Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2003 [06] Jun 02 . www.cityofstjoseph.com ity of St. Joseph 25 College Avenue North St. Joseph Planning Commission PO Box 668 June 2, 2003 St. Joseph, MN 56374 7:00 PM (320) 363-7201 Fax: (320) 363-0342 1. .7:00 PM - Call to Order ADMINISTRATOR 2. Approve Agenda Judy Weyrens 3. Approve Minutes MAYOR Larry J. Hosch 4. 7:05 PM - Public Hearing, Interim Use Permit, John & Kathryn COUNCILORS Owner Occupied Rental in a R-1 Single Family Zoning District. Alan Rassier 5. 7:25 PM - Public Hearing, Preliminary Plat, Leo Buettner Ross Rieke Buettner Business Park Plat 3 Gary Utsch Dale Wick 6. 7:30 PM - Jim Degiovanni, Discussion on future land use for property located on Ridgewood Road. . 7. 7:45 PM - Frank Osensorf, Discussion on curb cut regulations. 8. 8:00 PM - Lemmer Trucking, Tom Lemmer Development Review, Construction of a Loading Dock. 9. 8: 15 PM - BTL Properties, Dave Mehr Development Review, Construction of a 10,000 Sq. Ft. Facility. 10. 8:30 PM - Hettwer Reality Services, Jerry Hettwer Northwest Truck Accessories, Construction of a 30,000 Sq. Ft. Facility. 11. 8:45 PM - Linda Schyma - Special Use Permit and Variance Request Special Use: Allow a rental unit in a General Business Zoning District. Variance: Allow for a parking to be located further than 350 ft from the property. 12. Adjourn . f~1JttJ1.g: · ST. JOSEPH CITY HI/NeiL JUNE 2, 2003 FOR THE OFFICIAL RECORD PLEASE SIGN YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS NAME ADDRESS .- Dy~dórl S¡~-e l. ~~~ 2. ~ ~bmfrl~VL¡J) Sí, ~ka-D !Li~l~ 3. 4. y~ ÅJ l;J¡f)( 5. V)Ad~ rrW~ 17n /J 5l 6. 7. 8. · 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. · May 5, 2003 Draft Page 1 of 7 . Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the Planning Commission for the City of St. Joseph met in regular session on Monday, May 5, 2003 at 7:00 PM in the St. Joseph City Hall. Members Present: Chair Gary Utsch. Commissioners S. Kathleen Kalinowski, Marge Lesnick, Jim Graeve, Kurt Schneider, Mike Deutz, Bob Loso. Administrator Judy Weyrens. City Representatives Present: City Attorney Tom Jovanovich Others Present: Linda Schyma, Diane Schneider, Philip Zehner, Doug Carlson, Lance Honer, Norm Cole, Joe Finley, Mark Lambert, Jim Bensoof, Darrell Bruestle, Steve Hagman. Approve AQenda: Loso made a motion to approve the agenda as presented; seconded by Lesnick and passed unanimously. Linda Schyma, Special Use and Variance Request: Chair Utsch called the public hearing to order and stated the purpose of the hearing is to consider issuance of a Special Use Permit to allow a rental unit in a General Business District and a Variance to allow parking for the rental unit in a parking area located further than 350 feet from the property. The property is legally described as: the south 61 feet of the east 27.15 feet of Lot Twelve (12), Block Nine (9), in the Townsite of St. Joseph and is located at 11 College Avenue North. St. Joseph Code of Ordinances 52.20 provides for the following under Special Use: Mixed use of a permitted use and a mu/tiple residential dwelling units, but only if at least 50% of the interior square footage (exclusive of the basement or cellar) is used full time for a permitted use. The area consisting of multip/e residential dwelling units must meet the standards Sf. Joseph Code of Ordinances 52.19 subd 5 and 6. Parking requirements shall be separately determined for the commercial and residential uses in accordance with Section 52.14 subd. 4. . Sf. Joseph Code of Ordinances 52. 14 provides a collective provision for off-street parking facilities for two (2) or more buildings or uses provided, collectively, such facilities shall not be less than the sum of the requirements for the- various individual uses, computed separately in accordance with the table, and Subdivision 4, and said buildings or uses are within 350 feet of the parking area The request for Special Use and Variance has been submitted by Linda Schyma. Linda Schyma spoke on her own behalf. Schyma stated that she has owned the property at 11 College Avenue North for the past 15 to 20 years. Schyma stated that the upper level of property has been used as a rental unit since approximately 1992 when her daughter Mary Kay Nordman received a Special Use Permit to allow a rental unit in a General Business District. Schyma stated that she was recently informed that a rental license could not be secured for the property as parking for the rental unit is no longer available. At this time Utsch opened the floor for questions or comments. JoAnne Schneider of 408 Gumtree Street approached the Planning Commission questioning the appropriateness of granting a variance for the parking requirement for a rental unit. Schneider stated that it was her understanding that Schyma did have a parking arrangement with Loso's Mainstreet Pub but since the issuance of the Special Use Permit Mr. Loso did not renew the previous parking arrangements. Schneider stated that she does not oppose the issuance a.rentallicense for the aforementioned property, but questions if granting a variance would resolve the downtown parking issues. Schneider stated that she owns a rental unit in the downtown area and provides the required parking. However, due to the shortage of parking spaces, her tenants have been unable to use the provided parking spaces. Schneider stated that if the rental unit at 11 College Avenue North does not need to . provided the required parking adjacent to the property, then the Planning Commission should review the Parking criteria of the Ordinance. The more potential users for available parking spaces will only create additional parking congestion. Weyrens stated that she received written objection to the proposed Special Use and Variance from St. Joseph Mutual Insurance. The letter indicated that they objected to the initial Special Use that was May 5/ 2003 Draft Page 2 of 7 issued in 1992 and are equally opposed to the Special Use at this time. The letter further indicates that the Insurance Company is concerned with excess refuse and parking related problems, both which have . been problematic since the issuance of the Special Use Permit. There being no one further wishing to testify, Utsch closed the public hearing at 7:10 PM. Utsch questioned how Schyma was able to secure a rental license since the Special Use Permitted granted in 1992 contained a condition that the rental license was non-transferable and the license was originally issued to Mary Kaye Nordmann. Schyma stated Mary Kaye Nordmann is her daughter and had interest in the property for a two year period. Weyrens clarified that in addition to the license being non transferable, the Special Use Permit was issued with the clear understanding that the rental unit must have three off-street parking spaces provided by Mark Loso. The Special Use Permit contained the following contingency: "If the parking arrangements with the adjacent property owner, Mark Loso, cease, the special use shall become null and void". Weyrens stated that the City has been made aware that the parking arrangements with Mark Loso are no longer available. Therefore, Schyma was sent notification that the rental license would not be issued for the year 2003-2004. Schyma responded that she was unaware of the off-street parking agreement and the contingencies of the Special Use Permit. She further stated that she had been informed by the rental housing inspector for the City that her rental unit was grandfathered under the old Ordinances. Weyrens responded that the property was grandfathered in respect to the number of tenants, but a Special Use Permit carries unique conditions specific to a property. The conditions of the Special Use Permit were recorded with the property and the City Offices has the official recording document verifying such. Schyma stated that she had spoken with the College of St. Benedict and they have agreed to sell seven parking permits to Schyma each year. It was clarified that the proposed parking is located more than six . blocks form the property. Utsch stated he has a hard time believing that a tenant would park more than six blocks away from their residence. In addition, Utsch stated that he cannot recall any Special Use Permits that have been issued for rental units where the property owner was not required to provided the ~necessary parking, including requiring the parking to be adjacent to the property which is being rented. Loso made a motion to accept Resolution PC2002-_ denying the Variance and Special Use Permit as requested by Linda Schyma. The motion was seconded by Graeve. Discussion: Steve Hagman, City Rental/nspector approached the Planning Commission. Hagman stated he has been the City of St. Joseph's Renta//nspector for four years and had been informed by the former City Administrator, Mayor, City Council, and City Attorney that the rental list that was provided iI/ustrated the above described property as grandfathered under a previous version of the St. JoseDh Code of Ordinances. Therefore Hagman stated he has been under that assumption that they did not need to provide parking. Hagman clarified that this is the only rental unit within the City of St. Joseph that does not provide any off-street parking. Utsch clarified that the number of occupants were grand-fathered in and that is a separate issue from the Special Use Permit. Hagman further stated that the Planning Commission should be aware that the air conditioner and fire escape are located on the adjoining property and refuse removal is also provided by the adjoining property owner. Weyrens clarified that if the fire escape is not available the rental license would be suspended due to fire/building code issues. Jovanovich stated that the property line issue is not one for the City to resolve and is considered a neighbor dispute. Deutz and Graeve recommend giving Schyma time to find parking within 350-feet. Loso made a motion to amend his motion to include the waiving of the public hearing fee if the . property owner can secure parking for the rental unit within the required 350 feet of the above described property. Graeve seconded the amended motion and it passed unanimously. BMD Commercial. Loso Trust Property, Proposed Uses: Philip Zehrer of BMD Commercial Real Estate, approached the Planning Commission to discuss potential uses for the Loso Trust property located on May 5, 2003 Draft Page 3 of 7 · Birch Street West. Zehrer stated !hat he has been working with the trust agent, US Bank, trying to find a tenant to lease the facility. He stated that RL Siding is a potential tenant for the building, but the Ordinance governing the General Business District does not list Storage Facilities as a permitted use. Zehrer stated that this building is difficult to lease as it is not heated, the plumbing is not updated and the building has a unique shape. Therefore, using the building for a storage business makes sense. Utsch stated in the past, this property has had a tendency of storing items outside and the property begins to look like an outside storage facility. Weyrens stated that the new Ordinances include an outside storage provision requiring that all material stored outside must be screened from public view. Zehrer clarified that the property has been cleaned with only a truck and dog kennel stored on the property. Utsch questioned Jovanovich if the City could place a restriction on a Special Use Permit that no outside storage will be allowed. Jovanovich stated a Special Use Permit typically includes special provisions and/or restrictions and limiting or prohibiting outside storage would be appropriate. Weyrens questioned Deutz if the EDA is considering this property as part of a potential redevelopment district. Deutz, also a member of the EDA, stated that this property has been listed as a potential redevelopment area which would include a refurbishment of the exterior. The Planning Commission encouraged Zehrer to contact the St. Joseph EDA consultants for possible renovation and development assistance of the property stated above. Kalinowski made a motion authorizing the property owner of _ Birch Street West to make application for a Special Use Permit in a General Business Zoning District to allow a storage facility in said Zoning District. The motion was seconded by Deutz and passed unanimously. Carlson Development - WobeQon Trail Apartments, Preliminary Plat: Doug Carlson of Carlson Development approached the Planning requesting Preliminary Plat approval for the Wobegon Trail Plat. · Weyrens stated that the City did receive correspondence from Stearns County Environmental Services stating that the proposed plat is an exempted wetland. Weyrens stated that there are two separate issues before the Planning Commission at this time, they are: 1) Preliminary Plat; 2) Site Plan Approval. The Commission should resolve the Preliminary Plat before finalizing the Development Plan. Deutz made a motion to recommend the City Council approve the Wobegon Trail Plat contingent upon approval of the City Engineer. The motion was seconded by Loso and passed unanimously. Discussion: It was clarified that the temporary water and sewer hook up would be included in the final plat approval. Loso questioned if the proposed development will utilize the sewer main recently installed near the existing Maintenance Facility. Weyrens stated that at this time it would not be financially feasible, that is why the property owner is installing temporary water and sewer lines. Carlson Development - WobeQon Trail Apartments, Site Plan Approval: Carlson presented the Planning Commission with a revised site plan and requested approval of the Plan. Utsch stated it is his recommendation that the Planning Commission should review the revised site plan and identify items that need to be included in the Developer's Agreement. The matter could then be finalized at the June 2, 2003 meeting. Weyrens stated that as this matter is regulated with the 60 action ruling, the Planning Commission must either approve the plat at this meeting or extend the time period another 60 days. Jovanovich questioned Carlson if they would be willing to extend the action deadline an additional 60 days. Carlson requested before he agrees to such he would request the Planning Commission outline the areas that need resolution. The Planning Commission outlined the following items needing resolution: Engineering · The annexation should be reviewed to assure that the eastern portion of CSAH 2 was included in the annexation document. · · The building pad needs to elevated 8 to 10 feet and must be completed with suitable material to avoid problems in the future. · The watermain must show an 8" gate valve connection with the existing water main located at First Avenue Northeast and Fir Street East. · The water main should show an 8-inch gate valve at the connection with the existing water main located at First Avenue Northeast and Fir Street East. May 5, 2003 Draft Page 4 of 7 · The water main should be extended past the northern most hydrant, east out the driveway, and stubbed out north and south to provide for a future loop of this line. A hydrant should also be · placed at the end of this line. · The forcemain should maintain a positive slope to the existing manhole located at First Street Northeast and Fir Street East entering the existing manhole as low as reasonably possible. If the forcemain enters the existing manhole 2.5 feet above the inlet, then a drop will be required. Recreational Equipment · A playground plan must be submitted illustrating the type of equipment and location that will be constructed. · The playground facility should be designed for a 69 unit complex. The plan submitted does not appear adequate. · The playground should include activity for residents of all ages. · The bike storage will not be considered recreational activity. Deutz made a motion to extend the 60 land use action requirement so that the above stated information can be submitted and a Development Agreement can be prepared. The motion was seconded by Lesnick and passed unanimously. Weyrens clarified that the Preliminary Plat can be forwarded to the Council for approval separate from the Development Plan. Summit Manaqement, Proposed R3 Development: Weyrens reported the Planning Commission has received a revised site plan for the proposed 44-unit apartment complex proposed by Mark Lambert. The Planning Commission had previously reviewed the proposed site plan and tabled action until the following information was provided: Drainage: The proposed development plan indicates that the storm water will drain to the City · holding pond west of the proposed site. The City Council on April 17, 2003 agreed to the drainage plan contingent upon the developer and City agreeing to a fee for the storm water storage. Therefore, a drainage plan has been submitted and the Development Agreement will specify the fee that will be charged for the drainage. Fire Issues: The Fire Chief has reviewed the plan and will not require that the fire lane be maintained year round, including snow removal, if the connections are placed in the same location as they are indicated on the plan. Lighting: The Lighting was required to be installed on the garage to reduce light pollution to the residential neighborhood north of the proposed development. Access: The Planning Commission required that the City Engineer review the proposed access to the property and determine if the property would best be served with one access located between Lot 1 and Lot 2 Indian Hills Park Plat. The access would extend west, requiring residents to approach the building from the west, rather than the east as presented. Norm Cole of Cole Group Architect, approached the Planning Commission stating that bedroom configuration has changed since the last meeting. The following table indicates the final bedroom configuration and the required parking: # of # of Required # of Units Bedrooms Parking Stalls 6 1 9.0 35 2 87.5 3 3 12.0 Totals 44 108.5 · Weyrens stated the revised plan submitted to the Planning Commission indicates that only 104 parking spaces are provided. Weyrens recommended that a new cover sheet be submitted for inclusion in the Developer's Agreement that indicates the correct number of parking spaces. May 5, 2003 Draft Page 5 of 7 · Joe Finley, legal counsel for Lambert, approached the Planning Commission requesting clarification on several items in the proposed Developer's Agreement. The following is a list of items from the developer's agreement that were discussed: 3.7 Ingress/Egress - The developer's agreement states "Access to the property shall be constructed as shown on the Final Site Conditions Plan "A". Jovanovich stated "vehicular access" had been added to now read" Vehicular access to the property shall be constructed as shown on the Final Site Conditions Plan "A". 3.11 Drainage Plan - The City Council has agreed to allow the development to drain to the City holding pond subject to determining a storm water fee. This matter will be resolved by the City Council on May 15, 2003. 3.12 Landscaping - Jovanovich stated that there is a time frame in which landscaping for R 1 & R2 have to be completed and the R3 Ordinance does no contain such a provision. Therefore, the City has suggested, and Summit Management has agreed, to place a $15,000 escrow with the City to ensure compliance with the landscape design requirements. The escrow will be released when both the playground equipment and the landscaping have been installed. 3.13 Fire Hydrant - Jovanovich received authorization from Fire Chief Dave Theisen to delete the entire paragraph. Theisen stated that as long as the fire connections are located as indicated on the plan and the fire lane is left open he will not require the fire lane to be plowed and maintained during the winter months. 3.19 Requirements for Certificate of Occupancy - Finley requested that the since the Lambert is placing $ 15,000 in escrow in part for the assurance of the construction of a playground facility, the Certificate of Occupancy should not be connected to the construction of such. Cole stated that if the construction of · the 44-unit apartment complex is completed in December 2003; it will be difficult to install the playground equipment especially if the landscaping is not completed. Jovanovich will correct this section as requested. 3.20 Construction Schedule - It was consensus of the Planning Commission that the completion date of the development including the playground will be one (1) year after the issuance of the building permit, subject to reasonable extension for delays due to force majuere causes and material supply shortages beyond the control of Developer. The Planning Commission questioned whether or not Lambert will install curb along Northland Drive. Lambert responded that his plans do not include curbing as it should be coordinated with the property owners abutting Northland Drive on the east side as well as his property. Graeve stated it is his opinion that the proposed access to the property is not a safe access and recommends the access to the development be moved to the center point, accessing from the west. Jovanovich stated he had specifically asked Bettendorf if the access at the north end of the development meets engineering standards and he responded that it met transportation standards. Jovanovich stated it is difficult to deny something when there is factual basis to support it. Jim Benshoof of Benshoof & Associates, approached the Planning Commission on behalf of Mark Lambert. Benshoof stated that he has been retained by Lambert to complete the transportation study and determine the most effective and safe manner to access the property described above. Benshoof stated that while he appreciates the safety concern, it is his opinion that the best access for the property is the one illustrated on the plan. If the access were created on the center point of Block One Indian Hills Park Plat, the elevations would make the road difficult to construct and create a road with an undesirable elevation. · Darrell Bruestle of Luma Sales Associates, approached the Planning Commission on behalf of Mark Lambert. Bruestle stated that he has been retained by Lambert to design the outside lighting. ßruestle stated that two separate lighting plans have been submitted and recommends that the plan labeled "A" be adopted as part of the development project. Plan "An includes Spaulding fixtures that are mounted on the apartment building approximately 28-feet off the ground. Layout "An illustrates that no light extends beyond the back of the garages, thus giving no light pollution on the adjoining residential neighborhood. May 5/ 2003 Draft Page 6 of 7 Conversely, lighting layout "B" only includes lights on the garage, back and the sides of the apartment · building providing only minimal lighting. Bruestle stated in his opinion layout "B" will not provide a safe area. Schneider questioned Bruestle as to what assurance is provided that light will not filter into the residential district. Bruestle responded that the foot-candle print measures the lighting and the meter illustrates the candle illumination at 0.0. Weyrens clarified that the revised Zoning Ordinance restricts candle illumination to 0.4. Therefore layout "A'" meets the requirements of the Ordinance. Jovanovich stated that Bettendorf is requesting that the drainage for the lower lot of Block 1 not be included with the Developer's Agreement. The City Council has already stated that Lot 2 Block 1 can drain to the City holding pond so there is no need to include any additional language. Lambert stated that he would prefer that the drainage for the entire block be considered at this time since the hydrology calculations have been completed. Jovanovich stated that he would review this matter with the City Engineer, but agrees that the drainage for Lot 2 should not be considered at this time. Deutz made a motion to recommend the City Council authorize the Mayor and City Administrator to execute a Development Agreement between the City of St. Joseph and Summit Management for the construction of a 44 unit apartment complex based on the plans approved by the Planning Commission. Ayes: Utsch, Deutz, Loso, Kalinowski, Lesnick, Schneider