" "'~ ." ~:S ~.2 o ...,0> -:~ -,<0 " " 0" Qjo o)~ "'< ,,is ~Q 0" QO'- "'~ r-.....~ "'..., lÒ >;f-. "'-'< ," ",0 "'Qj ~r--:.. ,,~ 0) C 0 _ 0 '" " '" <0 c ~t¡)~ I I I I I , I I I I '" I '- I < I ::, , a I l) 1 I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I'" I~ :~ <56 ~ lì1 Cl ~ " ::, 0: a '" " a " < ::¡; '" a '" '" < ~ 'g " ~ o ... o ~ " oS ~ ~ " " "- ~ o ~ o ~ -c " " ~ " '" " " " ~ .!? " oS ~ o ~ ð~ -" ,,- ::S~ õ~ -c~ -c ~~ --¡:" ~§ " .0 ~ " -c I I I I I I , I I I I I I I " õ a ~ " I: ~ " o a I I I I I I I I I I '" I '- I < , ::> I a I l) I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I'" j~ I~ I", ~ð ~~ Q ~ ~ ~ '" l) a" < ::¡; '" a i ~ -I I I I I Q I ~ I " ~I " -0 I: ~ , I I I , I I I I I I 1 I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I" ,'- I::> I~ I'" 1cÙ' o Õ '" " c ~ o .6'~ i I," C) " o ~ '" 0 ~ ~ .'2 U 2 ;;; c o l) " ~ o ] ~ ~ ~ o 0 " o " .~ I , I I I I I , I I I I I" I ~ ~ I & ~ 1 E .Q ~8 -g I Q) ~ I::S ~ Jõ o ~ ~ I 0 g I ~ 1-0 I ~ I 0 '" c I ~ " I 0 I: : E- ~ 18 .~ I ~ .£ I] & 1·2 ~ I ~ ~ 1 It! i{ ,..., ~ oS c o l' o " ~ ~ ] ... .0 " 0 l' l) 8 õ ~ it 1) .£ ~ " " " 8 ~ o " " ::S ~ l' " I I I~ 'a I'" I~ 1< I~ I", 1,- 1< I::> 10 Il) I I'" I~ 1« I~ I'" I, I~ 10: 10 I" I", 10: I" ',- 1< I::> 10 I" ~ ~ E I I I I I '" I 0 I S I I I '" I a i ~ i < I :;;", "'a a>.. ~~ ~ 8 \U V)O~ f " " " -0 ~ " -c XJUON 1nOH1v.t 3:JNVH] 01 1J3rens Álff'iVfflffZYlfd ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ÞP~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~gg~~~~g~¢¢¢~¢¢~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~£~t~~ ~m~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ggg~gg~~~~2R ~ ¿¿~~~~~<¿¿~~~~¿¿¿~¿¿~ ~ ~~ ~~~~~~~~gggggg~gggg~gg~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ :::;~ ~~~~~~~~~~~S~3~~~~~~~5~S5~~ /- I ~ <:) ¡:: ....... Q Q q: ----- ~ ~ ~ ~ <:) Q.. )... t--. f5 £S ....... 4J§Ò ~~î ~õO) ::,>-'" ¡Xt::t5 so < ;;:: ~2::~ ~ c :ð~.~ ~ I :t V) '" C> ¡...:: t...J -. 0 ~ " ~i':~~ ~ c "-Vi 0 ~~~~ c " 0 " " ~-.J~co J¡ § en« .:: l....J:t-.-2 " " <>:>-- 0 . ':{~<e õ 0 ~ ~ (r¡~~~ '" '" ()l..JtJ 2) h:;¡~ « "" 0 . ~~ð~ c~~~~R~~~~EÞÞ;~~ ~~~~~g:~2..-¡~g~~~(Q QR.~~o~k~~~~~~~~ ~~gggg8~88ggggg~ ~§~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ¡...:~~")--- -.....- ~~~~~~~~ê~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~ci~;~~~~~~ u ~ .... _ ~~rnJè;}3~t>~ôG5GaG 'š " ]:JUON lnOH11\1 3!JN'rIH:J 01 1:J3fsns .Á 21VA// A1/zY21d , , " " ........ :';-- ....,I'_J....;: _'n -JU ¡,..// : :}Ç - --~- -~~,- _Jf f-L ---~~ ---- --- - \ \ \ 3..6C'd'doOO5'. ~-t- \ '" , ~ \ -.!..6-~ //"'1.,'.............. .J-V I...L,."V , , A1..lP.6PoOON ---T , II -:J3S .JO p/IMS 3HJ " dO 1:/1] ]H1 30 ]N17 15V] / vO'J'd1 -- -- vi ~~';!!, ~~~ e,,"\1 ~"'a::. '~.c:o ~~~ ~~\l\ ~\\c:o \l·cñt;t ~Ó~ ~ ~ ,..,,~~ t-"i~ ~~~ ð~t :j~~ """'''' i'.. ll~1 ~, t ("\ /' , ~ -- , £\ ~8 \ Õ'" Y/' o - o ¡¡; \ \ /' Y' \ \ //' '( ,.., \ y/' \ ~-- \ j /----- / ,--- --- Á ç: iJ- '\ L,~ \ ~D \ -.... \ \ \ \ () ~,':J/1 /' /' /' -'\ \ \ À /' \ ." \ À /' \ ~! \ À /' \ \ -\ ') \ ) " /' /' /' \...~J -7 ~.:/ ü- C' '" C'~ -, "Ó "\--- --) \- -- Ý-;') \.:" "Ò '- ) <- '" ~ ;; ~ '" ~ ,,- ." '" <0 .¡; :~ - ...-/ C> --- '" <0 " (¡ ,}¡ I I I I I ¡_-L 3t il7 , ~ ;:; ~ ('~ ~ '" '" '" ~ ------ Õò "i ::¡ () / ~ " .") .... ~~ ~r:: . , .' I), ~ ~ \ 'ill 8 ~j 8 ..,: "<i ~ '" 917 - ~ 'X. ----- --- '\ \ \?\ \? \ -,{ :;: \ X' / ~'\'o.~..... - \ \' ~Y-b~ s , ._ 0~q. t ,-='tl',u.)~ . 0\ 1\ ;,.v\,>.!o C) ~ 41', \ ~~0 0 ~~ ~ \ ' ',~).