Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2002 [07] Jul 01 ity of St. Joseph .ollege Avenue NW . . Box 668, St. Joseph, MN 56374 (320) 363-7201 Fax: 363-0342 CLERK! St. Joseph Planning Commission ADMJNISTRATOR Judy Weyrens July 1, 2002 7:00 PM MAYOR Larry J. Hosch COUNCILORS 1. Call to Order Bob Loso Cory Ehlert 2. Approval of Agenda Kyle Schneider Alan Rassier 3. Approval of Minutes 4. 7:05 PM - Vic West Steel- Lot Split Request, Buettner Business Park 5. Comprehensive Plan Update 6. Other Matters . 7. Adjourn . Draft Page 1 of 8 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the Planning Commission for the City of St. Joseph met in regular · session on Monday, June 3, 2002 at 7:05 p.m. in the St. Joseph City Hall. Members Present: Chair Gary Utsch. Commissioners Mike Deutz, S. Kathleen Kalinowski, Marge Lesnick, Jim Graeve, Kurt Schneider. Council Liaison AI Rassier. Administrator / Clerk Judy Weyrens. Others Present: Jerry Hettwer, Mike Miller, Joe Miller, Scott Miller, Gary Schroeder, Joanne Foust, Cynthia Smith-Strack, and Ted Schmid Approve Aqenda: Rassier made a motion to approve agenda as presented; seconded by Lesnick and passed unanimously. Approve Minutes: Kalinowski made a motion to approve the minutes of March 4, 2002; seconded by Lesnick. Discussion: After review of the minutes it was determined the minutes of March 4, 2002 were incomplete. Utsch tabled approval of the March 4, 2002 minutes to the July 1, 2002 meeting. Kalinowski made a motion to approve the minutes of March 26, 2002 as presented; seconded by Lesnick. Discussion: Graeve questioned the wording of schedule of allowances in relation to the R-3 Zoning District. Weyrens reported City Attorney John Scherer is reviewing the proposed modifications to the R-3 Zoning District, including the schedule of allowances. When Scherer submits his opinion it will be presented to the Planning Commission and City Council. Graeve would like for future reference, the need for special allowances and they are designed to accomplish. · The motion passed unanimously. Kalinowski made a motion to approve the minutes of April 9, 2002 as presented; seconded by Lesnick. Ayes: Utsch, Kalinowski, Deutz, Rassier, Lesnick, Schneider. Nays: None Abstain: Graeve Motion Carried: 6:0:1 Kalinowski made a motion to approve the minutes of May 6, 2002 as presented; seconded by Rassier. Discussion: Graeve requested the minutes reflect the alternatives given to Bohlen as his request was denied. The motion passed unanimously. Diamond Enerqy, Variance and Special Use Request: Chair Ustch called the public hearing to order and stated the purpose of the hearing is to consider a variance to allow remodeling to the building located at 601 West County Road 75, St. Joseph MN 56374 without meeting the exterior building material requirements as stated in Section 53.22 B-2 Hiqhway 75 Business District, Subdivision 7 (c) Buildinq Exteriors of the St. Joseph Code of Ordinances. Section 53.22, Subdivision 7 (c) states that acceptable exterior building materials shall include brick, stone, tip-up concrete panel, decorative concrete block or glass. Wood siding, plastic, and other combustible material not listed as acceptable shall not be used for building exteriors. Architecturally approved steel is acceptable provided that at least 50% of the building (excluding windows and doors) consist of brick, stone, tip-up concrete panel and / or decorative concrete block. Any building undergoing renovation, repair, or an addition, so as to require the issuance of a building permit, shall be brought into · conformance with this subsection at the time of repairs, renovation, or addition are completed. Draft Page 2 of 8 Realtor Jerry Hettwer spoke on behalf of the property owner. Hettwer stated Diamond Engery is currently · located at 819 - 19th Avenue NE and is in the process of relocating the business to 601 West County Road 75. Diamond Energy is a sheet rock company that is looking for a larger facility to store supplies and provide office space. The property is currently zoned B-2 Highway 75. Hettwer clarified that when the existing building at 601 West County Road 75 was constructed the property was zoned Industrial. When the building constructed in 1995 it met all the requirements of the zoning district including securing a special use permit. The property was zoned General Business in 1997 and again rezoned in 1999 as Highway Business. Hettwer stated that the proposed use for Diamond Energy is similar in nature to the existing use. It is his understanding that a special use permit is needed as minor remodeling, including the construction of a bathroom and office space will require the issuance of a building permit. Therefore, the building must conform to the Ordinance requirements. Hettwer presented the following site plan details: Site Size 2.47 Acres Building Steel Frame Construction Building Size 80' x 120'; 21,600 square feet Comprised of an office space of 2,400 square feet and 19,200 square feet of warehouse area. Loading Facilities 2 docks Parking Area: 11,200 square feet - 22 parking spaces Signage Details are not available at this time but all signage will conform to · the regulations as stated in the St. Joseph Code of Ordinances Their being no one present wishing to present testimony on the proposed variance and special use permit, Chair Utsch closed the hearing at 7:23 PM. Graeve stated that he is unfamiliar with Diamond Energy and requested the property owners to give a brief summary of who Diamond Energy is. Owner representative Mike Miller presented the following facts about Diamond Energies: 0 The business is currently located at 819 - 19th Avenue NE and has been in existence since 1987 0 Current Pay Scale $ 12.50 to 26.50 per hour 0 The company owns 14 vehicles which will be parked on the site each night 0 Diamond Energies is comprised of 26 employees Graeve questioned Miller if there are any potential safety hazards with their business. Miller reported that Diamond Energy only warehouses insulation and it is mainly fiberglass. In addition to fiberglass insulation they also carry Styrofoam and fiberglass pipe covering, fiberglass blanket for duck insulation, and fiberglass board for duck insulation. None of these products will produce a safety hazard. Rassier made a motion to recommend the City Council adopt the following finds, recommending approval of the Special Use Permit. The motion was seconded by Deutz · Draft Page 3 of 8 Resolution of finding . The request of Diamond Energy for a Special Use request came before the Planning Commission at a public hearing held on June 3, 2002. The purpose of the hearing was to consider issuance of a Special Use Permit to allow Industrial Warehousing in a Highway 75 Business Zoning District. St. Joseph Code of 52.22 subdivision 4 (c) allows for industrial and office warehousing. That part of Lot 9, AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NUMBER 4, a duly recorded plat in Stearns County, Minnesota, which lies east of the west 186.50 feet thereof, north of the northerly right of way line of County Road Number 75 (formerly U.S. Trunk Highway Number 52) and west of a line drawn due south from a point which is 800.00 feet due west of a point on the west line of SCHNEIDER'S ADDITION, a duly recorded plat in said county and state, distant 800.00 feet northerly of the intersection of said west line with said northerly right of way line of County Road Number 75. Together with an easement for ingress and egress over that part of the south half of the northeast quarter of Section 9, Township 124, Range 29, Stearns County, Minnesota, which lies within 33 feet on each side of the following described line: Commencing at a point on the west line of SCHNEIDER'S ADDITION, a duly recorded plat in Stearns County, Minnesota, distant 800.00 feet northerly of the intersection of said west line with the northerly right of way line of County Road Number 75 (formerly U.S. Trunk highway Number 52); thence due west for 800.00 feet; thence due south to a line drawn parallel with and 33.00 feet northerly of the north line of Lot 9, AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NUMBER 4, a duly recorded plat in said county and state, this being the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence westerly along said parallel line to its intersection with the west line of the east half of said Section 9; thence deflect to the left along a tangential curve, having a radius of 80.00 feet and a central angle of 53' 00" for 74.00 feet; thence southwesterly on tangent to said curve in the northerly right of way line of said County Road Number 75 and there terminating. The request has been submitted by Diamond Properties Partnership, 819 19th Avenue NE, St. Joseph MN 56374. . Notice of this matter was duly served and published. In consideration of the information presented to the Planning Commission and its application to the Comprehensive Plan and Ordinances of the City of St. Joseph, the Planning CommIssion makes the following findings: The proposed use is consistent with the standards for granting a special use permit, st. Joseph Code of Ordinances 52.9 Therefore, based on the above findings, the Planning Commission makes the following recommendation: Approval of the Special Use Permit to allow Industrial warehousing a Highway Business Zoning District. Variance, reqardinq exterior requirements: Hettwer stated the building contains a small amount of brick that is placed on the south and west sides of the building. The Commission discussed the parking area and questioned if the additional parking will be paved. Hettwer stated that there is a significant area that is already blacktopped and the property owner does not intend on surfacing and additional area. Graeve questioned if the property owners would be agreeable to planting trees on the west side of the building to provide for some aesthetics. Hettwer stated the property around the building is already landscaped with shrubbery and decorative rocks. In addition, the property contains trees on the east side of the building. Graeve stated that placing trees on the west side of the building would help reduce the large building that is visible and parking area. In addition it would provide some relief for dust control. . Hettwer stated that Diamond Energies is considering leasing a portion of the facility as they do not need the entire building at this time. The Commission questioned if a variance is needed as the modifications Draft Page 4 of 8 to the building are minor and all interior. Weyrens clarified that the Ordinance requires all building permits in the Highway Business Zone to be approved by the Planning Commission. Deutz questioned if by · granting a special use permit for industrial warehousing that any company could lease the building without first securing a special use permit. Weyrens stated it special use permits are not transferable therefore she would believe that each use would require a special use permit. Weyrens agreed to research clarification on this matter and report back to the Planning Commission. Rassier made a motion to recommend the City Council adopt the following findings recommending approval of the variance on the exterior requirements. The motion wàs seconded by Kalinowski and passed unanimously. RESOLUTION OF FINDING The request of Diamond Energy for a Variance on the exterior requirements came before the Planning Commission at a public hearing held on June 3, 2002. The purpose of the hearing was to consider issuance of a Variance to relieve the 50% exterior requirements as stated in St. Joseph Code of Ordinance 53.22 . St. Joseph Ordinance 53.22. Subdivision 7 (c) states that acceptable exterior building materials shall include brick, stone, tip-up concrete panel, decorative concrete block or glass. Wood siding, plastic, and other combustible material not listed as acceptable shall not be used for building exteriors. Architecturally approved steel is acceptable provided that at least 50% of the building (excluding windows and doors) consist of brick, stone, tip-up concrete panel and I or decorative concrete block. Any building undergoing renovation, repair, or an addition, so as to require the issuance of a building permit, shall be brought into conformance with this subsection at the time of repairs, renovation, or addition are completed That part of Lot 9, AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NUMBER 4, a duly recorded plat in Stearns County, Minnesota, which lies east of the west 186.50 feet thereof, north of the northerly right of way line of County Road Number 75 (formerly U.S. Trunk Highway Number 52) and west of a line drawn due south from a point · which is 800.00 feet due west of a point on the west line of SCHNEIDER'S ADDITION, a duly recorded plat in said county and state, distant 800.00 feet northerly of the intersection of said west line with said northerly right of way line of County Road Number 75. Together with an easement for ingress and egress over that part of the south half of the northeast quarter of Section 9, Township 124, Range 29, Stearns County, Minnesota, which lies within 33 feet on each side of the following described line: Commencing at a point on the west line of SCHNEIDER'S ADDITION, a duly recorded plat in Stearns County, Minnesota, distant 800.00 feet northerly of the intersection of said west line with the northerly right of way line of County Road Number 75 (formerly U.S. Trunk highway Number 52); thence due west for 800.00 feet; thence due south to a line drawn parallel with and 33.00 feet northerly of the north line of Lot 9, AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NUMBER 4, a duly recorded plat in said county and state, this being the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence westerly along said parallel line to its intersection with the west line of the east half of said Section 9; thence deflect to the left along a tangential curve, having a radius of 80.00 feet and a central angle of 53' 00" for 74.00 feet; thence southwesterly on tangentto said curve in the northerly right of way line of said County Road Number 75 and there terminating. The request has been submitted by Diamond Properties Partnership, 819 19th Avenue NE, St. Joseph MN 56374. Notice of this matter was duly served and published. In consideration of the information presented to the Planning Commission and its application to the Comprehensive Plan and Ordinances of the City of St. Joseph, the Planning Commission makes the following findings: St. Joseph Code of Ordinances 52.8 subd (a) states: "That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applying to the property in question as to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same zoning district. The · Draft Page 5 of 8 exceptional or extraordinary circumstances must not be the result of actions taken by the . petitioner. FINDING: This building was constructed under a different zoning classification and requiring the property owner at this time to modify the exterior would create a financial hardship. Additionally the remodeling to the building is minimal and all interior construction, St. Joseph Code of Ordinances 52.8 subd. (b ): "states that the literal interpretation of the provisions of this Ordinance would deprive the petitioner of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same district under the terms of this Ordinance". FINDING: The proposed use is consistent with the standard. St. Joseph Code of Ordinances 52.8 subd.(c): "states that granting the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by this Ordinance to other lands in the same districf'. FINDING: The proposed use is consistent with the standard. St. Joseph Code of Ordinances 52.8 subd. (d) "states that the proposed variance will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property, or diminish or impair established property values within the surrounding area, or in any other respect impair the public health, safety or welfare of the residents of the City". FINDING: The proposed use is consistent with the standard:.. St. Joseph Code of Ordinances 52.8 subd. (e) "states that the condition or situation of a specific piece of property, or the intended use of said property, for which the variance was sought, is not of so general or recurrent a nature as to make reasonably practicable the formulation of a general regulation for such conditions or a situation". FINDING: The proposed use is consistent with the standard. . Therefore, based on the above findings, the Planning Commission makes the following recommendation: Approval of the Variance request relieving the exterior requirements. Approval is recommended with the following contingency: The property owner will plant trees on the west side of the building. Final Plat Northland Phase Six: Weyrens reported the Final Plat for Northland Six is for the first phase only which includes approximately 54 homes. Since the preliminary plat included more than 100 lots, and Environment Assessment Worksheet (EAW) must be completed. The EAW requires a thirty (30) day comment period for interested persons to question environment issues. The thirty day period ends on June 27,2002. The City Council cannot take action on the plat until the waiting period is ended. The EAW process also requires that the City adopt a resolution of no impact at the completion of the waiting period. Deutz questioned why the Planning Commission is not approving the entire preliminary plat that was presented to the Commission. The original plat contained 107 homes and the final plat for Northland Six only contains 54 homes. Weyrens responded that the City allows developers to phase large plats. Once the preliminary plat is approved it cannot be changed. All final plats must be consistent with the approved preliminary plat which is kept on file in the City Offices. Ted Schmid stated that plats are developed in phases for economic reasons including taxes. Schmid stated that pockets of wetlands have been determined in the southeast corner of the plat. Therefore, the final plat for Norhtland Six excludes five lots which are in a wetland area. Schmid stated that he will delineate the area in questioned and include those lots in a future final plat. Schmid stated . the final plat before the Commission at this time includes all the revisions as requested by the Planning Commission and City Council. Draft Page 6 of 8 Utsch questioned if access to County Road 2 for construction traffic is included in the Final Plat presented at this time. Schmid reported that he does own the property and a gravel access will be provided to · County Road 2 at all times of construction. Weyrens reported that she has received a letter from Rothfork agreeing to the access to County Road 2. This agreement will become part of the Developers Agreement. When questioned as to the time line for construction, Schmid state that he plans to begin construction as soon as possible this year. Phase two is scheduled for the spring of 2003 and Phase three the spring of 2004. Kalinowski made a motion to recommend the Council approval the final plat of Northland Phase Six as presented with the following contingencies; 1. Approval of the City Engineer 2. Execution of the Developers Agreement including a provision for access to County Road 2. The motion was seconded by Lesnick and passed unanimously. Vic West - TIF District, Municipal Development Group: Cynthia Smith-Strack and Joanne Foust of Municipal Development Group, Inc. approached the Planning Commission regarding the Tax Increment Financing Plan (TIF) of Vic West Steel. Smith-Strack stated that the City Council has authorized the preparation of a TIF Plan and Development Agreement in conjunction with the Vic West Project. A required element of the preparation process is a finding of fact certifying the proposed TIF District conforms to the City's Comprehensive Plan. The project consists of the construction of a 67,000 square foot manufacturing facility (7,000 sq ft of office space, remaining production) on 10 acres of land located in the Buettner Business Park. The single story · facility will be constructed of steel and block materials with ceiling heights from 12' (office) to 26' (production). Construction cost is estimated at 3.2 Million with an additional $ 500,000 for overhead cranes and $ 380,000 for land acquisition making the total project cost $ 3.8 million. The building will be leased from the LLC by Vic West. Vic West plans to move into the facility in December 2002. The project is anticipated to create 7 new jobs with wages of $ 12.00 through $ 14.00 per hour. TIF Assistance is requested in order to help the project move forward. Without the help of TIF, Vic West will not move forward with the project as it would be cost prohibitive. Utsch questioned the use of TIF and if it is necessary for the City to provide subsidy in the full amount requested by Vic West. Smith-Strack stated that the TIF available through the City is the pay-as-you-go method which provides no risk to the City. The property taxes are only recaptured by Vic West after they pay their taxes and ten percent is retained by the City for administrative expenses. Utsch stated that the City extended services to the Industrial Park to increase the tax base. If the taxes are captured by the businesses for seven to nine years then the City is not receiving additional taxes. The businesses utilizing TIF still receive City services and the City is not receiving any additional benefit. Smith-Strack stated that the City will always have the building. Even if the Company would leave after a period of time the building could be sold or leased to another party. Without TIF St. Joseph cannot compete with the surrounding communities. Again Smith-Stract stated that the TIF policy adopted by the City of St. Joseph does not include any risk to the City. Smith-Strack stated the Planning Commission needs to make a resolution of findings as to whether or not the proposed TIF plan conforms to the standards of the St. Joseph Comprehensive Plan. Smith-Strack presented the following statements with regard to the proposed TIF Plan and the Comprehensive Plan: 1. "Encourage and market commercial and industrial development compatible with the City and · that will support and diversify the local economy." 1 Draft Page 7 of 8 Proposed project: The proposed project will generate an annual gross tax increment (increase in taxes) . of $ 73,423, thereby supporting and diversifying the local economy. "Promote commercial and industrial development that is cost effective and sustainable.,,1 2. Proposed project: Vic West Steel has been a member of the St. Joseph business community for several years. The proposed development will allow the business to expand and function more efficiently. 3. "Explore funding possibilities and financial incentive plans that will encourage commercial and industrial development.,,1 Proposed Project: The financial incentive plan includes the issuance of an Industrial Development Bond, tax increment proceeds and participation in the Minnesota Investment Fund program. The investment fund portion is a grant to the City which is, in turn, loaned at below market rates to the Developer. The City is able to retain a percentage of the grant and all the interest for dedication to a revolving loan fund. The local revolving loan fund will then be available as a financial incentivf¡to other busi(.Jesses. 4. "The City will attractively encourage commercial and industrial development that helps sustain the economic vitality of the City and enhances the standard of living." 1 Proposed Project: The project will allow a member of the business community to expand and remain in the City. The project will result in an increase in the City's tax base and assist in the diversification of the tax base. 5. Industrial development within the City will adhere to the environmental quality standards." 1 Proposed Project: The proposed site for the development is within the Buettner Business Park wherein . existing covenants require compliance with EPA and MPCA standards. 6. ''The local EDA will explore funding possibilities and financial incentive plans that will etlcourage commercial and industrial growth." 