The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2003 [04] Apr 07 . www.cityofstjoseph.com ity of St. Joseph St. Joseph Planning Commission . 25 College Avenue North April 7,2003 PO Box 668 7:00 PM St. Joseph. MN 56374 (320) 363-720 I Fax: (320) 363-0342 FILE 1. Call to Order ADMINISTRATOR Judy Weyrens 2. Approve Agenda MAYOR 3. Approve Minutes Larry J. Hosch 4. 7:05 PM - Habitat for Humanity COUNCILORS Alan Rassier 5. 7:20 PM - Redevelopment District, Maintenance Facility Ross Rieke Gary Utsch 6. 7 :25 PM - Preliminary Plat, Anthony Lahr Dale Wick 7. 7:35 PM - Honer Homes a. Preliminary Plat, W obegon Trail Plat . b. Site Plan Review - 69 Unit Apartment Complex 8. 8:00 PM - Final Plat - Pond View Ridge Seven, Rick HeidIBob Herges 9. 8: I 0 PM - Development Plan Review, Summit Management 44 Unit Apartment Complex (Northland Drive) 10. Other Matters II. Adjourn . March 3, 2003 Draft Page 1 of 3 · Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the Planning Commission for the City of St. Joseph met in regular session on Monday, March 3, 2003 at 7:00 PM at the St. Joseph City Hall. Members Present: Chair Gary Utsch. Commissioners S. Kathleen Kalinowski, Marge Lesnick, Jim Graeve, Kurt Schneider, Mike Deutz. Administrator Judy Weyrens. Others Present: Tom Skahen, Rick Poplinski, Jeff Schlingman. Approve AQenda: Graeve made a motion to approve agenda as presented; seconded by Lesnick and passed unanimously. Minutes: Lesnick made a motion to approve the minutes of February 3, 2003 as presented; seconded by Deutz and passed unanimously. Lesnick made a motion to approve the minutes of February 26, 2003 as presented; seconded by Deutz and passed unanimously. Lot Split Request - Tom Skahen: Weyrens presented the Planning Commission with a proposed lot split for property on College Avenue North and Date Street East. The lot is currently a lot of record and is a buildable lot for commercial development. Skahenis asking to split the easterly ten (10) feet and attach it to the adjoining property. Weyrensclarified that approving the lot split as requested would not have a negative impact on development. Tom Skahen of Sunset Manufacturing approached the Planning Commission on his own behalf. Skahen stated that he currently owns both parcels of property in question. Skahen stated that he is requesting to detach ten (10) feet from one parcel to provide a larger buffer area around an existing building. Skahen · further stated that at this time he does not have a development plan for the vacant lot. However, approval of the lot split at this time could potentially expedite the sale of the property. Utsch stated that since one of the two parcels being discussed recently received approval for development, it is customary for the Planning Commission to ensure that all building requirements have been met before approving additional land use matters. Therefore, Utsch questioned Skahen if all the requirements for the addition to Sunset Manufacturing have been met; to which Skahen stated yes. Graeve made a motion to recommend the Council approve Resolution PC2002-02, approving the lot split request submitted by Tom Skahen of Sunset Manufacturing. The motion was seconded by Kalinowski and passed unanimously. VikinQ Development - Rick Poplinski: Weyrens reported that Viking Development is requesting preliminary plat approval at this time. As stated in the minutes of the February 25, 2003 Planning Commission meeting, there were five outstanding issues. Drainage Weyrens reported that she has discussed this matter with Concern was expressed that catch basins the City Engineer and he has not seen the revised were not indicated on the plat and the drainage plan since the lots were reconfigured. area being developed contains a large Bettendorf discussed the drainage plans with the wetland and currently has drainage developer and is satisfied the developer will provide issues. sufficient drainage. Bettendorf further stated that he would be comfortable if the Planning Commission approved the preliminary plat contingent upon approval of the City Engineer. Weyrens clarified that all drainage issues would need to be resolved before the final plat is · submitted. March 3, 2003 Draft Page 2 of 3 Gas Line Easement · Weyrens reported that the gas line easement only allows The proposed plat indicates the walking for farming activity. Therefore, the trail must be relocated. trail will be constructed over the Northern Natural Gas Line Easement. The Poplin ski stated that he will move the trail south, beyond Planning Commission requested the easement area. verification that the trail can be placed over a high-pressure line. Covenants Poplinski stated that he has not prepared the final The Planning Commission requested a covenants for the proposed development, but presented copy of the covenants to ensure that two documents from similar developments. Poplinski adequate funding is available for stated that the covenants require the land associåtion to maintenance/snow removal with regard to be managed by a professional management company. the private roads. Further, the covenants will include a provision whereby residents can be assessed if improvements are needed and funds are not readily available. Poplinski stated it has been his experience that land associations must be managed by a professional management company so that the funds and improvements remain objective. Private Roads Weyrens reported the City Engineer calculated that a 50' The Planning Commission requested the ROW easement could be established for the private road. developer review the private roads to However, if at some point in the future the City · determine the maximum amount of ROW constructed a public road, the proposed buildings would that can be established without encroach the ROW creating non-conforming uses. Utsch encroaching the buildings. clarified that requiring the easement would not be practicable as the City should not be creating additional non-conforming uses. Cul·de·Sac Weyrens stated that the concept of a cul-de-sac with the The Planning Commission requested the Fire Chief. Without having the opportunity to view the developer consider constructing a plan, the Chief indicated that there could be a potential temporary cul-de-sac either at the safety issue. intersection of Dale Street and the private street, or 18th Avenue SE and the private The Commission concurred that fire and police services street. The Planning Commission could be compromised with the construction of a indicated that a cul-de-sac may alleviate temporary cul-de-sac. excessive traffic on the private street. Street Signage Weyrens reported that she had not received a response The Commission requested the City on this matter, but it can be addressed before completion Engineer to review the traffic controls at of the final plat. the intersection of 18th Avenue SE and Baker Street East. Lesnick questioned Poplinski if he would provide the City with a three-year maintenance agreement for the walking trail. Poplinski stated that he would be agreeable to adding such language in the Developer's · Agreement. March 3, 2003 Draft Page 3 of 3 · Deutz made a motion to recommend the Council approve the Preliminary Plat of Viking Development entitled Liberty Point. Approval is contingent upon the following: 1. Approval of the City Engineer 2. Before submittal of the final plat the developer must provide the City with approval from Stearns County Environmental Services. . 3. Traffic controls must be determined for the intersection of East Baker Street and 1 Efh Avenue SE. 4. Submittal of the covenants for Liberty Point. 5. The Developer's Agreement must require the Developer to maintain the walking trail for a period of three years. The motion was seconded by Lesnick and passed unanimously by those present. Other Matters: Utsch reminded the Planning Commission that they are meeting jointly with the City Council on March 10,2003 at 6:00 PM to review the proposed amendment to the Subdivision Ordinance. Adjourn: Lesnick made a motion to adjourn at 7:35 PM; seconded by Utsch and passed unanimously by those present. · · M .'- Fact Sheet and Map ~ - Building simple, decent houses with God's people in need - What is Habitat for Humanity International? homeowners invest hundreds of hours of their own Habitat for Humanity International is a nonprofit, ecu- labor-"sweat equity" -into building their house and the - menical Christian housing ministry. HFHI seeks to elimi- houses of others. nate poverty housing and homelessness from the world, What does a Habitat house cost for a partner family? and to make decent shelter a matter of conscience and ::J action. Habitat invites people from all walks of life to work Throughout the world, the cost of houses varies from as together in partnership to help build houses with families little as a few thousand dollars in some developing coun- in need. Habitat has built more than 100,000 houses tries to an average of $46,642 in the United States. '\ around the world, providing some 500,000 people in more Habitat houses are sold to low-income families at no than 2,000 communities with safe, decent, affordable profit, and no interest is charged on the mortgage. shelter. HFHI was founded in 1976 by Millard Fuller, Mortgage length varies from seven to 30 years. House - along with his wife, Linda. costs are kept low by using locally contributed materials 4€ and volunteer labor. Habitat continues to search for inno- How does it work? vative approaches and partnerships that will enable even Ir r- Through volunteer labor and donations of money and the poorest families to have a simple, decent place to live. I materials, Habitat builds and renovates simple, decent houses with the help of homeowner (partner) families. How are partner families selected? Habitat houses are sold to partner families at no profit, Families in need of decent shelter apply to local Habitat ~ affiliates. The affiliate's family selection committee choos- ti, financed with affordable, no-interest loans. The homeowners' monthly mortgage payments go into es homeowners based on their level of need, their willing- a revolving Fund for Humanity that is used to build more ness to become partners in the program and their ability houses. Habitat carries out its mission at the community to repay the no-interest loan. Every affiliate follows a 5 level through organized groups called affiliates (also called nondiscriminatory policy of family selection. Neither race "community groups"). nor religion is a factor in choosing homeowner families. Affiliates around the world raise the funds used to Where does Habitat for Humanity construct houses. All Habitat affiliates are asked to tithe- International operate? to give 10 percent of their contributions-to fund house- There are now more than 2,000 affiliates in all 50 states of building work in other nations. the United States, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, the In many countries, national organizations have been territory of Guam and 82 other countries around the world. formed to support the development of affùiates. These Habitat is a grass-roots movement. Concerned citizens national organizations also support fund raising, raise from all walks of life come together as volunteers to form a awareness and provide training and leadership develop- Habitat affiliate in their community. Fund raising, house ment. Some national organizations and affiliates receive construction, family selection and other key decisions are funding grants and fund-raising support from Habitat for carried out by the local affiliates. HFHI's offices, located Humanity International. around the world, provide training and a variety of support Habitat is not a giveaway program. In addition to a down payment and the monthly mortgage payments, (continued on back page) - "Habitat for Humanity' is a registEred service mark owned by Habitat for Humanity International. .. 1;1 , ~-;"-'ð ~< gi ~ ~ ,~.u \-. i _ .QJ~__ 2- § Í" ' .. C N 1':- ~, ~ ~ I ~..: U C ~ ~ ~ - _ ro ~ . 0 ;:-~~-~ --- ·S ::ri c À ~ ... ::::I cn- C ,'~ .. .." 0 'Õ , ,~ :=--~ =:~= ~ ~ .~ ~ a , If ¡ QJ "D êí .~ ð o'.~'·Sð It -5 C ro c ~ - to '\. .~ .2 is ~ .g .,.. ~ r~ VI C I/) VI ro _ .If{!/:> ", )V:~ ~ ' ~ ~ is. ~ § 1f!lII¡j1'P,. ~ q- u E ~ ~ ....~ ~ >!=o"''''c " 8 « LL U a... .- CD-·I .."" -= -~': ~~ . _ '" d == ' oj ~ ¡<J <n ¡;¡ y .-.... "ó;j ¡,¡: "ó 8 ª @ Ü " .y ~ J- § ~ ~ '0 * $ '0 -= I'\ oj ~ 08 .~ oj.~ <;¡ * ('¡) ¡:: U ~ ¡:: oj >-"ó 8 0. .- "ó <n._ - ('¡) ¡:: z .-.- 0 0 ~ .... ¡:: ;j """~ cd (Ij~ ~ * ~~_N.s (Ij 2::0 cd 0...8 § 0 ro~ cd .~ ~ ~.s ~ ...... ~ ..g [~ § ~ ~ ~ & ~ & å ~ s :: 'Š ~ ê ~ ......3 oj ..c:u oj :::<' ¡:: ¡:: oj "" "" Z Z oj oj ..c: .::3 oj .- 0 .... ~ t: ~ .>- I::. ;:"-,-<¡:Q 1:Ll1OI.<~~_""'''''' P-.P-.P-.......(/)(/)(/)(/)r'r'...-- = a=. : ~ ~ 1 .... - ¡:: +0) ~ ._ <n .... .......... . ro ¡::: ""d - .:. aJ cd cd >--.1:: >..5 § e .-.~ *('d ~ II Co.·8 '¡:: ~ ÇQ ~ ~ o-¡:: <l) ""d gb ¡::: '8 t;; = O('¡)oj8-b.O>-j:;..c:¡::;joj('¡):.;2 :- § 5J ~ ~ § ~ 1U ~ ~ t:: 8 ð :~ = ~ g, ~,,¡joo,"'bz'£'£~",," E ¡:: o u U *'" ...... 4-t III :D 0 = ro ;jU w o..r~ :za ~ ~1 . ¡:: .., ð ~ ('¡) .- u...... 1-c::S cd ~ ¡:: ..t: .- <n oj CT"~ .., - - - _ _ -'ìã "2-~ [ .~... "'0"_ ~~ ·ã_l - . . . - v ~ ¡:: ('¡) .... 0 - P< oj = ~ oj ¡:: ..c: .- oj ~ ï::..c: oj "ó :.ö oj -.:=11- - - - - _~~~·~~~~~aêï~'¡¡]Ji~:J!j,~~~g,~~. · .... = .... . -= 0 = I = "ó .!3 (I) ro §cIj oj oj ;j >- "ó 0) 80j ""ojob.Ooj oj;j ('¡) ¡:: ;j U U oj;j "ó N . C ...... cd ...... '1j 'Cd ...... ~ OJ) ;::j .- v .>0 ItS g 5"@ § 8 Ö ~ ~ .... .5 ¡:: ~üü::r:::r:~~z~~Þ~ .c .¡: ¿ ItS oj U ._ ~ "ó ._ .r> ItS ;j :D 8 v-B ;j ('¡) ;j ._ oj 0.. -Bõ"ó ~ ¡:Q ~ ¡i2@8 E"2 oj¡:: 8 ItS - 0 oj .- _ oj oj oj u oj "ó "'C .¡g - "ó ~ .... oj..§ oj :.ö ¡:z ,13 8 oj ItS <n .~ ;j .9 c 5b ¡:: ('¡) .- - 8 oj .- "ó ..2; C c::t 0 .þ 8 .... .- .- ('¡) N ~ ,:; J!,! 0 - 8 oj oj fa V\ ~ .~ ~ ~ '; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ :.a 0 Ô 0 a ::: u ~<;¡Q¡:QP-' ~-<-<¡:Q¡:Q¡:QUUUQ~~ III \ ~ ß / - - - - - -- - - - - ~ I ~ ~ ø ..... 0 b.o td ~ ~ bfJ '1j .- v) ~ ~ n:I.r:. oj-¡::ooj('¡)¡:; .., ¡::b.OtO ;j. '" "'C '5 v ~ (1) t) ß td ...c: ~ .~ 'S: ~ ro ~ .5 ~ ''ª 0 :g gp ~ C n:I m c.r:.'- - <n U ..c: "ó ._ :> .- U ('¡) :> ~ ¡:: N "..c: ....0 ._ .... .... n:I C 0 .- 3: 3: .r> .- .... - .... ~ .... - '-:>'-"";j'- ~ b.O "ó ¡ ~-gðg-~32:::~ce. ]=§~f3.gÆ~~ 1~B~~~'ê~~~~ E >- C) .:: - 0 :::¡ ~ ~ m -0 ~ ~ N 8.¡g . ~;j .~"ó ~ ~ <;¡ 0.ß 'S - .... v .t::.r:. oJ ~ C).c :::¡ 0 ~ -0 QI ":..,"2 ¿15~bb..c: çJ!,!Æ o...g ¡i .....r>"2 §:9 cv c: ... .... QI .r:. >- 0 .r:. '.¡j c "'C 1:: -B 'i;í .$2 ;j - b.O.s ï3 g. 0.. .9 .- ;j ~ .~ ;j '+:1 ~ ':û Ê '§ ~ "'C .t:: ..a .r:. 1: .¡: ItS ~ ~ "2 8 ~ ~ ~ E 5 S ~.B 1:: :a ßD ~ ç ~ s :g '!:. J::::¡ 0. ~ g ~ ~ .~ ~ E .~ .Š ~ g .~ g.'~ § .; ~ :î! ~ ~ @ ~ ~ ~ 'fj ~.£ ~ vi v. .r:..... oJ QI QI ... Q) 0 .... ¡:: 0..:"::: ..c: .@ v _ ..c: oj ~ >- 0 8 0 ¡:; ~ '" C .... VI QI '"'" .- C ItS "'C E c: "'C '+< oj -< <n V 0 "ó :D 8 1J ..; ¡:: .~ <n ..c: :J ..c: .- 'i;í 0\ o Q¡ > .- .t:: c: > 0 ItS 0 "ó ~ '::0 õ.. ¡:: ro'¡:: '+<..... 5 ð --g ~ ::r: 01) ~ .- 'f o '"'" c: QI - C .- 0 ~ v v C) ~ .¡¡; gp -¡:: 0 ('¡) ¡:: .... v; 'i;í <a u >-.e. oj .., .... .5 0 $ ..q< .- in +" q¡ 0 :::¡ q¡ c: (Q +" q¡'" ¡:: :J ï:; 0 .., ~ .- ..8 ¡:: :~ .., ~ .., iJ <n ¡:: <£ ::s 8 oj ~ '^ ... .... ^ VI E ^ ~ .., C ^ ItS ('¡) 0 ('¡) ~ c....c:"" _ .9 ~ ~ ".£ .... ~ ('¡) 'i;í 'S .... 'i;í d. '" .- ItS -. ~ -. .... QI -..r:. ..c: ..c: b.O ('¡) ¡:: .... ('¡) <n .~ ..... ('¡) J!,! <n ('¡) .... ..c: _ 0 ~ .- .c 0. 0 - E 0 "'C Q¡ v 0..... I-- ..c: .8 0 0..:9 "ó ....... ..c: 0.. 8 .s ~ ..... :.ö .r> IOI.< :.ö ¡;:¡ II:: n:I QI n:I 0 QI C QI QI -::::b.O~8¡:: -8........;j"óoj"Ó oj' c:; :r: .= 0. 3: u 0. ItS '5 -0 0. ItS _ 'õ :.E .S Þ ro 8 .9 .¡¡; ~ [-fj ~ ::r: @ ::r: Õ I services to Habitat national organizations and affiliates. contact HFHI headquarters for information. Persons I The headquarters is in Americus, Georgia, USA, along with calling from within the United States may call1-800- the area office for the United States. Other area offices are HABITAT. Those calling from outside the U.S. may contact located in San Jose, Costa Rica, for Latin America and HFHI headquarters at + 1-229-924-6935. For contact -, Caribbean; Budapest, Hungary, for Europe and Central information for HFHI's worldwide area offices, see Asia; Pretoria, South Africa, for Africa and Middle East; www.habitat.orglgetinv/contact; for national organization and Bangkok, Thailand, for Asia and the Pacific. contact information, go to www.habitat.org and click "Where How are donations distributed and used? We Build" for a list of country profiles. When writing I Habitat to request information, use the address below. Donations, whether to a local Habitat affiliate, national program or to HFHI, are used as designated by the donor. How can I become a volunteer? I Gifts received by HFHI that are designated to a specific To volunteer where you live, contact your local affiliate. affiliate or building project are forwarded to that program If you are interested in volunteering at the international or affiliate. Undesignated gifts are used where most needed headquarters in Americus, Ga., send for an application at I and for HFHI administrative expenses. HFHI's most recent the address below or e-mail vsd@hfhi.org. audited financial statement is available upon request. May I volunteer overseas? Who controls and manages Habitat for HFHI offers short-term volunteer opportunities of one to I Humanity International? three weeks with its affiliates in the United States and An ecumenical, international board of directors determines around the world. For more information or to receive a policy and oversees and guides the mission of Habitat for schedule of upcoming trips, write to HFHI's Global I Humanity International. Board members are dedicated Village department at the address below. Call Global volunteers who are deeply concerned about the problems Village at 1-800- HABITAT, ext. 2549, from within the of poverty housing around the world. HFHI offices oper- United States; or + 1-229-924-6935, ext. 2549, from I ate with an administrative staff, assisted by a core group any other country. E-mail gv@hfhi.org, or see of professional and support employees and supplemented www.habitat.org/gv for program information and trip by long- and short-term volunteers. Each Habitat for descriptions. -- Humanity affiliate and national organization is managed How else can I help? by a local volunteer board. Get involved! Pray for the work of Habitat for Humanity. I How does Habitat work with the government? Contribute financially to HFHI or your local Habitat Habitat does not accept government funds for the con- affiliate, and/or participate in Habitat fund-raising events. struction of new houses or for the renovation or repair of HFHI affiliates need people to help build, to serve on I existing houses. Habitat does accept government funds committees and to spread the word about Habitat. Write for streets, utilities, capacity building or training, so long to Habitat at the address below for more information. A as the funds have no conditions that would violate wide variety of books, videos and literature is available to I Habitat's principles or limit its ability to proclaim its help you share Habitat's vision with others. Materials may Christian witness. be ordered by mail, phone or fax. How does a Habitat for Humanity Habitat for Humanity invites you to join in the exciting I affiliate get started? partnership of building houses with God's people in need. Anyone who wants to explore the possibility of eliminating poverty housing in his or her community is encouraged to I Central Minnesota I Habitat for Humanity 1200 25th Avenue South St. Cloud, MN 56301 I )-nr Habitat lor Humanity® ·1 International 121 Habitat S1. Americus, GA 31709-3498 USA phone: 1-229-924-6935 In the USA 1-800-422-4828 (800-HABITAT) I fax: 1-229-924-6541 e-mail: info@hthi.org Web site: www.habita1.org 3295/20M/MED/3-02 . 