Nays: Graeve Abstain: None Motion Carried: 6:1:0 Discussion: Weyrens stated the exhibits presented to the Planning Commission at his meeting will be attached to the Developer's agreement as exhibits to assure that the approved plans are constructed. Lambert questioned the status of the site plan approval. Jovanovich responded the site plan has been approved except for the assessment for drainage which will be decided by the · City Council on May 15, 2003. Other Matters: Weyrens stated that the City has received a number of Development requests and questioned if the Planning Commission would consider meeting specially if needed. The Commission agreed to meet on Wednesday, May 28,2003 at 7:00 PM if Development Plans are ready for review. Adjourn: Loso made a motion to adjourn at 8:50 PM; seconded by Graeve and passed unanimously. Judy Weyrens Administrator · April 7, 2003 Draft Page 1 of 8 · Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the Planning Commission for the City of St. Joseph met in regular session on Monday, April 7, 2003 at 7:00 PM at the St. Joseph City Hall. Members Present: Chair (Council Liaison) Gary Utsch. Commissioners S. Kathleen Kalinowski, Marge Lesnick, Jim Graeve, Kurt Schneider, Mike Deutz, Bob Loso. Administrator Judy Weyrens. City Representative: City Attorney Tom Jovanovich. Others Present: Cory Ehlert, Mac Bryant, Jerry Hettwer, Lance Honer, Doug Carlson, Linda Brown, Norm Cole, Ed Terhar, Aaron Krandle, Mark Lambert, Ron Galligan, Wilbur Wilkens, Mel Butkowski, and Gene Plachecki. Approve AQenda: Graeve made a motion to approve agenda as presented; seconded by Lesnick and passed unanimously. Minutes: Kalinowski made a motion to approve the minutes of March 3, 2003 with corrections; seconded by Deutz. Ayes: Utsch, Kalinowski, Lesnick, Graeve, Schneider, Deutz. Nays: None Abstain: Loso Motion carried: 6:0:1 Habitat for Humanity: Cory Ehlert approached the Planning Commission on behalf of the St. Joseph Lions Club who are considering partnering with Habitat for Humanity. Ehlert stated the Lions are looking for a project to not only provide financial assistance but labor as well. Habitat for Humanity is a project whereby a home is provided to a family meeting the income requirements. A family receiving a home must agree to help build the home. · Ehlert stated that Habitat for Humanity typically builds a home on a smaller lot that cannot otherwise be built. The Planning Commission can assist the St. Joseph Lions by allowing a smaller lot that can be purchased for a Habitat home. Ehlert stated that when reviewing a preliminary plat the Planning Commission can encourage the developer to provide a smaller lot by dividing an oversized lot or developing an area of the plat that would not be developed due to Ordinance constraints. Executive Director of Habitat for Humanity Mac Bryant approached the Planning Commission providing a brief overview of Habitat for Humanity. Habitat for Humanity is an international organization that began in 1976 in Georgia. At the present time Habitat for Humanity is operating in 83-86 countries worldwide. Locally, Habitat for Humanity was started in Central Minnesota in 1989 and have since built 24 homes. Bryant stated that families receiving a home must meet the following criteria: 1 . Cannot obtain a commercial loan. 2. Family income must be considered low income based on the federal income brackets. In addition, the family financial statement must indicate that the loan can be repaid. All loans through Habitat for Humanity are interest free. 3. The qualifying family must agree to donate 100+ hours of "sweat equity". Bryant further stated that Habitat for Humanity changes lives for the recipients as it gives them hope and a clean/safe place to raise their children. Habitat for Humanity is funded through private contributions. Schneider questioned if Habitat would consider purchasing older homes and remodeling them to meet current building codes. Bryant stated that they would consider remodeling an older home as long as it did not need to be moved to another location. Redevelopment District, Maintenance Facility: Weyrens stated that over the past year the City Council has been working on the construction of a Public Works Facility. The Facility is anticipated to cost $ · 400,000 and was to be funded through a lease back purchase. However, since the Legislature has been discussing the potential reduction of local government aid and levy limits, the Council requested the St. Joseph Economic Development Authority issue Public Project Revenue Bonds. The advantage of issuing April 7, 2003 Draft Page 2 of 8 public project revenue bonds is that they fall outside of levy limits and should the City need, a levy could . be imposed to help pay the cost of the facility. The project will be built regardless of the financing mechanism, but the issuance of bonds is the most secure method of financing. The original plan for the Public Works Facility included removing the existing facility and constructing a new 12,000 square foot facility at the current site. However, the City Council has reconsidered the location of the facility. If the facility is to built on the current site expansion is not possible and the building cannot be expanded. Therefore the City has found an alternative site located on the corner of 19th Avenue SE and Elm Street East. The property is owned by Hirschfeld, Backes and Helland and they are asking $ 1.09 per square foot for a five acre parcel. The new site could not only be used for the Public Works Facility, but a future water tower and public safety facility. Before the Planning Commission at this time is a proposed Redevelopment District Plan which includes all the property on 19th Avenue SE. The Planning Commission must review the plan in relation to the Comprehensive Plan. If the Plan is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan the Planning Commission must pass a resolution stating such. The City Council will be conducting a Public Hearing on April 17, 2003 on the same development plan that is before the Planning Commission at this time. Deutz stated he is opposed to the proposed location of the maintenance facility. Deutz further stated that the St. Joseph EDA is working to increase the tax base while the City is proposing to remove an industrial lot from the tax base. Deutz further questioned if the water tower will in-fact be placed on the same site and disagrees with the placement of a public safety facility in an Industrial Park. As of this time he has not seen evidence from the City Engineer that the water tower can be placed on the site and that it is a suitable option. Weyrens stated that the property has been sited with the water tower on the property. At this time the hydrology reports have not been completed to determine if the water tower can be placed on the site. . Loso stated that he concurs with Deutz and he was part of the building committee when it was originally presented to the Council. Loso stated it is his opinion that the building should be located_on the property owned by the City. Further, he stated that the City has not explored the option of purchasing a portion of the former Lyman Hul Property. Weyrens stated that she has contacted the property owner of the former Lyman Hul property and was not prepared to determine a value for the land but would be willing to negotiate such. Loso stated that he knows the property owner who purchased the site and he paid $ 50,000 for the 10 acre site. Therefore in his opinion this site would be a more economical site and would not reduce available Industrial property for development. Weyrens stated that the Planning Commission is not making a decision on the location of the Maintenance Facility, rather if the area outlined before them is a redevelopment district and if it is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Utsch stated that it is his opinion that the Public Works Facility does not belong at the current site and the City needs to look for the future. He further stated that constructing a Public Works Facility is a major expenditure and he does not want to locate the building at the current site solely for economic reasons. The City needs to think to the future and at some point the City will have to expand the Public Works Facility. Therefore relocating the facility makes sense. Further, Utsch stated that if the facility is built else where, the current facility can be used for storage of off season equipment. Loso stated that the building committee did review other sites before a decision was made to locate the new facility on the same property. The Council at that time was trying to meet the building needs as well as staying within a reasonable budget. Weyrens stated that since the Planning Commission is meeting jointly with the City Council on April 14, 2003 this matter could be tabled until that time and additional information can be provided. . April 7,2003 Draft Page 3 of 8 · Lesnick made a motion to table action on adopting a Resolution approving the Redevelopment District until April 14, 2003. The motion was seconded by Graeve and passed unanimously. Public HearinQ: Preliminary Plat - Anthonv Lahr: Utsch called the public hearing to order and stated the purpose of the hearing is to consider a preliminary plat application to develop approximately 2.23 acres. The property is located adjacent to 88th Avenue and County Road 75. The property is zoned Highway Business and the request for platting has been submitted by Anthony Lahr. Weyrens stated the property being discussed at this time has recently been annexed and the annexation documents required that the property must be platted upon development. The property is in the process of being sold and it is anticipated the property will be developed with the construction of a Steak House. The Planning Commission will review the development plan at a later date. Jerry Hettwer of Hettwer Real Estate Services representing the Lahr family, approached the Planning Commission and requested approval of the Preliminary and Final Plat. Deutz made a motion to recommend the Council approve the preliminary and final plat of St. Joseph Business Park Plat 2 as presented. The motion was seconded by Loso and passed unanimously. Public HearinQ - Honer Homes, Preliminary Plat - WobeQon Trail: Utsch called the public hearing order and stated the purpose of the hearing is to consider a preliminary plat application to develop approximately 7.62 acres. The development will consist of a 69-unit apartment building and is located west of County Road 2 and North of the abandoned rail bed. The property is zoned Multiple Family, R3 and is legally described as: · That part of the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter, Section 10, Township 124, Range 29, City of St. Joseph, Stearns County, Minnesota, bounded on the southwest by the northeasterly right of way line of the Burlington Northern Railroad Company (now abandoned); bounded on the southeast by the centerline of County Road Number 2; and bounded on the north by the south line of the north 429.00 feet of said Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter. Lance Honer spoke on his own behalf. Honer stated that the plat is being requested as a requirement of the recent annexation and desire to develop the property with a 69 unit apartment complex. It is anticipated that the apartment complex will be constructed late 2003 or the spring of 2004. Loso made a motion to recommend the Council approve the Preliminary Plat of the Lake Wobegon Trail Plat as presented; seconded by Kalinowski. ~iscussion: Weyrens stated that before final plat approval, the City must receive verification from Stearns County Environmental Services that all wetland issues have been resolved. She further stated that Honer is working with· Stearns County Environmental and is hoping that the area will be classified as an exempted wetland. If the area is an exempted wetland then Honer will not need to secure a permit from Stearns County. Therefore, any approval must be contingent upon the wetland permit and the City Engineer. Deutz made an amendment to the motion to require a letter from Stearns County Environment Services either exempting the wetland or approving a wetland permit. Loso seconded the amendment. Discussion: Utsch expressed concern with the proposed development and stated that when the developer first approached the Planning Commission and requested rezoning of the property to · R3, it was stated that the development would include senior apartments. The plan before the Commission at this time is significantly different than what was presented at the re-zoning hearing. Honer stated that when the concept was presented to the Planning Commission, at the time of re-zoning, the engineering had not been completed. Since that time it has been April 7, 2003 Draft Page 4 of 8 determined that development constraints limit the amount of units that can be constructed. · Therefore, the development plan has been altered. Graeve questioned the City Attorney, Tom Jovanovich, if procedurally the Planning Commission is following the right process and approving a plat with contingencies. Jovanovich stated since a plat cannot be changed once the preliminary plat has been approved, the Planning Commisison should not be approving any plat with contingencies. The matter should either be tabled or denied until the required information is submitted. Vote call on the amended motion: Ayes: Loso, Deutz Nays: Utsch, S. Kalinowski, Graeve, Lesnick, Schneider Motion Fails 2:5:0 Lesnick made a motion accepting the proposed layout of the Lake Wobegon Trail Plat and requested that the City Engineer and Stearns County Environment Services provide the City with a letter of approval before a recommendation is forwarded to the City Council. The motion was seconded by Graeve and passed unanimously. Development Review Request, Honer Homes: Doug Carlson of Carlson Development reviewed the proposed 69 unit apartment complex with the Planning Commission. Carlson acknowledged that action cannot be taken on the site plan until the Lake Wobegon Trail Plat is approved, but requested the Planning Commission review the plan and provided comment. The following table is a summary of the site plan review: Issues Honer Homes · Building Rear Yard Setback - The plan Carlson stated they can make the necessary change in indicates the building does not meet the front order to meet the 40 foot requirements. - yard setback of 40 feet, the building is illustrated at 35 feet. Elevation - The Plan does not illustrate the Carlson stated the plans will be revised to illustrate the side, height of the building. rear and front elevation. Sign - The plan indicates a sign will be placed Carlson stated the sign will be located at the entrance of the on CR 2 but the specifics of the sign are not complex and the base of the sign will be landscaped as included. required. The plans will be modified to illustrate such. Dumpster/Refuse - The plan indicates the Carlson stated the dumpster would be screened with a rock location of the dumpster but does not state base and metal gate. The plans will be modified to include how or if it will be screened. such. Recreational Areas - The Ordinance requires Carlson stated the plans include a bike rack and a recreational and green space, the plan community room. Additional recreational opportunities can presented does not illustrate such space. be provided. Carlson agreed to present a recreation plan at the next meetinQ. Lighting Plan - A lighting plan was not Carlson presented the Planning Commission with a included with the development material. proposed lighting plan. The plan includes lighting above the garages and post lighting in the parking area. Parking Lot I Landscaping - The Planning Carlson clarified that the parking lot will meet all the · Commission noted that the parking area must requirements of the Ordinance and he present a revised be paved and marked. As far as landscaping landscapinQ plan at the next meetinQ. April 7, 2003 Draft Page 5 of 8 · the Planning Commission indicated the proposed landscaping is not sufficient and the developer should re-submit a plan WaterlSewer -It was clarified that temporary Carlson stated that they are aware of the future water and service is being approved at this time. sewer assessment and extension. However, when the City extends water and sewer north on CR 2 the developer will be required to re-connect and pay the assessment charges for such. Stop Sign - The Planning Commission requested that any traffic controls should be placed on the revised plan, including a stop sign at the apartment entrance and CR 2. Fire Lane - The fire lane needs to be Carlson stated the building has an indoor sprinkler system indicated on the plan and must remain and has two fire hydrants located at each end of the facility. dedicated as such. Based on the comments of the Planning Commission, Carlson agreed to present the Planning Commission with a revised development plan at their next meeting. · Pond View Ridqe Seven - Final Plat: Linda Brown of Surveying & Engineering Professionals approached the Planning Commission on behalf of Bob Herges and Rick Heid. Brown stated she is requesting final plat approval of Pond View Ridge Plat Seven. The proposed plat contains 18 single family lots. Weyrens clarified that the proposed final plat is consistent with the preliminary plat that was approved in 2000. Kalinowski made a motion relieving developers to present final plats to the Planning Commission provided the final plat is consistent with the approved Preliminary Plat. The motion was seconded by Lesnick and passed unanimously. Development Plan Review. Summit ManaQement: Mark Lambert of Summit Management approached the Planning Commission on his own behalf. Lambert presented the Commission with a development plan to construct a 44 unit apartment complex on Lot 1 Block 1 Indian Hills Park Plat. Weyrens clarified that the plan before the Commission is the same plan presented by Lambert in 2002. Since that time the Ordinances have been updated and the project does not require a Special Use Permit or Variance. Weyrens stated that the Commissioners have been provided a summary of the project in relation to the R-3, Multiple Family Ordinance and there are a few outstanding issues that must be resolved by the Planning Commission. Once all the issues are resolved a development agreement will be drafted and executed to memorialize the approval of the City. Norm Cole, architect retained by Lambert, approached the Planning Commission to discuss the proposed development. The following is a summary of items discussed along with the resolution. Issues Summit Management Fire Truck Access - Verification of the fire lane Cole stated that the plans indicate a fire lane around the should be provided to assure that fire access is building as well as a Siamese connection for fire access. · available at all times. The Engineer should verify Cole stated the building will be sprinkled and fire safety the elevation of the fire lane to make sure the will not be compromised. trucks can use the provided lane. April 7, 2003 Draft Page 6 of 8 Lighting - The Planning Commission discussed Cole stated they can review the proposed lighting plan. · potential light pollution to the residential The plan presented includes the installation of wall pac neighborhood north of the proposed development. lights that will be mounted on the building with adjustable Due to the elevation of the building, the developer lenses so they can effectively adjust any light that would should place the lights are the garage to minimize over flow onto any adjacent property. overflow of lighting. Proposed Drainage Plan - Weyrens stated that a Cole verified the plan utilizes the holding pond owned by drainage plan has been submitted to the City. the City. Hydrology calculations have been completed However, the plan requires that the proposed and the existing holding pond has the capacity to not only development drain to a City holding pond. The hold the storm water for Lot 1 Block 1 Indian Hills Park City Council will be meeting to review this request. Plat, but Lot 2 Block 1 as well. Sign - The proposed sign is located in the front Cole stated they development will include a monument yard setback and must be moved back. In sign that will be located near the entrance and the revised additional the specifics of the sign have not been plans submitted at this meeting indicate the sign has been included with the submitted plans. moved out of the ROW. Lot and area configurations - Weyrens clarified Cole clarified that the plan labeled "A" is the desired plan. that two different building configurations have been The configuration of the apartment is as follows: 11 - presented to the Planning Commission. At this One bedrooms; 30 - Two bedrooms; 3 - Three time the developer must indicate which plan is final bedrooms. Parking requirement: 104 as the parking spaces are based on the number of bedrooms. Exterior Finishing Cole stated the siding would be beige/tan constituting earth tones. Fire Safety Issues - Three issues remain: Cole stated the site plan identifies where the Siamese · connections are located on the building as well as the · Fire Tane around the building, as stated hydrant locations. The fire lane will be a clear area built above. with suitable material to sustain a fire truck. The fire land · Fire hydrant location area will then be landscaped. · Siamese connection, should their be one on the front and back. Recreational Area - Kalinowski questioned the Cole clarified that there will be a swing set and a type of recreational area that will be provided. community room would be located within the building. Ed Terhar of Benshoff and Associates spoke on behalf of Lambert. Terhaar stated that he was retained by Lambert to complete a traffic study to determine the best and safest location for access to the proposed development. Terhar stated that he prepared a report dated March 21,2003 which summarizes that the best access for the subject property. The main reason for not utilizing the centerline access is the elevation of the property which could lead to unsafe conditions. The access indicated on the plan meets applicable engineering standards. Lesnick stated that she opposes the proposed access to the property as in her opinion constructing a north access has the potential of creating a safety hazard. The proposed access is near the crest of the hill on Northland Drive and she has concerns that cars exiting the parking area may not yield for cars traveling south. Terhar reiterated that they have reviewed the elevation of Northland Drive drive and the proposed access for the apartment complex meets all engineering and traffic standards. Terhar further stated the City · Engineer, Joe Bettendorf concurred with the study completed by his firm. If the access was at the centerline of Block, the access would be a much steeper grade with greater potential for people to slide out into the street. April 7, 2003 Draft Page 7 of 8 · Utsch asked Jovanovich for his opinion regarding the proposed access and stated it is his opinion that one access for both lots would appear to be better transportation planning. Jovanovich stated that based on the information presented by the traffic engineer and the City Engineer, he does not see a strong basis for denying the site plan due to the location of the access. Schneider questioned Terhar if when the access study was completed if they reviewed providing access to the property from the rear of the building, using the centerline of Block One, extending the road to the west of the Block. Aaron Krandle, legal counsel for Lambert approached the Planning Commission questioning the need for a Development Agreement and stated that a Development Agreement was entered into two years ago for the same property. Weyrens clarified that the Development Agreement executed two years ago had nothing to do with the proposed apartment complex, rather it was an agreement at the time of platting. Jovanovich stated that it is important to enter into a Development Agreement when multiple plans are presented and the project is reviewed by 4 to 5 different staff