The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2006 [03] Mar 16 {Book 37} Administrdtor Judy Weyrens MdYor Richdrd Cdrlbom Councilors AI Rdssier Ross Rieke Renee Symdnietz Ddle Wick CITY OF ST. JOSEPH www.cityofstjoseph.com St. Joseph City Council Thursday, March 16,2006 7:00PM 1. Call to Order 2. Approve Agenda 3. Consent Agenda 4. Public Comments to the Agenda a. Bills Payable - Requested Action: Approve check numbers 036977-037034. b. Change Order - Requested Action: Authorize Change Order #1 to meet OSHA requirements at the existing Water Treatment Plant in the amount of $4,503 .00. c. Change Order - Requested Action: Authorize Change Order #2 to increase the size of raw water site piping and associated items in the amount of$23,257.00. d. Well Maintenance - Requested Action: Authorize the approval for Traut Wells to perform the yearly well maintenance for Well No.4. e. Gambling License - Requested Action: Accept the lawful gambling application for the Church of St. Joseph for an event on July 3&4, 2006 at the Church of St. Joseph. 5. 7:05 PM Scherer Trucking a. Comprehensive Plan Amendment b. Rezoning Request - R3 to B2 Highway Business. 6. 7:10 PM Regional Human Rights Task Force 7. City Engineer Reports a. St. Cloud Wastewater Treatment Facility Plant Expansion Update b. Transportation Plan Proposed Schedule c. 2006 Trunk Watermain - Advertisement for Bids d. Other Matters 8. Police Chief Reports a. Staff Request 9. Mayor Reports a. 2006 Mayor Appointments 10. Council Reports II. Administrator Reports a. Annexation - Feld Farm b. Fund Transfers c. Other Matters 12. Adjourn File 2'; College Avenue North' PO Box bb8 . Sdint. Joseph, Minnesotd ,;6')74 Phone j20.,6,.7201 FdX )20.,6,.0,42 St. Joseph City Council March 16,2006 FOR THE OFFICIAL RECORD PLEASE SIGN YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS NAME ADDRESS ::~;f ~:!;!::~c 3. ~~j~/t,\jJYI/'--~-~'~? t ()~' 2- 1-->62 r3lJ--€-.. 4. /~~ tvl~ Ih~ UJM< 5[ 5. kn1t/Jf~, ~ .~t :: ~~~.k~~~. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. CITY OF ST JOSEPH Bills Payable March 14, 2006 Check Search Name Comments Amount FUND DEPART OBJ Nbr 036977 POSTMASTER return osha book $3.51 601 49440 322 036979 FIRST STATE BANK-CUSTOMER T Struck NSF Chrg $3.00 601 49440 310 036979 FIRST STATE BANK-CUSTOMER ACH Payroll chrgs $20.00 101 41530 200 036980 A-1 TOILET RENTAL portable rental - $74.55 205 45203 531 036980 A-1 TOILET RENTAL portable rental - $74.55 205 45203 531 036981 ACCLAIM BENEFITS administration $11.11 101 41530 137 036981 ACCLAIM BENEFITS administration $3.70 603 43230 137 036981 ACCLAIM BENEFITS administration $3.70 602 49490 137 036981 ACCLAIM BENEFITS administration $14.81 601 49440 137 036981 ACCLAIM BENEFITS administration $33.35 101 42120 137 036981 ACCLAIM BENEFITS administration $22.22 101 41430 137 036981 ACCLAIM BENEFITS administration $11.11 101 45202 137 036982 . ALLIED WASTE SERVICES February usage $189.78101 45202 384 036982 ALLIED WASTE SERVICES February Usage $13,981.35 603 43230 384 036982 ALLIED WASTE SERVICES February usage $55.48 105 42220 384 036982 ALLIED WASTE SERVICES February usage $55.48 602 49490 384 036984 BOUND TREE MEDICAL, LLC tape adhesive, $49.98 105 42270 210 036985 CAMERA TRADER repairs to minolta $100.00 101 42120 220 036986 CASEY'S GENERAL STORE safety meeting $3.74 601 49440 212 036986 CASEY'S GENERAL STORE safety meeting $3.74 101 45202 212 036986 CASEY'S GENERAL STORE safety meeting $3.75 601 49440 212 036986 CASEY'S GENERAL STORE safety meeting $3.74 101 43120 212 036987 CITY OF ST. CLOUD sewer rental $11,758.57 602 49480 419 036988 CLOUDNET INC Internet Service- $150.00 101 43120 321 036989 COLD SPRING ELECTRIC SERVICES repair to pump $55.00 602 49480 220 036989 COLD SPRING ELECTRIC SERVICES change out bulbs $55.00 601 49410 220 036989 COLD SPRING ELECTRIC SERVICES change out bulbs $227.50 101 45201 220 036990 COLD SPRING VETERINARY CLINIC kennel $140.00 101 42700 300 036991 HAWKINS WATER TREATMENTGROUP hydrofluqsilicic $263.31 601 49420 210 036991 HAWKINS WATER TREATMENT GROUP T-Influent BOD $91.20 602 49480 312 036991 HAWKINS WATER TREATMENT GROUP T -Phosphorus $40.20 602 49480 312 036992 HOLIDAY STORES fuel - February $168.35 101 43125 210 036992 HOLIDAY STORES fuel - February $168.36 602 49490 210 036992 HOLIDAY STORES fuel - February $168.36 101 43120 210 036992 HOLIDAY STORES fuel - February $168.35 101 45202 210 036992 HOLIDAY STORES fuel - February $168.36 601 49440 210 036993 HOME DEPOT CR vac muffler $12.80 101 45201 220 036993 HOME DEPOT CR joint compound $5.16 101 41942 220 036993 HOME DEPOT CR shop vac $180.83 101 45201 240 036994 INSITUFORM TECHNOLOGIES USA, 8" pipe liner $21,047.00 602 49450 530 036995 JM GRAYSTONE OIL CO., INC fuel $99.06 101 43125 210 036995 JM GRAYSTONE OIL CO., INC fuel $161.11 105 42220 210 036995 JM GRAYSTONE OIL CO., INC UPS charges $12.81 602 49490 322 036995 JM GRAYSTONE OIL CO., INC fuel $99.06 101 43120 210 036996 KEEPRS, INC/CY'S UNIFORMS batteries & lamp $108.34 101 42120 220 036996 KEEPRS, INC/CY'S UNIFORMS single star $6.33 101 42120 171 036996 KEEPRS, INC/CY'S UNIFORMS J Klein-2 shirts $83.90 101 42120 171 036997 KERN, DEWENTER, VI ERE, L TD audit 2005 $3,500.00 101 41540 301 036998 KLN DISTRIBUTING, INC nobilis system $1,403.03 101 41430 220 036998 KLN DISTRIBUTING, INC terminal $1,327.94 437 41430 582 036999 LARSON EXCAVATING Callaway St $10,065.73 425 43122 530 037000 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES Loss Control $20.00 101 42140 331 037001 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRUST Gen Liability $1,550.00 101 45201 361 037001 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRUST Gen Liability $7,450.00 101 43120 361 037001 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRUST Gen Liability $600.00 101 41110 361 037001 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRUST D Taufen $435.14 601 49440 151 037001 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRUST Gen Liability $2,150.00 101 45202 361 037001 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRUST Gen Liability $17,750.00 105 42220 361 037001 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRUST Gen Liability $658.00 101 41941 361 037001 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRUST Gen Liability $484.00 602 49473 361 037001 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRUST Gen Liability $7,950.00 602 49480 361 037001 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRUST Gen Liability $484.00 602 49471 361 CITY OF ST JOSEPH Bills Payable March 14, 2006 Check Search Name Comments Amount FUND DEPART OBJ Nbr 037001 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRUST Gen Liability $5,450.00 601 49440 361 037001 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRUST Gen Liability $5,950.00 101 42120 361 037001 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRUST Gen Liability $1,950.00 101 41430 361 037001 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRUST Gen Liability $50.00 101 41942 361 037001 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRUST Gen Liability $485.00 602 49470 361 037001 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRUST Gen Liability $484.00 602 49472 361 037001 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRUST Gen Liability $50.00 101 41310 361 037002 LEE'S ACE HARDWARE supplies $129.02 101 43120 220 037002 LEE'S ACE HARDWARE supplies $50.94 602 49450 220 037002 LEE'S ACE HARDWARE supplies $13.27 101 45201 220 037002 LEE'S ACE HARDWARE supplies $28.88 101 41942 220 037002 LEE'S ACE HARDWARE supplies $4.14 101 45202 220 037003 LEEF BROS rugs, towels $119.87 101 41430 220 037003 LEEF BROS clothing exp $55.96 601 49440 171 037003 LEEF BROS rugs, towels $49.43 101 42120 220 037003 LEEF BROS clothing exp $55.95 602 49490 171 037003 LEEF BROS clothing exp $55.95 101 43120 171 037003 LEEF BROS clothing exp $55.95 101 45202 171 037004 LOSO'S STORE supplies $12.55 101 42120 200 037005 LOSO, NATHAN 1 Council Mtg, 2 $90.00 101 41950 103 037006 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH M Sworksi License $23.00 601 49440 446 037006 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH J Marthaler $23.00 602 49490 446 037007 MINNESOTA ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO bulbs for city hall $253.07 101 41942 210 037007 MINNESOTA ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO credit from -$104.63 101 45201 210 037008 MINNESOTA ELEVATOR, INC service-March $77.17 101 41942 220 037009 MN BOARD OF PEACE OFFICER o Pfannenstein $90.00 101 42120 446 037010 MN COUNTY ATTORNEY'S ASSOC DUI forfeiture form $26.63 101 42120 200 037010 MN COUNTY ATTORNEY'S ASSOC 2005 Criminal $15.98 101 42120 433 037011 MOTOROLA radio repair sIn $79.01 105 42250 230 037012 MUNICIPAL DEVELOPMENT CORP eda contract $2,014.02 150 46500 300 037014 NORTHLAND SECURITIES, INC 2005 disclosure $1,125.00 331 47100 621 037015 ONE CALL CONCEPTS, INC notification-feb $6.52 601 49440 319 037015 ONE CALL CONCEPTS, INC notification-feb $6.53 602 49490 319 037017 R: L. LARSON EXCAVATING, INC Liberty Pointe $55,391.59 428 43124 530 037017 R. L. LARSON EXCAVATING, INC East Baker $3,498.78 501 49470 530 037018 RAJ KOWS KI HANSMEIER LTD Dev Agreement $57.50 101 41610 304 037018 RAJKOWSKI HANSMEIER LTO polices $359.50 101 41610 304 037018 RAJKOWSKI HANSMEIER L TO Water Pit $703.50 434 49440 530 037018 RAJKOWSKI HANSMEIER L TO Trunk Water Main $42.00 434 49440 530 037018 RAJKOWSKI HANSMEIER L TO Arcon Dev $187.50 101 41610 304 037018 RAJKOWSKI HANSMEIER L TO Criminal Matters $1,820.00 101 42120 304 037018 RAJKOWSKI HANSMEIER L TO Meetings $1,375.00101 41610 304 037018 RAJKOWSKI HANSME.IER L TO Police Matters $458.50 101 42120 304 037018 RAJKOWSKI HANSMEIER LTO Annexation $150.00 101 41610 304 037018 RAJKOWSKI HANSMEIER L TO Bldg Maintenance $11.50 101 41610 304 037018 RAJKOWSKI HANSMEIER LTO '99 Ford Escort $92.00 101 42120 304 037018 RAJKOWSKI HANSMEIER LTO Criminal appeal $748.73 101 42120 304 037018 RAJKOWSKI HANSMEIER LTO Meadowvale $750.00 101 41610 304 037018 RAJKOWSKI HANSMEIER LTD Verizon $80.50 101 41610 304 037018 RAJKOWSKI HANSMEIER LTD Ordiances $145.50 101 41130 304 037018 RAJKOWSKI HANSMEIER L TO Trobec's $25.00 101 41610 304 037019 RANDY KRAMER EXCAVATING 16th Ave $4,404.70 430 49451 530 037020 REED CONSTRUCTION DATA ad for 2006 street $216.24 438 43120 530 037021 RIDGEWATER COLLEGE Haz Mat Refresher $200.00 105 42240 443 037022 SEH New Water $17,907.44 434 49440 530 037022 SEH Wellhead $3,288.15 434 49440 530 037022 SEH Mise GIS Services $1,405.00 101 43131 303 037023 SPRINT Jan 15 thru Feb 14 $153.54 101 42151 321 037024 ST. CLOUD HOSPITAL Salzer, Muyres Hep $162.00 105 42210 305 037025 ST. CLOUD TIMES Police Officer ad $514.91 101 42120 340 037026 TOS METROCOM telephone $56.81 601 49440 321 037026 TOS METROCOM telephone $55.46 602 49473 321 CITY OF ST JOSEPH Bills Payable March 14, 2006 Check Search Name Comments Amount FUND DEPART OBJ Nbr 037026 TDS METROCOM telephone $53.46 602 49471 321 037026 TDS METROCOM telephone $55.46 602 49472 321 037026 TDS METROCOM telephone $100.38 602 49470 321 037026 TDS METROCOM telephone $226.05 101 41430 321 037026 -TDS METROCOM telephone $89.03 602 49490 321 037026 TDS METROCOM telephone $100.12 105 42250 321 037026 TDS METROCOM telephone $53.46 101 41946 321 037026 TDS METROCOM telephone $267.04 101 42151 321 037026 TDS METROCOM telephone $189.93 101 45201 321 037026 TDS METROCOM telephone $41.00 150 46500 321 037026 TDS METROCOM telephone $53.46 101 41941 321 037027 TIREMAXX SERVICE CENTERS kcar brake repair $494.51 101 43120 220 037027 TIREMAXX SERVICE CENTERS kcar brake repair $494.51 101 42152 220 037028 TRAUT WELLS Water $70.00 601 49420 312 037028 TRAUT WELLS Water $64.00 601 49420 312 037028 TRAUT WELLS New Municipal $27,384.93 434 49440 530 037029 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED 2 tasers $1,720.89 437 42120 580 037030 US CABLE internet service $40.55 105 42250 321 037030 US CABLE internet $50.55 101 41430 321 037031 VERIZON WIRELESS cell phone $15.26 601 49440 321 037031 VERIZON WIRELESS cell phone $15.26 602 49490 321 037031 VERIZON WIRELESS cell phone $7.63 101 45202 . 