1nr . Central Minnesota Habitat for Humanity Myths and Facts about Habitat for Humanity Myth: Habitat for Humanity gives away houses. · Fact: Habitat for Humanity sells houses to partner homeowner families. Houses are sold at no profit and with a no interest loan. House payments go to the construction of other houses. Myth: Habitat for Humanity cannot impact the current housing situation because they only build a few houses. · Fact: Habitat for Humanity has built over 125,000 houses, building in all 50 states in the United States, and is working in 83 countries. Habitat's ultimate goal is to eliminate poverty housing from the face of the earth. Myth: Habitat for Humanity is a political faction started by Jimmy Carter. · Fact: Habitat for Humanity is an ecumenical, Christian housing ministry . founded by Linda and Millard Fuller. HFH was founded in 1976,at Koinonia Farms in Americus, Georgia. Myth: Habitat homes decrease property values. · Fact: Habitat homes enhance neighborhoods, and in many communities have increased property values. Visible improvements are made by building on vacant lots and rehabilitating abandoned structures. One Habitat home can spur the revitalization of an entire neighborhood. Myth: Habitat for Humanity is a charity. · Fact: Habitat for Humanity is a development program. Habitat involves local businesses, churches, and individuals who invest in the improvement of their community. Habitat homeowners contribute to their communities as tax paying citizens. Myth: Habitat for Humanity only builds houses for minorities. · Fact: Habitat for Humanity does NOT discriminate based upon age, race, sex, sexual preference, religion, ethnic background, familial status, marital . status, national origin, handicap, or source of income. Habitat selects families based upon need, ability to pay, and willingness to partner. A decent house in a decent community for God's people in need. )-n-( L~·m$ ..... '\ Benton I I ~~~oHd ....,. s.~ Central Minnesota Habitat for Humanity s--. . Y.~ Myths and Facts about Habitat for Humanity (Can't) Myth: Habitat for Humanity is not active in Minnesota. · Fact: Minnesota has 34 affiliates and has built the 860 houses to date. Myth: Habitat for Humanity is a corporate franchise. · Fact: Habitat for Humanity is a grassroots community based organization. Affiliates are formed only 'Nhen members of a community identify a housing need, and ask to become involved in the work. of HFH. Myth: Habitat for Humanity can solve the housing crisis alone. · Fact: Habitat for Humanity needs the help of everyone including: Social Service Agencies Other Housing Organizations Professionals Fraternal Organizations Civic Groups Businesses . Schools Banks Churches Local Govemments Central MN Habitat for Humanity 1200 25th Ave S S1. Cloud, MN 56301 320-656-8890 . A decent house in a decent community for God's people in need. -------- ------ Central Minnesota Habitat for Humanity International Status . A Christian ministry began in 1976 by Millard and Linda Fuller of Georgia. * Currently working in 83 countries, building homes with low-income families. * Have built approximately 130,000 homes, world-wide, to date, through locally organized groups called "affiliates," which are officially "affiliated" with the international entity. Minnesota Status * There are 43 individual affiliates in Minnesota, each covering one or more counties, each building from one to about eighty houses per year. OUT Central Minnesota Affiliate Status * Began in 1989 by a group of interested residents of Saint Cloud. * Build houses in Stearns, Benton, Sherburne, and Wright Counties. * Have built 24 houses as of 2002; two more houses are underway in Stearns and Sherburne counties. Four more are planned for the summer of 2003 in Wright and Stearns counties, depending upon funding availability. Ingredients for the process * Appropriate low-income families, selected by their (1)degree of need, (2)ability to pay . back the no-interest loan, and (3)willingness to perform hundreds of "sweat equity" hours, building the houses with us, making them into "homes" for their families. * Lots - donated or obtained at significantly discounted rates- on which to build the houses. * Buildina materials - donated or obtained at significantly discounted rates. * Labor - donated or obtained at significantly discounted rates. * Funds - contributed "from the heart" by generous individuals, businesses, churches, foundations and other sources - as people are stirred to help those less fortunate. How yOU can help Do you have a heart for other people? Can you empathize with their desire to be in a house of their own - to be given an opportunity to "get ahead" in life and provide a secure, stabile environment for their families? These people are looking for a "hand-up, not a hand-out." They are willing to work with us to secure their dream house: a simple, decent "no-frills" house that will keep them warm in the winter and dry and secure in the summer. They often work two or more jobs just to break even, and must also work with us oh the construction of the house and pay back our no-interest loan in order to secure the house and remain in it. Perhaps God is stirring your heart to contribute land, labor, materials, or dollars to lend a hand to those less fortunate. Providing materials, land, or labor at a significantly discounted rate can also be .f great benefit. You will be blessed by the giving - as Jesus said in Matthew 6:38: "Give, and it will e given to you: good measure, pressed down, shaken together, and running over. . ." Thank you for considering this opportunity to be blessed. (1 . I Attachment: B or No I REQUEST FOR-PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION DATE: Aprill,2003 Economic Development Authority ~~~ ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT DEPARTMENT APPROVAL AGENDA ITEM The Planning Commission is asked to review the enclosed Redevelopment Plan for the St. Joseph Public Works Project, determine its consistency with the Comprehensive Plan and adopt the enclosed Resolution: .L A Resolution of the Planning Commission Concerning the EDA of the City of St. Joseph Redevelopment Project Area and Plan for the Municipal Public Works Maintenance Facility. PREVIOUS ACTION On March 19, 2003 the EDA and City Council conducted a joint meeting to discuss the acquisition of . land and construction of a new public works maintenance facility. The Council requested the EDA finance the project with the issuance of public project revenue bonds, with the City leasing the facility from the EDA. On March 19th the EDA took action by adopting a Resolution Initiating the Process for Approval of the Redevelopment Project Area and Plan. On March 20th the Council adopted a resolution Initiating the Process for Approval of the Redevelopment Project Area and called for a public hearing on the Redevelopment Plan. RECOMMENDED BOARD ACTION Following review of the plan, adopt the Resolution Concerning the EDA of the City of St. Joseph Redevelopment Project Area and Plan for the Municipal Public Works Maintenance Facility. FISCAL IMPACT The above action is one of the steps in the process which would move toward the issuance of $545,000 in public project revenue bonds to finance the acquisition ofland and construction of a Public Works facility. A bond payment schedule is attached. COMMENTSIRECOMMENDATIONS The EDA and City Council will conduct a joint session on Thursday, Apri117, 2003 on this topic. A public hearing is scheduled for 7 p.m. with Council and EDA following the hearing. . · REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR ST. JOSEPH PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT DATED APRIL 17,2003 · - - - ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF ST. JOSEPIL MINNESOTA [Note: This assumes that the Authority is acquiring land for this Project] · 1509547vl TABLE OF CONTEl\"PfS Page . 1. ]}\.rrRODUCTION AND LEGAL BASIS .......................................................................1 A. Intent. .... .. .. .. ....................... .. .. ........ ..... ...... .. ....... ................................. ... ............1 B. Statement......... .... .... ...... ......... ............. .......... ....... .......... ............... ........... ..........1 C. Redevelopment Area Boundaries ................................ ................................. .......1 D. Statement of Authority................ .... ............... ... .............. .......... .............. ............1 E. Findings and Declaration ................ ............................................... ........... ... .......2 II. RBDE\ŒLOP:N.IENT PROGRAM....... .... ................. '" .............. ........ ................ ..... .......2 A. Redevelopment Plan Objectives............... ............... ......... ...................................2 B. Land Use........... .... .... .... ............... .......... .... .... ............ '" ........ ...... .... .......... ..........3 C. Redevelopment Activities. .... .... ...... .,......... .... ............... ............ .,.... ..... ..... .... ......3 D. Financing Plan..... '" ................ .... .........:............ ............ .... ....... ,......... .......... .......3 E. Development Standards............ ...... ....... ...... ........... .... ........ ........ .... ....................4 F. Environment Controls ....... .......... .... ........... .... ............. ................ ........................4 G. Administration of Project...... .... ...... ....... ........ .... .................. ....... ...... ............ ......4 H. Modification of Plan .... ..... .............. ......... .,....... .... ....... ........... .... ........ ...... ..... .....4 Exhibit A - Redevelopment Area Boundary Map Exhibit B - Budget . - . 150954Îvl 1 · I. INTRODUCTION AND LEGAL BASIS A Intent . . . The Economic Development Authority of the City of St. Josep~ :Minnesota (the "EDA"), proposes to establish a Redevelopment Project Area as described herein (the "Redevelopment Project Area"), in connection with the acquisition and betterment of a new public works facility (the "PublicW orks Facility"). The City of St. Joseph, Iviinnesota{the "City") willlease'the building from the EDA with an option to' purchase pursuant to a lease with option to purchase agreement. Revenue bonds in the principal amount not to exceed approximately $545,000 are proposed to be sold by the EDA .to finance the redevelopment project costs. The revenue bonds will be' secured by the payments to be made by the City under the lease with option to purchase agreement. In the remainder of the Redevelopment Area the EDA proposes to facilitate, as appropriate, . priv~te development by acquiring land and preparing· it for private develQpment and by constructing publiè infrastructure improvements. B. Statement The City and EDAhave determined that conditions exist within the Redevelopment Area which have prevented fwther developmènt ofland by '. · private enterprise. It has been found that the Redevelopment Area is potentially more useful and valuable for contributing to the public health, safety and welfare . than has been realized under existing development. The development of these-parcels are not attainable in the·forèseeable future without the intervention of the EDA in the private development process. The EDA hås prepared the Redevelopment Plan, wliich provides for the elimination of these conditions, thereby making the land useful and valuable for contributing to the public healtl;, safety and welfare. C. Redevelopment Area Boundaries The boundaries of the Redevelopment Area are outlined on the Redevelopment Area Boundary Map, Exhibit A All land included in the Project Area is within the legal boundaries of the City. D. Statement of Authority Minnesota Statutes Section 469.001-469.047 (Housing and Redevelopment Authority Act) grants municipalities the authority to designate redevelopment areas within the bounda.,·i.es of the municipalities. Within these areas, the municipality may adopt a redevelopment plan and establish a project consistent · with the municipality's public purpose. The project as contemplated by this plan consists ofa redevelopment project as defined in Section 469.001, Subdivision 1509547vl \ 14. The lease with option to purchase agreement is authorized under Minnesota . Statutes, Section 465.7l. ·E. Findings and Declaration The City and the EDA make the following findings: l. The certain parcels ofland in the project area would not be made available for redevelopment without some public. financial aid. 2. The redevelopment plans for the Redevelopment Area in the City will afford maximum opportunity consistent with the needs of the locality as a whole, for the redevelopment of the area by private enterprise. 3. The Redevelopment Plan conforms to the general plan for development of the locality as a whole. ll. REDEVELOPMENT PROGRAM A Redevelopment Plan Objectives The EDA, through implementation of this plan., seeks to achieve the following objectives: l. To provide for the least costly and most efficient Public Works Facility for . the City required to provide adequate City services to the region. 2. To promote and seek the orderly and harmonious development of the . . Redevelopment Area. 3. To provide logical and organized land use for the entire Redevelopment Area consistent with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan and the Zoning Ordinance of the City. 4. To promote the prompt development of property in the Redevelopment Area with a minimal adverse impact on the environment. 5. To provide general design guidance in conjunction with a suitable development contract in order to enhance the physical environment ofthe area. 6. To provide adequate utilities and other public improvements and facilities, to enhance the Redevelopment Area and the City ror new and existing development. 7. To assist the financial reasibility of private projects to the extent necessary and where there is a corresponàing level of public beæñt. . 1509547,,1 2 . 8. To enhance thè overall economy of the City and surirn:mding area by . retaining current, and providing additional employment opportunities for the reSidents of the city and SUIToundingcommunity. 9. To increase the City's tax base by providing critical public infrastructure improvements for the City. 10. To stimulate development and investment within the Redevelopment Area by private interests. B. Land Use Public owned and operated facilities necessary for the public health, safety and welfare are permitted uses in the Redevelc>pment Area. C. Redevelopment Activities 1. Acquisition The Authoñty intends to acquire property in the Redevelopment Area on which the Public Works Facility will be located. Other than that property~ other property in the Redevelopment Area will be acquired by the EDAif and when required to facilitate development or redevelopment within the Redevelopment Area: . 2. Relócation It is notexpecte(Lthatany persons will bedisplace4..as a result of this Rëdevelopment Plan. 3. Public Works Facility and Other Public Improvements. The EDA proposes to cause the Public Works Facility to be constructed and, as appropriate, other public improvements within the Redevelopment Area. The Public Works Facility will be leased to the City under a lease with option to purchase agreeme:nt. D. Financing Plan l. Project Budget . Attached hereto as Exhibit B is a budget which details estimated development costs associated with the acquisition and betterment of the Public Works Facility currently contemplated. The items of cost and the costs thereof shown in the budget are estimated to be necessary based upon information now available. It is anticipated that the items of cost and the costs thereof shown in each category in . the budget may decrease or increase, but that the total project cost will not exceed the amount shown above. 1509547vl 3 2. Source of Funds and Security . The City is entering into the lease with option to purchase agreement 'With the EDA pursuant to1vfumesotaStatutes, Section 465.71. The lease with-option to purchase agreement is payable from general sources including taxes, and its payment is not limited to a specific fund or specific source of revenues. Sources of funds for any other public improvements include rates and charges, assessments and other available funds of the EDA or City. 3. Bond Issue Details The EDA will issue approximately $545,000 in public project revenue bonds to finance the acquisition and betterment of the Public Works Facility. No bonding has currently been structured to finance costs of any other public improvements. E. Development Standards The EDA will consider among other things, the following factors when evaluating development proposals for projects within the Redevelopment Area seeking public assistance and support: 1. Degree to which redevelopment objectives are provided for or enhanced. 2. Consistency with this plan and the S1. Joseph Comprehensive Plan. -. F. Environment Controls It is presently anticipated thatthe proposed development in the Redevelopment Area will not present major environmental problems. All municipal actions and public improvements will be camed out in a manner that will comply with applicable environmental standards. The environmental controls to be applied 'Within the area are contained within the codes and ordinances of the City. G. Administration of Project The St. Joseph City Council has authorized the Economic Development Authority of the City to be responsible for seeing that the contents of this Plan are promoted, implemented and enforced. H. Modmcation of Plan A Redevelopment Plan may be modified at anytime. The modification must be adopted by the EDA and the City, upon notice and after the public hearing required for the original adoption of the Redevelopment Plan. Changes that do not alter or affect the ex'terior boundaries and do not substantially alter or affect the general land use established in the plaR shall npt constitute a . modification of the Redevelopment Pl~ nor require approval by the City. 1509547vJ 4 A .. I~_ / .. ~-D . . ,¡ , ~ . : L 0.. : . . I,· ~¡\: . :::::::::::::::::::::~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~: ~:: .::;:~=.~:=.::~:~=.~:: ., . . 7' ~V .,,~" J~ .l {........ J .,~ . ~ 7 1/ )MW;'F ~f . ~:z CJ -'~ . I ~ ¡~ ~'.t':. ~~ i~F' "E-< 0 " ¡ ~, i .. r- ~ -g :z -' r [ -[ , , -v.,I"'" ",13 1ð . 0 .- "".JAY HIO' ~ . '-/ !~ ITHfEÐ \ I L..l....l 9v \ \.~ I \ 1 IJT T 1 I . 'çr ~ -. . ~ ~. tt ~ . ~ . "'Ð~ £' ~; - ....~~. ~ , ã -1'5_'" ~."t"; ~ ~ !: \ c: ,0 '" , ~ 3 ~.~ ~ ~..~ c>! i 1_ - ':! J~ Q- ." -;;, ., ".. - ~ --.--I . .~ ".\ à _1- '-I S ']At l"î'l "'~ _ IT _ _ - "'~ - ¡- I- tI \ \' I-IT ";0, I i-fI 1\ I~:;;' ~~ 1 -lrl- 1 'n ·,n HJHH - ::!§ - -' - - 2 \ ke:. 2-:' ,I--:I- 1 1- 11-1-1 . " . I~ ~§ , ED._ . ~í~~iffiEP§;~ ~. 'n'" ~~~ ~ . a } '3:5 "3"" JH:l13 _ ~ - [IE it:- no T1 I ITI:J~_J :;1-- _ I' \_ i-- - . I -~ ïs'. Î IT I \ J"=, _ ~ . - V ~ \\~~ ~8Irrt~-B..· ~..).' 1;.1 ~- \ =L ,., .,,, ..., ë2 no 2 -l~~. r- ~ c:( L-- 1 f;! .-J:i E! ~ 0 ...~s '.Jj. ~", ;, "'" Q ~ . ID 1\ ~g" ~ t.' Z; g ~"-.. \ ~ ~ 1JU 2:. ~ ~ ~ I' ~ . 'f-....._-,..;==A 'n .,.:!i. . éi: ;- O c:( U ~ CIJ -( Ii I . . O '7 0;;., ~",- ! ~~'--fl. '! ~~.nOJ ~ . ~. ~..:: _ 5: ~_ L k - W r ~ ¡;o" <: ..... ~ '" Co ì-'j'i .,. HI-'. I (~fi.~;'I- .: -< Z ~ ... ~ 1- . -:. p ~ 1 . -" ~ _ ~ .,.. '" ¡...--TI\'.'!L-, I II _ '-" p- tt r::::=:1 \--\ \..;¡ :".. _ '/'~ _ ..,. ",'''' H,""OJ > I]' --,l-1~ II "- . ~ oo±E tt --=-~:¡, [ffi]]1 ¡;¡¡J ;.; ,_ . = L f! ¡-c: - i I ... ,0_ þ' - t::::=' I ~ rn i._ I I I "! 1- ... C1 § ~§ ~,j """n I c>- ~. '._ ~ .,.. ~ 'J" ..", .It: cr; ~t ]I-~,:-" \==}¡¡\TI1~t r \Ë -jH~-I-lj¡E!lli8,:::: J I]I~W~\ª~8 illUJ. - ;¡~ 'J" ...om 1;= 1 ¡J11~=\J- \\. bBr-;;1~Uill_ ... ~ I I I I I T \[ffi:: - . c:::3~L\\-j. q\~. -'.l!!L --~L ~ I . .., - - ,¡.. ',n ,..--\ TS -\11 Y[J: I ,~ - - lTI-\- ---: - \ J1 \ L ;:;- I -;:;;:;;;. ...... ,., ~ JIlt \1~~a~~ßª. ~£~\[J~\" ""-.. . II{ 5 .i1=1r:=J"'I= ~---- I I¡::::::;; -;;~ '-...... '"'-- 11r--1t--Ll-. "" ("'~ \ EXHIBIT B . Budget \. Estimated Construction and Related Expenses $500,000 'Capitalized Interest 20,635 Costs ofIssuance 11,375 Discount ·Factor 13.625 Total Issue (Rounded) $545,000 . - . 1509547v1 B-1 (0) , .' 545..;15 . . ECONOMic DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY' OF THE CITY OF ST. JOSEPH, MINNESOTA·· PUBLIC PROJECT REVENUE BONDS OF 2003 PUBLIC WORKS FACiLITY ,. H;nW¡¡1HmH1¡m¡tmm1¡~~H~¡¡(#i~¡jt~~nH¡m¡;:m¡H1nHjm¡¡¡¡¡mHmmn?:¡H:¡ m:¡~jmm1mH¡¡W~~~~~~¡$ø~r,~~~f¡HHHm¡m¡¡H';L ¡¡;·¡H¡:¡¡mHÞiisH¡Ê.~WJ¡¡¡HH¡¡j¡¡m¡· . Estimated Total Statutóry Annual (12-1) . Interest · Debt 0.00% Capitalized 'Other Municipa/ Surplus!. Cumulativ.e ~. ." ar . Principal Rates Interest Payment Coverage interest Payments Funds . Deficit Ba/ance )3 . 0 0.00% 10,630 10,630 . . 10,630 20,635 ° () 10,005· .10,005 )4 25,000 2.50% . 21,260 46,260 46,260 ° ' 47,000 740 10,745 )5 30,000 2.75% . 20,635 50,635 50..635 0 47,000 -3,635 . . 7,1.10 )6 30,000 3.00% ·19,8"10 49;810 49,810 ° 47,500 -2,310 .4,B~OO J7 30,000 3.10% 18,910 . 48,910 48,910 . ° . 48,000 -910 3,890· 08 3Ó,OOO 3.25% 17,980 47,980 47,980 ° 48,500 '·520 4,410 09 35,000 3.40% 17,005 52,005 52,006 0 49,000 ..3,005 1 ,405 10 35,000 3.60% 15,815 50,815 50;815 0 49,500 -1,315· 90 11 35,000, 3.80% 14,555 49,555 . 49,555 0 50,000 445 535 12 35',000 4.00%. 13,225 48,225 48.,225 ·0 .50,000 1,775 2,310 13 40,000 4.20% 11,825 51,825 . 51,825 0 . 50,000 -1,825 -485 i14 . 