members and consultants. The agreement is a process of memorializing the final approved plan and provided a development guide for not only the City but the Developer as well. Once the Development Agreement is executed issues should not arise during the construction. Lesnick made a motion to table action on the Development Plan submitted by Summit Management until the May 5, 2003 Planning Commission meeting at which time the following information should be submitted: · Drainage: Summit Management must receive approval from the City Council to drain the proposed project to the City owned holding pond. Without such approval the project does not include a drainage plan and cannot be approved. Access: The City Engineer should review the logistics of changing the access from the illustrated northern access to using the centerline as the access point constructing the road to the west of the property access the apartment building from the rear. In addition, Bettendorf should provide an opinion as to whether or not the information presented by Benshof and Associates meets the minimum design standards and if safety is an issue with the proposed access. Lambert stated the Ordinance states that each lot is entitled to one access and that they have a five foot separation off that sideline. Lambert stated he is opposed to using a centerline access and has presented a plan which conforms to the Ordinance. Lambert stated there is an option however to bring Cedar Street through the commercial lot connecting to the common access desired by the Planning Commission. However, the planning for this road would take time and negotiation and he does not want the proposed project to be delayed further. Lambert encouraged the City to consider this matter before the commercial lot is developed. The motion was seconded by Graeve and passed unanimously. Deutz stepped down from his chair at 9:20 PM OTHER MATTERS · Future St. Joseph Township Industrial Park, Mike Deutz: Mike Deutz approached the Planning Commission regarding a proposed industrial park in St. Joseph Township. Deutz stated he is part of a partnership that is purchased a103 acre tract of Ignd located on Ridgewood Road, just north of Astech. April 7, 2003 Draft Page 8 of 8 Oeutz stated that he is in the process of platting the property for an Industrial Park and Stearns County is · requiring that he present the proposed development to the City of St. Joseph Planning Commission. Oeutz stated that the Planning Commission does not need to act on the proposed development, rather they must acknowledge the proposed development. Graeve questioned Oeutz as to his intentions for the property. Oeutz responded that the proposed Industrial Park will include small lots and will be developed in phases. The proposed development meets all the standards as required by Stearns County Environmental Services. The property will be serviced with well and septic systems. Oeutz resumed his chair at 9:25 PM Subdivision Public Hearinq: Utsch reminded the Commissioners of the public hearing for the Subdivision Ordinance that will be held on April 14, 2003, 7:00 p.m. at City Hall. Adjourn: Schneider made a motion to adjourn at 9:25 PM; seconded by Lesnick and passed unanimously. Judy Weyrens Administrator · · . I Attachment: i~~ or No I REQUEST FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION Interim Use Permit - Kathryn Kalkman DATE: June 2, 2003 AGENDA ITEM Public Hearing - Interim Use Permit, John and Kathryn Kalkman Owner Occupied Rental in a Single Family Zoning District PREVIOUS ACTION In 2000 the Ordinance regulating rental in a residential district was changed requiring that all rental in a RI Zoning district must be owner occupied and the applicant must secure a Special Use Permit. In 2003 the Ordinance regulating rental in a residential district was changed to require the applicant secure an Interim Use rather than a Special Use Permit. An Interim Use Permit could be issued to the owner therefore the rental license is not grandfathered nor is it transferable. RECOMMENDED PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION Table or Denial of the Interim Use Permit as proof of ownership has not been satisfied. An owner occupied license requires 50% or greater interest in the property. Therefore for included in your packet . is a proposed resolution of finding denying the application. The Planning Commission could also table this matter until proof of ownership is provided. COMMENTSIRECOMMENDATIONS I have been dealing with Mr. Kalkman for the past 3-4 weeks regarding issuance of an Interim Permit. I have repeatedly requested proof of ownership verifying that his daughter owned at least a 50% ownership in the property. During that time I was supplied with three different versions of a purchase agreement all dated 4-18-03. While the last version of the purchase agreement did list he and his daughter as owners, I was not provided a signed copy. Through discussion I learned that his daughter was not in the Country and unavailable to sign the purchase agreement. In the event that proof of owner ship is provided at the meeting on June 2, 2003 and the Planning Commission is inclined to approve the Interim Use Permit, I would recommend that one of the conditions of the rental license is that each year proof of ownership must be submitted with the rental license application. This provision should be included on all owner occupied rental units as a check and balance method. Since this is the first Interim Use Permit requested, I have enclosed the extraction of the Ordinance that relates to the issuance of such. Please notice that the findings for approval or denial include the same standards that are used for a Special Use Permit. . . www.cityofstjoseph.com ity of St. Joseph City of St. Joseph 25 College Avenue North Public Hearing PO Box 668 St. Joseph. MN 56374 (320) 363-7201 The Planning Commission for the City of St. Joseph will conduct a public hearing on Fax: (320) 363-0342 Monday, June 2, 2003 at 7:05 PM in the St. Joseph City Hall. The purpose of the hearing is to consider an Interium Use Permit to allow an owner occupied rental unit in an R-1, ADMINISTRATOR Single Family Zoning District. The property is legally described as Lot 012 Block 001 Loso Judy Weyrens Loso's 4th Addition located at 209 East MN Street. MAYOR St. Joseph Code of Ordinances 52.27. subd 5 allows for an Interium Use permit as Larry J. Hosch follows: Residential rental provided the unit is owner occupied and provided the room (s) rented does not contain separate kitchen facilities and is nöt intended for use as an COUNCILORS independent residence. For purposes of establishing if the property is owner occupied, the Alan Rassier owner must be a natural person and the owner occupying the property as his or her Ross Rieke principal residence and must own a fifty percent (50%) or greater interest in the property. Gary UIsch Dale Wick The request for Interium Use has been submitted by John and Kathryn Kalkman, 2716 S. 23rd Avenue; St. Cloud MN 56301 . Judy Weyrens Administrator Publish: May 23, ~003· . "', , , J ¡ I / ¡ f I / a I : ! I I! q I I ~ I I ~ I I --------¡e --L-. _ ____ ------ I I I I I I APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL USE PERMIT CITY OF ST. JOSEPH . 25 College Avenue NW Fee$ Paid P.O. Box 668 Receipt # St. Joseph, MN 56374 Date (320)363-7201 or Fax (320)363-0342 STATE OF MINNESOTA) )ss COUNTY OF STEARNS) NAME: 1(4 rHtYrJ /ÝIAtt It:: /(11 Lk;¡ý\P\ fJ PHONE: 320 Z~ S"bb'-Î ADDRESS: ~O7 E. mtNN£_\oTA. .sT. S~ < :JõS'ëf~. (Y\ N S 6'57 'I . . INVe, the undersigned, hereby make the following application to the City Council and Planning Commission of the City of SI. Joseph, Steams County, Minnesota. (Applicants have the responsibility of checking all applicable ordinances pertaining to their application and complying with all ordinance requirements): 1. Application is hereby made for Special Use Permitto conduct the following: R-¿NT :t í? £b(Go{)f}t.s; . 2. Legal description of land to be affected by application, including acreage or square footage of land involveçJ~d treet address, if any (attach additional sheet if necessary):. LOT /2... ELûC' Lo30 '$ . 1>,brJ, \ .20C¡ £. (Yl / fJN£501{A. .$'7', 5,' 'Jð~EftJ: 1\"1 tV S (3.7 q . 3. - Present zoning of the above described property is: . e. f S"t tJ(; ¿z F Arn f ¿ 'I . '¡::es / b¿(Jft-AL - - KA'THR.Y r-.; KA.Lk.IYlf\ rJ 4. Name and address of the present owner of the above described property is: 5. Is the proposed use compatible with present and future land uses of the area? Please explain: Y£.>- s'Ii'llJ./l/1AúAL r'£úPt-E, IS Si^,'v¡(...~f;~ Îe) f\. ..rï"-J6LB fA..MlLJ. 6. Will the proposed use depreciate the area in which it is proposed? Please explain: ND- 7. Can the proposed use be accommodated with existing City service without overburdening the system? Explain: Y (Ç 5 - 8. Are local streets capable of handling traffic which is generated by the proposed use? Please explain: YE5 . Attached to this application and made a part thereof are other material submission data requirements, as indicated. Applicant Signature: 'iíá~ Jf11 --111 l<afktM'7f.) Date: ::5'/1/03 · , .-, !:j/Jj 0:; Owner Signature: ifdJ[/I J //1'1 ..:.(11 If/!.. é!vnC{ßU Date: l ' FOR OFFICE USE ONL Y DATE SUBMITIED: DATE COMPLETE: DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING PUBLICATION DATE: Planning Commission Action: _ Recommend Approval _ Recommend Disapproval Date of Action: Date Applicant/Property Owner notified of Planning Commission Action: City Council Action: _ Approved _ Disapproved Date of Action: Date Applicant/Property Owner notified of City Council Action: · · r; -- /~--o~ . HOUSING, MAINTENANCE AND OCCUPANCY CODE ORDINANCE NO. 55 CITY OF ST.]OSEPH, MINNESOTA Address: Addition: Owner: Manager: Type of Structure: Apartment To the owner, lessee, agent or occupant of the above dèscribed premises, pursuant to the authority vested in me by St. Joseph Code of Ordinances No. 55, you and each of you upon whom this order shall be served are hereby ordered within days to make the following repairs. () 'VJ IU E R ;S J D lJ JJ ¿ IÜ9-T ~/ R v A ) k 4 Lk fYJ or?- c) '. -=;:r: ~ I - T~L <i ß C:;:p I(t}rl tY) .j!öýÞ' t5 JI}} ~J~ (p S ~ _ ç ~ :; ç r: A 1/.1 G fè ç f) n U(.. t.!e; R... tP WA-IGI( S .1. m4/.r t<- I:}LL OODR ~ , S 61? tI'¡CP I:> (. iÝr e. It.J'....Jf)tr;o'd{. . Á1 fft>o I r'9 /( fit>!J WI ø,vd""; /)é () ~ /I:!fC:¡-oa . .". r:J-()ð S/YJ,..,hp PJçr(;;:;:Ci~Jl t W NéRR IJ ,-".l!f t:) e:; t:::J . y, f\l..f){) {;. P (.7 (50 7 l' e 7' 5 p.J ).J r.Ç¡n5 IYJ Jr:":cÇ ¡0 t:::¡D ," Ilpo I ¡::"I{ .. ç; . } I"C.- -K X, vG-u'S¡çf{ ~ Cltlt FbR.. A. ¡:;., TµS?Gc..!,'¡j¡J f.¡V »fÇ ¡J 4 Jo.a -k 1"- ( ðl/Ý/pLGT&:-" Failure to comply with this order may be grounds for imposition of a fine up to $1,000 and/or suspension or revocation of your rental license by the St. Joseph City Council Dated this day of ,2000 RE-INSPECTION DATE . COMPLIANCE DATE . . " - - . . : .. - . ~ - é1,~' i . .. .. . .. . SUBJECT PROPERTY PHOTO ADDENDUM File No.: Case No.: Lender: Vip;w of Garage · · . i I I I í I I I I · FLOORPLAN FileNo.: Case No.: State:MN Zi : 56374 I 30' Bedroom Balh Kitchen 26' up-HlllIlJ] En! 26' LfvingRoom Dining Room Eo1ry 3D' 2nd Floor 10' T T 10' 10' 12' Bedroom lliIIIIIIHffi]-on 12' 10' 10' T T 1D' Sketch by Apex IV Windows '" AREA .CAtGl:J1J\1'10NS<SUMMARY ~L1'v)NG'ÃR~ ,SRE'AKDOWN Code-_ Description J$ize:. Tb1àls- ~~i'eä~down Subtotals Gt.Al First Floor 780 780 First F1.oor GLA2 Second Floor 500 500 26 x 30 -780 Second F1.oor 10 " "2 120 10 x 26 260 10 x 12 120 TOTAL LIVABLE (rounded) 1280 4 Areas Total (rounded) 1280 -- 2716 23rd Avenue South, 51. Cloud, MN 56301 320 656-5656 Fax 320 656-5678 - _u_ ---.- AL"" 't -- _. - tbc / -.---- -'-"'---.- --- , --- - .--- __..__ ___._n_. --"'- i 'l' ..... roo! r -----.- -.--- -. . u_,__ ---- ____ - u__ n___ __ .__ I . . , __'__c __.___._. I: ; -- --- - -~--.--_:-._- - - --~ --- .- I - .._-~ -- - - + ------- .... --'. --- - ,) . - ' -- -- - _u " ' 1 --,- -_.. --- -, - '-'--- --- ( , - \ I -' .-_._----. - ..~-~-- -.--, ---- '-"'--:--,,--- -,- - ._----,,- -- I ,) , i _....' ".'. .... ,.-'-~~~ ....-. '( ¡ o ___n_ "___.__ ---_.-- liD 0: , ,-- ¡ , -------- -.- <d \ " JCirfN-t-KAT f{ ~rÆ:-=-'__=c.._" r>'. I --------_.,- ---'-- J/ I , ' . -I/.ALr¿ {Y1A.-N---::=·__: = - __'__H. __'_0_ _ _ _d_ ._,_,._ , ,(. , ( -- - ----------~, ------ ----'-~'--' I \ I .- ,--- .-. - -- - ---- - ------ \ ({ " -, ' - ( 209 d£.f{lJ fJNJE£'-f\T~,-.Sf...-. 1, I i ---.'--- .--_._-,------.:_-_.------ i - -51", ,GPS=6fß-{M-~_~-,-. I: ·CTOI I - '--~----' - - -- ; - : - .- --- I ----'--- l ,,-- , 1 _u_ _.___..._-< " > ....!,' '. I ' . -'-- -----.-.-"'-. ---'- . ---. ---- - - ----. -. 'j ~ ._ ,1, \ L6T IZ ·BiocR"(,-:--·-·- , I I ï . ....:.. :::'-.' .. .. ¡ - --'.-- ¡ LO~()' ~1'~__~t?:~J?}~¡ _._-~ - -' .-- .- ~.- ---- J_~ r , ______.__O_~ _____ ____._____..__.___ 11: ' -'.-' '.--- I , 'fN~.Þ't,q. C5-;C:b-O~'@' - ___.n j ¡ - ___. _n'_----,___... J-bi ; _ . U_'. ___ --._--'.-. ---- - G p.,y¿ÄC,,!i .-- --- -.----- ---. -'.. - - -_..- - ,- -- -.- - ___0 ! ----~ __u.. ._..__ .--- --- , i ---------~..----- -, I --.--. - .._------.-~_. --- ! J - - --, - --.. ---- -'--- ~.___.__.___.. __u__u --L-- _~.__n_. __n ___ __~_________ ._..._______H _____ _0_'_'_ ):..;). __._____ ._:_ __ - _0_- ___u__~_____ ____. -----. - - - '-'-~"-'--'~- --'-- -- , _._ ___-__.n_.__ ~.:_ ___ -,-~ - - - .- ----- .. -...-'- - '-- - -----~ ----- ---- .'.'- --~. - - - - ---- - -'- .------.--- ------- - --.---. -"------:---~.-- __._ ____ _..--'________. ._.._ _n__ ~ dDri© ---' -. ~ i ; ,----- --- _._----;~._..- ~- ; ----.- ,--- - - ~ -- ----- . __,,_ ___n_ ----~--------.--_.~~------- - -.--- - _~__. _, n ___________ , - O'n __ _..__ ___. _____ _. ___n·_ __ __~ _____.,,_. n_ __~_ __. -. -- .>'c--. . '--.__..-------:,t __. _ _______ __.__. . - - --- --.-. :.. ~ --~-- .- ~'.-. -- .-- ':J-. -+- - - - -~-- ----- -..-- -- - -- - ------ i .. .- --.- - --- --,.. ---- ....--- ---.--- ----- --._~--._-- -'---'- _~ -0 , - - ..~ - - ___.______;_n ,_ _. ____ _.___, ._ __u_ _ ._, __ .___. _~_ n'_ --'- -~ - -_..-~ --0_-_0----· . .- -.- ' ¡ _u__._____ _ _ ------ ~._...._-- ----.. - - - --- - ___...0_' _ .---.-----.----u __~,____p.__ ____n__. ______ ~--.-.- ---- - - --- .------- '--.,---- ---- - n___. ------- ----- - -~-.~----,- 30 -..----- i .----...,-_. - __'..n'_ ¡ :J,b j H04<;.;:: ! , -~- - -.- ! _____ n_ --.-. ....-.."--- ; ~. - --- - -..-'-- ,----- - ..-'- -.--.-- ':<0 - -" i ! 1"""0 ;;) i _~_____.L <¡;_p.7"-~ . [ ....p;.~ I 5/27/2003 . Judy Weyrens, City of St. Joseph With regards to the application for special use permit for the property located at 209 E Minnesota Street, St. Joseph : Our daughter Kathryn is the intended owner and occupant of the dwelling, and is currently unavailable to be present at your June 2nd board meeting. We would like to submit the application for special use for your review at this meeting. If there are any concerns or unanswered questions at that time, we ask you to table your decision until the July meeting when Kathryn will be present. Thank you for your consideration, John & Karen Kalkman .- 'This letter was electronically transmitted bye-mail. - - Page I of 1 Judy Weyrens . From: "John Kalkman" <johnkalkman@charter.net> To: <jweyrens@cityofstjoseph.com> Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2003 10:51 AM Attach: StJosephLetter5-27 -03 .doc Subject: Kathryn Kalkman Judy, the title company says they can Quick-claim her name to the deed on the day of closing. I,m not sure what to expect. The house is in tough shape and we just want to get in and fix it up. Any questions - feel free to call. Otherwise I'll see you at the meeting. John 656-5656 . - - 5/27/2003 . . RESOLUTION PC2003-_ RESOL TUION RECOMMENDING DENIAL OF THE INTERIM USE PERMIT REQUEST TO ALLOW AN OWNER OCCUPIED RENTAL UNIT IN A R1, SINGLE FAMILY ZONING DISTRICT The request of John and Kathryn Kalkman for an Interim Use Permit came before the Planning Commission at a public hearing held on June 2, 2003. The purpose of the hearing was to consider issuance of an Interim Use Permit to allow a rental license in a R1 Single Family Zoning District. St. Joseph Code of Ordinances 52.27, subd 5 allows for an Interium Use permit as follows: Residential rental provided the unit is owner occupied and provided the room (s) rented does not contain separate kitchen facilities and is not intended for use as an independent residence. For purposes of establishing if the property is owner occupied, the owner must be a natural person and the owner occupying the property as his or her principal residence and must own a fifty percent (50%) or greater interest in the property. The request for Intèrim Use has been submitted by John and Kathryn Kalkman, 2716 S. 23rd Avenue; St. Cloud MN 56301 In consideration of the information presented to the Planning Commission and its application to the Comprehensive Plan and Ordinances of the City of St. Joseph, the Planning Commission makes the following findings: The property owner failed to provide proof that the owner occupying the building owns at least 50% interest in the property. Therefore, based on the above findings, the Planning Commission makes the following recommendation: . Denial of the Interim Üse Permit to allow an Owner Occupied rental unit in a R1 Single Family Zoning District based on the abov~stated finding. Approved this 2nd day of June 2003 Gary Utsch, Planning Commission Chair Judy Weyrens, Administrator - - Extract of the St. Joseph Code of Ordinances . Regulating Rental Units in a Residential Zoning District Subd. 5: Interim Uses. The following are Interim Uses allowed by pennit based upon the procedures and criteria set forth in Section 52.07.04 of this Code. a) Residential rental provided the unit is owner-occupied and provided the room(s) rented does not contain separate kitchen facilities and is not intended for use as an independent residence. For purposes of establishing if the property is owner occupied, the owner must be a natural person and the owner occupying the property as his or her principal residence must own a fifty percent (50%) or greater interest in the property. In addition, 1. The property must satisfy the parking requirements contained in this Ordinance. 2. The rental unit(s) must: a. Have a ceiling height of at least seven (7) feet; b. Contain adequate ventilation and fire escapes as detennined by the Building Official; and, . c. Meet all applicable rental codes as outlined in St. Joseph Ordinance 55. - - Extract of the St. Joseph Code of Ordinances Outlining the process for issuance of an Interim Use Permit Subd.3: Special Use Permit. . A. Puroose and Scope. The purpose of this Section of the Zoning Ordinance is to provide the Planning Commission and City Council with a reasonable degree of discretion in determining the suitability of certain designated uses upon the general welfare and public safety. B. Issuance. Special use permits may be issued for any of the fol1owing: 1. Any of the uses or purposes for which such permits are required or permitted by the provisions of this Ordinance. 2. Public utility or public service uses or public building in any district when found to be necessary for the public health, safety, convenience or welfare. 3. To classify as a conforming use any non-conforming institutional use existing in any district at the time of the establishment of such district. C. Application. Applications for Special Use Permits and required fees shal1 be submitted the City Administrator. The application shal1 be accompanied by a site plan containing such information as is necessary to show compliance \vith this Ordinance, including but not limited to: 1. Description of site (legal description). . 2. Site plan drawn at scale showing parcel and building dimensions. 3. Location of all buildings and their square footage, and the location of easements. 4. Curb cuts, driveways, access roads, parking spaces, off-street loading areas and sidewalks. 5. Landscaping and screening plans. 6. Drainage and erosion control plan with pertinent elevations. 7. Sanitary sewer and water plan with estimated use per day. 8. Soil type, the location of wetlands as defined by Minnesota Statute 1036.005, Subd. 19, or absence thereof as verified by a statement from the Steams County Environmental Services Office. 9. Any additional written or graphic data reasonably required by the City Administrator or the Planning Commission. 10. Proof that the Applicant is the owner of the parcel in question. - D. Procedure. The City Administrator shal1 forward said application to the Planning - Commission for consideration at their next regular meeting. 1. The City Administrator shall review all Development Review . Applications and upon verification that the Application is complete and meets the requirements of the Ordinance, the City Administrator shall schedule a public hearing. The City Administrator shall complete the review process within ten (I 0) days of receipt of the Application. Notice of such hearing shall be published in accordance with State Law and notice shall be published at least once in the official paper of the City and mailed to individual properties within three hundred fifty (350) feet of the parcel included in the request not less than ten (l0) days nor more than thirty (30) days prior to the date of said hearing. Failure of a property owner to receive said notice shall not invalidate any such proceedings. 2. The Planning Commission shall consider possible adverse effects of the proposed special use and what additional requirements may be necessary to reduce any adverse effects, and shall make a recommendation to the City Council within the guidelines as mandated by State Law. 3. The City Council shall act upon the report and recommendation from the Planning Commission within the guidelines as mandated by State Law. Upon receiving the report and recommendation rrom the Planning Commission, the City Council shall have the option of holding a public hearing if necessary and may impose any conditions deemed necessary. Approval of a special use permit shall require passage by a majority vote of the full City Council. . E. Standards. The Planning Commission shall recommend a special use permit and the Council shall order the issuance of such permit if the application conforms to the specific standards set forth below, as it would apply to the particular use at the proposed location: 1. Will not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, morals, comfort, convenience or general welfare of the neighborhood or the City. 2. Will be harmonious with the general and applicable specific objectives of the comprehensive plan of the City and this Ordinance. 3. Will be designed, constructed, operated and maintained so as to be harmonious and appropriate in appearance with the existing or intended character of the general vicinity and will not change the essential character of that area. 4. Will not be hazardous or disturbing to existing of future neighboring uses. 5. Will be served adequately by essential public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water and sewer systems, and schools. 6. Will not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for - public facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic - welfare of the community. 7. Will not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property, or the general welfare because of excessive production of traffic, noise, . smoke, fumes, glare or odors. 8. Will have vehicular approaches to the property which are so designed as not to create traffic congestion or an interference with traffic or surrounding public thoroughfares. 9. Will have adequate facilities to provide sufficient off-street parking and loading space to serve the proposed use. 10. \-Vill not result in the destruction, loss or damage of a natural, scenic, or historic feature of major importance. F. Denial For Non-Compliance. If the Planning Commission recommends denial of a special use permit or the Council orders such denial, it shall include in its recommendations or determination findings as to the ways in which the proposed use does not comply with the standards required by this Ordinance. G. Conditions. In recommending or approving any special use permit, the Planning Commission and the Council may impose conditions which are considered necessary to meet the standards of this Ordinance and to protect the best interests of the surrounding area or the City as a whole. Violation of any such condition is a violation of this Ordinance. These conditions may include but are not limited to the following: l. Ingress and egress to property and proposed structures thereon with . particular reference to vehicle and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, and access in case of fire or other catastrophe. 