1 Proposed Project: The EDA has recommended the use of TIF to facilitate this project 7. The land use map included with the 1997 Comprehensive Plan indicates the proposed area is zoned industrial. Proposed Project: The project is industrial in nature (i.e. construction of a manufacturing facility). Deutz made a motion to approve Resolution 2002-01; seconded by Kalinowski and passed-> unanimously_ Resolution 2002-01 Finding Tax Increment Financing District 1-4 Conforms with the General Plans for Development and Redevelopment of the City of St. Joseph WHEREAS, the City Council for the City of St. Joseph, Minnesota (the "City") has proposed to adopt a Tax Increment Financing Plan for the Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-4 (the "Plan") and has submitted the Plan to the City Planning Commission (the "Commission") pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.175, Subdivision 3, and WHEREAS, the Commission has reviewed the Plan to determine its conformity with the general plans for the development and redevelopment of the City as described in the comprehensive Plan for the City of St. . Joseph. Draft Page 8 of 8 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the St. Joseph Planning Commission that the development . Plan of Vic West Steel conforms with the general plans for the development and redevelopment of the City of St. Joseph as a whole. Comprehensive Plan - Review of draft chapters: Cynthia Smith-Strack and Joanne Foust from Municipal Development Group, Inc. approached the Planning Commission regarding the updating of the St. Jospeh Comprehensive Plan. Smith-Strack and Foust presented the Planning Commission with the draft of the first three chapters of the new Comprehensive Plan. The following information was presented: Chapter One - Introduction 0 Purpose 0 Scope of Plan 0 Methodology 0 Community Strengths and Opportunities Chapter Two - Community Characteristics and Setting 0 History of St. Joseph 0 Physical Profile Summary (Topography, Surface/Ground Waters, Soils, Woodlands and Vegetation) Chapter Three - Demographic Trends and Assumptions 0 Social Profile Summary e 0 Population Growth - Historical and Future Projections 0 Household Growth 0 City of St. Joseph Population and Household Projection Assumptions 0 St. Joseph Population Characteristics 0 Employment Characteristics Other Matters: The City Council and Planning Commission will be meeting in joint session to discuss affordable housing. Deutz stated that he is part of the St. Joseph Beautification Committee and at that same meeting he would like the opportunity to update the City Council and Planning Commission on the beautification plans for College Avenue North and South. Adjourn: Lesnick made a motion to adjourn at 9:15 PM; seconded by Rassier and passed unanimously. Judy Weyrens Administrator Clerk 1 St. Joseph Comprehensive Plan, 1997 . .ollege Avenue NW ity of St. Joseph P.O. Box 668, St. Joseph, MN 56374 (320) 363-7201 Fax: 363-0342 DATE: June 28, 2002 CLERK! MEMO TO: Planning Commission, Administrator Weyrens ADMJNISTRATOR J(~re-~st & Cynthia ~-Strack, Municipal Development Group Judy Weyrens FROM: MAYOR RE: Request for He-Subdivision of Lot 1, Blpck 2, Buettner Business Park Larry J. Hosch Request: COUNCILORS Bob Loso St. Joe Development, LLC requests approval of the re-subdivision of Lot 1, Block, Buettner Cory Ehlert Business Park (a.k.a. St. Joseph Business Park). Lot 1, Block 2 is currently, 17.343 acres in Kyle Schneider size. The applicant request a lot split which would result in two lots measuring 9.343 acres in Alan Rassier size and 8.0 acres in size. The request is proposed to accommodate the construction of VicWest's new facility on the 8.0 acre lot. A site plan for this project will be submitted to the' Planning Commission for approval in the near future. Background: Section 54.3, Subdivision 2 of the City's Subdivision Ordinance indicates, " The regulations contained herein shall apply to the subdivision of a lot, tract or parcel of land into two or more . lots, tracts, or development, whether immediate or future, ilicluding the re-subdivision or re- platting of land or lots; except; the City Council may exempt the division of a single previously plattêd lot from the application of the Ordinance and condition the division upon application of the ordinance and condition the division upon Council approval only, where the Council finds that full compliance with the platting procedure is not necessary to meet the purposes of this Ordinance." The proposed re-subdivision appears to meet all design and improvement standards including frontage on a city street, serving with municipal utilities and sufficient lot width and depth to accommodate required setbacks in an Industrial zoning district. Enclosed is a certification from Landata with the proposed lot split dimensions. Action: Enclosed is a resolution for the Planning Commission's consideration which recommends the City Council approve the lot split, contingent upon the installation of monuments/markers at the new lot corners. The resolution also recommends that the City Council approve the re- subdivision of the lot exempting the applicant from the formal platting process, as outlined in the exceptions in Subdivision 54.3, Subdivision 2. A MOTION is in order. . j 1 1 I I 2 I I I I I 3 I I I 4 I- I¡J 5 I¡J Q:: l- I I ~ I Q.. ~ 7 ~ o ~ IS \"?¡ I i I 1 I 10 I 8.306 ACRES u.i \ 1 11 I % I 17.343 ACRES I 1 u.i 2 12 > ~ I' ; I 13 I ffil k 14 I g, <?>t>-~~0 ~ I I r "=! fÇ.~ 2 110.. \ I 1 .~ \> 10.03 ACRES I I ~ - I i l=--", II 2 e ELM ST, E. '--.J- .J: --, ~ f I II ~ ~ \ 8 I II I :5 I ~ ~ 1 5! I 1\ I J ~ ~ 4.978 ACRES 1 0 1 1 I 2 I ~ \\ 4 Q:: 5,699 ACRES 7,836 ACRES ~ ~ I ~ I. \ ,"ï¡-- ! ~ I ~ 113 I --------- N ~. L _ -1 8 L I I · ~~~~- 1 ~ BURUNGTON - - '""""'--=.-= - -.J I¿. __ ~RTH£RN SÞNTA =- --_ ffi . --...", _ _ ..:.:.... R.R. (J' _........ s CSAH 75 ------- '--L C:L ------. ~~~ ~ -- o . _ ~ ~ z _ ~~ o . '- I¡J ~ ~ ~ I- ~ ~ $::I ST. E. 0 zoo " ..... N N ..... õ FILE NO. ST. JOSEPH ~~~ STJOE9904.00 BUSINESS PARK EXHIBr wI;(" DATE: ST JOSEPH MINNESOTA NO,' 01/22/02 . , .. OF ST. CLOUD, "INC I 2233 ROOSEVELT RD, SUITE 10 ST. CLOUD, .~ 56301 Ph/F£K 320 251 2851 Date; ~ /2.t./t? 7-- · FAX TO: ß rv¿:,c=- &c>h,~~ · *. · · · Pbone No; .-.-.'--. _.-..~...- ---.-. -. 'H __.. ._. . · 3CoJ 7 2-0 "7 Fax Nø; · No. ofPaaè~: .3 · Comments: · /..-e.5~1 .¡; Þ- . .{' 17 .RAG Q ..¡:. . /.... ø1- / /z ¡Jve;l/,.,ðv'.J ¡J~'l: ~^" · .; . . . · · · · · · w. · · · · · , · · · · · · · · · . · · · · . · r'H\';:\t. tJ:¿ _.,,1....."11"""1 , ....It)( -- - -- ~, J '11' ~~ t " I. I . 1 hereby certify that this is a true and correct ~apresentat1on of B survey of the bounde~ies of: That part of Lot 1. BlocK Z. 8U~TTNEA SUSINESS PARK. a duly recorded PJat in Stearns County. Minnesota. 'ly1ng South of a Hna drawn East. at riQnt ðngles to the west line of said Lot i. trom 8 point en seid west 1ine distant ~9D.iO feet North of tne southwest corner of said L.et 1, \ 7 J¿, 38 As ~urveyed by inS this /~ day of 57Þ-ie...¡'~ 20 t!'J I, ~~",-:ß¿_,. .,... Wil1iðln F. Lunser¡UL .$. Mn Reg-No 9:394 0 . ~M ~ OF ST. CLOUO. INC 2233 ROOSEVELT RD *~o (:) Dem ST. CLOUD. MN, !58301 ~20 ;¡¡ð~ eB~1 , .., . . . .. __I __I ____ .-....... . ...._-_..........,1.<'-_........1.. ~...'.....".I.. J . '_L... <..I.... I I ~... ..... ,.. I -- .:¡ ..,' #:1. . ---------- . /. ". ...1 ----------- .'. -- .~, -~ .. .,. .'. ... -,-.. . .~-,,- . f.¡ ---------- ... ./t. . '''Z --------j--- . M R 01 fa'· ... G;) -01'- - - - --'---- - - - - - - .' ~ q 1 b '.' Ý.oD -Q---------- > 87"'5'f J 19 "E Î:> U) ·t {'i t.····~., .. ...... ..... ! ,. j p",.. ---rf çt) . () (;) ----------- - .. ....+..."... ¡.... .... ..~-:...,:::.. "1 '! J::~......... 2 . . . --------1:W- ...·..!S·lj9·19·U02.66___ '- 1 ~:: C"a.. .- -- - ,. I... ':~'t . ~.... --------~- ~ :'4'., ·1· ':¡ to: : .. ..... ." ... gP . ..... ________S_ .1 .: "- ! ..:"¡. ... 2 'lit' ~. t I": ---------, Øi ~- M I .1: '"' .f ~ .f II) 1 :5 ..': .4··. ':... ....\. I··.. :.'. ..... , ~ ..,~ .. ..... :-;: .:!,:.:., f'· !"~' ! : ~ ..: I 0) .... ...'. . .... ,.. . '. . . "=i . .... ------------ /2 U) ~f~': .t .:.. , ¡ ."': or,l· t ._-- - : t....."..: '59'1 9"W ago.gs .,.: 'ET a I .' I CD . .-.. ~!19~E 975.19 t . -., ...--- ----- ~- - II 546.88 I J . I J J I I J .',.. I 1 ." " ..... .;¡ . ~_..... ST. JOSEPH PLANNING COMMISSION . RESOLUTION - RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE RE-SUBDIVISION OF LOT 1, BLOCK 2, BUETTNER BUSINESS PARK WHEREAS, St. Joe Development LLC has submitted a request to re-subdivide Lot 1, Block 2, Buettner Business Park, and WHEREAS, the re-subdivision would result in two lots measuring 9.343 acres and 8.00 acres in size; and WHEREAS, Section 54.3, Subdivision 2 of the Subdivision Ordinance provides for exceptions from the formal platting process for the re-subdivision of lots provided full compliance with the platting procedure is not needed to meet the purposes of the ordinance; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the proposed subdivision and has found the lot split to comply with minimum design and improvement standards; and WHEREAS, LanData has provided a registered land surveyors' certification for the proposed legal description for the 8.00 acre parcel. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE ST. PLANNING COMMISSION THAT: The Planning Commission does hereby recommend the City Council of the City of St. Joseph find the re-subdivision of Lot 1, Block 2 in compliance with the Subdivision Ordinance and exempt . the applicant from the formal platting procedures, contingent upon the following condition: 1. That approved monuments/markers be installed at the new lot corners resulting from the re- subdivision of Lot 1 , Block 2 by a registered land surveyor. DATED THIS 1st DAY OF JULY, 2002 ATTEST: Planning Chair Secretary . ellege Avenue NW ity of St. Joseph P.O. Box 668, St. Joseph, MN 56B TE' June 27, 2002 (320) 363-7201 . Fax: 363-0342 MEMO TO: Chairperson Utsch CLERK! Planning Commission Members City Administrator Weyrens . ADMJNISTRATOR ~~st and Cynth~ith-Strack, Municipal Development Group, Inc. Judy Weyrens FROM: MAYOR RE: Comprehensive Plan Items Larry J. Hosch We are continuing to proceed with the Comprehensive Plan update process. Attached please find COUNCILORS a copy of survey results from those surveyed thus far. We will review comments received at the Bob Loso Planning Commission meeting. Cory Ehlert Kyle Schneider Also, enclosed are DRAFT Chapters 4, 5 and 6 of the Comprehensive Plan. Please note these Alan Rassier are in very preliminary form. Chapter 4 is the land use chapter. This includes a discussion of existing land uses, proposed infill and development uses and future uses. The DRAFT chapter includes recommendations applicable to 16 planning districts in the area (11 in the city limits, four in St. Joseph Township and one in St. Wendel Township). Again, these are in draft from for discussion purposes only. Following review of the survey, we will begin reviewing the land use chapter. The chapter will be modified throughout the planning process to incorporate comments from public meetings, . neighborhood and business meetings. Maps illustrating the boundaries of each planning district will also be included in the future. This is provided at this time to provide a basis for discussion. Chapter 5 is the housing chapter. Again, this is in draft from. The Housing Chapter reviews applicable demographic material, information on type, price, availability and condition of existing owner-occupied and rental housing units within the city. The chapter will be modified throughout the planning process to incorporate comments from public, neighborhood and business meetings. This is provided as a guideline for discussion. Chapter 6 is the transportation chapter. It includes information on existing transportation systems and future needs relative to transportation. The chapter will be modified throughout the planning process to incorporate comments from the public. Maps with traffic counts and future collector streets will be included in the future. This is provided as a basis for discussion. At the Planning Commission meeting we would like to discuss: 1. Survey results; 2. Initial review of the land use chapter 3. Dates to meet to further review chapters 4, 5 and 6. If you have any questions prior to or after the meeting, please feel free to contact us at: 952-758- 7399 or e-mail: mdg@bevcomm.net. . CITY OF ST. JOSEPH BUSINESS LEADER AND AGENCY/ORGANIZA TION SURVEY QUALITY OF LIFE · 1. Please list what you think are the two best aspects of day-to-day life in St. Joseph or the two most positive attributes of St. Joseph? 10 Small community atmosphere/charm with access to a larger city 3 Community involvement, community spirit, working together 3 Friendliness - knowing people, familiar faces 3 College of St. Benedict, St. Ben's Monastery - college town atmosphere 2 Proximity to Minneapolis 2 Good City Government, Council is open to people and ideas 1 Community leaders who care 1 Aesthetic appearance of the community 1 St. Joseph has a main street and a downtown 1 Populace is made up of a large variety of vocations and skills 1 Parks 1 Always feel at home 1 Businesses knowing each other 1 Access to major roads: 1~94, Cor. Rd 75, 23 and 15 1 Police Department outreach to college 1 Good places to meet and eat · 2. Please explain what you believe are major challenge~ facing St. Joseph? 11 Growth management, fiscally and a balance of business growth with residential growth 3 Retaining small, local businesses and an attractive main street business area 2 City and college working relationship; senior population and youth population integrating 2 Comprehensive plan needs updating; comprehensive planning beyond city limits is critical 1 Avoiding being assimilated into St. Cloud and maintaining individuality 1 Quality of life is deteriorating 1 Organized recreation is very limited 1 High costs for city improvements 1 Aesthetics - parking lots on Main Street 1 Need a vision or mission statement. Town is being defined by absentee owners 1 Student housing is poor but rent is high ($280 per person with multiple in homes) · City of S1. Joseph - Comprehensive Plan Survey 1 · 3. What is the one major change you have seen, if any, that has occurred in St. Joseph over the past 5 years? 10 Growth - new residential (3rd ST, SE, 5th Ave NW), 2 The relationship between residents and students have improved greatly 2 Law enforcement has improved 1 Growth - positive thing, steady increase in residential and commercial 1 Growth and congestion that we are not accustom to 1 A more positive attitude toward economic development and commercial/industrial development - a more progressive 1 Change in leadershipgovernment 1 Influx of national labels 1 Abandonment of Downtown and movement to Co.Rd 75 4. What do you see or would you like to see for the future of St. Joseph, over the next five years? Please check/complete all that apply. -L A. Increased Growth at a fast pace · JL B. Steady Growth C. No Major Changes - - D. Decrease population/business remain the same 4 E. Other: Explain: Managed growth, business growth, sJow, smart, planned growth that is friendly to St. Joseph residents, more industrial impact. Planning commission has too much power- they should make decisions based on criteria, not who is requesting 5. In your opinion, what should the upper limit of the population in St. Joseph be in 10 years? Why? 1 7,500 9 10,000 2 10,000 to 15,000 0 15,500 1 20,000 3 Unlimited Comments: Controllable expansion - we need $ to do it right. -10,000 is a manageable pace, not too fast, not too slow. -10,000 is a 7.5% annual growth · -10,000 is reasonable # to be able to provide services and maintain a friendly small town atmosphere. City of St. Joseph - Comprehensive Plan SUlvey 2 . If we get too large we will lose our small town feeling. - We can't afford to grow faster than 10,000. - Doubling the population would strain the system causing the system to break down. - Don't lose the small town flavor - 20,000 if you can provide the infrastructure. . - You can't set a number on the upper limit - Bigger is not better. More growth will impact wetlands and open space needed for healthy living. - Our annexation area is only so large. - Quality of growth is more important than then the quantity. - Controlled growth - not sprawl (small lots are ok - they are economical). 6. What is the one major improvement that would make living in St. Joseph better for you? 4 Recreation/community center for youth especially in winter and for seniors with a library 3 Increase the tax base - commercial development 3 A viable, vibrant downtown, preserve downtown "Americanafl 2 Comprehensive plan management 2 Having the college more of a community player, more interaction between students and the general populace 1 Planning that would allow open space to off-set the pollution that comes with growth 1 Steak house 1 A high school in the city, located on the south side- build a sense of community 1 No sprawl and attention for ordinary people 1 Participatory democracy- broader spectrum of decision makers 1 People knowing one another - better neighborhood dialog 1 Lake Wobegon Welcome Center 1 Shopping mall . 7. What, if anything can be done to keep young adults in our community or attract them back to the community once they have completed their further education? 6 Good/better paying jobs with a livable wage, livable community 3 Industrial park- expand commercial enterprises 2 Affordable housing options and meaningful work 2 Alumni association activities in the city, involve the college in the community 1 Maintain the "small town" feel 1 Community center/sports park 1 Affordable taxes 1 Restaurants, shops and a pleasant place to live 1 New business operations to provide healthy employment 1 Educational amenities * Note 1 participant did not think this was an issue . City of 81. Joseph - Comprehensive Plan Survey 3 HOUSING 8. How would you describe the current condition of the existing housing stock in St. Joseph? · EXCELLENT to GOOD to FAIR to POOR 1 -1- 9 -2- 2 1 1 Comments: -Avoid carbon copy style housing - duplication of the same style of housing -Lots are too large and unaffordable -We have made strides in the last couple of years to improve the quality of housing stock, -North of Super America and 1 block 2nd and 3rt! Avenue NW - substandard hOusing 9. What type of housing do you feel is most needed in the City? ...1l. Comments _2_ Senior Assisted Living 1. There are waiting lists _8_ Senior Apartments -L- Multiple-Family Rental -ª- CondominiumfTownhome -1L Single-Family Housing 1. For LMI or $30,000-$50,000 income range _5_ Other: Affordable rental Comments: - Senior apartments - low income have vacancies · 10. In your opinion, are there ample sites available within the City for the development of new housing . (single & multi family)? What areas in and around the community should be targeted for future housipg development? 8 YES 6 NO 1 UNCERTAIN AREA(S) TO BE TARGETED: -West and Northwest - We need to preserve green spaces -Southwest -South, south on Co. Rd. 121 (3) -Within the annexation areas -With the Bechtold Farm, Heins Farm and CSB land and Lumber 1 all coming on-line we dcn't need more housing, we need to concentrate on commercial and industrial growth. -Area south of Kennedy Elementary -North and south for residential (3) -East and west for commercial (3) -West and north where wetlands and open natural spaces willnot be affected. TRANSPORTATION 11. In your opinion, what is the physical condition of roads in the community? · 0 EXCELLENT 12 GOOD City of St. Joseph - Comprehensive Plan Survey 4 4 FAIR 0 POOR Comments: · . We had a schedule for maintenance and reconstruction. I would like one back in place, ego Seal coat every 5 years, 15-20 years reconstruction or mill and overlay. 12. Are public transportation access and services being adequately met for all age groups? 2 YES 12 NO 3 UNCERTAIN Comments: II Tri-cab buses, dial a ride 13. Would you use the metro bus if it were extended to St. Joseph? 8 YES 8 NO Would you support a tax increase for the metro bus service? 8 YES 7 NO 1 NA - I don't pay property taxes 14. Are you aware of any existing or pending transportation/traffic hazards in the City that have not been · addressed, both motor and pedestrian? Where, describe. Are there particular times of the day/year when traffic presents safety hazards? When and where? 4 County Road 75 and 4th Avenue NE- both motorized and pedestrian (1) may need a stoplight in the future. 3 County Road 75 and 2nd Avenue (1) 7 -8 a.m. and Semis (1) recommended a pedestrian foot bridge (1) Oversized trucks on truck route not able to make turns. 3 County Road 75 (in general) - Crossing 75 2 Need crosswalk enforcement at COllege and County Road 121 1 Coming out of the church parking lot it is really hard to see a car coming from the left. Removing one more parking space may help. 1 Many people make U-turns on Minnesota in the a.m. especially by Meeting Grounds. 1 County Road 121 and Minnesota stop signs get congested. 1 We are opposed to the proposed collector street through the College of St. Benedict 1 College and County Road 121 - the curve in the road. Address the transition from rural to urban. They are rebuilding and straightening this curve. 1 We need one or two more main roads connecting south and north. 1 Enforce students not stopping for stop signs. 1 Pothole on Kennedy 1 Northland across Co. Road 75 · City of St. Joseph - Comprehensive Plan Survey 5 . 15. Should the City require sidewalks in the following areas, please check all that apply? 7 Leading to educational facilities 3 Within all new subdivisions (trails) 5 Leading to parks 8 All of the areas listed 2 In all recreational areas 0 None of the areas listed Other: 1 Safe Pedestrian Crossing at Co. Rd. 75 1 Leading to downtown PUBLIC UTILITIES 16. How would you rank the quality of the following public utility services: Poor Fair Average Good Excellent Average Water 0 0 2 9 4 Sewer 0 0 1 11 5 storm 0 1 1 12 3 Sewer/Drainage Electric 0 0 1 10 4 Affordability 0 0 7 9 0 Reliability 0 0 0 13 3 Gas 0 0 1 12 3 Telephone 0 0 3 11 2 Cable 0 1 1 15 3 . Telecommunications 0 1 1 12 1 Comments: - Storm water: Watab creek, Watab chain of lakes north. Size is small. Need to update on 5 year CIP. - We should make it a policy to bury utilities underground. - Astound has been a great addition. - Good cooperation between the city and monastery with water systems. 17. On a scale of one to five (1- poor to 5 - excellent), how would you rank the following health care services, and why? A. Hospital: #of Rank Comments respondents 6 5 Both St. Cloud and Albany hospitals in the area 4 4 3 3 Too large, too greedy, need competition (1) Services are good but proximity is on the east side of St. Cloud (1) 2 2 Not user friendly 0 1 1 Uncertain . Average ranking for the hospital: City of St. Joseph - Comprehensive Plan Survey 6 B. Clinic(s): # of Rank Comments respondents 6 5 Outstanding service · 7 4 Need to expand but good doctors and response, many in the area 3 3 Need more options. Feel like a # not a person 0 2 0 1 0 Uncertain Average ranking for clinics: C. Nursing Home: # of Rank Comments respondents 0 5 2 4 3 3 Few around. Keep people in the community 1 2 Need one - waiting lists 1 1 Uncertain Average ranking for nursing homes: D. Assisted Living Developments: #of Rank Comments respondents · 5 5 4 4 3 3 Need more 1 2 1 1 Uncertain Average ranking for Assisted Living developments: E. Other Professional Medical Services: #01 Rank Comments respondents 4 5 7 4 0 3 0 2 1 1 Average ranking for other professional medical services: 18. Are there health care services that are lacking in the community? YES - 5 Pharmacy needed · 1 Rehab services 1 Expand Centra Care Clinic City of S1. Joseph - Comprehensive Plan Survey 7 · ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 19. In your opinion what businesses/services would be a pleasant addition to the community? 5 Pharmacy/Drug Store 5 Nice restaurant (1) steak house 5 Retail grocery store 4 Fast food restaurant 2 Library 2 Nicellittle shops - "Stillwater romance" with lighting and awnings 1 Bakery 2 Bookstore 1 Adult bar 1 Arts and crafts 1 Mall wit clothing 1 Auto dealer/maintenance 1 Recreational center/senior center . 20. Should the City promote and/or assist development, which pays employees minimum wage (commercial and retail businesses)? · 1 YES 10 NO - 5 UNDECIDED: Depends on the type of business. I think the city should assist (not necessarily financially) all businesses that are thinking about moving here. They build the City's tax base. Assistance comes in a lot of different forms and types! Loans are ok, but I'm not in favor of grants or TIF. 21. What should be the wage goal necessary to warrant public assistance to businesses seeking to locate/expand in St. Joseph? 1 Federal Minimum Wage 3 A minimum of $8.00/hour-$9.99/hour 6 A minimum of $10.00/hour-$11.99/hour 6 A minimum of $12/ hour 1 Undecided Comments: It depends on the type of business and skill levels required. $12+: This is the range if we want them to make their homes here. 22. Are there ample sites available within the City for the development of new industry and commercial · development? 11 YES City of S1. Joseph - Comprehensive Plan Survey 8 3 NO Comments: Industrial- Yes, Commercial- No. Minnestoa - east, if annexed · Office along County Road 2, jfrerouted to connect to County Road 3. What areas in and around the community should be targeted for future commercial/industrial development? 11 Northeast portion of the city - (1) Once Buettner Park is gone we won't have any industrial land available - start planning for this now! 10 County Road 75 (1) The future business district - traffic counts dicate commercial development with city facilitating with zoning. 4 South along Interstate 94 1 88111 Avenue by the Delwin south to Arcon area 1 County Road 2 ¡County Road 3 bypass for truck traffic - maybe a stoplight. 1 East on Co. Road 75 to protect large wetland areas that serve us well environmentally and a natural barrier for St. Joseph from Waite ParklSt. Cloud congestion. 1 Businesses should not be allowed to operate in from homes. 