321 037031 VERIZON WIRELESS cell phone $171.54 101 42151 321 037031 VERIZON WIRELESS cell phone-March $45.62 105 42250 321 037031 VERIZON WIRELESS cell phone $18.41 101 41430 321 037031 VERIZON WIRELESS cell phone $7.63 101 43120 321 037032 VISIONAIR RMS Software $199.07 101 42120 215 037033 XCEL ENE.RGY February Usage $30.79 101 43120 381 037033 XCEL ENERGY February Usage $751.17 101 41942 381 037033 XCEL ENERGY February Usage $31.32 101 42610 386 037033 XCEL ENERGY February Usage $2,163.35 101 43160 386 037033 XCEL ENERGY February Usage $60.86 101 45202 381 037033 XCEL ENERGY February Usage $9.83 101 45123 .381 037033 XCEL ENERGY February Usage $23.16 101 45123 383 037033 XCEL ENERGY February Usage $247.92 601 49435 381 037033 XCEL ENERGY February Usage $1,350.82 101 41941 383 037033 XCEL ENERGY February Usage $8.20 101 42500 326 037033 XCEL ENERGY February Usage $644.68 101 41942 383 037033 XCEL ENERGY February Usage $42.19 101 45201 381 037033 XCEL ENERGY February Usage $63.29 101 43120 381 037033 XCEL ENERGY February Usage $638.85 101 45201 383 037033 XCEL ENERGY February Usage $113.38 602 49470 381 037033 XCEL ENERGY February Usage $1,218.57 101 41941 381 037033 XCEL ENERGY February Usage $21.30 602 49471 383 037033 XCEL ENERGY February Usage $18.87 101 45201 381 037033 XCEL ENERGY February Usage $357.52 602 49480 383 037033 XCEL ENERGY February Usage $524.40 602 49480 381 037033 XCEL ENERGY February Usage $184.92 601 49410 383 037033 XCEL ENERGY February Usage $199.30 101 45202 381 037033 .XCEL ENERGY February Usage $391.04 101 43120 383 037033 XCEL ENERGY February Usage $26D.68 101 45201 383 037033 XCEL ENERGY February Usage $17.03 101 43120 381 037033 XCEL ENERGY February Usage $11.35 101 45201 381 037033 XCEL ENERGY February Usage $685.77 601 49410 381 037034 ZEF'MANUFACTURING supplies $126.82 101 45202 220 037034 ZEP MANUFACTURING supplies $126.82 101 45201 220 037034 ZEP MANUFACTURING supplies $126.81 101 41942 220 $266,441.10 Attachment: Yes REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: March 10, 2006 Engineering ORIGINA TING DEPARTMENT DEPARTMENT APPROVAL AGENDA ITEM Water Treatment Plant Change Order No.1 PREVIOUS ACTION . I Authorized Notice of Award. RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION Authorize Change Order No.1 to meet OSHA requirements at existing Water Treatment Plant. FISCAL IMPACT $4,503.00 COMMENTS/RECOMMENDA nONS , The existing Water Treatment Plant was subject to an OSHA inspection in 2005. As part of the corrective action requirements from OSHA, an existing eyewash was deemed inadequate needs to be replaced with a new combination safety shower/eyewash. This work is necessary to meet the OSHA requirements for the existing chemical room. This work is not required as part of the current WTP project, but it is proposed to complete this work as a change order to the current contract for cost efficiency purposes. Modifications for the new chemical room (at the existing WTP) already includes a safety shower/eyewash in the project costs. X:\PT\stjoe\common\D39 Req Council ActionlBLANK REQ FOR COUNCIL ACTION.doc ~ SEH CHANGE ORDER City of Saint Joseph OWNEER March 3, 2006 DATE OWNEER'S PROJEECT NO.. Water Treatment Facility PROJECT DESCRIPTlo.N 1 CHANGE ORDER NO.. A-STJOE0506.06 SEH FILE NO. The tollowing changes shall be made to. the cantract dacuments: Descriptio.n: Remove eyewash in chemical room at existing water treatment plant and install new safety shower/eyewash and all associated piping. Purpose af Change Order: New safety shower/eyewash installation is needed because the existing eyewash was deemed inadequate during a recent OSHA inspection. Basis of Cost: !81 Actual 0 Estimated Attachments (list supporting documents) See attached documents from Contractor and Mechanical Subcontractor listing expenses for change order. Cost $5,764,932.90 Contract Status Original Contract Net Change Prior C. O. 's to. Change this C.O. $4,503.00 Revised Cantract . $5,769435.90 Recommended for Appraval: Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc. by c:::;:? /I.~ E 4 ~J_ Thomas E.. Wesolowski, P.l:. Time Agreed to. by Contractar: Approved far Owner: BY John T. Jones Construction Co. BY City of Saint Joseph TITLE TITLE Distribution Contractor 2 Owner 1 Project Representative 1 SEH Offfce 1 JC\pllsljoe\05060017-ca\change orders \change order J.doc 1104 Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc., 3535 Vadnais Center Drive, 51. Paul, MN 55110-5196 5EH is an equal opportunity employer I www.sehlnc.com I 651.490.2000 I 800.325.2055 I 651.490.2150 fax St. Joesph, MN Water Treatment Plant JT J PROJECT # 0503 PROPOSED CHANGE: 1 MATERIAL 2 Material Cost 3 Sales Tax 4 Material Handling Cost 5 Expendable Material Cost 6 TOTAL MATERIAL COST 7 LABOR Manhours Supervision 8 Fringe Benifits 9 Hourly Labor Cost 10 Labor Overhead 11 Tool Replacement Cost 12 TOTAL LABOR COST 13 EQUIPMENT COSTS 14 OTHER DIRECT COSTS 15 16 MARKUP 17 Safety Shower/Eyewash SUMMARY SHEET @ @ @ 0.0 @ O.O@ 0.0 @ @ @ SUBTOTAL @ SUBTOTAL 18 SUBCONTRACT COST 19 MARKUP @ 20 TOTAL SUB CONTRACT COST 21 SUBTOTAL 22 BOND COST @ . 23 BUILDERS RISK 24 SUBTOTAL PROPOSED CHANGE ORDER REQUEST # PCO # DATE 02/17/06 5% 5% 5% $30.00 $40.00 $0.00 45% 5% 15% 5% 1% -After 30 days we reserve our right to renegotiate this proposal if it is not turned into a fully executed change order. - This proposal may be withdrawn by John T. Jones Const. Co. if not accepted within 10 days. -Payment to be made within 30 days of date of invoice. 25~ $4,5031 CHANGE REQUEST TOTAL I j DIRECT COSTS SUBCONTRACTOR #1 Weidner's TOTAL SUBCONTRACTOR #2 TOTAL SUBCONTRACTOR #3 TOTAL SUBCONTRACTOR #4 TOTAL $4,139.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $4,139.00 SUBCONTRACTS $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 SUBCONTRACTOR TOTAL $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $4,139.00 0.2/1612006 17:27 FAX 7017742375 John T. Jones Const. .' ;)\?J Wf Weidner's MEC,HANICAL CONTRACTORS :-> JTJ Jl""''''''~81rs IaI 0011002 29 Wilson Ave. N.E. . P.O. Box 1087 · St. Cloud, MN 66302 · 3201252-3000. Fax 33S!-~5~iW RECk:IVI: FEB 0 3 2006 Febmary 1, 2006 John T. Jones Construction Co. 2213 7lh Ave N. PO Box 2424 Fargo, ND 58108 Attn: Vicky Nikle Re: Eyewash Addition for St. Joseph Water Treatment Plant Dear Vicky: JOHN -f. JONES CONSTRUCTION VN :s13 _ CJSCX The following is the breakdown for the addition of a Safety Shower/Eyewash at St. Joseph Water Treatment Plant. Pipe, fittings and hangers Labor (18 @ $61) Subtotal 10% Mark up Total $2,665.00 1.098.00 $3,763.00 376.00 $4,139.00 Please issue a change order. Sincerely, ~~ WEIDNER'S MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS Attachment: Yes REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: March 10. 2006 Engineering ORIGINA TING DEPARTMENT DEPARTMENT APPROVAL AGENDA ITEM Water Treatment Plant Change Order No.2 PREVIOUS ACTION Authorized Notice of Award. RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION Authorize Change Order No.2 to increase size of raw water site piping and associated items. FISCAL IMPACT $23,257.00 COMMENTS/RECOMMENDA TIONS The present design calls for the installation of three wells to provide the required 2 million gallons per day (MGD) of water to the treatment plant with the need to add an additional three wells in the future when the plant is expanded to treat 4 MGD. As part of this project pipeline for the three wells is to be installed as well as portions of the pipelines for the future wells. The portions installed for the future wells include where the pipe enters the building and the piping located under the paved parking area and access road. Pumping tests conducted on the three wells that have been installed show that the wells are capable of providing water at higher rates than expected. Based on those results only four wells would be required to provide the future water requirement of 4 million gallons per day, not six. The raw water piping was designed for the lower flow rate and is not large enough to handle the higher rate that the wells will be able to provide. To accommodate future higher flows the raw water site piping and associated valves and fittings from the three wells installed would be increased from 6-inch to 8-inch and the portion of the piping to be installed for one of the future wells would also be increased. The remaining two portions of pipelines to be installed for future wells would not be needed and removed from the project. Modifications to interior piping will also have to be made to accommodate the future higher flows. Installing the larger piping will allow larger well pumps to be installed in the existing wells in the future, which will be able to provide higher flow rates to the water treatment plant without additional site piping. Also, due to the higher flow rates allowed by the piping only one future well will be required instead of three. The savings associated with not installing two wells is estimated at $186,000, based on 2006 dollars. Please see attached well cost breakdown. X:\PT\Stjoe\050600\7-ca\Change Orders\C02 RCA.doc Jt.. SEH CHANGE ORDER City of Saint Joseph OWNER March 9, 2006 DATE OWNER'S PROJECT NO. Water Treatment Facility PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2 CHANGE ORDER NO. A-STJOE0506.06 SEH FILE NO. The following changes shall be made to the contract documents: Description: Increase well site piping, interiQr pipng and associated valves and fittings from 6" to 8", see attached sheet. Purpose of Change Order: To provide for future higher flow rates from the wells. Basis of Cost: ISI Actual Attachments (list supporting documents) See attached documents from Contractor o Estimated Contract Status Time Original Contract Net Change Prior C. O. 's ...L to Change this C. O. Revised Contract Recommended for Approval: Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc. by Cost $5,764,932.90 4,503.00 $23,257.00 $5,792,692.90 Thomas E. Wesolowski, P.E. Agreed to by Contractor: Approved for Owner: BY John T. Jones Construction Co. BY City of Saint Joseph TITLE TITLE Distribution Contractor 2 Owner 1 Project Representative 1 SEH Office 1 x:\pt\stjoe\050600\7-ca\change orders\change order 2.doc 1/04 Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc., 35:;5 Vadnais Center Drive, St. Paul, MN 55110-5196 SEH is an equal opportunity employer I www.5ehinc.com I 651.490.2000 I 800.325.2055 I 651.490.2150 fax Change Order #2 Attachment Schedule A - Lump Sum Bid Changes 1. Increasing the size of the raw water piping that enters the building from 6" to 8" and removing the piping and fittings associated with two of pipelines that were to be installed for future well connections. 2. Increasing the size of butterfly valves V-RW-6A, 7A, 8A & 9A from 6" to 8" and removing valves V -R W -lOA & llA. 3. Installing 8" x 6" reducers, flange coupling adapters, 16" x 10" reducers, and modifications to spool pieces on each of the three raw water supply pipelines. 4. Modifying the main raw water heading piping by removing the 16" x 12" reducer, the five - 12" x 10" tees, and two - 10" blind flanges. Replace with three - 16" tees, one - 16" 90 degree bend, one - 16" blind flange, and required spool pieces. Increase the size of butterfly valves V-RW-6B, 7B & 8B from 10" to 16". Total Cost for Schedule A - Lump Sum Changes $12,567.00 Schedule B - Unit Price Changes 1. Delete Bid Item 0254.006 - 6-inch DIP Water Main, Class 52 1870 LF @ $50.60/LF 2. Add Bid Item 0254.008 - 8-inch DIP Water Main, Class 52 1550 LF @ 67.50/LF 3. Decrease Bid Item 0266.060 - 6-inch Gate Valve and Box 3 Each @ $799.25/Each 4. Add Bid Item 0266.080 - 8-inch Gave Valve and Box 3 Each @ $1,028.25 ($94,622.00) $104,625.00 ($2,397.75) $3,084.75 Total Cost for Schedule B - Unit Price Changes $10,690.00 Total Cost for Change Order #2 $23,257.00 X:\PTlStjoeI05060017-caIChange OrderslChange Order 2 allachment.doc Estimate Costs for Future Wells Saint Joseph Water Treatment Plant A-ST JOE0506.06 March 10, 2006 Item Well Construction Pitless Unit and Security Enclosure Submersible Pump Electrical 6" DIP Water Main 6" Gate Valve and Box Hydrant Total Cost all Items Amount 2 LS 2 LS 2 LS 2 LS 600 LF 4 Ea 2 Ea Unit Cost $35,000 $15,000 $15,000 $10,000 $45 $1,000 $2,500 Total Cost $70,000 $30,000 $30,000 $20,000 $27,000 $4,000 $5,000 $186,000 I Attachment: .. or No REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: March 13, 2006 Water ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Dick Taufen DEPARTMENT APPROVAL AGENDA ITEM Rehab Well No.4 PREVIOUS ACTION Yearly maintenance on wells every 3rd year. RECOMMENDED BOARD ACTION Approval for Traut Wells to perform the yearly rehab for Well No.4. FISCAL IMP ACT $4,120.00 COMMENTS/RECOMMENDATIONS Fe b .28, 2006 1 2: 30 PM TRAUT WELLS No.0095 P, 2 _'-1 141 28th Ave South Waite Park, MN 56387 320-251-5090 Email joetraut@trautwells.com www.trautwp.II!ll_t:om REHAB QUOTE WELL 4 DATE: 2128/2006 PHONE # FAX # 363-7201 36H863 NAME: CITY OF ST JOE ADDRESP.O. BOX668 ST JOE, MN 56374 ATTN: .DICKTAUFEN JOB # 30.6199 RE: QUOTE TO REHAB WELL 4 WELL 4 WAS LAST WORKED ON IN APRIL 2003 Description Unit MOB/DEMOB TO REMOVE PUMP REMOVE PUMPS FROM WELL UNLOAD&DISASEMBLE PUMP MOB/DEMOB TO INSTALL PUMP & STARTUP TEST RUN DIAGNOSTICS & REPORTS INSTALL ACID IN WELL CAP & PRESSURIZE WELL CASING INSTALL/REMOVE DUAL TUBE & JETTING Ea. JET SCREEN ACID MURATIC LIQUID CHLORINE Unit Price QTY Totals HR. 100.00 1 $ 100.00 HR. 150.00 4 $ 600.00 HR. 85.00 4 $ 340.00 HR. 100.00 2 $ 200.00 HR. 65.00 1 $ 65.00 HR. 150.00 1 $ 150.00 HR. 150.00 3 $ 450.00 HR. 150.00 4 $ 600.00 HR. 150.00 5 $ 750.00 GAL 5.00 175 $ 875.00 GAL 4.00 3 $ 12.00 TOTAL MA TERIAL$ TOTAL LABOR INCOMING FREIGHT TOTAL $ 887.00 $ 3,255.00 $ 4,142.00 Check No. Previous lawful gambling exemption number '736/ () State/zip code County MN 56374 Stearns Daytime phone number of CEO Include area code 820 ) 363-7505 \"; Minnesota Lawful Gambling . LG220 Application for Exempt Permit Organization Information Organization name , Church of St. Joseph Street (mailing address) City 12 W Minnesota St.' St. Jospeh Name of chief executive officer (CEO) First name Last name Rev. Gregory Miller, OSB Name of treasurer First name Peter Spaniol, . Last name Trustee . Fee $50 Page 1 of 2 06/03 For Board Use Only Fee Paid Daytime phone number of treasurer. Include area code (320) 363-7505 Type of Nonprofit Organization Check the item that best describes your organization: _ Fraternal L Religious ~ _ Veteran _ Other nonprofit organization Check the item that indicat~s the type of proof your organization attached to this application: . _ IRS letter indicating income tax exempt status (501 c designation) _ Certificate of Good Standing from the Minnesota Secretary of State's Office (must be current . _ A charter showing you are an .affiliate of a parent nonprofit organization --/ Proof pr:Yiou~ly submitted and on file with the Gambling Control Board ~Cathol~cD~rectory . Gambling Premises Information Name of premises where gambling activity will be conducted (for raffles, list the site where the drawing wIll take place) Church of St. Joseph~ Church and'School Grounds . County Address (do' not use PO box) City 12 W Minnesota St. St. Joseph Date(s )of activity (for raffles, indicate the date .ofthe drawing). 