HomeMy WebLinkAbout1993 [10] Oct 14
Page 2392
October 14, 1993
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the City Council for the City
o:f St. Joseph met in special session on Thursday, October 14, 1993 at
'1:00 p.m. in the City Hall. I
MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Donald Bud Reber. Members of the Council Bob
Loso, Stephanie Hazen, Ken Hiemenz. Clerk/Administrator Rachel
Stapleton.
OTHERS PRESENT: City Engineer Joe Bettendorf, Sylvester Prom, Dan
I::ller, Bob Gohl, Steve Dehler, Ron Kostreba, M. C. Pfannenstein, Dennis
H. Stueve, Diane Schneider, Daryl Counter, Jackie Jones, Mark Thyen,
Paul Kollmann, Dave and Lisa Hallermann, Ray Brandenburger, Janice P.
Mensinger, Ed Villalta, Margie Kalla, Arnie Lauer, Merl Gretsch
At 7:00 p.m. Mayor Reber called to order a Public Assessment Hearing
for the DBL Labs Sanitary Sewer and Lift Station Improvement. Notice
has been published and mailed to the affected property owners. City
Engineer Joe Bettendorf discussed the costs of the project. The final
cost was $329,000. The generator was deleted from contract one. Want
to purchase a generator which will handle both the DBL pump station and
the water plant. The costs were broken down as follows:
Contract One 160,000
Contract two 42,200
Well 3,200
Generator 26,800
I::ngineering 71,000
Financing 25,800
This pump station is built to service a larger area, with multiple I
options.
Steve Dehler: Is this the Sewer Project from last year. Bettendorf
stated that it is. This job was done late last year, and then there
was no time to hold the assessment hearing last year. Dehler - Is the
generator a portable one? Bettendor:f - No. That's a trailer mounted
generator to provide standby power at that lift station and also to
provide standby power for the new pumps in the water plant. Dehler
asked if the generator is being assessed. Bettendorf stated that the
total amount being assessed is about $230,000. The other $100,000
would be picked up based on the same cost per acre as on the assessment
role.
There is an error in the assessment role. The computer did not make
the computation of $700 times each acre area. The two ways this can be
handled is (1) to include that hookup charge in the assessment as was
done for DBL and MCO properties; then this hearing should be tabled for
two weeks and send out revised assessment roles; or (2 ) These costs
could be picked up with the hookup charges which people pay when they
hook up. This is not a normal assessment because DBL agreed to pay a
large amount up front. On the truck sewer share, the part that would
not fit into a normal assessment is spread over 240 acres. Southeast
of County Road 133. I
Dehler asked if the line was oversized. Mr. Bettendorf stated that it
is included in the trunk.
· 'd ----
October~ 14, 1993
Bob Gohl of G. 1~1. Well Dr~ i 11 i n g stë:'\ted that all he has is a 50 feet
ingr~ess and egr~ess allot.'Jance, and that he can't even get to the line.
Bet t endo'r~f stated that a later~al is stubbed out fOr~ his p'r~oper-'ty. G.
- 1'Ij . v.Jelling Dr~ i 11 i n 9 would have r~un the ir~ ser~vice line down the
dr~iveway. Gohl stated that all he has is an ingr~ess and egr~ess
easement and questioned if he could r~un utilities down it. Ðet t endor~f
stat ed that he would check on the allowance of the easement. Gohl
asked if he would st i 11 have to pay the assessment if he did not have
the access to it thr~ough his dr~iveway easement. Bett endor~f stated he
would check on it and he stat ed that the City wi 11 do whatevey' is legal
and r~i ght.
Deh 1 er~ asked if the pr~oj ect is affiliated \fJith the East Minnesota
Street project. IYlr. Bettendorf stated that they have similar~ t r~un k
char-'ges, and that the East End s ewer~ main \fJill clump into the pump
station.
