Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout[06] CIP Bonds Hearing 11 Council Agenda Item 06 url'v 01 S-1'.JoSE"'10Ei MEETING DATE: February 1, 2016 AGENDA ITEM: Public Hearing - Capital Improvement Plan—Government Center SUBMITTED BY: Finance BOARD/COMMISSION/COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: None PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION: Council adopted the 2016 Budget/Capital Improvement Plan. Council authorized bidding the Government Center. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The City relies on the assistance of Monte Eastvold of Northland Securities and Mary Ippel of Briggs and Morgan to help determine the bonding type and process for projects undertaken in the City. The City would have different alternatives for bonding the Government Center. In reviewing the financial options issuance of GO Capital Improvement Bonds (CIP)has the lowest interest rate; therefore that is the option that is being forwarded to the City Council. Minnesota Statute §475.521 allows GO CIP bond funding for certain capital improvements of city buildings. The statute provides strict requirements to follow to qualify a project for GO CIP bond funding. The enclosed CIP 2016-2020 amendment addresses the requirements of issuing GO CIP debt to construct a new Government Center for administration,police and Council. The enclosed hearing notice was published January 15"', 2016 in the St. Joseph Newsleader. The capital improvement plan and proposed bonds are the maximum issuance amount. The estimated debt schedule for a$5,035,000 bond issue is located in Appendix B of the CIP document. The final bond issue is expected to be lower after proceeds from the sale of the current building are received. In addition, the bids may come in more favorable than current estimates. City Council will have the opportunity to adopt a resolution for the final bond amount as the project progresses. BUDGET/FISCAL IMPACT: $5,035,000 bond issue ATTACHMENTS: Request for Council Action—Government Center CIP/Bonds Public Hearing Notice Resolution 2016-004 Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan—Government Center REQUESTED COUNCIL ACTION: Adopt Resolution 2016-004 approving Issuing GO Capital Improvement Bonds and Adopt the Capital Improvement Plan for the Government Center. CITY OF ST. JOSEPH NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON INTENTION TO ISSUE GENERAL OBLIGATION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN BONDS AND THE PROPOSAL TO ADOPT A CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN THEREFOR NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that the City Council of the City of St. Joseph, Minnesota (the "City"), will meet on February 1, 2016, at 6:10 p.m. at the City Hall, 25 College Avenue North, in St. Joseph, Minnesota, for the purpose of conducting a public hearing on (a) the intention to issue general obligation capital improvement plan bonds in an amount not to exceed $5,035,000 and (b) the proposal to adopt a capital improvement plan therefor. The proceeds of the bonds will be used to finance the acquisition, construction and equipping of a new city hall and public safety facility to be located in the City. All persons interested may appear and be heard at the time and place set forth above. If a petition requesting a vote on the issuance of the bonds is signed by voters equal to five percent of the votes cast in the City in the last municipal general election and is filed with the City within thirty days after the public hearing, the bonds may only be issued upon obtaining the approval of the majority of the voters voting on the question of issuing the bonds. Individuals unable to attend the public hearing can make written comment by writing to the City Administrator, St. Joseph City Hall, 25 College Avenue North, St. Joseph, Minnesota 56374. Written comments must be received prior to the date and time of the public hearing. BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL /s/Judy Weyrens City Administrator CITY OF ST. JOSEPH, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 2016-004 EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL CITY OF ST. JOSEPH MINNESOTA HELD: February 1, 2016 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular or special meeting of the City Council of the City of St. Joseph, Minnesota, was duly called and held at the City Hall in St. Joseph, Minnesota on February 1, 2016, at 6:10 p.m. for the purpose, in part, of giving preliminary approval to the issuance of general obligation capital improvement plan bonds and adopting the capital improvement plan. The following members were present: and the following were absent: Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION GIVING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL TO THE ISSUANCE OF GENERAL OBLIGATION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN BONDS IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $5,035,000 AND ADOPTING THE CITY OF ST. JOSEPH, MINNESOTA, CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN FOR THE YEARS 2016 THROUGH 2020 A. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of St. Joseph, Minnesota(the "City") proposes to issue its general obligation capital improvement plan bonds (the "Bonds") and adopt the City of St. Joseph, Minnesota, Capital Improvement Plan for the Years 2016 Through 2020 (the "Plan"); and B. WHEREAS, the City has caused notice of the public hearing on the intention to issue the Bonds and on the proposed adoption of the Plan to be published pursuant to and in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.521; and C. WHEREAS, a public hearing on the intention to issue the Bonds and on the proposed Plan has been held on this date, following published notice of the public hearing as required by law; and D. WHEREAS, in approving the Plan, the City Council considered for each project and for the overall Plan: 1. The condition of the City's existing infrastructure,including the projected need for repair and replacement; 2. The likely demand for the improvement; 7420157v1 3. The estimated cost of the improvement; 4. The available public resources; 5. The level of overlapping debt in the City; 6. The relative benefits and costs of alternative uses of the funds; 7. Operating costs of the proposed improvements; and 8. Alternatives for providing services more efficiently through shared facilities with other local governmental units; and E. WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the issuance of general obligation capital improvement plan bonds in the aggregate principal amount of up to $5,035,000 is the best way to finance the capital improvements identified in the Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of St. Joseph, Minnesota, that: 1. The City hereby ratifies the actions of the City Administrator in causing the publication of the Notice of Public Hearing to be published in the City's legal newspaper as required by law; and 2. The City hereby adopts the Plan and authorizes the issuance of up to $5,035,000 aggregate principal amount of general obligation capital improvement plan bonds. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and, after full discussion thereof and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon the resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. 2 7420157v1 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF STEARNS CITY OF ST. JOSEPH I, the undersigned, being duly qualified and acting Administrator of the City of St. Joseph, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes with the original minutes of a meeting of the City Council, duly called and held on the date therein indicated, which are on file and of record in my office, and the same is a full, true and complete transcript therefrom insofar as the same relates to a resolution giving preliminary approval to the issuance of the City's general obligation capital improvement plan bonds and adopting the City's capital improvement plan therefor. WITNESS my hand on February 1, 2016. City Administrator 3 7420157v1 City ... IIIIMfirunesota Stearns iii JON Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan Government Center Table of Contents I. Introduction........................................................................................................................2 11. Purpose...............................................................................................................................2 111. The Capital Improvement Planning Process................................................................. 3 IV. Project Summary............................................................................................................. 3 V. Financing the Capital Improvement Plan..................................................................... 5 ProjectCosts.................................................................................................. Appendix A Proposed CIP Bond Issues........................................................................... Appendix B Pre-Sale Schedule....................................................................................... Appendix C Pagel CITY OF ST. JOSEPH FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN 2016 THROUGH 2020 I. INTRODUCTION In 2003, the Minnesota State Legislature enacted legislation that authorized municipalities to issue debt for projects identified in the City's Capital Improvement Plan (CIP)without first requesting voter approval through a referendum. Before this legislation, issuance of debt for projects such as City Hall, libraries and public safety facilities would require voter authorization by means of referendum. II. PURPOSE A capital improvement is a major expenditure of City funds for the acquisition or improvement to public lands, buildings, such as a city hall, libraries, public safety, or public works facility,which has a useful life of five years or more. For the purposes of Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.521, capital improvements do not include light rail transit or related activities, parks, road/bridges, administrative buildings other than city hall, or land for those facilities. However,this plan includes certain additional capital improvements beyond the scope of this statute. A Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) is a document