40,000 4.40% 10,145 50,145 50,145 .0 50,000 -145. ~40 115 40,000'. 4.50% 8,385 48;385 48,385 0 50,500 - 2,1"15 2,455 116 . 45,000 . 4.60%. 6,585 51,585 51,585 0 50,500 ';'1,085 1,370. 11~ 45,000 4.70% 4,515 49,515 49,615 0 50,500 985 2,355 ) 50,000 4.80% 2,400 52,400 52,400, 0 50,500 -1,900 455 . 545,OOQ. 213,680 758,680 758,6.80 20,635 0 738,500 _ -455 ~p'ii¿~t1Þh.1Bï¡ Ê~~d${?¡¡¡ ¡:;11mH1m\¡:¡mm1n m ¡~¡W¡¡mmnHmj äQ~~¡~~fÇ)t~¡iji~W.¡¡;¡¡¡¡;jnHm¡nHHH¡m¡¡;¡1¡:mnn{H{mj:¡¡1U¡:¡mm1¡:W¡nHH;¡m¡¡W( 'it. Public Works Building Project 500,000 Bonôs Dated: ·6/1/2003 . 3t. Furniture, Fixtures, Equipment O· . Bonds Mature: 12/1/04 Through 12/1/18 ;t. Architect/Engineer Fees 0 Interest Payments: 12/1/03 & Each 6/1 & 12/1 Thereafter. ;t. Contingency. .0 Call Qption: 12/1/2009 @ Par Plus Accrued!ínterest Less: City Cash Contribution 0 Registrar/Pay Agent: . U.S. Bank Trust, N.A., 5t. Paul Less: Investment Proceeds (A) ~295 Purchase Price: $531,375 Jtal Hard Costs 499,705 Est. Average Coupon: 4.229% Est. Net Effective Rate: 4.499% Add: Issuance Expenses Bond Sale Date: Late May, Early June, 2003 st. Underwriter Discount @2.50% 13,625 . Bond Closing Date: Approx. 21 Business Days After Sale. apitalizedlríterest (12 Months) 20;635 Bond Counsel: Briggs & Morgan, Þ .A. . st. Financial Advisory Fee 0 st. Bond Counsel 7,500 ating Fee 0 (A) $100,000 Invested @ 1.20% For 90 Days, st. GIS Printing 650 st. Registration (One-Time Fee) 3.225 Tota/ 545,340 wed For Issuance II 545,00011 Monte Eastvold, V.P.. Partner, Northland Securities,ïnc. Dated: 3/6/2003 ~ RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNJNG CO:MMJSSION, CITY OFST. JOSEPH, MJNNESOTA, . CONCERNlliÜ THE ECONOMIC DEVELOP:MEJ\TT AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF ST. JOSEPH, :MINNESOTA'S REDEVELOP1vlENT PROJECT AREA PROPOSAL \VHEREAS, the proposal by the Economic Development Authority ofthe City of St. Joseph, Minnesota, to establish a Redevelopment Project Area as described herein (the IIRedevelopment Project Area"), in connection with the acquisition and betterment of a new public works facility and adopt the Redevelopment Plan for the Redevelopment Project Area.(the "Plan"); all pursuant to and in confonnity with applicable law, including :Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.001 through 469.047 and 469.090 through 469.1081; have been submitted to the Planning Commission, City of St. Joseph, Minnesota (the "Commission"); and WHEREAS, the Commission has reviewed the Plan to determine the consistency of the Plan with the Comprehensive Plan of the City. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission, City of St. Joseph, Minnesota, that the Plan is consistent with the St. Joseph Comprehensive Plan and the Commission recommends approval ofthe Plan to the St. Joseph City Council. Adopted on April 7, 2003. By . Its - . 1509547vl ® . I Attachment: f. or No 1 REQUEST FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION Preliminary Plat - Lahr . DATE: April 7, 2003 AGENDA ITEM Preliminary Plat - Anthony Lahr PREVIOUS ACTION This property has recently been annexed and as part of the agreement, all metes and bounds legal description must be platted before development. RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION . The site plan request was determined to be complete on March 24, 2003, therefore, the Planning Commission must a recommendation to the Council no later than May 23,2003. COMMENTS/RECOMMENDATIONS I have not received any comments ITom Joe Bettendorf or staff. The plat involves onelot and does not include any utilities. This property is being purchased by Bill Nelson and he has already secured a liquor license for the future business. The sale of the property was contingent upon the City granting a liquor license. The license does not grant any site plan approvals and the Planning Commission will be reviewing the site plan when it is submitted. It is anticipated to begin construction late summer. . Document 15 . www.cityofstjoseph.com . ity of St. Joseph 25 College Avenue North Public Hearing PO Box 668 City of St. Joseph St. Joseph, MN 56374 (320) 363-7201 Fax: (320) 363-0342 The Planning Commission for the City of St. Joseph shall conduct a public ADMINISTRATOR hearing on April 7, 2003 at 7:25 p.m. in the St. Joseph City Hall. The purpose of the Judy Weyrens hearing is to consider a preliminary plat application to develop approximately 2.23 acres. The property is located adjacent to 88th Avenue and South of County Road 75. The MAYOR property is zoned Highway Business and is legally described as: Larry J. Hosch COUNCILORS That part of the Northwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter (NW1/4 SE1/4) of Section Alan Rassier 11, Township 124, Range 29, Stearns County, Minnesota bounded on the South by the Ross Rieke north line of Lancer Street as shown and dedicated on ST. JOSEPH BUSINESS PARK, Gary Utsch a duly recorded plat; bounded on the east by northerly extension of the east line of said Dale Wick Lancer Street; bounded on the north by the southerly right of way line of County Road Number 75 (fka. U.S. Highway No. 52); and bounded on the west be a line drawn parallel with and 50 feet easterly of, as measured at the right angles to, Line A described follows: Beginning at a point on the east line of the West 49.50 feet of said NW1/4 SE1/4 distant '. 50.00 feet South of its intersection with the centerline of Minnesota Street as shown and dedicated on K AND L PROPERTIES ADDITION, a duly recorded plat; thence North . along said east line of the West 49.50 feet for 50.00 feet; thence deflect to the right along a tangential curve, having a radius of 7.16.20 feet and a central -angel of 24 degrees 47 minutes 12 seconds, for 309.83 feet; thence northerly, on tangent to said curve, for 59.17 feet to the southerly right of way line of County Road No. 75 and there terminating. The request for preliminary plat has been submitted by Anthony Lahr, ET AL; 22633 State Highway 15; S1. Cloud, MN 56301. Judy Weyrens Administrator / Clerk Publish: 03/21f2003 . - - - - - - - ~- r...i Z ~ . ï: ~ ~ - - - - - ==-- - ---.. - --- - I/ir A FE R.R. - ------ -.- -------- --- --- -- - - - ~ "'~" "~" '~, '~ "~ I .......... I I I I I . I I ~. \ I I - - I - - - - - I - - - - - -1--- - - - I - - - - - I Attachment: II or No I . REQUEST FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION . W obegon Apartments - Honer Homes DATE: April 7, 2003 AGENDA ITEM Preliminary Plat - W obegon Trail Addition Development Review - Apartment Facility PREVIOUS ACTION The property was annexed and re-zoned in 2001. A requirement of annexation was that the property would be platted. RECOMMENDED BOARD ACTION SITE PLAN REVIEW: The site plan request was determined to be complete on March 24, 2003, therefore, the Planning Commission must make a approval/denial no later than May 23,2003. The newly adopted Ordinance gives the Planning Commission final approval unless the Commission request a joint meeting with the Council. . PRELIMINARY PLAT: A recommendation to the Council would be required within the 60 day time p~riod. COMMENTS/RECOMMENDATIONS Included in your packet you should have the following: Hearing Notice, Application request of Honer Homes, the proposed Plat, Development Plans, Ordinance Compliance Review, City Engineer Comments, City Attorney Comments, and the Combined Public Safety Comments. Procedurally the Commission must deal with each issue (preliminary plat and development plan) separately. In discussing the outstanding issues with Lànce Honer, the wetland issue is unresolved and will require more time. Ifthe Planning Commission is comfortable with the preliminary plat it would have to be approved contingent upon the wetland and engineering issues being resolved. This is the same process that was used for the preliminary plat for Liberty Pointe. The site plan cannot be approved until the wetland issues are resolved and the issues outlined by the Engineer. - ~~ . Section 52.29: R-3 MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENCE DISTRICT. Subd. 1. Intent. R-3, Multiple Family Residence District is intended to provide a district which will allow higher density or residential development where city sewer services are available. Subd.2. Permitted Uses. a) Multiple Family dwelling structures b) Public parks and playgrounds. c) Hospitals, extended care centers, nursing homes, group care centers or assisted living centers. d) Churches, libraries, museums or schools. e) Townhouses. £) Lodging houses. g) Licensed in-home daycare serving 16 or fewer persons. h) Licensed residential facilities/group homes serving 16 or fewer persons. . Subd.3. Permitted Accessory Uses. a) Private garages, parking spaces and carports for passenger cars, trucks, recreational vehicles and equipment. The total floor area of private garages shall not exceed 300 square feet per unit and shall not be higher than fifteen feet and the exterior covering must be the same or similar to the roof and side wall materials on the principal structure. R-3 developments with three (3) or less units shall abide by the R-l accessory building provisions, including but not limited to the maximum lot coverage requirements. b) Home occupations per Section 52.16. c) Storage buildings for storage of domestic equipment used in the maintenance of the property and non-commercial recreational equipment used primarily at the property. 1. Location: No accessory building, other than a garage, shall be located within any yard other than the rear yard. 2. Height: Accessory buildings shall not exceed fifteen feet (15') in height. 3. Exterior: All accessory buildings shall be the same or similar to the roof and side wall materials on the principal structure. 4. Number of Buildings: No lot shall have more than one (1) detached storage building. . 5. Size: All detached accessory buildings shall have a floor area not to exceed 300 square feet. - I - d) Swimming pools and tennis courts. e) Residential communal facilities such as laundry, recreation buildings, and residential · leasing office. £) Fences. Subd. 4. Uses Under Special Use Permit. a) Public buildings, police and fire stations and other public buildings, except those customarily considered industrial in nature. b) Cemeteries and memorial gardens. c) Manufactured Home Parks, in accordance with Section 52.14. d) Uses which in the judgment of the Planning Commission and City Council are similar to those listed in Subdivision 2 of this Section. Subd. 5. Lot Area Requirements. a) Minimum lot area shall be 12,000 square feet. b) For the basis of computing the number of permitted units within a multiple residence, the follo\ving shall apply: 1. Efficiency unit for each 2,000 square feet of lot area; and · 2. One 1 bedroom unit for each 3,000 square feet of lot area; and 3. One 2 bedroom unit for each 3,500 square feet oflot area; and 4. One 3 bedroom unit for each 4,000 square feet of lot area; 5. For each additional bedroom (over 3) per unit, an additional 500 square feet of lot area; 6. Lot depths of greater than 150% of the average lot width shall be used in computing the maximum number of units. 7. On-site manager unit - shall be based on the same square footage requirements as stated above. c) Multiple family dwellings shall not occupy more than 35% of the lot including accessory buildings. d) Each lot shall have a minimum width of 150 feet at the building setback line. e) Each lot shall have a minimum width of 80 feet at the public right-of-way. Subd. 6. Schedule of Allowances. The lot areas per dwelling unit described in Section 52.29, · Subd. 5 shall be further subject to the following schedule of allowances, which shall be added to or subtracted from, the minimum lot area per dwelling unit as prescribed hereby regulating density - 2 - requirements as to the location, use and access provided for the property within the R-3 multiple · residence family district. a) For each parking space provided within the building, or underground, subtract 300 square feet. b) If the site upon which the multiple dwelling is being constructed, or the zoning district adjacent to the site is zoned for a commercial use, subtract 300 square feet. c) Ifthe multiple dwelling site is within 300 feet of an R-I or R-2 Residence District, add 300 square feet per unit, for all units constructed on the site. d) If the total lot coverage is less than 20%, subtract 150 square feet per unit. e) In such cases where it is necessary to raze an existing principal structure in a dilapidated condition, or where said building is economically unfeasible to rehabilitate, there shall be provided an allowance of two dwelling units above any other allowances required within this section. f) If the multiple dwelling unit contains major outdoorrecreational features or structures such as swimming pools, improved outdoor common areas with pathways/parkland or similar facilities requiring a substantial investment equal to or greater than five (5%) percent of the construction cost of the principal structure, subtract 75 square feet per unit. g) If the multiple dwelling unit contains indoor recreation and social rooms equal to twenty- · five (25) square feet per unit or 1,000 square feet, whichever is greater; subtract 50 square feet per unit. Subd. .7. Setback Requirements. a) The front yard of any R-3 residence shall be 35 feet from the lot line. b) The side yard of any R-3 residence shall be 20 feet from the lot line, unless the side yard abuts a street or highway in which case the setback shall not be less than 30 feet. In the event the side yard of an R-3 residence abuts another residential district, all principal structures shall be set back 50 feet from the property line. c) The rear yard of any R-3 residence shall be 40 feet from the lot line. d) All building pennit requests must be accompanied by a building plan and a landscape plan acceptable by the Planning Commission. A. No part of the structure including footings, soffits, gutters or other overhangs shall encroach on easement areas. Subd. 8. Height Requirements. No structure shall exceed the lesser of 3 stories or 40 feet in height except as hereinafter provided. Benning the building does not allow a building to be constructed higher than 40 feet. Elevation for the building shall be detennined by the average grade of the land. · Subd. 9. ~. In R-3 Multiple Family Districts the general provisions apply to all signs: a) No sign shall be placed closer than ten feet (10') to any property line, except directional signs which have a zero foot (0') setback. - 3 - l. No sign shall be placed in any interior side yard · 2. No sign shall be mounted on the roof of a building. 3. No signs shall violate the side or rear yard requirements. 4. Signs shall not be placed in the public right-of-way or easements. 5. Plashing or rotating signs resembling emergency vehicles shall not be permitted. 6. illuminated signs are not allowed. b) One unlighted sign per vehicle entrance identifying a dwelling unit complex. Such signs may indicate the name and address of the building and rental or management offices. l. Such signs shall have a surface area of all faces not exceeding an aggregate of fifty (50) square feet. 2. The height of the sign shall not exceeding eight feet (8') 3. Landscaping must be provided around the base of the sign. 4. The entrance to a development shall be one that abuts a collector or arterial road. c) One area identification sign for each multiple-residential complex consisting of three (3) · or more structures. l. ~ Such signs shall have a surface area not exceeding fifty (50) square feet per sign face with an aggregate area not to exceed one hundred (100) square feet if double faced. 2. The height ofthe sign shall not exceed eight feet (8'). 3. Landscaping must be provided around the base of the sign. 4. Sign content shall be solely for displaying the name of the apartment complex. d) Wall Sign: One wall sign shall be allowed for the purpose of street identification. Such sign cannot exceed Í\velve (12) square feet. e) Sign Removal - All signs not maintained and kept in good repair or in non compliance of the St. Joseph Code of Ordinances shall be subject to removal upon direction of the City Building Inspector. Subd. 10: Yard Cover. Every yard on a premise on which a dwelling stands shall be provided with lawn or combined lawn cover of vegetation, gardens, hedges, shrubbery, and related decorative materials and such yards shall be maintained consistent with prevailing community standards. Motor vehicles may not be left parked or unattended on or within a yard. Grass shall be maintained so not to exceed a height of 6 inches. · Subd. II: Development Plan Requirements. No building permit shall be issued until the Planning Commission reviews the development plan to determine that the use and development is compatible with - 4 - adjacent land uses, and consistent with the stated intent of this zone. Upon the request of the Planning . Commission the City Council will make the final determination on site plan approval. The developer shall provide the following items to the Planning Commission for any development located in the R3- Multiple Family Residence District: a) Building location on the lot, drawn to scale. b) Building elevations; front, rear and side. c) Building exterior materials and color. d) Locations of ingress and egress points. e) Dumpster and solid waste pick-up areas and proposed screening material. f) Sign location and dimensions. g) Lighting standard and hood detail. h) Parking and loading areas identified. i) Drainage by the use of arrows and/or contours. j) Screening of heating, ventilation and air-conditioning equipment. . k) Landscaping material including the location, type of plant and size. I) Fire hydrant and fire lane locations. m) Utility locations. n) A description of provisions which shall be made on the site for adequate open space and recreational areas to properly serve residents of the facility. 0) Any other fencing, screening, or building accessories to be located in the development area. p) When required, evidence of completion of National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permitting program and/or the City ofSt. Joseph Storm Water Pollution Prevention Program (SWPPP). q) If applicable, evidence of compliance with federal, state and local pollution and nuisance laws and regulations, including, but not limited to glare, smoke, dust, odors and noise. The burden of proof for compliance with appropriate standards shal1lie with the applicant. r) Required Feel Agreement. I. Payment Required. Any person filing a petition requesting development plan review shall pay a fee according to the schedule established by the City Council. . II. Amount. Fees payable under this section for development plan review shall be in an amount as established by resolution of the City Council. Preparation and review of all elements of the required development plan, as listed and described above, is to be at the - 5 - sole expense of the developer and at no expense to the public. The fee is payable at the time of filing a petition and is not refundable. In addition to the above fees and in the . event the City incurs professional fees, either legal, engineering or professional planners, or any other cost, including but not limited to, postage and publication expenses, the applicants shall reimburse the City for those fees, and the City officials may require an escrow deposit, cashier's check or letter of credit for these fees prior to the final action on the application for development plan review. Such escrow or letter of credit shall be in the form approved by the City Attorney. 111. Development Agreement. In the event additional review by the City or its assigns is anticipated and/or needed during implementation of Development Plan, or other similar circumstance, the City shall require the property owner(s) and/or developer(s) enter into a development agreement with the City. The development agreement shall stipulate the conditions for approval and the City's authority to inspect the development. The agreement shall further require the owner or developer, as the case may require, furnish a cashier's check, escrow account or irrevocable letter of credit in favor of the City in an amount equal to II 0% of all costs associated with City's review of the development, including but not limited to, engineering, legal, fiscal and administrative, as estimated by the City. Such escrow or letter of credit shall be in the form approved by the City Attorney, shall be conditioned upon the approval of the development plan. Subd. 12. Additional Requirements. Uses may be subject to additional requirements contained in this Ordinance including, but not limited to the sections governing parking, home occupation, floodplain, signs, etc. a) A Lock Box shall be installed on all buildings before a Certificate of Occupancy will be issued. . Subd. 13. Regulation of Activities Adiacent to Wetlands. a) The following activity shall be subject to a 50 foot setback from wetlands: The construction or maintenance of a building attached to a foundation, including but not limited to, pole buildings. For purposes of this paragraph, pump houses, moveable storage sheds, recreational docks and storm water or erosion control devices shall not be considered buildings. b) The following activity shall be subject to a 75 foot setback from wetlands: The constmction or maintenance of paved driveways or areas designed for the parking of a vehicle or trailer. c) The following activities shall be subject to a 100 foot setback from wetlands: l. The construction or maintenance of a well used for agricultural irrigation, or any well less than 50 feet in depth. 