Bob Gohl also asked about how user~ char-'ges ar~e figl.\i'~ed. The pr~oper~t y
owner" is r~equired to have a wat e1'~ met er-' installed on his wat er~ system,
and sewer~ use char~ges ar~e based on the wat er~ usage.
Lose made a motion to table the assessment hearing unt i 1 the f ir~ s t
meeting in November~ in or~cler~ to send cOr~'r'ect ed notice to the ë:\ ff ect ed
pr~opert y own er~s. The motion was seconded by Hiemenz.
Ayes: Reber, Loso, Hiemenz, Hazen.
N!:\yes: Non e. Not ion car~r~ i ed.
The hearing was r~ecessed.
METROPOLI1AN SlATISTICAL AREA: iYlayor~ Re ber~ stated that Mike Sullivan
of Collin Peter~son' s office has contacted him concer~n i ng Sh er~bl.n~n e
County's placement in the Metr~opo 1 i tan Stat i st ical Ar~ea. He asked that
the area Municipalities should r~eaffi r~m the ir~ position on the
71etr~opo 1 i tan Statistical Ar~ea, and asked that the Council consider~
r"ea ff i ¡'~m i ng their~ motion of last spr~ing. The Counci 1 discussed their~
pr-'evi ous position and stated that Benton and St ear~n s County should also
have been included in the MSA Or~ Sh er~bur-'n e County excluded. Being in
the MSA prO' 0 v ide s fOr~ mO'r~e benefits in ar~eas subsidized by the Fede1'~al
Gover~nment. Loso stated that if st ear~ns County we'r~e included in the
'IIS~) the ar~ea could lose ser~vices to the T\fJin Cities ar~ea. The Counc'i 1
gene'r~ally felt that they needed mOr~e i nfo'r~mL"It ion in or~der~ fO'r~ them to
define their~ position. Also o f concer~n was the NSA's effect on the Met
Council's power~S , and if they could extend to St ear~n s County if it is
in the 1'r1SA. Loso stat€·c:I that OUr~ ar~ea is mostly r~ur~al and wishes to
r~et ë:iÌ n the r~ur~a 1 at m 0 sph er~e, and could not be well ser-'ved by belonging
to the 'IISA. 'ilayor~ Reber~ r~equested a motion that Stear~ns ë:\nd Benton
County would r~eceive the same benefits as those in the Þ1SA.
Repr~esentat i ve Deh 1 er~ stated that the fiscal d i spa r-' i t Y bet\fJeen
:3h er~bl.wn e County and Benton and St ear~n s County will ¡¡ave fiscal
dispar~ity because of the differ~ent Statistical A'r~eas. Loso also stated
that the Met Council is seeking taxing power-'s which could have a tax
effect on OUr~ area. Hazen made a motion to state the Council fOr~ the
City of St. ~Toseph does not s uppor~t Stear~ns and Benton Count:i,es
consolidating into the Twin Cities MSA but r~eql..\est the Oppor~t un it Y to
par-'t ici pat e in the same benefits that Sh er-'bur~n e County is ·r~eceiving.
The motion was sec.'onded by Hiemenz.
Page 22; 9 L}
Oc·t.obe'r-' i i} , 1993
nyes: R e be 'r-' Loso, H22ellj HiGmen:,~.
I\~aye£, : NonE:'. t'10t ion céH'r'i ed.