~ ~ ~ /\ ðJ' , \--- ---y ;;1. - \ \? \fi....'-, fg.íOI '. -- ¡'d'OOZ 3.fO,ZfoOOS '/: ~ I ;-"1--':7£J I n/'\~ I J..~V_Jf/-L'V...... __ - ----:--/J..::: - - - - ~_Ço.lfoOON ... /// ..., " " '- '" ~ë; ~~ '" ;, -TI- . ~ NOll100V 3DOf8 } I 1 380.1.10 3Nf7 lSV3/ I '- '^/C',~/C'by :7C\r/J\ f ,L ~ 8t! I -J\/v/{::! ~,_'\ In Il.....~ l.J9 -L........._.J(:!v - öo (r¡Q: I _J "';: I (~ ~2 ~.- ()}! ~~ I Ž) ~Q () I ~Q:_ I -" I '-~- ('c ~ }Y "- !'> "- g< t ~ ~ ;¡: ::;,'" ':.,. "'.,. F /, " ' ',\ 99 -~~,; 00'99 -I<) ¡,~fõ.ï[;oõÑ- ..., -1/ì ^ -) It ,--' _J, " y_-~U 'v 8 ... ~ en (::::~ ~ ~J-\::T - - -- J.... (.:}, ~C.:/ rr~ :7C\///\ I c) I ,J\/v/{::! ¡:~ ¡ :) () I l I I I " (3 () I r~ lb --- _'n -JU Ç9T'ÇÞ , ) f_ () r: :) C) LI 1 ~::' c) '"\ lJ 'u ~-.... \- 99 ~- '". ," c. . i~/ ~: (,') , - ,.' t~ :'t-~ èã ~~ ~~ '-.'J -~ è§ '" '6 '", ~~ ~~ \ ~- .. I 5000 J2'OJ"C t I 7õ.0~ "'''' ~~ ('~ ~I '" <: OO-OL M,.fO,lf' , ,- g\? ~ "'i ' "9' '" '" - - 617 }Y '" !'> "- / g< r-- ()) l...J1::) OO·9l ~ [;;:â t 3JO.~Co005 ~- ~ ¡g ., I ~ ~è ~:J /1 A1..fO.l"f oOON /:~~~"'" f.f;~5rovps ;:; O'd't91 M. ..., /1~9 : -- IOlíÞ , I I ..; "'Ø .E IIÌ ~ 0 QI ~ u 0 .~ ;: QI "- VI (ij ~ .... <= '" Ut 0 .¡¡¡ >- CD V> tj QI 3: '+- iJi e c.. ~ Z// :/:: -'- - ,'/~ ~c¿ " ~~~ ,~tš ~-,:::: t.u-â ~~~ ..."';, :~~ 8~~ ~~~ I", ¡¡ !~ .D J~ I~ ,I,¡ '~r::. ,,::: ~~ ",,,, ~~ Is, §~ ~ðt '" "'... '('0 \"l , ' \ ' . \ .,. ..., ~ , , , ì I &~~ ~~~ iI. 4'1 , I :t'I) :r , !Q ~A ~ -,~ ~~~I ~ 3t5~YI ~ ð~~\1 '~I ð :j~~1 ~ "ia~ I C:I IJ) ~)",~ OJ "! ~ 3t C F> Õ o '" g¡ , " ,......... 1 , (I ~~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ I IiJI "'I ON I ,~I <: \ c ~I 6~1 to ~I "'¡-- 0, - , 1 I o () ~:: ~0 '" "'''' 2;... ...'" 0" ð~ "", ~~ -+ , I " ///(Q '" , \_~.) ~~ ..., , ., : ..., , ¡: I -:;; 30 >/,.,5 ];;;'0 -::/ T I l/13 ]H1 .10 3Nl7 153',1--' I\.) ~h '<~ ~... e ~ " Ic~~ 8 /~:_;'/~ ~ f"~¿-) //^ In J ~~ ~ () 'JI v UG I~s õi ~ 99 ~- LI~ t:j --.J -._ o;;;:f I.J... cS tij --- ~ ;:' ~ " (j - ::x 8 ð~~ ð-~~ .-~~~ I Attachment: Yes or No REQUEST FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION College of St. Benedict - Variance Request DATE: July 5,2005 AGENDA ITEM College of St. Benedict - Variance Request PREVIOUS ACTION The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on June 2, 2005. The hearing was opened, testimony was heard and the hearing was then closed. During the Commission discussion additional information was requested. Please see the information in your packet under item #6. RECOMMENDED PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION Please find enclosed two proposed resolutions - one approving the request and one denying the request. COMMENTSIRECOMMENDATIONS Since this is a land use matter and requires action within 60 days unless the City has a reason to extend the time frame an additional 60 days. Therefore, a recommendation should be made a this meeting. · COLLEGE OF . Saint Benedict April 21, 2005 Judy Weyrens, Administrator, City of Saint Joseph PO Box 668 Saint Joseph MN 56374 Dear Judy, As we discussed on the telephone, regarding the width of the driveway for the Presidents house, I'm concerned that an 18 foot width creates safety concerns. I believe 85% of the time the 18 foot width would serve us quite adequately. I am most concerned about the times in which we have a large gathering with significant traffic entering and exiting simultaneously. An 18 foot driveway width is quite narrow and creates safety concerns. To compound the problem several of these guests will be from out of town and therefore, will not be familiar with the surrounding streets/roads. The College of Saint Benedict very much appreciates the relationship we have the city of Saint Joseph. We also appreciate your consideration on this issue. Sincerely, ,j''ijfìU/] hæ>cj(/..