designed to anticipate capital improvement expenditures and schedule them over a five-year period so that they may be completed in the most efficient and cost effective method possible. A CIP allows the matching of expenditures with anticipated income. As potential expenditures are reviewed,the City considers the benefits, costs, alternatives and impact on operating expenditures. The City of St.Joseph, Minnesota (the "City") believes the capital improvement process is an important element of responsible fiscal management. Major capital expenditures can be anticipated and coordinated so as to minimize potentially adverse financial impacts caused by the timing and magnitude of capital outlays. This coordination of capital expenditures is important to the City in achieving its goals of adequate physical assets and sound fiscal management. In these financially difficult times,good planning is essential for the wise use of limited financial resources. The CIP is designed to be updated on an annual basis. In this manner, it becomes an ongoing fiscal planning tool that continually anticipates future capital expenditures and funding sources. III. THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLANNING PROCESS The City adopted the first Capital Improvement Plan in 2004. When the plan was developed the Council and staff participated in a Planning Workshop to discuss the existing infrastructure, staffing needs and the future landscape for the City. From this workshop a Page 2 Capital improvement Plan was developed. The CIP was presented to the City Council who reviewed the projects, prioritized, and considered fiscal impact, and available funding. At this time the final plan was prepared and a public hearing was conducted to solicit public comments. Adoption of the capital improvement plan will followed the public hearing. The City Council prepares a plan based on the available funding sources. If general obligation bonding is necessary,the City works with its financial advisor to prepare a bond sale and repayment schedule. Over the life of the CIP, once the funding, including proceeds from the bond sales, becomes available the individual capital expenditures can be completed. In subsequent years,the CIP is reviewed and amended as the City grows and needs change and expand. To help assure that the City is prepared for future needs, the CIP encapsulates five years. For a City to use its authority to finance expenditures under Section 475.521, it must meet the requirements provided therein, including publication of hearing notice. In addition, the City Council must approve the sale of capital improvement bonds by a three-fifth majority vote of all members. The City Council approves bond issuance following the public hearing. Although a referendum is not required, a reverse referendum is allowable. If a petition bearing the signatures of at least five percent of the votes cast in the last municipal general election requesting a vote on the issuance of bonds is received by the municipal clerk within thirty days after the public hearing, a referendum vote on the issuance of the bonds shall be called. IV. PROJECT SUMMARY The expenditures to be undertaken with this CIP are limited to those listed below. All other foreseeable capital expenditures within the City government will come through other means. The following expenditures have been submitted for inclusion in this CIP: 2016 Expenditures The City of St.Joseph intends to build a government center to the West of the community center to house police services, administration and council chambers. The City intends to issue General Obligation Capital Improvement Bonds, Series 2016A to finance the construction project. The City already owns the land where the proposed government center is scheduled to be constructed. 2017 Expenditures None anticipated at this time. 2018 Expenditures The City of St.Joseph plans to build a cold storage building for public works equipment and vehicle storage to the north of the current public works facility. The City will consider issuing General Obligation Capital Improvement Bonds to finance the construction of the new building. 2019 Expenditures Page 3 None anticipated at this time. 2020 Expenditures None anticipated at this time. The statute has established certain criteria that must be met. Under these criteria,the City has considered the following eight points: 1. Condition of the City's infrastructure and need for the project. 2. Demand for the improvement. 3. Cost of the improvement. 4. Availability of public resources. 5. Level of overlapping debt. 6. Cost/benefits of alternative uses of funds. 7. Operating costs of the proposed improvements. 