ßU I LD I Nt.3 I NSPEl~: r I LH\j APARTI'tiEN IS: 1'1ayo'r" 'r~ e po 'r-,t e d that the State -
IJF Reb,;?'¡"
F' i )'-'£1 ilar'shall inspected the city apa'¡"'t m ent £, on the second floo'r" of the
annex building. He stated that vi i 'r' i n 9 needs to be '¡' e don e , ë:~nd smoke
cI et e e:t 0)'" s '(' e \.'J i r"' e cJ . H d 0 0 r-' ~.J i t h a pacJlock ~.¡ i 11 be installed to p'¡~eveÏlt
en t r~?,nC'e to the t hi '-'d floo'¡-', ln o ,~d e'r-' to p r' 0 h i bit sleeping on the t h i'r-'d
f 1 0 0 'r' . "I he key Iti i 11 be kept in the Clerk/Administrator's office. Cold
~:Ìpr' i n q t:: 1 eet r" i c q'.lot ed i u~·t I_I ïl d e '1'-, $800 ¿;,nd G i ,~o I_\ì{ Con st 'r-'uct i on q 'J 0 t e d
$350 fO'r" installing a door-' to the t tl i r~d f 10 Or' and a new handr~ai J. in the
e nt 'ï-'2nce s t 2 i r-' ~'J a y . Loso ffië<,d Ii? a motion to 2ccept the quotes as
pr-'€' s E'n t eel and ha'le the ~'J 0 r-' k done as soon a.s possible. The liIotion ~"Ja~·
s, econd ed by f<ebe,'.
(iy e s : R E:' be,' , Loso, Hazen, Hiemenz.
I\L3. yes : None. '10t ion C2,)-'¡-' i ed.
HES I DE::N'I I At.. F-E:.NCE. cü 'H-'LA I NTS : ila yo 'r" Rebe'r-' stated that he r-'eee i v €,d a
lette'¡"' fr~om I'{oss Rieke' <::, neighbü'r"s, <::, t at in g 'chat they a'ee in opposition
to thE' constr-'I..\ct ion and mate'f-'ial s of the fencE' ~·Jh i ch he is
con s t 'r"I.lct in g. t'::ouncil discu<::,sed l'f the ,-, e ~·Jas a per-'f11 it and if the
m~\t e'r'" i ¿\ 1 s meet cod e. L.oso macJe a mat ion to have the building ins pect O'r-'
check the location of the fence, and It tile p..~ope-r-'t y line has been
establ i shed, and to check the type of mater'ial being used fOro,
con s t 'r"'uct i on. 1-4150 Ross Rieke lS to L)e notified by phone that this
matte'r-' (:a m e I..\IJ at the meeting and the Counci 1 ex pr"'es sed eoneer~n . The
motion vias s eLOn(] eo by Hazen.
r\yes: Reber~, Loso, Hazen, Hiemenz.
1\1i.=<. yes : None. 1'1ot ion Car-"r-' i ed.
DESV-, CW"'¡STRUCT I W, : Loso pr"e sent ed a quote f o'¡-' eonst'r~uct ion of a desk
'C 0 hold the o 'l e d"¡ e ad pr~oj ect O'r" and t Or~ the at t or~n e y and enginee'f' to S l'C
d U'r~ in!;;! .1.' Hiemenz made E\ motion to appr~o v e the quote of G i r~ 0 U x
meel,.lng~,.
COï'¡ st r'uct ion f Ü'ï"' the descr~ibed desk, of '$/,;)60 ; seconded by Hazen.
(-\ yes : Reber"', Loso, Hazen, Hiemenz.
Nayes: None. "10t ion Cë<,'r"'r-' i ed.
HOCI'ŒY RINK: LO~,D r~equested pe-r-'mission to contact Cold Sp'r-' i n 9 El ect'r-' ic'
to install the lights at the hoc!-<ey r"' ink. Hiemenz made a motion to
2'11 1 0 ~.J Cold Sp,'i ng E 1 e ct r' i c to in~,t2-,ll the light.s at the hockey 'r~ ink ;
seconded by Reber~.
nyes: Reber-', Loso, Hazen, Hiemenz.
Nayes: Non e. j'10t ion Cai-'r"'1 ed.
The Council discussed the pop machine and we'r~e in gener~al agr~eemeÏlt to
ask the employees if the 'r' e is a pr-' e f er~ ence to the b'r~and of pop. If not:
have the Coke mac.:'hine r"eplaced by 2, Pe ps, i machine.
The meeting ItJi.."IS 'ï"eeessed fOr" tl'le m i n IXC e s ,3,'C ~l : ~55 p. In.