¿j~J .James Fredricks J Chief Physical Plant/Facilities Management Officer 37 South College Avenue St. Joseph, MN 56374-2099 www.csbsju.edu Affirmative Action/Equal Opportunity Employers Planning Commissioner Variance Worksheet Please remember that MN Statute requires that the findings must illustrate that all of the items listed below are satisfied. 1. That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applying to the property in question as to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same zoning district. The exceptional or extraordinary circumstances must not be the result of actions taken by the petitioner. Applicable: _ Yes No If yes, please indicate finding: 2. That the literal interpretation of the provisions of this Ordinance would deprive the petitioner of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same district under the terms of this Ordinance. Applicable: _ Yes No If yes, please indicate finding: 3. That granting the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by this Ordinance to other lands in the same district. Applicable: _ Yes No If yes, please indicate finding: 4. That the proposed variance will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property, or diminish or impair established property values within the surrounding area, or in any other respect impair the public health, safety or welfare of the residents of the City. Applicable: _ Yes No If yes, please indicate finding: 5. That the condition or situation of a specific piece of property, or the intended use of said property, for which the variance was sought, is not of so general or recurrent a nature as to make reasonably practicable the formulation of a general regulation for such conditions or a situation. Applicable: _ Yes No If yes, please indicate finding: 6. That the variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the hardship on the particular property. Applicable: _ Yes No If yes, please indicate finding: Planning Commissioner Variance Worksheet 7. That the variance would not be materially detrimental to the purposes ofthe zoning ordinances or property within the same zoning classification. Applicable: ~ Yes No If yes, please indicate finding: made a motion to recommend the Council approve the six foot variance request of the College of St. Benedict based on the following findings: RESOLUTION OF FINDING The request of the College of St. Benedict for a six (6) foot variance on the maximum size of curb cut in an R 1 Zoning District came before the Planning Commission at a Public Hearing held on June 2, 2005. The purpose of the hearing was to consider a variance to allow a larger curb cut opening. The property is legally described as follows: Lot 1 Block 1 College Addition St. Joseph Ordinance 52.12 Subd. 4 i) states: Residential lots shall have no more than a single curb cut providing access to the lot. The cmb cut shall not be morè than 24 feet in width. In consideration of the information presented to the Planning Commission and its application to the Comprehensive Plan and Ordinances of the City of St. Joseph, the Planning Commission makes the following [mdings: St. Joseph Code of Ordinances 52.07 subd 