3 and 4, July 2006, Raffle Diawing July 4, 2006 Check the item(s) that indicate the type of gambling activity your organization will be ccinducting: ~ *8ingo ~ Raffles (cash prizes may not exceed $12,000) L *Paddlewheels l *Pull-tabs *Equipment for these activities must be obtained from a licensed distributor. Thls.form will be made available in altemative format (i.e. large print; Braille) upon request. The information requested on this form (and any attachments) will be used by.the Gambling Control Board . (Board) to determine your qualifications to be involved in lawful gambling activities in Minnesota. You have the right to refuse to supply the information requested; however, if you refuse to supply this information, the Board may not be able to determine your qualifications and, as a consequence, may refuse to issue you a permit. If you supply the information requested, the Board will be able to process your application. Your name and and your organization's name and address will be public information when received by the Board. All the other information that you provide will be private data about you until the Board issues your permit. When the Board issues your permit, all of the information that you have provided to the Board in the process of applying for your permit will become public. If the Board does not issue you a permit, all the information you have provided in the process of applying for a permit ~ains private, with the exception of your name and your organization's name and address which will remain public. Private data about you are available only to the following: Board members, staff of the State/zip code MN 56374. Stearns *Tipboards Board whose work assIgnment reqUires that they have access to the information; the Minnesota Department of Public Safety; the Minnesota Attomey General; the Minnesota Commissioners of Administration, Rnance, and Revenue; the Minnesota Legislative Auditor, national and international gambling regulatory agencies; anyone pursuant to court order; other individuals and agencies that are . spedfically authorized by state or federal law to have access to the information; individuals and agencies for which law or legal order authorizes a new use or sharing of information after this Notice was given; and anyone with your consent. , LG220 Application for Exempt Permit Organization Name Church of St. 'Joseph, St. Joseph, Minnesota Local Unit of Government Acknowledgment Page 2 of 2 06/03 If the gambling, premises is within city limits, the If the gambling premises is located in a township, both city must sign this application. the county and township must sign this application. On behalf of the city, I acknowledge this application. On behalf of the county, I acknowledge this application. Check the action that Check the action that the city is taking on this application. the county is taking on this application. o The city approves the application with no D The county approves the application with no waiting period. , waiting period. , ' o The city approves the application with a 30 day D The county approves the application with a 30 day waiting period, and allows the Board to issue a waiting period, and allows the Board to issue a permit after 30 days (60 days for a first class permit after 30 days. city). o The city denies the application. '0 The county denies the application. Print name of city Print name of county (Signature of city personnel receiving application) (Signature of county personnel receiving application) Title Title Date~~_ Date---.l----1_ TOWNSHIP: On behalf of the township, I acknowledge that the organization is applying for exempted 'gambling activity . within the township limits. [A township has no statutory authority to approve or deny an applicatibn (Minn. Stat. sec. 349.213, subd. 2).] Print name of township (Signature of township official acknowledging application) Title Date----.!----.!_ Chief Executive Officer's Signature , The information provided in this aPPli~~tion is co~plete and accura~e to the best of my knowledge. Chief executive officers signalure t u( <4 ;u.tr!u.. a5{J- ;"10 Name (please print) Rev. Gregory Miller, OSB Date 3 ,-06 Mail Application and Attachments At least 45 days prior to your scheduled activity date send: . the completed application, . a copy of your proof of nonprofit status, and . a check for $50. Make check payable to "State of Minnesota". Application fees are not prorated, refundable, or transferable. Send to: Gambling Control Board 1711 West County Road B, Suite 300 South Roseville, MN 55113 I Attachment: Yes or No REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Scherer Trucking Rezoning - Comp Plan Amendment DATE: March 16,2006 ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT DEPARTMENT APPROVAL AGENDA ITEM Scherer Trucking PREVIOUS ACTION The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on Monday, March 13,2006. The public hearing included consideration of an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan and to rezone all the property owned by Scherer Trucking to B2, Highway Business. In January the Planning Commission authorized the public hearing and expanded the area to include all the property up to Ith Avenue. This addition included two homes. The Planning Commission recommended the Council amend the Future Land Use Map for Planning District 9 illustrating B2 Highway Business from the Scherer property east to 12th Avenue. Based on the input received from the public, the Planning Commission only recommended the Council rezone the property owned by Scherer Trucking. As can be seen from the following information, the request for rezoning has been submitted to allow the expansion of the parking area for Scherer Trucking. Currently Scherer parks the trucks on the north side ofCR 75 near GM Drilling. Scherer Trucking has agreed to meet the Ordinance requirements and provide a dense natural screen on Minnesota Street. RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION Two actions are required by the City Council: 1. Accept the recommendation of the Planning Commission and amend the Land Use Map of Planning District 9, allowing B2 Highway Business adjacent to 12th Avenue and the property currently owned by Scherer Trucking. 2. Accept the recommendation of the Planning Commission and amend the Zoning Map to rezone the outlot owned by Scherer Trucking from the current R3 to B2 Highway Business and to rezone the Scherer property abutting MN Street from the current Rl to B2, Highway Business. CITY OF ST. JOSEPH www.cityofstjoseph.com The meeting for March 6, 2006 has been canceled and rescheduled for March 13 at 7:00 PM Administrator Judy Weyrens Public Hearing City of St. Joseph Mayor Richard Carlbom Councilors AI Rassier Ross Rieke Renee Symanietz Dale Wick The St. Joseph Planning Commission shall conduct a public hearing on Monday, March 13, 2006 at 7 :00 PM. The purpose of the hearing is to consider amending the Comprehensive Plan changing the future land use plan for the property described below to B2 Highway Business and to consider the rezoning ofthe same property. The area for consideration is as follows: 1005 East Minnesota Street from current R3 to B2 Highway Business 1007, 1013, 1019 East Minnesota Street from current R1 to B2 Highway Business The Comprehensive Plan and rezoning is being considered to allow Scherer Trucking to expand the parking area to 1005 East Minnesota Street and to consider extending the B2 Zoning District to allow for commercial expansion along 1th Avenue NE. I,;V~lWA.t) 15 CQlJN.ry:RtIA075 5 ~"'-"'."."'."""."""""-'f"""~~ ~ ,. "'"'......_~-,-,..... = Project Area Judy W eyrens Administrator Publish: March 4, 2006 2." College Avenue North' PO Box 668 . Saint. Joseph. Minnesota .,6,74 Phone ,2.0.,6,72.01 Fax ,2.0.,6,.0,42 - e fl I i I f ; f ! I <n 1'- I .. (/) (j e i -r-- i ! ~ J i i 1 i i i i i i i i i i i ! i i i i i i i i i i ! ~:c E-< C,) O~ 2 N 0 ~ E-<O' 0 (f.) N ~CS i:l< '" r.a uJ IX) ~~ CI:lg:; ::< c:< uJ u - . :J uJ U~ E-< el :J en ~ .~.~: , nd , ~ ~ ~ " H P ~~ ' i .."h~ dH I !. ~ j ~ ~ ! i" t ~ · 5, I . . -'E--il! 'g~! ... i~~i~~;~g~iniin O~IIIIOIIIOD~IO~~ i _."~ 000" :J.~6J.!i>IPOO9\DO:l\...orO\901.:.S\;'" J\id .liS1rs;m ~CREATE COMMUNITY ~Ar'..t tZN.t OJ:;PurtWtfttt /i>r ,411 I S AI AH Great River Interfaith Partnership (GRIP) 81. Cloud Area TO: Mayor Richard Carlbom and S1. Joseph City Council Members FROM: The Regional Human Rights Task Force DATE: March 7, 2006 RE: INFORMATION FOR THE TASK FORCE PRESENTATION ON MARCH 16 Enclosed please find background information for the Regional Human Rights Task Force presentation scheduled for Thursday, March 16. We intend to do a brief power point presentation followed by time for discussion. The Task Force has completed research on "Exploring the Needs and Benefits of a Regional Human Rights Office" and has entered the next phase of our work-researching models and cost. The purpose of meeting with you is to update you on our progress, highlight the needs and benefits of a regional approach to human rights, and entertain questions that you might have as we move forward. Thank you for the opportunity to meet with you and we look forward to seeing you on March 16. REGIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS TASK FORCE CREATE CommUNITY: Mark Sakry, Co-Chair of Regional Human Rights Task Force DeWayne Mareck GRIP (Great River Interfaith Partnership)..;, Mark Jaede, Co-Chair of Regional Human Rights Task Force Charlotte Stephens CITY REPRESENTATION: Waite Park: Mayor Carla Schaefer St. Cloud: Mayor Dave Kleis Sartell: Mayor Robert Pogatshnik Sauk Rapids: Marilyn Patterson, City Council Member St. Joseph: Renee Symanietz, City Council Member Cold Spring: Michael D. Kathman COUNTY REPRESENTATION: Stearns: Don Otte, County Commissioner Sherburne: Chuck Roehrdanz Benton: Earl "Butch" Bukowski COMMUNITY REPRESENTATION: Debra -Leigh, CARE Committee Mark Ochu, NAACP President Dan Anderson, Human Rights Commission Chair Felix Tristani, Casa Guadalupe/Cold Spring RESOURCE ASSISTANTS: Silvia, Ferraretto, Community Services Director, City of S1. Cloud Ruth Weichman, GRIP Organizer Baba Odukale, Human Rights Director, City of S1. Cloud Sue Wilken, Recording Secretary, City of S1. Cloud FACILITATOR: R. Joseph Hobson Paul L. Ringsmuth (alternate) Bob Johnson ( alternate) Anita Rasmussen (alternate) Ross Olson (alternate) Allen Rassier ( alternate) Roxanne Chmielewski (alternate) Dan Lieser (alternate) Mary Clifford (alternate) John McCray, NAACP (alternate) Marcia Summers (alternate) Dara Fernandez (alternate) . PRESENTATION BY THE REGIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS TASK FORCE ON EXPLORING THE NEED FOR CREATION OF A REGIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS OFFICE Why Create A Regional Human Rights Office? Having an effective regional office makes a public policy statement that human rights violations will not be tolerated. It lets people know that when human rights violations occur, offenders will be held accountable. A goal of the Regional Human Rights Office is to create a welcoming climate within our communities. Jb.: ~~~ : t., . :_-~ . Our Local Story Let us begin by sharing a local Human Interest Story that demonstrates an experience of a human rights violation. . It is often easier to become outraged by injustice halfa world away than by oppression and discrimination half a block from home. -Carl T. Rowan Stories often bring to life the realities around human rights violations. 4l AN EXPERIENCE OF DISCRIMINATION Human rights refers to the concept of human beings as having universal rights, or status, regardless of legal jurisdiction. 4;~_ 1 4+t_ These rights commonly include the right to an adequate standard of living, freedom from torture and other mistreatment, freedom of religion and of expression, freedom of movement, the right to self-determination, the right to education, and the right to partiCipation in cultural and political life. !.\l~..