2. Off-street parking and loading areas where required and the economic effect, noise, glare, or odor of the special use on nearby property. 3. Refuse and service areas. 4. Utilities with reference to location, availability and compatibility. 5. Diking, fencing, screening, landscaping or other facilities to protect adjacent or nearby property. 6. Signs, if any, and proposed exterior lighting with reference to glare, traffic safety, economic effect and compatibility and harmony with properties in the district. 7. Required yards and other open space. 8. General compatibility with adjacent and other property in the district. H. Expiration. If substantial construction has not taken place within one (1) year after the date of a special use permit, the permit is void except that, on application, the Council, after receiving the recommendation of the Planning Commission, may - extend the permit for an additional period not to exceed one (1) year. A special - use permit authorizes only the conditional use specified in the permit and expires if, for any reason, the authorized use ceases for more than one (1) year. . Subd. 4. Interim Use Permit. A. Purpose. The purpose and intent of allowing interim uses is: 1. To allow a use for a limited period of time that reasonably utilizes the property in the manner not permitted in the applicable zoning district. 2. To allow a use that is presently acceptable but that, with anticipated development, may not be acceptable in the future. B. Application, Public Hearing, Notice and Procedure: The application, public notice and procedure requirements for interim use permits shall be the same as those for Special Use Permits as provided in Section 52.7, Subd. 3 of this Ordinance. C. Standards: The Planning Commission shall recommend an interim use permit and the Council shall issue such interim use permits only if it finds that such use at the proposed location: 1. Meets the standards of a special use permit set forth in Section 52.7, Subd 3, of this Ordinance, except subdivision B.lO. 2. Conforms to the zoning regulations, performance standards and other requirements of this Ordinance. . 3. Is allowed as an interim use in the applicable zoning district. 4. Will terminate upon a tangible date or event specified in the resolution approving said interim use permit. 5. Will not impose, by agreement, additional costs on the public if it is necessary for the public to take the property in the future. 6. Will be subjected to, by agreement with the owner, any conditions that the City Council has deemed appropriate for permission of the use, including a condition that the owner will provide an appropriate financial surety to cover the cost of removing the interim use and any interim structures upon the expiration of the interim use permit. D. Termination: An interim use permit shall terminate upon the occurrence of any of the following events; whichever first occurs: 1. The date specified in the permit; 2. A violation of the conditions under which the permit was issued; or 3. A change in the City's zoning regulations which render the use nonconforming. - - . I Attachment: Ii or No I REQUEST FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION Preliminary and Final Plat - Buettner Business Park 3 DATE: June 2,2003 AGENDA ITEM Public Hearing - Preliminary Plat, Buettner Business Park 3 PREVIOUS ACTION When the Buettner Business Park was originally developed, larger lots were platted with the understanding that if development required smaller lots the City would consider such. The EDA has considered this matter as the St. Joseph EDA and Leo Buettner market the property together and the EDA assists with the governing of the Covenants. The Covenants of the Park require that all lots must contain at least three acres. Therefore, in reviewing the Preliminary Plat with regard to the . Protective Covenants of the Buettner Business Park, the EDA recommends the Planning Commission approve the Preliminary and Final Plat as presented. RECOMMENDED PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION Adopt the resolution recommending the Council approve the preliminary and final plat as presented. COMMENTS/RECOMMENDATIONS The plat has been reviewed by the City Staff including the Engineer, Attorney, Public Works Director, Administrator and Police Chief. The only comment received was to make sure the property owner is aware that when the utilities were installed only two stubs were provided to the property being subdivided. The proposed subdivision meets the requirements of the Ordinance. - - . www.cityofstjoseph.com ity of St. Joseph 25 College Avenue North CITY OF ST. JOSEPH PO Box 668 PUBLIC HEARING St. Joseph, MN 56374 (320) 363-720 I Fax: (320) 363-0342 . The Planning Commission for the City of St. Joseph will conduct a public hearing on Monday, June 2, 2003 at 7:25 PM in the St. Joseph City Hall. The purpose of the hearing is ADMINISTRATOR consider a preliminary plat to create smaller industrial lots in the 81.· Joseph Business Park. Judy Weyrens The preliminary plat will create three lots approximately three acres in size. The property is legally described as Lot 2 Block I Buettner Business Park. MAYOR LarryJ. Hosch The request for subdivision has been requested by Leo Buettner, 5855 Ridgewood Rd, St. Cloud MN 56303. COUNCILORS Alan Rassier Ross Rieke Gary Utsch Judy Weyrens Dale Wick Administrators . Publish: May 22, 2003 - - ~:.I l'O~/"""""~C:'~~"'-:-'~'-=~~'" . . .. ......~v··c ··T·7·.·.·..~·..··:.·<c.-;.·..-h~.. '. L....ï~ . ~ lì~ s.S. I ., I . ]] , , Ô.E. I I I E~ ~ I \ r \ ,.S I I ~ ~ I I . ~ ~~ II ___ .E. IT1 L ______~ - \ \ ("') I ~ œ/ <Ji ~I I . ª I ~ I '~ \ ~I I I ~ I I ~ I;:¡ I to ~ (,! 7TH "'IE. S.E; I I I I I I I I I \ - \ \ , \ I I .- COUNTY OF. S·TE A R'N'S' \ . Dspørtmento/ Jr-,ghW(lJ1S PO Box 246 - StCloucl, MN' 56302 MI'J'CIØLL;.L ANDJtUON, 1'.1- (320) 255.06180- FAX (320) 255-6186 'H~""", . . .JØ'Ji' MØ..1.R,..It. ÅIIt. 1Iipw:rryBnP-" J01Þl mœ. PeL Am. Hl6RWWy~r. Dcceæher 19, 2002 Mr. Leo Bul!4tl1er R.e: Accm to Nonh 3.343 ActeLot of Buettner BusineB Park nearMr. Buc:'ttDc:1 Access to the referenced lot of the ~dBU1'Vey will Mpcmù!t«l to be m.t.l1Dè leø 1ban ~ minim.um required '300 feet &om centen' of CR 133 contingent D1l the n:moval of the exîlting field approach on CR. 133 by you at )'our ~peI1Sè. The right.or.way sba11 . be l8graàed w:hh 5" of IOpsoU1 _ ~ .to matCh the .~ ditch. :FLIttbonnore, 1h~ :new approach o:n 15m . Avenuesha.tl be locstedno leø the 180 feet from center ofCR133 to center of . tbe Dew &ppr0llCh. - ·If you require 1Urthcr ÍDfonnation please c:om:a:t my offiçe, - > i-1J! JeffMillst, P.E. Atst. ·Co=ty Highway En¡ineer-MaintenacelOpcratiolJ$ ..~ "'~kiiø1tIEqwt~~ .- - "J.t""" UC> .LJ..V" ..AA J.i5..v"uo.\lt .Lv tl.....,J. ",.1Al.b liA!= ,..Iv. I I I I I ! I : 15TH ¡(I'EME IE : I __________~~~ili~~L__ Tï--------7ïü..--------- - ZIlT7 / ~I Lot I ~ ... ... /1 8 I k : !-~ ij gs It ~ :~~ f · ~ it ;; ~ I g ILl BUETTNER BUS / N ______________________ ztOAO -----r----r--T--T--T--T J I I I IDEf..'NJ'E JÆDrillNI I I I I n Jf". ¡f1 f.,( 11 I I I I II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I III'" .,.. ma> ...N . tfi ~. It 0'.... . = ~ Q ~P»-!i ... 5 ¡ Qg8, ,~I ..~......«ø.... ...a-..zn"'.... :¡ ~ 0 = ", .c.. =' - . :r . . I'r;r ;p . _. D þ.,.. :r ., c:r 11'" .;:: r . . ". ~ . . ...... .. . o.....,!.., -< "'ZfhO -= 1:I.r:.þ.r-'~r- ~t:A; ~,. :R lie::: r c: ~. CI: CI . -ID ..::J' 'D .. E ':) =' 'Q . ..~p ~~~~~~~. .n·..on.. ø~ ~a~ !11 ~_="'f;in¡- ..~=.~-t;n~ :--: sa... a:l....-=- C ...170. ...mo ..... ~.å -II I ~~~;IIØ~§~ ;-:".:::~..§!. -: .... ;t .. I:O'~Z···.~~ ·":I.~=... -¡ g -- ::E' . .. -. 0 .... it c,.. ,. 0- ... þ - ... I:;IGD...;r... w .., -c .. . _n~ .....a:; ...O....R ~ =~ .~ ~- -~-~..~- f .. I~ :.N~~g~E· :.~¡...I;~· .. g-~..,g.I"I'I¡;;:S a.~...:=-...:~ a ~~ . ~ '..._III....eo =.~. COD .. ?:! .-:- =~~:;.N;~ D~ &g-¡~ -. -~ ~ ~...~.... ~.~-;n; ~ · t ¡¡ .a . .. ... - I!I. P .. ø . _ .. z: . ,. - ~N.. kS,."';r ., ¡ i ~ ~ -~ ~:: ~! . ~ t ,.. D I D- -= i ::: r e.....""::..,.. :>c "'_D::r; II '" ;.¡~..~~ Q.~¡..~..:: ! ,.~ -..1.;:1 "'" ...........=' Co I ,,.. ~ !!;cne-",-.. ;r....;r__.. WI E i ~a·:~.~ ~~~.Q:.~ G """" c: 5' .~...~.g:o ....0.111:1:1> ., I't ... 1,1....".0 c . .....eSle ., iR IS .....Q.~. ... .....,..a.....,. . cþ .,.. -..g.. . ;r....,.,..... 0 Q., ~i I:1 .. i:.?....-o ".... .......;1 ,. < ~ä. t . gg.o~;,: !.c",~ ~q,: ., f'9'\ C> ~ ........ 11:0 :2.C:rl'i'D__ . ..,.. ... l~ ~ ~ g ~ e: PI" !:.! .. · .. i ,.... \111 I" IU a..... þ." .. _~... c :r!!=:! '- '< j ::5'" --S:2 _..511 m 11:..:1::'-111'" cee ::to W . .. .. "....n....... .~~.oc ~.. D _ .....I ....oø......-. ..ø- IN.." .. --, ......... "" .... ~ '. ,.. ~ 5: A. .....: þ.:- Do =- a.. =: ......J ~ ........O....::I'....c: --m.-"EC:: ø ....., Q ¡g,.¡.=~ ~5:;"""~;~ =- Z .. ....n..g C - ~ ..1D......g...., ...:lJ;",.::r.., - m ~fþ;-~~",~ ~tQ ..,""e-~ ... ~ ., ... ;::r.CI ~N...~.c:::I 1T ~:E IU. ....2;., .- CI_n" · ~ .w D.~~.WR ~ ~~=~~ C O,...Cg.aA þ,...~......Æ .., . .,. ,.....g. ";rlt tdD~ C ~:Ngn~~ ~.;~.~~ ~ _~~~~~; ~=·~;~G ~ -0' , :~:..::~. :¡i:=-~~ .. r.' I'" C/) Z . ,.. CI ". .., ..... - ... -, · - ,. ~15 ~ :r:> ".,."...~ :r ~ ~~ ~D. "'~~D . _~ a~ c_ ~ I ,- ~ ¡¡¡l rn · ~ r -~..'..~.'~."" ---.~-- .-. ... \. ,. '\ " 1 I I I I I ·2 I I I I I \ 3 I I I I I 4 t- iLl !5 iLl 3.0 ACRES ~ I I; I W~ ~ 7 ~ o. I a I""";) I I 3.0 ACRES I \' SOLD I I, \ 1 I 10 I 8.306 ACRES I \ ~~ 1n Industrial I . 1 2 112 ; I - 13 I ~ . 8.0ACRES. . I 1 1%1 -., . ~ üJ . L. '-_ I ~ I· . :SOLD .\ r I ... \!o: 1,' I ~,2 Iu... ' I 1 .~. 10.03þ ACRES \ I I ~ ~~ I .. . Industrial . I 3 . II 2 ~ . . \ ~ I _ ~ ~ ~ I r ~~r I I ; ~. I ~ \11 \. 3 I \ -g . ~ 1 \ ~. \ II I . j L. ~ 1\ 4.978 ACRES I 0 I 1 II . 2 I g \ 4 . 0:: 5.6S9 ACRES 7.836 ACRES' .' ~ ZonÈld \ >- II Zoned 1 .[ ~ . Hwy.· \ ~ I ~~~. 113 Industrial I ---_~_ :; L co~m. 5 Comm. ·11 --- N - -- .J (.) L· . I . . ~~-:;;.,. I" ~, tu . ~~ :! BURUNGTON -=---=--=- . . t.o.NORTHERN S'AU'" - - _ "%- ·......'AFE'RR ~ ~------ .. s CSAH 75 -........---- -,--C a. --...._ . - ~ o '1I.j _ ~_~ ~ z_ o . ~ iLl . ~ ~ :c. ~ . - . ... ~ .... ST. E. <400' ~ 0 ~ . . FILE NO. ST. JOSEPH :"-;~e'i.I STJOE9904.00 BUSINESS PARK EXHIBIT . ~I;(" 'DATE: ST JOSEPH MINNESOTA NO.1 . 01/22/02 . , Extract of the St. Joseph Economic Development Authority . May 21,2003 Subject: Buettner Business Park Plat 3 Re-subdivision Lot 2, Block 1 Buettner Business Park Strack reviewed the request to re-subdivide Lot 2, Block I of the original Buettner Business Park plat into three separate parcels of3.03, 3.0 and 4.0 acres. The proposed re-subdivision meets the requirements of the covenants which specify a minimum lot size of three acres. The Planning Commission will review the proposal for compliance with the Subdivision Ordinance and recommend an action to the City Council. Jerry Hettwer offered to answer any questions from the EDA on behalf of the property owner. Moved by Rieke and seconded by Skahen to recommend approval to the Planning Commission based on concurrence with the protective covenants. Motion carried 3:0 . - - RESOLUTION PC2003- - . RESOL TUION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLAT FOR BUETTNER BUSINESS PARK PLAT 3 The request of Leo Buettner for Plat approval came before the Planning Commission at a public hearing held on June 2, 2003. The purpose of the hearing was to consider the Preliminary Plat of Buettner Park 3, re-platting Lot 2 Block 1 Buettner Business Park. The request for platting has been submitted by Leo Buettner, 5855 Ridgewood Rd, St. Cloud MN 56301 In consideration of the information presented to the Planning Commission and its application to the Comprehensive Plan and Ordinances of the City of St. Joseph, the Planning Commission makes the following findings: 1. The proposed plat is consistent with St. Joseph Code of Ordinances 54. Said Ordinance sets forth the guidelines for Subdivision of property. 2. The proposed plat is consistent with the Protective Covenants of the Buettner Business Park and the St. Joseph Economic Development Authority is recommending Planning Commission Approval. 3. The proposed Subdivision is being requested to increase the business tax base for the City of St. Joseph and without the subdivision and without the subdivision a development project will not take place. Therefore, based on the above findings, the Planning Commission makes the following recommendation: . Approval of the Preliminary and Final Plat as presented. Approved this 2nd day of June 2003 Gary Utsch, Planning Commission Chair Judy Weyrens, Administrator - - . I Attachment: I~~ or No I REQUEST FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION Jim Degiovanni - Discussion of the Karen Bechtold Property DATE: June 2,2003 AGENDA ITEM Jim Degiovannie - Discussion on the Karen Bechtold Property PREVIOUS ACTION None RECOMMENDED PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION The City has been approached by the property owners of the Karen Bechtold Property to discuss future land uses and potential uses of the property. When City staff met with representatives, family members . were informed that the newly adopted Comprehensive Plan illustrates the Bechtold property as Industrial. Familymembers are-questioning if the City would consider some residential uses as the property abutting the Bechtold property is being developed residentially, both single and multiple. The adjoining property is also located in the City of St. Cloud. At this time the family is only looking for discussion on this matter and what the Planning Commission would consider for land uses. - - RINKE NOONAN A T T o R N E Y S A T L A W SUITE 700, WELLS FARGO CE·NTER, P. O. Box 1A97 ST. CLOUD, MINNESOTA 56302-1497 TELEPHONE 320·251-6700, FAX 320-65.6-3500 . EMAIL: MAIL.@RNOON,COM WWW.RNOON.COM May 8,2003 Ms. Judy Weyrens, City Administrator City of St. Joseph City Hall 25 College A venue North P.O. Box 668 St. Joseph, MN 56374 Re: Our File No. 10261.003 Dear Ms. Weyrens: I represent the children of Hildegard Kremer. In 1991, Hildegard conveyed a tract ofland north of County Road 134 in Section 12 of St. Joseph Township. The remaining tract of land is approximately 128 acres and it borders on the City of St. Cloud munièipal boundary. I have enclosed a plat map showing the location. It is designated on my plat map as owned by Karen Bechtold, et al. Karen is one of the five sisters who currently own the property. This is to request that you schedule some time at the June 2nd Planning Commission meeting for the . purpose of discussing possible annexation of this property and issues related to its zoning if it were to be annexed to the City of St. Joseph. I have reviewed the City's Comprehensive Plan and discussed it with my clients. The property is currently designated in the Plan as appropriate for light industrial. The Kremer daughters are interested in selling the property and have received several inquiries from local land use. developers and potential land investors. However, all of those persons have expressed interest in it only if it could be developed as residential property. Their interest raises several issues which we would like to discuss with the Planning Commission, and subsequently with the City Council. It is ~our understanding from discussions we had with you and other City staff, that the City will probably be reluctant to zone the entire property as residential. However, we are hoping that it might be possible to create a transition zone which would consist of some single family and some multi-family housing. The transition zone would be a buffer between the single family neighborhood which is currently being developed in the City of St. Cloud as part of the Westwood Parkway residential development. The single family development could transition into a multi-family zone which could then transition into the light industrial property which would remain on the balance of my client's property. PMay 8, 2003 :C2003 05 07 F:\DATAIl026J\OO3ILetter Judy Weyrens 05 07 2003.wpd mjb RINKE. NOONAN. _GROTE:. SMOLEY, DE:TER. COLOMBO, WIANT. VON KORFF, DEGIOVANNI & HOBBS, LTD. D. Michael Noonan James L. Wiant David J. Meyers1.2.3 Igor S. Lenzner3 Jason H. Thomas William A. Smoleyt Gerald W. Von Korff John J. Meuers Gary R. leistico4.6 Stafanie l. Brown Kurt Ä. Deter' James Degiovanni Roger C. Justin3.4 John C. Kolb Tanya T. Hinkemeyer Barrett l. Colombo Sharon G. Hobbs John J. Babcock Scott G. Hamal< Darryl J. Henehan Jill A. Adkins Pamela A. Steckman 1 Ryan J. Hatton 1. QUalified neutrol under Rule 114.2. A Real Property Lavv Specialist certified by the Mirm6sota State Bar Association. 3. Admitted TO praCTice lavv in Wisconsin. 4. Admhted to prtlctice leVV' in North Dakota. 5. Admitted tQ proctice law in South Dakottl. Ms. Judy Weyrens . May 8, 2003 Page 2 We do not have a specific proposal to make to the Planning Commission as of this date. Weare basically looking for input so we can determine howit is best for the owners to proceed with looking for potential buyers. In addition, we would also be interested in knowing whether there might be some possibility that the City of S1. Joseph Economic Development Authority might be interested in purchasing part of the property for a future city industrial park. As I indicated, I have enclosed a site map showing the general location of the property. Although you obviously have them, I also made copies of some of the relative pages of your Comprehensive Plan. In summary, we are only asking for a general discussion of what concepts the City might be open to. In this connection, I am also requesting that you mail me a copy of the Orderly Annexation Agreement. Please send a bill for any charge that is required in connection with that copy. I thought it might be included with the Comprehensive Plan we purchased previously, but the Orderly Annexation Agreement is not actually in there. Thank you for your cooperation, and my clients and I all look forward to discussing the possibilities . of development of their property with you, the Planning Commission and the City Council. Please feel free to contact me if you think I can provide you with any additional information. Sincerely, RINKE-NOONAN r- ... James Degiova JD /mjb Enclosures cc: Karen Bechtold Lorna Boone Arlene Faber Luann Blonigen Ardell Sowada PJ\!ay 8, 2003:C2003 05 07 F:\DATA\I0261\OO3ILetter Judy Weyrms OS 07 2003.",pd mjb - ~ O! ~ ~ ~ ..I 0 g s :¡¡:!£! I- z W W ,~ -' ~ ~ 0 0: '" -~ -' ~ æ ~m~ ~ a ~ I- W W0C/) ~ ,.". ¡:: " a: _ .. " ::;:: y " W ~ ~OO ~ e ~ ~ eŒ~ ~. iij ~ ~ ~ ~!: ~ ¡¡J ~ 0: ~ ~ '~[3.. !!! -' ::- ..... ~ >- - ..J a: - WZ~ . !;¡ !11 0: ~ 0 ~ ~~w Q'" '" ..,. 0 a: I- Q :JJ:a: Z o 2 We ..J I- U Z UI- A W W C/) W:J WC/) ~ aJ L. '" 0 0 ~ '" ¡;¡ :I 0 !š::;!o: ~ ~ ~ 1;;4 * ::J: ~ ~o ~ .. ~ ~¡ ;;: 8 ~ [:; I- ::;! ...1 ::;:: 6 D.._ :!: w 0. W U u..uu Z <n W :;; -' w w w ::! 0: _ .. w w ¡,¡ z r:ff.¡ ~ - w W wo:o: 0: ::> ::> 0: ~ ii! :i .... . o..J a: a: a: ;:) ;:) ;:) I- I- ~ 0;:)0 ~ :> ::> ~ ~ I- [:; [:; ::> ~ ¡¡ "<nU :::> ~. I- ... I- ::) ::) ::) II.. II.. II.. 6 ~ p Cl)õ D~'. ~,~~ ~ I.·~· tI I' ·12'~;. i i & .... "...'...."....".0 ~~." ~ ........... I I ~~;S~¡~. ~~ ................... I I o . ..... .. ,¿}~;i;"~ II!~ . ~;rw~ ". .... .... I I ffi ",1i\; '" ~ .""" I"iiiI: ... - - ~J V' ~'I ~ ~., ,/ anOl::nS ~O All:) . . 111~\:'vi. O . "".¿".'.' - ~ ~ :·~."'\BIfC:~.';~·.flI¿ ~ I \. ~y )/ ~"""."',~"' "" ¡¡.¡ ~~""" .~ ., "",," ;;,~.. 4:£", \ ""'~".'''''' "',:.;«¡¡", . "'I> " "·~c. .,,,:' .B ., '~;~~~~t(";'" ~o;n ~_ .. ·-·I:\1.H ." " .., ~~" .~~=~ ...;, - ".,~..~~ ". '" ~~ ..~. , "~" ,,"ð, .. ' <: ".;",.,. ", . .... ' ' lit:,: ,'if;' /"" '-. ,- F . ''''",. '.', ,", " ",,>' ."'. '. ~ "J ~ V Ì"--- I ~ . -I. , ~~::'~:- . '. " ~. .... '~.f5;~O'''''' \ ~cs- c. ~~ [ ........ I~ L!J '" ·C· 'll". ".æ ~~~'. ".'. ;:"'.~" ". . ~ ~==-----= . - ',. iIiIIO- '''''''' _ = ~ z '" ""'b~if, _ ~. L- / !, W . >','.. ~. .;»¡~- . ''b ~ ( r 0:; , , ø" \'\( ~'t>. ~ , ~. , .' , ~""", , . "", pw", ~ ' ~ Iii, ...:ì1!! ~~..' ' . ~. ~ h'-l t-Hl \.. '\j /. c? .>. .' . ~~'.": ~~,d" .' .. .f \ ~~~/ , .' . ~~lJ -I~~' . I·.·· . . '. , ".~ ' k '. ""~' '. . , \\l '- I 0 ~" :. ...... '. . .... ·.~I:' ~ l.,'i· . . I". ....... , ""rt l,,; \ ... . ~ ~ '<i .. . .... , . . """ . . 'I" ~ . ,- , ~" " " ',!'i:' '.' ~ ~ '~" #. r- I 1· ~ ~ 'I . ""'. , ',' .,,;,' . ........ L.,... .11~ ~ .''-~'" . -,~ "" L - , ~ " ., " ,'" ,= - "'Iii' ", ~~. ""'ib _ ~ ~- -....... 0 , _R, , . . ,.' , ," .. < . ""'"' d. , r- ~~ ,~*-_ ~c~r-:,,~,<. '. "¡~:~' ,_. I......n ~ ~ ,,~ ~ ~'Q,. :- h L-... ~~ .1 ",', '.';'" " . 'L-~i~'" " ~ - "" 1:'1 i\ r- k'. I ':, : "'j¡¡¡ !iII"'.J\\ ~. __,'. " ,,,. ~ ' " ..~'~"'=., Yií:..... r\ ~\\ . " "",.' ;~~ ~ ~~'~;.. ~ ~ .." ". 'I' 11~.- ". ~~'~O' '\\ I ..,. '~' ' \ . I, "~ - 'U;¡' ~~ · .."'" .' !l\{"t \ \ .1. =:øJ=~' fi!'f~ I···.· ~~ , ~~:'". ..' j¡ ':'. .:...;.""~ ....... '. ". .."'- . r ~~" ;;!\ .~~~ ' ~ ~ ~~~~"\I~ -' . . , ',- ,~ .. ,. "0 ,"" .... !E' J N " , iIS!J '.' . " ~~. 1-,-. .,~ t. " " .. · ~ . '....""'"., ' . 'i,1 .", '" ." I '. < , ~ .. ..' ;: ~i;'&?¡ 2 _ _'1 '. è "'" "';-, C1' ,. . . ,,;'. ''''''', ~~~~i#" _ \ r ó -, '." . ''''' " J"' '0 ~"1i'...iI&~.,"> .c'~ ¡. , -Q (~A .~ ~ I .... ". · . .!!"~" .. , -""''' ""'~;,:"; {è: t [..{ C ~ '81 · '" till '. , .. ,. " ' '. , """" . '" ,~ ' '''!, "', .,~ > '. &'I~~'1K"'"",,~ v . I//Illi· . """ ~. ;.<! . ". t<.' ~~'~1%;.t" .'. }/; .J¡ - ~ ~ - J ". I ;::~I 111.':' ¡, II ¡::¡~~ L 1 i~; _ 0~ '" ~ ~ - ,~ " I . · ~!êf" "" · . "'!-~~"I ':'Jf l~ ~ r-r. . 'I""~ I ~~-,", h <.' ~~~~.~~;; ~ ~."r.!i';J e- í~Y'~ '" ~ .' "). I ~~it: . ....~.- ~~~~~~'S""":;.K~~~: ~t £ .s f h ' '. ,,¡¡w¡: ,. ,< \¡,"" ."iii;' ,~" . "~'O'" ' "h-H~ I """'" -' ". _ ,',.,-. "B ", .... -1 ~ ..lJYllll'.~ ",., _''I, 'c '>"0.1 ?' ;.,,» , . '" " \ ll· '" .... =",' . œE .~ ;,;~ "",~ r'l>, ~~. ~ ;~~ <ft,,:'<¡;; ;;:;; _ ~ ¿:P' . ¡£ ,,,- '$. ~ Œ . A '" .fit"-,, I "J r--- " ~. .. ....... 1 ". z;¡:¡ I!II~ ¡,¡¿; ~~~,~ ;:'I~~ 'W~"', ::/1 ~ rv-'\ . '- ., ~""~., ~~~:¡".,f~.w< "" <> ~ ~ rt' ) ." I', . , ." '" , ~ ~t¡;i'<'1¡""..~.~. X'~;. CN I , '.' .. '",.;' .w..,....~_II.~ ~ / L I I.. Æ ~ e~~ , ,¡w:g: ...~"'" <: ". - r- t--- ,.,I,EI 'f.~:;\\ ':;;':." _I' -~ .: -'< "'~ ~~~:1 ~ .. "". . Þo '-' -"" :!.-c , ',;.;"'7,' ~'~"'i'Ið' ".:~Ii-~~&~~~¿;~~~ ~ ~ t--, 1-. "1 '" 'r,.., .·"'lB . .:1c. '~"ä""'~e ~ '. , = . , ..... ,...~ ~. 'æèl1ffi~ ~ ~ I I / f I ~ ., r,..""'·;;.'.~'...~(to ":~~~~"1'~~t~ . ~ \>- I ~ L ( ~L ~?1'~ ~ ,·æ "'~ _~ ill'. ''''-'.k ._. ,. ~ L1 z / f~~« '. - . , . ~ ".,. ...----1 . , ~ -'. ~,.~, 'e,",. "'" .. " '. ~ .V I~ \ . v.:o:'~> ..~. I . I! ~i:T " 0~ ": ;;,,,W," ('... I _ -0 V\ ~ . ð ~ j '/ $ ,(;-] ¡---. I ~:;;, ~ 'h ,\dV A ~ v".1 I r----.. ~0 V-r \ /'0 ! I '" I 'R ¿ III X Z' ¿ ,¥ /kt,~ ~ ól¿,D~...... ~ ~ c::: Fe ./ !I r CO "'-- ~ ,/ ) (J /~ . "~~;:, ~. 0jJ ~~ [D ~~"~ L~ ____ / V \' O~" J I " j _ ;::¡ ;r- j I ßfP / ~. "-_ 0 I ~ ê OJ - /..ø~ ( "l.D I ~ þ- ...--- CJ. ~c[Llr':v/ rvì .~ I .\ . ~""~""~ I ~"."",,, J ,.J ,"""IS' I _ IYJ' Highway Map ..' z ~ " : ___ r 1 ~ ~ " ~ "Ì,: z )\. : '~_~ L1 1 / ---ij -.;., Ir--·...." l' . '- ',' 'p~ '" 1ft ~I/- .N I - r..,..) fit-""" ~ 1\. \ ,,~ .~. ";-~:.. I ' .L ~.f " ,1 "~ ~ ':, -~ \ HC&ingfor~ ~/Y/- JBIíOCk. waYi ','t ~ .' ~. ~ ,. ',\--~ '" .J, \;¡, ,, " 1, - ." I· " ~ 1 ' '\1 / 15 ;-- . - r-)f-'~:<' .' ¡~~.' '. __ ~i~~;- t''HOI~ing< ~-" t "è~'; f(L~~~n.:";~";n>-æl I j-,-I.¡"., I .~; 1; -- I' I"~ 1 ~~."~'."' ..J. II ~ +--r--"".?--t5.2i t ... a t1 215 ......-. :IS ~ ~-~; -·"30 :!1 ~ '~"\ hj . '.' ' . I I . 1 L 1#f,¡~.f.<.~l\M ~ ..I, . ,/ ':'/~¥ 1'1 I I i !'~ é r"",·éÆ"!"1 ..., "1 I ¡.. ~- /r~"~j i i ;." ¡' ~~$.. f I~ í " lï -'" ,,' ..J!!Ø . .~ '...... C i'p¡,~~ ./ ,,:~~... - I· . / '¡-\ " 4 .~ ..~ 1--' ,," '. ... IL "", 5' } / ;' j "T- . ~ '-- .......:L. . ,,,'I '" 1 ~ I !.'