2. External storage of materials used in conjunction with industrial or commercial processing or manufacturing. 3. The storage of waste or refuse generated by industrial or commercial activities. 4. The construction or maintenance of a septic system. . - 6 - · www.cityofstjoseph.com ity of St. Joseph 25 College Avenue North Public Hearing PO Box 668 City of St. Joseph St. Joseph. MN 56374 (320) 363-7201 Fax: (320) 363-0342 The Planning Commission for the City of S1. Joseph shall conduct a public ADMINISTRATOR hearing on April 7, 2003 at 7:35 p.m. in the S1. Joseph City Hall. The purpose of the Judy Weyrens hearing is to consider a preliminary plat application to develop approximately 7.62 acres. The development will consist of a 69-unit apartment building and is located west of MAYOR County Road 2 and Nòrth of the abandoned railbed. The property is zoned Residential Larry J. Hosch District R3 and is legally described as:· :::OUNCILORS Io,lan Rassier That part of the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter, Section 10, Township 124, '(05S Rieke Range 29, City of S1. Joseph, Stearns County, Minnesota, bounded on the southwest by ::;ary Utsch. the northeasterly right of way line of the Burlington Northern Railroad Company (now )ale Wick -abandoned); bounded on the southeast by the centerline of County Road Number 2; and bounded on the north by the south line of the north 429.00 feet of said Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter. .- The request for preliminary plat has been submitted by Honer Homes, Inc.: 21 North 21st Avenue; Waite Park, MN 56387. Judy Weyrens Administrator / Clerk Publish: 03/21/2003 \ oV IS \ I :. \ ~~ I ~ I \- w """ ", \ G ~ + ---- -~-- --. --. '~ s "" I " " " " ¡J ~ ¡J ~ GUWTREE ST. E. I ~ ;g ~ I ~~ ¡- " ~ ~ :¡: I I- - ~m~ § LI.. I I mrn~I[mffi~ ~rnm ~ ; ITllJË3 ITillrD~ T - CSNi 75 ijNHESQT A I APPLICATION FOR PLANNING CONSIDERATION . CITY OF ST. JOSEPH , . 25 College Avenue NW ~:~d$ P.O. Box 668 ~~~# Date I St. Joseph, MN 56374 (320)363-7201 or Fax (320)363-0342 STATE OF MINNESOTA) I )ss COUNTY OF STEARNS) NAME: L.kt.tt. 1-tt.1"'~ !DD~I.o..~ A. ~1"1~oNE: ~5 'ô. ~ I~O q'" 3~ '3. 'l g ~ '5 I ~w.~· t2 · ADDRESS: :t CfLf 5'{ I 15 L Au tt. eo I S P,..v.o, \ UA)\. .) IN/e, the undersigned, hereby make the following application to the City Council and Planning Commission of the City of SI. Joseph, Stearns County, Minnesota. (Applicants have the responsibility of checking all applicable ordinances pertaining to their application and complying with all ordinance requirements): 1.! Application is hereby made for: (Applicant must check any/all appropriate items) I _ Rezoning _ Zoning Ordinance Amendment _ Home Occupation Permit _ Surface Water Management Plan (Grading Permit) _ PUD _ Building Mover's Permit _ Building Movirlg - Owner's Permit _ ~evelopment Plan Approval X. Other, please specify: . 2. Legal description of land to be affected by application, including acreage or square footage of land involved, and street address, if any: ~~ Q ~ P (Q...,^- . I 3. PreseQt zoning of the above described property is: "R '3 I , D .+.. .~~. ~ r~p~I~. 5. Pers(;ms, firms, corporations or other than applicant and present owner who mayor will be interested in the above described land or pror;:;ed improvements within one year after issuance of permit applied for, if granted, are: O\A..p, I - . '. 6. Attached to this application and made a part thereof are additional material submission data requirements, as indicated. Applicant Signature: Date: '3 - /~ - ð j Owner Signature: ate: . FOR USE ONLY DATE SUBMITTED: DATE COMPLETE: DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING PUBLICATION DATE: Planning Commission Action: _ Recommend Approval _ Recommend Disapproval Date of Action: -'. Date Applicant/Property Owner notified of Planning Commission Action: ity Council Action: _ Approved _ Disapproved Date of Action: Date Applicant/Property Owner notified of City Council Action: APR- 2-03 WED 4:20 PM CARLSON DEV. INC. F AX NO. 320 363 0238 P. 2 1';;1.~ 'f'A~~;:: ê.- . ;i~ g?t7~ Jf. g"~t7Æ g?e~ J4c. ~~~M~~..ø.~~';;¡~~~_·ij~·~~~~~·~!!'lt.~""'-"'\~!''''J-''; """:' Ii 2.454 151 "",n", · Cold 'þ'¡n~.,,~ "." , . ,. "!t> Bus: (;~2()) 363·8835 · hl".~ 0:.'0: ;.<, < .' : ~. :' . Í\.~ ~ ; " Judy Weyrens, Administrator April 1st, 2003 City of St. Joseph ~ 25 College A venue North PO Dox 668 , 51. Joseph, MN. 56374 ; RE: Wobegon Trail Apartments: ! 013ar Ms. Weyrens~ I am wriûng to respond to your phone call regarding several items to be addressed : .;onccrning the Wobegon Trail Apnrlments. They are as follows: I. The peak ofthc :roofis 39 feet above the fi:rst floor concrete slab. . 2. Monument sign has two 24"x24" brick columns which are 5 feet high with R 5'x3' .' wooden sand blasted sign ill beLWeCll. We will landscape around the sign with rock, 'ihrubs and flowers. Refer to proposed drawing. l Recreation area includes the following: community room, inside and outside bike " o)torage. 4, Front yard is toward cOllnty road 2 which is 35 feet from building to properly line. Óhank~ D~.S A. Carlson . jÜ.~ . .~ m\~, ~~;a'" :~~,(¡,'X'''';¡'~''';·~,&:'·''';.¡r.·;¡¡¡g¡·~·<;'I~'''''N:'!If:~~~-ÆI<W2~''''"''~>;j'''f'''''J«¡t.¡~øJf:ß¡Y~!('m!.~·Il\'S!;.'W""'IJ;~·~~:ÐJfu"',\i~iI-~·~ ""~' ," ' . *' f""'" ''''' oM{ ..., ", \ tIC.. ,\. . ~ ^, Inn\ft.. '0 oih.u.....\'...... " . ., I . No. ~ of' .. APR- 2-03 WED 4:20 PM CARLSON DEV. INC, J1'" NO 320 363 0238 p, 3 . J\À . . .... ,..··.·.........____'·'11_ H~I"" 01 03 04:58p 320-230-65'70 p . ~ ü 0>- :2: O:::æ :æ tyW :3 CLCD <m 0 0::::) 0 enD-:: ð OX 0 2(f} 0 < 0;: ~ _J ~ CD Z , « þ / -I -" / Q. t I , f ~ í \ Z \ ... I \ c;> I \ ~ \ (/) \. 'Ø \ a . I j I I I , I I \ t ¡ 0 j \ I N· i \ I \ I \ \ ' I \ . / I \ I \ ¡ . \ I / ... / . APR- 2-03 WED 4:20 PM CARLSON DEV. INC. FAX NO. 320 363 0238 P. 4 flpr' 01 03 04: 5?p 320-230-6570 F' - :¡; . ß 0.. ~ -4: (,) 0 0(1) I.&J Oz ..J ~::! C) ~3 z « æ8 OO~ Z 0 i= « > þ W -.J - Wi - 'I Z ~ or- '-' ~ ~ iì5 ø Þ--t . -< en ~E---o 8Z J:i1 b Z~ I o E--~ 0 c..')~ ..... riJ<t: oor:t. 0< ~ -- . Project: Wobegon Trail Apartments Determination: - COMPLETE - INCOMPLETE Developer: Doug Carlson / Lance Honer Site Plan submitted: March 14, 2003 Date Reviewed: March 24, 2003 and March 31, 2003 .ge10f4 City of 51. Joseph Ordinance Compliance - R3 Multiple Family Development Plan Applications Completed applications for Development Plans and required fees shall be submitted the City of St. Joseph Zoning Administrator at least 21 days prior to the proposed date of consideration by the City. The City will review the application within 10 days of submission and make a determination as to whether or not the application is complete. Only completed applications will be processed for review by the Planning Commission. It is the applicant's responsibility to submit required materials. If an application is determined to be incomplete, notification, which indicates which portion of the application is incomplete, will be mailed to the applicant within 10 days following submission of the application. REQUIRED MATERIALS - The applicant shall provide the following: Requirements Satisfied Comments 1 Is the proposed use a permitted use NO 2 Is an accessory included (a) Private garages - total floor area not to exceed 300 Ii. NO square feet per unit and not higher than 15 feet. (b) Storage buildings - equipment maintenance YES NO · Location: must be located in rear yard YES NO . · Maximum Height -15 feet YES NO · Exterior --Same/similar to roof and side walls YES NO · Maximum allowed: 1 detached storage building YES NO · Maximum size: floor area cannot exceed 300 sq ft YES NO 3 Lot Area - Minimum Requirement 12,000 square feet 6.9 Acres or 300,567.80 square feet Computation of number of permitted units Units Included Square foot Required Efficiency unit for each 2,000 square feet 2 4,000 One 1 Bedroom unit for each 3,000 square feet 14 42,000 One 2 Bedroom unit for each 3,500 square feet 48 168,000 One 3 Bedroom unit for each 4,000 square feet 5 20,000 Total Area Required 232,000 square feet 4 Lot Area cannot exceed 35% of the lot including accessory building NO 5 Allowances add/deduct per unit < 300> sq ft for each parking space provided within the YES NO . building or underground <300> sq ft - if the site is adjacent to commercially YES NO zoned property . Project: Wobegon Trail Apartments Determination: - COMPLETE - INCOMPLETE Developer: Doug Carlson / Lance Honer Site Plan submitted: March 14,2003 Date Reviewed: March 24, 2003 and March 31, 2003 Page 2 of 4 · + 300 sq ft if site is within 300 feet of an R1 or R2 YES NO <150> sq ft if total lot coverage is less than 20% YES NO + 2 dwelling units if building is razed or cannot be YES NO rehabilitated <75> sq ft for outdoor recreation feature exceeding 5% YES NO of the construction cost of the main structure. <50> sq ft for indoor recreation feature equal to 25 YES NO square feet per unit or 1,000 square feet 6 Setback requirements · Minimum width - 150 feet at building setback line YES NO · Minimum width - 80 feet at public right-of-way ¥ES NO · Front Yard - 40 feet from lot line YES NO · Side yard - 20 feet from the lot line unless the side YES NO yard abuts a street or highway in which case it shall not be less than 30 feet. If the side yard abuts another residential district all principal structures shall be setback 50 feet from the property line. · The building will need to be moved five feet as the plan states the · Rear yard - 40 feet from the lot line YES NO setback is only 35 feet. This is agreeable to the developers. 7 Height -lesser of 3 stories or 40 feet YES NO This information has not been provided 8 Signs · No sign shall be placed closer than 10 feet to any YES NO property line, except directional signs · No sign shall be placed in any interior side yard, mounted on the roof, violate any setback or placed YES NO in the right of way. · No sign shall be flashing, rotating or illuminated YES NO 9 Vehicle Entrance Sign YES NO · Maximum size - 50 square feet YES NO Proposed sign is only 30 feet · Maximum height - 8 feet YES NO Undetermined from the plan, must be clarified · Landscaping - must be around base of sign YES NO Not indicated on the plan, must be clarified · Abuts a collector or arterial YES NO County Road 2 qualifies as a Collector/Arterial 10 Area identification sign - must have 3 or more structures YES NO Not applicable, property only contains one structure · · Maximum size - 50 square feet per side, YES NO aggregate total of 100 square feet. ~ Pr()ject: Wobegon Trail Apartments Determination: - COMPLETE - INCOMPLETE Developer: Doug Carlson / Lance Honer Site Plan submitted: March 14,2003 Date Reviewed: March 24,2003 and March 31,2003 .ge30f4 · Maximum height - 8' YES NO · Landscaping - must be around base YES NO · Sign content - must display name of complex YES NO 11 Wall Sign - not exceeding 12 sq ft, street identification YES NO Not indicated on the plan only 12 Development Plan a) Building Location on the lot drawn to size If I NO b) Building elevations; front, rear, side NO The building will consist of three colors - Asphalt shingles will be c) Building Exterior materia1 and color NO weathered wood; siding will be combination of light and dark tan d) Locations of ingress/egress .; NO b-~~:;- Is not clear on the plan if it is screened e) Dumpster/solid waste areas screened YES NO D Sign Location and dimensions NO g) Lighting Standard and hood detail YES I~ h) Parking and loading areas defined NO . Drainage by the use of arrows and/or contours j) Screening of HVAC E_quipment YES NO Not applicable will not located outside k) Landscaping material including the location, type, size NO Only seven trees are being provided for the entire site I) Fire hydrant and fire lane locations NO m) Utility Locations NO n) A description of provisions which shall be made on the YES Nm site for adequate open space and recreational areas to properly serve residents of the facility 0) Fencing/screening/accessory buildings identified NO p) NPDES Permitting requirements fulfilled NO See comments of Joe Bettendorf q) Compliance with state and federal guidelines including, YES NO but not limited to glare, smoke, dust, odors, and noise. r) Required fee NO 13 Parking Units Boarding house, rooming house, bed and breakfast, NO 16 efficiency/ 1 Bedroom 24 spaces multiple family dwellings and rental residential dwellings. One and one-half (1 2) spaces for each single- bedroom 48 - 2 Bedroom 120 spaces . dwelling, two and one-half (22) spaces for each two- bedroom dwelling, four (4) spaces for each three- 5 - 3 Bedroom 20 spaces bedroom dwelling, and an additional 1.25 spaces for each additional bedroom within the dwelling. Any Total parking spaces required 164 bedroom larger than 140 square feet shall be considered Total parking spaces provided 189 as two bedrooms for the puroose of determinina the total Project: Wobegon Trail Apartments Determination: - COMPLETE - INCOMPLETE Developer: Doug Carlson I Lance Honer Site Plan submitted: March 14,2003 Date Reviewed: March 24,2003 and March 31, 2003 Page 4 of 4 · as two bedrooms for the purpose of determining the total number of bedrooms within a dwelling. Fractional numbers shall be rounded up to the next highest whole number. 14 · Adequate ingress and egress shall be provided. YES NO · Such parking lots shall be constructed and YES NO The parking area will be paved and striped maintained in a useable condition, with a hard surface consisting of concrete, bituminous, pavement or paver stone designed to drain and dispose of surface water. Recycled bituminous or concrete shall be prohibited except as permitted in an industrial area by special use permit or variance. · Whenever such parking lot boundary adjoins YES NO property zoned for residential use, a setback of fifteen (15) feet from said lot line shall be required, and maintained. · Necessary curbs or other protection against YES NO damages to adjoining properties, streets and sidewalks shall be provided and maintained. · No sign shall be so located as to restrict the sight, YES NO orderly operation and traffic movement within any · parking area. Only signs necessary for the orderly operation of traffic movement or parking regulation shall be permitted in any parking area (e.g. visitor parking, deliveries, handicap parking). Such signs shall not be considered part of the permitted advertising space and shall be subject to sign age regulations. · All parking lots shall be screened and landscaped YES NO from abutting residential uses or districts by a wall, fence or densely-planted compact hedge or tree cover not less than four (4) feet nor more than eight (8) feet in height. · Except in the case of single-family, two-family, and YES NO townhouse developments, parking areas shall be designed so that circulation between parking aisles or driveways occurs within the designated parking lot and does not depend upon a public street or alley and such design does not require backing onto the public street. Comments: · ~5eJ 1200 25th Avenue South, P.O. Box 1717, St. Cloud, MN 56302-1717 320.229.4300 320.229.4301 FAX architecture . engineering . environmental . transportation . March 31, 2003 RE: St. Joseph, Minnesota Honer Homes Wobegon Trail Apartments SEH No. A-STJOE0301.00 D29 14 Ms. Judy Weyrens Clerk! Administrator City Of Saint Joseph 25 College Ave N PO Box 668 Saint Joseph, Mn 56374-0668 Dear Judy: I reviewed the preliminary plat for the Honer Homes Wobegon Trail Apartments and have only a few comments: 1. Has the wetland shown in the plat been designated by the County Environmental Office? Do they know this wetland is planned to be filled? What are their comments? 2. When the final plat is annexed into the City, the east half of CSAH 2 will also need to be annexed. 3. There is approximately 8-10 feet of fill needed for the building pad. This area will need to be filled with suitable material and correctly compacted to avoid future problems. . 4. The water main should show an 8-inch gate valve at the connection with the existing water main located at First A venue Northeast and Fir Street East. 5. The water main should be extended past the northern most hydrant, east out the driveway, and stubbed out north and south to provide for a future loop of this line. Å. hydrant should also be placed at the end of this line. 6. The forcemain should maintain a positive slope to the existing manhole located at First A venue Northeast and Fir Street East. It should also enter the existing manhole as low as reasonably possible. If the forcemain enters the existing manhole 2.5 feet above the invert, then a drop will be required. This concludes my remarks. Please call if you have any questions. Sincerely, Am~; Project Engineer mdh c: Joe Bettendorf, SEH Dick Taufen, City of St. Joseph . Dave Theisen, City of St. Joseph x:\pt\stjoe\d29 honer de\f\l~honer-033103_(Joc Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc. . Your Trusted Resource . Equal Opportunity Employer . V RajkOYvSki 11 Seventh Avenue North ~~~~~~~! Ltd. P.O. Box 1433 St. Cloud, MN 56302-1433 March 31, 2003 320-251-1055 Toll Free 800-445-9617 Ms. Judy Weyrens Clerk Administrator, City of St. Joseph Fax 320-251-5896 25 College A venue North P.O. Box 668 rajhan@rajhan.com St. Joseph, MN 56374 www.rajhan.com RE: Honer Properties, Inc. Application for Development Plan Approval Our File No. 22641 Dear Judy: I have had an opportunity to review the Development Plan of Roner Properties, Inc., for . County Road 2 site. I assume that a copy of this application has also been sent to Joe Bettendorf for his review and comment. I have the following comments: 1. The property is zoned R-3. The proposed development is for a 69-unit apartment complex. This is a permitted use under the revised Ordinance 52.24. Frank J. Rajkowski .. 2. The total lot area exceeds the minimum lot area required for the proposed Gordon H. Hansmeier number of units. Frederick l. Grunke 3. The proposed development appears to meet the minimum lot size, width Thomas G. Jovanovich· and setback requirements, as well as the 35% lot occupancy. It also appears to meet the Paul A. Rajkowski' parking requirements for the number of units proposed. Kevin F. Gray 4. I have a question about the height of the building. According to the scale William J. Cashman shown on the elevations, the building is only 18 feet high. This figure should be checked Richard W. Sobalvarro with the developer. Susan M. Dege 5. The proposed sign meets the dimension requirements; however it appears LeAnne D. Bartishofski to be placed within the 35' front setback. Sarah L. Smith 6. The plans do depict the location of fire hydrants and utility easements. Joseph M. Bromeland However no fire lane or dumpster location is noted in the plans. .ory J. Haupert Frank J. Rajkowski and Rkhard \Ill. Soba/varro are admitted to practice in North Dakota, Gordon H. Hansmeier in North Dakota and Wisconsin, Paul A. Rajkowski and Sarah L Smith in !/tliscons;n, and William J. Cashman in South Dakota. uMember of American Board of Trial Advocates. GlQualified ADR Neutral. V March 31, 2003 Page 2 . 7. The ordinance requires "adequate open space and recreational areas." I will defer to thejudgment of the Planning Commission on whether the plan meets this requirement. It appears as though the pond area makes up the majority of the open space. 8. The plans detail the exterior building materials and colors, as well as the landscaping and lighting plans. If you have any questions regarding my comments, please give me a call. Very truly yours, SMD/jll . , . COUNTY OF STEARNS · Envir-Onmental Services AdministrationCenter Rm 343 · 705 Courthouse Square· St. Cloud, MN 56303 320-656-3613 · Fax 320-656-6484 . 