~.. i) \~ To understand who is covered by Human Rights Legislation it is important to review the MN Department of Human Rights Law chart showing Protected Classes and Areas of Protection. Minnesota Human Rights Law Reality of Discriminations in OUf Local Region . Are human rights violations reall'{ happening in my community? Minnesota Human Rights Law MltlNESOTA DfPARTMHiI Of Human ~ Give to every human being every right that you claim for yourself. -Robert . Ingersoll .. 11 II ~ & 11 ll:" 1 ~t . .'l ~ .g J ,I PROTECTED-CLASSES i ! i ~ m 51! . ~ r;;;;-- I. ..1.. -1i: ,...... I. . -I- -- !N~tionalOrlglb: I. . .1.1. .i. iMa"\alStatu~ I. ..1 I. .1 PubUcllrt.,"l~noe .. I.i.. i ., s..uar OrlentatlQn .. .!.I. .. , ~a.lHU~RiIlIttsC~""'.Al:t:hitrI. i i Reality of Discrimination in Our Region . Currently only the City of St. Cloud, by ordinance, operates a Human Rights Office and Commission whose purpose is to promote Human Rights through education, individual assessment, investigation, information and referral. 2 Reality of Discrimination in Our Region ill, '~ . . Between March and December 2004 the number of persons in the City of St. Cloud who benefited from the services of the St. Cloud Human Rights Office/Commission totalled 3,041. DATA FROM THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RIGHTS . Occurred in . Cold Spring 2 . Sauk Rapids 3 . St. Cloud 29 . St. Joseph 3 . Sartell 2 . Waite Park 4 Resident of Cold Spring Sauk Rapids St. Cloud St. Joseph Sartell Waite Park 1 4 33 1 2 5 2004 Total 43 2004 Total 46 DATA FROM ST CLOUD AREA LEGAL SERVICES With regard to housing discrimination, their most frequent complaints comefrom the protected classes of race/nationality, disability, and familial status. During 2005, St. Cloud Area Legal Services opened 42- 47 housing discrimination cases in the region. People Served in St. Cloud Alone · Number of individuals attempting to file complaints . 601 . Actual complaints investigated 105 · Number of HR Commission sponsored presentations and education events/participants 4/450 . Number of presentations and education events/participants conducted by the Human Rights Office 40/1,990 Total Number Benefiting 3,041 DATAFROMSTCLOUDAREA LEGAL SERVICES St. Cloud Area Legal Services provides free legal assistance in several areas of civil law, but only to people who qualify based on income guidelines. Often, individuals who may have legitimate discrimination complaints are ineligible for assistance due to the amount of their income. Those individuals may not be able to afford other legal help, and if they are not residents of the City of St. Cloud, those claims may not be reviewed or enforced. DATA FROM EEOC (EQual Emplovment Opportunity Commission) From October 1, 2002 to December 12, 2005, 98 charges of employment discrimination were filed against companies in Benton, Sherburne and Steams Counties. Benton County - 9 charges filed Sherburne County -15 charges filed Steams County - 74 charges filed Total = 98 3 STORIES AND TESTIMONIALS FROM TASK FORCE QUESTIONNAIRE DEMONSTRATE THE NEED FOR A REGIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS OFFICE STORIES AND TESTIMONIALS Paula Erdmann, Director of Tri-County Action program- "We see people here for help with housing saying they have been discriminated against because of color. I have worked with this agency for over 29 years and the area has needed a single office for Human Rights all that time. It simply makes sense to have the service available for a larger area so issues can be dealt with quickly. Unless someone helps with the paperwork, many low income people do not file with the state even though they have what appears to be a good case." STORIES AND TESTIMONIALS Rich Diedrichsen from Deaf and Hard of Hearing Services- "We have a number of cases where people who are deaf want to do everyday things that all of us do-buy a car, house or other major purchase; seek the advice of an attorney; seek the advice of an accountant to start a business or limit their tax liability; learn to drive, etc.-and in most cases the business or service provider refused to provide an interpreter. If they experience this kind of discrimination in a surrounding township, rural area or even a city outside of St. Cloud, they find themselves with no forum where by they can make their voice he"rd." STORIES AND TESTIMONIALS Director of Hands Across the World who teaches English to new immigrants- "Students tell me stories about how supervisors or companies are taking advantage of them, asking them to work many hours without breaks. There is a big population in Benton County and Cold Spring in need of protection. Businesses will stop taking advantage of minority workers if they see an office of human right in this area." STORIES AND TESTIMONIALS HR Manager for Bauerly Companies in Sauk Rapids- "The potential benefit of a Regional Human Rights Office would be to provide training, consulting, and a resource for employees and managers on human rights and discrimination issues. " "America has never really addressed the issue of acism in this country, of prejudice, or discrimination... nd so as long as you don't address something, it's like aving an open wound..." Tyrone Terrill, Director, St Paul Department of Human Rights 4 Reality of Discrimination in Our Region Costs .Cost of Discrimination to Those Being Victimized .Cost of Discrimination to the Community '@1 Cost of Discrimination to the Community . While direct victims bear the worst effects, the whole community suffers from human rights violations Cost of Discrimination to the Community . Loss of valuable workers. ., People who face discrimination may take their skills elsewhere. Cost of Discrimination to those being victimized . Denied employment . Denied housing opportunities . Personal Insults . Unprepared to respond to stereotypes, prejudices, and lower expectations . Mistrust . Verbal attacks . Physical Violence . Toll of planning daily how to respond Cost of Discrimination to the Community . Loss of workers . Loss of inv~stment. . Loss of customers. . Harm to loved ones. . Sharing the blame. . Reduced quality of life Cost of Discrimination to the Community . Loss of business investment. \"~"! ' ~~{~ Businesses prefer to locate in communities where they and their workers can feel safe and welcome. 5 Cost of Discrimination to the Community . Loss of customers. Customers take many forms - restaurant patrons, tourists, university students, tenants, mall customers. They will not visit, shop, live, and study where they feel unwelcome. Cost of Discrimination to the Community . Reduced quality of life. Everyone's self-esteem can be lowered by shameful acts in the community. Victims reasonably become suspicious of their neighbors, and that undermines an atmosphere of trust for all. Everyone's sense of safety and danger is distorted The Need for a Regional Office 2. Barriers to accessing the State Office in St. Paul . a. Processing a complaint is done through phone calls and written questionnaires . b. This back and forth exchange can take up to a year . c. It takes a great deal of trust that the process will work or is worth the effort Cost of Discrimination to the Community . Sharing the blame. When some people practice discrimination with impunity, the reputation of the whole community suffers. People of good will see their ideals betrayed and their community disgraced. The Need for a Regional Office · More diversity in the area; More need . a. Nonwhite population in Benton Sherburne, and Stearns increased almost 23% from 2000 to 2003 . b. Racial and ethnic diversity will continue to increase rather than decline . c. Newcomers frequently do not have a network of relationships to support them The Need for a Regional Office 3. Face-to-face services would be more effective . a) In gathering the needed information quickly . b) In dealing with language and cultural issues . c) In making referrals to those whose problems are not human rights issues . d) In helping to lessen the frustration of those who believe they have been the target of discrimination but do not have enough supporting evidence 6 The .Need for a Regional Office 4. State has limited resources . a) Most cases judged on written statements . b) Only a small percentage is so clearly discriminatory that no additional investigation is required . c) Only cases that have potential for major impact are investigated to determination . The Need for a Regional Office . 1. More diversity in the area; More need . 2. Barriers to accessing the State Office in St. Paul . 3. Face-to-face services would be more effective .4. State has limited resources . 5. St. Cloud Human Rights Office is not available to neighboring communities Benefits of Regional Office A St. Cloud Success Story The Need for a Regional Office 5. St. Cloud Human Rights Office is not available to neighboring communities . a) Only serves St. Cloud residents . b) Difficult and frustrating for people from neighboring jurisdictions Our Vision/Benefits to the Region Benefits of Regional Office . A Human Rights Office Creates a Public Policy Statement 7 November, 2005 St. Cloud Times Online Chat Room A writer states: "".we can't have all these Chicagoans moving in and taking over. My family and I moved out of St. Cloud to a nice little city to the west, but sometimes I wish I was still in St. Cloud helping rid the city of this garbage. I'd like to walk down those roads of yesteryear at 2 a.m. locked and loaded and help clean the streets...." There was support in the chat room for this writer's idea for getting rid of newcomers. . Highlights of educational interactions by the Human Right office in 2005 Broad ranges of educational efforts are needed to shift perc'eptions and create a more positive climate for protected classes. . Speaker, Fourth Annual St. Cloud GLBT Film Festival, Paramount Theater (200 people) . Presentation at the African Americans - Somali Youth Summit, at Boys and Girls club (75 people) . EEOC Training: Religion in the Work Place, at City Hall. (60 people) . Fair Housing Training: (100 people) . Justice and Peace Conference: (50 people) . Stearns County .Human Services In Service (100 people) Benefits of Regional Office . Increased Availability for Local Education Educational interactions by the Human Right office in 2005 . Speaker, Rasmussen College's MLK . Observation - "Community Activism to . make change" (120 people) . Speaker, Cathedral High School, Racism in Central MN - (150 people) . Speaker, SCSU, Race and the Media -- (100 students) . ....-. Benefits of Regional Office . Increased Economic Development Opportunities 8 Benefits of Regional Office . A St. Cloud Success Story . A Human Rights Office Creates a Public Policy Statement . Increased Availability for Local Education . Increased Economic Development Opportunities You are a human being. You have rights inherent in that reality. You have dignity and worth that exists prior to law. -Lyn Beth Neylon ') -~- . Think Again of the Cost of Discrimination to the Community Family members and friends are not always members of the same protected groups as victims, but they suffer emotionally and materially. The able-bodied husband of a wife with disabilities suffers from housing discrimination, too. The straight mother also suffers if her gay child is . harassed. A whole family suffers economically if one member cannot get a job due to discrimination Discussion ~lf!~ . What in this presentation stands out or makes sense for you? . Based on this presentation and our discussion, what did we learn about the need for a human rights office in our local community? . What questions do you have in moving forward? 