1 Northwest and northeast 1 Redevelop the Kresbach property downtown 1 Concerns with wetlands to the east and assimulation to Waite Park/St. Cloud PARKS AND RECREATION 23. What park facilities would add to the quality of life in St. Joseph? 3 Playground equipment 0 Athletic Fields · 0 Picnic Shelters 13 Trails Comments: - The Wobegon trail is one of the top 100 in the nation. Romance the Wobegon Trail heritage. - Lions have done a lot for City parks. - The planned trail system is excellent. - Network trails around and through the city. - Continue to develop trails throughout the city and college. - We have enough parks and amenities. Develop the parks we have and tie the system together. - We have ample parks. We need to maintain and put adequate equipment in them. - Need trees in parks and larger shelter. 24. Are all areas of the City served well by existing parks facilities? 11 YES 3 NO - 0 UNCERTAIN Comments: - North side needs equipment for volleyball, football and basketball. · - It is hard getting to parks. Co. Rd 75 is a barrier. - Central does not have parkland. City of St. Joseph - Comprehensive Plan Survey 9 - The park on the north side of the city is small and not developed. - Park location not receptive to getting there. Locations not readily known. Parking is inadequate. 25. How would you rank the existing park facilities on a scale of 1 to 5 with 1 being poor and 5 being · excellent? # Respondents Ranking 0 1 0 2 2 3 11 4 1 5 Comments: If you want to develop the park system you have to figure out a way to pay for it. You cannot pay for it with residential taxes because of the homestead exemption. We all want great parks and park facilities but who is going to pay for it without the increased tax revenue provided by businesses. We need to work on increases in the revenue that the city collects ie. Promote commercial/industrial growth. 26. Do you think the following groups have sufficient recreational opportunities in St. Joseph: Yes No Undecided Children 13 2 1 Teens 3 12 1 Adults 9 4 2 Seniors 7 4 5 Families 8 4 4 Tourists 6 5 4 *Comments: - Sports are offered through the college. Culturally much is available through the BAC, theater, orchestra, galleri~s, etc. Arts Heritage - artesian studios of the sisters. · - In the summer there are sufficient recreational opportunities. In the winter there are not. - It is hard to plan for teens, but we need a place for the!1l to hang out. Keep the college influence away from teens. - Control snowmobiles in the city. - We have a hockey rink. We need figure skating rink improvements. - Need swimming opportunities - Kraemer lake is awful with weeds and an 10 is needed at St. John's to use the lake - which is a good requirement. - North Branch is installing a skateboard park with city funding at the high school. - Who cares about tourists. 27. What one major recreation improvement would you like to see made in St. Joseph during the next 3 years? 3 Wobegon trail and welcome center 3 Rec center (1) primarily for the youth- community center with gym and service rooms 1 Library and senior center where seniors can get together and play cards and socialize 1 Wading pool 1 Swimming pool - cooperative with the college 1 Upgrade shelters 1 Stay current with trends - update parks for volleyball and basketball 1 Summer art program at the College of St. Benedict 1 Trails to connect park and neighborhood facilities · City of 51. Joseph - Comprehensive Plan Survey 10 EDUCATION 28. On a scale of one to five (1· poor to 5 - excellent), how would you rank the following, and why? A. Education Programs: . # of respondents Ranking Comments 2 1 No community ed - venue lacking Absence of Jr/Sr high. Need community ed, theater, library. 3 2 No library, no Middle school or high school 1 3 5 4 Large variety of programs 6 5 Excellent education elementary to college, We are blessed. Post ed is excellent Undecided B. School Facilities: # of respondents Ranking Comments 1 1 2 2 Older schools in the district, Need a Jr.lSr high 4 3 4 4 Existing facilities good but need a Jr/Sr. High. 5 5 Undecided C. Do you think the City should/could support a Junior High and/or High School? . 13 Yes 3 No Comments: We have enough young people to support a high school. This would give the community identity and establish ties to local events. 29. What one major improvement would you like to see made in the public school district in the next 3 years? 5 Junior/Senior High School within St. Joseph 1 Community Education classes 1 Better use of funds 1 Reduction in class sizes 1 Improved salaries 1 Full disclosure of all information by the superintendent and school board e City of St. Joseph - Comprehensive Plan Survey 11 PUBLIC SERVICES (Churches, govt" social services, non-profits, other) . 30. Are there adequate pUblic services available in the community? 14 YES 2 NO · Comments: Good fire and police. · Large number of clubs, food shelf in the city. · Library and community center are needed. 31. Are there any programs, services or resources that are not located in the community now that would be beneficial? - Child care -small daycare within the city - Social services branch - Community center LANDUSE-LOCALCONTROLS 32. In your opinion, what do you think is the overall condition of buildings in St. Joseph? 0 EXCELLENT 7 GOOD 8 FAIR 1 POOR . Comments: Downtown is getting old, Highway 75 buildings are ok. - Main Street looks,poor. Businesses need a facelift. - Good along 75, fair in downtown. 33. It is the basic premise of the community planning process and land use control, that these tools be utiliZed to achieve orderly growth and protect adjacent private property owners. Understanding this, should the City enact stronger: A. Zoninglland use controls (lot size and coverage, set backs): 9 YES 5 NO 3 UNDECIDED B. Park & open space dedication rules for new housing developments: 8 YES 7 NO 2 UNDECIDED C. Housing & Rental Maintenance codes: 11 YES 5 NO 1 UNDECIDED D. Historic Preservation guidelines: 14 YES 1 NO 2 UNDECIDED . E. Environmental controls: 13 YES City of St. Joseph - Comprehensive Plan Survey 12 4 NO 1 UNDECIDED F. Community aesthetics (signage, etc.): 13 YES . 1 NO 3 UNDECIDED G. Comments: - Enforce current zoning without so many special use permits and variances - Include more "open space" - Planning decisions should be based on criteria not who is making the request. - Some residential lots are too small. - Current comprehensive plan is reactive, not proactive. - In areas to be annexed, provide zoning for cluster development and allow open space. - Housing codes have improved the past 5 years. - Enforce rental codes. These homes may be destructive to neighborhoods. - Present laws seem to be adequate; we don't need to make them stricter or stronger. - Lot sizes and setbacks should be larger in new subdivisions. - Historic preservation guidelines would be nice but with common sense applied. - Historic preservation ok but fair and balanced, not too strict that people are afraid to buy a building. - The downtown needs to be a destination with ambiance. - Cleanup industrial areas. Debris and exterior building standards and maintenance codes. - Add large lot residential to zoning ordinance. - 75 foot minimum lot width now allowed. Affordable housing is not a problem. - Look at single family requirements for density per unit! limit # people. ANNEXA TION/STAGING GROWTH 34. In what area(s) should the City consider annexation? . 6 As planned in the annexation agreement with the township 1 Interstate 94 to the south 1 County Road 133 and along collectors - Co. Rd 75 and Co. Rd. 2 1 Commercial east and west, residential north and south 1 Northeast for industrial 1 North and east, but limited 1 No annexation 35. Do you feel the current orderly annexation agreement is effective?: 11 YES 0 NO 6 UNDECIDED Comments: Very cooperative - It may have been at the time but timing or staging of annexations may need to be changed . Good city/town communication - Yes, with the exception of the proposed collector street through the college. 36. Do you think the City should limit the number of new building permits issued per year as a part of a controlled growth policy? 10 YES 7 NO 1 UNDECIDED Comments: - Loot at the growth with infrastructure and ability to serve with fire services e - 100 to 125 per year City of S1. Joseph - Comprehensive Plan Survey 13 - 100 per year - 200 per year - No, unless they lose control - It should be controlled by the capabilities of the sewer, water, police protection, etc. If the city can · keep up there it no need to limit permits. POLICY - ELECTED OFFICIALS - GENERAL GOVERNMENT 37. Do you feel you are informed about City Council decisions? 11 YES 3 NO 3 UNDECIDED 38. How can the City provide better opportunities for input and participation (public access TV, open houses, etc.)? 4 Adequate. The city tries hard with the mayor's meeting, police meeting, TV pUblic access 4 Publish minutes and/or articles in the newspaper. Reporter should attend as in past. Watching cable TV is too long. A summary in the paper would help. 3 Joint meetings of various public committees and civic organizations 2 Concept plan meetings with developers 1 Cable TV program with all department heads 1 More steps in the local businesses t get their input 1 Open houses 1 One on one meetings and e-mail 39. How involved are you in city policy and planning decisions? 5 VERY INVOLVED 1 VERY TO MODERATELY INVOLVED · 7 MODERATELY INVOLVED 4 NOT INVOLVED Comments: - I have been involved because: (1) very interested and concerned (1) civic minded (1) we have continuous contact with city leaders. - I have not been involved because: (1) live in the township (1) do not attend meetings 40. Have you ever held a public elected or appointed office? Why or why not? 8 YES (1) Civic minded, (1) Felt I could help, (1) To be involved 9 NO (1) Being appointed is a very political and closed process (1) I don't live in the city. 41. Do you feel community organizations work together? 8 YES 3 NO Some problems with HCP and Park board, not the college and city 2 UNDECIDED 4 Other: (3) Could be better. somewhat (1) most of the time 42. Is local government responsive and are services provided equitably? 12 YES 2 NO City should want to aid organization that want to help the city · I believe local leaders get swayed and seem to change their minds when the pressure is on. 3 UNDECIDED City of S1. Joseph - Comprehensive Plan Survey 14 43. In your opinion. how well is St. Joseph facilitating ethnic and racial diversity? 0 EXCELLENT . 7 GOOD 5 FAIR 2 POOR 2 NA Comments: - Ignored topic - this is an opportunity to plan - Not an issue yet. Time will make the community more diverse. - Realistically, St. Joseph does not draw diverse groups. Provide services as the diverse population occurs. - St. Cloud area is conservative. - More integration between the college and community would help. . . City of St. Joseph - Comprehensive Plan Survey 15 . LAND USE I. Purpose This portion of the Comprehensive Plan describes: · Analysis of existing land uses and forecast land use; · Staging of future land use; · Surface water management; · Planning district evaluations; The goals of this section are to maintain and promote cost effective and orderly development and redevelopment patterns throughout the City, to maintain and enhance the quality of life within the City, and to prevent and eliminate blight and resist deterioration of the developed areas of the City. The responsibility for implementation of this chapter ultimately depends on cohesive efforts by and between a variety of entities including, but not limited to: the public, prospective developers, ecclesiastical entities, educational entities, the City Council, City Staff and Department Heads, St. Joseph and St. Wendel Township Boards and Commissions, Planning Commission, Joint Annexation Board(s) and the St. Joseph Economic Development Authority, Park Board and Central MN Housing Partnership. Stearns County and the Minnesota Department of Transportation are also important in the development and redevelopment of the City. II. LAND USE ANALYSIS . The following land use analysis will identify existing land uses, vacant and redevelopable areas within the current municipal service area, projected land use demands and the staginglintensity of future growth. The following Table illustrates land use in the City in 2002 as depicted on the City's Official Zoning Map. 2002 2002 LAND USE TYPE Acres Percent Single Family Two Family Multiple Family Manufactured Homes Subd. Residential Central Business District Commercial Subd. Commercial Industrial Subd. Industrial Parks/Open Space Government/Public Ecclesiastical/Educational Environmental Protection Areas Subd. Public/Semi-public Right of Way Right-of-Way Subd. . Vacant/Agricultural Subt. Vacant/Agricultural City of St. Joseph Comprehensive Plan, 2002 Chapter 4 Page 1 TOTAL . The following is a description of the individual land uses that make up the City of St. Joseph. RESIDENTIAL Comprising _ percent of the City, residential development (Single Family, Duplex, Apartments, Manufactured Homes) is one of the largest land use types in the City. Residential land uses are located throughout the City. More aged housing stock is primarily centered in an area surrounding the City's original plat. New residential developments are located (1) north of CR 75 between First Avenue NE and Eighth Avenue NE and (2) in the southeast portion of the City. It is noted a 460 unit residential development combining market rate and affordable single/two family housing has been approved for the area south of Kennedy Elementary School and east of County Road 121, directly adjacent to the College of St. Benedict property. There is limited vacant land zoned residential remaining in the City. Said vacant acreage is primarily clustered south of East Baker Street and west of Brian Kleinfelter Memorial Park. In addition to a few scattered infill lots found throughout the City, larger parcels of vacant residential land are located in the northeastern part of the City. With _ acres or _ percent of the total City, single-family homes make up roughly _ of the residential acreage developed within the City. House styles are mixed reflecting the era when they were built. Much of the housing is in good shape, however, there are some homes that are in need of maintenance or rehabilitation, mostly within the older areas of the City. Lots are smaller in the City's core area, with densities ranging from three to eight units per acre. More recent residential development in,cludes larger lots with a less structured layout pattern. There are a number of duplexes scattered throughout the City. They are not concentrated in anyone area of the City and are both double units and single-family conversions. The duplexes serve a variety of . housing needs including student housing and empty nest units. More information on housing is included in Chapter 5 of the Comprehensive Plan. Multi-family units make up about. _% of the residential housing stock.... These units are found throughout the City. This~jsanigher than-avéragemultiRle,-ffimily tosingle-familynousing ratio for a comnìúnitythis 'size,duefofuè·presenÅ“df'thecOUege. Manufactured homes make up a small amount of the housing stock at the present time. For the most part, the manufactured housing units are in relatively good condition. Continued vigilance and strict code enforcement should ensure that these areas do not become rundown. If the manufactured home park is converted to an alternate use, care should be given to offer displaced residents alternate, affordable housing. Between 1997 and 2002,the City annexed ~acres of land intoits corporate limits from St. Joseph Township. Amajorityofthì~Jan(Frs l1ow-resicje-ntjal,whilèthe~l:>alanceis vacant Approximately _ of the land annexed was developed at the time of annexation. The City is continuing discussions with St. Wendel Township which is located north of the City and includes Watab Lake regarding a joint annexation agreement. COMMERCIAL With _ acres or _% of the total City land inventory in 2002 is commercial in nature. This makes up a relatively small part of total land use. Commercial uses are concentrated in areas of the City adjacent to minor arterial and commercial collector streets especially adjacent to CR 75 and in the City's downtown area along Minnesota Street and College Avenue. Commercial uses in the downtown area provide specialty goods and services including neighborhood grocery, specialty coffee and restaurant/lounge establishments. Other uses in the downtown area include office and professional . services. Businesses which rely on automobile traffic and high visibility can be found along Highway 75. City of 51. Joseph Comprehensive Plan, 2002 Chapter 4 Page 2 . These include gas stations, convenience stores, fast food restaurants, professional offices/services and used auto dealers. There are vacant areas for infill dedicated to highway commercial use along the CR 75. In addition, the St. Joseph EDA has identified several redevelopment sites with the downtown area. INDUSTRIAL Industrial land uses have remained a relatively small part of the City's land use as it relates to overall land use. Industrial uses comprise _ acres or _ percent of total land uses within the City today. Virtually all of the industrial land use is located in the northeast quadrant of the city north of CR 75. The City's industrial base is typically 'light industry" producing little or no noise or odor. The northeast portion of the City has vacant land suitable for industrial growth. PUBLIC/SEMI-PUBLIC Public/semi-public land uses include parks and open spaces; government buildings such as City Hall; institutional uses such as schools and churches; and water. Together, these land uses account for _ acres or percent of the City. The government category includes such buildings as City Hall, public works facilities and the Fire Station. Further information on government facilities is contained in the Municipal and Administrative Facilities and Services section of this Comprehensive Plan. Parks and recreational facilities comprise _ acres or _ percent of the City's total acreage. A description of each facility is included in the Park and Recreation Chapter. Institutional uses include schools (not the college) and churches (not the monastery). RIGHT -OF-WAY Street right-of-way comprises _ acres or _ percent of the total City. The grid-like pattern of . residential streets that exists throughout the City's core occupies less area than the contemporary street system found in many of the City's newer developments. Major traffic corridors in the City include Interstate 94 on the south end of the City, CSAH 75, CSAH 121, CSAH 2 and CSAH 133. Transportation elements are discussed in depth in the Transportation section. VACANTJAGRICUL TURAL Comprising _ acres or _ percent of the total City, vacanUagriculturalland is a modest part of the City's total land use. The majority of this vacant land is located in the southern part of the City and guided to residential use. While the amount of vacant land within the area serviced by municipal utilities is modest, the City should emphasize the use of currently available sites within the service area prior to the development of alternative sites. The development of sites within the serviced area will ensure prudent land management, assist in the prevention of 'leap-frog' type development and ensure maximum cost effectiveness for community residents. Additionally, efforts shall be made to ensure proper placement and phasing of urban expansion and the maintenance of existing and future land use compatibility. Potential redevelopment areas are primarily centered in or near the City's core. The City shall focus redevelopment efforts on commercial and residential areas/parcels in the more established areas of the City. To achieve this the City will (those responsible for implementing efforts are in parenthesis): . Encourage the removal of existing buildings that have exceeded their useful life and promote the redevelopment of the site or dedicate the site to public open space. (City Building Official should identify such buildings/parcels. City EDA, Planning Commission, City Council should . promote redevelopment of sites). City of St. Joseph Comprehensive Plan, 2002 Chapter 4 Page 3 · Encourage the preservation/retention and re-use of existing buildings that have historical significance. (EDA, Planning Commission, City Council should promote redevelopment of . sites. The City may also consider the establishment of a Historic Preservation Board). · Promote appropriate re-uses for under-utilized properties. (EDA, Planning Commission, City Council should promote redevelopment of sites). · Preserve existing neighborhoods through zoning, subdivision and building controls. (City Administrator, Building Official, Planning Commission and City Council). · Support efforts to eliminate nuisance conditions relating to specific property(ies) and/or conditions which are deemed to have a 'blighting effect' upon adjacent properties and/or nuisance conditions which pose a threat to the health and safety of adjacent property owners. (City Administrator, Building Official, Police Department, Planning Commission and City Council). Further information regarding specific redevelopment/development policy statements can be found in the Economic Development Section of the Comprehensive Plan. However, it is the intent of the City of St. Joseph to promote niche commercial development in the City's core. Therefore the City should encourage uses customarily dependent on pedestrian traffic to locate in the City's core. Correspondingly, uses dependent on visibility and/or heavy traffic patterns shall be centered along the CR 75 corridor. FORECAST LAND USE/DEMAND As previously identified, the current municipal service area provides a finite amount of vacant and redevelopable acreage. The City of St. Joseph will need additional land with urban services to . accommodate forecast household and employment growth through the year 2022. Projections of population and households in St. Joseph identified in Tab 3 of this Plan were developed on the basis of an analysis of local and regional trends and policies, and through the application of economic and demographic principals, with emphasis on the detailed profile of the City developed in this planning inventory. Specific data applied to the projections were the rate of U.S. Census data, residential building permits issued, historical population/household patterns and trends, trends in average household size, and sub-regional migration patterns. Table 4-1, below, illustrates the estimated additional land which will be required to accommodate projected residential growth within the city. This is exclusive of land which may be annexed that is already developed with residential households. if ABLE 4..:1 SUMMÄR¥OFPOÞULATION~PROJECJ1ONSJ.HOUSEHOLD'-GR0wrH ANDRESIDENJ=IAL:l/(NQ'DEMAND Me.thodofCalc:ul¡¡ting Population proj ec1i on "'Projected """Projected + Additional Number of Residential 30% for Year Exponential Average Househo1ds Acre Demand Roads, Etc. 2000 8,820 8,82Q ***4,047 ~005 -9,311 9,312 4,434 65 83.91 2010 9,802 9;822 4;677 67 86.88 2015 10,293 10,3~ 4,926 69 89.92 2020 10,784 1 (j~89!) 