Iii a y ü r~ Rebe'r" called the l-oJe st '1i nnesota Str-'eet I m pr~OV e m ent Assessment
Ii e a'r' i n 9 to or'd e r"' at: 8:00 pa mil
Joe Bett Emdor-'f discusseJ the p'r~oj ect. steve Deh 1 er-' questioned the
p "r'~ e v i 0 t\ S h e a r-' i II q s 'ì O'f' th(~ p'r'O i ect. He felt that notice ~·¡as given f 0';"
'J
an i n f [I r' Ii1 at ion a 1 hea'r'i ng, Itih i e:h did not discuss assessments. Joe
Page 22~9 5
October~ 1 if, 1<)')3
Bet tend or-'f stated thê.Ü the assessments ¿,i r-' e not allfJays d et er-'IJ! in ed ¿it the
public: :i. mp'r~ovement hea'rh':i.ng. Stapleton tn'-' 0 I_\ght out the file \.'Jh i ch
sh o\.'Jed notice sent fO'r-' both an in f o'r"lJIat i ona I heaf"'ing and a public
i mpr~ovement hear~ing.
The s,tr~eet was built ~A feet ~Jide \.'Ji t h St ear~n s County paying 4,8 feet of
it. D'.n~ing const'r~uction the soutl"'1 cUr~b vJas moved n Or-,t h t IfJ 0 feet to
give a ~·Jider~ boulevar-'d fOr~ thE' beautification pr~oj ect, and the str~eet
is t:::;'·..·, feet !¡-Jide. HCt u,:..l assessments I¡-Je¡'~e $6.ïO fOr~ conc'r~ete cUr-'b ¿,,:¡,nd
.....¡c:.
gutt e'r~ and $25ø 5i) per~ squar~e yar~d fOr~ the dr~i vewëiy apr~ons.
Steve Deh 1 e)'-' stated that two feet \.'Jer~{;: t ak en off the nOr-,th side by
widening the sidewalk two feet on the no)'~th, to twelve feet \.'Jide. The
str"eet was cent e'r~ed on the r~ i ght of way and then the south CUr~b \.'Jas
shifted t\.'JCI feet to the nOr~t h. Joe stat€·d that he had or-':i.ginally
r-'ecommended that iYlinnesota street be con st r~uct ed n ê.i r~r~ O!¡-J e'r-' but the
dm·mt clwn busin!?~,s o\.'Jner~s \.'Jant ed to r~etain the width.
Dennis Stueve ,B.sked why the sidewalks needed to be so \.OJ ide in the
downt o\.'m ar~ea. Joe stated str~eet s ar~e nOr~mally con st n.\c:t ed in the
middle of the r"ight of If Jay and that in o¡''''der~ const'r~uct the str~eet
cOr-"r-'ect 1 y, it r"eq u:i. r"ed shifting it over~ t~w feet. Dennis stated that
the st'r~eet ~¡eems nar~r-'ovJer-' that it \.OJas. Bet t end o¡'~f stated that it is
only t\.'w feet nar~r~owe)'~.
Steve Deh I er~ asked abo ut the pa'r-'t ici pat i on by the County in funding.
rhe agr~e e m ent bet!¡-Jeen the City of St. Joseph and Steaf"'ns County
allowed that the Co unt It' would pay fOr~ the cent er" L¡,ß feet of the str~eet
and pr-'obabl y CUr-'b and !~ ut t er~. The County's funding fOr" this is gas
tax. Dehl!?'r-' asked on City po 1 icy that in Pë:i ¡,~ k Ter~r-'ace and Second
Avenue Nl-J, ther~e was some cu)'~b \.'Jh ich IfJas r-'emoved and r-'ep laced but not
assessed because it was good cur~b. Dehler~ also asked if it isn't city
policy to assess fcn~ aJ1Y widening. The Counci 1 agr"e ed. It is City
policy to assess fo'r'" CUr~b and guttE!r~" Deh 1 E'r-' felt that the s iel 12 !¡-Ed k
which was constr~ucted in 1\;}ï6~ was cm~b and sidewalk. Bett endor~f
~>tated that he felt what ~'Jas put in in F.,ï6 i,'Jas only sic:l€·I¡<Jalk. Deh 1 e'r-'
¿,isked about other~ costs of the city. Bet tend Q)'-'f stated that it is,
appr-'o pr~ i at e to assess of 0 'r~ n 0 'r~ m ëil costs, to help clefr~ay city cost s, even
though the County may be paying fO'r~ those specific costs.