9 ~ .t.' Z t/) 0 c: Jurisdiction of the ~ 0 (.) ~ Minnesota Human Rights Act w "'C I- 0 0 E E CI) a: +" Co) a.. c: 0 '> CI) Co) ~ c: Ll- E Co) CI) 0') <C en 0 t/) 0 >- '.j:l t/) c: CI) 0 'Ci) Co) ,~ Ctl ,'I: en Q.. ,- Co) "'C c: <C ::l ::c ::c ::l CI) 'Ci) E 0 ::l ::l "'C .. ::l W w J: a.. a.. w (.) co a: PROTECTED CLASSES <C OTHER PROHIBITED PRACTICES AIDING/ABETTING AND OBSTRUCTION = The Act prohibits a person from aiding in a violation of the MHRA, coercing a person to violate the law, obstructing a person's compliance with the Act, or interfering with the Department's performance of its duties, REPRISAL = The Act prohibits reprisal or retaliation because a person opposed a practice forbidden by the MHRA, filed a charge or participated in a matter brought under the Act; or because a person associated with a person or group of persons who are disabled or of a different race, color, creed, religion, sexual orientation, or · national origin. Revised 8/1/01 enf2.pm4 HUMAN RIGHTS REGIONAL OFFICE TASK FORCE Planning Document March 2006 Human Rights Regions Office Vision PREVENTION ~ Cultural Diversity & Ordinance ~ Inability to go Beyond Ordinance . ~Community Education/Training ~ Educate what Enforcement would mean ~ Language & Cultural Barriers ~ Internal Staff Training ~ Welcoming Community EDUCATION INTERVENTION .:. Conflict. Response .:. Information gathering .:. Investigation .:. Evaluation . .:. Referrals .:. Handing Off .:. Mediation .:. Facilitate Settlement REGIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS OFFICE o Legal Right to Enforcement o Set Limits of Authority o Determine Roles/Police o Relationship with HR Office o Secure Federal Funds o . Decide Territorial Issues o Determine Aggressiveness o Collaborations/ Avoid Duplication o City/County Agreement to Prosecute/Give Legal Advice o Adequate Human Resources TEN TALENTS LEADERSIP CONSULTANTS 2 R. Joseph Hobson, Facilitator ~ Assessment )( Conflict Competent Culture ~ Who is Invo lved? ~ City/County affected ~ Civic Engagement/Respon sibilities Attachment: Yes REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: March 10, 2006 Engineering ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Tracy Ekola. PE DEPARTMENT APPROVAL AGENDA ITEM Update from on St. Cloud Wastewater Treatment Facility Expansion Plans PREVIOUS ACTION None RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION None FISCAL IMP ACT See Attached Table 2 COMMENTS/RECOMMENDATIONS Additional information and a review of the facility plan will be provided at a future joint Cities meeting to be scheduled in April 2006. Sartell City Administrator will be contacting the City with proposed meeting dates. Proposed construction for the expansion is proposed to begin in 2009. MPCA submittal and approval of the Facility Plan is expected to be completed in 2006. Permitting and design activities would begin late 2006 and be completed by 2009. X:\PT\stjoe\common\D39 Req Council ActionlBLANK REQ FOR COUNCIL ACTION.doc Table 1 Projected Customer Community Capital Cost Responsibility Treatment Option 1 - Delay Nitrification Pbase I" Phase 1,D Total Cost Communitv BlOoP UlIl!I'lldec EmllllSion" Rebab" Subtotal BNR UDl!I'lldlf Per Communitv (S) ($) (S) (S) ($) (S) StCloud 3,093,000 0 6,821,000 9,914,000 12,087,000 22,001,000 Sartell 520,000 3,747,000 1,542,000 5,809,000 3,055,000 8,864,000 Sauk Rapids 494,000 1,524,000 1,411,000 3,429,000 2,828,000 6,257,000 St Joseph 308,000 2,226,000 977,000 3,511,000 2,081,000 5,592,000 Waite Park 367,000 1,435,000 1,108,000 2,910,000 2,308,000 5,218,000 St Augus1a 124,000 2,461,000 341,000 2,926,000 987,000 3,913,000 4,906,000 11,393,000 12,200,000 28,499,000 23,346 000 51,845,000 Notes: (a) PIuIse 1 constl'ltction COIIIJIleted by ZfJlfJ to plfTfide IIDI1ia tlmJlIgla ZOI7- (6) PIuIse 2 constr"ction COIfIJJietetI by ZfJ17 to J1'OVitk SD'IIice tImJ"gh Z03IJ. . (c) Bio-P Upgnule cost aIIocIItion _don tott1l fI-1msis IlSing 2017 projectd demllIrds. (4) ExpIInslon cost tJIIoClltion basd on fJIIIJitJmud.flow bt1sis from cll1'l'eltt thl'O"gh 2017- (e) RehabilJtation cost aIIocIItion _d on tott1l.flow basis using ZfJ3fJ projected demands. (f) BNR UpgnuJe cost aIIoctdMm 1HIsetl on totIIlJl_lHtsis usbtg 2030 projectetl...... Table 2 ~ Projected Customer Community Capital Cost Respousibility Treatment Option 3 - Start with Full DNR '5l'o~ &.sf' Phase l' Phase 2 Total Cost Communitv BNR UlIl!I'lldec ExDllIISion Rebab" Subtotal Emansion Per Co_unitv ($) ($) ($) (S) ($) ($) St Cloud 10,060,000 0 6,821,000 16,881,000 3,083,000 19,964,000 Sartell 1,690,000 3,688,000 1,542,000 6,920,000 1,619,000 8,539,000 Sauk Rapids 1,605,000 1,500,000 1,411,000 4,516,000 i,293,000 5,809,000 St Joseph 1,003,000 2,191,000 977,000 4,17l,Q!)Q 1,224,000 5,395,000 Waite Park 1,195,000 1,412,000 1,108,000 3,715,000 1,217,000 4,932,000 St Augus1a 404,000 2,422,000 341,000 3,167,000 244,000 3,411,000 15 957 000 11,212000 12 00,000 39,370,000 8,680,000 48,050,000 !Y!!ItE. (a) Phase 1 constl'ltction COIII}Jleted by ZfJI0 to proride service through ZOI7- (6) PIuIse Z const1'ltction cmnpleted by ZfJ17 to prtwide SD'IIice throllgh 2fJ3IJ. (c) BNR uP1irade cost aIl6C11tion bosed on tott1I.fIow basis usbtg ZfJ17 projected dauuuIs. (d) PIuIse 1 qNIIfSisn cost aIIOClItion based on adIlitional.flow lHtsis fromcll1'l'eltt throllgh ZOI7- (e) RehabiJit4Iion cost aIl6C11tion based on totai.flow _is "sing 203fJ projected demands. (f) PIuIse 11 expansion cost aII6CIItion bosed on tuIdiIional flow lHzsis from Z017 thro"g1I2fJ3IJ. Black & Veatch March 9, 2006 I Attachment: Yes REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: March 10. 2006 Engineering ORlGINA TING DEPARTMENT Tracy Ekola, PE DEPARTMENT APPROV AL AGENDA ITEM Transportation Plan Schedule PREVIOUS ACTION Authorized Transportation Plan RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION None FISCAL IMP ACT N/A COMMENTS/RECOMMENDA TIONS For information and comment purposes only. The attached schedule shows the proposed schedule for the Transportation Plan. Listed at the bottom of the schedule are the estimated completion dates of the various corridor studies (completion dates are corridor scoping only, not EIS or EA portions of the study). Proposed stakeholders would include Stearns County Public Works, City of Waite Park, St Joseph Township, Wakefield Township, Major Land Owners or Major Businesses, EDA, Planning Commission, City Council, citizen volunteers. X:\PTlstjoelcommon\D39 Req Council ActionlBLANK REQ FOR COUNCIL ACTION. doc .0 !'- Q) 0 LL 0 N C m ..., (.) Q) 0 > 0 z 15 ~ 0 ..... a. Q) Q) ~ Cf) ::Ja.. to -+c -oc 0 Q) 0 0 ..c:: "- N O.....tO (/)mO to ~ (l) :>. ~N - CU -0 fJ) ~ 0 ::JCO> tOtO!'- +-' m..c:: c: 000 (/).....0 . 0 000 -01-"- .. NNN Q)..cro -- --. -- (l)!'-N to fJ) a. ~ 'Q.O...... 0 o Q) c..fJ) E o 0 0 ........, (.) a....... Cf) C'l c '2 c C'l :. .~ J.:. ; ~ ii: ~ J.:. UJ u :>. - cu (l) ;: ~ "C UJ ~ 'i! IX: I- - c (l) E fJ) fJ) fJ) CD Cl Cl Cl > c c c o ~ +:i :i:i > Q) Q) Q) c Q) Q) Q) ~ ~ ~ .~ .0 ..... ..... ::E c ~ ~ ;:, :::J C ,0 ~ 0 ..c U _Q Q) "l:t ~ .0 ~ ~ u-- a..:::J ..... fI) Cf) cu I- :>. ::E E (l) fI) fI) <( cu - (l) CU EO CU Z _ N C") ~ ~ ~ ~ fI) fI) fI) fI) CU CU CU CU I- I- I- I- t t o 0 Q) Q) 0:: 0:: ;;= m 1:: ~ C o 0 u: c. ...... N &. Lri Lri .::.:: .::.:: l/) fJ) ro ro I- I- ~ fI) CU I- ..... C Q) E C .9' en Q) 0:: N>,>' fl)J:"O"O .! <(.3 .3 "CCf)Cf)Cf) .au'-B UJ"Oo"O C :g "C C'lrot::'- CoO '0 BUU 9l:gG):5 c: '- Q) :::J 00,- 0 ...U(;5Cf) (l)..c"O..c ="EQ)"E ozu:z I Attachment: Yes REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: March 9. 2006 Engineering ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Tracy L. Ekola. PE DEPARTMENT APPROVAL AGENDA ITEM 2006 Trunk Water Main '. PREVIOUS ACTION None. RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION Authorize advertisement for bids and accept plans for 2006 Trunk Water Main. FISCAL IMP ACT COMMENTS/RECOMMENDATIONS Bids are due April 20, 2006. Advertisement for Bids is attached. Construction is anticipated to begin in June 2006 with substantial and final completion in September 2006. Draft plans have been submitted and reviewed with City staff. X:\Slstjoe\common\D39 Req Council Action\0602 ad for bid. doc DOCUMENT 00 1113 ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS 2006 Trunk Water Main St. Joseph, Minnesota SEH No. A-STJOE 0602 Notice is hereby given that sealed Bids will be received by the City Administrator until 11 :00 a.m., Thursday, April 20, 2006, at the office of the City Administrator, 25 College Avenue North, P.O. Box 668, St Joseph, MN 56374-0668, at which time they will be publicly opened and read aloud. Approximate major quantities are as follows: 300 SY Bituminous Removal & Replacement 4,000 LF 16" DI Water Main CL 50 400 LF 16" DI Water Main CL 50 wi Fast Grip Joints Hydrant 16" Butterfly Valves Jack/Bore 36" Steel Casing DI Fittings Seeding 4 7 450 3,500 4.5 EA EA LF LB AC Bids shall be on the form provided for that purpose and according to the Bidding Requirements prepared by Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc., dated March .16, 2006. The Bidding Documents may be seen at the issuing office of Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc. located at: 1200 25th Avenue S, PO Box 1717, St. Cloud, MN 56302-1717. Digital copies of the Bidding Documents are available at http://www.questcdn.com or http://www.sehinc.com for a fee of $20.00. These documents may be downloaded by selecting this project from the "Browse Projects" page or by entering eBidDoc™ #398829 on the "Search Projects" page. For assistance and free membership registration, contact QuestCDN at 952.233.1632 or info@questcdn.com. Paper copies of the Bidding Documents may be obtained from Docunet Corp. 763.475.9600 or 151 Cheshire Lane #300, Plymouth, MN 55441 for a fee of $90.00, plus applicable taxes. Drawings are in 11 x 17 format. Bid security in the amount of 5 percent of the Bid must accompany each Bid in accordance with the Instructions to Bidders. Bids shall be directed to the City Administrator, securely sealed and endorsed upon the outside wrapper, "BID FOR 2006 TRUNK WATER MAIN, ST. JOSEPH, MN, STJOE 0602." The Owner reserves the right to reject any and all Bids, to waive irregularities and informalities therein and to award the Contract in the best interests of the City. Ms. Judy Weyrens City Administrator St Joseph, Minnesota Publish: . Construction Bulletin St Cloud Times March 24 and April 7, 2006 March 24 and April 7, 2006 END OF SECTION ST JOE 0602 Advertisement for Bids 00 11 13 - 1 RESOLUTION 2006-006 RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS 2006 TRUNK W ATERMAIN WHEREAS, pursuant to a motion passed by the council on November 29,2005, the City Engineer has prepared plans and specifications for the trunk watermain project which starts approximately 400 feet west of 6th Avenue NW along CSAH 2 near the west City limits, which continues along CSAH 2, crossing Interstate 94, and ultimately connecting to the new water treatment plant located on the west side of Interstate 94 along the Frontage Road, and has presented such plans and specifications to the council for approval; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF ST. JOSEPH, MINNESOTA: 1. Such plans and specifications, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, are hereby approved. 2. The City Administrator shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official paper an advertisement for bids upon the making of such improvement under such approved plans and specifications. The advertisement shall be published for twice, shall specify the work to be done, shall state that bids will be opened and that the responsibility of the bidders will be considered by the council at 7:00 PM on April 20, 2006, in the city council chambers of the city hall. Any bidder whose . responsibility is questioned during consideration of the bid will be given an opportunity to address the council on the issue of responsibility. No bids will be considered unless sealed and filed with the City Administrator and accompanied by a cash deposit, cashier's check, bid bond or certified check payable to the City Administrator for five (5) percent of the amount of such bid. Richard Carlbom Mayor Judy Weyrens City Clerk! Administrator City of St. Joseph Additional/Increase Staff Request For the Budget Year 2006 Department Police Position Dispatcher/Secretary Employment Status (Full Time or Part Time) Elevate to Full-Time How the position will be utilized: Currently the police department works with a part time secretary. This position is responsible for data input, state reporting, transcription and many other duties. This position also takes care of dog registration, and dog violations. The position answers calls, dispatch's officers and handles the public when they come to the office. Reason for the additional/increased staff: Do to increasing caseload and additional officers Mary's workload has increased. Request for records checks, increased records collection along with calls for service. We need a person to staff the office to handle these requests. Additional Comments: We currently have Mary for 30hrs a week. Mary has been with us for the. past two years. Mary has done an excellent job in reorganization of the office and files. Her knowledge of the computer has assisted us in keeping track of a lot more information that we did not have before. The increase in staff along with the change in the type of calls has now more than ever-made Mary's job more important to us. This position was full time when the last secretary left. Mary has far exceeded any of her predecessors. I would like to request that Mary start full time on 03/24/06. . (y/c!{)G Date .; \U (I)~ '11-'-0 C.l!! Q) .(; E~ .....0 c~ ._ Itl o~ Q.~ Q..E <C~ '0 - t: COItl s..~ O~ ~~ CO .r: :E.~ COil 0'" O~ N'i ~ (I) e ~ ~ .<.1 ~ 0) <C Cl !:f 0) .~ -~ CI.l 0) 0) ~ ~ ~ ~ .c.c_ ..:u"5i] = ; .t;l CHJ ,g ~ ~ .... ... <.I s~~g~ :l_ '" l!l tl" 1O<;<::E:E.s .:: ~ .. ..l 5 .... .. Eo< 'ti ~ r: Q) .~ ~ .(1) :S o '" '" .!!! t: ::) :5 tll r: .!!! .E .... Cll ~ Q) t: o !!! Cll '" E .l!! ;q: c:l:; .s:I: ~.~ "t:lU ~.~ .. ::! :E:E is: ~Cl. -g ~~ : ti-i r--~ elii ~ ~ -21 i ~~ ~ t.~ o !ii ~ "i....l Z 5 s ~ o 0 E-<Z 5 .5' 0) ::tl ~ 8 ..2 I.l o bO I:: .; ::!:! ~~ l'a~~><.c ... ~~2 ~g~ o CI.l _.... I.l ~8~~c:.c :E~~U~~ . 8 !Of'; e.o..8 fIl '" .... .s :l2 ..8iai- ..8 =rn ~:;;J!~~3~! >.a;>CI.lCl.l-",~~ "t:l..c: >'l:: Ii!"t:l 0 ~ a t.l ~ '" ~ 5 0) rn'- p::Q:l.El:EOIilE-<.5:E Cl :E c 8 ~ 8 ~ ~ ,.g., 'fij..8 ~ ~ ....]~ ~ ~ :u ] rn E-< .~. U .- .2 CI.l '00 U '" >. E-< .... 13: p:: tU ~ .... ~ ~ c:l ~..2 ~. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~.~ ~ cL~ ~:< ~ u; .;; c: ~ :u bO'E ;:: 0) .