HomeMy WebLinkAbout1999 [05] May 13
I
I
I
Page 3522
May 13, 1999
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the City Council for the City of St. Joseph met in regular
session on Thursday, May 6, 1999 at 7:00 p.m. in the st. Joseph City Hall. i
Members Present: Mayor Kenneth J. Hiemenz. Councilors Ken Twit, Bob LOsO, Cory Ehlert,
Mary Niedenfuer. Deputy Clerk Judy Weyrens.
Citv Reoresentatives Present: City Attomey John Scherer; City Engineer Joe Bettendorf; EDA
Director Chad Carlson.
Others Present: Michael Deutz, John Provinzino, Mike Rennie, Dorine Rennie, Sylvester Prom,
Mike Schaebel, Dick Backus, David Terwey, Steve streng, Jennifer Thienes, Mike Schoenecker.
Aoorove Aaenda: Twit made a motion to approve the agenda as presented; seconded by Ehlert.
Ayes: Hiemenz, Twit, Loso, Ehlert, Niedenfuer
Nays: None. Motion Carried 5:0:0
Consent Aaenda: Loso made a motion to approve the consent agenda as follows; seconded by
Twit.
(The outdoor liquor permit of the La Playette was tabled to the May 13, 1999 meeting)
a. Capital Purchase request: Asphalt saw, $ 893.00 (Water & Sewer)
b. Pay Application No.2, 1999 street Improvement Project, Randy Kramer
Excavating, $85,116.08.
c. Pay Apptication 8 (Final) 1996 East MN Street. Mid Minnesota Concrete and
Excavating, $ 18,690.01.
d. Engineer Pay Schedule - Acceptance of the 1999 Engineering Rates
Ayes: Hiemenz, Twit, Loso, Ehlert, Niedenfuer
Nays: None. Motion Carried 5:0:0
i
Aporove Minutes: Twit made a motion to approve the minutes of March 10: March 23, and April
15,1999 as presented and April 6, 1999 with the following correction:
Page 1: ... the Engineer's estimates have been higher than....
The motion was seconded by Loso.
Ayes: Hiemenz, Twit, Loso, Ehlert, Niedenfuer
Nays: None. Motion Carried 5:0:0
Bills Payable: Ehlert made a motion to approve the bills payable as presented; check numbers
26829 - 26855; seconded by Niedenfuer.
Ayes: Hiemenz, Twit, Loso, Ehlert, Niedenfuer
Nays: None. Motion Carried 5:0:0
Overtime and Callouts: Ehlert made a motion to aPProve the overtime and callouts as presented
seconded by Niedenfuer.
Ayes: Hiemenz, Twit, Loso, Ehlert, Niedenfuer
Nays: None. Motion Carried 5:0:0
Public Comments to the Agenda
Steve Frank, 606 Birch street W spoke in regard to the dog license fee charged by the City.
Frank stated that he was not satisfied with the service he received at the st. Joseph Vet Clinic
when purchasing the dog license and indicated the fee was the highest in the area. Frank
presented a summary of dog licenses in the area of which st. Joseph was the highest for spayed
animals. Further he stated that two yearn ago the fee was $ 2.00 and one year ago the fee as $
7.00. In his opinion the fee has increased to a point where it exceeds the value of the license.
Frank also expressed objection to having to purchase the license at the St. Joseph Vet Clinic.
Ehlert clarified that the Vet Clinic offered to assist the City in licensing dogs and property owners
Page 3523
May 13, 1999
are not required to vaccinate their animals at the clinic. The St. Joseph Clinic is just another
location to purchase the license.
I
Michael Deutz stated that he would like the opportunity to present information regarding Joseph
Street and questioned if he would have the opportunity during the Engineer's Report to speak.
The Council agreed that Deutz would be allowed to present his information during the Council
discussion of Joseph Street.