5,18~ 72 93.10 *Projected household size = 2.10 ***2000 Actual . UAveragelot size (sq. ft) = 12,000 City of 51. Joseph Comprehensive Plan, 2002 Chapter 4 Page 4 . Market conditions will have a major impact on housing types as the City progresses toward the year 2022. Interest rates, land/material prices and inflation, among other factors will significant impact buyer preferences. Since housing types are difficult to forecast, the land use plan focuses on density rather than housing types. Residential use computation is based on current City indices relative to life-cycle housing and density. Please note net densities of two and six units per acre are used respectively for forecast single family and multiple family residential development calculations. Housing mix and associated densities are summarized in Table 4-2. Land Use available supply and forecast demand is summarized in Table 4-3. TABLE 4-2 COMMUNITY HOUSING MIX AND RESIDENTIAL DENSITY ASSUMPTIONS Iflll'~ *2000 Census indicates _% owner-occupied, _% rental ** The ratio of owner occupied units and rental units is expected to adjust as acreages are annexed. . As indicated in the Table above, it is estimated _ net acres will be needed to accommodate future single-family residential development through the year 2022. It is further estimated --'- net acres will be needed to accommodate future multiple-family residential development through the year 2022. The net acreage is used to calculate gross acreage needed to accommodate such growth as follows: ~ *ROW estimated at 20% of gross acreage. ** Park/Open space requirement assumes 10% dedication (current standard is eight percent) of gross acreage. It is noted the current ratio of residential to commercial/industrial acreage in the City of St. Joseph is _ percent. The City has been proactive in seeking tax base diversification over the past few years. Therefore, it is assumed the City would like to reach a goal of _ percent C/I tax base and _ percent residential tax base. Using those assumptions, _ additional acres will be needed to support future commercial and industrial growth. III, Staging of Growth The Maps on the following pages offer a visual representation of future land use projections, including all planned land use changes, infill areas and potential redevelopment sites. This plan and subsequent documentation takes into consideration the land uses that have previously been approved by the City, and the land uses encourage compact, contiguous development. It efficiently uses the existing and . proposed infrastructure and capital investment. City of St. Joseph Comprehensive Plan, 2002 Chapter 4 Page 5 IV, Surface Water Management · The City of 81. Joseph features plentiful natural resources including several wetlands of diverse types, several old growth tree massings and the South Fork of the Watab River. The City is committed to preserving its natural resources as evidenced by its review of storm water drainage issues and its desire to educate the public on issues relative to surface water quality. The City of St. Joseph has not adopted a surface water management plan. However, the City's zoning and subdivision ordinances include standards pertaining to on-site storm water management and erosion control plan approval processes for all commercial/industrial land disturbing activities and new residential subdivisions. To protect and perpetuate the City's natural resources it is recommended the City adopt a comprehensive surface water management plan. Identifying funding sources and authorizing the development of the plan rests with the City Council. A surface water management plan will be used to guide the development and expansion of the City's drainage system in a cost-effective manner that preserves existing water resources. Possible goals of the surface water management plan include, but are not limited to: assessment of the current system; the identification of an ultimate storm drainage system for the entire City; reduction of public expenditures necessary to control excessive volumes and rates of runoff; flood prevention especially those urban in nature; identification of current and future drainage patterns; protection and enhancement of the areas natural habitat; promotion of ground water recharge; definition of all drainage outlets; and reduction in erosion from surface flows. The development of a surface water management plan should be initiated by the City Administrator and City Council with assistance as requested by the Planning Commission. It is expected the surface water management plan would be developed by a certified engineer and approved by the Department of · Natural Resources. Implementation of the surface water management plan would be achieved with assistance from the City Engineer, City Administrator, Planning Commission and City Council. · City of 51. Joseph Comprehensive Plan, 2002 Chapter 4 Page 6 . V, Planning District Evaluations To more fully examine all areas of the community, the City of St. Joseph has been divided into sixteen (16) individual 'planning' districts. The planning district boundaries were established using the location of similar land uses and physical barriers but DO NOT represent zoning district boundaries. The locations of the planning districts are illustrated on Map _. This section of the land use plan will detail existing and recommended development for each individual planning district. In addition to the 15 planning districts within the City and St. Joseph Township, the City is also pursuing a joint annexation agreement with St. Wendel Township. An area slated for eventual service by St. Joseph adjacent to Watab Lake in ST. WENDEL township comprises the 16th planning district. It is noted the City has an orderly annexation agreement in place with St. Joseph Township, and is pursuing an agreement with St. Wendel Township. Goals outlined for each planning district will vary, however, the following general guidelines form the basis for recommendations hereafter: · Promotion of safe, healthy and attractive residential environments offering a broad choice of housing options including sufficient life-cycle housing options, sizes and values conducive to a diverse population and various income levels. > Implementation: City Council, Planning Commission, St. Joseph & St. Wendel Township Boards, City EDA, and the City Administrator. · Promotion of continuous economic development and redevelopment projects that are conscientiously planned and reviewed so as to induce growth, maximize quality of life and . further local employment opportunities while responding to market demands. > Implementation: Economic Development Authority, EDA staff, City Council, Planning Commission and City Administrator. · Promote fiscally responsible infrastructure construction conducive to continued development and redevelopment while ensuring existing infrastructure is maintained and upgraded in a cost effective and timely manner that provides optimum service to the community. > Implementation: Area utility service providers, City Engineer, Street Superintendent, Water Superintendent, Planning Commission and City Council. · Promote adequate and affordable public wastewater treatment facilities and water supplies that sustain current and future development while securing the public's health and safety. > Implementation: City Engineer, City Administrator, Planning Commission and City Council. · Promote and sustain an affordable, safe and convenient transportation network including local, county and state roadways and amenities. > Implementation: City Engineer, Street Superintendent, City Administrator, Planning Commission and City Council. · Promote other public facilities including parks, trails and open space that favorably impact the quality of life for all residents. > Implementation: Park Board, Planning Commission and City Council. . City of St. Joseph Comprehensive Plan, 2002 Chapter 4 Page 7 District One · Location District One occupies the northwestern portion of the City and, for conceptual planning purposes only, includes a very small portion of the 6-10 year annexation area within St. Joseph Township. The planning district is bounded: · To the west by CSAH 3, · The north the former Burlington Northern Railroad now the Lake Wobegon Trail · To the East by the mobile home park; and, · To the south by CSAH 75. Existinq Uses/Features Existing land uses within District One include parkland, highway business, vacant/open space and public. The district includes Millstream Park, the South Fork of the Watab River, wetlands, large tree massings, the previous sanitary sewer treatment facility and a small portion of tillable acreage. Physical barriers to development include the absence of urban utilities in a portion of the district. Natural amenities such as wetlands and the Watab River are highlights of the district. It is noted the South Fork of the Watab River is included in a flood hazard boundary area as identified by the Federal Emergency Management Association. Therefore, floodplain standards should be adopted in accordance with Department of Natural Resources requirements. A summary of existing land uses within the district follows: LAND USE TYPE # OF PARCELS TOTAL ACREAGE Park Highway Business · Wetland VacanUAgriculture Public/Government TOTAL Recommendations 1. Recommended land uses within District One in the future include: · Park/open space. · Trail use from the Wobegon Trail or the Welcome Center (if developed) to Millstream Park. ? Implementation: City Council, Planning Commission and St. Joseph Township Board and City Administrator. 2. Protect the integrity of wetland communities and the floodplain overlay district associated with the South Fork of the Watab River by strict enforcement of environmental codes and through the adoption of a surface water management plan and a floodplain ordinance. ? Implementation: City Council, Planning Commission, St. Joseph Township Board, City Attorney and City Administrator. 3. Promote the continued existence of woodlands and open space within the district. ? Implementation: City Council, Planning Commission and City Administrator. · City of St. Joseph Comprehensive Plan, 2002 Chapter 4 Page 8 . 4. Review the appropriateness of the business use west of the mobile home park, north of the medium sized wetland and south of the Wobegon Trail. Consider residential use. ~ Implementation: City Council, Planning Commission and City Administrator. 5. Demolish wastewater treatment cells which are no longer in use. ~ Implementation: City Council, Wastewater Supervisor and City Engineer. 6. Continued implementation of the Orderly Annexation Agreement with St. Joseph Township. ~ Implementation: City Council, Planning Commission, St. Joseph Township Board and City Administrator. 7. Future pedestrian/bicycle trail constructions and linkages should be provided as a means of maximizing the use of the Wobegon Trail and as a means of promoting alternative transportation methods. ~ Implementation: City Engineer, Park Superintendent, Park Board, Planning Commission, City Council and City Administrator. . 8. The township and City should work together to review proposed developments within the District to determine: a. Impact on existing and future transportation facilities, b. Existing and future surface water management systems, c. Adequacy of park facilities within the proposed development, d. Appropriateness of the proposed use(s), e. Adequacy and quality of proposed sanitary sewer and water facilities, f. Sufficient capacity is available within proposed sanitary sewer and water facilities to service the proposed development, and g. Compliance with floodplain standards. ~ Implementation: City Council, Planning Commission, St. Joseph Township Board, Park Board, City Engineer, City Administrator, Street Superintendent and Park Superintendent. Consultation with and/or approval by: Stearns County, DNR and Soil & Water Conservation District as appropriate. . City of St. Joseph Comprehensive Plan, 2002 Chapter 4 Page 9 District Two . Location District Two occupies the west central portion of the corporate limits. The district is bounded by: · Western corporate limits; · To the north by CSAH 75; · To the east by Second Avenue NW; and, · To the south by the ecclesiastical property. Existinq Uses/Features Existing land uses within District Two are predominantly residential (single family, two family and multiple family) and agricultural in nature. There are also two parks within this district: Centennial and Memorial. A summary of existing land uses within the Planning District Two follows: LAND USE TYPE # OF PARCELS TOTAL ACRES Single Family Residential Two Family Residential Multiple Family Residential Parks/Open Space Right-Of-Way Vacant/Agriculture TOTAL St. Joseph Apartments (elderly apartments) are located within District Two. Major roadways include CSAH 75 and CSAH 2/Minnesota Street. Subdivisions within the district include: Hollow Park, Loso's ih Addition, Clinton Village Addition and Park Terrace. The Church of St. Joseph, listed on the National . Register of Historical Places and the Lab School are within District Two. Terrain is generally flat and conducive to urban development. Recommendations 1. Recommended future land use within District Two are predominantly limited to low density residential in nature, with the exception of property directly adjacent (within the first % of the first tier of blocks) to CSAH 75 and CSAH 2 which shall be commercial or medium/high density residential in nature as they will allow for a smooth transition between the high traffic corridor and residential uses. >- Implementation: City Council, Planning Commission and City Administrator. 2. Future pedestrian/bicycle trail constructions and linkages should be provided between Centennial, Memorial and Millstream Parks as a means of maximizing the use of the parks and to promote alternative transportation methods. >- Implementation: City Engineer, Park Superintendent, Park Board, Planning Commission, City Council and City Administrator. 3. Pedestrians should be provided a safe route adjacent to CSAH 2 as the area continues to develop. >- Implementation: City Engineer, Park Superintendent, Park Board, Planning Commission, City Council and City Administrator. . City of St. Joseph Comprehensive Plan, 2002 Chapter 4 Page 10 . 4. The City should work together to monitor the amount of vacant lots available as a means of avoiding excess lot quantities, partially developed subdivisions and 'leap-frog' type developments. :Þ> Implementation: Planning Commission, City Council and City Administrator. 5. Future development driveway access points directly onto CSAH 2 and CSAH 75 should be avoided by planning internal road systems with provide access to the lots or when direct access is required, joint driveways. Primary emphasis on the two arterials should be mobility and traffic flow. ~ Implementation: City Engineer, Planning Commission, City Council and City Administrator. 6. Continued judicial development of existing land resources is suggested. ~ Implementation: City Council, Planning Commission and City Administrator. . . City of St. Joseph Comprehensive Plan, 2002 Chapter 4 Page 11 District Three . Location District Three occupies the southwest portion of the City. Planning District Three is consistent with the ecclesiastical and educational zoning classifications in the southwest portion of the City. Existinq Uses/Features This planning district includes: the College of St. Benedict, St. Benedict's Monastery and Kennedy Elementary School. St. Benedict's Convent and the College of St. Benedict are within a district listed in the National Register of Historical Places. A summary of existing land uses within the district follows: LAND USE TYPE # OF PARCELS TOTAL ACRES Educational Ecclesiastical TOTAL Recommendations 1. Recommended future land uses in District Three include: a. Ecclesiastical uses. b. Educational uses. ~ Implementation: City Council, Planning Commission and City Administrator. . 2. As a condition of acceptance of the Orderly Annexation Agreement with St. Joseph Township plans for the extension of CSAH 2 to the southeast were required. Past plans indicate the route may extend through Planning District Three. Current uses, existing natural amenities and a perceived need to protect the intrinsic value of the St. Benedict ecclasiastic/educational property directly oppose the extension of CSAH 2 through District Three. As a means of resolving the need for mobility and protection of resources it is suggested a feasibility report including a study of the environmental impact of such an extension be performed to determine the best long-term solution. Public and private entities with vested interest in the project should be involved in the study. The study should be performed in the context of regional transportation planning which includes the construction of northern and southern East/West collector streets AND the construction of eastern and western North/South collectors. ~ Implementation: St. Benedict's Monastery, College of St. Benedict, Stearns County, Planning Commission, City Administrator and City Council. . City of SI. Joseph Comprehensive Plan, 2002 Chapter 4 Page 12 · District Four Location District Four occupies the east central portion of the northwest quadrant of the City. The triangular district is bounded: · To the west by the mobile home park; · To the north by the railroad/Wobegon Trail corridor; and, · To the south by CSAH 75 extending to 4th Avenue/Northland Road. ExistinQ Uses/Features Planning District Four includes land uses with a more intensive nature including: St. Joseph Mobile Home Park, highway business and multiple family housing. The City's distinctive elevated water storage tank occupies a small parcel of public land. The district also includes two small islands of unincorporated property . Campus Park Townhomes, College Avenue North, First Avenue NW and Cedar Street are more prominent features of District Four. Areas within the district are mostly developed, and minimal barriers to (re)development exist. A summary of existing land uses within District Four follows: LAND USE TYPE # OF PARCELS TOTAL ACRES High Density Residential Manufacture Home Residential Highway Business Public · Right-Of-Way Vacant/Agriculture TOTAL Recommendations 1. Recommended future land uses within District 4 include: a. Highway business uses dependent upon high traffic volumes. b. Medium to high density residential. ~ Implementation: City Council, Planning Commission and City Administrator. 2. To the extent possible, future commercial (re)developments should be focused in areas now designated for such uses. ~ Implementation: Planning Commission, City Administrator and City Council. 3. The intersection of Second Avenue NW and CSAH 75 has been identified as a point of traffic congestion, especially during weekday a.m. commutes, by several survey participants. Second Ave NW is the designated truck route, however, truck traffic otten backs up near the intersection. A designated truck route which bypasses CSAH 75 should be established in conjunction with the extension of CSAH 3/CSAH 2 and the construction of an East/West collector street in the southern portion of the City. · ~ Implementation: City Engineer, St. Joseph Township, City Administrator and City Council. City of SI. Joseph Comprehensive Plan, 2002 Chapter 4 Page 13 4. The City should protect the integrity of CSAH 75 as a mobility corridor. The City should examine . the possibility of establishing a continuous frontage road system both north and south of CSAH 75. ;. Implementation: City Engineer, Street Superintendent, Planning Commission, City Administrator and City Council. 5. The City shall aggressively enforce crosswalk and vehicle speed laws at the controlled intersection of CSAH 75 and College Ave. North as it is the only established pedestrian crossing of the arterial. As residential growth continues in the northern portion of the City, a dedicated overpass/underpass should be considered to afford pedestrians safe access to the southern portion of the City. ;. Implementation: Police Department, City Engineer, Street Superintendent, Planning Commission and City Council. 6. Medium density residential developments bordering the RR corridor/Wobegon Trail should be encouraged as they will allow for a smooth transition between current uses and, if in the future, a commuter train system is established in the corridor. ;. Implementation: Planning Commission, City Council and City Administrator. 7. Northland Drive and CSAH 75 was also identified by survey participants as a major point of traffic congestion. The City shall examine the benefits of creating a continuous frontage road system in the area versus the installation of a controlled access if/when traffic counts warrant such installation. . ;. Implementation: City Engineer, Street Superintendent, Planning Commission and City Council. 8. The need for an East/West collector street in the northern potion of the City, north of CSAH 75 and south of 320th Street may also impact this district. Further investigation is warranted. ;. Implementation: City Engineer, Street Superintendent, Planning Commission and City Council. 9. Strict enforcement of property maintenance codes is warranted. ;. Building Official, Planning Commission, St. Joseph Police Department and City Council. . City of St. Joseph Comprehensive Plan, 2002 Chapter 4 Page 14 . District Five Location District Five occupies the original townsite. District Five includes the Central Business Zoning District, the parcels located north of Birch Street zoned Highway Business and the first tier of blocks adjacent to the CBD and south of Minnesota Street. This district is bounded: · To the west by Second Avenue NW; · To the north by CSAH 75; · The east boundary is coterminous with the CBD zoning class; and, · To the south by the ecclesiastical/education district. ExistinQ Uses/Features Existing land uses within District Five are primarily commercial in nature. Uses dependent on heavy pedestrian traffic including, specialty retail, neighborhood grocery and bar/lounge establishments are located in the City's downtown commercial area. Professional offices are also located in the CBD. Uses south of Minnesota Street within District 5 are residential and institutional in nature. Uses north of Birch Street are Highway Business in nature. St. Joe Lab School, the Church of St. Joseph (listed in the National Registry of Historical Places) and the former State Bank (listed in the National Registry of Historical Places) are located in District Five. Significant transportation routes include Minnesota Street, Second Avenue NW, College Avenue N. and Birch Street. A summary of existing land uses within District Five follows: . LAND USE TYPE # OF PARCEL TOTAL ACRES GeneraLBusiness Highway Business Residential Institutional TOTAL Recommendations 1. Since all areas within District Seven are developed efforts within the district should be primarily centered on redevelopment of underutilized parcels and preservation of structures within the district. ~ The EDA and/or Building Official should identify such buildings/parcels. The EDA, Planning Commission and City Council should promote redevelopment of sites. 2. The City should investigate commercial assistance programs aimed at rehabilitation and/or restoration of significant structures within the City's core area. ~ St. Joseph EDA, Planning Commission and City Council. 3. The City should consider the adoption of design standards for new, expanded or remodeled buildings in its City's core area and/or the establishment of a Historic Preservation Board as a means of preserving the historical significance and promoting the character of the area. . ~ Economic Development Authority, Planning Commission, City Council and City Administrator. City of St. Joseph Comprehensive Plan, 2002 Chapter 4 Page 15 4. The City should maintain the integrity of the commercial areas by strict code enforcement. . ~ Building Official, Planning Commission, St. Joseph Police Department and City Council. 5. The City should develop and promote a specific identity or thematic plan for the revitalization and redevelopment of the downtown area. Such a theme may include a mix of uses including specialty retail, residential rental, parkland and professional offices. The City should also encourage streetscape designs, greenspaces and amenities that encourage pedestrian use of the City's core area. ~ Economic Development Authority, Planning Commission, City Council, City Engineer and City Administrator. 6. The City should ensure pedestrian safety throughout the City's core area by strictly enforcing applicable laws. ~ 81. Joseph Police Department. 7. The City should encourage the development of uses dependent on heavier volumes of vehicular traffic in the corridor adjacent to CSAH 75. ~ Implementation: Economic Development Authority, Planning Commission, City Administrator and City Council. . 8. The City should continue to implement measures that promote fiscally responsible infrastructure (re) construction that is conducive to and whenever possible concurrent with redevelopment efforts. ~ Implementation: City Engineer, Street Superintendent, Utility Providers and City Council. . City of St. Joseph Comprehensive Plan, 2002 Chapter 4 Page 16 . District Six Location District Six is located in the north central portion of the City of St. Joseph. The area occupied by District Six is bounded: · To the west by Section _line; · To the north by Section _line; · To the east by Eighth Avenue NE; and, · To the south by the railroad/Wobegon Trail corridor. Existinç¡ Use/Features Existing elements within District Six include Northland Park and Northland Housing Development. A few small wetlands, old growth tree massings and a small portion of unincorporated area are within this district. Uses are mixed and include single and multiple family residential, highway commercial and industrial classes. A summary of existing land uses within the district follow: LAND USE TYPE # OF PARCELS TOTAL ACRES Low Density Residential High Density Residential Parks/Open Space Highway Commercial Industrial Right-Of-Way . Unincorporated TOTAL Recommendations 1. Recommended future land uses within District Six are: a. North and western portions of the district: Single Family Residential. b. CSAH 75 corridor: Highway Business. c. East: Industrial. » Implementation: Planning Commission, City Administrator and City Council. 2. Existing land uses, which are primarily residential in nature and within commercial areas, should be transitioned to future commercial development as appropriate. » Implementation: Planning Commission, City Administrator and City Council. 3. Medium density residential developments bordering industrial and commercial areas and corridors of higher traffic flow (e.g. CSAH 2 and 75) should be encouraged as they will allow for a smooth transition between commercial/industrial and residential uses. » Implementation: Planning Commission, City Administrator and City Council. 