- > iit 0 .9Z ;S .," tU ~ :S g>~ 'Z<:~ ~~8 lil~..o v ~ ~ .g ~:; ~::l::t: ;>.E~ o Q).- -lX.lX. . .. 1 I ~ '0 8 Q.. = ~ g c...a g :E-lau rn~r! ~ 0 .9 ~t:~ -a-8ii3 '. ~ai ~ .g ~ ~ v5~~ ] o ~ ~ 5 ~ ~ OM :z - C1.)~O\f"-o.OO <.>j8gg iii NNN .5~.!.J..~ ~ ....88 g Oc-r\NMN 0. :E ... '" C C '0 iit .... 0 :uE-< <ti. cu.l!3 "t:lQ) a e "t:l~ ~t:: ~.~ gj 0 >.u - bO c: s:: 0._ ... s:: 3]:a .~~::t: s ~ o <.I .c .- 1:..c:53"", 8 .M j .~ ....::>v~ ~~~~ ~o::;E< .c e- rn o ...., !:ii 'l<l .13 13 Q) . ;::- ~~ >'0. 8~ .. ;:: 3 ~ :EE-< .... 8 IS o'(! 0 bO ~ s:: a .~ .t:: !~ ~ .... E: cu S ::l 0 t) cu 0 <: ~ ".5 Q) .;:: u '5 fIl ~ ~ 1 0 0 .~~ .. E '" ] "" c e 0 .... ;:: c.. v cu U"t:l .9.9 0 <.I :E cu 0 co .~ 0 .- >. ~ I.l ~.~ u~ ;z: cu l;! t) rn o:l U t:: OJ ... > ,~.~ > >. .~ >< .... bOO) .. 0'- 0 ~ 0) cu_ 0) 0 ~~'5t:Q~ Cl CI.l ... ....- ] ;::.;; - ;:: >. 0 ._ cu .= ;:: e <<l ~ - <.> <.I '" ....lX...r:: 0 0 ;:: ::l s::<: e~~"3 ~8 's ai .;; tU .... '" co u << a >> "t:l. :E a l;! ~ ~Cl) E:;:: Q lX.._1!,) 0 e.o <: ut:.i~ oS bO u'.Eoo;gz s:: '" I:: ... c: =~ e tU e or;.; ~ ~ "a 0) .- 0 .;:: "t:lC <~~&le <.> .... ii:.g:ii:~ Q) :Ii .... 0 '00 ILl t:Q ii: :I: ON ...., '-' 6 :1 .:g- SO o ~ <.> "'. a ~ 'S 'S e e ~ <"1 on 0 1 ~ .;2:; E~b E~~b:::S 8 B~~B~~~~~a ~..j.,), ~..j..J,N-b.;.,.5 ~ 8 g >>8 g 8 8 g ] <"1NN'CNNNNNO <<i ::t: a U ~ Cl. o o .;.; ~ -g o ~ ..., -g 0) ::r.: -= if i Clh Cl ..... o ~ .!:l ..<:: .... .g ~ 5 >. "'2 o '"' III tn~ ...."t) c~ CJ)'" E~ ....0 c:~ -- ~ Os:: Q.~ Q.,E:; <ti "t) - t: tall! ....~ o~ ~~ ta 'S: ~ '~ U).l!l o~ O.El N~ ~ Q) e.! ~ "ti .El o l; Q) ,1:2 ~ Q). ~ (/) (/) .!!l 5 :S 0> t: .!!l 'S: ..... l\l ~ Q) t: o ~ (/) ~ .El ~ ..<: 0.. ~ = o 0 . ~ s os J-c tI> '" '" ::> .g 4-c ~ Q).-==~ o 0> '::1"80> ~ ~... '13 u'" 1 l;j >. 0> c.> ., r:ri o>.g~;Z;Z "'2 ~~"O:2:..c: tg~al~a_fr "Q tI> la ,- - ., '" c_aloS=,€J:l.Q ~ ;~ tI> 's '5 0 !:i .... p..:::lenOZUen ~ = .. ..J e .. .. ... .. ... 01 5:: "CI = ... .. c ~ = ~ .. :;: '" .. ., c';:: 01 0 z:t:: t ~ _0.. :.:: QJ eo c";i Q'- u~ "-' o J!3 :il t:: '" Q) '';:: E ~~ -12 ~Q. ~~ It: :u~ ~o 0..2 ",- ::: II) ., t:: z8 ~Q. c.> Q) So o~ '" 8 E= 1 o tl ~ a ~ ~'a ., _..c:.o::l~7J!l l1' e!l.o ., ~ ::l :C, ~ < 0 .2 ~ .., 0>""'.. - 8'-.!:l o- s 1: ~ ~'i'] Ual~O.~U ....: en "0 l;l o "Q tl '8 ~ t- ct-t-ooooa--a-- !;;oooooo :::000000 l;l<-;l<-;l~<';l<i'~ ~:g:g0C!;~0 000000 t<l~~~N~~ ., oS .~ ~ ~ .s t:: ~ '5:2: ..0.. <l.lo "-'0 o .. >.t- .. , "0 = .t:: Ol 0::I:: :2:~ :g, .- t<lU ::l ,~ ~ ....;:: - ~ ~~ ~ ~ I C ... 9 &E .. '- ~~ ::: ~ <l.lo"O Z 'il ia ~i:S t.,)'ti~ IE ~ a 08~ g'3 o . ~ ~ .= := ~ . e ";j ,2 e. 0 e :.43 0.... g .0"'0 . "Q~...t::i!:i"Q ~] 8 . ~ 0 t i,.g s 'E ul~ i Q ::) :c .2 as ~ '!il U, c .b .. "0 ~ U G) 1;Iao...l[(l5J:ll3E-<l;j?,a ~ ~~'i'e.gl:l:: ~ ~ ~ ~'5I-Ei ~ :2:"rA:2:;:;al<~u.siSQ2~~ ...1<1 o ~ ., ";j o = o ';;; 'I o c.> ~ '8 e t- :=" a-- a-- r- 00 00 t- ,1:000000 .,000000 ....~N~NNN l;l.,J...J.J...,J..,J.J.. .,000000 >'000000 t<lNNNNNN ~ u ::;E ~ o o r:-: ..c -= ~ ..<: ~ ., "-' o 2 -g o ::;Eo-: OJ =-::I:: t:: o s:: ,- o ~ ,1; 's .- E ;8 a t:.O o = Q:l ,- ~] ~~ . M~ o 6 z.z ., ., ~ ~ I:: I:: ::e~ 00 ~ ::t: ~ ~~u oo~ <::<::l3 t-t-... I~";~ 'l<! Oil ca "O"O::l ~~O' .a.a~ .,~~ ~::>o IE " <:: .............. 1,9 -iii =. I] ~ ~ 0 "; c: 'E :.:i e'~ .~ ~ tl '0 (;3 a.... 0> is > '0 B OJ) =' lE g Q ,S .0",- ~ 0 e c.> 2 '" a li:l ~ a 'S .. ~ '~ .- "Q - .... '" .;::; ~ '" E"~ .. 0 '" .~ ::s .8 ,S 8 E ~ 8EZgj]~~< . h. 0 ~ 0 0"0<"0 cU'-e:I:u::s~ ::l '8 8 ~ g I L 0 00 &j:':::ol::r.a tJ.l ii:~~~enti~~ .t::l e E~ '1 0 '" ~ ~I :S = ., l;i !;; >. ~.~ en Uti> ~ ... 0) o >. ~., 5 ~"O as 5 0::: ~~ ::;Eo::: ~ == ~ u ~ >; i: ~. 0' ::;E ~ o ...... ~ E .. c .... E ~ o ~ -< U rtl .,; ,~ 1;1 o .2 c.o I:: ... ,- 0 ~.- o (i .....>:1 " ., >.., "5 ~ t- ""0 ::l ., 0'::: ~e "5l~ .,"0 ::l to: E-< ~ ~-< ..-. 1:: ., t) ..... <<i ..c ......... '" .~ u '- o 0) ::l ~ 0) ...l >.~ g.:: o 'is Uc '" ~ ~ ~ E Il.l CI':l" >< ~ '" ., <<i r:n ...: l\\ rn~ ....'0 C:::l!l (l)C3 E~ ....0 c::~ -- ~ Os::: Q..!!J 0.'" <C~ '0 - s::: res CO , '- 's.,. ~ r O~ ~~ res . C: :IE .i U)1:l 0'" o~ N~ ,co ~ Q) e ~ -0 .l!! o s::: Q) .'" ~ Q) :5 o '" '" .!!1 5 :5 0> s::: ..!!1 .E; ... l\\ ~ Q) s::: o ~ l\\ '" E .l!! ~ ,- " , ~ u 0 ~ e tu g~]..= :;a g a 0 '" .c ::9-- .c 5 ...~ .c..E=1il ",i ~ a~ ~ 'u Jil i :g 87il ~ ~ ~~ ~~ s:i..8GJuGJ .c ~u ~ 4>,_ G.lUiia ,s::"4)G.J .J:I ... tf.l ...p-< ...~ ~~ etf.l 6 >.]:::2 e ~ G.l GJ 0.... o 4> >.G.l .. m ~ <<l ~.2 ~<<l ~<<l fa 1i gj ~ ~ .~ 5 :s ~ 0 :so :So ~o :S~~:S::E:S;.:::; .c: ~ .. ...1 e ... .. , :a :a =: =: , ~ a a rn D D .... 0 ~ ~ a D- r;... .r;... -s .f:l .f:l GJ '@ '@ .. = .s .. O' ~ ~ <'i S >. E: ..= .c >: >: 'C !il ~ ;:: ;:: = ~ GJ 4> .. 4> <<l i i " .... l e ~ .u :l :l 1= 13 Ci Ci .m :s :s .5 11 ]~ :l r;... r;... i rn .=. :l <=> <=> :... ",,.S: r'l M ~ -<u Vi Vi G.l ~ G.l ~ = I 0 ~ ';) = a '" 0 0 0 .~ .~ co u Il '0 5' 5' r:: 0 0 ~ .S u .~ (3 ~ '" -0 cS " .; ~ G.l ... = ~ '-" ~ E 0 ~ bQ bQ a 0 0 .~ .S = .~ ~u u Q.). >. '" 'iiJ -0 l3 :l. :l ,,- G.l = 0 0 0 .. 0 u ~ ~ =: Q.) =:Q.) u :t: .b ~ .~ g ~ G.lt;; Q.)t;; ~ au E Q.) =: :ge :ge 0 0-0 5 <Il -a ~.f:l "'C.f:l ~ ,!e 0 ...- ...- u " .... .~ ~-< ~< " ~ 0 i3= Ci.l ~ -< -< 0 .~ Exhibit A Parcell: The Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter (NEl/4 NEl/4) of Section Eleven (11), Township One Hundred Twenty-four (124), Range Twenty-nine (29), according to the U.S. Government Survey thereof, Stearns County, Minnesota. Parcel 2: The Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter (SEl/4 SEl/4) of Section Two (2), Township One Hundred Twenty-four (124), Range Twenty-nine (29), according to the U.S. Government Survey thereof, Stearns County, Minnesota. Parcel 3: The West Half of the Southwest Quarter (W1I2 SWll4) of Section One (1), Township One Hundred Twenty-four (124), Range Twenty-nine (29), according to the U.S. Government Survey thereof, Stearns County, Minnesota. Parcel 4: The Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter (SWl/4 SEl/4), Section Two (2), Township One Hundred Twenty-four (124), Range Twenty-nine (29), according to the U.S. Government Survey thereo-f, Stearns County, Minnesota. Parcel 5: The Northeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter (NEl/4 SEl/4) of Section Two (2), Township One Hundred Twenty-four (124), Range Twenty-nine (29), according to the U.S; Government Survey thereof, Stearns County, Minnesota, LESS AND EXCEPT the following described parcel: Beginning at the Northeast corner of the Northwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter (NWl/4 of SW1/4) of Section Two (2), Township One Hundred Twenty-four (124), Range Twenty-nine (29), thence continue Easterly along the section line (N 88006'45" E) a distance of 139.46 feet to center.,.line of public road CAR #133, thence Southwesterly along the center of said road a distance of 209.56 feet to the Easterly line of said NW 1/4 of SE 1/4 of Section 2; thence Northerly along said quarter section line a distance of 152.47 feet to point of beginning and there terminating. Par:c~J 6: The Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter (NW1I4 NEl/4) of Section Eleven (11), Township One Hundred Twenty-four (124), Range Twenty-nine (29), according to the U.S. Government Survey thereof, Stearns County, Minnesota. Parcel 7: The Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter (NWl/4 NWl/4) of Section Twelve (12), Township One Hundred Twenty-four (124), Range Twenty-nine (29), according to the U.S. Government Survey thereof, Stearns County, Minnesota. SECOND AMENDMENT TO PURCHASE AGREEMENT This is the Second Amendment to the Purchase Agreement dated September 14,2005, by and between PF Family Holdings, a Minnesota Limited Liability Company, Seller, and Central Minnesota Land Development - S1. Jon's, LLC, a Minnesota Limited Liability Company, hereinafter referred to as Buyer. WHEREAS, the parties hereto entered into a Purchase Agreement for the purchase of real property located in S1. Joseph Township, Stearns County, Minnesota as described therein, dated September 14, 2005; and WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend said Purchase Agreement as hereinafter provided; NOW THEREFORE, ITIS HEREBY AGREED by and between the parties hereto as follows: 1. That the id~I)Jity ofthe Buyer referenced in the first Amendment to Purchase Agreement dated December 2,2005, shall be Central Minnesota Land Development - S1. Jon's, LLC, and not Equity Professionals, Inc., a Minnesota Corporation. 2. That the real estate description contained in the original Purchase Agreement dated September 14, 2005, shall be amended to conform to the real estate described on Exhibit A, hereto attached and hereby made a part hereof replacing the original Exhibit "A". Except as herein amended, said Purchase Agreement is in all other respects ratified and affirmed in accordance with its terms. Dated: 51-//;," () b Dated: -4~10? PF FAMILY HOLDINGS, LLC CENTRAL DEVELOP. ( ESOTA LAND - S1. Jon's, LLC ~-c:, ~) ?J . ,J? /7 )_ By: ~~~n._ ~?... Nich-6las Prom, Partner Exhibit A Parcell: The Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter (NE1I4 NEl/4) of Section Eleven (11), Township One Hundred Twenty-four (124), Range Twenty-nine (29), according to the U.S. Government Survey thereof, Stearns County, Minnesota. Parcel 2: The Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter (SE1I4 SEl/4) of Section Two (2), Township One Hundred Twenty-four (124), Range Twenty-nine (29), according to the U.S. Government Survey thereof, Stearns County, Minnesota. Parcel 3: The West Half of the Southwest Quarter (WI/2 SWI/4) of Section One (1), Township' One Hundred Twenty-four (124), Range Twenty-nine (29), according to the U.S. Government Survey thereof, Stearns County, Minnesota. Parcel 4: The Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter (SWI/4 SEl/4), Section Two (2), Township One Hundred. Twenty-four (124), Range Twenty-nine (29), according to the U.S. Government Survey thereof, Stearns County, Minnesota. Parcel 5: The Northeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter (NE1/4 SE1/4) of Section Two (2), Township One Hundred Twenty-four (124), Range Twenty-nine (29), according to the U.S~ Government Survey thereof, Stearns County, Minnesota, LESS AND EXCEPT the following described parcel: Beginning at the Northeast corner of the Northwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter (NWl/4 of SWl/4) of Section Two (2), Township One Hundred Twenty-four (124), Range Twenty-nine (29), thence continue Easterly along the section line (N 88006'45" E) a distance of 139.46 feet to center-line of public road CAR #133, thence Southwesterly along the center of said road a distance of 209.56 feet to the Easterly line of said NW 1/4 of SE 1/4 of Section 2; thence Northerly along said quarter section line a distance of 152.47 feet to point of beginriing and there terminating. Parcel 6: . The Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter (NWl/4 NEl/4) of Section Eleven (11), Township One Hundred Twenty-four (124), Range Twenty-nine (29), according to the U.S. Government Survey thereof, Stearns County, Minnesota. Parcel 7: The Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter (NWl/4 NWl/4) of Section Twelve (12), Township One Hundred Twenty-four (124), Range Twenty-nine (29), according to the U.S. Government Survey thereof, Stearns County, Minnesota. ALL OF THE PROPERTY OWNERS OF TITLE: CENTRAL MINNESOTA LAND DE LOPMENT - ST. JO ~ C By: Mark Tablberq, Orqariizer ~ Date PF FAMILY HOLDINGS, ~ C By: ~~~R~ Nicholas Prom, Partner /' rP-/ tf,-C) ~ Date REOEIVED BY .?/~( lah Date' PETITION FOR ANNEXATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ST. JOSEPH, MINNESOTA: IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION OF CERTAIN PERSONS FOR ANNEXATION OF UN-INCORPORATED ADJOINING PROPERTY TO THE CITY OF ST. JOSEPH, MINNESOTA: We, the undersigned, all the owners of the territory described below, hereby petition the Council to annex this territory to the City of St. Joseph, Minnesota, . and to extend the City boundaries to include the same, and for that purpose respectfully state: 1. The territory to be annexed consists entirely of unplatted lands. All of the lands lie entirely within the County of Stearns, Minnesota and the description of such lands is as follows: See Attached Legal Description 2. The territory described above abuts upon the City Limits along its northern boundary thereof and none of it is presently included within the Corporate Limits of any Incorporated City. 3. The petitioners are in need of municipal sewer service. 4. All of this territory is urban in character and is vacant land with one farmstead. 5. The residents in the area will increase the population by 1 . 6. All of the property is within the 11 to 20 year zone of the Orderly Annexation Agreement between the Town of St. Joseph and the City of St. Joseph of February 6, 1998. . 7. All of the property owners of title exceed the required percentage to constitute a sufficient petition under M.S. 414.033, Subd 5, and the percentage of parcels of property in the affected area according to Section 7 B of the Orderly Annexation Agreement between the Town of St. Joseph and the City of St. Joseph. 