1-800-450-0852 . RECerV'EO May 22, 2002 MAR 1 8 2003 Lance Honer CITY OF ST. JOSEPH Honer Homes 21 21sT Ave N Waite Park MN 56387-1814 Dear Mr. Lance Honer, " The Wetland Delineation Report completed by Earth Tech of Minnesota for Honer Homes Site, St. Joseph, in Section 10 of St. Joseph Township, was received in Stearns County Environmental Services Department qn May 20, 2002. The wetland boundaries were field checked by staff from Environmental Services on May 21,2002. The ESD found the wetland boundaries as determined in the Wetland Delineation Report dated May, 2002 are accurate. If this property is platted, the surveyed wetland boundaries should be · included in the final plat. Wetland draining and filling activities are regulated by the Wetland Conservation Act (WCA). Please be advised that draining or filling-of wetland areas are not be allowed without first obtaining the proper permits. Sincerely, øeL~ ~~. Susan McGuire Environmental Specialist · 875·8898 "Affirmative Action / Equal Opportunity Employer" DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY '-VI I ~ ST. PAUL DISTRICT. CORPS OF ENGINEERS ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS CENTRE 190 FIFrH STREET EAST ST. PAUL, MN 55101-1638 REPLY TO . ATTENTION OF August 6, 2002 RECEIVED Construction-Operations MAR 1 8 2003 Regulatory (02-05342-YSB) Mr. Lance Honer CITY OF ST. JOSEPH 1509 Oxford Lane St. Cloud, Minnesota 56303 Dear Mr. Honer: We have reviewed the Wetland Delineation prepared by EarthTech for the Honer Homes Site located in the W 1/2 of the NW 1/4 Sec. 10, T. 124 N'I R. 29 W., Stearns County, Minnesota. Although the information provided in the report does not clearly define where the development would take place, the sketch maps submitted does indicate the presence of wetlands which may involve future wetland filling. As Ms. Berner of my staff hàs explained in previous telephone conversations, the Corps of Engineers regulates the discharge of dredged or fill material into waters and wetlands under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. We have no jurisdiction over work done in the upland areas and removal of vegetation . would not require a permit provided there is no discharge of dredged or fill material. Also, within the Corps of Engineers regulations are Letters of Permission (LO P) , which authorize minor wetland fill projects with a minimum amount of formal· review. It is possible that some or all of the work you propose could be authorized by a LOP. When the Honer Site plans are finalized, please forward a copy of the application to our office for a jurisdictional determination. If you have any questions, please contact Yvonne S. Berner in our Saint Paul office at (651) 290-5365. In any correspondence or inquiries, please refer to the Regulatory number shown above. Sincerely, d~ J. Whiting Regulatory Branch . Printed on * Recycled Paper -.-. · PUBLIC SAFETY COMMENTS Police Chief · Requests adequate lighting · Stop sign must installed at County Road 2 Public Works Director · Questions how many access are requested · Erosion control and silt fencing will be required · Is not in favor of temporary water and sewer lines but at this time there is not an alternative. When the water and sewer lines are installed along County Road 2 a development agreement should be drafted requiring connection and cost participation in the permanent water and sewer servIce. · · . I Attachment: III or No I REQUEST FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION Final Plat - Pond View Ridge Seven DATE: Apri17,2003 AGENDA ITEM Final Plat - Pond View Ridge Seven PREVIOUS ACTION Bob Herges and Rick Heid completed the Preliminary Plat procedure for Pond View Ridge. The Preliminary Plat was approved and the first phase underwent construction in 200 I. The proposed final plat seven is in accordance with the plat that was presented and approved by the Planning Commission and City Council. RECOMMENDED PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION Recommend approval of the final plat . COMMENTS/RECOMMENDATIONS The staff-has reviewed this plat at the monthly meeting and have a concern with how the remaining. property is being platted. As can be seen on the plat three outlots are being left for development later. As staff the following concerns have been noted: 1. The developer must provide an assurance that the outlots will be maintained at all times so that we don't end up with residents calling about weeds. Please see the comment :£Tom the City Attorney regarding this matter. 2. Developing the property in the manner which is illustrated shows that the roads will be constructed past the outlots. The City will not allow new roads to be cut for utilities one they are constructed. The developer will be made aware of this concern. The proposed final plat has been reviewed in relation to the preliminary plat and it is consistent with the preliminary plat. For your convenience the preliminary plat has been enclosed. RELATED MATTERS The Planning Commission should make a decision as to whether or not they want to continue reviewing final plats. Once the preliminary plat is approved changes cannot be made to the final plats or phases being developed. The Council must approve the final plat and authorize the execution of the Developer's . Agreement. Document I 5 1-01-19959:10PM FROM P. 1 Surv@~ & EntÞt ProP. 320-259-9010 p.2 · APPLICATION FOR PLANNING CONSIDERATION CITY OF ST. JOSEPH 25 College Avenue NW P.. o. Box 668 St. Joseph, MN 56374 (320}363-7201 or Fax (320)363-0342 STATE OF tJlNNESQ"rA ) )$$ d5"3- /3leÞ &b. COUNTY OF STSARNS) NAME: ~O~r ¡r¿~cir¿ J t..., bf PHONE: ;L~~ - im R/ct:- ADDRES$; ~~ AJó~ ILf"-~-e· s -1-. ek>~ I'm.), ~303 1NJe.1IIc undelsiglled.11efeI;r¡ make ~ fcbÑ1g epPic:aI!or\ \0 \fie CIty CouJ1d! an<! P/aImir¡g ~ of th8 City of St. Jaseph. StBøm& COuIl1'j. MinIIeØ!. (Aþpiea1IIs hM#Ie~!t¡ DfctJeddn¡aJI ~ ordJnanœs ~ Ia!helr appIicafun and ~ v.itb 11\ oldlMnœ ~): 1. Appficatlon is hereby made for: (Applloant must ct\eck any/åu appropriate items) - Re2xx1In9 _ zonIng 0rcI!nance Amendment ~ Home Otazp81ion Pelmit _ Suffaœ Water Man89ement Pian (GradIng permit) _ PUD _ Building Mover's Permit · _ BI.I1Idí'Ig MoW1g - OWner's Permit _ DweIopment Þlan ~rova! V Other.' p!eue specify: H,JAlø PIA"- - PCN&' vIeW R I þ/;, If., sELleN' 2. Legal cIesQiption ~ to be _ by appIIcaIIoo. ináucIIng """"9" or square bøIago of land in"'¡"'¡. and sIree ~~ff;~ ~:WIA!f.'.¡~oau. .~~/;;f:¥-J~~~ ~# 3. Present ZQßÌng of the above described proþarty Js; i.-e~~tf~'Ì-' ( 4. Narmt. add;' and pf!one number of the presenqþer of the above described land: 5~e q~ ov<-- 5. . Pemons, firms, cœporations cr other fhan. eppIìcant and present owner who may or will be interested in the above described land ~ proposed ~fs wittlin one Yes! after issuance of permit applied for, if granted, are: . . Dam Date: FOR OFFICE USE ONLY DATi COMPLETE: DATi OF PU8UC HEARING PUSUCA'TIOH CAT!: , nlng CommIssIon Action: _ Recctnmenlt Approval ~ Recommend DISapþrOval Date of AcIion: ate ~ Owner Mlllied Of Planning Commission Adion: · ty CoundI Act!ore _ Appn:wed _ D/sapproved Date of AdIon: AppVcantIPropen OWner notlled of CIly CnundI ActIon: . V Raikowski '''"",o<h A~""""rth , tt~~~rr~!;s Ud. P.O. Box 1433 S1. Cloud, MN 56302-1433 March 31, 2003 320-251-1055 Toll Free 800-445-9617 Ms. Judy Weyrens Clerk Administrator, City of St. Joseph Fax 320-251-5896 25 College Avenue North P.O. Box 668 rajhan@rajhan.com St. Joseph, MN 56374 www.rajhan.com RE: Pondview 7 Application for Final Plat Approval Our File: 22641 Dear Judy: I have prepared this letter with regard to the seventh phase of the Pondview Plat which is being considered by the Planning Commission. . I have not been provided with an actual copy of the plat. I would suggest that Joe Bettendorfhave an opportunity to fully review the plat and provide comments before any final consideration of the matter. I will defer{o Joe with regard to issues related to proposed streets, traffic pattern, utility service, and drainage/erosion control issues. Frank J. Rajkowski .. Based on the information that has been provided, I have the following comments: Gordon H. Hansmeier 1. The lots all appear to conform with the minimum lot size and lot width Frederick L. Grunke requirements for the City of St. Joseph. Thomas G. Jovanovich e Paul A. Rajkowski· 2. Final plat approval and execution should be made contingent upon the negotiation and execution of a Developer's Agreement sub stanti all y like the agreements Kevin F. Gray executed in phase six. William J. Cashman 3. I note that there are no outlots designated in the drawing. I am assuming Richard W. Sobalvarro that the developer will be paying cash in lieu of dedicating land for purposes of park Susan M. Dege dedication. If cash is to be paid, the amount should be determined. If the developer is LeAnne D. Bartishofski dedicating land outside of this phase, the Developer's Agreement should provide that the land shall be accepted by the City once the property taxes have been paid. Sarah L. Smith Joseph rv1. Bromeland 4. My file contains references to protective covenants regarding the prior .Ory J. Haupert phases. If there were restrictions in the prior phases, the approval of this plat should be conditioned upon execution and filing of identical protective covenants. Frank ). Rajkowski and Richard W Sobalvarro are admitted to practice in North Dakota, Gordon H. Hansmeier in North Dakota and Wisconsin Paul A. Rajkowski and Sarah L. Smith in Wisconsin and Willíam 1. Cashman in South Dakota. -Member of American Board of Trial Advocates. -Qualified ADR Neutral. V March 31, 2003 . Page 2 5. Prior to execution ofthe Developer's Agreement, the developer should provide the City with a Title Opinion verifying tile to the property so that we can be assured that the proper parties are executing the agreement and the plat. 6. I note that the area within the plat is designated as "low and wet." Approval of the plat should be conditioned upon the Developer detennining whether any part of the area is a wetland, and executing an easement to the City and/or development restrictions as necessary to protect the wetland. 7. Judy, you had mentioned that there were some outlots remaining in the Pond View Ridge development, and that the City is concerned with the seeding and weeding/mowing of those outlots pending further development. Seeding of these outlots can be addressed in the erosion control plan required by the standard development agreement. If the City wishes that the outlots will be maintained in a manner more restrictive than provided in the weed ordinance, then plat approval should be conditioned upon such conditions being included in the Developer's Agreement on this plat. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Very truly yours, RAJKOWSKl HANSMEIER LTD. . æ" ~¿'~\I ---- B ' . V;f\/vl I Sus \n M. Deg~ \. ' SMD/jll \J Enclosure . . I Attachment: Blor No I REQUEST FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION Mark Lambert - R3 Site Plan Approval DATE: April 7, 2003 AGENDA ITEM Summit Management - R3 Site Plan Review PREVIOUS ACTION Mark Lambert proposed this same building plan in 2002 which was ultimately denied. At the time the plan was submitted R3 development beyond 12 units required a special use permit and the applicant was required to complete the PURD process. The plan at that time required a variance as well on the height of the building. Since that time the City has adopted a new Zoning Ordinance which does not require a special use permit or PURDprocess for an apartment building. In addition the maximum height was changed from 35 feet to 40 feet and allows for a three story building provided it does not exceed the maximum height. . RECOMMENDED COMMISSION ACTION The site plan request was determined to be complete on March 24, 2003, therefore, the Planning Commission must make. a approval/denial no later than May 23, 2003. The newly adopted Ordinance gives the Planning Commission final approval unless the Commission request a j oint meeting with the Council. COMMENTS/RECOMMENDATIONS Included in your packet you should have the following: Application request of Mark Lambert, the proposed Development Plans, Ordinance Compliance Review, City Engineer Comments, City Attorney Comments, and the Combined Public Safety Comments. Since the new Zoning Ordinance is not ready for distribution, I have included directly behind this form the R3 Ordinance as it has been adopted. As the site plan does not require a special use or variance, the Planning Commission must make their decision based on the requirements of the R3 Ordinance. In reviewing the site plan I have also reviewed the parking and sign provisions which are detailed on following compliance review. . · Section 52.29: R-3 MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENCE DISTRICT. Subd. 1. Intent. R-3, Multiple Family Residence District is intended to provide a district which will allow higher density or residential development where city sewer services are available. Subd. 2. Permitted Uses. a) Multiple Family dwelling structures b) Public parks and playgrounds. c) Hospitals, extended care centers, nursing homes, group care centers or assisted living centers. d) Churches, libraries, museums or schools. e) Townhouses. f) Lodging houses. g) Licensed in-home daycare serving 16 or fewer persons. h) Licensed residential facilities/group homes serving 16 or fewer persons. · Subd. 3. Permitted Accessory Uses. a) Private garages, parking spaces and carports for passenger cars, trucks, recreational vehicles and equipment. Tile total floor area of private garages shall not exceed 300 square feet per unit and shall not be higher than fifteen feet and the exterior covering must be the same or similar to the roof and side wall materials on the principal structure. R-3 developments with three (3) or less units shall abide by the R-I accessory building provisions, including but not limited to the maximum lot coverage requirements. b) Home occupations per Section 52.16. c) Storage buildings for storage of domestic equipment used in the maintenance of the property and non-commercial recreational equipment used primarily at the property. 1. Location: No accessory building, other than a garage, shall be located within any yard other than the rear yard. 2. Height: Accessory buildings shall not exceed fifteen feet (15') in height. 3. Exterior: All accessory buildings shall be the same or similar to the roof and side wall materials on the principal structure. 4. Number of Buildings: No lot shall have more than one (1) detached storage building. · 5. Size: All detached accessory buildings shall have a floor area not to exceed 300 square feet. - I - d) Swimming pools and tennis courts. e) Residentialcommunal facilities such as laundry, recreation buildings, and residential · leasing office. £) Fences. Subd.4. Uses Under Special Use Pennit. a) Public buildings, police and fire stations and other public buildings, except those customarily considered industrial in nature. b) Cemeteries and memorial gardens. c) Manufactured Home Parks, in accordance with Section 52.14. d) Uses which in the judgment of the Planning Commission and City Council are similar to those listed in Subdivision 2 of this Section. Subd. 5. Lot Area Requirements. a) Minimum lot area shaH be 12,000 square feet. b) For the basis of computing the number of pennitted units within a multiple residence, the following shaH apply: 1. Efficiency unit for each 2,000 square feet of lot area; and · 2. One I bedroom unit for each 3,000 square feet oflot area; and 3. One 2 bedroom unit for each 3,500 square feet oflot area; and 4. One 3 bedroom unit for each 4,000 square feet of lot area; 5. For each additional bedroom (over 3) per unit, an additional 500 square feet of lot area; 6. Lot depths of greater than 150% of the average lot width shall be used in computing the maximum number of units. 7. On-site manager unit - shall be based on the same square footage requirements as stated above. c) Multiple family dwellings shall not occupy more than 35% of the lot including accessory buildings. d) Each lot shall have a minimum width of 150 feet at the building setback line. e) Each lot shall have a minimum width of 80 feet at the public right-of-way. Subd. 6. Schedule of Allowances. The lot areas per dwelling unit described in Section 52.29, · Subd. 5 shall be further subject to the following schedule of allowances, which shall be added to or subtracted from, the minimum lot area per dwelling unit as prescribed hereby regulating density - 2 - . requirements as to the location, use and access provided for the property within the R-3 multiple residence family district. a) For each parking space provided within the building, or underground, subtract 300 square feet. b) If the site upon which the multiple dwelling is being constructed; or the zoning district adjacent to the site is zoned for a commercial use, subtract 300 square feet. c) If the multiple dwelling site is within 300 feet of an R-l or R-2 Residence District, add 300 square feet per unit, for all units constructed on the site. d) If the total lot coverage is less than 20%, subtract 150 square feet per unit. e) In such cases where it is necessary to raze an existing principal structure in a dilapidated condition, or where said building is economically unfeasible to rehabilitate, there shall be provided an allowance of two dwelling units above any other allowances required within this sectiòn. f) If the multiple dwelling unit contains major outdoor recreational features or structures such as swimming pools, improved outdoor common areas with pathways/parkland or similar facilities requiring a substantial investment equal to or greater than five (5%) percent of the construction cost of the principal structure, subtract 75 square feet per unit. g) If the multiple dwelling unit contains indoor recreation and social rooms equal to twenty- . five (25) square feet per unit or 1,000 square feet, whichever is greater; subtract 50 square feet per unit. Subd. 7. Setback Requirements. a) The front yard of any R-3 residence shall be 35 feet from the lot line. b) The side yard of any R-3 residence shall be 20 feet from the lot line, unless the side yard abuts a street or highway in which case the setback shall not be less than 30 feet. In the event the side yard of an R-3 residence abuts another residential district, all principal structures shall be set back 50 feet from the property line. c) The rear yard of any R-3 residence shall be 40 feet from the lot line. d) All building permit requests must be accompanied by a building plan and a landscape plan acceptable by the Planning Commission. A. No part of the structure including footings, soffits, gutters or other overhangs shall encroach on easement areas. Subd. 8. Height Requirements. No structure shall exceed the lesser of 3 stories or 40 feet in height except as hereinafter provided. Berming the building does not allow a building to be constructed higher than 40 feet. Elevation for the building shall be determined by the average grade of the land. . Subd. 9. ~. In R-3 Multiple Family Districts the general provisions apply to all signs: a) No sign shall be placed closer than ten feet (10') to any property line, except directional signs which have a zero foot (0') setback. - 3 - 1. No sign shall be placed in any interior side yard . 2. No sign shall be mounted on the roof of a building. 3. No signs shall violate the side or rear yard requirements. 4. Signs shall not be placed in the public right-of-way or easements. 5. flashing or rotating signs resembling emergency vehicles shall not be pennitted. 6. Illuminated signs are not allowed. b) One unlighted sign per vehicle entrance identifying a dwelling unit complex. Such signs may indicate the name and address of the building and rental or management offices. 1. Such signs shall have a surface area of all faces not exceeding an aggregate of fifty (50) square feet. 2. The height of the sign shall not exceeding eight feet (8') 3. Landscaping must be provided around the base of the sign. 4. The entrance to a development shall be one that abuts a collector or arterial road. c) One area identification sign for each multiple-residential complex consisting of three (3) . or more structures. 1. Such signs shall have a surface area not exceeding fifty (50) square feet per sign face with an aggregate area not to exceed one hundred (100) square feet if double faced. 2. The height of the sign shall not exceed eight feet (8'). 