4. Northland Drive and CSAH 75 was identified by survey participants as a major point of traffic . congestion. The City shall examine the benefits of creating a continuous frontage road system in City of St. Joseph Comprehensive Plan, 2002 Chapter 4 Page 17 the area versus the installation of a controlled access if/when traffic counts warrant such . installation. ~ Implementation: City Engineer, Street Superintendent, Planning Commission and City Council. 5. The City should protect the integrity of CSAH 75 as a mobility corridor. The City should examine the possibility of establishing a continuous frontage road system both north and south of CSAH 75. ~ Implementation: City Engineer, Street Superintendent, Planning Commission, City Administrator and City Council. 6. The City should establish a fund for environmental analysis and corridor acquisition for the placement of an East/West collector street within the northern portion of the City north of CSAH 75 and south of 320th Street. Environmental analysis and corridor reservation should be initiated. ~ Implementation: City Engineer, Planning Commission, City Administrator and City Council. 7. The City should determine the need for the future extension of Northland Drive as a major North/South collector street. If Northland Drive is to be extended the City should designate the corridor for future extension and protect an area for Fourth Avenue SE extension. ~ Implementation: City Engineer, Planning Commission, City Administrator and City Council. 8. The City should promote a pedestrian trail or right-of-way reservation in Northland Addition to . offer a continuous link to the Wobegon Trail. ~ Implementation: City Engineer, Park Superintendent, Planning Commission, City Administrator and City Council. . City of St. Joseph Comprehensive Plan, 2002 Chapter 4 Page 18 . District Seven Location District Seven is located in the south-central portion of the southeast quadrant of the City. District Seven is bounded: · To the west by College Avenue and the CBD zoning class boundary; · To the north by CSAH 75; · To the east by Eighth Avenue NE and Seventh Avenue SE; and, · To the south by East Baker Street. ExistinQ Uses/Features Existing land uses within District Seven are mixed and include Highway Business, single family residential, two family residential, multiple family residential and public in nature. Major transportation corridors in this district include CSAH 75, East Minnesota Street, East Baker Street and Fourth Avenue SE. Lots and blocks west of Third Avenue SE are of a grid pattern, typical of the post World War II housing boom. Residential areas east of Third Avenue SE feature lot/block designs more suburban in nature and typical of developments occurring in the final quarter of the twentieth century. A summary of existing land uses within this district follows: LAND USE TYPE # OF PARCELS TOTAL ACREAGE Single Family Residential Two Family Residential . Multiple Family Residential Highway Business Public Right-Of-Way Subtotal Recommendations 1. Future land uses: a. Highway Business adjacent to CSAH 75. b. Higher density residential next to commercial uses, Seventh Avenue SE and Eighth Avenue NE, to provide a transitional zone between high intensity uses and single-family residential uses. c. Single family in the remainder of the district. ~ Planning Commission, City Administrator and City Council. 2. Since all areas within District Seven are developed efforts within the district should be primarily centered on maintenance of existing facilities, redevelopment of underutilized parcels, infill in appropriate locations and preservation of structures within the district. ~ EDA, Planning Commission and City Council. 3. Since this district includes housing stock of various ages, as a means of protecting the property . values of well-maintained housing units, and to enhance the community's character, the City should continue to pursue policies that will provide incentive programs for upgrading depressed City of St. Joseph Comprehensive Plan, 2002 Chapter 4 Page 19 parcels. The City should investigate residential (owner occupied and rental) assistance programs . aimed at rehabilitation and/or restoration of housing structures within the area. ~ Building Official should identify such buildings/parcels. City Council and City Administrator should promote residential rehabilitation with assistance from applicable housing agencies. 4. If Northland Drive is to function as a north/south collector, then the City should designate and protect a corridor for the future extension of Fourth Avenue SE extension. ~ Implementation: City Engineer, Planning Commission, City Administrator and City Council. 5. As parcels currently zoned as single family directly adjacent to CSAH come to the end of their useful life, replacement uses should be converted to highway business. ~ Implementation: Planning Commission, City Administrator and City Council. 6. The City should protect the integrity of CSAH 75 as a mobility corridor. The City should examine the possibility of establishing a continuous frontage road system both south of CSAH 75. ~ Implementation: City Engineer, Street Superintendent, Planning Commission, City Administrator and City Council. 7. Strict enforcement of property maintenance codes is warranted. ~ Building Official, Planning Commission, St. Joseph Police Department and City Council. . 8. The City should promote more park/open space within this district as the district ages. ~ Implementation: Park Board, Planning Commission, City Administrator and City Council. . City of St. Joseph Comprehensive Plan, 2002 Chapter 4 Page 20 . District Eight Location District Eight occupies the south central portion of the City. District Eight boundaries follow: · To the west CSAH 121; · To the north East Baker Street; · To the east Seventh Avenue SE/95th Avenue · To the south proposed residential subdivisions including Arcon Development. ExistinQ Uses/Features District Eight includes one unincorporated parcel compíetely surrounded by the City's urban area. Current uses are mostly agricultural, but guided to single-family residential development. The southern portion of this district is within the _ year joint annexation area. The terrain within this district is well suited to urban development. A summary of existing land uses within the city and township follows: LAND USE TYPES - ALL # OF PARCELS TOTAL ACREAGE Single Family Residential Multiple Family Residential Right-Of-Way Vacanti Agricu Iture TOTAL . Recommendations 1. Recommended future land uses within District Eight include: a. Single family residential. b. Higher density residential development adjacent to 95th Avenue, Fou,!h Avenue SE (if designated as collector street) and CSAH 121. ~ Implementation: City Council, Planning Commission, St. Joseph Township Board and City Administrator. 2. Future development driveway access points directly onto CSAH 121 and 95th Avenue should be avoided by planning internal road systems with provide access to the lots or when direct access is required, joint driveways. Primary emphasis on the two roadways should be mobility and traffic flow. > Implementation: City Engineer, Planning Commission, City Council and City Administrator. 3. The City should determine the location for a southerly EasUWest collector street which should be performed in the context of regional transportation planning which has been discussed in previous planning district recommendations. ~ Implementation: City Engineer, Stearns County, Planning Commission, City Administrator and City Council. 4. The City and the Township should work together to monitor the amount of vacant lots available as . a means of avoiding excess lot quantities, partially developed subdivisions and 'leap-frog' type developments. City of St. Joseph Comprehensive Plan, 2002 Chapter 4 Page 21 >- Implementation: St. Joseph Town Board, Planning Commission, City Administrator and City . Council. 5. As this district further develops emphasis should be placed on retaining the small town and rural nature of the community. Generous parkland facilities, open space areas, tree plantings and trail amenities should be emphasized. >- Implementation: City Council, Planning Commission, St. Joseph Township Board and City Administrator. 6. The City shall continue to promote attractive residential environments that offer a broad choice of housing options including diverse life-style housing options, sizes and values. Future single- family residential housing types should be of diverse types and include affordable (under $120,000), standard and executive homes. >- Implementation: Planning Commission, St. Joseph Township Board, City Council and City Administrator. 7. Future pedestrian/bicycle trail constructions and linkages should be provided as a means of maximizing the use of the current and future parks and the City's existing trail facilities. >- Implementation: City Engineer, Park Superintendent, Park Board, Planning Commission, St. Joseph Township Board, City Council and City Administrator. 8. If an area is platted as part of a larger development project, the City should require the developer . to submit a ghost plat (build out plat) of the entire development. >- Implementation: City Administrator, Planning Commission, St. Joseph Township Board and City Council. 9. Continued judicial development of existing land resources is suggested. >- Implementation: City Council, Planning Commission, St. Joseph Township Board and City Administrator. 10. The township and City should work together to review proposed developments within the District to determine: a. Impact on existing and future transportation facilities, b. Existing and future surface water management systems, c. Adequacy of park facilities within the proposed development, d. Appropriateness of the proposed use(s), e. Adequacy and quality of proposed sanitary sewer and water facilities, and, f. Sufficient capacity is available within proposed sanitary sewer and water facilities to service the proposed development. >- Implementation: City Council, Planning Commission, St. Joseph Township Board, Park Board, City Engineer, City Administrator and Park Superintendent. Consultation with and/or approval by: Stearns County, MnDOT, DNR and Soil & Water Conservation District as . appropriate. District Nine City of St. Joseph Comprehensive Plan, 2002 Chapter 4 Page 22 . Location District Nine occupies the central part of the eastern portion of the City. District Nine's boundaries include: · To the west Eighth Avenue NE; · To the north Elm Street to the Highway Business Corridor and then south to the railroad/Wobegon trail; · To the east CSAH 134; and, · To the south Lynx Road to 1ih Avenue SE to Minnesota Street East. ExistinQ Uses/Features Existing land use within District Nine includes Highway Business, single-family residential and multiple- family residential. Several important roadway corridors including CSAH 75, 133, 134 and Minnesota Street East are located within this district. A summary of existing land uses within the district follows: LAND USE TYPE # OF PARCELS TOTAL ACREAGE Single Family Residential Multiple Family Residential Highway Business Right-Of-Way Subtotal . Recommendations 1. Recommended future land uses within the district include highway business and multiple family residential. ~ Implementation: City Council, Planning Commission and City Administrator. 2. The City should protect the integrity of CSAH 75 as a mobility corridor. The City should examine the possibility of establishing a continuous frontage road system both north and south of CSAH 75. ~ Implementation: City Engineer, Street Superintendent, Planning Commission, City Administrator and City Council. 3. As parcels currently zoned as single family directly adjacent to CSAH come to the end of their useful life, replacement uses should be converted to highway business. ~ Implementation: Planning Commission, City Administrator and City Council. 4. The City should consider the adoption of more strict design standards for new, expanded or remodeled buildings in the highway business district as a means of promoting the image, preserving the character and protecting the value of the area. ~ Economic Development Authority, Planning Commission and City Council. . 5. Strict enforcement of property maintenance codes is warranted. City of St. Joseph Comprehensive Plan, 2002 Chapter 4 Page 23 a. Building Official, Planning Commission, St. Joseph Police Department and City Council. . 6. The City should encourage the construction of high/medium density housing units in areas directly adjacent to commercial uses so as to provide a transitional zone between high intensity uses and single-family residential uses. ? Implementation: Planning Commission, City Administrator and City Council. . . City of St. Joseph Comprehensive Plan, 2002 Chapter 4 Page 24 . District Ten Location District Ten occupies the southeast quadrant of the City's corporate limits. District Ten's boundaries include: · To the west Seventh Avenue SE/95th Avenue; · To the north Minnesota Street East; · . To the east 1 ih Ave SE to the corporate limits; and, · To the south the southern boundary of the corporate limits. Existinq Uses/Features Uses within the district include single-family residential, multiple-family residential, parkland and highway business (intersection of CSAH 75 and Sixteenth Ave. SE. A few unincorporated parcels are located directly adjacent to Seventh Avenue SE and are surrounded by the City's urban area. Agricultural uses exist west of Klinefelter Memorial Park. Most of District 10 was developed within the past 20 years. Notable roadways within the district include 1ih Avenue SE, East Baker Street, Pond View Lane E and Minnesota Street East. Pond View Ridge subdivisions and Cloverdale Estates are located in District Ten. Clayen soils in the southeastern most portion of this district may pose moderate limitations to develoment. A summary of existing land uses within the city follow, this district is completely within the corporate limits: LAND USE TYPE #OF PARCELS TOTAL ACREAGE Single Family Residential . Parks/Open Space Multiple Family Residential Highway Business Right-Of-Way Vacant/Agriculture Subtotal Recommendations 3. Recommended future land uses within District Ten include: a. Single family residential. b. Higher density residential development adjacent to 95th Avenue, Twelfth Avenue SE (if designated as collector street) and 91st Avenue.. ~ Implementation: City Council, Planning Commission, St. Joseph Township Board and City Administrator. 4. Additional playground areas within the center of this district should be promoted. ~ Implementation: Park Board, Planning Commission, City Council and City Administrator. 5. The City should determine the need for the future extension of CSAH 133/1ih Avenue as a North/South collector street. If so, the City should designate the preserve 1ih Avenue SE for future extension. . ~ Implementation: City Engineer, Planning Commission, City Administrator and City Council. City of St. Joseph Comprehensive Plan, 2002 Chapter 4 Page 25 6. Future development driveway access points directly onto 91 st and 95th Avenues should be . avoided by planning internal road systems with provide access to the lots or when direct access is required, joint driveways. Primary emphasis on the two roadways should be mobility and traffic flow. ? Implementation: City Engineer, Planning Commission, City Council and City Administrator. 7. The City should promote trail/pedestrian right-of-way reservations adjacent to roadways within this district to allow safe pedestrian routes to the 40-acre Klinefelter Park. ? Implementation: City Engineer, Planning Commission, City Administrator and City Council. 8. Remaining residential development within this district should preserve existing trees when possible. ? Implementation: Planning Commission, City Administrator and City Council. 9. As this district further develops emphasis should be placed on retaining the small town and rural nature of the community. Generous parkland facilities, open space areas, tree plantings and trail amenities should be emphasized. ? Implementation: City Council, Planning Commission and City Administrator. 10. The City shall continue to promote attractive residential environments that offer a broad choice of . housing options including diverse life-style housing options, sizes and values. Future single- family residential housing types should be of diverse types and include affordable (under $120,000), standard and executive homes. ? Implementation: Planning Commission, City Council and City Administrator. 11. Future pedestrian/bicycle trail constructions and linkages should be provided as a means of maximizing the use of the current and future parks and the City's existing trail facilities. ? Implementation: City Engineer, Park Superintendent, Park Board, Planning Commission, City Council and City Administrator. 12. If an area is platted as part of a larger development project, the City should require the developer to submit a ghost plat (build out plat) of the entire development. ? Implementation: City Administrator, Planning Commission and City Council. 13. Continued judicial development of existing land resources is suggested. ? Implementation: City Council, Planning Commission and City Administrator. . City of St. Joseph Comprehensive Plan, 2002 Chapter 4 Page 26 . District Eleven Location This triangular shaped district occupies includes the industrial areas of the City. District 11 boundaries include: · To the west Eighth Avenue/CSAH 133, including the industrial zones on both sides of 8th Ave; · To the north CSAH 133; · To the east the City's corporate limits; and, · To the south the railroad/Wobegon Trail corridor. Existinç¡ Uses/Features The major land use within the district is industrial. A small parcel zoned highway business located north of CSAH and St. Joseph Industrial Park. Notable roadways in the corridor include CSAH 133, Elm Street and Nineteenth Avenue NE. Buettner Business Park, Renne Addition and Borgert Industrial Park are also located in District 11. The terrain is flat and soils are conducive to development. A summary of existing land uses within the district follows: LAND USE TYPE # OF PARCELS TOTAL ACREAGE Industrial Highway Business Right-Of-Way Subtotal . Recommendations 1. Future land use within District Eleven should include those light industrial in nature. ~ Implementation: City Council, Planning Commission and City Administrator. 2. Continued judicial development and infill of existing industrial land resources is suggested. ~ Implementation: City Council, Planning Commission, EDA and City Administrator. 3. The City should protect the integrity of CSAH 75 as a mobility corridor. If the City determines a need for a continuous frontage road system north of CSAH 75 District 11 may be impacted. ~ Implementation: City Engineer, Street Superintendent, Planning Commission, City Administrator and City Council. 4. The City should consider the adoption of more strict design standards for new, expanded or remodeled buildings in the industrial district as a means of promoting the image, preserving the character and protecting the value of the area. ~ Implementation: EDA, Planning Commission, and City Council. . City of St. Joseph Comprehensive Plan, 2002 Chapter 4 Page 27 District Twelve . Location District Twelve includes all of the identified joint annexation area within the northwest quadrant of the City. The boundaries of this district encompass annexation areas in St. Joseph Township west of First Avenue NE and north of CSAH 2. Existinq Uses/Features Existing land uses within this district are primarily low density residential and agricultural. Other predominant features in this district include the South Fork of the Watab River and large areas of wetlands east of CSAH 3 and north of the railroad/Wobegon Trail corridor near the river. Soil studies indicate soil types may pose moderate to severe limitations to development. A summary of existing land uses within the district follows: LAND USE TYPE # OF PARCELS TOTAL ACREAGE Low Density Residential Right-Of-Way Vacant/Agriculture Open space/Wetlands/River TOTAL Recommendations 1. Recommended future land uses within District Twelve include: a. Single-family residential development within areas contiguous to existing urban locations. b. Park/open space. c. Tiered higher intensity uses such as very limited industrial, commercial and high density . residential adjacent to CSAH 2 and CSAH 3. A reserve strip for highway commercial directly adjacent to the roadways is suggested. ~ Implementation: City Council, Planning Commission, and City Administrator. 2. Implement design standards for highway business and industrial facilities in order to enhance CSAH 2 as a quality entry point to the City of St. Joseph from Interstate 94. ~ Implementation: Planning Commission, City Council and City Council. 3. Medium density residential developments bordering commercial and industrial areas should be encouraged as they will allow for a smooth transition between commercial/industrial and residential uses. ~ Implementation: Planning Commission, City Council and City Council. 4. Future residential development driveway access points directly onto CSAH 2 and 3 should be curtailed. ~ Implementation: City Engineer, Planning Commission, City Council and City Administrator. 5. Future pedestrian/bicycle trail constructions and linkages should be provided as a means of promoting alternative transportation methods. . City of St. Joseph Comprehensive Plan, 2002 Chapter 4 Page 28 . ~ Implementation: City Engineer, Park Superintendent, Park Board, Planning Commission, City Council and City Administrator. 6. Protect the integrity of wetland communities and the floodplain overlay district associated with the South Fork of the Watab River by strict enforcement of environmental codes and through the adoption of a surface water management plan and a floodplain ordinance. ~ Implementation: City Council, Planning Commission, St. Joseph Township Board, City Attorney and City Administrator. 7. Promote the continued existence of woodlands and open space within the district. ~ Implementation: Park Board, City Council, Planning Commission and City Administrator. 8. The City shòuld determine the location for a continuous westerly North/South collector which should be performed in the context of regional transportation planning which has been discussed in previous planning district recommendations. As previously recommended, the City should immediately establish a fund for environmental study and right-of-way acquisition for the development of future roadway corridors. ~ Implementation: City Engineer, Stearns County, Planning Commission, City Administrator and City Council. 9. The City and the Township should work together to monitor the amount of vacant lots available as . a means of avoiding excess lot quantities, partially developed subdivisions and 'leap-frog' type developments. ~ Implementation: St. Joseph Town Board, Planning Commission, City Administrator and City Council. 10. As this district further develops emphasis should be placed on retaining the small town and rural nature of the community. Generous parkland facilities, open space areas, tree plantings and trail amenities should be emphasized. ~ Implementation: City Council, Planning Commission, St. Joseph Township Board and City Administrator. 11. The City shall continue to promote attractive residential environments that offer a broad choice of housing options including diverse life-style housing options, sizes and values. Future single- family residential housing types should be of diverse types and include affordable (under $120,000), standard and executive homes. ~ Implementation: Planning Commission, St. Joseph Township Board, City Council and City Administrator. 12. If an area is platted as part of a larger development project, the City should require the developer to submit a ghost plat (build out plat) of the entire development. . ~ Implementation: City Administrator, Planning Commission, St. Joseph Township Board and City Council. City of St. Joseph Comprehensive Plan, 2002 Chapter 4 Page 29 13. Continued judicial development of existing land resources is suggested. . » Implementation: City Council, Planning Commission, St. Joseph Township Board and City Administrator. 