8. The acreage of the parcel requesting annexation is 320 acres 9. The fee for annexation of the above described parcel is $1,600.00. RESOLUTION J.?OR ORDERLY ANNEXATION 1. The Township of 8t. Joseph and the City of 8t. Joseph have entered into an Orderly Annexation Agreement approved by the Municipal Board February 6, 1998 as OA-524, and, pursuant to Section 7, Subdivision B, Paragraph 3, states if the owners of 100% of the parcels of property in the affected area have petitioned to annex, the City Council will, as an agenda item at their next regular meeting, review . the petition for consideration of annexation. 2. The City Clerk! Administrator received a petition for annexation by the property owners of title for the following described property, all of which are governed by the OA Agreement. See attached legal description (Exhibit "A") 3. The City Council agrees to reimburse the Township pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 414.036 and Section 4 of the OA Agreement, for the taxes to be collected on this property according to the following schedule: 2007 60% 2008 50% 2009 "40% 2010 30% 2011 20% In the year 2011 and every year thereafter, all pertinent tax revenue will be the property of the City. 4. Upon annexation the property shall be zoned as Agricultural, subject to the requirements according to City Ordinance No. 52 and future amendments to such Zoning Ordinance. 5. The OA agreement states the Town and City mutually agree and state that this Joint Resolution and Agreement sets forth all the conditions for annexation ofthe areas designated, and that no consideration by the Municipal Board is necessary. The Board may review and comment, but shall, within thirty (30) days, order the annexation in accordance with the terms of this Joint Resolution. Approved by the City of St. Joseph this day of ,2006. ( seal) Richard Carlbom Mayor ATTEST: Judy Weyrens Administrator/Clerk Jerome Salzer Township Supervisor ATTEST: Ann Reischl Township Clerk I. Attachment: Yes or No REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Consent Fund Transfers DATE: March 15, 2006 Administration ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT DEPARTMENT APPROVAL AGENDA ITEM Fund Transfers - Requested Action: Authorize the End of Year 2005 Fund Trasnfers PREVIOUS ACTION RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACTION FISCAL IMP ACT COMMENTS/RECOMMENDATIONS At the end of each year debt service accounts are reviewed and the required revenue sources are transferred to the appropriate fund. The transfers include Water and Sewer Access Fees, Storm water fees and fire fulld transfer for equipment. In addition some transactions were not recorded properly and needed to be reclassified. . Journal Entries 03/10/06 6:54 PM Page 1 CITY OF ST JOSEPH Current Period: Closing 2005 Batch Name transfers Journal Entries $1,101,263.66 $1,101,263.66 $0.00 In Balance Rd~f;~--'"652'~-tr;;t;;'~;;itYt;~ts-=~-_=_'_Mm_M==__-=~%'-'-D;bit'--'''~'=''~~''-"'C~edit"' Journal Enty R 602-00000-39201 Transfers from 0 $0.00 $47,200.00 Journal Enty G 602-10100 Cash $47,200.00 $0.00 Journal Enty E 50149470-700 Misc $47,200.00 $0.00 Journal Enty G 501-10100 Cash $0.00 $47,200.00 Transaction Date 3/10/2006 Total $94,400.00 $94,400.00 Debit Total Credit Total Refer 653 Journal Enty Journal Enty Journal Enty Journal Enty Transaction Date Refer 654 Journal Enty Journal Enty Journal Enty Journal Enty Transaction Date Refer 655 Journal Enty Journal Enty Journal Enty Journal Enty Transaction Date Refer 656 Journal Enty Journal Enty Journal Enty Journal Enty Journal Enty Journal Enty Transaction Date Refer 657 Journal Enty Journal Enty Journal Enty Journal Enty Journal Enty Journal Enty Transaction Date Refer 658 Journal Enty Journal Enty Journal Enty transfer CR 121 bond requirments R 32143120-39201 Transfers from 0 G 321-10100 Cash E 50149470-700 Mise G 501-10100 Cash 3/10/2006 transfer fire equipment certificate R 32743120-39201 Transfers from 0 G 327-10100 Cash E 105-49301-700 Misc G 105-10100 Cash 3/10/2006 Debit $0.00 $16,900.00 $16,900.00 $0.00 $33,800.00 Debit $0.00 $19,557.94 $19,557.94 $0.00 . $39,115.88 Debit $0.00 -$14,000.00 $14,000.00 $0.00 $28,000.00 Debit $55,500.00 $0.00 $55,500.00 $0.00 $111,000.00 $0.00 $222,000.00 Debit $0.00 $0.00 $12,388.00 $9,148.00 $3,240.00 $0.00 $24,776.00 Debit $25,373.66 $0.00 $0.00 Total Total transfer street sweeping R 101-41430-39201 Transfers from 0 G 101-10100 Cash E 651-49300-700 Mise G 651-10100 Cash 3/10/2006 Total transfer storm water/water main req E 65149300-700 Mise G 651-10100 Cash E 50149470-700 Mise G 501-10100 Cash G 328-10100 Cash R 32843120-39201 Transfers from 0 3/10/2006 Total transfer fire admin/maint R 101-41430-34118 Administration R R 101-41430-34119 Fire Hall Mainten G 101-10100 Cash E 105-42210-301 Audit & Accounting E 105-49301-700 Misc G 105-10100 Cash 3/10/2006 Total reclassify bond payment R 330-49471-36100 Sl'lecial Assessm G 330-10100 Cash R 602-00000-36100 Special Assessm Credit $16,900.00 $0.00 $0.00 $16,900.00 $33,800.00 Credit $19,557.94 $0.00 $0.00 $19,557.94 $39,115.88 Credit $14,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $14,000.00 $28,000.00 Credit $0.00 $55,500.00 $0.00 $55,500.00 $0.00 $111,000.00 $222,000.00 Credit $9,148.00 $3,240.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $12,388.00 $24,776.00 Credit $0.00 $25,373.66 $25,373.66 CITY OF ST JOSEPH 03/10/066:54 PM Page 2 Journal Entries Current Period: Closing 2005 Journal Enty G 602-10100 Cash $25,373.66 $0.00 Transaction Date 3/10/2006 Total $50,747.32 $50,747.32 Refer 659 reclassify assessments Debit Credit Journal Enty R 431-43120-36100 Special Assessm $60,447.31 $0.00 Journal Enty G 431-10100 Cash $0.00 $60,447.31 Journal Enty R 433-43120-36100 Special-Assessm $230,483.67 $0.00 Journal Enty G 433-10100 Cash $0.00 $230,483.67 Journal Enty R 333-43120-36100 Special Assessm $0.00 $290,930.98 Journal Enty G 333-10100 Cash $290,930.98 $0.00 Transaction Date 3/10/2006 Total $581,861.96 $581,861.96 Refer 660 reclassify bond payment Debit Credit Journal Enty E 602-47100-611 Bond Interest $13,281.25 $0.00 Journal Enty G 602-10100 Cash $0.00 $13,281.25 Journal Enty E 601-47100-611 Bond Interest $0.00 $13,281.25 Journal Enty G 601-10100 Cash $13,281.25 $0.00 Transaction Date 3/10/2006 Total $26,562.50 $26,562.50 Fund Summary Debit Credit Difference Refer 652 501 $47,200.00 In Balance 602 $47,200.00 $47,200.00 In Balance Refer 653 321 $16,900.00 $16,900.00 In Balance 501 $16,900.00 $16,900.00 In Balance Refer 654 105 $19,557.94 $19,557.94 In Balance 327 $19,557.94 $19,557.94 In Balance Refer 655 101 $14,000.00 $14,000.00 In Balance 651 $14,000.00 $14,000.00 In Balance Refer 656 328 $111,000.00 $111,000.00 In Balance 501 $55,500.00 $55,500.00 In Balance 651 $55,500.00 $55,500.00 In Balance Refer 657 101 $12,388.00 $12,388.00 In Balance 105 $12,388.00 $12,388.00 In Balance Refer 658 330 $25,373.66 $25,373.66 In Balance 602 $25,373.66 $25,373.66 In Balance Refer 659 333 $290,930.98 $290,930.98 In Balance 431 $60,447.31 $60,447.31 In Balance 433 $230,483.67 $230,483.67 In Balance Refer 660 601 $13,281.25 $13,281.25 In Balance 602 $13,281.25 $13,281.25 In Balance For each fund the Debits MUST equal Credits to be In Balance. I Attachment: Yes or No REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: March 8, 2006 EDA ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT DEPARTMENT APPROVAL AGENDA ITEM EDA monthly report. PREVIOUS ACTION None. RECOMMENDED BOARD ACTION For review and approval. FISCAL IMPACT N/A. COMMENTSIRECOMMENDATIONS EDA monthly report offered for your review and approval. MUNICIPAL DEVELOPMENT GROUP, INC. DATE: MEMO TO: March 8, 2006 FROM: RE: Mayor Carlbom Chairperson Reike City Council Members EDA Board Members' City Administrator Weyrens Jo~~: Foust & cynt~~.?smith-Strack. Municipal Development Group Economic Development Activity Report - February 2006 Municipal Development Group, Inc. has been interacting with a number of prospects throughout the past several years. Following is a summary of activities that have transpired. If you have any questions on any of these or other projects, please do not hesitate to contact us at 952-758- 7399. A project number has been assigned to protect the confidentiality of the businesses prospects. Proiect 01-E: This project involves the expansion of a service within the community. MDG has been keeping in touch with the project contact over the past four and a half years. This prospect has been working with another entity within the community with regard to the sale of land for the expansion of the service in St. Joseph. Most recent contact included an email on March 8th. Contacted Project 05-1 on this contact's behalf to forward contact information. Proiect 01-F: This company has been in contact with the EDA regarding potential sites for a commercial business since August, 2001. MDG has forwarded the contact information on a number of commercial sites at various times throughout the previous four and a half years. The local real estate representative and the corporate contact both changed in 2005. This prospect is currently inactive. Most recent contact included a phone call on March 8th. Proiect 01-1: This business originally contacted the City in 2001. Since then the project has undergone periods of inactivity. On several occasions, as requested MDG has forwarded additional information. MDG remains in contact with this prospect. Most recent contact included an email on March 1st. Proiect 02-L: This prospect constructed an industrial facility in 2003. The business owner occupies a portion of the facility with the remainder used for industrial incubator facilities. The business/property owner notes difficulty in leasing the incubator space due to competition from an industrial park in the neighboring township. MDG remains in contact with this building owner on a regular basis including most recently via mail on March 8th. :;.:.;;",,' EQA ,Report - March 2006 Page 1 Project 02-R: _ This prospect originally contacted the City in 2002, the following year the prospect purchase 8.31 acres in the Buettner Business Park. In 2005 the prospect initiated construction of a 17,000 s.f. industrial facility which will bring an estimated 20 jobs into the community. The prospect is expected to occupy the building in May/June 2006. MDG mailed the business owner a letter on March 8th. Proiect 03-A: This group of developers are contemplating a large highway commercial development in an area not yet annexed into the City. The development representatives are awaiting the results o{ the Field Street extension corridor prior to moving forward with a potential project. MDG continues to maintain active correspondence with this prospeCt including via email on March 8th. Project 04-B: This developer purchased an industrial lot in the City in 2004. The prospect has no immediate construction plans. MDG, Inc. occasionally follows up with this contact including via mail on March 8th. Project 04-F: This prospect contacted MDG in May of 2004 regarding commercial lease space in the downtown area. The prospect continues to express occasional interest in a project in downtown. MDG remains in contact with this prospect occasionally including via email on March 8th. Proiect 04-N: This business is currently a home occupation in an adjacent area. The business owner contacted the City in 2004 re: industrial acreage. The project has been inactive for several months, however MDG follows up occasionally with the contact, including via mail on March 1st, Proiect 05-0: MDG spoke to the project representative initially in June of 2005 to respond to very preliminary requests. MDG met with the prospect and an industry specialist from the Mn. Department of Employment and Economic Development later in the year. MDG continues to remain in contact with this prospect including most recently viaemail on March 8, 2006. Proiect 05-1: This project involves a potential new investment within the business community. Property has been-secured and concept planning is on-going. MDG met with development contacts on March 1st and spoke with the development contact on March 8th. A preliminary application for redevelopment TIF is expected before the EDA at the April meeting. Proiect 05-J: This developer contacted MDG in Mid-December and is seeking three to five acres of industrial land to establish a new distribution facility. MDG has been in contact with the prospect on several occasions and has forwarded information to the owners of potential industrial lots in the City. MDG has met with this prospect and encouraged prospect to secure interest from investors and financing. In the meantime, MDG occasionally follows up to offer assistance including via mail on Maroh1~ . Proiect 06-A: This project involves the existence of access to rail freight service within the City of St. Joseph. MDG has been interacting with the rail lessors since January. Letters to all industrial property owners were mailed in February regarding interest in rail service either singular or shared. Response from industrial property owners was minimal. MDG/EDA occasionally follow up with the