f'tier~ 1 Gr~et sch asked if thE:' County is paying fOr-' C'ur~b and gutt er~ why is
the City assessing those costs. Bet t endor~f stated that the C'ur-,b and
gutter assessments a'r~e some of thE:' cost =, that the City nOr~mall y
assesses. The City may .-assess thes,e costs to pay fO'r~ othe)'~ co·,;t s the
cit y i nC:Ur~S, such ê'tS the ext'r"'ëi ~Jidth on the str-'e€'t. ;1 E' r~ 1 also asked
VJhy the sid e vJa 1 k was t,-aken out by the ba'r~be'r~ shop. Joe stated that
this was fOr-' the extension of the beautification pr~oj eC't. Joe st at eel
that he did not th iï'ik it !¡-Jas a good idea to extend it the'r~e, b(~çaus e
the sidewalk was good ëlnd the el€'vation \.'Jas high.
¡)a¡'~y 1 COI.\'nt e'r~ asked Bett endor~f to look at his dr~ i v e\.'Ja y because the
slope is high and the car~ hit s bottom on it.
Dehle'r" asked who decides wh er-'e the utility poles a'r-'e located"
Bettenclor~f st¿lt€·d that t 1"1 12 ut i 1 it Y co m pë\1"1 y 1 oc:'at e s them. Th er-'e ar~E' not
many options, and som(~times have to be 1 OCi:\t ed in the middle o i= the
Page 23'36
Octo bEY" i 47 1"3'13
sidelt-Jalf{.
;i ¿n-' 9 e :.., 'I' ann ens t e i n asked if the pole by her-' building couldn't have been
moved over' i::::O feet. It is. d i r-'ect 1 y in fr-'ont of the bl..lÍ Iding.
E\c-tt €'nclo'r~'f stateû that he \.J 0 u 1 d 1001< at '.L. and )'~e pOr~t back to thE'
1 1..-
COI_\lîci 1.
J. R. bt ud ins k i as f{ 12 cl "'ihy he "'i2S a~.sessed fOro, the d'r'ivEway ap'r~on on 2nd
í4venl.\E nl.-J, because he had cUr-'b and gut t e 'r-' a'r"'O I),nd the C' 0 'r~n e'r' pr' e v i 0 us 1 l' .
J. R. ~,t at ed that he clid not need a ne\·J d'r~i veway thE')'-'e, because that
OilE' "'Jas in good condition. 'i ¿~ Y 0 r~ Rebe'r-' stated that the gr-'ad e \-Jas
chë;\n ~I ed sever~¿d times the)"e and asked J. R. ' J:: that "'Jas the dr-' i v e"'Ja l'
11
that he asked to have ,", e d 0 1) e . ,J¡; F;. stated that he stopped them
be f Q'r-'e it got thëd; fa'r-', so it did not have to be )'~edone. He a 1 ~,o
stated that his dt-'i ve~·Jay was 1n good condition and that he did not. need
it 'r~ecJone. Bettendor'f stated that he wh¿d; he un d e 'r-' S t 0 Q d J. R. ~·Jas
saying \·Jas that bec¿~use the gr'ad e '=, \.J E'r"'e changed they had to go back on
SeconcJ Avenue to liIatch the g'r~ad e, and that is ~·Jhy the Second Avenue
Lh'i VE\·Jay was r'edone. Bett endo'r·'f stated that he felt this is a
legitimate cOlilplaint and that maybe thE' d)'-'i vet.'iay on Second Av€·nue
sho:.dd be omitted. Bet ten d 0 'r-' f s,tated that he \-¡O 1.\ ld 'r'efigm~e that
asses,sment \'iithout the dr~i vei'Jay on Second Avenue.