14. The City should review proposed developments within the District to determine: a. Impact on existing and future transportation facilities, b. Existing and future surface water management systems, c. Adequacy of park facilities within the proposed development, d. Appropriateness of the proposed use(s), e. Adequacy and quality of proposed sanitary sewer and water facilities, f. Sufficient capacity is available within proposed sanitary sewer and water facilities to service the proposed development, and g. Compatibility with the Floodplain Ordinance. » Implementation: City Council, Planning Commission, Park Board, Township Board/Planning Commission, City Engineer, City Administrator and Park Superintendent. Consultation with and/or approval by: Stearns County, DNR and Soil & Water Conservation District as appropriate. . . City of SI. Joseph Comprehensive Plan, 2002 Chapter 4 Page 30 . District Thirteen Location District Thirteen includes all of the identified joint annexation area within the southwest quadrant of the City. The boundaries of this district encompass annexation areas in St. Joseph Township south of CSAH 2/east of 1-94 and west of CSAH 121. ExistinQ Uses/Features Existing land uses within this district are primarily low density residential and agricultural. Other predominant features in this district include the some areas of wetlands and some tree massings, generally located on the perimeter of wetland communities. Soil studies indicate soil types may pose moderate to severe limitations to development. A summary of existing land uses within the district follows: LAND USE TYPE # OF PARCELS TOTAL ACREAGE Low Density Residential Right-Of-Way Vacant/Agriculture Open spacelWetlands TOTAL Recommendations 1. Recommended future land uses within District Thirteen include: a. Single-family residential development within areas contiguous to existing urban locations. . b. Park/open space. c. Tiered higher intensity uses such as very limited industrial, commercial and high density residential adjacent to CSAH 2. A reserve strip for highway commercial directly adjacent to the roadway is suggested. d. Tiered commercial and higher density residential adjacent to CSAH 121. ~ Implementation: City Council, Planning Commission, and City Administrator. 2. Implement design standards for highway business and industrial facilities in order to enhance CSAH 2 as a quality entry point to the City of St. Joseph from Interstate 94. ~ Implementation: Planning Commission, City Council and City Council. 3. Future residential development driveway access points directly onto CSAH 2 and 121 should be curtailed. ~ Implementation: City Engineer, Planning Commission, City Council and City Administrator. 4. Future pedestrian/bicycle trail constructions and linkages should be provided as a means of promoting alternative transportation methods. ~ Implementation: City Engineer, Park Superintendent, Park Board, Planning Commission, City Council and City Administrator. . 5. Promote the continued existence of woodlands and open space within the district. City of 81. Joseph Comprehensive Plan, 2002 Chapter 4 Page 31 ? Implementation: Park Board, City Council, Planning Commission and City Administrator. . 6. In the context of regional transportation planning which has been discussed in previous planning district recommendations: The City should conduct a feasibility study including an environmental assessment with participation by the City and public entities to determine the merit of extending CSAH 2/3 south and east as a means of bypassing the Highway 75 corridor, reducing truck traffic within the heart of the City and providing an east/west collector street in the southern portion of the City. ? Implementation: Public, City Engineer, Stearns County, Planning Commission, City Administrator and City Council. 7. The City and the Township should work together to monitor the amount of vacant lots available as a means of avoiding excess lot quantities, partially developed subdivisions and 'leap-frog' type developments. ? Implementation: St. Joseph Town Board, Planning Commission, City Administrator and City Council. 8. As this district further develops emphasis should be placed on retaining the small town and rural nature of the community. Generous parkland facilities, open space areas, tree plantings and trail amenities should be emphasized. ? Implementation: City Council, Planning Commission, St. Joseph Township Board and City Administrator. . 9. The City shall continue to promote attractive residential environments that offer a broad choice of housing options including diverse life-style housing options, sizes and values. Future single- family residential housing types should be of diverse types and include affordable (under $120,000), standard and executive homes. ? Implementation: Planning Commission, St. Joseph Township Board, City Council and City Administrator. 10. If an area is platted as part of a larger development project, the City should require the developer to submit a ghost plat (build out plat) of the entire development. ? Implementation: City Administrator, Planning Commission, St. Joseph Township Board and City Council. 11. Continued judicial development of existing land resources is suggested. ? Implementation: City Council, Planning Commission, St. Joseph Township Board and City Administrator. 12. The City should review proposed developments within the District to determine: a. Impact on existing and future transportation facilities, b. Existing and future surface water management systems, . c. Adequacy of park facilities within the proposed development, City of St. Joseph Comprehensive Plan, 2002 Chapter 4 Page 32 d. Appropriateness of the proposed use(s), · e. Adequacy and quality of proposed sanitary sewer and water facilities; and, f. Sufficient capacity is available within proposed sanitary sewer and water facilities to service the proposed development. > Implementation: City Council, Planning Commission, Park Board, Township Board/Planning Commission, City Engineer, City Administrator and Park Superintendent. Consultation with and/or approval by: Stearns County, DNR and Soil & Water Conservation District as appropriate. · · City of St. Joseph Comprehensive Plan, 2002 Chapter 4 Page 33 District Fourteen Location . District Fourteen includes all of the identified joint annexation area within the southeast quadrant of the City. The boundaries of this district encompass annexation areas in St. Joseph Township east of CSAH 121 and southeast of CSAH 75. Existinq Uses/Features Existing land uses within this district are primarily low density residential and agricultural. A summary of existing land uses within the district follows: LAND USE TYPE # OF PARCELS TOTAL ACREAGE Low Density Residential Right-Of-Way VacanUAgriculture Open space/Wetlands TOTAL Recommendations 1. Recommended future land uses within District Fourteen include: a. Single-family residential development within areas contiguous to existing urban locations. b. Park/open space. c. Tiered higher intensity uses such as commercial and high density residential adjacent to CSAH 121. A reserve strip for highway commercial directly adjacent to the roadway is suggested. d. Professional offices are recommended for the area where utilities are being extended adjacent to East Minnesota Street. >- Implementation: City Council, Planning Commission, and City Administrator. . 2. Future residential development driveway access points directly onto CSAH 121 should be curtailed. >- Implementation: City Engineer, Planning Commission, City Council and City Administrator. 3. Future pedestrian/bicycle trail constructions and linkages should be provided as a means of promoting alternative transportation methods. >- Implementation: City Engineer, Park Superintendent, Park Board, Planning Commission, City Council and City Administrator. 4. The City should determine the location for a continuous southerly East/West collector which should be performed in the context of regional transportation planning which has been discussed in previous planning district recommendations. Additionally, the city should designate an easterly North/South collector either or both CSAH 134 or 12th Ave SE. As previously recommended, the City should immediately establish a fund for environmental study and right-of-way acquisition for the development of future roadway corridors. >- Implementation: City Engineer, Stearns County, Planning Commission, City Administrator and City Council. e City of St. Joseph Comprehensive Plan, 2002 Chapter 4 Page 34 District Fifteen · Location District Fifteen includes all of the identified joint annexation area within the northeast quadrant of the City. The boundaries of this district encompass annexation areas in St. Joseph Township northwest of CSAH 75 and east of First Avenue NE. ExistinQ Uses/Features Existing land uses within this district are primarily low density residential and agricultural. Numerous large wetland areas are contained within this district, especially between of CSAH 75 and 134. A review of soils indicate a potential moderate to severe limitations to development due to a combination of hydric soils and clayen soils. A summary of existing land uses within the district follows: LAND USE TYPE # OF PARCELS TOTAL ACREAGE Low Density Residential Right-Of-Way Vacant/Agriculture Open space/Wetlands TOTAL Recommendations 1. Recommended future land uses within District Thirteen include: a. Single-family residential development within areas contiguous to existing urban locations. b. Park/open space. c. Tiered higher intensity uses such as commercial and high density residential adjacent to CSAH 121. A reserve strip for highway commercial directly adjacent to the roadway is suggested. · d. Additional industrial expansion is recommended for the area directly adjacent to existing industrial development. ~ Implementation: City Council, Planning Commission, and City Adlllinistrator. 2. Future driveway access points directly onto CSAH 134, 133 and 75 should be curtailed. ~ Implementation: City Engineer, Planning Commission, City Council and City Administrator. 3. Protect the integrity of wetland communities by strict enforcement of environmental codes and through the adoption of a surface water management plan. ~ Implementation: City Council, Planning Commission, St. Joseph Township Board, City Attorney and City Administrator. 4. Promote the continued existence of woodlands and open space within the district. ~ Implementation: Park Board, City Council, Planning Commission and City Administrator. 5. Future pedestrian/bicycle trail constructions and linkages should be provided as a means of promoting alternative transportation methods. ~ Implementation: City Engineer, Park Superintendent, Park Board, Planning Commission, · City Council and City Administrator; City of St. Joseph Comprehensive Plan, 2002 Chapter 4 Page 36 6. The City should determine the location for a continuous northerly East/West collector which . should be performed in the context of regional transportation planning which has been discussed in previous planning district recommendations. Additionally, the city should designate an easterly North/South collector either or both CSAH 134 or 1 ih Ave SE. As previously recommended, the City should immediately establish a fund for environmental study and right-of-way acquisition for the development of future roadway corridors. » Implementation: City Engineer, Stearns County, Planning Commission, City Administrator and City Council. 7. Promote the continued existence of woodlands and open space within the district. » Implementation: Park Board, City Council, Planning Commission and City Administrator. 8. The City and the Township should work together to monitor the amount of vacant lots available as a means of avoiding excess lot quantities, partially developed subdivisions and 'leap-frog' type developments. » Implementation: St. Joseph Town Board, Planning Commission, City Administrator and City Council. 9. As this district further develops emphasis should be placed on retaining the small town and rural nature of the community. Generous parkland facilities, open space areas, tree plantings and trail amenities should be emphasized. . » Implementation: City Council, Planning Commission, St. Joseph Township Board and City Administrator. 10. The City shall continue to promote attractive residential environments that offer a broad choice of housing options including diverse life-style housing options, sizes and values. Future single- family residential housing types should be of diverse types and include affordable (under $120,000), standard and executive homes. » Implementation: Planning Commission, 81. Joseph Township Board, City Council and City Administrator. 11. If an area is platted as part of a larger development project, the City should require the developer to submit a ghost plat (build out plat) of the entire development. » Implementation: City Administrator, Planning Commission, St. Joseph Township Board and City Council. 12. Continued judicial development of existing land resources is suggested. » Implementation: City Council, Planning Commission, St. Joseph Township Board and City Administrator. e City of St. Joseph Comprehensive Plan, 2002 Chapter 4 Page 37 13. The City should review proposed developments within the District to determine: · a. Impact on existing and future transportation facilities, b. Existing and future surface water management systems, c. Adequacy of park facilities within the proposed development, d. Appropriateness of the proposed use( s), e. Adequacy and quality of proposed sanitary sewer and water facilities; and, f. Sufficient capacity is available within proposed sanitary sewer and water facilities to service the proposed development. ~ Implementation: City Council, Planning Commission, Park Board, Township Board/Planning Commission, City Engineer, City Administrator and Park Superintendent. Consultation with and/or approval by: Stearns County, DNR and Soil & Water Conservation District as appropriate. · · City of St. Joseph Comprehensive Plan, 2002 Chapter 4 Page 38 District Sixteen Location . An area slated for eventual service by St. Joseph adjacent to Watab Lake in ST. WENDEL township comprises the District Sixteen. It is noted the City is pursuing an agreement with St. Wendel Township. . . City of St. Joseph Comprehensive Plan, 2002 Chapter 4 Page 39 . HOUSING I. Introduction This Section of the Comprehensive Plan will include a detailed description of the housing related issues facing the City of St. Joseph. The issues have been identified through: · An analysis of City demographics; · . The Housing Study Update, completed in 2001 by Admark Resources; · A community survey; · An evaluation of existing housing conditions gathered through a wind-shield survey of the City; and, · A review of land use options for housing growth. The goal of this section is to summarize housing issues within the City and establish goals promoting healthy residential infrastructure and furthering a variety of life-cycle housing options. II. Housing Issues Life Cycle Housing Variety The housing stock within a community must be responsive to the needs of its residents. However, the housing needs of residents are not static but change over time as people move through different stages of their lives. Housing needs tend to evolve from: affordable basic units for young people just beginning . to enter the workforce; to affordable single family units for first time home buyers and young families; to move up housing for people with growing families and/or incomes; to empty-nester dwellings for persons whose children have grown and left home; to low maintenance housing options for aging persons as their ability to maintain their property decreases; and finally to assisted living environments to provide health and medical care to the elderly. To address the life-cycle needs of residents, it is critical that a community provides a wide range of housing types, sizes and values. The development of life-cycle housing works to sustain the community by preventing a polarization of residents to one age or income group. As one generation of residents moves through its life cycle it can move into the housing provided by the previous generation, just as the next generation will move into the housing being vacated. Population Characteristics/Growth St. Joseph's existing population as described in the Social Profile (Chapter 3) depicts a relatively young populace, with 29% of the population between the 8gesof 20 and 24, which is a result of the College of St. Benedict in the community. The second largest age category (18%) is 15 to 19 years. While 8 majority of the college students (81 %) live on campus, the number of rental units for non-family households is higher in St. Joseph. The college has indicated they do not anticipate increasing enrollment in the near future. As the population of St. Joseph increases, there will be a higher demand for the types of life cycle housing available. The 2000 Census indicates the number of persons per household continues to dip slightly. This follows a continued national trend toward smaller families and more single person households. Conversely, St. Joseph Township 2000 Census data reveals a median age of 31.8 years, or ten years older than St. Joseph. . City of 81. Joseph Comprehensive Plan, 2002 Chapter 5, Page 1 Housing Affordability Housing affordability is a calculation of the household income and the value of housing stock. The Family . Housing Fund describes affordable housing as costing not more than 30% of household income. Household income includes total money received in a calendar year by all household members 15 years old and over. The following Table presents the median household income level reported in the 2000 Census. TABLE 5-1 MEDIAN INCOME LOCATION 2000 MEDIAN INCOME ESTIMATE S1. Joseph $ Stearns County $ 42,426 The above Table indicates median income in the City of St. Joseph is $219 less than the County median income. Stearns County's median income increased by 19% from 1990 to 2000 or from $35,707 to $42,426 (U.S. Census). The City's median household income translates into a maximum mortgage payment ability of approximately $_ per month, or assuming a 7.5% fixed rate 30-year mortgage. The City's median household income translates into a monthly rent payment ability of approximately $1,055. The average residential property within the City is valued at approximately $ per the County Assessor. The 2000 Census indicates the median owner-occupied unit in the City of St. Joseph in 2000 was valued at $ The 2001 Housing Study conducted by Admark Resources reported a median listing price for a single family home at $139,900. Building permit data from the City reports 321 new single- family homes constructed between 1992 and June of 2002 with an average value of $132,052. The U.S. Census reports that among cities of 1,000 or more, St. Joseph had one of the highest portions . of people 65 years and older living in poverty at 34%. This contrasts significantly with the neighboring community of Avon which reported the lowest percent of families in poverty at 1%. TABLE 5-2 S1. Joseph Study Area Household Income Distribution 1990-2005 1990 1990 2000 2000 2005 2005 Number Percent Percent Percent Household Income Estimate Proj. Total Households 2,133 100.0 2,996 100.0 3,325 100.0 Less than $5,000 42 2.0 40 1.3 35 1.1 $5,000 to $9,999 153 7.2 132 4.4 129 3.9 $10,000 to $14,999 188 8.8 182 6.1 184 5.5 $15,000 to $24,999 385 18.1 470 15.7 474 14.3 $25,000 to $34,999 415 19.5 338 11.3 407 12.2 $35,000 to $49,999 559 26.2 664 22.2 571 17.2 $50,000 to $74,999 293 13.7 779 26.0 854 25.7 . City of S1. Joseph Comprehensive Plan, 2002 Chapter 5, Page 2 $75,000 to $99,999 47 2.2 245 8.2 375 11.3 · $100,000 to $149,999 38 1.8 93 3.1 203 6.1 Over $150,000 9 0.4 52 1.7 94 2.8 Median Household Income $31,976 $42,207 $46,928 Source: 1990 Census of Population and Housing Claritas, September 2000 TABLE 5-3 St, Joseph Study Area Household Income Distribution 2000 % of Benton/Stearns 2000 2000 County Median Income Household Income Estimate Percent Range Total Total Households 2,996 100.0 30% or less $15,030 or less 355 11.8 31% - 40% $15,031 to $20,040 235 7.8 41% - 50% $20,041 to $25,050 235 7.8 · 51% - 60% $25,051 to $30,060 169 5.6 61% - 80% $30,061 to $40,080 392 13.1 81 % --100% $40,081 to $50,100 442 14.8 101 % - 115% $50,101 to $57,615 234 7.8 More than 115% More than $57,615 932 31.1 Median Household $42,207 Income Source: 1990 Census of Population and Housing Claritas, September 2000 III. Existing Housing Stock Type of Housing The existing housing supply in St. Joseph includes single family, duplex, town homes, multiple-family and mobile home units. However, despite the presence of the College of Benedict and st. John's University, St. Joseph has a higher percentage of owner-occupied units than neighboring communities. As represented in the following table from the Area Housing Study completed in February, 2001 : TABLE 6·2 Total Study Area · Housing Unit Vacancy and Owner/Rental Mix -1990 City of S1. Joseph Comprehensive Plan, 2002 Chapter 5, Page 3 Total I Occupied I Vacant HousingUnits Total Owner Renter Total Occasional . Use No. % No. % No. % No. % No. % No. % No. ¡St. Cloud 21,946 100.0 21,000 95.7 11 ,985 57.1 9,018 42.9 947 4.3 44 4.7 ~01 St. Joseph 2,239 100.0 2,133 95.3 1,764 82.7 369 17.3 104 4.6 70 66.7 5 Sartell 2,783 100.0 2,721 97.8 2,048 75.3 672 24.7 61 2.2 8 13.3 152 Sauk 3,634 100.0 3,495 96.2 2,417 69.2 1,077 30.8 139 3.8 8 5.7 132 Rapids Waite Park 2,844 100.0 2,664 93.7 1,038 38.9 1,627 61.1 180 6.3 7 3;9 174 Total St. 33,221 100.0 31,802 95.7 19,226 60.5 12,578 39.5 1,417 4.3 136 9.6 1,282 Cloud Area 'A vacant housing unit is defined as vacant by the Census Bureau if Uno one is living in it at the time of enumeration, unless its occupants are only temporarily absent such as on vacation. Units temporarily occupied at the time of enumeration entirely by persons who have a usual residence elsewhere (such as summer homes or cabins) are also classified as vacant." "Data on occupied housing units is based on sample and subject to sampling variability which may cause slight inconsistency in numbers of households and housing units reported. Source: 1990 Census of Population and Housing: Claritas, September 2000 St. Joseph has the highest owner-occupied rate in the area and Waite Park has the highest renter- occupied rate. Overall the owner/renter households are about a 60/40 split in the total St. Cloud Area. When asked what type of housing is needed in the community, comprehensive survey respondents . indicated as follows: L Senior Assisted Living Comments: There are waiting lists --ª- Senior Apartments -º- Multiple-Family Rental --ª- CondominiumfTownhome -1L Single-Family Housing 1. For LMI or $30,000-$50,000 income range -º- Other: Affordable rental Condition of Existing Housing Stock The condition of the existing housing stock in St. Joseph has been documented to be in generally good condition. A windshield survey of various residential areas conducted in June of 2002 reveals that most single family structures are well maintained. However, some evidence of deterioration was cited, particularly in older areas of the City including the original townsite, Loso's Addition One thru Addition 7, and the Lodermieir Addition. While not necessarily a determining factor of condition, structure age is a good indicator as to the need to aggressively promote maintenance, rehabilitation and even redevelopment, for as a structure ages, maintenance needs increase. Neglected maintenance, especially for older structures, can lead to deterioration that will have a blighting influence to adjacent properties and the entire neighborhood. . City of 81. Joseph Comprehensive Plan, 2002 Chapter 5, Page 4 · The Housing Study completed by Admark arrived at the following conclusions regarding substandard housing units in St. Joseph. TABLE 8-4 Total Study Area Substandard Indicators 1990 Lacking 20% 1.01 or More Complete Built Persons Per Plumbing Before Room Mobile Homes Facilities 1939 S1. Joseph 21 54 56 238 Source: 1990 Census of Population and Housing Claritas, September 2000 A community survey performed in conjunction with the updating of this Plan asked what type of housing respondents felt was most needed in St. Joseph. The majority of those surveyed responded single-family housing was most needed. A majority of respondents to the survey indicated they felt the existing housing stock is in "Good" condition (65%) or "Excellent to Good" condition (12%) while approximately 24% felt it is in fair to poor condition. IV, Rental Units · The City St. Joseph was included in a Housing Study prepared in 2001 by Admark Resources The following Table (included in the Study) inventories rental housing in the City of St. Joseph. It is noted the vacancy fates within the City vary with the college school year. Owners of rental properties with four or more units were contacted by Municipal Development Group as a part of the comprehensive plan update. Owners reported a range of 0% to 7.4% vacancy rates in from June 2001 to June, 2002, noting higher vacancies in the summer months. As a part of the February, 2001 Housing Study by Admark Resources, there were no vacancies found out of 216 rental units interviewed in St. Joseph. The median rent for a 1-Bedroom apartment was $323, a 2-Bedroom apartment was $500, a 3-Bedroom apartment was $521, and a 4-Bedroom apartment was $1,200. There are no efficiency units in St. Joseph. From 1990 through 2000, 59 multi-family units were constructed in St. Joseph. TABLE 5-2 RENTAL HOUSING INVENTORY-CITY OF ST. JOSEPH GO [ ELD TAX YR #of PROJECT ST CR SUB BUILT UNITS 1 BR 2 BR 3 BR 4 BR 1 BR 2 BR 3 BR 4 BR 1 BR 2 BR 3 BR 4 BR A.rlington Place ELD 1998 20 20 600 $2,200 0 St. Joseph Apts. ELD X 1988 16 15 1 $275 $315 0 :Ioverdale TH GO 19805 36 26 10 $583 $621 0 Der Wohn Platz GO 1973 14 10 4 700 1,200 $200 $500 0 Hollow Park Apts. GO X N/A 12 2 10 880 1,240 $370 $400 0 · Meadowlark Apts. GO 1980 36 36 $500 0 City of S1. Joseph Comprehensive Plan, 2002 Chapter 5, Page 5 t. Joseph Public Housing GO X 1995 12 12 1,220 $521 ilshire Apts. GO 1970 31 5 25 1 $380 $418 $450 ampus Park TH ST 1994 15 15 S 1,200 ampus Park Villas ST 1994 24 24 $1,200 The 2000 Census indicates a total vacancy of nearly _ percent. A vacancy rate of five percent or lower is considered normal for a healthy rental market. The City does have a rental code in place. However, the community survey indicates 73% of respondents thought the code should be strengthened. Others commented the rental code must be enforced more strictly and uniformly to protect adjacent housing values. V, Owner Occupied Units The City Assessor indicates nearly _ % of the 1,120 existing owner-occupied units in the City of St. Joseph were constructed prior to . The Assessor indicates the average assessed value of owner- occupied housing in the City is approximately $ VI. Housing Study Findings The following goals were identified in the 2001 Admark Housing Study. The information is provided ONLY to form a framework for the recommendations in Section V. of this chapter. Housing Demand . TYPE UNITS LAYOUT RENT/PRIC E Low income total 29 1&2 Bedroom <$478 38 2&3 Bedroom <$598 22 3&4 Bedroom <$693 Low income Age 55+ 7 2 Bedroom <$538 Affordable general 5 I-Bedroom $421-$537 occupancy 52 3-Bedroom $629-$745 24 4-Bedroom $802-$831 Congregate 13 n/a n/a Market rate general occupancy 89-102 1 - 4 Bedroom $400-$1,000 (Current pent-up) 49-61 1 - 4 Bedroom $400-$1,000 (2000-2005) Market rate Age 55+ (Current pent-up) 16-29 1 - 2 Bedroom $400-$1,000 (2000-2005) 18-31 1 - 2 Bedroom $400-$1,000 Single family affordable 33 <$124,000 . City of 81. Joseph Comprehensive Plan, 2002 Chapter 5, Page 6 . I Single-family market rate I 947 I I >$124,000 I n/a - not applicable Recommendations for 2 years TYPE UNITS LAYOUT SQ. FT. RENT/PRICE Affordable general occupancy 8 I-Bedroom 600 $500 3-Bedroom 1,000 $675 Market rate general occupancy 8 I-Bedroom 700 $600 4 2- Bedroom 950 $700 12 3- Bedroom 1,100 $800 Single family affordable 20 <$124,000 Single-family market rate 70 >$124,000 . TABLE 9-3b ~ St, Joseph General Occupancy Affordable Housing Demand . One Two Three Four Bedroom Bedroom Bedroom Bedroom Total Å“<'air Market Rent by Bedroom $421 $498 $629 $802 $421 - $802 Size - ~come necessary to afford FMR $16,840 $19,920 $25,160 $32,080 $16,840 - $32,080 60% of county median income $537 $645 $745 $831 $537 - $831 ent 60% of county median income $21,480 $25,800 $29,800 $33,240 $21,480 - $33,240 Households within income levels ($16,840 - $33,240) - refers to highlighted range 663 Times St. Joseph rental rate (17.3%) 115 115 multiplied by bedroom mix 5 25 52 24 106 4.4% 21.9% 45.3% 21.1% 92.7% Minus existing units within rent 0 66 0 0 66 levels Total affordable demand 5 (41) 52 24 40 Admark's Housing Study noted St. Joseph has a demand for One, Three and Four Bedroom affordable units. The reason for the negative demand for Two Bedroom units in St. Joseph is because of residents . earning less than the income necessary to afford the fair market rent or earning more than 60% of the Stearns County median income living in these units. St. Joseph also has a 0% rental vacancy rate so City of 81. Joseph Comprehensive Plan, 2002 Chapter 5, Page 7 people who would qualify to live in a One Bedroom or Three Bedroom unit choose the Two Bedroom unit because of the lack of choice. e TABLE 9·3b St. Joseph General Occupancy Moderate Income Housing Demand One Two Three Four Bedroom Bedroom Bedroom Bedroom Total 30% of county median income rent $537 $645 $745 $831 $537 - $831 30% of county median income $21,480 $25,800 $29,800 $33,240 $21,480 - $33,240 180% of county median income rent $716 $860 $994 $1,108 $716 - $1 ,108 180% of county median income $28,640 $34,400 $39,760 $44,320 $28,640 - $44,320 Households within income levels ($21,480 - $44,320) - refers to highlighted range 915 rnmes St. Joseph rental rate (17.3%) 158 158 multiplied by bedroom mix 7 35 72 33 147 4.4% 21.9% 45.3% 21.1% 92.7% Minus existing units within rent levels 0 0 0 0 0 Total affordable demand 7 35 72 33 147 TABLE 9-7 .2a e Market Rate Rental Demand by Income Level St. J~seph Study Area 1990-2000 Minimum 1990 2000 1990 to Hh plus Subtotal Demand Income Income Projected 2000 Change vacancy Demand mmus Rent Required Eligible Income Change in times (5% of from 1990 constructi Level to Support H'holds Eligible Eligible Area new Hh to 2000 on smce Rent Level H'holds H'holds Rental growth) 1990 (59) Rate of 17.3% $400 $16,000 1,712 2,595 883 153 8 161 102 $450 $18,000 1,635 2,501 866 150 7 157 98 $500 $20,000 1,558 2,407 849 147 7 154 95 $550 $22,000 1,481 2,313 832 144 7 151 92 $600 $24,000 1 ,404 2,219 815 141 7 148 89 $650 $26,000 1,324 2,138 814 141 7 148 89 $700 $28,000 1,241 2,071 830 144 7 151 92 $750 $30,000 1,158 2,003 845 146 7 153 94 . City of St. Joseph Comprehensive Plan, 2002 Chapter 5, Page 8 . $800 $32,000 1,075 1,935 860 149 7 156 97 $850· $34,000 992 1,868 876 152 8 160 101 $900 $36,000 913 1,790 877 152 8 160 101 $950 $38,000 838 1,701 863 149 7 156 97 $1,000 $40,000 764 1,613 849 147 7 154 95 Source: 1990 Census of Population and Housing TABLE 9-7,2b Market Rate Rental Demand by Income Level St. Joseph Study Area 2000-2005 Minimum 2000 2005 2000 to Hh Chg. plus Total Income Proj ected Projected 2005 times Area Vacancy Demand Rent Required Income Income Change in Rental (5% of from 2000 Level to Support Eligible Eligible Eligible Rate of New Hh to 2005 Rent Household Household Household 17.3% Growth) Level s s s $400 $16,000 2,595 2,930 335 58 3 61 $450 $18,000 2,501 2,835 334 58 3 61 - $500 $20,000 2,407 2,740 333 58 3 61 $550 $22,000 2,313 2,645 332 57 3 60 $600 $24,000 2,219 2,550 331 57 3 60 $650 $26,000 2,138 2,462 324 56 3 59 $700 $28,000 2,071 2,381 310 54 3 57 $750 $30,000 2,003 2,300 297 51 3 54 $800 $32,000 1,935 2,218 283 49 2 51 $850 $34,000 1,868 2,137 269 47 2 49 $900 $36,000 1,790 2,058 268 46 2 48 $950 $38,000 1,701 1,982 281 49 2 51 $1,000 $40,000 1,613 1,906 293 51 3 54 Source: 1990 Census of Population and Housing Claritas, September 2000 . City of S1. Joseph Comprehensive Plan, 2002 Chapter 5, Page 9 TABLE 9-8,2b Age 55+ Market Rate Rental Demand by Income Level . St. Joseph Study Area 2000-2005 Minimum 2000 2005 2000 to Hh Chg. plus Total Income Proj ected Projected 2005 times Area Vacancy Demand Rent Required Income Income Change in Rental (5% of from 2000 Level to Support Eligible Eligible Eligible Rate of New Hh to 2005 Rent Household Household Household 17.3% Growth) Level s s s $400 $16,000 625 798 173 30 1 31 $450 $18,000 592 761 169 29 1 30 $500 $20,000 558 724 166 29 1 30 $550 $22,000 524 686 162 28 1 29 $600 $24,000 491 649 158 27 1 28 $650 $26,000 466 617 151 26 1 27 $700 $28,000 451 590 139 24 1 25 $750 $30,000 436 564 128 22 1 . 23 $800 $32,000 420 538 118 20 1 21 $850 $34,000 405 511 106 18 1 19 . $900 $36,000 385 486 - 101 17 I 18 $950 $38,000 360 461 101 17 I 18 $1,000 $40,000 336 437 101 17 1 18 Source: 1990 Census of Population and Housing Claritas, September 2000 Potential methods to address housing needs: 1. Promote first time homebuyer, down payment assistance, purchase price reduction and homeowner counseling programs. 2. Develop a lease to purchase program. 3. Promote townhouse/condo development. 4. Support purchase price reduction programs. DTED has awarded Small Cities Development Program funds to communities to lower the cost of new owned housing construction. The Greater Minnesota Housing Initiative has also launched some new initiatives under its First Home Program. 5. Promote moderate priced new housing on in-fill lots. 6. Support construction of high cost housing. . City of 81. Joseph Comprehensive Plan, 2002 Chapter 5, Page 10 . 7. Develop financing initiatives for the construction of new housing. 8. Promote owner occupied and rental housing rehabilitation programs. 9. Promote a purchase/rehabilitation program. A purchase/rehab mortgage program may help to improve the quality of older homes and add to the affordable housing stock. 10. Acquisition/Demolition Program. VII. Recommendations 1. Establish/activate an HRA Authority thru either the EDA or the City Council to promoting housing (re)development issues. ~ EDA and City Council. 2. Frequently review the housing information/studies and all updates specifically as it pertains to the following recommendations: a. Development of a lease to purchase program. The older existing stock may provide an affordable ownership opportunity, when compared with the costs of new construction. Due to the high cost of housing a lease to purchase program should be investigated. To make such a program function, a public or non-profit agency needs to implement the . program and funding sources must be identified. ~ Implementation: City of St. Joseph HRA. b. It is recommended the City actively review and promote potential areas of residential redevelopment and infill within the corporate limits. The areas included within the orderly annexation area appear to provide ample space to accommodate anticipated land needed to support projected residential growth. ~ Implementation: City of St. Joseph Planning Commission, St. Joseph City Council, St. Joseph Township. c. Participation in a review of St. Joseph and Greater St. Joseph's housing delivery/support system to determine its effectiveness and efficiency. A large amount of agencies, organizations and entities have a role in addressing housing needs in the St. Joseph and Greater St. Joseph areas including: Stearns County HRA, St. City of St. Joseph, College of St. Benedict, St. John's University, Initiative Foundation, local lenders and local social service providers. It is recommended the City actively participate in the development of a plan to address housing needs which utilizes the strengths of these various agencies, organizations and entities to ensure a coordinated approach to prioritizing projects is also recommended. ~ Implementation: City of St. Joseph, Stearns County HRA, College of St. Benedicts, St. John's University, Initiative Foundation, local lenders & local social service providers d. Awareness of diversity issues. The City should prepare for increased diversity in its . population. City of St. Joseph Comprehensive Plan, 2002 Chapter 5, Page 11 ~ Implementation: City of St. Joseph, College of St. Benedicts and St. John's University . . 3. The City should address local and regional housing issues through cooperative efforts with neighboring communities. ~ Implementation: City of St. Joseph and Stearns County HRA. 4. The City should encourage the development of housing that respects the natural environment of the community as an amenity to be maintained. Land use and subdivision controls should be routinely reviewed to ensure said controls respect the natural environment. ~ Implementation: Planning Commission, City of St. Joseph City Council. 5. The City should stabilize and sustain the community through the promotion of St. Joseph as a community that is family-oriented with a high quality of life, strong neighborhoods and a wide variety of housing options (including type, size, and value) with expanding employment opportunities. ~ Implementation: Planning Commission, St. Joseph EDA and City Council. 6. The City should encourage a range of property values and rent rates within the housing stock as a means of diversifying the population and sustaining the community. An over supply of one type of housing or level of housing cost should be avoided. ~ Implementation: Planning Commission and City Council. . 7. A majority of those responding to the community survey undertaken in conjunction the update of the City's Comprehensive Plan indicate a lack of: senior housing, townhomes/condos and affordable single-family housing units within the City. A variety of solutions to addressing this need are required. The solutions should include, but are not limited to, increased funding (primarily at state/federal levels), supportive local regulations and increased private sector participation. For simplicity purposes the affordable housing issue may be separated in two categories: affordable existing homes and affordable new construction. ~ Implementation: St. Joseph City Council and local financial institutions (e.g. Minnesota City Participation Program). 8. The community survey and various studies, including the Admark Study have identified housing units with substandard indicators. Furthermore, it is noted existing homes are most often affordable for lower-income households. Primary obstacles to access to ownership of existing homes for first time home buyers and lower-income households are: (1) lack of savings for down payment and closing costs and (2) credit history difficulties. It is recommended the city participate in the development of rehabilitation programs which allow low/moderate income homeowners/potential homeowners to fix up existing older homes. ~ Implementation: St. Joseph City Council and local financial institutions (e.g. Minnesota City Participation Program). . City of 81. Joseph Comprehensive Plan, 2002 Chapter 5, Page 12 . 9. It is noted new single-family construction often exceed the payment ability of first-time homebuyers and low/moderate income persons. Costs of land, labor and materials are frequently cited as factors impeding the production of new affordable housing. Other factors limiting the production of affordab,le housing are: local zoning and subdivision controls, reaction from the community, taxes, financing issues and development fees. Despite the various factors limiting the production of affordable ,housing some developers, builders and local housing agencies are producing such housing. Government assistance in the form of financial assistance and regulatory waivers are often cited as elements required for the production of affordable new housing. It is recommended the City continue to seek alternatives to promote the production of affordable new single-family units. Alternatives may include the participation of several entities in the demolition of substandard existing units on smaller lots within the City and the construction of new units. ~ Implementation: City Council and local HRA authorities. 10. The City should consider financial assistance programs for the development of housing for special needs populations (elderly, physically challenged) as funding sources and market conditions allow. ~ Implementation: St. Joseph City Council and local HRA authorities. 11. The City should restrict or prohibit residential development on floodplains, wetlands, and other natural features as they perform important protection functions in their natural state. ~ Implementation: Planning Commission and City Council. . 12. The City should pursue programs for housing structural condition maintenance to protect the health and safety of residents and ensure stability of neighborhoods. ~ Implementation: St. Joseph Rental Inspector, St. Benedict College and St. Joseph City Council. 13. The City should aggressively address maintenance problems and code violations as a means of improving and strengthening the character of individual neighborhoods and avoiding blighting conditions. Violations of property maintenance which infringe upon residential neighborhood quality, pose public health and safety problems and threaten neighboring property values should be aggressively eliminated. ~ Implementation: Building Inspector and Rental Inspector 14. The City should protect low-density residential neighborhoods from encroachment or intrusion of incompatible higher intensity residential land uses, as well as non-residential use categories through adequate buffering and separation. Residential developments should be protected from and located away from sources of adverse environmental impacts including noise, air, and visual pollution. ~ Implementation: Planning Commission and City Council. . City of 81. Joseph Comprehensive Plan, 2002 Chapter 5, Page 13 10. GMHF/Rural Development New Construction Program. Up to $10,000 per unit in gap financing is available for new homes constructed by non-profit developers selling to . qualified buyers. GMHF gap financing is combined with USDA Rural Development first mortgages, participation loans or guarantees. 11. GMFH: Employer Assisted Housing. GMHF will match employer contributions to single family housing development projects on a 1:1 basis, up to $15,000 per unit. 12. Minnesota Housing Finance Authority (MHFA) Partnership: Community Rehabilitation Fund and Housing Trust Fund. These funds are distributed to non-profit and public agencies to assist new construction and rehabilitation of single family homes. GMHF will partner with MHFA to provide an affordability or value gap subsidy on new construction or rehabilitation. 13. MHFA Entry Cost Homeownership Opportunity (ECHO) Program: GMHF down payment assistance funding is coordinated with the ECHO program, which provides up to $4,000 (in entry costs) per homebuyer. If a local resource will pay 50% of the ECHO discount, GMHF will pay the remaining 50%. 14. GMHF Employer Assisted Housing: GMHF will match employer contributions for employee down payment assistance on a 1:1 basis, up to $2,000 of GMHF funds per employee. 15. GMHF will consider GMHF will consider locally administered down payment assistance program requests on a case-by-case basis, matching local funds up to $2,000 per family. 16. GMHF funding activity: GMHF is committed to spending up to $5 million per year on its employer assisted housing program, including both single family and multi-family . funding initiatives. 17. GMHF Affordable Housing Specialists are professionals who have earned the designation from the Mortgage Association of Minnesota (MAM). The title of Affordable Housing Specialist is awarded to those members of MAM who have successfully completed a comprehensive training course designed to help them assist lower income people obtain a mortgage. 18. MHFA Fix-Up Fund. This program provides home improvement loans to assist current homeowners improve the livability, energy efficiency or accessibility of their existing housing. The program is offered in Minnesota by local lenders, HRAs, or CAPs. There are income limits for this program. The interest rate on the loan is below market, but may vary based on market conditions. The maximum loan amount is $25,000. 19. MHFA Rehabilitation Loan Program. This program provides deferred loans to very low-income Minnesota homeowners to make home improvements related to the safety, energy efficiency, accessibility, or livability of their homes. There are income limits and asset limits for this program. The loan must be repaid if you sell your home within ten years. After ten years, the loan is forgiven. Funds for this program are extremely limited. This program is available through local administrators. 20. Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LlHEAP). This is a federally funded program that has three main components: Primary Heat, Crisis· Assistance and Energy- Related Repair. Primary Heat provides grants to low-income households' pay for home heating costs. Crisis Assistance includes grant funding that allows low-income households to keep their utility service from being disconnected, or to obtain a delivery of fuel. Energy-Related Repair allows low-income households to make repairs or replace . City of 81. Joseph Comprehensive Plan, 2002 Chapter 5, Page 15 heating systems to cut energy consumption. These programs are available from · Community Action Programs (CAPs), local governments, or social service agencies. 21. FHA 203(k) Loans The FHA 203(k) program is a special type of mortgage loan. This mortgage program may be used to finance both the purchase and remodeling costs for a property in one loan. A 203(k) loan may be used to buy and remodel a property or to refinance your current mortgage and remodel your home. 22. Rural Development (RD) Home Improvement Loans and Grants RD is an agency of the U. S. Department of Agriculture (formerly the Farmers Home Administration, or RECD). It offers several programs for home improvement. To be eligible, you must live on a farm, in the open country, or in a town of less than 10,000 people. There are income limits for most programs and some require that you be unable to qualify for other types of financing from commercial lenders. Loans are available with interest rates between 1 % and 3%. Very low-income families or people over 62 years of age may qualify for grants that do not have to be repaid. If you do not see a listing for RD programs available for your county in this directory, call the local county office of the Rural Development Agency listed in the telephone book under IOU. S. Government - Agriculture." 23. Weatherization. This is a federally funded program that assists low-income households in reducing their energy costs. It is available to homeowners as well as renters. Priority is given to the elderly, people with disabilities, high-energy consumers and households where a safety hazard exists. The program can help you with an energy audit, add wall or attic insulation, improve ventilation, and offer energy education. CAPs and local government agencies administer the program. Federal Government Proqrams Section 8 vouchers and certificates programs · Shelter Plus Care (S + C) Supportive Housing Demonstration Program Federal Home Loan Bank Section 2Q2: Supportive Housing for the Elderly Section 811: Supportive Housing for Persons with Disabilities Home Investment Partnership Program HOPE 3 Minnesota Housinq Finance Aqency Proqrams Minnesota Mortgage Program Home Ownership Assistance Fund Urban Indian Housing Program/Triballndian Housing Program Purchase Plus Program Partnership for Affordable Housing Minnesota Cities Participation Program Entry Cost Home Ownership Program (ECHO) MHFA Rental Assistance for Family Stabilization (RAFS) Low Income Housing Tax Credit Program New Construction Tax Credit Mortgage Builders Loans Low and Moderate Income Rental Program Affordable Rental Investment Fund Home Rental Rehabilitation Program Rental Rehab Loan Program Community Revitalization Fund The Great Minnesota Fix-Up Fund Affordable Rental Investment Fund · Blighted Properties Community Rehabilitation Community Rehabilitation Fund City of 81. Joseph Comprehensive Plan, 2002 Chapter 5, Page 16 TRANSPORT A TION . I. Introduction This segment of the Comprehensive Plan will provide a discussion of various transportation system components within the City of St. Joseph. The principal components of this section include: · An inventory of existing transportation facilities · Land use impact on future volume · A discussion of the Interstate 94, CSAH 75 and CSAH 2 corridors · City transportation plan This element of the Comprehensive Plan is intended to provide sufficient guidance for the development of a transportation system that serves the access and mobility needs of the City in a safe, efficient and cost- effective manner. It is important the local transportation system is coordinated with respect to county, regional and state plans and that the system enhances quality economic and residential development within the City. II. Existing System The existing conditions of the transportation systems are an important consideration in the determination of future needs. Discussion of certain existing elements of the roadway and transit systems in St. Joseph follows. Roadway System . As a part of the transportation plan analysis, an inventory of the roadway system is necessary in order to view certain characteristics. To better understand the character of various roadways, it is helpful to classify them according to their function. All roadways within the City of St Joseph may be classified according to their function as follows: Principal Arterial: Interstate 94 can be classified as a principal arterial roadway. Principal arterials connect communities with other areas in the state and other states. Emphasis is placed on mobility rather than land access. Intersections with principal arterials are usually limited and controlled. Direct access to principal arterials from local or residential streets should be discouraged. The nature of land uses adjacent to principal arterials is typically of a higher intensity. Principal arterials generally carry 5,000 to 25,000 vehicles per day with speed limits of 55 to 70 miles per hour. Minor Arterials: CSAH 75 and CSAH 2 can be classified as minor arterials. Minor arterials are designed to accommodate moderate to long trip lengths and to connect communities and regional business concentrations. Like principal arterials, minor arterials emphasize mobility as opposed to land access. Minor arterials generally connect to interstate freeways, other minor arterials and collector streets, but may occasionally connect to some local streets. The nature of land uses adjacent to minor arterials is typically of medium to high intensity. Minor arterials generally carry 1,000 to 10,000 vehicles per day with posted speeds of 55 miles per hour. The County Road 2 corridor warrants special consideration as it is the subject of discussion regarding a future linkage with CSAH 3 and it will not always follow the characteristics of a typical arterial because it runs through the City and its commercial core. Collector Streets: The collector system facilitates movement