railway lessor iflwhen requests for service extensions occur in the future. EDA Report - March 2006 Page 2 Proiect 06-B: This project involves investment in commerciai property within the City of St. Joseph. MOG has met with the prospect on two occasions and forwarded information as requested. MDG last followed up with this contact on March 1st to ensure receipt of mailed information. Project concerned about existing transportation studies and how they impact potential development. . Proiect 06-C: This lead was forwarded from the SCAEDP. The contact is interested in two acres of shovel ready industrial property somewhere in the St Cloud area. MOG phoned the contact on March 1st and then emailed information on available lots. Strack followed upwith the contact via.phone on March 8th. NOTES FROM FEBRUARY EDA MEETING: Future Land Use - 20th Avenue South Corridor The EDA has been reviewing potential future land uses adjacent to the southerly projection of 20th Avenue South as requested. The area is currently guided toward single family residential development, however, 20th Avenue South will likely be a collector or arterial roadway which would be incompatible with residential development, especially directly abutting the major roadway corridor. At the February EDA meeting the Board discussed various land use scenarios including commercial, office and retail facilities and associated potential densities. The EDA specifically spoke of the type of demands for development in this area. The Board Members discussed the potential for discount retailers to be attracted to the area. It was the consensus of the Board to recommend the corridor for such uses in addition to new car dealerships, medical and office facilities. Board Members also recommended the City embrace a desire to let the commercial/real estate markets dictate the actual type and pace of development in the area. The Board further recommended the City enforce a high level of architectural/aesthetic quality for the corridor, including special emphasis on landscaping, fencing, screening and pathways/sidewalks. Strack noted the current B-3 district requirements would need to be revised to accommodate the Board's recommendation for the corridor. Railwav Service to Industrial Areas of the City MDG reported to the EDA that it appeared an opportunity to extend railway freight service to additional properties and/or the installation of a joint service point could be possible. Prior to the EDA meeting and as a means of exploring the issue further, a letter was mailed to 28 industrial property owners to gauge interest in holding an informational meeting with railway representatives. Industrial property/business owners did not express interest in attending an informational meeting with railway representatives. The Board discussed the importance of rail service to existing and/or potential industries within the City of St. Joseph and noted existing demand seemed low but a shared terminal could be an asset in marketing new industrial lots. The Board discussed the need for BNSF to approve any extension and the need for benefiting property owners to bear the cost of extending a rail spur and creating a joint terminal facility. The Board discussed their level of interest in participating in rail line extension. EDA Board Members reached consensus in noting the Board did not have resources available to participate in rail line extension at this time, however, they did support individual businesses extending rail service to enhance their operations. Buettner Business Park Covenant Enforcement The EDA is a party to protective covenants in place in the Buettner Business Park. For a period of twenty years after initial date of execution of the covenants, the EDA is responsible for administering the covenants. The covenants cover a wide range of issues from building facade materials to landscaping and parking lot screening. Over the previous few months the City has been receiving a large amount of calls from property owners within the park. Most of the calls amount to complaints regarding other properties within the business park. As a means of EDA Report - March 2006 Page 3 furthering communication, understanding and good-will between property owners the EDA will be convening of a meeting with property owners in the park. Perimeter Curbina Reauirements:... Industrial Zonina Class The City Administrator has requested the EDA review zoning requirements relating to the installation of perimeter curbing in the Industrial District. Currently, Section 52.34-7 (Industrial Zoning District) requires all parking lots meet the requirements of this section and Section 52.10 (Off Street Parking). Section 52.10.-5 of the City Code requires the installation and maintenance of necessary curbs or other protection against damages to adjoining properties, streets and sidewalks. The City has historically required the installation of high-back curbing within all industrial parking areas even those surfaced with materials other than concrete or bituminous. The curbing in addition to providing protection from damage to adjoining property the curbing also assists in directing the flow of stormwater. Occasionally the City has received requests for variance to the curbing standard. The City is looking to the EDA for a recommendation on the appropriateness of the standard. The EDA noted that in most situations the high back curbing was probably a good idea. but in certain situations a better way of directing stormwater and protecting property adjacent to the lot could exist. The EDA reached consens.us in recommending the high back curb requirements seem. quite restrictive for all applications and suggested providing for some exclusion from the requirements. EDA Report - March 2006 Page 4 Sisters ot the. Order of Saint Benedict 0''''", ;;'EIf"'1f:;: ..... ... "'" <'"" IV f{:,' If' ". " ~~;""" lLJ"i March 3, 200 ilJ (; lfJOf" ,,,lJ /) r:!TV ' , ; Or St JO' , .$EiP/--; . Dear Judy, Yesterday, as I read the March/April 2006 issue ofPRESERV ATION, "The Magazine of the National Trust for Historic Preservation," I couldn't believe how much an article on the case of "Getting the Farm" by Richard Todd related to the Corridor Road "case" here in St. Joseph_ Development proposals disregarding the historical significance and beauty ofthe Daniel Webster farm and retreat in New Hampshire is just another prime case about "America's conflicting romance with technology and nature," states the author. Referring to the book, THE MACHINE IN THE GARDEN, by Leo Marx, he concludes his article with the following point he feels is the higWight of Marx's book: "Already in the 19th century our culture had developed a disposition that has grown only stronger over years: the logic of the market is serious and real, the logic of aesthetics soft and frivolous. This is not unique to America, but we have perfected the attitude. It does not seem impossibly utopian to imagine another world in which building a sub- division in a place like Webster Farm would be either illegal or un- thinkable, but that is. not the world we live in." I encourage you to dare to be a City Council that decides to preserve a community's - the St. Joseph community's - integrity (historically and environmentally) and have the next generation declare how proud they are of the legacy you left them? Sincerely, ;'~ ..:' .:. -1 /c(~:.ld':~ !c!.~:f)<j 0'- - ,> L ~_~' Ruth Nierengarten, OSB Saint Benedict's Monastery 104 Chapel Lane St. Joseph,MN 56374 /l/7,' :'~ '(:(,.1 t/,,:,z.ti- (d, rlj.i<f..1;'<'" . ?c.j}i.<J (320)-36317100 - cj Saint Bened~crE: -~ OLj , ~" Lanc~:::>t. iV;j\~ 50:'j74-G~~2C P-hDriS 3'3::>7-j ;..~ :.'.\ ; 3:2.('; :;3C:~; '"7-; r~,'-" '-',.-'" ~:I\f~I\/)\ ; RECEIVED MAR () 9 2D06 CITY OF ST. JOSEPH March 8, 2006 It has come to my attention that the growing city of 81. Joseph is in need of a new road. I have been told that one of the areas being considered goes through the 81. Ben's Campus, near the football field and the woods. I would hope that this never happens. I would encourage each of you to spend at least % hour of your time on a q~uiet walk in the area being considered for the new road. I do not live in 81. Joseph, but I come through the area often. I spend money at your gas stations, meat market, and restaurants. I also spend time in retreat at 81. Ben's. Please consider carefully a decision that can have long term effects on an area that provides a great deal of peace to a world. 8il')cerely, Margaret Schroeder 1205 Geneva Drive Alexandria MN 56308 3/6/06 To Whom It May Concern: I am a student at the College ofSt. Benedict's and have been a resident ofSt. Joseph my entire life. I was recently informed that the City of St. Joseph will be constructing a new road in order to accommodate its growing population. I understand that this new road, Field Street if I am not mistaken, is intended to run through the St. Ben's campus. I sincerely urge the decision making administrators to object to this plan. Building this road in the proposed location would not only take away from the lifestyle the St. Ben's Monastery and College has worked so hard to create and preserve, but it would also take away from the St. Joseph community and its natural resources. It is undeniably possible to create a better and more practical alternate route for this road, which I highly encourage. Sarah Dietman March 7, 2006 Judy Weyrens P.O. Box 668 Saint Joseph, MN 56374 Dear St. Joseph City Council Members and Officials, I have been a resident of the city of Saint Joseph for 17 years. I am writing to oppose the proposed Field Street Corridor that would run through Saint Benedict's Monastery land, the College of Saint Benedict campus, farm land and residential property. Building this road would violate the natural and rural character of the St. Joseph community, which is the reason why many families choose to live here. The proposed road would increase noise and air pollution, cut off safe access to the woods for the sisters, students and residents of Saint Joseph. In addition, this road would eliminate prime agriculture land and limited wooded acreage. Please help save the historic character of Saint Joseph and Saint Benedict Monastery by not building this road. Thank you for helping preserve special places. Sincerely, x~~~ ~e Dietman 2006 TRUNK WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS ST. JOSEPH, MN SEH NO. A-ST JOE 0602 03/15/06 ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION OPINION OF PROBABLE COST UNIT OF APPROXIMATE UNIT MEASUREMENT QUANTITY PRICE COST TOTAL 2 TRAFFIC CONTROL LUMP SUM 1.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 3 DEWATERING LUMP SUM 1.00 $20,000.00 $20,000.00 4 SALVAGE & INSTALL 15" CMP UN FT 28.00 $15.00 $420.00 5 REMOVE AND REPLACE CHAINUNK FENCE UN FT 30.00 $15.00 $450.00 6 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SQYD 317.00 $2.50 $792.50 7 SAWING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT UN FT 218.00 $3.00 $654.00 8 AGGREGATE BASE PLACED CLASS 5 (CV) CUYD 73.00 $18.00 $1,314.00 9 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE LV4 SYIN 507.00 $2.35 $1,191.45 10 NON-WEAR COURSE MIXTURE LV4 SYIN 635.00 $2.25 $1,428.75 11 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GAL 10.00 $1.25 $12.50 12 SILT FENCE, HEAVY DUTY UN FT 856.00 $2.00 $1,712.00 13 BIOROLL DITCH CHECK UN FT 246.00 $5.00 $1,230.00 14 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET, CAT 3 SQYD 328.00 $2.00 $656.00 $51,861.20 15 16" WATER MAIN - DUCT IRON, CL 50 UN FT 3,423.00 $49.00 $167,727.00 16 16" WATER MAIN - DUCT IRON, CL 50, FAST-GRIP, UN FT 950.00 $60.00 $57,000.00 17 6" WATER MAIN - DUCT IRON, CL 52 UN FT 83.00 $25.00 $2,075.00 18 HYDRANT EACH 4.00 $2,200.00 $8,800.00 19 16" BUTTERFLY VALVE AND BOX EACH 7.00 $1,700.00 $11,900.00 20 6" GATE VALVE AND BOX EACH 4.00 $750.00 $3,000.00 21 CONNECT TO EXISTING WATER MAIN EACH 2.00 $1,000.00 $2,000.00 22 JACK/BORE 36" STEEL CASING PIPE UN FT 450.00 $275.00 $123,750.00 23 WATER MAIN FITTINGS POUND 3,406.00 $5.50 $18,733.00 24 GRANULAR PIPE BEDDING CUYD 150.00 $10.00 $1,500.00 $396,485.00 25 TOPSOIL SALVAGE AND RESPREAD CUYD 2,960.00 $5.00 $14,800.00 26 SEEDING (PERMANENT) ACRE 3.61 $250.00 $902.50 27 SEEDING (TEMPORARY) ACRE 1.00 $200.00 $200.00 28 SEED MIXTURE 280 (PERMANENT) POUND 181.00 $4.00 $724.00 29 SEED MIXTURE 150 (TEMPORARY) POUND 40.00 $2.50 $100.00 3/16/2006 2006 TRUNK WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS ST. JOSEPH, MN SEH NO. A-ST JOE 0602 03/15/06 ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION 30 SODDING TYPE LAWN 31 MULCH MATERIAL, MNDOT TYPE 1 32 DISC ANCHORING 33 COMMERCIAL FERTILIZER OPINION OF PROBABLE COST UNIT OF APPROXIMATE UNIT MEASUREMENT QUANTITY PRICE COST sa YD 293.00 $3.00 $879.00 TON 9.22 $150.00 $1,383.00 ACRE 4.61 $75.00 $345.75 POUND 1,614.00 $1.00 $1,614.00 TOTAL $20,948.25 SUBTOTAL - CONSTRUCTION $469,294.45 CONTINGENCY (10%) $46,929.45 ENGINEERING (18%) $75,087.11 SOIL BORINGS $4,500.00 LEGAL, FISCAL, AND ADMINISTRATIVE (8%) $46,929.45 GRAND TOTAL $642,740.45 C:\Documents end Settings\tekola\My Documents\SRWO\[Rev31606 SESSION SCHEDULE.x1s]Sheet1 2 3/16/2006