3. Landscaping must be provided around the base of the sign. 4. Sign content shall be solely for displaying the name of the apartment complex. d) Wall Sign: One wall sign shall be allowed for the purpose of street identification. Such sign cannot exceed twelve (12) square feet. e) Sign Removal- All signs not maintained and kept in good repair or in non compliance of the St. Joseph Code of Ordinances shall be subject to removal upon direction of the City Building Inspector. Subd. 10: Yard Cover. Every yard on a premise on which a dwelling stands shal1 be provided with lawn or combined lavm cover of vegetation, gardens, hedges, shrubbery, and related decorative materials and such yards shall be maintained consistent with prevailing community standards. Motor vehicles may not be left parked or unattended on or within a yard. Grass shall be maintained so not to exceed a height of 6 inches. . Subd. 11: Development Plan Requirements. No building pennit shall be issued until the Planning Commission reviews the development plan to detennine that the use and development is compatible with - 4 - · adjacent land uses, and consistent with the stated intent of this zone. Upon the request of the Planning Commission the City Council will make the final determination on site plan approval. The developer shall provide the following items to the Planning Commission for any development located in the R3- Multiple Family Residence District: a) Building location on the lot, drawn to scale. b) Building elevations; front, rear and side. c) Building exterior materials and color. d) Locations of ingress and egress points. e) Dumpster and solid waste pick-up areas and proposed screening material. f) Sign location and dimensions. g) Lighting standard and hood detail. h) Parking and loading areas identified. i) Drainage by the use of arrows and/or contours. j) Screening of heating, ventilation and air-conditioning equipment. · k) Landscaping material including the location, type of plant and size. I) Fire hydrant and fire lane locations. m) Utility locations. n) A description of provisions which shall be made on the site for adequate open space and recreational areas to properly serve residents of the facility. 0) Any other fencing, screening, or building accessories to be located in the development area. p) When required, evidence of completion of National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permitting program and/or the City of St. Joseph Storm Water Pollution Prevention Program (SWPPP). q) If applicable, evidence of compliance with federal, state and local pollution and nuisance laws and regulations, including, but not limited to glare, smoke, dust, odors and noise. The burden of proof for compliance with appropriate standards shall lie with the applicant. r) Required Feel Agreement. 1. Payment Required. Any person filing a petition requesting development plan review shall pay a fee according to the schedule established by the City Council. · 11. Amount. Fees payable under this section for development plan review shall be in an amount as established by resolution of the City Council. Preparation and review of all elements of the required development plan, as listed and described above, is to be at the - 5 - sole expense of the developer and at no expense to the public. The fee is payable at the . time of filing a petition and is not refundable. In addition to the above fees and in the event the City incurs professional fees, either legal, engineering or professional planners, or any other cost, including but not limited to, postage and publication expenses, the applicants shall reimburse the City for those fees, and the City officials may require an escrO\v deposit, cashier's check or letter of credit for these fees prior to the final action on the application for development plan review. Such escrow or letter of credit shall be in the form approved by the City Attorney. 111. Development Agreement. In the event additional review by the City or its assigns is anticipated and/or needed during implementation of Development Plan, or other similar circumstance, the City shall require the property owner(s) and/or developer(s) enter into a development agreement with the City. The development agreement shall stipulate the conditions for approval and the City's authority to inspect the development. The agreement shall further require the owner or developer, as the case may require, furnish a cashier's check, escrO\v account or irrevocable letter of credit in favor of the City in an amount equal to II 0% of all costs associated with City's review of the development, including but not limited to, engineering, legal, fiscal and administrative, as estimated by the City. Such escrow or letter of credit shall be in the form approved by the City Attorney, shall be conditioned upon the approval of the development plan. Subd. 12. Additional Requirements. Uses may be subject to additional requirements contained in this Ordinance including, but not limited to the sections governing parking, home occupation, floodplain, signs, etc. a) A Lock Box shall be installed on all buildings before a Certificate of Occupancy will be issued. . Subd. 13. Regulation of Activities Adiacent to Wetlands. a) The following activity shall be subject to a 50 foot setback from wetlands: The construction or maintenance of a building attached to a foundation, including but not limited to, pole buildings. For purposes of this paragraph, pump houses, moveable storage sheds, recreational docks and storm water or erosion control devices shall not be considered buildings. b) The following activity shall be subject to a 75 foot setback from wetlands: The construction or maintenance of paved driveways or areas designed for the parking of a vehicle or trailer. c) The following activities shall be subject to a 100 foot setback from wetlands: 1. The construction or maintenance of a well used for agricultural irrigation, or any well less than 50 feet in depth. 2. External storage of materials used in conj unction with industrial or commercial processing or manufacturing. 3. The storage of waste or refuse generated by industrial or commercial activities. 4. The construction or maintenance of a septic system. . - 6 - APPLICATION FOR PLANNING CONSIDERATION . CITY OF ST. JOSEPH 25 College Avenue NW P. O. Box 668 St. Joseph, MN 56374 (320)363-7201 or Fax (320)363-0342 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )sS COUNTY OF STEARNS) NAME: Summit Manaqement, LLC PHONE: 651-223-5493 ADDRESS: 101 East Fifth Street, #910, St. Paul, MN 55101-1808 INVe, the undersigned, hereby make the following application to the City Council and Planning Commission of the City of Sf. Joseph, Steams County, Minnesota. (Applicants have the responsibility of checking all applicable ordinances pertaining to their application and complying with all ordinance requirements): 1. Application is hereby made for: (Applicant must check any/all appropriate items) _ Rezoning _ Zoning Ordinance Amendment _ Home Occupation Permit -1L... Surface Water Management Plan (Grading Permit) - PUD _ Building Mover's Permit _ Building Moving - Owner's Permit -1L- Development Plan Approval ~ Other, please specify: . City Council permission to pond storm water in city owned Northland Addition outlot/pond area 2. Legal description of land to be affected by application, including acreage or square footage of land involved, and street address, if any: Lot 1, Block 1, Indian Hill Park 3. Present zoning of the above described property is: R-3 4. Name, address and phone number of the present owner of the above described land: Mark Lambert, Trustee of the M.W. Lambert Revocable Trust. Same address as above. 5. Persons, firms, corporations or other than applicant and present owner who mayor will be interested in the above described land or proposed improvements within one year after issuance of permit applied for, if granted, are: Same as above 6. Attached to this application and made a part thereof are additional material submission data requirements, as indicated. ApplicantSignature:~ø£-:: - Date: ~/..z Z--ðJ' Date: ~ ./-l 2-D:? Owner Signature: . FOR OFFICE USE ONLY DATE SUBMITTED: DATE COMPlETE: DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING PUBLICATION DATE: Planning Commission Action: _ Recommend Approval _ Recommend Disapproval Date of Action: Date ApplicantlProperty Ovmer notified of Planning Commission Action: City Council Action: _ Approved _ Disapproved Date of Action: Date ApplicantJProperty Owner notified of City Council Action: W 0$:\'\'.a.:D:=-";'-~:jCQ_KJ:h·Qu_L.-""r"'J.'!"Sar:o.7!l-~ WARRANTY DEED Form No. 7-ì\1 Minne--ota Uoliorrn o,owyancing Blanks (6I17/9ï) Corporation, Partnership or limited Liabilitv Company I to Individuallsl No delinquent taxes 8;lìd transfer entered; Certificate of I 9 8 8 9 6 8 Real Estate Value ( r ) filed ( ) not required. ¡ Certificåte of Real Esta,t.e",V,alue No. Ii 0 I 'IOV 20 PH 3 35 . ~ fH.ì¥ /.. ;.; zoot ¡ n: /J ,¡ate),ç ç / . /. ¡ ~ v\ .I-;~!A¡A..'#.u· ! COUIlTYRECgRDER . . I STEARNS C .WI ~,I~" , ) U \¡~un 'Audltor II ~IC' M.O~ERMAf.1 V. ~" "{y \ 1.. N~otPIITY by' I I ._~ . .....,... '=' 1 j .,-- ~ ' U 7 D ~ 1..' I Q . - ..;:). -"".5, .. <., ~ . Deputy ,_ Co ö \ , "5e- ~ 'if.,¥! I .. cc- DEED TAX DUE: $ .j. 'T!f. 3 '7 I ..-- 10-17-01 I Date: (reserved for recording data) FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, Dlof PARTNERSHIP , a PARTNERSHIP under the laws of MTl\.'NRgO'1'A , Grantor, hereby conveys and warrant.s«¡;¡.rk Lambert, Trustee of H.Yl. Lambert Revocable Trust dated Harch 26, 1993 as amended,Grantee, real property in Stearns County, Minnesota, described as follows: Lot One (1), and Lot Two (2), Block One (1), Indian Hill Park, according to the plat and survey thereof on file or of record in the office of the County Recorder in and for Stearns County, Þiinnesota. together with all hereditaments and appurtenances belonging thereto, subject to the following exceptions: Easements. restrictions and conditions if any which appear in the public records. Check box if applicable: . !3tThe Seller certifies that the Seller does not know of any wells on the described real property. o A well disclosure certificate accompanies this document. o I am familiar with the property described in this instrument and 1 certify that the status and number of wells on the described real property have not changed since the last previously filed wel! disclosure certificate. DH Partnership ~~S05 ~m3i~% llf~~~ By ~):)'I(VvL WÆA (~¿'-:D r\ " ,,' '~ner ~ ~9.37 /71 By "jt/ Its Partner v STATE OF MINNESOTA }ss. COUNTY OF Stearns October 17, 2001 This. instrumen.t was acknowledged before me on ..., by Dorlan Davldson and John It Heyer the Partner and Partner of DH Partnership . a Partnership under the laws of Hinnesota , on behalf of the Partnership NOTARL.\L STAMP OR SEAL (OR OTHER TITLE OR RANK) t.:-:' ... -- _- :"'.~:'~:' _!, :~.;. ~\~!~I::cJ ¿J{ Check here if part or all of the land is Registered (Torrens) 0 ~ / THIS lXsrRU~Œ:\ï- \\'AE DRAFTED BY (NA...\IE & ADDRE...~)· I/.,. . Ta.'X Statement$- for the real properly described in this instrument should Trl-County Abstract and Tl tle b. sent to (lndude name and address or Grantee): Guaranty, Inc. Hark Lambert Trustee I 921 1st Street North 523 5""'f!-" Aj(,'-T1-+ p ~3 I st. Cloud, Þlli 56303 I _. j S·T. é... lo.,A.., f'\tv !>-b3<3 7.:> 1&-5""" R C+"H'~ -1- 0 SCH.-Lur-L ØcN~HUUr ~ H~~UC. ':J1.:>¿ ¿..:it 1b (1 t" . Ø1/'J=' I ... ._~ 't::...-._...J ~l'~d W BENSHOOF & ASSOCIATES, INC. TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS AND PLANNERS 10417 EXCELSIOR BOULEVARD, SUITE TWO / HOPKINS, MN 55343/ (952) 238-1867/ FAX (952) 23&-1871 . FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL Date: March 21, 2003 Job No. 03-19 PLEASE DELIVER THE FOLLOWING PAGE(S) TO: Name: Judy Weyrens, City ofSt. Joseph RECEIVED Fax No.: 320/363-0342 MAR 2 1 2003 Remarks: CITY OF ST. JOSEPH Enclosed is a copy of our traffic study report for the propòsed apartment development on Northland Drive. If you or other City representatives have any questions about our report, please caJl. An original copy of the report is being sent by mail. . This transmittaJ is being soot by: Jim øeD.h.J) & If you do not receive nine pages, incluåir.l.g this sheei~ plc2Se ca1l952/238-1667. . . MAR-21-2003 11:28 BENSHOOF & ASSOC. 952 238 1671 P.02/09 W BENSHOOF & ASSOCIATES, INC. TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS AND PLANNERS . 10417 EXCELSIOR BOULEVARD, SUITE 1WO f HOPKlNS, Þ.4N 55343/ (8S2) æ8-1661/ FAX (952) 238-1871 - March 21,2003 Refer to File: 03..19 MEMORANDUM TO: Mark Lambert, Swnmit Management FROM: JamesA. BenshOO~1S RE: Review of Access Arrangements for Proposed Apartm~t Development on Northland Drive in City of St. Joseph PURPOSE This memorandum. is to present the results of the review we have performed regarding anangements to provide access for the n~ apartment development you would like to construct in the City ofSt. Joseph, Aß shown in Figure I, the subject property is located . on the west side of Northland Drive between Fir Street on the north and CSAH 7S on the south. We understand the apartment development site is subject to a development agreement. This agreement suggests that access to the apartment property and the fut1J.re development parcel to the south should be provided through a shared entrance on Northland Drive at the southeast corner of the apartment site) opposite Little Crow Court on the east side, unless different access ammgements are approved by the City as part of a development site plan. Through your site planning pIWesB, we understand you bave identìñed alternative access arrangements that you think would be preferable for the apartment development and for the City. Thus, the purpose of our work has been twofold: a) to review the access amngement specified in the development agreement and your alternative plan relative to appropriate criteria and b) to detomùne the access arrangement that would best saûsfY applicable objectives for your development and for the City. ACCESS ALTERNATIVES Figure 2 illustrates access concept B, as suggested in the development agreement. As shown, a single driveway would be provided opposite Little Crow Court to serve both the apartment development to the north and the future development to the south. . MAR-21-2003 11:29 BENSHOOF & ASSOC. 952 23B 1671 P.03/09 4IÞ 1::1 ~HACKBERRY DR HREE ST. E, . LJ I.&J . :> . :z <[ w . L.J :z > LJ <t > :I: <t I- ~ H CI :I: ~ ¡... ~ æ FIR ST, E. ::I: ::> I- I::) L.&.. ~. W -.-. .,,-.. >- .... O! ~ ~ :z ~ ...J :I: I- O! 1:1 Z . . FRONTAGE ROAD Þ. ~: CSAH75 ~ ' ~~í~ -I r ] J ~ N t [~XI~=~~~~~ o 300' ~ ~~ ~,..- ..... SUMMIT MANAGEMENT ACCESS STUDY FOR FIGURE 1 APARTMENT DEVELOPMENT IN CITY OF ST. JOSEPH m BENSHOOF & ASSOCIATES, INC, SITE LOCATION V tll~IISPORTATIONENGIHEI!RSANDPlANNiR6 . ~ ~~ ~~ ~ BENSHOOF & ASSOC. 952 238 1671 P.Ø4/09 MAR-21-2003 11:29 · ~ if Q C ¡ . 0 Z I. - - .~ . lIB -.A/ I I I · POTENT1Al FU'T'UAE ~ I - DRJVEWAY TO SERVE " THIS PARCEL I - - - I - APPROXIMATE SCALE .~--...- I I I ~ -. ~ 0 80' ~- .- SUMMIT MANAGEMENT Access STUDY FDA FIGURE 2 APARTMENT DEVELOPMENT IN CITY OF ST. JOSEPH ACC!SS CONCEPT 8 W BENSHOOF &ASSOC~ INC. · flWjS'ORTATlOII!li&llImS 4HO PUIIHW MAR-21-2003 11:29 BENSHOOF & ASSOC. 952 238 1671 P.05/09 Mr. Mark Lambert -4- March 21 ~ 2003 . Figure 3 shows the alternative arrangements, access ooncept A. Under this concept, the 8partntent development would have a separate driveway on Northland Drive) which would be located 260 north of Little Crow Court (centerline spacing) and 245 feet south ofFîr Street. The future development to the south would be served by access on Northland Drive opposite Little Crow Court, as envisioned in concept B. As shown in Figure 2, two options are available for access on Northland Drive to/ftom the south parcel, depending on the preferences of the City and developer at the time a site plan is proposed for development on this parcel. Under option I, the access on Northland Drive would consist of just a driveway to serve future development on this south parcel. Option 2 would involve constructing a public street west of Northland Drive and then south across the trail to a cOMection with the frontage road on the north side ofCSAH 75. Under this option, future development on the parcel to the south would have driveway access from this new public street. Though this option is more extensive and complicated, it offers a significant potential benefit in facilitating closure of the frontage road at Northland DTive. which would eliminate existing difficulties caused by the close spacing oftbe frontage road to CSAH 75. In essence, the new street under option 2 would constitute a detaclunent of the ftontage road, which would maintain the connectivity presently provided by the frontage road, while eliminating problems associated with the close spacing between the ftontage road and CSAH 75. REVIEW OF ACCESS ALTERNATIVES . In order to review the access alternatives. it first is important to establish the objectives that need to be met regarding acçess for the apartment site and the future south development site. Accounting for interests of both the developer and City, we have established the following four principal objectives; a) Provide safe and convenient access for the apartment development. b) Provide safe and convenient access for potential commercial development on the parcel to the south. c) Provide safe traffic operations on Northland Drive. d) Be compatible with the roadway system in the area. Next, we have reviewed the ability of each access alternative to meet the preceding objectives. In this review, we have accoW1ted for applicable engineering standards. . MAR-21-2083 11:38 BENSHOOF & ASSOC. 9S2 238 1671 P.06/09 - !!: S ~ ~ ê i -=--: 280' ."",. '" POTENTIAL FUrüRE ACCESS OPTION 2, /. ~C F/0AJ:j THAt'NOULD CF/OSS ~ ' FFI~~: ~~IV/JH ~, 71118 N~ F/OAO IVOULD~ O!"TrON I: 'kg~Å'G~9f tHti:§X¡S7JNG OF/I\1§IVAY JUst To NoRtfiu. OAO At SEiFIVE 1I1/S PAFlCEil NO ORlVE. N --- t ,-.. APp~OXJMA~ 8CALE ~ ~ SUMMIT MANAGEMENT ACCess ~Oy FOR ~ AÞAR1J.fENT tJ~LOÞMENT FIGURE 3 - ~ ~ & A8S0c~'Æs, INC, IN CIiY o: Sr. JOsePH ACcess CONcept A TIWtSPORTA TrON E1t6/ /fEERs ANo PLANNERs MFlR-21-2003 11:30 BENSHOOF & FlSSOC. 952 238 1671 P.07/09 Mr. Mark Lambert -6.. March 21, 2003 . Our comments regarding the ability of the access arrangements specified in the development agreement (concept B shown in Figure 2) to meet the applicable objectives are presented in the followin¡ table. OBJECTIVE COMMENTS Provide safe and convenient access for The ability of the driveway to serve apartment users is the apartment development. particularly correlated with the driveway grades. This item is particularly challengin¡ under concept B beoause a 14 foot elevation difference would exist between the driveway termini at the parking lot and at North1and Drive. To acconunodate this elevation difference, the driveway grade would be between five and six percent over the full length, including right to the edge of Northland Drive. Such a steep driveway would cause safety difficulties, including a potential that motorists. under slippery conditions, would not be able to stop and would slide into Northland Drive. Provide safe and convenient access for This concept would involve two limitations regarding potentiat conunercial development on access for this parcel: a) safety difficulties due to the the parcel to the south. steep grade on the apartment driveway and b) complications due to the need for a T intersection serving the two development sites just 40 feet west of Northland . Drive. Provide safe traffic operations on This concept has an advantage of consolidating access at Northland Drive. one four-way intersection. Adisadvantage relates to the steepness of the driveway and the potential, under icy conditions, that motorists on the west driveway approach would slide into Northland Drive. Be compatible with the roadway This concept is compatible with the roadway system and system in the area. prior plans. . MAR-21-2003 11:30 BENSHOOF & ASSOC. 952 238 1671 P. 08/09 Mr. Mark Lambert -7- March 21, 2003 Our comments regarding the ability of the alternative access ammgements (concept A . shown in Figure 3) to meet the applicable objectives are presented in the following table. OBJECTIVE COMMENTS Provide safe and convenient access The ability of the driveway to serve apartment users is for the apartment development. particularly correlated with the driveway grades. This concept has much lesser grades than concept B - a grade of 4.5 percent over most of the driveway length, with a three percent grade over the last 40 feet approaching Northland Drive. The main reason for these improved grades is that the elevation difference between the edge of the parking lot and Northland Drive is only five feet, much less than the 14 foot difference under concept B. These lesser grades ørovide safety benefits. Provide safe and convenient access This concept provides effective access for this parcel, for potential commercial without the difficulties noted under concept B. If the City development on the parcel to the and developer decide to implement option 2, a public street south. across this property, access for this property would be improved further. Provide safe traffic operations on A disadvantage of this concept is that it would create two Northland Drive. access points on Northland Drive, instead of one as under concept B. Two further important points involve: a) spacing between the proposed apartment driveway and adjacent intersections and b) adequacy of sight distances at . the proposed apartment driveway. As previously noted, the apartment driveway would be 245 feet south of Fir Street - and 260 feet north of Little Crow Court. These spacings are significantly greater than the minimwn 125 foot spaoing recommended by the Institute of Transportation Engineers. Using methods established by the Minneso~ Department of Transportation (MnIDOT). 