2 (a) rI) states: "That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applying to the property in question as to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same zoning district. The exceptional or extraordinary circumstances must not be the result of actions taken by the petitioner. FINDING: The College of St. Benedict completed an application for a special use permit to construct an expanded Single Family dwelling unit. The request was approved by the Planning Commission and City Council. Therefore. since an expanded Single Family use was approved. it was acknowledged that the house would be more than a typical residence. St. Joseph Code of Ordinances 52.07 subd. 2 (a) r21: "states that the literal interpretation of the provisions of this Ordinance would deprive the petitioner ofrights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same district under the terms of this Ordinance". FINDING: The Special Use Permit secured by the College of St. Benedict is the only expanded Single Family use in a R1 Zoning District. Therefore rights of other property owners are not being deprived. St. Joseph Code of Ordinances 52.07 subd 2.(a) r31: "states that granting the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by this Ordinance to other lands in the same district" . FINDING: This property is operating under a special use. expanding the typical rights. St. Joseph Code of Ordinances 52.07 subd. 2 (a) [4]: "states that the proposed variance will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property, or diminish or impair established property values within the sunounding area, or in any other respect impair the public health, safety or welfare of the residents of the City". FINDING: To the contrary. not providing adequate ingress/egress to the property would be creating a hazard. St. Joseph Code of Ordinances 52.07 subd. 2 (a) [5]: "states that the condition or situation of a specific piece of property, or the intended use of said property, for which the variance was sought, is not of so general or recurrent a nature as to make reasonably practicable the formulation of a general regulation for such conditions or a situation". FINDING: If another property owner requested an expanded single family use it is likely the same proyision would be needed. It is unlikely that a similar use will be requested. Sf. Joseph Code of Ordinances 52.07 subd 2 (a) r6]: "states that the variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the hardship on the particular FINDING: The petitioner is only requesting the footage needed to provide for two-way traffic into the property. Sf. Joseph Code of Ordinances 52.07 subd. 2 (a) r71: "states that the variance would not be materially detlimental to the purposes of the zoning ordinances or property within the same zoning classification. FINDING: Again, the Council already approved an expanded Single Familv Use Therefore if the variance is detrimental to the zoning classification the use should not have been approved. The motion was seconded by made a motion to recommend the Council deny a six foot variance of the College of St. Benedict based on the following findings: RESOLUTION OF FINDING The request of the College of St. Benedict for a six (6) foot variance on the maximum size of curb cut in an R 1 Zoning District came before the Planning Commission at a Public Hearing held on June 2, 2005. The purpose of the hearing was to consider a variance to allow a larger curb cut