City Engineer Reports
Joseph Street ImDrOvemenl: City Engineer Joe Bettendorf stated that since the public
improvement hearing regarding the proposed improvement of Joseph Street he has had an
opportunity to review the project costs and street design. Bettendorf stalled that in an effort to
reduce the cost of the improvement the following can be considered:
1. Storm Sewer materials - can reduce the cost by changing th,e type of piping.
2. Road Width - The road can be constructed at 26 feet rather 1han 40 feet and the
curb and gutter could be removed. This deduction would reduce the street cost by
approximately 23% and an average decrease in the assessment of 9.7%.
Bettendorf clarified that a major portion of the street assessment is for drainage. At the present
time a drainage system is not available for Joseph Street and it must be constructed.
Niedenfuer questioned if reducing the road bed would create a problem for trucks loading and
unloading in the Industrial ParK. ' Bettendorf responded that when the driveways are
reconstructed to the individual businesses the apron will need to be enlarged to accommodate
truck traffic.
Michael Deutz questioned the City Attorney as to who is responsible for providing proof that the
proposed assessment will increase the value of the property. City Attomey John Scherer
responded that the burden of proof rests with the property owner. Scherer further stated that
before the public hearing was conducted the City Assessor reviewed the assessments and
compared the values against existing Industrial Parks in the area. It was his opinion that the
values were equal to or less than surrounding Industrial ParKs.
I
Deutz questioned if the City Council would consider subsidizing the project. Loso stated that
prior to 1996 the property owner was responsible for pay 100% of a street reconstruction. Since
that time the City has adopted a policy where a residential property owner pays 60% of the street
improvement cost. At the same time the Council discussed what type of cost share would be
appropriate for business development, but no action was taken. Loso questioned whether the tax
payer should be burdened with the additional expense. Deutz responded that it is his opinion
that the business community makes the majority of revenue for the City and the residential lots
actually cost the City money.
John Provinzino, attomey for Detuz, stated that while he understands the decision to move
forward with the proposed development is a political decision, the Councillleeds to determine if
they will subsidize the project The property owners are looking for finandal relief from the City.
Provinzino further discussed the property owned by Deutz and the comparison between the
property purchase price and proposed assessment.
Weyrens stated that Jerry Hirschfeld has submitted a letter of support for the proposed
improvement to include street, curb and gutter, storm sewer, water and sewer.
Niedenfuer stated that she has been contacted by residents who expressed opposition to
subsidizing the Proposed improvement.
I
Page 3524
May 13, 1999
I
Ayes: Hiemenz, Loso, Ehlert, Niedenfuer
Nays: None Motion Carried 4:0:0
Public Hearina - Zonina Ordinances: Weyrens requested the Council establish a special meeting
to conduct a joint meeting with the Planning Commission. The meeting will be published as a
public hearing on the proposed changes to the St. Joseph Code of Ordinances. Loso made a
motion to schedule the public hearing for the Ordinance revisions for Monday, June 7, 1999 at
8:00 p.m.; seconded by Niedenfuer.
Ayes: Hiemenz, Loso, Ehlert, Niedenfuer
Nays: None Motion Carried 4:0:0
I
MisceHaneous: Mayor Hiemenz reported on the following:
o The City Engineer met with the residents along 90th and 91"' Avenue regarding the
street improvement project. The main concern expressed was the height of the road
and why it was lowered. Additionally, one property owner is questioning why
separate trenches were used for his water and sewer line. This matter will be
referred to the City Engineer.
o Hiemenz reported on proposed housing units on Minnesota Street. One of the units
proposed would contain over 100 beds. The Council discussed the intent of Genera
Business and how the proposal meet the guidelines. Weyrens stated that the
Council has the opportunity when revising the Ordinances to require that a certain
percentage of the property be developed with a commercial use, thereby limiting the
amount of rental units in the General Business area. Further, the Council could
require multiple family uses in a General Business area to meet the minimum design
standards of R-3 zoning districts.
Adioum: Ehlert made a motion to adjoum at 9:50 p.m.; seconded by Loso.
Ayes: Hiemenz, Loso, Ehlert, Niedenfuer
Nays: None Motion Carried 4:0:0
~"'~
,U Deputy Clerk
I