400 feet of sight distance would be available between motorists exiting from the development and motorists traveling southbound on Northland Drive. This sight distance meets standards published by Mn/DOT for the posted 30 mph speed limit on Northland Drive. We are confident that the proposed apartment driveway would not cause safety problems on Northland Drive because the standards for intersections spacing and sight distance would be met and because the driveway grades would anow exiting motorists to come to a safe stopped condition at Northland Drive. Be compatible with the roadway Aside from having two access points on Northland Drive as system in the area. mentioned in the preceding point. this concept is compatible with the roadway system and prior plans. This concept offers further potential benefits to the City in terms of dosing the e"isting frontage road at Northland Drive and resolving existing difficulties due to the close spacing of the . ft'ontage road to CSAH 75. M~R-21-2003 11:31 BENSHOOF & ~SSOC. 952 238 1671 P.09/09 Mr. Mark Lambert -8- March 21, 2003 . CONCLUSIONS Based on the review of access alternatives addressed in this memorandum, we detennined that the alternative access plan shown in Figure 3 (concept A) meets applicable engineering standards and better fulfills the overall objectives regarding access on Northland Drive than does the plan suggested in the current development agreement (conoept B). Therefore, we offer the following two recommendations: 1) The City should approve the access plan for the apartment development shown in Figure 3 (concept A). 2) The City and developer should continue exploring the two options shown in Figure 3 regarding future access for the property south of the apartment site and the relationship of this site access to other City objectives, including consideration of the existing ftontage road north ofCSAH 75 and its intersection with Northland Drive. . . TOTAL P. 09 . _'" " .:,IU. V'f:'~) I r~ 1-~4u ,. UU'/UU6 1'-/ tU j l¡~htfa?[e'M _ ~ '..:... . I "_" ., :;,.~. ..... ,,: t.: ..... -. . .... . ",_.:...I_,I._I..~;,.._.."...,\...()......,..... 81ôo Coller Way Woodbury, MN 66125 m&in: 651.264.~400 fax: 661.264.9414 Febru.ary 27, 2002 To Whom It May Concern: Attached is a. preliminary photometries that sho·w the light pattern of this fooiprint. With the fixture that has been chosen, there will be no light that goes out further then about sixty feet ~d light pollution vál1 be eliminated. On the attached charts you can see the foot-candles and lumens. A 1. Foot- candle is equal to a moonlit night. If you have further concerns feel :tree to contact me at 651-264-9400 . Yours truly, ~~< Vice PresidentJlightfaire e. .. tf· "11 I(:I:;¡CoQ1 ugn lure· c; . . ...-------~---..... - - --........ ........,......----- ,-.,."".. . ~-i---- -.'\. I I ~-- ------ I ____.",.,,- , It. I ~ 11;" ':) .. . '1 e.... 0 0 Wi : I ; :. ., ... "'.,. I... k' - · <> . .' ' I I w W Q . . ð Q Q Q L' 0 W · ~ - ~ ~ ~ I I .~ :-- '" 0 0 ~ ~ I w Q ~ ~ - w ø I , ' J I W ~ ~ ~ 0 C F ¡ I L.... ... · ... - ...... . I In ~ - - · '" '? ~ <I' I I : ~ ... - eo. · '" .. ..... I \ I "I"'''' ° I> ?p'" ~ a_ ~ 0 ~ ~ W 0 . I I W ... ~ ? """ . o:::r I ; ! ~ l..:C .. .. .. .. .. ,. ... C0 : .. - -------- .......- ..- -- ... .). t '- ___.------. ;' ~_~/!-' . - 0 fJ ,. ).' ~ , ~ VI .. ... . I ",...... '=' ~ ~, .." ,ok -. ~ ' U\ L~ Y:'" ..~ -;~. ~ :--:-'1:-~ ..~ :: ~ : ¡ 1 ì ~ . --- .. _::;;.;;-- .:- - ...- - co .. . ":' ~,! I " . .,., . . . .. . I .... . I III,. -a:a..-~ 0, w w ,. " - .... eo " ......,.....! .- -- \ ~ ,~ ---_....____.. ......-' w-............ !:I 0:> A .. v i ~~~Å 0 ...--~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I "" / ~ !" ? ? .. ".. t'- .. ! '''\ III 10 "'_ ... 0 I '" ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ p ~ ~ "r I ,- .. co ... . ... w'" ~ I' . I 1 ¡J I". .. - 0 0 <:1 ~ c ~ . I .r -..J ;.. Ie <It .. W ' . \. ! I .. .. ò co. ~ I 0, W '0 \C'.. 9\4"':', "" : ~ 1 ' .... ' I --. ~ <> 0 ~ ~ c , ;,. .....____:~_/ --..... . W:"..:, ~ ~-,~ .. ~ · .. ~? r -........M" to ~"WI - '" ..... ---.-...~ - u . ? ~ ' ..., .., ., ~ ¡ , ~ !' ,. . ~ w e ~ ~ ~ co ~ ~ ... k' e. ~\" <:) I ~ Co '" !It .1 i· ... I c,.f ~ en u ....? r\ ~ i 1"1 or:' .. · <> , ~ ,.." ( I ~.I 0 'lI 10 '" I>Þ CI ' ~ . ,- \ .. ~ . .... "" . '" .... - :... ¡"" ~ ~ ~ \ . 0 'F' ? 'I' I t~ I C.t..., W w. I¡:)I~ . , " I :,j W 0 CD ., 0 a -= ~ to, : I ., ., I~ ,~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ - . . . I I _ ð a ~ ~ D ~ ~ ~ · . ........;'"' UI '" co< .. ~ -_ ~ co '- - - "" .-/" - - -- -' / .. ." .... ---_/ -. ..........._ ___ ".....----."" Iff" .- _..........__..... _.,-Þ .. . ---. 9lQ-~ 90D/200'd £IZ-¡ 99g9 9SS 296 XV. JIdOXYHS S¡,VS ~n'-WQH~ vl;O;BZI9S-DL 9;180 ZDDZM10~vn l8l-~ 90D/ZDO'd 990-! -WOJ~ WdIZ:~D ZOOZ-IO-J!~ ,~" 'I ,UII. ~ ;1.;1 I II., I U4'¡ r .UU'IU~IO I. J . ~t..¡. \.." '\ '1:.'.' \, .. ".-~-\. ,';;; "I 'J n..J,"" ..... \ "\ ., '- ,....". J u¡;; \ Jf " ". r.¡" , '" 8" ~\..I? "~ ,....._. 7't'iì 'I~ \,' "" '"\"~ '... ."1 ~ ~ '.'. --'. \'1 ".;'. \ ". C'~ \, '\. "~.;Z " "- ". -;"~'''''1 ~~ . ""\ ,_ " 'i', ,. \ :>0'",,' "~~"I' ... ~ '. .. JJ " '.... " "'\ "'i, ~. ... ~_. . ,/ \ '.. ~, ... ..' '\ :r'aï~ ......0:. I /... _.~uw...~... ".~ ·_,(1dIdÇ1j~ij) ::iGi:'~ ~,,_v""~·· .. . --,.Ý' , \; -. ~ - - ....--, ,. /'~ t 1 '" '--....-....,...-._..--...-.._,._^_~I_.~""""""""'... .... \. "' ...:;...... ,.tß:i.. '11A~~2..4_..__ .... .... ..::.._~..- ~~.::-"II. ~ . .:,.....:.··~-':.~.:w .,-" ~"'1¡\.......~~... :;<,I -~~ '. -·1II~~·~~--II\"~-Ñt~:t-...\ ".'~1o'\'"_',.¡I . '\. \. \ ''''\\ ':.," ~...,.,........... .". ¡pO) ¡,~ ' L- \ .....r , Jw ¡ ..... ~---- .,-____-;-'W -_--__.._\-._...._._.. . .....'.. __I........ _ -...... ~ .. _"9£1 ' I I ¡pg,1 è' þ ...~- - ,- .".'.' ""--. --- - --_... 4' .__--' ~~læIO N ./ ",:lA.IHO I ON tl7HJ.JlI ...." '. ... "....... '~~'~:::-, ..... -.. ----: ." '. ,,-,,' ~f.t¿'.--li:;·,~ {t \. ~.¡, .......-....- ... r+ . .... l· \ ~. . .. \'..;' " , w", \, _,'I... ,.. ...., ....t:'; \: - . ......, r 't '.. '~ < ¡, - " .st ... t ...., ~ '\I ". !: '. ~ - I~ ~ "" ',,' ... f!\ ", I .... ~ (., " \. iii ;-; ·t~ ~ "' '. 'lor. " . ........."11' \~.. . .. . .... " ". '. ... ... ... . " " ~- , '~1~ "~ . ~ I "i " r " I . . .'~ ., .~.. I~' l . '", , l' ,'f. ., ' '..', r . w 1 . GO 'd 81£9 EGZ 199 'ON Xtl,j S30I.HO t1i:J1 J.Jd or :Z¡ NOM ZOOZ-SZ-83:.1 ,;I iol ,"U "- U " ~~ . I ~ I04U 1". ~ùUUUtì r ¡I U < . Beam Properties . -- ~ --_..-@ Tl'ìese ¡¡il;s:rations are reprsssntatiOns of me bearr spreads pror:JuCèd by each oplical sYStenì, Tiley are Imended to help you visùaiiz9 ttle periormance differences between each mode: wilhout nav;ng to analyze photometric cn~rt$, AFL21 ttìrougl1 AF~25 oeam pat!errl$ are show'1 in lr;tn~ç3¡ $calç. The AFL26 bèarr pattern is $!"own at h scale oue to page cOI'\3,raim$. Ma,!"! Seam Main ß@am .. Main B&iim Main Seam . ~ &1 AFL21 AFL22 AFL.23 Wide Flood Vertical Flood Medium Flood - 4.-..- Tr'le .A.FL21 prOðuoes a very wide The AFL22 prQdl,ces a i.mìque distribu- The AFL22. is desígMd to bridge th~ horlzonlal bêarn patlern designed to lion in whiclî the peak intensity occurs gap betvVe,en wide and narrow flood yield maximum tixture spacings and above the airr.ing line and rapidly reduces dlstribulions. It is a mid-range Il.Iminaire exceptionally ur'liforrn illLirnination when below the aìming line to generate designed for lighting $¡,¡rfe¡ce$ from t¡-I~ Lmirs must be ¡oeated close to the outstanding uniformity of illumination on O;Slanoas ('If 20' m 60', with low Eliming liomed surface. As a ground mDUn¡ec:1 vElrtical surfaoes wl1an me fixtur$ is at angles generating exoeilent uniformity fixture tor facade ligliting. the idel!1l optiml,m 50° Tilt. As a pale or wall of illumination. fiXMe-1D-Surface distance is 10' [0 30', or mounted lurninaire, me AFL22 has ver¡ twe·thirds the height of tne iliurrinaled low brightneS$ at nlgn angles ~or sulÍace, dep~ndlng on ¡he oesin~d light inoreased vis!pillty. !evel. . . . , ...-.____Â- ~ . ~ ~" - -~--..-- . " '~U' U4"4.. rll" , ., I 04~ p. UU4¡UU6 , I' ~ , 'HOTOMETRIO FILENAME: AF23250M.IE!S . PO!..AR GRAPH · AXIAL CANQ!L.A r ....... - ~ ---~- I I I ì ---,.-- I . j I . ----.J .' . ,.".:' ~\M.-~~~mbYW~\1ÞII~. , -- ..,- ......---...........- ~ . cu no on :: rne I) ø tJon.. Page 5 . ReHID Øari~ ~ccment ~ ESfi:Inn¡¡tp~11Ie, lit -...""',....- .~~ "1 T~~ ç r": ~I 'UU. U4.t4 rl ~ . . -- _. f U4U I . UU51 uUli I It J PHOTOMETRIC FILENAME: Af23250M.UiS . LUMEN TAÐU1..ATlON AVer:age of right and left sides 0 5 15 25 36 45 66 65 7~ 85 90 90 0.03 0.06 0.13 0.1 0.06 0.03 0.04 0.03 0.02 o. as 1.03 2.08 2.21 1.68 0.75 0,25 0.23 0.14 0.07 0.01 16 2.86 621 4.82 3.48 2.04 0.91 0.82 0.26 0.08 0.01 as 8.00 16.39 16.6 16.08 13.72 8.18 2.84 0.31 0.12 0.01 eo 14.32 29.83 30.91 30.78 v,en 19.92 7.35 0.87 0.21 0 52 18.45 37.22 37.31 ~ ;32.~ ~~ 12.69 2.61 0.34 0 44 ~ ,!,.4;1 ~ 4.1.4~ ~ it9.sa 16.99 4.83 0.45 0 36 6iJ!! §U ~ S~,Ð1 §1ä ~.l.1. 19.76 ElM 0.5 0 28 , ~ BíW H.:5§ ~ ~.w ~(!,1.1 ~ 7.7 0.53 0 2Q W ~ ~ 1~6.02 ~ §a¡2B 25;59 8.48 0.66 0 12 ~ ~ ~ ~ ?:14.41 ~ ~ 8.94 0;57 0 4 35.4~ 18.1 aM 131.58 32~.S2 ~ 12·"{1 . 4.84 0.2:1 0 0 35.8ª §LW ~ j 84.63 ~ W 12D. 4.$5 0.25 0 04- . äM 148.15 .1Zt.§4 ~ ~ ä.1§ 24-l 8.00 0.49 0 -12 §i& ~ ~ mø .:11.Za ~ äM 8.51 0.64 0 -20 ~ ~ 94.46 ~ j1U .§.Qd W 1.74 0.61 0 -28 27.78 . SA §t§ l1J.á ~ ~ 18.16 6,61 0.6 a -36 äZ1 ~.4i ~ ä.a ·3.5.a7 ~ 16.3 4.99 0.51 0 44 17.6 34.S7 34.56 23.a5 ~ 24.91 12.24 2.75 0.86 0 ..a2 13.8 28.01 28.92 28.77 26.6 20.02 7.44 0,85 0.22 0 -GO 8.62- 17.14 17.2' 16.94- 14.99 10.4 3.4 0,2 0.11 0 . -68 3.132 6.£11 6.4 5.42 $.89 2.26 1;11 0.13 O.oe 0 ..15 1.25 2.57 2.86 2.16 0.88 0.61 0.35 0.09 0.05 0 -as 0.06 0.09 O.1S 0.11 0.07 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.01 0 -so $72.0101 1240.19 1367.82 1719.22 1671.4 714.3101 286.8 90.92 1.53 O.OS ¡oml Lumens = 762B.39 Toiij¡ Ei!!tld Lumens,: ~EW3 ~~=~_1~=~~~~'--- - - Page 4 . Ril\¡œ derived frgm GOfñan1 ør 1'MI\1I1acIIut1tr,a IEfI fcJtrnIIt ~~ 1Uer. ~ . · Fab-'¡-ZUUZ U4:,.pm Frcm- I-U4J ~.UUbIUUb I I IV PHOTOMETRiC FILSNAMIe : AF23250M.lES . ISOCANÞELACURVØ ~ --- 1647.3 (10%max.) ,8236.8 (50 % rnax.) / 60 , ........ --.. ... .. \ -r--t. \ . I 30 ì , \ \ \\ I ~.. . .. I \" I I I I T t \ o i~ ¡ I . '~,! i I \ ¡i II -t \- I I I I , of ~, . / '........ ¡ ,/ -30 I I " ( ..--1-- . ,/ :.:.:.:L "J ¡ ~ .. __ ...... _ -. ~ _, ~ t ! I . I I ¡ -60 ,_ I I I ~ I" I 1-1 ¡ ! ¡ I II ~-'-: I " i H ~ ~~ï] _~ ~L~iù=f~~~h¡¡,t~· - - - - ,,- -.. - - - - - ~ ~ -...... -.. - -. ~ . - - - - pågË, s-· . Jlbø¡¡1tD ~. .::ontant 4W ~Nt& lEa fI:!tI\1MØ!t*~tlle. TOTAl.. P.6? Project: Summit Management Determination: ./ COMPLETE INCOMPLETE Developer: Mark lambert - Site Plan submitted: March 14, 2003 Date Reviewed: March 24, 2003, March 31, 2003 Page 1 of 4 . City of St. Joseph Ordinance Compliance - R3 Multiple Family Development Plan Applications Completed applications for Development Plans and required fees shall be submitted the City of St. Joseph Zoning Administrator at least 21 days prior to the proposed date of consideration by the City. The City will review the application within 10 days of submission and make a determination as to whether or not the application is complete. Only completed applications will be'processed for review by the Planning Commission. It is the applicant's responsibility to submit required materials. If an application is determined to be incomplete, notification, which indicates which portion of the application is incomplete, will be mailed to the applicant within 10 days following submission of the application. REQUIRED MATERIALS - The applicant shall provide the following: Requirements Satisfied Comments 1 Is the proposed use a permitted use . NO . "i;A .. The building plan includes private garages which are evaluated on the' 2 Is an accessory included ..¡~ .;-- ':«<; NO standards stated below. (a) Private garages - total floor area not to exceed 300 . NO ' :_~;;~ square feet per unit and not higher than 15 feet. (b) Storage buildings - equipment maintenance YES NO Not applicable · location: must be located in rear yard YES NO . · Maximum Height - 15 feet YES NO · Exterior - Same/similar to roof and side walls YES - NO · Maximum allowed: 1 detached storage building YES NO · Maximum size: floor area cannot exceed 300 sq ft YES NO """I' 3 Lot Area - Minimum Requirement 12,000 square feet g.w NO Lot area = 3.7 Acres or 161,172 square feet Units in Units in Required Square Computation of number of permitted units Configuration Configuration Footage Total Lot area 'A" 'B" "A" 'B" Efficiency unit for each 2,000 square feet Configuration 'A" One 1 Bedroom unit for each 3,000 square feet 150,000 square feet 11 8 33,000 24,000 One 2 Bedroom unit for each 3,500 square feet Configuration 'B" 30 30 105,000 105,000 153,000 square feet One 3 Bedroom unit for each 4,000 square feet 3 6 12,000 24,000 4 Lot Area cannot exceed 35% of the lot including The print provided illustrates the building is 270 x 60 for a total square accessory building M§' NO footage of 16,200 sq ft and the garage is 5,900 sq ft, Total area covered is 22,100 or 14 percent. 5 Allowances add/deduct per unit This project does not have any additions or deletions when configuring square footage per unit. The site is given a deduction for < 300> sq ft for each parking space provided within the YES NO being adjacent to commercial property and an addition for being - building or underground adjacent to a residential district The addition and deduction are a wash. - <300> sq ft - if the site is adjacent to commercially zoned property Project: Summit Managemént Determination: .,r COMPLETE INCOMPLETE - Developer: Mark Lambert Site Plan submitted: March 14, 2003 Date Reviewed: March 24, 2003, March 31, 2003 Page 2 of 4 . + 300 sq ft if site is within 300 feet of an R1 or R2 ¡~'N£S NO <150> sq ft if total lot coverage is less than 20% YES NO + 2 dwelling units if building is razed or cannot be YES NO rehabilitated <75> sq ft for outdoor recreation feature exceeding 5% YES NO of the construction cost of the main structure, <50> sq ft for indoor recreation feature equal to 25 YES NO square feet per unit or 1,000 square feet Ô Setback requirements · Minimum width -150 feet at building setback line ~;¡y;~ NO The width of the property is approximately 340 feet · Minimum width - 80 feet at public right-of-way ti$,~ NO · Front Yard - 40 feet from lot line YES NO The property has two frontages, the portion facing County Road 75 ~ESc and that facing Northland Drive, The front facing Northland Drive · Side yard - 20 feet from the lot line unless the side NO meets the setback which the front facing Cty Road 75 does not. The yard abuts a street or highway in which case it building will need to be moved 10 feet. shall not be less than 30 feet. If the side yard abuts another residential district all principal structures shall be setback 50 feet from the property line. Facing South (County Road 75) setback is approx 30 feet therefore. · Rear yard - 40 feet from the lot lihe -~ES NO the building will be moved north approximately 10 feet. 7 Height - lesser of 3 stories or 40 feet ifES NO 8 Signs · No sign shall be placed closer than 10 feet to any YES NO property line, except directional signs · No sign shall be placed in any interior side yard, mounted on the roof, violate any setback or placed YES NO in the right of way, · No sign shall be flashing, rotating or illuminated YES NO 9 Vehicle Entrance Sign YES NO Lambert has clarified that the sign wiil not exceed eight feet, will be landscaped and it will be moved out of the ROW, · Maximum size - 50 square feet h'ES NO · Maximum height - 8 feet YES NO · Landscaping - must be around base of sign YES NO The sign does qualify as Northland Drive will be considered a · Abuts a collector or arterial YES NO collector/arterial street - 10 Area identification sign - must have 3 or more structures YES NO The oroposed development does not qualify for an area identification sign as the site does not contain more than 3 structures - · Maximum size - 50 square feet per side, YES NO aggregate total of 100 square feet. Project: Summit Management Determination: ./ COMPLETE INCOMPLETE - Developer: Mark Lambert Site Plan submitted: March 14, 2003 Date Rèviewed: ~ March 24, 2003, March 31,2003 tige30f4 · Maximum height - 8' YES NO · Landscaping - must be around base YES NO · Sign content - must display name of complex YES NO 11 Wall Sign - not exceeding 12 sq ft, street identification YES II This is not indicated on the plan. Only 12 Development Plan a) Bùilding Location on the lot drawn to size .. NO b) Building elevations; front, rear, side .. NO c) Building Exterior material and color .. NO .. The plan includes two alternatives with the preferred access in the d) Locations of ingress/egress [<¡- .-=.<1: NO upper northeast comer. An alternative ingress/egress has been included using an access point between lot 1 and lot 2. Included in your packet is a letter from a traffic engineer hired by Lambert regarding the access points. The Commission will need to determine the access for this property. e) Dumpster/solid waste areas screened .. NO fj Sign Location and dimensions .. NO . Lighting Standard and hood detail .. NO -"'-~'" h) Parking and loading areas defined lIrIi NO i) Drainage by the use of arrows and/or contours stl-i NO j) Screening of HVAC Equipment YES NO Not applicable as nothing will be located outside k) Landscaping material including the location, type, size e NO "" ""n- -~ . I) Fire hydrant and fire lane locations E~% NO ~~~.J% m) Utility Locations NO The plan indicates that a playground area will be provided this too n) A description of provisions which shall be made on the NO should be conditioned upon the Certificate of Occupancy. In addition site for adequate open space and recreational areas to to the playground area, an additional open space is being provided in properly serve residents of the facility the northeast corner of the lot. 0) Fencing/screening/accessory buildings identified NO This has been referred to Joe Bettendorf please refer to his p) NPDES Permitting requirements submitted NO comments. q) Compliance with state and federal guidelines including, YES NO but not limited to glare, smoke, dust, odors, and noise. r) Required fee NO Units Units Configuration Configuration 13 Parking 'A' uB" 'A' 'B' - Boarding house, rooming house, bed and breakfast, 1 Bedroom 11 8 16.5 12.0 multiple family dwellings and rental residential dwellings. - One and one-half (1 2) spaces for each single- bedroom 2 Bedroom 30 30 75.0 75.0 dwelling, two and one-half (2 2) spaces for each two- bedroom dwel/ina. four (4) SDaces for each three- 3 Bedroom 3 6 12.0 24.0 Project: Summit Management Determination: .,r COMPLETE INCOMPLETE - Developer: Mark Lambert Site Plan submitted: March 14,2003 Date Reviewed: March 24,2003, March 31, 2003 Page 4 of 4 . bedroom dwelling, four (4) spaces for each three- bedrôom dwelling, and an additional 1.25 spaces for Total Required Configuration A - 104.0 each additional bedroom within the dwelling. Any Total Provided Configuration A - 104.0 (provided double garage is bedroom larger than 140 square feet shall be considered acceptable) as two bedrooms for the purpose of determining the total number of bedrooms within a dwelling. Fractional Total Required Configuration B - 111.0 numbers shall be rounded up to the next highest whole Total Provided Configuration B -104 (provided double garage is number. acceptable) The parking will need to be increased for this altemalive. 