opening. The property is legally described as follows: Lot 1 Block 1 College Addition St. Joseph Ordinance 52.12 Subd. 4 i) states: Residential lots shall have no more than a single curb cut providing access to the lot. The curb cut shall not be more than 24 feet in width. In consideration of the information presented to the Planning Commission and its application to the Comprehensive Plan and Ordinances of the City of St. Joseph, the Planning Commission makes the following findings: St. Joseph Code of Ordinances 52.07 subd 2 (a) fll states: "That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applying to the property in question as to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same zoning district. The exceptional or extraordinary . circumstances must not be the result of actions taken by the petitioner. FINDING: The petitioner created the use by constructed an expanded Single Family Dwelling unit and should have requested a)J)Jroval at the time of requesting the Special Use Hearing. St. Joseph Code of Ordinances 52.07 subd. 2 (a) r21: "states that the literal interpretation of the provisions of this Ordinance would deprive the petitioner ofrights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same district under the terms of this Ordinance". FINDING: Rl property owners are not afforded a larger curb cut therefore the petitioner is not being deprived rights. St. Joseph Code of Ordinances 52.07 subd 2.(a) r31: "states that granting the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by this Ordinance to other lands in the same district" . FINDING: Rl Property owners are limited to a 24 Foot curb cut which is enforced by the City ofSt. Joseph. S1. Joseph Code of Ordinances 52.07 subd. 2 (a) [4]: "states that the proposed variance will not impair an adequate supply oflight and air to adjacent property, or diminish or impair established property values within the surrounding area, or in any other respect impair the public health, safety or welfare of the residents of the City". FINDING: S1. Joseph Code of Ordinances 52.07 subd. 2 (a) [5]: "states that the condition or situation of a specific piece of property, or the intended use of said property, for which the variance was sought, is not of so general or recurrent a nature as to make reasonably practicable the formulation of a general regulation for such conditions or a situation". FINDING: St. Joseph Code of Ordinances 52.07 subd 2 (a) r6l: "states that the variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the hardship on the particular FINDING: S1. Joseph Code of Ordinances 52.07 subd. 2 (a) r7J: "states that the variance would not be materially detrimental to the purposes of the zoning ordinances or property within the same zoning classification. FINDING: The motion was seconded by I Attachment: Yes or No REQUEST FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION Discussion - Curb Cut DATE: July 5,2005 AGENDA ITEM Discussion - Curb Cut PREVIOUS ACTION At the June Planning Commission the Planning Commission considered a variance request from the College of St. Benedict regarding the maximum allowed curb cut. During the discussion Planning Commissioners requested additional information on the history of the Ordinance and if there is a reason for limiting the curb cut in RI Zoning Districts. For your convenience I have enclosed the packet material from 2003 regarding the same issue. Since the Ordinance has been adopted we have only