8. Options for shared facilities with other cities or local governments. The City has analyzed the eight points required per statute for the project. Their findings are as follows: Project: Build a new government center on the land purchased by the City next to the community center. Description:The City Council reviewed options for locations and needs of a government center to include city administration, police services and council chambers. A facility committee was commissioned to assist with identifying the community needs. The committee consisted of residents, council members and city staff. In August 2015, the City purchased the Colts Academy from the St. Cloud School District for a community center. Along with the purchase was over 15 acres of land. After the City purchased Colts Academy, the facility committee recommended the City Council secure an appraisal on the current City Facility with anticipation of selling the property. The Facility Committee determined that creating a campus was more cost effective that owning multiple buildings. On August 17, 2015 the City Council accepted the recommendation of the facility committee and ordered an appraisal of the existing City Facility. The appraisal has since been received and the City is waiting from an interested party to submit a formal purchase agreement. At their January 4, 2016 council meeting, City Council approved recommendations from the facilities committee to complete construction documents and let bids for a 19,525 square foot government center at the Colts Academy site. Bidding is scheduled for March 2016 with construction beginning as early as mid-April. The current government center is planned to be sold to an interested buyer for the appraised value. Conditions of City Infrastructure and Need for the Project The City offices and the police department moved into the existing facility in 2000. The building was purchased from Sentry Bank to meet police and city accommodations,while maintaining a downtown presence. The current facility no longer meets the space and layout needs for the current functions. In addition, significant mechanical repairs and safety upgrades are necessary. With the lot space available, it was determined that either a new facility on the current site or a new site is the best option to meet current and future city needs for the next 30-50 years. Page 4 The City issued bonds in 2011 to upgrade the mechanical systems in the government center. Keyless entry was also to be added. In 2014 the City hired a facilitator to work with interested residents to establish the needs of the City for facilities and space and then prioritize the established needs. When the committee completed their analysis, a formal report was submitted to the City Council identifying the top two needs of the City were developing a community center and providing a public safety facility. From this report discussions began on the future of the government center and whether or not the space and function of the building would continue to meet city needs well into the future. The mechanical repairs and keyless entry were postponed until the facilities committee completed their work. The money remaining in the capital fund for these repairs/upgrades will be transferred to the new facility. The current facility is in sound condition for other entities. The City has received interest from a developer to purchase the existing property contingent upon the City relocating the government center. The proceeds from the potential sell would draw down the bond amount on a new government center facility. Demand for the Project The Committee that reviewed the facility needs of the City toured the existing City facility and determined the current facility does not have proper space for police interrogation, evidence storage, processing, overall function. Administration has created an office space to accommodate staff, but not at the best flow of operations and does not have room for additional staff. The council chambers does not hold many residents and has been an issue for some meetings such as assessment hearings and project developments. The council chambers is in the basement of the building creating some logistics and safety concerns. Remodeling the building is an option, but will not provide the space needed to accommodate all needs. Also, plumbing, electrical and mechanical work make remodeling costly and less favorable. Another significant concern is safety. The current government center does not provide safety for staff or visitors in either administration or police departments. The council chambers does not provide ample escape routes in case of fire or hostile attacks. Estimated Cost of the Project The project improvements will not exceed the par bond amount less issuance costs. The total bond amount is estimated to be not more than $5,035,000. The bond issue may be less depending on the sale of the current facility and possible use of local option sales tax revenue reserves. Availability of Public Resources The project will be funded by a general property tax levy. Relative Costs and Benefits of Alternative Uses of the Funds A purchase agreement was received for the current building. The Council hired an appraiser to evaluate the value of the current building. The appraisal supported the sell price range offered in the purchase agreement. If the sell goes through,the proceeds from the sell would offset the bond issue project costs. Page 5 Operating Costs of the Proposed Improvements The operating costs are reviewed annually through the City's budget cycle. Options for efficiency of HVAC, construction, plumbing, electrical are being considered in the construction documents. Options for Shared Facilities with