::)"t: eve Oeh 1 e'r-' asked h O~-J that sit 1_\ a t ion was d i ffe'r~ent f'r'om h i~, situation.
Bett endo)'~'f st at ec.i that Deh 1 e)" did not have C'u'r"'b aÏid gutt E·)'-'. Rebe'r~
)"'e i t e),~i:\t ed that it i'Jas side~·Jalk.
}-i ¿\ zen macie a motion to have Bet ten d 0 'r-' f r~ e fig tn-' e J'. R. St I..\d ins k i ' s
assessment !"J i tho 1..\ t the Second Avenl.\e d 'r~ i v e !'.J a y included; seconded by
Loso.
Ryes: HebE"r', Loso, Hazen, Hiemenz.
l\Iayes: Non e. ¡>'Jot i OTì cëü'r'i ed.
St ud i ns,k i askeu if hE' h¿\~. to p¿¡y fO'r"' taking out the .L.' tank In the
s,epL,lc
f:n-'oj ect. Bett endor~f stated that all he is paying f O'r~ is c1_\'r'b and
gutter~ ¿\nd d)'-'i veway ¿i :J"r-'onSn
DE'nn is btueve st at ed that the sidewalk in f )'~ 0 n t of 1 e 'r-' I Gt"'et s,ch' s is
paid fo)'-' by the i.:J e a 1.\ t i fie a t ion p'r~oj eC't. He will only pay f Or~ cU'r'b ¿~nd
~:¡ u t t e 'r' .
Loso liIade a motion to app'r~o\!e a )'-'E'solution aDopt i ng the assessment 'r~O 1 e
fÜ'r' the l-Jest t1innesota Str'eet Impt'ovement p'r" oj eC't, "'Ji th t er"'ms ot 81- foy··
15 year~s. The J.. ' ~"Jas seconded by Hiemenz.
mOl,lOn
Ayes: ¡'~ebe'¡,', Loso, Hazen, Hiemenz.
Nayes: None. Mot ion C'aty,i ed.
n-¡ e h ear-' i n 9 was closed <:\ t 13::jS p. m.
Loso IJ) ¿\e] E' ¿i mot ion to r~ecess , 8:56 p. HI. ; seconded by Hiemenz.
-t;..........
f~y e s : R e b e r~ , Loso, Hazen, Hiemenz.
Nayes: non e. '1ot i on ca'r~t~ i eel.
1'1 a y 0 {, r<ebe'(" called the t::ast IYlinnesota St 'r~e et Sei'Jer-' and l·J 2, t e t'
T rn r- ¡''''' r '.1 ...... n ... ï +. (0, ..... ...... t::' - ,... -1 >-"" ..... +. l.... ~. "" ; T- n +. -, ' - - ~ ~- ....+ í\ ~ i-)I~ n m
Page 2397
October-' 14, 1993
Joe Bet t endQ'r-'f gave a summa'r~y of the status of the pr~oj ect. The
constr~Uc:t i on is not complete and t her~e ar~e no final pr~oj ect cost s. The
P)'~oj ect ed total costs of the p'r-'oj ect ar~e $493,&00.
Bet t endor~f stated thë:\t the homes on 91 s,t Avenue s,outh of Baker~ St'r~eet
ar-'e not connected to the DBL Lift station but will be s e¡'~v iced by the
East er-'n Par~k 1 i ft station, and should not be assessed the t r-'un k se!tJer~
costs of '..¡; 3::i0. The pr"epay amount should be r-'eadjusted also. '~350 I¡-J i 11
be deducted fr~om the effected assessments and those pr-' 0 per~t y OvJner-'S who
pr~epaid will be issued a refund O),~ have it applied to their~ hool-<up
fees.