had one request to extend the curb cut. We have had residents question if they could expand the size but once information is provided they do not move forward. As staff we discussed this item and it does revolve around the characteristics of a neighborhood and defining for safety were vehicles will be ingressing/egressing. Another issue is off street parking - if the lot widths are reduced or maintained at the minimum extending the curb cut will has the potential of limiting or prohibiting adequate off street parking. RECOMMENDED PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION COMMENTSIRECOMMENDATIONS I Attachment: Yes or No \. REQUEST FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION . . Frank Osendorf - Discussion on allowances for curb cuts in a Rl District DATE: June 2, 2003 AGENDA ITEM Frank Osendorf, Discussion on allowances for curb cuts in a Rl Zoning District. PREVIOUS ACTJON ill 2000 the City amended theZoning Ordinance limited all residential property to one curb cut that cannot exceed 24 feet in width, including the wings.- The amendment was initiated by the Planning Commission and was requested to help control ingress./egress in an effort to provide safer neighborhoods and provide traffic controls. RECOMMENDED PLANNING COMMISSIONACnON COMMENTSIRECOMMENDA TIONS Frank Osendorf recently purchased a lot in Northland and built a home with a three car garage. In addition, he is pouring a cement slab to park a fifth wheel. It was noticed that Mr. Osendorf removed a large portion of curbing and when questioned he informed the City of his plans. Osendorf is requesting that the Planning Commission consider amending the Ordinance. City staff contacted the area Cities and questioned if they limited access or width of curb cuts. For your convenience the information follows. Some Cities that currently do not have limits are looking at revising their Ordinances for safety and traffic control reasons. II) II) ...... ..t:: Q,) ~ Q..~ Q,) ~ u E CI) Q,) 0 ('t' ".. ~ Q,) = .... C'" ~ <x: Q,) CI) - c:: "+- 0 ...... 0 >. = Q,) u ~2: ..c '- = .... <:..:> en = U ~ .2 c Q) Q) .a Æ a 0> Q) .9 ,.¿ ..0 "C "6 :5 ro '§: .~ .r:::. Q) .5 ~ ro :r: ~ Q) "C :5 ..- c .~ l) z-. ro ...... ..0 :5 I L- 'u æ :::J Q) en l) c.. a ...... :=¡ L- en E u OJ .r:::. .9 Q) ..0 - ..0 L- a Q) :I C l) ...., u ro c a - "0 C'O c:: a 15. Q) c:: rn ::I: Q) 1:: 'E ..J:: Q) 0 C'O a If) .r:::. ;: - .E Q} L- u> ~ ~ a .¡¡; ...., ..c:: -:5 ::J 'u C ü5 ;: l) Q) Q) 0> ..0 c.. c.S Q) "E ¡:: L- en c::: -:5 '6> :::J ...... In 0 Q) l) 0> 0 :E .9 "C C Õ c::: c::: c::: '(ñ ro 'S ro Q) .r:::. cn -:5 c.. L- l) ::1: ~ Q) ::J a OJ :I 0 ~ d: -:5 :5 ..J:: 0- 0 u) 0 ~ '§: - I Q) 15. E c::: Q) 0> ~ .a Q) ~ 0 :::J c::: 'u u Q) ëi5 If) ~ () '§: c::: 0 .Q 'u .f!? a c.. rn OJ ro .Q If) ...... c::: .5 Q) "0 ...., :I "E "C 0 ro ~ 0 co Îi3 "5 I ..c:: ro c::: I 0 Q) 0 Q) ..-J' >- a5 a5 If) Q) 0> .5 a5 ~ l) :::5 OJ L) L) Q) u c::: OJ u c::: l) c:: c:: a c::: :;::: c: c: -0- ro .r:::. ro ro 0 ro rn .a - L- UJ Q) c::: L- "C c: c:: , c: C'O c: = ~ :::J ~ ~ 'Ë Q... -0 ~ 'u l) c Q) c 0 >,C'O a a u 0 L- ro a Q) s:: .¡¡; 0- L- \of- == L- L- L- If) L- V) '03 '13 l) 'ã) 'ã) rn .¡¡; :5 c: 'Q3 c .5 Õ :5 Q) :::5 -:5 :5 :5 L- a :5 a... 0 -0 Q) ...... c:: .5 If) .5 ,5 L- .S "C l) .5 '5 Õ ü 0 c::: Q) 0> Þ OJ 0> 0) 0> ::J a. 0) u c::: c c:: c:: c:: .S If) c:: :E If) <3 :E :E :;::: -0 E :E = .r:::. Q) ::; õ Q) () õ - õ rn õ 115 Q) Õ 0 ü z: 0 -:5 z: z: Q... Z ::J :5 z: >< ..J:: ro N b b :;,¡. :;,¡. ..... :æ: ('") ~ N C"Î ~ ~ N ~ N ~ "C - - - X X - ~ c (0 z: N « z: z « z: <.0 z: ~ ..