14 · Adequate ingress and egress shall be provided. YES NO To be determined by the Planning Commission · Such parking lots shall be constructed and ¡yes. NO The plan indicates the parking area will be paved, striped maintained in a useable condition, with a hard surface consisting of concrete, bituminous, pavement or paver stone designed to drain and dispose of surface water. Recycled bituminous or concrete shall be prohibited except as permitted in an industrial area by special use permit or variance. · Whenever such parking lot boundary adjoins ' 'y,t~ NO Plan exceeds the requirements property zoned for residential use, a setback of fifteen (15) feet from said lot line shall be required, and maintained. · Necessary curbs or other protection against ¡,'ES NO Curbing is included damages to adjoining properties, streets and sidewalks shall be provided and maintained, · No sign shall be so located as to restrict the sight, YES NO The proposed sign is not located in the parking area. However, . orderly operation and traffic movement I'/nhin any depending on the height of the sign it may impair visibility and the sign parking area. Only signs necessary for the orderly may need to be moved back. As stated above the sign will be moved operation of traffic movement or parking regulation out of the ROW. shall be permitted in any parking area (e.g. visitor parking, deliveries, handicap parking). Such signs shall not be considered part of the permitted advertising space and shall be subject to signage regulations. · All parking lots shall be screened and landscaped YES NO While the garages abut the residential neighborhood, the proposed from abutting residenlial uses or districts by a wall, landscape plan meets the requirement as if the parking area abuts the fence or densely-planted compact hedge or tree residential use. cover not less than four (4) feet nor more than eight (8) feet in height. · Except in the case of single-family, two-family, and N'ES NO townhouse developments, parking areas shall be designed so that circulation between parking aisles or driveways occurs within the designated parking lot and does not depend upon a public street or alley and such design does not require backing onto the public street. Comments: - - .). Page 10[2 Judy Weyrens . From: "Mark Lambert" <mlambert@infi.net> To: "Judy Weyrens" <jweyrens@cityofstjoseph.com> Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 10:07 AM Subject: Re: Plan Review Judy, per your request and our conversation this morning, I have provided my responses below each question. I also-want to call your attention 'to Subdivision 3(k) and 3(1), Section 52._: General Parking Requirements: Section 3(1) provides that "all properties shall be entitled to at least one (1) curb cut". Section3(k) provides that "curb cut openings shall be a minimum of five (5) feet from the side property line". These two sections seem to indicate that my Plan B (common access) is not longer allowed under your new ordinances and that I am entitled to at least two curb cuts for my two lots on Northland Drive. Is this your understanding of these sections? How would you recommend we proceed in light of this? ----- Original Message ----- From: .J..ldQy_\'YªYI-ªD~ To: Mark Lambert . Sent: Monday, March 31, 2003 9:30 PM Subject: Plan Review Good Morning Mark -- I have finished reviewing your site plan and have the following questions: 1. Accessory Buildings are limited to 300 square feet per unit. In reviewing your plan I believe some of the garages exceed that limit. The only garage unit that exceeds 300 square feet is the handicap unit which is 440 square feet. Cole Architects has advised me that a handicap garage is needed to comply with the American with Disabilities Act. 2. Rear Yard Setback - Requirement includes a 40 foot setback in reviewing the plan the southeast corner of the lot is only 30 feet from the lot line. The plans are based on the front yard being the side along Northland Drive, the side yards being interior and parllel to the building length, and the rear yard being the western most side of the property (opposite Northland Drive). In the definition sections: Subdivision 56 defines a lot as having its "principal frontage" upon a street; Subdivision 63, defines lot frontage as "the front of a lot shall be for puposes of complying with this Ordinance, that boundary abutting a public right of way having the least width'; Subdivision 93 described the setback line as "the mean horizontal distance between the front street, right of way line and the front line of the building or allowable building line as defined by the front yard regualtions of this Ordinance. All of these references seem to indicate that Northland Drive should be considered the front yard of - the property, and that the interior property lines be considered the side yards (which south side yard would require a 20' setback to comply with the originance). - 4/112003 Page 2 of2 If there is some basis to reach a different conclusion or interpretation of the oridinance, I am willing to move the building an additional 10' north to obtain a 40' setback. 3. Signage - The plan is missing the height of the sign as it can only be 8 feet. On the same issue on plan A is . the sign located in the ROWand could it create a visiblity problem. The entrance sign on Plan A does appear to be in the right of way. This is a mistake and it will be located immediately west of its present location, just inside the property line. This height will not exceed 8 feet. 4. Curbing of parking area - I did not see that it mentioned curbing around the parking area. I assume it will be curbed. While it is hard to see, the plans include curing and it will be curbed. I could be miss reading the plan and the comments have not been submitted to the Planning Commission of yet as I am seeking clarification first. They will be going out today. Please call me with your comments. . - - 4/1/2003 "'sæ 1200 25th Avenue South, P.O. Box 1717, St. Cloud, MN 56302-1717 320.229.4300 320.229.4301 FAX architecture . engineering . environmental . transportation · April!, 2003 RE: S1. Joseph, MN Lambert Apartment Development SEH No. A-STJOE 0301.00 D22 Ms. Judy Weyrens Clerk! Administrator City Of Saint Joseph 25 College A venue North PO Box 668 Saint Joseph MN 56374-0668 Dear Judy: I have reviewed the analysis prepared by Benshoof & Associates, and submitted by Summit Management, for access to the proposed apartment site on Northland Drive. I concur with the recommendation of Benshoof & Associates that the northerly access (Concept A) is the best fit for the site. The access has been moved north approximately 90 feet from that shown on Summit · Management's previous submittal. This provides better separation from Little Crow Court, and a flatter grade into the parking lot. It also presents a better entrance for emergency vehicles. I have also reviewed the drainage information submitted for the site, and recommend approval of the concept of taking drainage from the entire site west to the old gravel pit near First Avenue NE. There are still easement issues to be worked out, and I would like to have the actual construction plans for all site improvements submitted for approval prior to a building permit being issued. Finally, I do not recommend approval of the overall site plan until the following changes have been made: , 1. There is a "tìre lane" noted on the site pian that goes around the south side of the building. As I understand it, this is to be a flat area that is not paved, that can only be used in the summer time. Snow will make this lane not accessible during the winter months. The Fire Chief has indicated to me that this is acceptable provided the access is there during the remainder of the year. To accomplish this, a curb cut is needed from the parking lot, a gradual slope is needed to get from the parking lot to the lane, and the lane must be widened at the comers to allow room for the City's fire truck to make the turns. The surface must be solid enough to allow access during rainy weather. · Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc. . Your Trusted Resource . Equal Opportunity Employer Ms. Judy Weyrens April 1, 2003 Page 2 2. The fire hydrant near the east end of the building should be relocated near the parking lot so that · it is accessible year around. A second fire hydrant should be provided at the west end of the building near the parking lot. The water main serving the two hydrants must be 8~inchs in diameter. " The Fire Department hookup on the building (the "siamese") should be located on the front of J. the building so that it is easily accessible from the parking lot. A second Fire Department hookup should be located at an accessible location on the south side ofthe building. This concludes my remarks. Sincerely, SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON INe. Jo ~ ph R. Bettendorf, PE City Engineer mdh c: Dave Theisen, St. Joseph Fire Department Dick Taufen, St. Joseph Public Works Superintendent · x:\pt\sljo~\d22Iambert apartment de....e!opment\1-city·040103.doc · . VRajkOWSki 11 Seventh Avenue North ~~~~~~~~ Ltd. P.O. Box 1433 St. Cloud, MN 56302-1433 March 31, 2003 320-251-1055 Toll Free 800-445-9617 Ms. Judy Weyrens Clerk Administrator, City of St. Joseph Fax 320-251-5896 25 College Avenue North P.O. Box 668 rajhan@rajhan.com St. Joseph, MN 56374 www.rajhan.com RE: Summit Management, LLC Development Plan Approval/Stonn Water Plan Approval Our File No. 22641 Dear Judy: I have had an opportunity to review the Development Plan of Summit Management, LLC . for Lot 1, Block 1, Indian Hills Park. I assume that a copy ofthis application has also been sent to Joe Bettendorf for his review and comment. I will defer to his judgment regarding the adequacy of the surface water management plan. Apart from that, I have the following comments: 1. The property is zoned R-3. The proposed development is for a 44-unit Frank J. Rajkowski .. apartment complex. This is a pennitted use under the revised Ordinance 52.24. Gordon H. Hansmeier 2. The plans submitted do not contain the total lot area so I am unable to Frederick L. Grunke determine whether the apartment complex meets the lot density requirements contained Thomas G. "Jovanovich· in the Ordinance. Paul A. Rajkowskio 3. The proposed development appears to meet the minimum lot size, width Kevin F. Gray and setback requirements, as well as the height limitations and the 35% lot occupancy. It William J. Cashman also appears to meet the parking requirements for the number of units proposed. Richard W. Sobalvarro 4. The proposed sign meets the dimension and location requirements. Susan M. Dege 5. The plans do depict the location of fire lanes, fire hydrants, utility LeAnne D. Bartishofski locations, dumpster location and screening, and open space/recreation areas. The Sarah L. Smith ordinance requires "adequate open space and recreational areas." I will defer to the Joseph M. Bromeland judgment of the Planning Commission on whether the plan meets this requirement. The .~ry J. Haupert plan refers to a "future community center area." This would be a pennitted accessory use; however it is not depicted in adequate detail to be approved at this time. Frank J. Rajkowski and Richard W Soba/varro are admitted to practice in North Dakota, Gordon H. Hansmeier in North Dakota and Wisconsin, Paul A. Rajkowski and Sarah L. Smith in Wisconsin, and William 1. Cashman in South Dakota. uMember of American Board of Trial Advocates. -Qualified ADR Neutral. V March 31, 2003 Page 2 . 6. The plans detail the exterior building materials and colors, as well as the landscaping and lighting plans. 7. The, plans contain two options for ingress/egress onto Northland Drive. It is my understanding that the developer eventually plans to construct a similar apartment complex on Lot 2 immediately to the South of this development. Considering that intent, the option whereby both lots would share an ingress/egress onto Northland Drive would be the preferred option in order to minimize the impact on the traffic flow. All in all, this appears to be a well planned facility which will benefit the City. If you have any questions regarding my comments, please give me a call. Very truly yours, SMD/jll . Enclosure . City of St. Joseph . Development Routing Form Site Plan Sùbmitted (Date): Friday, March 14, 2003 Developer: Mark Lambert Planning Commission (Date): April 7 , 2003 (Anticipated agenda date) Date Plan is Routed to appropriate departments March 19, 2003 Comments tobe returned by: March 28,2003 Project Type Preliminary Plat B 1 Development Industrial Final Plat B2 Development R2 Development PUD B3 Development x R3 Development Departments for which comments are requested: . x City Engineer x Public Works x Building Inspector x City Attorney x Fire Chief EDA Please review the attached development plans and submit written comments by the date indicated above. This form must be returned to the City Offices by the date stated above. If you do not have any concerns please indicate so on the lines provided below. f)~ ~ !;J¿trAJ. ~P4f.:6døU> A',,, ¡- k ),d¿,/h. !2kP,,~ /Áh~Øffo -~ <, <¿~;p/ ~.k_ 6I-~-' ð~ú/~)/7Yj~ r;6IiõuziD ~Ti¡J:tb::~~;Z1:f1j~~7~1¥ ~)ldr~ '¿~~A,,Ød¿'''#dÜ);'j~-.J I a j!-. ? 1 ?. J") . ^ ., - , _. ',"~. ,~Ú ~ tb þ ()~~~(,b~' th1LJ.t~d('~1/V'6~úJzdiD~£;. ". ~% '--' .3/d/ ~'6J3 R Department Si "ature Date . . . 'JtoAnt?d~ ~i:b Ad- ~ /7- ~5. o,-~.~ .~J:ieI.~.~?l~.~ ~ OJ!1lù ti lJ~ ~ ~~ cJ¥ 1J!d.~;J~}aa f) íiÞq¡~ ./:Á ..."Y.}1U ;r Ai ~ A;.,..-.h._ . ¿1 City of St. Joseph Development Routing Form · Site Plan Submitted (Date): Fridav. March 14. 2003 Developer: Mark Lambert Planning Commission (Date): April 7. 2003 (Anticipated agenda date) Date Plan is Routed to appropriate departments March 19. 2003 Comments to be returned by: March 28. 2003 Project Type Preliminary Plat B I Development Industrial Final Plat B2 Development R2 Development PUD B3 Development x R3 Development Departments for which comments are requested: x City Engineer x Public Works x Building Inspector · x City Attorney x Fire Chief EDA Please review the attached development plans and submit written comments by the date indicated above. This fonn must be returned to the City Offices by the date stated above. If you do not have any concerns please indicate so on the lines provided below. -/ ., ('A/~uø:d£; /~ c/?/",u ö J- -/ h é>U/.é'ÙCJéL ~ - ./ ./Vt,R'¡¡'~~,£) 2JÆ. ,.¿? 2)~),:.(J;(.J /i? h/I ~s 7/C/ o/íVP ~6¿: .5~,p 5.J-p~ /11{,·"'~.:>J 3---- c:/ 7¿JS Date · . Public Safety Comments Public Works Director - Dick Taufen · Does not support entrance on Hillside, would prefer middle access · Concern expressed about drainage and ponding as considerable water runs off the hill. · Proper silt fencing must be installed during construction and erosion control must be reviewed to avoid washouts. · Encouraged participation in the drainage system if the proposed site is to be drained to the City holding area. Police Chief - Pete Jansky · Prefers the plan with the access at the center line. Concerns about public safety. . . City of St. Joseph . . Development Routing Form Site Plan Submitted (Date): Friday, March 14, 2003 Developer: Mark Lambert Planning Commission (Date): April 7,2003 (Anticipated agenda date) Date Plan is Routed to appropriate departments March 19, 2003 Comments tobe returned by: March 28, 2003 Project Type Preliminary Plat B 1 Development Industrial Final Plat B2 Development R2 Development PUD B3 Development x R3 Development Departments for which comments are requested: . x City Engineer x Public Works x Building Inspector x City Attorney x Fire Chief EDA Please review the attached development plans and submit written comments by the date indicated above. This fonn must be returned to the City Offices by the date stated above. If you do not have any concerns please indicate so on the lines provided below. f){) ~ ill ~ <~~,tb """-.¡ k ;,;;¿¿, ,';,Ú /)jf P, /~ I-Ù'4H'H~ ~ ~~ ~j'f;!;to Æ~ <?-£ ÁT~LdA~)~~ ~/b~ , ~:iÄ~f~~~~~J1:::j~:;;:;;¿7~~ (j>TJ~~¿~~A.ø-£~)ð~L~) . ~ a I 1/ ,7 1 ?, ~(, ' . '- . J-. i , . ç' f ." ' , ,', ~!//!7. . i- tf) ,þ ~T~~~~~i~' [k.v~~dl~'..¿~Wzdib'~f/¿' " }JbA'l'r 3·-¿;r/ --;:;3 ' Department Si ature Date . lfo.4)tttd~rävAJ/~-: d-~. íD( I~. r. /' ~.d. _lJII1}~ft'-'~~~~~~k1J~ ~h IJ;?Údà~'-&~ 1Y.dM;)~pa¡;~.M~ jh/Y.rJHdif Ai~/IdJ:N",_A._ _ ¿1 / City of St. Joseph Development Routing Form · Site Plan Submitted (Date): Friday. March 14. 2003 Developer: Mark Lambert Planning Commission (Date): April 7.2003 (Anticipated agenda date) Date Plan is Routed to appropriate departments March 19. 2003 Comments to be returned by: March 28. 2003 Project Type Preliminary Plat B I Development Industrial Final Plat B2 Development R2 Development PUD B3 Development x R3 Development Departments for which comments are requested: x City Engineer x Public Works x Building Inspector · x City Attorney x Fire Chief EDA Please review the attached development plans and submit written comments by the date indicated above. This form must be returned to the City Offices by the date stated above. If you do not have any concerns please indicate so on the lines provided below. ---:r- ?h~u ø ~k /L Cr;?/"~ Ô' J ./ £ ¿',uI.<pùc.J éL ~ - ./VtoR/kÁ:.-FC/.o 2JÆ? ..J? :2)t1i,U;i) /'i? ..4&-// ~..5 ,7,/[) c../NP 46¿ .5 ~,'p .5J-P,K/ /.1 t (" r'&.!>J /tk,,-.r{¡1 .ß¿¡//£J.h!)6 0/ 2;.?,K.;74/b ~/ . - 5~ c;;? r¿J ...5 Date · ---~~~- II J! o~ i X t. If" ~l :1 ' < - ' . ",..: .1:.1. ~ g ã - í!~1.~h;;8:~t f: ~fl ï J J 61) I I \J) ~iHÎ~~!mU~~!:! 1 ! H ~ .j f ~"I J H IU !~rl~íIJJ:i!H I ~f · 1.1 d¡!íf î ; J I ~ ~ '1i, it ·0.. I· t 1 -11¡j · i 6 J · I \I) Wi qHiu~ t ;:¡ J i I mJí§ :] : i, j f I j h i Q j 1iiU1î~lgJ!! ~i I" I !i' i~j¡~i d ~ Ii ~ I ¡ " I' J~"i:!J=I~01 IIf .õ Õ1i'¡1 "" ~ .! ~ _ i!].9¡ li( õl J ~ i ", . õ t . w It h~h·i.f~iJ;f! lat i d! J It;i 11 fi B" Ia i I, ~.~ . ~I·¡"q.î' Hi! II I J-I" rf-' ~ H ~ .1 ~ J. ~ ! ~ Jji:hU;¡i¡ i Ii; t jl f ill&~! . ; I b j :1 ~ ~ ~J ~ ~ ~ I: H:~H!¡8i!i~¡ ~ .~ Î Iii i:I~Ji~ . ~ ~"11'11 ~; .it ~ lj I ~ i" IU limiji!i:~tf ¡ !i¡ il J. )!¡ 1 iï:iif!f i) ~I¡ Htlt Iii !i j !¡~ 1 j ! ~, J > ¡i"!~I~íl '!t¡ j ¡;. J i . fIlII "fi¡".: I I'f ~ ~I; rf §fl! ñl ~ fa. ! ñ f; ! Hf~lnl;lf1{! i ill H I¡~~" f~ I!mm ¡H~~ j dL ~ .i; } In j I: r !i ¡ J I!: j ~ ~~)J ~i¡z~~ ¡J ß Q ~~~~~~~J.~~q~~i.~~~~~~~~~~~~~~; å~~~!~~i~g~~!S~g~~!~~~[~~~~~ ~ ~ _ o~ ~_~, 1~~~~~~~~~8~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 0 C . i¡·';~Hd f;l!f i¡t II , ì m.h,h;"""""'¡Ii¡¡¡U g g:§ I () 1'1'1= .ia,.- o¡ G · I ~ I h¡ ~ i . .. ~ E L ìl:jIHî~~mm ~~!i;~tl ì! i~ ¡h'Î,:h (II, i ¡im ! 'I! J ~ ~ if I J1 hI 0 ¡ 0 ft Þ ~ t- ~ I 1,1 M HI au Þ M ttI ~ä ~C~ 2 Š õ.l õ:¡¡o . -"""7.'~'.~"T'.....-' "",. +" ._.._....!!!L.'!"~..I.!!!..-, ~! L jl~ ili'I~j1~;~ _ _ _ .~~ _ '~..:-~~~, J~_ --..n9£ M.i':51.90.JOS-- \ _.!,,, ..:i is IH )1 SIi_¡ . 3~,V H.1.9~,',\ 30N3^V H.l'1 -----,------------- ;Zj' - 8 JI 0 I '.-.. jÞ ~ f¡ :111= d=aj~s l I I r=--==~'t9T--=-=M----õl'm- 81' ~!i !i ; I fill - a:! .s õ ..Iõ õ _ '": It): . It) I I in "'.I!IH II~ J' !II ¡f ifí;HHiliIH~!i--~ ~---f ~j--,---~---,Ii~ -loq'bll~ In~II~1 ,~I: ¡: : .' aj~H""'!""h:" I I , ~...... 9 '1..Jó //' / I . A . - 2 c: c: i~ i:S ° : . . C·.~ ¡;;o - -.:- J... "I sm:Lt' 011 \" 0; I. c» . J II II· _ % _ :.;"\ . . 01::.., ti"iil-- nOt. -;'''';''''' ':;:IOC:J .dO ãNn J.S3H-...... --' I 1f p=OO¡!¡ I î"I·i .e' I ~j I ~ I ,. ¡¡ iiJ'--.--" -' --- ' --- 0·... .......0.'05---- - ---, ~ 0 foe · i ~ D Ii - -: . :-I'L- ~ - J I" I OJ I J .... ':. ;z ~ :80& ¡.s&¡1í.!:s¡ I e:j 8 ~81' I'"~ I"~ _ t ~Ð ~ ...., \ gj ~ U ðJ ri~~21Ni~s 1i2 .,- : VI: iß8·...~~1 I '--------- II f )~ I ~ \ \ ... 0 j8 1íØii- = Ili- ~ lJ' ~ " s¡: ... I' ~5 Ciñ¡ ~ a~ J¡f;ïi a1 * 1\1\ L-__.tQ1~____ J~~ ...' I \ I _ j .I Þ _ 511 Z ¡:! "'I :!! - R ., ".. - '.. -~ M;I - OJ \ ... o , ¡ g A! Z II . , ---- - ß ~nlt M t9 ~ wJ^ ., "':. ~ I · ~ mil J ~ 'l I H" ~. 311'11 M3,^ ClNÒ.-_ -', · ;;¡'¡'¡'""T'H i -- 'I $ ! t õí _11 -...---¡ ,..'7.... ',fi.,š ~! t¡dji)il ]i:¡i: : : ~(/' I lœ·õiï-~I·' .. ,6'oe.-'¡:iij "''''--.. ", ~ t'" ... 1 'Ii 1 I I' "r-~ I I I I I OJ', .... ü.5 z Õ ~.õ ji ".uõ ~: : fa I r-- a: If:! ~:~ ''''... "'..., ... Ii '!limjtj;'U~ I r-'i!\II-1 .J.,-,.,,",,~ I ¡i '" Iii ----....... ---_ ~ '" õ~ aaa! II) t a1 : : ' ~~ 1í;¡8UI.! .~~li --1 I co \ - g o.i II j J! 1 i z I. . . ~. 'U ã j II E :!l -; Ji ~r' . ði! ~ d~ EUh",õdiñ ad a ..... I I- - -- "·1 : ---I I I It) . I .,-~ I 6 5: ... oó --î N ... C·· ... fi .,.- I ~ f:ì IU --~ /:iJ L'ì ~¡ .,~ I i ·'t) . 0_ -----= I ~ I I I 0 ,- I I ¡ ¡~I u i .-~ --Ii! (~ ~¡¡ I ~~~~ =ti . "'" I ~),~. .~ 5 J,~ x1~~ § '",' I ¡¡; fi ~fii ~ I U~~' bl'! sJI .-~ . 'fl !l~ ~ I· !l xl . 0 ~ I 9 ¡¡; IS b~ J ,,--..... I"W ................~~~ I J -1-- -p --OL'L88 3..9£.i':O.JON--- J ....--mial-.... I UUG.IDH I , t/l /III ]HJ. JIJ t/l /III _ I ~~~,." I J JHJ. JO HI !S3II-- autAIICO ..11 JGH'" ::~t¡~~l(,:! t¡~i.L·l~1.~~il~il::~ I t I 1'1 i I ~ I I I I I I . i ~ I ~¡~ ~¡~~~~~ ~~~¡~~~~~~~ ~ ¡¡¡ ~ ~ ~ i _§~Õ h§I!!IIJn~lllll~a!l~ ...1 ",I~I .I'ml ul § i~~~ ~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~;~ ~~ !~~~ I I I - . . .