from residential neighborhoods to: other residential neighborhoods; to business concentrations; and, to minor arterials. For the purposes of this discussion collector streets shall be classified as either community or neighborhood collector streets. . Community collector streets may be thought of as roadways with higher traffic volumes than City of St. Joseph Comprehensive Plan 2002 Chapter 6 Page 1 neighborhood collector streets. Both community and neighborhood collector streets typically serve short · trips with speeds ranging from 30 to 55 miles per hour. Both types of collector streets place equal emphasis on mobility and land access and generally carry 250 to 2,500 vehicles per day. Community collector streets within the City of St. Joseph include: CSAH 121, CSAH 133, CSAH 134, 1 ih Avenue SE, East Baker Street, Minnesota Street East, Northland Drive, 91st and 95th Streets and 4th Avenue SE. Neighborhood collectors include Joseph Street, Pond View Lane, Third Avenue NW, Second Avenue NW and Elm Street. Local Streets: Local streets connect blocks and land parcels. The primary emphasis is on land access. In most cases, local streets will connect to other local streets and collector streets. In some cases, they will connect to minor arterials. Local streets serve short trips at low speeds. Local streets generally occur at every block and carry less than 100 vehicles per day at speeds less than 35 miles per hour. With each step downward in the aforementioned classification system comes a decrease in the size and carrying capacity of the roadway. Each street type is designed specifically for a separate and distinct function. Local streets distribute traffic to and from residential areas, channeling tràffic to collector streets. Collector streets in turn channel traffic to other residential areas, business concentrations and minor arterials. Minor arterials channel traffic from areas of business concentrations to other areas of business concentrations, to other communities, and to principal arterials. Principal arterials channel traffic to other regions and states. Traffic Volumes The Stearns County Highway Department has recorded traffic volume information for major roadways within the City of St. Joseph. Daily volumes are illustrated in Table 6.1 and indicative of 1999 County data. The historic volumes are indicated in Table 6.2 and reflect the growth/decline at each location from 1995 to the most current estimate available( 1999). Stearns County updates traffic counts every four · years. The next traffic counts will bein the year 2003. TABLE 6-1 1999 TRAFFIC COUNTS* PRINCIPAL ARTERIALS, MINOR ARTERIALS, COLLECTOR STREETS** VARIOUS LOCATIONS Traffic Count Location Average Daily Volume-1999 1-94 at CSAH 121 1-94 at Collegeville CSAH 75 at CSAH 3 12,100 CSAH 75 at First Ave NW 14,400 CSAH 75 at Northland Drive 21,100 CSAH 2 at Fourth Ave NW 7,300 CSAH 2: Second Ave NW to College Ave. 4,700 Mn. Street: College Ave to First AveNE 4,650 Mn. Street: First Ave NE to Third Ave SE 2,700 Mn. Street: Third Ave SE to Seventh Ave SE 2,150 CSAH 3 at CSAH 75 1,750 CSAH 121 at corporate limits 2,050 College Ave: SE First Ave to Minnesota Street 2,550 t3Ji North College: Mn. Street to CSAH 75 4,900 · North College: CSAH 75 to E. Elm Street 2,100 North College: E. Elm Street to jcnt. First Ave NE 3,800 City of 81. Joseph Comprehensive Plan 2002 Chapte r 6 Page 2 CSAH 133 south of CSAH 75 3,000 . CSAH 133 north of CSAH 75 1,700 . Source: Steams County Engineer .. Some Collector Street Traffic Counts Not Available TABLE 6-2 HISTORICAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES Traffic Count Location Average Daily Average Daily Change Percent Volume Volume Trips/Day Change 1995 1999 CSAH 75 at CSAH 3 12,600 12,100 -500 -3.9% CSAH 75 at First Ave NW 13,200** 14,400 1200 9.0% CSAH 75 at Northland Drive 18,100 21,100 3000 16.6% CSAH 2 at Fourth Ave NW 4,800 7,300 2500 52.0% CSAH 2: 2nd Ave NW to College Ave. 5,200 4,700 -500 -9.6% Mn. Street: College Ave to First Ave NE 4,600 4,650 50 1% Mn. Street: 1st Ave NE to Third Ave SE 3,400** 2,700 -700 -20.6% Mn. Street: 3rd Ave SE to ih Ave SE 2,900** 2,150 -750 -25.9% CSAH 3 at CSAH 75 1,150 1,750 600 52.2% CSAH 121 at corporate limits 1,350 2,050 700 51.9% College Ave: SE 1st Ave to Minn. Street 1,450 2,550 900 62.1% North College: Mn. Street to CSAH 75 3,400** 4,900 1500 44.1% North College: CSAH 75 to E. Elm St. 2,100** 2,100 0 0.00% N. College: E. Elm St to jcnt. 1st Ave NE 1 ,900** 3,800 1900 100% CSAH 133 south of CSAH 75 Not Available 3,000 - - CSAH 133 north of CSAH 75 1,500** 1,700 200 11.8% . . Source: Steams County .. Steams County Estimate Traffic Hazard Areas Community surveys respondents were asked to comment traffic hazards within the City. The following comments were received: · Lack of dedicated pedestrian crossing of CSAH 75. · Congestion (truck traffic) at First Ave NW and CSAH 75. · Congestion at Northland Drive and CSAH 75. Railroad System At one point the Burlington Northern Railroad was central to the City of St. Joseph. Today the railway corridor has been abandoned for rail use and is now under the control of the Minnesota Department of Transportation. The railroad corridor is being reserved for the possible construction of the Northstar Commuter Rail System which would extend from St. Cloud to the Twin Cities. In the interim, Stearns County has a limited use permit to use the corridor for trail purposes. The Lake Wobegon Trail is being extended nine miles from the City of Avon to its eastern-most terminus in the City of St. Joseph. Additional information on the trail system is included in the park, recreation and trail section of the Comprehensive Plan. City of St. Joseph Comprehensive Plan 2002 Chapter 6 Page 3 . · Transit Service MTC bus service is not currently available within the City of St. Joseph, however, the extension was to be the focus of a recent study by MTC. Tri-CAP (Tri-County Action Program) provides transportation services for people in St. Joseph. Established routes include the City of St. Joseph on Wednesdays and Fridays. Passengers are picked up at Loso's Grocery Store and delivered to any St. Cloud destination. Round trip service costs $2.75 currently, but will be increasing to a flat $5.00 fee shortly. The bus service is available to the general public with no age or income requirements. All buses are handicapped accessible. Bus reservations should be made one day in advance. Tri-CAP bus service is also available on a scheduled basis every weekday providing reservations are made 24 hours in advance. A third service offered by Tri-CAP is a volunteer driver service wherein volunteers utilize their own vehicles to deliver passengers to social services at Stearns County or medical appointments in the area. To access this service, passengers are required to have the service recommended by either the County or a medical provider. The community survey indicates most respondents (71 %) believe public transportation access and services are not being adequately met for all age groups. An additional 18% were undecided. Comments were evenly split as to whether or not respondents would utilize MTC services if extended to St. Joseph. Just slightly over half of those responding (53%) indicate they would support a tax increase for metro bus service extension to St. Joseph. Taxi Service Taxi service within the City of St. Joseph is offered by private providers. Currently Yellow Cab, Pioneer Taxi and Allied Cab provide taxi service within the area. · Sidewalks and Trails As a part of the community survey, respondents indicated Specific comments relating to sidewalks and/or trails included the need to: Additional information relating to trails is contained within Chapter 10 entitled, "Parks and Recreation". III, Transportation System Analysis The analysis of the transportation system of St. Joseph is primarily concerned with the roadway system since that is the principal element through which people and goods are transported. The preparation of a thoroughfare plan considers many factors including, but not limited to; public input, existing plans and future volume projections. Public Input Input from the public regarding transportation issues was achieved via a community survey conducted in conjunction with the updating of this plan. Survey respondents were asked for their opinion on a number of transportation related topics. A summary of survey responses follows: · . Respondents approve of the physical condition of roadways within the City. A majority (75%)of respondents rated the physical condition of road in the community as 'good'. City of St. Joseph Comprehensive Plan 2002 Chapter 6 Page 4 Several respondents indicated a desire to re-implement a schedule for roadway maintenance and reconstruction (e.g. seal coating every 4-5 years; complete reconstruction or mill/overlay . every 15-20 years). . As indicated previously, the community survey indicates most respondents (71 %) believe public transportation access and services are not being adequately met for all age groups. An additional 18% were undecided. Comments were evenly split as to whether or not respondents would utilize MTC services if extended to St. Joseph. Just slightly over half of those responding (53%) indicate they would support a tax increase for metro bus service extension to St. Joseph. . Respondents were asked to itemize any existing, pending or seasonal transportation/traffic hazards in the City that have not been addressed. A large portion of respondents expressed concern with congestion throughout the CSAH 75 corridor, especially at the 75 and 4th Avenue intersection. Several residents also indicated congestion primarily with respect to truck traffic at First Avenue NE and CSAH 75. - As a part of a Neighborhood meeting to obtain input on Comprehensive Plan, individuals attending noted the following transportation issues: 1 . 2. 3. Existing Plans Principal and minor arterials usually fall under the jurisdiction of state or regional agencies such as the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) and the Stearns County Highway Department. To . those ends, MnDOT, City and county representatives must continue to discuss area transportation issues. One of the key transportation issues affecting the City of St. Joseph is the route designation, corridor acquisition and eventual construction of collector streets in all four quadrants of the City. The St. Cloud Area Planning Organization's Transportation Plan appears to call for the extension of CSAH 133 to CSAH 121 via Twelfth Avenue SE and the extension of East Baker Road from CSAH 121 to CSAH 75. The County's long range plan indicates the possible extension of CSAH 134 to TH 23, although the County Engineer indicates this is not a favorable route at this time. Both the APO and the County long-range plans indicate the extension of CSAH 3 to CSAH 3. Other new construction projects include: The following projects are included in the City's five-year capital improvement plan: Proiect Area Proiect Description Year Scheduled 2002 CI P Amt. . City of SI. Joseph Comprehensive Plan 2002 Chapter 6 Page 5 · TOTAL Projected Traffic Volumes The projection of traffic volumes to a future year is highly dependent upon expected development within the City of St. Joseph and in the entire St. Cloud Area. Another factor, particularly as it relates to arterial roadways, is the expected increase in through traffic volumes on those facilities. Those volumes, which mayor may not have destination within the city, are dependent upon regional and state growth. TABLE 6-3 VEHICULAR TRIPS GENERATED BY NEW DEVELOPMENT BASED ON YEAR 2020 LAND USES Daily Trip Estimated Daily land Use Number of Units Rate per Unit Trips Residential-Low Density · Residential - High Density Industrial** Highway Commercial** Sub Total additional Assume 50 percent of the Highway Commercial Trips are Pass-By or Dual Purpose Trip Types Total additional . Assumes _'Yo of new households low density & _'Yo of new households high density .. Reflects current ratio of commercial to industrial acreage (i.e._'Yo commercial and _'Yo industrial) The calculations for the new development assumptions indicate that an additional daily vehicle trips could be generated by projected land uses within the City by the year 2022. These trips would be spread out across the entire roadway system. IV, Transportation Plan/Goals The thoroughfare plan for the City in conjunction with the land use plan and other infrastructure plans, provides a guideline for which growth can be accommodated in a reasonable fashion and existing issues regarding transportation can be addressed. The Transportation Plan consists of a map indicating existing and future roadways and a written discussion regarding transportation issues and goals. · City of St. Joseph Comprehensive Plan 2002 Chapter 6 Page 6 Transportation Plan Map The functional classes utilized on the Transportation Plan Map are as follows: principal arterials, minor . arterials, community collectors, neighborhood collectors and, local streets. Roadway right-of-way and pavement widths will vary with the functional classifications and the volumes on the facilities. Right-of-way ranges are as follows: Functional Classification Right-of Way Range Principal Arterial 100-300 feet Minor Arterial 80-150 feet Community Collector 60-100 feet Neighborhood Collector 60-100 feet Local 50- 80 feet Map 6-1 illustrates the transportation system designations of streets and highways within and adjacent to the city. It is important to note the attached map is consistent with forecast residential and commercial/industrial growth through the year 2022 (See Chapter 4). As growth occurs, adjustments in the Transportation Plan Map should be made as appropriate. Transportation Plan Discussion Interstate 94 Corridor . One of the principal arterials which provides primary regional access throughout central Minnesota is Interstate 94. This arterial has long served as the access route to/from the metropolitan areas in Minnesota (such as Minneapolis, S1. Paul and 81. Cloud) in addition to areas in western Minnesota and North Dakota (Moorhead and Fargo). Additionally the roadway provides access to the City via the CSAH 2 interchange. The St. Cloud Regional MnDOT District estimates approximately 14,510 vehicles per day utilize 1-94 in the vicinity of CSAH 2 daily. Interesting, traffic estimate jump to 26,363 trips per day at the St. John's exit indicative of the amount of traffic utilizing C8AH 75. The speed limit on the 1-94 is 70 miles per hour with access provided to the City via the one interchange. At this time there are no plans for changes to the 1-94 corridor immediately adjacent to the City. Future development may be expected adjacent to the 1-94 corridor especially upon the extension of C8AH 3 to CSAH 2. It is recommended future land uses directly adjacent to C8AH 2 form an impressive entry to the community along with being of a higher intensity. The implementation of uniform design standards for the corridor will help ensure the quality of the access point to the community. Uses should include a reserve strip for commercial uses directly adjacent to C8AH 2, especially between 1-94 and the intersection with CSAH 3. The allowable commercial uses should be those that are dependent on highway access and large traffic volumes. Tiered directly behind the reserve commercial land uses should be very light industry with similar strict design standards and use requirements developed. ~ Implementation: EDA, Planning Commission, City Administrator and City Council. . City of St. Joseph Comprehensive Plan 2002 Chapter 6 Page 7 CSAH 75 and 2 Corridors . The roadways that provide primary access to the City of St. Joseph are CSAH 75 and CSAH 2. CSAH 75 runs east-west through the St. Joseph area. CSAH 2 primarily follows a north-south course. Both minor arterials serve as primary routes to move moderate and long distance travelers between communities. CSAH 75 accommodates approximately 21,100 vehicle trips per day a 16.6% increase in the volume afforded from the year 1995 to the year 1999. It is understood the CSAH 75 corridor is of primary importance to the accessibility of businesses that have been and will continue to be developed along its length. The roadway is also of primary importance to commuters traveling to employment destinations in the St. Cloud Area. Direct access to CSAH 75 has been curtailed in recent years. Intersections are controlled at College Ave (CSAH 2) and Avenue. The City should protect the integrity of CSAH 75 as a mobility corridor. The City should examine the possibility of establishing a continuous frontage road system both north and south of CSAH 75. ~ Implementation: City Engineer, Street Superintendent, Planning Commission, City Administrator and City Council. The intersection of Second Avenue NW and CSAH 75 has been identified as a point of traffic congestion, especially during weekday a.m. commutes, by several survey participants. Second Ave NW is the designated truck route, however, truck traffic often backs up near the intersection. A designated truck route which bypasses CSAH 75 should be established in conjunction with the extension of CSAH 3/CSAH 2 and the construction of an East/West collector street in the southern portion of the City. ~ Implementation: City Engineer, St. Joseph Township, City Administrator and City Council. Northland Drive and CSAH 75 was also identified by survey participants as a major point of traffic . congestion. The City shall examine the benefits of creating a continuous frontage road system in the area versus the installation of a controlled access if/when traffic counts warrant such installation. ~ Implementation: City Engineer, Street Superintendent, Planning Commission and City Council. The City shall aggressively enforce crosswalk and vehicle speed laws at the controlled intersection of CSAH 75 and College Ave. North as it is the only established pedestrian crossing of the arterial. As residential growth continues in the northern portion of the City, a dedicated overpass/underpass should be considered to afford pedestrians safe access to the southern portion of the City. ~ Implementation: Police Department, City Engineer, Street Superintendent, Planning Commission and City Council. To promote the integrity of developments and retain existing property values in the CSAH 75 and CSAH 2 corridors the City should establish design requirements for commercial and industrial development. ~ Implementation: St. Joseph Economic Development Authority, Planning Commission, City Administrator and City Council. Economic development activity primarily industrial and highway business in nature is expected to continue in both the CSAH 2 and CSAH 75 corridors. Such growth will place additional emphasis on the need to provide adequate and effective access to/from both roadways. In the future, access management issues may be minimized by limiting the number of new intersections in developing areas. . The objective of access spacing is management and maintenance of mobility during peak traffic periods. A balanced approach to access management is the key to providing mobility while not instituting barriers City of SI. Joseph Comprehensive Plan 2002 Chapter 6 Page 8 that force internal traffic to travel greater distances than necessary in order to move from one part of the city to another. . ~ Implementation: Stearns County, City Engineer, Street Superintendent, Planning Commission and City Council. Collector Streets The location of community collector streets is a major determinant of what land use patterns will look like. Future growth patterns shall correspond to existing community collector streets where possible. The spacing of future community and neighborhood collector streets should balance a strong need for mobility with a lesser need for land use access. Collector streets shall be designed to provide continuity and prudent access to minor and principal arterials. Since the primary purpose of collector streets is to provide large volumes of through traffic with a high level of mobility, continuity is critical. Intersections should be controlled with cross street stop signs or traffic signals. Stop signs should not be used to stop traffic on collector streets except for intersections with other collector or arterial streets. Each segment of the collector street system should be designed to satisfactorily perform its specific role within the overall transportation system. The City should immediately establish a fund for environmental study and right-of-way acquisition for the development of future collector corridors. ~ Implementation: City Administrator and City Council. In the context of regional transportation planning and to most efficiently provide for the development of future roadways, the City should develop an official future transportation map with collector streets, . spacing guidelines (every ~ mile) and inclusion of the following: 1. With participation by the City and public entities determine the merit of extending CSAH 2/CSAH 3 south and east as a means of bypassing the Highway 75 corridor, reducing truck traffic within the heart of the City and providing an easUwest collector street in the southern portion of the City. 2. A designated easterly North/South collector either or both CSAH 134 or 12'h Ave SE. 3. A determined location for a continuous northerly EasUWest collector. 4. A designated easterly North/South collector either or both CSAH 134 or 12'h Ave SE. ~ Implementation: Public, City Engineer, Stearns County, Planning Commission, City Administrator and City Council. The city should consider the adoption of access management plan guidelines for city collectors streets. This would allow for determining the best location and number of access locations to allow on city controlled roadways. ~ Implementation: City Engineer, Street Superintendent and City Council. . City of SI. Joseph Comprehensive Plan 2002 Chapter 6 Page 9 · Local Streets Local streets primarily function to serve residential neighborhoods and other areas of lesser daily traffic volumes. The extension and/or spacing of future local streets should promote excellent access to lower intensity land uses and discourage excessive vehicle speeds. Local streets should not be used for on- site traffic circulation which should be accommodated off the right-of-way. Local streets should be laid out to permit efficient plat layout while being compatible with the area's topography, municipal utility plans and environmental constraints. ~ Implementation: City Engineer, Street Superintendent, Planning Commission and City Council. Future Roadways/Land Use The various sized roadways form an interrelated network which can easily either benefit or detract from the community. Therefore determining the size, location and timing of construction of roadways is an essential function of the City. Land uses that generate heavy traffic loads require efficient access and should be located near roadways designed to carry heavy volumes which are focused on providing mobility rather than land access. Conversely, land uses which generate very little traffic and do not benefit to through traffic (Le. residential uses) should be located away from the noise, pollution and bustle of roadways designed to carry heavy traffic volumes. · ~ Implementation: City Engineer, Planning Commission and City Council. Roadway Infrastructure The City's Capital Improvement Plan should contain elements for new construction and reconstruction of the street system, with scheduled maintenance included in annual budgets. Street maintenance is a regular component of any community's public works operation. Street maintenance should include routine patching, crack filling, and storm sewer cleaning. The City should re-implement a schedule for roadway maintenance and reconstruction (e.g. sealcoating every 4-5 years; complete reconstruction or mill/overlay every 15-20 years). ~ Implementation: Street Superintendent, City Engineer and City Council. In the future the City should continue to correlate future road constructionlreconstruction with all utility service providers to ensure efficient repair/replacement and avoid duplicate costs. ~ Implementation: Utility providers, City Engineer, Street Superintendent and City Council. · City of 81. Joseph Comprehensive Plan 2002 Chapter 6 Page 1 D Alternate Modes of Transportation . To diminish congestion in the CSAH 75 area, the City should encourage alternate transportation methods which are less dependent on motor vehicles. The City could promote and encourage walking and biking as alternate transportation methods. The City should strive to maintain park and ride facilities near the 1- 94 interchange as a means of encouraging car-pooling and ride sharing. As the population ages and diversifies, bus service will become an important amenity in the community and should be promoted. Special attention should be given to improving pedestrian access, movement and crossings throughout the CSAH 75 and CSAH 2 corridors to provide both convenience and safety. ~ Implementation: Stearns County, City Engineer, Planning Commission and City Council. . City of St. Joseph Comprehensive Plan 2002 Chapter 6 Page 11 .