- ........ ~ ~ ..- .... .c ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 .... :::I :::¡ Z Z ..- Z Z Z z: Z Z z: ~ u U I- Z U « 0 E :c Æ i::' - ro ro "C Q) I- C/) 0) C'O c:: ...... "C > c:: 0 0 c:: ro a... Q) .¡::: 0 ro Z I- -, « ~ a::: « I- 0 0 W u a.. :::: oo;:T N ('<') C> r.o r.o ..- C> C> N W oo;:T N \..î.) r.o r.o ('") t"- o 0 N Z N 0") r.o N 0") co ..- M N co oo;:T t"- C"') t"- N \..î.) N l() t"- CD 0 .n ç};, , , , I I ob .n ~ Lt? co r.o ..-- C"Î :I: oo;:T Lt? co r.o -.:t \..î.) \..î.) lCì \..î.) L.O a.. co ('") = 0"> l"- N N N N N 0> "E en .--,¿ t:: ~ -0 -0 ro >- >- 'S:: >- .2 ~ 15, :::::I c::: c:: a. Q) 0> 'S; rn 0 Q... !::: ro 0 UJ Õ c -"'" 0:: Ü .2 .a > :s l) ro U « « '"0 L.L.. 0 en ..><:: 'ffi 0 a a:: :::J ü5 Ü I C'O 3= C/) Extract of Planning Commission Minutes June 2, 2003 Curb Cut Width Frank Osendorf. Discussion on allowances for curb cuts in a R-1 District: Weyrens reported that in 2000 the City amended the Zoning Ordinance limiting all residential property to one curb cut that cannot exceed 24-feet in width, including the wings. The amendment was initiated by the Planning Commission and was requested to help control ingress/egress in an effort to provide safer neighborhoods and provide traffic control. Weyrens stated that recently Frank Osendorf of 615 - yth Avenue NE removed a portion of his curbing and it was discovered that he was in the process of installing a 50' curb cut. Osendorf was informed of the City regulations and he requested an opportunity to approach the Planning Commission to request an amendment to the Ordinance allowing larger curb cuts. Weyrens presented the Commission with a summary of the area Cities regulations regarding curb cuts. Of the Cities surveyed, the majority limit curb cut widths. Some Cities that currently do not have limits are looking at revising their Ordinances for safety and traffic control reasons. Frank Osendorf of 615 - 7h Avenue NE, approached the Planning Commission on his own behalf. Osendorf stated that he understands that he has the opportunity to apply for a variance but would prefer that the Planning Commission consider amending the Ordinance. Osendorf stated that he recently built a home in Northland which he spent 2 % years designing. The house includes a three car garage and a cement pad for the parking of a fifth wheel. Osendorf stated that he needs additional curb cut space so that he can back in his fifth wheel. Osendorf asked the Planning Commission to drive by 409 Gumtree Street and view its driveway, as it was constructed before the Ordinance Amendment and exceeds 24 feet. He also recommended the Planning Commission drive by yth Avenue NE and Gumtree Street, east of Northland Drive, to view their driveways and ask themselves the following questions: 1. Which of the driveways do you see presents a greater curb appeal? 2. Which of these driveways is going to make the greatest contribution to resale value? 