Hazen quest i onecJ if those on the west side of 91st Av€,. ar-'e r~eceiving
wat e'r-'. Bett endor-''f stated that they a're included in the pr~oj ect, and
will !;let wat er~ stubbed out to them.
J'anice Mensinge)'~ asked vJh at the cost of the hool-<up chi:ü~ge. Bett endor~f
stated that ' .... is $é~, 085 per~ lot.
1...
~1ar-'Y t::llen Villalta stated that another~ house has been added to th(~
pr~oj ect. IAi 11 trlat decr~ease the cost s fOr-' the pr~oper~t y O~'Jne~~s. No, it
I¡-Ji II be applied to the city costs fQ'r~ th i s pr~oj ect. The Ci t Y is
holding a lot of the costs fQr~ this pr~oj ect.
Ron Kostr-'eba asked whe'('e the hoo~(up chi:':r~ge goes. Bett endor-'f stated
that it is a connection char~ge which allows connection to the m¿dn.
Ú¿ive Ha 11 er~mann asked if it is mandat Or~y to hool-< up to I¡-Jat er~. No, the
City only makes available s ewer-' mandat Or~y.
;ia)'~k Thyen asked when they can expect to hOl1k up to sevJer~. Bet t end Q'r~f
stated that they should be able to in a fe\.^J days.
J'anice ¡Vlensinge)'-' asked how the sept i c systems must be handled.
Bet t end or~f stated that the people shc,uld talk to the County and find
out their requirements.
Ron I<os'\;'r-'eba stated that hi s' vJe 11 vJent dr-'y today so he is anxious fOr~
the water~ to get installed.
Janice l'ilensinger~ asked when they could expect cUr~b and gutte)'~ \.'JOuld be
installed on Ninnesota Street. Bett endor~f stated that it ~oJ a s in the
County~s five y €'¿lr~ pI ¿In but it quest i on¿lbl e at this point.
Hiemenz made a motion to appr~ove a °r-'esolution ,'adopting the East
Minnesota street l-Jat er~ and Se~.¡er~ I mp'r~ovement P¡'~oj ect assessment r~O 1 12
I¡-Ji th ter~ms of 8'i'~ f Q'r-, 15 year-'s. The motion I¡-Jas seconded by
Loso.
¡'=Iyes: Re be)~, Loso, Hazen, Hiemenz.
Nayes: None. Motion car~'r~ied.
Joe Bettendo'r~f st at ed th¿lt amor~t i zat i on schedules wi 11 be sent out.
The hear~ing was closed at '-) : ~35 p. I'll.
Page 22;':L:::,
Octobe'r-' 1 if, 1 (}92;
HC30LU r I LJt,~ m APPLY FUR PU4t'~N II'JG GRHNT: Loso made a motion to app'r~O v e
E\ ',-'E:' S c! 1 ut i Q'I-¡ aplj',~o'ling t!-'8 3.ppl ic.:at i on fD'r-' ¿\ co 0 pe'r-'at ion p13,nning gt-'2nt
~\I¡~1 i (:·h pì~ovides ',- Or-' 'financing <;."'~ s e 'rU' \/ ice s h a'r-' i Ii g s t 1.\0 'i .t~ _ ._ the City 2,nd
I U ï'
ü\ÞJn o'¡ be. ,J 0 !;;, e \-Jh , to the Bo ¿<,t-'o of (jover-'nment Innovation ¿\nd
L: 0 () pe'r-'at i D -t"'1 ; s ec'ond ed by Hií:::rI1i2nz.
(1ye s : Rebe'r-', Loso, Hazen, Hiemenz.
i'Jayes: I"Jon e" 'Îot ion c a t-' 'r-' i e d .
HE\;::en made ¿I .1.' to au j 0 IJ t-'Ï¡ - - 9: irC) p. m. ; seconded b" Lü so.
mO\"lon ooi \" "
Ayes: Heber", L.oso, Hazen, Hiemenz.
NE\yes: None. 1'1 0 t ion
@
J'¡1C1"]C
Clerk/Administrator