..,- , \- I " ~.A.~).(, J L \" -' ~ _ j , I, ~ /" ~ (-:.. ." u¡ ~ . - . "" I L.! I '- A ,.. ¡r -·Av.o'!, ~:', 7-L,~ '..,.J" "S rte ' },., I any' ,--". T ,''t... I ".." -'" " ~'.' - , 1,.,,1· . / I I ", f . :.--" "_ .~ 'StWe"'d i''';'''' '2> ~'- l' ¡g . / }j__" \~.20· 1.1 84 ~ "~I!I: ..~..; I:; . ff ./ . ~ >... - ~ " < '" ··a'r:I: II-;: . "'"';'\~' . ' uany I...... f . .>:~. h.. ì '\ ~. rp. ;/ I A 25--¡ ~ 52 2!1 r" =- 25 t ~ r-..-. 2'1 n 27 . ~'2S ~-:- 1~~ r . ) ~, 1'1"'" ~ . I '\ / ~ \ _ - " ~,;"" ) 'IW r - l£4\.':~:¡~·-ìN·:- I J - ...... I"" .-~. Si~ ~ ~ ..>~ z --~t 1~~}.r1 ~\ ,.)..f-~I ~~l ~ A ~ ,j ~ m'~' I e1 c-P r-I. 'V lib: ,U ;") . ~~ ~c ' ' fh' "'. ' w c-: N "'<> 'r--"'--!' ",,; . ~ ---+-'c~',o" '.' , ' w, '" ' < . 'J' , I '¡'. >- .'" .i<':';!¥.. " ¡,. ",I.JoÞe~,·. . ."., \ ----r C I ..r-r "', . ~ ,<;4 -;-", !-----t- ~i¡.. ~ - , , ,~ < .. ',.L c, "so' rlr'"" u \ <t,,- 'W I ole' 0 l,-..2:.;jt , ');¡ . ,"' '" , ~"" "'. . . I , ~J ~ f "\ ,,' ~." '_<"' , W E ¡ ( " I.... ~:::,';f¡ "( ~" ~ld ". L "\}"~ ~~~~ "',, ' -." ,.' . I f'-a mi fjJ r ~c.OIl~§e'~llIeY- ^. ,'fl "i'.. /J -- ",,;/jij -- '. ~ " " '~-'<j',$ 1'..1 .. ~ l- \1 ~ ~ " <to S't"XU :ttð~ ,~~ - , " ,-- .~ S .,.:', ,..,,,. _ U '" . , I I . I l ìØs.eplJI '. '," '" " . \ +.7 i;~r ~ ;::'>~kj i J '" 7f'~ ¥J~" :"'~'"'" '<~~~' .' '.' ~L' - " _. .,'i,,{~~~ /~.r---''-''~ I I "/ " ~~~', .' .,> .~>~. --,', ',,-"~ I' ~ '''Ii z ,þt-i£ ,. "RYf~"~~' ~ z . ~~~..r '" ,;Ç:'-( '; ,-' . .~ ~li :, J~~,,~ { . ~ -~ r:~1~%,~!~; ::';'~:~'..' .:.~, . , , '., 1 vlakefieirl.l!:;¿ "':'" ~'.';'. ~:".." ~ ': . >. . c ;:~ 'i ~"," '; iCht,--· J~ .': ,.' ,.~Id mfig ~~~;v/:.;~: :i.;",:~~=~f::7~'" ~"., ~ :' .-:. "'<~:f~!j~Jt~ lunson,' .;: IS. ..-., ?i~.'¡¢i.'.".~'....~..-.'."'.."OÐ!M.<d"".<.'.;...;.~-c"". -.' - ..' .. '. "'''~'_<¡'-'i{'' l;~J(~:l_~, .~,~. ~~<. "r.,'",' ~~i{'!:l~~w,,~~P,~L~.,: ~_-. ,'"': :.,,, '~.\ .~~~ !-!.J;~~¡ .;;;,,7.':1 . 'f Kb ,;/; ~;'j¡.1~ji;~";-f~ ~\:.'"' J>, ;,. ~ ":~ ~ ~ ;'tRt .fF< . ~~: ~ ¡_l¡~k :;/;,,:'(;:,," ;~~ "' ¡J;;t I f7 .,¡ . .,~ ( -; IT~ l.x-, ,/0- j~ J :"1 V .L '-1 I·þj 1 ,,¿- '",' '. " . , 'n I , ., - r .? L- ; .'1 Jh I ',." ". . c.. c,'; 'J;r- H". I ,0> ,'~ / CI' 1é" / t . ' ~.", 'r"i_.u14S ",,' ri ~~Y;,¡,;1 ,( "è"'-" 'i ,¡ f / . ~ t .: ...., l' ~(~ "n n"~~Ke 1 ~1 ~ <I, ':~í~. r. .. 1~" . i;;" " ,,-"'~, .. .." t{'~~~~1 ,,,.1 ,'i! d I I T \- .' .;;:= (K'l 1 . .... "~~' . I -,"t n J> >/1 n .1. i""',t t y T':1j-,~ i'n " ~ 'V' ),~ ~~~--/ .;C" " a I v . 4~.... I~uxemburg I ~ ~j,-I J _ -l. ;'j (¡ ¡,,» 'lalr~tt~en_...._ fJ - ~ ! .~ . I ,- ìlJ'\Z alOß 5rà¡~1e - t\ ·"-n.,"~ I,A'" ~ ',c'" _,<:" Ed n V.2!!J.all ~1ill - f ~' 1- =::j' ~i.'T.. . r. ~I.. . ·W., ..; 7,,1)" ,. I 3J fè~~ 3Iii ...-:v J2 3J 301 1.3!ô ~ 33 _<"f'I7'\:T JI "\ 33 /..--;: 3S -/( LV:-' ,,",, '''.' I ,I "."' . 111 ! '''¡;'''*'.. \ .... '.'.~ ~;:;;¡, . '1" ~.-L .. f-L;;~ h\ ~.... 1QJ ~ ..... .-.~ l " "\'1) ""'.' Á ,,' .......'... ~J;~;"" ...... ,&~ . - '" 'if"'" ~ )Y . ' ",;, I" ...,.... ",'*, ':._ ìL ~ . .<"'." "I" " l tr~" . , i , I 1 I I I 117 ST. JOSEPH 111& T124N - R29W See St. Wendel Page 84 o ~ ~>' '~'1/ "- .~ViCoi"'g9ofStS'nedíct~ - ;~I .œJ·~e uro.",,I.!,1I. K ht~;,j . J010 '''1 v=,~, N 'X 0. '" H1'~'r""¡SAT' i 142.4,:;:;L .'~_!t.~. Roman \'hnert'~ ~;¡.œN '-I . '" ¿ ~ . _. Io.~~· rF IIJ ~ ~ ~rtI ~~ci!'!;-;; LEIaI 0 ,-----,~,.~~,,;,.>. --------. ' ~ T~681 ,J~=.,-'- ~!h$ff45 N~d, ~1"'Nl,~~;'J i N1rscn '1€1';'''' EvelynL . ~ ¡ RS '~2941 "ìZ, 7V6f,- ':! 104.7 '~~~~7" ~~'j;;; I 1 O~?3n5ell 6 \ 52.5 757 Jo"nR ,....--,;, It>:r9neH:1- (;en:"ljB& Gem!"dB. ¡ . :2 2~ I ~~2~5 ''1t.~~ ~~.V I~I~~ R~~ Louis & . ~ "I Go"."", r-0¡lsabeL rs Feld i . · Order of 8: \ ~ l..~'e~r ~ N~" 1\.10. cs~ "3ytiŠ" Georgie ~ ~ C:Oh'r.-TI~ 1133¡ I f~.8 ¡ , !. . ~ß \ 818 t _ t ... ... ^': ,- . Merkhng100 pgter ":~ ~' J Gemerú&--1.. í David I Saint Benedict 51: CC1in.'i¡:::::.::s:::: ~ I DG~F ~IRAJ34 '-.£~ Roc:;;';;" ~~/ 'JJ¡ Isabel PFeJd 1 i Morrelm 74.5 o è 856.4 -: U \\ 43 tiL1c......~,~ ~4Q'.31 ~~ ~~ "'" 1 f";' ~~ 70 ~ ¡~,(, ~ ~~ . _'~~'_"-': .~ . M : I ~..,.!. Roger& ;;¡e""TEl ~I~' ,.""-~ ' 1,jIP - !I'¡->':.-~~.ffs~G&IFeI<\ - :. I ' I Gall Buermann "",",0 ~ "ÿ," >HI, ~ ~l, - JW""" ~':',:, J. '~>-"'~?é"'£; 40 1 · I 1235 '-1 -iIJ"'r~ 426, --ø:-i ~~õI: .~-~~! ~ · F!()(enz _, 78 I L ;) R ~ì% NPt ettne:r ¡r:; ~ :'\.=I.-~~\.~'" ~- II R - ~ ~ l~~:1; I ·r'fl - ·-B in :~ - ¡!p,. I ~ .--;~:ShJr18 ïræ " \'Iaiz 1I'Ie"'" 52 Wendrn & ""'fa' , ",,' -<il· ~" ,. 'or? ' ~. <Ð.. ~'1I~. Em Y /.. 809 I t~~s; ---tsaWalz ¡ -. - . ~ ~'~ a. . 'u:::ri~í 1~ ;408 r ~ 7 LJQ6 1248 J ,.l !r?U~H~.:~">- ~~.~R ~--- "LP_-~-~ -' I.' 1 "' a. N';;:'~" 'OTÐS h ¡¡ '34!"! ~ -~, 1¥>i--'- ,~"-~t>A - I : ~ames V 1 Florenz R ~' & "1r:¡;109~ j! 5~ fA~:t .( ì7ï' ~'~¡: '-.. "Œ~;~~~;;áûéà"" ~ L'e~' ; 127.7.1. ' . C 1596. U,.!;' \'R ~n 'f~:;t.., q -.:c' ._ ' B I T4: 011 ~ '1 &KFamlly "~¡N I "_' ~ ''''~&" - .,','},i EI~_ ......0Q2B2O< "" CL~r . ~_'- , <.£..: I ~,-",:....'J:o.~ ..!--ŒM -:.~4 Ct:I'" A1B GK'è-."\ . LId Ptrsp ~ '1'~I!ì ! I ~~~I= I . ~ 121¡;~¡!.'~"i!d'~:E'.ii·d:'\L ~~~ ~ "". ~ 19 µ,3-<R&rP'56 4~ o 230.6~ ff~dj ".. r:-II~I£¡ ~ . ,~ ~ ~ ~ ";1.c- ~ .~ .fìi~\¥; -.{ ;c.-f'\7IJ. D.. ! J6 j Ardeno-, g -~o 'ÍS'<;¡a'(:í!!~~.' (;f,,,,"',, ~~ ¡ I~'i«~*"'~ -~'N~~*';'~%¡~~ lO_B ! <¡g 1..."",1 ~~... W F ~3;)~WJl - /" ~\ ~i .. :> ::¡;;~".. 7t",,:~k~ ~ &R'.a MR=<, iMS2õ Li;,' i I ~ - ~ & Dorothy ~ r¡p¡-~J,1pt';V;~I¡;-'_2õ¡ ~: 1''''-2,',. ~~, ?,,"'~_~-"','è ¿'~. '58. ' 1 ---¡kt"ijf~~....... (l) Honer 1;;' _-,- ~lWaIz ' w S'sl"",o! . I,Gri~~ , ,Donna M . "... - OJ 33.29 . ..~. I....',..~,v~.'.<~.....:.'.). J --r::9~ G~lZel~TheOrder ~."'. '~Š~1~qçs;J,V'~iz53. ! 14U, Don.o.van1i3'-"""!;,,;, ¿;: co ~ . 18 2 d}i'R;'ÆÆ~t 17 rY.. 53.3", ." ,12~;~ ~~.~ ~lif [if! i. , ' , : !~-,j i '__~-2~.t,a--' S¡gØ,; , IfJ ..- -----; ~. ......,.<.K.rae.'nreJ~_.'-'j.'i Jlr"".'o'I't~"". :2-"~'.o .!.;;~":'IO!y~~..,,,,.... e <.ISH4.051 I"~~ ! 1 '. ^''';:;;::::.''œ1. -OS:'9.' i~. .9! g LJttx;~1¿~¥:,~;~~:L _~~ ~H I~I!£C' X) :~'~ ~1r~,\. r,1 I~~ u::;J I Tf \ I ~~' \~ ð.. CJ.. 'Walz¡ii~~~' ,~",.. -Il,g~i .s;",1fJ >b'r''''''01'^~,;:~ì'~ Bechtold ~I~~r,l~~()--=---.. ,/~!~I . I ~ ~ -t '* 0, I 30 ,ffiW~~ ~I,x 1 J":"j'h j.., If I 1 1!D Jomson 4C.11....~r· '°"1 ~. '2,rT 102.6 I'"': I ~ {( , ¡; ',- I " : :~. '" ¿;: > g¡' ! '. '. / ·I~' carolJ· 1., J5, ! . '~Gera!dP it I '-' John &. . James'".;;. Q) o i Frards IT¡. ert &. ~l1ertes 1 . _ i ~r;J:n to. It...\ & Bernice He!m "'"...... ; Hardnves W <': :!::::: ro ~ Eiyn~1Š5.2 ¡Cwrt OJ ~ _ ~1t~'4 s~~r:~er 10 ; ð- '-I . _ P10 --. -- 366.6 :'" ,~',- _ 129.6 138.9 tt~~ ~ 8 IJ I.. ¡5"")~ JanC . h'.· Rm~f~~¡"rc,~\~i..,p..~.:{:l ~sr;9::?"'2-2~wJ ~~ ~', ro¡;;'"I!A [;;.0: oð ) 1'9 I K~<8 K..ter. tw~~ 't -825 Z't:d~.J~.¡:¡ ~\ I .//'r~ I £5 ~"'~ - ~.~ '0 ~ ...., i I~" 74.8.tl, ", ~ ¡ . . ~~~"1~ B ~~.ne-rrt ':,. 7"! 'x~~es ~.7 --: 91 ð RoyL&Susani I \,1 \,f('c,,>/ ! Terwey 7vere!. ..I.pa "Gt.·.'.3. ~;; I 41 232:.9~-'":jJ· '..j I'. . ~ /' 76.1 . ."".C Ü AZmmer112.7 I 'Kr" , Brothers ;;2.5 ;..-. _ __I .>oM ~ ~~", ""'-. -~¡¡:L . 1"( =-" ~ ,r-,.'.aryM' þ,¡fredJ& ¡ 42 IA.~J& & H~~ /. ;\ ,tf 8lo~ ~n!o:" ~ ~ Ma~R6 J; (f) Zimmer Famj:yl Tree Dolores 1 ~ ,...;;.. I Ket1lem ~9 AJfre,? ~'e-S u 1 - .6 ~f: - á -- Jæ"d~. I' Properties ¡v..ttie:~· Tfb"r~~ i tFi <0;' ~ .J... ~"i I ',m,1 F~?' S~u5æ I 56' ,. \./& Enger12Q! ·1 · f;f(f...,~ w I ,~~ æ '" 84.., 160 ¡ ~H . / ".. , ..' I I' "~' "~if';¡ ,¡ I lei""" .,. en . CO r..f'IPr! kjJ& ~E&V" (\ '........."? ......:. ~1.,. 1..:!6Al: 1:.0< N Wm-&wh" James & ( MK ~ - ~, ~'G &'1 r.' - ATSI t 1 ~IS~~ ;'Qr~ ""'''''''[§IO'''''' I v"'<lslmc~l. 40 I "~Z¡mme;"~9 \. ; I ~ '~~~ ~ 1:t;~1 . /'.1<>", 265 I r.! ". - .. - 1",,2. r< 11~¡ I -.-:2= - ,-.,.------f-i) ¡"ill 40 f{~$"'~ ~il!'" ^ ¡1601 j ~& 10 ,~~ ;;~::ø" S - I (-'/o-t E-.-/'¡ Ii Wn& LJ ~o:? r=:c J ~1~ II ColdS Jf ._~~ 274 . "- to j LEuaM j,J ~ID L 10 i 1S6 ~ng -,. o:t~~ r 30S'i>;~",/: §. § ! 29 :~ 7 28 :"'A:heW '47 Grn",eCc~ 52 ~..< JR~~E LJ 25'!.J-d _ ~ /¡ ~,~ ~E JI EuoeneH LI EJX>ef""Æ l ~~oe ~,1083 .<--::::::~~ . 71¿ ,R.'1:adE I ~el~are I ~ : '\J .SO'~ "! 119 -<0 TeresaM j 127.5 ~___~}~ -" L~"-~~A:-::7.Z --7.F------7143.4¡T i '-C>i1--V~ ! ;..;"I~·~ 1, Koltes280 RobertA, J, Hi?255~~& ~JlHá7'A': ~9r~t)';/ E ~g .''''j.'I~. '''1.01.011 ;,Joseph '.0. '\'r.,]"".,·.!i;¡I~i"I~Y! ~..'.'-'-"... i. HUlin.. 9 ! 0 JS{,~:I'l~'55A. .......;;.J,. "&!J:N.G,,""~....Biil#t.... - '.. ,~ o~, ~ i~!¡~ . Z¡~"ö" ^ i 3Q jl ~ ~! ~ !~r~" ïK1ñl ' 70.8.-':;; 13/6 If¡ t=.,t.¡. .,., , "9: ,'- 0\\ ':-,~' ~ ; = ;:; "R- ~ ";' ·1' A'o;s & Laura~ ¡ ,139, " Th I ~ ~.' ' c~ ~ / Tn~. æ ~~, j, ~ ~¿rr:,n I '.. JÃ. \ t~ir0.¿~"2J¡\;. Iud ~ oger The!sen MaomSS¡ ¡ 1.....1 ~_~~' Carol ~1.4~ f/- ~Tree 1 ,. ~ ~; S:hÞ<X~~';;'l!~:O:Ji' r Loretta. &-:J yersJ _ ¡-.j Heinen ...;.":1 r:::S 0 127.5 _ Kthli!;-:7'A g 1188 - ~f!.e r~, . . . 140.8 I;:' I ' ri ' 610 95 .. - IP.nro:l,..I- ~ i FamJJ1 ..... :-:.::' 1J7~ Zimmer i M:ct1ael MI I C "11391. I ;::.J""",,,e.",,,~ 'Y. ~~JA~ \ I. UpitB~ ~ 36j~.-TBlack ~ ... 155.2 -:11 ZJ'i'sm6'" I 32 ' I~ ~iil!-~ i 33 R&SF m ·'>-W20..... 119<+ ml1\ ' 35 Pmt111.7 8;, BloX I"¡ , """- 10 ". .:0.3. . ,..~ ,." ~I nc :r: I MarÏ{& . __~ 5 ' IKLŠ E5 ~!~¡.,:: ¡ 1~¡"'~ O!cU ~ '" ~ ,~e;'~ %~,.. ~ '" /......r:'{c IIVtí;;ne -. ~ / 11 175.7 Norbert& '1- ~za.bet~. 1~;~.i2iC&Al:the.3~~!,N51;)eH10¡""I~I~1.~-' e.s.1 RS15~~l ~~~ ./~ t.fiE!~ Sehit·; ~1 Dolores _ PnnPP1127\c l..-.----1 4,( l ,e:_, ~ufHšTA5l p....! ~! ~ 52 _~~ ~. Hatoi-d ~~ 0 ;Oq ~~;::~ Farrflyl1 ~1J&KZa!:o'nMi Mueller rr\:r~ .J," Is"".,Yn!~¡g'31C'::;Þ'f-.Qic1o'."'<~:"" l~~jÆ "- r;I~~I'¡¡~ R ';;{.F~' PaMe'>hÞ-Î." '':':'8"" 151 a ! E . " I "'-'M3',' if-'''' . """~ ,~~ /jj1lJf Ar<\en;", 0 e'ð<'''' 11 -- 166.3 J ' . o .... j ~/ Sct1e!orL~ ll~i ro i ~ 1...0 ~l1&J~r:-ÖKW . - ~' 104.2 ~J g .!;~! .'- 1 \ . ~ ' -/ W 20 I 60.2 !Q:: J 0 ' .... . , , ð Q .. 83 73 133 123 113 103 _3 See Rockville - City Page 68 ~~j;;':]YÜ~~fX;:c{;',~11m11¥{ÆŒ~{;K}t%;:;}f;~{~;1f~~~fi~l~;:~Z¿~~),ª~!~Bttff~18~êJ~íJ~~!~fj00*'¿~1~~¿flJ~ITttiflli(~~}~t12?iÍ'j~fi-jBl;;~kÙ1 ~ Street Name Location Street Nams Location Street Name Location Street Name Location 103RD AVE ........................KI103 264TH ST.........................HH/110 315TH 8T .............................M/86 BELMAR ST ...........................1/74 112TH AVE......................HH/111 265TH ST .........................HH/104 320TH 8T .............................M/90 BORGERT DR ......................U86 115TH AVE ..........................11116 270TH ST .............................1/106 73RD AVE N ........................M/73 CLAREMONT ST ...................1174 115TH AVE ........................M/116 270TH 8T .............................1/126 74TH AVE .............................KI74 CLAROMA 8T ........................1/73 119TH AVE.........................KI119 280TH ST ............................J/119 75TH AVE .............................K/74 COLLEGE AVE N ...............U101 123RD AVE.........................J/123 282ND 8T............................J/113 76TH AVE .............................U76 COLLEGE AVE 8................U100 124TH AVE .........................J/124 287TH ST ............................J/124 818T AVE .............................H/80 COLLEGEVILLE RD ..........M/118 125TH AVE .........................U124 290TH ST ............................J/128 82ND AVE..........................HH/81 CORD2 TO 194 ...................KI110 128TH AVE .........................J/128 290TH ST ..............................J/90 83RD AVE..........................HH/83 CORD2 TO 94....................U111 133RD AVE......................HH/133 295TH 8T ...........................KI101 86TH AVE .............................J/86 COUNTY ROAD 121 ............KI96 133RD AVE.........................J/133 295TH 8T ...........................KI104 88TH AVE .............................L/88 COUNTY ROAD 122 ............H/98 19TH 8T S ............................KI74 295TH 8T ...........................KI116 91 8T AVE .............................K/89 COUNTY ROAD 133............MI88 - / 18T AVE NE ........................M/99 295TH 8T .............................KI90 93RD AVE..........................HH/93 COUNTY ROAD 134.............U76 260TH 8T ...........................HI116 304TH ST ..............................L/74 ARBOR ST .............................1/74 COUNTY ROAD 137 .........HH/73 261ST ST.........................HH/111 '305TH 8T ..............................LJ76 ARCTIC CIR .........................N/98 COUNTY ROAD 138.............J/90 263RD ST ..........................HH/83 310TH 8T ...........................M/116 BEL CLARE DR .....................1/78 80 © 2003 Steams County, MN Created By PianSight LLC -- I Attachment: Yes or No I -- REQUEST FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION Frank Osendorf - Discussion on allowances for curb cuts in a Rl District DATE: June 2, 2003 AGENDA ITEM Frank Osendorf, Discussion on allowances for curb cuts in a RI Zoning District. PREVIOUS ACTION In 2000 the City amended the Zoning Ordinance limited all residential property to one curb cut that cannot exceed 24 feet in width, including the wings. The amendment was initiated by the Planning Commission and was requested to help control ingress./egress in an effort to provide safer neighborhoods and provide traffic controls. . RECOMMENDED PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION COMMENTS/RECOMMENDA nONS Frank Osendorf recently purchased a lot in Northland and built a home with a three car garage. In addition, he is pouring a cement slab to park a fifth wheel. It was noticed that Mr. Osendorf removed a large portion of curbing and when questioned he informed the City of his plans. Osendorf is requesting that the Planning Commission consider amending the Ordinance. City staff contacted the area Cities and questioned if they limited access or width of curb cuts. For your convenience the information follows. Some Cities that currently do not have limits are looking at revising their Ordinances for safety and traffic control reasons. - - ~ S e: 0> 0> .0 0> o ~ 0> 0> o ~.o ~ ~ 5 ~ ..ê 3='~ e:..... - 0> .-- ~ _ ro ....... v 0> N -C ....... . c:: CJ) ~ .,- co'- u~ ~..... ~ .- ....... I :sU 0> en ,... Q) L....... ~ c.. 0 ~ a; en E U :5£ o>-e o 0> .0 ~ e: U - U co e: 0_ .....: -c ê e: 0 c.. 0> . - ro:;t: 00> "E "E ~ 0> ro 0 en ~ . Q) 3= .:: en;:' . o 0> 0 0> '5 ~ 'E .þ..c::5 U g . U) 3= 0> .0 c.. ù ê 0> "E .S :s en .!:Q 0:5 ~ g> U 0> Õ "'"" e: 0 .- ro - .S e: ..:: ro - en~ 0 ~ en ~ c.. ~ U :;t:!:? 0> ..... ~ 0 0> ~ 0 ~ ¢:: :5 -<;: ~ c.. 0 o ~ .~ .::: ;:. 0> I 2 E e: 0>0> ~ .0 0>ã3- 3=.Q ~ ~ g .- g 0 o.~ en 0 c.. 3= ro ~ - U .- 0 en ..... e:~' ro 0> -c - _ ~ 'B.S -c 0 co 0> 0 c:a 0.... a; ~, ..c: ro . . e: I 0> . ~ ~ ¡:s "5 >- ¡:s ¡:s ¡ß ¡:s g> . S ¡:s ..s::: tJ) s::: e: U 0> e: e: 0 e:'- g> e: Q) ,.. -c co .0 :5 ro ro 0 co -r: w co ,..,. :;:; "'" 0> e: .... e: e: e: ro e: ~ E = - -c .- .- I .- 0... ~ ...... .- ._ -c ~ e: -C -C "0 ~ -C Cl)UQ) u"" uro........ ¡:s ,,-....e: .... ~ 0> ~ ~= ~ ~ e: ~ (j) ro ~ o C1:J._ c...-·u U ._ ._ co ._ ~ en ._ ~~:::s ~.ê o>e:.ê.ê e: .ê:::§.ê _ . «C""o...- C- =:s ~ ....... "'E ......., Q):"¡::; ....... ..... Q) e: e: cn ,~ e: e: 0 e: -C U e: CI) _ ,.., -'- - '-' '-'- .- e: 0> .- 0..... ~ 0> g>- 0> 0> 0> 0> ~c.. 0> - .... ..... U e: :'::: e: e: e: e: ~ en e: >.:::s .o:E cn(.):E:E:;2:E IDe: :E o ....,... ......... 0> 0> - - - .... -..... 0> ..... ""'_ ~ 0 o~ 0 0 co 0 cn~ 0 ~2:,.Q (.) Z 0_ Z Z 0... Z:..::J..... Z .- :::s ~ Ucn:::s U ~ _ _;;.... :;... _ .J:: N 0 ~ ...... v _:!: (V) « N (V) « « N « N c:x:: :2......... -- -.....: -- X -- -- X -- -- -- :> c:: (0 Z N c:x:: Z Z c:x:: Z (0 Z :> '-.,- ......::;¡;: ::;¡;:.,- :!: _~cn c:x:: c:x:: « c:x:: « « « c:x:: c:x:: o :s ~ -- -- ~ -- -- -- -- -...; -- -- ~UU Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z I-Z U <C 0 E .~ i::' ..... co co -C 0> I- en -c 0> ro ro e: :'::: -c > Z e::: 1-0 0 e: """ 0... 0> e: 0 ro OW -- c:x::..:: a::: c:x:: I- 0 UCl.. ~ v N (V) 0 c.D c.D .,- 0 0 N W v N UJ c.D c.D (V) r- 0 0 N Z N 0'> c.D N 0'> ex:> .,- (V) N ex:> O v r- (V) r- N UJ N UJ r- c.D I I I I 1 I I I 1 I ::I: ~ ff5 :ß ¡g ~ ~ ~ ~ tg ~ Cl.. ex:> (V) c.D 0'> r- N N N N N 0> -c en.::.:; >- .§ 0 0> _ ~ -g ro - >- e: e: c.. >- - .- 0> ro 0 0... I- ~ 0> U) 00> g> ~ t a::: n 0> - ~ .- ü ro "-' """-' u « c:x:: -c u.. -c 0 U) 'Š _ 'm o 0 a::: ro U) :> ü:J: U) :> . I Attaclunent: ;[;fi~ or No I REQUEST FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION Development Site Plan Approval - Lemmer Trucking DATE: June 2,2003 AGENDA ITEM Development Site Plan Approval- Lemmer Trucking PREVIOUS ACTION Lemmer Trucking received a building permit in 2000 to construct a facility. The City has started reviewing past building permits to make sure that all the provisions of a previous building permit are completed before a new addition is constructed. Therefore, when reviewing this building permit we rejected the application as the property was collecting outdoor storage items including cars, trailers etc. and it was unclear if the parking lot was built according to the plans. The request for Planning Commission approval was also delayed as the applicant had not completed the required Development application and had not submitted a detailed site plan. . Since the City notified the applicant of the prior conditions of the 2000 building permit, the property has been cleaned. The parking lot is paved but should be marked as 8 parking spaces were part of the original approval RECOMMENDED PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION Approve the site plan and authorize the execution of a Developers Agreement with the contingency that a building permit cannot be issued until the final drainage plans have been approved by the City Engineer and the sideyard setback requirement is satisfied (the loading dock must be moved 15'). COMMENTS /RECOMMENDATIONS When the initial building permit was issued, the sideyard setback was 10 feet. However, since that time the new Ordinances have become effective and the sideyard setback is 25 feet. If the applicant does not wish to move the loading dock a variance could be applied for and considered on July 7, 2003. If a variance is requested then approval ofthe Development Agreement must be tabled/denied and reconsidered on July 7,2003. - - Project: Lemmer Trucking Determination: -E- COMPLETE - INCOMPLETE Developer: Tom & Mary Kay Lemmer Site Plan submitted: Date Reviewed: Page 1 of 3 . City of 81. Joseph Required Material Submission Development Plan Applications Completed applications for Development Plans and required fees shall be submitted the City of St. Joseph Zoning Administrator at least 10 days prior to the proposed date of consideration by the City. The ten days allows the City to review the application and forward the application to other entities for review when reqUired. Only completed applications will be accepted. It is the applicant's responsibility to submit required materials. If an application is determined to be incomplete, notification, which indicates which portion of the application is incomplete, will be mailed to the applicant within 10 days following submission of the application. REQUIRED MATERIALS - The applicant shall provide the following: Requirements Complete Comments ¡ Is the proposed use a permitted use YES NO 2 Lot Area - Minimum Requirement (1 acre) YES NO The proposed building site contains 1.21 acres exceeding the minimum 3 Setback Requirements a) Front Yard - 30 feet from the lot line YES NO The new loading dock will be located behind the existing facility which The front yard cannot be used for parking is within the requirements Note: The parking is located in the front yard setback but that was . allowed prior to the Ordinance update and they are not looking to increase it at this time. b) Side Yard - 25 feet from the tot line and must be YES NO Plan indicates 10'. The new Ordinance increased the setback to 25'. landscaped if abuts any roadway. c) Rear Yard - 20 feet YES NO Far exceeds 20 feet 4 Height Requirements - Maximum height 55 feet YES NO Loading dock is 4 feet. 5 Site Coverage - No structure may cover> 50% YES NO The proposed loading dock is approximately 1500 square feet and the existing building is approximately 2000 square feet for a total coverage of 3500 square feet or 7%. 6 Parking Lots - paving stones, concrete, bituminous YES NO The parking lot is existing from a previous development but was never Industrial areas may have class II if approved by PC stripped or curbed this should be completed with this development. 7 Loading Docks - Loading docks must be 10' x 50 YES NO The loading dock is a platform without division so it meets the requirements 8 Exterior Requirements - YES NO Pre-cast tilt-up masonry material which meets the requirements 9 Statement of Development - The development plan must include a statement concerning the specific nature A completed application was submitted - of the use to which the property is to be put and include YES NO certification that the proposed use shall comply with all ~ regulations, ordinances or special provisions that apply. Project: Lemmer Trucking Determination: ~ COMPLETE - INCOMPLETE Developer: Tom & Mary Kay Lemmer Site Plan submitted: Date Reviewed: ege20f3 10 Landscape Plan NO The plan indicates landscaping from the previous application. While Arbor-vitae were planted the original design included trees. 11 Screening of HVAC YES NO Not applicable 12 Lighting NO Hood detail included 13 Curb Cut NO Property is already curbed along 19th Avenue 14 Landscaping - A unified landscaping plan must be NO See above notes submitted 15 Development Plan a) Building Location on the lot drawn to size NO b) Building elevations; front, rear, side NO Poured concrete wall and slab. c) Building Exterior material and color NO The property will be accessed from 19th Avenue NE d) Locations of ingress/egress NO A dumpster is not provided on site . Dumpster/solid waste areas screened NO Signs are not indicated therefore not part of this approval f) Sign Location and dimensions NO g) Lighting Standard and hood detail NO h) Parking and loading areas defined NO i) Drainage by the use of arrows and/or contours NO Not applicable j) Screening of HVAC Equipment YES NO k) Landscaping material including the location, type, size NO I) Fire hydrant and fire lane locations NO m) Utility Locations NO None illustrated n) Fencing/screening/accessory buildings identified YES NO Will be completed with the final utility and drainage plans 0) NPDES Permitting requirements fulfilled YES NO p) Compliance with state and federal guidelines including, NO but not limited to glare, smoke, dust, odors, and noise. A deposit of $ 500 was received for the review process q) Required fee NO 16 Signage - Business sign cannot exceed 100 square feet No signs are indicated on the plan per face or an aggregate total of 200 square feet if double faced. YES NO . Project: Lemmer Trucking Determination: ~ COMPLETE - INCOMPLETE Developer: Tom & Mary Kay Lemmer Site Plan submitted: Date Reviewed: Page 3 of 3 . 17 Parking -: Required Loading Berths. In connection The loading dock does nol require additional parking as it does not with any structure which is to be erected or exceed 5,000 square feet. substantially altered and which requires the receipt or distribution of materials or merchandise by YES NO trucks or similar vehicles, with a gross floor area of five thousand (5,000) square feet or more, there shall be off-street loading provided . . MA~-24-200~_MON 11:26 AM CITY OF ST JOSEPH FAX NO, 3203630342 p, 01 APPLICATION FOR PLANNING CONSIDERATION - CITY OF ST. JOSEPH Þ'ee $ - 25 College Avenue NW Ê P. O. Box 666 'ptll . St. Joseph, MN 56374 ¡ (320)363-7201 or Fax (320}363..o342 5TA~OFMINNESOTA ) )ss COUNTY or STEARNS) NAME: l-£}'V\f]1. fL// lr4-c.1:l^C¡ r-Í'\é PHONE: --:s Co '3 :Î Z 6 Lp ADDRESS: ÚLCJ. I C Th ¡4v--<... 8 {- JÔÆ- ~'ì Sù:> ~ 7 c¡ !¡We. !hG UI1de~>;¡ned.lWf~þy mahe tlte fOl!owir.¡; applICatiOn (o:ne City Counol and Planning Coo1m1s11on of tie City Oí S¡, .i<>senh. SteMM CQU1\ty, Minoosota. {Applioant& h8ve the responsibffity of cheo<lng a, appdœO!è <J(dinar.ot~ DBrtaininglo !heir epptc<l1iOn ¡ fId C()~,~,ng wit1 ón or(\Uwnœ reQuirement¡~ 1. Applícatlon is hereby made for. (Appücant must check anyiall app(opnate lIems) _ Rezoning _ Z~n:ng Ordinance Amendment _ HolY\! OocupaUon Permit _ Su!1¡¡ce Water Managerrent Pian (Grading Permil) --L PUD _. 