3. Which driveway would you prefer to have? Utsch stated he has viewed a home located at 1212 East Minnesota Street where the home has a four stall garage and only a 24-foot curb cut. Osendorf stated it is his opinion that the survey presented at this meeting is inaccurate. The contractor that built his home has lived in Cold Spring for approximately six months and has a 36-foot curb cut which is contrary to the information presented in the survey. Weyrens verified that the information provided is accurate and she has a copy of Ordinance from the City of Cold Spring. Loso stated it is his opinion that the City should allow rollover curbing. Rollover curbing would alleviate the need to limit curb cuts widths as any portion of the curb can be used as an entrance. Osendorf agreed with Loso and stated he would be willing to install rollover curbing if it were allowed by the City. Deutz questioned if the roll-over curbs were included in the survey to which Weyrens responded no. Lesnick questioned if roll-over curb would be a safety issue. Deutz questioned why the City restricted the width of curb cuts. Weyrens stated that it is her understanding that curb cut limits were imposed to provide safer streets. In residential areas when children are playing, it is easy to identify traffic areas by curb cuts. If you wouldn't have any limitations it would be possible for vehicles to use the entire width of the lot as an ingress/egress and traffic control would be lost. Utsch stated the Ordinance cannot be changed without a public hearing. Therefore, Utsch stated that Osendorf has the opportunity to apply for a variance if he was interested in pursing a larger curb cut. Attachment: Yos or No I REQUEST FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION Discussion - Original Townsite of St. Joseph DATE: July 5, 2005 AGENDA ITEM Discussion - Original Townsite of St. Joseph PREVIOUS ACTION At the June meeting the Planning Commission received a request ITom Mike Gohman to subdivide property at the corner of 2nd Avenue NE and Minnesota Street. During discussion the Planning Commission discussed the "old" part of town and if the setbacks or lot sizes conform to the current, Ordinance or if a separate zoning district should be created for this part. i ! RECOMMENDED PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION COMMENTSIRECOMMENDATIONS Through the GIS Mapping, the attached map illustrates four blocks of the Townsite, between 1" Avenue and 3'd Avenue. As you can see only one block has a lot size average less than 10,000 square feet.! With. the exception of one rental property, we have not had issues with land use regulations. The area khownas Eastern Park actually has smaller lots than the "old part of town". ¡ ! - I , I I ! ,~)_J;EDARl S11' $~ BIRCH ST ECOUNTY ROAD 75 E I I I I COUNTY ROAD 751 E 1 e-_____, I \ , " I \1 1'- I' I _~\)J~ll """""1 ~ ~ _---' \r<'I r '0 -9 -T ~ ,', ' \II .3 ::. "" r-1 r<' cf' ¡;, '" 'ii '" H-7I ,,\ ',--" ';. -g; r - '~I i>O 't, ~ 7\ . . ,I é! ~, ~~Msb J~;' :c1;, @,_~-,~= ",' ,~ I ,t.A ' . ' ~ 1\ M~ ?ti. I Ii ~ ~ ~ ~ \ ~::~~l-i/ ~ ~ ¡"" tJI! J.r:h \ c ,I; ~ \ ~ 1'1 ~"\ ~ II, ~----!I 4'~1t ~ , ' , ,'" V) I ' J-/ '\.¡Vì'Y ~-~~~/ I ,>'----------- , ,-'~ " I! ,,' ---, .(j" ~--1 1·-------- \ '- I -~ ~-- 1'iS1o'ì;', "~3~, \12-61 L-,----L-----~ L- \0'-1,"1 Q11S I \\¡\ ~o " --,-___-=-~~-----~J -'---c-~~ I 'I"--¡ ~ ':; <>-\,j N~;-~ VJ ~ o-C"" , I \,,, r.\ r<' ;:,0 '"' '" "" 'JJ r - '-I, -'> --" I VI 1: cO "'" "" - <>- '" '" "" - \' <> \' <> G ~ Q '" " '" Q 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ '" '" ;¡ '" <" "" '" '" ":\- r ,., rI -r <' " 'ì' Q (" ~ - " ~ ' ~ '1' --¡~\' 'I " \ 'i " 1 'i I" 1,1 , , , I,', I " ¡---1 _ L _.-L.--1..---J 1#/ 10QO '10',\,'6 '1c1Lfß ~~--_.--------- ~j ~\ ¡-__--------------------1 ',----------..--'; , ,-------rr-\ ~, " _ ¡ \i i¡ 'L i-__..~___'_--'_.---î ¡---------..-.', , I ¡--'I I ?II! I~ , . , -....-, --1..-" --