Other Cities or Local Governments The new government center will have options for Gold Cross Ambulance service and Stearns County Sheriff's to use space and provide a presence in the City. Other service groups, such as the St.Joseph Quilters, St.Joseph Senior Citizens, Historical Society(to name a few) may have an option to use the facilities. Level of Overlapping Debt Taxing Unit 2015/2016 Net Tax Capacity Est. GO Debt 12-31-15 Stearns County $125,166,376 $12,590,000 St. Cloud ISD 742 $71,085,363 $3,320,135 Stearns County HRA $125,166,376 $1,340,000 V. FINANCING THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN In the financing of the CIP,two statutory limitations apply. Under Chapter 475,with few exceptions, cities cannot incur debt in excess of 3%of the assessor's Taxable Market Value (TMV)for the City. In the City the TMV is$314,447,800. Therefore, the total amount of outstanding debt cannot exceed $9,433,434. As of December 31, 2015,the City had $1,020,000 of debt subject to the legal debt limit leaving a debt margin of approximately $8,413,434. Another limitation on bonding under the CIP Statute (475.521) is that without referendum, the total amount that can be used for principal and interest in any one year for CIP debt cannot exceed 0.16%of the TMV for the City. For the City,the limit of CIP debt is $503,116 ($314,447,800 x.0016). The principal and interest payments for the Series 2016 Bonds will have a maximum annual payment of approximately$339,000. Under the CIP,the City will secure approximately$5,035,000 in twenty-year general obligation bonds in the year 2016 to finance a government center. The par amount of the Series 2016 Bond is based on the amounts listed in Appendix A. Continuation of the Capital Improvement Plan The City Council acknowledges the importance of financial management and therefore reviews the CIP annually as part of the budget process. The review of the CIP provides the City Council with an overview of infrastructure and development allowing for prioritization Page 6 of projects, placing funding where it is most beneficial. Occasionally a need will arise that has not been included in the CIP causing the City Council to amend the CIP. Page 7 APPENDIX A PROJECT COSTS (Capital Expenditures to be Funded with Bond Proceeds) 2016 Expenditures • Government Center$4,900,000 2017 Expenditures • No project identified at this time 2018 Expenditures • Public Works Cold Storage Building$400,000 2019 Expenditures • No project identified at this time 2020 Expenditures • No project identified at this time Page 8 Proposed Debt Service Schedule CITY OF ST..069EPK MINNESOTA 0,01,CAPITAL IM FIKOVEMENT PLAN BONUS OF 2011 Egi, TOM stalu'lory k#w#V1 V#bf 5 00% Ypar f��q( RA14 Inforost Pwmioof Govarvo, 2016 (1 000% 67 �4 V t 2G17 2015.000 120% 134�7[18 319:709 359,0393 2015 206,000 1 40% 132,240 537,248 364.1113 2010, 210,000 160% 12%,378 339,379 3W346, 2020 210,000 110% 126,010 334,1315 35201$ 2021 215,000 1,90% 1122,U3 317,343 354,210 2022 220,000 U3% 11118,250 338,235 336,170 2023 226,000 220% 113,748 33B,740 355,665 2024 2317,1110 2,331% 1108,790 336,7)5 35d,*7 2025 233,000 250% 103,303 339,303 355,312 2026 240,000 245% VIVO 337,610 U4,10� 2027 20,000 280% 01,158 341,tSB 358,215 2020 2153,000 210% 414,1511 339,158 sool 16 2029 2131 ,13 36, O% 76,70 3,36,763 353,601 2030 27C,000 3,10% M,963 33k,W9 365,9,11 2031 2&C,000 11.696 W,593 340,503 357,622 2032 285,00D 3,25% 51,773 336,773 353,511 20,33 225,000 330% 42,510 3,17,610 354,3.66 2034 305,0011, &40% 32,776 337,776 364A64 2033 315,000 3,06% 22,405 331',43 364,275 2013 325,000 335% 1'1„63+3 3 KOO 353,.V4 2037 0 0,00% a 0 a 5,036,000 1,77,391 6,831,191 7,IV,,239 Vonittgosvo,IAVIFI, Norrlotic SecWtIes,Inc 0sled-, 1W 131 Page 9 APPENDIX C Proposed Five-Year City Capital Improvement Plan/Bond Issuance City of St.Joseph, Minnesota The City Council must take the following actions before bonds can be issued: • City Council authorizes the preparation of a five-year Capital Improvement Plan • City Council conducts a public hearing on the issuance of bonds and the Capital Improvement Plan • City Council approves the bonds and Capital Improvement Plan by at least a three-fifths vote of the Council membership The table below lists the steps in issuing process. Please not this proposed timetable assumes regularly scheduled City Council meetings. Jan. 4, 2016 Council approves government center design and approval for construction documents and bidding. Jan. 15, 2016 Publish Notice of Public Hearing on the Capital Improvement Plan with consideration of bond funding. Financial Bonding Plan sent to the City. Jan. 18, 2016 Close date to get Notice of Public Hearing on the Capital Improvement Plan with consideration of bond funding Feb. 1, 2016 Public Hearing—Resolution Approving the Capital Improvement Plan Adopted (3/5 vote required) Mar. 3, 2016 Reverse referendum period ends Mid-Mar. 2016 Bid opening for government center project Apr. 4, 2016 Bid awards considered by Council. May 2016 Credit ratings assigned Jun. 6, 2016 Council approves Resolution issuing General Obligation Capital Improvement Bonds, Series 2016. Public Sale of the Bonds. July 2016 Bond closing/receipt of funds Page 10