6uildìng Mover's Permit . - """ ...fog - Ow,,"'.m' i 7""" Aw,,,·1 - """" -..,.., 2. Legal descrip"OP......· ... ~. .~,..- 71' .,:..,~, ,. D~~'~are footage cflanCilnvolved. and sl:"eel a~. s,i!any: '2,Et::'"T1glJ~iÆ...ng{i~~~/. ..tJZ/L. (i/iJïE AC>- ~1' ' LA .~ ~. Present¡:oning of tM above described property is: II-..:> \")Oi;rt¿4 At..... 4, N. a.. 'roe.. ' fa.",..àd.'es.sand. p!:.::ne nu, moor Of.,1h~r88ent.·. 0W,sr of the ail.'.' ove de$,,~.OO. ~}.and; í Q I'V. .,-1., kA,\,}t¡ Hí t',,:," ,; (:.", . :;/..(."h.' t.:1t2...~ t;.ï AJ/fi,: !$¡ oJD!';, .3&"",.~~,,", 11.& {... 5, Persons. firms, corporations or other than appiicant a~d pre!ent owner whe; mayor wili be i~terested !~ the above desçribed land or proposed irnprove!Yienœ wíthil\ 0116 yea; after issuanc~ of pe!'mit applied for, if granted, are: - 6, Atiaehed to tnli appli il\dicated, ApP"~I~",,,,..1 ...., 4";"; 1<> .3 Owner Signature: ; / bA7E SJBMITT!D: _ CArE COr,1PLE'Tf, Dp.TE OF PU¡¡LIC HeARING __ PL'BL!CATI,*WATE: ._ I ! . , iptarn~ng Commis~on '&'cdún: _ RecO(!1m~;d Approyal, ~ FW.on1rT,~~.d DiSapr~O'iaJ Diliij of Action: I ate "Ppl,cwL'Prope'1y Owner no!íf\ed {}f Piannl!1q Comr¡¡¡5S!On MIIOn: City Council ACI!on: _ Approved __ Dís~'oved Date c{ Aç:,on: : ate Applicant/Property ONn~r notified of City Covn:;,1 Ac\iO!;: . I --- - _.__.______.______.m : ~¡; cOl «>01 '" h----Zöi7Z-¡--"""'" "£óïlóïVó-uro «: NIA'· 'ïO· r ',lr' ~ I ~..-~.-= m ....."'~ .~, ~ ~ ~ C\J- ~I - __n_______________________n_n_ ~ V ~::1 "::::>: ¿fJl.o-999-0~E: H.~OHá N/Y/fH3:J .lS J.SV3 "01 ~ I 8 ~ ~ ! M""'31UJOSmIHHloonYifffm"'!fA; JNI 9NI) Jn¿¡1 ¿¡;¡V\lV\l;Il : S1J:JN~IS:Ja :S1J3NNV7cI ·S.LJ:J.LIHJèIV Va 'I' ~. «. . !ì' ° Œ '·O""S1"",m""«"ßH'Off> '80,","""ns ¡¡ '-lad '-'JOO ''In''l MïN . ~ ¡ .r.ma,!oMl1=sg~~~?!:~~1j~~~l~ Go c:I ,)t )t c] ::I °J1v! S ,LJ3LIH:JtJV flH(J ), . I -, ~ - ~~ ,,~-...-'" '~ -.. IoSZ>C Oll~ ,., "3>1<'11N3a 31_. 0t0H )Y)eV"1 +Z"" ....~ I1:>WO'I.5Wi1IJSIOIV1 VJOS3NNJI'( 30 ~NJM33NI!1N3 I ~'"~~~ NOSHV1 I J.IOIOOW'1-.oJPE"'CJlIW"oßIM$'Bl_.o t 1CQ~'W'1oI~.L"""",IM([Ð"""'1 I ....N <0: ....N IIO-IG I IIO-,g I <0: v~ vN ..-~__________ _______ , Z <0: Z'" ':l Z ; ¡------- -----, I ill ~ '? ! ~ '? § '? :: <t: ~ ~ <t: ~ <t: ~ I "= ::> " 1:\ ::>" ::>" : : 01 ¡::r::¡ (X) ¡::r::¡ (X) ~ (X) I : I ,.....:¡ '-. ,.....:¡ '-. ,.....:¡ '-. , I C\J ~ ~ ¡::r::¡ ~ ~ ~ I 1_ : ' , 1 I I '<t~ J.{)~ tD~ "'~ , I , I I I I ~ 1: L________ ----- ----------- .. I , i : L__________________ --------, I I , , , , I W I ~ I ~ , a , ~ , ~ 1 I ~ I , , , , õ : I I I C\J t I , Z , a II) '-.: 8 .1 -' ·v I Z c.- ~ 8-,:::;¿'-. I. ~ " o::~ CD~~ : õ <t: U N is s ~ CD : _I ,.....:¡ ~ '-. o...~ (/)oS 0 P-. ~ if) .~ .0 Ux(/) "t' a ~ ~ rou zOw ~ 1 <{ N N <( "I 8~o... 0 ~ ::;: ~ - ~ ~ '<t<{ .....0 ";;:;;: ~ ~ ;: : .....-' 0;;: 0 ...:...: 0 It) L{)~(/) , ::! It) It) It) It) "" I ~....... u, ~ ~ ~ ~ r") , µ... ~ 5~ I üID " . S It)'" I "IN I ü ...: ¡ t;:L{) 1 N~ I ~I") I X , ~ I v'-. , ê2 I N~ I a I I , V ' t; Z I v~ I X : . : W 0 I L________________________ _________________~ , ~ , I E-< cl~--------------------------------------------~I> ,0-,' , ~ IIO-IO~ U o ~ Q ~< 0 ~8 : ~ I ...:¡? ,. <( U ~ . '" "I N It) II ð g z· ~ - ~ ~ ~ 000 ~NU ~ ~ ;: t') N ~Oðð .x::-ó...:...: a ~ '-. t-~ü-l~ ~,; ~ ~ ~ ~ E--t..- ~~ð~t- ~~~ C3;:ðe~ ~~ JçO r ,..}~ u....-a::Q::~~ o~OwoU °æa..a:::~ Z~~~LL~ º~xO-~ W E ~~Ww~ffi I ê2w <0: X"'X : S ü::;: ~z~ I ",::;:a <{o : -WDO~Z ~ CL..J « t- t- « ~ Š !. oi i i i~ ~i ¡ ¡ Ëi ~ j i r i i r - , : +- I+-'" \ Ii : ! I \ ~ S S , I ~ i a ~ , I' \ ~ ~~~ Z : I", ~ ~: ! ! ...... !¡' ~ ~ ¡¡ :3 ~ ~ i wi -- . J ~...... ~ N Iš r -. w u : >: ~ 8J ~ ~ f5 I CI..J I «I t""\ -I !::::ž I ~ ~~ I : ~ 0 I ~D\~ I I ~i?" I I! I I 0 l:::"' I W . I ðÕ"~' I f- / I f-! r_' a I z'" ~ u I \ 0 \ cni 1-'-1 I") I I \ ~. E-< II I \ -1 . \ i . : I \ \ ' Cñ ~ , '+-I \ b ! L L \- ,... -.I ! ! L-----------------------------~----------~----------5~------~~---------------------------------1---------~~1I I ~~ ~~ n:~ i i - ~ d m I . . ~ROM :Lindell Engineering FRX NO. :7635429214 Ma~. 20 2003 08:43RMP2 . ... .......,.".. . . .. ... . : ' . ..... . .: ,. .. , ",,---. . C RIDG"')!,,'" . . '., . . . , '...., . . .... .' '" ........ /J1édallWn Serw ...::....;::;;: ..' ., , " .." ,'I. · .' :·1·~.~ · .:-: ... . . :: ~i · ...... L';/:':':; ....:~ ....'" NEXTGENERATJON: .. . of an inJUdtry c!adðœ . By Spaulding Lightîng FROM :Lindell Engineering FRX t~O. :7535429214 Ma~. 20 2003 08:43RM P3 Ordering Gui~e_____.___, . .-.-----~-_..__....,.. .-- Order No. ~_O .@ ~-- 0 0 @ ~, Hample CM - PMS - M40Q - 111 - '120 - LP - DBZ ~ _I - o MDDEL @ OPTIONS GM - horii:ontal lamp with flat lens PH - photo receptacle (less cell) CMNL - vertical lamp with convex. lens PRC · photo receptaole with cell (Type IV refler:tor only) PRS .- photo recept(tole with shorting c;j;lþ ~,)MOUNTINGMODE PC - photoelectric buttoh cðJI (120-';277v) SF - single fuse <12Qv. 277v, 3471J} PM5 5"arm mount PF - double fuse (208V, 240vj 48QV) :PM1O - 10" arm mount, required for ¡:¡ny FB fuse block 90" möÜritingc.onfigurations fB · terminal block W,S · W:äl1,bi:a~k!H AS automatic shuf Oif :>tarter (HPS orily) mast arf"¡l:iitter for ~~ía"ODarm - !MAF - RP remov.:¡blé: panel fptelectrìcal - 6).. loAM? TYPESJWA'1iS cornponent$ ihC1Uöe$; In·line d~cj!ìnec1s ;Metal Halide. High Pressure Sodium Tl · tooHess lens door,önd reflectDr p,mel M1 DO CE-17) S100 CE·23'r?,J QZ - quartz standby time delay M175 ([.;28) 5·150 (E-23~ ) (D.C bayonet ba.se lamp ìnclu-ded) ~ (E~28) 525D CE:-18) VG · .125' 'thick pôl]'t'i.\rbonatevðrrot:l¡ gUGlrd (ED-28)* $400 (E-18) (norizontallamp 'OnlY) S.uPl:lf MetQl t\~lide{CMonIY) CS - internal mQuot hO,use~;;ìc!e cutoff $hield M175MS (E..;28) (horìzontallamp 9nly) :M250MS (E-26) LP - lamp Included M400MS (E.D,~28)· fJ COLOR 'ÞUISÐ Start.'Metal Halide ,M250PS (E-2'8) OBZ - dark bronze FGP - TOTe!>t green M4qflAS (EbI"2Bì* 8GB - bjack TOP - teal blue . SWT - white RRP - royal blue {) ,REfLECTOR BGE - beige OMS - burgundy ',--¡! II · a~yrnmatr¡ç PRO - gray R~N - - JQoket retJ III · Mymmßtric IV forward throw '0\<100 ....!!'~I tltn~, (D"2~~ ~i'tQ.lnIø fQt IYø~lhnd:tYPo KI ~fttH:tor. VS symmetric squ.m: t·31rian'Jfd IJ"", tillltb ' IW 1~ IV -end 1)pe YS~; - '0 VOLTAGE 120 208 240 ~ 277 347 480 [ill] MT · multì;t¡¡p 020/.208/240/.27711) ~. ~~_~~~ing Acces~~Ei_~~,_"._._ Pho\!J Re~eptacle locaiioM Cutoff Shield CCS) option VaruMí GUili'd (va) O»tìon Order Number Description 4.5CRPA rDlJncj pole adaptor for 4.5' OD pole 5GRPA rour;,! Pole adaptor for 5" OD pole 6CRPA r<:Jund pale adaptor for 6" OD pole CRTPA2.5 round tapered pOle adaptor for 23Î8," - 2!itaIOD pole CRTPA3.0 round tapered pole adaptor for 23;4" . 3~s' 00 pole 'CRTPA3,5 fau qd' ~pered pole adaptor for 3!4' - 33¿,' OD pole CRTPA4.0 round tlJpered pole adaptor for 3vs· . 4 ¡'2' OD pole CRPA ~w,,~ ~jl~ . @!,.~ }, ~·.,,,¡,I' ~~~'SPaulding Lighting .. l736 ¡)r,emao Avenue 1:1 Cincinn¡:¡¡i, Ohio 45223 513/541-348'6 II fax 5J3J541-ì454 www, <; D a u I d i np; i ia h t ¡"e. c:o.m 0'1/01 rl: )\,/i)II~~~" lJtfL~ ~U-tlj"'Cl· tQ C¡';'''I1-'tt "dhl'\'.>t no,htn "'681 1200 25th Avenue South, P.O. Box 1717, St. Cloud, MN 56302-1717 320.229.4300 320.229.4301 FAX architecture . engineering . environmental . transportation . May 21, 2003 RE: St. Joseph, MN Lemmer Trucking SEH No. A-STJOE 0301.00 D44 Ms. Judy Weyrens Clerk! Administrator City of Saint Joseph 25 College Avenue North PO Box 668 Saint Joseph, MN 56374-0668 Dear Judy: Lemmer Trucking submitted a site plan for a freestanding loading dock. The plan contained a diagram showing the location of the dock, and proposed drainage was illustrated with arrows. There . were no elevations or contours. Mr. Lemmer was asked to provide existing elevations along with a holding pond design. After much discussion, this information has still not been provided. Mr. Lemmer did provide a drawing prepared by SEl! in 2000 that shows proposed contours and a holding pond; this drawing was prepared to show the original landowner how the site could be graded. I have no field elevations to show that this plan was ever implemented. Given the above comments, I did conduct a site visit on May 20,2003, and the site appears to drain without impacting other properties. The drainage arrows on the original submittal show the entire site draining to the street, which is incorrect. It appears that the drainage breaks near the location of the proposed loading dock, with the east third of the lot draining to the street, and the west two- thirds of the lot draining to the west. The lot has been graded to contain the runoff so that it will flow east to the street or west to an existing holding pond near the west lot line. A revised submittal arrived at my office by FAX on May 20, 2002, showing the correct drainage patterns and the pond. The loading dock is shown as 1344 square feet in surface area, which is insignificant in terms of the size of the lot. The parking area is shown to be gravel. Given the small size of the loading dock and its minimal impact on the quantity of on-site runoff, and given the fact that there is a small holding pond at the rear of the lot, I recommend approval of the site plan with the following conditions: 1. Mr. Lemmer should provide a hard copy of the revised site plan shòwing the correct drainage patterns and the actual location of the pond. . Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc. . Your Trusted Resource . Equal Opportunity Employer Ms. Judy Weyrens May 21, 2003 Page 2 · 2. The drainage around the new loading dock should be contained on site and directed west to the holding pond. This concludes my remarks. Sincerely, SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON INe. c~~rðø-J;"¡ ¡xL J9¿Ph R. Bettendorf / City Engineer ~/ mdh c: Tom Lemmer, Lemmer Trucking Inc. Ron Hommerding, RHA Architects, Inc. x:\pt\stjœ\common\corr\1-cîty-lemmcr-052103.do>: · · www.cityofstjoseph.com ity of St. Joseph . May 6, 2003 25 College Avenue North PO Box 668 St. Joseph. MN 56374 Lemmer Trucking· (320) 363-7201 PO Box 602 Fax:.(320) 363-0342 St. Joseph MN 56374 . ADMINISTRATOR Judy Weyrens Dear Tom and Mary Kay: MAYOR Larry J: Hosch The City is in receipt of your application for development review. In reviewing your plan it ::OUNCILORS was determined to be incomplete. Before the PlaÍ1l1ing Commission can consider your development application the following information must be submitted: Alan Rassier Ross Rieke 1. Completion of all the items identified on the Development Plan Application Gary Utsch Form. Dale Wick 2. A detailed drainage plan In addition to the above requirements, the City will not consider your application untij the requirements for your building permit issued in 2000 are completed and the property is in . compliance with the outdoor storage Ordinance. For your convenience I have included the current Outdoor Storage·Ordinance and Industrial Zoning District Regulations. As soon as I receive the required materials and the building permit requirements for building permit 88-00 are completed the application will be forwarded to the Planning Commission for review and consideration. If you have any questions or need additional . please feel free to contact me at 363-7201. CITY OF ST. JOSEPH ~'7W~ . Jud Weyrens Ad . nistrator . 617 -19th Avenue NE Lemmer Trucking . X Cars, Trailers, Miscellaneous X X X Gravel r r . X X i X umdscaping X X X La dscaping X X 19th Avenue SE . » --. ^ 0-"2 OI'VC) - '-" -I~ Om zr 0 () . ^ 0 Z fT1 --. ..:....>. '-" , tn 0 0. I c¡, .... ~ x '" ~ m e: ¡= 0 z (;) - '" 0 q I c¡, \ " " ~ » '" ¡;¡ '< Z '" 5 . >0(11""0 :þ(')I'11"tJ FS¡;¡!3 FS¡;¡!3 !/!~¡gª" !/!~¡gª" '" ",0 fTlZr'11111 o ",0 ~F~$; "'3:¡:j'" t J ~~~! ..,21¡g ",zIO ;¡ »"'~ ;¡ ~"'~ ~~S¡; ~gS¡; ",e: 10S' -0· 5' CEMENT z "'"" 0 0 SO', JOSEPH STREET Plan submitted for building permitthat was issued on September 21, 2000. The landscaping and parking are not the same as the submitted plans. . . I Attachment: Ii or No I REQUEST FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION Development Site Plan Approval- BTL Properties DATE: June 2, 2003 AGENDA ITEM Development Site Plan Approval- BTL Properties PREVIOUS ACTION None RECOMMENDED PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION Approve the site plan and authorize the execution of a Developers Agreement with the contingency that a building pennit cannot be issued until the final drainage plans have been approved by the City Engineer. . COMMENTS/RECOMMENDA TIONS . Project: BL T Properties Determination: .,t' COMPLETE INCOMPLETE - Developer: Dave Mehr Site Plan submitted: Date Reviewed: Page 1 of 2 · City of St. Joseph Required Material Submission Development Plan Applications Completed applications for Development Plans and required fees shall be submitted the City of St. Joseph Zoning Administrator at least 10 days prior to the proposed date of consideration by the City. The ten days allows the City to review the application and fow/ard the application to other entities for review when required. Only completed applications will be accepted. It is the applicant's responsibility to submit required materials If an application is determined to be incomplete, notification, which indicates which portion of the application is incomplete, will be mailed to the applicant within 10 days following submission of the application. REQUIRED MATERIALS - The applicant shall provide the following: Requirements Complete Comments 1 Is the proposed use a permitted use IfES NO The proposed use is for an incubator business. This is a permitted use under 52.28 subd 2 (d) 2 Lot Area - Minimum Requirement (1 acre) YES NO The proposed plat indicates 2.93 Acres 3 Setback Requirements a) Front Yard - 30 feet from the lot line YES NO a) Plan indicates a front yard setback of 60' b) Side Yard - 25 feet from the lot line and must be YES NO b) Plan indicates a side yard setback of 78' and 105' landscaped if abuts any roadway. c) Rear Yard - 20 feet YES NO c) Plan indicates a rear yard setback in excess of 20 feet · 4 Height Requirements - Maximum height 55 feet YES NO The plan indicates the l:Juilding is 19 feet in height 5 Site Coverage - No structure may cover> 50% ¡YES NO The proposed building is 16,000 square feet or 13% v Parking Lots - paving stones, concrete, bituminous YES NO The parking area will be paved with a light duty pavement consisting Industrial areas may have class II if approved by PC of 1 Y, to 2 inch bituminous. The parking area should be stripped and curbed and the Planning Commission may wish to require a heavier pavement. 7 Loading Docks - Loading docks must be 10' x 50 ¥ES NO Meets the requirements 8 Exterior Requirements - YES NO The architect agreed to comply with the complete perimeter foundation with frost footings extending a minimum of 8' above ground. This will be part of the development agreement 9 Statement of Development - The development plan must include a statement concerning the specific nature This item has not been included of the use to which the property is to be put and include YES NO certification that the proposed use shall comply with all regulations, ordinances or special provisions that apply. 10 Landscape Plan YES NO · 11 Screening of HVAC YES NO Screened through the 8' front landscape buffer and the vegetation has been detailed Project: BL T Properties Determination: ./ COMPLETE INCOMPLETE - Developer: Dave Mehr Site Plan submitted: Date Reviewed: .ge20f2 12 Lighting YES NO Additional information is needed if exterior lighting is proposed. 13 Curb Cut NO 14 Landscaping - A unified parking plan must be submitted NO 15 Development Plan a) Building Location on the lot drawn to size NO b) Building elevations; front, rear, side .. NO c) Building Exterior material and color .. NO Cream steel with cultured stone or rock face masonry veneer. d) Locations of ingress/egress NO e) Dumpster/solid waste areas screened NO D Sign Location and dimensions NO See comment below g) Lighting Standard and hood detail YES 1"1 Additional information is required. h) Parking and loading areas defined NO . Drainage by the use of arrows and/or contours NO j) Screening of HV AC Equipment NO k) Landscaping material including the location, type, size NO I) Fire hydrant and fire lane locations NO Located directly across from the proposed building m) Utility Locations NO Will be located on the final utility plans n) Fencing/screening/accessory buildings identified NO The only fencing requested is around the dumpster 0) NPDES Permitting requirements fulfilled YES Il~ Will be reviewed when the drainage is submitted p) Compliance with state and federal guidelines including, YES NO Not applicable but not limited to glare, smoke, dust, odors, and noise. q) Required fee NO Submitted the required $ 500 development review fee 16 Signage - Each individual business is allowed one sign The free standing sign appears to be less than 50 square feet and if not to exceed 50Square feet and the site is permitted an '-. that is correct the sign is permissible. It also appears that each additional free standing sign not to exceed 100 square '..' , NO individual sign is less than 50 square feet. m AÞ'"o .,.- feet or an aggregate of 200 square feet if double faced. 17 Parking - Manufacturinq. fabricatinq or processinq of a Based on the minimum requirements, the proposed building will need product or material. warehouse, storaqe. handlinq or 32 parking spaces ( 1 space for each 500 square feet of floor area) bulk qoods. post offices. At least eight (8) spaces, plus NO . one (1) space for each two (2) employees on each shift The plan provides for 49 spaces based on maximum planned employment or at a minimum one (1) space for each five hundred (500) square feet of floor area. ~. · MUNICIPAL DEVElOPMENT GROUP, INC. March 21, 2003 RECEIVEr: Judy Weyrens ~i¿R 2 1 2003 City Administrator City of St. Joseph CITY OF ST. JOSEPH PO Box 668 25 College Avenue N St. Joseph, MN 56374 RE: Development Routing Form- BL T (Dave Mehr) Project Judy: The EDA reviewed the site and building plan for the proposed 16,000 square foot industrial building proposed by Mr. Dave Mehr at 700 Fifteen Avenue North. The EDA found the proposed plans to be in compliance with the Protective Covenants in place for the Buettner Business Park, with the following notations: 1. The Covenants require open areas, excluding parking, driveway and storage areas · to be landscaped with trees, shrubs or planted ground cover. The plan illustrates berms and plantings but did not identify the installation of groundcover for the remainder of the lot. Mr. Mehr and his architect indicated that areas which are disturbed as a result of the construction will be restored and planted with grass seed. Undisturbed areas will remain with its current groundcover. The EDA indicated for their purposes this would be acceptable, but noted the Planning Commission may further discuss this and also referenced the city's weed ordinance. 2. Section 3.05 of the Covenants outline foundation and frost footing requirements. A foundation plan was not submitted as a part of the plans for EDA review. The architect indicated they would comply with the complete perimeter foundation with frost footings extending a minimum 8" above the final grade, and that he would supply a foundation/footing drawing for the Planning Commission review. EDA approval is contingent upon compliance with this section. 3. Although it is not addressed in the covenants, the EDA did briefly discuss the need for a paved area adjacent to the entrance to the loading docks to eliminate or reduce the Class II gravel from washing into the city street and storm sewer. The EDA informed Mr. Mehr and the architect that this would most likely be an issue raised by the Planning Commission. 4. Also, not addressed by the covenants but discussed by the EDA was the need for a heavier duty paving on the parking lot. It was noted that the light duty (1 %") paving would be too thin and that the Planning Commission would discuss this. · 25562 Willow Lane. New Prague, MN 56071. (952) 758-7399 . Fax: (952) 758-3711. mdg@bevcomm.net 5. Finally, the EDA suggested the architect coordinate the completion of a storm water plan with Joe Bettendorf and review sprinkler requirements with the Building . Inspector. In addition, I had an opportunity to discuss a number of the items you had noted as incomplete with the architect at Rice Building. Following are responses to a few of your notations: 1. Color: The proposed color is crème. The architect did bring a color rendition ofa similar building to the EDA meeting. 2. Drainage: Tom Bruce at Rice Building, the architect for the project, noted he would be in contact with Joe Bettendorf to discuss required drainage plans, for submittal for the Planning Commission. 3. Fire hydrant and fire lane locations: Mr. Bruce indicated there is a fire hydrant located on the west side of Fifteen Avenue, directly across from the proposed building. He inquired if this would meet the needs of the St. Joseph Fire Department. 4. Fencing/Screening/Accessory Buildings: Mr. Bruce indicated the only fencing/screening or accessory building will be the dumpster identified on the southwest side of the building. A 5' high slatted chain link fence is noted on the plan in that location. Other screening includes the landscaping/trees, which are identified on the plan. 5. Parking lot pavement: As noted above, Mr. Mehr and Rice Buildings is aware that the . light duty pavement proposed in the parking lots on the north and west sides of the building are not acceptable and that pavement adjacent to the truck entrance on the south side of the building may be required by the Planning Commission. 6. Loading Docks: The zoning ordinance requires loading docks to be 10' x 50'. The plan illustrates 8' doors but a total width for the two loading docks of 26'. The architect has noted these are standard dock widths and doors are not manufactured in 10' widths. 7. Statement of Development: The architect has noted that the intended use of the property is an industrial multi-tenant building. There is a requirement that this statement certify compliance with regulations. It is recommended the architect or Mr. Mehr provide this Statement of Development in writing, rather than verbally as provided. The above items were discussed verbally and not submitted to Mr. Mehr or his architect in writing. If you would like us to prepare the summary, please let us know, otherwise please include the above in your letter relating to the completeness of the application. . 25562 Willow Lane. New Prague, MN 56071. (952) 758-7399 . Fax: (952) 758-3711. mdg@bevcomm.net UIoIaYW3 <J"":::-'~"""'~.-_.~" ~I~IC! tT'Vno YJI"b"']NNI11 ·HnSt"o(" · rn OV --..-....--..-- N(ìll')n'd I sNO') oltO-m (ott) "'J ~~ (œt) ':N ~ EMu.... 'IS NI.'n!O lI.VO ." .. -.. 1 ....... L .' to/II~ QtYO ""'!'==: eLteç NrI~}I ~l'ÐS . . . . . , . I to/Wt ~o.-IJDN .~~.~ itI"'8V'd'w;-'QUOlUO I '"S1101 :)11 S3LUI3dO'Bd1.HI i N --;'t= ! A1/VNH'IjITlìld '"'iF.i=:r= 8.lepgna / 8.JQuIII"Q ~m '>IQ-JliIlDV.""NŒ>OJo>JlOOl ....,.-I to WW.....MUIL¥»UIØII· ~ ~ o. Z . ~ ~ ~ ~. _ x. . ø ~ w 0 U m < ~., . \ D ~ I \ .-1" fÍ\ 0> I I , , I 1'1 I I I I I . .. '\ . I '<. 0> _ I _ I "'I M, " I ''', ~, "\ ~ I ~,.. , ... I ~, "I Ii \ I [Ie ~ ~ ~ ,.' - L...n I- ~ - , I 1 , ., <I., , , I I ~I '1-, I I II. ! 1 \.,1 I I- ...... , I 1-V.clOY' I 1 1 I I '<I I , I I I' ." ',\'.) , - ~ -~-..-.._.. _.._.L_.L_.L_L_..--"'---..--....-. J I .JJI i I ,,,",'0:;, N R f i ";'c, ' r:: ...... '1< ¡lJ,ror I J ~f~';j 1 ðDr ".' J 10 fÍ\ í-,-ITì-ì-í~íì¡¡;;;,Jrì-"t:--r~~-- j IIIH I ~ l I' ;h ~j I~}( ¡ ::1 I I 1 I 'I, 1 I I I 1 I I I I~ '1_ I III W ';"'; 10 ., '.~~'~' r J ú) 0 : : : : : : : : : : : : L~r- ~----. I II ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~.., z:X ill ~ I" I ~ I '. I ". , " I ~ I jè I : I ~ I ~ I ~ \ - ~I ... I 'I ¡ eJ Ii' !ž Ii !ž z, I ':.1 (~: <{ I- ~ . 1 1 I , I I I I 1 , I ~"I I J.! III . ,~ ~ ~ ~ .:)-:; 0 <{ , I I I I I I I' I 1 r I "I 1 ^ , . I ¡ I ~ ~ ~ è: ,;/t1.(·I" '~/;" ill 0 I I I , I I I , I , I '--¡i I \1-' '" ' .' r:: ': n' 11:'1"1_111' 1_'" "...., .1<[' ;.1. ' . '~"!,' 'I jl . ," f' , t: ..,~~ojñ1"~"::::",,, ., I, / ·1/ ~.,: . x;~· : !' ...-¡Il,( '~II'I/ ~ ' ~.;~ I .. ~ Æ~... . . .¡.' I ... _~ - :;. t-; . X' I ILJ: I / ~ .,:{:¡ I... _ :!! }I , "-"..,.. I I" I l. .....{ I 1- ~ .1)...... 1 ,. I :1;.;': I 1..'<. ,.. _ __.::-; -,/.Þ=::-. , . I I ¡./, ~ k :\'.': ¡ (' ¡ ~;'.4.. c. HJF.>:r...,. . -, I' /, =-~ .,}: I ~ I ~ ~~.' ~f. .flkr '-pf1e~ H '''; ./ I' ' . ~~! J :::~:?: I :I~ I '~ ~ ~ ~ .. t I --=- E:J.. . \\ , I §¡ ~~~:~' -O~o;O \' . 1 : ~.. : i " : '9 ~;.:\~? ¡I~ ;îlll ill 2 '\ ~,,) .~ " ~ 0{ I ' . ~ ,§ II: I 2 '\ .(\"\'> ." tsi '1' I . . <. I ~ ~ . ~.... -i.t' 'i. -!> - -.' .--. ':1 " , ä ¡r¡ ~ a - I 111&; 'YY : Ii ) , ~ "r<: ~ ~I I ' / Ð ~' '.'¡".~. I I ' .... . ~ ~ , Ð "." -U ' " ~ I) J {I _ f I , I ~ ~ ì ì ì ¡, I ¡. \;"; , ' \.' ~~ ~ I I '" '" '" :;[ ./:'.... I I -... ...:..:.~,. "~"I'" :1, , I <.; : : '\ '\. ...... J .' '.H . 'n ..-- ." I', I!, ~ Is I ~:"" , ~ - \. -~~~,~', I I ..:...., I. I :. ~ ¡ - }~$'; I ~ '\~., :.:~..:' ,H ~ I : I ,;:-:, I I :~)'}~ : -'_00_" .._.._ . - . ~. . ,Tiõ, ... ~I\ {..~ . ;<J..-....,.,.. I.¡-~....+-I- . ~ . .1.. ' "~.,,...,.:::...._J \C~ ~\A ¡ ::... "" Ii ';1' 1- j ¡ 3 f I II R ;f.)( :9 ~ ~ '.: r~;" . .1/ '0' I· ~ ¡ i £ :::i" III F; F; "H___'''./ O::;,:¡. 1 I'. L !I 0 ~.!:-¡: I ;.II ~ . \1.1\ L I I' a oJ ····iI· I ~ :! /13N 'ltJ\~....." IrJ/:t:-d ~ IIJ IJ ~, :~:~\ ¡iI ~ ~ .. '.--- 'H,.I , , I E P 0 ® r;'" ~ \g1~ :11 it Ii ~1 it ~ '~"'~'~ ~ I I I L- ~ ·.I.~ ~. t-:-. ¡ I L !11'::- . .1"'" ~ J 1 ~ . . _ . . _ . . _ . . -f' ,l1(1\;t .,~,~ ~o~., r . - . . - . . - . . - . . - . . - . . - . . Jl :\:~~ : I ! ì : ~ ~ ¡."t.·, I --U '::? ~ t·· -. C: i\ r.. ~ ij \:.;~';, -J ~ y ~ y ;¡ N I~. S; I] N ~... ;:,\ I I N - ¡:;~ ì' , 1- ~ ...: ' , . I , . CJ I , r-------------, 0 rll : i 0 ¡ I LU ,:., , C I I u·· , L 1 - ~~\ : I.- ... ~.. I L,- I ~~. : I j~ ,: I _..... --G 'R E :;;: ~ -1J 'I ~ IE I i}¡: I! o. 7-: ~~I I:~' ~ 0 - ~ Ii: f" :~ .RR l 1('ll- W, ~WË W¡r;¡ ." au '.~ <d !§i¡ " i'~'~ ~~ I '1~ ! Ib~¡I! . 1 (t 11 ~ E: II~ (! si.f¡ J1 1IIIIIIil 0> lULU ~'::i ..... - ==:1i li,il ~!, ,. If II". I I . ;;. JJ r ~ ft ~ ! i'15 I I :, , ' I~ ~ ~ I t III1 .f."'- 1 t \ '!.' :. C r' : dL'11 '" . I a ~ I .If E ;.;!; ,f~ I '" ~ i & 'II 0 , ÎiI. 1 101>1 I 0111.1 ~ il,dl \ : Ii ~ I ' . ~ ~ J.' ,I ~ , I ~ ~ ¡ . t;b ~Sl . ¡~\ :1111 : i · -----0 . c--- I L,~. ~Io f':' I~ ~ I f 1 I , ......... .' :r I I I ... I......~...... . ~...~ :...- ....- ......1 ~~ --+J II --¡-J ... - ~ - E: -.....:-.... ~. \ tf 0 DI~ ( : ____~__________ ________ I : - I ~ --c--:-:r-------- -------~. tr .,' nil I - -+ :jl' ..---..' ) t· r- ~ 1 ~ '" - , 'I~ "L-A' · t 9:-\ : m \ ç- ~ ;1' '" i == ~ ¡ ~~¡: ',~' I, i II ~J I ¡ ~~ ,d : _! _ I I~~ ~~~~ Lb_~ ~I <) (~ ~ t n E1' ¡ , i! 11: ~ on I '----- ....... -~ I~.. n * u! i. ! ;~{ ¡! ~;f' ~I ! '" ~ \ _ iIlr .... :R r" . t1 I (:,J I "'.,. ! ..! _ ~ L ~ . r:; : 0 v;Jr, I I· ! - ~ -Iq r.. tr I~ - r- ~; :h ,¡: ~i~ 6 . - L ï ~ ~IE ( I-A a"; '..-__..' ~ I ~. :ì' J;; .... . _ ¡ _ " f ~ ----LJ 11~. ." ---1 . I - I :;.;..... .n ... II - - ~ r ~ . ~ [.ill - - f : - ~ : 1i _ - O. Lb. ili i' 5 1'· : ~ n ,I~ ¡ ~l .11 I IT 1;1..1 II- t11i! J' I I j i ~ 0 C iI ~ " · ~ I I- la , I I I 0 E - , ~ I ~ i h' JI I i .-+ ~ ~ _,.""",·n.--.. . .tle ~ ~ ~ ¡ it ¡ it L~ ~......- ~ M ......-." t .. ~ ~ ~ \ ...... . .....~..... ..... ........... i i., . i \ '.. .' ... 'ðN :II'IG^'9' HJ.91 E P G ~ . ....;. E p - !I ,..". ~ .... " - {,1 , ' a.. 0 .::: ::E -' ~ I '"? _ I % U I \¡,. I.&J 0 0 CD -< . . . . I Attachment: .~~~ or No I REQUEST FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION Development Site Plan Approval- Northwest Truck Accessories DATE: June 2,2003 AGENDA ITEM Development Site Plan Approval- Northwest Truck Accessories PREVIOUS ACTION As this property is located in the St. Joseph Business Park, the EDA must review the plan as it relates to the covenants. Based on the submitted plan, the EDA is recommending the Planning Commission approve the Site Plan for Northwest Truck Accessories as the plan satisfies all the requirements of the Covenants. RECOMMENDED PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION . Approve the site plan and authorize the execution of a Developers Agreement with the contingency that a building permit cannot be issued until the final drainage plans have been approved by the City Engineer. COMMENTS/RECOMMENDATIONS During the review process the City Staff and consultants have discussed at great length the drainage requirements. Before completing a development review we have been requesting that the final drainage plans be prepared. However, the developers have requested that the final drainage plans be submitted after approval of the site plan. If the site plan is not accepted, then a considerable amount of money is spent on engineering that is not needed. Joe Bettendorf is comfortable with a preliminary drainage plan using arrows and contours and then requiring a final plan before a building permit is issued. This seems like a reasonable request so a requirement of all Development Agreements will be a contingency that the final drainage plans must be approved by the City Engineer. When reviewing the application you will notice that the lighting detail and HV AC screening is not illustrated. I have contacted the developer and that information will be provided at the meeting. For your convenience we have prepared a proposed development agreement that can be amended and adopted as the Planning Commission wishes. . Project: North Central Truck Accessories Determination: --M- COMPLETE - INCOMPLETE Developer: Tim Ross Site Plan submitted: May 6,2003 Date Reviewed: May 17,2003 Page 1 of 3 . City of St. Joseph Required Material Submission Development Plan Applications Completed applications for Development Plans and required fees shall be submitted the City of St. Joseph Zoning Administrator at least 10 days prior to the proposed date of consideration by the City. The ten days allows the City to review the application and forward the application to other entities for review when required. Only completed applications will be accepted. It is the applicant's responsibility to submit required materials. If an application is determined to be incomplete, notification, which indicates which portion of the application is incomplete, will be mailed to the applicant within 10 days following submission of the application. REQUIRED MATERIALS - The applicant shall provide the following: Requirements Complete Comments 1 Is the proposed use a permitted use YES NO 52.33 Subd. 2 (t) Warehousing of non explosive material/equipment 2 Lot Area - Minimum Requirement (1 acre) YES NO The proposed building site contains 4 acres exceeding the minimum 3 Setback Requirements a) Front Yard - 30 feet from the lot line YES NO This site plan contains two front yard setbacks, Elm Street and 15th The front yard cannot be used for parking Avenue. 15th Avenue - 36.5'; Elm Street 199.4' The parking is located in the front yard and must either be moved or the applicant must wilh move parking or apply for a variance. . b) Side Yard - 25 feet from the lot line and must be YES NO Plan indicates 25' landscaped if abuts any roadway. c) Rear Yard - 20 feet YES NO Plan indicates 64' 4 Height Requirements - Maximum height 55 feet YES NO Plan indicates 24' 5 Site Coverage - No structure may cover> 50% YES NO The proposed building is 30,000 square feet with a total lot size of 174,240 square feet. The building covers 18% of the lot. If the total impervious surfaces are used, 38% of the lot is covered. 6 Parking Lots - paving stones, concrete, bituminous YES NO The plan indicates the parking area will be paved with a light duty Industrial areas may have class II if approved by PC pavement consisting of 1 y,' to 2' pavement. The parking will be required to be stripped. 7 Loading Docks - Loading docks must be 10' x 50 YES NO The loading illustrated on the plan includes an area 40' wide by 44 . long and contains two doors. The width is sufficient, but the length will need to be expand by six feet. 8 Exterior Requirements· YES NO Pre-cast tilt-up masonry material which meets the requirements 9 Statement of Development - The development plan must include a statement concerning the specific nature A completed application IVas submitted . of the use to which the property is to be put and include YES NO certification that the proposed use shall comply with all regulations, ordinances or special provisions that apply. , Project: North Central Truck Accessories Determination: ...!L- COMPLETE - INCOMPLETE Developer: Tim Ross Site Plan submitted: May 6,2003 Date Reviewed: May 17, 2003 IIge20f3 10 Landscape Plan NO The plan indicates trees along both street frontages and small bushes around the front of the building. 11 Screening of HVAC YES NO Not indicated on the plan 12 Lighting YES NO Not submitted 13 Curb Cut NO Illustrated around perimeter on 15th and Elm Streets 14 Landscaping - A unified landscaping plan must be @""%W''''''''''1 NO See above notes ):1,1_ submitted 15 Development Plan a) Building Location on the lot drawn to size NO b) Building elevations; front, rear, side NO The proposed material is tip-up concrete with a buff colored vertical c) Building Exterior material and color NO rib exterior. The property will be accessed from 15th Avenue NE d) Locations of ingress/egress NO The dumpster is located in the front right corner and will be screened ~ Dumpster/solid waste areas screened NO appropriately. The only signage will be thewall sign as indicated on the plan and is Sign Location and dimensions NO 48 square feet, within the requirements. A future sign is indicated on the plan. The sign will need to be moved back as it is currently in the ROW. The second sign can be included in the original approval provided it does not exceed the square footage. g) Lighting Standard and hood detail YES h) Parking and loading areas defined iEl NO i) Drainage by the use of arrows and/or contours NO Not illustrated on the provided plan j) Screening of HVAC Equipment YES NO k) Landscaping material including the location, type, size NO Will be completed with the final utility and drainage plans I) Fire hydrant and fire lane locations YES NO Will be completed with the final utility and drainage plans m) Utility Locations YES NO None illustrated n) Fencing/screening/accessory buildings identified YES NO Will be completed with the final utility and drainage plans 0) NPDES Permitting requirements fulfilled YES NO p) Compliance with state and federal guidelines including, NO but not limited to glare, smoke, dust, odors, and noise. A deposit of $ 500 was received for the review process q) Required fee NO . Sign age - Business sign cannot exceed 100 square feet As stated above the proposed future sign must be moved back so it is per face or an aggregate total of 200 square feet if not in the ROWand cannot exceed 100 square feet. double faced. YES NO Project: North Central Truck Accessories Determination: ~ COMPLETE - INCOMPLETE Developer: Tim Ross Site Plan submitted: May 6, 2003 Date Reviewed: May 17, 2003 Page 3 of 3 · 17 Parking - Manufacturinq, fabricatinq or processinq of a The new business will employee 23 employees, Therefore based on product or material. warehouse, storaqe, handlinq or the requirements 20 parking spaces must be provided, (23/2 = 12 bulk qoods, post offices. At least eight (8) spaces, plus plus 8 = 20) one (1) space for each two (2) employees on each shift YES NO based on maximum planned employment or at a minimum one (1) space for each five hundred (500) square feet of floor area, · · APR-16-2003WED 12:30 PM CITY OF ST JOSEPH FAX NO, 3203630342 p, 02/04 . APPLICAtiON FOR PLANNING CONSIDERATION CITY OF ST. JOSEPH 25 College Avenue NW P. o. Box 668 St. Joseph, MN56374 (320)363-7201 or Fax (320)363-0342 STATE OF MINNeSOTA) )ss COUNTY OF STf:ARNS) NAME: North Central Truck Accessories, IPWtmE: (320) 257- 1 23~ ADDRESS: 2627 Clearwater Road, st. Cloud, Mn 56301 l!We, the undersigned. hereby make tOe fOllowing application to thE! City Council and Planning Commission or the City of SL Joseph, Steams County. Minnesota. (Appticants have the re5ponsibility of checking all applicable ordinances pertaining tD their application and complying with aJI ordinance requirements): 1. Application is hereby made for: (Applicant must check any/all appropriate items) _ Rezoning _ Zoning Ordinance Amendment _ Home Occupation Permit _ Surface Water Management Plan (Grading Permit) _ PUD _ Building Mover's Permit _ Building Moving - Owner's Permit '~evelopmentP an Approval --X- Other. please specify: preli ill Plat . Drainage Plan Final plat . . Si te plan 2. LegaJ description of land to be affected. by application, includin~ acreage or s~uare footage of land involved, and, street address, if any: Lot Three ( 3 ), Bloc One ( ), BIJP-ttne:r:: Bus1.~ Park Threl Elm 5t-reed- ; nh:"r~p-r.tR 1 5th A venue N. E. 4.0 Actes _ 3. PresBnt zoning of the above described property is: L-ILight Industrial District 4. Namt:, address and phone number of the present owner of the abov~ described land: Leo ¡¡nd Glorja 'Rll¡::>t-rnpr. 5855Riq~ewQQ9 Road, st. Cloud 56303. if.. 5 ~eTs6n1:%~s, corporations or other than applicant and present owner who mayor will be interested in the above described land or proposed improvements within one year after issuance of permit applied for, if granted, are: N/~. 6. Attached to this application and made a part thereof are additional material submission data requirements, as indicated. Applicant Signature: . May 6,2003 Owner Signature: May 6,2003 _ FOR OFFICE USE ONLY ATE SUBMITT~D: DATI: COMPLETE: DATE OF PUBUC H~RING PUBUCATION DATE: lanning CommissìOf1 Action: _ Recommend Approval _ Recommend Disapproval Date of Action: Date ApplicantIPropeny ONner notified of Planning Commission Action: ìty Council Action: . _ Approved ~ Disapproved Date of Action: ~ . ate ApplìcantJProperty OWner natmed of City Council Action: APR-16-2003 WED 12:28 PM CITY OF ST JOSEPH FAX NO. 3203630342 p, 03 APpLICATION· FOitST. :JOSEPHlf![)A·REVleW · .. .1~D·U:S"FtIALBUIJ,..DI~G: :AND'SITE··PLAN . ... DATE: May 2.2QO,3 APPLICANT NAME: 'T'im()rny "R()c:c::: APPLICANT ADDRESS: ?~?7 rlQ~rMatQr Rd. CITY: st. C]nud STATE: MN ZIP CODE: 56301 PHONE #: ( 32Q) ?S7-1?ii BUSINESS NAME: North Cp-nrrñ 1 'T'rlJr.k Þ.r.r.po::::o::::()ri PO::::, .I nc PROPOSED SITE - LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT 3 SLOCK 1 PLAT Buettner Business Park Three PROPOSED BUILDING SIZE AND DIMENSIONS: 4_00 bI. sa FT ~ 4 5 . 4 § X 5 04 . 3 9 PROPOSED BUILDING USE: Truck A~~p~~()ry f)i ~t-r; hl1t-i r'\n 1=i'~(""I; 1 ; rìT NOTICE: The st. Joseph EDA reviews Site Plans and Building Plans as they relate to the Protective Covenants for the Buettner Business Park. Their review does not include ì1ems revÎewed by the Planning CommÎssion or · included in the City's Zoning Ordinance. Please check items submitted. REQUIREMENT- INFORMATION REQUIRED INFORMATION COVENANT SECTION SUBMITTED SPECIFY PLAN SHEET OR INCLUDE DESCRIPTION Covenants; Section 3.01: Prior approval of Elevation drawings. structures. Subd. 1. requires submission of a Site Plan horizontal ftoor plan and the exterior elevations in relation to finished proposed Prelim Plat grade. Covenants: Section 3:01: Prior approval of Description of exterior building structures. Subd. 2. Requires submission of materials proposed including % of Pre-cast "::> a full description of exterior building materials. façade which meets requirements of tilt-up ~ covenants. ~ Covenants; Section 3.02, paragraph one Landscape plan illustrating proposed requires: open areas, excluding parking, ground cover and identifying any and On Site Plan drivaway and storage areas be landscaped all proposed trees and shrubs, height with trees, shrubs or planted ground cover. of berms, spacing 01 trees, etc. Covenants: Section 3.02, paragraph two Parking lot plan with proposed requires: perimeter landscaping, identifying 8" thick Class II for parking lots adjacent to public R-ü-W's grades, types of plantings and truck traffic include a six foot strip of landscaping with a distances between trees. Type of On site plan . minimum three-foot drop in grade (from the R- pavement in parking lot and number Asphalt parking lot ~ to the parking lot) with a minimum of of parking spaces should also be one shade tree and five shrubs for every 35 identified. 28 parking spac :=s linèar feet for screening. · 1 APR-16-2003 WED 12:29 PM CITY OF ST JOSEPH F AX NO, 3203630342 P. 04 . Landscape plan adjacent to Co. Rd. Covenants: SectiQn 3.03. Requiresa landscaped greenway adjacent to C/R 133. 133, if applicable. N/A. Section 3.05 requires all new facilities to Drawings and description of type of ~l'Isist of pre-cast or cast tip up concrete construction including foundation walls, ~ncrete block, posi frame/steel frame construction. With concrete block or poured concrete See Pàan complete perimeter foundaticn with frost . footings extending a minimum of 8' above the final grade, and stick built construction. Pre- finished architectural metal panels need a 20- year manufacturer colorfast warranty. . Section 3.06 and 3.07 define acceptable Drawings and description of type of exterior building materials. A minimum of exterior building materials, including 25% of the exterior building finish directly % of façade which meets See Plan facing $treets shall consist of: face brick, requirements of covenants. natural stone, glass, vinyl. stuCC(!o aluminum lapsiding. cut block, or concrete block and other aonroved decorative siding. Covenants: Section 5:01 requires refuse Drawings identifying location of corner of containers to be kept in three sided refuse containers and description of N.E. T &m:::rE enclosures a minimum of five feet in height proposed enclosure including type of bldg. in pre cAS constructed of brick, stone, decorative construction and height concrete mateñal or durable material (Le. screen chain link with a latched gate for the forth side. Covenants: Section 6.03: states, aNo Drawing illustrating location of any outdoor storage of product$, non-mollable proposed outdoor storage, size of equipment, inventory or storage in any space and proposed screening for N/A/ . container or semi-trailer shall be allowed. allowable outdoor storage. Any storage of allowable material shall be . screened from public view." - Covenants: Section 5.02 requires "Loading Drawing illustrating loading docks and docks and garage entrances and exits shall garage entrances/exits and proposed be screened to mínimize visibility fanTI any screening description and location. Interior loadir.g public street and/or any adjacent buìlding for delivery t:r µcks structures front or side yard viewing point. 2 exterior recei ~ing docks I understand that approval by the EDA does not constitute approval of Zoning related items or building permit requirements which will be reviewed separately by the Planning Commission, City Council and/or Buildìng Official. APPliCant$ignature~ / 4-,,.¡/ ~ Date: M:::oy h-.2nn~ fOR OFFICE USE ONLY: DATE OF EDA MEETING: EDA _APPROVED . CONDITIONALLY· APPROVED _ DENIED. EDA COMMENTS: . 2 I "'- t~· I I Nœ~ I I I œ......~ I I ~:! Cì> I œ -U~ I :x I 9N!G1lng 8 HI I ~ 'I .001 ~ .051 :;!~n.Lnd œ œ ~ ~ ~Q~ ~ I I ~~U' ~ I OJ~œ œ I : U}~~ 2 I ~ œ ...... : : ?:;!c.;/ld n? 9 l'v' I I ~:; M:;!c.; W~Olc.; I 0 lN! :;!c.;'v':; 1:;!~ I I (]NOd I I N0I1NaL:;!~ I I ~___ ________ _______________ I ~___ ________ ________ _______________, I I I I : I I I ~: .v9~.OSI L ("¡ I ~~ I 9NI)lWd t ~ C> ~ I :;!~n.Lnd 1 ~U' Ë$ I ~ O'Ñ ~ ïP I (]:;!(]:; :;!c.; \ 1 ~, ~hil t ~~I I $cl . ~~I t Z~I I : ;;!AI~(] 11'v' " ~c.;'v' I Alno "';"" / , ; ~ L~ I .. , <> :\ U' ~("¡I ! I . I 0' ~Ol ~ I Ñ C>~ I -O-.SS MO-.OfZ I ("¡ zC'I c ~ (;j~. I I 2 ~ I ~ I I @ : q ~ I ~ Jþ I dMM /:,'Z'X/,;Z-9'X9 1M ~ -u ~ )/::J I-Il Mg NO~ OJ · I ~~~ :;!l:;¡~?NO? M:;¡N ~ I œzC> C> I I I $Cì>~ . I I @ I r I @ I I UJ...... _ _ _ _ _ _ _ , ,~ I @ I r I I ~~ 0 I N-u I N I œG N I ~:::j. I ï' I ~œ C> I rQ I . I œ~ @ I ~~ I ~~ -Sfflf : ~~~ I ~~ 0 I ~œ~ @ $~ ~ I UJ$~ ....... 6 ~. $~Cì> $N @ dI I œQ~ -0:0 _ : ~œHl ~Q @ ~OI~aL'X:;! q I : I ~~~ ~~ aL:;!~?NO? lc.;'v'?:;!&I <) @ I ~ HI ~ ::r¡ ~ 9N!G1lng .OSI ~ .ooz . I . -< ~œ @ ') I ~UJ ~~ .... ~ Q~ ~- '<IV JUJ l:n:: ~~ @ ~O' <~ :\Ñ O-.O'l- œ...... I MO-.SV MO-.OOZ I I MO-.S Mo-.S I I I I I M~~ I IN:;¡W;;!A'v'd I I ~~ I )I?\191:;!c.; ~ ~ J...Ln(] l " ~ ¡ ~ ~ I I v I I . I -----____.J...... ~ ( ~~) I I C> ~<) I 2 () 2 ~B~----- --- --------------__ ~ ____________________ c>ZI c.;lN'v'N:; ¡\O? dO IO'S Z~I NOIl?:;¡c.; I-IlIM J..1dWO? ~I 01 N:;!:;!~?c.; :;!'.3I1d:;!~ œ :;¡l:;!~?NO? lc.;'v'?:;!&I dO : N0I1'v'?01 (]:;!OOdO&l I I I I - - - - - - - - - - - - . . . () \J () \J AJ AJ rn rn \ \ ~ ~ ~ z ~ z » » AJ AJ -< -< rn (j) ?J) C) c -1 -1 rn I \ rn rn ~ ~ ~ -1 ~- ~-1 (\C) ~z ~- ..C) " ~z 5:: . . . . ~ ~ . . "'~~~ !¡¡§~ ~{J!i - - - - _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -c I i . . . l I I I I I I I rmmr; ~D I I I I I I I ) -u ~ Œ \ ~ . ~ I I I I I I I 11 § ~ I I I II I I z ~ ~ c:::: ~ I I I I II I I I I I I I I III1IIII ~I~'" d V I \j~ f1 EÅ )O\/" r- > ilL ~ 5~11~0 '=: - . . . .~ . ~ i1i r---.. ;:=/\, -.J . __~_nl:£l_~ I \ Il ~ rr==I\ ~ r=v v [1 ~ '7 NILJ'=v V=V >- l ~ \j DD LAJlAJ . CITY OF ST. JOSEPH ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Meeting Minutes - Wednesday, May 21, 2003 BUilding and Site Plan - North Central Truck Accessories EDA members reviewed a building and site plan for a 30,000 square warehouse and distribution facility proposed for Lot 3, Block 1, Buettner Business Park III. Mr. Tim Ross, developer, Mr. Duane Schultz, Winkleman Inc. and Dean Wick were present to discuss the project and respond to questions. Mr. Wick noted the site plan illustrates a possible 30,000 square foot additional structure and a possible 6,000 sf expansion for the proposed facility. Mr. Schultz reviewed style and color of the proposed tilt-up masonry finish. The EDA discussed the proposed plans as they related to the Protective Covenants in place for the Buettner Business Park, and made the following notations: 1. The Covenants require open areas, excluding parking, driveway and storage areas to be landscaped with trees, shrubs or planted ground cover. The plan illustrates berms and plantings but did not identify the installation of ground cover for the remainder of the lot. Mr. Wick, Mr. Schultz and Mr. Ross indicated that appropriate grass seed, such as blue grass will be installed. 2. Section 5.02 of the Covenants requires loading docks and garage entrances and exits to be screened to minimize visibility from any public street and/or any adjacent building structures front or side yard viewing point. The plan as presented did not include a landscaped buffer on the south side of the parcel adjacent to Elm Street due to the proposed buildings 400' distance from Elm . Street. The EDA discussed application of the screening requirement and indicated a desire to ensure the covenants were applied. The EDA recommended a 3' berm and appropriate vegetation, shrubs and trees be installed along the southern border of the property immediately adjacent to Elm Street. - Moved by Rieke, seconded by Skahen to approve the building and site plan for Norlh Central Truck Accessories for Lot 3, Block 1, Buettner Business Park 11/ as it relates to the Protective Covenants for the Buettner Business Park contingent upon the installation of acceptable groundcover for the remainder of the lot and the installation of a three foot high berm with appropriate screening vegetation on the south side of the properly adjacent to Elm Street. Motion approved 3-0. Mr. Hettwer requested Input from the EDA on the installation of an indoor firing range in the industrial park. Strack indicated the EDA would review the proposed site plan for consistency with covenants and not the zoning ordinance. Strack further indicated the zoning ordinance did not specifically allow for an indoor firing range in any zoning classification and the Planning Commission and City Council would ultimately decide whether or not to approve the use. Mr. Wick, Mr. Schultz, Mr. Ross and Mr. Hettwer departed from the meeting at 4:35 p.m. . Section 52.33 - LI-LlGHT INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT. · Subd. 1: Intent. The Light Industrial District provides space for industrial activities involving a minimum degree of refuse byproducts and air or noise pollution, and requiring a relatively low level of on- premise processing. These activities may include secondary commercial functions which are conducted on site. Subd. 2: Permitted Uses. The following use shall be permitted within the LI-Light Industrial District: a) Assembly plants and manufacturing enterprises of a wide variety of products that do not cause noxious odors or noise, including excessive users of water and sewer. Examples of such uses include: fabrication or assembly of small products such as opticals, electronics, pharmaceuticals, medical supplies and small equipment. b) Publishing establishments. c) Clothing or apparel manufacturing or assembly. d) Business incubator facilities. e) Bottling establishments. f) Dry cleaning and drying establishments. g) Manufacturing/assembly of crates, boxes, baskets, furniture, veneer, cabinets and similar word items. h) Building materials sales and storage/lumberyards. · i) Manufacturing of plastic, fiberglass and metal products. j) Mini-storage. k) Major automotive repair. I) Offices/showroom/retail space as a portion of the principal industrial use provided they do not exceed a combined 25 percent of the total square footage of the principal use. m) Appliance assembly and warehousing. n) Industrial research laboratories. 0) Manufacturing of small electrical parts and service. p) Newspaper and printing plants. q) Telecommunication facilities, base stations. r) Telemarketing and mail order establishments. s) Warehousing, of non-explosive material and equipment within the structure. t) Wholesale or distributor storage and distribution of non-hazardous materials. · u) Wholesale water conditioning systems. v) Uses determined to be of a similar nature as those contained in this section upon a . finding that the uses will not be detrimental to the health, safety and welfare of the City, and that the use is consistent with the stated intent of the zone as contained in Subd. 1. Subd. 3: Permitted Accessory Uses. The following uses shall be permitted as an Accessory Use in the Light Industrial District and subject to the all the requirements in this Section: a) Restaurant, lunch counters, confectioneries to serve the employees employed within the District. b) Residential structures and related residential uses riecessary for security and safety reasons in relation to the principal use. c) Off-street parking and off-street loading. d) Outdoor storage as regulated in Section 52.12, Subd. 12. e) Office accessory to the principal use. f) Business identification signs as regulated in Subd. 11. g) Temporary buildings for construction purposes for a period not to exceed a period of 12 months. Subd. 4: Uses Under Special Use Permit. The following uses shall require a Special Use Permit based on the procedures set forth in this Ordinance. a) Adult Entertainment as regulated in Section 52.15 of this Ordinance. . b) Commercial activities relating to production systems, structural maintenance programs or the construction industry. c) Service structures, public or private, designed and used to serve the uses in the surrounding area, such as electric power substation, telephone buildings, deep wells, elevated tanks and similar structures and uses. d) Commercial/Industrial Planned Unit Development. e) When property within a Light Industrial District abuts County State Aid Highway 75: 1. Motels 2. Gasoline service stations 3. Restaurant or supper clubs 4. Drive-in establishments, provided that an internal site pedestrian circulation system shall be defined and appropriate provisions made to protect such areas from encroachments by parked cars or moving vehicles. 5. Open sales or temporary rental lots Subd. 5: Lot Area Requirements. Minimum Lot Size: One (1) acre (43,560 square feet). Minimum lot width one hundred (100) feet. . Subd. 6: Setback Requirements. No part of the structure including footings, soffits, gutters or other overhangs shall encroach on easement areas. Front Yard Setbacks: a) Front yard setback shall be thirty (30) feet from the lot line. On corner lots, the setback · from all lot lines abutting a street shall be thirty (30) feet. When an industrial district lot is separated from a residential zone by a city street, the setback from the lot line shall be one hundred (100) feet. b) Front yards abutting any roadway: the setback shall be landscaped as in accordance to the requirements of any applicable protective covenants and such reasonable requirements as established by the Planning Commission, and shall not be used for parking. Side Yard Setbacks: a) Side yard setback shall be at least twenty-five (25) feet from the lot line. b) A Light Industrial District side yard adjacent to a residential boundary line shall provide for a landscaped strip of at least sixty (60) feet in width along the lot boundary line. A portion of this landscaped strip shall be planted to provide a screen. The governing body may require additional side yard setback in these cases. When such additional width is required, such additional width shall not exceed one hundred (100) feet and paring in this area will be permitted. c) Side yard boarding upon any roadway: the setback shall be landscaped in accordance with any applicable protective covenants and such reasonable requirements as established by the Planning Commission. Rear Yard Setback: a) Rear yard setback shall be at least twenty (20) feet, which may be used for parking. · Subd. 7: Heiqht Requirements. a) No building constructed in any Light Industrial District shall be more than fifty-five (55) feet in height. Berming the building does not allow a building to be constructed higher than 55 feet. Elevation for the building shall be determined by the average grade of the land. Subd. 8: Site Coveraqe. No structure or combination of structures shall occupy more than 50 percent of the lot area. Subd. 9: Other Requirements. A. Parking Lots: All parking lots shall conform to the standards set forth in Section 52.10. All lots shall include parking controls and other landscaping techniques to improve their aesthetic quality and to direct the flow of traffic. B. Loading Docks: All loading docks shall conform to the standards set forth in Section 52.10. No loading docks or overhead doors shall directly face County State Aid Highway 75. C. Building Exteriors: All construction of new facilities shall consist of pre-cast or cast tip up concrete walls, concrete block (painted or decorative), post framelsteel frame with a concrete block or poured concrete complete perimeter foundation with frost footings extending a minimum of eight inches (8") above the final grade, and stick built construction. Pre-finished architectural metal panels, with a minimum twenty (20) year manufacturer color-fast warranty, · may be used as a construction material. A minimum of twenty-five (25%) of the exterior building finish directly facing streets shall consist of materials comparable to: face brick; natural stone or cultured rock; glass; vinyl; stucco, aluminum lapsiding; cut block; and, concrete block (the surface must be treated with an applied decorative texture or material). · Pre-cast or cast in place concrete buildings shall provide as much adornment as is possible considering their exterior finish limitations. D. Every applicant for a permit develop or expand any industrial property in the City shall be required to submit a complete and accurate statement concerning the specific nature of the use to which the property is to be put and shall certify that the proposed use shall comply with all regulations, ordinances, or special provisions which may apply. E. The Planning Commission shall have the right to require any additional information, corrections, or control, deemed necessary for the protection of the public. The Planning Commission shall have the right to hire expert consultants, at the permittees' expense, to assist in the establishment of special restrictions for any Industrial Use. F. Every applicant shall be required to submit for approval of the Planning Commission a landscape plan providing for the planting of trees and other vegetation. G. Any use creating periodic earthshaking vibration shall be prohibited if undue vibrations are perceptible beyond boundaries of the property on which the use is located. This standard shall not apply to vibrations created during the process of construction. H. Any use requiring the storage, utilization or manufacture of products which could decompose by detonation shall be located not less than 400 feet from any residence. This section shall not apply to the storage or usage of liquid petroleum, natural gas for normal residential or business use providing other performance standards are met. I. All activities that emit radioactivity shall comply with the minimum requirements of the Federal regulatory body. · J. All uses associated with bulk storage of oil, gasoline, liquid fertilizer, chemicals, similar liquids and hazardous substances shall comply with the requirements of the Minnesota State Fire Marshall, the Minnesota Department of Agriculture and other hazardous substance legislation by the Federal government. The user of such material shall have documents from the above offices that the use is in compliance. All existing above ground liquid storage tanks with a capacity of 2,000 gallons or more, shall comply with the requirements of the Minnesota State Fire Marshall's office within 12 months following enactment of this Ordinance. K. Screening: All heating, ventilation and air conditioning equipment, and refuse storage areas shall be screened and in a suitable location as determined by the Planning Commission. L. Lighting: All lighting shall be hooded and no light may directly strike County State Aid Highway 75 or areas outside of the development. M. Stops and Curbs: Concrete curb to B-612 specifications shall be used for all automobile stops and for all drive and parking areas. N. Landscaping: In addition to requirements relating to parking lots, the Development Plan shall show a unified landscaping scheme for the development. O. Signs: All proposed business signs shall be an element of the Development Plan. All signs shall conform to the requirements of Subd. 11. P. A Lock Box shall be installed on all buildings before a certificate of occupancy will be issued. · Subd. 10: Development Plan Requirements. No building permit shall be issued until the Planning Commission reviews the development plan to determine that the use and development is compatible with adjacent land uses, and consistent with the stated intent of this zone. Upon the request of the Planning Commission the City Council will make the final determination on site plan approval. The developer shall provide the following items to the Planning Commission and City Council for any development located in · the LI - Light Industrial District: a) Building location on the lot, drawn to scale. b) Building elevations; front, rear and side. c) Building exterior materials and color. d) Locations of ingress and egress points. e) Dumpster and solid waste pick-up areas and proposed screening material. f) Sign location and dimensions. g) Lighting standard and hood detail. h) Parking and loading areas identified. i) Drainage by the use of arrows and/or contours. j) Screening of heating, ventilation and air-conditioning equipment. k) Landscaping material including the location, type of plant and size. I) Fire hydrant and fire lane locations. m) Utility locations. · n) Any other fencing, screening, or building accessories to be located in the development area. 0) When required, evidence of completion of National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permitting program andlor the City of St. Joseph Storm Water Pollution Prevention Program (SWPPP). p) If applicable, evidence of compliance with federal, state and local pollution and nuisance laws and regulations, including, but not limited to glare, smoke, dust, odors and noise. The burden of proof for compliance with appropriate standards shall lie with the applicant. q) Required Fee/Agreement. i. Payment Required. Any person filing a petition requesting development plan review shall pay a fee according to the schedule established by the City Council. ii. Amount. Fees payable under this section for development plan review shall be in an amount as established by resolution of the City Council. Preparation and review of all elements of the required development plan, as listed and described above, is to be at the sole expense of the developer and at no expense to the public. The fee is payable at the time of filing a petition and is not refundable. In addition to the above fees and in the event the City incurs professional fees, either legal, engineering or professional planners, or any other cost, including but not limited to, postage and publication expenses, the applicants shall reimburse the City for those fees, and the · City officials may require an escrow deposit, cashier's check or letter of credit for these fees prior to the final action on the application for development plan review. Such escrow or letter of credit shall be in the form approved by the City Attorney. · iii. Development AQreement. In the event additional review by the City or its assigns is anticipated and/or needed during implementation of Development Plan, or other similar circumstance, the City shall require the property owner(s) and/or developer(s) enter into a development agreement with the City. The development agreement shall stipulate the conditions for approval and the City's authority to inspect the development. The agreement shall further require the owner or developer, as the case may require, furnish a cashier's check, escrow account or irrevocable letter of credit in favor of the City in an amount equal to 110% of all costs associated with City's review of the development, including but not limited to, engineering, legal, fiscal and administrative, as estimated by the City. Such escrow or letter of credit shall be in the form approved by the City Attorney, shall be conditioned upon the approval of the development plan. Subd. 11. SiQns. In the L-I Light Industrial district the general provisions apply to all signs. a) Special and Temporary SiQns 1. One (1) identification sign not exceeding thirty-five (35) square feet in area for the following uses: church, school, or similar uses. Such signs shall be solely for the name and of the use and its activities and may be illuminated but not flashing. 2. Temporary signs advertising a new subdivision development limited to the following: (1) maximum size shall be thirty-two (32) square feet in surface area, (2) maximum height of fifteen (15) feet above ground level. · 3. Real estate signs, including signs advertising the sale or rental of premises, are permitted provided the area on one side of any such signs shall not exceed six (6) square feet. 4. Temporary signs of contractors, architects, mechanics, special events and artisans are permitted, provided that such signs shall be removed promptly upon completion of the work and further provided that such signs shall not exceed thirty-two (32) square feet in area. b) Portable SiQns. 1. Definition. A portable sign is one that is movable from one location to another and is not permanently affixed to the ground, sales display device, or structure. 2. Permit Required. A business seeking to use or display a portable sign shall obtain a permit from the City for the period of display. Permits will specify the length of time the sign will be displayed, location of the sign, and business applying to use the sign. 3. Length of Use. The duration of time a portable sign can be located on a property is limited to a maximum of forty (40) days in anyone calendar year. 4. Size. A portable sign shall not exceed 50 square feet which accounts for all letters, numbers and attachments; excluding material required to support the sign. · c) Business or Commercial SiQns 1. Signs shall have a surface area not exceeding one hundred (100) square feet per sign with an aggregate total not to exceed two hundred (200) square feet if . double faced. 2. Such sign except a directional sign, is erected only on the premises on which the use, to which the sign relates, is conducted. 3. Notwithstanding the above, where two or more separate and individual commercial operations are conducting business in separate areas of a single building or structure, in which each operation owns or leases separate and individual premises, but share in the use and maintenance of common areas within or around the structure, then and in those circumstances, each individual business operation may be permitted to display an individual business sign as provided in subdivisions a) and b), except that said sign must be directly attached to that particular premises actually occupied by the business operation to which the sign relates. In addition to these individual business signs, the combination of business operations occupying the structure, may maintain a 50 square foot sign detached from the structure identifying the structure, the individual business operations located therein, or other reference to the combination of business operations located within the structure. For purposes of this subdivision, a combination of two or more business operations within a single structure includes, but is not limited to, shopping centers, shopping malls, and subdivided retail, office or industrial buildings offered for lease or condominium ownership. e) Siqn Removal. All signs not maintained and kept in good repair shall be subject to removal upon direction of the City Building Inspector. . . North Central Truck Accessories a MAIN OFFICE: 2627 CLEARWATER RD. e P. O. BOX 1925 . ST. CLOUD, MN 56302 (320) 257-8561 . WATS (800) 892-8561 . FAX (320) 654-9980 METRO LOCATION: 2500 CLEVELAND AVE. N., SUITE J. ROSEVILLE, MN 55113 We Deliver Value! . (651) 635-9680 . WATS: 877-635-9680· FAX (651) 635-9320 North Central Truck Accessories, Inc. is a growing sales and distribution company launched in 1967 as a division of St. Cloud Industrial Products. We separated our company from the parent organization in March of 1999. We are an Employee Owned Stock Trust Company, 80% owned by our retirement trust and 20% owned by Tim Ross, President and Chief Executive Officer. Our company primarily sells bolt on exterior aftermarket pickup truck accessories, bedliners, step bars, bug shields, rocker panel stainless trim, pickup bed tonneau covers, and many others. Weare a wholesale company, we market, sell, and deliver to customers in the five state area. Our company employs currently 24 full time employees, including 3 in Roseville, MN, and 3 Territory Sales Representatives working out of their homes in Eau Claire, WI, Mankato, MN, and Sioux Falls, SD, plus 4 . Territory Sales Representatives working out of our current location. Our current office & warehouse staff in 8t. Cloud is comprised of 4 administrative, 4 city desk salespersons, 2 warehouse employees, and 5 commercial drivers, who also assist in warehouse activities. We typically buy our products by the pallet or by the semi load and resell the variety of products piece at a time. We deliver to the St. Cloud and Minneapolis St. Paul area daily and the rest of the five state area either weekly or every other week. Our fleet of delivery vehicles consists of 5 enclosed cubed straight trucks ranging in bed length of 17 to 30 feet. We load and keep our vehicles in a segregated loading & parking area of our current facility and plan to do the same with the new building. Our trucks are hand loaded and unloaded from both curb side and the rear of the truck. We load most trucks from once to five times a week depending on the route area they are to deliver to. For freight coming in to our facility we receive from most of our manufacturers weekly or every other week. The shipping schedule is varied in volume because we are an independent distributor buying from many companies, but all deliveries are received during a 7 :00 - 5:00 business day. We do ship numerous packages with both Speedee Delivery and UPS, both pickup by 4:30pm each day. . Any further information you may need about our company please don't hesitate to call 320-257-1230 (Tim Ross' direct line). Quality Product DistrÎbLltor$ of Automotive & Pickup Accessories since 1959 ICIII\II\IDVATIVE ~rjver~ W""~ CREATlDI\I§ .-.....- I I PROPQ€>¡;D LOCATION 1 \!) I OF PR¡;CA6T CONCR¡;T¡; I III ~ R¡;F1J6¡; 6CR¡;¡;N TO Iu I!! COMPL-Y WITH 6¡;CTION 'e35 G 5.01 OF COveNANT6 . 15 ~ ~ -------------------- - - - - - - - - - --- - - -- ---- -----1\) 10 ~ b~ . .' ca 9 I( 101- ) lo ~Ill ~ \S) ~~ I ,.--------- :;:iï: 1 I I j 20' I I I!!CI 30' :ß~ 16¡;TBACt -t 6¡;TBAC" >-Illlo I I ~llltO I : z~~ Itllll~ I ~~Ill I :t::t:\S) I \!)\S)~ I ï:~~ 200'-0· io~\S) 2'-0" I III I Z 200' x ISO' BUIL..DlNð * I III . * ::J 9 PR¡;CA6T CONCR¡;T¡; * z ~ XT¡;RIOR 0 ~ i~ <( ~ê !û I!!\S) 30'-5" * ~~ (:) " ¢~~ \S) CI 1 ~ . Ë~ 8~ ~~ 3:~ ~ <S~~ I I- ..( I * I 1L--1 CI~~ I ------ - æ~ I-Ill:t: ()ZI- o.:.~~ 9 ~:t: .,...... ~ * Q * I \!) O!z I- ca . I!! æ:z ~ \)~ \) I : :8~ ~ I \ 5..D7 I * I 1 I ~I 31 / I ~I I I ~~ H¡;fvf DUTY g~ A6 AI.- T DR y¡; I I I!!p-:- I I~Za . 9 I \5.W7 I ~~ . (:) I I~\S) ... I I ILl- I I I ~~ ~\!) !.... I I¡Q:;: 1-oZ; I 'V,~~ FUTUR¡; ! 2~ I ~ I P AR"INð 150' x 64' I . I I I I I I I I Z --------------- - - - i 1 ~ ,.--------------- ------------~ I I 1 I I R¡;reNTION . I I I CL POND ~ I I I R¡;œA6¡; INTO ê¡- I I I Lll 6TORM 6¡;W¡;R !t: I 1 t- AT 6 CU FT/6¡;C 1 I I I , I I \S) III Z ~z I I 3 ~~lo I I >- III lll~tO I III I I!! ca >- I ~ l- I!! \!) ~CI~ I « () Z; 3: III III FUTUR¡; ISO' x 100' I- ~~~ Z 't" Ý2 BUlLDlNð >< I!!Il.. :E III \!)I- :t:1L1ll ~ ~r--~ :t:1ll Lll io51O ~ ---~ ~---------------- --------- --- - CL · ~~O 0 0 I \S) ____J____________ -------- -------------- . . . I Attachment: Yes or No I REQUEST FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION Linda Schyma - Special Use and Variance DATE: June 2, 2003 AGENDA ITEM Linda 8chyma - Special Use and Variance PREVIOUS ACTION The Planning Commission on May 5, 2003 conducted a public hearing for the issuance of a Special Use Petmit to allow a rental unit in a General Business Zoning District and a variance request to allow parking further than 350 feet from the property. The Planning Commission unanimously recommended the City Council deny the variance and special use request as the parking request was not a reasonable distance to the property. The proposed parking was located on the southern edge of the campus at least six blocks from the rental unit. The Planning COh1mission further agreed that if the parking can be resolved a new hearing can be conducted and the fee will be waived. At the May 15, 2003 City Council Linda Schyma stated that parking had been arranged with St. Joseph's Parish and she requested the Council reconsider the request. The Council referred the matter back to the Planning Commission for reconsideration. RECOMMENDED PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION- If the Planning Commission is inclined to approve the request, the following contingencies should be included: . The annual application for a rental license must include an executed agreement with 8t. Joseph's Church that seven overnight parking spaces will be designated for use by the residents at II College A venue North. . The property must meet all the license requirements, including fire access. COMMENTS/RECOMMENDATIONS Since the Council did not take action on the matter and referred it back to the Planning Commission a new public hearing is not required. I have informed the property owner that the Planning Commission would not reconsider this matter without written proof from the Church. Concerns have been expressed regarding the outside fire access, air conditioner and refuse service. I have been told that the fire escape and air conditioner are located on the adjoining property. The City considers this matter a neighbor dispute and if the exterior stairway is removed without a second means of ingress/egress constructed, the rental license will be void as two ingress/egress is a building/fire code requirement. As far as the air-conditioning unit there is nothing that requires rental units to have air conditioners. Refuse can be provided through the City by use of the bag system. . Please bring your information with you from the last meeting.